Datasets:

jhonalevc1995

/

political_bias_train

like 0

This bill provides statutory authority for the 60-day time frame for a state or local government that receives a complete eligible facilities request or a complete telecommunications facilities request to approve such request. The bill makes other changes related to such requests, including

right

bill provide statutory authority time frame state local government receive complete eligible facility request complete telecommunications facility request approve request bill make change relate request include

Speeches, etc. (1) No deductions shall be made from a widowed mother's allowance in respect of her earnings; and accordingly section seventeen of the National Insurance Act, 1946 (which provides, inter alia, for such deduction), and certain enactments and regulations, which amend that section and are mentioned in the Schedule [column 488](Repeals in connection with widowed mother's allowances) to this Act, are hereby repealed to the extent mentioned in the third column of that Schedule. (2) This section shall come into force on a day to be appointed by the Minister by an order made in the form of a statutory instrument and laid before Parliament.—[Mr. Ross.] Brought up, and read the First time. Mr. Ross I beg to move. That the Clause be read a Second time. The purpose of the Clause is simple and I hope that it commends itself to most, if not all, hon. Members. This is, again, a matter which we shall have to take to a Division if we do not receive a satisfactory answer from the Minister. However, I am more hopeful this time. The Clause seeks to remove altogether the earnings limit in respect of the personal part of the widowed mother's allowance. In Committee, I suggested that a notice should be put up behind the Minister's table in his office saying, “Beware of widows, especially young ones” . It is only fair to say, however, that in respect of widowed mothers the Minister, over the past few years, has shown a very warm and human attitude, both in respect of benefits and in respect of the subject we are discussing. The amount which widowed mothers can earn has risen. It is now £5. The rise itself has placed the National Insurance Advisory Committee in a dilemma. It wants to know exactly where we are going with the earnings rule. The personal allowance was supposed to take account of the fact that a mother with children could not go out and earn her living. I do not think that there is any dispute that, improved as the benefits are, a widowed mother cannot be expected to keep her family in the comfort and standards she has every right to expect on the allowance given to her and her children under National Insurance and by family allowances without some augmentation of that income. The total allowances received by a widowed mother with three children are £6 14s. 6d. a week. The widowed mother's allowance for herself and the first child is £4 2s. 6d.; the allowance for the second child is 17s.; the allowance for the third child is 17s.; and she receives 18s. by way of family allowances. Everyone who has studied the earnings rule has said that, if ever there was a case in which it could be altered without great complications and consequential anomalies, this is the case. That is why we have limited the Clause to widowed mothers. It does not affect retirement pensions or widows. The retirement pension is paid because the [column 490]person is presumed or proved to have retired. If we attempted to abolish the earnings rule in relation to the retirement pension, we should come right up against the first requirement of paying the retirement pension, namely, retirement. When one realises that a woman in receipt of widow's pension automatically, when she reaches the age of 60, has that translated into retirement pension, one realises that there is a relationship between the ordinary widow's pension and the retirement pension. But the widowed mother's allowance is a transitional benefit. When her children grow up she gets a widow's pension and my hon. Friend's and I are pressing that while she is in receipt of a widowed mother's allowance—for she must maintain her family single-handed and may consider that to do this best she should go to work—there should be no earnings limit at all. The arguments against doing this in the past appear to have been that if one made this alteration one would be helping the widows who go to work and earn more than £5 but, at the same time, one would be doing little or nothing more for widows doing perhaps part-time work or no work at all. This seems a very unfair argument. It was used, I think, on the last occasion we debated this subject. It seems peculiar to argue that one should do nothing for anyone unless one does something for everyone. A study of this subject will soon reveal that if something can be done to improve the circumstances of the widows under discussion, it should be done. When the National Insurance Advisory Committee last considered the Minister's increase to £5 the Committee was faced with a measure of dilemma because its members, too, would rather that something was done for everyone. The Committee pointed out, however, that the amount of money available would have been insufficient to do anything either for widows in relation to their allowances or for their children. Thus, the Committee agreed because, at that time, the Minister was not merely increasing the earnings limit in relation to wages. He was actually making a change. It was because the right hon. Gentleman made that change and widened the gap—by 30s. compared with [column 491]the earnings rule for ordinary widows, of £3 10s.—that we have every justification now to seek to persuade the right hon. Gentleman to remove it altogether. We want him to appreciate that, in this field, this change can be made without any complications concerning the retirement pension. I do not wish to traverse the entire subject, but I sincerely hope that the Minister will not seek to divide the widows in the way I have described, just to make a debating conquest. The majority of widows who go to work do so because they must. It is a question of striving to bring up their families and to give their children a chance. When one appreciates that, single-handed, they are making this struggle, one must surely realise that they are entitled to our help. After all, we are talking about widows with children. These children have exactly the same appetities as those whose fathers are alive. They are just as hard on clothes, especially school clothes—and practically every school has its own uniform. I urge hon. Members to realise the household and other expenses these widows have. They are just the same as in a family where the husband is able to help his wife to cope with all the problems of family life. We are, therefore, entitled to make the change proposed by my hon. Friends and I sincerely hope—and I appreciate that the Minister is as sympathetic towards this as anyone—that the right hon. Gentleman will agree to make the change and will not allow this fear of anomaly or comparison—that we are unable to do something for everyone—prevent him from making this reasonable and justifiable alteration. Mr. J. T. Price (Westhoughton) I fully support the speech of my hon. Friend the Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross), who put forward, in a reasonable fashion, powerful arguments for making the change that we propose. There are other reasons which strongly appeal to me. For a woman benefit of her husband and claiming benefit under the terms of the Act, while her children are still young and going to school she is, in most cases, bereft not only of the consortium of her husband—I think that is the legal term—but she is also outside [column 492]certain provisions of the financial system of taxation. As soon as she enters widowhood and begins to cope with the problems of bringing up her family—and she may be living in a house which has been obtained by mortgage—she has all these additional liabilities with which to cope. At that stage she not only loses the financial support of the breadwinner, but she receives, if she is subject to taxation by way of Income Tax, only one allowance for herself and not the joint allowance—I think it is £280—which would normally be payable to a husband and wife. I have never understood this arrangement, although I am familiar with it and I have tried to go into these problems. Why, because a widow chooses to assist her family income by going to work—to earn an extra £5, £6, or £8 a week—should the Ministry be relieved of part of the liability of paying her the full widowed mother's allowance? While we cannot completely avoid an anomaly in this respect, many hon. Members cannot understand—and I shall welcome anything the Minister may say to enlighten me—why it should be argued for the Government that because a woman chooses during widowhood to earn herself such additional income as she may she should receive this lesser benefit and the Ministry should be relieved of its full liability under the Act. Many hon. Members—and I may be as guilty as any of them—fall into the error of supposing that many of these benefits are in some way tinged with relief, that because of the introduction of an earnings rule, which is another form of means test, there should be diminution of benefit. I do not consider that this is justified under an insurance scheme. The Government Actuary, who advised originally on the foundation of the scheme from an actuarial viewpoint, surely did not put any loading factor into his calculations that a certain proportion of widows would not qualify for the full benefit because they chose to earn money in suitable employment. Therefore, with those two additional arguments—first, that there is not available to a widowed mother the full allowances of taxation under our tax system that would fall to the household if the [column 493]husband were living, and, secondly, that this is an insurance scheme paying a specified rate of benefit in respect of a substantial rate of contribution, which, under our system, is constantly rising—I suggest that the time has come to look more compassionately and more favourably upon doing something to remove what, we believe, is a relatively unfair position for the widowed mother. I know that the widowed mother will get the allowances provided by Statute for the children, but if a woman in this position, in addition to the domestic hardship of having to battle with life without a husband and bringing up children, shows herself so adaptable to her new circumstances as to go out and earn a reasonably good living that will maintain the family in the status to which they have been accustomed, she should not be penalised by a diminution of benefit under the existing regulations. Therefore, without wishing to exaggerate or to elaborate further, I sincerely hope that on this occasion the Minister will respond in the way in which my hon. Friends have asked him to do. Mr. Percy Browne (Torrington) I rise again, as the hon. Member for West Houghton (Mr. J. T. Price) has done, briefly to support the Clause. I associate myself with the hon. Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross) when he said that the Minister and the party to which I belong have lifted the widow, from the point of view of benefit and the earnings rule, above the average level which is given to many other people. That is quite right. The new Clause opens up generally the operation of the earnings rule, with which I disagree. If I were to go into the pros and cons of the earnings rule now, I should be out of order, so I shall, therefore, keep to the new Clause. We are all agreed that the widowed mother who is, as the hon. Member for Kilmarnock pointed out, under pensionable age is in a special position. The chances are that when she loses her breadwinner, especially if she has young children to look after, she has to go out to work. This being the case, it seems to me entirely wrong that we should by law take away some of her benefit if she is prepared to go out and earn [column 494]money above a certain limit. That can be said generally about the earnings rule. At present, the position is that we do not want to “shell out” too much public money. Why I like the Clause particularly is because subsection (2) states that I congratulate hon. Members opposite on the Clause. I rather wish that I had put down a proposal about credits for seasonal workers on the same lines. It never occurred to me and it was too late when I saw the new Clause, or I should have done so. I hope that my right hon. Friend will accept the Clause. He cannot advance the argument that he is unable at this moment to provide funds to operate the Clause, because he does not need to implement it when the Bill comes into force. If he agrees, as I am sure he will, in principle that it is right that the earnings rule should be extinguished for widowed mothers who are drawing their allowance rather than their pension, he should accept the Clause and put it into the Bill rather than bring forward new legislation on another occasion. Mr. W. Griffiths (Manchester, Exchange) I support the new Clause. I am delighted that my hon. Friends have put it down, because in Session 1959–60, having been successful in the Ballot, I promoted, together with some of my hon. Friends, a Private Member's Bill to do precisely what my hon. Friends now seek to do. Again this Session, having been successful in the Ballot—although, unfortunately, I am so far down the list that my hon. Friends are quite right to seek to remedy the anomaly in this way—I have done the same thing again, largely with the same supporters as I had two Sessions ago. The hon. Member for Torrington (Mr. P. Browne), whose support on this occasion we are delighted to have, will, I hope, follow us into the Division Lobby if we have to divide the House. One of the things which attracted the hon. Member about the Clause was that the Minister was not called upon immediately to find the money. The position under the existing law is that if any widowed mother wishes, or [column 495]has, to cease working, the Government have to meet her pension in full. In the original Act, the Government took power to meet that situation. The operation of the earnings rule prevents a widow in that category from receiving the pension in full. If, however, for any reason she decided to finish working, her pension rights would have to be met in full by the Government. I agree entirely with the arguments advanced by the hon. Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross) and the hon. Member for Westhoughton (Mr. J. T. Price) about the special responsibilities of widowed mothers to their families. One thing which I should like to add about the position of the widow—it applies not only to widowed mothers, but to widows in general—is the great loss which industry, commerce and the professions suffer when women have to leave their employment. There are a vast number of people in jobs such as nursing, physiotherapy, radiography and in hospitals. These people are trained to do a skilled and necessary job for the community, but, upon marriage, they have to leave their work. I should have thought that to encourage widows with those qualifications and who desire to do so to go back to their employment would be highly desirable. I have never accepted the theory which is advanced in some quarters that when a woman marries, whether she becomes a widow or not, she should cease to have any interest in her profession or job. She is perfectly entitled to go out to work and should be encouraged to do so if she wishes. The main argument against the retention of the earnings rule for widowed mothers under the National Insurance Act is the gross inequality which is applied to widows who become widowed as a result of the normal hazards of life and the different treatment accorded to widowed mothers under the Industrial Injuries Act and to other widowed mothers. Even today, there are large numbers of people who do not realise that if a husband loses his life at work, the widowed mother is not subjected to any earnings rule. She can earn as much as she likes. To repeat an example which [column 496]I have given before, if a man is driving a bus and the bus crashes and he is killed, his widow is able to go out to work and earn as much as she can get. If the bus driver had ceased his employment half an hour beforehand and was a passenger in the bus when it crashed and he was killed, his widow would be subjected to the earnings rule. This distinction is completely indefensible. Whenever one puts it to people outside, they at once describe it is an outrageous distinction. It has gone on for a long time and Parliament should put an end to it. When I introduced my Bill in 1959–60, I was struck by the enormous volume of correspondence which I received from all over the country and from all kinds of organisations, particularly women's organisations. I have been a Member of the House for 16 years, but never before had I had such a volume of correspondence. The Minister is well aware of these arguments, because I had the honour to lead a deputation from the National Council of Women to meet him some time ago. He was sympathetic and listened to us courteously, but the right hon. Gentleman raised again the difficulty of creating fresh anomalies. What the Minister did not say to us on that occasion—and I have not heard him or any other Minister from his Department say anything about it in the House—was whether he could justify the continuation of this anomaly between different types of widowed mother. Can he possibly justify the widow of the man killed at work not being subject to the earnings rule and the widow of the man who dies, as it were, a natural death at home being subject to it? These are some of the matters about which we should hear from the Minister. It is for this reason and the reasons which we have heard from both sides of the House that I hope the Minister will agree to the Clause and bring it into operation when he and his colleagues in the Government consider the time convenient. Mr. Julian Ridsdale (Harwich) When we discuss pension cases or the earnings rule, I often find myself in agreement with my hon. Friend the Member for Torrington (Mr. P. Browne) because, like him, I have a constituency with many [column 497]seaside towns and with many retired people and with a certain number of widowed mothers with children. I have had arguments with the Minister when I have found myself in agreement with my hon. Friend the Member for Torrington concerning the earnings rule, although quite often we have been torpedoed by the superior science and knowledge of the Minister in some of the cases which we have put forward. I have, however, been very much impressed by the arguments put forward by the Opposition in support of the new Clause, and particularly by the hon. Member for Manchester, Exchange (Mr. W. Griffiths) when he pointed out that when a person is killed in action or dies of industrial injury the earnings rule does not apply, although it operates when a person dies naturally, despite the fact that the circumstances of the widow are exactly the same in all cases. I hesitate to speak about increases of any kind when we are in the period of the pay pause as part of our economic policy. I have supported it because I do not wish to see an increase in the cost of living in the country as a whole. The cost of the new Clause cannot be very much. I know of only two cases in my constituency of widowed mothers with children who are affected by the earnings rule. Obviously, in the country as a whole the number is higher. I hope that when the Minister replies he will say what the cost would be if the new Clause were accepted, but, in general, I must say that I find myself very much in sympathy with the new Clause and I hope that the Minister will find it possible if not to accept the new Clause during the period of the pay pause at least as soon as possible afterwards. Mr. Eric Fletcher (Islington, East) May I just add two or three words in support of the new Clause moved by my hon. Friend the Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross) and supported by speeches made on both sides of the House? I very much hope that the right hon. Gentleman will give us a sympathetic response to the representations which have been made to him on this subject and that we shall not be met with some stony, obstinate refusal that to make this concession would produce administrative anomalies, for it seems to me that here is real hardship where we can take a well-defined though probably not very [column 498]numerous category of widows and can make a relaxation of the earnings rule, a relaxation which is required on all considerations of humanity and justice. Personally, I am against the earnings rule altogether, but on this new Clause that wider question of principle does not arise. Here we are dealing with a small, limited number of cases in which, I submit, special considerations arise. Widowed mothers are in a class by themselves. They are not pensioners. I speak about this matter because only in the last few months I have had two specific cases come to my notice, and they illustrate the difficulty which faces a married woman, perhaps around 50, with two or three children who suddenly loses her husband, not as a result of an industrial accident, in which case she is fully protected, but as a result of some other misfortune—ill-health, as it happened to be in both these cases—causing the sudden, unexpected death of the husband and father. One case concerns a woman in her forties with young children who is faced with this sudden, unexpected emergency. What is she to do? While her husband was alive she was bringing us those children in reasonable comfort, two of them at grammar schools and the other being educated with natural prospects of a reasonable education; living in the sort of comfort which a woman can enjoy if her husband is enjoying a reasonable income. It is bad enough in all conscience for a woman to find herself suddenly placed in that emergency, but apart from the bereavement and misery and tragedy due to the loss of her husband there is financial loss. In the two cases I have in mind each is a brave, courageous woman deciding that she must continue to try to earn as much as she can in order that while the young children are still at school they may be able to qualify to go out into the world for themselves, and she must try to give them what they would have had if her husband had lived. She can do that only by going out to work. As one knows, a great many married women in the circumstances of today can earn a reasonable income. It so happens that these two women, before they were married, had secretarial qualifications which enabled them to obtain a reasonable salary. To do that would, of course, [column 499]mean obtaining assistance in the house. It is only by such a method that these brave women, anxious, quite naturally, to do the best for their children, can try to maintain them in the same kind of state which they would have enjoyed had their husbands lived. On what grounds of principle should they be deprived by this earnings rule? Why should they not be entitled to the allowances which the State gives them under what is, after all, an insurance scheme, and why should they not also be enabled to earn—and retain—as much as they reasonably can without having to sacrifice their contributions from the Exchequer? On what ground of common sense and equity in this society in which we live can that be justified? As the right hon. Gentleman knows perfectly well, there is ancient and honourable authority and injunction specially to help widows and orphans in their affliction, and it seems to me that this is one way in which we can do it and in which we ought to do it. I hope that no question of administrative difficulties or anomalies will be used, in answer to this new Clause, in order to frustrate what I am sure is not only the wish of both sides of the House but would accord with what it seems to me to be the ordinary common sense of humanity and decency. Reference has been made to subsection (2) of the new Clause. It is perfectly true that in some ways it should be a comfort to the Minister. It would enable him, in accepting the new Clause, to say, if he wanted to say it—I hope he would not—that no immediate charge would fall upon the Exchequer. It would enable him to say that because of the present parlous state of the economy this ought to be deferred for a time. Personally, I hope that the Minister will have the courage not merely to accept the Clause but to announce that it is his wish to bring it into force at the earliest possible date. But, as my hon. Friend has pointed out, the second part of the Clause would enable the House—I hope we shall agree upon this—to write into the Bill what we all think is fit and required by justice and equity to be enacted, leaving the time for its introduction to be decided as and when the Statutory Instrument is brought forward. Mr. Charles Curran (Uxbridge) I support the new Clause, and I do so with my eyes open, recognising that if it is carried we shall be creating a new anomaly in place of an old one. I hope that the Minister will accept the fact that we are hoping for a new anomaly. We recognise that many objections have always been raised to this change, this scrapping of the earnings rule whether for a widowed mother or a widow or any other people subject to it. We are always told that if we do that we start a chain reaction, that if we do it for one group we shall have to do it for all other groups throughout the social services. I recognise that in the long run we should have to do this. It is because I recognise that this chain reaction will flow ultimately from this new Clause that I support it. The earnings rule is something which should never have been imported into our social arrangements. Although previous speakers have avoided any reference to the circumstances in which the earning rule was invented, and also to the arguments which have been used for it, I think it is just as well, before the Minister replies, to look back at them, because he has, of course, got a formidable debating case for it against the background of the earnings rule as applied to widows and to others. On what basis does the State decide that a benefit should be paid to someone with the limitation that if that person earns a further sum of money the benefit paid by the State shall be reduced or abolished? Why does the State ever say that? Mr. Deputy-Speaker (Sir Gordon Touche) The hon. Member realises that the new Clause applies to widowed mothers? Mr. Curran I do. I am saying that the arguments which will be used in defence of the existing state of the law relating to widowed mothers are arguments which have very much wider implications. I want to guard myself against the reply from the Minister that, “It is all right to say you are voting for this in vacuo, but in fact you cannot vote for it in vacuo; you have to accept the implications of voting for it, and they will spread right through the social services.” [column 501] We invented this earnings rule after the war for widowed mothers and retirement pensioners as well. We did so because after the war it appeared that the big post-war risk would be unemployment and that we should, therefore, try to keep people off the labour market rather than encourage them to stay in the labour market. We did it for a further reason, which was the fear that if we provided people with money and allowed them to work that might act as a subsidy to wages and might therefore tend to reduce wage rates. Hon. Gentlemen opposite will agree that trade unions have always had this almost pathological fear that if we put into the labour market a lot of people getting benefits from the State those people will tend to work for less than trade union rates. The unions have always wanted an earnings rule of some kind because of that fear. I was glad to hear a speaker on the opposite side of the House ignoring that completely unreasonable fear and speaking up plainly in favour of getting rid of the earnings rule. After all, if a trade union cannot maintain wage rates without penalising widows or without penalising pensioners then the sooner that union goes out of business the better. These two fears led to the invention of the earnings rule. The difficulty now is that if we try to abolish it in respect of one class of sufferers, we run the risk—and it is a real risk, it must be admitted at once—that by abolishing it for one group we shall be forced to abolish it for other groups. At this point we are always told that to do this would cost a very large and indeed unpredictable sum of money. I hope that when the Minister replies he will grasp this nettle as well. Mr. W. Griffiths We are not seeking to create fresh anomalies. What we are seeking to do is to bring the widowed mothers into the same position as the war-widowed mothers and the widows to whom the provisions of the National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act apply and so to bring them into the same relationship with those two other classes. Mr. Curran I quite agree with the hon. Gentleman. [column 502] This is, as the servant girl said, only a little one. I know; but, nevertheless, it is the inevitable if unfortunate fact about little ones that they presently grow up to be big ones. I recognise all that. I imagine that the cost of the new Clause would be very small indeed. But when we are arguing in favour of this, we must face the fact that it is perfectly true that, although this is a financial trifle, once we start tampering with the earnings rule in one respect we shall be forced to go on and tamper with it in many other respects. I think that consequence will follow. It is because I accept and want that consequence that I support the new Clause. This earnings rule both as it is applied to widows and also as it is applied to retirement pensioners is something which causes a bitter sense of unfairness in this country. People argue, quite reasonably, “These are insurance benefits. We have paid for them. We ought to get them as a matter of right, not with strings tied on to them.” This feeling of unfairness goes on festering. Members of the Government, colleagues of the Minister, are concerned nowadays, and quite rightly, about the social climate of this country. They all recognise, as we on these benches do, the need for carrying everybody with us if we are to make economic changes. So we have to try to remove any sense of unfairness. I believe that by tackling the earnings rule on the lines proposed in the new Clause we shall make a real contribution. Many people feel, and with some reason, that where the earnings rule is applied there is one law for the rich and another for the poor. They see that people can retire from their job at 60 or 65 and receive a pension as a right with no questions asked, whilst widows, like retirement pensioners, do not receive the pension as a right with no questions asked but are subject to this limitation. This contrast leads to a widespread and festering sense of unfairness. It also leads to a great deal of “fiddling” . Some widows evade the operation of this rule by earning money in small sums and keeping quiet about it, just as there is a sizeable number of pensioners who similarly avoid the rule by earning money on the quiet and not telling the authorities about it. This leads to a feeling of uneasiness. People [column 503]are afraid of anonymous letters and informers. A good many people, through the operation of this earnings rule throughout the social services, are led to the fringes of the law. For this reason also it would be highly desirable to get rid of it. Like my hon. Friend the Member for Torrington (Mr. P. Browne), I should like to draw the Minister's particular attention to the proposal in the new Clause that I find this feature highly attractive and I join in congratulating the hon. Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross) on his ingenuity in putting it into the Clause. It blocks up one of the great bolt holes—the plea that we are voting at once for an additional payment which may be large and certainly will be inflationary. This provision enables the Minister to impose a pay pause of his own in respect of the earnings rule. I hope that my right hon. Friend will accept that the need for this is extensive and the demand for it widespread. We members of his party will vote for both because we think it right and a matter of fair play and also because we all want to create a new anomaly—thereby hoping that in the not very long run we shall get rid of the earnings rule completely. Mr. Edwin Wainwright (Dearne Valley) I am grateful to the hon. Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Curran) for the point of view that he has put forward. I disagree with him when he says that the trade unions should be strong enough to make certain that if this type of person is employed in industry he should not be employed at a wage-rate lower than that of the ordinary citizen. If I went into the history of how the earnings rule came about I should be going outside the scope of the debate. I would only say that it was due to the massive unemployment in the country at that time. I urge the Minister to accept the new Clause. I can think of one case of this kind among the many with which I have had to deal. It is the case of a widow whose husband was a regular worker on [column 504]seven shifts a week, receiving a reasonable income. He died suddenly and left her with four children to bring up. She lived for several years in dire poverty. She could not go out to work because the children were young and she had to do whatever was possible to make ends meet. It was pitiful to see her trying to do her best to manage on a mere pittance. Only someone who has been forced to live on that kind of income can imagine how a person in those circumstances can exist at all. Later, when the children grew up this woman obtained a part-time job but then her widow's allowance was reduced. There are many such cases where women are doing their best to bring up their children as we would like to see them brought up and to give them a reasonable education. There are also minority cases where it is not necessary to pay the widow anything because of her capacity to earn a reasonable salary. That possibly may be at the back of the Government's mind when, from time to time, they refuse to abolish the earnings rule. In spite of the fact that we have a wages pause and that the Government think that we should cut down on expenses, we are not entitled to refuse any longer to carry out the provisions embodied in the new Clause. We ought now to give the consideration which they deserve to these widows who have carried out the great responsibility, in dire need, of bringing up future citizens. I hope that the Minister will accept the new Clause and will take into consideration that subsection (2) gives him power to bring its provisions into operation at a future date. The Joint Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance (Mrs. Margaret Thatcher) I am grateful to the hon. Member for Kilmarnock (Mr. Ross) for the moderate and sincere way in which he moved the new Clause. I will try to reply in the same vein. The debate has ranged over pretty nearly the whole of the National Insurance Scheme and I will try to reply to the points made in a certain order. First, there was the point raised by the hon. Member for Kilmarnock which I would put briefly as asking [column 505]whether the new Clause would not make the best use of available resources. Secondly, there was the point raised by the hon. Member for Westhoughton (Mr. J. T. Price) about the basis on which we deduct from a benefit where there are earnings. Thirdly, came the comparison with the industrial injuries widows. So far as I do not cover other points under those three headings, I will do my best at the end. The hon. Member for Kilmarnock posed a problem which on this side of the House we always have to face, when we consider the expenditure of any money on any aspect of the National Insurance Scheme. The problem is posed very vividly by this proposed new Clause and was, of course, considered, as the hon. Gentleman mentioned, by the National Insurance Advisory Committee. The cost of the Clause would be about £1½ million. Perhaps it would help if I gave the numbers of people who are at present in receipt of widowed mothers' allowances. There are about 148,000 widowed mothers' allowances in payment. Some 20,000 of these women suffer adjustments under the earnings rule. Thus, only 20,000 of the widows would, at present, be affected by the Clause. What we must consider, were this £1½ million available now—and we have considered this problem in the past—is how best to use that money. Should it be used in favour of widowed mothers who are able to go out to work? Or should it be used in favour of those widowed mothers who, because they have more or younger children, cannot go out to work, or, perhaps, can only do part-time work, earning so little that they would not come within the scope of the earnings rule? Were we to accept this Clause we should be deliberately helping those widowed mothers who, compared with others, are considerably better off because they can go out to work. We should thereby, by implication, be preferring them to those who cannot go out to work. We should, of course, be preferring women such as myself—professional women—over and above those who have young children or who live in areas where they cannot get reasonably highly paid jobs. As the hon. Member for Kilmarnock pointed out, the earnings rule for the [column 506]widowed mother is at present at the level of £5. That is not something to be dismissed lightly. Hon. Members will be aware that when one sits in Opposition one pleads a cause, but standing at this Dispatch Box one has to consider what would be the very best use of resources. My right hon. Friend takes the view, which has been endorsed by the N.I.A.C. in the past, that we should use the money in order to increase benefits to those who are hardest hit. The hon. Member for Kilmarnock referred very kindly to the work of the N.I.A.C. on this problem, when the earnings limit was raised for widowed mothers' allowances from £4 to £5 a week. I should like to read out the whole of paragraph 10 dealing with this relaxation. It states: That was the recommendation. I will read the rest of the paragraph. Hon. Members will never find me reading selected passages out of paragraphs without trying to give the whole picture. The paragraph went on: That was written just before the earnings rule was relaxed in April, 1960. It was upon that proposed relaxation that the N.I.A.C. was commenting. As a result of the relaxation, the widowed mother got a £5 earnings limit which, of course, gives her a considerable preference over other National Insurance beneficiaries. In deciding to make increases in 1961, we could have done what this Clause proposes or what in essence the N.I.A.C. proposed, which was to increase the basic benefit to the widowed mother who cannot go out to work. [column 507] We chose the second course. We chose to increase all the benefits, throughout National Insurance, which affect the widowed mother. I do not make any particular point of that, but we also increased the benefit payable in respect of the children of the widowed mother by an amount over and above the amount of the increase for the children of other National Insurance beneficiaries. The child of a widowed mother now draws 7s. 6d. more than the child of a person who is unemployed or who is in receipt of sickness benefit. Until April, 1961, the child of the widowed mother drew 5s. more than the children of other National Insurance beneficiaries. The cost of giving this preferential increase to the widowed mother who could not go out to work because of young children was about £1¼ million. I do not think that anything turns on the odd £¼ million. My point is that when we were faced with this choice of how best to deploy the resources we felt that we should follow the N.I.A.C. and give it to the widowed mother who cannot go out to work. Mr. Ross The hon. Lady has a point there, but does she imply that this benefit was given only to widowed mothers who were not working? If it was given in respect of the children, then it was given in respect of all widowed mothers. Mrs. Thatcher It was indeed, but it will help most of all those who are unable to go out to work, and that is the particular category which we thought we should help in preference to others. I now turn to the point raised by the hon. Member for Westhoughton (Mr. J. T. Price). I am grateful to him for raising it. He asked on what basis we reduced benefit when there were earnings. It was a point which I had not completely comprehended before coming to the House. Fortunately, I believe that I did comprehend it before coming to this job. It goes to the root of the whole scheme. I do not think that some of those who complain to us about this rule fully appreciate the significance of the change from the old scheme to the new scheme which was made in the 1946 Act. The whole basis of the new scheme is that one contributes against the con[column 508]tingency of interruption of earnings. One contributes to get benefit when one's earnings are interrupted by unemployment or by sickness, or because one has reached the age of 70 for a man or 65 for a woman or has retired from work during the preceding five years. One is insured against interruption of earnings. It is not an unimportant point but one which goes to the whole basis of the scheme. I hope the hon. Gentleman will see that it applies also to widows' benefits. One contributes to a scheme which supplies benefits when earnings are interrupted, but when earnings are not interrupted those benefits are not payable. Mr. J. T. Price Perhaps the hon. Lady will allow me to interrupt her very charming argument, which she is putting with great ability. I can put her mind at rest on one matter concerning the question underlying most of the scheme. I had to live with it at close quarters from 1946 to 1948 when the basis of the law was changed. The fundamental distinction in 1948 was that, for the first time, this scheme was put on an insurance basis with the payment of substantial premiums. We claim, as reasonably and forcibly as we can, that the £1½ million she now says would be represented by this Clause is really the £1½ million provided as a relief to the Ministry by holders of policies of insurance, and that the disposal of these benefits is not a matter for the Minister. I know that under the Regulations the House is talking of where to put the money instead of giving it to the people mentioned in this Clause, but surely this money is being given by beneficiaries through their willingness to go out to work. It is not provided out of the Exchequer at all. Mrs. Thatcher I am glad that the hon. Gentleman comprehends the basis of the scheme. But I must say that at certain times he seems to do his best to conceal that fact. The question remains: What is one insured against? The answer remains: One is insured against interruption of earnings. It is for that reason that there is an earnings rule. The discussion ranged widely over the earnings rule and I do not want to follow certain hon. Members into all its vicissitudes. I would point out, however, to those who made reference to the earnings rule [column 509]for retirement pensioners that if we want the earnings rule abolished—and certain hon. Members said that if this proposed new Clause came into effect one would ultimately have to abolish it—we would also have to abolish the increments scheme which goes with it. The scheme of increments is extremely valuable, is rapidly maturing and enables people very quickly to acquire a larger weekly income because they go on working when they have the option to retire. I will not pursue that further, but it is an important point. So the reason why widowed mothers' allowances are subjected to an earnings rule goes to the root of the whole scheme. Were we to abolish the rule for the widowed mother, we should promptly come to the question of what we were to do when she ceased to be a widowed mother and became a widow for the purpose of National Insurance. At that time, she would have been drawing 25s. a week for the last child dependent upon her. According to this proposed new Clause, having been subject to no earnings rule, at the time of going over to the widow's pension—which would also be the time when perhaps she could earn more—she would come under the operation of the earnings rule, having lost a benefit for a dependent child. I do not think that this position would be tenable. Naturally widows would at that point feel aggrieved and would lobby hon. Members, who would be able to put their case very well. We should then have to give way on the earnings rule for widows' pensions as well, and ultimately right through the system. The cost of doing so for the widow pensioner would be some £5½ million on top of the £1½ million for abolition of the earnings rule for the widowed mothers' allowances. If one took it all the way through, it would mean an extra £100 million for the abolition of the rule for retirement pensioners as well. The case I am trying to argue is not that there is any inconsistency in the present position but that the basis of the scheme is quite consistent in this respect for the widowed mother, and does not produce any anomaly. I now turn to the comparison with the industrial injuries widow. One point strikes one immediately in this. If com[column 510]parison for the National Insurance widowed mother with the industrial injuries widowed mother is undertaken, likewise comparison of the National Insurance widow with the industrial injuries widow must follow. The hon. Member for Manchester, Exchange (Mr. W. Griffiths), who put this point, on this argument would support my contention that we could not stop at releasing widowed mothers from the earnings rule because the same argument based on the comparison with industrial injuries widows would likewise apply to the widow's pension. The arguments against assimilating the two go very much deeper than that. One contributes to the N.I. scheme in order to be insured against interruption of earnings and one contributes to the I.I. scheme to be insured against loss of life or injury because of the extra hazards at work over and above those in ordinary life. One contributes a certain amount for compensation for loss of faculty or, in the case of a widow, compensation for the loss of a husband. One is insured against something completely different. The war widow's pension is not on a loss of earnings basis but is a compensation for the loss of a husband and it is entirely different. There is nothing unreasonable or illogical, if one contributes to certain schemes, in getting the benefit of those schemes when the contingency takes place. It is unfair to take one feature of the Industrial Injuries Scheme, which is what the hon. Member did, and try to assimilate the N.I. widow when the features of the I.I and the N.I. schemes are different throughout. The benefits are different and there are many different features. I have sat through all the debates on the Bill and have heard many arguments against the N.I. Scheme. I sometimes wonder whether it would be better to abolish the whole preference for the industrial injuries, but I do not think that would be in accordance with the wishes of hon. Members. Mr. W. Griffiths The hon. Lady has been saying that there is a difference between industrial injuries insurance and National Insurance concerning the widow. The widow has still the same number of mouths to feed whether her husband has been killed in the factory or, as so often [column 511]happens, because of an illness or debility which follows from his employment but is not directly attributable to his work, he dies. It is well known that illness happens and death sometimes follows as a result of certain conditions. I should remind the hon. Lady that before she became a Minister she took a slightly different view about this proposal than she takes now. Mrs. Thatcher No, I think that the hon. Member is quite wrong. I went on television in support of the very argument which I am trying to put to the House. In his observations about the I.I. widow, the hon. Member put up a very good argument for abolishing the preferential rates and conditions for the I.I. widow and for assimilating them into the N.I. scheme. Mr. Griffiths Not at all. Mrs. Thatcher The entire basis is different. It has a different historical basis. Compensation is one of the reasons for the difference. Various figures have been given in the debate and I wish to give one or two. With an earnings rule of £5 we should consider what the widow with one child, the widow with two children, and the widow with three children, respectively, has left, assuming that she is earning right up to the £5 limit. I believe that the hon. Member for Kilmarnock gave the benefits paid in one case. I interpose the point here that it is £5 net. It is not necessarily the amount which the widow receives in her pay packet. She can deduct from that anything which is deducted by way of P.A.Y.E., anything she has to pay by way of national insurance, fares to work, the cost of having someone in to look after her children, and the cost of tools, protective clothing, trade union subscriptions and the like. When she has deducted all that, she can be left with £5 net. The widow who has £5 net and one child, with what she gets from N.I. and family allowances, will have £9 2s. 6d. If she has two children, she will have £10 7s. 6d. and if she has three children £11 14s. 6d. I am well aware that none of that represents luxury, but that widow is not at present in any way touched by the earnings rule because her net earnings do not bring her within it. The personal benefit of [column 512]57s. 6d., which is the only benefit in the widowed mother's allowance which can be extinguished by earnings, is not, in fact, extinguished until her net earnings reach eight guineas a week. I shall now try to answer some of the points which have been raised by hon. Members. The hon. Member for Kilmarnock said that children had the same appetites after their fathers had died as when they were alive. That argument applies with equal force to children of widowed mothers who do not go out to work. They have children who have similar appetites to those of the children whose mothers go to work. Therefore, one should give as much to those who do not go to work. There is the further point in subsection (2) of this proposed new Clause which attempts to suspend its operation until such time as the Minister may decide. I hope that I have said enough to make the House appreciate that I am opposing the new Clause on merit, and for the reasons I have given. It would be entirely dishonest to accept it without having any intention of putting it into operation. I also submit, in answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Curran), that if he is to vote for this new Clause in the avowed desire to get the whole basis of the scheme changed from its present one of interruption of earnings, perhaps this is not the best way to go about it. If he is going to do that he should do it after due consideration of the consequences and having a very good idea of what he would put in its place. For these reasons, I recommend the House to reject the new Clause. Mr. Houghton If I speak briefly I hope the House will understand that my hon. Friends have a very important meeting upstairs at seven oclock. I am most anxious that we should bring our discussion on this new Clause to an end before that time. [Interruption.] Hon. Members opposite have meetings upstairs and they must understand what a nuisance it is to have a whole assembly disturbed in the first few minutes after the meeting has begun. I shall therefore compress my remarks into a very few minutes, although I should like to have spent more time replying to the hon. Lady and to the [column 513]debate. First, I wish to point out that the hon. Lady was the first hon. Member in the whole House to defend the existing arrangement and to oppose the new Clause. On this occasion, not even the hon. Member for Barry (Mr. Gower) stayed to defend the Minister. Unthanked and unrewarded, he has deserted the Minister on this occasion. The whole House has approached this new Clause with sympathy and support. I want to make quite clear to the hon. Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Curran) that it is not the purpose of this new Clause to open up substantial consequences regarding the earnings rule as a whole. We thought that this new Clause could be accepted by the House without setting up a chain reaction on the earnings rule generally. The widowed mother has been distinguished from the widow and from retirement pensioners for a very long time. First, the gap was 10s., then it became 20s. and now it is 30s.—the difference between the upper earnings rule for the widowed mother and for other beneficiaries. So the House has already distinguished sharply, and to a growing extent, between the widowed mother and the earnings rule in her case, and widows and retirement pensioners. This new Clause would carry that differentiation to the point of abolishing the earnings rule for the widowed mother. That is all that is intended in the new Clause. The hon. Lady said that the earnings rule for widowed mothers, as for other beneficiaries, goes to the root basis of the whole scheme. The root basis of the whole scheme is not the earnings rule. The root basis of the whole scheme is adequate benefits. Paragraph 346 of the Beveridge Committee's Report, on this very point dealing with the new benefits for widowhood, says: Those two things were linked—adequacy of benefit without a reduction if she did [column 514]not go out to work, but, if the widow goes out to work, a reduction would be made in the full guardian benefit. We have to provide the widowed mother with an adequate benefit without her going to work. Who will say that £6 14s 6d. a week is an adequate benefit for a widowed mother who has three children and who does not go out to work? We know that it is not. The truth is that by the inadequacy of the benefits widows are forced to go out to work. Then an earnings rule is applied in the sacred name of the principle which the hon. Lady says is the root basis of the whole scheme. These two things must be considered together. Unhappily, Clause 8 will worsen the position of many widowed mothers by depriving them of family allowance for their apprenticed son if they bring in more than 40s. a week. There are 50,000 apprentices affected by Clause 8. The widowed mothers will undoubtedly suffer some of the disadvantage, along with other parents. I do not agree with the hon. Member for Uxbridge that the additional expenditure incurred by lifting the earnings rule for widowed mothers would be inflationary, for it would mean more widowed mothers would be contributing more to the national economy. At present we are deducting from the benefit the additional earnings beyond the £5 which the widowed mother can get by work. She is discouraged from earning more than £5 a week. Under our proposal she would be encouraged to work more and to earn more. I regret that the response by the hon. Lady has been unfavourable, but this problem will be with us for some time to come. I have no doubt that there will be a persistent endeavour to secure a revision of our approach to the earnings limit. Valuable and wise as I believe the recommendations of the National Insurance Advisory Committee to be, this House has not yet surrendered to that body its right of absolute judgment on a matter of this kind. If ever the time comes when the House can function only by adopting recommendations of outside bodies, we might as well go out of business. We have our job to do. Acknowledging at all times the selfless service of the advisory bodies, we still [column 515]reserve the right of the House to decide for ourselves. The truth is that throughout the Report of the National Insurance Advisory Committee of 27th January, 1960, was a note of displeasure at what the Government evidently intended to do. That can be seen running through the Report. In paragraph 4 the Committee says, The Committee could see no reason for departing from what it had said previously. It had to acknowledge that the Government intended to liberalise the earnings rule, which is what we did in the earlier part of 1960. I am afraid that I must ask my hon. Friends to go into the Lobby in favour of the Clause. Question put, That the Clause be read a Second time:— The House divided: Ayes 172, Noes 216. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc deduction shall widow mother allowance respect earning accordingly section seventeen national insurance act provide inter alia deduction certain enactment regulation amend section mention schedule column connection widow mother allowance act repeal extent mention column schedule section shall come force day appoint minister order form statutory instrument lay parliament mr ross bring read time mr ross beg clause read second time purpose clause simple hope commend hon member matter shall division receive satisfactory answer minister hopeful time clause seek remove altogether earning limit respect personal widow mother allowance committee suggest notice minister table office say beware widow especially young one fair respect widow mother minister past year show warm human attitude respect benefit respect subject discuss widow mother earn rise rise place national insurance advisory committee dilemma want know exactly go earning rule personal allowance suppose account fact mother child earn living think dispute improve benefit widow mother expect family comfort standard right expect allowance give child national insurance family allowance augmentation income total allowance receive widow mother child week widow mother allowance child allowance second child allowance child receive way family allowance study earning rule say case alter great complication consequential anomaly case limit clause widow mother affect retirement pension widow retirement pension pay column presume prove retire attempt abolish earning rule relation retirement pension come right requirement pay retirement pension retirement realise woman receipt widow pension automatically reach age translate retirement pension realise relationship ordinary widow pension retirement pension widow mother allowance transitional benefit child grow get widow pension hon friend press receipt widow mother allowance maintain family singlehande consider good work earning limit argument past appear alteration help widow work earn time little widow parttime work work unfair argument think occasion debate subject peculiar argue study subject soon reveal improve circumstance widow discussion national insurance advisory committee consider minister increase committee face measure dilemma member committee point money available insufficient widow relation allowance child committee agree time minister merely increase earning limit relation wage actually make change right hon gentleman change widen gap compare column earning rule ordinary widow justification seek persuade right hon gentleman remove altogether want appreciate field change complication concern retirement pension wish traverse entire subject sincerely hope minister seek divide widow way describe debating conquest majority widow work question strive bring family child chance appreciate singlehande make struggle surely realise entitle help talk widow child child exactly appetitie father alive hard clothe especially school clothe practically school uniform urge hon member realise household expense widow family husband able help wife cope problem family life entitle change propose hon friend sincerely hope appreciate minister sympathetic right hon gentleman agree change allow fear anomaly comparison unable prevent make reasonable justifiable alteration mr j t price westhoughton fully support speech hon friend member kilmarnock mr ross forward reasonable fashion powerful argument make change propose reason strongly appeal woman benefit husband claim benefit term act child young go school case bereft consortium husband think legal term outside column provision financial system taxation soon enter widowhood begin cope problem bring family live house obtain mortgage additional liability cope stage lose financial support breadwinner receive subject taxation way income tax allowance joint allowance think normally payable husband wife understand arrangement familiar try problem widow choose assist family income go work earn extra week ministry relieve liability pay widow mother allowance completely avoid anomaly respect hon member understand shall welcome minister enlighten argue government woman choose widowhood earn additional income receive less benefit ministry relieve liability act hon member guilty fall error supposing benefit way tinge relief introduction earning rule form mean test diminution benefit consider justify insurance scheme government actuary advise originally foundation scheme actuarial viewpoint surely loading factor calculation certain proportion widow qualify benefit choose earn money suitable employment additional argument available widow mother allowance taxation tax system fall household column live secondly insurance scheme pay specify rate benefit respect substantial rate contribution system constantly rise suggest time come look compassionately favourably remove believe relatively unfair position widow mother know widow mother allowance provide statute child woman position addition domestic hardship have battle life husband bring child show adaptable new circumstance earn reasonably good living maintain family status accustom penalise diminution benefit exist regulation wish exaggerate elaborate sincerely hope occasion minister respond way hon friend ask mr percy browne torrington rise hon member west houghton mr j t price briefly support clause associate hon member kilmarnock mr ross say minister party belong lift widow point view benefit earning rule average level give people right new clause open generally operation earning rule disagree pro con earning rule order shall new clause agree widow mother hon member kilmarnock point pensionable age special position chance lose breadwinner especially young child look work case entirely wrong law away benefit prepared earn column certain limit say generally earning rule present position want shell public money like clause particularly subsection state congratulate hon member opposite clause wish proposal credit seasonal worker line occur late see new clause hope right hon friend accept clause advance argument unable moment provide fund operate clause need implement bill come force agree sure principle right earning rule extinguish widow mother draw allowance pension accept clause bill bring forward new legislation occasion mr w griffiths manchester exchange support new clause delighted hon friend session having successful ballot promote hon friend private member bill precisely hon friend seek session having successful ballot unfortunately far list hon friend right seek remedy anomaly way thing largely supporter session ago hon member torrington mr p browne support occasion delighted hope follow division lobby divide house thing attract hon member clause minister call immediately find money position exist law widow mother wish column cease work government meet pension original act government take power meet situation operation earning rule prevent widow category receive pension reason decide finish work pension right meet government agree entirely argument advance hon member kilmarnock mr ross hon member westhoughton mr j t price special responsibility widow mother family thing like add position widow apply widow mother widow general great loss industry commerce profession suffer woman leave employment vast number people job nursing physiotherapy radiography hospital people train skilled necessary job community marriage leave work think encourage widow qualification desire employment highly desirable accept theory advanced quarter woman marry widow cease interest profession job perfectly entitle work encourage wish main argument retention earning rule widow mother national insurance act gross inequality apply widow widow result normal hazard life different treatment accord widow mother industrial injury act widow mother today large number people realise husband lose life work widow mother subject earning rule earn like repeat example column give man drive bus bus crash kill widow able work earn bus driver cease employment half hour passenger bus crash kill widow subject earning rule distinction completely indefensible put people outside describe outrageous distinction go long time parliament end introduce bill strike enormous volume correspondence receive country kind organisation particularly women organisation member house year volume correspondence minister aware argument honour lead deputation national council woman meet time ago sympathetic listen courteously right hon gentleman raise difficulty create fresh anomaly minister occasion hear minister department house justify continuation anomaly different type widow mother possibly justify widow man kill work subject earning rule widow man die natural death home subject matter hear minister reason reason hear side house hope minister agree clause bring operation colleague government consider time convenient mr julian ridsdale harwich discuss pension case earning rule find agreement hon friend member torrington mr p browne like constituency column town retired people certain number widow mother child argument minister find agreement hon friend member torrington concern earning rule torpedo superior science knowledge minister case forward impressed argument forward opposition support new clause particularly hon member manchester exchange mr w griffiths point person kill action die industrial injury earning rule apply operate person die naturally despite fact circumstance widow exactly case hesitate speak increase kind period pay pause economic policy support wish increase cost live country cost new clause know case constituency widow mother child affect earning rule obviously country number high hope minister reply cost new clause accept general find sympathy new clause hope minister find possible accept new clause period pay pause soon possible mr eric fletcher islington east add word support new clause move hon friend member kilmarnock mr ross support speech side house hope right hon gentleman sympathetic response representation subject shall meet stony obstinate refusal concession produce administrative anomaly real hardship welldefine probably column category widow relaxation earning rule relaxation require consideration humanity justice personally earning rule altogether new clause wide question principle arise deal small limited number case submit special consideration arise widow mother class pensioner speak matter month specific case come notice illustrate difficulty face married woman child suddenly lose husband result industrial accident case fully protect result misfortune illhealth happen case cause sudden unexpected death husband father case concern woman forty young child face sudden unexpected emergency husband alive bring child reasonable comfort grammar school educate natural prospect reasonable education live sort comfort woman enjoy husband enjoy reasonable income bad conscience woman find suddenly place emergency apart bereavement misery tragedy loss husband financial loss case mind brave courageous woman decide continue try earn order young child school able qualify world try husband live go work know great married woman circumstance today earn reasonable income happen woman marry secretarial qualification enable obtain reasonable salary course column obtain assistance house method brave woman anxious naturally good child try maintain kind state enjoy husband live ground principle deprive earning rule entitle allowance state give insurance scheme enable earn retain reasonably have sacrifice contribution exchequer ground common sense equity society live justify right hon gentleman know perfectly ancient honourable authority injunction specially help widow orphan affliction way ought hope question administrative difficulty anomaly answer new clause order frustrate sure wish side house accord ordinary common sense humanity decency reference subsection new clause perfectly true way comfort minister enable accept new clause want hope immediate charge fall exchequer enable present parlous state economy ought defer time personally hope minister courage merely accept clause announce wish bring force early possible date hon friend point second clause enable house hope shall agree write bill think fit require justice equity enact leave time introduction decide statutory instrument bring forward mr charles curran uxbridge support new clause eye open recognise carry shall create new anomaly place old hope minister accept fact hope new anomaly recognise objection raise change scrapping earning rule widow mother widow people subject tell start chain reaction group shall group social service recognise long run recognise chain reaction flow ultimately new clause support earning rule import social arrangement previous speaker avoid reference circumstance earning rule invent argument think minister reply look course get formidable debating case background earning rule apply widow basis state decide benefit pay limitation person earn sum money benefit pay state shall reduce abolish state mr deputyspeaker sir gordon touche hon member realise new clause apply widow mother mr curran say argument defence exist state law relate widow mother argument wide implication want guard reply minister right vote vacuo fact vote vacuo accept implication vote spread right social service column invent earning rule war widow mother retirement pensioner war appear big postwar risk unemployment try people labour market encourage stay labour market reason fear provide people money allow work act subsidy wage tend reduce wage rate hon gentleman opposite agree trade union pathological fear labour market lot people get benefit state people tend work trade union rate union want earning rule kind fear glad hear speaker opposite house ignore completely unreasonable fear speak plainly favour getting rid earning rule trade union maintain wage rate penalise widow penalise pensioner soon union go business well fear lead invention earning rule difficulty try abolish respect class sufferer run risk real risk admit abolish group shall force abolish group point tell cost large unpredictable sum money hope minister reply grasp nettle mr w griffiths seek create fresh anomaly seek bring widow mother position warwidowed mother widow provision national insurance industrial injury act apply bring relationship class mr curran agree hon gentleman column servant girl say little know inevitable unfortunate fact little one presently grow big one recognise imagine cost new clause small argue favour face fact perfectly true financial trifle start tamper earning rule respect shall force tamper respect think consequence follow accept want consequence support new clause earning rule apply widow apply retirement pensioner cause bitter sense unfairness country people argue reasonably insurance benefit pay ought matter right string tie feeling unfairness go fester member government colleague minister concern nowadays rightly social climate country recognise bench need carry everybody economic change try remove sense unfairness believe tackle earning rule line propose new clause shall real contribution people feel reason earning rule apply law rich poor people retire job receive pension right question ask whilst widow like retirement pensioner receive pension right question ask subject limitation contrast lead widespread fester sense unfairness lead great deal fiddle widow evade operation rule earn money small sum keep quiet sizeable number pensioner similarly avoid rule earn money quiet tell authority lead feeling uneasiness people column afraid anonymous letter informer good people operation earning rule social service lead fringe law reason highly desirable rid like hon friend member torrington mr p browne like draw minister particular attention proposal new clause find feature highly attractive join congratulate hon member kilmarnock mr ross ingenuity put clause block great bolt hole plea vote additional payment large certainly inflationary provision enable minister impose pay pause respect earning rule hope right hon friend accept need extensive demand widespread member party vote think right matter fair play want create new anomaly hope long run shall rid earning rule completely mr edwin wainwright dearne valley grateful hon member uxbridge mr curran point view forward disagree say trade union strong certain type person employ industry employ wagerate low ordinary citizen go history earning rule come go outside scope debate massive unemployment country time urge minister accept new clause think case kind deal case widow husband regular worker column shift week receive reasonable income die suddenly leave child bring live year dire poverty work child young possible end meet pitiful try good manage mere pittance force live kind income imagine person circumstance exist later child grow woman obtain parttime job widow allowance reduce case woman good bring child like bring reasonable education minority case necessary pay widow capacity earn reasonable salary possibly government mind time time refuse abolish earning rule spite fact wage pause government think cut expense entitle refuse long carry provision embody new clause ought consideration deserve widow carry great responsibility dire need bring future citizen hope minister accept new clause consideration subsection give power bring provision operation future date joint parliamentary secretary ministry pension national insurance mrs margaret thatcher grateful hon member kilmarnock mr ross moderate sincere way move new clause try reply vein debate range pretty nearly national insurance scheme try reply point certain order point raise hon member kilmarnock briefly ask column new clause good use available resource secondly point raise hon member westhoughton mr j t price basis deduct benefit earning thirdly come comparison industrial injury widow far cover point heading good end hon member kilmarnock pose problem house face consider expenditure money aspect national insurance scheme problem pose vividly propose new clause course consider hon gentleman mention national insurance advisory committee cost clause million help give number people present receipt widow mother allowance widow mother allowance payment woman suffer adjustment earning rule widow present affect clause consider million available consider problem past good use money favour widow mother able work favour widow mother young child work parttime work earn little come scope earning rule accept clause deliberately help widow mother compare considerably well work implication prefer work course prefer woman professional woman young child live area reasonably highly pay job hon member kilmarnock point earning rule column mother present level dismiss lightly hon member aware sit opposition plead cause stand dispatch box consider good use resource right hon friend take view endorse niac past use money order increase benefit hard hit hon member kilmarnock refer kindly work niac problem earning limit raise widow mother allowance week like read paragraph deal relaxation state recommendation read rest paragraph hon member find read select passage paragraph try picture paragraph go write earning rule relax april propose relaxation niac comment result relaxation widow mother get earning limit course give considerable preference national insurance beneficiary decide increase clause propose essence niac propose increase basic benefit widow mother work column choose second course choose increase benefit national insurance affect widow mother particular point increase benefit payable respect child widow mother increase child national insurance beneficiary child widow mother draw child person unemployed receipt sickness benefit april child widow mother draw child national insurance beneficiary cost give preferential increase widow mother work young child million think turn odd million point face choice good deploy resource feel follow niac widow mother work mr ross hon lady point imply benefit give widow mother work give respect child give respect widow mother mrs thatcher help unable work particular category think help preference turn point raise hon member westhoughton mr j t price grateful raise ask basis reduce benefit earning point completely comprehend come house fortunately believe comprehend come job go root scheme think complain rule fully appreciate significance change old scheme new scheme act basis new scheme contribute concolumn interruption earning contribute benefit one earning interrupt unemployment sickness reach age man woman retire work precede year insure interruption earning unimportant point go basis scheme hope hon gentleman apply widow benefit contribute scheme supply benefit earning interrupt earning interrupt benefit payable mr j t price hon lady allow interrupt charming argument put great ability mind rest matter concern question underlie scheme live close quarter basis law change fundamental distinction time scheme insurance basis payment substantial premium claim reasonably forcibly million say represent clause million provide relief ministry holder policy insurance disposal benefit matter minister know regulation house talk money instead give people mention clause surely money give beneficiary willingness work provide exchequer mrs thatcher glad hon gentleman comprehend basis scheme certain time good conceal fact question remain insure answer remain insure interruption earning reason earning rule discussion range widely earning rule want follow certain hon member vicissitude point reference earning rule column retirement pensioner want earning rule abolish certain hon member say propose new clause come effect ultimately abolish abolish increment scheme go scheme increment extremely valuable rapidly mature enable people quickly acquire large weekly income work option retire pursue important point reason widow mother allowance subject earning rule go root scheme abolish rule widow mother promptly come question cease widow mother widow purpose national insurance time draw week child dependent accord propose new clause having subject earning rule time go widow pension time earn come operation earning rule having lose benefit dependent child think position tenable naturally widow point feel aggrieved lobby hon member able case way earning rule widow pension ultimately right system cost widow pensioner million million abolition earning rule widow mother allowance take way mean extra million abolition rule retirement pensioner case try argue inconsistency present position basis scheme consistent respect widow mother produce anomaly turn comparison industrial injury widow point strike immediately comcolumn national insurance widow mother industrial injury widow mother undertake likewise comparison national insurance widow industrial injury widow follow hon member manchester exchange mr w griffiths point argument support contention stop release widow mother earning rule argument base comparison industrial injury widow likewise apply widow pension argument assimilate deep contribute ni scheme order insure interruption earning contribute ii scheme insure loss life injury extra hazard work ordinary life contribute certain compensation loss faculty case widow compensation loss husband insure completely different war widow pension loss earning basis compensation loss husband entirely different unreasonable illogical contribute certain scheme get benefit scheme contingency take place unfair feature industrial injury scheme hon member try assimilate ni widow feature ii ni scheme different benefit different different feature sit debate bill hear argument ni scheme wonder well abolish preference industrial injury think accordance wish hon member mr w griffiths hon lady say difference industrial injury insurance national insurance concern widow widow number mouth feed husband kill factory column illness debility follow employment directly attributable work die know illness happen death follow result certain condition remind hon lady minister take slightly different view proposal take mrs thatcher think hon member wrong go television support argument try house observation ii widow hon member good argument abolish preferential rate condition ii widow assimilate ni scheme mr griffith mrs thatcher entire basis different different historical basis compensation reason difference figure give debate wish earning rule consider widow child widow child widow child respectively leave assume earn right limit believe hon member kilmarnock give benefit pay case interpose point net necessarily widow receive pay packet deduct deduct way paye pay way national insurance fare work cost have look child cost tool protective clothing trade union subscription like deduct leave net widow net child get ni family allowance child child aware represent luxury widow present way touch earning rule net earning bring personal benefit column benefit widow mother allowance extinguish earning fact extinguish net earning reach guinea week shall try answer point raise hon member hon member kilmarnock say child appetite father die alive argument apply equal force child widow mother work child similar appetite child mother work work point subsection propose new clause attempt suspend operation time minister decide hope say house appreciate oppose new clause merit reason give entirely dishonest accept have intention put operation submit answer hon friend member uxbridge mr curran vote new clause avow desire basis scheme change present interruption earning good way go consideration consequence have good idea place reason recommend house reject new clause mr houghton speak briefly hope house understand hon friend important meeting upstairs seven oclock anxious bring discussion new clause end time interruption hon member opposite meeting upstairs understand nuisance assembly disturb minute meeting begin shall compress remark minute like spend time reply hon lady column wish point hon lady hon member house defend exist arrangement oppose new clause occasion hon member barry mr gower stay defend minister unthanked unrewarded desert minister occasion house approach new clause sympathy support want clear hon member uxbridge mr curran purpose new clause open substantial consequence earning rule think new clause accept house set chain reaction earning rule generally widow mother distinguish widow retirement pensioner long time gap difference upper earning rule widow mother beneficiary house distinguish sharply grow extent widow mother earning rule case widow retirement pensioner new clause carry differentiation point abolish earning rule widow mother intend new clause hon lady say earning rule widow mother beneficiary go root basis scheme root basis scheme earning rule root basis scheme adequate benefit paragraph beveridge committee report point deal new benefit widowhood say thing link adequacy benefit reduction column work widow go work reduction guardian benefit provide widow mother adequate benefit go work week adequate benefit widow mother child work know truth inadequacy benefit widow force work earning rule apply sacred principle hon lady say root basis scheme thing consider unhappily clause worsen position widow mother deprive family allowance apprentice son bring week apprentice affect clause widow mother undoubtedly suffer disadvantage parent agree hon member uxbridge additional expenditure incur lift earning rule widow mother inflationary mean widow mother contribute national economy present deduct benefit additional earning widow mother work discourage earn week proposal encourage work earn regret response hon lady unfavourable problem time come doubt persistent endeavour secure revision approach earning limit valuable wise believe recommendation national insurance advisory committee house surrender body right absolute judgment matter kind time come house function adopt recommendation outside body business job acknowledge time selfless service advisory body column right house decide truth report national insurance advisory committee january note displeasure government evidently intend see run report paragraph committee say committee reason depart say previously acknowledge government intend liberalise earning rule early afraid ask hon friend lobby favour clause question clause read second time house divide aye no copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill temporarily bars noncitizens from entering the United States and addresses related issues. During the four-year period starting from this bill's enactment, any alien who unlawfully enters the United States at a port of entry without proof of citizenship shall be inadmissible. The bill requires the detention of certain aliens (generally, those not legally present in the United States) who have been charged with any crime resulting in the death or serious bodily injury of another. Furthermore, a state or local government shall be ineligible for certain federal assistance if that government has a law or policy that (1) violates certain laws about sharing immigration status information with federal officials, or (2) prohibits law enforcement from obtaining immigration status information from any individual. The bill also requires (1) the Department of the Treasury to establish a fund for a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border, and (2) the Department of Homeland Security to construct such a barrier by December 31, 2021. The bill also reinstates certain immigration-related executive orders, including an order that generally barred nationals of certain countries (such as Somalia and Sudan) from entry, while rescinding other orders, including an order promoting access to voting for individuals legally entitled to vote. The bill also rescinds orders establishing the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) programs. (Generally, DACA defers the deportation of eligible aliens who entered the United States as minors, while DAPA is a similar program for the alien parents of U.S. citizens or permanent residents.)

right

bill temporarily bar noncitizen enter united states address related issue fouryear period start bill enactment alien unlawfully enter united states port entry proof citizenship shall inadmissible bill require detention certain alien generally legally present united states charge crime result death bodily injury furthermore state local government shall ineligible certain federal assistance government law policy violate certain law share immigration status information federal official prohibit law enforcement obtain immigration status information individual bill require department treasury establish fund barrier usmexico border department homeland security construct barrier december bill reinstate certain immigrationrelate executive order include order generally bar national certain country somalia sudan entry rescind order include order promote access voting individual legally entitle vote bill rescind order establish deferred action childhood arrival daca defer action parental accountability dapa program generally daca defer deportation eligible alien enter united states minor dapa similar program alien parent citizen permanent resident

This bill excludes from gross income, for income tax purposes, the basic needs allowance of members of the Armed Forces.

right

bill exclude gross income income tax purpose basic need allowance member armed force

Speeches, etc. Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, Conservative Shadow Minister of Transport, left Bristol on Saturday convinced of the viability of the port's expansion plans. And she reaffirmed the Tories pledge to allow Bristol to go ahead and build a new deep water dock at Portbury, given by Mr. Edward Heath in March, 1966. This would depend on there being little change in the country's economic circumstances. “We all hope it will not be in any way detrimental to Bristol by the time we are in power again,” she said. But she held out hope for the port, saying: “If you have great faith in the scheme and are confident of its viability and are prepared to find the risk capital, then it is up to you. “If the scheme is viable the way the test it is whether the people concerned are prepared to put up the capital to go ahead with it.” Mrs. Thatcher said Bristol's ability to do this, convinced her that the Portbury project was sound. She was speaking after a three-hour visit to the Port of Bristol which she saw from land, sea and air. Seeing the dock installations from the Port of Bristol Authority's helicopter showed her how close the port really was to the country's motorway network. The whole picture could never be gained from ground level, she said. Mrs. Thatcher referred to the Government's threat to nationalise the ports. She forecast that nationalisation could not come in until January, 1971. The last date for a general election is two months later, in March. She thought it might not be too late for the Conservatives to undo nationalisation, if they came back to power at that General Election. Earlier Mrs. Thatcher took a look at the North Somerset stretch of the A38 and expressed concern at the county's 1968 record death-roll. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mrs margaret thatcher conservative shadow minister transport leave bristol saturday convince viability port expansion plan reaffirm tory pledge allow bristol ahead build new deep water dock portbury give mr edward heath march depend little change countrys economic circumstance hope way detrimental bristol time power say hold hope port say great faith scheme confident viability prepared find risk capital scheme viable way test people concern prepared capital ahead mrs thatcher say bristol ability convince portbury project sound speak threehour visit port bristol see land sea air see dock installation port bristol authoritys helicopter show close port countrys motorway network picture gain ground level say mrs thatcher refer government threat nationalise port forecast nationalisation come january date general election month later march think late conservative undo nationalisation come power general election early mrs thatcher take look north somerset stretch express concern countys record deathroll copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill generally requires fiduciaries of employer-sponsored retirement plans to make investment decisions based only on pecuniary factors (i.e., factors that a fiduciary prudently determines are expected to have a material effect on the risk and return of an investment based on appropriate investment horizons consistent with the plan's policies and objectives). The bill allows nonpecuniary factors to be considered when selecting investment options for certain participant-directed retirement plans if specified requirements are met (e.g., the investment option is not a default investment). Further, if a plan includes investment options based on nonpecuniary factors, it also must include investment options that are not based on any such factors.

right

bill generally require fiduciary employersponsored retirement plan investment decision base pecuniary factor ie factor fiduciary prudently determine expect material effect risk return investment base appropriate investment horizon consistent plan policy objective bill allow nonpecuniary factor consider select investment option certain participantdirected retirement plan specify requirement meet eg investment option default investment plan include investment option base nonpecuniary factor include investment option base factor

Ep. 1648 - The Battle Over Racial Reparations Published: 1/17/2023 (in RSS feed: 53m 9s) Democrats reinvigorate the debate over racial reparations for black Americans. Joe Biden talks up his radical agenda while being unable to sing Happy Birthday, and we examined how to fight woke in the classroom. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro show. Well, folks, yesterday was m l k day and that was an excuse for people on the left to start talking about racial reparations once again, San Francisco apparently is now considering a regime of racial reparations. San Francisco's reparations committee has now proposed a 5 million payment to each black longtime resident, as well as total debt forgiveness of like all debt. Based on what I'm unaware that, that anybody who's alive today was a slave in the United States. If so, then we should probably find out about that. I'm unaware that the members of the San Francisco tax paying community were slave holders at any point in their lives or lives of their parents or in the lives of their grandparents. However, that is not stopping San Francisco from talking up race reparations. According to Fox News, San Francisco's reparations committee has proposed paying each black longtime resident 5 million Public California was a free state when it was originally admitted to the union and granting total debt forgiveness due to the decades of systemic repression faced by the local black community. The San Francisco African-American Reparations Advisory Committee, which advises the city on developing a plan for reparations for black residents, released its draft report last month to address reparations, not for slavery, not to address the public policies explicitly created to subjugate black people in San Francisco by upholding and expanding the intent and legacy of channel slavery. So presumably these would be policies of, for example, redlining despite the fact that it has been illegal in the United States to Redlin since the late 1970s, despite the fact that federal government and state government in California have subsidized black home ownership for decades on end, despite the fact that public policy in the United States has been heavily tilted in favor of discriminatory actions on behalf of black Americans since the affirmative action moves of the 1960s and 1970s doesn't matter. The draft says, while neither San Francisco nor California formerly adopted the institution of channel slavery, the tenants of segregation, white supremacy and system systematic repression and exclusion of black people were codified through legal and extra legal actions, social codes and judicial enforcement. The draft plan includes a long list of financial recommendations for black San Francisco residents, including a one-time lump sum payment of 5 million to each eligible individual. Now you'll notice again the, the vaguery of the language here that yeah, we didn't actually have slavery here, but there were tenets of segregation. Now, again, there were no Jim Crow laws in California, as far as I'm aware that was reserved exclusively for the Southern United States. There may have been informal regimes of racism in California. There certainly were no question. That does not mean that that was legal action by the government of California in order to uphold that. So you'd actually have to look at each specific law and each individual person who is impacted by that specific law. And that's on the moral side, right? When you're talking about reparations, you have to discuss who's sinned and who is sinned against. You actually have to show who is sinned against by what policy, promulgated by whom if you, you actually wish to pay reparations. If you're, if you're seriously talking about repairing a damage that was done, you have to ask who did the damage and to whom? And then you have to ask a secondary question, which we'll get to in just a moment, which is, is this designed to work? What Ill, is this designed to remedy specifically when we are talking right now about people predominantly in San Francisco who were born post the civil rights era, you're talking in San Francisco, people who are born in the year 2000, right? Those people are 23 years old right now in the year 2000 was vast racial discrimination the way in San Francisco, is that a serious problem in public policy in San Francisco in say the year 2000 or say the year 1990? What, what? How long is this going to go on? Lump sum payment would compensate the affected population for decades of harms they've experienced and will redress the economic and opportunity losses to that Black San Franciscans have endured collectively as a result of both intentional decisions and unintended harms perpetuated by city policy according to the draft statements. So now we are supposed to do reparations for unintended harms. So public policy that accidentally harm black folks, that is now going to re redress by a giant bag of cash, presumably according to the San Francisco Committee. Now, that's gonna be kind of a problem because as it turns out, virtually every democratic policy in a major American city for the last 60 years has harmed black Americans disproportionately, I presume accidentally. Do we now pay reparations for all of that bad policy? Are we gonna pay reparations for all the bad policing policy that is disproportionately harmed black Americans in major American cities over the course of the last four or five years? How's that going to work to be eligible for the program, the applicant has to be 18 years old and has to have identified as black or African American on public documents for at least 10 years. It must also prove at least two of eight additional criteria, choosing from a list that includes born in San Francisco between 1940 and 1996, and has proof of residency in San Francisco for at least 13 years and or personally or the direct descendants of someone incarcerated by the failed war on drugs. So now we are going to pay reparations to you if your parent went to jail for drug dealing because every aspect of America, according to the woke left, has been impacted by the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, and that is up to and including your criminal violations. So if you were selling cocaine to a minor and then you went to jail and you're the child of that person, now you deserve reparations because of the failed war on drugs. The plan also calls on the city to supplement lower income recipients income to reflect the area median income about 97 grand annually for at least 250 years. 250 years. Okay? Racial disparities across all metrics have led to a significant racial wealth gap in the city of San Francisco. It argued by elevating income to match a m i. Black people can better afford housing and achieve a better quality of life. The plan also seeks to establish a comprehensive debt forgiveness program that clears each eligible person's student and housing loans, credit card debt, et cetera. We get to mourn on all this in just one second. First, if you're tired of the government playing games with your savings and your retirement plans, you need to get in touch with the experts at Birch Gold. Today. For over 5,000 years, gold has withstood inflation, geopolitical turmoil, and stock market crashes. Well, now you can own gold in a tax shelter retirement account. Birch Gold makes it easy to convert an IRA or 401K into an IRA in Precious Metals. Text Bens who 98 98 98 claim your free information kit on gold. Then talk to one of their precious metal specialists when you purchase from BCH Gold. By January 31st, you'll get a signed copy of my book, how to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps, which seems more and more like the Biden administration playbook these days with an a plus rating from the Better Business Bureau, thousands of happy customers and countless five star reviews, you can trust Birch Gold to help protect your savings. I bought gold because I was tired of my money being impacted by the decisions made by people at the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. Well, if you wanna be more like me, text Ben, 2 98, 98 98, claim your free information kick at a signed copy of my book today, that's Ben through 98 98, 98 today. Ask all of your questions and when you feel comfortable, start investing with my friends over at Birch Gold text Ben through 98. 98. 98 to get started today . Speaking of the economy, the economy is on a night's edge right now. Most economists expect a recession in the near future, just another blow to your business. But here's the thing, it's possible that over the course of the past several years, you actually spent too much money on your taxes. What if you could claw some of that money back? You should give my friends an innovation, refunds a call. If your business has five or more employees and managed to survive covid, you could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to $26,000 per employee. This isn't alone. There's no payback. It is a refund on your taxes. The challenge is how do you get your hands on it? How do you cut through the red tape and get your business refund money? Go to get refunds.com. Their team of tax attorneys are highly trained in this little known payroll tax refund program. They've already returned a billion dollars to businesses and they can help you as well. They do all the work no charge upfront. Simply share a percentage of the cash that they get for you. Businesses of all types can qualify, including those who took P P P nonprofits, even those who had increases in sales. Just head on over to get refunds.com, click on qualify me, answer a few quick questions. This payroll tax refund, it's only available for a limited amount of time. Do not miss out. Go to get refunds.com. Again, that is get refunds.com, G E T R E F U nds.com until we get started. So now, if you wanna go to college, you got your stuff together, ed. Well in high school, you wanna go to college, all your students don't loan debt is going to be relieved. They also want you to have your credit card debt relieved. So if you've been spending exorbitant amounts of cash on random nonsense, that should be relieved Also because of the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow in the year 2023, again, calendars exist. Folks, we are not living in the year 1964. We are living in the year 2023. I had my 39th birthday on Sunday. I was born in nineteen eighty four, twenty twenty years after the Civil Rights Act. Two decades like a full generation and chose pretty much everybody that we are talking about in San Francisco right now. Black households are more likely to hold costly or riskier debt and are more likely to have outstanding student loan debt. The draft explains when this is combined with lower household incomes, it create inescapable cycle of debt. Eliminating the set gives black households an opportunity to build wealth. So again, the idea is that if you have a bad credit history, we have to wipe away your credit card debt and then we have to give you a low interest loan. And this is what's going to allow you to rise outta poverty. The problem is all of these loans have largely been available to people who have established decent credit over the course of their lifetimes. Why don't the rules apply to people who were born in San Francisco and are black and were born in the same year I was born, say 1984 or well after that? Because apparently you have to be born like as, as long as you were born, according to their recommendations between 1940 and 19 96, 19 96, okay? Which would make you, again, by my calculation, 27 years old. This means that you are now eligible for the kind of thing they're recommending. Board of supervisors, president Aaron Peskin told the San Francisco Chronicle, he hopes the plan is approved. There are so many efforts that result in incredible reports that just end up gathering dust on a shelf. We cannot let this be one of them amazing stuff there from the San Francisco Reparations Committee. Now the the, is this actually going to be effectuated? Of course this is not actually going to happen because the immediate result of this would be to radically increase the cost on San Francisco City government. It would radically increase the taxes. Businesses would flee, San Francisco would turn into a ghost town. You wanna turn cities into Detroit. Detroit was one of the most successful cities in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s. And then racial conflicts, increasing taxes, massive regulation, drove a lot of people who had the means out of the city. And you ended up with a a defacto arena of, of racial separatism, a largely black city where virtually everybody who was white moved out of the interior of the city despite the fact that it had been one of the more integrated cities in the American North and one of the most successful industrialized cities in the American north, particularly for American blacks. Now, all of these policies have precisely the opposite of the consequences that they seek to achieve. But we are having these conversations now because we have to achieve a more equitable world, right? This is the buzzword of the Biden administration, and this has been the buzzword of Democrats going all the way back to Lyndon Banes Johnson in the 1960s, and it has been a complete fail. So here yesterday was the incompetent and horrifically untalented vice president of the United States, Kamala Harris, who lives in a country so racist that she's vice president of the United States, specifically because she was picked by affirmative action lottery by Joe Biden to be the vice president of the United States. If she were a white lady that she would not be vice president of the United States, she would just be a less talented Amy Klobuchar. So here is Kamala Harris talking up a more equitable world. Hey everyone. Today we honor the legacy of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King was a prophet. He saw the future as it could be, a future of equity, justice, and opportunity for all. Freedom is never really one. You earn it and you win it in every generation. So let us all commit to continue the fight for justice for our generation and for generations to come. And what is she talking about? She of course is talking about vast Bevs of government spending. Sunny hostin on the view made it clear she said that on Martin Luther King, we should remember that the country was built on the backs of black people for free. So we need to talk about racial reparations. Now, if we're gonna talk about the history of discrimination and people who have been victimized in the American project, that list is very, very long. And of course, black Americans historically are at the top of the list. Also included in the list would be Asian Americans who are exploited to build the railroads, for example, or Latino Americans who were used for extraordinarily cheap labor in the 1920s, thirties, forties and fifties. And there, there are a lot of people who'd been victimized in the history of the United States. But the amazing thing about the United States is that everybody has the chance to rise in the modern era. This is the difference. The difference between the United States and every place else is not the evils that existed in the United States that have existed every place else. The difference between the United States and every place else is the good that exists in the United States that does not exist nearly any place else. In any case here is Sunny Hostin making the claim that we needed racial reparations for people who were not slaves from people who were never slave holders. He was deeply invested in economic equality and he was deeply invested in making sure that black people got reparations and that there was wealth distribution redistribution. And that's the one area when we talk about diversity, and we talk about inclusion and we talk about equity, people are real comfortable lately with diversity. They're real comfortable with inclusion. But when you ask them about giving us some reparations, because this country was built on the backs of black people for free, no one wants to talk about that. And that was really a big part of his dream and his legacy. And the liberal white ladies who watched the viewer all clapping in the background because it makes them feel good to talk about this sort of stuff, never paying attention to the fact that we actually have tried massive wealth redistribution in this country. And in terms of healing the racial wealth gap, it has been utterly insufficient. It has not worked. So LBJ back in 1965, gave a very famous speech at Howard University. It was a commencement address at Howard University in which he explained that negative freedom was not enough. That basically getting rid of segregation, making it illegal was not enough. That creating an even playing field for people was not enough because after all, the legacy of racial oppression meant that the government now had to play favorites and actually reverse discriminate in order to redress the problems of history. Now, you could make that case certainly in 1965, there's a case to be made because the people who are the direct victims of Jim Crow were alive. Well, and Jim Crow was in operation. So sure you can make that case in 1965, very difficult to make the case in 2023. And all of that puts aside, forget the moral case for a second. The utter in effect, inefficacy and failure of the regime, the regimen of, of racial reparations that were put into place by the war on poverty under lbj. So here's what LBJ said at the time. He said, it's not enough to just open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates. You do not take a person who for years has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say you are free to compete with all the others and still justly believe that you have been completely fair. Okay? I mean that that, again, that's a fair enough point. But after 60 years of extraordinary efforts by the federal and state governments of the United States to redress poverty, largely directed toward minority communities, as LBJ openly discussed, I mean, this was a commencement speech at Howard University. Has it been a failure or has it been a success? The answer is it has been a gigantic failure. Now, the way that you can tell it's been a gigantic failure is because one thing that actually has happened is that the income gap in the United States, despite all of the talk about how income inequality is still the dominant factor in American life, that actually is not true. Income inequality has actually become significantly better in the United States. Why? Because of the reparations, meaning all of the poverty, reparations, all of these sort of redistribution has actually alleviated much of the income gap in the United States. Whenever you see these gigantic stories about how the income inequality persists and the the gap between the top and bottom households is 17 to one, that's not actually true. If you include taxes from the top and you include subsidies to the bottom in the form of welfare, in the form of food stamps, in the form of housing subsidies, and all the rest, the 2017 income gap actually shrinks from 17 to one to about four to one. The government likes to play this little game where they point out that the income gap in terms of private income has not actually alleviated between black and white. And that's true. What has happened is that all of the racial redistribution that has been happening has alleviated the income gap post taxes and post benefits. Okay? But the problem is that doesn't actually heal the underlying problem, right? Cause the underlying problem that everybody wants to get to is the income gap. Without all of that, without the taxes and without the government subsidization, why hasn't that been healed? And the answer there is that when you incentivize people to make bad decisions, they continue to make bad decisions. The income that is gained through welfare, social safety, net benefits, all of the stuff that's subsidized by the federal and state governments, that does not actually translate into healing the wealth gap because all wealth is is accrual of income over time. Wealth happens when you save your income and when you invest your income and when you turn it into a home, for example. And then when you take the income from, from your your job, you pay your mortgage and pay off your home, and then you take the extra income, you buy a second home and you rent it out, right? This is how you actually achieve wealth in the United States. Well, we, we've done an extraordinary amount to alleviate poverty directed at alleviating racial historical gaps. And what we have done is we have alleviated some of the income gap, but we've done very little to alleviate the wealth gap. The wealth gap is essentially the same as it was in 1960. Before any of this starts, the Washington Post acknowledges as much, right? If you actually look at the racial wealth gap in the United States in in 1960, black households and white households is much smaller. The the wealth gap in 1960 than it is today, as of about 2000 and and 20 white households were worth $149,000 on average in 2016, black households were worth $13,000 in 2016. That is a far larger gap than existed at the beginning of the so-called war on poverty. Why? Because it turns out that when you expend extraordinary amounts of federal money and you do so not only in inefficient ways, but without really tackling the underlying crippling cultural problems that lead to intergenerational poverty, you don't end up alleviating anything. You can throw 5 million at every black citizen of San Francisco, and it is not going to fix the racial wealth gap in San Francisco after about 10 years. The reason being that people make different decisions with their money, people make different life decisions, and the notion that this is just a problem of Marxist redistribution is a lie. It's not true. There's a good piece by Louis Andrews from 2020 over at the American Conservative talking about the failure of the sort of reparations ideal here. He says one critical fact that is always ignored whenever the issues of reparations resurfaces, namely that any financial financially expressible amends the country might owe its black citizens was made long ago. In January, 1964, president Lyndon Johnson declared an unconditional war on poverty in America By 2015, it had cost the nation more than 22 trillion, 22 trillion or three times what we previously spent on all shooting wars. In the years at Sins President Johnson's address in 1965 at Howard University, the poverty rate for African Americans has followed a few points in good times, risen a few points in bad on average remained essentially unchanged. Today, 26% of blacks age 25 and older have a bachelor's degree compared with the national average of 36%. And the failure of Johnson's attempt to make up for the unfair historical treatment of American blacks was not an indicator of whether sufficient money had been raised for that purpose only of how effectively it was spent. Villains at that time were not the taxpayers of every color who allowed themselves as well as their children and grandchildren to be put on the hook for reparations. The blame properly falls on the four groups of intermediaries most involved in shaping the war on poverty. The first of those groups was the politicians, policymakers, and bureaucrats who channeled those anti-poverty funds into a complex administrative overlay involving a hundred programs, which ended up benefiting themselves far more than poor black Americans feeding the horses to feed the sparrows. As Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan sarcastically described it at the time. The second group was self-serving. Intermediaries consisted of all the university social scientists who prospered during the sixties and seventies by producing thick reports and demonstration projects to confirm whatever their government sponsors wanted to hear. As John f Hogan's documents in his 2017 history of Federal Entitlement programs, the high cost of good intentions, all the seemingly scientific studies at that time, which purported to show how expanding welfare programs would make black Americans more independent were consistently wrong. There was in fact precious little evidence to support the contention that social welfare services would prevent welfare dependency or help existing recipients achieve self-sufficiency. The third group to siphon off America's slavery reparations were the opportunistic attorneys unintentionally empowered by the centerpiece of President Johnson's war on poverty. The 1964 Economic Opportunity Act written to financially incentivize urban and rural minorities to form community action groups, which in turn could help local welfare recipients become social sufficient, self-sufficient, while as soon exploited by legal services lawyers and related professionals to do the very opposite, sue the government for even more dependency, creating benefits. And this is why you saw a bunch of sort of community activist organizations that were rent seeking from local, state, and federal governments. All of this created the new nonprofits of the mercy of the fourth self-serving intermediary local public employee unions, which especially in blue states, could influence how much the legislature annually donated to various charities. The result was that policies like school choice extremely popular with black families were rarely endorsed by any state funded or union subsidized groups supposedly set up to look out for blacks At the same time, civil rights groups were expected to back union efforts to keep Washington's war poverty money flowing through local welfare bureaucracies, regardless of any negative effect. All of this happens to be the case, but we're supposed to pretend that that none of it is the case. And then if we just shout about the injustices of life and then throw a fire hoses of money at it, going to solve all of the problems. And that, of course, is not even remotely true. It also is a great evil to call on people who have not sinned to pay people who have not been sinned against by those people. And it also involves violations of liberty in pursuit of, of redressing problems, and in pursuit of utopia to be built there upon. There are a lot of people who are willing to run directly over individual rights. This in includes of course, representative Sheila Jackson, Lee of Texas, who yesterday introduced a house Bill Criminalizing Conspiracy to commit white supremacy, which would include criticism of non-white people, which influences an individual to commit a hate crime. Now, all of that may sound well and good. It does run directly foul of the First Amendment. White supremacy is not a crime, it's an evil. It is not a crime. There's a difference between an evil and a crime. And if we are now in the business of eviscerating particular viewpoints by the federal government to the tune of criminalizing those viewpoints, that is a far remove from the founding promise of the country and carries its own dangers because the people who are in the political ascendancy today may not be in the political ascendancy tomorrow. They're also victims to this whole new attempt at racial reparations. Those victims obviously have been, have been largely centralized at this point in the Asian community when it comes to colleges, which is why you've seen active discrimination against Asian Americans in our colleges and universities. Very interesting story from the Wall Street Journal about all of that today before the Supreme Court renders its decision on Harvards and the University of North Carolina's use of race preferences and admissions, the justices might take a glance across the Potomac. Northern Virginia today offers a snapshot of how affirmative action intended as a benevolent effort to prevent discrimination has hardened into an ugly war on achievement. The latest fuss was kicked off before Christmas when Oscar Nomani, an India born mom and reporter, wrote a piece for the Manhattan Institute City Journal detailing how her son's Virginia High School never informed him. He'd actually been recognized by the National Merit Scholarship Program. Other students at Thomas Jefferson High School for science and technology known as TJ and regularly ranked America's number one high school, said they had the same experience. So Virginia Attorney General Jason Mayes launched a civil rights investigation on January 4th. Days later, principals at two more Fairfax County high schools, Westfield and Langley admitted they too had failed to inform student award winners. Mayors then expanded his investigation to all Fairfax fan County. No sooner had he done so than neighboring, Loudoun County reported that three of its high schools had delayed at notifying its students. Officials insisted it wasn't intentional. On Friday, for more Fairfax high schools fe up, followed by another on Monday, telling kids that they actually were finalists or semi-finalists. That stuff goes on your college resume. Given that the program leaves notifications to the individual schools, it's possible this was bureaucratic failure, but the context offers a less generous reading. Public education in Fairfax County has become the frontline for an equity agenda that has hardened into a war on achievers who are disproportionately Asian American says a columnist for the Wall Street Journal as a federal judge pointed out in 2022 in a case contesting TJ's new admissions policy, the Fairfax County School Board eliminated the merit based entrance exams to make room for African-American and Hispanic students by reducing the number of Asian Americans. In that sense, it worked. The class admitted before the change was 73% Asian, 3% Hispanic, 1% African-American. After the change, the figures one to 54% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 7% black. The sheriff white students grew actually from 17% to 22%. What makes Asian-American achievements so resented by our equity warriors is that it exposes as false the narrative about an irredeemably racist America where minorities cannot succeed. This progressive disdain for Asian Americans is amplified by a resentment of moms and dads who believe they should have a say in their kids' education. This happens to be exactly correct as William McGrew rights over at the Wall Street Journal. And this is extending into the way that our kids are taught the the, the attempt to use the educational system to cram down this perverse view of American life in which America is deeply evil. And the only way to fix that evil is by racial discrimination. It has entered our classrooms. It is being crammed down on students. You have to target the youngest members of the American community and then indoctrinate them in the idea of intergenerational racial guilt and the necessity of violation of anti-discrimination law, right? This is why, for example, the National Education Association Teachers Union has now created a race-based trauma learning course according to Fox News, the nea, which they major labor union in the educational sphere, they're two big ones. The NEA and the American Federation of Teachers led by the equitable, Randy Winegar, has announced a race-based trauma blended learning course. The course will quote, explore race-based trauma. Its causes and effects and offers research-based tools to address it. According to the NE's Twitter, our students are shouldering the accumulation of inherited racial trauma, such as implicit bias or racism, and can affect young people's ability to learn, make responsible decisions, or maintain healthy relationships. As the nea, it is imperative to recognize the effects of racial trauma in order to restore equity and wellbeing. Again, that word equity, again, you're not responsible for your own decisions. It must be intergenerational racial trauma that has caused you to make a bad decision that Rex your life today. The nea, of course, has a long history of involvement in racial and sexual issues with the organization hosting an annual conference on racial and social justice. Again, these are, this is one of the two big teachers unions in the United States. The a F T is just as far to the left. NEA experts are frequent speakers at South by, which includes seminars like why porn literacy belongs in sex education Without roe, impact on education and workforce and white supremacy and antisemitism on campus. You, you can see the impact of all of this in the classroom itself. Libs of TikTok, which Kaira runs that, that account does an excellent job of exposing the woke indoctrination in our public schools. Yesterday, she posted a video of one teacher bragging about fostering political unrest in her classroom. But today I would like to talk about how I am the political unrest that Cedar City needs. So besides the fact that I did admire hair verbal last night, and I have two visible tattoos, I wrote my pronouns as she up on the board. I was teaching 10th grade and I told this to all my classes. And it wasn't until the last period where someone was like, what's the second pronoun? And so I explained, I was like, I do she any pronouns? I do go by any pronouns. She, he, they, anything. But I am totally okay with you just referring to me as she, But this is fostering of course, the most important thing, political unrest in classrooms. You have teachers across the nation work for the NEA and the A F T who are teaching this crap to children and creating a whole new generation of intergenerational trauma well purporting to alleviate intergenerational trauma. This is also how you end up with Maryland classroom that looks like this. There's a libs of TikTok tweet sent to me by a parent, a classroom in their kids' school in Maryland, homeschool your kids and what is there while blocking windows, a giant Black Lives Matter flag, as well as a pride progress flag hanging from the, hanging from the wall when it comes to your kids' education. So I saw a lot of responses from people on the right too, this sort of stuff. And the, the right seems to think, or at least many members of the right seem to think that the, the best analogy is if you put a cross or the 10 commandments in a classroom, right? The idea being, well, you know, it's a, it's a value neutral space, right? All, all you members on the left, you should at least acknowledge that this is the equivalent of you pushing your brand of religion. And religion is banned in the classroom. We're not allowed to play in your praying in a classroom. We're not allowed to have the 10 Commandments in a classroom. And, and, and thus, you, you should acknowledge that, that your flags, your Black Lives Matter propaganda flag and your pride progress propaganda flag, they, they don't belong in the classroom. There's only one problem with this. Someone is going to win when it comes to teaching values in the classroom and someone is going to lose the, the notion of value neutrality in public schools is nonsense. It has been nonsense for a very long time. There is no value neutrality in America's public school classrooms. There just isn't. Would that it were so, but the NEA and the AFT make sure that that is not in fact the case. Which means that if you wish to actually have your kids taught good values, you need to get active at the school board level. The case that you should be making against the Black Lives Matter flag. And the pride progress flag in the classroom is not that they are the equivalent of the 10 Commandments in the cross, because frankly, they are not. They're not, by the way, even if you put a cross in the classroom that is different from the 10 Commandments. The 10 Commandments is in fact interdenominational Jews, Muslims, and Christians all take very seriously the 10 Commandments. They're the predicate for all moral systems of government in the West. So th this notion that the 10 Commandments is somehow an indoctrination into the religious precepts of Christianity, or an attempt to force you to, to worship in the classroom is obviously a lie. But the, the moral distinction is the one that matters. And people who are conservative should stop trying to aim for the value neutral space when it comes to the classroom. Instead, they should be as parent protecting the values that they wish to see their kids learn. If value neutrality is the best that we can come to, if the left will agree to value neutrality, fine and good. But guess what? It ain't gonna happen. The left purports that secular religious practice is superior. That's why they are doing it. They're not doing it because they believe that secularism is the, is the way of the world and that religion is false or any of that. What they believe is that they are doing an active good. They're doing an active good by promulgating their point of view. The right needs to start arguing that their point of view is good because the responses to Black Lives Matter flags and pride progress flags in the classroom is not no flags in the classroom. It is in fact the 10 commands. No idolatry. Idolatry is bad. No tribal sectarianism, it's bad. No notion of sexual identity as the core of human living. It's bad. It's not something you should be taught to. Kids parents had better get aggressive on this or they're going to lose. Certainly the left has been aggressive on this. And how aggressively does the left use our public schools? So Lori Lightfoot, the, the awful mayor of Chicago, she apparently attempted to recruit Chicago public school students to help with her own reelection. She offered them extra credit. So she was asked about this the other day, like, how is it that you are able to go into public schools and offer extra credit to students for working for your campaign? It's just amazing, amazing stuff. Here is Lori Lightfoot, the terrible mayor of Chicago. Mayor Lightfoot, I gotta get you on one controversial thing before we let you go. Your campaign reelection campaign is under investigation after being accused of trying to recruit Chicago public school students to help you get reelected. What's your response to this story? The out of N B C news? Look in our z in, in our zeal to make sure that young people had an opportunity to participate in air flocking to our campaign. One of our staffers reached out through publicly available information to CPS teachers and our city colleges, and that was just simply a mistake. Oh, oops. It was just a oopsie, it was Oopsy. It says it's not an oopsie in the nea in the a f t, they work with politicians like Lori Lightfoot. It is all part of a giant machine. The NEA and the aft get paid by politicians like Lori Lightfoot, and they get funded by politicians like Lori Lightfoot, and then they all use that power to indoctrinate your kids, which is why as Lancey Zumi writes over the New York Post, the critical race theory debate is turning parents into unlikely activist quote, a multidisciplinary education philosophy. The places race at the center of American history and culture c r t is akin to racial Marxism with whites viewed as oppressors and non-whites framed as the oppressed. In the Great Parent Revolt, we profile more than a dozen parent students in grassroot. Leaders who have courageously fought up and fought, stood up and fought at c r t. One unlikely hero is Gabs Clark, a widowed low-income African-American mother of five children who had been living in a motel in Las Vegas. Her high school-aged son William, was in a local charter school, which required a course called Sociology of Change. According to Clark, a course included an assignment that asked students to list your identities, your erase, your gender, your sexual orientation, your religion. William whose mixed race with blonde hair and blue eyes refused to complete the assignment and was given a failing grade for the class, which kept him from graduating. According to Clark, because of his fair complexion, the class viewed her son as a dirty, filthy oppressor. Clark filed a federal lawsuit charging the School of violating William's First Amendment, free speech rights, 14th Amendment equal protection rights and federal anti-discrimination rights for compelling him to complete the race based assignment. The case has sins been settled out of court, and this sort of stuff is going to happen more and more commonly because parents are going to stand up because if they don't, they're going to lose their kids to this perverse worldview, which is n It's not only immoral, it's wildly ineffective in achieving even its stated goals. Now, this is the sort of stuff that should theoretically make Democrats more unpopular, but because Democrats were not in fact punished for their radicalism since 2020, since the Black Lives Matter riots have mid 2020, they've not been punished for the sexual indoctrination of children. They, they've not been punished for any of this, right? They avoided the guillotine in 2020 and then they in 2020, and then they also avoided the guillotine in 2022. So that means that Joe Biden is, is going strong on this. He's moving harshly to his left, at least in terms of his rhetoric on a wide variety of issues. We'll see how he, how this pays off for him. It's a bold strategy cotton, we'll get to that in just a moment. First, bad news for you, you will die. I know I've been in that mindset recently. I had a birthday and it gets you in a, in a document, but it reminded me that life insurance is a necessity and it should be a necessity for you as well because you have a family to support and God forbid something happens to you, you're hit by a following airplane or something, you need to make sure that your family is taken care of. This is why you need life insurance and policy genius can help you out. Life insurance through your workplace might not offer enough protection for your family needs. It's not gonna follow you if you leave your job. Since life insurance typically gets more expensive as you age, now would be the time to buy. Policy Genius gives you a smarter way to find and buy the right coverage for you and your family. Policy Genius was built to modernize the life insurance industry. Their technology makes it easy to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and find your lowest price. With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just 17 bucks per month for 500 grand. In coverage. Policy, geniuses, licensed agents can help you find coverage options and as little as a week, there are no added fees. Your personal information is private. No wonder they have thousands of five star reviews on Google and Trust Pilot, your loved ones deserve a financial safety net and you deserve a smarter way to find and buy it. Head on over to policygenius.com/shapiro or click link in the description, get your free life insurance quotes, see how much you could save today. Again, go to policygenius.com/shapiro to get started. That is policygenius.com/shapiro. Well, folks, Friday was the anniversary of one of the greatest moments in daily wire history. After months of us leading the legal battle against the federal government and a national Do Not Comply campaign, the Supreme Court ruled in our favor and blocked the Biden administration's outrageous and ridiculous vaccine mandate. That mandate would've set a dangerous precedent giving unelected OSHA bureaucrats power over the personal medical decisions of American citizens. The Supreme Court recognized it was a gross power grab. They made the right decision. We are proud to have led the charge in this fight. We were the first major company in the United States of file lawsuit against the Biden administration and their garbage OSHA VAC mandate. Thousands of you joined the Daily Wire. Over a million Americans signed our petition against the mandates to celebrate. We're offering 40% off our annual memberships with the code do not comply. Listen at this company, there are a wide variety of views on vaccines, but there's one thing, there was no argument about forcing other people to take an experimental vaccine that had not been proven out was a mistake. And the attempt by the federal government to push that was garbage and tyranny. So help us celebrate one of the greatest moments in daily wire history with 40% off on your annual membership. Join now at daily wire.com/subscribe. Join the winning team as we continue to crush the left. Remember, do not comply for 40% off. Do not comply is the code. Alrighty? So meanwhile, while the, while the left sort of reifies its radical bonafide ease in the aftermath of the 2022 election, Joe Biden is no exception. He was out there giving speeches yesterday on civil rights and he talked about being woke and he said, I'm not woke. I'm just honest. Well, no, you, you are woke and by necessity, dishonest. This is him speaking apparently at the National Action Network, which is Al sharpens grift group To make Juneteenth the first new federal holiday since the establishment of Dr. The idea, if we can hold a second here, the idea that we're supposed to remain silent on the, on, on, on the abuses of the past as they didn't, as if they didn't occur, that's not being woke, that's being honest. That's talking about history. Well, folks, well, we have a lot of unfinished work to do though. A lot of unfinished work. Oh, well, it's, it's always unfinished work. It's not being, it's not being woke, it's being honest to suggest that we need some form of additional government interventionism, more government spending, more racial reparations. I urge the Democrats to run on this in a time of economic turmoil. We're about to see a recession breakout in the United States like a real recession breakout in the United States. Most economists are foreseeing that at this point earnings are way, way, way down at a variety of companies. So I urge President Biden to run on redistribution of income and massive welfare payment and transfer payment. That'll be fascinating and to say that's being honest, not being woke. But he, he wasn't stopping there for some odd reason, he decided to go sort of into his litany of giant government programs, which is a, a strange thing to do. But he didn't stop him. So he, he gave his usual shtick about how he wants to ban AR 15 and particularly how you don't need an AR 15 because he will just blow you up with an F 15, which is not, I think the, like if you're encouraging me to give up my gun to resist government tyranny and your argument is I could just nuke your house. You are not actively achieving what you seek to achieve with this particular argument. I am am going to get assault weapons banned. I did it once. I'm gonna do it again. There's no, you're not Social Redeeming value. Deer aren't wearing Kevlar vests out there. What the hell? You need a assault. No, I'm serious. Gimme a, if you need to work about taking on the federal cover, you need some F fifteens. You don't need an R ar 15. I'm serious. Think about it Anyway, think about how, think about you don't, you don't need it. And I could just, I could just use a Moab mother of all box, just drop it on your house and kill your children. You don't need AR 15 to defend against me. I'm a nice old man who's threatening you with a nuclear arsenal. Yes, this is, this is the way, by the way, Joe Biden, he could have tried to ban assault weapons. I noticed that he had control of the Senate as well as the house about five minutes ago. He did not achieve it. So no, he's not going to ban on assault weapons in the United States. Not just that. Joe Biden also wants more IRS agents. We need more IRS agents. Guys, I know that this is something that you're all enthusiastic about. I, I don't know about you. I love the irs. The IRS is great. And what we need is more IRS agents who are combing through your old restaurant deductions and trying to figure out whether or not you cheated on your taxes to the tune of 1299. We really have to find out whether that burger was at a business lunch or whether you're just kind of jobbing the system. Here is Joe Biden talking about how we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to hire 87,000 new IRS members, many of whom will in fact be agents despite their lies. You know, all these new IRS agents we have is because they fired a lot of them and a lot of retiring. And guess what? Who needs serious agents to know what they're doing and not doing? The billionaires, the multi multimillionaires? Hmm. Yeah. No, it's, they're only, he, he keeps saying they're just gonna audit the very, very rich people. That is not true. One of the great lies that Democrats like to tell is that there are enough rich people in the United States to pay for all of the kind of programs that Joe Biden wants to pay for. And the answer is that no, there aren't, there are not. In order for you to achieve the kind of spending and the kind of utopian redistribution of schemes that, that Joe Biden wants, you have to have scandanavian style tax programs. The only person in American politics is actually honest about this is Bernie Sanders, which is why he's a fringe old cook from Vermont, because Bernie at least has the stones to say <unk> $60,000, 70%. That's just the way it's going to go. And you'll have one type of bread at the store. I do need seven types of bread. You don't need rye. Rye is bud <unk> You need white bread, maybe a little. So, nope, nope. We do not have money for SA though, so like, at least Bernie is honest, but Democrats are, are just like, like Biden are just dishonest. We need IRS agents that they can audit the very rich people. So the very, very rich people campaign for these programs. That's a lie. It's not gonna be the very rich people paying for the programs. You will pay for the programs through higher inflation rates. You'll pay through the pro for the programs through lower economic growth or through higher taxes, right? These are, that's just the way that this is going to go. Joe Biden then claimed that Republicans are fiscally demented. I mean, if there's one person who should know dementia, it's Joe Biden. So I suppose this makes some sense. Here we go. I reduced the deficit last year, 350 billion, and this year federal deficit is down 1 trillion plus dollars. Hear me? That's a fact. And there's gonna be hundreds of billions reduced over the next decade. But so what? These guys are the fiscally, you know, they're fiscally demented. I think they don't, they don't quite get it Demented. Kind of like me when I, when I look at my Cheerios in the morning and I, and I see words, I said one long, long word. It says, Ooh, every time I look at my ch ooh said all the letters in my Cheerios spell dementia. It's the thing. I'm not kidding guys. Just, just to make clear that I'm not just making fun of Joe Biden for being all, I'm also making fun of him for being demented. Here. Here is Joe Biden flubbing over and over yesterday. This is on this on Hello? Hello, hello, hello. No ho. Okay Ho Also he, he forgot who he was singing Happy birthday to yesterday also. So it went, it went amazing. It went. Things are going great guys. Well look, my wife has a rule in her family on somebody's birthday sing, happy Birthday. You ready? Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday dear. Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday dear, dear. Yeah, but Herman is Salad stuff there from the, but, but at least he has a world beating agenda. It is amazing the attempt to transform this dottering old fool into one of the world's great presidents. And people are actually attempting to do this. They really are. We'll see how that works out for them. It is again, a, a bold plan. Speaking of bold plans, there was an amazing clip of Sam Harris making the rounds yesterday. Sam has gone off the rails in the past several years. He was basically driven over the edge by the election of Donald Trump in 2016. And Sam Harris was, who's been a, a famous advocate in favor of everything from lockdowns to mask mana mandates with regard to vaccines and, and mask masking regiments and, and all the rest. Yesterday he was trying to make the case that covid that that we, we wouldn't have any VA skepticism if Covid had been killing more kids. We wouldn't have had any, any vax skepticism if, if, if we wouldn't have mask skepticism, if it had been killing more kids or if the death rate were higher. Oh, you mean if the conditions were different, we might have different viewpoints. You mean why, why no, you shock me sir. Here, here's Sam Harris, though, unwilling to walk back his own positions on, for example, should there be VA mandates based on the science instead creating bizarre hypotheticals in which the vaccines were in fact doing the things they promised to do. If kids were dying by the hundreds of thousands from, from Covid at a rate of whatever it was, you know, 1% say, but it was pretty much all kids. We, we would've had a very different experience. Let's say the vaccines really did block transmission, but then nothing else was, you know, all of the other SGAs about how, you know, untested they are and how dangerous they yet might be and the spike protein and blah, blah, blah. The co the conspiracy thinking, the platforming of people who were obviously unwell and unbalanced professionally and mentally arou around vaccines and their skepticism, the patients for that would've been non-existent. So in other words, if in fact this disease had been something completely different and the vaccines had been something completely different, then we might have treated it differently. Well, yes, that's, that's sort of the point. But the point now is that it's clear that the vaccines did not do what they had promised to do, namely stop or slow transmission in any serious way. It is now clear, and it was very clear at the very beginning that this thing was not killing kids. That it was predominantly killing the very elderly, which meant that you could shield and protect those people while allowing everybody else to go about their lives, which was actually the preferred policy of this show and the preferred policy throughout the pandemic of people like J Aria at Stanford University. The fact that there's so many people who, who have to uphold the idea that they were right all along, and if only you squint bizarrely through sort of a cracked glass, then you come up with the proper solution, which is that they were right guys. Maybe it is that you, that what you promised just did not materialize because the facts were not on your side, and so your hypotheticals are of no consequence whatsoever. Speaking of which, by the way, brand new study out from the Wall Street Journal, and you know what it says? It says, I know we weren't allowed to say this during the pandemic, if you're less fat, you died less often of covid. I know this is shocking. It is a shocking circumstance. People who exercise regularly had lower rates of hospitalization and death from Covid 19. In a study published recently in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, regular exercise improves overall health and healthier people generally have fewer serious complications with Covid 19 earlier, research has shown in association between exercise and better covid 19 outcomes. This latest study goes a step further and suggests that even people whose age and or health conditions make them higher risk have better outcomes If they're regular exercisers, you don't say you don't, you mean healthier people died less often. That that is, that is crazy talk. By the way, everyone knew this. My parents were both 64 when this thing broke out and my dad, he felt like he wanted to drop some pounds specifically so he would not be in a higher risk group in terms of his weight. And so he started exercising a lot more regularly. This was a smart move by my father. A lot of other people should have done this. Joe Rogan was encouraging this, and then people laughed at him, how dare you say that exercise is a cure for disease. Joe never said that exercise is cure for disease. He said that exercise is a great way of preventing you from getting a serious version of the disease because your body is less vulnerable. But this was considered verboten, right? We had to shut down all the gyms because if you go to the gym, you might get infected with covid as opposed to if you go to the gym, you might exercise and then be less vulnerable to Covid because you're not a fatso, by the way. It is. It is really incredible. How much of the left wing viewpoint with regard to health policy is predicated on ignoring the fact that America is an enormously fat country. So much of our healthcare policy is predicated on just pretending that America is not fat and that we don't have horrible eating habits. We are fat. We have horrible eating habits here in the United States. So for example, the entire push for nationalized healthcare along the lines of Finland or Sweden or Norway, you wanna know one reason why they have better health outcomes over there. It's because they aren't as fat as we are. 40% of America is at least in the seriously overweight to obese category. That is why people are dying at outsized rates in the United States. If you go into young, healthy communities, so you're comparing apples to apples with other countries that have better health outcomes, what you'll find is that America actually has excellent health outcomes. In other words, Swedes in the United States are very healthy. In fact, they probably have just as high lifetime expectations, maybe higher than they would in Sweden. You cannot compare populations without recom, without recognizing that the populations may be different in their health habits, maybe different in their genetics. It it's, it is a simple fact that there are certain diseases that attack certain populations at a differential rate. So not comparing apples to apples is a huge mistake with all of this. But again, so much of our public policy is rooted in the idea that if you notice differences between people, this is in and of itself, racists, inequitable problematic, and that makes for a horrible public policy. Whether you're talking about health or you're talking about slavery, reparations, whether you're talking about any of this stuff, the differences in people's habits, the differences in what people do, the differences in the choices people make, those are the predominant factors in how their life goes. And attempting to cure all of that. With broad public policy mandates, redistributionist measures, it is bound to fail. Alrighty, guys, the rest of the show is continuing. Now. You're not going to want to miss it. We are going to get to disaster breaking out in terms of the Chinese economy. Their population is actively declining at this point. Is that the future of the United States as well? If you're not a member, become a member. Use Code Shapiro. Check out for two months free on all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep battle racial reparation publish rss feed m democrats reinvigorate debate racial reparation black americans joe biden talk radical agenda unable sing happy birthday examine fight wake classroom m ben shapiro ben shapiro folk yesterday m l k day excuse people left start talk racial reparation san francisco apparently consider regime racial reparation san franciscos reparations committee propose million payment black longtime resident total debt forgiveness like debt base m unaware anybody s alive today slave united states probably find m unaware member san francisco tax pay community slave holder point life life parent life grandparent stop san francisco talk race reparation accord fox news san franciscos reparations committee propose pay black longtime resident million public california free state originally admit union grant total debt forgiveness decade systemic repression face local black community san francisco africanamerican reparations advisory committee advise city develop plan reparation black resident release draft report month address reparation slavery address public policy explicitly create subjugate black people san francisco uphold expand intent legacy channel slavery presumably policy example redlining despite fact illegal united states redlin late despite fact federal government state government california subsidize black home ownership decade end despite fact public policy united states heavily tilt favor discriminatory action behalf black americans affirmative action move not matter draft say san francisco california adopt institution channel slavery tenant segregation white supremacy system systematic repression exclusion black people codify legal extra legal action social code judicial enforcement draft plan include long list financial recommendation black san francisco resident include onetime lump sum payment million eligible individual ll notice vaguery language yeah not actually slavery tenet segregation jim crow law california far m aware reserve exclusively southern united states informal regime racism california certainly question mean legal action government california order uphold d actually look specific law individual person impact specific law s moral right talk reparation discuss s sin sin actually sin policy promulgate actually wish pay reparation seriously talk repair damage ask damage ask secondary question moment design work ill design remedy specifically talk right people predominantly san francisco bear post civil right era talk san francisco people bear year right people year old right year vast racial discrimination way san francisco problem public policy san francisco year year long go lump sum payment compensate affected population decade harm ve experience redress economic opportunity loss black san franciscan endure collectively result intentional decision unintended harm perpetuate city policy accord draft statement suppose reparation unintended harm public policy accidentally harm black folk go redress giant bag cash presumably accord san francisco committee s go to kind problem turn virtually democratic policy major american city year harm black americans disproportionately presume accidentally pay reparation bad policy go to pay reparation bad policing policy disproportionately harm black americans major american city course year s go work eligible program applicant year old identify black african american public document year prove additional criterion choose list includes bear san francisco proof residency san francisco year personally direct descendant incarcerate fail war drug go pay reparation parent go jail drug deal aspect america accord woke leave impact legacy slavery jim crow include criminal violation sell cocaine minor go jail child person deserve reparation fail war drug plan call city supplement low income recipient income reflect area median income grand annually year year okay racial disparity metric lead significant racial wealth gap city san francisco argue elevate income match m black people well afford housing achieve well quality life plan seek establish comprehensive debt forgiveness program clear eligible person student housing loan credit card debt et cetera mourn second tired government play game saving retirement plan need touch expert birch gold today year gold withstand inflation geopolitical turmoil stock market crash gold tax shelter retirement account birch gold make easy convert ira ira precious metal text ben claim free information kit gold talk precious metal specialist purchase bch gold january ll sign copy book destroy america easy step like biden administration playbook day plus rating well business bureau thousand happy customer countless star review trust birch gold help protect saving buy gold tired money impact decision people federal reserve treasury department wanna like text ben claim free information kick sign copy book today s ben today ask question feel comfortable start invest friend birch gold text ben start today speak economy economy night edge right economist expect recession near future blow business here thing possible course past year actually spend money taxis claw money friend innovation refund business employee manage survive covid eligible receive payroll tax rebate employee not s payback refund taxis challenge hand cut red tape business refund money refundscom team tax attorney highly train little known payroll tax refund program ve return billion dollar business help work charge upfront simply share percentage cash business type qualify include take p p p nonprofit increase sale head refundscom click qualify answer quick question payroll tax refund available limited time miss refundscom refundscom g e t r e f u ndscom start wanna college get stuff ed high school wanna college student not loan debt go relieve want credit card debt relieve ve spend exorbitant amount cash random nonsense relieve legacy slavery jim crow year calendar exist folk live year live year birthday sunday bear nineteen eighty year civil right act decade like generation choose pretty everybody talk san francisco right black household likely hold costly risky debt likely outstanding student loan debt draft explain combine low household income create inescapable cycle debt eliminate set give black household opportunity build wealth idea bad credit history wipe away credit card debt low interest loan s go allow rise outta poverty problem loan largely available people establish decent credit course lifetime not rule apply people bear san francisco black bear year bear apparently bear like long bear accord recommendation okay calculation year old mean eligible kind thing recommend board supervisor president aaron peskin tell san francisco chronicle hope plan approve effort result incredible report end gather dust shelf let amazing stuff san francisco reparations committee actually go effectuate course actually go happen immediate result radically increase cost san francisco city government radically increase taxis business flee san francisco turn ghost town wanna turn city detroit detroit successful city united states racial conflict increase taxis massive regulation drive lot people mean city end defacto arena racial separatism largely black city virtually everybody white move interior city despite fact integrate city american north successful industrialized city american north particularly american black policy precisely opposite consequence seek achieve have conversation achieve equitable world right buzzword biden administration buzzword democrats go way lyndon bane johnson complete fail yesterday incompetent horrifically untalente vice president united states kamala harris live country racist s vice president united states specifically pick affirmative action lottery joe biden vice president united states white lady vice president united states talented amy klobuchar kamala harris talk equitable world hey today honor legacy reverend dr martin luther king jr dr king prophet see future future equity justice opportunity freedom earn win generation let commit continue fight justice generation generation come talk course talk vast bevs government spend sunny hostin view clear say martin luther king remember country build back black people free need talk racial reparation go to talk history discrimination people victimize american project list long course black americans historically list include list asian americans exploit build railroad example latino americans extraordinarily cheap labor thirty forty fifty lot people d victimize history united states amazing thing united states everybody chance rise modern era difference difference united states place evil exist united states exist place difference united states place good exist united states exist nearly place case sunny hostin make claim need racial reparation people slave people slave holder deeply invest economic equality deeply invest make sure black people get reparation wealth distribution redistribution s area talk diversity talk inclusion talk equity people real comfortable lately diversity real comfortable inclusion ask give reparation country build back black people free want talk big dream legacy liberal white lady watch viewer clapping background make feel good talk sort stuff pay attention fact actually try massive wealth redistribution country term heal racial wealth gap utterly insufficient work lbj give famous speech howard university commencement address howard university explain negative freedom basically getting rid segregation make illegal create playing field people legacy racial oppression mean government play favorite actually reverse discriminate order redress problem history case certainly s case people direct victim jim crow alive jim crow operation sure case difficult case put aside forget moral case second utter effect inefficacy failure regime regiman racial reparation place war poverty lbj here lbj say time say open gate opportunity citizen ability walk gate person year hobble chain liberate bring starting line race free compete justly believe completely fair okay mean s fair point year extraordinary effort federal state government united states redress poverty largely direct minority community lbj openly discuss mean commencement speech howard university failure success answer gigantic failure way tell gigantic failure thing actually happen income gap united states despite talk income inequality dominant factor american life actually true income inequality actually significantly well united states reparation mean poverty reparation sort redistribution actually alleviate income gap united states gigantic story income inequality persist gap household s actually true include taxis include subsidy form welfare form food stamp form housing subsidy rest income gap actually shrink government like play little game point income gap term private income actually alleviate black white s true happen racial redistribution happen alleviate income gap post taxis post benefit okay problem not actually heal underlie problem right cause underlying problem everybody want income gap taxis government subsidization not heal answer incentivize people bad decision continue bad decision income gain welfare social safety net benefit stuff s subsidize federal state government actually translate heal wealth gap wealth accrual income time wealth happen save income invest income turn home example income job pay mortgage pay home extra income buy second home rent right actually achieve wealth united states ve extraordinary alleviate poverty direct alleviate racial historical gap alleviate income gap ve little alleviate wealth gap wealth gap essentially start washington post acknowledge right actually look racial wealth gap united states black household white household small wealth gap today white household worth average black household worth far large gap exist beginning socalled war poverty turn expend extraordinary amount federal money inefficient way tackle underlie crippling cultural problem lead intergenerational poverty not end alleviate throw million black citizen san francisco go fix racial wealth gap san francisco year reason people different decision money people different life decision notion problem marxist redistribution lie true s good piece louis andrew american conservative talk failure sort reparation ideal say critical fact ignore issue reparation resurface financial financially expressible amend country owe black citizen long ago january president lyndon johnson declare unconditional war poverty america cost nation trillion trillion time previously spend shooting war year sin president johnson address howard university poverty rate african americans follow point good time rise point bad average remain essentially unchanged today black age old bachelor degree compare national average failure johnson attempt unfair historical treatment american black indicator sufficient money raise purpose effectively spend villain time taxpayer color allow child grandchild hook reparation blame properly fall group intermediary involve shape war poverty group politician policymaker bureaucrat channel antipoverty fund complex administrative overlay involve program end benefit far poor black americans feed horse feed sparrow senator daniel patrick moynihan sarcastically describe time second group selfserve intermediary consist university social scientist prosper sixty seventy produce thick report demonstration project confirm government sponsor want hear john f hogan document history federal entitlement program high cost good intention seemingly scientific study time purport expand welfare program black americans independent consistently wrong fact precious little evidence support contention social welfare service prevent welfare dependency help exist recipient achieve selfsufficiency group siphon america slavery reparation opportunistic attorney unintentionally empower centerpiece president johnsons war poverty economic opportunity act write financially incentivize urban rural minority form community action group turn help local welfare recipient social sufficient selfsufficient soon exploit legal service lawyer related professional opposite sue government dependency create benefit see bunch sort community activist organization rent seek local state federal government create new nonprofit mercy fourth selfserve intermediary local public employee union especially blue state influence legislature annually donate charity result policy like school choice extremely popular black family rarely endorse state fund union subsidize group supposedly set look black time civil right group expect union effort washington war poverty money flow local welfare bureaucracy regardless negative effect happen case suppose pretend case shout injustice life throw fire hose money go solve problem course remotely true great evil people sin pay people sin people involve violation liberty pursuit redress problem pursuit utopia build lot people willing run directly individual right include course representative sheila jackson lee texas yesterday introduce house bill criminalize conspiracy commit white supremacy include criticism nonwhite people influence individual commit hate crime sound good run directly foul amendment white supremacy crime evil crime s difference evil crime business eviscerate particular viewpoint federal government tune criminalize viewpoint far remove found promise country carry danger people political ascendancy today political ascendancy tomorrow victim new attempt racial reparation victim obviously largely centralize point asian community come college ve see active discrimination asian americans college university interesting story wall street journal today supreme court render decision harvard university north carolinas use race preference admission justice glance potomac northern virginia today offer snapshot affirmative action intend benevolent effort prevent discrimination harden ugly war achievement late fuss kick christmas oscar nomani india bear mom reporter write piece manhattan institute city journal detail son virginia high school inform d actually recognize national merit scholarship program student thomas jefferson high school science technology know tj regularly rank americas number high school say experience virginia attorney general jason maye launch civil right investigation january day later principal fairfax county high school westfield langley admit fail inform student award winner mayor expand investigation fairfax fan county soon neighboring loudoun county report high school delay notify student official insist not intentional friday fairfax high school fe follow monday tell kid actually finalist semifinalist stuff go college resume give program leave notification individual school possible bureaucratic failure context offer generous read public education fairfax county frontline equity agenda harden war achiever disproportionately asian american say columnist wall street journal federal judge point case contest tjs new admission policy fairfax county school board eliminate merit base entrance exam room africanamerican hispanic student reduce number asian americans sense work class admit change asian hispanic africanamerican change figure asian hispanic black sheriff white student grow actually make asianamerican achievement resent equity warrior expose false narrative irredeemably racist america minority succeed progressive disdain asian americans amplify resentment mom dad believe kid education happen exactly correct william mcgrew right wall street journal extend way kid teach attempt use educational system cram perverse view american life america deeply evil way fix evil racial discrimination enter classroom cram student target young member american community indoctrinate idea intergenerational racial guilt necessity violation antidiscrimination law right example national education association teacher union create racebase trauma learn course accord fox news nea major labor union educational sphere big one nea american federation teacher lead equitable randy winegar announce racebased trauma blend learn course course quote explore racebased trauma cause effect offer researchbase tool address accord ne twitter student shoulder accumulation inherit racial trauma implicit bias racism affect young people ability learn responsible decision maintain healthy relationship nea imperative recognize effect racial trauma order restore equity wellbee word equity responsible decision intergenerational racial trauma cause bad decision rex life today nea course long history involvement racial sexual issue organization host annual conference racial social justice big teacher union united states f t far left nea expert frequent speaker south include seminar like porn literacy belong sex education roe impact education workforce white supremacy antisemitism campus impact classroom lib tiktok kaira run account excellent job expose woke indoctrination public school yesterday post video teacher brag foster political unrest classroom today like talk political unrest cedar city need fact admire hair verbal night visible tattoo write pronoun board teach grade tell class not period like s second pronoun explain like pronoun pronoun totally okay refer foster course important thing political unrest classroom teacher nation work nea f t teach crap child create new generation intergenerational trauma purport alleviate intergenerational trauma end maryland classroom look like s libs tiktok tweet send parent classroom kid school maryland homeschool kid block window giant black life matter flag pride progress flag hang hanging wall come kid education see lot response people right sort stuff right think member right think good analogy cross commandment classroom right idea know value neutral space right member left acknowledge equivalent push brand religion religion ban classroom allow play pray classroom allow commandment classroom acknowledge flag black life matter propaganda flag pride progress propaganda flag not belong classroom s problem go win come teach value classroom go lose notion value neutrality public school nonsense nonsense long time value neutrality americas public school classroom not nea aft sure fact case mean wish actually kid teach good value need active school board level case make black life matter flag pride progress flag classroom equivalent commandment cross frankly way cross classroom different commandment commandment fact interdenominational jews muslim christians seriously commandment predicate moral system government west th notion commandment indoctrination religious precept christianity attempt force worship classroom obviously lie moral distinction matter people conservative stop try aim value neutral space come classroom instead parent protect value wish kid learn value neutrality good come left agree value neutrality fine good guess be not go to happen left purport secular religious practice superior s believe secularism way world religion false believe active good active good promulgate point view right need start argue point view good response black life matter flag pride progress flag classroom flag classroom fact command idolatry idolatry bad tribal sectarianism bad notion sexual identity core human live bad teach kid parent well aggressive go lose certainly left aggressive aggressively left use public school lori lightfoot awful mayor chicago apparently attempt recruit chicago public school student help reelection offer extra credit ask day like able public school offer extra credit student work campaign amazing amazing stuff lori lightfoot terrible mayor chicago mayor lightfoot get to controversial thing let campaign reelection campaign investigation accuse try recruit chicago public school student help reelect s response story n b c news look z zeal sure young people opportunity participate air flock campaign staffer reach publicly available information cp teacher city college simply mistake oh oop oopsie oopsy say oopsie nea f t work politician like lori lightfoot giant machine nea aft pay politician like lori lightfoot fund politician like lori lightfoot use power indoctrinate kid lancey zumi write new york post critical race theory debate turn parent unlikely activist quote multidisciplinary education philosophy place race center american history culture c r t akin racial marxism white view oppressor nonwhite frame oppress great parent revolt profile dozen parent student grassroot leader courageously fight fight stand fight c r t unlikely hero gab clark widow lowincome africanamerican mother child live motel las vegas high schoolaged son william local charter school require course call sociology change accord clark course include assignment ask student list identity erase gender sexual orientation religion william mixed race blonde hair blue eye refuse complete assignment give fail grade class keep graduate accord clark fair complexion class view son dirty filthy oppressor clark file federal lawsuit charge school violate williams amendment free speech right amendment equal protection right federal antidiscrimination right compel complete race base assignment case sin settle court sort stuff go happen commonly parent go stand not go lose kid perverse worldview n immoral wildly ineffective achieve state goal sort stuff theoretically democrats unpopular democrat fact punish radicalism black life matter riot mid ve punish sexual indoctrination child ve punish right avoid guillotine avoid guillotine mean joe biden go strong s move harshly left term rhetoric wide variety issue pay bold strategy cotton moment bad news die know ve mindset recently birthday get document remind life insurance necessity necessity family support god forbid happen hit follow airplane need sure family take care need life insurance policy genius help life insurance workplace offer protection family need go to follow leave job life insurance typically get expensive age time buy policy genius give smart way find buy right coverage family policy genius build modernize life insurance industry technology make easy compare life insurance quote company find low price policy genius find life insurance policy start buck month grand coverage policy genius license agent help find coverage option little week add fee personal information private wonder thousand star review google trust pilot love one deserve financial safety net deserve smart way find buy head policygeniuscomshapiro click link description free life insurance quote save today policygeniuscomshapiro start policygeniuscomshapiro folk friday anniversary great moment daily wire history month lead legal battle federal government national comply campaign supreme court rule favor block biden administration outrageous ridiculous vaccine mandate mandate ve set dangerous precedent give unelecte osha bureaucrat power personal medical decision american citizen supreme court recognize gross power grab right decision proud lead charge fight major company united states file lawsuit biden administration garbage osha vac mandate thousand join daily wire million americans sign petition mandate celebrate offer annual membership code comply listen company wide variety view vaccine s thing argument force people experimental vaccine prove mistake attempt federal government push garbage tyranny help celebrate great moment daily wire history annual membership join daily wirecomsubscribe join win team continue crush left remember comply comply code alrighty left sort reifie radical bonafide ease aftermath election joe biden exception give speech yesterday civil right talk wake say m wake m honest wake necessity dishonest speak apparently national action network al sharpen grift group juneteenth new federal holiday establishment dr idea hold second idea suppose remain silent abuse past not not occur s wake s honest s talk history folk lot unfinished work lot unfinished work oh unfinished work wake honest suggest need form additional government interventionism government spend racial reparation urge democrats run time economic turmoil recession breakout united states like real recession breakout united states economist foresee point earning way way way variety company urge president biden run redistribution income massive welfare payment transfer payment ll fascinating s honest wake not stop odd reason decide sort litany giant government program strange thing not stop give usual shtick want ban ar particularly not need ar blow f think like encourage gun resist government tyranny argument nuke house actively achieve seek achieve particular argument go assault weapon ban m go to s social redeem value deer not wear kevlar vest hell need assault m gimme need work take federal cover need f fifteen not need r ar m think think think not not need use moab mother box drop house kill child not need ar defend m nice old man s threaten nuclear arsenal yes way way joe biden try ban assault weapon notice control senate house minute ago achieve s go ban assault weapon united states joe biden want irs agent need irs agent guy know enthusiastic not know love irs irs great need irs agent comb old restaurant deduction try figure cheat taxis tune find burger business lunch kind job system joe biden talk need spend hundred million dollar hire new irs member fact agent despite lie know new irs agent fire lot lot retire guess need agent know billionaire multi multimillionaire hmm yeah keep say go to audit rich people true great lie democrat like tell rich people united states pay kind program joe biden want pay answer not order achieve kind spending kind utopian redistribution scheme joe biden want scandanavian style tax program person american politic actually honest bernie sander s fringe old cook vermont bernie stone unk s way go ll type bread store need seven type bread not need rye rye bud unk need white bread maybe little nope nope money sa like bernie honest democrat like like biden dishonest need irs agent audit rich people rich people campaign program s lie go to rich people pay program pay program high inflation rate ll pay pro program low economic growth high taxis right s way go joe biden claim republican fiscally demente mean s person know dementia joe biden suppose make sense reduce deficit year billion year federal deficit trillion plus dollar hear s fact s go to hundred billion reduce decade guy fiscally know fiscally demente think not not demente kind like look cheerio morning word say long long word say ooh time look ch ooh say letter cheerio spell dementia thing m kid guy clear m make fun joe biden m make fun demente joe biden flub yesterday hello hello hello hello ho okay ho forget singe happy birthday yesterday go go amazing go thing go great guy look wife rule family somebodys birthday sing happy birthday ready happy birthday happy birthday happy birthday dear happy birthday happy birthday dear dear yeah herman salad stuff world beat agenda amazing attempt transform dottere old fool world great president people actually attempt work bold plan speak bold plan amazing clip sam harris make round yesterday sam go rail past year basically drive edge election donald trump sam harris s famous advocate favor lockdown mask mana mandate regard vaccine mask masking regiment rest yesterday try case covid not va skepticism covid kill kid not vax skepticism not mask skepticism kill kid death rate high oh mean condition different different viewpoint mean shock sir here sam harris unwilling walk position example va mandate base science instead create bizarre hypothetical vaccine fact thing promise kid die hundred thousand covid rate know pretty kid ve different experience let vaccine block transmission know sga know untested dangerous spike protein blah blah blah co conspiracy think platforming people obviously unwell unbalanced professionally mentally arou vaccine skepticism patient ve nonexistent word fact disease completely different vaccine completely different treat differently yes s s sort point point clear vaccine promise stop slow transmission way clear clear beginning thing kill kid predominantly kill elderly mean shield protect people allow everybody life actually preferred policy preferred policy pandemic people like j aria stanford university fact s people uphold idea right squint bizarrely sort crack glass come proper solution right guy maybe promise materialize fact hypothetical consequence whatsoever speak way brand new study wall street journal know say say know not allow pandemic fat die covid know shock shocking circumstance people exercise regularly low rate hospitalization death covid study publish recently american journal preventive medicine regular exercise improve overall health healthy people generally few complication covid early research show association exercise well covid outcome late study go step suggest people age health condition high risk well outcome regular exerciser not not mean healthy people die crazy talk way know parent thing break dad feel like want drop pound specifically high risk group term weight start exercise lot regularly smart father lot people joe rogan encourage people laugh dare exercise cure disease joe say exercise cure disease say exercise great way prevent get version disease body vulnerable consider verboten right shut gym gym infect covid oppose gym exercise vulnerable covid fatso way incredible left wing viewpoint regard health policy predicate ignore fact america enormously fat country healthcare policy predicate pretend america fat not horrible eating habit fat horrible eating habit united states example entire push nationalize healthcare line finland sweden norway wanna know reason well health outcome not fat america seriously overweight obese category people die outsized rate united states young healthy community compare apple apple country well health outcome ll find america actually excellent health outcome word swede united states healthy fact probably high lifetime expectation maybe high sweden compare population recom recognize population different health habit maybe different genetic simple fact certain disease attack certain population differential rate compare apple apple huge mistake public policy root idea notice difference people racist inequitable problematic make horrible public policy talk health talk slavery reparation talk stuff difference people habit difference people difference choice people predominant factor life go attempt cure broad public policy mandate redistributionist measure bind fail alrighty guy rest continue go want miss go disaster break term chinese economy population actively decline point future united states member member use code shapiro check month free annual plan click link description join

Speeches, etc. Q1. Mr. Skinner asked the Prime Minister whether he will set up a committee to examine the abolition of the Honours List. Q6. Mr. Gow asked the Prime Minister what proposals he has to strengthen the Political Honours Scrutiny Committee. The Prime Minister (Mr. James Callaghan) I shall keep all aspects of the honours system under review. But I am not at present satisfied that a committee should be established to review the system, or that additional powers are needed to strengthen the Political Honours Scrutiny Committee. Mr. Skinner Does my right hon. Friend agree that perhaps the most sensible and democratic thing to do would [column 732]be to abolish the Honours system altogether? Does he agree that the last list of the ex-Prime Minister shows that where there is patronage and no accountability it will always be property speculators first and Labour door-knockers last? The Prime Minister The cohesion of our society certainly does not depend upon the Honours system. I do not claim that it is in every way a perfect system, but it is a useful way for society to recognise the contribution that individuals make to our national life. If I may judge from the letters that I receive from hon. Members on both sides of the House making recommendations to me on behalf of others who have performed a service, it is clearly widely recognised as such in the House. I am bound to say that from my own experience it gives a great deal of satisfaction to a great many people who do voluntary service in many ways. As regards the list of my right hon. Friend the Member for Huyton (Sir H. Wilson), it is not the custom of the House to comment on individual awards. However, I recommend that my hon. Friend makes a close study of the list. If he does so, I do not think he will find his strictures justified. Mr. Gow Does the right hon. Gentleman accept that the very criteria that he mentioned—namely, a reward to those to whom reward is due—has been breached in the most shameful fashion by his right hon. Friend the Member for Huyton (Sir H. Wilson)? The Prime Minister No, I do not accept that. I doubt whether many of the people making these accusations have read the whole list. Q2. Mr. Blaker asked the Prime Minister whether the interview given by the Chancellor of the Exchequer on BBC television on the “Money Programme” on Friday 21st May on economic policy represents Government policy. Q3. Mr. Norman Lamont asked the Prime Minister whether the interview by the Chancellor of the Exchequer on BBC Television's “Money Programme” on [column 733]21st May on economic policy represents Government policy. The Prime Minister Yes, Sir. Mr. Blaker How can we expect the world to have confidence in the Chancellor when the Leader of the House and the Secretary of State for Energy have both made it clear in public that they do not regard him as fit to be Treasurer of the Labour Party? The Prime Minister I did not know that they had said such a thing, and the hon. Gentleman is misrepresenting the situation when he puts it in that way. They are entitled to say whom they would like to see as Treasurer of the Labour Party. On the whole, I believe that they would all prefer to see me continue, but as they cannot have that pleasure, in a democratic party such as ours a choice must be made and will be made by the votes of the constituencies and by all the others who make up the Labour Party Conference. Mr. Atkinson Does my right hon. Friend accept that his successor, whoever he may be, will have to show tremendous expertise to gain a balance in Labour Party funds, which show a tremendous debt this year—in fact, almost double the previous year—and that that person will have a great responsibility on his shoulders? Does he also accept that whoever takes on the job of treasurership of the Labour Party will find his job much easier if those trade unionists who yesterday took the decision to sacrifice their living standards to prevent any further cuts in public expenditure—[Interruption.] Will the Prime Minister now say that the Government do not intend to go back on their word, reiterated repeatedly over the last 12 months, that our primary function will be to safeguard the level of public expenditure? The Prime Minister I take note of my hon. Friend's election address. There is in fact no governmental responsibility for the finances of political parties—our own or any others. It is clear from the financial results that have been published that all voluntary organisations have been hit very hard by inflation. It would be a very sad thing if the level of political activity, voluntarily financed, were to be reduced because of the effects [column 734]of inflation. I hope that, in pursuance of his campaign, my hon. Friend will throw his full support behind the Government's successful efforts to reduce inflation, so that whoever succeeds me as treasurer will have a much easier task. Mr. Lamont Is it not the case that in the past there has been a connection between the level of public expenditure and inflation? If so, is not any deal with the TUC, purchased at the price of agreeing not to cut public spending, likely to prove pointless and self-defeating, and to lead to a further weakening of the pound? The Prime Minister No. In economic matters I have never believed in isolating one factor and placing all the weight on it. Other considerable weight should be placed upon issues not of public expenditure but of the level of wage increases in any year. Of course, as the hon. Gentleman knows full well, the level of the money supply under the Government that he supported was at an incredibly dreadful rate, from which this country has not yet recovered. Mr. Wrigglesworth Whilst in no way under-estimating the remarkable achievement of the TUC yesterday, does my right hon. Friend agree, as he seemed to indicate, that there are many other influences on inflation in this country, as was ably demonstrated by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the last Administration—for example, by the oil sheiks and by the money markets over recent weeks? Does he agree that it might be wise, therefore, to make clear to trade unionists and their wives that despite yesterday's remarkable achievement, there are many other battles to be won before we see the end of this war? The Prime Minister Yes, Sir. I agree with my hon. Friend. Indeed, I think that the Chancellor, both this afternoon, when I heard him answering questions, and on other occasions, constantly reiterated the theme, as I have reiterated it, that voluntary restraint on wage increases is not the only issue that affects the fortunes of this country or the future prosperity of our people. It is upon all factors, not on any single one in isolation, that we have to concentrate. Mrs. Thatcher Is the James CallaghanPrime Minister aware that we would agree with him that [column 735]too much weight should not be attached to any one factor for economic recovery? It is because we take that view that we think he is putting too much weight on pay restraint alone. May I urge upon him the view urged by my hon. Friends on the Denis HealeyChancellor of the Exchequer, that pay restraint is not enough, that pay restraint plus the standby loan is not enough, and that, until the Government face their responsibility and reduce the Budget deficit, the sacrifices in pay restraint and in increased taxes which have been made will be wasted? The Prime Minister That is a repetition of questions and answers made on many previous occasions. [Interruption.] I have nothing to add to the answers that I have given to similar questions on previous occasions. My view is clearly on the record and will remain on the record. Q4. Mr. Arnold Shaw asked the Prime Minister when he next plans to meet the CBI. The Prime Minister I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave to the hon. Member for Blackpool, South (Mr. Blaker) on 27th May. Mr. Shaw In view of yesterday's magnificent response by the TUC to the needs of the nation, will my right hon. Friend, when he meets the CBI, press upon industry the need for an equal response, particularly on investment and prices? The Prime Minister Yes, Sir. I agree with my hon. Friend that the trade unions' response yesterday by such an overwhelming figure is illustrative of the fact that by this policy they are trying to place first not only the national interest, but, as I have constantly pointed out, their own interest. I have discussed this matter with the leaders of the CBI and impressed upon them—I think they accept it—that there is now a need for new investment. As the level of wage costs is pretty well known, if this agreement is adhered to until the spring of 1978—because a lot of wage agreements are not negotiated until the spring—they have a considerable period ahead in which to plan new investment with confidence. I believe that [column 736]Lord Watkinson and his colleagues accept this, and discussions are going on to see how it can be achieved. I should like to re-emphasise that studies have shown that, apart from shortages of orders, which means that machinery and plant stand idle, still not enough use is made of the plant and machinery that we have. Perhaps we could get a lot more out of our existing investment if we were to plan and use it properly. Mr. Paul Dean When the Prime Minister meets the CBI, will he admit to it that the cost of the Government's expensive nationalisation programme means that they are abandoning their social programmes? The Prime Minister No, Sir. Mr. Kinnock Does my right hon. Friend agree that, unlike the TUC, there is no discipline of solidarity among employers or members of the CBI to ensure that they deliver the undertakings that they give in respect of price restraint and other matters? Does he further agree that that indicates an elementary necessity not for the relaxation of Government control in these matters but for the extension of that control, including major controls over the export of capital, which we need for a reinvestment programme? The Prime Minister The export of capital has been dealt with by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. I have nothing to add to what he said. I agree that the CBI does not have the same influence over individual firms and companies as the TUC has over its members. That is inevitable, as individual firms and companies take decisions based on their expectations for the future. It is for us to let them see that in the Government's strategy there is a real prospect of reducing inflation by the end of 1977 to a level that will be no greater than that of our major competitors and that we want to see them prosper in order that manufacturing industry can produce the goods out of which the social dividend will be paid. That is the policy that the Government will follow. Mr. Tapsell As today's issue of the Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin clearly states that this Government must either cut public expenditure or raise [column 737]taxes which of those alternatives will the Prime Minister suggest to the CBI? The Prime Minister I have nothing to add to the replies that I have given on numerous occasions on this matter. I do not intend to gild the lily. My position on this matter is quite clear. Q5. Mr. Moonman asked the Prime Minister if he will consider making an official tour of Great Britain's new towns, including Basildon. The Prime Minister I have at present no plans to do so, although I hope to visit Redditch New Town in September. Mr. Moonman With the passage of the New Towns (Amendment) Bill only yesterday, and as the new towns have proved themselves in so many ways, will my right hon. Friend give some consideration to the question of stimulating the development of further new towns? The Prime Minister Yes, Sir, I am aware of my hon. Friend's great interest in this matter. We are at present giving careful consideration to the Thirteenth Report of the Expenditure Committee on these matters. My hon. Friend was a member of the Committee. There has been no doubt about the success of the new towns. We are currently considering their future. Mr. Tebbit When the Prime Minister does visit a new town, will he take care to talk to many of the tenants in order to find out how many would welcome a return to the scheme under which, under the previous Conservative Government, tenants were enabled to purchase their houses at advantageous prices, and will he then attempt to persuade his colleagues to reintroduce such a scheme? The Prime Minister There is no universal and permanent right and correct ratio between housing for rent and housing for owner-occupation. The ratio will continue to be kept under review in the light of demands and need. The Government's first priority has been to increase the provision of rented housing to meet the very high demand that was apparent when we first took office. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr skinner ask prime minister set committee examine abolition honours list mr gow ask prime minister proposal strengthen political honours scrutiny committee prime minister mr james callaghan shall aspect honours system review present satisfied committee establish review system additional power need strengthen political honours scrutiny committee mr skinner right hon friend agree sensible democratic thing column abolish honours system altogether agree list exprime minister show patronage accountability property speculator labour doorknocker prime minister cohesion society certainly depend honours system claim way perfect system useful way society recognise contribution individual national life judge letter receive hon member side house make recommendation behalf perform service clearly widely recognise house bind experience give great deal satisfaction great people voluntary service way regard list right hon friend member huyton sir h wilson custom house comment individual award recommend hon friend make close study list think find stricture justify mr gow right hon gentleman accept criterion mention reward reward breach shameful fashion right hon friend member huyton sir h wilson prime minister accept doubt people make accusation read list mr blaker ask prime minister interview give chancellor exchequer bbc television money programme friday economic policy represent government policy mr norman lamont ask prime minister interview chancellor exchequer bbc television money programme column economic policy represent government policy prime minister yes sir mr blaker expect world confidence chancellor leader house secretary state energy clear public regard fit treasurer labour party prime minister know say thing hon gentleman misrepresent situation put way entitle like treasurer labour party believe prefer continue pleasure democratic party choice vote constituency labour party conference mr atkinson right hon friend accept successor tremendous expertise gain balance labour party fund tremendous debt year fact double previous year person great responsibility shoulder accept take job treasurership labour party find job easier trade unionist yesterday take decision sacrifice living standard prevent cut public expenditure interruption prime minister government intend word reiterate repeatedly month primary function safeguard level public expenditure prime minister note hon friend election address fact governmental responsibility finance political party clear financial result publish voluntary organisation hit hard inflation sad thing level political activity voluntarily finance reduce effect column inflation hope pursuance campaign hon friend throw support government successful effort reduce inflation succeed treasurer easy task mr lamont case past connection level public expenditure inflation deal tuc purchase price agree cut public spending likely prove pointless selfdefeate lead weakening pound prime minister economic matter believe isolate factor place weight considerable weight place issue public expenditure level wage increase year course hon gentleman know level money supply government support incredibly dreadful rate country recover mr wrigglesworth whilst way underestimate remarkable achievement tuc yesterday right hon friend agree indicate influence inflation country ably demonstrate chancellor exchequer administration example oil sheik money market recent week agree wise clear trade unionist wife despite yesterdays remarkable achievement battle win end war prime minister yes sir agree hon friend think chancellor afternoon hear answer question occasion constantly reiterate theme reiterate voluntary restraint wage increase issue affect fortune country future prosperity people factor single isolation concentrate mrs thatcher james callaghanprime minister aware agree column weight attach factor economic recovery view think put weight pay restraint urge view urge hon friend denis healeychancellor exchequer pay restraint pay restraint plus standby loan government face responsibility reduce budget deficit sacrifice pay restraint increase taxis waste prime minister repetition question answer previous occasion interruption add answer give similar question previous occasion view clearly record remain record mr arnold shaw ask prime minister plan meet cbi prime minister refer hon friend reply give hon member blackpool south mr blaker mr shaw view yesterdays magnificent response tuc need nation right hon friend meet cbi press industry need equal response particularly investment price prime minister yes sir agree hon friend trade union response yesterday overwhelming figure illustrative fact policy try place national interest constantly point interest discuss matter leader cbi impressed think accept need new investment level wage cost pretty know agreement adhere spring lot wage agreement negotiate spring considerable period ahead plan new investment confidence believe column watkinson colleague accept discussion go achieve like reemphasise study show apart shortage order mean machinery plant stand idle use plant machinery lot exist investment plan use properly mr paul dean prime minister meet cbi admit cost government expensive nationalisation programme mean abandon social programme prime minister sir mr kinnock right hon friend agree unlike tuc discipline solidarity employer member cbi ensure deliver undertaking respect price restraint matter agree indicate elementary necessity relaxation government control matter extension control include major control export capital need reinvestment programme prime minister export capital deal chancellor exchequer add say agree cbi influence individual firm company tuc member inevitable individual firm company decision base expectation future let government strategy real prospect reduce inflation end level great major competitor want prosper order manufacturing industry produce good social dividend pay policy government follow mr tapsell today issue bank england quarterly bulletin clearly state government cut public expenditure raise column alternative prime minister suggest cbi prime minister add reply give numerous occasion matter intend gild lily position matter clear mr moonman ask prime minister consider make official tour great britain new town include basildon prime minister present plan hope visit redditch new town september mr moonman passage new town amendment bill yesterday new town prove way right hon friend consideration question stimulate development new town prime minister yes sir aware hon friend great interest matter present give careful consideration thirteenth report expenditure committee matter hon friend member committee doubt success new town currently consider future mr tebbit prime minister visit new town care talk tenant order find welcome return scheme previous conservative government tenant enable purchase house advantageous price attempt persuade colleague reintroduce scheme prime minister universal permanent right correct ratio housing rent housing owneroccupation ratio continue keep review light demand need government priority increase provision rent housing meet high demand apparent take office copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill prohibits any state government that provides monetary payments to undocumented immigrants from receiving funds made available under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. If a state made such prohibited payments after the enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 but before the enactment of this bill, the state must immediately pay to the federal government the amount equal to the sum of the prohibited payments.

right

bill prohibit state government provide monetary payment undocumented immigrant receive fund available american rescue plan act state prohibited payment enactment american rescue plan act enactment bill state immediately pay federal government equal sum prohibit payment

Speeches, etc. Mrs. Margaret Thatcher (Finchley) Clearly the danger of a debate of this kind on such a large subject is that the right hon. Gentleman and I will make speeches which are a general thesis with a bit of everything in them and nothing about much in particular. I had that impression after listening to the right hon. Gentleman's speech. I am wondering what he did say that was positive. The right hon. Gentleman started rather naïvely by pointing out that the present Government have been in power for only eight weeks, with the implication that Socialism has been in power in London for only eight weeks. In the difficult London boroughs Socialism has been in power all the time. In fact, the worse those boroughs are the more Socialism they have had. The prosperous boroughs have been Conservative all the time and the medium boroughs have been part Conservative and part Socialist. During the past 10 years we have had a Conservative Government for only three and a half years. For six and a half years the central Government have been Socialist. Of course, the Socialists have been in power at County Hall, almost continually, apart from a six-year break, for 40 years. If we have problems we know at whose door to lay them—namely, the door of the Socialist Party. The right hon. Gentleman knows full well that whatever problems there are they are not the sort of matters that can be solved within a short span of a few years. They are problems that are fundamental and very difficult. That applies particularly to the problem of the London housing market. The right hon. Gentleman made some reference to that problem and seemed to suggest that the housing problem was totally new. He gave the impression that everything had gone [column 799]smoothly during the time of the last Labour Government. That is not so. The housing construction market has always been extremely difficult. The last Labour Government encountered the same difficulties as the last Conservative Government. In 1968 the number of permanent dwellings started in Greater London was 38,000. That was the last big year. Then there were devaluation and deflation difficulties. In 1969 the figure reduced to 31,000. In 1970 it was 31,000. In 1971, a period of expansion, it was 33,000. In 1972 it was 33,000 and in 1973, although I have only the figure for the first three quarters, it had fallen again. We have all had the same problems with the housing market. We have not yet learned to smooth out the market in any way or to insulate it. I was interested in the way in which the right hon. Gentleman refused to say anything about the London allowance. With respect, the teachers are but a small part of the London allowance problem. If my memory is correct, the teachers constitute about 60,000 people. The total affected by the London allowance is 750,000. Many of those people are people for whom the right hon. Gentleman has responsibility. To duck the question altogether and to be allowed to get away with it by his own back benchers is remarkable. Mr. Wellbeloved He was not. Mrs. Thatcher Not quite. The hon. Member for Erith and Crayford (Mr. Wellbeloved), a seat which I once fought, must agree that he would have given me a much worse ride if I had said what his right hon. Friend said. Mr. Wellbeloved The right hon. Lady will recall that, with a number of my hon. Friends, I came to her about two years ago on the question of the London allowance for teachers. She told us that she could do nothing about it, and she turned down the London teachers' claim. The trouble we are suffering today is clearly at her doorstep. Mrs. Thatcher But R. Prenticethe Secretary of State for Education and Science now says that he cannot do anything about it either, except what I did, which was [column 800]to refer the matter to the Pay Board. It was referred there with detailed terms of reference, and the report will be out by the end of June. All hon. Members opposite are relying on that at the moment. I am interested to note that the present Government rely on the same things as we did but that their supporters give them a very much calmer ride than they would have given us. The right hon. Gentleman gave veiled hints about what is going to happen to the office blocks. The worst thing possible is to have veiled hints and uncertainty. That is very bad indeed. We included some clauses in our Housing and Planning Bill, but I notice that the right hon. Gentleman has taken them out. I realise that, as we said that we would do something about the situation long before we did, I might be a bit vulnerable on the issue of veiled hints, but to those the Labour Party has added a great deal of uncertainty by the general phrasing of its policy for land, and we know nothing more about its policy than that at the moment. This is having a bad effect on the market. I go on to some of the remarks—I cannot call them more than that because I encountered the same difficulty as the right hon. Gentleman—which I had intended to make. I think we all accept that all Governments are going to be interventionist. It is important, first, that economically intervention should be a series of related acts, because a series of unrelated acts, however well meaning and seemingly appropriate to the narrow expedient of the moment, can throw up inconsistencies and contradictions. Economic policy must be more than a series of disjointed expediencies because, if the contrary is true, it can only land us in much greater difficulties later on. Secondly—and here I agree with the right hon. Gentleman—political acts of intervention should amount to a philosophy whose objectives can be clearly stated and discerned. The economic point struck me very forcibly after reading some statements in the Labour Party document “London; The Future and You” , with a foreword by Sir Reginald Goodwin. It might ease the right hon. Gentleman's mind if he realises that I am not going to make a [column 801]party political point. I think that this is a fundamental matter for us all. I went through the document and picked up one or two paragraphs which are seemingly contradictory or inconsistent, or are the result of contradictory or inconsistent policies which had been insufficiently thought through at the time they were imposed. Paragraph 6, after pointing out, as the right hon. Gentleman has done, that London's population is declining, continues: After discussing the reason for this, the paragraph goes on: There we have a statement that we are losing the skilled and medium skilled and some of the unskilled because of the new towns policy. We then go forward to paragraph 11. After pointing out the value of the foreign exchange which we get from tourism, the paragraph goes on to say that tourism's These are points which one has taken. I remember Sir Reginald Goodwin coming to us when we were in Government and telling my right hon. Friend the Member for Sidcup (Mr. Heath) of the great difficulty London was having in finding enough people to man its essential services. It seems to me that here we have several contradictory policies imposed at different times. First, there was the new towns policy, to which we all subscribed a long time ago but which has taken essential labour from London. One of the reasons for that policy was that we could not house them all in London. We all said that they must go to new towns where they would find new and better jobs and new housing. But we had to replace their skills with imported foreign labour and, as the document points out, [column 802] We then had a policy, initiated by the last Labour Government in about 1967, of building more hotels—a large number of them—which gave a boost to the construction industry. At that point of time we had to import quite a number of foreign workers for them. The figures of applications for the importation of foreign workers for them. The figures of applications for the importation of foreign workers are given in the Department of Employment Gazette, and the last annual figures I have are in the Gazette for March 1972. The point is that the one policy drew skilled and unskilled workers out of London, whilst the other policy positively imported them from elsewhere and, according to the Labour Party's own document, Mr. John Silkin The right hon. Lady is surely muddling up two categories of workers. The skilled workers who go to Stevenage, for example, are not usually unskilled foreign hotel workers but people with skills in manufacturing although not in very large numbers in each factory. The foreign workers are largely unskilled or perhaps skilled in something specialised, like the hotel business. For good or ill, there are few hotels in Stevenage. Mrs. Thatcher Those who come in, as the right hon. Gentleman will see from the categories for which workers are applied for, are not always unskilled. That is true. Some are skilled. But it seems ironic that we are decanting people into new towns, where they can get housing, and at the same time importing people into London for whom we have to provide a lot of housing in areas of housing stress. In addition, of course, we have to provide them with a good deal of education, because some of them bring their families in with them and, obviously, the children of foreign workers speak a different language. There is a great deal of stress in these areas for this reason. We now gather also that London Transport is short of people for manning London's essential services. Today we had a document from the GLC indicating that although organisations like London Transport are short of workers for essential services there is nevertheless a good deal of unemployment in London. [column 803] These different factors are not tying together. What I am trying to say is that whether the policies are those of encouraging more tourism, of building more hotels, of creating more new towns or of building more office blocks outside central London, they must all be economically consistent. We did not have in 1945–50 the techniques of economic analysis that we now have. We should use those techniques and not dash into a new policy without trying to work out its effect on other sectors. London Transport is very short of people to operate its services. In its report published this week it said: Those of us who represent London seats know the difficulties involved in providing full services, and we know of the complaints there are when full services are not provided. I can imagine the letters I shall receive from my constituents when they read that London Transport's surplus was due to an inability to provide an adequate service. It is an unusual reason for making a profit— “I could not give you a good service. Therefore I have made a surplus.” We understand the reasons for it: net receipts were up and the services were down. That will not necessarily be easily understood by some of the people we represent, because they do not have access to the figures. My plea is that the economic policies should hang together. We have initiated some which have caused problems later. It has been said that planners earn their living by tackling the problems created by other planners. In some cases this is what has happened. What was enlightenment some years ago has caused many problems today. I wish to follow some of the right hon. Gentleman's references to housing policy, dealing first of all with rents. Our Housing Finance Act brought a benefit to many people paying rents in the private as well as the council sector. Many of them are paying less rent now [column 804]than they were paying under the last Labour Government, because we followed a policy of helping the person rather than subsidising the property. The Government have imposed a rent freeze. Even R. Prenticethe Secretary of State for Education, alone on the Front Bench at present, who is not involved in this directly, will be aware of what happens if a rent freeze remains for any length of time. Two things happen to property. First, rented property disappears from the market. Secondly, because the controlled rent is usually too low for adequate maintenance, homes fall into disrepair and can rapidly become slums. There can be a situation when deterioration of the housing stock is at a far faster rate than the rate at which new houses can be provided. This means that we have to be particularly careful to look after the state of existing houses in London. That is a better housing policy, and it often produces better homes than some of the new tower blocks which have been built in London. I was interested in a Shelter report entitled “Tomorrow in Upper Hollo-way” , a section of which is entitled “What people want” . The authors say: “almost all private tenants expressed a willingness to pay an average of £2 to £2.50 a week more rent for accommodation that possessed the amenities they thought important.” They indicated that they were prepared to pay the rent for the facilities, but the problem of rigid rent control is that if the landlord makes improvements he knows that he cannot recover the cost because he cannot get increased rent of that amount—£2 or £2.50. Because of rent control it is impossible for people to get other accommodation with those amenities. We must not duck these factors. These quick expedients have long-term effects on the housing stock. We must look at those factors, too. It would be different if either Government had made different arrangements for landlords, enabling them to write off the cost of improvements against tax over a period of years. Then they would not have to recoup so much of it through rent. Mr. Arthur Lewis What improvements? Mrs. Thatcher I am trying to say that we might get some more improvements to the older housing stock if that were done. Neither Government have managed to do that. Street after street of fundamentally well-constructed houses of the Victorian and Edwardian periods have fallen into decay and in some cases have been bulldozed away to be replaced by tall blocks which are much less pleasing in outward design and cause living problems. In the same document, “Tomorrow in Upper Holloway” the majority of people said that they would prefer I am sure that this shows that it is right to have a policy of improvement grants for those homes and a policy of taking action by designating housing stress areas, about which I suspect we shall be talking next week, so as to put the housing stock in good condition and to keep it in good condition. It is easier to make a home in that kind of house than it sometimes is in a flat in a tall block. One of our successful housing policies stemmed from the extra number of improvement grants we gave in London and elsewhere. In 1969, the last year of Labour Government, 2,900 improvement grants were given to local authorities in the London area. In 1972, under the Conservatives, the corresponding figure was 5,058. In 1969 there were 7,217 improvement grants given to private owners, including housing associations, whereas in 1972 the figure was 23,900. I know that the Government are continuing our policy, in the Housing and Planning Bill, of extending grants to repairs. I am sure that that is the right policy. It also often enables young people to get on the first rung of the house ownership ladder. They can buy older houses, some of them in twilight areas, get an improvement grant and do a great deal of work on them. Then they have got over the first hurdle to home ownership. They can sell that house for another later on. The right hon. Gentleman's Department, the GLC and Labour-controlled London local authorities are pursuing a programme of buying houses and taking [column 806]them permanently into council ownership—a policy of municipalisation. In some cases there may be an argument for local authorities buying properties when there is no other buyer for the time being. But there is no compelling reason why the houses should remain Government owned thereafter. People are usually prepared to spend far more on their own homes than on local authority or privately tenanted property. If we are anxious to have maximum housing standards it pays to have as many people as possible as owner-occupiers. The only reason for retaining these homes in council ownership is that the Government want an increasing measure of control over the lives of the people living in them by way either of nationalisation of land or municipalisation. That is why I believe the Government are prepared to frustrate the ambitions of many a council tenant by refusing to let him purchase. We believe that many people living in council properties have exactly the same ambition to own their own home as have other people. We also know that the turnover of council property is comparatively low, because once a person gets a council home he hangs on to it—very wisely. Therefore, the only way to achieve home ownership is to let those people purchase the houses. We are particularly anxious that this policy should be continued and hope that the Government will adopt it, if they really believe in home ownership. Tenants can often purchase their homes at favourable prices. The Government say that they are anxious about land and house prices, yet they encourage local authorities to bid for vacant properties even if the result is that they bid against one another. There is no more certain way of driving up the price of land or property than to have a local authority, with the public purse, going to an auction and bidding. It can almost always win. It is wrong when the GLC bids against Richmond for places in Richmond or when one or two boroughs are bidding against one another. In some areas the prices being paid are enormous. A case illustrated in the Daily Telegraph the other day concerned the Brent Council, who had purchased a plot of land for £500,000 and later [column 807]bought 47 houses, each with two garages and two bathrooms for £15,000 each. The Daily Telegraph stated: The houses The result is that rates in Brent have increased enormously, and they will continue to increase if purchases of this kind take place. The domestic rate has increased by 35 per cent. and the commercial rate by 48 per cent. If the Government really want to help young people towards home ownership they should not ask local authorities to buy all the available houses. They cannot say, “We are anxious to help people to become home owners” and at the same time ask local authorities to go into the market and buy all the available property. Those are fundamental contradictions. Mr. Wellbeloved I am grateful to the right hon. Lady for giving way because I am sure that she would want to clear up the position concerning local authorities bidding in the open market at auctions. Is it not a fact that local authorities are governed by the requirement to obtain the district valuer's valuation of a property before making their bid? Therefore, there is a maximum price which is already agreed by the local authority, which it cannot exceed at auction. One assumes that the district valuer would give the same advice to the various authorities. Therefore, conflict is not likely to arise. Mrs. Thatcher I believe that is the position, but the district valuer's valuation will vary according to the sales of other property in the area. As the hon. Gentleman knows, land and property prices have been falling at the auctions. I do not know the speed at which the increases or falls are reflected in the values of houses in respect of which the local authorities are permitted to bid. Mr. William Shelton(Streatham) May I advise my right hon. Friend that in Lambeth the local authority seldom bids at an auction? The council puts a compulsory purchase order on the property. When the owner becomes depressed about [column 808]the CPO, he sells, usually at less than the market price, to Lambeth council. Mrs. Thatcher I should like to say a few words about the question of available land. It is important not only to pay lip service to the desirability of open spaces but to retain them. Many of us have few open spaces in our London constituencies, but the GLC is casting envious eyes at them. We hope that it will keep its eyes off sports grounds and playing fields. The Housing Action Committee found that there was more land available in inner London than there was in the outer boroughs, and yet it lies fallow. It would be best if it were used before a further assault was made on the few remaining “lungs” in outer London. Inevitably, because I knew that the right hon. Member for Newham, North-East (Mr. Prentice) would be sitting on the Government Front Bench, I turn to the question of education. I have said a few words about the London allowance. The right hon. Gentleman is much more fortunate than I was—he has a very reasonable Opposition facing him. I shall not embarrass him as the person who used to stand in my place at this Box would not have hesitated to embarrass me on this point. To jog hon. Members' memories, that was not the right hon. Member for Newham, North-East. R. PrenticeThe Minister will expect me to say a few words about his new Circular 4/74 as it affects London. The right hon. Gentleman has managed matters rather badly. Other circulars on comprehensivisation have always started with the number 10. The right hon. Member for Grimsby (Mr. Crosland) introduced circulars numbered 10/65 and 10/66. I introduced one numbered 10/70. The present Minister has let the side down by introducing a circular numbered 4/74. We would have found it much easier to remember which circular we wanted to attack if it had been numbered 10/74 rather than 4/74. The argument about comprehensive education has been going on for some time. However, a new element has emerged from my predecessor at this Box, the hon. Member for Birmingham, Spark-brook (Mr. Hattersley), and from the right hon. Member for Grimsby, who has just written a book on the subject. The new doctrine of the Labour Party is egalitarianism, or equality. One would not [column 809]deduce it from certain people's life style, but that is what the party says. But equality is death to education. Education is about opportunity, and opportunity is the opportunity to be unequal. If children's only opportunity is to be equal, it is a very restricted opportunity. Indeed, it is no opportunity at all. Therefore, opportunity is the opposite of equality, and education is about opportunity. I well know R. Prenticethe Secretary of State's argument about selection and creaming off. We used to talk about selection and creaming off. Now the right hon. Gentleman says that we cannot separate children into sheep and goats. Therefore, I suppose that we must all be sheep or goats. The creaming off and selection argument is that it is not possible for a grammar school to co-exist alongside a comprehensive school because if that were so one would cream off the talent into the grammar school. People used to say, “We are against selection because it is inefficient” . But if the selection creams off all the talent, it is very efficient, otherwise it would not be creamed off. The argument has gone round in circles for years, but, as the Secretary of State knows, or should know, in an area such as London, whatever people's feelings and ideals may be, they consider whether the system will work. The right hon. Gentleman knows that there are and will be problems in London with the neighbourhood schools in the difficult areas, and having an ideal or theory about them will not solve them. In the previous Labour Government Alice Bacon, as she then was, used to quote to me the acme of the perfect comprehensive school in London offering fantastic opportunities to children which was the great advertisement of the system—Tulse Hill. During my time as Minister we learned a little more about comprehensive schools, and Tulse Hill became a problem school. I shall be eternally glad that I did not listen to Labour doctrine and turned down flat an application from the Inner London Education Authority to enlarge that already large comprehensive school. Had I taken notice of its doctrine I would have expanded the Tulse Hill school and closed the Strand school—a small grammar school which was doing a magnificent job for children from all backgrounds. [column 810] In case the Secretary of State should think that it is only grammar schools which people wish to save, I would point out that I went against the Inner London Education Authority and saved a small secondary modern school called Bow, in Tower Hamlets. People who were concerned about the future of the school came to my home. They bought me a beautiful fuchsia plant, but that was not why I saved the school! I should like to thank them for the plant; it flourished beautifully. Those people who wished to save a small secondary modern school which was doing well were not concerned with doctrines or theories. Against the background of the situation in London, it is monstrous that the Secretary of State should say that children should not be sent to grammar schools or even to secondary modern schools and that it was an absolute crime to send children to schools like Emanuel, Colfe, or even to Godolphin and Latymer, which have served very well the children of some members of the Labour Party, even though those schools suited the children. I have looked at the Secretary of State's circular very carefully. It states: In other words, the child must fit the system, come what may. The system must never be adapted to the child. The right hon. Gentleman has not allowed any exceptions. His tactics are tactics which I pay him the compliment of saying I did not expect of him. I expected him to use his powers of persuasion, which are considerable. I expected him to say, “I cannot under the existing law coerce local authorities, parents or governors. In all constitutional decency I must go to Parliament to get a law to enable me to do it.” That I could have understood. We would have fought it, but he would then have had the power. I cannot accept the method which the right hon. Gentleman has chosen. He is saying to local authorities, parents and [column 811]governors, “Unless you do as I say, I shall withdraw both capital and revenue money from you.” Those are the tactics of the bully, the tactics which the teachers used against him when they said, “Give us what we want or we will withdraw the education of the children” . The right hon. Gentleman said to the teachers, “You do not think that I am the sort of chap to be influenced by tactics of that kind, or bullying” , but now he is using the identical tactics with the parents and governors. He is saying, “Do as I want or I shall withdraw the finance for the education of your children.” The tactics he condemns are the tactics he adopts. The Secretary of State for Education and Science (Mr. Reginald Prentice) Is the right hon. Lady saying that the doctrine of the Conservative Party is that central Government should never use financial sanctions to ensure that their policies are carried out? Is she saying that there should be no differential taxation, no differential tax rebates, no subsidies, no industrial training levies and nothing to persuade people to carry out agreed national policy? Mrs. Thatcher The right hon. Gentleman should come to the House of Commons to get the appropriate powers for that purpose rather than making a threat in the circular. I hope that the parents and governors will respond to his threats in the same way as he responded to the teachers' threats. I am well aware of certain legal opinions that were given in previous cases. I hope that people will say that they are not moved by those tactics and that they will make the right hon. Gentleman go through every legal device—and that will be a lengthy process. If the right hon. Gentleman is saying that unless the schools go comprehensive he will withdraw money so that the children have no schooling of any kind, an interesting legal point may emerge that could have to be thrashed out in the courts. The question, is, who is in breach of his statutory duty to educate the child—the Minister or the local authority? I hope that the voluntary aided schools which have not before had a threat of this kind will fight to retain their grammar schools or secondary modern schools if they wish to retain them. The right [column 812]hon. Gentleman knows that in practice there will be trouble in London if he has every school turned into a comprehensive school. The circular shows once again a difference between Labour and Conservative policy. The right hon. Gentleman is making a final assault on parental choice. There is to be none. The Minister knows best for the child, and the parent shall have no choice. The parent is to be informed that the school is to go comprehensive and is to be consulted only about what kind of comprehensive school it shall be. If the choice is not enough the remedy is to widen it, not to reduce it. I turn from the circular to make one other comment to the right hon. Gentleman about education. When there was a period of retrenchment under a Conservative Government I accepted, as most of us have to accept during a period of retrenchment, that education must take its share. That is why there were capital cuts before Christmas—cuts which, incidentally, the right hon. Gentleman has not restored. When in Government whatever one may say in opposition, one has to take one's share of the retrenchment. But when money was being handed out by the Treasury, my hon. Friends who were with me as junior Ministers and I lined up outside the Treasury and we would not have been mollified, pacified, satisfied or quietened without getting some of that money for education. There has been a great spending period. Pounds have been trotting out of the Treasury, left, right and centre—there has been another £10 million this week—and not a penny piece extra for education. What is the right hon. Gentleman doing? As Secretary of State I was a good badgerer of the Treasury, and I obtained a great deal for education, but the right hon. Gentleman sees money going everywhere but to his Department. He knows full well that I would have supported him in everything he did to restore the money for the primary school improvement programme or part of the secondary school improvement programme. The right hon. Member for Deptford (Mr. John Silkin) is related to the hon. and learned Member for Dulwich (Mr. S. C. Silkin), in whose constituency the replacement of the Thomas Calton School has had to be delayed. Some of the [column 813]£10 million could have been used to restore to the programme the Thomas Calton School, and others which did not get into the primary school building programe. But the right hon. Gentleman has not got money for education in a period of greatly increased public expenditure. Mr. Prentice Will the right hon. Lady explain to the House which items of Government expenditure she would rather do without? Is she against increased pensions? Is she against food subsidies and, therefore, in favour of higher rises in food prices? She will be aware that there has been no increase in expenditure for most Government Departments and that the increases have been selective. If she says that the increases are wrong she has a duty to tell the House which ones she would do without. Mrs. Thatcher I would far rather put some of the money that has gone to food subsidies into restoring the school improvement programme. That would have been fundamentally better in the long term for the children who are affected. I know the condition of some of those schools, and so does the right hon. Gentleman. He knows that we need a programme which stretches ahead for years. I have no difficulty in meeting that point. Vast sums have gone into food subsidies. A comparatively small amount would have done. The £10 million to unions would have done quite a bit. It would have provided 10 big secondary schools. Mr. Arthur Lewis Some of the Maplin money could have been used in that way. Mrs. Thatcher Yes, and the Government are carrying on with the Channel Tunnel, which they opposed when in opposition. However, we shall debate that tomorrow, and I shall be speaking in that debate too, if I catch Mr. Speaker's eye. I come to finance. We find that the Labour Party is the party of high taxation, very high rates, particularly in London, and high public expenditure. It seems that whatever policy the Government have the people must pay. My own council—Barnet—has sent a resolution to the Greater London Council about the high precept which the GLC has made upon Barnet. The resolution has also been sent to the London Boroughs Association. [column 814] The right hon. Gentleman may not have noted—I am not sure whether his right hon. Friend Denis Healeythe Chancellor of the Exchequer has yet noted—that the tendency of local authorities is to spend more than the estimated amounts. That tendency could upset the Chancellor's Budget judgment. Last year there was an out-turn of more than £200 million over the Estimate. If this is going to happen, the right hon. Gentleman will find himself in difficulties at the end of the year over his general Budget judgment. I began with some of the economic inconsistencies of policies which have left London with severe problems and continued with one or two of the philosophic differences. Whether in taxation or in policies, the modern history of Socialism in this country is the history of increasing control over the life of the citizen, whereas the history of liberty and responsibility is the history not of increasing Government power but of its limitation. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mrs margaret thatcher finchley clearly danger debate kind large subject right hon gentleman speech general thesis bit particular impression listen right hon gentleman speech wonder positive right hon gentleman start naïvely point present government power week implication socialism power london week difficult london borough socialism power time fact bad borough socialism prosperous borough conservative time medium borough conservative socialist past year conservative government half year half year central government socialist course socialist power county hall continually apart sixyear break year problem know door lay door socialist party right hon gentleman know problem sort matter solve short span year problem fundamental difficult apply particularly problem london housing market right hon gentleman reference problem suggest housing problem totally new give impression go column time labour government housing construction market extremely difficult labour government encounter difficulty conservative government number permanent dwelling start great london big year devaluation deflation difficulty figure reduce period expansion figure quarter fall problem housing market learn smooth market way insulate interested way right hon gentleman refuse london allowance respect teacher small london allowance problem memory correct teacher constitute people total affect london allowance people people right hon gentleman responsibility duck question altogether allow away bencher remarkable mr wellbelove mrs thatcher hon member erith crayford mr wellbelove seat fight agree give bad ride say right hon friend say mr wellbelove right hon lady recall number hon friend come year ago question london allowance teacher tell turn london teacher claim trouble suffer today clearly doorstep mrs thatcher r prenticethe secretary state education science say column refer matter pay board refer detailed term reference report end june hon member opposite rely moment interested note present government rely thing supporter calm ride give right hon gentleman gave veil hint go happen office block bad thing possible veil hint uncertainty bad include clause housing planning bill notice right hon gentleman take realise say situation long bit vulnerable issue veiled hint labour party add great deal uncertainty general phrasing policy land know policy moment have bad effect market remark encounter difficulty right hon gentleman intend think accept government go interventionist important economically intervention series relate act series unrelated act meaning seemingly appropriate narrow expedient moment throw inconsistency contradiction economic policy series disjointed expediency contrary true land great difficulty later secondly agree right hon gentleman political act intervention philosophy objective clearly state discern economic point strike forcibly read statement labour party document london future foreword sir reginald goodwin ease right hon gentleman mind realise go column political point think fundamental matter go document pick paragraph seemingly contradictory inconsistent result contradictory inconsistent policy insufficiently think time impose paragraph point right hon gentleman london population decline continue discuss reason paragraph go statement lose skilled medium skilled unskilled new town policy forward paragraph point value foreign exchange tourism paragraph go tourism point take remember sir reginald goodwin come government tell right hon friend member sidcup mr heath great difficulty london have find people man essential service contradictory policy impose different time new town policy subscribe long time ago take essential labour london reason policy house london say new town find new well job new housing replace skill import foreign labour document point column policy initiate labour government build hotel large number give boost construction industry point time import number foreign worker figure application importation foreign worker figure application importation foreign worker give department employment gazette annual figure gazette march point policy draw skilled unskilled worker london whilst policy positively import accord labour party document mr john silkin right hon lady surely muddle category worker skilled worker stevenage example usually unskille foreign hotel worker people skill manufacture large number factory foreign worker largely unskille skilled specialise like hotel business good ill hotel stevenage mrs thatcher come right hon gentleman category worker apply unskille true skilled ironic decant people new town housing time import people london provide lot housing area housing stress addition course provide good deal education bring family obviously child foreign worker speak different language great deal stress area reason gather london transport short people man london essential service today document glc indicate organisation like london transport short worker essential service good deal unemployment london column different factor tie try policy encourage tourism build hotel create new town build office block outside central london economically consistent technique economic analysis use technique dash new policy try work effect sector london transport short people operate service report publish week say represent london seat know difficulty involve provide service know complaint service provide imagine letter shall receive constituent read london transport surplus inability provide adequate service unusual reason make profit good service surplus understand reason net receipt service necessarily easily understand people represent access figure plea economic policy hang initiate cause problem later say planner earn living tackle problem create planner case happen enlightenment year ago cause problem today wish follow right hon gentleman reference housing policy deal rent housing finance act bring benefit people pay rent private council sector pay rent column pay labour government follow policy help person subsidise property government impose rent freeze r prenticethe secretary state education bench present involve directly aware happen rent freeze remain length time thing happen property rent property disappear market secondly control rent usually low adequate maintenance home fall disrepair rapidly slum situation deterioration housing stock far fast rate rate new house provide mean particularly careful look state exist house london well housing policy produce well home new tower block build london interested shelter report entitle tomorrow upper holloway section entitle people want author private tenant express willingness pay average week rent accommodation possess amenity think important indicate prepared pay rent facility problem rigid rent control landlord make improvement know recover cost increase rent rent control impossible people accommodation amenity duck factor quick expedient longterm effect housing stock look factor different government different arrangement landlord enable write cost improvement tax period year recoup rent mr arthur lewis improvement mrs thatcher try improvement old housing stock government manage street street fundamentally wellconstructe house victorian edwardian period fall decay case bulldoze away replace tall block pleasing outward design cause living problem document tomorrow upper holloway majority people say prefer sure show right policy improvement grant home policy take action designate housing stress area suspect shall talk week housing stock good condition good condition easy home kind house flat tall block successful housing policy stem extra number improvement grant give london year labour government improvement grant give local authority london area conservative correspond figure improvement grant give private owner include housing association figure know government continue policy housing planning bill extend grant repair sure right policy enable young people rung house ownership ladder buy old house twilight area improvement grant great deal work get hurdle home ownership sell house later right hon gentlemans department glc labourcontrolle london local authority pursue programme buy house take column permanently council ownership policy municipalisation case argument local authority buy property buyer time compelling reason house remain government own people usually prepared spend far home local authority privately tenant property anxious maximum housing standard pay people possible owneroccupier reason retain home council ownership government want increase measure control life people live way nationalisation land municipalisation believe government prepared frustrate ambition council tenant refuse let purchase believe people live council property exactly ambition home people know turnover council property comparatively low person get council home hang wisely way achieve home ownership let people purchase house particularly anxious policy continue hope government adopt believe home ownership tenant purchase home favourable price government anxious land house price encourage local authority bid vacant property result bid certain way drive price land property local authority public purse go auction bidding win wrong glc bid richmond place richmond borough bid area price pay enormous case illustrate daily telegraph day concern brent council purchase plot land later column house garage bathroom daily telegraph state house result rate brent increase enormously continue increase purchase kind place domestic rate increase cent commercial rate cent government want help young people home ownership ask local authority buy available house anxious help people home owner time ask local authority market buy available property fundamental contradiction mr wellbelove grateful right hon lady give way sure want clear position concern local authority bid open market auction fact local authority govern requirement obtain district valuer valuation property make bid maximum price agree local authority exceed auction assume district valuer advice authority conflict likely arise mrs thatcher believe position district valuer valuation vary accord sale property area hon gentleman know land property price fall auction know speed increase fall reflect value house respect local authority permit bid mr william sheltonstreatham advise right hon friend lambeth local authority seldom bid auction council put compulsory purchase order property owner depressed column cpo sell usually market price lambeth council mrs thatcher like word question available land important pay lip service desirability open space retain open space london constituency glc cast envious eye hope eye sport ground play field housing action committee find land available inner london outer borough lie fallow good assault remain lung outer london inevitably know right hon member newham northeast mr prentice sit government bench turn question education say word london allowance right hon gentleman fortunate reasonable opposition face shall embarrass person stand place box hesitate embarrass point jog hon member memorie right hon member newham northeast r prenticethe minister expect word new circular affect london right hon gentleman manage matter badly circular comprehensivisation start number right hon member grimsby mr crosland introduce circular number introduce number present minister let introduce circular number find easy remember circular want attack number argument comprehensive education go time new element emerge predecessor box hon member birmingham sparkbrook mr hattersley right hon member grimsby write book subject new doctrine labour party egalitarianism equality column certain people life style party say equality death education education opportunity opportunity opportunity unequal children opportunity equal restricted opportunity opportunity opportunity opposite equality education opportunity know r prenticethe secretary states argument selection cream talk selection cream right hon gentleman say separate child sheep goat suppose sheep goat cream selection argument possible grammar school coexist alongside comprehensive school cream talent grammar school people selection inefficient selection cream talent efficient cream argument go round circle year secretary state know know area london people feeling ideal consider system work right hon gentleman know problem london neighbourhood school difficult area have ideal theory solve previous labour government alice bacon quote acme perfect comprehensive school london offer fantastic opportunity child great advertisement system tulse hill time minister learn little comprehensive school tulse hill problem school shall eternally glad listen labour doctrine turn flat application inner london education authority enlarge large comprehensive school take notice doctrine expand tulse hill school close strand school small grammar school magnificent job child background column case secretary state think grammar school people wish save point go inner london education authority save small secondary modern school call bow tower hamlet people concerned future school come home buy beautiful fuchsia plant save school like thank plant flourish beautifully people wish save small secondary modern school concern doctrine theory background situation london monstrous secretary state child send grammar school secondary modern school absolute crime send child school like emanuel colfe godolphin latymer serve child member labour party school suit child look secretary states circular carefully state word child fit system come system adapt child right hon gentleman allow exception tactic tactic pay compliment say expect expect use power persuasion considerable expect exist law coerce local authority parent governor constitutional decency parliament law enable understand fight power accept method right hon gentleman choose say local authority parent column shall withdraw capital revenue money tactic bully tactic teacher say want withdraw education child right hon gentleman say teacher think sort chap influence tactic kind bullying identical tactic parent governor say want shall withdraw finance education child tactic condemn tactic adopt secretary state education science mr reginald prentice right hon lady say doctrine conservative party central government use financial sanction ensure policy carry say differential taxation differential tax rebate subsidy industrial training levy persuade people carry agree national policy mrs thatcher right hon gentleman come house common appropriate power purpose make threat circular hope parent governor respond threat way respond teacher threat aware certain legal opinion give previous case hope people move tactic right hon gentleman legal device lengthy process right hon gentleman say school comprehensive withdraw money child schooling kind interesting legal point emerge thrash court question breach statutory duty educate child minister local authority hope voluntary aid school threat kind fight retain grammar school secondary modern school wish retain right column gentleman know practice trouble london school turn comprehensive school circular show difference labour conservative policy right hon gentleman make final assault parental choice minister know good child parent shall choice parent inform school comprehensive consult kind comprehensive school shall choice remedy widen reduce turn circular comment right hon gentleman education period retrenchment conservative government accept accept period retrenchment education share capital cut christmas cut incidentally right hon gentleman restore government opposition one share retrenchment money hand treasury hon friend junior minister line outside treasury mollify pacify satisfied quieten get money education great spending period pound trot treasury leave right centre million week penny piece extra education right hon gentleman secretary state good badgerer treasury obtain great deal education right hon gentleman see money go department know support restore money primary school improvement programme secondary school improvement programme right hon member deptford mr john silkin relate hon learn member dulwich mr s c silkin constituency replacement thomas calton school delay column million restore programme thomas calton school primary school building programe right hon gentleman get money education period greatly increase public expenditure mr prentice right hon lady explain house item government expenditure increase pension food subsidy favour high rise food price aware increase expenditure government department increase selective say increase wrong duty tell house one mrs thatcher far money go food subsidy restore school improvement programme fundamentally well long term child affect know condition school right hon gentleman know need programme stretch ahead year difficulty meeting point vast sum go food subsidy comparatively small million union bit provide big secondary school mr arthur lewis maplin money way mrs thatcher yes government carry channel tunnel oppose opposition shall debate tomorrow shall speak debate catch mr speaker eye come finance find labour party party high taxation high rate particularly london high public expenditure policy government people pay council barnet send resolution great london council high precept glc barnet resolution send london boroughs association column right hon gentleman note sure right hon friend denis healeythe chancellor exchequer note tendency local authority spend estimate amount tendency upset chancellor budget judgment year outturn million estimate go happen right hon gentleman find difficulty end year general budget judgment begin economic inconsistency policy leave london severe problem continue philosophic difference taxation policy modern history socialism country history increase control life citizen history liberty responsibility history increase government power limitation copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

August 19, 1976 Mr. President, Mrs. Ford, Mr. Vice President, Mr. Vice President-to-be, the distinguished guests here, you ladies and gentlemen. I was going to say fellow Republicans here but those who are watching from a distance (including) all those millions of Democrats and independents who I know are looking for a cause around which to rally and which I believe we can give them. Mr. President, before you arrive tonight, these wonderful people, here, when we came in, gave Nancy and myself a welcome. That, plus this, plus your kindness and generosity in honoring us by bringing us down here will give us a memory that will live in our hearts forever. Watching on television these last few nights Ive seen also the warmth with which you greeted Nancy and you also filled my heart with joy when you did that. May I say some words. There are cynics who say that a party platform is something that no one bothers to read and is doesnt very often amount to much. Whether it is different this time than is has ever been before, I believe the Republican party has a platform that is a banner of bold, unmistakable colors with no pale pastel shades. We have just heard a call to arms, based on that platform. And a call to us to really be successful in communicating and reveal to the American people the difference between this platform and the platform of the opposing party which is nothing but a revamp and a reissue and a rerunning of a late, late show of the thing that we have been hearing from them for the last 40 years. If I could just take a moment, I had an assignment the other day. Someone asked me to write a letter for a time capsule that is going to opened in Los Angeles a hundred years from now, on our Tricentennial. It sounded like an easy assignment. They suggested I write about the problems and issues of the day. And I set out to do so, riding down the coast in an automobile, looking at the blue Pacific out on one side and the Santa Ynez Mountains on the other, and I couldnt help but wonder if it was going to be that beautiful a hundred years from now as it was on that summer day. And then as I tried to write-let your own minds turn to that task. Youre going to write for people a hundred years from now who know all about us, we know nothing about them. We dont know what kind of world theyll be living in. And suddenly I thought to myself, If I write of the problems, theyll be the domestic problems of which the President spoke here tonight; the challenges confronting us, the erosion of freedom taken place under Democratic rule in this country, the invasion of private rights, the controls and restrictions on the vitality of the great free economy that we enjoy. These are the challenges that we must meet and then again there is that challenge of which he spoke that we live in a world in which the great powers have aimed and poised at each other horrible missiles of destruction, nuclear weapons that can in a matter of minutes arrive at each others country and destroy virtually the civilized world we live in. And suddenly it dawned on me; those who would read this letter a hundred years from now will know whether those missiles were fired. They will know whether we met our challenge. Whether they will have the freedom that we have known up until now will depend on what we do here. Will they look back with appreciation and say, Thank God for those people in 1976 who headed off that loss of freedom? Who kept us now a hundred years later free? Who kept our world from nuclear destruction? And if we fail they probably wont get to read the letter at all because it spoke of individual freedom and they wont be allowed to talk of that or read of it. This is our challenge and this is why were here in this hall tonight. Better than we've ever done before, we've got to quit talking to each other and about each other and go out and communicate to the world that we may be fewer in numbers than we've ever been but we carry the message they're waiting for. We must go forth from here united, determined and what a great general said a few years ago is true: There is no substitute for victory. Mr. President. 40 Presidential Drive Simi Valley, CA 93065 800-410-8354 [email protected] Museum Hours Mon-Sun 10am-5pm Research Room Hours Mon-Fri 9am-5pm Appointments Are Required Holiday and Special Event Hours Closed Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and New Year's Day

right

august mr president mrs ford mr vice president mr vice presidenttobe distinguished guest lady gentleman go fellow republican watch distance include million democrat independent know look cause rally believe mr president arrive tonight wonderful people come give nancy welcome plus plus kindness generosity honor bring memory live heart forever watch television night ve see warmth greet nancy fill heart joy word cynic party platform bother read not different time believe republican party platform banner bold unmistakable color pale pastel shade hear arm base platform successful communicate reveal american people difference platform platform oppose party revamp reissue rerunning late late thing hear year moment assignment day ask write letter time capsule go open los angeles year tricentennial sound like easy assignment suggest write problem issue day set ride coast automobile look blue pacific santa ynez mountain not help wonder go beautiful year summer day try writelet mind turn task go write people year know know not know kind world ll live suddenly think write problem ll domestic problem president speak tonight challenge confront erosion freedom take place democratic rule country invasion private right control restriction vitality great free economy enjoy challenge meet challenge speak live world great power aim poise horrible missile destruction nuclear weapon matter minute arrive country destroy virtually civilized world live suddenly dawn read letter year know missile fire know meet challenge freedom know depend look appreciation thank god people head loss freedom keep year later free keep world nuclear destruction fail probably will not read letter speak individual freedom will not allow talk read challenge hall tonight well ve ve get quit talk communicate world few number ve carry message wait forth united determine great general say year ago true substitute victory mr president presidential drive simi valley reaganlibrarynaragov museum hour monsun research room hour monfri appointment require holiday special event hour close thanksgive day christmas day new year day

Speeches, etc. Mr. Speaker Before I call the right hon. Lady the Leader of the Opposition to propose her motion, I should tell the House that I have had representations that I should call the Liberal amendment. I gave considerable and careful thought to this question, but I must tell the House that it is a long-standing convention that if the Government give time for the discussion of a motion of no confidence or censure put down by the official Opposition the Government themselves do not table an amendment to the motion, and any amendment tabled by any other party or group in the House is not called. I take it that the purpose of that convention is to allow an unimpeded and clear decision to be taken for or against the motion. Although it has weighed in my mind that in the present Parliament the number of smaller opposition parties is somewhat larger than it has been in other Parliaments for many years past, that does not affect the principle which I have stated. Therefore, I am unable to accept the amendment today. I hope that the Liberal Party will find some other opportunity to seek a formal decision in its own way. Mr. A. J. Beith (Berwick-upon Tweed) On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I am grateful to you for the careful thought that you have given to our request and to requests from other parties, and for the ample reasons that you have set out. But would it not be desirable for the Procedure Committee to give consideration to the fact—[Interruption.] Mr. Speaker Order. May I say that I deplore the growing tendency in the House, on both sides, to shout abusive terms that are really out of harmony with the dignity of the House. Mr. Beith I was seeking to ask you, Mr. Speaker, whether you thought in the circumstances you have described that it would be desirable for the Procedure Committee to consider, as it has considered related matters in the past at the suggestion of Mr. Speaker, whether there should not be ways in which the parties now represented in the House which do not have confidence that Her Majesty's [column 1446]Opposition would provide a viable Government could register that view. Would that not ease the difficult decision that you have had to take, given that the Opposition are unlikely to make their Supply Day available for the purpose? Mr. Speaker I have no doubt that the Procedure Committee will consider the position of a Parliament in which many minority parties are obviously anxious to express their points of view. I call Mrs. Thatcher. 4.12 p.m. Mrs. Margaret Thatcher (Finchley) I beg to move, That this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government. This is the first Conservative Opposition motion of no confidence in the Government since 1967. There have been two Socialist motions of no confidence, one in 1972 and one in 1973. I want to make it quite clear that this motion was not put down lightly. The specific occasion arose from the economic situation, but that is not the only subject of our criticism. There is plenty else to criticise in the Government's handling of the nation's affairs. The debate is about more than a set of statistics, about more than the one figure of 4½ per cent. It is about a whole way of life of which economic policies are but a part. It is about values and standards which are beyond economics. It is about freedom under a just law. It is about parliamentary democracy and about Parliament as the only forum of the whole nation—[Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.” ] The Government will be voting for us soon. The debate is about people who are all equally important but who are all different. Indeed, one can tell a free society from one that is not free by the extent to which variety is cultivated within it. In the past two years, under the policies of this Government, we have seen a retreat from freedom, a retreat from the rule of law, a retreat from parliamentary democracy, a retreat from a mixed and free enterprise economy and a retreat from living within the nation's means. I note also that it takes a Socialist Government to boast that the pound has now risen to $1.77. It was $1.87 a few weeks ago when Denis Healeythe Chancellor of the Exchequer announced his Budget. It takes a Socialist [column 1447]Government to boast that the annual rate of inflation is now down to 18.9 per cent. Such is the state we have arrived at under Socialism. Under the Socialists, rapid strides have been taken towards the Iron Curtain State. We have seen increased nationalisation measures, increased powers of central Government over both large and small companies, increased levels of tax on the pay packet and on savings alike, and an increased proportion of the national income spent not by the wage-earner but by the Government or Government agencies. In the result, James Callaghanthe Prime Minister has become the first Socialist Minister since Hugh Gaitskellthe Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1951 to say that his policies will mean a reduced standard of living for our people. As an accurate prediction I do not quarrel with that. But it is clear that Socialist systems are not good at creating wealth; they can only spend the wealth that others create. The first charge we make against the Government is their mismanagement of the economy. The common characteristic of Socialist Governments is that their expenditure rapidly exceeds the taxpayers' capacity and will to pay. That does not quench the Government's appetite for spending. When the Chancellor runs through the pound in the pocket he goes to the moneylenders. We have a Chancellor who has elevated bluster into a principle of economic policy and borrowing into a way of life. The Chancellor's Budget continued the course of overspending which he has followed ever since he came to office. He continued his series of spiteful gestures against those very managers he claimed that he wanted to help. However, he included one innovation, for he surrendered the power to decide fiscal policy and the power to determine the course of the economy to an outside body. He left it to the TUC to decide the level of taxes for this year; and in some measure he left it to the TUC to determine the value of the pound. Not surprisingly, the nine weeks since Budget day have been weeks of near disaster, with the reserves depleted and the pound sinking week by week to new lows. [column 1448] We warned the Chancellor when he introduced his Budget that it was a recipe for disaster, and the whole nation has watched that disaster unfold day by day. Finally, the extent of the potential catastrophe penetrated even his complacency and he took action. It was not thoughtful action, it was reflex action, the action of every Labour Government since the war faced with the consequences of their own policies. The Chancellor fixed up an enormous loan. Once again, a Socialist Government have bought time, or rather have borrowed time, to enable them to postpone the hard decisions, time to enable them to carry on for another six months with policies which have failed. They have borrowed time to get us deeper and deeper into debt. The Chancellor chooses to claim that the loan that he has been able to fix up is a sign of the confidence that the rest of the world has in his policies. It is not a sign of confidence, it is a sign of patience. The world have given us a little more time. But unless the Government are removed from office we are doomed to see this money going down the drain as so much has before. The Chancellor made the borrowings, not to give us time to make fundamental changes, but to get time to avoid fundamental changes. The Government dare not tell the truth to their own followers, let alone to the country. At all costs nothing must be done before the special TUC Congress next week. Already some trade union leaders are getting restive. Indeed only this week I see from The Times, Alan Fisher warned that Therefore, the Chancellor dare not act before next week. But then he dare not act before the autumn either, because there is a Labour Party conference coming up. So we have the miracle cure—more borrowing while the overspending and the nationalisation goes on. Drift, debt and decay are the whole course of this Government. [Hon. Members: “Shocking.” ] Yes, that depicts a shocking performance by the Government. [column 1449] All the time that the Government are staggering in the short term from financial crisis to financial crisis they are damaging the long-term economic prospects of this country. They are putting far too much into the public sector and starving the private sector. Yesterday, while the Prime Minister at Bournemouth was saying that the private sector had to put its scoop into the same pool as the public sector, the Chancellor was busy announcing a new loan—a loan at a 14 per cent. annual rate of interest. Other nations which handle their affairs competently and prudently can bring their interest rates down, thereby helping their manufacturers to invest. We cannot. We are borrowing so much at such high rates that debt interest is becoming a major problem. It now amounts to 10 per cent. of Government expenditure. It absorbs the whole yield of VAT and corporation tax to finance the debt interest alone. Put another way, half the public sector borrowing requirement goes not to repaying debt but to paying interest on past debt. The other day the Prime Minister spoke to the CBI about investment and the Price Code. The Price Code is now so complex that one of our major companies recently said that it cost it £500,000 a year to operate it. If industry now has to pay 14 per cent. interest, its profit margins will not be big enough to service the loans. Will the Prime Minister's promise to improve the profit margins sufficiently to encourage investment be yet another broken pledge? Will the promise to allow prices to increase sufficiently to give a good return on investment be another broken pledge? One thing is certain, as the CBI pointed out to the Prime Minister and the Chancellor: either we have a price code which allows enough profitability or we do not get jobs tomorrow. The choice is as clear as that. Of course, both the Chancellor and the Prime Minister always pay lip service to profitability, but, when the time comes they fail to take the requisite action. However, they know that it is the key to future prosperity. Two of the most prosperous countries in the world with two of the strongest free enterprise systems are countries where the rôle of profit in building pros[column 1450]perity is encouraged and acknowledged. They are usually two of the countries from which this Government have to borrow money when they need it. Both the Prime Minister and the Chancellor also pay lip service to the need to encourage small businesses. They know that they will get new jobs from the small businesses of today. They know that they get more jobs from the expansion of small businesses. Yet, although they pay lip service to them, they do not hesitate to put enormous new taxes upon them which penalise and discourage them from expanding. Such taxes encourage a one-generation society and prevent people from passing on the fruits of their labours to their families. If we cut off the continuity of society from the efforts of the past and cut off the continuity to the future we shall get a selfish society. [Interruption.] Of course we shall, because we shall have no incentive to build for future generations. The Prime Minister and the Chancellor also pay lip service to taxation incentives. They pay lip service to the need for middle management to have more rewards. They pay lip service to their grievances. But what do they do about it? Nothing. These people are the discarded section of society under a Labour Government. The Government know that people need incentives and rewards. They know, for example, that the middle management person on about £5,000 a year will, after tax, take home about £500 a year more in France than he will in Britain. The Government know full well that the queues of these people to go abroad are increasing; yet they do nothing to help. They do nothing, except pay lip service to their grievances. It is not only those people who have suffered from the high taxation of a Labour Government. We have the highest rate of taxation on the lowest incomes in the whole of the EEC. We also have the highest rate of taxation on the highest incomes in the whole of the EEC. In fact, we have the highest rate of direct taxation in Europe. It is little wonder that many European countries are forging ahead much faster than we are, because they offer incentives. People in those countries keep more of their pay packets than is kept by our people here. [column 1451] The Government pay lip service to the mixed economy, but they put up enormous threats of future nationalisation. The Shipbuilding and Aircraft Industries Bill is a total irrelevance to the needs of our modern society. Nothing could be less justified than the pretence that the Government need this measure to save jobs in the shipbuilding and aircraft industries. The Government have all the power that they need. But they are nationalising out of dogma. They pay lip service to the mixed society, but in practice they reduce the mixed society as fast and as far as they can so that in fact we become the fixed society and the complete Socialist state. Added to that, vast new sections of industry are threatened under Labour's new draft programme for Britain, which has been called a plan for national ruin. Pharmaceuticals, banks, insurance and land are under the threat of nationalisation. As I said earlier, that is a recipe for the complete Iron Curtain State. We note that the Prime Minister has not disowned, but has only postponed, the programme. The Prime Minister has postponed the extra public expenditure for which the plan called, but yesterday Michael Footthe Leader of the House seemed to want more public expenditure. For him it is the red badge of Socialist courage. For the country it is the red badge of bankruptcy. Mismanagement of the economy leads not only to economic problems but to falling standards in the social services. Socialists pretend that they are the protectors of the social services, but, by damaging the economy, they are damaging our capacity to help those in need. Our social services are poorer than in many other countries in Europe, because they have concentrated on increasing prosperity and creating wealth. They have better pension schemes and better unemployment benefit. They spend more on health. They know that every welfare payment, every improved pension help to the elderly, every improved aid to the disabled, every child benefit depends in the last resort on the wealth-creating capacity of industry and the earnings of those who work in it. Therefore, it is not surprising that, with this Government's attitude towards the productive sector of the economy, pensions [column 1452]and child benefit proposals have been adversely affected. Because they had not laid the foundations for increased prosperity this Government have done a deal with pensions, which effectively eliminated increases for six months when price increases were at their peak. They shelved the child benefit scheme. We would have thought that they would at least introduce a scheme under which the same amount as they spend now could be handed to the mother and not to the father. But they did not do so. Apparently fear of the unions paralysed their capacity to act. If the devaluation of our currency is not enough in itself to justify the motion of no confidence—and I believe that it is—there is a second charge against the Government. They have devalued liberties as well. These days, having a job depends not only on joining a trade union but on joining a particular trade union. Labour would rather throw a person out of a job than let him continue in his job without joining the union. Mr. William Molloy (Ealing, North) The Conservatives threw men into gaol. Mrs. Thatcher The hon. Gentleman never did understand the rule of law, so his intervention is not surprising. Mr. Molloy Does the right hon. Lady deny that she was a member of a Government who put working men in gaol? Then they found themselves in a dilemma and had to be rescued by the Official Solicitor, who got the men out of gaol. Mrs. Thatcher The hon. Gentleman does not understand contempt of court. It is operated wholly independently of Parliament. What the hon. Member is proposing is that Parliament should interfere with the impartial administration of the law. This is how Lord Salmon put the case when he spoke on the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Amendment) Bill and the relevant section of it in March last year: Nevertheless, this Government struck that section out of the Act, so that we now have coercion and in order to keep a job a person must join a trade union. Many people thought it could never happen here but it did happen here as part of the price of the social contract, or should I say the anti-social contract? The other way in which the Government have devalued the rule of law is the way in which they bowed—moderates along with those below the Gangway—to the Clay Cross comrades—[Interruption.] It is interesting to note that on this occasion when an election took place the people knew exactly what to do with the Labour candidates who represented that area. The six official Labour candidates at Clay Cross, scene of the events involving those councillors who were in defiance of the Housing Finance Act, were defeated by Ratepayers' candidates for seats on the North-East Derbyshire District Council. It was the first time in 25 years of the Labour Party in Clay Cross that they were not represented on the council. That is what the people thought about the whole episode. What a pity that the Government could not live up to the people's standards. What a pity that the Government, including the moderates, chose to surrender to their own left wing—the Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and all. One of the few people who did not vote, I believe, was Roy Jenkinsthe Home Secretary. Mr. Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) Is the right hon. Lady aware that when these Ratepayers' candidates took office at Clay Cross the following week, at the first council meeting they barred the whole of the Press and the public and broke three election pledges at a stroke? Mrs. Thatcher What I am aware of is that the electorate totally rejected the Labour Party. [Hon. Members: “Answer.” ] The third charge we level against the Government is the way in which they have devalued our parlia[column 1454]mentary institutions. We all know the difficulties we had in getting the right numbers of our own people on Committees upstairs. We all know the episode the other night of the tied vote and the vote which was won by one. We all know the willingness of the present Government to abandon the rules of the House when it suits them. I know of no principle of parliamentary democracy which enables a Government to follow the rules when the result suits them but to change the rules at short notice when the result does not suit them. Mr. Bruce Douglas-Mann (Mitcham and Morden) When the right hon. Lady refers to the incident of the tied vote and the one vote victory she does so in a manner which suggests that she is still under the impression that there was something improper in it. As she is aware, I raised this matter on the following day because I was unhappy about it and I made it clear to my Whips that unless I was satisfied on this point I would not wish to support the Government on the remaining stages of the Aircraft and Ship-building Bill. I have now discussed this matter at length with the Government Chief Whip and I can assure the right hon. Lady that I am completely satisfied. [Hon. Members: “Give him a job.” ] If hon. Members opposite make assertions about giving me a job they have not followed my actions in this House very closely. I have discussed this matter very carefully and I would suggest that the right hon. Lady discusses it with her Chief Whip. I am sure that she will be satisfied and that she will then make it clear to the House. Mrs. Thatcher I only wish I could reciprocate what the hon. Member has said, but I cannot. All along I have stuck strictly to the facts. In statements put out in the Press we have stuck to the facts. I am not satisfied on this matter. I wish I could be. Mr. Nicholas Fairbairn (Kinross and West Perthshire) Does my right hon. Friend appreciate that while I was abroad I was paired with a Labour Whip who voted? Mrs. Thatcher I was aware of that fact. Immediately following the Chancellor's Budget I made quite clear what view I took on his innovation about referring [column 1455]certain matters to the TUC. I am sure that the stand I took then was correct, and I endorse it now. I yield to no one on the right of this House to represent all the people. It is the only forum which does represent all the people, and that duty is not discharged by rubber-stamping proposals from the TUC, or any other body. Consultation is quite a different thing from largely handing over authority. It is quite wrong for agreements to be made outside this House and then presented to it as a fait accompli. It is wrong to introduce legislation into this House simply because it is part of an agreement between the Government and the TUC. If the Trades Union Congress, having agreed to legislation, says that it is incumbent upon us to adopt it, I suggest that when a Labour Member writes his next election address it should be in these terms: The Member from whom I am quoting went on to say, He continued, That was said by the former Member for Ebbw Vale, Mr. Aneurin Bevan. Mr. Norman Tebbit (Chingford) Not that rat. Mr. Robert Hughes (Aberdeen, North) On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I distinctly heard the hon. Member for Chingford (Mr. Tebbit) say “Not that rat” . Is that in order? Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Bryant Godman Irvine) I have heard nothing which is out of order. Mr. Martin Flannery (Sheffield, Hillsborough) Further to that point of order, [column 1456]Mr. Deputy Speaker. Every one of us over here heard the hon. Member for Chingford (Mr. Tebbit) use the word “rat” about my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House. Mr. Deputy Speaker If the hon. Member for Chingford (Mr. Tebbit) did say the word which is alleged, I think he should withdraw it. Mr. Tebbit If it makes it easier for the House, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I will say that the expression I used was “Not that rat” . I specified no particular person. If it will make it easier I will use the words “One of those who are lower than vermin” , to employ a phrase once used by the former Member for Ebbw Vale. Mrs. Thatcher The last words in my quotation represented perfectly the situation which we feel, and we regret that that view has been abandoned by the Government and the Labour Party. It seems as though under modern day Socialism we have the trappings of parliamentary democracy, but that we are in danger of losing the substance of it. Michael FootThe Leader of the House would not even allow us to debate the proposed agreement with the TUC, let alone to influence it. The Government are trying to sidestep and debase democracy. I have asked almost every week for a debate and a White Paper. Every week the answer has been “No” . There are many other points that my right hon. and hon. Friends will wish to take up. They will wish to consider questions of defence and security, the pursuit of foreign affaris in areas where we should take an initiative such as Cyprus and Rhodesia, the Government's failure to pursue the interests of our fishermen in the EEC. In all of these, Government actions scarcely give rise to confidence. If the Liberals wish to abstain rather than risk a General Election in which they might do badly, any claim they have to be a party of principle is destroyed for ever more. A heavy responsibility rests on anyone who chooses to help this disastrous Administration to stagger on for a few more miserable months. If the Liberals wish to endorse more nationalisation, the Dock Work Regulation Bill the attack on parliamentary democracy, the closed shop, high taxation, perpetual borrowing, higher unemployment than [column 1457]ever before, record inflation and falling living standards, so be it. At least the nation will know where they stand and that when under fire they flee. The nation will also know that the Conservative Party will not flinch or falter and nor does it fear to face the electorate. People are tired of seeing Britain slipping year by year further behind under Socialism. They know the full extent of our latent talents and abilities and would prefer to use them to forge ahead so that we may hold up our heads with pride instead of just holding out our hands for cash. I believe that the Government are far less ready to face reality than are the people of Britain. I believe that the people have the will and the courage to do anything required of them so long as they believe that it will lead to the rebirth of Britain. The Prime Minister can hardly be happy with things as they are—devalued currency, devalued standards and a Parliament that his Government disregard when they can and would devalue if they could. In 1967 after his own economic strategy had collapsed the Prime Minister did a very honourable thing and resigned as Chancellor of the Exchequer. He rightly took on himself the responsibility for three years of wrong economic policies, overspending and the decline in the value of the pound. He has not been Prime Minister long, but he has been in the Cabinet since the Government came to office. Now it is he who is presiding over the mismanagement of the economy, the decline in standards and the attack on liberties. Nothing would be more honourable than for him to remember what he did in 1967 and proffer this time not just his own resignation but that of his entire Government. It is time to end this policy of “steady as she sinks.” 4.48 p.m. The Prime Minister (Mr. James Callaghan) I heard the right hon. Lady the Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher) say that the motion of no confidence was not lightly put down. I did not hear her move it, and I do not know whether that was a Freudian slip. [Hon. Members: “She did move it.” ] Very well, she did. At any rate, having heard her interesting speech, I can quite understand why the motion was not lightly put down. [column 1458] Whatever the right hon. Lady's motives in insisting on this vote of no confidence, with the support of a unanimous Shadow Cabinet—[Interruption]—I shall perhaps return to her motives a little later—the debate gives the Government an opportunity to restate their objectives and their strategy and political intentions. [Interruption.] If Opposition Members will do me the courtesy of listening to what I have to say instead of interrupting every half-sentence, I shall do my best to answer the right hon. Lady. I have said on many occasions, and I apply it to both sides of the House, that sedentary interruptions do nothing but lower the tone of the House. I say that to everybody. The Government's economic objective is to overcome inflation. Already, thanks to the economic and financial policies of the Government, bolstered as they have been by the pay agreement made by the TUC, inflation has been reduced. The right hon. Lady complained that it was far too high at 18.9 per cent. I agree with her that it is far too high, but this is a rate which will continue to decline further throughout the rest of the year and our intention and belief is that by the end of 1977, if we continue with the pay policy which the TUC is proposing to its conference next week and if the Government continue with their existing policy on fiscal and monetary control, we shall be able to reduce the rate of inflation to a figure which will be comparable with that of our major competitors—France, Germany, the United States and Japan. That is the Government's first and overriding objective, and I believe that it will secure the support of the whole House. Our second objective is to make inroads into the unacceptably high level of unemployment, which has been partially caused by inflation as well as by the world recession, and to reduce it by 1979 to 3 per cent. Our third objective, an overall objective which was agreed between the CBI, the TUC and the Government last autumn at Chequers, is to achieve a high-output, high-productivity, high-wage economy based on full employment. Our next objective is to foster export-led expansion—an expansion which has already begun—and to ensure that this expansion, together with the domestic [column 1459]expansion which is now on the point of beginning, will have room to go on without being hampered by excessive—I repeat the word “excessive” —public expenditure demands next year. Nor must industrial expansion be fuelled by a return of inflation. We therefore have the objective of increasing industrial efficiency and enabling the wealth-producing manufacturing industry to earn sufficient surplus so that it may invest in the necessary new plant and machinery. Another important objective, and here I part from the right hon. Lady, is to use public expenditure as a means of increasing real personal freedoms. [Hon. Members: “Gobbledegook.” ] It is not gobbledegook. The areas I was referring to are areas such as the provision of housing, the provision of educational opportunities, the provision of hospital treatment and proper health facilities and the provision of pensions in order to provide security in old age. When hon. Members say “Gobbledegook” they tempt me to rehearse my own personal position, which I shall do. I was brought up in a family where, after my father died, we lived in two furnished rooms. That was a denial of freedom. I was unable to go to university because my parents could not pay for it. That was a denial of freedom. There was an occasion when I should have had hospital treatment and could not because we could not afford it. That was a denial of freedom. I was not alone in my generation. I am one of the older Members of the House: the new generation, thank God, has those freedoms. That is what public expenditure is about. Among our objectives will be the underpinning of the necessary industrial regeneration of British industry. We shall seek co-operation on planning agreements. We shall support the industrial regions and we shall use the National Enterprise Board to assist in this purpose. The right hon. Lady was quite right to mention that, in addition to the economic aspects on which she criticised us, a vote of no confidence in the Government should cover much wider fields. First let me say that among our objectives—I do not necessarily put these in order of importance, although the one I am about to enumerate is very important—is the preserving of [column 1460]the integrity of the United Kingdom whilst ensuring that Scotland and Wales enjoy the devolution for which they ask. I notice that the Scottish nationalists complain that we have not yet introduced the Bill. Even if we had done so I do not think they would not be voting with us tonight, because there is no prospect of satisfying them. Their ultimate objective is separation, is it not? No Bill which we could introduce would satisfy the Scottish nationalists. For the majority of the people in Scotland, however—and I emphasise the word “majority” —let me assure them that we shall be proceeding with a Bill in the autumn to achieve devolution in the next Session of Parliament. The Scottish nationalists now intend to vote with a Conservative Opposition who say that they intend to vote against any devolution Bill that we introduce. That is a very strange alliance between the do-nothing Tories and the all-or-nothing Scottish nationalists in order to bring down a Labour Government. Mrs. Winifred Ewing (Moray and Nairn)rose—— The Prime Minister I think I have put the position perfectly fairly. I have a lot to say, and the hon. Lady will be able to make her speech later. Mrs. Winifred Ewing rose—— Mr. Deputy Speaker Order. Unless the Prime Minister gives way, the hon. Lady must resume her seat. The Prime Minister Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I have a long speech to make. Next, we have the overriding objective to persist in the hard and stony path of pacifying Northern Ireland, to assure the people of Northern Ireland that there is no doubt about their position as part of the United Kingdom as long as they wish to remain so but that we shall be ready to envisage a devolved Government in Northern Ireland who have the support of the whole community. These are our objectives. We shall pursue the objective of ensuring, as far [column 1461]as Parliament can, a society in which racial harmony and tolerance will flourish, and through the medium of the Race Relations Bill, now on its way through Parliament, we shall give legislative backing to that end. Finally, when we have recovered our economic strength we shall use the influence that we gain from our economic recovery to strengthen our position abroad, to ensure a peaceful solution to world problems through the use of the United Nations and other international organisations, to assist in overcoming the poverty of the Third World and to use our influence in the defence of freedom and to strengthen Europe's voice. These are the overall objectives of the Government. From the beginning our strategy has been to replace the atmosphere of confrontation, which we found when we came to office, by co-operation. The task is so great that no Government can fulfil these major objectives on its own. Perhaps the greatest condemnation of the previous Administration was that it forfeited the confidence of workers, especially in its ham-fisted handling of industrial relations. When we were in opposition we devised a social contract. That has been the subject of many sneers, but it was designed for one purpose—and I know because I had some hand in it—namely, the idea of co-operation as opposed to confrontation. The repeal of the Industrial Relations Act, undertaken under the leadership of my right hon. Friend the Lord President of the Council, enabled a fresh and more hopeful start to be made in industry between management and men. It must be the experience of nearly everybody that the atmosphere in Britain's factories and workshops has much improved since the confrontation of 1973. Evidence of this comes in every day—and, what is more, the record shows it to be so. During 1975 we lost fewer days through strikes than in any year since 1968. We have kept up the improvement during 1976, and in the first four months of this year little more than half of last year's total of working days was lost, favourable though last year was. If we keep that up in our industrial relations, we shall be on the way to a new era. [column 1462]Furthermore, the number of stoppages this year is far smaller than the figure last year. It is only the class warriors among the Opposition who cannot see what is happening in industry today. I agree with the right hon. Lady that the social contract was a unique innovation in our political life. It is a topic to which Parliament must pay attention so that Parliament can be involved in a full discussion of these matters. Even if that situation has not been properly worked out—and I do not think that it has—not even the Leader of the Opposition could deny that the social contract has had remarkable success in improving the atmosphere of this country. We intend to reinforce the situation in due course with a new social contract to enable us to proceed with confidence in the years ahead. The Labour Government must rest not only on trade union and working-class support, as we do, but on the support of a wider group—and, indeed, we need every other group in the country, too. The CBI knows from my meetings with its representatives that we seek its co-operation in the task of industrial regeneration. The Government cannot do this on their own. The right hon. Lady said that we paid lip-service to the situation that affects the CBI and middle managers. There is a difference between paying lip service and saying “Yes, we recognise your problem, but there are things that must wait.” This is the position in which the country finds itself. Middle managers are a group whose voice has not been much heard, but they have behind them a great deal of experience. They are responsible for procuring new orders and for meeting export deadlines. I know that some of them feel that they have borne the brunt of events in the last few years and have regarded themselves as being between the upper and nether millstones. I wish to assure them that the Government recognise that their contribution, too, is invaluable. Let me return to the question of group pressure. There are many well-organised and socially-valuable groups who are making clamant demands on the Government. Often, if not always, such demands are entirely justifiable. The middle managers feel that their standards have been cut. Young people in Scotland, England and Wales are finishing their [column 1463]teacher-training and are pressing that every one of them should have a teaching job irrespective of whether the resources exist to provide those jobs, and despite the great improvement in pupil-teacher ratios. Anybody who has examined the figures will know the vast improvement which has taken place under Labour and Conservative Governments, in the last 10 or 15 years. The Child Poverty Action Group is pressing the Government for full implementation of the new scheme to give large additional allowances to mothers. The pensioners are pressing for an earlier increase in their pensions, and foremen and skilled men in industry feel that their differentials are being squeezed. All have legitimate claims. The common factor is that they are all demanding more. Mr. Churchill (Stretford) And the money is not there. The Prime Minister A beam of truth has at last emerged from the Opposition, and I thank the hon. Member for Stretford (Mr. Churchill) for his support. There is a sensible growing recognition in the country that not every demand can be satisfied and that some have to be deferred. Mr. Tebbit Nationalisation? The Prime Minister But in order to secure acquiescence in this situation, our people must feel that there is a sense of underlying fairness and good prospects for the future. Let me tell the country once again that the first task is to beat inflation. We are well on the way. This, in turn, will enable us to reduce unemployment. Hence, the significance of the special conference of the TUC to be held a week today. At that meeting the trade unions will be pledging themselves to adhere to wage levels that will ensure that we halve the rate of inflation by the end of 1977, even though they take that decision in the full knowledge that this will cause them great difficulties and will increase comparative grievances and bring some hardship to their members. We shall then be on a level with our competitors. That is their contribution to helping to solve Britain's economic problems. In return, what do they ask? They ask that [column 1464]unemployment should be cut. They ask that expenditure on such matters as housing, education and welfare should not be sacrificed in mad panic cuts. They also ask for a voice in economic and social policies when they are being formulated by the Government. Is that attitude unreasonable? Mr. Hugh Fraser (Stafford and Stone) Have an election and find out. The Prime Minister Is this agreement with the trade unions worth having? What do the Opposition say? Mr. Alexander Fletcher (Edinburgh, North) Ask the people. The Prime Minister Does such an agreement offer more prospect than the angry confrontation of the years 1970–74? What do the Opposition think about these matters? Mr. Michael McNair-Wilson (Newbury) Will the Prime Minister say what figure of inflation was used in the talks between the Government when obtaining their new pay deal? The Prime Minister I am not sure to what figure the hon. Gentleman refers, but what we are hoping to do with these policies is to reduce inflation to something like 7 to 8 per cent. or thereabouts by the end of 1977, which will put us on a level with most of our major competitors. That is an objective well worth reaching, and it is well worth supporting the Government to achieve that. We all know that the Opposition's policy of confrontation failed. We now have a policy of co-operation and of trying to work things out. Let me ask the Opposition a question. If they could obtain such an agreement, would they be willing to offer in exchange for such an agreement anything—or nothing? Let me take an example. Let us suppose that there was an industry in distress, with the prospect of a large number of workers being laid off. Let us imagine that such an industry had inadequate financial resources and was in need of drastic reorganisation if it was to face world competition. It could be Rolls-Royce, but it happens to be ship-building. Would the Opposition be willing in such circumstances in the national interest to assist the passage of such a Bill to reorganise that industry? Mr. Tebbit rose—— The Prime Minister I shall not give way to the hon. Gentleman. He does not yet speak for the Opposition. He may do one day, but not yet. I am asking these questions of those who will be replying to the debate. Mr. Tebbit Chicken! The Prime Minister Would they be willing to do so? If so, and it is in the national interest, I ask them to overcome whatever feelings they may have about the events of a fortnight ago, when clearly there was a genuine feeling of grievance—a feeling which I acknowledged to the Leader of the Opposition. Will they be willing, in the country's interests, to let business proceed? It is the future of this industry we are discussing. It is the future of these men we are discussing. If the Opposition are willing, we shall be ready to hold out a hand so that we can resume discussions. If not, the country will know that the Opposition are still playing at their playground games. Mrs. Thatcher Is the right hon. Gentleman prepared to put the grievance right? The Prime Minister Yes, I will be willing to discuss the matter with the right hon. Lady at any time. The fact that she has a grievance does not necessarily mean that that grievance is shared. She must come half way and not insist on everything. Like the right hon. Lady, the Government are particularly concerned about the level of public expenditure. The problem, which she did not state in this way—I will state it in my own way—is obvious. It is that the amount we have spent on social facilities, and our spending on the matters I referred to at the beginning of my speech, have increased very much faster than our national income. Despite difficulties with some of my hon. Friends in the debate in March, the Government have set out, and intend to adhere to, the planned expenditure for 1978–79. They have established a level which provides for very little increase over and beyond the programmes for next year. The local authority world is very important in this connection because it [column 1466]accounts for about one-third of all public expenditure. Thanks to the new early-warning system for controlling monetary expenditure, the local authorities discovered and informed the Government at this early stage in the financial year—it is only two months old—that if they went on spending as they had begun, they might over-spend by as much as £400 million. The local authorities recognised that that was unacceptable and inconsistent with the programmes and the agreements they reached with the Government at an early stage. They have, therefore, agreed to revise their expenditure programmes and bring them back into line with the agreements to which they put their hand. I recognise that in doing so they will need to take some hard decisions. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment has asked that there should be full consultation with the trade unions concerned, with full use made of provisions for early retirement and, where appropriate, for the sharing of services and staff between authorities. I believe that local authorities have the intention to keep to the agreed limit. It is in our interests that they should do so, for the reasons that the right hon. Lady gave. In 1977–78, the forecasts show, manufacturing industry and the basic industries will be seeking funds to carry out fresh and enlarged programmes of new investment in plant and machinery. Manufacturing industry is a creator of wealth. Some of its profits have been very low in recent years. It will, therefore, be in competition with local and central Government when borrowing available funds. Part of the requirements of the nationalised industries for funds for expansion will also fall on the Government. The Government are very carefully watching the development of these investment plans against the present level of public expenditure. Our policy will be to ensure that there is no return to galloping inflation as a result of the upturn in export-led expansion or in the economy generally. There is no need for panic cuts in public expenditure. We shall take whatever action is necessary to achieve an appropriate balance between public expenditure and the needs of manufacturing industry. Mr. Ian Gow (Eastbourne) Will the right hon. Gentleman tell the House whether he thinks that the share of GDP taken by public expenditure could and should go above the present figure of 60 per cent.? The Prime Minister The level of public expenditure should not be determined by any arbitrary arithmetical figure. It should be fixed by determining the social needs of people which cannot be met individually and the requirements of manufacturing and basic industries for available funds. To try to take a simple arithmetical figure is to put oneself into a straitjacket. The country should not accept that. I should like, if the Opposition would excuse me, to say a few words about some of the things that are going right for Britain. I deal first with engineering. The volume of new orders by overseas countries for our products rose by as much as 10 per cent.. in the three months to last February. Commercial vehicle production ordered overseas in the past six months has risen by 11 per cent. New orders for machine tools for export in the three months to February nearly doubled—they rose by 94 per cent. Steel production rose by 18 per cent. in the three months to April. The total value of all our sales of goods to overseas countries rose by 8½ per cent. in the three months to April while our imports in the same period rose much less, by 5½ per cent. Likewise, the volume of our exports rose by 4 per cent. in the same period, whereas the volume of our imports rose by ½ per cent. I hope that the hon. Member for Stretford approves of that. The result of all this was that we had a substantial surplus in our visible trade balance, excluding oil, of £443 million in the three months to April in addition to a comparable figure of £283 million in the three months before that. Note that last year was only the second year in the past 20 years when Britain increased its volume of world trade. That is the overseas side. Even if we include high-price oil—and I think that we should now begin to include this because we could tend to deceive ourselves if we excluded it for ever—our current account deficit in the three months to April averaged £52 [column 1468]million a month compared with £150 million a month for 1975. Let us also remember—I know that the Opposition will excuse me for saying such things—that North Sea oil is likely to save us about £1 billion this year alone. At home we intend to continue with our policy to strengthen industry in the regions. We look for full co-operation on such matters as planning agreements to assist the regeneration of British industry. We shall also try to plan ahead to avoid bottlenecks in skilled manpower and in component requirements. The National Enterprise Board is already using part of the funds made available to it to avoid bottlenecks in the machine tool industry. Those who have lived through past industrial cycles know that this is always where the difficulty comes. What the board is doing is financing advance orders being placed by firms on a deferred payments basis so that the tools will be manufactured now and will be ready to be taken up as the economy turns up. The Government are financing the production of steel in advance of requirements. How necessary that is! There are still some long-term contracts from two or three years ago requiring the import of steel. That was when we had the last cramping of steel output. Is this not democratic Socialist planning? Or is this the Gestapo? The Government are taking the lead with the NEB in assisting the formation of consortia of British firms so that they may be in a better position to tender for contracts abroad when they are placed on a turnkey basis. I think that Opposition Members who deal with these matters know that one of the weaknesses of British industry has been its inability, because of its size—there have not been super-companies—to get together in order to fulfill some of the very large orders, some of which run into £200 million and £300 million for a single project. The National Enterprise Board is taking this on board and in assisting this is filling a very important gap. I shall not say much about the standby credit announced by the Chancellor earlier this week. I gave the right hon. Lady yesterday my view that this is a valuable reinforcement to the international monetary situation. I have [column 1469]never argued that by itself this is a solution to our domestic difficulties; nor has my right hon. Friend. But, taken in conjunction with the strategy I have already outlined and taken in conjunction with the measures that we are now following, this credit is a powerful reinforcement to what we are doing. As to the future, when tonight is over we shall press ahead with our plans for legislation for Scotland and Wales next year, and with our policies in Northern Ireland. We shall press ahead with the Race Relations Bill, with the support of all parties, and we shall place that on the statute book. That is our path, and it is deserving of the nation's confidence. The right hon. Lady does not need to spell out her alternative policies. She asked a lot of questions. What I did not hear stated by her when she asked the questions was what was her policy—I did not hear what was her policy—I am choking on my own words—I did not hear from the right hon. Lady what was her policy on defence, what were her proposals for the fishing industry, or what she would do about Rhodesia. She does not need to spell her policies out, but the country will draw its own conclusions from her failure to do so. Sir John Eden (Bournemouth, West) Will the right hon. Gentleman give way? The Prime Minister No. With respect, I am addressing these remarks to the right hon. Lady herself. Sir J. Eden I may be able to help the Prime Minister with his voice problem. The Prime Minister All right. I shall give way. Sir J. Eden I should like to raise a point that might help the right hon. Gentleman for a moment or two—and it does not really matter for this purpose what I say. The right hon. Gentleman has just mentioned Rhodesia. Is he himself taking any new initiative to prevent the development of what appears to be a very ugly scene indeed, or is he relying solely on the initiative being taken by the United States Secretary of State? Does he recognise that first and foremost this is a British responsibility? Will he [column 1470]give some information about what action he has taken? The Prime Minister I am very grateful to the right hon. Gentleman. On the matter of Rhodesia, I think that the next step is that which will be taken as a result of the meeting between Dr. Kissinger and Mr. Vorster. We are, of course, closely in touch with Dr. Kissinger about this. There are also contacts with Mr. Vorster. That is not to say that we contract out of this situation. However, there are times when the baton has to be handed to others, and we then pick it up again. We have carried it a long way forward. For example, we have influenced American policy considerably in the American attitude towards Rhodesia, and if American strength, in every sense, can be used with South Africa in order to ensure that majority rule is established in Rhodesia, whatever the combination of countries may be, that will be a service to the whole of the people of Rhodesia. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary is very closely in touch with the situation and will continue to be so. I am much obliged to the right hon. Member for Bournemouth, West (Sir J. Eden). I hardly like to be unkind to the right hon. Lady the Leader of the Opposition, as she has been so considerate—but I must be, because I have written it down. In political matters, I am afraid that the Opposition, as the right hon. Lady showed by her questions, have a gaping void where there should be a policy on all the matters that I enumerated. We have heard nothing of what the Opposition would do. On economic matters the Conservative Party is split down the middle between the monetarists and the pseudo-Keynesians, with the right hon. Lady oscillating between them, floating from the arms of Leeds, North-East to the arms of Surrey, East, while the right hon. Member for Penrith and The Border (Mr. Whitelaw), looking slightly bewildered and baffled, tries to cut in on this excuse-me dance that is going on. The right hon. Lady has said that she is in favour of large public expenditure cuts now. They would hit at the young, the improverished, the poor, and they would hurt the sick. Somehow I cannot [column 1471]understand why the right hon. Lady believes that from the conflict and confrontation that would ensue she would then secure support for a Conservative Administration in the country. The right hon. Lady would throw away the atmosphere that is beginning to pervade British industry and to spread into the rest of the country. Indeed she has already begun with what was grandiloquently called last weekend a parliamentary fight to the death—although after Monday and Tuesday I thought that it was looking a little tattered. Was there ever a more reluctant army wheeled into motion than that on this particular issue this afternoon? If by some mischance the motion were carried tonight, there would be a General Election. I put on record my own very clear view that whatever party advantage might ensue, a General Election at this time would be against the national interest. This week the miners have pledged their co-operation for another year. The National Union of General and Municipal Workers has done the same, and I see that NALGO has done the same this morning, as have many other unions in previous weeks. Next week the TUC Special Congress will set its seal of approval. Would the right hon. Lady throw all that away? I think not. Her Shadow Cabinet must bear responsibility for not restraining her on this motion of confidence. She was reported in the Daily Express this morning as saying “You have either got it or you haven't” . The Opposition have got it all right; all of them. In any case, it is not for me to intrude upon the Shadow Cabinet. I leave the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. McCrindle) to sum up the country's views of the Shadow Cabinet. In case the House missed it, let me repeat what the hon. Gentleman said. I am not surprised that the right hon. Lady herself had to take these decisions. The hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar summed up the Shadow Cabinet a week or two ago like this: “They are an unconvincing lot of also-rans” . The Government will press ahead with our objectives. The result of the vote tonight will uphold us. I hope that right [column 1472]hon. and hon. Members who come winging back from Afric and Cathay, and Cathay and Afric, will feel that their journey was really necessary. More seriously, I hope that after tonight my right hon. and hon. Friends the Northern Ireland Ministers will be able to return to their posts of duty in Belfast. For what purpose has all this clamour and clangour been? I say that it is to satisfy an impatient and imperious vanity. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr speaker right hon lady leader opposition propose motion tell house representation liberal amendment give considerable careful thought question tell house longstanding convention government time discussion motion confidence censure official opposition government table amendment motion amendment table party group house call purpose convention allow unimpeded clear decision take motion weigh mind present parliament number small opposition party somewhat large parliament year past affect principle state unable accept amendment today hope liberal party find opportunity seek formal decision way mr j beith berwickupon tweed point order mr speaker grateful careful thought give request request party ample reason set desirable procedure committee consideration fact interruption mr speaker order deplore grow tendency house side shout abusive term harmony dignity house mr beith seek ask mr speaker think circumstance describe desirable procedure committee consider consider related matter past suggestion mr speaker way party represent house confidence majestys column provide viable government register view ease difficult decision give opposition unlikely supply day available purpose mr speaker doubt procedure committee consider position parliament minority party obviously anxious express point view mrs thatcher pm mrs margaret thatcher finchley beg house confidence majestys government conservative opposition motion confidence government socialist motion confidence want clear motion lightly specific occasion arise economic situation subject criticism plenty criticise government handle nation affair debate set statistic figure cent way life economic policy value standard economic freedom law parliamentary democracy parliament forum nation hon member hear hear government vote soon debate people equally important different tell free society free extent variety cultivate past year policy government see retreat freedom retreat rule law retreat parliamentary democracy retreat mixed free enterprise economy retreat live nation mean note take socialist government boast pound rise week ago denis healeythe chancellor exchequer announce budget take socialist column boast annual rate inflation cent state arrive socialism socialist rapid stride take iron curtain state see increase nationalisation measure increase power central government large small company increase level tax pay packet saving alike increase proportion national income spend wageearner government government agency result james callaghanthe prime minister socialist minister hugh gaitskellthe chancellor exchequer policy mean reduce standard live people accurate prediction quarrel clear socialist system good create wealth spend wealth create charge government mismanagement economy common characteristic socialist government expenditure rapidly exceed taxpayer capacity pay quench government appetite spend chancellor run pound pocket go moneylender chancellor elevate bluster principle economic policy borrowing way life chancellor budget continue course overspending follow come office continue series spiteful gesture manager claim want help include innovation surrender power decide fiscal policy power determine course economy outside body leave tuc decide level taxis year measure leave tuc determine value pound surprisingly week budget day week near disaster reserve deplete pound sinking week week new low column warn chancellor introduce budget recipe disaster nation watch disaster unfold day day finally extent potential catastrophe penetrate complacency take action thoughtful action reflex action action labour government war face consequence policy chancellor fix enormous loan socialist government buy time borrow time enable postpone hard decision time enable carry month policy fail borrow time deeply deeply debt chancellor choose claim loan able fix sign confidence rest world policy sign confidence sign patience world give little time government remove office doom money go drain chancellor borrowing time fundamental change time avoid fundamental change government dare tell truth follower let country cost special tuc congress week trade union leader get restive week times alan fisher warn chancellor dare act week dare act autumn labour party conference come miracle cure borrowing overspending nationalisation go drift debt decay course government hon member shocking yes depict shocking performance government column time government stagger short term financial crisis financial crisis damage longterm economic prospect country put far public sector starve private sector yesterday prime minister bournemouth say private sector scoop pool public sector chancellor busy announce new loan loan cent annual rate interest nation handle affair competently prudently bring interest rate help manufacturer invest borrow high rate debt interest major problem amount cent government expenditure absorb yield vat corporation tax finance debt interest way half public sector borrowing requirement go repaying debt pay interest past debt day prime minister speak cbi investment price code price code complex major company recently say cost year operate industry pay cent interest profit margin big service loan prime minister promise improve profit margin sufficiently encourage investment broken pledge promise allow price increase sufficiently good return investment broken pledge thing certain cbi point prime minister chancellor price code allow profitability job tomorrow choice clear course chancellor prime minister pay lip service profitability time come fail requisite action know key future prosperity prosperous country world strong free enterprise system country rôle profit build proscolumn encourage acknowledge usually country government borrow money need prime minister chancellor pay lip service need encourage small business know new job small business today know job expansion small business pay lip service hesitate enormous new taxis penalise discourage expand taxis encourage onegeneration society prevent people pass fruit labour family cut continuity society effort past cut continuity future shall selfish society interruption course shall shall incentive build future generation prime minister chancellor pay lip service taxation incentive pay lip service need middle management reward pay lip service grievance people discard section society labour government government know people need incentive reward know example middle management person year tax home year france britain government know queue people abroad increase help pay lip service grievance people suffer high taxation labour government high rate taxation low income eec high rate taxation high income eec fact high rate direct taxation europe little wonder european country forge ahead fast offer incentive people country pay packet keep people column government pay lip service mixed economy enormous threat future nationalisation shipbuilding aircraft industry bill total irrelevance need modern society justified pretence government need measure save job shipbuilding aircraft industry government power need nationalise dogma pay lip service mixed society practice reduce mixed society fast far fact fix society complete socialist state add vast new section industry threaten labour new draft programme britain call plan national ruin pharmaceuticals bank insurance land threat nationalisation say early recipe complete iron curtain state note prime minister disown postpone programme prime minister postpone extra public expenditure plan call yesterday michael footthe leader house want public expenditure red badge socialist courage country red badge bankruptcy mismanagement economy lead economic problem fall standard social service socialist pretend protector social service damage economy damage capacity help need social service poor country europe concentrate increase prosperity create wealth well pension scheme well unemployment benefit spend health know welfare payment improve pension help elderly improved aid disabled child benefit depend resort wealthcreating capacity industry earning work surprising government attitude productive sector economy pension column child benefit proposal adversely affect lay foundation increase prosperity government deal pension effectively eliminate increase month price increase peak shelve child benefit scheme think introduce scheme spend hand mother father apparently fear union paralyse capacity act devaluation currency justify motion confidence believe second charge government devalue liberty day have job depend join trade union join particular trade union labour throw person job let continue job join union mr william molloy eale north conservative throw man gaol mrs thatcher hon gentleman understand rule law intervention surprising mr molloy right hon lady deny member government work man gaol find dilemma rescue official solicitor get man gaol mrs thatcher hon gentleman understand contempt court operate wholly independently parliament hon member propose parliament interfere impartial administration law lord salmon case speak trade union labour relation amendment bill relevant section march year government strike section act coercion order job person join trade union people think happen happen price social contract antisocial contract way government devalue rule law way bow moderate gangway clay cross comrade interruption interesting note occasion election take place people know exactly labour candidate represent area official labour candidate clay cross scene event involve councillor defiance housing finance act defeat ratepayer candidate seat northeast derbyshire district council time year labour party clay cross represent council people think episode pity government live people standard pity government include moderate choose surrender left wing prime minister chancellor exchequer people vote believe roy jenkinsthe home secretary mr dennis skinner bolsover right hon lady aware ratepayer candidate take office clay cross following week council meeting bar press public break election pledge stroke mrs thatcher aware electorate totally reject labour party hon member answer charge level government way devalue parliacolumn institution know difficulty get right number people committee upstairs know episode night tie vote vote win know willingness present government abandon rule house suit know principle parliamentary democracy enable government follow rule result suit change rule short notice result suit mr bruce douglasmann mitcham morden right hon lady refer incident tie vote vote victory manner suggest impression improper aware raise matter follow day unhappy clear whip satisfied point wish support government remain stage aircraft shipbuilding bill discuss matter length government chief whip assure right hon lady completely satisfied hon member job hon member opposite assertion give job follow action house closely discuss matter carefully suggest right hon lady discuss chief whip sure satisfied clear house mrs thatcher wish reciprocate hon member say stick strictly fact statement press stick fact satisfied matter wish mr nicholas fairbairn kinross west perthshire right hon friend appreciate abroad pair labour whip vote mrs thatcher aware fact immediately follow chancellor budget clear view take innovation refer column matter tuc sure stand take correct endorse yield right house represent people forum represent people duty discharge rubberstamp proposal tuc body consultation different thing largely hand authority wrong agreement outside house present fait accompli wrong introduce legislation house simply agreement government tuc trade union congress having agree legislation say incumbent adopt suggest labour member write election address term member quote go continue say member ebbw vale mr aneurin bevan mr norman tebbit chingford rat mr robert hughes aberdeen north point order mr deputy speaker distinctly hear hon member chingford mr tebbit rat order mr deputy speaker mr bryant godman irvine hear order mr martin flannery sheffield hillsborough point order column deputy speaker hear hon member chingford mr tebbit use word rat right hon friend leader house mr deputy speaker hon member chingford mr tebbit word allege think withdraw mr tebbit make easy house mr deputy speaker expression rat specify particular person easy use word low vermin employ phrase member ebbw vale mrs thatcher word quotation represent perfectly situation feel regret view abandon government labour party modern day socialism trapping parliamentary democracy danger lose substance michael footthe leader house allow debate propose agreement tuc let influence government try sidestep debase democracy ask week debate white paper week answer point right hon hon friend wish wish consider question defence security pursuit foreign affaris area initiative cyprus rhodesia government failure pursue interest fisherman eec government action scarcely rise confidence liberal wish abstain risk general election badly claim party principle destroy heavy responsibility rest choose help disastrous administration stagger miserable month liberal wish endorse nationalisation dock work regulation bill attack parliamentary democracy closed shop high taxation perpetual borrowing high unemployment column record inflation fall living standard nation know stand fire flee nation know conservative party flinch falter fear face electorate people tired see britain slip year year socialism know extent latent talent ability prefer use forge ahead hold head pride instead hold hand cash believe government far ready face reality people britain believe people courage require long believe lead rebirth britain prime minister hardly happy thing devalue currency devalue standard parliament government disregard devalue economic strategy collapse prime minister honourable thing resign chancellor exchequer rightly take responsibility year wrong economic policy overspend decline value pound prime minister long cabinet government come office preside mismanagement economy decline standard attack liberty honourable remember proffer time resignation entire government time end policy steady sink pm prime minister mr james callaghan hear right hon lady member finchley mrs thatcher motion confidence lightly hear know freudian slip hon member rate having hear interesting speech understand motion lightly column right hon ladys motive insist vote confidence support unanimous shadow cabinet interruption shall return motive little later debate give government opportunity restate objective strategy political intention interruption opposition member courtesy listen instead interrupt halfsentence shall good answer right hon lady say occasion apply side house sedentary interruption low tone house everybody government economic objective overcome inflation thank economic financial policy government bolster pay agreement tuc inflation reduce right hon lady complain far high cent agree far high rate continue decline rest year intention belief end continue pay policy tuc propose conference week government continue exist policy fiscal monetary control shall able reduce rate inflation figure comparable major competitor france germany united states japan government overriding objective believe secure support house second objective inroad unacceptably high level unemployment partially cause inflation world recession reduce cent objective overall objective agree cbi tuc government autumn chequer achieve highoutput highproductivity highwage economy base employment objective foster exportled expansion expansion begin ensure expansion domestic column point beginning room hamper excessive repeat word excessive public expenditure demand year industrial expansion fuel return inflation objective increase industrial efficiency enable wealthproduce manufacture industry earn sufficient surplus invest necessary new plant machinery important objective right hon lady use public expenditure means increase real personal freedom hon member gobbledegook gobbledegook area refer area provision housing provision educational opportunity provision hospital treatment proper health facility provision pension order provide security old age hon member gobbledegook tempt rehearse personal position shall bring family father die live furnish room denial freedom unable university parent pay denial freedom occasion hospital treatment afford denial freedom generation old member house new generation thank god freedom public expenditure objective underpinning necessary industrial regeneration british industry shall seek cooperation planning agreement shall support industrial region shall use national enterprise board assist purpose right hon lady right mention addition economic aspect criticise vote confidence government cover wide field let objective necessarily order importance enumerate important preserving column integrity united kingdom whilst ensure scotland wale enjoy devolution ask notice scottish nationalist complain introduce bill think vote tonight prospect satisfy ultimate objective separation bill introduce satisfy scottish nationalist majority people scotland emphasise word majority let assure shall proceed bill autumn achieve devolution session parliament scottish nationalist intend vote conservative opposition intend vote devolution bill introduce strange alliance donothe tory allornothing scottish nationalist order bring labour government mrs winifre ewe moray nairnrose prime minister think position perfectly fairly lot hon lady able speech later mrs winifre ewe rise mr deputy speaker order prime minister give way hon lady resume seat prime minister thank mr deputy speaker long speech overriding objective persist hard stony path pacifying northern ireland assure people northern ireland doubt position united kingdom long wish remain shall ready envisage devolve government northern ireland support community objective shall pursue objective ensure far column parliament society racial harmony tolerance flourish medium race relation bill way parliament shall legislative backing end finally recover economic strength shall use influence gain economic recovery strengthen position abroad ensure peaceful solution world problem use united nations international organisation assist overcome poverty world use influence defence freedom strengthen europe voice overall objective government beginning strategy replace atmosphere confrontation find come office cooperation task great government fulfil major objective great condemnation previous administration forfeit confidence worker especially hamfisted handling industrial relation opposition devise social contract subject sneer design purpose know hand idea cooperation oppose confrontation repeal industrial relation act undertake leadership right hon friend lord president council enable fresh hopeful start industry management man experience nearly everybody atmosphere britain factory workshop improve confrontation evidence come day record show lose few day strike year keep improvement month year little half year total working day lose favourable year industrial relation shall way new era column number stoppage year far small figure year class warrior opposition happen industry today agree right hon lady social contract unique innovation political life topic parliament pay attention parliament involve discussion matter situation properly work think leader opposition deny social contract remarkable success improve atmosphere country intend reinforce situation course new social contract enable proceed confidence year ahead labour government rest trade union workingclass support support wide group need group country cbi know meeting representative seek cooperation task industrial regeneration government right hon lady say pay lipservice situation affect cbi middle manager difference pay lip service say yes recognise problem thing wait position country find middle manager group voice hear great deal experience responsible procure new order meet export deadline know feel bear brunt event year regard upper nether millstone wish assure government recognise contribution invaluable let return question group pressure wellorganised sociallyvaluable group make clamant demand government demand entirely justifiable middle manager feel standard cut young people scotland england wale finish column press teaching job irrespective resource exist provide job despite great improvement pupilteacher ratio anybody examine figure know vast improvement take place labour conservative government year child poverty action group press government implementation new scheme large additional allowance mother pensioner press early increase pension foreman skilled man industry feel differential squeeze legitimate claim common factor demand mr churchill stretford money prime minister beam truth emerge opposition thank hon member stretford mr churchill support sensible grow recognition country demand satisfied defer mr tebbit nationalisation prime minister order secure acquiescence situation people feel sense underlying fairness good prospect future let tell country task beat inflation way turn enable reduce unemployment significance special conference tuc hold week today meeting trade union pledge adhere wage level ensure halve rate inflation end decision knowledge cause great difficulty increase comparative grievance bring hardship member shall level competitor contribution help solve britain economic problem return ask ask column cut ask expenditure matter housing education welfare sacrifice mad panic cut ask voice economic social policy formulate government attitude unreasonable mr hugh fraser stafford stone election find prime minister agreement trade union worth have opposition mr alexander fletcher edinburgh north ask people prime minister agreement offer prospect angry confrontation year opposition think matter mr michael mcnairwilson newbury prime minister figure inflation talk government obtain new pay deal prime minister sure figure hon gentleman refer hope policy reduce inflation like cent thereabout end level major competitor objective worth reach worth support government achieve know opposition policy confrontation fail policy cooperation try work thing let ask opposition question obtain agreement willing offer exchange agreement let example let suppose industry distress prospect large number worker lay let imagine industry inadequate financial resource need drastic reorganisation face world competition rollsroyce happen shipbuilde opposition willing circumstance national interest assist passage bill reorganise industry mr tebbit rise prime minister shall way hon gentleman speak opposition day ask question reply debate mr tebbit chicken prime minister willing national interest ask overcome feeling event fortnight ago clearly genuine feeling grievance feeling acknowledge leader opposition willing countrys interest let business proceed future industry discuss future man discuss opposition willing shall ready hold hand resume discussion country know opposition play playground game mrs thatcher right hon gentleman prepare grievance right prime minister yes willing discuss matter right hon lady time fact grievance necessarily mean grievance share come half way insist like right hon lady government particularly concerned level public expenditure problem state way state way obvious spend social facility spending matter refer beginning speech increase fast national income despite difficulty hon friend debate march government set intend adhere planned expenditure establish level provide little increase programme year local authority world important connection column onethird public expenditure thank new earlywarne system control monetary expenditure local authority discover inform government early stage financial year month old go spending begin overspend million local authority recognise unacceptable inconsistent programme agreement reach government early stage agree revise expenditure programme bring line agreement hand recognise need hard decision right hon friend secretary state environment ask consultation trade union concern use provision early retirement appropriate sharing service staff authority believe local authority intention agree limit interest reason right hon lady give forecast manufacturing industry basic industry seek fund carry fresh enlarged programme new investment plant machinery manufacturing industry creator wealth profit low recent year competition local central government borrow available fund requirement nationalise industry fund expansion fall government government carefully watch development investment plan present level public expenditure policy ensure return gallop inflation result upturn exportled expansion economy generally need panic cut public expenditure shall action necessary achieve appropriate balance public expenditure need manufacture industry mr ian gow eastbourne right hon gentleman tell house think share gdp take public expenditure present figure cent prime minister level public expenditure determine arbitrary arithmetical figure fix determine social need people meet individually requirement manufacturing basic industry available fund try simple arithmetical figure oneself straitjacket country accept like opposition excuse word thing go right britain deal engineer volume new order overseas country product rise cent month february commercial vehicle production order overseas past month rise cent new order machine tool export month february nearly double rise cent steel production rise cent month april total value sale good overseas country rise cent month april import period rise cent likewise volume export rise cent period volume import rise cent hope hon member stretford approve result substantial surplus visible trade balance exclude oil million month april addition comparable figure million month note year second year past year britain increase volume world trade overseas include highprice oil think begin include tend deceive exclude current account deficit month april average column month compare million month let remember know opposition excuse say thing north sea oil likely save billion year home intend continue policy strengthen industry region look cooperation matter plan agreement assist regeneration british industry shall try plan ahead avoid bottleneck skilled manpower component requirement national enterprise board fund available avoid bottleneck machine tool industry live past industrial cycle know difficulty come board finance advance order place firm defer payment basis tool manufacture ready take economy turn government finance production steel advance requirement necessary longterm contract year ago require import steel cramping steel output democratic socialist planning gestapo government take lead neb assist formation consortium british firm well position tender contract abroad place turnkey basis think opposition member deal matter know weakness british industry inability size supercompanie order fulfill large order run million million single project national enterprise board take board assist fill important gap shall standby credit announce chancellor early week give right hon lady yesterday view valuable reinforcement international monetary situation column argue solution domestic difficulty right hon friend take conjunction strategy outline take conjunction measure follow credit powerful reinforcement future tonight shall press ahead plan legislation scotland wale year policy northern ireland shall press ahead race relation bill support party shall place statute book path deserve nation confidence right hon lady need spell alternative policy ask lot question hear state ask question policy hear policy choke word hear right hon lady policy defence proposal fishing industry rhodesia need spell policy country draw conclusion failure sir john eden bournemouth west right hon gentleman way prime minister respect address remark right hon lady sir j eden able help prime minister voice problem prime minister right shall way sir j eden like raise point help right hon gentleman moment matter purpose right hon gentleman mention rhodesia take new initiative prevent development appear ugly scene rely solely initiative take united states secretary state recognise foremost british responsibility column information action take prime minister grateful right hon gentleman matter rhodesia think step take result meeting dr kissinger mr vorster course closely touch dr kissinger contact mr vorster contract situation time baton hand pick carry long way forward example influence american policy considerably american attitude rhodesia american strength sense south africa order ensure majority rule establish rhodesia combination country service people rhodesia right hon friend foreign secretary closely touch situation continue oblige right hon member bournemouth west sir j eden hardly like unkind right hon lady leader opposition considerate write political matter afraid opposition right hon lady show question gaping void policy matter enumerate hear opposition economic matter conservative party split middle monetarist pseudokeynesian right hon lady oscillating float arm leed northeast arm surrey east right hon member penrith border mr whitelaw look slightly bewildered baffle try cut excuseme dance go right hon lady say favour large public expenditure cut hit young improverishe poor hurt sick column right hon lady believe conflict confrontation ensue secure support conservative administration country right hon lady throw away atmosphere begin pervade british industry spread rest country begin grandiloquently call weekend parliamentary fight death monday tuesday think look little tattered reluctant army wheel motion particular issue afternoon mischance motion carry tonight general election record clear view party advantage ensue general election time national interest week miner pledge cooperation year national union general municipal worker nalgo morning union previous week week tuc special congress set seal approval right hon lady throw away think shadow cabinet bear responsibility restrain motion confidence report daily express morning say get not opposition get right case intrude shadow cabinet leave hon member brentwood ongar mr mccrindle sum countrys view shadow cabinet case house miss let repeat hon gentleman say surprised right hon lady decision hon member brentwood ongar sum shadow cabinet week ago like unconvincing lot alsoran government press ahead objective result vote tonight uphold hope right column hon member come wing afric cathay cathay afric feel journey necessary seriously hope tonight right hon hon friend northern ireland minister able return post duty belfast purpose clamour clangour satisfy impatient imperious vanity copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill makes certain irrigation districts in North Dakota eligible to receive pumping power (i.e., hydropower) from the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, subject to the terms and rates established by the Bureau of Reclamation. Under this bill, an irrigation district must enter into a contract with Reclamation to receive such pumping power.

right

bill make certain irrigation district north dakota eligible receive pumping power ie hydropower picksloan missouri basin program subject term rate establish bureau reclamation bill irrigation district enter contract reclamation receive pumping power

This bill changes the assumptions that the Congressional Budget Office uses to calculate the baseline for discretionary spending. (A baseline is a projection of federal spending and receipts during a fiscal year under current law.) The bill changes the assumptions used for the discretionary spending baseline to

right

bill change assumption congressional budget office use calculate baseline discretionary spending baseline projection federal spending receipt fiscal year current law bill change assumption discretionary spending baseline

This bill repeals the excise tax on the transfer of firearms. The bill shall not be construed as placing any regulated firearms under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

right

bill repeal excise tax transfer firearm bill shall construe place regulate firearm jurisdiction consumer product safety commission

Speeches, etc. Politics is the act of finding solutions to problems. Acceptable solutions. But some of the problems wouldn't exist if it weren't for the politicians. The current solution is “participation” ; the current problem is too much government: the fashionable theory which links the two—that interference by Government will be acceptable if more people participate in it—is nonsense. What has gone wrong? We are full of doubts and protests. Yet the worst problems of poverty were solved several years ago and, although much remains to be done, the evils which seemed to derive from poverty or ignorance should have vanished and the future be promising. But it hasn't turned out that way. Why? The political and economic structure in which we live has been changing in a way which seems to take less account of people and more of economic theories and systems. Size is the order of the day. Central control, statistical returns, regulations, taxes, levies and demands from the Government for yet more information are part of the daily round. What place is left for the individual? In his private capacity he has less say over the direction of his affairs. Adding together the amount he pays in direct and indirect taxation, he is left with only about half his income to spend on the items of his choice. The politicians decide how the other half shall be spent. Perhaps he has an occupational pension scheme. This gives him some private means independent of the State when he retires. Now he reads of a great new State scheme, which doesn't reveal its plans about the future of occupational pensions. So he doesn't know whether he will have any choice left, or merely have to subscribe much larger amounts to the State. Supposing he recognises his responsibility to his wife and puts his house in their joint names. Nevertheless if he dies within seven years estate duty will be chargeable on the value of the whole house in spite of this gift. The Chancellor will take preference to the widow. Perhaps he would like to have some say in the kind of school to which his child should go. But the Government is imposing a comprehensive system on everyone, so there, too, he has no choice. Consider the case of a man who has a house near a proposed new fly-over. It will not be compulsorily acquired but its amenities will be adversely affected and therefore its market price reduced. He has no right to compensation. On the other hand, if the land should have some development potential and he sells it rather well he will have to pay a 40 per cent. levy to the Land Commission. If he gains he pays levy: if he loses amenities, he goes without compensation. Suppose he works in the accountancy department of a large company. Much of his time is spent in filling in returns for S E T, or forms like those from the Department of Employment and Productivity which require 12 pages of information in question and answer form about selected employees. Or he may work in a large State organisation; he is a skilled person, is ambitious, and needs to feel that his job is worth doing and that he has some importance in the scheme of things, but the decisions always seem to be passed up to someone else and he has to wait for them. He decides to submit a written memorandum to the Fulton Commission on the Civil Service, but it doesn't even reach a single member of that Commission. It was one of those sifted out by a sub-committee of officials! [end p1] He is suffering from too much Government intervention and too little personal responsibility. There is little point in propounding the theory that everything will be much better if the person concerned participates in some of the decisions of government and local government. If the problem is the extent of authority, the solution is unlikely to be the method by which that authority is exercised. The relevance of the word participation is that Government has participated too much in the lives of our citizens and of our industries. The balance should now be redressed to give the citizen more say in his own affairs. In taxation, this means reducing the total burden of tax and especially the amount taken in direct taxation. This is just what the Conservative Government did in our 13 years of office. Contrast with these Conservative policies the whole attitude of Harold Wilson, who when speaking in the House of Commons on April 5, 1960, said that in his view “the individual taxpayer” was no more than “a trustee” for his income “on behalf of the nation.” In other words he is allowed to keep some of his income by kind permission. How the taxpayer disburses his own money is a matter for him. In pensions, it means ensuring that the new State plan provides for the continuance of occupational pensions to which over 12 million people have been contributing. Many of these schemes provide better terms than the State. There must be adequate relief from the new heavy State contributions to the extent of the private provision. Further, the tax reliefs attaching to contributions under Section 379 and Section 388 of the Income Tax Act, 1952, must continue. Turning to savings, if the citizen's money goes to the Exchequer in tax the Treasury decides how it shall be invested. If more remains to the citizen, he decides whether building societies, equities, unit trusts, investment trusts or life assurance policies are to his own advantage. One of the few bright spots in the recent Budget was the contractual savings scheme, which is on lines Conservatives have been urging for some time. But it is one thing to have a savings scheme and quite another to get people to save. The right climate for saving must be created and this means lower personal taxes and confidence in the value of money. In housing policy it is important that young couples purchase their own home as early as possible. The chances are that they will never then come to be dependent on the State. Intervention by Ministerial Departments can be cut down only by a reversal of policy away from the idea that the bureaucrat knows best, towards more decisions by the trained man on the spot, with the market providing the acid test. The words of de Tocqueville so aptly fit our rulers today: I referred earlier to the exercise of power. The case for regional councils or some other unit of local area does not depend on greater participation of the citizen, because only a comparatively small number would ever be involved. It depends on the advisability of diffusing power. How successful such regions would be is a matter of conjecture: 50 miles away can be just as remote as 300; the people in an area would be just as dissatisfied with a bad decision by a regional authority as by the central government. Compulsory purchase, the siting of main roads, airports, detention centres or new towns are no more attractive because they are the subject of a decision in which the local council or region has been involved. A large part of any MP's postbag consists of requests for intervention on local matters. It would be unthinkable to deprive electors of their right of redress through Parliament, which in the last resort can alter the law. The danger with new regional authorities is that an extra tier of government will be created involving yet another layer of officials, more delays, and more expense. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc politic act find solution problem acceptable solution problem not exist not politician current solution participation current problem government fashionable theory link interference government acceptable people participate nonsense go wrong doubt protest bad problem poverty solve year ago remain evil derive poverty ignorance vanish future promise not turn way political economic structure live change way account people economic theory system size order day central control statistical return regulation taxis levy demand government information daily round place leave individual private capacity direction affair add pay direct indirect taxation leave half income spend item choice politician decide half shall spend occupational pension scheme give private mean independent state retire read great new state scheme not reveal plan future occupational pension not know choice leave merely subscribe large amount state suppose recognise responsibility wife put house joint name die seven year estate duty chargeable value house spite gift chancellor preference widow like kind school child government impose comprehensive system choice consider case man house near propose new flyover compulsorily acquire amenity adversely affect market price reduce right compensation hand land development potential sell pay cent levy land commission gain pay levy lose amenity go compensation suppose work accountancy department large company time spend fill return s e t form like department employment productivity require page information question answer form select employee work large state organisation skilled person ambitious need feel job worth importance scheme thing decision pass wait decide submit write memorandum fulton commission civil service not reach single member commission sift subcommittee official end suffer government intervention little personal responsibility little point propound theory well person concern participate decision government local government problem extent authority solution unlikely method authority exercise relevance word participation government participate life citizen industry balance redress citizen affair taxation mean reduce total burden tax especially take direct taxation conservative government year office contrast conservative policy attitude harold wilson speak house common april say view individual taxpayer trustee income behalf nation word allow income kind permission taxpayer disburse money matter pension mean ensure new state plan provide continuance occupational pension million people contribute scheme provide well term state adequate relief new heavy state contribution extent private provision tax relief attach contribution section section income tax act continue turn saving citizen money go exchequer tax treasury decide shall invest remain citizen decide build society equity unit trust investment trust life assurance policy advantage bright spot recent budget contractual saving scheme line conservative urge time thing saving scheme people save right climate saving create mean low personal taxis confidence value money housing policy important young couple purchase home early possible chance come dependent state intervention ministerial department cut reversal policy away idea bureaucrat know good decision train man spot market provide acid test word de tocqueville aptly fit ruler today refer early exercise power case regional council unit local area depend great participation citizen comparatively small number involve depend advisability diffuse power successful region matter conjecture mile away remote people area dissatisfied bad decision regional authority central government compulsory purchase siting main road airport detention centre new town attractive subject decision local council region involve large mp postbag consist request intervention local matter unthinkable deprive elector right redress parliament resort alter law danger new regional authority extra tier government create involve layer official delay expense copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. It has been said that people pay their fares in sorrow, but their rates in anger. This is still true although rates now take on average a smaller percentage of personal incomes (net after tax) than they did before the war; the actual figures are 4.2%; in 1960 compared with 5.2%; in 1938. Local authorities have only three sources of income, the rates, government grants (which contribut more to local expenditure than the amount raised through rates) and “trading and specific” income. It is worth considering what services we are receiving for our money. Education is by far the largest charge on local government income. When a Conservative government came to power in 1951, £381m. was spent annually on education in Great Britain as a whole. Such is the priority that education has been given in our economy that this year the comparable figure will be £978m. (This takes no account of the sums spent on private education). Some of the factors which have necessitated this rapid increase could not have been foreseen. The rising birth-rate, together with the fact that more children have stayed at school after the age of 15, has resulted in an increase in the number of pupils in primary and secondary schools of nearly 1¼ million in the last ten years. New schools have had to be provided for these children and old schools have had to be repaired. Altogether some 2¾ million new school places have been provided since 1951. As well as new schools we have needed more teachers and consequently more teacher training colleges. The number of full-time teachers has risen by nearly 60,000 in the last ten years, but this is not enough. A six year programme to more than double the number of training college places from 23,000 to 47,000 by 1966 is now in hand at a cost of £36m. This is but a part of the vast programme for the expansion of educational facilities. It will mean increases in rates in future years as well as bigger grants from the Exchequer. Housing is another very large item of expenditure. Here again the plans have been confounded by a rise in population far higher than was anticipated. The Preliminary Census report shows that the population increased by 2½m. between 1951 and 1961. In 1951 there were a million fewer dwellings in England and Wales than there were households. By 1961 the census report showed that there are almost exactly as many dwellings as households, but this figure conceals the severe shortage of houses in some areas. Clearly, as prosperity increases families are becoming more and more home conscious and will require more housing accommodation. Although nearly four million houses have been built since the war, the demand for new houses will continue to be high for several years to come. At present, local authority housing is the only substantial source of new homes built to let. Over a quarter of this building is now being devoted to the kind of accommodation most needed by older people. Other vital services to which ratepayers contribute, are the police and fire services. Both were experiencing difficulty in recruitment before the recent pay increases. Both central and local government representatives face similar problems of rising expenditure. We are constantly being urged to spend less in total and yet to spend more on each individual item. Economies which are secured in one department are quickly swallowed up and overtaken by increases in others. This point is well illustrated by the estimates for the government's expenditure in the coming year. In spite of all out efforts the total amount is up by £384m. and yet a quarter of the items are lower than they were last year. Most of the increase is accounted for by six items—the railways deficit requires a further £43m. (the total annual loss on the railways is now £151m.); Defence nearly £100m. more; Agricultural subsidies £66m. more; extra grants to local authorities to finance education, including the higher pay for teachers, take £86m.; National Health Service expenditure another £27m. and roads a further £15m. There are many objectives which are desirable in themselves, but which added together are beyond our resources. Constant scrutiny is necessary if the collective total is to be contained within reasonable limits. This is the task of central and local government. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc say people pay fare sorrow rate anger true rate average small percentage personal income net tax war actual figure compare local authority source income rate government grant contribut local expenditure raise rate trading specific income worth consider service receive money education far large charge local government income conservative government come power m spend annually education great britain priority education give economy year comparable figure m take account sum spend private education factor necessitate rapid increase foresee rise birthrate fact child stay school age result increase number pupil primary secondary school nearly million year new school provide child old school repair altogether million new school place provide new school need teacher consequently teacher training college number fulltime teacher rise nearly year year programme double number train college place hand cost m vast programme expansion educational facility mean increase rate future year big grant exchequer housing large item expenditure plan confound rise population far high anticipate preliminary census report show population increase million few dwelling england wale household census report show exactly dwelling household figure conceal severe shortage house area clearly prosperity increase family home conscious require housing accommodation nearly million house build war demand new house continue high year come present local authority housing substantial source new home build let quarter building devote kind accommodation need old people vital service ratepayer contribute police fire service experience difficulty recruitment recent pay increase central local government representative face similar problem rise expenditure constantly urge spend total spend individual item economy secure department quickly swallow overtake increase point illustrate estimate government expenditure come year spite effort total m quarter item low year increase account item railway deficit require m total annual loss railway m defence nearly m agricultural subsidy m extra grant local authority finance education include high pay teacher m national health service expenditure m road m objective desirable add resource constant scrutiny necessary collective total contain reasonable limit task central local government copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. It is an honour as well as a great pleasure to follow today the many people of distinction who have spoken in this series of lectures. The tradition of Christian thought which you uphold has decisively influenced my own political thinking and that of my Party. It has helped to shape the Europe to which we all belong. It is an essential sinew of our foreign policy in the Western World. Recently, we in Britain watched with anxiety the invasion of Shaba. We understood that our anxiety was as nothing compared with that felt here in Belgium. [end p1] We admired the speed and success with which the French and Belgian forces carried out their mission. But the events in Zaire also served as one of the many warnings that both the analysis and the policies of the West may sometimes be defective. We were caught by surprise. The invasion of Shaba and the savagery and destructiveness which accompanied it form part of a pattern which we had not anticipated. We lack a common policy towards Zaire and other countries threatened by the Soviet scramble for Africa. We must see how to reshape our policies to meet the needs of a changing situation. [end p2] But this in turn depends on our total view of world affairs and Europe's part in them. Let me begin with the principles which guide our approach to foreign affairs, then consider in turn the promising signs and the worrying signs, before coming on to a number of key issues and policies. One of the difficulties about foreign affairs is the gap between the bland, unexceptionable but platitudinous statements usually enunciated when principles are called for AND the immense complexity, and hasty improvisation, with which policy is usually carried out. [end p3] The difficulty is not new. A 19th century Conservative Prime Minister, Lord Salisbury, one of the best we have ever had, when asked to define his policy could go no further than say that, so far as he knew, British foreign policy was “to float lazily downstream occasionally putting out a diplomatic boathook to avoid collision.” That definition hardly did justice to the subtlety and wisdom of the actual policy of Salisbury. But in the 19th century, matters of foreign policy, though complicated, at least did not have to be worked out under the shadow of nuclear arms. [end p4] A modern Prime Minister in Europe can hardly avoid realising that the decisions to which he may have to be a party will be far harder than those taken by statesmen at any previous time, [Start of first section filmed for television] which brings me to my first principle which is that as long as we have potential enemies, we must recognise that peace can only be maintained through strength. Our first duty to freedom is to defend our own. Foreign policy and defence policy must be interlocked, the first dictating the second. There is no case whatsoever, as has happened too often in history, for military men to dictate diplomacy. There must be political control. As the same time, foreign policy must be supported by adequate military strength and understanding. [end p5] We are concerned to defend not only our sovereignty and that of our allies, but the way of life which enhances that sovereignty's value. In that context, and this is my second point, we have to distinguish between the 30 or so sovereign states in the world which are democracies and the 20 or so which are not. It is true that none of our democracies are perfect. Most of our time and effort as democratic politicians is spent on trying to improve them. But we have nothing to apologise for when dealing with the despotisms which seem to threaten us in Europe and elsewhere. [end p6] Here in the western community of democratic nations war between us has been renounced as an instrument of foreign policy. Not so the Communist states. Democracies in the 20th century have never been engaged against each other in warfare in any major way. [Manuscript addition by MT] In the First World War, remember that we (Britain and Belgium) were fighting authoritarian monarchies; in the Second, Nazi and Fascist tyrannies. [Typescript resumes:] To reduce the risk of war therefore we must work for steady progress towards more democracies. With the advancing tide of democracy, the risk of war recedes. If the tide of democracy recedes, the risk of war advances. End of first section filmed for television. Of course, we have to have relations with a great many countries which are not democracies: —Our antipathy to communism will not diminish our efforts to reach whatever understanding we can with Russia and other communist states. [end p7] —It would be naive to suppose that many African states will move very far, very quickly towards democratic government. But that is no reason for slackening our endeavours to help them achieve the prosperity and quality of life needed to underpin national political stability. But we should never hesitate to proclaim that democracies are morally superior to all states which are subject to tyrannical governments. [end p8] The third principle is that foreign policy commitments are not to be made and unmade at will. We are bound by past commitments. We have a respect for past contracts, both as governments and as ordinary citizens. We cannot expect others to keep their word to us unless we keep our word to them. When Chancellor Bethman Hollweg of Imperial Germany tore up the guarantee of Belgium's neutrality in 1914, dismissing it as a scrap of paper, he was tearing up something far more important than he seems to have known. Continuity does not of course stop the evolution of policy nor the proper renegotiation of commitments in the light of changing circumstances. [end p9] Fourth, although some foreign policy will be a matter of dealing with new situations as they arise, we should have a picture of the world as we would like to see it in twenty five years time, and try to work realistically and patiently towards it. Of course, we may be diverted, but I think that we have suffered in the last few years by not thinking enough about, for example, the sort of Europe which we should like to see at the end of the century or the kind of relationship which Africans and Europeans should develop. We sometimes seem all too like Plutarch 's description of the population of Syracuse in the days of the tyrant Dion when he said: “They had forgotten they were able to make things happen around them rather than always wait for things to happen to them” . [end p10] The fifth point is simply the need for information and its intelligent interpretation. Again, referring to the last century, it was doubtless possible for some European statesmen to affect a lordly ignorance about the rest of the world. Today, largely due to the revolution in communications and a growing interdependence, nobody can afford to ignore even minor political trends in other parts of the world. What at first sight may appear to be an innocuous minority movement in any country or continent can suddenly become a focus for international passions, propaganda or exploitation; as for example with Cuba at the time when Castro came to power. Or Angola after the Portuguese withdrawal. [end p11] We now know that the Russians and Cubans achieved a decisive victory for the Marxist faction there in Angola. Some Western leaders then believed that the Cuban involvement in Africa would stop. But what did we see? We saw the Cuban action repeated in Ethiopia, probably Zaire and they may have designs on Rhodesia and Namibia. We must be careful not to choose the interpretation of the facts which arises only from our previous experience. We must approach them with a more open mind, and take into account any new context which may have arisen. As Robert Conquest has said: [end p12] My sixth point is that the national character of a people may give a nation historic goals which persist through changing political ideologies. Russian imperialism, for example, was not born in 1917. The history of Russia since the fifteenth century has shown a constant drive to accumulate territory and influence beyond her frontiers. [end p13] The revolution and civil war barely interrupted this process. Russia was expansionist before, she is expansionist still. [end p14] Because any review of foreign policy must of necessity identify the most urgent problems, the picture tends to seem gloomy. Good news is no news. But in fact there are many encouraging signs. First, the heroic actions of a number of Russian dissidents over the past few years have brought home to us and to some Iron Curtain countries how deepseated is the desire for liberty and how much can be achieved through resolve, courage and ideals. [end p15] Solzhenitsyn could not be ignored, nor could his quiet disappearance be arranged. In some ways the pen is still mightier than the sword. Then we have seen a growing realisation by China of the threat that Russia poses to them as well as to us. Indeed, the Chinese criticisms of Russia have been even stronger than some of our western ones. [Beginning of section checked against BBC Radio News Report 0700 24 June 1978:] China is, of course, very far from being a member of the golden club of democracies. In philosophical terms, we're as different from her as we are from Russia. But we can recognise that China is not an expansionist power like Russia and she doesn't pose a threat to us. So our present friendship with China can have only beneficial consequences, both for our people, and hers. End of section checked against BBC Radio News Report 0700 24 June 1978. [end p16] Another good sign over the last year or so has been the political evolution in three Southern European countries, Spain, Portugal and Greece, which, five years ago, still had tough dictatorships. The transition from dictatorship to democracy in Spain and Portugal in particular is one of the few really encouraging things which have occurred. Again we should not forget that many Third World countries are sympathetic towards the West. In so far as they trade with us and make use of our education, technology and culture, they absorb the customs of political democracy. [end p17] Democracy depends on private enterprise as well as on the ballot box and countries which have the first are more likely to be able to move towards the second. Free enterprise has historically usually preceded freedom, and political freedom has never long survived the end of free enterprise. Next, among favourable signs, we should not forget that Western technology remains much more inventive than that of the communist bloc. We may be bad sometimes at following up our own good ideas, bad at keeping secrets, but, looking back over the last generation, it has been Western inventiveness which has shaped the pattern of industrial advance. [end p18] Finally in the West we have a closer alliance than has ever been achieved between sovereign states in time of peace. In NATO and the European community, we have forged new associations between old enemies which have transformed the nature of European politics. [end p19] Against the background of these encouraging developments we can identify set-backs and dangers. First, although we have been the most economically successful countries the world has ever seen, we are not spending enough on defence in relation to the threat we face. Russia has established the largest armoury the world has ever seen, able to challenge the West increasingly by land, sea and air in every part of the world. Not only does the Soviet Union maintain this vast armament, it maintains it on the basis of an economy incomparably weaker than those of the democracies. Western Europe alone more than matches the GNP of the entire Soviet bloc. [end p20] Further, although in the West we have the liberties of which I spoke, we have less of a spirit of resolve, and less of a sense of mission than we used to—less than the communist countries, which openly boast of their desire to establish their own narrow and tyrannical system throughout the world. Perhaps the poet Yeats put it best when he said: ‘The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.’ I do not believe that this feeling will endure, but it is a weakness we must face and cure. [end p21] When we look at what is happening in the European Community, we find that some of the hopes we have always had for Europe's future are not being fulfilled. The idea of European unity is a grand concept. But the cause of unity is surely not advanced by hundreds of petty internal regulations, such as on the content of ice cream or the activities of doorstep salesmen. Moreover, we need far better machinery for ensuring that Community decisions in matters of trade and finance are in harmony with our European political interests, for example, as they affect Turkey, Yugoslavia, Australia or New Zealand. [end p22] To us in Europe these Community decisions may seem detailed economic matters about levies, tariffs and quotas, to be settled as best we can to suit the economic interests of European producers. But these decisions affect, often substantially, the ability of some of our friends overseas to continue as our friends. We have created an instrument but not yet learned how to use it in our own vital interests. The Commission and the Council of Ministers need to be more farsighted, more political in their approach. The Soviet Union would not dream of taking such decisions on technical grounds only. [end p23] Perhaps this would be the point to sound a warning about the trend to increased protectionism. This would harm economic growth and political stability in the West and the underdeveloped countries alike. While we in Europe have our problems, the United States has been through a difficult period in her great history. The experiences of Vietnam, the traumas of Watergate, the open discussion about the activities of the CIA, have meant that our predominant ally has been through an understandable period of doubt and introspection. [end p24] But we should be encouraged by what President Carter said at Annapolis. We should applaud every evidence that the United States, having taken risks and suffered tragedies which we did not share, is still determined to play a positive and imaginative part in the world. [end p25] I want, in the last part of my talk, to discuss some of the major problems that we face and how we should approach them. Defence must be our first consideration. As we have seen in Britain and elsewhere, there are always politicians ready to neglect defence in favour of other expenditure which is more immediately rewarding and which they suppose will therefore be more popular. I believe that such politicians underestimate those whom they represent. [end p26] Start of second section filmed for television. Our people are ready to accept the need for stronger defences because they see these defences not as a provocation likely to lead to war but as a necessary condition for peace between East and West. The motorist who fastens his safety belt cannot be accused of trying to provoke a crash. It is not firmness but feebleness on the part of the West which could put a question-mark over the chances of a peaceful world for our children. End of second section filmed for television. Peace is not best secured by pretending that all is well when it is not, by saying that Soviet leaders are other than they are, and that their aims and practices are quite different from what we know them to be. [end p27] The NATO Alliance will always be our best source of security. Indeed the United States, who will remain the foremost member of that alliance, has taken the lead in increasing her own contribution to our joint defences. [end p28] But should we not also recall that we have in Brussels the headquarters of two great organisations, the EEC and NATO, both concerned with the protection and prosperity of Western Europe but which have little to say to one another. Can that be right? I understand the difficulties—the membership of the two organisations is not identical, though overlapping. The position of France must be respected, the Treaty of Rome does not cover foreign policy or defence. The friendship of Turkey, for example, is crucial to the West. She has an association agreement with the EEC which needs revising. She might one day become a full member. She is a member of NATO, and it is vital that she remains so. Should not these things be considered together? [end p29] The expansion of the Community, to include Spain and Portugal might cause certain constitutional problems, but from a defence, as well as a political, point of view their entry seems a very different matter. It is essential. Yet who is there in the EEC deliberations to speak up for defence? I feel no assurance that all these connected matters are being looked at together. Where there is so much at stake we cannot tolerate confusion of purpose in the West. [end p30] I said earlier that the West should take every opportunity of realistic debate and negotiation with the Soviet Union. I hope that the contacts which exist will in time become more fruitful. As I said publicly in Peking last year, we should continue day by day dealings with the Soviet Union and the search for balanced agreements which are of genuine advantage to both sides. But among ourselves we should be realistic about the conditions of success. The main condition is clear enough. We shall not reach lasting understandings with the Soviet Union until she realises that the West is capable of coherent and resolute protection of its own interests. It is precisely because we wish to avoid confrontation that we need to strengthen our policies. [end p31] To that end, we must see our relationships with the Soviet Union as a whole. The supply by the West of credit, grain, and technology; the negotiation of different aspects of security and disarmament; Soviet and satellite activities in Africa, Asia and the Pacific—these are all features of one landscape. Unless we learn, as the Soviet Union has learnt, to look at the landscape as a whole we shall be consistently out-manoeuvred. [end p32] Our relationship with the Soviet Union cannot be separated from the issue of human rights. Respect for human rights is the foundation of our democratic way of life. So accustomed are we to this thought that we regard as normal in our countries a degree of respect for human rights which is unparalleled elsewhere in the world. Among the world's sovereign states authoritarian regimes are easier to find than democracies and among the authoritarian regimes there is an immense variety of attitudes towards the rights of the individual. [end p33] For example, a characteristic of marxist states is the depth and thoroughness of the control exercised over their subjects. They aim to govern thought and faith as well as action. They regard no belief as private, no emotion beyond their reach, whether about this world or the next, the past or the present. I have previously mentioned Russian dissidents,—the heroic actions of a number of Russian dissidents, like Yuri Orlov, have brought home to us yet again the real nature of the Soviet regime in this post-Stalinist age. Even the Communist parties of Western Europe have criticised it. [end p34] There is of course a connection between this thoroughness of control and the long life of these regimes. We have seen this recently in Europe. Six years ago alongside the Marxist authoritarian regimes in Eastern Europe there were three other dictatorships, in Spain, Greece and Portugal. It is no coincidence that all the Marxist regimes remain, while the others have vanished and have given way to democracy. The former rely not only on military support from the Soviet Union but also on a much more pervasive system of controls. We must be free from double standards. We must not blind ourselves to contempt for human rights wherever it occurs. [end p35] The name of Steve Biko is well known as a man who died in the custody of the South African police and there are numerous accounts of prisoners' sufferings in Chile and Uganda. But why is the United Nations not examining the atrocities in Cambodia and Ethiopia and the prison camps of Cuba, which no outsiders from the Red Cross or Amnesty International have ever seen? Any discussion of human rights takes us naturally to consider some of the problems of Africa. [end p36] Peace and prosperity in the world in, the future will be influenced by our ability to solve the problems of Southern Africa. In this, we in the West have a constructive part to play, for we and the countries of the African continent are deeply interdependent. To ensure her future prosperity Africa needs to develop her raw materials and expand her trade; we need both to maintain our standard of living and our way of life. I believe that there is not only much good-will towards us but a greater understanding in many countries in Africa of the value to them of trade, technical assistance and investment from the West. [end p37] In particular, some of them recognise the need to keep in their countries the Europeans whose skills and technology have contributed so much to their economic advance and who are so important to their future. This is all in marked contrast to the destructive Soviet and Cuban military intervention in Africa and their complete failure to provide any economic assistance. Let me take Rhodesia as an example of a problem in which we need Western and African understanding. [end p38] The history of Rhodesia is unique because it has never been under direct rule from Westminster. We have had responsibility with only tenuous power over the years. In spite of this, the world looks to us even at this late hour to take the lead in helping black and white Rhodesians to reach peaceful independence based on majority rule. It is an African and Western interest to see a successful settlement. It is a Soviet and Cuban interest to see failure. [end p39] But what needs to be recognised by all who seek peace is that the fundamental principle of majority rule was conceded in 1976 after Mr Smith 's discussions with Dr Kissinger. The objective of the Executive Council and the four parties to the Salisbury Agreement is to see this principle of majority rule fulfilled. After all, it is black and white Rhodesians who have to live with each other in an independent Rhodesia and it is they who have reached their own internal settlement in Salisbury. Black Africans in Rhodesia fully acknowledge that the prosperity of their country depends largely upon the willingness of the whites to stay in that country. It is therefore the views of black and white Rhodesians that really matter. [end p40] Here we have the foundations of a lasting settlement. It is a tender plant but one which we must do everything in our power to nourish. Failure to do so will encourage those who believe that they can achieve their objectives only by violence. Time is running out, but we must do everything in our power to help the Rhodesians to hold free and fair elections by the end of 1978 and to end racial discrimination. And the Patriotic Front must realise that it is in their best interests and those of their country to stop fighting and to participate in these elections. [end p41] A peaceful solution in Rhodesia would also serve as an encouraging example to South Africa in tackling her own racial problems. [end p42] My theme today has been the need for resolution. Resolution to face, not shy away from the opportunities, as well as the risks, of a troubled world. Resolution to see international problems as they are and not as we would like them to be, nor as they seemed to be a year, or a decade ago. Resolution to keep our friendships in Europe and across the Atlantic, as Dr Johnson put it, ‘in good repair’. [end p43] To falter would be to break faith with our heritage. In the past, Europeans have carried free commerce, scientific discovery, the Rule of Law, and democracy itself to the ends of the earth. But we are more than just an economic or cultural entity, we are a spiritual force or we are nothing. For hundreds of years our story has been bound up with Christianity. It is our taproot to the history of civilisation and our link with the future. From it springs our belief in the essential dignity of man and his right to decide his own destiny; our belief in liberty, responsibility, duty and justice. [end p44] Together let us resolve to work for these things, fight for them, live for them. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc honour great pleasure follow today people distinction speak series lecture tradition christian thought uphold decisively influence political thinking party help shape europe belong essential sinew foreign policy western world recently britain watch anxiety invasion shaba understand anxiety compare feel belgium end admire speed success french belgian force carry mission event zaire serve warning analysis policy west defective catch surprise invasion shaba savagery destructiveness accompany form pattern anticipate lack common policy zaire country threaten soviet scramble africa reshape policy meet need change situation end turn depend total view world affair europe let begin principle guide approach foreign affair consider turn promising sign worrying sign come number key issue policy difficulty foreign affair gap bland unexceptionable platitudinous statement usually enunciate principle call immense complexity hasty improvisation policy usually carry end difficulty new century conservative prime minister lord salisbury good ask define policy far know british foreign policy float lazily downstream occasionally put diplomatic boathook avoid collision definition hardly justice subtlety wisdom actual policy salisbury century matter foreign policy complicate work shadow nuclear arm end modern prime minister europe hardly avoid realise decision party far hard take statesman previous time start section film television bring principle long potential enemy recognise peace maintain strength duty freedom defend foreign policy defence policy interlock dictate second case whatsoever happen history military man dictate diplomacy political control time foreign policy support adequate military strength understanding end concerned defend sovereignty ally way life enhance sovereigntys value context second point distinguish sovereign state world democracy true democracy perfect time effort democratic politician spend try improve apologise deal despotism threaten europe end western community democratic nation war renounce instrument foreign policy communist state democracy century engage warfare major way manuscript addition mt world war remember britain belgium fight authoritarian monarchy second nazi fascist tyranny typescript resume reduce risk war work steady progress democracy advance tide democracy risk war recede tide democracy recede risk war advance end section film television course relation great country democracy antipathy communism diminish effort reach understanding russia communist state end naive suppose african state far quickly democratic government reason slacken endeavour help achieve prosperity quality life need underpin national political stability hesitate proclaim democracy morally superior state subject tyrannical government end principle foreign policy commitment unmade bind past commitment respect past contract government ordinary citizen expect word word chancellor bethman hollweg imperial germany tear guarantee belgium neutrality dismiss scrap paper tear far important know continuity course stop evolution policy proper renegotiation commitment light change circumstance end fourth foreign policy matter deal new situation arise picture world like year time try work realistically patiently course divert think suffer year think example sort europe like end century kind relationship african european develop like plutarch s description population syracuse day tyrant dion say forget able thing happen wait thing happen end fifth point simply need information intelligent interpretation refer century doubtless possible european statesman affect lordly ignorance rest world today largely revolution communication grow interdependence afford ignore minor political trend part world sight appear innocuous minority movement country continent suddenly focus international passion propaganda exploitation example cuba time castro come power angola portuguese withdrawal end know russians cubans achieve decisive victory marxist faction angola western leader believe cuban involvement africa stop see cuban action repeat ethiopia probably zaire design rhodesia namibia careful choose interpretation fact arise previous experience approach open mind account new context arise robert conquest say end sixth point national character people nation historic goal persist change political ideology russian imperialism example bear history russia fifteenth century show constant drive accumulate territory influence frontier end revolution civil war barely interrupt process russia expansionist expansionist end review foreign policy necessity identify urgent problem picture tend gloomy good news news fact encouraging sign heroic action number russian dissident past year bring home iron curtain country deepseate desire liberty achieve resolve courage ideal end solzhenitsyn ignore quiet disappearance arrange way pen mighty sword see grow realisation china threat russia pose chinese criticism russia strong western one begin section check bbc radio news report june china course far member golden club democracy philosophical term different russia recognise china expansionist power like russia not pose threat present friendship china beneficial consequence people end section check bbc radio news report june end good sign year political evolution southern european country spain portugal greece year ago tough dictatorship transition dictatorship democracy spain portugal particular encourage thing occur forget world country sympathetic west far trade use education technology culture absorb custom political democracy end democracy depend private enterprise ballot box country likely able second free enterprise historically usually precede freedom political freedom long survive end free enterprise favourable sign forget western technology remain inventive communist bloc bad follow good idea bad keep secret look generation western inventiveness shape pattern industrial advance end finally west close alliance achieve sovereign state time peace nato european community forge new association old enemy transform nature european politic end background encouraging development identify setback danger economically successful country world see spend defence relation threat face russia establish large armoury world see able challenge west increasingly land sea air world soviet union maintain vast armament maintain basis economy incomparably weak democracy western europe match gnp entire soviet bloc end west liberty speak spirit resolve sense mission communist country openly boast desire establish narrow tyrannical system world poet yeat well say good lack conviction bad passionate intensity believe feeling endure weakness face cure end look happen european community find hope europe future fulfil idea european unity grand concept cause unity surely advanced hundred petty internal regulation content ice cream activity doorstep salesman need far well machinery ensure community decision matter trade finance harmony european political interest example affect turkey yugoslavia australia new zealand end europe community decision detailed economic matter levy tariff quota settle well suit economic interest european producer decision affect substantially ability friend overseas continue friend create instrument learn use vital interest commission council minister need farsighte political approach soviet union dream take decision technical ground end point sound warning trend increase protectionism harm economic growth political stability west underdeveloped country alike europe problem united states difficult period great history experience vietnam trauma watergate open discussion activity cia mean predominant ally understandable period doubt introspection end encourage president carter say annapolis applaud evidence united states having take risk suffer tragedy share determined play positive imaginative world end want talk discuss major problem face approach defence consideration see britain politician ready neglect defence favour expenditure immediately rewarding suppose popular believe politician underestimate represent end start second section film television people ready accept need strong defence defence provocation likely lead war necessary condition peace east west motorist fasten safety belt accuse try provoke crash firmness feebleness west questionmark chance peaceful world child end second section film television peace well secure pretend say soviet leader aim practice different know end nato alliance good source security united states remain foremost member alliance take lead increase contribution joint defence end recall brussels headquarters great organisation eec nato concerned protection prosperity western europe little right understand difficulty membership organisation identical overlap position france respect treaty rome cover foreign policy defence friendship turkey example crucial west association agreement eec need revise day member member nato vital remain thing consider end expansion community include spain portugal cause certain constitutional problem defence political point view entry different matter essential eec deliberation speak defence feel assurance connect matter look stake tolerate confusion purpose west end say early west opportunity realistic debate negotiation soviet union hope contact exist time fruitful say publicly peke year continue day day dealing soviet union search balanced agreement genuine advantage side realistic condition success main condition clear shall reach lasting understanding soviet union realise west capable coherent resolute protection interest precisely wish avoid confrontation need strengthen policy end end relationship soviet union supply west credit grain technology negotiation different aspect security disarmament soviet satellite activity africa asia pacific feature landscape learn soviet union learn look landscape shall consistently outmanoeuvre end relationship soviet union separate issue human right respect human right foundation democratic way life accustomed thought regard normal country degree respect human right unparalleled world world sovereign state authoritarian regime easy find democracy authoritarian regime immense variety attitude right individual end example characteristic marxist state depth thoroughness control exercise subject aim govern thought faith action regard belief private emotion reach world past present previously mention russian dissident heroic action number russian dissident like yuri orlov bring home real nature soviet regime poststalinist age communist party western europe criticise end course connection thoroughness control long life regime see recently europe year ago alongside marxist authoritarian regime eastern europe dictatorship spain greece portugal coincidence marxist regime remain vanish give way democracy rely military support soviet union pervasive system control free double standard blind contempt human right occur end steve biko know man die custody south african police numerous account prisoner suffering chile uganda united nations examine atrocity cambodia ethiopia prison camp cuba outsider red cross amnesty international see discussion human right take naturally consider problem africa end peace prosperity world future influence ability solve problem southern africa west constructive play country african continent deeply interdependent ensure future prosperity africa need develop raw material expand trade need maintain standard living way life believe goodwill great understanding country africa value trade technical assistance investment west end particular recognise need country europeans skill technology contribute economic advance important future mark contrast destructive soviet cuban military intervention africa complete failure provide economic assistance let rhodesia example problem need western african understanding end history rhodesia unique direct rule westminster responsibility tenuous power year spite world look late hour lead help black white rhodesian reach peaceful independence base majority rule african western interest successful settlement soviet cuban interest failure end need recognise seek peace fundamental principle majority rule concede mr smith s discussion dr kissinger objective executive council party salisbury agreement principle majority rule fulfil black white rhodesian live independent rhodesia reach internal settlement salisbury black african rhodesia fully acknowledge prosperity country depend largely willingness white stay country view black white rhodesian matter end foundation last settlement tender plant power nourish failure encourage believe achieve objective violence time run power help rhodesian hold free fair election end end racial discrimination patriotic realise good interest country stop fight participate election end peaceful solution rhodesia serve encouraging example south africa tackle racial problem end theme today need resolution resolution face shy away opportunity risk troubled world resolution international problem like year decade ago resolution friendship europe atlantic dr johnson good repair end falter break faith heritage past europeans carry free commerce scientific discovery rule law democracy end earth economic cultural entity spiritual force hundred year story bind christianity taproot history civilisation link future spring belief essential dignity man right decide destiny belief liberty responsibility duty justice end let resolve work thing fight live copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill permanently allows state Medicaid programs to receive federal payment for substance-use disorder services that are provided at institutions for mental diseases (IMDs) for individuals aged 21 to 64. The bill also extends the maximum length of stay over a 12-month period from 30 days to 45 days. In addition, the bill provides statutory authority for a 2018 letter from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that provided for Medicaid demonstration programs for IMD mental health services for adults and children; the bill similarly increases the average length of stay under such programs to 45 days.

right

bill permanently allow state medicaid program receive federal payment substanceuse disorder service provide institution mental disease imds individual age bill extend maximum length stay period day day addition bill provide statutory authority letter center medicare medicaid service provide medicaid demonstration program imd mental health service adult child bill similarly increase average length stay program day

Speeches, etc. ( Notes by MT: Llandudno—here that my ambitions for a Parliamentary career really started. One rung of the ladder. Let us go after more Conservative membs. of Parl. from Wales to add to Nick Edwards ' splendid band.) Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen, “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” took Gibbon six whole volumes and several years to bring to a successful conclusion. Don't be alarmed. The decline and fall of the Labour Government will be encompassed rather more swiftly. Indeed, the decline, has already happened and the fall is now only a matter of time. [end p1] Providing, we Conservatives and those who share our beliefs give our undivided attention to ridding the country of its Socialist yoke. This Conference hall in LlanDIDno [sic] today is heartening evidence of the increasing number of people in Wales who are with us. Ladies and Gentlemen, I have the feeling you're ready for the fray. So am I. [end p2] It would perhaps be strange if it were otherwise. For more than 10 years out of the last 14 our country has laboured under Labour. First under Harold Wilson and then under James Callaghan, Labour has been tried and found wanting. [Beginning of section checked against BBC Radio News Report 1300 10 June 1978:] But the pattern's always the same. High hopes and lavish promises ending in full-blooded economic crisis. Then you get a juddering, shuddering halt—for the time being—of the Socialist measures which caused the crisis, a call for international rescue by the forces of capitalism. The rescue over, the whole process begins again. As it did this week. [end p3] [Beginning of first section released to press:] What are we to make of a Government which promises single figure inflation “for ever” on Tuesday, and produces a double figure bank rate on Thursday and all but a double figure mortgage rate on Friday? [End of section checked against BBC Radio News Report 1300 10 June 1978:] Of course we all knew that when Mr. Callaghan said he could “see no reason why inflation should ever get back to double figures” he was simply whistling in the dark. But now we really are entitled to wonder if he is living in a make-believe world of his own. And what are we to make of a Government which proudly announced in March that it was going to “save” a hundred thousand jobs which didn't really exist, and then acts in June to destroy a hundred thousand jobs that do? [end p4] A job creation scheme on the one had and a job destruction scheme on the other. It may be good Socialism but it is the economics of the mad-house. Let me make it clear. We don't criticise the Government for acting on Thursday to try to rescue international confidence. They had lost it and they had to do something to try to restore it. What we do attack is the way that the sacrifices made last year to slow the pace of inflation have once again been wasted: wasted because as soon as the last crisis receded from his mind, Denis Healey went on another spending spree with our money. And remember there is no such thing as public money, there is only [words missing]. [end p5] And who has to carry the the can for Labour's total failure to manage the economy properly? Once again it is the wealth producing part of the nation, mostly working in private industry, which suffers. It is the efforts of the self-employed and small businesses which are destroyed by the onward march of Socialism. And it is the independent spirit which has been the pride and salvation of our people. It is not the public sector that will feel the pinch. Will the payroll tax—imposed at a time when nearly 1½ million people are already out of work—cut a single bureaucrat from the pay roll of the Inland Revenue? I doubt it. Consider for a moment just what this extra tax does as well as being a tax on jobs. [end p6] By adding to costs, it will add to prices—all round. It is a tax on food, housing, fuel, transport, clothing, repairs, the tourist trade—indeed everything. The CBI calculates it will add another 1½%; to the cost of living. But of course that won't come through until after October. It is a tax on exports—just when we need more. It is equivalent to an extra 4p. on income tax. [end p7] In fact it is a cynical political manoeuvre designed by a Labour Government which cares little for its effect in the longer term—providing it doesn't show before the election. But of course the extra tax was only a part of the Budget. What an indictment of the Government that with output barely back to the levels of four years ago when we were in office with unemployment at levels unknown since the 1930's, it has to slap on another credit squeeze to try and avert yet another sterling crisis of its own making. And of course Mr. Callaghan when Chancellor was no stranger to those. [end p8] What a tragedy for Britain that the Liberals decided 15 months ago to keep this Government in power. What a price the electors have had to pay because the Liberals were frightened to face them. End of first section released to press. [end p9] Labour has pursued many policies which have increased unemployment. It then sought to cure that unemployment by measures which have made work but which have not created wealth. In a healthy economy, work creates wealth and therefore prosperity. But ours is not a healthy economy, and many of the jobs that have been created are artificial. Let us go for prosperity with work, not work without prosperity. [end p10] What, then, is the answer to these problems? What is the Tory alternative? One very important answer is evident here in Wales. The small business. When an old industry or plant dies, as some must, there has to be seed on the ground to grow and prosper in its turn. The small business is that seed. Be they farmers, shopkeepers, manufacturers, hotel keepers, together they provide services, variety, new products, new ideas—and new jobs. [end p11] In Wales alone, a recent survey by the National Federation of Self Employed suggested that 20,000 genuine jobs could be created if the restrictive provisions of Labour's employment legislation were removed. In the U.K. as a whole, the survey suggested that up to 1 million new jobs could be created by small businessmen, given the chance. Even Harold Lever, the Minister responsible for Small Businesses, has admitted that Socialist legislation, such as the misnamed Employment Protection Act, may be a hindrance to job creation, Our own surveys have shown the same. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that small firms could be a springboard for recovery in the labour markets—if Labour's shackles were removed. [end p12] So, three weeks ago, I asked the James CallaghanPrime Minister in the House of Commons, to review—not to amend or repeal or tear up, but simply to review—this legislation to give both the employer and employee a fair deal. But he apparently knows better than his ministers, better than the hundreds of small businessmen we have interviewed, better even than the tens of thousands of members of the NFSE, the employers themselves. For he rejected my modest proposal out of hand. There will be no review. There will be no new jobs. Just an extra tax on existing jobs to make things even more difficult. We will not get these new jobs until we get a Conservative Government, which believes in small businesses and will stand by them. Not out of electoral convenience, but out of conviction. [end p13] (Link.) Beyond Economics Standards of living have suffered visibly. But the standard of living alone is not the whole story. The quality of life and upholding the law are equally vital. Improved material standards are of little use to pensioners if they are frightened to venture out of their homes, and may even be attacked within their own homes. What's the good of a higher pension if you're too afraid to go out to collect it? [end p14] A larger wage packet is of little comfort to a father if he is worried about the safety of his children at a weekend football match. We have all heard of frightening examples of these problems recently. The Conservative Party does not exaggerate the growing threat to personal safety and law and order. But unlike the present Government we are not complacent about it. We ignore it at our peril. And after all—we politicians don't choose the issues, the people do. [end p15] In Wales in the last four years, the number of crimes of all kinds has increased by half, and the number of crimes of violence by more than half. What is particularly disturbing is the growing number of young persons getting into serious trouble. This has occurred at a time when the Children and Young Persons Act has taken away from Magistrates the power to deal with young offenders other than to fine them. Some of these offenders—a few—are no longer children but nothing less than vicious young thugs. The safety and well-being of the vast majority must not be imperilled by a few, no matter what their age. [end p16] So we will amend the Act, and restore to Magistrates the power to deal with young offenders directly and, if necessary, firmly. We are also determined to restore proper pay and conditions to the police force. To lower the morale of the police is to lower the nation's defences against crime. To protect the citizen as he goes about his lawful business should be the prime duty of Government. [end p17] The law is there to be obeyed and respected. No nation will retain its freedom for long if it loses its respect for the law. (Link to education.) [end p18] Not so long ago, in response to Conservative pressure and parental complaints, the Government launched a “Great Debate” on Education. It was, indeed, time for the Government to listen to the people's cries of frustration as they saw education falling rapidly into decline. According to Her Majesty's Inspectors of Education in Wales, “standards of school leavers are not satisfying present-day requirements. In terms of truancy and examination achievements at the lower end of the spectrum, Wales is noticably worse than any region of England.” ([Notes by MT:] Wynn Roberts. ‘liked his classless Welsh soul’.) [end p19] The National Coal Board reports that 10–15%; of the school leavers it interviews in Wales are virtually unemployable because of their lack of literacy and numeracy. The Training Services Agency in Wales has found that the percentage of school leavers entering apprenticeships in Wales is lower than elsewhere in the United Kingdom, while the CBI reports that “many smaller firms prefer to employ older persons rather then school leavers” so as to avoid having to provide elementary tuition in the basic educational skills. And this after each child has had eleven years of compulsory education or at least of compulsory schooling. [end p20] There seems no doubt that the present education system is not doing its best for our children, even though enormous sums are spent on it. It costs £297 to provide a place in primary school for a year, £773 for a sixth form place and £2,400 for a university place. We spend more on education than we do on defence or health. We are entitled to expect good value and also to expect the authorities to be responsive to the needs and wishes of parents. After all, elected representatives and officials are accountable to the taxpaying public for what they do. [end p21] Education is not about waiting for children to learn if they wish. It is about teaching them things they need to know. Use of language, use of figures, practical skills, general knowledge, right and wrong and something of our ideals and heritage. That is what the vast majority of parents want. That is what we must see their children are given. (Link to Housing.) [end p22] Last year, in Wales as throughout the United Kingdom, fewer houses were built than in almost any year since 1950. Further, one in six Welsh homes are officially designated as being below standard. Scope, you would have thought, for home improvements. In 1973 under the Conservatives, there were nearly 24,000 home improvement grants in Wales. In the last 3 years of Socialism, the average has been only 8,000 homes improved, a third of the Tory total. [end p23] Had the Conservative successes continued, nearly 60,000 families in Wales would today be living in better homes. But instead of building a better Britain, this Government has built only a bigger bureaucracy. (Economics. Protection of the Citizen. Ed'n. Housing. Link to Defence.) [end p24] Not surprisingly, Mr. Callaghan is much more at home at the disarmament Conference in New York than he was at the NATO Summit. After all, he and his Government have had some success at disarmament—though unfortunately only in this country. The Labour Government has already cut, or plans to cut £10 thousand million of our defence spending. And it has made these damaging cuts at a time when the Russians and the Warsaw pact are stronger than they have ever been. [end p25] Even Norway, Belgium and the Netherlands spend more on defence per head of the population than we do. That means, the Governments of those countries, along with West Germany, France and the United States, are prepared to spend more on defending the way of life of their people than our Government is. And to add to all the other damage Labour has done to defence, it has refused to pay our forces properly. [end p26] As a result of this scandal, many of the most valuable officers and men have already left the services or are anxious to do so. Never has a British Government so neglected our armed services. I pledge that a Conservative Government will restore services' pay to full comparability next year, and I very much hope that in the meantime the servicemen will decide to remain in the forces. [end p27] We have witnessed the bitter fruits of Labour's policies recently in Africa. Partly because of Britain's military weakness and partly because of this Government's natural weakness in dealing with the Russians, this country has stood on the sidelines while others have acted to defend Western interests and save Western lives. The Russians only respect you when you stand up to them. Ernest Bevin knew that when we had to have an airlift to Berlin in 1948. So did President Kennedy in 1962 when the Russians tried to put nuclear missiles in Cuba. [end p28] What would have happened by now if they hadn't been men of courage and resolve, and if they hadn't had the forces and materials available to do it. It is a sobering thought and one we should do well to ponder. [end p29] Beginning of second section released to press: Last October at our Blackpool Conference I made a prophesy. “In the coming months” , I said, “you will see a carefully orchestrated campaign by the Labour Party and Labour Government to portray me as “extremely this” and “extremely that” —not to mention “extremely the other” . A whole battery of extremist labels will be bandied about … the closer the election looms the faster and more furious will the bandying become.” And that's what happened. With the election looming closer the bandying has indeed become faster and more furious. [end p30] Beginning of section checked against IRN Report 10 June 1978: Easy labels, empty phrases like “right-wing” , “extremist” , “reactionary” —all intended to imply the same thing, a sort of early return to the Middle Ages—are being tossed about wildly like leaves in a high wind. Let's just catch a few of them and pin them down with the truth. Is it extremist to want to cut taxes and leave more money in people's pockets? If so, then I'm an extremist. [hear, hear and applause] And so are the majority of the British people. Is it extremist to be deeply concerned about declining standards in our schools and hospitals? If so, then I'm an extremist, and so are the majority of our people. Is it extremist to be profoundly worried by the increase in lawlessness and the growth of violence in our streets, to say nothing of violence on the picket line, a picket line given the stamp of respectability by cabinet ministers [Shirley Williams Fred Mulley Denis Howell]. [hear, hear and applause]. If so, I'm an extremist and so are the great majority. Is it extremist to oppose the Callaghan government's run-down of the armed forces, is it extremist to be concerned about the strength of our defences? If so, I'm an extremist and proud of it, and so are the great majority. Above all, is it extremist to listen to the voice of the people, and having listened to make proposals to deal with their very real and pressing problems? If so, if to put facts before fiction and people before political dogma is to be extreme, then yes, indeed, I am an extremist and I'm in marvellous company. [hear, hear and applause] And today at Llandudno I make this pledge: there'll be no extremism in the coming Conservative government. A change of direction for our country—yes. A new and lively sense of purpose—yes. A progressive putting of our house in order—yes. These things there will be and not a day too soon, but extremism there will not be in either our policies or in our party. [hear, hear] End of section checked against IRN Report 10 June 1978. [end p31] Of course Labour don't really believe all this talk of right-wing reaction and the rest of their jargon. It's a cover, a smokescreen, a well-worn Socialist-Marxist ploy. Try to conceal the beam in your own eye by attributing it to your opponent. It won't work—and I'll tell you why. Beam and boom away as they will, or mutter soft words in tones of smug complacency, they can't hide the stick they carry behind their backs. [end p32] The Socialist stick of still more taxes. The Socialist stick of still more nationalisation. The Socialist stick of mounting bureaucratic control, of lack of choice in education, of the steady growth of the power of the State over the life of the individual. You may not like the Socialist stick. The fact is, so long as they are in power, you are stuck with it, because they are stuck with their Left. [end p33] Who are the real extremists? Ask Reg Prentice. He found them among his former colleagues and when he could stomach them no longer he turned to us. And very welcome he is, as are many other former Labour supporters who have abandoned the modern Labour Party because they see the way it's going. Oh yes, there are “extremists” and their ranks are growing, but not in the Conservative Party. Today at LlanDIDno [sic] I make this pledge. There will be no “extremism” in the coming Conservative government. [end p34] A change of direction for our country—yes. A new and lively sense of purpose—yes. A progressive putting of our house in order—yes. These things there will be—and not a day too soon. But extremism there will not be, in either our policies or our Party. [end p35] If Labour really want to know where the face of extremism is to be found, let them tear off the mask of moderation and look in the mirror. It's not Margaret Thatcher they'll see reflected. It's Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Callaghan. End of section released to press. [end p36] Mr. Chairman, I began with the decline and fall of the Labour Party. Let me end with the rise and resurgence of Great Britain. There are some who say that Great Britain's decline is irreversible. I reject that view and I reject it utterly. There is nothing wrong with the British people:— [end p37] nothing wrong with their ability to create or invent, nothing wrong with their willingness to work—given the incentive to do so, nothing wrong with their deep-rooted sense of decency, fairmindedness and tolerance, nothing wrong with their devotion to their family, service to their community, or pride in their country. [end p38] The seat of Britain's decline lies not in its people but in its Government—in particular in the decade of Socialist Government we have endured over these last fourteen years. We need a Government that will change our country's course—that will change it for the better in the only possible way by unleashing the talent, the energy and the spirit of each and every citizen. [end p39] We need a Government that will put its faith: in the individual instead of the State, in free enterprise instead of State ownership, in greater opportunity instead of greater taxation. [end p40] We need a Government that will regard personal success as something to be warmly encouraged instead of being bitterly envied. We need a Government that will allow people to choose for themselves instead of choosing for them. We need: a Government that will impartially uphold the rule of law instead of allowing it to be frayed at the edge by its political friends; [end p41] a Government that will firmly tackle the rise in crime instead of weakly trying to explain it away; a Government that regards expenditure on defence as a necessity and not as an embarrassment. We need a Government that will build Britain's resurgence, not on the dictates of politicians, but on the deeply-rooted strengths of her people. We shall form such a Government, and, with your help, I firmly believe we shall do so before this Conference meets again. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc note mt llandudno ambition parliamentary career start rung ladder let conservative memb parl wale add nick edwards splendid band mr chairman lady gentleman decline fall roman empire take gibbon volume year bring successful conclusion not alarm decline fall labour government encompass swiftly decline happen fall matter time end provide conservative share belief undivided attention rid country socialist yoke conference hall llandidno sic today hearten evidence increase number people wale lady gentleman feeling ready fray end strange year country labour labour harold wilson james callaghan labour try find want beginning section check bbc radio news report june pattern high hope lavish promise end fullbloode economic crisis judder shudder halt time socialist measure cause crisis international rescue force capitalism rescue process begin week end begin section release press government promise single figure inflation tuesday produce double figure bank rate thursday double figure mortgage rate friday end section check bbc radio news report june course know mr callaghan say reason inflation double figure simply whistle dark entitle wonder live makebelieve world government proudly announce march go save thousand job not exist act june destroy thousand job end job creation scheme job destruction scheme good socialism economic madhouse let clear not criticise government act thursday try rescue international confidence lose try restore attack way sacrifice year slow pace inflation waste waste soon crisis recede mind denis healey go spending spree money remember thing public money word miss end carry labour total failure manage economy properly wealth produce nation work private industry suffer effort selfemployed small business destroy onward march socialism independent spirit pride salvation people public sector feel pinch payroll tax impose time nearly million people work cut single bureaucrat pay roll inland revenue doubt consider moment extra tax tax job end add cost add price round tax food housing fuel transport clothing repair tourist trade cbi calculate add cost living course will not come october tax export need equivalent extra income tax end fact cynical political manoeuvre design labour government care little effect long term provide not election course extra tax budget indictment government output barely level year ago office unemployment level unknown slap credit squeeze try avert sterling crisis making course mr callaghan chancellor stranger end tragedy britain liberal decide month ago government power price elector pay liberal frightened face end section release press end labour pursue policy increase unemployment seek cure unemployment measure work create wealth healthy economy work create wealth prosperity healthy economy job create artificial let prosperity work work prosperity end answer problem tory alternative important answer evident wale small business old industry plant die seed ground grow prosper turn small business seed farmer shopkeeper manufacturers hotel keeper provide service variety new product new idea new job end wale recent survey national federation self employ suggest genuine job create restrictive provision labours employment legislation remove uk survey suggest million new job create small businessman give chance harold lever minister responsible small business admit socialist legislation misname employment protection act hindrance job creation survey show evidence overwhelmingly suggest small firm springboard recovery labour market labour shackle remove end week ago ask james callaghanprime minister house common review amend repeal tear simply review legislation employer employee fair deal apparently know well minister well hundred small businessman interview well ten thousand member nfse employer reject modest proposal hand review new job extra tax exist job thing difficult new job conservative government believe small business stand electoral convenience conviction end link economic standard living suffer visibly standard living story quality life uphold law equally vital improve material standard little use pensioner frightened venture home attack home s good high pension afraid collect end large wage packet little comfort father worried safety child weekend football match hear frightening example problem recently conservative party exaggerate grow threat personal safety law order unlike present government complacent ignore peril politician not choose issue people end wale year number crime kind increase half number crime violence half particularly disturbing grow number young person get trouble occur time child young person act take away magistrate power deal young offender fine offender long child vicious young thug safety wellbeing vast majority imperille matter age end amend act restore magistrate power deal young offender directly necessary firmly determined restore proper pay condition police force lower morale police lower nation defence crime protect citizen go lawful business prime duty government end law obey respect nation retain freedom long lose respect law link education end long ago response conservative pressure parental complaint government launch great debate education time government listen people cry frustration see education fall rapidly decline accord majestys inspector education wale standard school leaver satisfy presentday requirement term truancy examination achievement low end spectrum wale noticably bad region england note mt wynn roberts like classless welsh soul end national coal board report school leaver interview wale virtually unemployable lack literacy numeracy training service agency wale find percentage school leaver enter apprenticeship wale low united kingdom cbi report small firm prefer employ old person school leaver avoid have provide elementary tuition basic educational skill child year compulsory education compulsory schooling end doubt present education system good child enormous sum spend cost provide place primary school year sixth form place university place spend education defence health entitle expect good value expect authority responsive need wish parent elect representative official accountable taxpaying public end education wait child learn wish teach thing need know use language use figure practical skill general knowledge right wrong ideal heritage vast majority parent want child give link housing end year wale united kingdom few house build year welsh home officially designate standard scope think home improvement conservative nearly home improvement grant wale year socialism average home improve tory total end conservative success continue nearly family wale today live well home instead build well britain government build big bureaucracy economic protection citizen edn housing link defence end surprisingly mr callaghan home disarmament conference new york nato summit government success disarmament unfortunately country labour government cut plan cut thousand million defence spending damaging cut time russians warsaw pact strong end norway belgium netherlands spend defence head population mean government country west germany france united states prepared spend defend way life people government add damage labour defence refuse pay force properly end result scandal valuable officer man leave service anxious british government neglect armed service pledge conservative government restore service pay comparability year hope meantime serviceman decide remain force end witness bitter fruit labour policy recently africa partly britain military weakness partly government natural weakness deal russians country stand sideline act defend western interest save western life russians respect stand ernest bevin know airlift berlin president kennedy russians try nuclear missile cuba end happen not man courage resolve not force material available sobering thought ponder end begin second section release press october blackpool conference prophesy come month say carefully orchestrate campaign labour party labour government portray extremely extremely mention extremely battery extremist label bandy close election loom fast furious bandying s happen election loom close bandying fast furious end beginning section check irn report june easy label phrase like rightwe extremist reactionary intend imply thing sort early return middle age toss wildly like leave high wind let catch pin truth extremist want cut taxis leave money people pocket m extremist hear hear applause majority british people extremist deeply concerned decline standard school hospital m extremist majority people extremist profoundly worry increase lawlessness growth violence street violence picket line picket line give stamp respectability cabinet minister shirley williams fred mulley denis howell hear hear applause m extremist great majority extremist oppose callaghan government rundown armed force extremist concerned strength defence m extremist proud great majority extremist listen voice people having listen proposal deal real press problem fact fiction people political dogma extreme yes extremist m marvellous company hear hear applause today llandudno pledge ll extremism come conservative government change direction country yes new lively sense purpose yes progressive putting house order yes thing day soon extremism policy party hear hear end section check irn report june end course labour not believe talk rightwe reaction rest jargon cover smokescreen wellworn socialistmarxist ploy try conceal beam eye attribute opponent will not work ill tell beam boom away mutter soft word tone smug complacency not hide stick carry back end socialist stick taxis socialist stick nationalisation socialist stick mount bureaucratic control lack choice education steady growth power state life individual like socialist stick fact long power stuck stick left end real extremist ask reg prentice find colleague stomach long turn welcome labour supporter abandon modern labour party way go oh yes extremist rank grow conservative party today llandidno sic pledge extremism come conservative government end change direction country yes new lively sense purpose yes progressive putting house order yes thing day soon extremism policy party end labour want know face extremism find let tear mask moderation look mirror margaret thatcher ll reflect doctor jekyll mr callaghan end section release press end mr chairman begin decline fall labour party let end rise resurgence great britain great britain decline irreversible reject view reject utterly wrong british people end wrong ability create invent wrong willingness work give incentive wrong deeprooted sense decency fairmindedness tolerance wrong devotion family service community pride country end seat britain decline lie people government particular decade socialist government endure fourteen year need government change country course change well possible way unleash talent energy spirit citizen end need government faith individual instead state free enterprise instead state ownership great opportunity instead great taxation end need government regard personal success warmly encourage instead bitterly envy need government allow people choose instead choose need government impartially uphold rule law instead allow fray edge political friend end government firmly tackle rise crime instead weakly try explain away government regard expenditure defence necessity embarrassment need government build britain resurgence dictate politician deeplyrooted strength people shall form government help firmly believe shall conference meet copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Everywhere I have been during this campaign I have found former Labour supporters telling me that for the first time they are voting Conservative. Why? Because the Labour Party of today is no longer the party of Clem Atlee and Hugh Gaitskell. Reg Prentice, Richard Marsh and George Brown have all testified to that over the past few weeks. There is widespread disillusion with Labour. They have doubled prices They have doubled unemployment, and crime has risen to an unacceptable level. This is what has happened in the last five years—and Labour propose no policy changes to make things any better. Indeed their plans would make things still worse… . This simply isn't fair to the British people. They deserve a better chance. It is appalling that a country with our rich natural resources—North Sea oil and gas, and the skills and enterprises of our people—should be doing so much worse than partners in Europe and our major competitors world wide. Of course, politicians can't please everyone, and it isn't their business to try. Their job is to ensure justice for everyone, so that everyone has a fair chance and the ambitions of the strong don't make the weak even weaker. Nearly everyone would like more money, no doubt. But most people recognise that if we doubled everyone's wages all we should get at the end of the day would be doubled prices. In the long run, no one would be better off. Yet there is a way to make everyone better off. If the Government takes less in taxes, people have more money to spend, even more important, if people see the chance of keeping more of what they earn, it becomes more worthwhile to work a bit harder or longer and produce more. It becomes more worthwhile to be in a job rather than on social security. With the right incentives, we can get more production, and on that everything else depends. Unless we produce more wealth, there will be no more to spend on pensions, on hospitals, on schools and roads. If we do then the elderly the sick and the children will get a better deal. It is as simple as that. As I go round the country, people constantly mention their anxiety about law and order. Crime rates such as we are seeing in our cities are a disgrace to a supposedly civilised society. If a Government can't protect citizens and their property against violence, vandalism and theft, there is little point in having a government at all. We will wage war on crime immediately. People can only be really free—free to live their own lives and go about their business in peace—if there are laws to guarantee that freedom and if the laws are to be observed. So following the events of last winter, the Conservatives have put forward three proposals which command general assent inside and outside the trade union movement. First, violence, intimidation and obstruction on the picket line cannot be tolerated. We shall ensure that the protection of the law is available to those not concerned in the dispute, but who at present can suffer severely from secondary action (picketing, blacking and blockading). Second, people arbitrarily excluded or expelled from any union must be given the right of appeal to a court of law. Thirdly, too often trade unions are dominated by a tiny handful of extremists who do not reflect the common sense views of most union members. Wider use of secret ballots for decision-making throughout the trade union movement should be given every encouragement. We will therefore provide public funds for postal ballots for union elections and other important issues. What are the other major issues people are worried about? Well, for a start there is the way our children are being educated. Standards have fallen in many schools. We shall promote higher standards of achievement in basic skills. The Government's assessment of performance unit will set national standards of reading, writing and arithmetic. Monitored by tests worked out with teachers and others, and applied locally by education authorities in teacher-training, there must be more emphasis on practical skills and on maintaining discipline. Then there is the way in which we look after the elderly. The level of pensions must be raised to take account of price rises. The November increases will go ahead. For a long time we have thought that the earnings rule for pensioners was unfair. It will be abolished. The Christmas bonus will continue, and war widows' pensions will be exempt from tax altogether. We have also made it clear that we shall give council tenants the legal right to buy their homes. Our discounts will range from 33 per cent after three years, rising with length of tenancy to a maximum of 50 per cent, after 20 years. Those council house tenants who do not wish to buy their homes will be given new rights and responsibilities under our Tenants' Charter Finally, what is my vision of a Conservative Britain? I want to see a freer and stronger Britain, in which people live and work within the law, respecting the rights of others. A Britain in which workers and managers can earn more by producing more—and keeping more of what they earn. In which there will be more genuine new jobs created, and where skill and hard work are rewarded. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc campaign find labour supporter tell time vote conservative labour party today long party clem atlee hugh gaitskell reg prentice richard marsh george brown testify past week widespread disillusion labour double price double unemployment crime rise unacceptable level happen year labour propose policy change thing well plan thing bad simply not fair british people deserve well chance appalling country rich natural resource north sea oil gas skill enterprise people bad partner europe major competitor world wide course politician not not business try job ensure justice fair chance ambition strong not weak weak nearly like money doubt people recognise double everyone wage end day double price long run well way well government take taxis people money spend important people chance keep earn worthwhile work bit hard long produce worthwhile job social security right incentive production depend produce wealth spend pension hospital school road elderly sick child well deal simple round country people constantly mention anxiety law order crime rate see city disgrace supposedly civilised society government not protect citizen property violence vandalism theft little point have government wage war crime immediately people free free live life business peace law guarantee freedom law observe follow event winter conservative forward proposal command general assent inside outside trade union movement violence intimidation obstruction picket line tolerate shall ensure protection law available concern dispute present suffer severely secondary action picket black blockade second people arbitrarily exclude expel union give right appeal court law thirdly trade union dominate tiny handful extremist reflect common sense view union member wide use secret ballot decisionmake trade union movement give encouragement provide public fund postal ballot union election important issue major issue people worried start way child educate standard fall school shall promote high standard achievement basic skill government assessment performance unit set national standard read writing arithmetic monitor test work teacher apply locally education authority teachertraining emphasis practical skill maintain discipline way look elderly level pension raise account price rise november increase ahead long time think earning rule pensioner unfair abolish christmas bonus continue war widow pension exempt tax altogether clear shall council tenant legal right buy home discount range cent year rise length tenancy maximum cent year council house tenant wish buy home give new right responsibility tenant charter finally vision conservative britain want free strong britain people live work law respect right britain worker manager earn produce keep earn genuine new job create skill hard work reward copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. 1. Mr. Carter asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on his attempts to improve the house building programme. The Minister for Housing and Construction (Mr. Reginald Freeson) There are encouraging signs that local authorities are responding to the initiatives we have taken to increase their house building programmes and extend social ownership. Extension of building and acquisition by housing associations together with the loans being offered to building societies should also improve the housing programme. Mr. Carter I thank the Minister for that reply. Is he aware that as a result of the previous Government's disastrous housing record there are now 30,000 people on the waiting list in Birmingham, and more broken homes and split families than in the last 20 years? Will he assure the House that if there are to be cuts in public expenditure in the future, housing will not be affected by them? Mr. Freeson My hon. Friend's observations on the situation in Birmingham—a situation that applies in many other parts of the country—go to the root of our deep concern to get something done about housing—to climb out of the mess we inherited. So far from cutting housing expenditure the Government have increased it and will maintain it at the levels we raised it to recently in order to get more houses built. Mr. Eyre In his consultations with local authorities will the Minister give full emphasis and encouragement to schemes for sponsoring low-cost housing? That could be of great assistance to lower-income couples seeking home ownership and could also provide work for small building companies. Mr. Freeson Yes. Indeed, the present Birmingham authority has a very good record in that respect. Provided that the provision by local authorities [column 1591]of housing for sale for owner-occupation, preferably at the lower end of the market, does not mean a reduction in the number of houses built for rent by those authorities, we shall certainly back any moves in that direction. Mr. Skinner Is my hon. Friend aware that we cannot and will not build sufficient houses to meet the people's needs if we allow other types of lower priority building to go ahead? To build houses requires men, materials and capital, but these are also needed by the less important projects. In that context, therefore, will my hon. Friend take steps to stop the building of the proposed 29 yachting marinas, possibly costing upwards of £1,000 million, projected for the coasts around Britain? If that sort of development goes ahead we shall not solve the housing problem. Mr. Freeson The provision of yachting marinas and other similar facilities does not come within my scope as Minister for housing, but I shall consult my hon. Friend in the Department on the point raised by my hon. Friend. Mr. Rossi Will the Minister give an estimate of the increase in the number of starts that will take place this year as a result of the new policies of the Government? Mr. Freeson No, not yet. This is no laughing matter, and two Conservative Members should be the last to laugh about it. We inherited the worst disaster in housing construction in 40 years. I shall be able to give some estimates in the not too distant future. There are positive signs, certainly in the local authority sphere, that there will be considerably more starts than were prepared for by the previous administration, as set down in their public expenditure survey document published in their last year of office. That document forecast 70,000 local authority housing starts in this financial year. We shall certainly be well above that figure. 2. Mr. Grylls asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what action he is taking to seek an increase in the number of EEC road transport permits allocated to the United Kingdom for 1975; and if he will make a statement. The Minister for Transport (Mr. Frederick Mulley) I am considering the Commission's recent proposal. This would give 272 EEC permits for 1975 and 318 for 1976—a considerable improvement on the present allocation of 129. Mr. Grylls I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his answer, and an improvement is obviously welcome, but will he confirm that that allocation is connected with our policy on heavy lorry axle weights within the EEC, and that as Minister he will continue to follow the firm line of my right hon. Friend the Member for Yeovil (Mr. Peyton) and resist and further increases, as proposed by other members of the EEC? I believe that if an increase is allowed the people in our villages and towns will revolt, because they do not want bigger juggernauts. Mr. Mulley I do not accept that there need be any link between the number of Community quotas and the question of the dimensions of lorries. We have had no meeting of Ministers since I took office, but I have met other Ministers individually, and I confirm that we are opposed to any increase in the dimensions of lorries. 3. Mr. Adley asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will now call in proposals to develop the site of Highcliffe Castle, Dorset, listed as a Grade I building by his Department, and hold a public inquiry. The Minister of State, Department of the Environment (Mr. Charles R. Morris) A planning application—for 30 flats—is being referred to my right hon. Friend and he will consider whether it should be called in for his decision. Mr. Adley I thank the hon. Gentleman for that reply. Is he aware that over a period of seven years his predecessors, the county council and the local authority all did everything they could to prevent development on the site? Will he keep a sharp eye on the buccaneers—until recently anonymous buccaneers—who bought the property? If they succeed in their aim, there will be great disillusionment in my constituency about the power of Governments and local authorities to stick to plans which they have set. Mr. Morris I have noted the substance of the hon. Gentleman's supplementary question. Bearing in mind the possibility that there could be an inquiry into the application, I hope that he will understand if I make no further comment on it. Mr. Robert Cooke Does the Minister agree that there is a national object lesson to be learned from the steady decline of Highcliffe Castle and its surroundings, which have already been seriously encroached upon by modern buildings of one sort or another quite unsuited to the setting of a major historic building? Is he aware that it is not too late to preserve the best of the ruin and the vista to the sea, and the trees? If, as a nation, we took more practical steps, we should not find ourselves in such situations. Mr. Morris I shall have regard to that point of view in our consideration of the matter. 4. Mr. Dixon asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will now make a statement about sewerage rates in Cornwall for 1975–76. The Minister of State, Department of the Environment (Mr. Denis Howell) Under the Water Act 1973, the South West Water Authority is responsible for fixing such charges for sewerage. Mr. Dixon Will the Minister elaborate on statements made by his ministerial colleagues to the effect that in 1975–76 there will be a reduction for people who are now invited to pay a sewerage rate but who are not on the main sewerage system? Can a concession be introduced for 1974–75 as well? Mr. Howell I answered that question in an Adjournment debate two nights ago. Mr. Marks Will my hon. Friend emphasise that sewerage has always had to be paid for through the rates? Does he not agree, however, that it and the other activities of the water authorities should now be transferred to the national Exchequer, out of the rating system? Mr. Howell There is considerable discontent about water and sewerage charges, exactly as we predicted when we were in opposition. The setting up of an administration taking those services out [column 1594]of local government is costing a great deal of money. We predicted that, and it has happened. I very much regret that this Government came to office much too late to stop this trend. Mr. Tyler Will the Minister confirm that the 150 per cent. increase in my sewerage rate and in the sewerage rates of my constituents in Cornwall is a direct result of the Water Act, which was supported in the Lobby by the hon. Members for Truro (Mr. Dixon), St. Ives (Mr. Nott) and Falmouth and Camborne (Mr. Mudd), and the then hon. Member for Bodmin, Mr. Hicks? Will the hon. Gentleman also confirm that it is as a direct result of the previous Government's proposals that we are suffering a massive increase in water rates at the same time? Will he and his colleagues reconsider the Act, and if possible get rid of the unfortunate effect it is having on rural areas? Mr. Howell I agree with the hon. Gentleman that all this was predictable, and it was predicted. We voted against the Act, and we very much regret its effects. But we came into office three weeks before the new service was implemented, and there was hardly time to change it. We are stuck with it, and we must do the best we can and see how, as the years pass, we can improve matters. I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman's sewerage rate increased by such an abnormal amount. The highest figure I have for Cornwall is 61.2 per cent. which is bad enough. It seems that in Liberal households there is a need for even greater increases. 5. Mr. Hal Miller asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what replies he has received to his letter of 16th April to those participating in the public inquiry following his inspector's report on the inquiry into the proposed Bromsgrove Eastern bypass; and if he will make a statement about his intentions in regard to the modified proposals. Mr. Mulley To date 18. No decision can be reached on the modified proposals until these and any other representations which might be made have been considered. Mr. Miller Whilst I thank the Minister for his reply, I must point out that[column 1595] these proposals have now been delayed—— Mr. Speaker Order. The hon. Gentleman may not point things out; he must ask questions. Mr. Miller I was coming to my question, Mr. Speaker. Whilst I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his reply, may I ask him to observe that there has been a considerable delay over the construction of both ends of this road? When may be come to a decision on the question whether a further public inquiry is needed? Mr. Mulley The question of a further public inquiry will arise only if modifications are required. The timing of a decision about the road is largely a matter for the county council. 7. Mr. Berry asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects the advanced passenger train to be introduced into service; and if he will make a statement. 39. Mr. Teddy Taylor asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the progress made in the advanced passenger train project. 49. Mr. Leslie Huckfield asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement on the introduction into service of the advanced passenger train. Mr. Mulley I am considering the board's proposals for the construction of four prototypes, which could be in trial service from 1977. Mr. Berry Is the Minister aware that I hope he will take into account the environmental results of the trains? We welcome their earliest possible use, but the effect on those living nearby will be serious, and must be considered. Will the right hon. Gentleman say something about the attitude of the unions, particularly ASLEF, following the report in the Daily Mail earlier this week about the high-speed diesel train and action which may have lost us considerable exports to the United States? It is an important matter, and I hope that the Minister will consider it seriously. Mr. Mulley The decision involves a number of difficult matters, which is why it is taking a little time. The environmental aspects are among those that must be considered. I understand that there have been no problems about the train or the high-speed diesel train running for trial and experimental purposes, but the union has put a ban on their use for the carriage of passengers. I understand from the Chairman of British Rail that that is why the difficulty arose earlier this week. Mr. Taylor Is the Minister aware that there is great enthusiasm in Scotland about the advanced passenger train, which will revolutionise transport from Scotland to London? When does the right hon. Gentleman expect the Edinburgh—London and Glasgow—London services to start? Is it the policy of the Government or the Railway Board to impose a surcharge for the faster journey? Mr. Mulley The hon. Gentleman wants to jump a large number of hurdles all at once. The first need is to get the train into production and have satisfactory trials before we can give firm dates for the start of particular services. The question of fares policy will not arise until we are in a position to go firm on particular services. 8. Mr. William Hamilton asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is yet in a position to make a statement on investment plans for the modernisation and extension of the Scottish railway system. Mr. Mulley The electrification of the main line to Glasgow has been completed. I am considering the board's programme for further work. Mr. Hamilton Is my right hon. Friend seized of the urgent need to get the matter right, in view of the increased prospect of getting more and more North Sea oil, with the consequent increase in heavy traffic, which is quite unsuitable for the road system? Will he make representations to the Scottish area of British Rail to ensure that there is more and more electrification on both fuel and environmental grounds? Mr. Mulley It is still a little too early to say whether fuel costs will substantially strengthen the case for continuing electrification programmes. I accept what my hon. Friend says about the importance of doing all that is reasonably possible to transfer freight from road to rail. I shall, as he wishes, discuss the Scottish aspects with the chairman of the board. Mr. Douglas Henderson In his conversations with British Rail will the Minister ask the board to reflect on the past folly of having closed railway lines which would now be beneficial to the community? With reference to the developments that are taking place in North-East Scotland, will he ask the board to carry out a feasibility study of the reopening of the Aberdeen to Peterhead and Fraserburgh lines, which would be beneficial to the whole community? Mr. Mulley There is not much benefit to be gained from trying to go over past history. When we consider the substantial sums that would be required in terms of both revenue support and investment, it is probably not easy to go back and reopen a lot of lines. I shall see that the hon. Gentleman's point is brought to the attention of the board. Mr. Teddy Taylor Will the Minister give us a clear assurance that there will be no question of the Government's cutting the substantial investment programme for the Scottish railway system which was approved shortly before the General Election? Mr. Mulley I am not sure what investment programme the hon. Gentleman has in mind. My predecessor made a statement of his intention on 28th November but there was a cut of 20 per cent. within a fortnight. I have made it clear that it is our intention to support the broad investment strategy of the British Railways Board plan that was before us last year. I cannot now give the details but it will be noted that I am introducing a Bill today which will deal seriously with the whole problem of railway finance. 9. Mr. Ralph Howell asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he can now say when he proposes to [column 1598]announce details of the Government's plans to nationalise sections of the road haulage industry. Mr. Mulley Not at present, Sir. Mr. Howell Is the Minister aware that serious damage is being caused by the uncertainty that is hanging over the road haulage industry? Does he appreciate that it is important that he should make a statement very soon? Mr. Mulley I have no evidence of any damage due to uncertainty. Of course, I am considering the extension of public ownership of road haulage in the context of the criteria that we set out in our election manifesto. Mr. Tom King Will the Minister give an undertaking that before considering the nationalisation of the haulage industry the interests and views of all those who work in it will be consulted? Mr. Mulley Naturally before taking any decision of this kind there will be full consultations with all those concerned. Mr. Loughlin Will the right hon. Gentleman give the House some idea of the proportionate cost to the taxpayer of road building on the basis of usage by the road haulage companies? For example, will he tell us, on that basis, what a motorway costs per mile? The road haulage companies use motorways extensively in the pursuit of their business. Mr. Mulley I cannot give an answer off the cuff. It would be difficult in any event to give a figure of the cost of a road strictly in the road haulage sense, because all our roads are used by different categories of transport. For a dual three-lane motorway the cost per mile is approximately £1 million. 10. Mr. Skinner asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he can now announce his conclusions on proposals to abolish the system of tied cottages. Mr. Freeson Not yet, Sir, but I hope to be able to say something after my meeting with union representatives on 20th June. Mr. Skinner Is my hon. Friend aware that on the very day that we met certain union representatives—he may well be meeting them in the near future—one of the most privileged members of our society was allocated a mansion with countless bedrooms? At the same time we hear lurid stories of the cold, ruthless and efficient way in which the roofs were being removed from over the heads of agricultural workers' families and from the homes of some miners. If my hon. Friend has difficulty in getting legislation brought to the Floor of the House, will he adopt the measure that my hon. Friend the Member for Keighley (Mr. Cryer) will introduce next Wednesday? Mr. Freeson I am not responsible for allocation policy for council or other dwellings. Therefore, I cannot comment on the allocation to which my hon. Friend has just referred. That must be so whatever views my right hon. and hon. Friends may have on the matter. Following the meeting that I shall have on 20th June, I shall consider legislation in consultation with my right hon. Friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. There are various forms of legislation which could be used and we shall consider the best form to use to tackle the abolition of tied cottages. Mr. Corrie I hope that the Minister will keep in mind the immense problems that the untying of cottages would cause the agriculture industry. Will he suggest how dairy farms can be run without tied cottages? Mr. Freeson I have little doubt that the NFU will express its views in detail on the various options that we shall consider in tackling this matter. Let there be no doubt that the Government are committed to abolishing the tied cottage system. 11. Mr. Dalyell asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on his official visit to the England versus Northern Ireland football match. Mr. Denis Howell This match was played at Wembley on 15th May 1974. It was an interesting and well-conducted match, marked by sportsmanship and enthusiasm on all sides. England won by one goal to nil, scored by Mr. Keith Weller [column 1600]in the 72nd minute. I do not wish to be too parochial but I am sure the whole House will wish me to send good wishes to Scotland as it enters the World Cup. Mr. Dalyell Now that the Northern Ireland Executive has fallen, will my hon. Friend agree that there is no longer any need for circumlocutory Questions? Those of us who recently visited the Shankill area of Belfast, Long Kesh and the prison at Armagh wonder whether the appalling lack of facilities in Belfast is not in some way connected with all these drillings of 17–and 18–year-olds in the Long Kesh prisoner-of-war camp? Mr. Howell I think that my hon. Friend is asking a serious question, which is concerned with the part that sport can play in unifying a country such as Northern Ireland. I am happy to say that I share that belief passionately and I shall, in the new circumstances, consult my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland to see whether we can do all that I would like to see done through sport to bring the communities together. Mr. Lane Is it the Minister of State or someone else in the Government who is delaying the reintroduction of the Safety of Sports Grounds Bill? Mr. Howell The reintroduction of the Bill has been promised and will take place as soon as time permits. 12. Mr. Stanley asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many newly-built unsold private houses have been purchased by local authorities since 28th February. Mr. Freeson Full information is not yet available. Circular 70/74, which contained details of the Government's initiative in this matter, was issued only on 19th April. A number of proposals have, however, already been approved and local authorities are in negotiation with builders on a substantial number of schemes. Mr. Stanley Is the Minister aware that the unfortunate but predictable result of the Government's policy is that private developers are tending to withhold estates from private purchase and, instead, are [column 1601]seeking to protect their profit margins at public expense by sales to local authorities? Instead of the Secretary of State instructing local authorities to extend municipalisation to these properties, will he instruct private builders to reduce their profits? Mr. Freeson I am tempted to use a rather blunt word in answer to the comments which we have just heard. The hon. Gentleman's remarks are totally at variance with the facts. What is more, I can assure the hon. Gentleman that the house building industry has welcomed this initiative, as it is a means of getting properties in use which, under the previous Government, were remaining unsold and uncompleted under construction to the extent of approximately 30,000 dwellings. The important objective which the Government set themselves was to get the cash flow moving and to get such houses into use, so that the builders could continue to build. We have also taken steps, which the hon. Gentleman seems to have overlooked, to try to get mortgage funds flowing more rapidly after they had sunk through the floor as a result of the previous Government's ignoring the problem for about six months before we came into office. Mr. Rose In considering this policy, will my hon. Friend look at the sordid series of events in my constituency, where the Conservative Government prevented the purchase of land by the local authority and allowed a private purchaser to buy the land and then sell it to another private purchaser, with the result that the newly-built houses on the Failsworth golf course, built by private enterprise, cost £2,000 or £3,000 more than if they had been built by the local authority, and are now being offered for sale to the local authority by the private purchaser, who cannot sell them? Will my hon. Friend ensure that the kind of abuse and profiteering permitted by the Conservative Government is not allowed to continue. Mr. Freeson I am aware of the case to which my hon. Friend refers and his sustained concern and interest in it. He raised it in the House during the last Parliament. We cannot undo what has [column 1602]been done and what we have inherited. The Government's proposals for land policy are primarily being prepared by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Planning and Local Government, and will, when eventually put before the House and approved—— Mr. Jeffrey Archer The hon. Gentleman will not be here much longer. Mr. Speaker Order. That sort of intervention only delays Question Time. Mr. Freeson Does the hon. Member for Louth (Mr. Archer) want to take us on? We should be glad for him to do so. The kind of sordid events to which my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester, Blackley (Mr. Rose) has referred will be taken care of in the proposals for land policy which we intend to introduce. Mrs. Thatcher But if the hon. Gentleman is anxious to help first-time purchasers, why does he provide grants to local authorities to purchase the very houses which those first-time purchasers want to buy? Mr. Freeson The right hon. Lady should stop talking nonsense. The average number of dwellings remaining unsold at the end of any particular year in the private sector has usually been about 10,000 spilling over into the following year. The figure we inherited at the end of last year was about 30,000. Our task was to get those houses into use as quickly as possible. It was also to try to get mortgage funds flowing more rapidly again. It was also to get house building in the public sector on the upturn again. In all three directions we have taken the initiative, and they are all related. They will all assist in getting the country's housing situation out of the disastrous mess in which the Conservative Government left it. 13. Mr. Sainsbury asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what proportion of privately rented accommodation is provided by landlords letting part of the building in which they themselves live. Mr. Freeson According to figures derived from the 1971 Census, approximately 5 per cent. of all privately rented [column 1603]lettings in England and Wales are provided by owner-occupiers or by tenants who sublet part of their own tenancy. Mr. Sainsbury Is the hon. Gentleman aware of the valuable rôle played by the private rented sector, especially in certain areas, as indicated in Supplementary Table 6 of the report of the Francis Committee? Is he further aware of the amount of accommodation which is now vacant because of the continued discouragement given to private landlords? Will he, therefore, give early consideration to allowing the landlords to recover the increases in costs of services that they provide to tenants? Mr. Freeson I am not aware of large numbers of properties standing empty as a result of rent increases, if that is what the hon. Gentleman is referring to. There has been a steady decline in the rented market for some years. That decline has increased in recent years. It has been running at the rate of about 130,000 a year over the last five or six years. We need to take steps to prevent a continued decline in the rented sector, and our municipalisation and socialisation policy will help us to do just that. Mr. George Cunningham Is it not necessary to distinguish between a house in which an owner-occupier lives and lets off one or two rooms and, at the other extreme, a block of flats where the owner lives in one of the self-contained flats? Will my hon. Friend assure us that the Government will not commend to the House any legislation which, in the latter circumstances, will remove security of tenure from the tenants? Mr. Freeson The Rent Bill is already going through Parliament. It is being dealt with in another place and will soon be introduced here. It will be best to leave detailed consideration of its terms to that occasion. 14. Mr. Andrew F. Bennett asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish in the Official Report a list of all the local authorities which have not completed definitive footpath maps for their areas; and what action is being taken to encourage those local authorities which have not done so to complete such maps. Mr. Denis Howell Yes, Sir. My Department is urging the local authorities concerned to complete action on definitive maps for the outstanding areas—eight former rural districts, two former county boroughs and one former municipal borough. Mr. Bennett Does not my hon. Friend agree that all those people who use the countryside for work or leisure are extremely concerned that the definitive maps were not completed a long time ago? Does he not also agree that now that the Ordnance Survey has adopted new signs and symbols on its maps it is particularly urgent that these definitive maps should be completed? Mr. Howell I agree that it has taken a long time—25 years. I shall try to bring the matter to a head as soon as possible. There are two appeal cases in progress which are nothing to do with the local authorities. One is in Bedfordshire, where there are 150 appeals to the Secretary of State against the local map. The other is on Humberside, where there is an appeal to the court. My hon. Friend can rest assured that we shall try to complete the matter as soon as possible. Mr. Blenkinsop Will my hon. Friend give encouragement to the Ramblers' Association and other bodies in their campaign on this issue, recognise the enormous value of walking both to health and as a non-inflationary measure, and tell local authorities to get on with the job of producing these maps? Mr. Howell We shall do all we can to encourage the Ramblers' Association. I am glad to say that its former general secretary has been put on my working party to advise on future sport and recreation policy. 15. Mr. Tebbit asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will ask local authorities to make to him a return of the numbers of residential properties unoccupied, the cause of the unoccupation where that can be established, and the ownership of such properties. Mr. Freeson No, Sir. Mr. Tebbit Is the hon. Gentleman aware that most of us on the Opposition [column 1605]side of the House will regret, even if we are not surprised at, that negative attitude? If we are to have informed discussion in the House on housing matters, it would be helpful if we had these figures. Does not the hon. Gentleman agree that hon. Gentlemen opposite see only unoccupied privately built houses, and perhaps some of my hon. Friends see only the vast areas of council property left vacant and unused in London, and that it would be helpful if we had the right figures? Mr. Freeson The kind of return for which the hon. Gentleman has asked would not be worth the tremendous effort and cost that would be involved. However, I can give him figures which will be of use to him. On the basis of a sample survey which involved about 700 authorities, undertaken by my Department not long ago—[Hon. Members: “When?” ] During the time of the last Government. [Hon. Members: “What date?” ] It seems that hon. Members opposite, having left a disaster behind them, are not interested in listening to answers. Mr. Jeffrey Archer Do not be so nasty. Mr. Freeson I am, after all, giving a reply to one of their hon. Friends. The figures are a 1 per cent. vacancy rate for local authorities as compared with a national average, according to the last available census, of 4 per cent. in England and Wales and 3.8 per cent. in London. Mr. Frank Allaun Are not vast numbers of desperately-needed private houses being kept empty for long periods, usually because the owners are holding out for high prices or high rents? In consequence, is it not the case that these houses are being ruined by vandals and in many cases have to be demolished? Will my hon. Friend introduce legislation to permit local authorities to requisition houses kept empty for over three months without good reason? Mr. Freeson Before taking steps of that kind—which have already been considered in the Department in one form or another during the last three months—I should like to see the results of initiatives we have taken through the recent circular that has been issued, and [column 1606]other housing advice that has been given to local authorities. We should also like to await the results of the Housing Bill which is currently in Committee and which will encourage local authorities to extend their ownership of houses available to let. This should help to resolve the kind of problems that my hon. Friend has raised. 16. Mr. Michael Morris asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is Her Majesty's Government's policy regarding the proportion of homes built for sale and rent in new towns. The Minister for Planning and Local Government (Mr. John Silkin) As I said in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Harlow (Mr. Newens) on 10th April [Vol. 872, c. 175]—policy on this matter is under review and my right hon. Friend will be making a statement in due course. He will not anticipate this statement, except to say that the main need at the present time in the new towns is for more houses for rent. Mr. Morris In view of that statement, is the right hon. Gentleman prepared to explain why the manager of the new town of Northampton, at least, has been instructed to stop the sale of any houses for the moment because the ratio is changing from 50/50 to 75/25 in favour of rented accommodation? Is the Minister aware that young families moving into new towns like Northampton have the greatest objection to the withdrawal of a facility that they thought would be their right when they applied to come to the new town? Mr. Silkin The ratio policy is under review. What we are concerned about is future house building and getting the right balance between the numbers of houses built for sale and the number built for renting. It is certainly true that many young couples would like to move to the new towns and buy their own houses. There will be such houses. But the vast majority at the moment need houses for rent. We have to see that these, too, are available. Mr. Edge Is my right hon. Friend aware of the need to compel development corporations to make houses available for renting to local people who are now homeless as a result of the difficulties [column 1607]placed in the way of the public building sector following the activities of the last Government? Mr. Silkin It was the realisation of this that caused my right hon. Friend and myself to undertake this review. It is the tragedy of the long waiting lists in the new towns that has pressed the issue. Mr. Allason Since it was the last Labour Government which introduced this concept of 50 per cent. of new town houses for renting and 50 per cent. for owner-occupation, what justification can there be for changing it? Is it that the Government want new towns to be different from the rest of the country? Do they want them to have nothing but tenanted homes? Mr. Silkin It was in 1968, or perhaps a year or two earlier, that the 50/50 ratio was suggested under a Labour Government. The hon. Gentleman might look at the housing figures of that year. He will find that at that time the highest number of houses ever built by any Government in the history of this country had been built. The position last year was calamitous, and something had to be done about it. 17. Mr. Michael Latham asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress is being made by his joint advisory committee with the Building Societies Association; and whether he will make a statement. 33. Mr. Frank Allaun asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress is being made by his joint advisory committee with the Building Societies Association. 44. Mr. Ioan Evans asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what further discussions he has had with the Building Societies Association; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Freeson At the meeting of the joint advisory committee on 6th June the Building Societies Association was offered the third tranche of short-term loans of £100 million at 10½ per cent. out of the total of £500 million to be made available if necessary. The Council of the Building Societies Association will consider this offer at its meeting on 14th June. Mr. Latham Has this expert body yet estimated the likely amount of mortgage finance which will be available during 1974 and, if so, on what level of private house building is any such estimate based? Mr. Freeson I am not aware of any such estimate having been made by the Building Societies Association or the joint advisory committee which would involve consultation with officials of the Department. Mr. Allaun Will the Minister lend more money to local authorities at the favourable rate recently granted to the building societies, so that they can provide more mortgages—100 per cent. mortgages if necessary? Will this not be possible when the building societies repay the £500 million or, as is possible, do not take up the third part of that sum? Will my hon. Friend not do more for the local authorities? Mr. Freeson If there were any difficulty about the flow of funds into local authorities for mortgages we might have to consider how to stimulate that flow. This was the position with the building societies. For the first time in living memory there was a net outflow of funds. This is not the position with local authorities. There is no limit on lending by them and, so far as I am aware, there are no difficulties for them in raising money for granting mortgages. Should there be difficulties we shall be glad to consider ways of dealing with them. Mr. McCrindle Will the hon. Gentleman say whether any discussions are taking place dealing with a voluntary stabilisation fund within the societies? Now that funds are flowing in, would it not be a good thing if the Government were to exercise their influence on building societies with a view to eliminating or at least mitigating a future mortgage famine? Mr. Freeson This issue has been the subject of discussions which have covered other aspects of the problems facing us. We shall be pursuing this aspect of policy. Mr. Evans Does my hon. Friend realise that he and his colleagues are to be congratulated on the action they have taken? Is he aware that if there had not [column 1609]been a change of Government those buying houses today would be paying a 13 per cent. interest rate? Will he continue with this policy of giving hope to those struggling to buy their homes? Is it not a fact that while the Conservative Party talked about creating a property-owning democracy, what it did was to create a money-lenders' paradise. Mr. Freeson I thank my hon. Friend for those observations. What we have been doing on a number of fronts is to take an immediate initiative to get out of the current situation, which we inherited. As to the future, there will be some careful medium—to long-term studies of a variety of policies. This is one such area. We shall be coming forward with substantive administrative policy proposals and legislation in due course to deal with the problems inherent in the situation. Mr. Walter Johnson Is my hon. Friend aware that the vast sums being loaned to the building societies at favourable rates of interest for the purpose of keeping down interest rates are being reinvested in the City at considerably increased rates of interest? Is this not a disgraceful misuse of public funds? Mr. Freeson No. The object of the exercise is to maintain the level of funds which building societies have available for lending and to maintain their liquidity levels so that they can grant mortgages at a reasonable level and at an increased rate. The money was flowing out of building societies. That was why we carried out this exercise. The result has been that, far from there being a net outflow of funds, which would have threatened the supply of mortgages, there is now a net inflow and we can rely on mortgages being issued in future. Mrs. Thatcher Are not the people who are taking money away from the building societies the local authorities and the Government, both of whom are offering a higher rate of interest to the saver? Mr. Freeson The right hon. Lady has raised an important point about the structure of the borrowing and investing market. We have a situation which was created by her Government—I make no party point about that—which threatened building societies as far back as October last year, and it grew worse as the months went by. We have taken immediate steps [column 1610]to tackle the situation. With regard to longer-term reform, we shall come to that in due course. 18. Mr. Arthur Jones asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is considering further financial support for new and expanded towns. Mr. John Silkin My right hon. Friend is considering the problems of local authorities in this field—though without commitment at this stage. Mr. Jones I know that the right hon. Gentleman recognises the burden which falls on ratepayers in those counties with town expansion schemes, such as Northamptonshire, which has no fewer than four. Does he recognise the particular circumstances for Northamptonshire and is he prepared to consider some special grant from central funds in recognition of these difficulties, in the second half of the current financial year? Mr. Silkin The hon. Gentleman will appreciate that I have a great deal of sympathy for new and expanded towns. I know of the difficulties that they are under. The trouble is that with things as they are in the present system the giving of funds to one authority must be done at the expense of another. That is the way it goes. Having said that, however, I can tell the hon. Gentleman that I am looking closely into the question whether any help can be given in the special circumstances of expanded towns. Mr. Ronald Atkins Is my right hon. Friend aware that if Government funds are available for local government purposes they are needed even more in the older towns in support of the rates, in connection with the housing programmes which the Government have urged us to carry out? I raise this point as a Member from a new town. Mr. Silkin My hon. Friend has clearly and eloquently put the other side of the equation which I was trying to suggest a moment ago. I think we shall have to get local authorities to see themselves what is the best and most reasonable way to answer the problem. Sir Harmar Nicholls Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that his first answer was the best? Its tone and approach gave much encouragement. In areas of [column 1611]new towns, such as Peterborough, where there is a doubling of the population of an old-established, traditional city, the influx of people from London has undermined the hospital and education services. Does he agree that the only way this can be remedied is by having a direct grant to take this into account, as distinct from the normal regional channels? Mr. Silkin I am aware that all my answers, all the time, are always the best and are always reasonable. I am trying to put the facts as they seem to be to me. I understand the necessity of helping those towns which are taking in increases in population and which have greater services to deal with. I also understand the problems of those towns which are old and decaying, and which must be helped. The trouble is that all are to be helped from the same fund of money. 19. Mr. Awdry asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a visit to Chippenham in order to discuss the problems of the local ratepayers. Mr. Charles R. Morris My right hon. Friend has no immediate plans to visit Chippenham; nevertheless, the problems of ratepayers in this type of area will receive full consideration in determining the 1975–76 rate support grant. Mr. Awdry Does the Minister not understand that the vast majority of my constituents consider the present rating system unacceptable and grossly unfair? Will he give an assurance that the Government intend to have a major review of the whole system as a matter of urgency? Mr. Morris I appreciate the concern of ratepayers in Chippenham at the present level of rates, but the hon. Gentleman can help in this regard by explaining to the people of Chippenham that by increasing the domestic element of the rate support grant from 6p to 13p this Government have made the largest single contribution ever to assist the domestic ratepayer. With regard to a review of the rating system, I assure the hon. Gentleman that the Government are considering the scope for the reform of the rating system generally. Mr. Kellett-Bowman Does the Minister recall that his hon. Friend the Minister of State, when speaking in the Adjournment debate on Monday night, said that he doubted That order is Statutory Instrument No. 448. If what was said is so, would it not be a simple matter for the hon. Gentleman to withdraw the statutory instrument and bring in a more satisfactory one, which either inserts in Article 9(2), after “hereditament” , the words “in receipt of the service” or, alternatively, makes provision for a retrospective payment for such hereditaments when they have been identified? Mr. Morris As the hon. Lady will observe, the Question on the Order Paper refers to a visit to Chippenham. In this context, if I may comment on the general point which she made, if we were to accept her thesis and solution we would leave the water authorities dry, financially. 20. Mr. Durant asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he proposes to publish a White Paper on the reform of local government finance. 25. Mr. Biffen asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what further consideration has been given to the appointment of a Royal Commission on the financing of local government expenditure. 38. Mr. Pardoe asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a White Paper on his proposals for the reform of the rating system in 1975–76. Mr. John Silkin I cannot yet say what further studies of these matters the Government may undertake, or when the results will be published, but I am well aware of the extent of public dissatisfaction with the rating system in its present form. My right hon. Friend does not rule out the possibility of a more thoroughgoing long-term examination of local government finance. Mr. Durant Does not the right hon. Gentleman agree that this is a disappointing answer, in view of the statement made by the Secretary of State in his speech on 25th March in the House, when he implied that there was going to be a thoroughgoing rate review? Unless the Minister is made aware of feelings in the country the next strike will be a rates strike. Mr. Silkin I have much sympathy with the hon. Gentleman. I sometimes do not even myself listen to my replies, but in fact I said—if I may repeat the reply for the hon. Gentleman's benefit—that my right hon. Friend does not rule out the possibility of a more thoroughgoing long-term examination of local government finance—and that, I suspect, is what the hon. Gentleman was asking about. Mr. Tomlinson Is my right hon. Friend aware that something must be done before next year because we now have a situation in which there are increases of rates of the order of 96 per cent., which some of my constituents have had to bear and which are completely intolerable in this type of economic climate? Mr. Silkin Of course something must be done. One must do it with what weapons and tools are available, which take the form of the rate support grant. This situation has arisen through four factors: first, the greatest inflation in our history; second, the highest interest rates in our history; third, the reorganisation of local government; and, fourth, the reorganisation of water and sewerage services. During the time of the last Government all the opposition parties warned what would happen, and it has been our unfortunate lot to have inherited the chaos. Mr. Biffen Does not the right hon. Gentleman agree that the size and style of the domestic residence is increasingly unrelated to the taxpaying capacity of its occupant? If that is his view, is it his hope that the studies which may be in prospect will bring about reforms which will take cognisance of that? Mr. Silkin I said that my right hon. Friend would not rule out a study of the whole situation. The trouble is that there [column 1614]have been studies before—for example, there was the famous Green Paper not long ago, when the hon. Gentleman's party was in Government. It was, as my right hon. Friend has just said, rather a shambles. There seem to be so many possibilities that I agree that the case is rapidly being made out on the lines that we need to consider the whole system again. Mr. Pardoe Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the present crisis in the rating system and in local government finance is a direct result of the criminal lunacy of reorganising local government without at the same time reorganising its finances, and that this represented a triumph for Whitehall civil servants, aided and abetted by the Conservative Government, who have long wished to destroy local democracy? In his proposals for the future will he now consider scrapping the rating system and allowing local authorities to raise their money in any way they think fit, thereby abolishing all central Government grants to local authorities with the exception of a contribution to the provincial or regional equalisation fund? Mr. Silkin On the final point, I reiterate that my right hon. Friend has not ruled out a long-term study of the whole situation. On the first two points, I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on having read most of my speeches in Committee on the Local Government Bill. I commend to him every other speech I have made in the House. Mr. Blenkinsop I accept completely my right hon. Friend's statement about where responsibility for the situation which we have inherited should lie, but does he not agree that there is a wide consensus that we must give far more attention to the possibility of raising funds by means of income taxation as being preferable to and fairer than the rating system? Mr. Silkin I should be very dim indeed if I were not aware that there was a feeling in the country to that effect. Mr. Gow Is the Minister aware that his constant repetition of the statement that his right hon. Friend has not ruled out the possibility of a long-term inquiry [column 1615]is wholly unsatisfactory to the overwhelming majority of ratepayers? Will he impress on his right hon. Friend the absolute and immediate urgency of a full-scale inquiry into the whole system of local government finance? Mr. Silkin I am sure that my right hon. Friend has his own ideas and is well aware of the situation without my informing him of it. However, I undertake to ensure that he is made aware of the feeling in the House. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr carter ask secretary state environment statement attempt improve house building programme minister housing construction mr reginald freeson encourage sign local authority respond initiative take increase house building programme extend social ownership extension building acquisition housing association loan offer build society improve housing programme mr carter thank minister reply aware result previous government disastrous housing record people waiting list birmingham broken home split family year assure house cut public expenditure future housing affect mr freeson hon friend observation situation birmingham situation apply part country root deep concern housing climb mess inherit far cut housing expenditure government increase maintain level raise recently order house build mr eyre consultation local authority minister emphasis encouragement scheme sponsor lowcost housing great assistance lowerincome couple seek home ownership provide work small building company mr freeson yes present birmingham authority good record respect provide provision local authority column housing sale owneroccupation preferably low end market mean reduction number house build rent authority shall certainly move direction mr skinner hon friend aware build sufficient house meet people need allow type low priority building ahead build house require man material capital need important project context hon friend step stop building propose yachting marina possibly cost upwards million project coast britain sort development go ahead shall solve housing problem mr freeson provision yachting marina similar facility come scope minister housing shall consult hon friend department point raise hon friend mr rossi minister estimate increase number start place year result new policy government mr freeson laugh matter conservative member laugh inherit bad disaster housing construction year shall able estimate distant future positive sign certainly local authority sphere considerably start prepare previous administration set public expenditure survey document publish year office document forecast local authority housing start financial year shall certainly figure mr gryll ask secretary state environment action take seek increase number eec road transport permit allocate united kingdom statement minister transport mr frederick mulley consider commission recent proposal eec permit considerable improvement present allocation mr gryll thank right hon gentleman answer improvement obviously welcome confirm allocation connect policy heavy lorry axle weight eec minister continue follow firm line right hon friend member yeovil mr peyton resist increase propose member eec believe increase allow people village town revolt want big juggernaut mr mulley accept need link number community quota question dimension lorry meeting minister take office meet minister individually confirm opposed increase dimension lorry mr adley ask secretary state environment proposal develop site highcliffe castle dorset list grade building department hold public inquiry minister state department environment mr charles r morris planning application flat refer right hon friend consider call decision mr adley thank hon gentleman reply aware period seven year predecessor county council local authority prevent development site sharp eye buccaneer recently anonymous buccaneer buy property succeed aim great disillusionment constituency power government local authority stick plan set mr morris note substance hon gentleman supplementary question bear mind possibility inquiry application hope understand comment mr robert cooke minister agree national object lesson learn steady decline highcliffe castle surrounding seriously encroach modern building sort unsuited setting major historic building aware late preserve good ruin vista sea tree nation take practical step find situation mr morris shall regard point view consideration matter mr dixon ask secretary state environment statement sewerage rate cornwall minister state department environment mr denis howell water act south west water authority responsible fix charge sewerage mr dixon minister elaborate statement ministerial colleague effect reduction people invite pay sewerage rate main sewerage system concession introduce mr howell answer question adjournment debate night ago mr mark hon friend emphasise sewerage pay rate agree activity water authority transfer national exchequer rating system mr howell considerable discontent water sewerage charge exactly predict opposition setting administration take service column local government cost great deal money predict happen regret government come office late stop trend mr tyler minister confirm cent increase sewerage rate sewerage rate constituent cornwall direct result water act support lobby hon member truro mr dixon st ive mr nott falmouth camborne mr mudd hon member bodmin mr hick hon gentleman confirm direct result previous government proposal suffer massive increase water rate time colleague reconsider act possible rid unfortunate effect have rural area mr howell agree hon gentleman predictable predict vote act regret effect come office week new service implement hardly time change stuck good year pass improve matter sorry hon gentlemans sewerage rate increase abnormal high figure cornwall cent bad liberal household need great increase mr hal miller ask secretary state environment reply receive letter april participate public inquiry follow inspector report inquiry propose bromsgrove eastern bypass statement intention regard modify proposal mr mulley date decision reach modify proposal representation consider mr miller whilst thank minister reply point thatcolumn proposal delay mr speaker order hon gentleman point thing ask question mr miller come question mr speaker whilst thank right hon gentleman reply ask observe considerable delay construction end road come decision question public inquiry need mr mulley question public inquiry arise modification require timing decision road largely matter county council mr berry ask secretary state environment expect advanced passenger train introduce service statement mr teddy taylor ask secretary state environment statement progress advanced passenger train project mr leslie huckfield ask secretary state environment statement introduction service advanced passenger train mr mulley consider board proposal construction prototype trial service mr berry minister aware hope account environmental result train welcome early possible use effect live nearby consider right hon gentleman attitude union particularly aslef follow report daily mail early week highspeed diesel train action lose considerable export united states important matter hope minister consider seriously mr mulley decision involve number difficult matter take little time environmental aspect consider understand problem train highspeed diesel train run trial experimental purpose union ban use carriage passenger understand chairman british rail difficulty arise early week mr taylor minister aware great enthusiasm scotland advanced passenger train revolutionise transport scotland london right hon gentleman expect edinburgh london glasgow london service start policy government railway board impose surcharge fast journey mr mulley hon gentleman want jump large number hurdle need train production satisfactory trial firm date start particular service question fare policy arise position firm particular service mr william hamilton ask secretary state environment position statement investment plan modernisation extension scottish railway system mr mulley electrification main line glasgow complete consider board programme work mr hamilton right hon friend seize urgent need matter right view increase prospect get north sea oil consequent increase heavy traffic unsuitable road system representation scottish area british rail ensure electrification fuel environmental ground mr mulley little early fuel cost substantially strengthen case continue electrification programme accept hon friend say importance reasonably possible transfer freight road rail shall wish discuss scottish aspect chairman board mr douglas henderson conversation british rail minister ask board reflect past folly having close railway line beneficial community reference development take place northeast scotland ask board carry feasibility study reopening aberdeen peterhead fraserburgh line beneficial community mr mulley benefit gain try past history consider substantial sum require term revenue support investment probably easy reopen lot line shall hon gentleman point bring attention board mr teddy taylor minister clear assurance question government cut substantial investment programme scottish railway system approve shortly general election mr mulley sure investment programme hon gentleman mind predecessor statement intention november cut cent fortnight clear intention support broad investment strategy british railways board plan year detail note introduce bill today deal seriously problem railway finance mr ralph howell ask secretary state environment propose column detail government plan nationalise section road haulage industry mr mulley present sir mr howell minister aware damage cause uncertainty hang road haulage industry appreciate important statement soon mr mulley evidence damage uncertainty course consider extension public ownership road haulage context criterion set election manifesto mr tom king minister undertaking consider nationalisation haulage industry interest view work consult mr mulley naturally take decision kind consultation concerned mr loughlin right hon gentleman house idea proportionate cost taxpayer road building basis usage road haulage company example tell basis motorway cost mile road haulage company use motorway extensively pursuit business mr mulley answer cuff difficult event figure cost road strictly road haulage sense road different category transport dual threelane motorway cost mile approximately million mr skinner ask secretary state environment announce conclusion proposal abolish system tie cottage mr freeson sir hope able meeting union representative june mr skinner hon friend aware day meet certain union representative meet near future privileged member society allocate mansion countless bedroom time hear lurid story cold ruthless efficient way roof remove head agricultural worker family home miner hon friend difficulty get legislation bring floor house adopt measure hon friend member keighley mr cryer introduce wednesday mr freeson responsible allocation policy council dwelling comment allocation hon friend refer view right hon hon friend matter follow meeting shall june shall consider legislation consultation right hon friend minister agriculture fishery food form legislation shall consider good form use tackle abolition tie cottage mr corrie hope minister mind immense problem untying cottage cause agriculture industry suggest dairy farm run tie cottage mr freeson little doubt nfu express view detail option shall consider tackle matter let doubt government committed abolish tie cottage system mr dalyell ask secretary state environment statement official visit england versus northern ireland football match mr denis howell match play wembley interesting wellconducted match mark sportsmanship enthusiasm side england win goal nil score mr keith weller column minute wish parochial sure house wish send good wish scotland enter world cup mr dalyell northern ireland executive fall hon friend agree long need circumlocutory question recently visit shankill area belfast long kesh prison armagh wonder appalling lack facility belfast way connect drilling yearold long kesh prisonerofwar camp mr howell think hon friend ask question concern sport play unify country northern ireland happy share belief passionately shall new circumstance consult right hon friend secretary state northern ireland like sport bring community mr lane minister state government delay reintroduction safety sport ground bill mr howell reintroduction bill promise place soon time permit mr stanley ask secretary state environment newlybuilt unsold private house purchase local authority february mr freeson information available circular contain detail government initiative matter issue april number proposal approve local authority negotiation builder substantial number scheme mr stanley minister aware unfortunate predictable result government policy private developer tend withhold estate private purchase instead column protect profit margin public expense sale local authority instead secretary state instruct local authority extend municipalisation property instruct private builder reduce profit mr freeson tempt use blunt word answer comment hear hon gentleman remark totally variance fact assure hon gentleman house building industry welcome initiative means get property use previous government remain unsold uncompleted construction extent approximately dwelling important objective government set cash flow move house use builder continue build take step hon gentleman overlook try mortgage fund flow rapidly sink floor result previous government ignore problem month come office mr rise consider policy hon friend look sordid series event constituency conservative government prevent purchase land local authority allow private purchaser buy land sell private purchaser result newlybuilt house failsworth golf course build private enterprise cost build local authority offer sale local authority private purchaser sell hon friend ensure kind abuse profiteering permit conservative government allow continue mr freeson aware case hon friend refer sustained concern interest raise house parliament undo column inherit government proposal land policy primarily prepare right hon friend minister planning local government eventually house approve mr jeffrey archer hon gentleman long mr speaker order sort intervention delay question time mr freeson hon member louth mr archer want glad kind sordid event hon friend member manchester blackley mr rose refer take care proposal land policy intend introduce mrs thatcher hon gentleman anxious help firsttime purchaser provide grant local authority purchase house firsttime purchaser want buy mr freeson right hon lady stop talk nonsense average number dwelling remain unsold end particular year private sector usually spill following year figure inherit end year task house use quickly possible try mortgage fund flow rapidly house building public sector upturn direction take initiative related assist get country housing situation disastrous mess conservative government leave mr sainsbury ask secretary state environment proportion privately rent accommodation provide landlord let building live mr freeson accord figure derive census approximately cent privately rent column england wale provide owneroccupier tenant sublet tenancy mr sainsbury hon gentleman aware valuable rôle play private rent sector especially certain area indicate supplementary table report francis committee aware accommodation vacant continued discouragement give private landlord early consideration allow landlord recover increase cost service provide tenant mr freeson aware large number property stand result rent increase hon gentleman refer steady decline rent market year decline increase recent year run rate year year need step prevent continue decline rent sector municipalisation socialisation policy help mr george cunningham necessary distinguish house owneroccupi life let room extreme block flat owner live selfcontained flat hon friend assure government commend house legislation circumstance remove security tenure tenant mr freeson rent bill go parliament deal place soon introduce good leave detailed consideration term occasion mr andrew f bennett ask secretary state environment publish official report list local authority complete definitive footpath map area action take encourage local authority complete map mr denis howell yes sir department urge local authority concern complete action definitive map outstanding area rural district county borough municipal borough mr bennett hon friend agree people use countryside work leisure extremely concerned definitive map complete long time ago agree ordnance survey adopt new sign symbol map particularly urgent definitive map complete mr howell agree take long year shall try bring matter head soon possible appeal case progress local authority bedfordshire appeal secretary state local map humberside appeal court hon friend rest assure shall try complete matter soon possible mr blenkinsop hon friend encouragement rambler association body campaign issue recognise enormous value walk health noninflationary measure tell local authority job produce map mr howell shall encourage rambler association glad general secretary work party advise future sport recreation policy mr tebbit ask secretary state environment ask local authority return number residential property unoccupie cause unoccupation establish ownership property mr freeson sir mr tebbit hon gentleman aware opposition column house regret surprised negative attitude inform discussion house housing matter helpful figure hon gentleman agree hon gentleman opposite unoccupied privately build house hon friend vast area council property leave vacant unused london helpful right figure mr freeson kind return hon gentleman ask worth tremendous effort cost involve figure use basis sample survey involve authority undertake department long ago hon member time government hon member date hon member opposite having leave disaster interested listen answer mr jeffrey archer nasty mr freeson give reply hon friend figure cent vacancy rate local authority compare national average accord available census cent england wale cent london mr frank allaun vast number desperatelyneeded private house keep long period usually owner hold high price high rent consequence case house ruin vandal case demolish hon friend introduce legislation permit local authority requisition house keep month good reason mr freeson take step kind consider department form month like result initiative take recent circular issue column housing advice give local authority like await result housing bill currently committee encourage local authority extend ownership house available let help resolve kind problem hon friend raise mr michael morris ask secretary state environment majestys government policy proportion home build sale rent new town minister planning local government mr john silkin say reply hon friend member harlow mr newen april vol c policy matter review right hon friend make statement course anticipate statement main need present time new town house rent mr morris view statement right hon gentleman prepare explain manager new town northampton instruct stop sale house moment ratio change favour rent accommodation minister aware young family move new town like northampton great objection withdrawal facility think right apply come new town mr silkin ratio policy review concerned future house building get right balance number house build sale number build rent certainly true young couple like new town buy house house vast majority moment need house rent available mr edge right hon friend aware need compel development corporation house available rent local people homeless result difficulty column way public building sector follow activity government mr silkin realisation cause right hon friend undertake review tragedy long waiting list new town press issue mr allason labour government introduce concept cent new town house renting cent owneroccupation justification change government want new town different rest country want tenant home mr silkin year early ratio suggest labour government hon gentleman look housing figure year find time high number house build government history country build position year calamitous mr michael latham ask secretary state environment progress joint advisory committee building society association statement mr frank allaun ask secretary state environment progress joint advisory committee building societies association mr ioan evans ask secretary state environment discussion building society association statement mr freeson meeting joint advisory committee june building society association offer tranche shortterm loan million cent total million available necessary council building society association consider offer meeting june mr latham expert body estimate likely mortgage finance available level private house building estimate base mr freeson aware estimate having building society association joint advisory committee involve consultation official department mr allaun minister lend money local authority favourable rate recently grant building society provide cent mortgage necessary possible building society repay million possible sum hon friend local authority mr freeson difficulty flow fund local authority mortgage consider stimulate flow position building society time living memory net outflow fund position local authority limit lending far aware difficulty raise money grant mortgage difficulty shall glad consider way deal mr mccrindle hon gentleman discussion take place deal voluntary stabilisation fund society fund flow good thing government exercise influence build society view eliminate mitigate future mortgage famine mr freeson issue subject discussion cover aspect problem face shall pursue aspect policy mr evans hon friend realise colleague congratulate action take aware column change government buying house today pay cent interest rate continue policy give hope struggle buy home fact conservative party talk create propertyowne democracy create moneylender paradise mr freeson thank hon friend observation number front immediate initiative current situation inherit future careful medium longterm study variety policy area shall come forward substantive administrative policy proposal legislation course deal problem inherent situation mr walter johnson hon friend aware vast sum loan building society favourable rate interest purpose keep interest rate reinveste city considerably increase rate interest disgraceful misuse public fund mr freeson object exercise maintain level fund build society available lending maintain liquidity level grant mortgage reasonable level increase rate money flow building society carry exercise result far net outflow fund threaten supply mortgage net inflow rely mortgage issue future mrs thatcher people take money away building society local authority government offer high rate interest saver mr freeson right hon lady raise important point structure borrowing investing market situation create government party point threaten build society far october year grow bad month go take immediate step column tackle situation regard longerterm reform shall come course mr arthur jones ask secretary state environment consider financial support new expand town mr john silkin right hon friend consider problem local authority field commitment stage mr jones know right hon gentleman recognise burden fall ratepayer county town expansion scheme northamptonshire few recognise particular circumstance northamptonshire prepare consider special grant central fund recognition difficulty second half current financial year mr silkin hon gentleman appreciate great deal sympathy new expand town know difficulty trouble thing present system giving fund authority expense way go having say tell hon gentleman look closely question help give special circumstance expand town mr ronald atkins right hon friend aware government fund available local government purpose need old town support rate connection housing programme government urge carry raise point member new town mr silkin hon friend clearly eloquently equation try suggest moment ago think shall local authority good reasonable way answer problem sir harmar nicholls right hon gentleman aware answer good tone approach give encouragement area column town peterborough doubling population oldestablished traditional city influx people london undermine hospital education service agree way remedied have direct grant account distinct normal regional channel mr silkin aware answer time good reasonable try fact understand necessity help town take increase population great service deal understand problem town old decay help trouble help fund money mr awdry ask secretary state environment visit chippenham order discuss problem local ratepayer mr charles r morris right hon friend immediate plan visit chippenham problem ratepayer type area receive consideration determine rate support grant mr awdry minister understand vast majority constituent consider present rating system unacceptable grossly unfair assurance government intend major review system matter urgency mr morris appreciate concern ratepayer chippenham present level rate hon gentleman help regard explain people chippenham increase domestic element rate support grant government large single contribution assist domestic ratepayer regard review rating system assure hon gentleman government consider scope reform rating system generally mr kellettbowman minister recall hon friend minister state speak adjournment debate monday night say doubt order statutory instrument say simple matter hon gentleman withdraw statutory instrument bring satisfactory insert article hereditament word receipt service alternatively make provision retrospective payment hereditament identify mr morris hon lady observe question order paper refer visit chippenham context comment general point accept thesis solution leave water authority dry financially mr durant ask secretary state environment propose publish white paper reform local government finance mr biffen ask secretary state environment consideration give appointment royal commission financing local government expenditure mr pardoe ask secretary state environment publish white paper proposal reform rating system mr john silkin study matter government undertake result publish aware extent public dissatisfaction rating system present form right hon friend rule possibility thoroughgoing longterm examination local government finance mr durant right hon gentleman agree disappointing answer view statement secretary state speech march house imply go thoroughgoing rate review minister aware feeling country strike rate strike mr silkin sympathy hon gentleman listen reply fact say repeat reply hon gentleman benefit right hon friend rule possibility thoroughgoing longterm examination local government finance suspect hon gentleman ask mr tomlinson right hon friend aware year situation increase rate order cent constituent bear completely intolerable type economic climate mr silkin course weapon tool available form rate support grant situation arise factor great inflation history second high interest rate history reorganisation local government fourth reorganisation water sewerage service time government opposition party warn happen unfortunate lot inherit chaos mr biffen right hon gentleman agree size style domestic residence increasingly unrelated taxpaying capacity occupant view hope study prospect bring reform cognisance mr silkin say right hon friend rule study situation trouble column study example famous green paper long ago hon gentlemans party government right hon friend say shamble possibility agree case rapidly line need consider system mr pardoe right hon gentleman aware present crisis rating system local government finance direct result criminal lunacy reorganise local government time reorganise finance represent triumph whitehall civil servant aid abet conservative government long wish destroy local democracy proposal future consider scrap rating system allow local authority raise money way think fit abolish central government grant local authority exception contribution provincial regional equalisation fund mr silkin final point reiterate right hon friend rule longterm study situation point congratulate hon gentleman having read speech committee local government bill commend speech house mr blenkinsop accept completely right hon friend statement responsibility situation inherit lie agree wide consensus far attention possibility raise fund mean income taxation preferable fair rating system mr silkin dim aware feeling country effect mr gow minister aware constant repetition statement right hon friend rule possibility longterm inquiry column wholly unsatisfactory overwhelming majority ratepayer impress right hon friend absolute immediate urgency fullscale inquiry system local government finance mr silkin sure right hon friend idea aware situation inform undertake ensure aware feeling house copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Title: Address to the Annual Convention of the American Red Cross Date: October 4, 1926 Location: Washington, D.C. Context: Coolidge addresses members at the Convention of the Red Cross in Washington D.C. on the importance and appreciation of the American Red Cross’s wartime and peacetime efforts and progress Members of the Convention: The annual convention of the American Red Cross is an occasion for reemphasizing the fact that the world is not yet perfect, and rededicating ourselves to continuing sacrifices for its redemption. Such a conception in its entirety is not simple but very complex. It is not narrow and restricted, but very broad and comprehensive. It brings into consideration the whole field of human relationship. The main purpose of this organization is charity, but charity is not something that can exist of self, apart from all else. It is very complete demonstration of the fact that we live in world that is interrelated and interdependent. Charity depends not only on a benevolent spirit but upon the material resources by means of which such sentiment can manifest itself. It is the realization of this principle that helps to sanctify the realm of business. The people of this country are engaged in their various daily occupations in order that they may meet their wide and comprehensive obligations. No doubt their first thought is to be self-supporting and independent, maintaining themselves and their families in comfort, supplying the needs of their declining years, and passing on to posterity the means of a broader existence and a more comprehensive life. It is with this in view that they have given heed to the scriptural injunction to be diligent in business, and under the inspiration of this motive America has become rich and prosperous. But our obligation does not end there. Although there is no doubt that we have surpassed every other people in that direction we have not yet attained, and perhaps it is not possible for finite beings to attain, to a complete economic justice. The limitations of humanity and the results of unforeseen and unforeseeable contingencies constantly leave some of our people, oftentimes without any fault on their part, in a condition of want and distress which they are enable of themselves to alleviate. Nothing is clearer than the requirement which is laid on society to use its resources for the relief and restoration of such conditions. The success and completeness with which these obligations are discharged measure the moral rank of a people. In a country as extended and diversified as our own which recognizes its obligation not only to itself but to humanity at large, such charity can not be left to the chance impulse of the occasion. It requires trained skill and thorough organization for its effective operation. It is to meet this broad purpose that the American Red Cross has been organized and maintained. More and more each year it has become a symbol and expression of the divine sympathy which exists in every human being. It takes the heart beats of humanity and transforms them into concrete acts for the alleviation of misery and suffering. Begun as an agency of mercy to relieve those stricken in battle, it soon developed into a service to heal the scars of those broken in body and spirit by such combats. This work is still vitally necessary. We can only hope that some day there will be found a way to prevent these appalling conflicts between nations, which bring such a harvest of physically maimed and mentally wrecked, with the resultant destruction of man power and material resources. But to-day there is much more in our Red Cross. Wonderful advances have been made in developing and organizing its peace-time activities. One of the purposes written into its charter, granted by Congress in 1905, is: “. . . . to continue and carry on a system of national and international relief in time of peace, and to apply the same in mitigating the sufferings caused by pestilence, famine, fire, floods, and other great national calamities, and” —I desire to lay particular stress on this— “to devise and carry on measures for preventing the same.” This a broad grant for service! In recent years we have come to realize more fully the great value of prevention. As this idea progresses and is carried out with increasing success, need for alleviation, for healing, and reconstruction inevitably will be lessened. This incalculable benefit to humanity is the goal to set for ourselves! Never in the history of mankind have benevolence and beneficence been applied so widely and effectively. Modern business methods and the results of scientific research have been adopted and put into operation. A sympathetic disposition, a desire to be helpful—these may be the marks of a fine nature, but they can not be of maximum benefit to others without an organization such as the Red Cross. Not only has our work been developed to a high degree of efficiency, but in and by that development has been set an example of virtues worthy of emulation by individuals, groups, and nations. One of our best-known services is that of disaster relief. It was first brought into large use under powers of the 1905 charter when the great emergency arose in San Francisco the following year. This agency has been perfected until now the supervision of relief in times of calamity, without any question, and with the utmost confidence and by common consent, it placed in the hands of the Red Cross. Preparedness and promptness are among its cardinal principles. Its forces and resources are organized so there may be no delay in securing immediate action when catastrophe strikes with sudden and destructive hand. Relief quickly given is doubly beneficial. We have recently had an example of its swiftness and efficiency in the emergency caused by the Florida storm. The relief agencies were put in motion upon receipt of the first news. Within 24 hours of the issuance of my appeal for financial assistance subscriptions amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars were reported to national headquarters in Washington. That was only the beginning. The public has come to realize the superlative ability of this organization to cope with such situations. There is faith that all contributions will be wisely, economically, and honestly spent for the benefit of the sufferers—none being used for purposes of administration. Another virtue of this society is that it “follows through.” Once having entered a devastated area, the Red Cross does not leave until there has been complete rehabilitation. It does not withdraw after the acute physical ills have been alleviated. Help is continued until every person affected has been restored to full powers of efficiency and the community has been reconstructed. Such work took a full year after the tri-State tornado in the mid-west in March, 1925; and a total of $3,000,000 was expended. Aid is given freely, necessity being the only requirement, and in such a way that the benefactor does not feel himself an object of charity. He does not lose his self-respect. Rather is he inspired by a fine example to a better and more efficient life, that he in turn may render service to others. While the Red Cross comes strikingly before the public eye at times of great emergency, reported extensively in the newspapers, it is in the less well-known and unspectacular services where constant and most important benefits are rendered. Not only are our active soldiers and sailors ministered to, but encouragement and assistance are being given to our war veterans, wherever they may be. In the broad field of prevention, destined to play an increasingly valuable role in the progress of civilization, already an excellent start has been made. Among the services now being supported by the Red Cross are: Home hygiene and care of the sick, public health and nursing, nutrition, first aid, and life-saving. It is not intended that local committees shall be superseded in their privilege and duty to carry on health preservation and social service work. But we undertake to start such activities wherever needed and to arouse public sentiment to the necessity of maintenance by the local authorities. One of the most promising of the recent developments is the Junior Red Cross, organized among the young of high-school age. The aim is to inspire in the youth the fine spirit of service and self-sacrifice which is so characteristic of the senior organization. These junior groups are kept in touch with similar groups in foreign lands, and evidences of good will are frequently exchanged. Who can doubt that this spirit of friendliness fostered among the young people of the different nations will bring a harvest of better international understanding and of mutual respect in the years to come? Among the choicest treasures of my bookshelves are thousands upon thousands of bound personal letters written by the school children of Japan expressing the gratitude of that exceedingly courteous nation for the millions of relief which was afforded them by the American Red Cross at the time of the devastating earthquake and flood which overwhelmed Tokyo and the surrounding territory in 1923. Out of the spirit of those who gave and the gratitude of those who received a better understanding and more enduring ties of friendship have certainly been wrought. Suffering and sorrow are universal. Sympathy and a desire to help those in distress are characteristics not confined to any one nation. Already the American Red Cross has established a comprehensive sphere of influence throughout these United States. It has more than 3,000,000 senior and over 5,500,000 junior members. There are 3,537 chapters, nearly 500 in excess of the total number of counties in our States. We are cooperating with other countries through the Pan American Red Cross and through the League of Red Cross Societies, composed of 54 independent national organizations. We have time and again given freely in aid of stricken communities in foreign lands. All of this represents a tremendous organizing ability, embracing vast resources, and including an enormous number of people. There was never any other like charity in the world. It represents idealism applied in a sensible, practical, sound way to the real problems of relief. What the Red Cross is doing is only one example of the innumerable results of American idealism. While there is no more moving spectacle than that of the poor, out of their meager substance, extending relief to their fellow beings in time of distress, such relief would be entirely inadequate to meet the needs of modern society. To extend medical aid, to give the necessary food, clothing, and shelter to the victims of disaster in the crowded areas of the world, either in war or peace, require great outlays of money and large aggregates of personal service. This can only be furnished from the resources of wealth and prosperity. The fact that these charities are supplied not only for the Red Cross but in innumerable other directions is one of the most complete demonstrations that our people in their effort to accumulate property are moved by a righteous purpose. Their success has not been turned to greed, avarice, or selfishness, but has been productive of generosity, benevolence, and charity. In this country we have no permanent class requiring charity. We have been remarkably free from the havoc of war, with its accompanying results of the maimed and the dependent, but even only under the hazards of peace 115,000,000 people can not exist without temporary emergencies constantly arising which need charitable relief. When we consider the rest of the world the requirements are endless and stupendous. While America has been and is surpassingly great in its charities, it looks upon those ministrations to our inhabitants as temporary and accidental. The normal state of the American people, the standard toward which all efforts are bent for attainment, usually with success, is that of a self-supporting, self-governing, independent people. That represents to us a condition of health and soundness which it is exceedingly desirable to maintain. After all the ideal charity is to place in the hands of the people the means of satisfying their own requirements through their own efforts. It is for these reasons that it is necessary to rely so largely upon the economic condition of the country to minister to the idealism of the country. We may be moved ever so strongly with benevolent impulses; but if we are without means to afford relief, such sentiments are of little practical value. Even where generosity and wealth both exist we can not say that even these are sufficient. After all, human nature does not want permanent charity but permanent independence through the opportunity to work out its own destiny. It is at this point that the economic well-being and prosperity of a nation passes over into the ideal. Great wealth belonging to a few is not a condition that we seek in this country, but rather a system of production and distribution where the great mass of people shall be contributors to the process and shall share in the rewards. Under this system, toward which we are constantly advancing in America, prosperity and idealism merge, and the cause of economics serves the cause of humanity. The higher idealism, the true philanthropy, is not that which comes to the rescue after the catastrophe, but rather that which through obedience to sound economic laws creates a prosperity among the people that anticipates and prevents the need of charity. In Calvin Coolidge’s day, before the advent of welfare state, when Jefferson’s concept of limited national government still lived, the American Red Cross served as the nation’s principal relief organization. In 1926, the year of this speech, the organization’s membership stood at 3,012,055. With 3,537 chapters, its presence was felt countrywide. President Coolidge was staunch admirer of the American National Red Cross. He undoubtedly looked upon it, as did many Americans, as a monument to the progress of civilization. More specifically, the organization represented to him American “idealism applied in a sensible, practical, sound way to the real problems of relief.” Mr. Coolidge had a long association with the Red Cross. Before coming to the presidency, he had become familiar with its work while an office holder in Massachusetts and then as Vice President. Pursuant to the Red Cross’s by-laws, as President of the United States, Mr. Coolidge served as the organization’s president from 1923-29. As its public face, he led its annual fund drives, running from Armistice Day through Thanksgiving, and addressed its annual conventions in Washington. Indeed, Mr. Coolidge chose to make his first formal address as President at the opening session of the Red Cross convention on September 25, 1923. On occasions, when funds were needed to meet emergencies, he would make special appeals for donations, sometime using the new medium of radio for the purpose. Later, in retirement, as a sign of his continuing support, he agreed to serve as vice president of the organization. The U.S. Congress had chartered the American Red Cross in 1900 and again in 1905 to act as a quasi-official arm of the national government. The Red Cross’s mission was to offer assistance to military personnel and families, particularly in times of war, and to provide aid to the public during those “great national calamities” that befell the nation from time to time. Having something of a “non-nationalist character,” it was also responsible for international aid when disaster struck abroad, a notable example being the relief rendered to Japan following the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923. The Red Cross was supported by private donations and manned by volunteers and a small paid staff. (It was a boast of the Red Cross that every penny given for relief when for relief—not administration.) Yet, the national government stood behind it, overseeing and, when necessary, assisting it in its operations. In major national disasters—by far the most notable example in the 1920s being the Great Mississippi Flood—the national government joined with the Red Cross in a grand cooperative relief and reconstruction effort. To understand this unique relationship between the Red Cross and the national government, one must consider how Calvin Coolidge and most Americans of his time looked upon the role government. The common view was that the national government had no direct role to play in disaster relief. Dealing with disasters was thought of as a local affair to be met by local governments and the communities involved. After all, local officials knew the situation best and local residents were ready and able to help their neighbors. Coolidge himself had direct experience of this as a municipal and later a State official. Most importantly, however, it was considered wrong for the national government to use money, gathered from all the people, for the benefit of a particular group or class of citizens. As an example of this thinking, in 1887, President Grover Cleveland famously vetoed a Texas seed corn bill, which was intended to provide seed corn to Texas farmers hard hit by drought. He did so on the grounds that it would be an improper expenditure of government money. In justifying his veto, Cleveland argued: “I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution; and I do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit. Prevalent tendency to disregard the limited mission of this power and duty should, I think be steadily resisted, to the end that the lesson should constantly enforced that, though the people support the Government, the Government should not support the people.” Cleveland went on to say, “The friendliness and charity of our fellow countrymen can always be relied on to relieve their fellow citizens in misfortune.” Indeed, these Texas farmers eventually received from private sources more than 10 times what the vetoed bill would have provided. Although of different political parties, Mr. Coolidge largely shared Grover Cleveland’s limited, Jeffersonian view of the national government. Nonetheless, he was willing to use the government’s resources when a great disaster necessitated it, as was well demonstrated in the case of the Great Mississippi Flood, which brought unprecedented devastation with it. Still, for him, self-government meant self-support. He expected local citizens and their government officials to do their part in relief and rebuilding, with no pushing off local obligations onto the national government. His famous extemporaneous speech, “Vermont is a State that I Love,” delivered at Bennington in September 1928 was evoked by his admiration for the vigorous, self-help response of Vermonters—an “indomitable people”—to the destructive New England floods of 1927. By the early Twentieth Century, with the Spanish-American War, the Philippine Insurgency, and the China Relief Expedition still a recent memory, the national government had come to realize the need for an organization to provide service to the military. It also sought an organization capable of responding to disasters and special needs situations at home and abroad. To achieve this, the government was now ready to give its backing and support to a “semigovernmental institution”—the Red Cross—that could mobilize the American people’s spirit of generosity and voluntarism in times of crisis. Under this arrangement, the government achieved its aims without its direct funding or involvement, except in exceptional instances. In away, the government succeeded in having its cake and eating it, too. It was not long after receiving its Charter that the Red Cross faced one of its greatest challenges, the San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906. The national government, though its military departments, joined with Red Cross in the relief effort, providing tents and blankets to stricken citizens, as well as sending in troops to maintain order. The following points make clear the Red Cross’s “semi-governmental” relationship with the national government: The relationship between the national government and the Red Cross grew much closer during the World War I. The two entities worked hand-in-hand, as the Red Cross mobilized to assist in the war effort. As an example of this cooperation, certain Red Cross officials and doctors were granted military rank to facilitate their work. This close working relationship would continue into the 1920s. Because of the war, the Red Cross greatly expanded its membership and activities and branches sprung up all over the country, which permitted national headquarters to do more by placing more responsibilities onto local groups. Its overseas work to assist the soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force (A.E.F.) received considerable public praise. With War’s end, the Red Cross, like the country itself, had to make the transition to peacetime. This involved downsizing and refocusing its work under the competent guidance of John Barton Payne, the new chairman of the central committee. During the 1920’s, the organization recruited thousands of nurses into its public heath-nursing program, which had as its goal bringing better health and hygiene to needy people living in rural America. Part of their work included bringing needed health care to Indian reservations. There was also a large increase in the number of Red Cross instructors, who taught their neighbors in first aid, nursing skills, and water safety. And, of course, the organization continued to provide relief in a number of major disasters that befell the country. In this area, the organization developed and implemented its comprehensive disaster response manual, which was to play such an important role in its successful relief efforts. Overseas, the Red Cross was active in aiding victims of the war, especially refugees in Eastern Europe and in the Fair East. Also, Cuba and other islands of the West Indies received assistance following devastating hurricanes. When needed, President Coolidge and the members of his Administration were always willing to join with the Red Cross to do their part. Near the end of his presidency, reflecting on the actions of his Administration, he observed, “In times of great disaster [the government] opened the doors of its Treasury.” What follows is a description of the Red Cross’s work in 1926, taken from the Americana Annual for 1927: “The year 1926 was one of the worst for disasters in the history of the American Red Cross. Fires, winds, and floods concentrated their fury in a way that set new records. Approximately 700 person were killed in the United States and hundreds injured. Two months—September and October—witnessed unparalleled outbursts of nature’s wrath. During this period occurred the Florida hurricane, the worst disaster in Red Cross annals since the San Francisco fire and earthquake; the Illinois River Valley flood; the Kansas flood; the Iowa flood; two fires in Alaska which destroyed whole villages; floods in Oklahoma; a tornado in Sandusky, Ohio; the Cuban hurricane, as destructive as the Florida storm; a flood in Mexico and hurricanes in the West Indies.” In this 1926 speech, Calvin Coolidge reviews the work agency and spells out his vision of the Red Cross, which includes the prevention of disasters. Jerry L. Wallace Sources: Publications: The Americana Annual: An Encyclopedia of Current Events: 1927 (New York: Americana Corp., 1927) The Americana Annual: An Encyclopedia of Current Events: 1929 (New York: Americana Corp., 1929) Haskin, Frederic J. The American Government. Washington, DC: Frederic J. Haskin, 1924. ———————-, The American Government. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1941. The Almanac and Book of Facts: 1927. New York: The New York World, 1927. Internet: Rosenberg, Jennifer. “Historical Importance of the American Red Cross”: retrieved August 2009 from http://history1900s.about.com/od/medicaladvancesissues/p/redcross.htm Fritz, Joanne. “The American Red Cross–From the Johnstown Flood to Hurricane Katrina”: retrieved August 2009 from nonprofit.about.com “Government Should Not Support the People.” Mackinac Center for Public Policy: retrieved August 2009 from www.mackinac.org Name (required) Email (will not be published) (required) Comment DONATE • NEWSLETTER Privacy Policy | Terms of Use Copyright © 2024 Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

right

title address annual convention american red cross date october location washington dc context coolidge address member convention red cross washington dc importance appreciation american red cross wartime peacetime effort progress member convention annual convention american red cross occasion reemphasize fact world perfect rededicate continue sacrifice redemption conception entirety simple complex narrow restricted broad comprehensive bring consideration field human relationship main purpose organization charity charity exist self apart complete demonstration fact live world interrelated interdependent charity depend benevolent spirit material resource mean sentiment manifest realization principle help sanctify realm business people country engage daily occupation order meet wide comprehensive obligation doubt thought selfsupporte independent maintain family comfort supply need decline year pass posterity mean broad existence comprehensive life view give heed scriptural injunction diligent business inspiration motive america rich prosperous obligation end doubt surpass people direction attain possible finite being attain complete economic justice limitation humanity result unforeseen unforeseeable contingency constantly leave people oftentime fault condition want distress enable alleviate clear requirement lay society use resource relief restoration condition success completeness obligation discharge measure moral rank people country extend diversify recognize obligation humanity large charity leave chance impulse occasion require train skill thorough organization effective operation meet broad purpose american red cross organize maintain year symbol expression divine sympathy exist human take heart beat humanity transform concrete act alleviation misery suffering begin agency mercy relieve stricken battle soon develop service heal scar break body spirit combat work vitally necessary hope day find way prevent appalling conflict nation bring harvest physically maim mentally wreck resultant destruction man power material resource today red cross wonderful advance develop organize peacetime activity purpose write charter grant congress continue carry system national international relief time peace apply mitigate suffering cause pestilence famine fire flood great national calamity desire lay particular stress devise carry measure prevent broad grant service recent year come realize fully great value prevention idea progress carry increase success need alleviation healing reconstruction inevitably lessen incalculable benefit humanity goal set history mankind benevolence beneficence apply widely effectively modern business method result scientific research adopt operation sympathetic disposition desire helpful mark fine nature maximum benefit organization red cross work develop high degree efficiency development set example virtue worthy emulation individual group nation bestknown service disaster relief bring large use power charter great emergency arise san francisco follow year agency perfect supervision relief time calamity question utmost confidence common consent place hand red cross preparedness promptness cardinal principle force resource organize delay secure immediate action catastrophe strike sudden destructive hand relief quickly give doubly beneficial recently example swiftness efficiency emergency cause florida storm relief agency motion receipt news hour issuance appeal financial assistance subscription amount hundred thousand dollar report national headquarters washington beginning public come realize superlative ability organization cope situation faith contribution wisely economically honestly spend benefit sufferer purpose administration virtue society follow having enter devastated area red cross leave complete rehabilitation withdraw acute physical ill alleviate help continue person affect restore power efficiency community reconstruct work take year tristate tornado midwest march total expend aid give freely necessity requirement way benefactor feel object charity lose selfrespect inspire fine example well efficient life turn render service red cross come strikingly public eye time great emergency report extensively newspaper wellknown unspectacular service constant important benefit render active soldier sailor minister encouragement assistance give war veteran broad field prevention destine play increasingly valuable role progress civilization excellent start service support red cross home hygiene care sick public health nursing nutrition aid lifesave intend local committee shall supersede privilege duty carry health preservation social service work undertake start activity need arouse public sentiment necessity maintenance local authority promising recent development junior red cross organize young highschool age aim inspire youth fine spirit service selfsacrifice characteristic senior organization junior group keep touch similar group foreign land evidence good frequently exchange doubt spirit friendliness foster young people different nation bring harvest well international understanding mutual respect year come choice treasure bookshelf thousand thousand bind personal letter write school child japan express gratitude exceedingly courteous nation million relief afford american red cross time devastating earthquake flood overwhelm tokyo surround territory spirit give gratitude receive well understanding enduring tie friendship certainly wrought suffering sorrow universal sympathy desire help distress characteristic confine nation american red cross establish comprehensive sphere influence united states senior junior member chapter nearly excess total number county state cooperate country pan american red cross league red cross society compose independent national organization time give freely aid stricken community foreign land represent tremendous organizing ability embrace vast resource include enormous number people like charity world represent idealism apply sensible practical sound way real problem relief red cross example innumerable result american idealism moving spectacle poor meager substance extend relief fellow being time distress relief entirely inadequate meet need modern society extend medical aid necessary food clothing shelter victim disaster crowd area world war peace require great outlay money large aggregate personal service furnish resource wealth prosperity fact charity supply red cross innumerable direction complete demonstration people effort accumulate property move righteous purpose success turn greed avarice selfishness productive generosity benevolence charity country permanent class require charity remarkably free havoc war accompany result maimed dependent hazard peace people exist temporary emergency constantly arise need charitable relief consider rest world requirement endless stupendous america surpassingly great charity look ministration inhabitant temporary accidental normal state american people standard effort bent attainment usually success selfsupporting selfgoverne independent people represent condition health soundness exceedingly desirable maintain ideal charity place hand people mean satisfy requirement effort reason necessary rely largely economic condition country minister idealism country move strongly benevolent impulse mean afford relief sentiment little practical value generosity wealth exist sufficient human nature want permanent charity permanent independence opportunity work destiny point economic wellbeing prosperity nation pass ideal great wealth belong condition seek country system production distribution great mass people shall contributor process shall share reward system constantly advance america prosperity idealism merge cause economic serve cause humanity high idealism true philanthropy come rescue catastrophe obedience sound economic law create prosperity people anticipate prevent need charity calvin coolidge day advent welfare state jefferson concept limited national government live american red cross serve nation principal relief organization year speech organization membership stand chapter presence feel countrywide president coolidge staunch admirer american national red cross undoubtedly look americans monument progress civilization specifically organization represent american idealism apply sensible practical sound way real problem relief mr coolidge long association red cross come presidency familiar work office holder massachusetts vice president pursuant red cross bylaw president united states mr coolidge serve organization president public face lead annual fund drive run armistice day thanksgiving address annual convention washington mr coolidge choose formal address president opening session red cross convention september occasion fund need meet emergency special appeal donation new medium radio purpose later retirement sign continue support agree serve vice president organization congress charter american red cross act quasiofficial arm national government red cross mission offer assistance military personnel family particularly time war provide aid public great national calamity befall nation time time have nonnationalist character responsible international aid disaster strike abroad notable example relief render japan follow great kanto earthquake red cross support private donation man volunteer small pay staff boast red cross penny give relief relief administration national government stand oversee necessary assist operation major national disaster far notable example great mississippi flood national government join red cross grand cooperative relief reconstruction effort understand unique relationship red cross national government consider calvin coolidge americans time look role government common view national government direct role play disaster relief deal disaster think local affair meet local government community involve local official know situation good local resident ready able help neighbor coolidge direct experience municipal later state official importantly consider wrong national government use money gather people benefit particular group class citizen example thinking president grover cleveland famously veto texas seed corn bill intend provide seed corn texas farmer hard hit drought ground improper expenditure government money justify veto cleveland argue find warrant appropriation constitution believe power duty general government ought extend relief individual suffering manner properly relate public service benefit prevalent tendency disregard limited mission power duty think steadily resist end lesson constantly enforce people support government government support people cleveland go friendliness charity fellow countryman rely relieve fellow citizen misfortune texas farmer eventually receive private source time veto bill provide different political party mr coolidge largely share grover cleveland limited jeffersonian view national government nonetheless willing use government resource great disaster necessitate demonstrate case great mississippi flood bring unprecedented devastation selfgovernment mean selfsupport expect local citizen government official relief rebuild pushing local obligation national government famous extemporaneous speech vermont state love deliver bennington september evoke admiration vigorous selfhelp response vermonter indomitable destructive new england flood early twentieth century spanishamerican war philippine insurgency china relief expedition recent memory national government come realize need organization provide service military seek organization capable respond disaster special need situation home abroad achieve government ready backing support semigovernmental red cross mobilize american people spirit generosity voluntarism time crisis arrangement government achieve aim direct funding involvement exceptional instance away government succeed have cake eat long receive charter red cross face great challenge san francisco earthquake fire national government military department join red cross relief effort provide tent blanket stricken citizen send troop maintain order follow point clear red cross semigovernmental relationship national government relationship national government red cross grow close world war entity work handinhand red cross mobilize assist war effort example cooperation certain red cross official doctor grant military rank facilitate work close work relationship continue war red cross greatly expand membership activity branch spring country permit national headquarter place responsibility local group overseas work assist soldier american expeditionary force aef receive considerable public praise war end red cross like country transition peacetime involve downsize refocus work competent guidance john barton payne new chairman central committee organization recruit thousand nurse public heathnursing program goal bring well health hygiene needy people live rural america work include bring need health care indian reservation large increase number red cross instructor teach neighbor aid nursing skill water safety course organization continue provide relief number major disaster befell country area organization develop implement comprehensive disaster response manual play important role successful relief effort overseas red cross active aid victim war especially refugee eastern europe fair east cuba island west indie receive assistance follow devastating hurricane need president coolidge member administration willing join red cross near end presidency reflect action administration observe time great disaster government open door treasury follow description red cross work take americana annual year bad disaster history american red cross fire wind flood concentrate fury way set new record approximately person kill united states hundred injure month september october witness unparalleled outburst nature wrath period occur florida hurricane bad disaster red cross annal san francisco fire earthquake illinois river valley flood kansas flood iowa flood fire alaska destroy village flood oklahoma tornado sandusky ohio cuban hurricane destructive florida storm flood mexico hurricane west indie speech calvin coolidge review work agency spell vision red cross include prevention disaster jerry l wallace source publication americana annual encyclopedia current event new york americana corp americana annual encyclopedia current event new york americana corp haskin frederic j american government washington dc frederic j haskin american government new york harper brother almanac book fact new york new york world internet rosenberg jennifer historical importance american red cross retrieve august fritz joanne american red cross johnstown flood hurricane katrina retrieve august nonprofitaboutcom government support people mackinac center public policy retrieve august wwwmackinacorg require email publish require comment donate newsletter privacy policy term use copyright calvin coolidge presidential foundation inc right reserve

Ep. 1809 - The “No Evidence” Lie Published: 9/14/2023 (in RSS feed: 57m 6s) Hosting a big game watch party. Well, you've probably got a playbook's worth of things to execute before people start showing up and the pressure is high. So add drizzly the go-to app for drink delivery to your pre-game prep and get drinks delivered before kickoff. That way you won't miss a single play. Download the Drizzly app or go to drizzly.com/hosting-handled. That's D R I zl y.com/hosting-handled and claim your position as most valuable host Must be 21 plus not available in all locations. The media rush to Joe Biden's defense as Republicans prepare an impeachment inquiry against him. inflation jumps again as the Biden administration tries to make Bidenomics a thing and Mitt Romney announces the end of his political career. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is The Ben Shapiro Show. This show is sponsored by Express VPN. It's time to stand up against Big tech protect our data ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben. Well, it's pretty obvious that Republicans launching an impeachment inquiry are going to end this process with an impeachment. There is no purpose for an impeachment inquiry if it does not end in an impeachment. That would just be a giant pratfall by the Republican party to launch an inquiry that does not actually end with an impeachment, which means we are steadily moving toward that. And so the question becomes what exactly must be proved in order for an impeachment to be pursued with vigor and alacrity? And the answer is pretty much whatever Democrats did in the last few years of the Trump administration. So apparently that means you don't have to lodge a crime. It means that you don't actually have to provide evidence that a crime was was full on committed. All you have to show is that there was corruption or abuse of power enough for your own party. That's basically all you need. And to this point, we've already shown that when it comes to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden and the DOJ, all that material is already public. One of the biggest gaslighting episodes I've ever seen is happening right now in real time as the media determined that actually there's No Evidence whatsoever that anything is wrong with Joe Biden or Hunter Biden. That that effectively these people are just as clean as the driven snow. For example, entire media montage last night of the media claiming there is No Evidence of Joe's connection with Hunter Biden's corruption, which is a lie. It is an absolute overt lie. Not only do we have two separate business partners of Hunter Biden's saying that Joe is involved in the business, that'd be Devin Archer and Tony Bobinski. We have them both testifying that Joe Biden would stop by meetings or call into meetings having to do with his son's business. We have direct texts from Hunter Biden to his own daughter suggesting that he paid daddy's bills. We have WhatsApps from Hunter Biden's computer to foreign companies suggesting that if they don't pay up, his daddy is sitting literally right next to him and will wield his outsized political power in order to punish said companies. We have tens of millions of dollars moving around from foreign forces sources into a variety of shell companies and then into companies and people connected with Hunter Biden, and we have Hunter Biden living in Joe Biden's house while a lot of this stuff is happening. So yeah, I mean there's a little bit of evidence why I say a little I mean a lot of evidence. The only thing that is missing is like an actual transaction Wire showing money moving directly from Hunter Biden to Joe Biden. But let me just make something pretty clear. When it comes to parents and kids, that sort of stuff doesn't have to happen in order for the bill to get paid. I'm just pointing this out, it's pretty obvious. Have you ever gone out to dinner with your parents and then you pick up the tab? You you picked up the tab, right? Well, does that mean that you parents did not benefit from you picking up the tab? Or do you have to actually transfer the money to your parents' accounts and then they pick up the tab in order for it to be considered a benefit for your parents idiocy? Anyway, here are the media denying, denying, denying. Again, remember, these are the people who for four long years, every single day on C Nnn, remember I'd be at the gym, which is the only place that that C n n has ever appeared in my life. And c n n would unfortunately be on the wall and every single day, Wolf Blitzer would be talking about how a new bombshell was emerging and the Russia investigation is gonna blow this thing wide open. It was gonna destroy the Trump presidency for four long years. We heard all of that and it never emerged. Adam Schiff is still sitting in the house, an honored member of the Democratic caucus. The media went crazy over things like the Steele Dossier for years on end. But here there is No Evidence, none, not, not, not a Witt, not a scintilla, not an iota of evidence that Joe Biden is corrupt in any way. Just listen to our vaunted media Having months and months of conversation and hearings and news coverage of, well, what exactly did go on with Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's business dealings. And as we've all said, No Evidence yet has been presented, but That the Bidens have made a lot of money, so on and so forth. Again, No Evidence that we have seen, Even some house Republicans say they're not convinced evidence exists, plus Republicans insinuated they might not back the move. They might not vote for it given the lack of evidence to support such a drastic actions. But House Republicans have so far not provided evidence that Biden directly profited off his son's business deals or made any decisions as vice president because of them. Okay? So here's the thing. The media are relying on a very, very broad definition of evidence here in order to escape the reality. So there's a, there's only circumstantial evidence. So let me first point out that circumstantial evidence includes thing in court, like for example, fingerprints on a weapon that is circumstantial. The definition of circumstantial evidence is evidence that indirectly points to an outcome but doesn't directly attest to the outcome. So direct evidence is I a witness saw OJ Simpson murder his ex-wife. That would be direct evidence. Indirect evidence would include things like blood all over OJ Simpson's, Bronco blood all over the crime scene, all of that matching, right? That would all be indirect evidence. That would be circumstantial evidence. When you hear people say, well, there's only circumstantial evidence that Joe and Hunter were involved together, circumstantial evidence like Joe Biden directly saying that he threatened the Ukrainians with a billion dollars and removed withdrawn aid if they didn't fire the prosecutor overseeing the prosecution of his son's company. Well, yes, that is circumstantial also. It's pretty indicative, it's pretty indicative. I mean, again, if the standard now on impeachment is effectively that if a party doesn't like another member of another party, they just get to impeach him. They don't have to allege a crime. And, and you don't even have to define the crime. I I just gotta tell you, if what I have stacked up here is Donald Trump impeached in 2019 for the great crime of calling up Vladimir Zelensky and allegedly threatening to withdraw military aid if Vladimir Zelensky did not dig up dirt on the Bidens. And then on the other hand, I have Joe Biden being impeached for an ongoing scheme with his son to clear tens of millions of dollars by essentially using his influence as vice president of the United States, or by the way, even allowing his son to purport to use his influence as vice President of the United States and clearing like actual money that way and shaping us policy that way because I mean, why else does Joe Biden care about Victor Shoken? Why is he in charge of Ukraine policy in the first place? Why is he squiring his son around to China and Air Force two? Well, I mean those seem like those stack up at least fairly evenly at the very least. And yet we're told there's No Evidence whatsoever. None No Evidence that that's a lie. There is In fact evidence, but the media are gonna continue along these lines. Kaitlyn Collins, for example, over at C N n directly asked Republican Congressman Mike Walt of Florida, have you seen any direct evidence? Well, I mean no, he didn't actually see like the heads of Barisma handing Joe Biden a sack of cash. But like these people don't know the definition of direct versus indirect evidence. We have tons of indirect evidence For you yourself when you're talking about the evidence that you say you've seen. And for those listening at home, have you seen anything that directly ties President Biden and shows that he profited from his son's foreign business dealings? We have his son complaining to his relatives about how many of his father's bills he's having to pay with these illicit gains. We have a, have You seen direct evidence? President Biden profit? We have, but I mean, but Caitlin, the point of the inquiry is to give us greater standing to get the full evidence. If we get full cooperation, if they say we have nothing to hide and give it to us and we don't see anything, then that's where the facts lead us. But so You're saying it may not lead to an actual impeachment if you don't get more evidence? We need to, we need to. We we're gonna follow the facts. We're gonna do this responsibly, but Again, I'm amazed at the standard. I'm amazed at the standard here. I mean the, the, the standard, which is Hunter Biden says to his own daughter, I paid dad's bills and Kailyn Collins like, have you seen any evidence that Hunter Biden paid dad's bills? Well, I mean he said he did. That seems like some evidence that he paid his dad's bills and the fact that his dad has like millions of dollars of unexplained wealth I mean that that seems pretty suggestive. So I guess the new standard is that Republicans have to show that Hunter Biden directly signed a check to Joe Biden and it has to have Joe's Joe Biden's name on the back of the check handed to the bank in order for any of this to be good. I, I don't think so. That's not how any of this is gonna work. And by the way, the American people don't believe that either. The reality is that impeached or not is almost irrelevant because we know that Joe Biden is not gonna be removed by the Senate of the United States. It's dominated by Democrats. What we do know, however, is that the American people, by and large believe the allegations that Joe Biden is involved in corruption because he very clearly is. We'll get to Joe Biden's response to this momentarily. First You know a company is looking out for you and they actually upgrade your service and don't charge you for it. It's great news for new and current Pure Talk customers. Pure Talk just added data to every plan and includes a mobile hotspot with no price increase whatsoever. If you've considered Pure Talk before but you haven't made the switch, well now it'd be a time to take a second look. For just 20 bucks a month, you get unlimited talk tax and now 50% more five G data plus their new mobile hotspot. It's just one reason I love Pure Talk. They're veteran owned. They only hire the best customer service team located right here in the United States of America. Most families are saving almost a thousand dollars a year while enjoying the most dependable five G network in the country. Remember, you vote with how you spend your money, so stop supporting companies that actually don't like you very much. That is not true of Pure Talk. That's the reason they sponsor the show. When you go to Pure Talk dot com slash shaer, you'll save an additional 50% off your first month because they actually value you. That's Pure Talk dot com slash Pure. They have great coverage. I know because I use Pure Talk myself. Pure Talk is wireless for Americans by Americans right now. They're giving you a fantastic deal. Head over to Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro. Save 50% off your first month because again, this is a company that actually cares about you. Tonight's a great night to wind down with some wine. But what if you're already in your comfy clothes, deep in the couch with your hand glued to the remote? Enter drizzly the go-to app for drinks delivery, choose your go-to wine or try something new and get it delivered to your door. Download the drizzly app or go to drizzly.com, that's D R I Z L y.com and have an epic at home Wine Night. Must be 21 plus not available in all locations. Okay, so the Joe Biden response to all of this is basically to pretend that it's big nothing. So he is at a campaign reception in McLean, Virginia. And. he reportedly said, don don't know quite why. They just knew they wanted to impeach me. And now the best I can tell, they wanna impeach me because they want to shut down the government. Look, look, I got a job to do. Everybody always asks about impeachment. I get up every day. Not a joke. Not a joke. He always says, not a joke. And it's like, dude, no one thought you were joking. I'm so confused why you always say anyway, I agree. I've heard not a joke, not focused on impeachment. I've got a job to do. I've gotta deal with the issues that affect the American people every single solitary. So his theory is that Republicans are pursuing impeachment so they can also persuade government shutdown, which by the way is actually the opposite of the truth. Even if you are cynical about politics, what you think is that McCarthy is pursuing the impeachment inquiry in order to get his own side off his back. So you can cut a deal with regard to the continuing resolution, not the opposite, but again, j i I love when Joe Biden pretends that he doesn't know what the hell is going on with regard to his son when he very clearly does. So the the goalposts continue to move. The White House is using the same line as the media ka Jean-Pierre says There's No Evidence that Joe Biden did anything wrong. You've suggested that there's No Evidence to back up the Republicans true effort here is, I'm not suggesting it. That's actually a fact. Oh, well, she says, yeah, there's No Evidence that, but my my favorite is they went from Joe knew nothing about hunter's businesses to yeah, he knew something about hunter's businesses, but he wasn't involved too well, yeah, he was involved, but he didn't actually clear the money and now they're moving to, well, you don't have any direct evidence that it cleared the money and from there they're going to move to, well, how could you expect him not to clear? How could you expect him not to benefit? After all, this wasn't really for him, it was for Hunter. He just loves his son too much. He just loves his son too much. And that's gonna be the final repository of this argument. It was trotted out yesterday by the White House's Ian Sams saying that the reason that Joe stopped by Hunter's business meetings was out of love. It was just out of love. Just like You know, the, in the quarterly owned family members of the family would stop by meetings held by other members of the family just out of familial love. Now, I love my family. I do, I'm also not a public servant. I'm not somebody who works for the American taxpayer. And it turns out that if your love for your family requires you to engage in corruption at the expense of the American taxpayer that is impeachable and quasi-criminal behavior. I, I love this defense. He, they, he just loved Hunter too, too much. He loved him too much. A tragic love story. Why was the president at those meetings on those phone calls? Well, again, I think this is part of the right Wings misinformation machine to try to confuse people about what the truth is. The truth is that the president, as he has said publicly for years, calls his family every day to check in. He calls his son every day to check in. He calls his other family members to check in to see how they're doing. He loves him. There's, they're a tight, tight-knit family. They're, they're so tight-knit. He was just checking in to see what he was doing, which is why his son would call him in the middle of business meetings and dad would get on the phone and he'd say, how's the weather in, in, in, in Ukraine and Ky son? And then he'd say, well, that's fine dad, and click the phone. That's the end of the call. He'd say, see, I can get my dad on the phone anytime I want. Well, according to the New York Times, the strategy here is to battle it out in the court of public opinion. It says Ian Sams to the New York Times. Well, good luck with that because again, it's pretty obvious the level of corruption that Joe Biden has been involved in his entire career. This is nothing new for Joe Biden. This is the part that's totally astonishing. I'm not sure how many Democratic scandals get ignored by the media on the basis that they're utterly unthinkable. They totally cannot be true. And then it's pretty obvious that they could totally be true. So I've mentioned before in a completely different context, scandals involving, for example, allegations about Barack Obama's drug and sexual behavior in the late 1990s. Be like, that's unthinkable. That's totally crazy how that's terrible. Now maybe those rumors are untrue. Maybe they are. The media didn't bother to look them up for five seconds. Why? Because they were unthinkable. And then it turns out that You know Barack Obama admits in his memoirs that he was doing cocaine And. he also wrote letters to his girlfriend talking about fantasies of having sex with men and the media when those rumors arrived. They're like, that, that's unthinkable. We cannot talk about this. And then later they're like, well, it's too late. There's nothing really to talk about here. Okay, here's the thing. As scoreless as those rumors, maybe were, were they high like the most implausible rumors? I mean not the most implausible rumors, but putting that aside here, we're not even talking about rumors here. We're talking about actual documented relationships between Hunter and Joe testified to by Joe's business, by Hunter's business partners. We have documentation from hunter's computer backing all this, and we have decades, decades of records of Joe Biden engaged in corrupt bargains on behalf of his family with a variety of sources ranging from M B N A in Delaware. He was known as the senator from M B N A. He was known as this because his son Hunter right out of law school already being a derelict got hired over at MB N a and M B N A was a huge Biden donor. And meanwhile, Biden was giving sweetheart legislative deals to M B N A, which was growing by leaps and bounds in the state of Delaware. It like that sort of stuff has been going on with the Biden sort. He was cutting sweetheart real estate deals with the heads of M B N A going all the way back to the 1970s. Cutting sweetheart deals with unions in order to get himself elected. You know there's nothing new about the corruption. Here he is cutting sweetheart deals with banks in order to get those banks to give loans to his brother Jimmy. So his, his brother Jimmy could start these rock a rock bar in, in Wilmington, Delaware. So like him using his power in order to benefit his family financially has been the entire Joe Biden story for as long as Joe Biden has been in public office. That's been the entire stick. Why is this Implo? There's No Evidence, there's No Evidence. Well actually there, there's a lot of evidence guys. There's a lot of evidence. Meanwhile, there's another scandal that's piled on top of the actual corruption and that is the coverup of the corruption. The obstruction of the corruption. We'll get to that in just one second. First, I love watching my baseball, even though my White Sox are absolutely terrible this year. Well, I, I gotta tell you, it sucks the joy out of watching baseball when your team is really bad. But one thing that can help inject some fun back into the sport is using prize Picks. Prize Picks is the easiest and fastest way to play daily fantasy sports. You pick two to six players and you choose whether they'll score more or less than their prize Picks projection. You can win up to 25 times your money on any entry. There's no competition against other people. It's just you versus the projections prize. Picks offers projections on pretty much every sport There is N B A M L B N F L N H L P G A, college Sports eSports, NASCAR disc golf, whatever you are into prize. Picks now offers Apple pay for quick and easy deposits into your accounts. This football season, producer Jake, he's been raving about prize Picks. He's been talking about the simplified interface of prize Picks. It's a lot easier to use than other fancy sports apps. Monday night Jake took a beating when Aaron Rogers got injured, since he picked Aaron Rogers to have more than 235.5 passing yards. That turns out to be like not a great pick by by Jake, but he had fun. Download the prize Picks app or go to prize Picks dot com to sign up and play daily fancy sports. First time users can receive 100% instant deposit match up to a hundred bucks with promo code Ben. If you deposit a hundred bucks prize, Picks will give you a hundred bucks. If you deposit 50 bucks prize, Picks will give you 50 bucks. Don't forget to enter promo code Bennett, sign up for an instant deposit match up to $100. Okay, so scandal number one is obviously Joe and Hunter corruption, but scandal number two is that that Joe is currently the president and the DOJ was attempting to cut a very obvious sweetheart deal, a sweetheart deal with Hunter. So obvious that the judge in the case uncovered it and blew it up and the DOJ was forced to pretend that it hadn't cut the sweetheart deal in the first place. Meanwhile, the White House is maintaining guys. Joe didn't talk to anybody about the Hunter case. Here's Ian Sams of the White House saying just that, Yeah, I mean. The president's been very clear about this since before he even took office, that the Justice Department and his administration is independent. He has not been involved in that case. He has not talked to anybody about that case. But don't take his word for it. Take the words of the GOP's own witnesses in the house who testified in an open hearing that neither Attorney General Garland nor President Biden interfered in this case. Okay, well I mean what they did testify to is that the attorney in this case, David Weiss, had asked for special counsel status from the DOJ and was not given it, or at the very least, that he was not given special counsel status even if he didn't ask for it. And then Americano, well he didn't even ask for it in the well, it's not up to him to ask for it. You just give it to him if you wish for him to be truly independent. Well now Politico is reporting an F B I agent involved in the Hunter Biden probe said the prosecutor leading it sought but was denied hope from a key fellow US attorney. The lack of cooperation did not prevent charges from being brought against the President's son But. it did make the prosecutor's job harder. The testimony delivered behind closed doors is consistent in part with an I R SS whistleblower's description of the probe and comes at a critical juncture in the investigations into the Biden family. Republicans appointed to that whistleblower description when making the case for opening an impeachment inquiry into presidential Biden. The agent said she did not recall another key part of the whistleblower allegation. Republicans have focused on that. David Weiss said he didn't have final authority to charge the President's son. Apparently the agent said, quote, I remember learning at some point in the investigation that Mr. Weiss would have to go through his other processes because the US attorney's office had, I guess in that sense using that terminology, wasn't going to partner. Asked if she recalled learning that Martin Estrada, the US attorney for the Central District of California specifically, decided not to bring tax charges against Hunter Biden. The agent said, I understand that yes, a decision had been made that the central District of California wasn't going to, I guess my understanding is they weren't going to bring the case on their own. So here is the problem with all of this, and again, this is, this is the problem inherently with issues involving the DOJ. Joe Biden doesn't have to say anything to Merrick Garland for all this to get done. There are widespread reports in the public media in the New York Times about how upset Joe Biden is about all of these charges with Hunter, how much he loves his son, how upset he is with all of this stuff happening. You think Merrick Garland doesn't know that you think Merrick Garland isn't interested at all. He has no political stake in making sure that a sweetheart deal gets cut with Hunter a sweetheart deal that he attempts to bury in a gun deal. You think that that's Joe Biden doesn't have to like pick up the phone and say to Merrick, Garland, Merrick, I want you to quash this investigation. He doesn't have to sign him a letter saying, Merrick, I love my son and, and make it go away. He doesn't have to do that. All he has to do is make it clear that he would like that to happen and Merrick Garland knows how to make that happen. So he makes it happen. And one of the ways he makes that happen is he says to David Weiss, I'm not giving you special counsel status. You work for me. So if things go wrong here, I get blamed anyway. Now like let's make this thing go away. That's all Democrats for the record are beginning to turn on Hunter House. Democrats are beginning to realize that maybe Hunter has to go under the bus in order to save Joe here, which is pretty Dirty pool. Get to that momentarily. First, innovation Refunds has been helping small businesses that qualify get a business payroll tax refund through the employee retention credit, also known as the E R C, the E R C's, a tax refund for businesses that kept employees on payroll for parts of 2020 and 2021. If you own a business with more than five employees, you could have money waiting to be claimed. Innovation Refunds Survey research shows a large number of small businesses who had from five to 500 full-time employees in 2020 or 2021 might be eligible for an E R C tax deduction. Qualifying for the E R C goes beyond sales decline. If your business faced challenges to the growth that would've had without pandemic government orders, it could be eligible for a substantial refund as well. Innovation Refunds has hundreds of five star reviews on Trustpilot and Google. They're accredited with the Better Business Bureau. They're not gonna charge you any upfront fees or any money at all until you actually get paid. So it's risk free to you. Innovation Refunds does not provide tax or legal advice. They work with an independent network of tax professionals. They share information with them to evaluate and process your claims head in order to innovation Refunds dot com to determine eligibility. And if you qualify, it could be on your way to receiving money for your business. There's no upfront charge. They don't get paid unless you get paid. Go to innovation Refunds dot com or dial 1 8 4 3 Refunds. That is 1 8 4 3 Refunds. Okay, so meanwhile Democrats, while they protest that there is nothing here, house Democrats are preparing to throw Hunter directly under the bus according to Politico. Quote, as the house barrels closer to an impeachment vote, Democrats are vowing to defend Biden to the end. Joe Biden. That is not Hunter. Top Democrats are coalescing around a strategy to oppose the GOP's impeachment inquiry cleaving off the son's conduct from his father's. They think they have the facts to back him up since the prob is yet to find any evidence directly linking Hunter Biden's business dealings to Joe. Again, they keep saying this over and over, I don't understand. You do have evidence. Hunter talked about it. Tony Bobinski talked about it. Devin Archer talked about like what? What are you talking about? But I guess they're gonna pretend Delegate Stacey Plaskitt of the Virgin Islands says, our job or my job will be to remind the American people of that over and over again. Hunter Biden is not the administration. Jamie Raskin said, you can't impeach Hunter Biden, but he will be prosecuted. Democrats don't even plan to try to defend Hunter Biden's conduct during his time serving on the board of the Ukrainian Natural Gas company. Barisma that arrangement, Republicans say, allowed him to trade on his father's influence at the time as vice president. By the way, that's not just what Republicans say. Hunter himself said it. He said, if my last name were not Biden, I wouldn't have been on the board of a natural gas company in Ukraine. He knows nothing about natural gas. He knows nothing about Ukraine, but his last name is Biden. Instead, the president's party is keen to keep Joe as far away as possible from the drip drip of damaging information coming out about his son Jerry Nadler of New York. He says Hunter Biden may have very well done some improper things. He's a disturbed ban. Almost every president has had problematic family members. Yes, but is the president in business with them? Question. We we understand that Roger Clinton, bill Clinton's brother was a really screwed up dude. Was Bill clearing checks? Was Bill, bill like actively using his influence to get Roger Clinton jobs outside the administration? I'm just, I'm so confused, but but this is what Democrats think they're going to do. They're going to throw Hunter under the bus. So it'll be fascinating to see. It's almost Shakespearean whether Joe is eventually just gonna throw a Hunter under the bus as well. If the, if the mask of he's a caring father goes by the wayside when his presidency is at stake. If he says, yeah, Hunter does a lot of corrupt terrible things, And, he is got problems obviously and You know, well I'm, I wasn't involved in those, but Hunter man, he's gonna have to go to jail and pay his like you think Joey's gonna do that? It'll be interesting to find out. Meanwhile, Democrats have come up with a secondary angle here and that is the person behind all of this is the nefarious Trump. Oh Trump. Trump is be, Trump is mani. He's pulling all the strings here. No, I'm just gonna say no. There are a lot of Republicans who think that Joe Biden has done corrupt and terrible things here. Nothing to do with Donald Trump. But again, everything has to be Trump's fault. That dog is not going to hunt, that is not a dog that is going to hunt that it's that it's Trump from behind the scenes manipulating genius. Like all of this. Donald Trump can barely manipulate his own hands. Are you kidding me? That's not a thing. Donald Trump manipulating the Republican party into impeaching Joe Biden. Gimme a break. But according to Yahoo News on a sweeping patio overlooking the golf course at his private club in Bedminster, New Jersey, former President Donald Trump dying Sunday night with a close political ally, Marjorie Taylor Greene. It was a chance for the former president to catch up with the hard right Georgia Congresswoman, but over halibut and Diet Cokes Green brought up an issue of considerable interest to Trump the push by house Republicans to impeach his likely opponent in next year's election. I did brief him on the strategy I wanna see laid out with impeachment. Brief Green said in a brief phone interview, Trump's dinner with green came just two nights before House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced his decision on Tuesday to or order the opening of an impeachment inquiry. Ah, so just to get this straight, the theory here from the press is that Trump talked to M T G who then dictated terms to Kevin McCarthy. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Nailed it. That's probably what's going on here. But of course this is what Jamie Raskin, who again was involved in the impeachment of Trump twice now, is claiming that the impeachment is coming from Trump. This is so tiresome You know where it's coming from. It's coming from the fact that Joe Biden is a lifelong corrupt politician for decades. You know You know what? He wouldn't have to worry about impeachment if he had not been a lifelong corrupt politician for decades deploying his drug addicted booze, adult prostitute abusing son to go pick up money for the family. I mean I don don't understand why this is so tough to understand. It's amazing. Here's Jimmy Raskin. Do you think the White House should have, could have handled the Hunter Biden saga better You know the I'm, I'm not closely watching the White House. What I'm doing is engaged in the work of oversight committee. So for seven months we have watched the Republicans on the oversight committee and Chairman Comer get all of the witnesses they want, all of the documents, they want more than 12,000 pages of documents. And there is No Evidence of any criminality or wrongdoing by Joe Biden. There's 91 criminal charges against Donald Trump right now, 13 criminal charges against Congressman Santos, who was just on the show a few moments ago. They have nothing to say about that. There are no charges against Joe Biden and they want to impeach the guy that's obviously coming from Donald Trump. It's obviously coming from Donald Trump or maybe it's coming from Republicans who look at the fact that you impeached Donald Trump twice without actually alleging crimes. And they're like, turnabout is fair play and your president is corrupt. Anderson Cooper's doing the same thing. Trump is behind it. Oh, it's the nefarious Trump. I do enjoy. The spectacle of Donald Trump is simultaneously a bumbling fool, but also he's a Machiavellian ingenious manipulating all the strings from behind the scenes. C n is reporting that the former President Trump spoke today with House g o p conference. She, Elise Stefanik about the impeachment strategy. Is he I mean is is he really the one driving this? Don don't know whether he is driving it directly or indirectly. Certainly as, as he participates in social media and talks about this on social media, he is driving the activists to call members of Congress and, and get involved. So whether he called Kevin McCarthy directly or whether he is just sort of getting the, the, the troops riled up. I'm not sure which way it happened, but certainly members of Congress are hearing about it. Oh, you mean, wow, shocker. What are Donald Trump has been saying publicly he wants Joe Biden impeach from like the very first day. So what else is new? What else? One of the reasons that Democrats are in a state of outsized panic about something that is not going to come to fruition. By the way, again, let me remind you. Democrats control the Senate. Joe Biden is not going to be removed from office. The reason Democrats are fighting mad about this is because by announcing an impeachment inquiry, McCarthy and the Republicans have successfully put this at the top of the news. And that's what they don't want. They wanna talk about Trump, they wanna talk about the old news of Trump's indictments and all the rest of this kind of stuff. They don't wanna talk about Joe Biden being absolutely corrupt. It's not something they wish to speak about. Why? Well, because they're fighting I mean they are afraid beyond all reason and all measure about Kamala Harris. That's really one of the things that's happening here. It's, it's hysterical. Every column that tells Joe Biden not to run always includes an addendum from these democratic kind of advisors that Kamala also shouldn't run. David Ignatius, as we talked about yesterday on the program, David Ignatius wrote a column in the Washington Post saying Joe should not run and also asterisk and also Kamala Harris, which is kind of amazing, right? Because she's supposed to be this wonder kin, this political genius. She's supposed to be amazing at this and we just all misunderstand her. But the problem is nobody likes Kamala Harris. So the reason they're panicking about Biden is 'cause they got nobody to back him up. Who's the person waiting in the wings? You can say it's Gavin Newsom, but lemme tell you, running on the record of California is not likely to win you the presidency. Or at the very least, it ain't gonna go amazing. California's been bleeding population, including my entire family for years under Gavin Newsom. It's truly an amazing spectacle to watch as the Democratic party recognizes I mean they really do that they must send this Madame two so wax figure of a human into battle and he's melting, but you better, you better get him back in the presidency before that dude completely melts because backing him up is Kamala Harris and you can hear the Democratic unease. Nancy Pelosi was asked yesterday about whether Kamala Harris was the best pick for vice president for Joe Biden. She refused three separate times to say yes. She's like, well, You know Joe did pick him, but she's like, I we don Vice president Kamala Harris the best running mate for this president. He thinks so, and that's what matters. People shouldn't underestimate what Kamala Harris brings to the table. But do you think she is the the best running mate though? She's the vice president of the United States. So when people say to me, well, why isn't she doing this or that? I said, because she's the vice president. That's the job description. You don't do that much. You know, you You know you, you, you are a source of strength, inspiration, intellectual resource and the rest. Again, she's not saying that you should, that she should be the running mate. She's saying, well, You know she is great and, and Joe pick Nobody's comfortable with Kamala Harris. Why? Well 'cause she's terrible at this. For example, she was asked about her limits on abortions. So remember the talking point from the Democrats, including from people like Jen Psaki, former spokesperson for the president of the United States. The talking point is that they're not for abortion on demand. The problem is when asked name a situation in which you would outlaw abortion, they cannot name any. Here's Kamala Harris on Face The nation botching it once again. So what, what is it that you believe I mean? What week of pregnancy should abortion access be cut off? We need to restore the protections of Roe versus Wade, which was we're not trying to do something new, But does it need to be specific in terms of defining and where that guarantee goes up to and where it does not at which week of pregnancy We need to put back in place the protections of Roe versus Wade. We Are not You know why I'm asking you this question though, because We're not trying to, but we're not trying to do anything that did not exist before June of last year. So that'd be abortion on demand. By the way, just recognize the question was where would you limit abortion? And the answer is, I'm not going to answer your question because they don't have any limits on abortion. She's terrible at this. Everybody knows she's terrible at this. And meanwhile it's a, it's a two, it's a two front war for Joe Biden in this election. And on the one hand you've got his corruption and his unpopularity and on the other hand you have a bad economic situation that is manifesting itself. Right now, according to the Wall Street Journal, consumer prices rose in August at the fastest pace in more than a year due to a jump in energy costs illustrating the potential obstacles to ringing inflation outta the economy without a sharper slowdown. The consumer price index closely watched inflation gauge rose 0.6% in August from the prior month according to the labor department, more than half of that increase was due to higher gasoline prices. But that doesn't matter because I mean you're still paying for it. The monthly core reading likely keeps federal reserve officials on course to hold interest rates steady at their meeting next week. However, on an annualized basis, prices were up 3.7 overall in August versus 3.2% in July. Annual core inflation is still 4.3% in August. So these are not good numbers. It's supposed to be again at 2%. Remember every time they say that inflation is slung recognized that all of the inflation that already happens is not being undone. So if you say that a, a good cost 10% more this year than less and then you say next month it costs only 5% more and the month after that 3% more and the month after that 2% more, you have to aggregate all of those for the final price. Right now people are paying in a boatload more than they were paying for their goods and services just a couple of years ago. And that is thanks to Joe Biden, which is why his economic numbers are in the toilet. Every single poll shows a plurality of Americans trust Trump over Biden to handle the economy without a doubt. But meanwhile, Democrats keep saying they, they keep trying to make fetch happen. It's not going to happen. Keep saying Bidenomics over and over and over I mean you're just cutting campaign commercials for Republicans at this point. Here's Kain and Jean Pierre suggesting that Bidenomics turn the economy around, which is quite a shock considering the economy was already turning around by Q four of 2020. Why is he going to Maryland, the blue state instead of maybe a red state to talk about this economic policies? So I'm not gonna get you heard, you heard Jared, the chair of c e a talk, talk specifically about the economy speak, speak specifically about a major speech, a major speech that the president's gonna do tomorrow on omics. You've heard us talk about omics and how we believe has turned the economy around and just not from us, but from the data that we certainly have seen. And this is the president has been very clear. He wants to see an economy that come, that build that's built from the bottom up, middle out and not the trickle down economy that we see bottom Up, middle out Congressional Republicans wanna continue to do. It's all sloganeering by the way. That's also the title of the next Meghan v stallion, Cardi B song, bottom up, middle out. It's gonna, it's gonna be fantastic. Jared Bernstein, who she just referenced there, he's blaming congressional Republicans for quote unquote allowing child poverty to double. I love the way they play this game. So the game is what if we just infuse trillions of dollars into the economy on the basis of emergency measures and it creates massive inflation and then that expires and then you blame people for allowing it to expire. That that's the game here. So we create a false perception of child poverty being relieved by blowing money into a pandemic era economy and a post pandemic era economy. And then when it expires, because You know inflation is through the roof, then it's the fault of everybody else. It's your fault guys. Costs and benefits accrued to every policy. It turns out the long-term cost of what you guys have created here is a an a stag flighting economy. That is what we have right now. That's not okay in a conte, in, in, in, in, in, in an economic context where congressional Republicans have allowed child poverty to double by by refusing to extend this child tax credit. They're so tiresome. Meanwhile, Joe Biden is facing some serious problems on the union front. We'll get to that momentarily first. Are you one of the millions of American men and women dealing with premature hair thinning and hair loss? Or maybe you're scared about inheriting that thinning look because it runs in the family. Look at your dad, you're like uhoh. Finally, there is a real solution that delivers on its promise without the harsh side effects, unwanted chemicals and unpleasant smells. ProVia Haircare uses a safe natural ingredient called pro capple to effectively target the three main causes of premature hair thinning and loss. ProVia supports healthy scalp circulation and delivers nourishing nutrients to strengthen hair follicles and anchor them to your scalp. And ProVia guarantees more hair on your head than in the shower Drain ProVia is effective for men and women of any age. It's safe, un colored, treated and styled hair as well. ProVia works guaranteed or 100% of your money back. It is that easy. So I mean that's a pretty good deal right now. New Customers Save over 50% off ProVia introductory Package at ProVia hair.com/ Shapiro. See results for yourself right now? Don't wait. That's provi hair.com/ don't wait until you've become your grandfather and there's nothing atop that egg. Instead, head over to ProVia hair.com/ Shapiro to get started. Also, critics and fans like our raving back Convicting a Murderer calling it one of the best documentaries of 2023. It's been a massive success reaching over 8 million views. Ranking number two in documentaries on Rotten Tomatoes were blown away by the response and if you haven't begun the series yet, it is an absolute must. Episodes one through four are now available right now at Daily Wire Plus without giving too much away, it is a wild ride to see how Netflix's filmmakers exposed by Candace in Convicting. A Murderer episode four is available right now. We have a sneak peek for you. Take a look Coming up on Convicting a Murderer, what would be the upside for this man? I mean he just got out of prison. He has this new lease on life. What would be the motive for something like this? We're talking about somebody with unexplainable impulsive behavior, a pattern of violence and aggression. There were a lot of coincidences on the day that Theresa Hollaback was killed and making a Murderer either completely omitted them or only presented half of the story. Steven Avery leaves work and doesn't tell his brothers He'd never used his sister's phone number to book an appointment before Steven Avery makes two phone calls to Theresa's phone. Why is he blocking his carer Id? I don't think Theresa liked Steven the way New episodes released every Thursday exclusively at Daily Wire plus head over to there right now to start the series. If you haven't already, if you're not a member, head on over to Daily Wire plus.com/subscribe to join today. Okay, meanwhile, Joe Biden is having some union troubles. So Joe Biden has always been a union guy and the reason he's been a union guy is because there's fairly good evidence that the unions were actually heavily involved in Joe Biden's first senate election campaign. Ben Schreck Inger writes about this in his book, the Bidens, that basically the day before Joe Biden's original senatorial election campaign back in like 1970, effectively there was a mailer that was supposed to go out in all of the newspapers that day and the unions picketed the newspaper to stop the mailer from going out at the behest of people connected with Joe. So he is always been bought and paid for by the unions. Well now he's running into a problem because the u a w is seeking another big payout from the car companies. Despite the fact that the U AAW did enormous work in the fifties, sixties, and seventies to completely undermine America's car advantage. Which is why by the eighties, by the time of the eighties everybody was driving a Toyota. The White House is closely monitoring as Detroit's big automakers and the u a w engaged in acrimonious negotiations with the laborers threatening to strike. And if agreement is not reached before their current contract expires at 11:59 PM on Thursday, a full or partial strike could send shockwaves through the economy while also calling into question Biden's pledge to create a win-win transition to a clean energy future. He's not directly involved, but he certainly has a strong interest in seeing a settlement both sides can live with said Harley shaken a labor professor at the University of California at Berkeley with the deadline approaching U W's fiery new president Sean Fain has not echoed Biden's optimism. He says the union's roughly 150,000 automotive members are ready to walk off the job if their demands are not met in the next couple of days, which could completely destabilize the industry. The workers are calling for a 36% pay hike over four years and the restoration of defined benefit pension plans, which means the utter bankruptcy of these car companies. Again, you remember that Barack Obama bailed out the car companies. So we'll get that again. Joe Biden presumably will come down on the side of the unions because Joe Biden didn't care about the economy, he doesn't care about the car companies. He cares about pleasing his union cronies, who will then presumably spend a billion dollars in the upcoming election to get him reelected. Okay, all of this bodes ill for Joe Biden's reelect chances. The good news for the Democrats is they always have the Republicans to fall back on, which is exciting, exciting stuff. So Republicans are about to have a a circular firing squad with regard to a possible shutdown. According to Axios House, Republicans have fallen into a state of paralyzed chaos on their second day back from recess with no obvious exit ramp in a government spending fight of their own creation. On the first night of the house Speaker election, we published a piece headlining the ungovernable house g o p. Eight months later. The sentiment has never rung more true. The house was forced to cancel a vote on Wednesday and financing funding for the Pentagon after the Freedom Caucus rebelled over spending levels. Another typically uncontroversial appropriations bill funding agriculture has been scrapped entirely over an internal G O P debate about abortion policy. McCarthy's announcement of an impeachment inquiry appears to have backfired with some Republicans trashing it as a distraction. G O P leadership is now advocating for a short term continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown. But if McCarthy puts a bill on the floor, Matt Gaetz is vowing to trigger daily votes to oust him as Speaker. I just have a question. What is the point of this? Like what is seeking to be achieved here? I said this with regard to the first threats to to not hand McCarthy the speakership unless he handed some concessions to the House conservatives. I'm fine with that, but can we name the points that you actually are advocating for? So McCarthy can either You know, do them or not. Instead what we're getting it seems is another fight over McCarthy with nobody waiting in the wings to pick up the pieces because 190 Republicans say they're committed to McCarthy no matter what. And meanwhile, Democrats are just sitting on the side shorting 'cause what do they care? Now behind all of this is a real sort of bizarre ideological battle and it's an ideological battle over the value of tactics at all there. There's part of the Republican party that just thinks that tactics don't matter at all. That the best way to strategize in situations in which you don't control all the power is to run directly at a wall at full speed with your head down. And if you do it over and over enough, the wall will crumble. I've yet to see that strategy achieve any sort of real success, lasting success. It seems more likely that what you should do is you should make moves that eventually guarantee you full power across all the branches of government. Then you can really make harsh moves. But instead we're just gonna get internal squabbling. Matt Gaetz goes on M S N B C to bitch about Kevin McCarthy. It's always a dead giveaway when Republicans are appearing on M S N B C to do this sort of stuff. This is about term limits, a balanced budget Amendment and single subject spending bills, just like I've been saying for an entire year, I am the most investigated man in the entire Congress. And right there you saw Kevin McCarthy lying like a dead dog because I have never asked him to interfere in any ethics matter. Okay? I had the F B I and DOJ who hate me investigate me for three years. You covered it nearly nightly. And even you acknowledged at the end that my denials held up consistently and the people who spread lies about me are sitting in a federal prison right now because they were part of a criminal scheme, not me. Yeah, don don't know what the hell that has to do with Kevin McCarthy, but suddenly, I guess the idea is that if what you, you yell at Kevin McCarthy that you'll replace by whom? Who's waiting in the wing? Steve Scalies doesn't want it. Jim, Jim Jordan can take it. Like what? What are you talking about right now? Meanwhile, McCarthy is accusing gates of teaming up with teaming up with Eric Ss swalwell to attack his speakership. So this is all, this is all going great guys, That is working Eric Swallow. But let me be very clear. Matt is upset about an ethics complaint. I don't care what they threaten against me. I'm not gonna interject into an independent committee like Ethics, and I'm not gonna put Swalwell back on the Intel Committee. Okay? So again, these sorts of firefights are completely useless, but leave it to Republicans to shoot themselves directly in the foot when facing down the possibility of Democrats doing the same. I swear watching the Democrats and the Republicans do battle with one another is like watching a gunfight in which both gunfighters are pointing their own guns at their own heads and threatening to commit suicide. It's like it's an amazing thing. They're standing 10 paces apart and the Democrats are like, if you don't gimme what we want, man, I'm gonna shoot myself right now in the head. And Republicans are like, don't, don't do it. I'll shoot myself in the head and Ev all of us are standing here like, why don't you? I don't understand why. Like, why don't neither of you do that? That seems like a, that seems stupid. I've been saying for years at this point, first party Des sanity wins. But it seems like we're not going in that direction anytime in the near future. Okay? Meanwhile, other big political story of the day is that Mi Mitt Romney is now announcing his retirement from the Senate of the United States. And Mitt Romney is one of the more peculiar figures in the history of American politics. He was a, a very, very moderate Massachusetts Republican governor. He ran as the conservative in 2008, you'll recall against John McCain. He came in seconds. John McCain, in that nominating battle And, he was considered the more conservative candidate against John McCain, largely because of immigration. Then he ran again in 2012 And. he won the nomination and then he lost the presidency to Barack Obama in an election that I think actually broke the country because he had an incredibly milk toast. Moderate Republican running against a radical Democrat. And the Radical Democrat wins by cobbling together a coalition of the supposedly oppressed against the, against the, the demographically elderly white majority in all this nonsense and And, he breaks politics permanently. Does, does Barack Obama in the United States. Okay, so then Mitt Romney goes to the Senate in Utah. He moves to Utah because he is a Mormon. He's elected to Senate overwhelmingly And. he proceeds to work with Democrats on a, on a wide variety of issues. His voting record overall is pretty conservative, but on some key issues on certain bills, like for example, the Infrastructure Act, he ends up working with Democrats. The widespread perception from Republicans about Mitt Romney is almost a circle. It starts from, he's a moderate Republican, not sure how conservative he is, but I guess he's gotten r by his name too. He's very, he's, he's a harsh conservative. He's a harsh conservative in 2008. Two, he's a harsh conservative, but he didn't really stand up to Barack Obama the way that he should probably, that's why he lost if he had been only a little bit of harsher too. He's kind of a moderate Republican. He kinda has an R by his name, but not all that conservative. Here's Mitt Romney announcing he's not gonna run for reelection At the end of another term. I'd be in my mid eighties. Frankly, it's time for a new generation of leaders. They're the ones that need to make the decisions that will shape the world they will be living in. Now. We face critical challenges mounting national debt, climate change, and the ambitious authoritarians of Russia and China. Neither President Biden nor former President Trump are leading their party to confront those issues. Political motivations too often impede the solutions that these challenges demand. The next generation of leaders must take America to the next stage of global leadership. While I'm not running for reelection, I'm not retiring from the fight. I'll be your United States Senator until January of 2025. Okay? So he then shared in an interview with McKay Coppins, his, his hatred for all the rest of the Republican Party. And And here is the thing about this kind of stuff. We have a peculiar standard inside the Republican party for what counts as loyalty and what counts as disloyalty for, so Mitt Romney's attacking all the other Republicans, he shared a unique discuss for senators Josh Howley and Ted Cruz who said, quote, put politics above the interest of liberal democracy and the Constitution. He also went after Senator JD Vance said, I don't, I don't know that I can disrespect someone more than JD Vans and, and You know. So, so that is considered disloyal by a lot of Republicans. I hear it, I hear it like, why are you directing your fire inside the house? Also, I tend to hold that rule about Donald Trump attacking fellow Republicans inside the house. But it's, it's very strange to me that certain types of attacks are considered completely verboten and certain types of attacks, depending on who is doing them, are considered totally appropriate. So when Donald Trump suggests that in some way Rhon DeSantis is a rhino, his fans will like, yeah, that's true. And you're like, wait, that's not true at all. And then when people attack Mitt Romney as a rhino, then the same people will be like, well, that's, that's appropriate or inappropriate, depending, like, how about one standard for whether you attack people inside the caucus or not? Like when they violate actual conservative principles, then you attack them. Donald Trump spent the, spent the day celebrating the ouster of Mitt Romney, which is again, like Donald Trump spends more time celebrating the ouster of Republican senators than any Democrat that I know. He, he put out a statement saying, fantastic news for America, the great state of Utah and the Republican Party, Mitt Romney, sometimes referred to as Pierre Delto. I will say the guys are really funny that that was his, his peculiar screen name on like an alternative Twitter account will not be seeking a second term in the US Senate where he did not serve with distinction. A big primary fight against him was in the offering. But now that will not be necessary. Congrats to all Make America great again. Now again, I'm fine with Mitt Romney stepping down and I'm fine with a lot of people thinking that he wasn't conservative enough in Utah. I agree with some of those criticisms. A lot of those criticisms. I'll just point out that Donald Trump has now celebrated the ouster of, of people ranging from Jeff Lake to John McCain to Mitt Romney I mean like he does this kinda stuff all the time. So when you're talking about like, it's bad for Romney to attack other Republicans in the Senate, it's not great to attack other Republicans in the Senate. You, you, you might think, okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like today, I have to say that the, the, the Pagan mentality that's taken over corporate America is truly an astonishing thing. So there's an ad that was released yesterday by Apple in which they effectively call for worship of Mother Nature. I mean this is just Pure, pagan Gaia worship nonsense. So this commercial is Tim Cook and supposedly the rest of the Apple Board meeting with Mother Nature, who of course is a, is a black woman. And she shows up to express her unease at the progress that corporate America has made in protecting her the environment. And here's how this commercial goes. Mother nature, Mother nature, welcome to Apple. There's something, how is the weather getting in? The weather was however I wanted it to be. Let's cut to the chase. In 2020, you promised to bring Apple's entire carbon footprint to zero by 2030. Henry David the row over here said, we have a profound opportunity to build a more sustainable future for the planet. We share, I Think our 10 o'clock's at the same thing They all do. Alright, this is my third corporate responsibility gig today. So who wants to disappoint me first? Well, we've got some updates we are excited to share with You materials status. Is there a materials person here? Yes. We are in the process of eliminating all plastic from our packaging. By the end, Let me guess, 50 years from now when someone else is left holding the bag by The end of next year, actually, Okay, so can I, can I just point out how stupid this is? So there are a few things that are incredibly stupid about this. So this entire commercial, which apparently was unveiled at the Apple product launch to demonstrate just how environmentally friendly they are. First of all, it begins with Mother nature arriving and then they say, how's the weather? And it gets real dark and Mother Nature says whatever I want it to be. So what are we worried about you for? I'm confused. If Mother Nature is all that powerful, then why is it that we are not seeking to protect ourselves from you and not the other way around? Which by the way, was the story of virtually all of human history until the last five minutes. Mother Nature trying to kill people and people trying to figure out a way not to die. It's pretty much the story of all of human survival and civilization still kind of the story of all of human survival and civilization. Okay? But immediately it's immediate contradiction. Then it turns into how can we worship the altar of mother nature? Well, we won't. What if we recycle all of our plastic? We don't even use plastic. What if we recycle all the aluminum that we use in our phones? And this is what we're, we're proving to you what good people we are, what amazing, amazing people we are. Don't, don't worry about values, don't worry about like whether what you're doing is good or evil in terms of the product that you produce. What kind of protections it has for say children. How content actually reaches people via the phones and computers you put out. Don't worry about any of that stuff. What you really ought to worry about is mother nature. So first of all, the substitution I mean this is, it is paganism worshiping nature is a form of paganism because the reality is nature don't care about you. And if you are making pagan sacrifices to the gods, but what you're offering up is not You know grain and meat. What you're offering up is instead like recycled aluminum. I'm not sure what the difference is. Maybe my favorite part about all of this is the Apple Board. The supposed Apple board meeting with Mother Nature here. It's super diverse. You got a black lady, you got an Asian woman, you got an Indian woman. Here's what the actual Apple Board looks like right now. That is the whitest group of people in human history. That is a very white group of people. There's maybe one person on this entire list who is not white. So yeah, they wouldn't wanna put that in the commercial 'cause then it would just be a bunch of white people meeting with a black lady and that would've looked You know nearly as good or or quite as diverse. What I like about this is it's good when the mask comes off, when, when corporate America basically says, when people like Tim Cook are like, well, You know my, my chief goal is to worship Mother Nature and to use my giant company to do so. Meanwhile, I'll produce all of our product in communist China where they completely abuse the environment and don't care about anything. Yeah, I I I don't believe you, but I, but I appreciate the sentiment. Okay, time for some things that I hate. All right, things that I hate today. So Sam Smith is running out of boundaries to transgress and so has become Boring the other day. Sam Smith, who used to be a talented musician and now has become a parody of himself, theyself herself, Zay self, put up a TikTok dressed up in Teletubby boots. I hesitate to show this just because it's so creepy, but here we go. That is Sam Smith, a creepy man and a beard wearing jean shorts and teletubby boots In a t-shirt with a small boy on it, eating an apple grown man wearing a shirt with little boy eating apple on it in short, like short, short jean shorts like Daisy Dukes and Teletubby boots as he dances to the Teletubby music. Why are you doing all these things involved with children's branding if you don't have, if if it has nothing to do with children? I'm just wondering and you You know what? I don't do children's activities in the absence of my children. Like I don't sit around dressing in Teletubbies outfits or playing with Teletubbies or doing any of those things unless I am You know, engaging in some sort of play with my small children. Sam Smith is a gender variable gay man who is wearing daisy dukes and Teletubby outfits. What is this? What is this I mean? First of all, it's, it's hideous, but besides it, besides it being hideous, I'm not sure why we're not supposed to find that creepy. 'cause it is super, it is super duper creepy, but the entire media have bought into the, have bought into the bizarre creepy nature of our, of our gender post gender world, which is why presumably Mike Pence, the former vice president who's currently running for president, who's appearing on c n n And, he had a face down a question from a mom who was distraught that her trans daughter would not be able to grow up in Mike Pence's America. Like I I'm, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. This is from News Nation rather not c n n Hard for me to ask these questions after just hearing what I heard. What is your policy plan to protect the transgender community, specifically black and brown trans women from historically high levels of violence? Well, Melissa, let me say, I, I, I'm deeply grieved to hear about those tragic circumstances and, and I hear your heart and I dunno, I'm I'm moved by your emotion. I truly am. Look, if I'm president of the United States, I'm gonna, I'm gonna see to the protection of every American and, and the rights of every American. But whether I that's, that squares with my values or not, and I'm a, I'm a Bible believing Christian. I have a particular view, as am I of these matters. And, and you have a different view of those perhaps. No, you're not. But I want you to know, I believe in the You're not a Bible. Believe freedom, sorry, not our religion. I believe in the freedom of conscience. I believe in the right of every American to live, to work, to worship according. Okay, so here's, here's the deal. PEs answer doesn't matter nearly as much as the questions being aired like this. The actual answer is black and brown transgenders, transgender people are not experiencing historically high levels of violence. They're not okay. The, the, the lie that there's like a great slaughter of transgender people going on in the United States is statistically untrue. Okay? But put that aside, the actual answer to this is not You know. I I feel your pain, I hear your heart, all of this kind of stuff. The actual answer is, I'm sorry that you're very upset. Boys are not girls. Girls are not boys, men are not women and women are not men. This is not an age dependent argument. And you are doing a great disservice to human beings when you tell them a lie. When you tell human beings that the delusions that they're experiencing are In fact reflected in reality, and that it is the job of everyone in society to reflect that back at them. You are not doing them any favors. You are engaging in a cruelty. It may sound harsh, but at some point somebody's gonna have to say, somebo something harsh about all of this. And if the American people can't take that, then maybe the American people deserve what they got. Honestly, if you can't take basic truth, then you're, you're voting for what you receive. Alright guys, the rest of the show continues right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be joined on the line by Yasha Monk, author of The Identity Trap. If you're not a member, become member Use Coach Shapiro checkout for two months for n l annual plans. Click that link and the description and join us.

right

ep evidence lie publish rss feed m host big game watch party ve probably get playbook worth thing execute people start show pressure high add drizzly goto app drink delivery pregame prep drink deliver kickoff way will not miss single play download drizzly app drizzlycomhostinghandle s d r zl ycomhostinghandled claim position valuable host plus available location media rush joe bidens defense republicans prepare impeachment inquiry inflation jump biden administration try bidenomic thing mitt romney announce end political career m ben shapiro ben shapiro sponsor express vpn time stand big tech protect datum expressvpn dot com slash ben pretty obvious republican launch impeachment inquiry go end process impeachment purpose impeachment inquiry end impeachment giant pratfall republican party launch inquiry actually end impeachment mean steadily move question exactly prove order impeachment pursue vigor alacrity answer pretty democrats year trump administration apparently mean not lodge crime mean not actually provide evidence crime commit corruption abuse power party s basically need point ve show come joe biden hunter biden doj material public big gaslighting episode ve see happen right real time medium determine actually s evidence whatsoever wrong joe biden hunter biden effectively people clean drive snow example entire medium montage night medium claim evidence joe connection hunter biden corruption lie absolute overt lie separate business partner hunter biden say joe involve business d devin archer tony bobinski testify joe biden stop meeting meeting have son business direct text hunter biden daughter suggest pay daddys bill whatsapps hunter biden computer foreign company suggest not pay daddy sit literally right wield outsized political power order punish say company ten million dollar move foreign force source variety shell company company people connect hunter biden hunter biden live joe bidens house lot stuff happen yeah mean s little bit evidence little mean lot evidence thing miss like actual transaction wire show money move directly hunter biden joe biden let pretty clear come parent kid sort stuff not happen order bill pay m point pretty obvious go dinner parent pick tab pick tab right mean parent benefit pick tab actually transfer money parent account pick tab order consider benefit parent idiocy medium deny deny deny remember people long year single day c nnn remember d gym place c n n appear life c n n unfortunately wall single day wolf blitzer talk new bombshell emerge russia investigation go to blow thing wide open go to destroy trump presidency long year hear emerge adam schiff sit house honored member democratic caucus medium go crazy thing like steele dossier year end evidence witt scintilla iota evidence joe biden corrupt way listen vaunted medium have month month conversation hearing news coverage exactly joe biden hunter biden business dealing ve say evidence present biden lot money forth evidence see house republicans convinced evidence exist plus republicans insinuate vote give lack evidence support drastic action house republicans far provide evidence biden directly profit son business deal decision vice president okay here thing medium rely broad definition evidence order escape reality s s circumstantial evidence let point circumstantial evidence include thing court like example fingerprint weapon circumstantial definition circumstantial evidence evidence indirectly point outcome not directly attest outcome direct evidence witness see oj simpson murder exwife direct evidence indirect evidence include thing like blood oj simpson bronco blood crime scene matching right indirect evidence circumstantial evidence hear people s circumstantial evidence joe hunter involve circumstantial evidence like joe biden directly say threaten ukrainian billion dollar remove withdraw aid not fire prosecutor oversee prosecution son company yes circumstantial pretty indicative pretty indicative mean standard impeachment effectively party not like member party impeach not allege crime not define crime get to tell stack donald trump impeach great crime call vladimir zelensky allegedly threaten withdraw military aid vladimir zelensky dig dirt biden hand joe biden impeach ongoing scheme son clear ten million dollar essentially influence vice president united states way allow son purport use influence vice president united states clear like actual money way shape policy way mean joe biden care victor shoken charge ukraine policy place squire son china air force mean like stack fairly evenly tell s evidence whatsoever evidence s lie fact evidence medium go to continue line kaitlyn collin example c n n directly ask republican congressman mike walt florida see direct evidence mean not actually like head barisma hand joe biden sack cash like people not know definition direct versus indirect evidence ton indirect evidence talk evidence ve see listen home see directly tie president biden show profit son foreign business dealing son complain relative father bill s have pay illicit gain see direct evidence president biden profit mean caitlin point inquiry great standing evidence cooperation hide not s fact lead say lead actual impeachment not evidence need need go to follow fact go to responsibly m amazed standard m amazed standard mean standard hunter biden say daughter pay dad bill kailyn collin like see evidence hunter biden pay dad bill mean say like evidence pay dad bill fact dad like million dollar unexplained wealth mean pretty suggestive guess new standard republicans hunter biden directly sign check joe biden joe joe bidens check hand bank order good not think s go to work way american people not believe reality impeach irrelevant know joe biden go to remove senate united states dominate democrats know american people large believe allegation joe biden involve corruption clearly joe biden response momentarily know company look actually upgrade service not charge great news new current pure talk customer pure talk add datum plan include mobile hotspot price increase whatsoever ve consider pure talk not switch d time second look buck month unlimited talk tax g datum plus new mobile hotspot reason love pure talk veteran own hire good customer service team locate right united states america family save thousand dollar year enjoy dependable g network country remember vote spend money stop support company actually not like true pure talk s reason sponsor pure talk dot com slash shaer ll save additional month actually value s pure talk dot com slash pure great coverage know use pure talk pure talk wireless americans americans right give fantastic deal head pure talk dot com slash shapiro save month company actually care tonight great night wind wine comfy clothe deep couch hand glue remote enter drizzly goto app drink delivery choose goto wine try new deliver door download drizzly app drizzlycom s d r z l ycom epic home wine night plus available location okay joe biden response basically pretend big campaign reception mclean virginia reportedly say don not know know want impeach good tell wanna impeach want shut government look look get job everybody ask impeachment day joke joke say joke like dude think joke m confused agree ve hear joke focus impeachment ve get job ve get to deal issue affect american people single solitary theory republicans pursue impeachment persuade government shutdown way actually opposite truth cynical politic think mccarthy pursue impeachment inquiry order cut deal regard continue resolution opposite j love joe biden pretend not know hell go regard son clearly goalpost continue white house line media ka jeanpierre say s evidence joe biden wrong ve suggest s evidence republicans true effort m suggest s actually fact oh say yeah s evidence favorite go joe know hunter business yeah know hunter business not involve yeah involve not actually clear money move not direct evidence clear money go expect clear expect benefit not hunter love son love son s go to final repository argument trot yesterday white house ian sam say reason joe stop hunter business meeting love love like know quarterly own family member family stop meeting hold member family familial love love family m public servant m somebody work american taxpayer turn love family require engage corruption expense american taxpayer impeachable quasicriminal behavior love defense love hunter love tragic love story president meeting phone call think right wing misinformation machine try confuse people truth truth president say publicly year call family day check call son day check call family member check love s tight tightknit family tightknit check son middle business meeting dad phone d s weather ukraine ky son d s fine dad click phone s end d dad phone anytime want accord new york times strategy battle court public opinion say ian sam new york times good luck pretty obvious level corruption joe biden involve entire career new joe biden s totally astonishing m sure democratic scandal ignore medium basis utterly unthinkable totally true pretty obvious totally true ve mention completely different context scandal involve example allegation barack obamas drug sexual behavior late like s unthinkable s totally crazy s terrible maybe rumor untrue maybe medium not bother look second unthinkable turn know barack obama admit memoir cocaine write letter girlfriend talk fantasy have sex man medium rumor arrive like s unthinkable talk later like late s talk okay here thing scoreless rumor maybe high like implausible rumor mean implausible rumor put aside talk rumor talk actual document relationship hunter joe testify joe business hunter business partner documentation hunter computer back decade decade record joe biden engage corrupt bargain behalf family variety source range m b n delaware know senator m b n know son hunter right law school derelict got hire mb n m b n huge biden donor biden give sweetheart legislative deal m b n grow leap bound state delaware like sort stuff go biden sort cut sweetheart real estate deal head m b n go way cut sweetheart deal union order elect know s new corruption cut sweetheart deal bank order bank loan brother jimmy brother jimmy start rock rock bar wilmington delaware like power order benefit family financially entire joe biden story long joe biden public office s entire stick implo s evidence s evidence actually s lot evidence guy s lot evidence s scandal s pile actual corruption coverup corruption obstruction corruption second love watch baseball white sox absolutely terrible year got to tell suck joy watch baseball team bad thing help inject fun sport prize pick prize pick easy fast way play daily fantasy sport pick player choose ll score prize pick projection win time money entry s competition people versus projection prize pick offer projection pretty sport n b m l b n f l n h l p g college sport esport nascar disc golf prize pick offer apple pay quick easy deposit account football season producer jake s rave prize pick s talk simplified interface prize pick lot easy use fancy sport app monday night jake take beating aaron roger get injure pick aaron roger pass yard turn like great pick jake fun download prize pick app prize pick dot com sign play daily fancy sport time user receive instant deposit match buck promo code ben deposit buck prize pick buck deposit buck prize pick buck not forget enter promo code bennett sign instant deposit match okay scandal number obviously joe hunter corruption scandal number joe currently president doj attempt cut obvious sweetheart deal sweetheart deal hunter obvious judge case uncover blow doj force pretend not cut sweetheart deal place white house maintain guy joe not talk anybody hunter case here ian sam white house say yeah mean president clear take office justice department administration independent involve case talk anybody case not word word gop witness house testify open hearing attorney general garland president biden interfere case okay mean testify attorney case david weiss ask special counsel status doj give give special counsel status not ask americano not ask ask wish truly independent politico report f b agent involve hunter biden probe say prosecutor lead seek deny hope key fellow attorney lack cooperation prevent charge bring president son prosecutor job hard testimony deliver closed door consistent r ss whistleblower description probe come critical juncture investigation biden family republicans appoint whistleblower description make case open impeachment inquiry presidential biden agent say recall key whistleblower allegation republicans focus david weiss say not final authority charge president son apparently agent say quote remember learn point investigation mr weiss process attorney office guess sense terminology not go partner ask recall learn martin estrada attorney central district california specifically decide bring tax charge hunter biden agent say understand yes decision central district california not go guess understanding not go bring case problem problem inherently issue involve doj joe biden not merrick garland widespread report public medium new york times upset joe biden charge hunter love son upset stuff happen think merrick garland not know think merrick garland not interested political stake make sure sweetheart deal get cut hunter sweetheart deal attempt bury gun deal think s joe biden not like pick phone merrick garland merrick want quash investigation not sign letter say merrick love son away not clear like happen merrick garland know happen make happen way make happen say david weiss m give special counsel status work thing wrong blame like let thing away s democrats record begin turn hunter house democrats begin realize maybe hunter bus order save joe pretty dirty pool momentarily innovation refund help small business qualify business payroll tax refund employee retention credit know e r c e r cs tax refund business keep employee payroll part business employee money wait claim innovation refund survey research show large number small business fulltime employee eligible e r c tax deduction qualify e r c go sale decline business face challenge growth ve pandemic government order eligible substantial refund innovation refund hundred star review trustpilot google accredit well business bureau go to charge upfront fee money actually pay risk free innovation refund provide tax legal advice work independent network tax professional share information evaluate process claim head order innovation refund dot com determine eligibility qualify way receive money business s upfront charge not pay pay innovation refund dot com dial refund refund okay democrats protest house democrats prepare throw hunter directly bus accord politico quote house barrel close impeachment vote democrat vow defend biden end joe biden hunter democrats coalesce strategy oppose gop impeachment inquiry cleave son conduct father think fact prob find evidence directly link hunter biden business dealing joe say not understand evidence hunter talk tony bobinski talk devin archer talk like talk guess go to pretend delegate stacey plaskitt virgin islands say job job remind american people hunter biden administration jamie raskin say not impeach hunter biden prosecute democrat not plan try defend hunter biden conduct time serve board ukrainian natural gas company barisma arrangement republican allow trade father influence time vice president way s republican hunter say say biden not board natural gas company ukraine know natural gas know ukraine biden instead president party keen joe far away possible drip drip damaging information come son jerry nadler new york say hunter biden improper thing s disturbed ban president problematic family member yes president business question understand roger clinton bill clintons brother screw dude bill clearing check bill bill like actively influence roger clinton job outside administration m m confused democrat think go go throw hunter bus ll fascinating shakespearean joe eventually go to throw hunter bus mask s care father go wayside presidency stake say yeah hunter lot corrupt terrible thing get problem obviously know m not involve hunter man s go to jail pay like think joey go to ll interesting find democrats come secondary angle person nefarious trump oh trump trump trump mani s pull string m go to lot republican think joe biden corrupt terrible thing donald trump trump fault dog go hunt dog go hunt trump scene manipulate genius like donald trump barely manipulate hand kid s thing donald trump manipulate republican party impeach joe biden gimme break accord yahoo news sweeping patio overlook golf course private club bedminster new jersey president donald trump die sunday night close political ally marjorie taylor greene chance president catch hard right georgia congresswoman halibut diet coke green bring issue considerable interest trump push house republicans impeach likely opponent year election brief strategy wanna lay impeachment brief green say brief phone interview trump dinner green come night house speaker kevin mccarthy announce decision tuesday order opening impeachment inquiry ah straight theory press trump talk m t g dictate term kevin mccarthy yeah make perfect sense nail s probably s go course jamie raskin involve impeachment trump twice claim impeachment come trump tiresome know come come fact joe biden lifelong corrupt politician decade know know not worry impeachment lifelong corrupt politician decade deploy drug addict booze adult prostitute abuse son pick money family mean don not understand tough understand amazing here jimmy raskin think white house handle hunter biden saga well know m m closely watch white house m engage work oversight committee seven month watch republicans oversight committee chairman comer witness want document want page document evidence criminality wrongdoing joe biden s criminal charge donald trump right criminal charge congressman santo moment ago charge joe biden want impeach guy s obviously come donald trump obviously come donald trump maybe come republicans look fact impeach donald trump twice actually allege crime like turnabout fair play president corrupt anderson cooper thing trump oh nefarious trump enjoy spectacle donald trump simultaneously bumble fool s machiavellian ingenious manipulating string scene c n report president trump speak today house g o p conference elise stefanik impeachment strategy mean drive don not know drive directly indirectly certainly participate social medium talk social medium drive activist member congress involve call kevin mccarthy directly sort get troop rile m sure way happen certainly member congress hear oh mean wow shocker donald trump say publicly want joe biden impeach like day new reason democrats state outsized panic go come fruition way let remind democrats control senate joe biden go remove office reason democrat fight mad announce impeachment inquiry mccarthy republicans successfully news s not want wanna talk trump wanna talk old news trumps indictment rest kind stuff not wanna talk joe biden absolutely corrupt wish speak fight mean afraid reason measure kamala harris s thing s happen hysterical column tell joe biden run include addendum democratic kind advisor kamala not run david ignatius talk yesterday program david ignatius write column washington post say joe run asterisk kamala harris kind amazing right s suppose wonder kin political genius s suppose amazing misunderstand problem like kamala harris reason panic biden cause get s person wait wing gavin newsom lemme tell run record california likely win presidency be not go to amazing california bleed population include entire family year gavin newsom truly amazing spectacle watch democratic party recognize mean send madame wax figure human battle s melt well well presidency dude completely melt back kamala harris hear democratic unease nancy pelosi ask yesterday kamala harris good pick vice president joe biden refuse separate time yes s like know joe pick s like don vice president kamala harris good running mate president think s matter people not underestimate kamala harris bring table think good running mate s vice president united states people not say s vice president s job description not know know source strength inspiration intellectual resource rest s say running mate s say know great joe pick nobodys comfortable kamala harris cause s terrible example ask limit abortion remember talking point democrats include people like jen psaki spokesperson president united states talking point abortion demand problem ask situation outlaw abortion heres kamala harris face nation botch believe mean week pregnancy abortion access cut need restore protection roe versus wade try new need specific term define guarantee go week pregnancy need place protection roe versus wade know m ask question try try exist june year d abortion demand way recognize question limit abortion answer m go answer question not limit abortion s terrible everybody know s terrible war joe biden election hand ve get corruption unpopularity hand bad economic situation manifest right accord wall street journal consumer price rise august fast pace year jump energy cost illustrate potential obstacle ring inflation outta economy sharp slowdown consumer price index closely watch inflation gauge rise august prior month accord labor department half increase high gasoline price not matter mean pay monthly core reading likely keep federal reserve official course hold interest rate steady meeting week annualize basis price overall august versus july annual core inflation august good number suppose remember time inflation sling recognize inflation happen undo good cost year month cost month month aggregate final price right people pay boatload pay good service couple year ago thank joe biden economic number toilet single poll show plurality americans trust trump biden handle economy doubt democrats say try fetch happen go happen say bidenomic mean cut campaign commercial republican point here kain jean pierre suggest bidenomic turn economy shock consider economy turn q go maryland blue state instead maybe red state talk economic policy m go to hear hear jar chair c e talk talk specifically economy speak speak specifically major speech major speech president go to tomorrow omic ve hear talk omic believe turn economy datum certainly see president clear want economy come build s build middle trickle economy middle congressional republicans wanna continue sloganeer way s title meghan v stallion cardi b song middle go to go to fantastic jared bernstein reference s blame congressional republicans quote unquote allow child poverty double love way play game game infuse trillion dollar economy basis emergency measure create massive inflation expire blame people allow expire s game create false perception child poverty relieve blow money pandemic era economy post pandemic era economy expire know inflation roof fault everybody fault guy cost benefit accrue policy turn longterm cost guy create stag flight economy right s okay conte economic context congressional republicans allow child poverty double refuse extend child tax credit tiresome joe biden face problem union momentarily million american man woman deal premature hair thinning hair loss maybe scared inherit thinning look run family look dad like uhoh finally real solution deliver promise harsh effect unwanted chemical unpleasant smell provia haircare use safe natural ingredient call pro capple effectively target main cause premature hair thinning loss provia support healthy scalp circulation deliver nourish nutrient strengthen hair follicle anchor scalp provia guarantee hair head shower drain provia effective man woman age safe un color treat style hair provia work guarantee money easy mean s pretty good deal right new customer save provia introductory package provia haircom shapiro result right not wait s provi haircom not wait ve grandfather s atop egg instead head provia haircom shapiro start critic fan like rave convict murderer call good documentary massive success reach million view rank number documentary rotten tomato blow away response not begin series absolute episode available right daily wire plus give away wild ride netflixs filmmaker expose candace convict murderer episode available right sneak peek look come convict murderer upside man mean get prison new lease life motive like talk somebody unexplainable impulsive behavior pattern violence aggression lot coincidence day theresa hollaback kill make murderer completely omit present half story steven avery leave work not tell brother d sister phone number book appointment steven avery make phone call theresas phone block carer d not think theresa liked steven way new episode release thursday exclusively daily wire plus head right start series not member head daily wire pluscomsubscribe join today okay joe biden have union trouble joe biden union guy reason s union guy s fairly good evidence union actually heavily involved joe bidens senate election campaign ben schreck inger write book biden basically day joe bidens original senatorial election campaign like effectively mailer suppose newspaper day union picket newspaper stop mailer go behest people connect joe buy pay union s run problem u w seek big payout car company despite fact u aaw enormous work fifty sixty seventy completely undermine america car advantage eighty time eighty everybody drive toyota white house closely monitor detroit big automaker u w engage acrimonious negotiation laborer threaten strike agreement reach current contract expire pm thursday partial strike send shockwave economy call question biden pledge create winwin transition clean energy future s directly involved certainly strong interest see settlement side live said harley shake labor professor university california berkeley deadline approach u ws fiery new president sean fain echo biden optimism say union roughly automotive member ready walk job demand meet couple day completely destabilize industry worker call pay hike year restoration define benefit pension plan mean utter bankruptcy car company remember barack obama bail car company joe biden presumably come union joe biden not care economy not care car company care please union crony presumably spend billion dollar upcoming election reelect okay bode ill joe biden reelect chance good news democrats republicans fall exciting exciting stuff republicans circular firing squad regard possible shutdown accord axios house republicans fall state paralyzed chaos second day recess obvious exit ramp government spending fight creation night house speaker election publish piece headline ungovernable house g o p month later sentiment ring true house force cancel vote wednesday financing funding pentagon freedom caucus rebel spending level typically uncontroversial appropriation bill funding agriculture scrap entirely internal g o p debate abortion policy mccarthy announcement impeachment inquiry appear backfire republicans trash distraction g o p leadership advocate short term continue resolution avert government shutdown mccarthy put bill floor matt gaetz vow trigger daily vote oust speaker question point like seek achieve say regard threat hand mccarthy speakership hand concession house conservative m fine point actually advocate mccarthy know instead get fight mccarthy wait wing pick piece republican committed mccarthy matter democrat sit short cause care real sort bizarre ideological battle ideological battle value tactic s republican party think tactic not matter good way strategize situation not control power run directly wall speed head wall crumble ve strategy achieve sort real success last success likely move eventually guarantee power branch government harsh move instead go to internal squabbling matt gaetz go m s n b c bitch kevin mccarthy dead giveaway republican appear m s n b c sort stuff term limit balanced budget amendment single subject spending bill like ve say entire year investigate man entire congress right see kevin mccarthy lie like dead dog ask interfere ethic matter okay f b doj hate investigate year cover nearly nightly acknowledge end denial hold consistently people spread lie sit federal prison right criminal scheme yeah don not know hell kevin mccarthy suddenly guess idea yell kevin mccarthy ll replace s wait wing steve scalie not want jim jim jordan like talk right mccarthy accuse gate team team eric ss swalwell attack speakership go great guy work eric swallow let clear matt upset ethic complaint not care threaten m go to interject independent committee like ethic m go to swalwell intel committee okay sort firefight completely useless leave republicans shoot directly foot face possibility democrat swear watch democrats republicans battle like watch gunfight gunfighter point gun head threaten commit suicide like amazing thing stand pace apart democrats like not gimme want man m go to shoot right head republican like not not ill shoot head ev stand like not not understand like not like stupid ve say year point party des sanity win like go direction anytime near future okay big political story day mi mitt romney announce retirement senate united states mitt romney peculiar figure history american politic moderate massachusetts republican governor run conservative ll recall john mccain come second john mccain nominate battle consider conservative candidate john mccain largely immigration run win nomination lose presidency barack obama election think actually break country incredibly milk toast moderate republican run radical democrat radical democrat win cobble coalition supposedly oppress demographically elderly white majority nonsense break politic permanently barack obama united states okay mitt romney go senate utah move utah mormon s elect senate overwhelmingly proceed work democrat wide variety issue voting record overall pretty conservative key issue certain bill like example infrastructure act end work democrats widespread perception republicans mitt romney circle start s moderate republican sure conservative guess s get r s s s harsh conservative s harsh conservative s harsh conservative not stand barack obama way probably s lose little bit harsh s kind moderate republican kinda r conservative here mitt romney announce s go to run reelection end term d mid eighty frankly time new generation leader one need decision shape world live face critical challenge mount national debt climate change ambitious authoritarian russia china president biden president trump lead party confront issue political motivation impede solution challenge demand generation leader america stage global leadership m run reelection m retire fight ill united states senator january okay share interview mckay coppin hatred rest republican party thing kind stuff peculiar standard inside republican party count loyalty count disloyalty mitt romney attack republicans share unique discuss senators josh howley ted cruz say quote politic interest liberal democracy constitution go senator jd vance say not not know disrespect jd van know consider disloyal lot republicans hear hear like direct fire inside house tend hold rule donald trump attack fellow republicans inside house strange certain type attack consider completely verboten certain type attack depend consider totally appropriate donald trump suggest way rhon desantis rhino fan like yeah s true like wait s true people attack mitt romney rhino people like s s appropriate inappropriate depend like standard attack people inside caucus like violate actual conservative principle attack donald trump spend spent day celebrate ouster mitt romney like donald trump spend time celebrate ouster republican senator democrat know statement say fantastic news america great state utah republican party mitt romney refer pierre delto guy funny peculiar screen like alternative twitter account seek second term senate serve distinction big primary fight offering necessary congrat america great m fine mitt romney step m fine lot people think not conservative utah agree criticism lot criticism ill point donald trump celebrate ouster people range jeff lake john mccain mitt romney mean like kinda stuff time talk like bad romney attack republicans senate great attack republicans senate think okay time thing like thing hate thing like today pagan mentality s take corporate america truly astonishing thing s ad release yesterday apple effectively worship mother nature mean pure pagan gaia worship nonsense commercial tim cook supposedly rest apple board meeting mother nature course black woman show express unease progress corporate america protect environment here commercial go mother nature mother nature welcome apple s weather get weather want let cut chase promise bring apple entire carbon footprint zero henry david row say profound opportunity build sustainable future planet share think oclock thing alright corporate responsibility gig today want disappoint ve get update excited share material status material person yes process eliminate plastic packaging end let guess year leave hold bag end year actually okay point stupid thing incredibly stupid entire commercial apparently unveil apple product launch demonstrate environmentally friendly begin mother nature arrive s weather get real dark mother nature say want worried m confused mother nature powerful seek protect way way story virtually human history minute mother nature try kill people people try figure way die pretty story human survival civilization kind story human survival civilization okay immediately immediate contradiction turn worship altar mother nature will not recycle plastic not use plastic recycle aluminum use phone prove good people amazing amazing people not not worry value not worry like good evil term product produce kind protection child content actually reach people phone computer not worry stuff ought worry mother nature substitution mean paganism worship nature form paganism reality nature not care make pagan sacrifice god offer know grain meat offer instead like recycle aluminum m sure difference maybe favorite apple board suppose apple board meeting mother nature super diverse get black lady get asian woman get indian woman here actual apple board look like right white group people human history white group people s maybe person entire list white yeah not wanna commercial cause bunch white people meet black lady ve look know nearly good diverse like good mask come corporate america basically say people like tim cook like know chief goal worship mother nature use giant company ill produce product communist china completely abuse environment not care yeah not believe appreciate sentiment okay time thing hate right thing hate today sam smith run boundary transgress bore day sam smith talented musician parody theyself zay self tiktok dress teletubby boot hesitate creepy sam smith creepy man beard wear jean short teletubby boot tshirt small boy eat apple grow man wear shirt little boy eat apple short like short short jean short like daisy duke teletubby boot dance teletubby music thing involve children brand not child m wonder know not children activity absence child like not sit dress teletubbie outfit play teletubbie thing know engage sort play small child sam smith gender variable gay man wear daisy duke teletubby outfit mean hideous hideous m sure suppose find creepy cause super super duper creepy entire medium buy buy bizarre creepy nature gender post gender world presumably mike pence vice president s currently run president s appear c n n face question mom distraught trans daughter able grow mike pences america like m yeah yeah yeah yeah news nation c n n hard ask question hear hear policy plan protect transgender community specifically black brown tran woman historically high level violence melissa let m deeply grieve hear tragic circumstance hear heart dunno m m move emotion truly look m president united states m go to m go to protection american right american s square value m m bible believe christian particular view matter different view want know believe bible believe freedom sorry religion believe freedom conscience believe right american live work worship accord okay here here deal pes answer not matter nearly question air like actual answer black brown transgender transgender people experience historically high level violence okay lie s like great slaughter transgender people go united states statistically untrue okay aside actual answer know feel pain hear heart kind stuff actual answer m sorry upset boy girl girl boy man woman woman man age dependent argument great disservice human being tell lie tell human being delusion experience fact reflect reality job society reflect favor engage cruelty sound harsh point somebodys go to somebo harsh american people not maybe american people deserve get honestly not basic truth vote receive alright guy rest continue right go to wanna miss join line yasha monk author identity trap member member use coach shapiro checkout month n l annual plan click link description join

This bill modifies the boundary of the Red River National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana.

right

bill modify boundary red river national wildlife refuge louisiana

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Standards of driving are deteriorating and motorists are showing a lack of concern over the problem. This warning came from Finchley and Friern Barnet MP Mrs. Margaret Thatcher on Saturday. “I would like to see an increase in those who take advanced driving tests,” she said. “Drivers must be taught that they cannot recognise their own bad habits. Simultaneously they must adapt their attitude to cater for other motorists' poor driving. She added that is was the young, aged between 18 and 25, that needed instruction in this area but pointed out that there were not enough people to teach and encourage them. Mrs. Thatcher was speaking at a reception to mark the redecoration of the Finchley offices of the League of Safe Drivers of which she has been a patron for more than 15 years. She said that only ten per cent. of new members that join the organisation in the South East of England come from Greater London. But league officials have expressed their hope that the £60 redecoration of the offices at Apex House, Grand Arcade, North Finchley, will increase membership. Mr. Stanley MacMillan, a driving instructor and member of the organisation since 1965, said: “The offices looked like a pig sty and did nothing to aid the league and its cause. Now it has a new coat of paint and strip lighting. It looks far more inviting.” The work was done voluntarily by Mr. MacMillan and his wife, Janet, a pharmacist, on Sundays and took two months to complete. Guests present at the function included league chairman Ald. Leslie Snelling and league vice-chairman the Mayor of Barnet, Cr. Frank Gibson. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc standard driving deteriorate motorist show lack concern problem warning come finchley friern barnet mp mrs margaret thatcher saturday like increase advanced driving test say driver teach recognise bad habit simultaneously adapt attitude cater motorist poor drive add young age need instruction area point people teach encourage mrs thatcher speak reception mark redecoration finchley office league safe driver patron year say cent new member join organisation south east england come great london league official express hope redecoration office apex house grand arcade north finchley increase membership mr stanley macmillan drive instructor member organisation say office look like pig sty aid league cause new coat paint strip lighting look far invite work voluntarily mr macmillan wife janet pharmacist sunday take month complete guest present function include league chairman ald leslie snelling league vicechairman mayor barnet cr frank gibson copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Oct 27, 2020 Donald Trump held a campaign rally in West Salem, Wisconsin on October 27. Read the transcript of his speech remarks here. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling. Donald Trump: (02:01)Wow. That’s so great. I want to start off by saying a very big hello, Wisconsin. It’s great to be with you. And I’ll also say this. I have never spoken where I had so many people behind me. I have a whole stadium behind. I want to just thank everybody. This is a great turnout. They wanted a bigger space. They got a bigger space. Because seven days from now, we are going to win this state and we are going to four more incredible years in the White House. Thank you. This election is a choice between a Trump super recovery or a Biden depression. That’s what you’re going to have with the raise of taxes, the biggest tax increase in our history. It’s ridiculous. It’s a choice between a Trump boom or a Biden lockdown. Let’s lock it all down. And by the way, speaking of lockdowns, let’s get your governor to open it up. Let’s get him to open it up. Donald Trump: (03:12)It’s a choice between our plan to cut your taxes or even, and I have to tell you, we’ve given you the biggest tax cut in the history of our country. You know that, biggest regulation cut in the history of our country. And sleepy Joe Biden, his plan is to raise your taxes at a level that our country has never raised taxes before. Somehow that doesn’t work too well. Do you agree? I don’t think so. I don’t think so. I’ve never heard of it before, but that’s okay. You can’t hear of everything, right? All my life I’ve watched people want to cut taxes. Here’s a guy, he’s running on a basis of let’s raise everybody’s taxes. Donald Trump: (03:55)Next week, Wisconsin is going to answer the call of history once again. We had a great victory here. Didn’t we have a great? Remember that four years ago? They said, “Donald Trump has won the state of Wisconsin.” It’s been a long time since a Republican did that, but we’re actually much higher now than we were then. We have a campaign that’s actually more enthusiastic. And that was, I would say, that had to be number one in history four years ago. But you know what? This is going to be the most important election in the history of our country. Because you see what’s happening, the radical lefts, and you’re going to defeat Biden and dark money donors and corrupt special interests. One of the most important issues in this election is law and order. We say it. Law and order. Donald Trump: (04:48)Joe Biden is party incite violence and hatred against our police officers. And we’re not doing that. No, we’re not doing that. Remember the debate, the first debate. Which one did you like better, the first one or the second one? He says, “Both.” That’s a fan. He said, “My man is there.” Yeah. Did anybody see the last one? Anybody watching? Seems to have had a very big impact. We learned a lot about him. Number one, he’s against oil, gas, probably likes wind, but wind is very intermittent. Let’s watch the President tonight on television. I’m sorry, darling, the wind’s not blowing. Donald Trump: (05:31)Last night, Philadelphia was torn up by Biden supporting radicals. 30 police officers, Philadelphia police officers, great people, they were injured, some badly. Biden stands with the riders and I stand with the heroes of law enforcement. And you know what? They can do their job very easily. Just let them do their job. The Biden Harris plan would end cash bail. You know, they want to have cash bail so everyone just walks around. No matter what they do, ends cash bail, free 400,000 dangerous criminals. It would slash police budgets all over the country. It would tie the hands of every police officer in the country and they would appoint anti-police prosecutors in every community in America. I don’t think that’s for Wisconsin. We know each other well. Donald Trump: (06:24)Biden is soft and weak and too scared to be President. He doesn’t want to be President. Let’s face it. You know, you got his bad body language there. This man knows body language better than any man I know. That’s a lot of bad body language from Joe. You know, he got out yesterday. You saw that? Because we’re making speeches all over Pennsylvania. He got out and he got out of Delaware and he said, “What’s the closest point to Pennsylvania?” And it was just a few minutes from his basement. And he went and made a speech. And that was a mistake because they had to take him off the stage because he didn’t know where the hell he was. Right? That didn’t work out too well. No, because he had a lid, you know, like a garbage can. You put it in the can. It’s a lid. It’s called a lid. But he doesn’t want to be President. One thing about this job, you got to want it. You got to want it. This is tough. This is tough. And doing this, I don’t usually say it, but I say it, doing this… Audience : (07:35)Four more years! Four more years! Four more years! Donald Trump: (07:48)And unlike Biden, who’s made a fortune in politics, what a fortune. The press is not allowed to write about that though. But Biden made a fortune. You know what? This is costing me billions of dollars. And you know, I could not be happier because we have done things that nobody else could have done in the first three and a half years. There’s been no administration that’s done what we’ve done in the first three and a half years with our military, with our vets, with regulations, with cutting taxes. Biden’s running mate, the most liberal member in the U.S. Senate. She makes Bernie Sanders look like he’s a conservative. Even urge their supporters to donate to a fund to bail out writers in Minneapolis, where they had such problems until the National Guard went in and they stopped it. Would you say that was about, what, 22 minutes? It was all over. Donald Trump: (08:44)Including an attempted cop killer, they wanted to bail him out. The policies will set cop killers free. We believe if you murder a police officer, you should get the death penalty. And I know you’re a state that believes. You murder a police officer. You saw a month ago. The two young officers sitting in a car and the guy comes up. No, you do that stuff and you can’t get away with it. When the violent mob came to Kenosha, you know, Kenosha? Everybody know Kenosha? Biden opposed sending in the National Guard. We sent in the National Guard and we saved Kenosha. We save Kenosha. Kenosha wouldn’t be standing. And I got a lot of credit. Thank you to the sheriff and so many others for their support. They’ve actually came out and supported me. Thank you very much. Where’s the sheriff? Is he around here some place? What a hell of a sheriff. Thank you very much. That’s great. I appreciate it, too. That’s the first time you ever did it. I appreciate it. Thank you very much. Fantastic. Good man. Good man. Donald Trump: (09:54)It took generations to build the America that we know and love. But if the radical left gain power, it would take them only a matter of months to burn it down, tear it down or destroy it. I’m the only one standing between you and the left wing mob. I hate to tell you. There aren’t too many of us, but we’re standing, and your second amendment and many other things, right? Donald Trump: (10:19)Biden has not only declared war on police. I mean, you know, it really is. My father taught me a long time. Don’t use the word cops because the word cops, that’s a little slang. Always call them police. So I never used it. You know, I see cops, but sometimes it’s not bad. Sheriff, let me ask you. Cops or police or doesn’t it matter? If it’s done with the heart, who cares, right? Right? If it’s done with a heart. So like I said, he declared war on the cops, and it’s not working out too well. Donald Trump: (10:50)You’re going to see something. You’re going to see a giant red wave on Tuesday. You’re going to see a red wave like they’ve never seen before. And they saw a very big one. I’ll tell you what, they got a glimpse on four years ago. And remember they said, “Where did these people come from? Where did they come from?” They’re great Americans. They don’t want anything. They just want that level playing field. And they came out and they voted. And this is going to be bigger. This is going to be bigger. And they know it. They know it. They know it. They don’t like to report it. They see what’s happening. They see what’s happening, Mike. Don’t they? They get it. It’s going to be very big and it’s going to be beautiful. Donald Trump: (11:33)And it doesn’t have to start on Tuesday. It could start earlier, early voting. You want to be there. You know these ballots. You see? Was I right about the ballots? It’s messed up like you wouldn’t believe. Now they say, “We’d like to get the ballots and maybe get them within a few days of the election. And we’ll take 10 days to count them up.” Oh good. Let’s let the whole world wait while you count your ballots. And you know what happens while they’re counting them? They’re dumping more ballots in there. Okay? Where did they come from? No. We had a great ruling right here. We had a great ruling. Right? Got that yesterday. Supreme Court said, “Nope, that’s your date. That’s the [inaudible 00:00:12:14]. November 3rd. That’s your date.” Right? Donald Trump: (12:18)But sleepy Joe declared war on American workers and Biden spent the last 47 years outsourcing your jobs. You got hit hard. Opening your borders, you don’t have borders, you don’t have a country. And sacrificing American blood and treasure and endless foreign, ridiculous Wars. Countries, most of you, including even most of the people, they never even heard of these countries. We’re bringing them all back home. You know that, right? They’re all coming back home. Afghanistan, Iraq, keeping some in Syria. If you don’t mind, we’re keeping the oil. You know, they should have done that with Iraq. Remember I said, “Don’t go into Iraq. But if you go in, at least keep the oil.” We didn’t keep the oil. Donald Trump: (13:03)Biden was a cheerleader for NAFTA, China’s entry into the world trade organization. He repeatedly tried to slash Medicare and social security. He’s a shill in a sense for foreign countries. You got to take a look at this guy’s record. Of course, right now he has no idea where he is, so that’s an entirely different problem. That’s a very big, different problem. Look, we have to say it like it is. Hey, we have the greatest country in the world and we have potential like no country has, and we can’t play games. We can’t play games. We can’t. And besides that, he’s not a nice guy. Okay? Just so you know, he was never a nice guy. So I feel better. If he was a nice guy, I wouldn’t say it. Audience : (13:47)USA! USA! USA! Donald Trump: (13:56)Thank you very much. Thank you. Decade after decade, Biden twisted his knife into the back of Wisconsin workers, but workers throughout the United States, you don’t have to take my word for it, for a special group of people, the people of Wisconsin. I spent a lot of money on this crazy video. Look at this. And you’re going to see it. I hope that people back here can see it. Can you see it too? I hope. Oh, that’s terrible. All right. You’ll take my word for it. Go ahead. Play. Speaker 2: (14:33)My problem is I voted for NAFTA. I’m supporting NAFTA because I think it is a positive thing to do. And I do not pretend to be an expert on international trade matters. Speaker 3: (14:44)Trade agreements, like NAFTA and permanent normal trade relations with China, which forced American workers to compete against people who are making pennies, and [inaudible 00:14:53] has resulted in the loss of 160,000 jobs. Speaker 4: (14:57)The President is absolutely right when he says that China has been cheating for 25 years and that Bill Clinton doing didn’t do enough about- Speaker 5: (15:03)That China has been cheating for 25 years, and that Bill Clinton didn’t do enough about it, George W. Bush didn’t do enough about it, Barack Obama didn’t do enough about it. Joe Biden: (15:06)A rising China is an incredibly positive development for not only China, but the United States and the rest of the world. A rising in China is a positive, positive development. It is in our self-interest that China continue to prosper. We want to see China rise. China’s a great nation and we should hope for the continued expansion. China is not our enemy. We talk about China as our competitor, we should be helping. The idea that China is going to eat our lunch is bizarre. The idea that they are our competition, they’re going to beat us is bizarre. They’re not bad folks, folks. China’s not problem. Speaker 5: (15:50)Allowing China into the World Trade Organization, which you supported, extending most favored nation status to China, which you supported, that those steps allow China to take advantage of the United States by using our own open trade deals against us. Do you think in retrospect that you were naive about China? Joe Biden: (16:12)No. Speaker 6: (16:13)But doesn’t he deserve some credit for that? It’s better. The USMCA is better than NAFTA. Joe Biden: (16:18)It is better than NAFTA. I never said I oppose fracking. Donald Trump: (16:26)You said it on tape. Joe Biden: (16:27)I didn’t. Show the tape. Put it on your website. Donald Trump: (16:30)I’ll put it on. Joe Biden: (16:31)Put it on the website. Kristen Welker: (16:32)Would there be any place for fossil fuels, including coal and fracking in a Biden administration? Joe Biden: (16:39)No, we would work it out. We would make sure it’s eliminated. I guarantee you we’re going to end fossil fuel. No more, no new fracking. I’d gradually move away from fracking. Kamala Harris: (16:52)And I think it’s critically important on day one that we end any fossil fuel leases on public lands. Speaker 7: (17:00)What about safe stopping and fracking, and stopping pipeline infrastructure and- Joe Biden: (17:03)Yes, yes, no pipelining. Exactly. Kamala Harris: (17:06)There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking. Kristen Welker: (17:09)I have one final question- Donald Trump: (17:12)Would he close down the oil industry? Would you close down the oil industry? Joe Biden: (17:14)I would transition from the oil industry, yes. I would transition. Donald Trump: (17:20)Oh, that’s a big statement. That is a big statement in terms of business, that’s the biggest statement because basically what he’s saying is he is going to destroy the oil industry. Will you remember that Texas? We remember that Pennsylvania, Oklahoma. Kristen Welker: (17:30)Vice president. Speaker 8: (17:37)Now to be fair, maybe Biden’s not telling us because he’s forgotten his own plans. Watch Biden’s staff quickly swoop in to shuffle him along during a quickie escape the basement trip to Pennsylvania. Joe Biden: (17:54)Here’s the deal. One of the things that is important is that keep in mind, although they’re going to vote on I think today. Speaker 8: (18:12)That was terrifying. Joe Biden: (18:13)What kind of country are we going to be? Four more years of George, we’re going to find ourselves in a position where if Trump gets elected, we’re going to be in a different world. Donald Trump: (18:30)That was yesterday. That was all yesterday. So that took place yesterday. Every day we could put up another treat. The whole thing is ridiculous. The whole thing. Until the plague came in from China, I didn’t even have a race. And then it came in and we did a great job. We saved millions of lives. two million lives, 2.2 million it was supposed to be. And this guy, “Oh, don’t ban it.” He’s xenophobic, right? Don’t ban China. Don’t China. And this is in January or very early on, very, very early. Everybody said don’t ban. I’m not blaming anybody, but they all said don’t ban. Donald Trump: (19:10)I said it’s a heavily infected country. It’s starting from there. I banned China. Then I banned Europe with all of the problems they were having with Spain and Italy and France and everybody. And I banned Europe and two and a half months later, he was saying, don’t ban and then he runs for president. He lucks out because Pocahontas decided to stay in. So she took a lot of votes away from Bernie. Not too many. She didn’t do too well, but she took enough away that he ends up winning on Super Tuesday. Right? Donald Trump: (19:43)And all of a sudden I got this guy running and he starts complaining that I should have moved faster, but he was two and a half months behind. And I said that’s going to be hard to explain, but I have to explain it to people. One thing nice is when you put this thing up here, saves you a lot of words, right? It saves you a lot of words. And then the other thing, remember for a year, “We will not frack.” Now it affects you because of your energy costs and all of the things that affects everybody. Donald Trump: (20:11)We’re right now energy independence. It’s a great thing. First time. Can you imagine Texas, Pennsylvania, the different places, Ohio, so many places, so many places, North Dakota? Can you imagine? Take Texas. I mean, he’s against oil, he’s against guns and he’s against religion. Right? Other than that, he’s wonderful. He’s just perfect. And then they say, “It’s a very close race in Texas.” I don’t think so. You’re against oil, guns and God. You don’t have a close race in Texas. I don’t think so. Donald Trump: (20:55)But they said the same thing years ago that, “Texas is too close to call. It’s going to be a very, very tough race for Donald Trump.” Then it was Donald, right? Now they call me president out of respect I’m sure for the office. “It will be a very, very, very tough race. I mean, the polls have closed in Texas. Donald Trump has won the state of Texas.” It was like all in one thing. They don’t do that unless you have a landslide. Now they do the same thing again. Well, this time, at least they say I have a little lead. How can you have a little lead when I’m the oil person Louie needed to fire up your factories? Donald Trump: (21:37)They don’t even know how to do it. They have AOC plus three. They say, “Okay, we’ll get rid of all fossil fuels.” We have a problem in Wisconsin. We’re doing very well. We have a lot of factories. We have a lot of plants. How are we going to fire them up? She has no clue. She has no clue. I don’t even think she studied it. Maybe in high school she studied it, but probably not in college. Did she go to college? Tell me. Did she? Because I don’t know. I don’t know her background, but it is not heavy into the environment. Donald Trump: (22:08)All of a sudden she comes up with the Green New Deal and these people all did because they have to because the radical left wants them. The Green New Deal will cost $100 trillion. If we have a hundred perfect years, the greatest years of the history of our country, we can’t make it with a 100 trillion spent on the Green New Deal. In 2016, Wisconsin voted to fire this corrupt political establishment and you elected an outsider’s president who is finally putting America first. And if I don’t sound like a typical Washington politician, it’s because I’m not a politician. It’s one of the reasons I was elected if I was a politician I probably wouldn’t have been elected, right? Donald Trump: (23:04)If I don’t always play by the rules of Washington and the Washington establishment, it’s because I was elected to fight for you. And I’m fighting for you harder than any president has ever fought for you. Together, we’ll continue to fight for American workers, support our police, defend our second amendment, which is under siege, but don’t worry about it. Don’t worry about it. It’s fine. But it is under siege. Secure our borders. And you know the wall is up to over 400 miles right now. We have a very secure border. Over four. We’re going to have it finished very soon. Donald Trump: (23:46)They don’t talk about it anymore. You know they used to go, “He will never get it built.” Because that was like you couldn’t. The Democrat party was so against it, they said it was obsolete. Used drones so we can watch everybody pour into the border. Right? Let’s send a drone up there, right? Walls and wheels, right? Walls and wheels never get obsolete. That’s about the only two things I know of that don’t get obsolete. Everything else is obsolete about 15 minutes after you figure it out. Donald Trump: (24:12)And ensure more products are proudly stamped with that wonderful, beautiful phrase made in the USA, right? We will deliver record prosperity, epic job growth at a safe vaccine that eradicates the virus and quickly ends this pandemic. And you know with the fake news, everything is COVID, COVID, COVID, COVID. I had it. Here I am, right? Now. I had it. The First Lady had it Barron had it, but Barron had it for about 12 seconds. Young, young immune system, young. Donald Trump: (24:51)No, it’s COVID. You turn on the news, COVID, COVID. You know when they’re going to stop talking about it so much? November 4th year. You’re right. November 4th. I know. It’s a whole crazy thing. I mean, it’s too complicated to explain. These people are very corrupt, very dishonest, but they’ve got a lot of problems. On November 4th, you’ll hear we’re doing extremely well and you’ll see. You’ll see. They used to always say that Europe, look at Europe, look at Europe. Well, first of all, they count their cases totally differently, but look at Europe. Well, they have a big spike and you know what? It’s going to go down and we had a spike in Miami. Donald Trump: (25:31)We had a spike in Texas, Arizona. It’s all way down to very low numbers, but I’ll tell you all they want to talk about is COVID. But the good news on the fourth, they’ll stop talking. You watch. They’ll stop talking. You get out that red wave, just get out. We have to win this election. This is the most important election we’ve ever had. We can’t let this radical left socialist group take over. And I’ve been saying it now for a long time, because I see it. There’s this inclination by a group of people, our country will never be a socialist nation. We will never become a socialist nation. Donald Trump: (26:15)Normal life will fully resume. That’s all we want is normal life. Seven months ago, right? We had the greatest economy in the history of our country. Everybody was doing well. Best numbers we’ve ever had. And next year will be the greatest economic year in the history of our country. You see what’s happening. You see how it’s being built up. And by the way, I’d love to do stimulus, but Crazy Nancy doesn’t want to do it. She wants to get bailout money for her Democrat run states that are high crime and doing badly. Donald Trump: (26:49)And I spoke for Wisconsin when I said, “No, thank you, Nancy. Have a good time.” We’ll get big stimulus right after the election’s over. Hopefully we can take back the House too. It’ll be nice. Get rid of her. Get rid of her as speaker. We’ll get Kevin there and Kevin would be good. You know who Kevin is? Kevin McCarthy. If Biden and the Democrat socialists are elected, you know what’s going on with your regulations? I’ve got your regulations down to a level, but we can go further. We have statutory requirements. We’re going further. Donald Trump: (27:26)They’ll bury really your family and yourself and regulations, terminate religious liberty, dissolve our borders, indoctrinate our children with that really bad stuff that they want to teach in schools, which we’ve largely ended. But it can be started again and destroy the suburbs beyond repair. Suburban women, you’re going to love me. You better love me. Did you see 60 minutes the other night? I always joke. I say “Suburban women, I’m getting rid of the regulation.” You know there’s a regulation that essentially destroyed the suburbs. Okay? It would have. Donald Trump: (28:04)You know who is in charge of it, who would have been? Cory Booker. Good luck, Cory. He’s another beauty. We deal with some real beauties, but we had a regulation where they can build low-income housing and projects in a neighborhood near you. Right in the neighborhood near you in the suburbs. Right? So the fake news was saying, “We think that Donald Trump is having problems with suburban women.” I said, “Why? Because I’m going to stop crime from going to the suburbs?” Because you know Antifa and the anarchists, they view the suburbs is next. That’s what they would like. Right? So the suburban woman wants law and order, they want safety and they don’t want a regulation that’s going to destroy the suburbs. Donald Trump: (28:49)And then I listened to these people talk about how so four years ago they talked about the same thing. They said, “Women will not be voting for Donald Trump.” And then after about four hours and they declared total victory for Trump, they said, “He cannot get to 270. He cannot.” This was in the afternoon and for about six months before that, by the way. Didn’t just start. “Donald Trump cannot get.” You need 270, right? “Cannot get to 270. He cannot get.” And they were right. We got 306. Donald Trump: (29:24)Well, we picked up a place called Wisconsin that helped a little bit. That wasn’t high on the list of victories. Now it is, but we just know it just came out. We’re leading by three points. That’s good. They won’t report that. They won’t report that. They’ll look at 30 polls. They’ll look at 30 polls. Some of them are totally fixed. Some of them are sickos, right? They look at polls where they interview 38% Democrats, 21% Republicans. I said that, “Doesn’t sound like too fair to me.” And they’ll say, “Trump is done by five.” Well, if I’m down by five, when they’re doing 38 to 21, that means I’m winning in- Donald Trump: (30:03)When they’re doing 38 to 21. That means I’m winning in a landslide. What kind of polls are these? No, seriously. What kinds of polls are these? These people are crazy. Joe Biden will delay the vaccine, postpone therapies, prolong the pandemic, shutter your schools. Open your schools, please. Bankrupt your small businesses, and shut down our country. He will destroy our country. And by the way, the cure cannot be worse than the problem itself. I said that a long time ago. Except when I originally said. I had no… I felt it. I felt it was bad. I just felt it was an instinct. It can’t be worse than the problem itself. So the shutdown, with alcoholism, with drugs, with abuse, with suicides, with all the things that happen, it’s worse. You can’t do this. You’ve got to get your governors to open up. There aren’t many of them. There aren’t many of them there aren’t many of them now, but you’ve got to… One of the reasons, this is another one. We’ll go to the fourth, November 4th. Donald Trump: (31:03)They’ll be announcing, “We’re opening our state.” One of them, stupidly, like three weeks ago announced, “Yeah, we think we’re going to open probably around November 4th.” How about that genius? You’ll all be open around a couple of days after the election. Biden even wants to lock down young and healthy Americans, yet for those under age 50 the recovery rate is 99.98%. Think of that. 99. 98%. And for school kids it’s better than that. Biden’s cruel and senseless lockdowns would cause countless deaths from suicide and from all of the problems we have, and we would have problems. And economic, people lose their jobs. They lose their jobs, their small businesses go out or they work for small businesses or big businesses that go out. We’ve got to open up our states. We’ve got to tell your governor, we got to open up our states. Does anybody like your governor? Do you like him? Okay, let’s have a… Who likes the governor? Is he going to win reelection? Crowd: (32:12)No. Donald Trump: (32:14)Who does not like the governor? All right. Interesting. Lots of love, governor. Got to open up. A lot of governors that did this. You know Michigan, the only one that it was allowed to go around and roam was her husband. He was allowed to go fishing and sailing. Nobody else was, they had to stay locked up in their house. But we won a Supreme Court case against them. They found it unconstitutional that she locked down the state of Michigan. I just left Michigan. I gave a speech in 32 degree weather in the rain. Donald Trump: (32:53)And they’re great people and they’re strong people, so I said, “You know what I’ll do? I won’t put on a hat and I’ll just stand there in the rain and I’ll freeze and I’ll make a speech.” But I’ll tell, you there was such love. It was incredible. We’re winning Michigan, too. We’re winning Michigan. I had a nice hat on, I was going to put it on. And they were waiting for four or five hours. I said, “I feel so guilty.” I was on time, but they get there very early, like probably some of you. You got here very early. All these front rowers I know got here. I know the front rowers get here very early. We have it where they get three, four days in advance. Were you here three, four days? No. Donald Trump: (33:35)You promise you voted for Trump, right? She’s great. We have great people. We’ve never had… And four years ago we had the most enthusiastic campaign anyone’s ever seen, probably there ever was this. This campaign, and I never thought I’d say it, has more enthusiasm, more support than we did four years ago, because four years ago I was a business guy. I was successful, I was very successful. I came and I said I was going to do… Go ahead. Go ahead. Get it out of your system. Crowd: (34:27)Four more years! Four more years! Four more years! Four more years! Donald Trump: (34:27)So four years ago I came and I saw trade. Probably trade was the big… It just drove me crazy. We’re losing all our factories, closing all our factories. They’re moving to Mexico, they’re making it in China, they’re doing all these things. A lot of places moved up to Canada. Canada was very tough on us. And I saw this, that’s probably the main reason I ran. But I saw it all happening. It was so easy to see. I saw it all happening, and that’s probably the main reason I ran. But four years ago I was just saying, “I’m going to cut your taxes. I’m going to cut regulations. I’m going to rebuild your military. I’m going to do all the things I said.” And actually I did more, because Space Force. We opened up Space Force. Donald Trump: (35:06)I never said I was going to do that. I learned that after watching Russia and China and everything else. I learned that after I was here. One of these people right back there said, “He may be the only politician that actually did more than he promised during the campaign.” I believe that’s true. So we have actually more enthusiasm because I did everything. I said the wall. The wall was just very expensive. The border patrol wanted a certain way, very expensive. They’re right, they wanted vision, they wanted steel, they wanted rebar, they wanted concrete inside. And I said, “You know what? I’ll do it. I want to do it the way you want it. I don’t want to give you any excuses for doing a bad job on the border.” Gee, if you only would’ve built the wall right. But all of the things that I said, I did. Everything I said, I did. Donald Trump: (35:58)And that gives this campaign more energy than a guy that was successful that said, “Hey, I’m going to do a lot of things.” Because you’ve been hearing that for years from politicians, and they don’t do it. They don’t get the job. As I said about Biden the other night at the debate, “Joe, you’re all talk and no action.” And it’s true. And I’d looked at him and I’d say, “Joe, why didn’t you do it?” He’d say, “Well, we should’ve done this. We should’ve done that.” I said, “Joe, you’ve been there for 47 years and you left three and a half years ago. It’s not like you left 30 years ago. You left three and a half years ago. And I only ran because of you, Joe. Because if you and Obama did a good job I wouldn’t have run, there would’ve been no reason. And if I did, I probably wouldn’t have been able to win.” Donald Trump: (36:46)So I only ran… It was quite insulting to him, but that’s the way it is. Biden had no plan, no idea. He didn’t have a clue. He just wants to lock up this country. He really does. He’s going to lock it up. If one guy walks up and says, “Sir, I think we should close up our country.” “Okay, that sounds good to me.” While letting rioters and looters run wild, or as Joe calls them peaceful protestors. I call you protesters. You know why? Because there’s a legal definition. You can’t have a political rally. They did that to keep me out. So I said, “Oh I see, you’re protesters.” The only thing you can do is protest, because they wanted to protect anarchists, rioters people that were burning down your stores. So you have the absolute right to protest. So I call this a friendly protest, okay? Officially. Not a rally. This is not a rally, it’s a friendly protest. Okay, now we’ve gotten over the legal hurdle, haven’t we? These people don’t believe in science. They believe in whatever gives them power and whatever gives them control. Donald Trump: (37:53)The Biden plan will crush you and crush your family. We will crush the virus and make our success, make this country more successful than it’s ever been. We have that kind of potential. We have the foundation set. You see what’s happening, you see the kind of numbers we’re doing. We’re going to make our country more successful, quickly, than it’s ever been. When the China plague arrived we moved heaven and earth to fight the disease. We airlifted medical supplies, pioneered groundbreaking therapies, reduced the fatality rate 85%. Think of that. 85%. And now it’s actually higher than that. Well, here I am. I’m here, right? I said, “Give me that stuff. Whatever the hell it is, doctor, I want it.” The next day I woke up and I felt like Superman. I said, “Get me the hell out of here. I have to go to Wisconsin tonight.” Donald Trump: (38:52)And saved over 2 million lives. Our excess mortality rate has been 42% less than Europe’s. Think of that, 42%. And we’re working with Europe very closely. Look, they have a problem. It should’ve never been allowed to leave China, ever. It should have never been allowed. Once it got Wuhan, Wuhan province, it never got out, but it came to the USA and Europe and the rest of the world. I’m working to make the breakthrough treatment I received, so what we’re doing is we’re going to make the Regeneron and Eli Lilly, a great company, has a similar antibody drug. And we’re going to make that available to people that need it, free. All I know is I didn’t feel great. And after I took that, I woke up the next morning, and I’ll tell you, I felt like I could take on the world. I said, “Let me out of…” Donald Trump: (39:49)And here we are standing here, freezing. Thanks to our relentless efforts, 97% of all current emergency rooms visits are for something other than the virus. You don’t hear these numbers from the fake news. Think of that, 97%. And we’re on track to deliver 100 million doses of safe vaccine. And I say, we’re turning the corner. We’re turning the corner. We’re rounding, like this racetrack. Look at this, it’s perfect. Donald Trump: (40:17)We’re rounding the curve. We will vanquish the virus. And by the way, we’re going to have the vaccine. Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Moderna. great companies, and others too. We have the vaccine. We’re going to have it very soon. Very soon. We’re going to deliver it. But without it, also, we’re rounding the curve, we’re rounding the corner. It’s happening. We’re going to emerge stronger than ever before. Biden’s made a corrupt bargain, and the Democrats. In exchange for his party’s nomination he is handed control of his party over to a rage-filled socialists and Marxists and the left wing extremists. You see it in Portland. How about Portland? We could solve that problem in I’d say a half an hour. Anarchists, you know what happens to them, right? They go back home to mom and dad. And they also stay in the basement, that’s what they have in common with Joe. Donald Trump: (41:16)Joe, in that one clip. That was yesterday, that took place. That was what happened. He was in the basement. He heard that we were doing really well in Pennsylvania, which we are. We’re at least two or three points up. Doesn’t sound like much. You know what happens with us? They’ll say, “He’s three points up,” and then you win by like 10. Got a lot of hidden votes out there. I don’t know if I’m supposed to be complimented by that and not, but there are hidden votes. They don’t want to talk. They are all action, they call that all action. If Biden wins, the flag burning radicals on the streets will be running for… You know that. They’ll be running your government, there’ll be running your government. This is Election Day, you must stop the anti-American radicals by delivering Joe Biden and those far left Democrats, all Democrats, a thundering defeat. This has to be a big defeat so we can end it. Just end it. Donald Trump: (42:13)And Joe Biden, as you see, is a corrupt politician. He wants to send your jobs to China while his family rakes in millions from the Chinese Communist Party. Millions. And he gets money from Ukraine, he gets money from Russia. How about Ukraine? His son sits on the board. No energy experience, no nothing. Didn’t have a job. Father becomes vice-president, he becomes in charge of Ukraine. Son goes on the board of Barisma. Goes on the board of Barisma, $183,000 a month. Would you say that’s good? Would you say that’s good? If Biden wins, China wins. China will own the USA if this happens, and they don’t want me to win. They don’t want me. We charge them tens of billions of dollars worth of tariffs. We never took 10 cents from China. Donald Trump: (43:02)And now we gave out… Where is Hunter? She’s going, “Where is hunter?” Where is hunter? By the way, come to think of it, how about the laptop from hell? Let’s call it the laptop from hell. And then you see shifting Schiff, “It was Russia that created the laptop. It was Russia.” Shifty Schiff. He says there with a straight face, watermelon shaped head, like a watermelon. ” It was Russia.” I said, “Oh no, here we go again.” When we win, you win, Wisconsin wins, and America wins. That’s what’s going to happen. We’re joined today by members of Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce. They really helped us with this location. And we were going to be out at the airport but the governor made it very difficult so I said, “That’s all right, get a location. Friendly people.” And they really are, your state’s chamber of commerce, and I want to thank them very much. Where are you folks? Where are you guys? What a group of people. Where? Where The hell are you? I met you at the airport. There they are. Good job you did. Thank you very much, I appreciate it. Good job. Donald Trump: (44:20)I said, “How are we doing?” They said, “Sir, you’re going to win easy.” That’s pretty good. They slightly know the area. I’m thrilled to receive their first ever presidential endorsement. They’ve been around a long time and they gave us their… We’ve got a lot of endorsements. Got a lot of newspaper endorsements today, too. A lot of them, all over the country. And virtually every law enforcement group has given us the endorsement, even New York’s finest. They’ve never endorsed a presidential candidate and they went be given back… We’ve got to respect our law enforcement. We’ve got to let them do what they have to do. Also with us is candidate for congress, Derrick Van Orden. Terrific. Where’s Derrick? Derrick, good luck. I hear good things. Donald Trump: (45:03)… Orden, who’s terrific. Where’s Derrick? Derrick, good luck. I hear good things Derrick. I hear good things. Derrick Van Orden, please vote for him. Win. His competition is not good. Not good. And also state GOP Chairman, Andrew Hitt. Andrew, thank you. Are we winning Andrew, please? If we don’t win, we’re going to fire you so fast. Ah, I hear good. Yeah, just get out that vote. Get out the vote. Donald Trump: (45:31)Together we built the greatest economy in history, and now we’re doing it again. Make America Great Again Again. Right? Again Again. See all those hats? Those hats are obsolete. It’s Make America Great Again Again. We increased middle-class family income over $6,000 more than five times the gains made under the last administration. Think of that. In a short period of time, African American, Hispanic American, Asian American, unemployment reached their lowest levels ever recorded. Since April, we created a record 11.4 million jobs. I ended the NAFTA nightmare and proudly signed the brand new USMCA into law. That’s going to be a big deal. Just kicked in. Donald Trump: (46:20)Wisconsin dairy farms were decimated under the Obama and Biden nightmare. They were decimated, and now you are doing very well, and you know Canada took advantage of you very much. You know that right? Not anymore. Under the USMCA our dairy exports to Canada are expected to surge by at least 100%. And we got rid of the tariffs. You know the tariffs? You know they used to charge you. You didn’t know this. You like the song, O Canada. Right? Yeah, hockey game, nice song. O Canada, their national anthem. Right? By the way, they stand for our national anthem. Our people have to stand for our national anthem. They have to stand. Donald Trump: (47:02)But Canada treated us badly, 287% tariff. Can you believe that? Think of it. I learned about that I said, “It’s time to get out of that crazy NAFTA.” NAFTA was a terrible thing. When GM went bankrupt Biden and Obama threw the workers of Delphi Corporation to the wolves. Their pensions were wiped out. I signed an order to restore the pensions of Delphi and others, and healthcare benefits promised the workers. These are workers in Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin that got really promised a lot of things and it never happened. We took care of it. I will never let anyone rip off our great American worker. Took care of it. They were treated very badly with a lot of promises from Biden and Obama. Donald Trump: (47:49)By the way, did you see this? Did you see the people they get for the crowds? Obama was up. He drew flies today, flies. He drew nobody. You know the cars are honking. Right? Honk, honk, honk. Let’s go home. I never saw anything like this. They have cars. They have like 12 cars. Now they have circles. They had to have bigger circles for cars together. I never saw anything like it. Obama has no crowd. I thought he had like a crowd. Right? He doesn’t have anything. Donald Trump: (48:18)The only one that has smaller crowds is sleepy Joe Biden. He’s got nobody, and the press doesn’t like covering our crowds. We have the opposite. We have so many people. They don’t like it. But they never show that nobody … Joe was speaking yesterday. There was nobody there before they carried him off the stage. Think of it. He got nervous speaking to nobody. But that wasn’t nervous. That was another problem. Donald Trump: (48:43)Under my leadership, we achieved the most secure border in U.S. history. My opponent’s insane immigration plan completely eliminates U.S. borders by implementing nationwide catch and release. You know what that is. You catch a criminal, murderer, rapist. You catch them and you have to release them into the United States. Then within two or three years they’re supposed to come back for a trial. We had an argument during the debate. I said, “Sleepy Joe, they don’t come back.” “Yes they do. They proudly come back.” No, no, Joe. They’re murderers. They don’t come back Joe. I turned out to be right, but you know. Donald Trump: (49:21)He would make every community into a sanctuary city for violent criminals. We invested $2.5 trillion in the U.S. military. You know that, right? You are a big beneficiary this state. A lot of business in this state, including nearly $6 billion to save the historic shipyard, Marinette Marine. You know that, right? And they’re great. I was there four or five months ago. I was watching. They build beautiful, beautiful … It looks like a yacht with lots of weapons on it. The only difference is you got rockets all over the damn thing, but it is beautiful. Donald Trump: (49:56)We killed the leader of ISIS, al-Baghdadi. We took out the world’s number one terrorist. Soleimani is dead. We took out 100% of the ISIS caliphate [inaudible 00:05:12]. When I took over it was a mess. I withdrew from the last administration’s disastrous Iran nuclear deal, $150 billion, 1.8 billion in cash. You know what we got? Nothing. I recognized the true capital of Israel and opened the American Embassy in Jerusalem. Instead of never-ending wars, we are forging peace in the Middle East. We’re doing it. It’s like working out really well. Three countries already, and many are lined up. They’re all wanting to get in. Donald Trump: (50:49)A vote for Republicans is a vote for the American Dream. We are the party of Abraham Lincoln. It’s a vote for the American Dream. In conclusion, over the next four years we will make America into the manufacturing superpower of the world, and we will end our reliance on China once and for all. It’s already happening. We will make our medical supplies right here in the United States, right here in Wisconsin. We will hire more police, increase penalties for assaults on law enforcement, and we will ban deadly sanctuary cities. You don’t want the sanctuary cities. Donald Trump: (51:32)We will defend the right to life, religious liberty, free speech, and the right to keep and bear arms. It’s very important. Supreme Court, you got to do that. You got to remember. A lot of people think that’s why I got elected because of the Supreme Court. And we’ve got already three great justices and Amy yesterday. By the end of the first term we’ll have close to three, maybe more, but approximately 300 federal judges, including court of appeals judges. A record. It’s a record. Donald Trump: (52:10)We will maintain America’s unrivaled military might, and we will ensure peace through strength. So the two-and-a-half trillion dollars, the greatest rockets and missiles, hydrosonic. The greatest in the world. They go seven times faster than what we have today. We have tanks. We have planes. We have bombers. We have submarines. We’ve rebuilt our military. We have the greatest equipment, the greatest military force in the world. Russia, China, everybody, they are envious. Nobody thought we could do this, and we’ve done it all. A lot of it’s made right here, but all made in the USA. All made in the USA. Our nuclear is now in tippy-top shape, and just hope, just hope, that we never have to use it. That’s all. Donald Trump: (53:10)We will end surprise medical billing, require price transparency. Already signed. January 1st it goes into effect. Lower drug prices even further, favored nations. Nobody can believe I did it, and we’re going to get the lowest prices in the world. And we will always protect patients with pre-existing conditions. America will land the first woman on the moon, and the United States will be the first nation to land an astronaut on Mars. NASA right now is the talk of the world as a space center. Again, it was closed and a mess when I took over. We will stop the radical indoctrination of our students and restore patriotic education to our schools. We will teach our children to love our country, honor our history, and always respect our great American flag. And we will live by the timeless words of our national motto, In God We Trust. Right? For years, you had a president who apologized for America. Now you have a president who is standing up for America and standing up for the great people of Wisconsin. That’s what we’re doing. So get your friends, get your family, get your neighbors, get your coworkers, even grab your boss if you have to. Come on boss, you got to go out and get out and vote. You got to get out and vote. Got to get out. This is a thing you got to do. Just remember the great red wave. It’s now just starting to form, and they know it’s coming. They know it’s coming. We didn’t come this far and fight this hard to surrender our country back to the corrupt Washington swamp. Donald Trump: (55:08)On November 3rd we must finish the job, drain the swamp. Go out and vote. Could be before November 3rd. Go out and vote. From Green Bay to La Crosse, from Madison to Milwaukee, and from Janesville to right here in West Salem, we inherit the legacy of red-blooded American patriots who poured out their heart, sweat, and soul to secure our liberty and defend our freedom. We stand on the shoulders of American heroes who crossed the oceans, settled a continent, tamed the wilderness, laid down the railroads, raised up the great skyscrapers, won two world wars, defeated Fascism and Communism, and made America the single greatest nation in the history of the world. And the best is yet to come. Donald Trump: (56:06)Proud citizens like you helped build this country, and together we are taking back our country. We are returning power to you the American people. With your help, your devotion, and your drive, we are going to keep on working, we are going to keep on fighting, and we are going to keep on winning, winning, winning. We are one movement, one people, one family, and one glorious nation under God, and together with the incredible people of Wisconsin we have made America powerful again. We have made America wealthy again. We have America strong again. We have made America proud again. We have made America safe again. And we will make America great again. Thank you Wisconsin. Thank you very much. Get out and vote. Thank you very much. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling. Copyright Disclaimer Under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Get a weekly digest of the week’s most important transcripts in your inbox. It’s the news, without the news.

right

oct donald trump hold campaign rally west salem wisconsin october read transcript speech remark transcribe content try rev save time transcribe captioning subtitle donald trump great want start say big hello wisconsin great speak people stadium want thank everybody great turnout want big space get big space seven day go win state go incredible year white house thank election choice trump super recovery biden depression go raise taxis big tax increase history ridiculous choice trump boom biden lockdown let lock way speak lockdown let governor open let open donald trump choice plan cut taxis tell give big tax cut history country know big regulation cut history country sleepy joe biden plan raise taxis level country raise taxis work agree think think hear okay hear right life watch people want cut taxis guy run basis let raise everybody taxis donald trump week wisconsin go answer history great victory great remember year ago say donald trump win state wisconsin long time republican actually high campaign actually enthusiastic number history year ago know go important election history country happen radical left go defeat biden dark money donor corrupt special interest important issue election law order law order donald trump biden party incite violence hatred police officer remember debate debate like well second say fan say man yeah anybody anybody watch big impact learn lot number oil gas probably like wind wind intermittent let watch president tonight television sorry darling wind blow donald trump night philadelphia tear biden support radical police officer philadelphia police officer great people injure badly biden stand rider stand hero law enforcement know job easily let job biden harris plan end cash bail know want cash bail walk matter end cash bail free dangerous criminal slash police budget country tie hand police officer country appoint antipolice prosecutor community america think wisconsin know donald trump soft weak scared president want president let face know get bad body language man know body language well man know lot bad body language joe know get yesterday see make speech pennsylvania get get delaware say close point pennsylvania minute basement go speech mistake stage know hell right work lid know like garbage lid call lid want president thing job get want get want tough tough usually audience year year year donald trump unlike biden fortune politic fortune press allow write biden fortune know cost billion dollar know happy thing half year administration half year military vet regulation cut taxis biden running mate liberal member senate make bernie sander look like conservative urge supporter donate fund bail writer minneapolis problem national guard go stop minute donald trump attempt cop killer want bail policy set cop killers free believe murder police officer death penalty know state believe murder police officer see month ago young officer sit car guy come stuff away violent mob come kenosha know kenosha everybody know kenosha biden oppose send national guard send national guard save kenosha save kenosha kenosha stand get lot credit thank sheriff support actually come support thank sheriff place hell sheriff thank great appreciate time appreciate thank fantastic good man good man donald trump take generation build america know love radical leave gain power matter month burn tear destroy stand left wing mob hate tell stand second amendment thing right donald trump declare war police mean know father teach long time use word cop word cop little slang police know cop bad sheriff let ask cop police matter heart care right right heart like say declare war cop work donald trump go go giant red wave tuesday go red wave like see see big tell get glimpse year ago remember say people come come great americans want want level playing field come vote go big go big know know know like report happen happen mike go big go beautiful donald trump start tuesday start early early voting want know ballot right ballot mess like believe like ballot maybe day election day count oh good let let world wait count ballot know happen count dump ballot okay come great ruling right great ruling right get yesterday supreme court say nope date inaudible november date right donald trump sleepy joe declare war american worker biden spend year outsource job get hit hard open border border country sacrifice american blood treasure endless foreign ridiculous war country include people hear country bring home know right come home afghanistan iraq keep syria mind keep oil know iraq remember say iraq oil oil donald trump cheerleader nafta china entry world trade organization repeatedly try slash medicare social security shill sense foreign country get look guy record course right idea entirely different problem big different problem look like hey great country world potential like country play game play game nice guy okay know nice guy feel well nice guy audience usa usa donald trump thank decade decade biden twist knife wisconsin worker worker united states word special group people people wisconsin spend lot money crazy video look go hope people hope oh terrible right word ahead play speaker problem vote nafta support nafta think positive thing pretend expert international trade matter speaker agreement like nafta permanent normal trade relation china force american worker compete people make penny inaudible result loss job speaker president absolutely right say china cheat year bill clinton speaker china cheat year bill clinton george w bush barack obama joe biden rise china incredibly positive development china united states rest world rise china positive positive development selfinter china continue prosper want china rise china great nation hope continued expansion china enemy talk china competitor help idea china go eat lunch bizarre idea competition go beat bizarre bad folk folk china problem speaker china world trade organization support extend favor nation status china support step allow china advantage united states open trade deal think retrospect naive china joe biden speaker deserve credit well usmca well nafta joe biden well nafta say oppose fracke donald trump say tape joe biden tape website donald trump joe biden website kristen welker place fossil fuel include coal fracke biden administration joe biden work sure eliminate guarantee go end fossil fuel new fracke gradually away fracke kamala harris think critically important day end fossil fuel lease public land speaker safe stopping fracke stop pipeline infrastructure joe biden yes pipeline exactly kamala harris question favor ban fracke kristen welker final question donald trump close oil industry close oil industry joe biden transition oil industry yes transition donald trump big statement big statement term business big statement basically say go destroy oil industry remember texas remember pennsylvania oklahoma kristen welker president speaker fair maybe biden tell forget plan watch biden staff quickly swoop shuffle quickie escape basement trip pennsylvania joe biden deal thing important mind go vote think today speaker terrify joe biden kind country go year george go find position trump get elect go different world donald trump yesterday yesterday take place yesterday day treat thing ridiculous thing plague come china race come great job save million life million life million suppose guy oh ban xenophobic right ban china china january early early everybody say ban blame anybody say ban donald trump say heavily infect country start ban china ban europe problem have spain italy france everybody ban europe half month later say ban run president luck pocahonta decide stay take lot vote away bernie take away end win super tuesday right donald trump sudden get guy run start complain move fast half month say go hard explain explain people thing nice thing save lot word right save lot word thing remember year frack affect energy cost thing affect everybody donald trump right energy independence great thing time imagine texas pennsylvania different place ohio place place north dakota imagine texas mean oil gun religion right wonderful perfect close race texas think oil gun god close race texas think donald trump say thing year ago texas close go tough race donald trump donald right president respect sure office tough race mean poll close texas donald trump win state texas like thing landslide thing time little lead little lead oil person louie need fire factory donald trump know aoc plus okay rid fossil fuel problem wisconsin lot factory lot plant go fire clue clue think study maybe high school study probably college college tell know know background heavy environment donald trump sudden come green new deal people radical left want green new deal cost trillion perfect year great year history country trillion spend green new deal wisconsin vote fire corrupt political establishment elect outsider president finally put america sound like typical washington politician politician reason elect politician probably elect right donald trump play rule washington washington establishment elect fight fight hard president fight continue fight american worker support police defend second amendment siege worry worry fine siege secure border know wall mile right secure border go finish soon donald trump talk anymore know build like democrat party say obsolete drone watch everybody pour border right let send drone right wall wheel right wall wheel obsolete thing know obsolete obsolete minute figure donald trump ensure product proudly stamp wonderful beautiful phrase usa right deliver record prosperity epic job growth safe vaccine eradicate virus quickly end pandemic know fake news covid covid covid covid right lady barron barron second young young immune system young donald trump covid turn news covid covid know go stop talk november year right november know crazy thing mean complicated explain people corrupt dishonest get lot problem november hear extremely europe look europe look europe count case totally differently look europe big spike know go spike miami donald trump spike texas arizona way low number tell want talk covid good news fourth stop talk watch stop talk red wave win election important election let radical left socialist group say long time inclination group people country socialist nation socialist nation donald trump life fully resume want normal life seven month ago right great economy history country everybody good number year great economic year history country happen build way love stimulus crazy nancy want want bailout money democrat run state high crime badly donald trump speak wisconsin say thank nancy good time big stimulus right election hopefully house nice rid rid speaker kevin kevin good know kevin kevin mccarthy biden democrat socialist elect know go regulation get regulation level statutory requirement go donald trump bury family regulation terminate religious liberty dissolve border indoctrinate child bad stuff want teach school largely end start destroy suburb repair suburban woman go love well love minute night joke suburban woman getting rid regulation know regulation essentially destroy suburb okay donald trump know charge cory booker good luck cory beauty deal real beauty regulation build lowincome housing project neighborhood near right neighborhood near suburb right fake news say think donald trump have problem suburban woman say go stop crime go suburb know antifa anarchist view suburb like right suburban woman want law order want safety want regulation go destroy suburb donald trump listen people talk year ago talk thing say woman vote donald trump hour declare total victory trump say afternoon month way start donald trump need right right get donald trump pick place call wisconsin help little bit high list victory know come lead point good will report will report look poll look poll totally fix sickos right look poll interview democrats republicans say sound like fair trump mean win donald trump mean win landslide kind poll seriously kind poll people crazy joe biden delay vaccine postpone therapy prolong pandemic shutter school open school bankrupt small business shut country destroy country way cure bad problem say long time ago originally say feel feel bad feel instinct bad problem shutdown alcoholism drug abuse suicide thing happen bad get governor open get reason fourth november donald trump announce open state stupidly like week ago announce yeah think go open probably november genius open couple day election biden want lock young healthy americans age recovery rate think school kid well biden cruel senseless lockdown cause countless death suicide problem problem economic people lose job lose job small business work small business big business get open state get tell governor get open state anybody like governor like okay let like governor go win reelection crowd donald trump like governor right interesting lot love governor get open lot governor know michigan allow roam husband allow fishing sail stay lock house win supreme court case find unconstitutional lock state michigan leave michigan give speech degree weather rain donald trump great people strong people say know will hat stand rain freeze speech tell love incredible win michigan win michigan nice hat go wait hour say feel guilty time early like probably get early rower know get know rower early day advance day donald trump promise vote trump right great great people year ago enthusiastic campaign see probably campaign think enthusiasm support year ago year ago business guy successful successful come say go ahead ahead system crowd year year year year donald trump year ago come see trade probably trade big drive crazy lose factory close factory move mexico make china thing lot place move canada canada tough see probably main reason run see happen easy see happen probably main reason run year ago say go cut taxis go cut regulation go rebuild military go thing say actually space force open space force donald trump say go learn watch russia china learn people right say politician actually promise campaign believe true actually enthusiasm say wall wall expensive border patrol want certain way expensive right want vision want steel want rebar want concrete inside say know want way want want excuse bad job border gee build wall right thing say say donald trump give campaign energy guy successful say hey go lot thing hear year politician job say biden night debate joe talk action true look joe say joe year leave half year ago like leave year ago leave half year ago run joe obama good job run reason probably able win donald trump run insulting way biden plan idea clue want lock country go lock guy walk say sir think close country okay sound good let rioter looter run wild joe call peaceful protestor protester know legal definition political rally say oh protester thing protest want protect anarchist rioter people burn store absolute right protest friendly protest okay officially rally rally friendly protest okay get legal hurdle people believe science believe give power give control donald trump biden plan crush crush family crush virus success country successful kind potential foundation set happen kind number go country successful quickly china plague arrive move heaven earth fight disease airlift medical supply pioneer groundbreake therapy reduce fatality rate think actually high right say stuff hell doctor want day wake feel like superman say hell wisconsin tonight donald trump save million live excess mortality rate europe think work europe closely look problem allow leave china allow get wuhan wuhan province get come usa europe rest world work breakthrough treatment receive go regeneron eli lilly great company similar antibody drug go available people need free know feel great take wake morning tell feel like world say let donald trump stand freeze thank relentless effort current emergency room visit virus hear number fake news think track deliver million dose safe vaccine turn corner turn corner round like racetrack look perfect donald trump round curve vanquish virus way go vaccine johnson johnson pfizer moderna great company vaccine go soon soon go deliver round curve round corner happen go emerge strong biden corrupt bargain democrats exchange party nomination hand control party ragefille socialist marxist left wing extremist portland portland solve problem half hour anarchist know happen right home mom dad stay basement common joe donald trump clip yesterday take place happen basement hear pennsylvania point sound like know happen point win like get lot hide vote know suppose compliment hide vote want talk action action biden win flag burn radical street run know run government run government election day stop antiamerican radical deliver joe biden far leave democrats democrats thunder defeat big defeat end end donald trump joe biden corrupt politician want send job china family rake million chinese communist party million get money ukraine get money russia ukraine son sit board energy experience job father vicepresident charge ukraine son go board barisma go board barisma month good good biden win china win china usa happen want win want charge ten billion dollar worth tariff take cent china donald trump give hunter go hunter hunter way come think laptop hell let laptop hell shift schiff russia create laptop russia shifty schiff say straight face watermelon shape head like watermelon russia say oh win win wisconsin win america win go happen join today member wisconsin manufacturer commerce help location go airport governor difficult say right location friendly people state chamber commerce want thank folk guy group people hell meet airport good job thank appreciate good job donald trump say say sir go win easy pretty good slightly know area thrill receive presidential endorsement long time give get lot endorsement get lot newspaper endorsement today lot country virtually law enforcement group give endorsement new york fine endorse presidential candidate went give get respect law enforcement get let candidate congress derrick van orden terrific derrick derrick good luck hear good thing donald trump orden terrific derrick derrick good luck hear good thing derrick hear good thing derrick van orden vote win competition good good state gop chairman andrew hitt andrew thank win andrew win go fire fast ah hear good yeah vote vote donald trump build great economy history america great right hat hat obsolete america great increase middleclass family income time gain administration think short period time african american hispanic american asian american unemployment reach low level record april create record million job end nafta nightmare proudly sign brand new usmca law go big deal kick donald trump dairy farm decimate obama biden nightmare decimate know canada take advantage know right anymore usmca dairy export canada expect surge get rid tariff know tariff know charge know like song o canada right yeah hockey game nice song o canada national anthem right way stand national anthem people stand national anthem stand donald trump canada treat badly tariff believe think learn say time crazy nafta nafta terrible thing gm go bankrupt biden obama throw worker delphi corporation wolf pension wipe sign order restore pension delphi healthcare benefit promise worker worker michigan ohio wisconsin get promise lot thing happen take care let rip great american worker take care treat badly lot promise biden obama donald trump way people crowd obama draw fly today fly draw know car honk right honk honk honk let home see like car like car circle big circle car see like obama crowd think like crowd right donald trump small crowd sleepy joe biden get press like cover crowd opposite people like joe speak yesterday carry stage think get nervous speak nervous problem donald trump leadership achieve secure border history opponent insane immigration plan completely eliminate border implement nationwide catch release know catch criminal murderer rapist catch release united states year suppose come trial argument debate say sleepy joe come yes proudly come joe murderer come joe turn right know donald trump community sanctuary city violent criminal invest trillion military know right big beneficiary state lot business state include nearly billion save historic shipyard marinette marine know right great month ago watch build beautiful beautiful look like yacht lot weapon difference get rocket damn thing beautiful donald trump kill leader isis albaghdadi take world number terrorist soleimani dead take isis caliphate inaudible take mess withdraw administration disastrous iran nuclear deal billion billion cash know get recognize true capital israel open american embassy jerusalem instead neverending war forge peace middle east like work country line want donald trump vote republicans vote american dream party abraham lincoln vote american dream conclusion year america manufacture superpower world end reliance china happen medical supply right united states right wisconsin hire police increase penalty assault law enforcement ban deadly sanctuary city want sanctuary city donald trump defend right life religious liberty free speech right bear arm important supreme court get get remember lot people think get elect supreme court get great justice amy yesterday end term close maybe approximately federal judge include court appeal judge record record donald trump maintain america unrivaled military ensure peace strength twoandahalf trillion dollar great rocket missile hydrosonic great world seven time fast today tank plane bomber submarine rebuild military great equipment great military force world russia china everybody envious think lot right usa usa nuclear tippytop shape hope hope use donald trump end surprise medical billing require price transparency sign january go effect low drug price favor nation believe go low price world protect patient preexist condition america land woman moon united states nation land astronaut mars nasa right talk world space center close mess take stop radical indoctrination student restore patriotic education school teach child love country honor history respect great american flag live timeless word national motto god trust right year president apologize america president stand america stand great people wisconsin friend family neighbor coworker grab boss come boss get vote get vote get thing get remember great red wave start form know come know come come far fight hard surrender country corrupt washington swamp donald trump november finish job drain swamp vote november vote green bay la crosse madison milwaukee janesville right west salem inherit legacy redbloode american patriot pour heart sweat soul secure liberty defend freedom stand shoulder american hero cross ocean settle continent tame wilderness lay railroad raise great skyscraper win world war defeat fascism communism america single great nation history world good come donald trump citizen like help build country take country return power american people help devotion drive go work go fighting go win win win movement people family glorious nation god incredible people wisconsin america powerful america wealthy america strong america proud america safe america great thank wisconsin thank vote thank transcribe content try rev save time transcribe captioning subtitle copyright disclaimer title usc section allowance fair use purpose criticism comment news reporting teaching scholarship research fair use permit copyright statute infringe weekly digest week important transcript inbox news news

Speeches, etc. Dear Elector Most of us would have preferred not to have two General Elections in one year, but the inconclusive result of last time plus the refusal of some parties to enter into a coalition has led to this second campaign. There are serious problems ahead. The effect of inflation is felt in prices, in rates and in every bill that has to be paid. If it continues like this, it will destroy all confidence in the future and put at risk the free society we regard as our birthright. The Conservative proposals to tackle the problem are set out in our manifesto. The keynote is co-operation between all people of goodwill. However wise and determined a government may be, it will need the consent, the understanding and active support of the people to implement its policies. Details of public meetings are given on this leaflet. As in all five previous elections I have successfully contested for Finchley and Friern Barnet, the emphasis will be on positive policies, and ample time will be given for questions. Margaret Thatcher P.S. Would you please display in your window Thank you Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc dear elector prefer general election year inconclusive result time plus refusal party enter coalition lead second campaign problem ahead effect inflation feel price rate bill pay continue like destroy confidence future risk free society regard birthright conservative proposal tackle problem set manifesto keynote cooperation people goodwill wise determine government need consent understanding active support people implement policy detail public meeting give leaflet previous election successfully contest finchley friern barnet emphasis positive policy ample time give question margaret thatcher ps display window thank copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill places restrictions on the provision of gender affirming care. Gender affirming care includes performing surgery, administering medication, or performing other procedures for the purpose of changing the body of an individual to correspond to a sex that differs from the individual's biological sex. Specifically, the bill makes it a felony to perform any gender affirming care on a minor and it permits a minor on whom such care is performed to bring a civil action against each individual who provided the care. Additionally, the bill prohibits the use of federal funds for gender affirming care or for health insurance that covers such care. Such care may not be provided in a federal health care facility or by a federal employee. The bill also prohibits qualified health plans from including coverage for gender affirming care. Further, plans that include coverage for such care are not eligible for federal subsidies. Finally, the bill prohibits institutions of higher education from offering instruction in gender affirming care. It also makes any non-U.S. national (alien under federal law) who performs gender affirming care on a minor deportable and inadmissible to the United States. The restrictions under this bill do not apply to the provision of care under certain circumstances such as when an individual does not have normal sex chromosome structure, sex steroid hormone production, or sex steroid hormone action.

right

bill place restriction provision gender affirm care gender affirm care include perform surgery administer medication perform procedure purpose change body individual correspond sex differ individual biological sex specifically bill make felony perform gender affirm care minor permit minor care perform bring civil action individual provide care additionally bill prohibit use federal fund gender affirm care health insurance cover care care provide federal health care facility federal employee bill prohibit qualified health plan include coverage gender affirm care plan include coverage care eligible federal subsidy finally bill prohibit institution high education offer instruction gender affirm care make nonus national alien federal law perform gender affirm care minor deportable inadmissible united states restriction bill apply provision care certain circumstance individual normal sex chromosome structure sex steroid hormone production sex steroid hormone action

Apr 13, 2020 Donald Trump held his daily COVID-19 press briefing on April 13. For the first part of the briefing, he berated the press’ coverage of his handling of the pandemic, and played a video of governors complimenting him. He also claimed his authority is “total” over state stay-at-home orders. Dr. Fauci also walked back some criticism of the president. Read the full transcript here. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev for free and save time transcribing. Transcribe or caption speeches, interviews, meetings, town halls, phone calls, and more. Rev is the largest, most trusted, fastest, and most accurate provider of transcription services and closed captioning & subtitling services in the world. Donald Trump: (11:23)Thank you very much, everyone. Before I begin, I’d like to offer my condolences and best wishes to the people all across our great South who have endured deadly tornadoes and other severe weather in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina. Donald Trump: (11:42)My administration will do everything possible to help those communities get back on their feet. We’re speaking with their governors and representatives. FEMA’s already on its way and they got there. As soon as we heard the word. I said, “Get out there.” So FEMA’s there and you know the great job that FEMA does, it’s really something very special. So we just want to say warmest condolences and we’re with you all the way. It’s a tough deal. That was a bad, bad level five. That was a bad group. That’s as high as it gets. It was a bad grouping of tornadoes, something that’s something incredible, the power, the horrible, destructive power. Donald Trump: (12:26)America is continuing to make critical progress at our war against the virus. Over the weekend, the number of daily new infections remained flat. Nationwide flat. Hospitalizations are slowing in hotspots like New York, New Jersey, Michigan and Louisiana. This is clear evidence that our aggressive strategy to combat the virus is working and that Americans are following the guidelines. It’s been incredible what they’ve done. Donald Trump: (12:54)You looked at the charts, and the charts are, and the models from early on predictions were 100 and 120,000 people look like if they did well, they were going to unfortunately perish. And we’re going to be hopefully way, way below that number. So that will be a sign of people doing things right, but it’s still just a horrible thing all over the world, 184 countries. This is attribute the wonderful healthcare advisors and experts who have been with us right from the beginning. We appreciate it so much. In fact, Dr. Fauci is here. Maybe I could ask Tony to say a few words before we go any further. Thank you very much, Tony. Please. Dr. Fauci: (13:46)Thank you Mr. President. Just a couple of things and then I just want to make a comment about something that happened yesterday. You’re going to hear from Dr. Birx soon about the numbers that we’ve been talking about, how things are starting to balance off. And I think the more as we go by each day, I think we’re going to see, and again, I never like to get ahead of myself, or of Dr. Birx. But it looks like even though we’ve had a really bad week last week, remember when I was speaking to you before I was saying this was really a bad week. There’s still going to be a lot of deaths, but we’re starting to see in some areas now that flattening, particularly in a place that was a hot spot like New York. That’s the first thing. Dr. Fauci: (14:25)The second thing is that I had a really very, very productive conversation with the Congressional Black Caucus this morning for about an hour. And they really wanted to know what exactly are we going to be doing in the immediate, as well as the long range about the health disparities and the discrepancies both in infection and in poor outcome in the minorities in general, specifically African American. And I made it very clear to them that what we have to do is focus on getting the resources where the vulnerable are to be able to get testing done, to be able to get the appropriate identification where proper and where appropriate to isolate and contact trace if we can. But also to help mitigate in a community that is suffering and suffering much more disproportionately. So I just wanted to get that to the way. Dr. Fauci: (15:17)The other point I wanted to make is that I, I had an interview yesterday that I was asked a hypothetical question. And hypothetical questions sometimes can get you into some difficulty, because it’s what would have, or could have. The nature of the hypothetical question was if in fact we had mitigated earlier, could lives have been saved? And the answer to my question was as I always do and I’m doing right now perfectly honestly say, “Yes.” Obviously, mitigation helps. I’ve been up here many times telling you that mitigation works. So if mitigation works and you instigate it and you initiate it earlier, you will probably have saved more lives. If you initiated it later, you probably would have lost more lives. You initiate it at a certain time. That was taken as a way that may be somehow something was at fault here. Dr. Fauci: (16:13)So let me tell you from my experience, and I can only speak from my own experience, is that we had been talking before any meetings that we had, about the pros and the cons, the effectiveness, or not of strong mitigations. So discussions were going on mostly among the medical people about what that would mean. The first and only time that Dr. Birx, I went in and formally made a recommendation to the president to actually have a “shutdown”, in the sense of not really shut down, but to really have strong mitigation. We discussed it. Obviously there would be concerned by some that in fact that might have some negative consequences. Nonetheless, the president listened to the recommendation and went to the mitigation. The next second time that I went with Dr. Birx into the president and said, “15 days are not enough. We need to go 30 days.” Obviously there were people who had a problem with that because of the potential secondary effects. Nonetheless, at that time, the president went with the health recommendations, and we extended it another 30 days. So I can only tell you what I know and what my recommendations were. But clearly as happens all the time, there were interpretations of that response to a hypothetical question that I just thought it would be very nice for me to clarify because I didn’t have the chance to clarify. Thank you. [crosstalk 00:17:50]. Excuse me? Speaker 6: (17:51)The date? Dr. Fauci: (17:52)You know what, to be honest with you, I don’t even remember what the date was. But I can just tell you the first and only time that I went in and said, “We should do mitigation strongly.” The response was, “Yes, we’ll do it.” Speaker 6: (18:02)And what did he do? Was that the travel restrictions? Dr. Fauci: (18:04)No. The travel restriction is separate. That was whether or not we wanted to go into a mitigation stage of 15 days of mitigation. The travel was another recommendation when we went in and said, “We probably should be doing that.” And the answer was yes. And then another time was, “We should do it with Europe.” And the answer was yes. And the next time, “We should do it with the UK.” And the answer was yes. Speaker 6: (18:25)In this interview, you said there was pushback. Dr. Fauci: (18:27)Yeah. Speaker 6: (18:28)Where did that pushback come from? Dr. Fauci: (18:29)No, it wasn’t. That was the wrong choice of words. You know what it was when people discuss, not necessarily in front of the president, when people discuss, they say, “Well, this is going to have maybe a harmful effect on this, or on that.” So it was a poor choice of words. There wasn’t anybody saying, “No, you shouldn’t do that.” Speaker 6: (18:45)Are you doing this voluntarily, or did the president [crosstalk 00:18:47]. Dr. Fauci: (18:45)No, I’m doing it…. Everything I do is voluntarily. Please. Don’t even imply that. Speaker 7: (18:53)So Mr. President, the question is… Donald Trump: (18:55)And by the way, the travel ban, that was earlier. Travel ban was done earlier. And if you look at statistics, I happened to write a couple of them down, if you look at statistics… So on January 6th, that’s long before the dates you’re talking about, CDC issued a travel notice for Wuhan, China, a notice before there was even a confirmed case of the virus in the United States. That’s on January 6th. It’s all documented because we have so much fake news, I like to document things. Donald Trump: (19:29)January 6th long before the dates we’re talking about. CDC issued travel notice for Wuhan. On January 11th, we have zero cases in the United States. Zero. We don’t have any cases, so there are no cases reported that we know of. This is January 11th. The CDC issued a Level 1 travel notice for health while there were still no confirmed cases. So we had zero cases. People want me to act. I’m supposed to close down the economy, the greatest economy in the history of the world, and we don’t have one case confirmed in the United States. That’s January 11th. Donald Trump: (20:10)On January 17th to CDC began implementing public health entry screenings at three major U.S. Airports that received the greatest volume of passengers from Wuhan, at my instructions. There was not a single case of the coronavirus in the United States. So on January 17th, there wasn’t a case. And the fake news is saying, “Oh, he didn’t act fast enough.” Well, you remember what happened, because when I did act, I was criticized by Nancy Pelosi, by sleepy Joe Biden. I was criticized by everybody. In fact, I was called xenophobic. I was asking Biden to please define that for me. I was called other things by Democrats. And some others, not too many others actually, by the media, definitely. Donald Trump: (20:58)Now, on January 21st this is long before the time we’re talking, because when Tony’s talking, I believe he’s talking about the end of February. On January 21st, it was still early, there was one case of the virus at that time. We called it the Wuhan virus. Wuhan. There was one case in the whole United States. We had one case. This is all documented. It all comes from you. A lot of it comes from your people. Donald Trump: (21:27)On January 21st the CDC activated an emergency operation center. There was just one case, one person. That’s why that ad was such a phony. There was one person in the United States, you see it, there’s only one person, that statement was made at that time. One case in the whole United States, one case. I’m supposed to shut down the government, the biggest economy in the history of the world, shut it down. We have one case. Seven cases were on January 31st. Now in January 21st there was a case, not one person had died. You heard that Steve, right? Not one person. Donald Trump: (22:08)So we have this massive country, the United States of America. We have the greatest economy in the world. Bigger than China’s by a lot, right? Because of what we’ve done over the last three and a half years, prior to the virus, but including the virus. So we have the biggest economy, the greatest economy we’ve ever had, the highest employment numbers, the best employment numbers, best unemployment numbers, also, the best of everything. So on January 31st, think of it, not one person has died. Not one. Nobody died. Not one, John, I don’t think you’ll find any. Donald Trump: (22:46)This is reported by CDC, confirmed by the news, which doesn’t mean anything to me, because they don’t tell the truth. But CDC reported, January 31st not one person has died. And I issued a travel restriction from China. Think of it. So nobody died. And I issued, you can’t get earlier than that. So we have, nobody died. And I said, “China, you can’t come in. I’m sorry”, because I saw what was going on. Wasn’t so much what I was told, it was that I saw what was going on and I didn’t like it. But I didn’t speak to Tony about, didn’t speak to very many people about it. I didn’t like it. So what did I do? Donald Trump: (23:28)Ready? January 31st in the United States, not one person had died because of, again, the Wuhan virus, so I issued travel restrictions on that date, even though nobody died and I got brutalized over it by the press, because I was way too early. I shouldn’t have done it. Brutalized by the press, but I’ve been brutalized for the last four years. I used to do well before I decided to run for politics, but I guess I’m doing okay, because to the best of my knowledge, I’m the president of the United States despite the things that are said. Donald Trump: (24:06)So then, first mandatory quarantine in more than 50 years, we did. First mandatory in 50 years. The same restrictions that the Democrats in the media called xenophobic. Now Joe Biden said he’s a racist. Call me a racist, because I said, “We’re shutting down entry from China. We’re shutting it down.” He called me xenophobic and he called me a racist and other things. Since then, on a Friday night, two weeks ago, Joe Biden issued a… It wasn’t him. He didn’t write it. I’m sure he doesn’t even know that it was issued. Donald Trump: (24:46)But the people from his campaign who are smart, people that write these little PR releases are pretty smart, reasonably good, not the best, but they’re not bad. But they issued a statement saying that Joe Biden agrees that that President Trump was right to close it down to China. Now he did that. Now he issued it on a Friday night. We’ve all heard about that, John, Friday nights, right? Donald Trump: (25:07)In fact, his was later Friday night than I ever released mine on Friday nights. Okay? [Crosstalk 00:25:12] So he did it pretty late, at like at 11 o’clock in the evening or something, it’s pretty late. Anyway, so Joe Biden issued, and it’s one of those things. But in February, Nancy Pelosi said, “We should come to Chinatown.” This is late February. “Come to Chinatown. We think it’s very safe. Come here. Let’s all have the big parade. Chinatown parade.” Probably referring to San Francisco, and that’s it. But I took this action early. Donald Trump: (25:42)And so the story in the New York Times was a total fake. It’s a fake newspaper and they write fake stories. And someday, hopefully in five years when I’m not here, those papers are all going out of business, because nobody’s going to want to read them, but now they like them because they wrote about me. Now with that, I have a couple of interesting… We have a few clips that we’re just going to put up. We could turn the lights a little bit lower. I think you’ll find them interesting and then we’ll answer some questions. I’ll ask you some questions, because you’re so guilty, but forget it. But most importantly, we’re going to get back onto the reason we’re here, which is the success we’re having. OK, please. You can put it on. Thank you. Video Woman: (14:59)People should be more concerned right now with the flu in this country. Video Man: (15:01)Probably, people are concerned about the coronavirus because they’re hearing a lot of news about it right now, but the reality is comparing it to the flu, for example, it’s not even close to being at that stage. Sean Hannity (Video): (15:10)What if it is worse? Is this a moment where maybe countries put politics aside, a little bit of pride aside, and do we have US officials? Should US professionals such as yourself get involved? Video Woman: (15:24)How worried should Americans be about coronavirus? Video Man: (15:27)Coronavirus is not going to cause a major issue in the United States. Donald Trump: (15:39)Well, we’ve asked them to accelerate whatever they’re doing in terms of a vaccine. Donald Trump: (15:43)We will be suspending all travel from Europe to the United States for the next 30 days. Donald Trump: (15:49)To unleash the full power of the federal government through this effort today, I am officially declaring a national emergency. Donald Trump: (15:55)Medicare patients can now visit any doctor by phone or video conference at no additional cost. Video Man: (16:01)The first 1 million masks will be available immediate- Donald Trump: (16:03) Video Woman: (16:09)As there were more cases, and it was clear that it was spreading out of China where it originated, the president took this move that he was widely criticized for by Democrats and even some Republicans at the time, which was he halted a number of flights from China into the US. The idea was to halt the spread of the disease, keep transmissions to a minimum. He was accused of xenophobia. He was accused of making a racist move. At the end of the day, it was probably effective because it did actually take a pretty aggressive measure against the spread of the virus. Andrew Cuomo (Video): (16:55)His team is on it. They’ve been responsive late at night, early in the morning, and they’ve thus far been doing everything that they can do. And I want to say thank you, and I want to say that I appreciate it. Gavin Newsom (Video): (17:08)He returns calls. He reaches out. He’s been proactive. We got that Mercy ship down here in Los Angeles. That was directly because he sent it down here. Two thousand medical units came to the state of California, these FMS, these field medical stations, and that’s been very, very helpful. Ron DeSantis (Video): (17:28)The president has been outstanding through all this. The vice president’s been outstanding. Members of the coronavirus task force, very responsive. Phil Murphy (Video): (17:37)We had asked if we could have, New Jersey could have, access to a piece of the beds that are on the USNS Comfort, and the president came back, called a short few minutes before I walked in here to say indeed they would grant that to New Jersey. So that’s a big step for us in addition to all the other capacity. That news is literally hot off the press, and I thank the president and vice president who were on the call together. Arizona Governor (Video): (18:02)President Trump approved Arizona’s requests for presidential major disaster declaration. I want to thank the president for a quick turnaround. We requested this on a Wednesday, and we had approval by Saturday morning. And we are grateful to the administration for their continued support and responsiveness. Larry Hogan (Video): (18:25)Well first of all, I want to thank the president and the vice president for doing a really good job of communicating with all the governors. Donald Trump: (18:37)So we could give you hundreds of clips like that from governors, including Democratic, or Democrat as I call them, governors, which is actually the correct term. We could give you hundreds of clips just like that. We have them. We didn’t want this to go on too long, but I just want to say it’s very sad when people write false stories, like in that case, I guess it was gotten mostly from The New York Times, which is a highly… I mean if you had libel laws, they would have been out of business even before they’ll end up going out of business, so it’s too bad. But we could have given you some other statements. We have hundreds of statements, hundreds of statements, including from Democrats and Democrat governors, and if you look, they were all saying, “We need ventilators.” Donald Trump: (19:27)You don’t hear ventilators anymore. They have all the ventilators they need, which we were right about. We said, “You’re asking for too many. You don’t need that.” And in all fairness, these two people right here, Dr. Birx, Dr. Fauci, they said, “I don’t think they need that many ventilators.” I said, “I agree.” At one point, and I’m not docking in New York for this, but they were asking, you remember, 40,000 ventilators. And that’s more than they have all over the country, and we got them a lot of ventilators and nobody’s complained. We got them, as you know, beautiful. We built hospital rooms all over the country. The governor of Louisiana, John Bel Edwards, was very nice. He said, “You know what? You don’t have to build the second hospital.” Because good news is happening. They’re not able to fill the beds. They needed two hospitals. We built one. It was perfect. We’re just starting the other. Donald Trump: (20:20)I called him up. I said, “Do you think we should build the second one? I don’t think you’re going to need it.” And you said, “Let me get back.” He got back, we didn’t need it. With Governor Cuomo, in all good spirit and faith, he wanted to have the Jacob Javits Center done, and we built 2,900 incredible beds, incredible. Then we made it COVID, or to be exactly accurate, COVID-19, which was a lot of work. We had to change the duct work. We had to seal up certain areas. We had to put areas of rooftop things over the beds. We did a lot of work, and we had it… but they never really had too much use for it. And they called also, Mayor de Blasio, rightfully he called. He said, “Would it be possible to get more medical help?” Donald Trump: (21:10)So now not only are we building facilities, they’re asking us to help because they’re unable to man it. And we got him the help. We got Mayor de Blasio a lot of help. Then when the Javits Center wasn’t used much, and then as you know, the Mercy, we took the Mercy and we took the Comfort. And we made them both Los Angeles and New York. We made them a COVID adaptable, which was not easy to do. And we didn’t get almost any people sent there. They didn’t need them at the beginning because they didn’t need it for anything but this because there were fewer accidents, fewer motorcycles, fewer everything. And what we did was an incredible job, but they didn’t need them. It turned out they were there, we were ready. You know the expression, they have an expression, “Ready, willing, and able.” We were ready, willing, and able. What the Army Corps of Engineers did was a miracle. What FEMA did was a miracle. What the doctors did, so I got a call two days ago from the mayor of New York. He said, “Could you help us even more with medical personnel?” And we sent, I think it was 448 doctors, nurses, and respiratory experts, real experts, and I got a call from the mayor and he said, “I want to tell you, incredible. These people are incredible.” He said, “They lifted the spirits of the hospital workers from New York City like nothing I’ve ever seen.” It was unbelievable, what he said was really appreciated, and I let them know that. I let the military people… He said, “They went in there so brave, so incredible. They lifted the spirits of everybody.” We did all of this work, but when you read the phony stories nobody acknowledges this. Donald Trump: (22:51)And it doesn’t have to be acknowledged from my standpoint, but it does have to be acknowledged from the great work that these doctors and nurses, the Army Corps of Engineers team, all these people, they’ve done this incredible job. And they shouldn’t be abused because you take a look at what’s happened, nobody’s asking for ventilators except outside of our country. Outside of our country, they’re calling me. Every country, they’re calling me. So many countries, and I’m going to try and help them because we have thousands of ventilators being built. But nobody’s asking for ventilators. Nobody’s asking for beds because we built hospitals. I think we built 20,000 beds in a period of a couple of weeks. The job they’ve done is incredible. With all of that being said, I’m getting along very well with the governors, and if I wasn’t… Mike Pence had a call today with the governors and it was like a 10. Donald Trump: (23:42)I said, “How was it?” He said, “It’s a 10.” He used one of my expressions actually, but he said it was a 10. And I’m sure you people were probably on the call, although you weren’t supposed to be, but you were sitting in somebody’s office listening to it because every time we have these… And you would know that for weeks those calls have been very good, but there wasn’t a raised voice. There wasn’t even a statement of, “We think you should do this or that.” I heard it was just a perfect phone call. It might not be reported that way. They’ll say, “I thought that somebody maybe slightly raised…” Didn’t even raise their voice. My only point of saying this because I want to get back to why we’re here, the press has not treated these incredible people who’ve done such a great job, they haven’t treated unfairly. Donald Trump: (24:27)They’re way off. We were way ahead of schedule, and remember this because The Times [inaudible 00:24:32] was a fake, but everything… Remember this, everything we did, I was criticized because I was too early. If I waited longer, you would have been critical. If I went way early, if I went three months earlier, I would have been criticized for being way too early. So with all of that being said, we understand it. I think I’ve educated a lot of people as to the press, and I would love to be able to say that we have a very honest press. Honestly, John, there’d be nothing I would be more proud of if the press would work, and I don’t mind being criticized. But not when they’re wrong. Not when people have done a great job. Yes? Speaker 17: (25:14)Let me talk to you about the video, so I’ve never seen a video like that played in this room. It looks a bit like a campaign ad. Who produced that video for you? Donald Trump: (25:23)That was done by a group in the office, and it was done just by… we just put some clips together. I’ll bet you I have over a hundred more clips even better than them. They were just pieced together over the last two hours. That was just… Oh, we have far better than that. That’s nothing compared to some of them. Speaker 17: (25:39)This was produced here in the White House by- Donald Trump: (25:40)Yeah, this was done by Dan and a group of people, and they just put it together in a period of probably less than two hours. Speaker 17: (25:46)Why’d you feel a need to do that? Donald Trump: (25:48)Because we’re getting fake news, and I like to have it corrected. They’re saying what a great job we’re doing, these are the governors of California, governor of New Jersey, governor of New York. Look in New York, we work very close with Andrew. In New York, ventilators were going to be a problem. They didn’t have a problem. We got them tremendous numbers of… thousands, but we got them tremendous number of ventilators. You don’t hear ventilators are a problem. Beds were going to be a problem. I mean, I’m happy about it. The Javits Center, which is incredible, is almost empty because they don’t need them. That’s good news, not bad news. I’m not saying, “Gee, I wish more people were there.” I don’t want more people there. We brought in the boat. We brought in the Comfort, and the Comfort was originally not supposed to be for this at all, the coronavirus, was not supposed to be for that at all. Donald Trump: (26:36)They called, they said, “Could we have it?” That was a number of weeks ago. We said, “We don’t think you need it, but if you need it, we’ll do it.” Then they said, “Could you get the medical personnel to run the Javits Center? Could you get the medical personnel to run the ship?” We said, “If it’s necessary, we will, and we did.” There were military personnel. That’s the ones that Mayor de Blasio was so great to in terms of his statements. I mean, I really appreciated his statements. He was so impressed with them, and I am too. The level of genius and bravery, they’re great people, the military people, and we pieced that together. I would say it took less than two hours. It was done in-house. Steve? Speaker 17: (27:14)But just to be clear, this was produced by government employees, by people here at the White House, this campaign-style video here? Donald Trump: (27:20)I wouldn’t use the word produced. All they did was took some clips, and they just ran them for you. And the reason they did is to keep you honest. Now, I don’t think that’s going to work. It’s not going to have any impact, but just think of it. You heard the clips, you heard what I said. They said I acted late on closing down the country. Some people wish we never closed it down. Now if we didn’t, we would have lost hundreds of thousands of people interestingly, so I’m against it. We did the right thing. Everything we did was right. If we would have closed down- Speaker 17: (27:48)There’s going to be dangerous [inaudible 00:27:49] along the way here. You think everything you did was right? Donald Trump: (27:51)Well look, governors should have had ventilators. They chose not to have them. We were able to get them ventilators. You haven’t heard other than there was a lot of panic, a lot of screaming, “We want ventilators.” They got the ventilators. You don’t have that anymore, and the surge is supposed to be coming now. And if they do need ventilators, John, we’ve got almost 10,000 that are ready to rock. We have people standing with those ventilators right now. If you needed 2000 in New York, which you don’t, but if you did, we can have them here in less than 24 hours. We’re ready to rock. [crosstalk 00:28:24] This was a great military and beyond that operation. Let’s get back to the regular. Well shouldn’t we get back to the regular? Donald Trump: (28:31)We can talk about this, but all I’m doing is this, I could have given you… Those are four or five clips that we just played for you, I could have given you hundreds of people. Gavin was on television two days ago with one of your competitors singing praise. The question was asked in a negative way. He said, “Look, I know what you want me to say, but he’s been really good. It’s hard for me to say that. In fact, it’s impossible for me to say.” Donald Trump: (29:02)Gavin Newsom, the governor of California. I have many clips. I have some clips from Anthony that I didn’t want to put up, which were really good. I think Anthony would be the first one to say when I closed the country to China, the China ban, whatever you want to call it, Anthony said I saved a lot of lives by doing that. I mean, am I correct? I don’t want to put words in Anthony’s mouth, by the way, and I like him. Today I walk in, I hear I’m going to fire him. I’m not firing him. I think he’s a wonderful guy. [crosstalk 00:00:29:32]. I retweeted somebody, I don’t know. They said fire, doesn’t matter. Speaker 17: (29:41)Did you notice that when you retweeted it? Donald Trump: (29:41)Yeah, I notice everything. Speaker 18: (29:44)So you retweeted it even though it said time to fire Fauci? Donald Trump: (29:46)Well, no, that’s somebody’s opinion. All that is is a opinion. Speaker 18: (29:49)But you read it, and you elevated it. Donald Trump: (29:50)Well, I was called about that. I said, “I’m not firing.” In fact, if you ask your friends in the public relations office, I was immediately called upon that, and I said, “No, I like him. I think he’s terrific.” Because this was a person’s view. Not everybody’s happy with Anthony. Not everybody’s happy with everybody, but I will tell you, we have done a job the likes of which nobody has ever done. The mobilization, getting of equipment, all of the things we’ve done, nobody’s ever done a job like this. We have 50 governors and territories, by the way, people don’t ever mention that. We have territories. We have 50 governors and territories, and many of those governors are Democrats. And they can’t find anything to complain about, and honestly, many of them didn’t do their jobs. I’ll let you know someday. Let’s see what happens, but I may let you know who’s not doing their job. Donald Trump: (30:41)I can tell you the ones that are good, both Republican and Democrat, and the ones who don’t know what they’re doing. But we help some of the ones that don’t know what they’re doing. They should have had their own stockpiles, and now if they want, we can build them stockpiles of ventilators. The hardest thing is the ventilator because it’s expensive. It takes a while to get. We got them and nobody believed we did. Now, many of the governors were asking for far too many, and we said they were asking for far too many. We talked and we said, you said very strongly that they just don’t need that, but you said they don’t need that many beds, Deborah. So that’s it. Go ahead. Speaker 19: (31:18)[inaudible 00:31:18] you and Dr. Fauci are on the same page? Donald Trump: (31:21)Yeah, we have been from the beginning. I don’t know what it is exactly, but if I put somebody’s opinion up, I don’t mind controversy. I think controversy is a good thing, not a bad thing, but I want it to be honest controversy. Now, when I got a call, I got a call not very quickly, and nobody saw that as being any big deal. They said, “How are you doing with Dr. Fauci?” I said, “I’m doing great,” and I didn’t talk to Dr. Fauci even until we just got here. Dr. Fauci asked one of the people if he could get up and speak, and he did. [crosstalk 00:31:53] And they totally misinterpreted him. I saw what they did. Speaker 18: (31:56)Can I ask you, he said the question was hypothetical, but what he was just acknowledging is that lives would have been saved if the mitigation practices were put into place earlier. Speaker 18: (32:03)That seems obvious. Do you not agree with that? Donald Trump: (32:06)Here’s the thing. Now what he really is saying though, but how could you have done it? Look, I just went over stats with you, right? Here, right here. How do you close it up? You have no deaths and no cases, on January 11th. Doctor, would you recommend closing the United States of America? Oh, this must be terrible. How many cases do we have? None. How many deaths do we have? None. January 17th, go back another week. On January 17th, this is 10 days before I did the, little bit less than 10 days, before I did the ban. I did a ban on China. You think that was easy? I then did a ban on Europe and a lot of people said that was an incredible thing to do because you look at Spain, and by the way, we’re doing very well because when you look at all of those flat graphs and you add it all up, the United States is very low. Donald Trump: (32:54)And per capita we’re very low. We’re doing very well. But how do you close up the United States of America? So on January 6th, no deaths. On January 11th, no deaths, and no cases. On January 17th, no cases, no cases, no deaths. I’m supposed to close up the United States of America when I have no cases. Speaker 21: (33:16)You didn’t close down until the middle of March. Should you have closed it down earlier? [crosstalk 00:33:19]. Donald Trump: (33:19)I closed down from China. Excuse me, I closed it down from China. And by the way, some people think I should have waited longer and maybe ridden it out. I disagree with them, okay? But it was thought of. I mean, that was an alternative. You know, there are a lot of people that would’ve said, “Let’s ride it out.” Now, I’ll give you the good news. If I would have done that, it would have been, I think, catastrophic, because their numbers are, Anthony, 1.6 to 2.2 million people would have died if we tried to do that. And I did this last time, cut it in half. Donald Trump: (33:54)Don’t say 2.2 million. Cut it in more than half, say a million people died. Well, that’s much more than the Civil War. Cut it in half. Take the million and cut it in half. That’s 500,000 people would have died. Now that number we would’ve reached, okay? That would have been easy to reach if we did nothing. So we did the right thing and our timing was very good. But here’s the one thing, and you have to say this. When you asked me, “Why didn’t you do this?” How come when I did the ban on China, and instituted some very tough things, how come Nancy Pelosi, a month later, is in Chinatown saying, “Let’s all march. This is not going to happen.” How come we have many of the experts from CNN and many other networks, if you call CNN a network, I don’t personally, but we have CNN, we have many other places, and they’re all saying he doesn’t need to do it. He doesn’t need to do it. Donald Trump: (34:50)All I’m saying is this, how do you close down the greatest economy in the history of the world, when on January 17th, you have no cases and no death. When on January 21st, you have one case and no death. One case, think of that. Now we’re supposed to close down the country? But here’s what happened. When on January 31st, I instituted the ban, Joe Biden went crazy. He said, “You don’t need the ban.” He didn’t go crazy. He didn’t even know what the hell the ban was, so he didn’t go crazy. But he did say, [crosstalk 00:35:24] he did call me xenophobic, wait a minute, he called me xenophobic. He called me a racist because… He has since apologized and he said I did the right thing. Donald Trump: (35:34)So when you say, why didn’t you do this? Every Democrat thought I made a mistake when I did it. I saved tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of lives [crosstalk 00:35:43] by him. Speaker 22: (35:44)What did you do with that time that you bought? The argument is that you bought yourself some time. You didn’t use it to prepare hospitals. You didn’t use it to ramp up testing. Right now, nearly 20 million people are unemployed. Donald Trump: (35:50)You’re so disgraceful. It’s so disgraceful the way you say that. Let me just, listen. I just went over it. Speaker 22: (35:57)Tens of thousands of Americans are dead. How is this [crosstalk 00:35:57] or this rant supposed to make people feel confident in an unprecedented crisis? Donald Trump: (35:59)I just went over it. Nobody thought we should do it, and when I did it- Speaker 22: (36:06)But what did you do with the time that you bought? The month of February. That video has a gap, the entire month of February. Donald Trump: (36:10)You know what we did? What do you do when you have no case in the whole United States? Speaker 22: (36:15)You had cases in February. Donald Trump: (36:18)Excuse me. You reported it. Zero cases, zero deaths on January 17th- Speaker 22: (36:23)January, February, the entire month of February. Donald Trump: (36:25)I said in January. Speaker 22: (36:25)That video has a complete gap. Donald Trump: (36:27)On January 30th- Speaker 22: (36:28)What did your administration do in February for the time that your travel ban bought you? Donald Trump: (36:33)A lot. Speaker 22: (36:33)What? Donald Trump: (36:33)A lot, and in fact, we’ll give you a list. What we did, in fact, part of it was up there. Speaker 22: (36:37)It wasn’t. Your video had a gap. Donald Trump: (36:37)We did a lot. Look, look, you know you’re a fake. You know that. Your whole network, the way you cover it is fake, and most of you, and not all of you, but the people are wise to you. That’s why you have a lower approval rating than you’ve ever had before times probably three. Speaker 22: (36:53)20 million people are unemployed. Tens of thousands are dead. Donald Trump: (36:54)And when you asked me that question, let me ask you this, why did Biden apologize? Why did he write a letter of apology? Speaker 22: (37:03)I don’t think anyone in this room cares about why Joe Biden didn’t apologize to you. Donald Trump: (37:03)No, that’s very important. Why did the Democrats think that I acted too quickly? You know why? Because they really thought that I acted too quickly. We have done a great job [crosstalk 00:05:12]. Now I could have, I could have kept it open and I could have done what some countries are doing. They’re getting beat up pretty badly. I could have kept it open. I thought of keeping it open because nobody’s ever heard of closing down a country, let alone the United States of America. But if I would’ve done that, we would’ve had hundreds of thousands of people that would right now be dead. We’ve done this right, and we really have done this right. The problem is the press doesn’t cover it the way it should be. Go ahead. One more question, Steve. Go ahead. Speaker 23: (37:47)There’s a debate over what authority you have to order the country reopened. What authority do you have? Donald Trump: (37:53)Well, I have the ultimate authority, but we’re going to get into that in a minute. We’re going to just finish this up. We’re going to tell you about other things that we’ve done right, but I will say this, had we said, “Let’s just keep going and let’s not do a closing,” whether it’s 2.2 that they at one point predicted as an outside, or 1.6 at a lower number, you cut it all the way down to six or seven or 800,000, take just a fraction of the number that could have happened, it literally would have been more than the Civil War. It would have been a disaster. So the minimal number was 100,000, and I think, I feel pretty good that we’re going to be substantially below, Anthony, the hundred thousand, and I hope we will. Donald Trump: (38:33)All right, so today the Department of Health and Human Services announcing five new contracts to procure large numbers of additional ventilators under the Defense Production Act, which we used a lot by the way, which you didn’t like to talk about, in addition to the 1,300 we received today. We received today 1,300 additional ventilators. Donald Trump: (38:55)Now we’re probably not going to need them, but we can add that to our stockpile, which is very big and we can move it around should the surge take place and should it be a very substantial surge. We’re ready to rock. The contracts are with General Electric, Hill-Rom, Medtronic, Resmed, and VIAIR combined with the DPA contracts that we announced last week with General Motors and Phillips, and two other contracts with Hamilton and Zole, we’re adding 6,190 ventilators to the strategic national stockpile of which we have a lot already, thousands, close to 10,000, but this will be added by May 8th, another 29,000 by the end of May, and more than 120,000 total we will have by the end of the year. Now we’re going to help other countries. We’re going to help states if they need it. We may help some state stockpile. Donald Trump: (39:49)You know, they’re supposed to buy their own stockpile. They have state stockpiles. They’re supposed to be using that and unfortunately most of the states weren’t there, and a lot of people didn’t want to talk about it, but they weren’t there. We will talk about it the right time if you want to. I, at this point, I’m more focused on getting past this nightmare of a epidemic or a pandemic, anything you want to call it. We got to get past it. No one who has needed a ventilator has not gotten a ventilator. Think of that. You know, you heard all about ventilators, ventilators, we need ventilators, because they didn’t have them, because the states should’ve had them. No one who has needed a ventilator has not gotten a ventilator. No one who has needed a hospital bed has been denied a hospital bed. That’s not even really our responsibility. Donald Trump: (40:34)Now if we can help, we’re going to do it, but that’s where the Army Corps of Engineers did such a great job. We built over 20,000 beds. In fact, we built thousands more than we’ve actually needed to be safe. We wanted to be safe, and they rose to this incredible occasion. I mean, we built more beds than we thought. We thought in Louisiana, we were going heavy. And again, when I called the Governor, I said, “Maybe we shouldn’t build that second hospital because we don’t want to build it if you don’t need it.” He called back, he said, “I don’t think we’re going to need it.” They had a thousand rooms, a thousand beds, and they used a lot of them, but they didn’t need the other ones, so we stopped it because we don’t want to waste. But we’re prepared to build thousands more, should we need it. I don’t think we’re going to need it because it looks like we’re plateauing and maybe even in many cases coming down. Donald Trump: (41:21)In addition, we’ve ordered a total of 16 mobile decontamination systems. So the decontamination is system from Battelle, Ohio, is an incredible thing because it takes the masks and up to 20 times you can decontaminate a mask. And I’ve been asking from the beginning, “Why can’t we sterilize and sanitize these masks?” And it turned out we can, and there was a great company in Ohio. They sent us some great equipment and they’re doing that now, and now we’re going to have more than 33 million N95 masks per week will be cleaned, decontaminated, and it’ll be great. It’s something that frankly, I think people should have thought of a long time ago. Donald Trump: (42:07)Five more flights landed today as part of the Project Air Bridge, our massive airless lift operation to bring personal protective equipment into the United States, which has now delivered nearly half a million N95 masks, 370 million gloves, 25 million surgical masks and 4.9 million gowns. So we have millions of gowns, gloves, masks, all surgical equipment coming in should the states need it. Now the states are supposed to be buying their own stuff, but should they need it, we are ready to give them because we’re building up our stockpile again like crazy. Donald Trump: (42:44)Remember, and you saw the stories, I inherited this administration, Mike, myself, the whole administration. We inherited a stockpile where the cupboards were bare. There was nothing, and I say it and I’ll say it again, just like we didn’t have ammunition, we didn’t have medical supplies, we didn’t have ventilators, we didn’t have a lot of things that should have been had, and you can read your own stories on that because you know what happened. They didn’t want to spend the money, but we did. To date, we’ve facilitated the supply of more than 38 million N95 masks nationwide. This week we’ll be sending two million N95 masks to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Vice President will go into more detail. He’s got great detail on that and I think it’s a pretty amazing story. We have a lot of masks already in stock and we have more coming. Donald Trump: (43:35)We’re further expanding hospital surge capacity in key areas of the opening, and we have a portion of certain VA hospitals and non-veteran coronavirus patients including at the East Orange New Jersey Medical Center as well as facilities in Manhattan and Brooklyn. They’re ready, they’re able, they’re beautiful. Hopefully we won’t need too many of them because frankly we built everything that the governors wanted and in many cases it’s too much. We told them it was too much, but we wanted to err on the side of caution. Donald Trump: (44:06)The United States has now conducted nearly 3 million tests for the virus, 3 million, the most of any nation. We’re performing approximately 115,000 tests every single day, and our rate of testing is especially high in areas hardest hit by the virus. If you look, and it’s hit some areas of the virus, very, very hard. For example, per capita testing in New York is higher than the rest of the world. The NIH, CDC and FDA are also currently validating several antibody tests that will allow us to determine whether someone has already had the virus and potentially become immune to infection. We’re looking at that. The antibody tests are going to be very interesting over the next short while. A lot of things are being developed as we speak. Donald Trump: (44:54)In the race to develop effective treatments, the drug company Gilead announced that its drug Remdesivir has shown promising results, very promising in compassionate use settings. In addition, the FDA has just granted Emergency Use Authorization for a device that removes certain proteins from the bloodstream, possibly preventing a patient’s immune system from overreacting to the virus and damaging vital organs, which is a big problem. Donald Trump: (45:23)Furthermore, over the last seven days, my administration has deployed roughly 28 million doses of hydroxychloroquine from our national stockpile. We have millions of doses that we bought and many people are using it all over the country. And just recently a friend of mine told me he got better because of the use of that drug. So, who knows? And you combine it with Z-Pak, you combine it with zinc depending on your doctor’s recommendation, and he’s having some very good results. I’ll tell you, I think of anybody recommended it other than me, it would be used all over the place, to be honest with you. I think the fact that I recommended it, I probably set it back a lot. But it’s a lot of good things are happening with it, a lot of good tests. Donald Trump: (46:07)Scientists are also pursuing a blood therapy known as a convalescent plasma, convalescent plasma. This therapy uses antibodies from the blood of recovered patients to treat those who are sick, and this is something that actually is a very old procedure, but it’s done in a very modern way. During this difficult time, we’re also working to ensure that the 2020 census is completed safely and accuracy. We may be asking for an extension because obviously they can’t be doing very much right now. They wouldn’t even be allowed to do it. So the census, we’re going to be asking for a delay, a major delay, I think. How can you possibly be knocking on doors for a long period of time now? The Census Bureau recently made the decision to temporary suspend its field operation data collection activities to help stop the spread. In addition, while millions of Americans continue to complete their questionnaire online, the Census Bureau has asked Congress for a 120 extension. Donald Trump: (47:07)I don’t know that you even have to ask them. This is called an act of God. This is called a situation that has to be, they have to give, and I think 120 days isn’t nearly enough. My administration’s also taking bold action to help American workers. On Friday, Americans began receiving the cash payments authorized by a historic $2 trillion relief bill. By the end of the week, nearly 80 million Americans will receive a total of $147 billion and from what the Secretary of the Treasury tells me, that’s very much on time and going very nicely. He’ll be speaking in a moment. In payments, these payments go directly into the banks and the bank accounts of these people. Millions of additional payments will follow. The typical family of four will receive $3,400, that’s for a family of four. That’s something. Additionally through our paycheck protection program, which is a tremendous success, and they should extend it and increase- Donald Trump: (48:03)… tremendous success, and they should extend it and increase it. This has been a tremendous success. So successful that the banks should take it a little bit longer to distribute the money, but it’s going rapidly. Donald Trump: (48:12)We’ve now processed over $200 billion in loans to help small businesses retain their workers. Now we urgently need lawmakers to set aside the partisan agendas and to replenish this program with new funds, because it’s really something that has been an incredible success and they need more money to keep it going, to take care of these business and keep them open. Donald Trump: (48:35)I want to thank the many governors, health professionals, scientists, and business leaders for their incredible hard work and input over the past month. And even long beyond a month, Mike, I would say. We’ve been working together with a lot of them for it seems like forever. Donald Trump: (48:50)I’ve been having many discussions with my team and top experts. We’re very close to completing a plan to open our country, hopefully even ahead of schedule. That’s so important. We will soon finalize new and very important guidelines to give governors the information they need to start safely opening their states. My administration’s plan and corresponding guidelines will give the American people the confidence they need to begin returning to normal life. That’s what we want. We want to have our country open, we want to return to normal life. Our country’s going to be open. It’s going to be successfully opened. We’ll be explaining over a very short number of days exactly what is going to be. Donald Trump: (49:35)We’ve also, as you probably heard, developed a committee. We’re actually calling in a number of committees with the most prominent people in the country, the most successful people in the various fields. We’ll be announcing them tomorrow. Donald Trump: (49:49)This weekend, the United States also helped facilitate an unprecedented agreement among the 23 nations of OPEC-Plus. That’s OPEC plus additional energy producing nations, representing many of the world’s largest oil producing countries to stabilize all markets. We have, in fact, and I think you’ve seen, a big stabilization over the last couple of days. Together, countries around the world will cut oil production by approximately 20 million barrels. People are saying 10 million, but we think that the number that they’ll actually hit is going to be closer to 20 million barrels a day. That will help a lot with saving jobs all over Texas, and Oklahoma, and North Dakota, and many other of our big energy states. Donald Trump: (50:33)This historic action will help nearly 11 million American workers who are supported by the US oil and gas industry. It’s a very monumental agreement. I want to thank Saudi Arabia and the king of Saudi Arabia, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, both. I want to thank President Putin of Russia. And I want to thank a very good friend of mine, man who’s become a friend of mine, the president of Mexico showed great flexibility. President Lopez Obrador. He showed great flexibility and tremendous intelligence doing what he did. It was not that easy for him, and I want to thank Mexico and the president. This is a very historic deal, very historic, so we’ll see how it all goes. Donald Trump: (51:18)In this time and challenge, and we are certainly in a time probably like we haven’t been in many, many decades, we are strengthened and sustained by the bonds of love and loyalty that unite all Americans. I’m so proud of the American people. Everywhere you look, you see the patriotism of our people shining through, and the courage of our doctors and nurses on the front lines, and the dedication of our food supply workers, and in the commitment of every citizen to achieving victory over the virus. That’s what’s going to happen. It’s going to happen sooner than people think. Donald Trump: (51:54)We’re going to be smart about it. Very, very smart about it. We’re going to be safe about it. We’re going to be listening also to the great doctors and medical professionals. Together, we’re beating back the invisible enemy, and we’re paving the way for great resurgence. It’s really a great resurgence, the American prosperity. Our country wants to go back. They want to go back to work. They’re going to go back safely. That’s what we want. Donald Trump: (52:18)I’d like now to ask Vice President Pence to say a few words, followed by Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx. I think before we do this, because I know there’s an emergency where they want Steve to come. So what I’ll do is I’ll ask Steve to come up, secretary of the treasury. You can talk a little bit, and then maybe take a couple of questions about what’s happening. Tell them the success we’re having. Thank you very much. Steven Mnuchin: (52:45)Thank you, Mr. President and Mr. Vice President. As you announced, we are very pleased that we are ahead of schedule on delivering the economic impact payments. These were what was known as the checks in the mail that we want to deliver in direct deposit. This is ahead of schedule. We started processing those last Friday. We expect that over 80 million hardworking Americans will get the direct deposit by this Wednesday. We know how important that is to all of those hardworking Americans, many of which are at home, not working at the moment. Steven Mnuchin: (53:20)If you do not receive them by Wednesday, on Wednesday, we will be launching at irs.gov, click on irs.gov, go to “Get your payment.” If you filed a tax return in 2018 or ’19, have that information available. You’ll be able to ID yourself. You’ll be able to put in your direct deposit information, and within several days, we will automatically deposit the money into your account. We want to do as much of this electronically as we can. It’s very important in this day and age. It’s more secure, and you don’t have to go to the bank. Steven Mnuchin: (53:56)If you are a social security beneficiary, you do not need to do anything. You will get a direct deposit. If you have not filed and did not need to file a 2018 and ’19 return, you can go to irs.gov now, and enter your information and authenticate yourself. Again, we are very pleased that that is ahead of schedule. Steven Mnuchin: (54:18)I’d also like to announce the progress we’re making on the new SBA program, the PPP. Let me just remind everybody, this is a brand new program that is now one week old. We have distributed and confirmed 230 billion of loans to over 4,600 lenders participating. That is multiples and multiples of anything that the SBA has ever done in one year before. I especially want to thank the broad-based community banks that are participating. Again, over 4,600 banks. If you haven’t had your loan processed, you will get it processed this week. As the president said, we’ve gone back to Congress and asked them for more money to make sure that every business has access to this. Steven Mnuchin: (55:08)Let me also comment for the states. We are distributing out half the money this week to the states. That’s a week ahead of time. We’ll deliver the other half of the money to the states next week. Steven Mnuchin: (55:19)Then let me just finally comment, we’ve been working very closely with the Federal Reserve. Last week, we announced expanded facilities and new facilities that total $2.3 trillion of liquidity. In particular, I’d just like to highlight a main street lending facility that will be for companies between one worker and 10,000 people, so mid-size businesses. Also, a municipal facility for states and local governments to be able to access funds, given the shortages that they have. With that, I’m happy to answer any questions. Donald Trump: (55:54)Do you have any questions for Steve, press? Speaker 24: (55:55)Secretary Mnuchin. Thank you, sir. Both Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader Schumer have said that they’re in negotiations with you right now on additional funding for these small business loans, that package. Leader McConnell though has said that nothing should be added to the package. They should just be specific to small business loans. What is the opinion of your administration? Should there be some sort of horsetrading here, or should it just be small business loans? Steven Mnuchin: (56:24)The president’s view, and the vice president’s, and my view is this was a bipartisan program. This SBA program, it wasn’t a Republican program, it wasn’t a Democrat program. It was a bipartisan program. We’ve committed to small businesses. We should top up that program now. I know the Democrats want to talk about more money for hospitals and states. Right now we’re just sending the money out to the hospitals and states. They haven’t come close to using that money. Steven Mnuchin: (56:50)I know the president and vice president have said, once we get the SBA done, we can go into a another funding bill. The president’s talked about potentially adding infrastructure and other things. We think there is a likelihood we will need more money. We will sit down and try to get a bipartisan bill. But this is important we deliver on small businesses. 50% of the people work for small businesses. Speaker 24: (57:13)Thank you, sir. Speaker 25: (57:14)What’s the emergency that the president said you had to go for? The president said you had an emergency- Donald Trump: (57:20)Negotiation. Speaker 25: (57:21)Over this bill? Steven Mnuchin: (57:22)Yeah. Well, because we don’t want to run out of money. We’ve used about 220 billion of the 350 billion. We don’t want to run out of that money. We don’t want to create panics that people won’t get it. That’s why we want to top that up, and we’ve asked for another 250 billion for that program. Steven Mnuchin: (57:40)Again, let me just remind you, every dollar we spend in this program, we save a dollar of unemployment insurance. Even though we’re asking for 250 billion, it really won’t cost that much. Speaker 25: (57:52)Could I follow up? Speaker 26: (57:52)Do you have concerns about lifting the guidelines too soon? I mean, what’s the economic impact? I understand the economic argument for getting people back to work, obviously. But what’s the economic risk of lifting them too early and seeing a spike in cases again? Steven Mnuchin: (58:07)Well, of course there’s economic risks in both directions. We reviewed with the president today a very broad list of over a hundred business people that are going to help advise the president on what needs to be done to reopen the economy. We want to make sure, and again, the combination of economic impact payments, small business payments, enhanced unemployment insurance. The president made very clear, we want to make sure that hardworking Americans have liquidity while we wait to reopen the government. Speaker 27: (58:37)Do you believe the country, excuse me, should be reopened on May 1? Steven Mnuchin: (58:41)I’ve had discussions with the president. I know he’s considering it. I believe he’s going to make a decision later in the week. Donald Trump: (58:47)Everything has to be safe. We want safe. Speaker 27: (58:48)What is your advice to the president? Steven Mnuchin: (58:50)My advice is as soon as it’s ready to open, and based upon the medical professionals… Again, we’re working very closely with the president and outside business leaders to develop a plan. Speaker 28: (59:00)[crosstalk 00:59:00] ask you, Mr. President. If you could sketch for us what reopening the economy looks like, do you think it’s going to be everything open or do you think- Donald Trump: (59:09)Well, I’ll be doing that over the next few days, because we’ll probably be making a statement about that and exactly what it looks like. I know what that looks like, but I also want to get the advice, in a sense. We have some of the biggest from every business on this council. We’re actually setting up a number of different councils or committees, I guess you could call them. We have a lot of smart people. I think that they will give us some also good advice. But no, we want to be very, very safe. At the same time, we’ve got to get our country open. Speaker 29: (59:41)Mr. President. Speaker 28: (59:41)I don’t understand though, Mr. President. Do you think there is a possibility then that what you do is you open it incrementally? Do you think people would go back to restaurants, concert, the cinema- Donald Trump: (59:49)I do think so. Eventually, they will. Yeah. We hope so. Speaker 28: (59:52)Let me ask one final- Donald Trump: (59:53)I think eventually they will do that. I think we’re going to boom. I think it’s going to go quickly. Our people want to get back to work, and I think there’s a pent up demand like there hasn’t been in a long time. Speaker 28: (01:00:05)[crosstalk 01:00:05]. Steven Mnuchin: (01:00:05)One other- Donald Trump: (01:00:06)That’s why you see the stock market… I mean, to think that the stock market’s at the level it is right now with all that this world and this country has gone… And look at the European Union, how badly decimated they’ve been. Look at other countries. Look at China, by the way. I’ve seen the numbers. Look at China. Look at how these countries have been just decimated by this. And to think that the stock market is at this tremendously high number. Not that much… It was looking a little bleak for a while, but it hit a certain point and then started going up. I think that’s a great tribute to the fact that there’s a demand. Yeah. Speaker 24: (01:00:39)Mr. President, thank you, sir. In regards to some of your tweets earlier today, and I think it was Steve’s question, my question to you is what provision in the Constitution gives the president the power to open or close state economies? And then- Donald Trump: (01:00:54)Numerous provisions. We’ll give you a legal brief if you want. Speaker 24: (01:00:58)We’ll be looking forward to that, sir. But following up, what happens if you say, for instance, we want states to reopen, but California or New York do not open, what would you do then? Donald Trump: (01:01:08)Well, I think everybody wants to open. I mean, I guess- Speaker 24: (01:01:09)[crosstalk 01:01:10]. Speaker 28: (01:01:11)Sorry, could I just ask one other thing on the- Donald Trump: (01:01:12)I guess that could happen, but I don’t think that would happen. Speaker 29: (01:01:13)Mr. President [crosstalk 01:01:14]. Speaker 30: (01:01:13)The states that have closed, ordered schools closed, it’s been states that have ordered businesses like restaurants and bars and place- Donald Trump: (01:01:21)That’s because I let that happen, because I would’ve preferred that. I let that happen. But if I wanted to, I could have closed it up. But I let that happen. I like the way they’ve done it. Donald Trump: (01:01:29)The seven that remained, really, in sort of a semi-lockdown, if you look at those states, they’ve really done a very good job. They’re very much different from a New York or from other places where they’ve been hit very hard. Go ahead, please. Speaker 31: (01:01:39)So you’re prepared then to [crosstalk 01:01:40] states and say, “I order you to open your schools. I order you to force kids to be able to go.”? Donald Trump: (01:01:44)Go ahead, please. Speaker 32: (01:01:45)Yeah. Yes, Mr. President. Following up on that, there are two consortiums of states today, California, Oregon, Washington on the West Coast, Northeastern states, totally representing about a hundred million people, who said they’re going to cooperate and decide when to reopen those states. Donald Trump: (01:02:00)Well they can decide, but- Speaker 32: (01:02:01)Does that undermine what you’re trying to do? Donald Trump: (01:02:03)No, not at all. Let me just tell you very simple. I’m going to put it very simply. The president of the United States has the authority to do what the president has the authority to do, which is very powerful. The president of the United States calls the shots. If we weren’t here for the states, you would have had a problem in this country like you’ve never seen before. We were here to back them up, and we’ve more than backed them up. We did a job that nobody ever thought was possible. It’s a decision for the president of the United States. Donald Trump: (01:02:31)Now, with that being said, we’re going to work with the states, because it’s very important. You have local governments. They’re pinpointed. It’s really, you talk about… It’s like a microchip. They’re pinpointed. We have local government that hopefully will do a good job. If they don’t do a good job, I’d step in so fast. But no, they can’t do anything without the approval of the president of the United States. Speaker 33: (01:14:21)So if some States refused to reopen and you ordered them to, the 10th amendment of the constitution says all powers that don’t reside in the president of the Congress reside in the states, how do you overcome that? Donald Trump: (01:14:30)Well if some states refuse to open, I would like to see that person run for election. They’re going to open. They’re going to all open. Speaker 33: (01:14:37)[crosstalk 01:14:37] the ballot box, I think that – Donald Trump: (01:14:38)That’s something that’s not going to happen. They want to open. They have to open. They have to get open. Every one of those states, the people want to go and they want to … Now, some will be, are in a different situation. You have, I won’t name states now, but I will over the next two or three days. I’m going to be very specific, but you have some states where this is not the kind of a problem than it is in New York or Louisiana or Michigan or other places that got hit very hard. Illinois got hit very hard, but all states want to open and they want to open as soon as possible, but they want to open safely and so do I. Yeah please. Speaker 34: (01:15:15)Thank you, Mr. President. Today, the French president, Emmanuel Macron , said that he will keep the shutdown down in France till the middle of May. Does that mean that the US will keep the ban of flights from New York? Donald Trump: (01:15:26)No, France got hit very hard. France got hit very hard and again, he has to do what he has to do. He’s a friend of mine, but France, Spain has just been decimated. You look at what’s happened in Italy, it’s a very well known fact what happened in Italy. No, they were hit very hard. Speaker 35: (01:15:43)Question for secretary Mnuchin. Has everybody that you would like to have, the 100 business people on the economic council, have they all been invited already? Have they all agreed to [crosstalk 01:15:51]? Steven Mnuchin: (01:15:52)They haven’t been invited yet. We just reviewed the names with the President today [crosstalk 01:15:55]. Speaker 35: (01:15:56)And are they from all sectors? Energy- Steven Mnuchin: (01:15:57)Yes. Basically there’s vertical, so every single area of the economy, we want it to be represented. Speaker 35: (01:16:03)Great. One other thing. Is there anything else needs to be done to work on industry, oil industry jobs to save oil industry jobs after the deal this past weekend? Steven Mnuchin: (01:16:12)Well, I think there’s always things. So we’re working with Larry Kudlow. We have- Speaker 35: (01:16:15)Anything specifically that needs to be done? Steven Mnuchin: (01:16:16)We have economic plans for every single part of the economy. Obviously in the case of the oil industry, they’ve been hit especially hard because you’ve had both the supply issue and you’ve had the demand issue. Speaker 28: (01:16:30)Have you figured out the bail-out money for the airlines, the allocations for the airlines? Steven Mnuchin: (01:16:33)So I’m pleased to say we’ve worked very hard. I think as you probably have seen, we put out a press release that we have now had discussions with almost all the airlines. I’ve personally had discussions with all the major airline CEOs. We specifically created an exception for small airlines that we could process very quickly and I think you’ll see, very quickly, decisions coming out. I’m very pleased with the discussion we’ve had. Donald Trump: (01:16:59)We’ve had very good [inaudible 00:13: 00]. Speaker 36: (01:17:01)Mr. Secretary? Steven Mnuchin: (01:17:02)Yes. Speaker 36: (01:17:02)Do you still see a need for a Phase Four stimulus or is it just [crosstalk 01:17:04]- Donald Trump: (01:17:04)Steve I just want to say we have had discussion- Speaker 36: (01:17:06)[crosstalk 01:17:06] with that? Donald Trump: (01:17:06)Excuse me one second. We’ve had very good discussions with the airlines. Very good discussions. Speaker 28: (01:17:12)Is it possible to reopen the economy on May the 1st? Donald Trump: (01:17:15)I don’t want to say that. You’ll be hearing over the next few days. Speaker 36: (01:17:18)[crosstalk 01:17:18] do you still see a need for a Phase Four this push in lieu of another stimulus? Steven Mnuchin: (01:17:25)Okay. So again, let me just comment. Congress, on a bipartisan basis, approved an unprecedented amount of money to help American workers and American business because it was no fault of their own that business was closed down. We have been very diligently executing on that. Everybody said it was going to take months to get people money. We are executing very quickly. We created a whole new SBA program in a week. Our job right now is to execute the 2.3 billion, which we can add several trillion dollars with the Fed. Steven Mnuchin: (01:17:59)The one area we are particularly concerned about is the small business program. Quite frankly, it’s even more incredibly popular and successful than we anticipated. So the President wants to be very clear. We have money for that and once we get done with that, we will review with the President. If there is more money that needs to be to support this economy, to support hardworking Americans, we will work with Congress to get that in time. Donald Trump: (01:18:22)And Steve, do you want to talk about Phase Four? Steven Mnuchin: (01:18:25)So Phase Four, the President has talked about infrastructure for a long period of time. We’ve talked about to the extent that the hospitals need more money because of the medical issues, we’ll monitor that. We want to make sure there are incentives for restaurants, entertainment, people to get back to those types of things. So we’ll be looking at very specifically provisions to stimulate parts of the economy. Some of them may be money issues, some of them may be regulatory issues. Speaker 37: (01:18:55)[crosstalk 01:18:55] just to clarify your understanding of your authority vis a vis governors. Just to be very specific. For instance, if a governor issued a stay at home order- Donald Trump: (01:19:06)When you say my authority, the president’s authority, not mine, because it’s not me. This is when somebody is the President of the United States, the authority is total and that’s the way it’s got to be. Speaker 37: (01:19:17)It’s total. Your authority is total? Donald Trump: (01:19:19)It’s total. It’s total- Speaker 37: (01:19:19)What part of the [crosstalk 01:19:19]. Donald Trump: (01:19:20)And the governors know that. Speaker 37: (01:19:21)So if a governor- Donald Trump: (01:19:22)The governors know that. Now you have a couple of bands of- Speaker 37: (01:19:24)[crosstalk 00:15:24]- Donald Trump: (01:19:24)Excuse me, excuse me. Speaker 37: (01:19:25)Could you rescind that order? Donald Trump: (01:19:26)You have a couple of bands of Democrat governors, but they will agree to it. They will agree it. Speaker 37: (01:19:34)What does the authority cover? Donald Trump: (01:19:35)The authority of the President of the United States having to do with the subject we’re talking about is total. [crosstalk 01:19:41]. Yeah please go ahead. Speaker 30: (01:19:43)One of the things you spoke we saw in your video about was the travel ban from Europe. As part of reopening America, do you want to reopen the borders so that people from Europe, from the UK- Donald Trump: (01:19:56)At the right time. Speaker 30: (01:19:57)How soon [crosstalk 01:19:57]- Donald Trump: (01:19:58)A very good question actually. Well, I would have to take a look. I wouldn’t say Italy’s doing great right now and I wouldn’t say Spain’s doing great right now and we just heard that France is extending its stay inside order. They’ve extended it. I just see that and I think for short period of time, but no. When they’re back, we want to do it very quickly, but we want to make sure everything’s good. No, right now we have a very strong ban. We’re going to keep it that way until they heal. Speaker 30: (01:20:24)Weeks, months? What would you- Donald Trump: (01:20:26)Well, I can’t tell you that. I have to see. How are they doing? France just went for another two weeks. We have to see. John. John: (01:20:32)So Dr. Fauci said that you took his advice on the question of mitigation. He made the recommendation, you accepted and you put it into place. As you make this next decision which you have said- Donald Trump: (01:20:41)Well, I’m not sure who … John, I’m not sure who really gave me advice on the ban. I think I took my own advice on the ban. I don’t know. John: (01:20:50)Not the ban [crosstalk 01:20:50] the social distancing, I’m talking about, the shutting down, not of travel, but of activity. So my question is, as you make this next decision, which you have said maybe the most difficult or important decision of your presidency, will you assure the American people that you will again take the advice of the doctors of Dr. Fauci, of Dr. Birx? Will you take the advice of the health experts before you do that? Donald Trump: (01:21:13)I will and many other people also, but I will absolutely take their advice. Please go ahead. John: (01:21:18)Would you go against their recommendation if they say you need another 15 or 30 days- Donald Trump: (01:21:20)I don’t think it would be likely because I think we’re not very far from being on the same page. Please. Speaker 38: (01:21:26)Yes, Mr. President. One thing that Governor Cuomo said today is that states do not have the capacity to do mass COVID-19 testing ahead of a reopening [crosstalk 01:21:36]- Donald Trump: (01:21:36)Well, they have to do it. [crosstalk 01:21:37] supposed to be [crosstalk 01:21:38]. Speaker 38: (01:21:38)They can’t purchase the diagnostic tests or equipment and needs federal help. So will the states get that? Donald Trump: (01:21:42)They may need help but- Speaker 39: (01:21:43)Will they get it? Donald Trump: (01:21:43)But they’re there. They’re on ground. They’ve got local mayors, local representatives. They have people that do it- Speaker 38: (01:21:50)But needs the supplies. Donald Trump: (01:21:50)And what we did last time is unprecedented. We literally rebuild tests. We rebuilt a whole industry because we inherited nothing. What we inherited from the previous administration was totally broken, which somebody should eventually say. Not only were the cupboards bare as I say, but we inherited broken testing. Now we have great testing. I just left the top executives at Abbott. Who would have thought that would have happened where they have such a great test as that? Donald Trump: (01:22:18)And in fact what I’ll do, I think unless you have any further questions for the Secretary of Treasury, do you have anybody for Steve? Anybody? Is that for the secretary of the treasury or for me? Because if it’s for me, we can wait. Speaker 27: (01:22:28)It’s for the secretary [crosstalk 01:22:28]. Donald Trump: (01:22:29)We have to get him back to work okay? Speaker 27: (01:22:30)Yes sir. For Secretary Mnuchin, I have a question from one of my colleagues who’s not able to be in the room. They’re curious about the SBA rule that prevents small casinos from getting some of this relief. Is that something that you’re taking a look at? Is there going to be a change [crosstalk 01:22:48]? Steven Mnuchin: (01:22:48)Not small casinos, but there are such things as small taverns and restaurants that have literally small gaming things, and we are coming out with some additional guidance on that. But I want to be clear, it’s not small casinos. Speaker 27: (01:23:02)Thanks sir. Speaker 39: (01:23:03)Secretary Mnuchin? Speaker 40: (01:23:04)Secretary? Steven Mnuchin: (01:23:04)Yes. Speaker 40: (01:23:05)There was a letter that some house Republicans sent this weekend about the liquidity for mortgage service owners. Steven Mnuchin: (01:23:11)Yes. Speaker 40: (01:23:11)Can you explain what you’re looking at in that front? Steven Mnuchin: (01:23:14)Sure. So I think I commented on this a week or so ago. We had a sub committee task force at FSOC that specifically studied this issue. We have all the appropriate people on it. Ginnie Mae has automatically taken some action. We’ve had conversations with the FHFA as to what they’re going to do for Fannie and Freddie. And we’ve said that to the extent they need certain authorities from the treasury, we will accommodate that. So we’re very aware of the issue. Quite frankly, we’ve been studying this issue way before COVID and had concerns about some of these non-bank servicers not being well-capitalized, but we’re going to make sure that the market functions properly. Speaker 27: (01:23:54)Thank you sir. We have seen in a number of these relief bills that Democrats and Republicans have been able to push forward different non coronavirus specific funding priorities. Are you trying to keep funding specific to coronavirus and then if there are going to be other additions, for instance a change to labor rules is something that many on the left wanted. Some on the right are wondering if they should also, if you should also be pushing for their preferred add-ons. Steven Mnuchin: (01:24:24)I think our expectation has always been this is COVID related. Some people have a rather broad view of what COVID related is because it has impacted almost every single business. I think we’ve, the President has talked about the Kennedy Center, which is a good institution. Obviously that was not the major priority of the bill, but they were hit with COVID related. So, but no, the President instructed we want to be very specific in the next bill, it’s COVID related items. Donald Trump: (01:24:52)[crosstalk 01:24:52] it’s been reported with the Kennedy Center just so you understand and that was done … The Democrats wanted it and we didn’t want that, but they wanted it in and we had to agree in order to get something done for the workers. But we want this to be for the workers and for companies that employ the workers. That’s what we’re looking for. We’re not looking for extraneous nonsense. Speaker 27: (01:25:11)You argued that at the time of that the China man was being discussed, that was too disruptive to the global economy. Was that accurate? Steven Mnuchin: (01:25:18)Let me be clear. I had nothing to do with the China ban. I wasn’t on the task force at the time. I’m not even sure I was … I think I was traveling at the time, but I never had any … I was not part of … I did become very active in after the China ban, but that report in the New York Times was not accurate. I was not part of the task force at that time and I was not involved. Matter of fact, I think I may have been traveling. Speaker 32: (01:25:41)A proposal by Senator Hawley to get direct payments to employers to pay people who’ve been laid off and to keep people on payroll. Does administration support that proposal? Steven Mnuchin: (01:25:57)Again, that is the PPP. The PPP is basically sending money to small business, 50% of American workers, to keep those people paid and it’s the most efficient way. Every dollar, as I said, we do through that, it’s one less dollar of unemployment and more importantly, we want those people to be associated with the business so as soon as the President is ready to open up the economy, those businesses are together. We don’t want those businesses to fall apart. That’s why this is such a successful program [crosstalk 00:22:26]- Donald Trump: (01:26:26)But are you talking about the unemployment or you’re the unemployment? Speaker 32: (01:26:28)[crosstalk 01:26:29]- Donald Trump: (01:26:30)Sending it indirectly to the states. We would have preferred that it was sent directly to the people. The Democrats wanted it to be sent through the unemployment system. And I’ve talked to you about it, we have 40-year-old equipment in many of those systems that run by the state, but I’m hearing to getting the money out anyway. Steven Mnuchin: (01:26:47)So some of them are and some of the states aren’t, and we encourage … We’re working with the states to try to update their computers, but it’s a long haul. [crosstalk 01:26:55] thank you. Thank you Mr. President. Donald Trump: (01:26:58)Phase Four Steve. Phase Four. Come on Steve. Speaker 29: (01:27:01)A quick question on something you just said. You said when someone is President of the United States, their authority is total. That is not true. Who told you that? Donald Trump: (01:27:10)You know what we’re going to do? We’re going to write up papers on this. It’s not going to be necessary because the governors need us one way or the other, because ultimately, it comes with the federal government. That being said, we’re getting along very well with the governors and I feel very certain that there won’t be a problem. Yeah please, go ahead. Speaker 29: (01:27:28)Has any governor agreed that you have the authority to decide when their states [crosstalk 01:27:32]? Donald Trump: (01:27:32)I haven’t asked anybody because- Speaker 29: (01:27:34)That no one is [crosstalk 01:27:34]- Donald Trump: (01:27:36)You know why? Because I don’t have to. Go ahead please. Speaker 29: (01:27:36)But who told you the president has the total authority? Donald Trump: (01:27:36)Enough. Please. Speaker 41: (01:27:40)You mentioned the Vice President’s call with the governor’s today. Governor Hogan of Maryland has urged your administration to ask Congress for 500 billion to help stabilize budgetary shortfalls created by coronavirus. Donald Trump: (01:27:52)It’s nice to have Governor Hogan very much. We appreciate Governor Hogan’s statement. Speaker 41: (01:27:56)Governor Cuomo said the CARES Act ignored state government [crosstalk 01:27:59] shortfalls. Do you [inaudible 01:28:01] that request and [crosstalk 01:28:02]- Donald Trump: (01:28:01)Which one? Where is it? Speaker 41: (01:28:03)He said the CARES Act ignored the budgetary shortfalls. Donald Trump: (01:28:08)Well, they’re looking at things in Phase Four where they talk about states and they’re also talking about hospitals. They’re talking about States who have been battered and they’re also talking about hospitals and we’re certainly willing to look at that. Speaker 41: (01:28:21)Will you urge Congress on their behalf? Donald Trump: (01:28:22)We’ll see what we all come back with but they are talking about states and they’re talking about hospitals. [inaudible 00:24:29]. Speaker 42: (01:28:29)Thank you Mr. President. Governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer, has on Thursday signed an executive order banning the sale of non-essential goods. If other states follow her- Donald Trump: (01:28:39)The sale of what? Speaker 42: (01:28:40)Non essential goods. She has banned the sale of non essential goods. Many are calling this draconian, unconstitutional. As president, do you think that if other states were to follow her example in the coming weeks that the federal government should intervene? Donald Trump: (01:28:56)Well I don’t think that’s going to happen. I think it’s very extreme, but she’s doing it and I think it’s going to be over a long way before we have to start thinking about it too much. It is strong. It’s a very strong position to take, but they’re making a lot of progress in Michigan, so let’s see how it all works out. Speaker 28: (01:29:12)What is the status of the funding for the World Health Organization? Donald Trump: (01:29:15)We’re going to be talking about that very soon. I’m getting a full report. I’m not happy with the World Health Organization. Not happy with the World Trade Organization either. We’ve been ripped off by everybody. We have, this country, for so many years, has been ripped off by everybody, whether it’s the World Health or World Trade. They’re like, I call them, the Bobbsey Twins. They look at our country, for years and years, we had people that did nothing about it. We’re doing a lot about it. So we’ll have a report and we’ll also, we’re also talking about the World Trade Organization, but we’ve made a lot of progress there. We’re now winning cases for the first time because they know I’ll leave if we don’t get treated fairly. Donald Trump: (01:29:52)This country, our country, was at a point where we’ve rarely, if ever, won the lawsuits within the World Trade Organization, but now we’re winning a lot of them because they know I’m not playing games. We will pull out if we have to. We just won a $7 billion lawsuit, which was very nice. Speaker 28: (01:30:11)Do you expect a decision this week on cutting funding for the WHO? Donald Trump: (01:30:14)Yeah. I would say by the end of the week, I’m going to make a decision, yeah. Right now there’s a lot of things happening. Go ahead. Speaker 36: (01:30:21)From China, why are there no consequences for China for the misinformation that they shared- Donald Trump: (01:30:27)How do you know that there are no consequences? Speaker 36: (01:30:28)Well, you’ve been asked and it appears that they’re weren’t- Donald Trump: (01:30:28)How do you know that there are no consequences? Speaker 36: (01:30:29)What are the consequences Mr. President of the misinformation- Donald Trump: (01:30:30)I wouldn’t tell you. China will find out. Why would I tell you? Speaker 36: (01:30:34)But people are concerned that they stone-walled [crosstalk 01:30:35]- Donald Trump: (01:30:35)No, you started off by saying why are there no consequences? Speaker 36: (01:30:39)But you’ve been asked this a few times, [inaudible 01:30:39]. Why are there no consequences for China? Donald Trump: (01:30:41)How do you know that there are no consequences? Speaker 36: (01:30:43)Because we’ve asked you and said- Donald Trump: (01:30:44)You’re going to find out. Speaker 36: (01:30:45)You’ve said [crosstalk 01:30:45]. Donald Trump: (01:30:45)I wouldn’t tell you. You’d probably be the last person on earth I’d tell. Speaker 36: (01:30:48)So you’re saying there was no consequences? Donald Trump: (01:30:49)Go ahead. Yeah, please. Speaker 37: (01:30:51)Mr. President, actually this is a question for Mr. Vice President. Do you agree with the President’s statement and his understanding of federalism that his power is total in a way that he described it? Is there anything you’d like to add or any context you’d like to add to the way he was discussing that? Mike Pence: (01:31:07)I support the president’s leadership under the national emergency declaration that he signed. We’re standing before you today, the first time in American history, when all 50 States have issued emergency declarations and the territories. This is an unprecedented time in the life of the nation. Unfortunately, as the President’s reflected and our health experts will continue to reflect, because the American people have heeded the President’s coronavirus guidelines for America, because state governors have taken those and implemented them even in States where there was not a significant outbreak, and implemented additional measures as we provided them with data about cases and best practices, we’re making real progress as a country. But make no mistake- Speaker 37: (01:32:00)[crosstalk 01:32:00] more circumscribed than total. Mike Pence: (01:32:03)Well, make no mistake about it. In the long history of this country, the authority of the President of the United States during national emergencies is unquestionably plenary. You can look back through times of war and other national emergencies. And as the president said, we’ll happily brief that. But in the days ahead, what the president’s charged us to do is to work with our health experts. We’re going to bring together an extraordinary group of American business leaders to council the president. And then working with the CDC, we’re going to produce new guidelines based upon the data for every state and territory in this nation. We’re going to give them guidance and as the president’s indicated, we’ll continue to respect the leadership and partnership that we’ve forged with every governor in America, but this is an unprecedented time. Mike Pence: (01:32:58)But I have to tell you, when you look at the fact, despite the heartbreaking loss of more than 22000 Americans, when you look at the fact of what the health experts told us this could be, I think I only can feel a sense of gratitude to the American people, gratitude to the extraordinary team that has counseled this President, the steps of President Trump has taken, the policies that governors have implemented all across America. We were discussing today at the task force that when you look at the European Union as a whole, they have nearly three times the mortality rate that the United States of America has today, and that is a tribute to our extraordinary healthcare workers, their dedication, their tireless work. But it’s also a tribute to the fact that the American people put into practice the mitigation efforts that the President counseled the nation to do on the advice of our best scientists now more than a month ago. And our hospitals were not overwhelmed and are not overwhelmed at this hour. Mike Pence: (01:34:09)And I have to tell you, standing here today, I couldn’t be more proud to stand alongside this president and to be a part of this team that has served the American people during this challenging hour. And I’ll just say to you, to every American looking on, as we see the numbers leveling and maybe even beginning to go down, I just encourage you to keep doing what you’re doing. Because of the sacrifices that Americans and American families have made through these mitigation efforts, you’re saving lives and you’re seeing our nation through this time. Speaker 43: (01:34:46)Sir, did the States tell you, you’ve been talking to the governors quite a bit. Did those coalitions of states on the West coast and in the Northeast, did they tell you what they were going to be announcing before they announced it? Mike Pence: (01:34:59)Governor Phil Murphy and the Governor of Connecticut expressed today that they were going to be speaking on and discussing on a regional basis what their recommendations would be. And we assured them today- Speaker 43: (01:35:11)[crosstalk 01:35:11] house about that though sir? Mike Pence: (01:35:11)We assured them today on our conference call with I think 48 governors that were with us today for the better part of an hour and a half, we told them that what the president would be producing is directed to be produced are additional guidelines for the states, certified by the CDC, that would inform those governors and local communities and mayors about the best way forward based on the unique circumstances that those states and those communities are facing. Mike Pence: (01:35:43)I think what’s clear is the American people have seen the experience in Washington State, where this really all began for us, and in California, and now the extraordinary challenges in the greater New York City area, including New Jersey and Connecticut, the challenges in New Orleans and Louisiana and Detroit, still Chicago- Mike Pence: (01:36:02)… New Orleans and Louisiana and Detroit, still Chicago, parts of Houston, but they’re also seeing that in each one of those cases that the mitigation efforts are truly working. So we’ll work with those States, and in some cases it’ll make perfect sense for them to work together on a regional basis. Speaker 44: (01:36:20)But you know ahead of time what they were planning? Donald Trump: (01:36:22)[inaudible 01:36:24]. Mike Pence: (01:36:24)The president will be … Donald Trump: (01:36:26)You don’t know that yourself. Mike Pence: (01:36:26)I’m sorry, I didn’t hear your question. Speaker 44: (01:36:28)Can you tell us? Did they let you know? Donald Trump: (01:36:29)[inaudible 01:36:31]. Mike Pence: (01:36:29)I didn’t hear what you said. I’m sorry. Donald Trump: (01:36:30)We would like to have their cooperation, and we are going to have that cooperation. They will cooperate perfectly. Watch. Mike Pence: (01:36:42)Let me just affirm what the president said. We heard it again today in what I think was our ninth conference call with governors is I think every American would be proud to see the partnership that this president has forged with governors across the country. It is an extraordinary statement, and you’ll see some data when Adam Polowczyk gets up in just a few moments, but the flow of resources from around the world that we’ve moved into areas that have faced challenges … I mean, this president has directed us to ensure that every state has what they need, when they need it. The spirit that I heard again from republicans and democrat governors today was reflective of that partnership, and as we move forward to the president’s goal of reopening America, we expect the same kind of partnership in the interest of the nation. Donald Trump: (01:37:31)All right, go ahead. Speaker 45: (01:37:34)Sir, if you can hear me through the mask. Donald Trump: (01:37:37)Barely. I hear you well. Speaker 45: (01:37:39)The District of Columbia argues that they were short changed in the most recent funding bill, because they were treated as a territory instead of as a state. Will that be made right in phase four? Donald Trump: (01:37:52)Well, we’re looking at that certainly. I heard that complaint, but the mayor seems to be very happy with everything we’ve done, and she was on today saying very good things. Okay, yeah. Go ahead in the back. Speaker 46: (01:38:03)Mr. President, you talked about this being the most difficult decision that you’re going to have to take about whether to reopen the economy. I wonder how much it weighs on your mind the thought that if there is a second wave, you’ve reopened the economy and you might have to shut things down again. Donald Trump: (01:38:20)It does, and I hope that won’t happen. I certainly hope that won’t happen, but it does weigh on my mind. Okay, in the back. Go ahead. Go ahead, yes. Speaker 44: (01:38:26)Mr. President? Donald Trump: (01:38:29)Go ahead. Speaker 47: (01:38:33)Thank you. A question for one of my colleagues who wasn’t able to be here. China deployed an aircraft carrier to the South China Sea this weekend amid claims by Chinese state media that COVID has reduced U.S. military readiness in the region. What kind of responses are you thinking of? Will you have a response to this action? Donald Trump: (01:38:57)China has their own difficulties. We have a relationship with China that we’re not happy with certain things that happened over the last period of time, as you know, and I’ve been very explicit on that, but we know all about that and know China is … We’ve seen what they did. We’ve seen many other things that they’ve done both pro and constitution, and we’ll be just fine. Speaker 48: (01:39:24)At the [crosstalk 01:39:25] earlier where you said that you’re putting together the economic task force and that you thought that the recommendations were happening earlier than expected, did you mean to suggest that it could be before May 1st that you start recommending? Donald Trump: (01:39:36)I don’t want to say that, but we’re going to be putting our guidelines and recommendations fairly quickly in a few days. Speaker 48: (01:39:43)You’re not rolling out that it would be before? Donald Trump: (01:39:44)I’m not going to say it, but look. Certain states are doing very well. Certain big parts of the country are doing very well. They’re doing really very well, so we’re going to be putting out recommendations and guidelines very soon. Stay with us. Steve: (01:39:55)What would your guidelines be? Would they fit each area, or would they be a uniform set of guidelines? Donald Trump: (01:40:00)See, I don’t want to tell you now, but right now we have a very strong indication that we know pretty much we have some good ideas. I also want to have … We’ll have video conference or at least a conference call with a lot of very good people having to do with certain fields, whether it’s energy or whether it’s entertainment and restaurants, et cetera, et cetera. We have to get people back into restaurants. We have to do what we have to do, whether it’s deductability or not. We’ll see, but it should be deductability. You’ll get them back so fast. I mean, they used to have deductability. The restaurant business, it was one of the hot businesses, and then they ended it a long time ago, many years ago, but we may need that to get people back into the restaurants. Speaker 49: (01:40:43)Yep. Michelle Obama today got behind mail-in voting nationwide as a possible solution to what’s been going on in the states. She said it shouldn’t be a partisan issue. Have your advisors told you that that could save lives? Donald Trump: (01:40:56)Absentee ballot are you talking about? Speaker 49: (01:40:58)Yeah, but on a massive scale because of the coronavirus. Donald Trump: (01:41:00)Well, I don’t know what she did. I mean, I didn’t see that. When did that happen? Today? Speaker 49: (01:41:03)Yeah, today. That’s a nonpartisan group. Donald Trump: (01:41:05)I wish her a lot of luck. Speaker 48: (01:41:06)On Abbott labs, you said- Donald Trump: (01:41:06)Please, go ahead. Speaker 47: (01:41:08)Yes, Mr. President. There’s a little bit of confusion about your phone calls yesterday with President Putin. The Kremlin is saying that you discussed current issues of ensuring strategic security. That wasn’t referred to in the White House readout. Can you enlighten us? Donald Trump: (01:41:28)We discussed many things. We did discuss China. We discussed many different things, but it was primarily a call on the oil, as you can imagine, and they were very helpful in getting a stabilization price, a stabilization of the number of barrels. I think the number is going to be closer to 20, maybe 15, but closer to 20 than it is going to be to 10, and I think it was a very important call. I also spoke with the King of Saudi Arabia, and that was a very important call. The bottom nine is OPEC+. It’s called OPEC+ because there are other states, also other nations. We came to a very good agreement. Please. Go ahead. Speaker 47: (01:42:04)What was the part about strategic security? Was that … Donald Trump: (01:42:07)I would say mostly we were talking about China. We were talking about their borders, and we were talking about our borders a little bit, our borders with Mexico, because as you know, Mexico was a big part of the deal. Mexico, really, it was very complex from the standpoint of Mexico. It was not an easy deal for Mexico and the president. We appreciated a certain amount of flexibility, but we talked about borders, we talked about China, talked about Mexico. Speaker 47: (01:42:31)Security sounds more like arms treaties. Donald Trump: (01:42:32)Well, we did talk about the arms. Yes, we did. That was a very important part of the call actually. Yeah, good point. Speaker 48: (01:42:39)So on Abbott Labs, you said testing is going great. We know that these machines had been sent to some of the governors, but some of them were saying they don’t have the materials to actually conduct the tests. Donald Trump: (01:42:50)Well, they have to get the materials. The governors have to get the material. Now, if they can’t get it, they’re going to see us. Speaker 48: (01:42:54)The federal government has distributed- Donald Trump: (01:42:56)I’m talking about the local government. I’m talking about governors have to get the material. Now, they have machines. In fact, we were going to go into it. Why don’t you ask Mike, to go into it as soon as I leave? They have very powerful machines that they don’t know they even have. I’m not talking about Abbott, I’m talking about the governors. They have machines that are used for this. You know what I’m referring to? Speaker 48: (01:43:14)I do, the two different machines. Donald Trump: (01:43:15)Very big, very powerful machines where in a certain state’s case, they’re only using 10% of their capacity and they didn’t know it. That happens to be Illinois. Speaker 48: (01:43:23)Okay, well, real quick. These 15-minute tests that you’ve sent out, these new ones that you had in the Rose Garden, they say, including Governor Sununu in New Hampshire, that they don’t have the cartridges to actually conduct the test, so when will they get those cartridges? Donald Trump: (01:43:36)What do you think the answer to that is? Mike Pence: (01:43:39)We’re rapidly increasing the numbers. Donald Trump: (01:43:40)Rapidly increasing the numbers. Speaker 48: (01:43:40)Are we looking at tripling? Donald Trump: (01:43:41)Rapidly increases. Well, pretty quickly. Yeah? Steve: (01:43:43)They can show 50,000 a day. Donald Trump: (01:43:45)Well, you have other machines where they can really work. A lot of the states have the big machines that can do a lot. They didn’t even know they had them. They didn’t even know that they had them, and Mike is going to be talking about that. Speaker 51: (01:43:57)Remember you mentioned several weeks ago that Google was putting together that website or that would handle the drive through testing. Donald Trump: (01:44:04)Google and Apple. Speaker 51: (01:44:05)Have you given up on it? Have you moved past that? Donald Trump: (01:44:08)A lot of people don’t like it from the standpoint of constitutional rights. A lot of people don’t like it, and some people think it’s great. No, they are working on that as I understand. Speaker 51: (01:44:17)I’m talking about the testing website. Remember you said a website for Google. It’s only operating in I think five counties in California right now. Donald Trump: (01:44:24)No, Google’s looking at it, but Google is also working with Apple, who are looking at something. We have the greatest companies in the world looking at things that, in a year from now, everything that we’re looking at now is going to be obsolete. That’s how good it is. We have things happening that are unbelievable. I saw a presentation today that I can’t talk about yet, but it’s incredible. Plus, I think they’re doing … Tony, I think they’re doing very well in the vaccines. They’re working hard on the vaccines, and I think you’ll have an answer for vaccines. I believe that there’s some great things coming out with respect to that. Now, you need a testing period, but you’re going to have some great things. Please. Speaker 50: (01:44:59)Yeah. Sir, on the contact tracing that Google and Apple are doing, so different subject, on the contact. Donald Trump: (01:45:04)No, this is the Google and Apple. I don’t know if it’s a partnership or what, but they’re working on some- Speaker 50: (01:45:08)Correct. There’s the one- Donald Trump: (01:45:09)They’re working on more than one element. They’re working on a couple of different things, Google and Apple. Google is also working on something as you know, having to do with testing. I believe they’re doing that in a singular fashion. Speaker 50: (01:45:20)So my question is not about the drive through testing website, not that. On Google and Apple’s contact tracing that they’ve got this process now where they can put contact tracing on your phone. If you opt in, you can be alerted if you’ve been in contact with someone with the coronavirus. How do you feel about that? Donald Trump: (01:45:36)Well, it’s an amazing thing, but a lot of people have some very big constitutional problems with it. You know that. It’s an amazing thing, and would be actually, as you know, other countries are thinking about using something similar, but not as good. Speaker 50: (01:45:49)Which other countries are thinking about doing something? Donald Trump: (01:45:51)I hear Singapore is. Singapore had a little bit of a setback, because they had a break. You know that, but they’ll take care of it. I know the folks in Singapore, they’re doing a great job, and they’re going to put it back very quickly, but Singapore and other countries are looking at other things, and some countries are doing other things. Speaker 50: (01:46:10)Would you prefer that Americans use some other thing? Donald Trump: (01:46:11)Well, I don’t want to get into that, because we have a whole constitutional thing. We have more of a constitutional problem than a mechanical problem, but we will be making a determination on that. That’s something we’re going to be discussing with a lot of people over the next four weeks. That would be a very accurate way of doing it, but a lot of people have a problem with it. Yeah, please. Go ahead. Speaker 45: (01:46:30)A testing question maybe for Dr. Fauci as well. Can you talk about where the antibody test is and how quickly it’s happening? Donald Trump: (01:46:37)It’s moving along. I think I can answer it, because I have to leave. Moving along quickly, moving along well .it’s a test that’s been going along for many, many years, except now we have very modern, very incredible versions of it, but that’s moving on. The antibody test, moving along very well. Okay, any more COVID-19? COVID-19? Steve: (01:46:56)[inaudible 01:46:56] Theodore Roosevelt has died. Have you decided the status of Captain Crozier, the former [crosstalk 00:11:03]. Donald Trump: (01:47:02)Well, that’s going through the Navy as I understand it. The Navy is going to be making decisions on all of that, and they had a break in. I don’t think the ship should have been stopping in Vietnam when you have a pandemic to be honest with you. I don’t think the captain should have been writing letters. He’s not Ernest Hemingway, as I said before, and he shouldn’t have been writing letters. I don’t know who gave the orders to stop in Vietnam, but they stopped in Vietnam, and all of a sudden they get on and now you have over 500 sailors and people on the ship that are affected. I don’t know whose idea that was, but that wasn’t such a good idea in the middle of a pandemic. Yes, please?. John: (01:47:42)One last thing on this question on this question of constitutionality. I’m just wondering what changed your view because- Donald Trump: (01:47:46)Nothing changed it. I know exactly what you’re going to say. Nothing changed it. The fact that I want to rely on states, or maybe will or have, and the fact that we’ve gotten on, that’s one thing. The fact that I don’t want to use the power is another thing. Look- John: (01:47:59)But you said from the standpoint of the constitution. Donald Trump: (01:48:02)Yes, the constitution. John: (01:48:03)You thought it should be up to the governors. Donald Trump: (01:48:05)You can look at it constitutionally, you could look at federalism. You can look at it any different way. John, the fact that I don’t want to exert my power is much different. We have the power. You asked does the federal government has the power? The federal government has absolute power. It has the power as to whether or not I’ll use that power. We’ll see. John: (01:48:23)[crosstalk 00:12:24]. Donald Trump: (01:48:24)John, I would rather work with the states, because I like going down to a local government. That’s why, with I guess it’s now seven states, not eight, because South Carolina did. They went away from what we discussed the last time, so that’s why I looked at the individual states. They’re doing a very good job. They’re really doing a very good job. I’d rather have them make the decision. Now, the fact that I’d rather have, that’s fine, but I have the absolute right to do if I want to. I may not want to. We have a very good relationship now. We’ll see what happens. If you notice the few states you’re talking about, they’re all with democrat governors, but if governors are doing a good job and they control it better, because you don’t have somebody in Washington saying, “Set up a testing site in the parking lot of a Walmart.” We’re in Washington, and they’re in a state that’s very far away. Donald Trump: (01:49:15)That’s really, it should be, and it should have always been. I’ve always said it was, but the relationship we have now with the states and governors is very good, and we’ll be announcing over the next very short period of time exactly what we’re going to be doing. Okay, a couple more. Go ahead. Speaker 44: (01:49:30)On coronavirus and Joe Biden, he’s the presumptive democratic nominee. Do you have any plans yet on when you’ll start sharing or when the White House will start sharing some of that information about the coronavirus? Your president [crosstalk 01:49:42]. Donald Trump: (01:49:41)Well, nobody’s called about what about coronavirus from their standpoint. Look, they had the H1N1, and that was a big failure. That was a tremendous failure. They had a lot of failures. You take a look at the history, and 17,000 people died, and you talk about late. They were so late, they were late like it never even existed. That was a big problem. It caused a lot of other people a big problem too. If Joe Biden would like a briefing, I’d certainly get him a briefing. I don’t know what he’d do with it. Yeah, please. Speaker 52: (01:50:23)Are Jared and Ivanka serving on new task force, and how are you going to balance- Donald Trump: (01:50:27)No. Speaker 52: (01:50:28)What? Donald Trump: (01:50:28)No, they’re not. Yes, go ahead, please. Speaker 48: (01:50:29)Just wanted to clarify. In earlier conversation, there was a description of multiple different councils or task forces. Can you just explain exactly what the structure is of those [crosstalk 00:14:42]. Donald Trump: (01:50:40)Well, you have Mike’s task force, which is the White House task force, which really brought us up to this point brilliantly, I must say. Dealt with governors and dealt with governors all the way through. I was on many of those calls, and every call got better and better and better. It was hostile at the beginning. By the time we finished, today’s call was a very good call, very friendly call. I think everyone’s online, and again, you don’t have anybody driving you crazy saying they’re not getting ventilators and not getting all of the different things, they need more beds. They have a lot of beds right now. We always are, and I think it’s important. Speaker 48: (01:51:15)[inaudible 01:51:16]. Donald Trump: (01:51:16)We always erred on the sake of give them more, even when we didn’t think … We didn’t think New York needed the beds that they were asking for. We didn’t think they needed the ventilators that they asked for, and they were right. Now, on ventilators, we’re ready to march. I told you this. We’re ready to march. We have 10,000 ventilators. We’re ready to move them anywhere in the country where we need them, if we need them. We’re also building lot of ventilators, and that’s going to be used at some point, I believe. We’re going to have stockpiles including state stockpiles if they want to work out some kind of an arrangement with us, but we’re also going to help other countries, whether it’s Italy or Spain or other. France is having a big problem. They all desperately need. Germany too. They need ventilators, so we’re going to have a lot of ventilators. We have a lot. You heard the numbers. We have a lot coming next week. Next week, we have a tremendous amount coming. Okay, final question. Speaker 48: (01:52:06)I’d ask how the task force is going to be structured. Is it one? Donald Trump: (01:52:09)No, but then we have, in addition to that, we have a number of committees. We’ll have a transportation committee. We’re going to have a manufacturing committee. You’ll see it tomorrow. We’re also having a religious leaders committee. We have a great group of religious leaders. We’re having committees with religious leaders. You’ve been seeing what’s going on at the churches and all of that, and we’re going to have a faith leaders committee. We’re going to have a few committees. I’ll call them committees, and then ultimately we’re going to make decisions. We’re going to make decisions fairly quickly, and I think they’re going to need to be the correct decision. I hope so. Steve? Steve: (01:52:46)You form the economic task force tomorrow. When do you want them to have recommendations for you? Donald Trump: (01:52:51)Soon, and they already know what I want. When we form, when you say form, I don’t have to give them instructions. These are very sophisticated people. These are the best people in their fields, so I’d have to say, “Gee, we just met, and we’re going to meet in two weeks, and here’s what we’re …” I said, “Here’s what I want. We’ve already told them, and they’re the best names in the various businesses and professions and religions. These are the greatest names, the people that I think probably know the best, so we’ve called them and we’re going to be speaking to them very soon. If it’s questions or statements, we want them to have that for us, and we will have either response. Or maybe, ideally we’re going to be learning from them, and we’ll be able to do that and put everything we learn from those calls into our new guidelines. We’re going to have new guidelines coming soon. I think it’s going to be very good. I think it’s going to be very smooth, and I hope it’s going to be very safe. Thank you all very much. John: (01:53:48)Any thoughts on Stanley Chera? Any thoughts on Stanley Chera? Donald Trump: (01:53:51)Stanley Chera is a friend of mine for a long time. He’s a great real estate person, passed away. Was a great real estate person. Great, great. Sort of a legend in New York real estate. He called me a couple of weeks ago, said he’s tested positive. Stanley’s in his early to mid-80s I guess, and Stanley went to the hospital, and he never came out. He went into a coma. He was unconscious for a long period of time, and he never made it. A great man. He left very charitable, really a great philanthropist, a very, very successful person in Manhattan, in the real estate business. I got to know him a lot. Donald Trump: (01:54:39)He was so excited when his friend from New York became the President of the United States. He was like a young boy, and he was not a young boy, but he was like a young boy. He was so excited. He thought I would do such a good job, and he was so happy. He was very proud of what we’ve done in this administration, but he was tested positive, and unfortunately he didn’t make it. To me, it’s a very sad thing. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Thanks, doctor. Thank you. Mike Pence: (01:55:16)Thank you, Mr. President. As the president mentioned, the task force today spoke to 48 of the nation’s governors. On that call, we reflected on the fact that all 50 States had emergency declarations in place, which was a first for American history. 5.2 billion dollars had been distributed to the states under the Stafford Act, and it was a productive call and reflective of President Trump’s ongoing direction for us to work closely with the states to make sure the states in the areas most impacted by the coronavirus have what they need when they need it. We spoke about the issue of testing and supplies, and I’m going to ask Dr. Deborah Birx to come forward as well as Admiral Polowczyk to reflect on both of those topics for you. Mike Pence: (01:56:12)Dr. Birx has been leading an effort from the task force from early on on rapidly expanding testing. It was early on that the president formed that public-private partnership with commercial labs, and as we stand here today, more than a 2.5 million tests have been performed, and when we add in the estimates of labs that we have to assume, with reasonable projections, have not yet reported in to the CDC, we think that number could be closer to three million tests that have been performed. Mike Pence: (01:56:50)As has been mentioned, the new 15-minute test, we are working closely with Abbott Laboratories that the president and our team met with today here at the White House to rapidly increase the availability of cartridges. Abbott is producing roughly 50,000 cartridges a day. FEMA acquired an initial supply of that and distributed those to the states, but we’re working with the states to not only distribute what’s being made, but also work with other suppliers to create additional cartridges. A point that I’ll ask Dr. Birx to expand on in just a moment is the fact that, beyond the new 15-minute test by Abbott Laboratories, beyond what we expect to be a new antibody test, which may well be approved by the FDA in just a matter of days, and antibody tests that would be produced at the rate of 20 million tests a month. Mike Pence: (01:57:50)The reality is that those commercial laboratories that the president brought in here the better part of two months ago and initiated that public and private partnership with have been producing hundreds of thousands of tests every single week. But as a Dr. Birx and our team have apprehended, we believe at this point in time that of the Roche equipment that is out there that does the high speed testing, and we informed governors of this today, we think that some 20% of that capacity is not being used. With regard to the Abbott m2000 systems, we told governors today that we think 75% of that laboratory capacity that exists in the United States today is not being utilized by our governors. Mike Pence: (01:58:43)We sent a very clear message to governors today to reach out to their hospitals, reach out to their labs, to identify the presence of the Roche Amplicore 500 and the Abbott m2000 to get those activated. We literally estimate that, although we’re doing over 110,000 tests a day in the United States, that if our governors and state labs would simply activate the machines that are already there, we could double the amount of testing in the United States literally overnight. I know that governors’ teams watch these briefings, and we’ll remind them very respectfully again to identify those labs. We have a team that now is deploying, reaching out to labs to see if we can activate all of those labs. Mike Pence: (01:59:36)Secondly, on the subject of supplies, I’ve said it a couple of times from this podium today, but let me say it one more time. President Trump’s direction to us in dealing with the states on personal protective equipment and ventilators has been to make sure the states have what they need when they need it. We recognize that while we all watch the overall curve of the coronavirus in America, understandably the national numbers, the reality is this outbreak has taken place in its own individual curves, first on the West Coast, then the New York City area, then Louisiana, Michigan, and now we continue to contend with it in Chicago and Houston and other metropolitan areas. Mike Pence: (02:00:22)It has given us the opportunity to ensure that personal protective equipment and ventilators are made available on a critical basis. I have to tell you, we’re incredibly proud of the effort and the partnership with states that has us standing here today that no one who has required a ventilator has been denied a ventilator in the United States of America. At this point, we have just short of 7,000 ventilators in the strategic national stockpile, but as Admiral Polowczyk will detail, we’re already beginning to receive newly manufactured ventilators. We’ll get another thousand in this week. By the middle of May, we’ll literally have another 8,000 ventilators available for deployment around the country. Mike Pence: (02:01:12)I’m going to let him describe to you the specific detailing of those resources, but I want to share these numbers most especially for care workers around the country in the areas most impacted by the coronavirus so that you know the resources are surging into the hospital systems at the point of the need, and we will continue to do just that. Let me recognize a Dr. Birx to reflect on the data and also on maybe some comments on testing, and then, Admiral Polowczyk, can you just step up, and then you’ll describe supplies. We’ll hear from Dr. Fauci again and then take a few questions. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:01:54)Great. Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I don’t know if we can get the first slide on cumulative cases. Yes, thank you so much. I wanted to show you a different way of looking at it today. Obviously, we look at case counts per 100,000 Americans in each of our states and metro areas, but I wanted you to see an absolute numbers how much the New York, New Jersey metro area dwarfs all other metro areas. You can’t even see Chicago, Detroit, or Boston, all of those Metro areas are under 25, 000 cases. You can see that the New York, New Jersey metro area is about almost 250,000 when you bring those cases together almost, a lot more. That’s why you hear us talking a lot about the metro area of New York and New Jersey and the counties of Rockland and Westchester and Suffolk and not Nassau and Bergen, New Jersey, and why we’re so focused on getting resources to that metro area. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:02:58)If I can see the next slide then. If I take New York and New Jersey metro area out, this is the other metro areas that we have been tracking very closely. I wanted to show this to you so that you could see how those curves are already starting to plateau. If you look at Detroit, if you look at Philadelphia, if you look at Louisiana. Louisiana’s in green. Detroit is in gray. You can see across the board, across these metro areas, across metro areas which have a higher concentration of individuals, this is what the American people in these large cities have done, where it is more difficult often to socially distance. We’re just really impressed by the work of the mayors and the governors to make this happen. I also wanted you to see this, because you can clearly see Chicago and Boston. Chicago is in the orange and Boston is in the yellow. They’re crossing Detroit, and that’s why we have been very much focused on the needs of those areas. Providence is also in that category. It’s difficult for them to you to see them because they’re a much further down on the slide. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:04:12)But the highest, if you look at the axis on this slide, it’s 25,000. The axis on the last slide was 300,000, so that’s why I really want people to understand each of these small epidemics in each of the metro areas we’re tracking independently as well as epidemics and outbreaks that are happening in some of our other States. I just wanted you to have that perspective of how significant the New York/New Jersey issue is and why we’ve been tracking that so closely, but I also wanted to assure all the other States that were tracking them also very closely and really working with the governors and mayors. That’s why I wanted you to just see that not only are the curves flattening in some of those major metropolitan areas, but they’re starting to decrease. This is what we’re very excited about. These are cases we also know that mortality will lag, so we’re really tracking also the number of individuals who have succumbed to the COVID-19. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:05:17)I also wanted to really note here that, yes, our mortality is less when you combine European countries equal to the size of the United States, and I think this is really two things. One, it’s the incredible work of the American people, but it’s also the incredible work of our healthcare providers and the system of each of these hospitals that have the resources and the ability to respond to the needs of the COVID-19 patients. I think you can really see the superb healthcare delivery that is happening by the low mortality. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:05:51)Just to mention really quickly about testing, because you’ve heard me before talk about it, and then it was a little bit misquoted and misaligned, but there are multiple Abbott machines. I’m going to be very clear, having spent years in the laboratory. The high throughput machines, which are the Roche 6800, and I think it’s the 8800 on Roche, and the Abbott m2000, these are the machines that run between 500 and a thousand assays at a time. The Abbott company worked really hard three weeks ago and getting a million tests out there to be utilized, and they can make a million tests a week for all of our laboratories that have these platforms. So far to date, somewhere around 250,000 tests have been utilized in three weeks worth of work. That’s why we’ve really been appealing to the laboratory directors to really bring all those machines on. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:06:50)Last week, Dr. Fauci and his incredible team of researchers have agreed to really reach out and find additional Roche and Abbott high throughput machines that are in research institutions and doing critical research work to bring them online also to supplement the other laboratories’ work to create a mosaic and a complete strategy that brings together the high throughput platforms with the medium throughput platforms with what are the low throughput but rapid platforms, which is this ID NOW. ID NOW is not going to be the answer to the number of tests that we need over the next few weeks. Those run a test every 15 minutes, and we can get about 55,000 cartridges a day. But I just got done saying that these other machines, of which we have hundreds of, can run 500 to a thousand in a single timeframe. We need to bring all of these assays together, and a team has been created to call every single laboratory and every single research institution across the United States to define the complete capacity in every … Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:08:03)Across the United States to define the complete capacity in every single state because it shouldn’t be our expectation that every governor understands exactly everything that’s in his state. But we have to understand everything and every state in order to be able to meet the needs of the American people as we increase testing. Now I know you all know that in three weeks we went from 300,000 tests total to 3 million tests total in three weeks. We know that we have to further increase that. That has been done really by HHS and Admiral Gerard and the team up there and we’re going to supplement that team to really bring on all of the additional resources and platforms that we have in the United States of America. Just like we did with ventilators to bring all of the capacity to bear so that we can also continue to increase testing. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:08:53)Also of course as these epidemics decrease, you can also be able to use more and more testing for surveillance. But I do want to call out the 19 States that aren’t ever represented in these graphics. And by and large the States have been Kenyon to do containment and outbreak investigation. And I’ve been able to talk to many of those States and I would just remind all of us when I talked to each one of these state health officials where they are finding outbreaks are in nursing homes. And so we really need to continue to protect and we continue to test in nursing homes because we know that that’s a particularly vulnerable group and it’s a group where often now that we’re beginning to understand asymptomatic transmission, no one is intending to pass the virus on to others. But we know in essential workers around the United States, people are unknowingly infected and then passing the virus on. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:09:51)And so those are the ones that we’re very interested in finding. And you might say, “Well how do you find them because they don’t have symptoms?” And so this is where we really have to increase surveillance in a very deliberative and understand way. And so we’re really looking what are Sentinel surveillance sites? I think we can see where there’s outbreaks because once people have symptoms you can see them, but where do you do Sentinel surveillance so that you find them before they have symptoms? This is what we have done for decades in HIV and it’s what’s allowing us right now to really control the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Subsaharan Africa because we’re finding people when they’re asymptomatic and treating them when they’re asymptomatic. So this is something we know how to do and it’s something we’re working very closely with CDC and others on to make sure that we can bring that full capacity to the American people. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:10:41)So these are just some insights and what we’re working on. We’re continuing obviously to track every single County and community. And then finally I’m going to call on one additional group. There’s a group out there of our HIV/AIDS activists and community workers that understand these tests that I have been talking about, these RNA based test. Because they often get viral loads in HIV, but they will know how to explain this to the community about sampling and what it means to run those assays. They are essentially virologists. They understand all of these assays. They also understand the antibody assays because it’s the antibody assays that they cancel and utilize in HIV testing across the United States. And they will be our translator to the American public and to their local mayors. They understand these tests, they essentially understand all the virology and all the immunology and I’m really asking all of them to help us communicate what these tests are so the community is ready for them. Because antibody tests measure something very different than the viral load in the front of your nose that we’re using for diagnosis. And so really being able to understand all of those tests, when to use them, how to use them will be really critical. But the great thing is in the United States of America, we have these community groups that understand these tests very well and we’ll be able to discuss them at every level with their community. Mike Pence: (02:12:07)Great. I’m going to call in [inaudible 02:12:11] up in a minute, but I have to call on Dr. Tony Fauci and let me just say something really straight from my heart if I can. I lost my dad 32 years ago today. April 13th is always a tough day for our family. And this morning when my brothers and sisters were sending around pictures of dad like we always do, I just thought of the families of the more than 22,000 Americans that we’ve lost. And I just want to tell you that you’re on our hearts and you’re in the prayers of millions of Americans as you deal with this heart breaking loss. As well as families that have family members that are struggling with serious illness. But let me just encourage everyone that in the midst of that loss because the American people have been putting these mitigation measures into practice there are families that are still together today. Mike Pence: (02:13:21)And I just want to encourage you here at roughly the halfway point of 30 days to slow the spread, to take that to heart. In no way minimize the losses that we’ve experienced as a nation and as families but to be encouraged to know when you see those numbers on the vast majority of States that because of what the American people are doing, it’s working. And Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx and the entire team continually ask us to remind the American people and we do so again today, keep doing what you’re doing with the 30 days to slow the spread and we will hasten the day that we heal our land. Dr Fauci. Dr. Fauci: (02:14:09)I just want to make one comment that related to a question that was asked and then we’ll have questions. I don’t want to take too much time. The idea about how we would evaluate from a purely public health standpoint about what I call reentry into some sort of normality as health people I don’t know anything about nor do I have a claim to know anything about economics. They’re going to be people that know a lot more than I do who are going to give advice about all of the committees that the president was talking about. But the one thing we do know as health people, as physicians and scientists and public health people, as I mentioned I think over the weekend on one of the shows is that some people may think it’s going to be like a light switch on and off, we’re either out and we’re in. Dr. Fauci: (02:14:57)It’s just not going to be that way because we have a very large country and there are different impacts, as you see New York is very different from other parts of the country, from the Midwest, from the mountain region, California and Washington different than new Orleans. So as we discuss and consider the public health aspects, it likely would be something that I refer to as sort of like a rolling re-entry. It’s not going to be one size fits all. So I don’t know what it’s going to be yet because we still have time to look at it. Dr Birx, who does an amazing job with showing you the data and the charts that’s going to likely influence some of the recommendations that we will make. But I can assure you there will be recommendations that we’ve based purely on public health and the president will get a lot of other input from others, but we’ll give the honest public health recommendation. Mike Pence: (02:15:49)Thank you Tony. Have Admiral Polowczyk get an update on supplies and then we’ll take a few questions. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:15:58)Thank you Mr vice president. Can I have the ventilator slide back up and just stop there right, thank you. So you start with what’s in the stockpile this morning and then here’s the contract that we’ll be delivering over the next few weeks. We had 8,600 ventilators to the pool we already have. That’s the math that you get there. That’s included the DPA action with GM and we’ll say that we’ve also issued what would be called rated orders with all of these vendors to allow them front of the line privileges so to speak within their supply chain. So there’s written the contract, this is the a hundred thousand plus families we were talking about and they continue to work with them too ensure that the ventilators actually show up. So those continue to work there. And as we did that, we realized that downstream supply chains needed some additional defense production act work as well. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:16:59)You go out to the air bridge, eight flight’s scheduled, 37 complete, 43 on the horizon and you could see the numbers of material that’s been brought in to supplement the volume that’s that’s needed. I’m going to go through a series of slides of New York first. Dr. Birx provides me what I would call as a geographic reference to align the supply chain. So all of those cities, you’ll see a little bit of a theme here. I’ll be talking about a lot of the cities and geographic areas. I align the supply chain to those geographic areas to try to get as much there while realize the rest of the nation needs supplies as well. And then we aligned the supply chain to site of care, public hospitals, VA private hospitals, nursing homes, first responders, acute care and on down the line. So the last business week, so Monday of last week through Friday, Saturday of the past week, these are the mass materials that came into the New York, New Jersey Metro area. And you could see the volumes there. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:18:22)So you can go to Detroit. We talked about their hotspot, here’s the volumes of deliveries going into Detroit for that same time period. You can go to Chicago and I’m going to run through this kind of quick, but you can see that the geographic alignment, the places that Dr. Birx has talked about is where we’re concentrating supplies. You can go to New Orleans to give you an understanding. Washington DC all right so Joe Nan talked about that. Today was a very kind of early entry into the Washington DC, Baltimore, positioning supplies ahead of need we hope in Washington. Go to Baltimore and you could see the volumes there are trying to get ahead of that and it ended up. Philadelphia’s next. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:19:21)And then now the next slide is a nine city roll up. And so to save a little time, I did not include Boston and Houston in there. So you could see the volume of material flowing through a commercial network, Airbridge, their supplies and the geographic regions and then further prioritize to site of care. Now final topic, N95 masks so the department of defense announced a DPA action this weekend that came over from DOD on Friday into the white house approved on Saturday and contract awarded today 131,000,000 five companies 3M, Honeywell [inaudible 02:20:16] and Drager. The cares act was signed before March was ending or towards the end their, so essentially two weeks from that money being put in the title three authority for DOD. This action takes us from a baseline of what was being produced domestically of about 30 million masks upwards to as we go through the fall into the end of the winter, 120 million masks domestically. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:20:51)So currently we’re filling some of that demand from overseas sources. And so the additive masks here through this will ramp up lower dependence on oversee sources and that will essentially secure a big piece of the supply chain. Five companies, six cities, Smithfield, Rhode Island, Phoenix Arizona, Del Rio Texas, Lexington, North Carolina, Sheboygan falls, Wisconsin and Aberdeen North Dakota, all either producing more fabric or increasing production facilities to have that ramp up. Mike Pence: (02:21:40)All right, great job. Thank you Admiral and can we put that slide, I guess it’s still up. This is for just the week ending April 11. We have distributed or directed the distribution of 5.3 million N95 masks, 5.5 million surgical masks, 110 million gloves. We share that mostly just to make sure our healthcare workers know that the resources are flowing. We’re going to continue to flow them, but this is just the numbers for this week. And don’t include for instance what the president announced. I was able to tell governor Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania today that next week they’ll be receiving two million N95 masks to support some of the healthcare challenges that they’re facing in the broader Philadelphia area. So with that we’ll be happy to take a couple of questions. Go ahead. Speaker 53: (02:22:44)Thank you so much. One for the Admiral and then one for Dr. Fauci if you don’t mind. For the Admiral, wouldn’t it have been useful as you’re going through all of those supplies that are now making their way into the system you talked about having to buy foreign products as we’re catching up and making it. Wouldn’t it have been useful if it hadn’t taken until mid March for the government to start placing bulk orders for these kinds of supplies? Admiral Polowczyk: (02:23:06)I came over from the Pentagon 20th of March, so I’ll speak from the 20th March on now. We’re using the defense production act. I think you’ll see a much more use of that as we go forward. You know we make- Speaker 53: (02:23:18)My question is about the time in here [crosstalk 00:15:20]. Admiral Polowczyk: (02:23:21)I’m not equipped to talk about other than from about the 20th of March forward. I was over at the joint staff I wasn’t [inaudible 02:23:29]. Speaker 53: (02:23:29)I wanted to ask Dr. Fauci, you said that you’d be giving the president your recommendations, you and Dr. Birx coming up with a plan that you guys are comfortable with. Once the president has made his decision, are you willing to come here and tell us, tell the American public what you actually had recommended to him and whether he followed through with what you recommended? Dr. Fauci: (02:23:52)What do you mean? Speaker 53: (02:23:58)So when the president stands up here, whether it’s May 1st whatever day it is and outlines his plan, are you willing to stand up here after him and tell us all, tell the American public what it was that you had recommended he do if there is a difference? Dr. Fauci: (02:24:14)I have to think about that because when you have conversations with the president, sometimes they really should be confidential and what you give him because he’s going to have to make his own choice. I have to think about that. Speaker 53: (02:24:28)So that we would know whether he was actually listening to the health advice that he’s being provided. Dr. Fauci: (02:24:34)He is, I mean I can tell you one thing, he’ll listen, but I think what’s going to happen, I don’t know for sure is that he will get input from a number of individuals representing a number of aspects of society. One of them will be health. The only thing that I can tell you is that I will give him the advice based on evidence. My observation of what the best public health approach would be. Speaker 54: (02:24:59)Dr. Fauci just to go back to where we started today, which was with the president seeming frustrations with some of the reporting about his early decision making process in January and February. As I’m sure you know, the reason we in the press do that kind of reporting is so that the next president that comes along that has to deal with a pandemic learn some of those lessons. Having watched this unfold up close, what do you think were the mistakes that were made early on that a future president could learn from? What would the benefit of hindsight of course? There’s no [inaudible 02:25:39] against you know obviously, I understand. Dr. Fauci: (02:25:42)I don’t want to use the word mistakes because when you’re in the fog of war when you’re doing something, you have to make decisions, you get input from a number of individuals. It’s always a moving target and I just don’t want to have anything taken out of context because I already had one of those already in the last couple of days, so I don’t want to go through it again. I wouldn’t say mistake could things have done better, of course. I mean nothing is perfect and you could always do better. But I mean, I hesitate to say something is a mistake. Speaker 54: (02:26:16)With the benefit of hindsight that with that caveat, what could have been done better? Dr. Fauci: (02:26:22)Well, I mean I can’t comment about anything outside of my own field, but the thing that when I think back on was evolving in my mind was something that was a virus that was much worse than what I had thought it was going to be based on what we had learned early on when it was first felt to be something that just jumped from an animal to a human and really didn’t have much capability of going human to human. And then all of a sudden you find out that not only was it not just animal to human, that’s probably the way it started, but then as you go back and you realize there were probably a lot of infections that maybe if we had dealt into that a little bit more, we could have learned that not only is it affecting human to human, but it’s transmitting really efficiently. Dr. Fauci: (02:27:21)When I question myself, I’m not perfect. Maybe I, I wouldn’t say made mistakes, but maybe I should have really tried to delve into that a little bit more about what was going on, but the information wasn’t as forthcoming as I would have liked. And then all of a sudden when you find out that you’re dealing with something that is not only what had been your worst nightmare, because people ask me that, what is your worst nightmare? A brand new virus that’s respiratory transmitted that has a high degree of transmissibilities that has a high degree of morbidity and mortality. You know, is that a mistake? Maybe I should have been able to realize that earlier, I’m not sure it’s a mistake. It was just an evolving thing that we finally realized and said, “Whoa, this is really worse than we could have imagined.” Speaker 55: (02:28:11)All right last one guys. Mike Pence: (02:28:11)One more. Speaker 56: (02:28:12)[inaudible 02:28:12] you’ve met whenever Abbott laboratories. What did you ask them to do? What did they say they could do? Mike Pence: (02:28:21)Well we spoke with Abbott laboratories today about how we can increase significantly the production of cartridges for the 15 minute test. Because remember we’re not only scaling to rapidly expand testing across the country today. And it’s one of the reasons why you heard me and Dr. Birx say that we have an entire team now that’s going to be working with governors and with laboratories around the country to identify the machines that already exist today and that could be activated and doing tests. But we also want to work with Abbott laboratories for the longer term because if the current trend lines hold and I hope and I literally pray that we will soon find ourselves on the down slope of the coronavirus in this country. This epidemic in its current form will come to an end, but as we make decisions and in the days ahead to reopen America what president Trump also wants to do is have a policy in place to stay open. Mike Pence: (02:29:33)And having the kind of surveillance testing available around the country so that CDC can do the immediate contact tracing when you have a positive test so that we can deploy resources like the new Abbott 15 minute test specifically to nursing homes. We spoke today to governor Baker in Massachusetts, governor Hogan in Maryland, both of whom have been very innovative implementing federal guidelines for preventing the spread of infectious disease at nursing homes. And we commend them for that, but being able to increase the manufacture of those devices so they can be deployed going forward in the months ahead is also a focal point of our efforts. So rapidly continuing to expand testing today and the governor of Louisiana told me today that they have tested at the highest per capita according to his numbers of any state in the union. We congratulate him for that, but making sure that going forward we’ll have the infrastructure of testing all across America to deal with the coronavirus should it return in the future. With that, let me bid you all a good evening. We will be back tomorrow. Speaker 57: (02:30:48)Vice president have still a question about these cartridges and this timeline because the New Hampshire governor says the federal government is in charge of distributing those, FEMA is. So what is the timeline for when they’ll have enough of them? Because they said that they’ll end up Illinois but they didn’t have enough, so what’s the timeline that you’re working with? Mike Pence: (02:31:04)Yeah, let me let Dr. Birx address that. But there was an initial traunch that we purchased. There’s some 18,000 Abbott laboratory machines around the country. And FEMA acquired a certain amount that were immediately distributed across the states, but now Abbott laboratories is literally producing some 50,000 a day. Those are available on the open market and we’re also going to be working with Abbott and with the states to deploy those resources. And we’re also working with other manufacturers to increase the production of cartridges. But if there’s more to that do you want to add [inaudible 02:31:45]. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:31:45)No that was perfectly said. You ask these questions and I just want to make sure that people understand. So a third of them went specifically to Indian health service and in these states that have smaller epidemics. Two thirds of it went into the public market, mostly targeted to the places where there’s high disease. But only two thirds one that way so that people could purchase them directly and one third went to the Indian health service and to the smaller states that really need these. And so I think what we’re trying to do now is balance the entire testing framework of medium low and high throughput machines to give everyone the maximum flexibility state by state based on what the needs are at that moment. Dr. Deborah Birx: (02:32:35)If there’s an outbreak and you have to do 5,000 tasks, you’re not going to do them on an ID mat now machine that takes 15 minutes for every negative, but you’re going to do it on your high throughput machine. So making sure everybody knows where everything is and what is being run will be really critical moving forward because we can’t leave anything not on, everything has to be on the table in order for us to be able to dramatically increase testing yet another. We went up by a log in three weeks, so if we’re going to increase again, it’s going to have to be getting every piece of equipment on. Mike Pence: (02:33:10)Let me just again say thank you all for your time and attention and thanks to every American who’s joined us tonight. I just want to encourage you, we’re going to continue to lean into this effort to expand testing across the country to deploy supplies to our incredible healthcare workers that have done such an amazing job in the midst of the coronavirus epidemic. But my last word on behalf of the president and on behalf of our entire task force is 30 days to slow the spread. And I know we’re almost at the halfway point and I know it’s been a month of these mitigation strategies. But I hope as you look on, as you see the progress that’s made on the West coast, the beginnings of real progress in the greater New York city area, Louisiana, Detroit and elsewhere. I hope it will only still your resolve to continue to do your part to slow the spread. Because we’ll get through this, but it’ll take all of us to continue to do it. So thank you the American people for all your efforts and we’ll see you tomorrow. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling. Copyright Disclaimer Under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Get a weekly digest of the week’s most important transcripts in your inbox. It’s the news, without the news.

right

apr donald trump hold daily press briefing april briefing berate press coverage handling pandemic play video governor compliment claim authority total state stayathome order dr fauci walk criticism president read transcript transcribe content try rev free save time transcribe transcribe caption speech interview meetings town hall phone call rev large trust fast accurate provider transcription service close captioning subtitle service world donald trump begin like offer condolence good wish people great south endure deadly tornado severe weather texas louisiana mississippi alabama florida georgia tennessee south carolina donald trump administration possible help community foot speak governor representative fema way get soon hear word say fema know great job fema special want warm condolence way tough deal bad bad level bad group high get bad grouping tornado incredible power horrible destructive power donald trump continue critical progress war virus weekend number daily new infection remain flat nationwide flat hospitalization slow hotspot like new york new jersey michigan louisiana clear evidence aggressive strategy combat virus work americans follow guideline incredible donald trump look chart chart model early prediction people look like go unfortunately perish go hopefully way way number sign people thing right horrible thing world country attribute wonderful healthcare advisor expert right beginning appreciate fact dr fauci maybe ask tony word thank tony dr fauci mr president couple thing want comment happen yesterday go hear dr birx soon number talk thing start balance think day think go like ahead dr birx look like bad week week remember speak say bad week go lot death start area flatten particularly place hot spot like new york thing dr fauci second thing productive conversation congressional black caucus morning hour want know exactly go immediate long range health disparity discrepancy infection poor outcome minority general specifically african american clear focus get resource vulnerable able testing able appropriate identification proper appropriate isolate contact trace help mitigate community suffer suffer disproportionately want way dr fauci point want interview yesterday ask hypothetical question hypothetical question difficulty nature hypothetical question fact mitigate early life save answer question right perfectly honestly yes obviously mitigation help time tell mitigation work mitigation work instigate initiate early probably save life initiate later probably lose life initiate certain time take way fault dr fauci let tell experience speak experience talk meeting pro con effectiveness strong mitigation discussion go medical people mean time dr birx go formally recommendation president actually shutdown sense shut strong mitigation discuss obviously concern fact negative consequence nonetheless president listen recommendation go mitigation second time go dr birx president say day need day obviously people problem potential secondary effect nonetheless time president go health recommendation extend day tell know recommendation clearly happen time interpretation response hypothetical question think nice clarify chance clarify thank crosstalk excuse speaker date dr fauci know honest remember date tell time go say mitigation strongly response yes speaker travel restriction dr fauci travel restriction separate want mitigation stage day mitigation travel recommendation go say probably answer yes time europe answer yes time uk answer yes speaker interview say pushback dr fauci speaker pushback come dr fauci wrong choice word know people discuss necessarily president people discuss go maybe harmful effect poor choice word anybody say speaker voluntarily president crosstalk dr fauci voluntarily imply speaker mr president question donald trump way travel ban early travel ban early look statistic happen write couple look statistic january long date talk cdc issue travel notice wuhan china notice confirm case virus united states january document fake news like document thing donald trump long date talk cdc issue travel notice wuhan january zero case united states zero case case report know january cdc issue level travel notice health confirmed case zero case people want act suppose close economy great economy history world case confirm united states january donald trump january cdc begin implement public health entry screening major airport receive great volume passenger wuhan instruction single case coronavirus united states january case fake news say oh act fast remember happen act criticize nancy pelosi sleepy joe biden criticize everybody fact call xenophobic ask biden define call thing democrat actually medium definitely donald trump january long time talk tony talk believe talk end february january early case virus time call wuhan virus wuhan case united states case document come lot come people donald trump january cdc activate emergency operation center case person ad phony person united states person statement time case united states case suppose shut government big economy history world shut case seven case january january case person die hear steve right person donald trump massive country united states america great economy world big china lot right half year prior virus include virus big economy great economy high employment number good employment number good unemployment number good january think person die die john think find donald trump report cdc confirm news mean tell truth cdc report january person die issue travel restriction china think die issue early die say china come sorry see go tell see go like speak tony speak people like donald trump january united states person die wuhan virus issue travel restriction date die get brutalize press way early brutalize press brutalize year decide run politic guess okay good knowledge president united states despite thing say donald trump mandatory quarantine year mandatory year restriction democrats medium call xenophobic joe biden say racist racist say shut entry china shut call xenophobic call racist thing friday night week ago joe biden issue write sure know issue donald trump people campaign smart people write little pr release pretty smart reasonably good good bad issue statement say joe biden agree president trump right close china issue friday night hear john friday night right donald trump fact later friday night release friday night okay crosstalk pretty late like evening pretty late joe biden issue thing february nancy pelosi say come chinatown late february come chinatown think safe come let big parade chinatown parade probably refer san francisco take action early donald trump story new york times total fake fake newspaper write fake story someday hopefully year paper go business go want read like write couple interesting clip go turn light little bit low think find interesting answer question ask question guilty forget importantly go reason success have ok thank video woman concerned right flu country video man people concerned coronavirus hear lot news right reality compare flu example close stage sean hannity video bad moment maybe country politic aside little bit pride aside official professional involve video woman worried americans coronavirus video man go cause major issue united states donald trump ask accelerate term vaccine donald trump suspend travel europe united states day donald trump unleash power federal government effort today officially declare national emergency donald trump patient visit doctor phone video conference additional cost video man million mask available immediate donald trump video woman case clear spread china originate president take widely criticize democrat republicans time halt number flight china idea halt spread disease transmission minimum accuse xenophobia accuse make racist end day probably effective actually pretty aggressive measure spread virus andrew cuomo video team responsive late night early morning far want thank want appreciate gavin newsom video return call reach proactive get mercy ship los angeles directly send thousand medical unit come state california fms field medical station helpful ron desantis video president outstanding vice president outstanding member coronavirus task force responsive phil murphy video ask new jersey access piece bed usns comfort president come call short minute walk grant new jersey big step addition capacity news literally hot press thank president vice president arizona governor video trump approve arizona request presidential major disaster declaration want thank president quick turnaround request wednesday approval saturday morning grateful administration continue support responsiveness larry hogan video want thank president vice president good job communicate governor donald trump hundred clip like governor include democratic democrat governor actually correct term hundred clip like want long want sad people write false story like case guess get new york times highly mean libel law business end go business bad give statement hundred statement hundred statement include democrats democrat governor look say need ventilator donald trump hear ventilator anymore ventilator need right say ask need fairness people right dr birx dr fauci say think need ventilator say agree point dock new york ask remember ventilator country get lot ventilator complain get know beautiful build hospital room country governor louisiana john bel edwards nice say know build second hospital good news happen able fill bed need hospital build perfect start donald trump call say think build second think go need say let get need governor cuomo good spirit faith want jacob javits center build incredible bed incredible covid exactly accurate lot work change duct work seal certain area area rooftop thing bed lot work use call mayor de blasio rightfully call say possible medical help donald trump build facility ask help unable man get help get mayor de blasio lot help javit center know mercy take mercy take comfort los angeles new york covid adaptable easy people send need beginning need few accident few motorcycle few incredible job need turn ready know expression expression ready willing able ready willing able army corps engineer miracle fema miracle doctor get day ago mayor new york say help medical personnel send think doctor nurse respiratory expert real expert get mayor say want tell incredible people incredible say lift spirit hospital worker new york city like see unbelievable say appreciate let know let military people say go brave incredible lift spirit everybody work read phony story acknowledge donald trump acknowledge standpoint acknowledge great work doctor nurse army corps engineer team people incredible job abuse look happen ask ventilator outside country outside country call country call country go try help thousand ventilator build ask ventilator ask bed build hospital think build bed period couple week job incredible say get governor mike pence today governor like donald trump say say expression actually say sure people probably suppose sit somebody office listen time know week call good raise voice statement think hear perfect phone report way think somebody maybe slightly raise raise voice point say want press treat incredible people great job treat unfairly donald trump way way ahead schedule remember time inaudible fake remember criticize early wait long critical go way early go month early criticize way early say understand think educate lot people press love able honest press honestly john proud press work mind criticize wrong people great job yes speaker talk video see video like play room look bit like campaign ad produce video donald trump group office clip bet clip well piece hour oh far well compare speaker produce white house donald trump dan group people period probably hour speaker feel need donald trump get fake news like correct say great job governor california governor new jersey governor new york look new york work close andrew new york ventilator go problem problem get tremendous number thousand get tremendous number ventilator hear ventilator problem bed go problem mean happy javit center incredible need good news bad news say gee wish people want people bring boat bring comfort comfort originally suppose coronavirus suppose donald trump call say number week ago say think need need say medical personnel run javit center medical personnel run ship say necessary military personnel one mayor de blasio great term statement mean appreciate statement impressed level genius bravery great people military people piece take hour inhouse steve speaker clear produce government employee people white house campaignstyle video donald trump use word produce take clip run reason honest think go work go impact think hear clip hear say say act late close country people wish close lose hundred thousand people interestingly right thing right close speaker go dangerous inaudible way think right donald trump look governor ventilator choose able ventilator hear lot panic lot scream want ventilator get ventilator anymore surge suppose come need ventilator john get ready rock people stand ventilator right need new york hour ready rock crosstalk great military operation let regular regular donald trump talk give clip play give hundred people gavin television day ago competitor singe praise question ask negative way say look know want good hard fact impossible donald trump newsom governor california clip clip anthony want good think anthony close country china china ban want anthony say save lot life mean correct want word anthony mouth way like today walk hear go fire fire think wonderful guy crosstalk retweete somebody know say fire matter speaker notice retweete donald trump notice speaker retweete say time fire fauci donald trump somebody opinion opinion speaker read elevate donald trump call say fire fact ask friend public relation office immediately call say like think terrific person view everybody happy anthony everybody happy everybody tell job like mobilization get equipment thing job like governor territory way people mention territory governor territory governor democrats find complain honestly job let know someday let happen let know job donald trump tell one good republican democrat one know help one know stockpile want build stockpile ventilator hard thing ventilator expensive take get believe governor ask far say ask far talk say say strongly need say need bed deborah ahead speaker dr fauci page donald trump beginning know exactly somebody opinion mind controversy think controversy good thing bad thing want honest controversy get get quickly see big deal say dr fauci say great talk dr fauci get dr fauci ask people speak crosstalk totally misinterpret see speaker ask say question hypothetical acknowledge life save mitigation practice place early speaker obvious agree donald trump thing say look go stat right right close death case january doctor recommend close united states america oh terrible case death january week january day little bit day ban ban china think easy ban europe lot people say incredible thing look spain way look flat graph add united states low donald trump capita low close united states america january death january death case january case case death suppose close united states america case speaker close middle march close early crosstalk donald trump close china excuse close china way people think wait long maybe ride disagree okay think mean alternative know lot people say let ride good news think catastrophic number anthony million people die try time cut half donald trump million cut half million people die civil war cut half million cut half people die number reach okay easy reach right thing timing good thing ask come ban china institute tough thing come nancy pelosi month later chinatown say let march go happen come expert cnn network cnn network personally cnn place say need need donald trump say close great economy history world january case death january case death case think suppose close country happen january institute ban joe biden go crazy say need ban crazy know hell ban crazy crosstalk xenophobic wait minute call xenophobic call racist apologize say right thing donald trump democrat think mistake save ten thousand maybe hundred thousand life crosstalk speaker time buy argument buy time use prepare hospital use ramp testing right nearly million people unemployed donald trump disgraceful disgraceful way let listen go speaker thousand americans dead crosstalk rant suppose people feel confident unprecedented crisis donald trump go think speaker time buy month february video gap entire month february donald trump know case united states speaker case february donald trump report zero case zero death january speaker february entire month february donald trump say january speaker video complete gap donald trump january speaker administration february time travel ban buy donald trump lot speaker donald trump lot fact list fact speaker video gap donald trump lot look look know fake know network way cover fake people wise low approval rating time probably speaker million people unemployed ten thousand dead donald trump ask question let ask biden apologize write letter apology speaker think room care joe biden apologize donald trump important democrats think act quickly know think act quickly great job crosstalk keep open country getting beat pretty badly keep open think keep open hear close country let united states america hundred thousand people right dead right right problem press cover way ahead question steve ahead speaker debate authority order country reopen authority donald trump ultimate authority go minute go finish go tell thing right say let go let closing point predict outside low number cut way seven fraction number happen literally civil war disaster minimal number think feel pretty good go substantially anthony thousand hope donald trump right today department health human service announce new contract procure large number additional ventilator defense production act lot way like talk addition receive today receive today additional ventilator donald trump probably go need add stockpile big surge place substantial surge ready rock contract general electric hillrom medtronic resme viair combine dpa contract announce week general motor phillip contract hamilton zole add ventilator strategic national stockpile lot thousand close add end total end year go help country go help state need help state stockpile donald trump know suppose buy stockpile state stockpile suppose unfortunately state lot people want talk talk right time want point focused get past nightmare epidemic pandemic want get past need ventilator get ventilator think know hear ventilator ventilator need ventilator state need ventilator get ventilator need hospital bed deny hospital bed responsibility donald trump help go army corps engineer great job build bed fact build thousand actually need safe want safe rise incredible occasion mean build bed think think louisiana go heavy call governor say maybe build second hospital want build need call say think go need thousand room thousand bed lot need one stop want waste prepared build thousand need think go need look like plateaue maybe case come donald trump addition order total mobile decontamination system decontamination system battelle ohio incredible thing take mask time decontaminate mask ask beginning sterilize sanitize mask turn great company ohio send great equipment go million mask week clean decontaminate great frankly think people think long time ago donald trump flight land today project air bridge massive airless lift operation bring personal protective equipment united states deliver nearly half million mask million glove million surgical mask million gown million gown glove mask surgical equipment come state need state suppose buy stuff need ready build stockpile like crazy donald trump see story inherit administration mike administration inherit stockpile cupboard bare like ammunition medical supply ventilator lot thing read story know happen want spend money date facilitate supply million mask nationwide week send million mask commonwealth pennsylvania vice president detail get great detail think pretty amazing story lot mask stock come donald trump expand hospital surge capacity key area opening portion certain va hospital nonveteran coronavirus patient include east orange new jersey medical center facility manhattan brooklyn ready able beautiful hopefully will need frankly build governor want case tell want err caution donald trump united states conduct nearly million test virus million nation perform approximately test single day rate testing especially high area hard hit virus look hit area virus hard example capita testing new york high rest world nih cdc fda currently validate antibody test allow determine virus potentially immune infection look antibody test go interesting short lot thing develop speak donald trump race develop effective treatment drug company gilead announce drug remdesivir show promising result promising compassionate use setting addition fda grant emergency use authorization device remove certain protein bloodstream possibly prevent patient immune system overreact virus damaging vital organ big problem donald trump seven day administration deploy roughly million dose hydroxychloroquine national stockpile million dose buy people country recently friend tell get well use drug know combine zpak combine zinc depend doctor recommendation have good result tell think anybody recommend place honest think fact recommend probably set lot lot good thing happen lot good test donald trump pursue blood therapy know convalescent plasma convalescent plasma therapy use antibodie blood recover patient treat sick actually old procedure modern way difficult time work ensure census complete safely accuracy ask extension obviously right allow census go ask delay major delay think possibly knock door long period time census bureau recently decision temporary suspend field operation datum collection activity help stop spread addition million americans continue complete questionnaire online census bureau ask congress extension donald trump know ask call act god call situation think day nearly administration take bold action help american worker friday americans begin receive cash payment authorize historic trillion relief bill end week nearly million americans receive total billion secretary treasury tell time go nicely speak moment payment payment directly bank bank account people million additional payment follow typical family receive family additionally paycheck protection program tremendous success extend increase donald trump tremendous success extend increase tremendous success successful bank little bit long distribute money go rapidly donald trump process billion loan help small business retain worker urgently need lawmaker set aside partisan agenda replenish program new fund incredible success need money go care business open donald trump want thank governor health professional scientist business leader incredible hard work input past month long month mike work lot like forever donald trump have discussion team expert close complete plan open country hopefully ahead schedule important soon finalize new important guideline governor information need start safely open state administration plan corresponding guideline american people confidence need begin return normal life want want country open want return normal life country go open go successfully open explain short number day exactly go donald trump probably hear develop committee actually call number committee prominent people country successful people field announce tomorrow donald trump weekend united states help facilitate unprecedented agreement nation opecplus opec plus additional energy produce nation represent world large oil produce country stabilize market fact think see big stabilization couple day country world cut oil production approximately million barrel people say million think number actually hit go close million barrel day help lot save job texas oklahoma north dakota big energy state donald trump historic action help nearly million american worker support oil gas industry monumental agreement want thank saudi arabia king saudi arabia crown prince saudi arabia want thank president putin russia want thank good friend man friend president mexico show great flexibility president lopez obrador show great flexibility tremendous intelligence easy want thank mexico president historic deal historic go donald trump time challenge certainly time probably like decade strengthen sustain bond love loyalty unite americans proud american people look patriotism people shine courage doctor nurse line dedication food supply worker commitment citizen achieve victory virus go happen go happen soon people think donald trump go smart smart go safe go listen great doctor medical professional beat invisible enemy pave way great resurgence great resurgence american prosperity country want want work go safely want donald trump like ask vice president pence word follow dr fauci dr birx think know emergency want steve come ask steve come secretary treasury talk little bit maybe couple question happen tell success have thank steven mnuchin mr president mr vice president announce pleased ahead schedule deliver economic impact payment know check mail want deliver direct deposit ahead schedule start process friday expect million hardworke americans direct deposit wednesday know important hardworke americans home work moment steven mnuchin receive wednesday wednesday launch irsgov click irsgov payment file tax return information available able d able direct deposit information day automatically deposit money account want electronically important day age secure bank steven mnuchin social security beneficiary need direct deposit file need file return irsgov enter information authenticate pleased ahead schedule steven mnuchin like announce progress make new sba program ppp let remind everybody brand new program week old distribute confirm billion loan lender participate multiple multiple sba year especially want thank broadbase community bank participate bank loan process process week president say go congress ask money sure business access steven mnuchin comment state distribute half money week state week ahead time deliver half money state week steven mnuchin let finally comment work closely federal reserve week announce expand facility new facility total trillion liquidity particular like highlight main street lending facility company worker people midsize business municipal facility state local government able access fund give shortage happy answer question donald trump question steve press speaker mnuchin thank sir speaker pelosi minority leader schumer say negotiation right additional funding small business loan package leader mcconnell say add package specific small business loan opinion administration sort horsetrading small business loan steven mnuchin president view vice president view bipartisan program sba program republican program democrat program bipartisan program commit small business program know democrats want talk money hospital state right send money hospital state come close money steven mnuchin know president vice president say sba funding bill president talk potentially add infrastructure thing think likelihood need money sit try bipartisan bill important deliver small business people work small business speaker sir speaker emergency president say president say emergency donald trump speaker bill steven mnuchin want run money billion billion want run money want create panic people will want ask billion program steven mnuchin let remind dollar spend program save dollar unemployment insurance ask billion will cost speaker follow speaker concern lift guideline soon mean economic impact understand economic argument get people work obviously economic risk lift early see spike case steven mnuchin course economic risk direction review president today broad list business people go help advise president need reopen economy want sure combination economic impact payment small business payment enhance unemployment insurance president clear want sure hardworke american liquidity wait reopen government speaker believe country excuse reopen steven mnuchin discussion president know consider believe go decision later week donald trump safe want safe speaker advice president steven mnuchin advice soon ready open base medical professional work closely president outside business leader develop plan speaker ask mr president sketch reopen economy look like think go open think donald trump day probably make statement exactly look like know look like want advice sense big business council actually set number different council committee guess lot smart people think good advice want safe time get country open speaker president speaker understand mr president think possibility open incrementally think people restaurant concert cinema donald trump think eventually yeah hope speaker ask final donald trump think eventually think go boom think go quickly people want work think pen demand like long time speaker steven mnuchin donald trump stock market mean think stock market level right world country go look european union badly decimate look country look china way see number look china look country decimate think stock market tremendously high number look little bleak hit certain point start go think great tribute fact demand yeah speaker president thank sir regard tweet early today think steve question question provision constitution give president power open close state economy donald trump provision legal brief want speaker look forward sir follow happen instance want state reopen california new york open donald trump think everybody want open mean guess speaker speaker ask thing donald trump guess happen think happen speaker president crosstalk speaker state close order school close state order business like restaurant bar place donald trump let happen prefer let happen want close let happen like way donald trump seven remain sort semilockdown look state good job different new york place hit hard ahead speaker prepared crosstalk state order open school order force kid able donald trump ahead speaker yes mr president follow consortium state today california oregon washington west coast northeastern states totally represent million people say go cooperate decide reopen state donald trump decide speaker undermine try donald trump let tell simple go simply president united states authority president authority powerful president united states call shot state problem country like see back job think possible decision president united states donald trump say go work state important local government pinpoint talk like microchip pinpoint local government hopefully good job good job step fast approval president united states speaker state refuse reopen order amendment constitution say power reside president congress reside state overcome donald trump state refuse open like person run election go open go open speaker ballot box think donald trump go happen want open open open state people want want different situation will state day go specific state kind problem new york louisiana michigan place get hit hard illinois get hit hard state want open want open soon possible want open safely yeah speaker mr president today french president emmanuel macron say shutdown france till middle mean ban flight new york donald trump france get hit hard france get hit hard friend france spain decimate look happen italy know fact happen italy hit hard speaker secretary mnuchin everybody like business people economic council invite agree crosstalk steven mnuchin invite review name president today crosstalk speaker sector energy steven mnuchin basically vertical single area economy want represent speaker thing need work industry oil industry job save oil industry job deal past weekend steven mnuchin think thing work larry kudlow speaker specifically need steven mnuchin economic plan single economy obviously case oil industry hit especially hard supply issue demand issue speaker figure bailout money airline allocation airline steven mnuchin pleased work hard think probably see press release discussion airline personally discussion major airline ceo specifically create exception small airline process quickly think quickly decision come pleased discussion donald trump good inaudible speaker secretary steven mnuchin speaker need phase stimulus crosstalk donald trump want discussion speaker donald trump second good discussion airline good discussion speaker possible reopen economy donald trump want hear day speaker need phase push lieu stimulus steven mnuchin let comment congress bipartisan basis approve unprecedented money help american worker american business fault business close diligently execute everybody say go month people money execute quickly create new sba program week job right execute billion add trillion dollar fed steven mnuchin area particularly concerned small business program frankly incredibly popular successful anticipate president want clear money review president money need support economy support hardworke americans work congress time donald trump steve want talk phase steven mnuchin phase president talk infrastructure long period time talk extent hospital need money medical issue monitor want sure incentive restaurant entertainment people type thing look specifically provision stimulate part economy money issue regulatory issue speaker clarify understanding authority vis vis governor specific instance governor issue stay home order donald trump authority president authority somebody president united states authority total way get speaker total authority total donald trump total total speaker crosstalk donald trump governor know speaker governor donald trump governor know couple band speaker donald trump excuse speaker rescind order donald trump couple band democrat governor agree agree speaker authority cover donald trump authority president united states have subject talk total crosstalk yeah ahead speaker thing speak see video travel ban europe reopen america want reopen border people europe uk donald trump right time speaker soon crosstalk donald trump good question actually look italy great right spain great right hear france extend stay inside order extend think short period time want quickly want sure good right strong ban go way heal speaker month donald trump tell france go week john john dr fauci say take advice question mitigation recommendation accept place decision say donald trump sure john sure give advice ban think take advice ban know john ban crosstalk social distancing talk shutting travel activity question decision say maybe difficult important decision presidency assure american people advice doctor dr fauci dr birx advice health expert donald trump people absolutely advice ahead john recommendation need day donald trump think likely think far page speaker mr president thing governor cuomo say today state capacity mass testing ahead reopen crosstalk donald trump crosstalk suppose crosstalk speaker purchase diagnostic test equipment need federal help state donald trump need help speaker donald trump ground get local mayor local representative people speaker need supply donald trump time unprecedented literally rebuild test rebuild industry inherit inherit previous administration totally break somebody eventually cupboard bare inherit broken testing great testing leave executive abbott think happen great test donald trump fact think question secretary treasury anybody steve anybody secretary treasury wait speaker secretary crosstalk donald trump work okay speaker sir secretary mnuchin question colleague able room curious sba rule prevent small casino get relief take look go change crosstalk steven mnuchin small casino thing small tavern restaurant literally small gaming thing come additional guidance want clear small casino speaker sir speaker mnuchin speaker steven mnuchin speaker letter house republicans send weekend liquidity mortgage service owner steven mnuchin speaker explain look steven mnuchin think comment week ago sub committee task force fsoc specifically study issue appropriate people ginnie mae automatically take action conversation fhfa go fannie freddie say extent need certain authority treasury accommodate aware issue frankly study issue way covid concern nonbank servicer wellcapitalize go sure market function properly speaker sir see number relief bill democrats republicans able push forward different non coronavirus specific funding priority try fund specific coronavirus go addition instance change labor rule left want right wonder push prefer addon steven mnuchin think expectation covid relate people broad view covid related impact single business think president talk kennedy center good institution obviously major priority bill hit covid relate president instruct want specific bill covid relate item donald trump report kennedy center understand democrats want want want agree order worker want worker company employ worker look look extraneous nonsense speaker argue time china man discuss disruptive global economy accurate steven mnuchin clear china ban task force time sure think travel time active china ban report new york times accurate task force time involve matter fact think travel speaker proposal senator hawley direct payment employer pay people lay people payroll administration support proposal steven mnuchin ppp ppp basically send money small business american worker people pay efficient way dollar say dollar unemployment importantly want people associate business soon president ready open economy business want business fall apart successful program crosstalk donald trump talk unemployment unemployment speaker donald trump indirectly state prefer send directly people democrats want send unemployment system talk equipment system run state hear get money steven mnuchin state encourage work state try update computer long haul crosstalk thank thank mr president donald trump steve phase come steve speaker quick question say say president united states authority total true tell donald trump know go go write paper go necessary governor need way ultimately come federal government say get governor feel certain will problem yeah ahead speaker governor agree authority decide state crosstalk donald trump ask anybody speaker crosstalk donald trump know ahead speaker tell president total authority donald trump speaker mention vice president governor today governor hogan maryland urge administration ask congress billion help stabilize budgetary shortfall create coronavirus donald trump nice governor hogan appreciate governor hogan statement speaker cuomo say cares act ignore state government crosstalk shortfall inaudible request crosstalk donald trump speaker say cares act ignore budgetary shortfall donald trump look thing phase talk state talk hospital talk state batter talk hospital certainly willing look speaker urge congress behalf donald trump come talk state talk hospital inaudible speaker mr president governor michigan gretchen whitmer thursday sign executive order ban sale nonessential good state follow donald trump sale speaker essential good ban sale non essential good call draconian unconstitutional president think state follow example come week federal government intervene donald trump think go happen think extreme think go long way start think strong strong position make lot progress michigan let work speaker status funding world health organization donald trump go talk soon get report happy world health organization happy world trade organization rip everybody country year rip everybody world health world trade like bobbsey twin look country year year people lot report talk world trade organization lot progress win case time know leave treat fairly donald trump country country point rarely win lawsuit world trade organization win lot know play game pull win billion lawsuit nice speaker expect decision week cut funding donald trump end week go decision yeah right lot thing happen ahead speaker china consequence china misinformation share donald trump know consequence speaker ask appear donald trump know consequence speaker consequence mr president misinformation donald trump tell china find tell speaker people concerned stonewall crosstalk donald trump start say consequence speaker ask time inaudible consequence china donald trump know consequence speaker ask say donald trump go find speaker say crosstalk donald trump tell probably person earth tell speaker say consequence donald trump ahead yeah speaker president actually question mr vice president agree president statement understanding federalism power total way describe like add context like add way discuss mike pence support president leadership national emergency declaration sign stand today time american history state issue emergency declaration territory unprecedented time life nation unfortunately president reflect health expert continue reflect american people heed president coronavirus guideline america state governor take implement state significant outbreak implement additional measure provide datum case good practice make real progress country mistake speaker circumscribe total mike pence mistake long history country authority president united states national emergency unquestionably plenary look time war national emergency president say happily brief day ahead president charge work health expert go bring extraordinary group american business leader council president work cdc go produce new guideline base datum state territory nation go guidance president indicate continue respect leadership partnership forge governor america unprecedented time mike pence tell look fact despite heartbreaking loss americans look fact health expert tell think feel sense gratitude american people gratitude extraordinary team counsel president step president trump take policy governor implement america discuss today task force look european union nearly time mortality rate united states america today tribute extraordinary healthcare worker dedication tireless work tribute fact american people practice mitigation effort president counsel nation advice good scientist month ago hospital overwhelmed overwhelmed hour mike pence tell stand today proud stand alongside president team serve american people challenging hour american look number level maybe begin encourage sacrifice americans american family mitigation effort save life see nation time speaker state tell talk governor bit coalition state west coast northeast tell go announce announce mike pence phil murphy governor connecticut express today go speak discuss regional basis recommendation assure today speaker house sir mike pence assure today conference think governor today well hour half tell president produce direct produce additional guideline state certify cdc inform governor local community mayor good way forward base unique circumstance state community face mike pence think clear american people see experience washington state begin california extraordinary challenge great new york city area include new jersey connecticut challenge new orleans louisiana detroit chicago mike pence new orleans louisiana detroit chicago part houston see case mitigation effort truly work work state case perfect sense work regional basis speaker know ahead time plan donald trump mike pence president donald trump know mike pence sorry hear question speaker tell let know donald trump mike pence hear say sorry donald trump like cooperation go cooperation cooperate perfectly watch mike pence affirm president say hear today think ninth conference governor think american proud partnership president forge governor country extraordinary statement datum adam polowczyk get moment flow resource world move area face challenge mean president direct ensure state need need spirit hear republicans democrat governor today reflective partnership forward president goal reopen america expect kind partnership interest nation donald trump right ahead speaker hear mask donald trump hear speaker district columbia argue short change recent funding bill treat territory instead state right phase donald trump look certainly hear complaint mayor happy today say good thing okay yeah ahead speaker president talk difficult decision go reopen economy wonder weigh mind thought second wave reopen economy shut thing donald trump hope will happen certainly hope will happen weigh mind okay ahead ahead yes speaker president donald trump ahead speaker question colleague able china deploy aircraft carrier south china sea weekend amid claim chinese state medium covid reduce military readiness region kind response think response action donald trump difficulty relationship china happy certain thing happen period time know explicit know know china see see thing pro constitution fine speaker crosstalk early say put economic task force think recommendation happen early expect mean suggest start recommend donald trump want go put guideline recommendation fairly quickly day speaker roll donald trump go look certain state certain big part country go put recommendation guideline soon stay steve guideline fit area uniform set guideline donald trump want tell right strong indication know pretty good idea want video conference conference lot good people have certain field energy entertainment restaurant et cetera et cetera people restaurant deductability deductability fast mean deductability restaurant business hot business end long time ago year ago need people restaurant speaker michelle obama today get mailin vote nationwide possible solution go state say partisan issue advisor tell save life donald trump ballot talk speaker massive scale coronavirus donald trump know mean happen today speaker today nonpartisan group donald trump wish lot luck speaker abbott labs say donald trump ahead speaker mr president little bit confusion phone call yesterday president putin kremlin say discuss current issue ensure strategic security refer white house readout enlighten donald trump discuss thing discuss china discuss different thing primarily oil imagine helpful get stabilization price stabilization number barrel think number go close maybe close go think important speak king saudi arabia important opec call opec state nation come good agreement ahead speaker strategic security donald trump talk china talk border talk border little bit border mexico know mexico big deal mexico complex standpoint mexico easy deal mexico president appreciate certain flexibility talk border talk china talk mexico speaker sound like arm treaty donald trump talk arm yes important actually yeah good point speaker abbott labs say testing go great know machine send governor say material actually conduct test donald trump material governor material go speaker federal government distribute donald trump talk local government talk governor material machine fact go ask mike soon leave powerful machine know talk abbott talk governor machine know refer speaker different machine donald trump big powerful machine certain state case capacity know happen illinois speaker real quick test send new one rose garden include governor sununu new hampshire cartridge actually conduct test cartridge donald trump think answer mike pence rapidly increase number donald trump increase number speaker look triple donald trump increase pretty quickly yeah steve day donald trump machine work lot state big machine lot know know mike go talk speaker mention week ago google put website handle drive test donald trump apple speaker give move past donald trump lot people like standpoint constitutional right lot people like people think great work understand speaker talk testing website remember say website google operate think county california right donald trump google look google work apple look great company world look thing year look go obsolete good thing happen unbelievable see presentation today talk incredible plus think tony think vaccine work hard vaccine think answer vaccine believe great thing come respect need testing period go great thing speaker sir contact trace google apple different subject contact donald trump google apple know partnership work speaker donald trump work element work couple different thing google apple google work know have testing believe singular fashion speaker question drive testing website google apple contact trace get process contact trace phone opt alert contact coronavirus feel donald trump amazing thing lot people big constitutional problem know amazing thing actually know country think similar good speaker country think donald trump hear singapore singapore little bit setback break know care know folk singapore great job go quickly singapore country look thing country thing speaker prefer americans use thing donald trump want constitutional thing constitutional problem mechanical problem make determination go discuss lot people week accurate way lot people problem yeah ahead speaker testing question maybe dr fauci talk antibody test quickly happen donald trump move think answer leave move quickly move test go year modern incredible version move antibody test move okay steve theodore roosevelt die decide status captain crozier crosstalk donald trump go navy understand navy go make decision break think ship stop vietnam pandemic honest think captain write letter ern hemingway say write letter know give order stop vietnam stop vietnam sudden sailor people ship affect know idea good idea middle pandemic yes john thing question question constitutionality wonder change view donald trump change know exactly go change fact want rely state maybe fact get thing fact want use power thing look john say standpoint constitution donald trump constitution john think governor donald trump look constitutionally look federalism look different way john fact want exert power different power ask federal government power federal government absolute power power use power john donald trump work state like go local government guess seven state south carolina go away discuss time look individual state good job good job decision fact fine absolute right want want good relationship happen notice state talk democrat governor governor good job control well somebody washington say set testing site parking lot walmart washington state far away donald trump say relationship state governor good announce short period time exactly go okay couple ahead speaker coronavirus joe biden presumptive democratic nominee plan start share white house start share information coronavirus president crosstalk donald trump call coronavirus standpoint look big failure tremendous failure lot failure look history people die talk late late late like exist big problem cause lot people big problem joe biden like briefing certainly briefing know yeah speaker jared ivanka serve new task force go balance donald trump speaker donald trump yes ahead speaker want clarify early conversation description multiple different council task force explain exactly structure crosstalk donald trump mike task force white house task force bring point brilliantly deal governor deal governor way call get well well well hostile beginning time finish today good friendly think online anybody drive crazy say get ventilator get different thing need bed lot bed right think important speaker donald trump err sake think think new york need bed ask think need ventilator ask right ventilator ready march tell ready march ventilator ready country need need build lot ventilator go point believe go stockpile include state stockpile want work kind arrangement go help country italy spain france have big problem desperately need germany need ventilator go lot ventilator lot hear number lot come week week tremendous come okay final question speaker ask task force go structure donald trump addition number committee transportation committee go manufacturing committee tomorrow have religious leader committee great group religious leader have committee religious leader see go church go faith leader committee go committee committee ultimately go decision go decision fairly quickly think go need correct decision hope steve steve form economic task force tomorrow want recommendation donald trump know want form form instruction sophisticated people good people field gee meet go meet week say want tell good name business profession religion great name people think probably know good call go speak soon question statement want response maybe ideally go learn able learn call new guideline go new guideline come soon think go good think go smooth hope go safe thank john thought stanley chera thought stanley chera donald trump chera friend long time great real estate person pass away great real estate person great great sort legend new york real estate call couple week ago say test positive stanley early guess stanley go hospital come go coma unconscious long period time great man leave charitable great philanthropist successful person manhattan real estate business get know lot donald trump excited friend new york president united states like young boy young boy like young boy excited think good job happy proud administration test positive unfortunately sad thing thank thank thank doctor thank mike pence mr president president mention task force today speak nation governor reflect fact state emergency declaration place american history billion dollar distribute state stafford act productive reflective president trump ongoing direction work closely state sure state area impact coronavirus need need speak issue testing supply go ask dr deborah birx come forward admiral polowczyk reflect topic mike pence birx lead effort task force early rapidly expand testing early president form publicprivate partnership commercial lab stand today million test perform add estimate lab assume reasonable projection report cdc think number close million test perform mike pence mention new test work closely abbott laboratory president team meet today white house rapidly increase availability cartridge abbott produce roughly cartridge day fema acquire initial supply distribute state work state distribute work supplier create additional cartridge point ask dr birx expand moment fact new test abbott laboratory expect new antibody test approve fda matter day antibody test produce rate million test month mike pence reality commercial laboratory president bring well month ago initiate public private partnership produce hundred thousand test single week dr birx team apprehend believe point time roche equipment high speed testing inform governor today think capacity regard abbott system tell governor today think laboratory capacity exist united states today utilize governor mike pence send clear message governor today reach hospital reach lab identify presence roche amplicore abbott activate literally estimate test day united states governor state lab simply activate machine double testing united states literally overnight know governor team watch briefing remind respectfully identify lab team deploy reach lab activate lab mike pence subject supply say couple time podium today let time president trump direction deal state personal protective equipment ventilator sure state need need recognize watch overall curve coronavirus america understandably national number reality outbreak take place individual curve west coast new york city area louisiana michigan continue contend chicago houston metropolitan area mike pence give opportunity ensure personal protective equipment ventilator available critical basis tell incredibly proud effort partnership state stand today require ventilator deny ventilator united states america point short ventilator strategic national stockpile admiral polowczyk detail begin receive newly manufacture ventilator thousand week middle literally ventilator available deployment country mike pence go let describe specific detailing resource want share number especially care worker country area impact coronavirus know resource surge hospital system point need continue let recognize dr birx reflect datum maybe comment testing admiral polowczyk step describe supply hear dr fauci question dr deborah birx thank mr vice president know slide cumulative case yes thank want different way look today obviously look case count americans state metro area want absolute number new york new jersey metro area dwarf metro area chicago detroit boston metro area case new york new jersey metro area bring case lot hear talk lot metro area new york new jersey county rockland westchester suffolk nassau bergen new jersey focused get resource metro area dr deborah birx slide new york new jersey metro area metro area track closely want curve start plateau look detroit look philadelphia look louisiana louisiana green detroit gray board metro area metro area high concentration individual american people large city difficult socially distance impressed work mayor governor happen want clearly chicago boston chicago orange boston yellow cross detroit focused need area providence category difficult slide dr deborah birx high look axis slide axis slide want people understand small epidemic metro area track independently epidemic outbreak happen state want perspective significant new yorknew jersey issue track closely want assure state track closely work governor mayor want curve flatten major metropolitan area start decrease excited case know mortality lag track number individual succumb dr deborah birx want note yes mortality combine european country equal size united states think thing incredible work american people incredible work healthcare provider system hospital resource ability respond need patient think superb healthcare delivery happen low mortality dr deborah birx mention quickly testing hear talk little bit misquoted misaligned multiple abbott machine go clear having spend year laboratory high throughput machine roche think roche abbott machine run thousand assay time abbott company work hard week ago get million test utilize million test week laboratory platform far date test utilize week worth work appeal laboratory director bring machine dr deborah birx week dr fauci incredible team researcher agree reach find additional roche abbott high throughput machine research institution critical research work bring online supplement laboratory work create mosaic complete strategy bring high throughput platform medium throughput platform low throughput rapid platform d d go answer number test need week run test minute cartridge day get say machine hundred run thousand single timeframe need bring assay team create single laboratory single research institution united states define complete capacity dr deborah birx united states define complete capacity single state expectation governor understand exactly state understand state order able meet need american people increase test know know week go test total million test total week know increase hhs admiral gerard team go supplement team bring additional resource platform united states america like ventilator bring capacity bear continue increase test dr deborah birx course epidemic decrease able use testing surveillance want state represent graphic large state kenyon containment outbreak investigation able talk state remind talk state health official find outbreak nursing home need continue protect continue test nursing home know particularly vulnerable group group begin understand asymptomatic transmission intend pass virus know essential worker united states people unknowingly infect pass virus dr deborah birx one interested finding find symptom increase surveillance deliberative understand way look sentinel surveillance site think outbreak people symptom sentinel surveillance find symptom decade hiv allow right control hivaid epidemic subsaharan africa find people asymptomatic treat asymptomatic know work closely cdc sure bring capacity american people dr deborah birx insight work continue obviously track single county community finally go additional group group hivaid activist community worker understand test talk rna base test viral load hiv know explain community sample mean run assay essentially virologist understand assay understand antibody assay antibody assay cancel utilize hiv testing united states translator american public local mayor understand test essentially understand virology immunology ask help communicate test community ready antibody test measure different viral load nose diagnosis able understand test use use critical great thing united states america community group understand test able discuss level community mike pence go inaudible minute dr tony fauci let straight heart lose dad year ago today april tough day family morning brother sister send picture dad like think family americans lose want tell heart prayer million americans deal heart break loss family family member struggle illness let encourage midst loss american people put mitigation measure practice family today mike pence want encourage roughly halfway point day slow spread heart way minimize loss experience nation family encourage know number vast majority state american people work dr fauci dr birx entire team continually ask remind american people today day slow spread hasten day heal land dr fauci dr fauci want comment relate question ask question want time idea evaluate purely public health standpoint reentry sort normality health people know claim know economic go people know lot go advice committee president talk thing know health people physician scientist public health people mention think weekend show people think go like light switch dr fauci go way large country different impact new york different part country midwest mountain region california washington different new orlean discuss consider public health aspect likely refer sort like rolling reentry go size fit know go time look dr birx amazing job show datum chart go likely influence recommendation assure recommendation base purely public health president lot input honest public health recommendation mike pence tony admiral polowczyk update supply question admiral polowczyk mr vice president ventilator slide stop right thank start stockpile morning contract deliver week ventilator pool math include dpa action gm issue call rate order vendor allow line privilege speak supply chain write contract thousand plus family talk continue work ensure ventilator actually continue work realize downstream supply chain need additional defense production act work admiral polowczyk air bridge flight schedule complete horizon number material bring supplement volume need go series slide new york dr birx provide geographic reference align supply chain city little bit theme talk lot city geographic area align supply chain geographic area try realize rest nation need supply align supply chain site care public hospital va private hospital nursing home responder acute care line business week monday week friday saturday past week mass material come new york new jersey metro area volume admiral polowczyk detroit talk hotspot volume delivery go detroit time period chicago go run kind quick geographic alignment place dr birx talk concentrate supply new orlean understanding washington dc right joe nan talk today kind early entry washington dc baltimore position supply ahead need hope washington baltimore volume try ahead end philadelphia admiral polowczyk slide city roll save little time include boston houston volume material flow commercial network airbridge supply geographic region prioritize site care final topic mask department defense announce dpa action weekend come dod friday white house approve saturday contract award today company m honeywell inaudible drager cares act sign march end end essentially week money title authority dod action take baseline produce domestically million mask upwards fall end winter million mask domestically admiral polowczyk currently fill demand overseas source additive mask ramp low dependence oversee source essentially secure big piece supply chain company city smithfield rhode island phoenix arizona del rio texas lexington north carolina sheboygan fall wisconsin aberdeen north dakota produce fabric increase production facility ramp mike pence right great job thank admiral slide guess week end april distribute direct distribution million mask million surgical mask million glove share sure healthcare worker know resource flow go continue flow number week include instance president announce able tell governor tom wolf pennsylvania today week receive million mask support healthcare challenge face broad philadelphia area happy couple question ahead speaker admiral dr fauci mind admiral useful go supply make way system talk have buy foreign product catch make useful take mid march government start place bulk order kind supply admiral polowczyk come pentagon march speak march defense production act think use forward know speaker question time crosstalk admiral polowczyk equip talk march forward joint staff inaudible speaker want ask dr fauci say give president recommendation dr birx come plan guy comfortable president decision willing come tell tell american public actually recommend follow recommend dr fauci mean speaker president stand day outline plan willing stand tell tell american public recommend difference dr fauci think conversation president confidential go choice think speaker know actually listen health advice provide dr fauci mean tell thing listen think go happen know sure input number individual represent number aspect society health thing tell advice base evidence observation good public health approach speaker fauci start today president frustration reporting early decision make process january february sure know reason press kind reporting president come deal pandemic learn lesson having watch unfold close think mistake early future president learn benefit hindsight course inaudible know obviously understand dr fauci want use word mistake fog war decision input number individual move target want take context couple day want mistake thing well course mean perfect well mean hesitate mistake speaker benefit hindsight caveat well dr fauci mean comment outside field thing think evolve mind virus bad think go base learn early feel jump animal human capability go human human sudden find animal human probably way start realize probably lot infection maybe deal little bit learn affect human human transmit efficiently dr fauci question perfect maybe mistake maybe try delve little bit go information forthcoming like sudden find deal bad nightmare people ask bad nightmare brand new virus respiratory transmit high degree transmissibilitie high degree morbidity mortality know mistake maybe able realize early sure mistake evolve thing finally realize say whoa bad imagine speaker right guy mike pence speaker meet abbott laboratorie ask mike pence speak abbott laboratory today increase significantly production cartridge minute test remember scale rapidly expand testing country today reason hear dr birx entire team go work governor laboratory country identify machine exist today activate test want work abbott laboratory long term current trend line hold hope literally pray soon find slope coronavirus country epidemic current form come end decision day ahead reopen america president trump want policy place stay open mike pence have kind surveillance testing available country cdc immediate contact tracing positive test deploy resource like new abbott minute test specifically nursing home speak today governor baker massachusetts governor hogan maryland innovative implement federal guideline prevent spread infectious disease nursing home commend able increase manufacture device deploy go forward month ahead focal point effort rapidly continue expand testing today governor louisiana tell today test high capita accord number state union congratulate make sure go forward infrastructure testing america deal coronavirus return future let bid good evening tomorrow speaker president question cartridge timeline new hampshire governor say federal government charge distribute fema timeline say end illinois timeline work mike pence let let dr birx address initial traunch purchase abbott laboratory machine country fema acquire certain immediately distribute state abbott laboratories literally produce day available open market go work abbott state deploy resource work manufacturer increase production cartridge want add inaudible dr deborah birx perfectly say ask question want sure people understand go specifically indian health service state small epidemic third go public market target place high disease third way people purchase directly go indian health service small state need think try balance entire testing framework medium low high throughput machine maximum flexibility state state base need moment dr deborah birx outbreak task go d mat machine take minute negative go high throughput machine make sure everybody know run critical move forward leave table order able dramatically increase test go log week go increase go get piece equipment mike pence thank time attention thank american join tonight want encourage go continue lean effort expand testing country deploy supply incredible healthcare worker amazing job midst coronavirus epidemic word behalf president behalf entire task force day slow spread know halfway point know month mitigation strategy hope look progress west coast beginning real progress great new york city area louisiana detroit hope resolve continue slow spread continue thank american people effort tomorrow transcribe content try rev save time transcribe captioning subtitle copyright disclaimer title usc section allowance fair use purpose criticism comment news reporting teaching scholarship research fair use permit copyright statute infringe weekly digest week important transcript inbox news news

This bill establishes an advisory council within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and sets out other efforts to address economic security and trade, as such matters relate to DHS's mission. Specifically, DHS must establish the DHS Trade and Economic Security Council, comprised of component heads or their designees, to advise on economic security concerns, such as identification of concentrated risks and priorities for protecting the nation's economic security. Additionally, the bill provides statutory authority for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Trade and Economic Security and specifies its functions and duties. These include, among other responsibilities, coordination of supply chain policy.

right

bill establish advisory council department homeland security dhs set effort address economic security trade matter relate dhss mission specifically dhs establish dhs trade economic security council comprise component head designee advise economic security concern identification concentrated risk priority protect nation economic security additionally bill provide statutory authority office assistant secretary trade economic security specify function duty include responsibility coordination supply chain policy

Ep. 1724 - Tucker's Back! Published: 5/10/2023 (in RSS feed: 1h 17m 56s) Tucker Carlson announces his comeback with a show on Twitter. a New York jury finds Donald Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation to the tune of 5 million. and the DOJ comes after George Santos. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro show. Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. Thousands of my listeners have already secured their network data to join them at ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben. While Tucker Carlson has now broken his silence last week he put out a video saying that he would be back sometime in the near future. And yesterday he put out about a two minute video in which he explained that he was In fact back. He will be launching a version of his show. He says on Twitter, here was Tucker's announcement yesterday. The best you can hope for in the news business at this point is the freedom to tell the fullest truth that you can. But there are always limits and you know that if you bump up against those limits often enough you will be fired for it. That's not a guess. It's guaranteed. Twitter has long served as the place where our national conversation incubates and develops. Twitter is not a partisan site. Everybody's allowed here and we think that's a good thing. And yet for the most part, the news that you see analyzed on Twitter comes from media organizations that are themselves thinly disguised propaganda outlets. You see it on cable news, you talk about it on Twitter. The result may feel like a debate, but actually the gatekeepers are still in charge. We think that's a bad system. We know exactly how it works and we're sick of it. Starting soon we'll be bringing a new version of the show we've been doing for the last six and a half years to Twitter. We bring some other things too, which we'll tell you about, but for now we're just grateful to be here. Free speech is the main right that you have. Without it, you have no others. See you soon. And so it is not perfectly clear at this point exactly what Tucker show on Twitter will look like. What is clear is that there's been no financial arrangement between Tucker and Elon Musk. That was the early speculation. As soon as this video came out, there'd been rumors in the air that Tucker was working some sort of deal with Elon in order to take his show to Twitter and that Twitter was gonna be launching essentially its own sort of show, network, video, podcast network and all of the rest. It was unclear exactly how that would monetize. Would you pay a subscription fee in order to be able to see a show like Tucker's? Would Tucker be directly getting advertising dollars or whatever the deal is? None of that has been cleared up, especially because Musk actually put out a statement in which he pretty much openly dissociated from the show that Tucker is doing. At least he didn't say it's bad that he's putting it up or anything, but he did say, I'm not putting money behind it. He, he suggested he, he put out a tweet saying that there, there is no actual deal between him and Tucker. He said on this platform, unlike the one way street of broadcast, people are able to interact, critique and refute whatever he or anyone else may say. He said, I wanna be clear, we have not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever. Tucker is subject to the same rules and rewards as all content creators. And then he added those rewards would be subscriptions and advertising revenue shares. So apparently there'll be some sort of sub stack model, I guess via Twitter in which you'll be able to directly contribute to people like Tucker if you enjoy their show via Twitter. He said, I hope that many others particularly from the left also choose to be content creators on this platform. So the early speculation, which is that Musk would've been paying some sort of cash bounty, yeah, some sort of salary to Tucker appears not to be the case at this point. What is clear is that Tucker is going to be bringing some version of his show back to Twitter. So he's not gonna be absent from the public debate for 12 or 18 months as the length of his contract at Fox News would suggest. Now remember the early news when Fox News parted with Tucker is that this would've made Tucker free as a bird. But that's not how these contracts work. Tucker presumably is still bound by contract. They can continue to pay him and just take him off the air. This is very common in the media industry is that you are able to to pay somebody and then basically pay them to stay home. Fox has an interest presumably in doing that cause they don't want Tucker going somewhere else and badmouthing them. So how exactly is he able to go on Twitter and do that? Because pretty much by implicit association that's what he's doing there. When he says there are a lot of media outlets that'll just fire you for saying the truth. You, you have to assume he means the people who just fired him for in his mind telling the truth. So what exactly is he doing? So here is my suspicion. My suspicion is that Tucker's contract is very onerous with regard to the other cable networks that he could go to. The other kinds of shows that he could start any sort of competitive service with say Fox Nation because again, this is how lawyers draw contracts. If you have a big personality like Tucker and if you let Tucker go either because you want to or because you have to, what you don't want is Tucker going into direct competition with you and so you pay him to stay home. However, I'm assuming that there is one area of Tucker's sort of public life that is unbound and that presumably would be Twitter. And that's again very, very common because most personalities wish to keep their Twitter personas separate from their business relationships. This is very common here at Daily Wire for example. We don't control Matt Walsh's Twitter feed, we don't control Candace Owens Twitter feed Daily. Wire does not control my Twitter feed, right? These are all things where we are saying exactly what we think and what we want. I assume that Tucker's personal Twitter feed is the same sort of thing that he retains rights to his personal Twitter feed and so he felt comfortable putting this out on his personal Twitter feed. Now, theoretically it could violate hiss contract if the contract extends to virtually all video content. But clearly it doesn't extend to all video content. It might be only extending to video content on channels to which Fox News has rights or its direct competitors. And so if Tucker is not considered a direct competitor, then theoretically this could free him from his contract and this is, this would be why he's launching a show on Twitter. Now, I would assume this is the first step in Tucker's comeback. I really doubt that this is the last step he's going to be battling out in the courts with Fox to free himself, I would assume from the other provisions of his contract, which is why he has now issued a letter according to Axis, an aggressive letter from his lawyer to Fox that that letter essentially argues that Carlson can now breach his contract because he's accusing Fox of having breached its contract. Carlson's contract, according to Axios, currently runs until January of 2025. Fox wants to keep paying him, which would prevent him from starting a competing show. And of course there are many outlets that have reached out to Tucker. No comment folks. And the fact is that Tucker is, you know, presumably until that legal situation clears up bound by contract. So his lawyer Brian Friedman, who's a very competent lawyer, is a lawyer for a lot of big name personalities ranging from like Megan Kelly, Tia Charlee. Brian Friedman has sent a letter to Fox officials like via Din and Arina ante saying that Fox employees broke promises to Carlson intentionally and with reckless disregard for the truth, they're going to claim that essentially Fox broke the contract, not Tucker. And so now Tucker is going to be able to come back and break the contract back. The lawyers are accusing Fox executives including Din and Murdoch of making material representations or promises to Carlson that were intentionally broken constituting fraud. What exactly would that fraud be? The letter alleges that Fox broken agreement with Carlson not to leak his private communications to the media and not to use Carlson's private messages to take any adverse employment action against him. Now, it is certainly PO possible that Fox executives were le this was the original assumption and there was an assumption made by Megan Kelly who's to work at Fox News, right? She actually mentioned Arena Briganti, who is sort of the head of comms over at Fox. She mentioned her saying that when she left for N B C daytime, when she did that, she believed that I ante was the one who was releasing information on her. So she was assuming that that was the same thing that was happening here, that a lot of these leaks about Tucker, you know, the the white supremacy leak or the the leak in which he suggested that white people don't fight this way. That that was actually coming from Fox in order to smear Tucker while he was still under contract. And now Tucker is claiming that's exactly what happened. This I assume it's also why Fox sent a letter to Media Matters, which has been the source of many of these leaks in terms of distributing them. Fox sent a letter to Media Matters, telling 'em to stop doing that. I assume that was a piece of legalese intended to say it's not us, we're not the ones who are doing the leaking, so it doesn't look as though they are violating their contract with Tucker. Also, the letter alleges that Fox broke promises not to settle with Dominion voting systems in a way that would indicate wrongdoing on Tucker's part. And now they're claiming that a, a member of the board said that Tucker had been filed fired because of the, because of the Dominion voting Systems settlement. Now that may very well be true. It may very may may very well be true that that as part of the sort of dominion settlement, not that Dominion wanted Tucker fired, they've actually put out a statement themselves saying We didn't want Tucker fired. We don't care about Tucker, but it's possible that Fox looked at that settlement, an 800 million settlement, and they said, we don't want anybody who presents legal risk to us. And Tucker is very often walking the line. He's, he's very often on Razor's Edge, we don't want that legal risk and so we're getting rid of Tucker. And so theoretically it could be sort of tangentially related to the Dominion Voting Systems fallout. They could legally do that, but they can't say it if they say that we did this as part of the Dominion Voting System settlement or as fallout from Dominion Voting Systems. Could that theoretically be read as a, as a breach of a promise that they would not harm Carlson's reputation over the Dominion voting systems claim and settlement? It's a letter from Tucker's lawyer says, these actions not only breach the covenants of good faith and fair dealing in the agreement they give rise to claims for breach of contract and intentional and negligence misrepresentation. A Fox News post spokesperson then came out and said it is categorically false that Carlson lost his job as part of the 787.5 million settlement. So we'll get to more on this in just one second. First. Now all of this stuff, it's very confusing, it's very metic and the communications have been garbled. But there is one area where you cannot afford to have your communications Gared. I'm talking about your cell phone coverage. You need the best cell phone coverage at the lowest possible price. This is why you need Pure Talk. Remember the last time you got a free phone, you started out feeling amazing and then came the hefty activation fees four line requirements and of course the binding contract. Pure Talk is giving you a free 5G Samsung Galaxy phone without the feeling you've been duped when you switched to Pure Talk's. Unlimited talk and text data plan that comes with the mobile hotspot. You got a 5G Samsung Galaxy for free. That's right, unlimited everything at a fraction of the price of Verizon, at and t or T-Mobile. Here's another thing, you'll be on America's Most Dependable 5G network. How do I know? Well, I'm a customer. I use Pure. Talk make the switch to Pure Talk the same way I did. It's the cell phone wireless company. I'm proud to stand behind because they actually stand behind us here at Daily. Wire Pure talk's us customer service team helped me make the switch in as little as 10 minutes I was even able to keep my phone number. Head on over to Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro for your free Samsung Galaxy when you sign up for unlimited talk text and unlimited data. That is Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro. Again, Pure Talk Wireless for Americans by Americans. Okay, so back to this conflict between Tucker Carlson and Fox News. And this is gonna decide the future of whether Tucker can go to say Newsmax or go to say Daily Wire or go to any place else and launch a competitive show. Again, Tucker's lawyers are trying to argue that Fox breached its agreement with Tucker and this now frees Tucker to do whatever he wants. Carlson is claiming that Reen Ti Fox's longtime communications and PR chief attempted to quote, undermine, embarrass and interfere with Carlson's future business prospects, which he maintains would constitute another breach of his employment contract. The letter says, make no mistake, we intended subpoena Ms. Ante's cell phone records and related documents which evidence communications with her and all media including but not limited to the New York Times. Now again, the the cell phone records are not really gonna demonstrate anything. I would assume Briganti is the head of communications at Fox News. I assume she speaks with people at the New York Times. The real question is gonna be written communications, which by the way, as a lawyer, I will now be my audience's legal advisor. Guys don't put stuff in writing. This is just like a general rule. Things in writing, bad idea, text messages, emails, verbal communica. Here's legal advice from me to you. It's gonna save you a bunch of money and a bunch of time in the future. Save things over the phone cuz things that are said orally are then not permanently memorialized. Okay? But I assume that Doreen ti knows this, presumably if she was leaking this stuff to the New York Times, there probably won't be any record of it, but you know, they're claiming that she wasn't leaking this stuff to the New York. Again, Megan Kelly with whom I'm friends, she says that it's pretty frequent practice for Reen ante to do exactly that. I don't know the truth on that, but that is the controversy. The Carlson's lawyers add that because Carlson is considering litigation against the network to resolve these disputes, Fox News must take all immediate steps to preserve all existing documents and data relevant to Fox's relationship with Carlson, including correspondence with Dean, top executives and several media outlets. Now, it's quite possible that all of this is designed by Carlson's lawyers, by Tucker's lawyers. In order to pressure Fox, you just release him from the contract. In other words, all this goes away if you guys just release him from the contract and let him fly like a butterfly wherever he wants to go. And Fox, which is a very large company, will have to decide, do they wish to continue to litigate this thing out with Tucker in order to preserve Fox News from competition in which Tucker goes to another network Just on a business level. You see exactly why Fox News would do this. Tucker had a huge audience, the audience in prime time on Fox has dropped by 50% since Fox left the network since, since Tucker left the network because Tucker again is very talented at what he does. Now, I assume that Fox's long-term plan is you rebuild the audience. They also had significant audience drop off and it took like several years for them to rebuild it. Even with Tucker, after they got rid of Bill O'Reilly, bill O'Reilly dropped. They lost like half their audience. It took them a couple of years. They rebuilt the audience and one of the things that Fox is saying is that their ad dollars are now coming back because there were a lot of advertisers who are afraid of Tucker, which again is part of the problem for a company like Fox News that is a major publicly traded corporation. If you're a publicly traded corporation, one of the things you have to do is maximize shareholder value. If you're a Daily Wire and an advertiser decides that they're going to boycott you, they don't like you because of something one of your hosts says, we launched like Jeremy's chocolates and Jeremy's Razors in order to fight people, right? We're, we're perfectly happy to do that. Fox isn't doing any of that sort of stuff. So the fact that advertisers had dropped off Tucker's program and that now some of those advertisers feel safer coming back in and they're saying, we're not actually losing money on this thing. So we're perfectly happy to prevent Tucker from going elsewhere and presumably drawing people away from Fox Nation shifting their subscriptions over from Fox Nation somewhere else. So the real question for Tucker now is whether what he's doing online just restricted to Twitter makes him as prominent in the culture as it otherwise, as it otherwise would. I mean, he was again, one of the biggest, if not the biggest voice in sort of conservative media because of that eight 8:00 PM slot on Fox News. Without that eight APM slot on Fox News, does he have the same sort of impact? Now, Tucker, his, his videos on Twitter are getting extraordinary numbers of views. You're talking about 12, 15, 20 in some cases, 40 million views on the last couple of videos. Is that something that's going to maintain, is it gonna play the same way online that it plays terrestrial media? And the fact is, a lot of the Fox News viewers are not people who are on Twitter. Only 2% of the population of the United States is regularly on Twitter when it comes to Fox News. There's not a huge crossover between the Fox News audience, which is disproportionately elderly and the Twitter audience, which is disproportionately younger. And this doesn't mean that Tucker isn't gonna have outsized impact. He definitely will, but that impact is going to change over time. That's probably what Fox News is counting on. It's all pretty fascinating. But suffice it to say Tucker is not gonna go completely absent in the debate and he's not going to allow himself to go completely absent in the debate over the course of the next couple of years. This was just the first shot. So anybody who thinks that this is like the, the end of Tucker's relaunch, that that is incorrect, it is not the end of Tucker's relaunch. But also this is not a cooperative venture between Tucker and Elon Musk, which means again, that there are gonna be other shoes to drop here. This is not like the final stage of Tucker's redevelopment deal. That's not what this is. Meanwhile, C n N is doing exactly what CNN does, and they say, of course, that Tucker is a right-wing extremist. This is literally how they report. Now this is the reporting from C N N and they say right-wing extremist Tucker Carlson announced Tuesday, he will relaunch his program on Twitter, which she praises the only remaining large free speech platform in the world after Fox News's fired him late last month. So again, they call him a right-wing extremist because this is what CNN does, is Oliver Darcy reporting over at cnn. This presumably is one of the reasons why Tucker is so popular is cuz the media insists on going overboard on literally all the things worth noting here, that C N N, which supposedly hates the right-wing extremists, and they really, really hate Donald, like really hate Donald Trump. They'll be hosting Donald Trump for a town hall style event tonight. So for all these people, we cannot give a voice to the right-wing extremists, particularly Trump and the MAGA Ultra MAGA movement. Also, tonight on our network, four ratings and money, we present Donald Trump in conversation. Yeah, man, your media corrupt as the day is long. Okay, just one second, we'll get to President Trump, who's now been hit with a 5 million defamation and assault verdict. We'll get to that momentarily first. If you own a business past few years have been a very bumpy ride, you could probably use a break. Innovation Refunds can help. Innovation Refunds knows the value of your time. This is why they made it easy to apply for the employee retention credit or e r c. Go to get Refunds dot com. Get started in less than eight minutes. See if your business qualifies for ERC assistance. Your business could be eligible for a payroll tax rebate of up to 26 grand per employee kept on payroll during covid 19. Innovation Refunds has already helped clients claim over 3 billion in payroll tax Refunds through the E R C, they might be able to help your business as well. There's no upfront charge. They don't get paid until your business gets its refund. Don't miss this opportunity because the payroll tax refund, it's only available for a limited amount of time. But to get Refunds dot com, again, that's get Refunds dot com, go check them out right now. Get Refunds dot com. If your business paid too much money into the tax system and you can get some of that money back, why wouldn't you do that? The government is seeking to screw you as often as humanly possible. Why not get some of your money back if you overspend on giving them money during the pandemic? Go to get Refunds dot com once again, that is G E T R E F u N d s.com. Get Refunds dot com. Go check them out right now. Okay, meanwhile, a jury in New York has now found President Trump in not guilty because it, it is a civil trial, but they have now found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation in the e Eugene Carroll case. Now, we've not followed this case particularly closely because I'll be frank with you, I don't find e Eugene Carroll to be a credible witness. I I I I think that she, her testimony, she's a very flighty, strange person. She makes Christine Blaze Ford, the lady who testified against Justice Kavanaugh during his judicial hearings. She makes Christine Blaze Ford look as sober as judge. She makes her look incredibly credible. Eugene Carroll made the allegation that sometime, sometime in 1996, sometime like in the entire year, Donald Trump took her into a room at Bergdorf Bergdorf Goodman, a fitting room, and then raped her. Right? This was, this was her allegation. Now, the jury has not found that Donald Trump was responsible for rape. Instead, they, they found that he was actually responsible for sexually abusing and defaming her. So how exactly do they find that he was guilty of some sort of sexual abuse but not rape? It seems kind of weird, right? It does. It seems kind of weird. And the reason it seems kind of weird is because again, the thing that she was alleging was rape. I mean, if you go back to her original piece in the Cut, which [email protected], this is back in June of 2019, she describes what happened. She says, with Donald Trump, she says this, before I discuss him, I must mention there are two great handicaps to telling you what happened to me in Bergdorf's. A the man I'll be talking about denies it as he has denied accusations of sexual misconduct made by at least 15 incredible women. And then she lists off a bunch of names. The White House at the time said, this is a completely false and unrealistic story surfacing 25 years after allegedly taking place and was created simply to make the President look bad. And b, I run the risk of making him more popular by revealing what he did. His admirers can't get enough of hearing that he's rich enough, lusty enough and powerful enough to be sued by and to pay off every splashy porn, star war Playboy playmate who comes forward. And then she continues along these lines. She says, back at this time in the 1990s, she was a sex advice columnist. She says, early one evening as I'm about to go out Bergdorf's revolving door on 58th Street and one of New York's most famous men comes in the revolving door, or it could have been a regular door at that time, I can't recall. He says, Hey, you're that advice lady. And I say to number 20, on the most hideous men of my life list, Hey, you're that real estate tycoon. Okay, so first of all, immediate question marks. She can't remember what kind of door is being used. So she, she's already saying that her memory is hazy of this. She says, I'm surprised at how good looking he is. We've met once before and perhaps it is the dusky light, but he looks prettier than ever. This has to be in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996 because he is garbed in a faultless top coat. And I'm wearing my black wool, Donna Karen coat dress, and high heels, but not a coat. Okay? So I point of doubt. Number two, she can't even name the year. Okay? So she's starting 1995 or 1996. Now, if you talk to people who have survived rape, the, the kind of general presumption that people block out the memories that may be true in some cases, in many, many cases, women who have been abused, anybody who's been abused, children who have been abused, they remember like exact details. Exact details, because it's so unbelievably traumatic. People who suffer from PTSD typically remember the exact details of the things that happened to them. In this particular case, she, she remembers what they were wearing, but she can't remember what kind of door was being used. She can't remember even the year, she can't remember the season, right? The fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996, which again, is a, a weird dating because there is a season in between, right? I mean, there's winter also that lies in between those. So you're talking about like, it's either September of 1995 or like April of 1996. So I'll, I'll continue with with this account in just one second. And this is again, why I haven't paid a lot of attention to the Eugene Carroll case because again, I do not find her to be a particularly credible witness. We get to that momentarily first, as you know, as everyone knows, I am like top-notch dad. I'm like amazing at the dad. I'm so good at it. And one of the things that I do as a dad, I have these giant pillow fights on my bed with all three of my kids, and I let them win. But let's be honest about this. I'm, I'm much bigger than they are. And you know, there, there comes a point where you have to take control. You gotta start, you know, hitting kids with the pillow. That's ju that's the way it works. But my kids are always comfortable falling on the bed. Why? Because we have bull and Branch sheets. As you can imagine being an incredible dad, it also makes me really tired. I like to sleep on those sheets. Bull and Branch sheets are great. Bo and Branch sheets are made from the finest 100% organic cotton threads on earth. They feel buttery to the touch. They're super breathable. They're perfect for both cooler and warmer months. Their signature hem sheets were made with threads. So luxurious four US presidents have slept in them. Boland Branch sheets actually soften with every wash cycle they're made without pesticides from aldehyde or other harsh chemicals. Best of all, Boland Branch gives you a 30 night risk-free trial of free shipping and returns on all orders. You're not going to want to return them. Get a better night's sleep with Bo and Branch right now. Get 15% off your first order when you Use promo code Shapiro today at bol and Branch dot com. That's BOL and Branch. B O L L A N D Branch dot com promo code Shapiro exclusions apply Seaside for details. By the way, I'm just telling you, boll and Branch also, they make like amazing blankets. Like they're blankets are set. They have an Afghan that's so good that literally when I travel, I bring it with me. That's how good it is. And Branch dot com, go check them out right now. Okay, so back to this Eugene Carroll account. This is the original account that she spilled in 2019. She says, this is in 19 95, 19 96. This is 2019. So this is 23 years later, minimum. She says that she met Trump walking into Berg. She was walking out, I guess at Bergdorf and he was walking in, come advise me. He says, the man, I gotta buy a present. Oh, I say charmed for whom? A girl. He says, don't the assistance of your secretaries buy things like that? I say, not this one. He says, or perhaps he says, not this time. I can't recall. It's like the third time in five paragraphs. He says, I can't recall. He's a big talker from the instant we collide. He yammers about himself like he's Alexander the great, ready to loop Babylon as we're standing just inside the door. I point to the handbags. How about, no, he says, making the face where he pulls up both lips. Like he's balancing a spoon under his nose and begins talking about how he once thought about buying Bergdorfs or a hat. I say enthusiastically walking toward the handbags, which at the period I'm telling you about, and Bergdorfs has been redone two or three times since then, are mixed in with and displayed next to the hats. She'll love a hat. You can't go wrong with hat. So why does she keep hedging this way? Presumably because the editors were saying to her, I mean, you have to imagine this is what happened. The editors of her book, they're like, you say that the hats were next to the purses, but I've been to Bergdorf and the hats aren't next to the purses. So what happened? So you're adding all of these qualifiers and provisos in the original story, right? Maybe the door's been changed since then. I dunno what season it was. The hats used to be next to the purses, but they're not anymore. And I don't really know. It's gone. It's gone over a couple of makeovers, right? They're, they're getting rid of every detail that would actually lend credibility or, or verifiability. Forget about credibility verifiability to her story. I don't remember what he says. But he comes striding along, greeting a bergdorf sales attendants like he owns the joint, permitting a shopper to gap and aw him and goes right for a fur number, please. I say, no woman would want dare would want to wear a dead animal on her head. What? He doesn't, what he applies, I don't recall, but I remember he cuddles the fur hat like it's a baby otter. How old is the lady in question? I ask, how old are you? Replies the man fondling the hat and looking at me like Louis leaky carbon dating a thigh bone. He's found in Old of I gorge. I'm 52. I tell him, you're so old. He says laughing. He was around 50 himself. And at this point, he drops the hat, looks in the direction of the escalator and says lingerie. Or he may have said underwear. So we strolled to the escalator. I don't remember anybody else greeting him or galloping up to talk to him, which indicates how very few people are in the store at the time. I have no recollection where the lingerie is in that era of Bergdorf. Again, this is like the fourth time in the same story in which she's saying, I don't know where anything is in the store. Nothing. No verify. Because here's the thing, under cross-examination, all of that could easily fall apart. If she said, I looked at the hat. So next to the purses, and that was five steps away from the lingerie. All it would take is somebody coming up with a schematic of a floor plan from Bergdorf in 1996 to say, that's not true, right? It turns out lingerie is on the other end of the store on a different floor. So she's removing all of the verifiable details so that nobody can doubt the story. It seems to me it is on a floor with the evening gowns and bathing suits. And when the man and I arrive and my memory is now vivid, now it's vivid. No one is present. There are two or three tain ty boxes and a lacy see-through body suit of lilac grand, the counter, the man snatches up the body suit and says, go try this on you. Try it on. I say, laughing, it's your color. Try it on, come on. He says, throwing it at me. It goes with your eyes. I say laughing and throwing it back. You're in good shape. He says, holding the filmy thing up against me. I wanna see how this looks, but it's your size. I say laughing and trying to slap him back with one of the boxes on the counter. Come on. He says, take my arm. Let's put this on. This is gonna be hilarious. I'm saying to myself, and as I write this, I'm staggered by my stupidity. Well, I mean, yes, I mean, yes, I I No one is responsible for their own rape. Also going with men that you don't know to a lingerie section and trying on lingerie for those men, that's a little flirtatious. And now it doesn't mean that he raped that, that that she wasn't raped. It doesn't mean he was justified in raping her. But this is not like smart behavior, you would say. As we head to the dressing rooms, I'm laughing aloud and saying, in my mind, I'm gonna make him put this thing on over his pants. There are several facts about what happened next that are so odd. I wanna clear them up before I go any further. Did I report it to the police? No. Did I tell anyone about it? Yes. I told two close friends. The first a journalist, magazine writer correspondent on tv, morning shows, author many books begged me to go to the police. He raped you. She kept repeating when I called her, he raped You go to the police, I'll go with you. We'll go together. So the fact that, so she, first of all, obviously she didn't think of it as rape at the time. She has a friend who keeps saying that he raped her and she didn't go to the cops. My second friend is also a journalist, a New York anchor woman. She grew very quiet when I told her. Then she grasped both my hands on her own and said, tell no one, forget it. He has 200 lawyers, he'll bury you. So I have photos or any visual evidence. Bergdorf's security cameras must have picked up as picked us up at the 58th Street entrance of the store. We also would've been filmed on the ground floor in the bags and hat section cameras must have captured us going up the escalator and into the lingerie department. However, even if it, if it had been captured on tape, depending on the position of the camera, it would be difficult to see the man on zipping his pants because he was wearing a top coat. The struggle might simply have read as sexy. The speculation is mood. Anyway, the department store has confirmed it long, no longer has tapes from that time. So there are no tapes, even though there were cameras present. And even if there were cameras present, it wouldn't have been clear what exactly was going on according to, so again, this all goes to verifiability. Why were there no sales attendants in the lingerie department? Bergdorf's perfections are so well known. It is the store so noble, so clubby, so posh. It is almost easier to accept the fact that I was attacked than the fact that for a very brief moment, there were no sales attendants in the lingerie department. Inconceivable is the word. All I can, she says, sometimes a person won't find a sales attendance in sacks. Sometimes one has to look for a sales associate in Barney's or Bloomingdale's or Tiffany. But 99% of the time you'll have an at attendant in Bergdorfs. All I can say is that I did not see an attendance. And the other odd thing is the dressing room door was open. So what, why haven't I come forward before now? Receiving death threats being driven by from my home, being dismissed, being dragged through the mud. Joining the 15 women have come. So she says she was scared. That's why she didn't come forward. Okay? And then she talks about what happened. She suggests that the moment the dressing room door is closed, he lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, puts his mouth against my lips. I'm so shocked. I shove him back and start laughing again and laughing again. He seizes both my arms and pushes me up against the wall a second time. And as I become aware of how large he is, he holds me against the wall with his shoulder and jams his hand under my coat dress and pulls down my tights. She says, I'm astonished by what I'm about to write. I keep laughing the next moment, still wearing correct business attire. Shirt tie, suit jacket, overcoat. He opens the overcoat, unzips his pants and forcing his fingers around my private area, thrust his penis halfway or completely, I'm not certain. Inside me it turns into a colossal struggle. I'm wearing a pair of sturdy black patent leather, four inch Barney's high heels, which puts my height around six one. I try to stomp his foot, I try to push him off with my one free hand. For some reason, I keep holding my purse with the other. I finally get a knee up high enough to push him out and off and I turn open the door and run outta the dressing room. The whole episode lasts more. No more than three minutes. Okay? So that, that is the, she says she's never had sex with anyone else again. This is a lifelong, this is a lifelong trauma. Okay? So the reason I don't find her particularly credible is because there are a bunch of lack of verifiable details in this particular story. It is now 20 some years later. And this is also beyond the statute of limitations for like any sort of real rape trial, right? This is well beyond the statute of limitations for rape, because the law generally presumes that 25 years on it's gonna be extraordinarily difficult to actually convict somebody of something like this. And you could easily see a defense like a he said, she said defense, right? She, she was laughing the whole time. You know, we went at, she told me to get off, I got off right? You could see like that, that would not be un implausible if you saw this in a criminal case. But it's not a criminal case. It's 23 years later in a civil case. And Eugene Carroll did not immediately upon writing the story file a civil suit. It took like several years. It's now 2023. The story came out in 2019. It took her a couple of years to file a civil suit when it was filed. It was funded by Reid Hoffman, who's a big Democrat owner. So there's some real credibility issues in all of this. And again, the, the biggest problem here is that Eugene Carroll is a strange person. So here is Eugene Carroll on CNN talking about the supposed rape. You don't feel like a victim. I was not thrown on the ground at Ravis, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotations. This was not, this was not sexual for, it just, it, it hurt. It just what? It just, you know. Well, I think most people think of rape as a, I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not. I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Let's take a short break. Think of the fantasies. We gotta take a quick, what if you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side. You're fascinating to Talk to. Most people think of rape as being sexy. What in the, even Anderson Cooper is like, I don't even know what is the story with this lady? Like, this is super duper weird. Okay, so she's a bad witness. So how exactly did this case go against Donald? So what the, basically what the jury found is that they don't believe her on the rape. and they clearly don't believe her on the rape. They believe that he assaulted her. So what they, that he pushed her up against her wall or he did. Now, why did they believe that? Why did they believe Not the rape? Because she's not a super credible witness, but they believe the assault and the answer to why they believe the assault is because basically this trial was a referendum on Donald Trump's P word tape, right on the grab by the P word. And that that is, that's what this trial was. This trial was a referendum on Donald Trump having said to Billy Bush on a hot mic on access Hollywood years ago, that when you are very famous, you get to grab women by the bleep. And they're fine with it because when you're famous, they'll let, when you're famous people let you do anything. And then there are a bunch of witnesses like women who came forward and that and said that's what Donald Trump did. That he assaulted them, that he, that he forcibly kissed them or he forcibly grabbed them or he forcibly touched them or whatever. And so, even though Eugene Carroll is not a good witness, be as evidenced by the fact that even a New York jury would not actually say that Donald Trump raped her. What they're basically saying is we believe Donald Trump. When Donald Trump says that he would grab women this way, then we believe that. And we believe that many of the women he was grabbing we're not super ha we're not super happy with it. Right? Donald Trump's original quote is that women will let you do that. Right? Which obviously implies consent, right? When people let you do a thing, this implies consent. So from Donald Trump's perspective, yeah, I grab women all the time and they're fine with it because I'm famous and rich. And from the perspective of the jury, Donald Trump grab grabs women all the time and they're not fine with it. And here's a list of 15 women who are, who are not fine with it. Now this again came back to bite Trump personally because Trump did do a deposition on tape. And so here is Donald Trump on tape talking about the grab him by the bleep comments. In this video, I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the, you can do anything. That's what you said, Correct? Well, historically, that's true with stars. It's true with stars that, that they can grab women by. Well that's what, that's, if you look over the last million years, I guess that's been largely true. Not always, but largely true, unfortunately, or fortunately. And you consider yourself to be a star. I think you can say that. Yeah. Okay. So again, not amazing testimony. And a lot of lawyers are like, oh no. Again, this is why being Donald Trump's lawyer is actually one of the hardest jobs in the world because the main job of a lawyer is shh to your client. Shh. Don't Donald trump's like, well, yeah, I mean, I guess you could, you couldn't say that. Now again, what Donald Trump should have said in that deposition is when I said that, I mean that people let you do it. I literally said that in the tape that it's consensual. And so I deny that these women did not consent to what I was doing and I deny for. But this is essentially what happened because Trump said that, because Trump said in that testimony in deposition that you can, if you are famous, grab women by the bleep. Then when a woman claims that you grabbed her by the bleep, then the jury's like, okay, well that, that's credible. It's credible that he grabbed a woman by, by the bleep, right? Which is why even the Fox News legal analyst, they were like, yeah, it turns out that testifying against yourself is is really not a, a brilliant idea here. Here were some of the Fox News legal analysts talking about this yesterday. So Andy, what do you think the impact was o of these pieces of tape on this process? Yeah, Martha, I think with something like that, I mean it, I think the impact was devastating because of the way, not only what he said, but the way that they presented it. We've seen the Access Hollywood tape up till this point, mainly in the abstract. I think one of the most effective things that the Carroll lawyers did was to introduce the tape to the jury in the course of the testimony of Natasha Soff, who was one of the women who claimed that she had been sexually assaulted by former President Trump. So it was not a situation where it could just be sort of dismissed as locker room banter in the abstract, Right? So basically this reified Trump's statements before. Now Trump is mad as hell about this, and he has a right to be, he, he wrote on his social media platform quote, I have absolutely no idea who this woman is. The verdict is the disgrace continuation of the greatest witch hunts of all time. This is why it's not going to harm him electorally. The reason it's not going to harm electorally is because it does look like this was concocted in laboratory. This case, it looks as though there was a person who almost read his access Hollywood comments and then was like, what if I just allege that he did that to me? Because he's already admitted he does that to women. And then I say, it wasn't consensual. And then I sue him and I go to a New York jury, and then they find him like $5 million. And that's kinda what the jury did here, because if the jury actually believed that Donald Trump had raped Eugene Carroll, then presumably they would've found that he raped Eugene Carroll. But they didn't find that, again, what they're basically saying is, we don't believe Eugene Carroll's story. We don't believe, like, we believe everything up to what the penetration, like what, what exactly did they not believe in her story? It sounds like what they're saying is we actually don't believe your whole story, but we believe that all these other women had experiences verified by Donald Trump on tape talking about grabbing women and therefore we're gonna find him. And so for everybody else looking at this, they're like, well, I mean, he did say that he did that, and there's nothing new here. Cause there have been allegations that he does this to women a lot. And now they're gonna give Eugene Carroll like a bunch of his money from a New York jury, which is just looking for an excuse to punish Donald Trump because they hate Donald Trump. So is this gonna affect Donald Trump electorally in any way? I have a hard time believing it's gonna affect Donald Trump in, in any way. And again, I think it's even, I think when, when he says, this feels like a witch hunt, it kind of does. I mean, it looks as though they're now litigating an an allegation that Donald Trump made about himself in 2014 or whatever it was with Billy Bush. and they found the world's least credible witness, Eugene Carroll, to talk about this on tape 23 years later. And then the trial wasn't even about Eugene Carroll. The trial was really about Donald Trump. So what does it look like? It looks like a trial of Donald Trump, about Donald trump by a New York jury, and they wanted to find him. That's what it looks like. And so for his supporters, they're like, okay, come on. I'm not gonna vote for him based on a New York jury. It doesn't like him, really. And based on the fact that he supported his own statements that he said on a hot mic, and which he's already said that he, he agrees with. We got some more on this in a second. First, let's talk about the fact that when you are figuring out your career, you really have to build a skillset. Then you have to build a resume, and then you have to find a good job. And that's kind of hard. And if you're an employer and you're looking for a good employee, hard to find the right employee for that job. Well, we have the greatest job matchmaking site of all time. This of course would be ZipRecruiter ZipRecruiter helps you find the most qualified people for your roles fast. Right now you can Try ZipRecruiter for FREE at ZipRecruiter dot com slash Daily. Wire ZipRecruiter's matching technology helps you find the most qualified candidates for a wide range of roles. If you see a candidate you like, you can easily send them a personal invites. They're more likely to apply their user-friendly dashboard. Makes it easy to filter, review, and rate your candidates all from one place. Let ZipRecruiter help you find the best people for all your roles. Four, five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within day one. See for yourself. Go to ZipRecruiter dot com slash Daily Wire to Try ZipRecruiter for FREE. Again, that ZipRecruiter dot com slash Daily Wire ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire. We've been using ZipRecruiter here at Daily Wire for literally years, and you should do the same. It'll make your employee base better. If you're an employee looking for an employer, go to ZipRecruiter as well. Find your next great job. ZipRecruiter dot com slash Daily Wire. It is the smartest way to hire. Also, despite the lackluster economy, The Daily, Wire continues to thrive. We are hiring right now. We're looking for a video editor to join our fast-growing post-production team. This person will get the opportunity to work on a variety of content, including our daily podcast, long form interviews, YouTube videos, and shows like mine, debone, and documentaries from Jordan Peterson, and more. Four plus years of professional video editing, experience familiarity, and working at a very fast paced environment with low turnaround times is required. Bonus points for experience working on viral YouTube content. This is the perfect role for somebody who can expertly follow standardized video editing formats, while also possessing a strong creative skillset. A link to your reel is required for consideration. The position is based in Nashville, Tennessee. For more information and to apply, visit at Daily Wire dot com slash careers. That's Daily Wire dot com slash careers today. Okay, meanwhile, so does any of this actually affect Donald Trump? The media are treating the Trump 5 million defamation verdict as though this is some sort of serious obstacle to him running. That's, that's ridiculous. It is, absolutely not. It'll be interesting to see how Trump responds to questions about this, I assume on Wednesday night, because he's supposed to do a town hall forum on c n n with Kaitlyn Collins. Presumably. She's going to ask him about all this, and he's going to do the exact same thing that he did in his testimony. He's probably going to say it's true when you're famous that you can do whatever you want. And also Eugene Carroll is a liar and, and that that's fine. He can do that. Is that gonna have any impact? I I assume that it will not. The, the only thing that's gonna have an impact on Trump legally, it's not gonna be this, it's not going to be the Alvin Bragg idiot case with regard to campaign finance violations and Stormy Daniels and all that. The, the only thing that is going to affect Trump legally speaking are just the drip, drip drip of indictments, right? It may come a point at which voters are like, yeah, this guy's under so many legal cases that it's, but it's also true that if it feels like, you know, a, a cartoon where all guns are trained on Bugs Bunny, you start to root for Bugs Bunny a little bit, right? That, that's kind of what it's going to feel like. There's an indictment watch in Fulton County from Fannie Willis investigating efforts by Trump in Georgia to affect the 2020 election post-election. You still have an upcoming trial in new, in a New York civil case against the Trump organization. There's still the federal probe from special counsel Jack Smith about Trump trying to subvert the 2020 election. And there's federal probe on the handling of classified documents. The problem is, each one of these cases in isolation looks really weak. And so when you have a bunch of weak cases in isolation, it looks like exactly what Donald Trump wants. This is actually, all of this can be seen as a giant in-kind contribution to Donald Trump's primary campaign. Every time he feels targeted, the Republican base rushes to his defense. So it all helps him in the primaries. Now, does it help him with the general population? I think not, I don't think there's anybody out there who was kind of an independent, they're like, well, now that he is being targeted by everyone, I like him more. I, I, I don't think there are tons of people like that, but the idea that it's really going to be like a serious bar to Trump running, I think is, is ridiculous. This is why there's an article in the Washington Post, it's titled right now, sexual Abuse Verdict Renews Republican Doubts about Trump's electability. Listen, I think if you had doubts about Trump's selectability, and I have doubts about Trump's selectability considering he already lost to Joe Biden and that he had to pull a rabbit out of a hat to beat Hillary Clinton, like again, I have doubts about his electability, but not because of this, because Trump is Trump and people have their opinions on Trump. Now, the, the notion that this is gonna be some sort of kill shot with regard to his campaign is obviously incredibly silly. It just, it doesn't make any sense. Meanwhile, George Santos, Republican congressperson from New York, he has now been arrested on 13 charges of Wire fraud, money laundering, theft to public funds, and making materially false statements. It's always the ones you least suspect, guys. It's, you know, it's, it's like the Butler did it, George Santos, who lied about literally all the things. It turns out that he probably also lied about money and public funds and how he was using the money and all the rest of that sort of stuff. And this provides a sort of conundrum for the Republican party because again, their majority in the house is extraordinarily slim at this point. Right now, their majority is like four seats, five seats, like 2 22 is their majority. Now they're down to 2 21, I would presume. And the way that it works is that he would presumably be replaced by the governor of New York. The governor of New York, of course, is Kathy Hoel, who's the Democrats. That means that the Democrats will appoint someone to fill that seat that was a swing district that Santos had won. And so the large scale probability here is that the Republican majority will decline by one, which is a problem for McCarthy because again, he does have this kind of solid core of people who are gadflies and who vote against everything that he brings up. That would be Matt Gaetz, Lauren Bobert, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and the like. It doesn't always include mtg. By the way, mtg very, very often will vote with McCarthy. Actually, she, she seems to be more rational in terms of her legislative priorities than say Matt Gaetz. But it does mean that his majority shrinks a little bit. And that's a problem for the Republicans meanwhile, and that I guess, that he's being indicted because he's slightly more of a liar than all the other members of Congress. But you know, here's the good news. There are plenty of liars left over in Congress that would include the irrepressibly stupid aoc. So she's also a pathological liar. Yesterday she pathologically lied about Jordan Neely. Jordan Neely is of course, the mentally ill and career criminal black man who died under a New York Subway after a Marine, put him in a submission hold in an attempt to stop him from attacking the other passengers. She tweeted out, A safer city is one with fewer people suffering from homelessness. Not because they've been displaced, but because they have been housed. Mm. So the real problem is that New York doesn't provide any of the resources necessary for people like Jordan Neely. There's only one problem as Thomas Chatterton Williams, a writer for The Atlantic, who is not a conservative, pointed out now, she, she says, Jordan Ely was killed because he couldn't access mental health support. That's a lie. According to the actual New York Times reporting, he was arrested not all that long ago, and he was supposed to go from court to live at a treatment facility in the Bronx and stay clean for 15 months. 13 days later, he abandoned the facility. We talked about this at the time. So this idea that this is about underfunding in New York City, it's not about underfunding. It's about the fact that there are no consequences for simply going out and living on the street and then abandoning your drug rehab facility. But AOC wants you to be able to abandon your drug rehab facilities in aspect of freedom to live on the streets according to people like a O c. Again, pathological lies exist all over Congress. Only George Santos is really being targeted over his pathological lies. Meanwhile, the immigration crisis on our southern border gets worse and worse and worse. According to the Wall Street Journal officials in New York and Chicago have now declared states of emergency. After Texas Governor Greg Abbott resumed busting migrants to northern sanctuary cities ahead of the expiration. Later this week of Title 42, busloads of migrants, mostly from Texas, began arriving in cities hundreds of miles from the border. Last year. Officials have been trying to provide housing and services for those new arrivals in Chicago, New York, and Washington dc Lori Lightfoot in Chicago, she says, we have hit the breaking point. She's still the outgoing mayor of Chicago. They've taken in like 8,500, 9,000 illegal immigrants over the course of the last year. Meanwhile, you have 10,000 illegal immigrants arriving on the Bo border like every single day. And all those people are just being schlep to the streets of El Paso and left there. But Lori Lightfoot is in a state of panic because some busloads of people are entering a city of millions. Here's Lori Lightfoot talking about it. Last week I sent a letter to Governor Abbott when we learned that he may be sending more migrants to our city via bus to try to reason and explain to him that, yes, of course we are a welcoming city, and we will always do what is right by our immigrant and refugee communities. But we've reached a breaking point in our response to this humanitarian crisis, primarily manufactured by him for cynical political purposes. Oh, it's super cynical for Abbott to send people to cities where they want to go. You know, it's not cynical though, apparently what Eric Adams is doing. So, Eric Adams is the mayor of New York. He's also claiming that it's very cynical to send people to New York City as a destination. So what is he doing? It's hilarious how undercover this is. What exactly is Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City doing with all these illegal immigrants? Quote officials representing some New York suburbs have rebuked New York City Mayor Eric Adams' plan to send migrants to their towns for shelter. This is ABC news reporting. So Eric Adams' plan is I'm going to whine about people being sent to New York City, one of the biggest cities on the planet, and I'm going to take those people and I'm going to send them to Rockland County. I'm gonna just schlep them to the suburbs and leave them off next to the school. That's my plan, Eric. So bad. When Greg Abbott sends busloads of illegal immigrants to New York City, good. When Eric Adams takes those busloads of immigrants and unloads them in Rockland County, Rockland County's top official declared a state of emergency on Saturday in response to Adams' plan to send 340 adult male migrants to live at Armani Inn and Suites in Orangeburg, New York for four months. Now, I mean, honestly, oh, oh darn. It's the consequences of my own actions. Oh, no, here they come. Rockland County had declared itself a sanctuary city in December of 2016, or, or apparently Rockland County did not. So New York City declared itself a sanctuary city, mainly to virtue signal to their left. And Rockland County's like, guys, we didn't do that. Why are you schlepping them here? The county executive, Edwin Days of the city declared itself a sanctuary city in December, 2016, committing itself to supporting undocumented individuals. This county has not where one 10th, the population of New York City we're not capable of receiving and sustaining the volume of undocumented migrants. Eric Adams intends to send over. Rockland County is 40 miles northwest of New York City. It is close to the Hudson River. So on Friday, Adams announced he was sending migrants to neighboring New York counties in response to the rising numbers of asylum seekers in the city. So now it's, this is good. DeSantis sends people to Martha's Vineyard very bad. Eric Adams says he's going, we'll take you in. We love you guys. Come on in. Illegal immigrants. This is a sanctuary city. We're not even gonna help the federal officials effectuate immigration policy. We're not gonna deport any of you. You get to stay here. Also. You're not staying here. You're staying actually in Rockland County. Adams said at a press conference, despite calling on the federal government for a national, national decompression strategy since last year, and for a decompression strategy across the state, New York City has been left without the necessary support to manage the crisis. With the vacuum of leadership, we're now forced to undertake our own decompression strategy. Man, I, I love this. I love that Eric Adams is going to escape scrutiny for now, schlepping people to the middle of nowhere after declaring that he was going to help everybody. Meanwhile, immigrants continue to pour over the borders. This, this video from Matam Morros Mexico is absolutely shocking. This is just people who are pouring over the border here. Look at this, it's unbelievable. That, of course, is people pouring across the Rio Grande, men and women and children by the hundreds climbing up the banks of this river. Things aren't going great, guys. And the good news is, Joe Biden has all of it under control. In fact, Joe Biden didn't even have to answer any questions yesterday. He did a pressor and by a pressor, I mean, he answered no questions. And then smirked as reporters were, were let out of the room, We're gonna solve all the world's problems, Mr. President, so much. There he is. He's smiling. Oh, this is fun, guys. I'll see you. I'll see you later. Yeah, that's right. A giant Jack, guys. Bye guys. I don't answer questions. I'm just the president. Bye. I's say that, that of course was during a, a session including Hakeem Jeffries, Kevin McCarthy and Chuck Schumer to talk about the, the budget crisis. But there'll be no questions to Joe Biden. Joe Biden did have a comment, by the way. He just keeps smiling like a weirdo. He's such a weird old Caesar Romero joker type. So weird. Anyway, here was Joe Biden yesterday on the border. Hi. His comments were less than edifying. I spent, I think, close to an hour with, with the Mexican president. Today. We're doing all we can. The answer is it remains to be seen. We've got an overwhelming cooperation from Mexico. We also are in the process of setting up resi offices in Columbia and other places where you can, where someone seeking a asylum can go first. So, but it remains to be seen. It's gonna be chaotic for a while. Oh, it'll be chaotic for a while, guys. Don't worry about, it'll be ca by by a while. I mean, for the rest of your life. That's by a while. Am I chaotic? I mean, like millions of illegal immigrants crossing the border, being caught and, and then released. Karine Shapiro was asked whether Joe Biden has any plans to address Americans on the Board of Crisis. She's like, are you kidding? We can't even get this guy to string two sentences together. No way. About Title 42 share message that New York has given, or, you know, you know, something to that effect. What we hear from the president on Title 42. Well, I would say you heard from the president just this past Friday. He did a, he did a interview, a sit down interview with one of the networks and talked about Title 42, talked about immigration. So the American people did hear directly from the president on this issue. I don't have anything else to share in the next couple of days about the presents schedule, so I'll just leave it there. Just that he did talk to MSNBC guys. I mean, you should be, but there is good news, Karine. John Pere says, we have top men on this, just like the Ark of the Covenant top men. And by top men she means Kamala Harris. I don't know how anybody finds the satisfying. She says, yeah, we got a board, Christ. But you know, Joe Biden is talking to Kamala Harris, who will presumably be supplying electric school buses and Venn diagrams to all of the illegal immigrants. Should the vice president be involved in today's meeting since she'll be here in the country while the president is away. So the president is, is closely, has been closely consulting with the vice president on this. They have have had several conversations on this issue. And so, again, when it comes to issues that matter to the American people, they're very much partners. Yeah. Mm. And probably Kamala Harris's like, mm, Yeah, yeah. Good, good stuff. From, from, I'm sure she's fixing all the problems. She's done an amazing job on the border so far. Remember, he deployed her to solve the border crisis two years ago, and it's been going swimmingly. And by swimmingly, I mean literally thousands of people swimming across the Rio Grande to enter the United States. That that's exciting stuff. Meanwhile, the Biden administration doing yeoman's work on blowing up the budget as well. So there's been no breakthrough on the debt ceiling. There was a all for show meeting yesterday between President Biden and House speaker Kevin McCarthy. But according to the Wall Street Journal, they remain at loggerheads after a meeting at the White House on Tuesday. They have made little progress in averting the first ever default by the federal government. Again, you know, I am not one for conspiratorial thinking. However, it occurs to me that Joe Biden, knowing that the economy is not in amazing shape right now, and that there will probably be a recession, him finding an excuse to blame Republicans who are not really in charge of the government, might actually be in his wheelhouse. He might be looking for a way to blame Republicans for an economic downturn. And maybe that's why he's not negotiating, because there's no other reason not to negotiate at this point, considering avoiding the debt ceiling is not all that tough Kevin McCarthy's proposal, which is to, again, not lower spending, but to stop the trajectory of spending from rising in the same way has been outright rejected by the White House. He just wants to go back to 2022 levels of spending, and yet there is no movement, none whatsoever. Here is Kevin McCarthy yesterday announcing. Yeah, we, we sat in a room and Joe Biden stared at the walls and ate oatmeal, and it was real weird. We can lift the debt ceiling and find a way that we can curve this increasing debt that is affecting every American family with inflation. And now three banks of our fourth largest banks have closed, or, and the debt problem, nothing has changed since then. The only thing that has changed is the house has raised the debt ceiling and passed the bill. That's why we had a meeting today. Everybody in this meeting reiterated the positions they were at. I didn't see any new movement. The president said the staff should get back together. But I was very clear with the president. We have now just two weeks to go. Okay? Meanwhile, the Democratic playbook here is we just can't default. Under no circumstances can we default. We're not cutting anything, but we, we definitely, it's so important. We cannot default. We must pay our, we must pay our debts. Also. We're not negotiating under any circumstances. Here's Hakeem Jeffries doing that dance. Under no circumstances should the United States default on our debt, America must always pay our bills. A default would be catastrophic for everyday Americans, for small businesses, for people all across the land. Well, n yes, obviously, you guys care about the small businesses all across the land that you shut down for two years and well, well done on that. You know, Chuck Schumer, he, he's doing the same routine. Look at these terrible Republicans. Chuck Schumer has always, all these terrible are just amazing. They won't, they won't do what we want them to do. And it's just awful. It's awful. He refused. President Biden said he would, leader Jeffrey said he would. Of course I said I would, but he wouldn't take it off the table. And instead of him giving us a plan to remove default, he gave us a plan to take default hostage. Take default hostage. He passed a bill that raises the debt ceiling. It's you guys who refuse to even negotiate so much so that Joe Biden now says he's thinking of just violating the Constitution, and he's going to, you know, consider the 14th Amendment a basically blank slate to spend whatever he wants to spend. You said you're certain you're not going, they're not, they won't be default. Are you willing to take the lateral action like book in the 14th Amendment to make sure it doesn't happen? Well, the question I have been considering the 14th Amendment and a man, I have enormous respect for Larry Tribe, who advised me for a long time thinks that it would be legitimate. But the problem is it would have to be litigated. And in the meantime, without an extension, it would still end up in the same place. Yeah. You see how much fun that is. It's really fun that Larry Tribe can plant an op-ed in the New York Times, talking about how he's now in favor of reinterpreting the 14th Amendment. And then Joe Biden can go out and cite that and pretend that he has legal precedent for this, which he doesn't. Joe Biden was asked about the fact that he's not negotiating, and, and then Biden got real chippy with the, with the reporters. He, he started getting real mad at the reporters, why are you even asking me this stuff, man? Why don't you know that I gonna get damage? And the gambit, Speaker McCarthy said that he asked you numerous times if there was anywhere in the federal budget for cuts, but he did not get any cancer. So, is there, you've Got a specific answer. Got a specific answer again today, which is why the first I, you didn't listen neither. So why should I even answer the question? I we cut the deficit by $160 billion billion B i l l i o n dollars on the Medicare Bill. No, you didn't. What He is proposing, is there any reason negotiation? No, you Didn't. What's he proposing? Did he tell you? Well, Did you hear he talked About No, no, I'm not being facetious. Did he tell you what he's proposing? He, he was talking about the bill. Yeah, but what, what does the propose do? You know, I'm not being a wise guy. You are though. It's in English on the web. You can read the bill. It talks precisely about the cuts that he wishes to implement. What are you talking about? What in the world are you talk, it doesn't matter. This is why, again, I think the Democrats, Joe Biden and Company, they may wanna run the economy directly into the ground and, and they may wanna do so just so they can blame Republicans. I mean, it, it really is an incredible thing. I mean, that's what Karine Shapiro tried yesterday. She was like, Republicans are threatening recession and 8 million jobs. Are they? Or are you, you won't even nego, like if you guys would negotiate and you'd say, here's our position, and then the Republicans like, here's our position, then maybe you could find a middle position. But when your position is, we will not negotiate ever at all who, who looks more unwilling to raise the debt ceiling. Kevin McCarthy, who passed a bill to raise the debt ceiling, or you who are doing nothing. It's not about the president, it's about the American economy. It's about the American people. That's what the president view as success. That's the way that it should be done. Regular order. This is regular order. What house Republicans are saying is that they are, they want to potentially, if they get their way, threaten their, the country's first default, something that has never happened before. That's what they're threatening again, could lead to trigger recession, 8 million jobs potentially lost. That is what they are threatening. That's what they're threatening. That's what you are threatening. Joe Manchin, senator from West Virginia. He's like, you know, it's unreasonable that Biden isn't even negotiating. Yeah, Joe, that's correct. Senator Joe Manchin, who has been calling on the White House to sit down and have these discussions with Republicans indicating that they need to agree to some spending cuts. Otherwise, the consequences he warned could be drastic. It's just, it's not rational, it's not reasonable, and it's not practical. And it's something that, it's hypocritical to say that we're not going to do it now when we've done it, every time that there has been a split in the party, the only time that I know there hasn't been big discussion is when one party, whether it be Republicans have the President, the House and the Senate, or the Democrats have all three plain, Well, they're saying no, no cuts, nothing tied To it. That's not, that's not, I think that's not reasonable. Yes, it is not reasonable. By the way, that's a member of Joe Biden's own party. And with Diane Feinstein absent, it means they don't actually have a majority in support of Joe Biden, even in the Democrat Senate. That's what that means, that Joe Biden, I didn't care, because that's the way this works. He's hoping the media will cover for all of his foibles, and he's probably not wrong him. Meanwhile, on the international front, there are a couple of major stories brewing. One, of course, is actually in Pakistan, which we don't pay attention to a lot. We really should. It's a country of 230 million people with nuclear weapons, and nobody ever pays any attention to Pakistan, despite the fact that Pakistan is generally in a widespread decades long battle between radical Islamists and people who are slightly more moderate between military dictatorship and a democracy that may go radical. So Imran Kahan, who is currently the most popular leader in Pakistan, and tends to be on the more extreme ang sort of more extreme side of Pakistani politics, has now been arrested, which could lead to mass unrest by his supporters. According to the New York Times, Imran Khan, who's Pakistan's ousted Prime Minister, was arrested on corruption charges on Tuesday in a major escalation of a political crisis that has engulfed the country over the past year. And that raises the prospect of mass unrest by his supporters. The arrest intensified a show down between the powerful Pakistani military and Khan and brought the le the country into uncharted political territory. Pakistani leaders have faced arrest before, but never has anyone like Khan so directly and with mass popular support challenged the military, which for decades has been the invisible hand wielding power behind the government. And this is what should scare people. And again, it it, it demonstrates pretty full scale that sometimes there's a conflict between democracy and, you know, the interests of the west. One of the great lies about American Foreign policy is that American Foreign policy in all circumstances must cut in favor of sort of formalistic Democratic arrangements as opposed to American interest. And it's a fool, it's a fool's game because the reality is that if the military in Pakistan were no longer in charge of the nukes, but Imran Khan war, this would be a significantly less stable region. It's already an unstable region. Political tensions been building for months as Kahn, a former Popul, former cricket star, who's extremely populist, has accused the military and the current government of conspiring against him. But the military and government officials deny those claims. His supporters are ransacking the official residences of army commanders. Hundreds of protestors have gathered outside Army headquarters just outside Islamabad in the port city of Karachi, the police are firing tear gas to disperse crowds. Again, it's the fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, is one of the least covered, most dangerous parts of world politics. Know Pakistan is in a, is in an, in unbreachable conflict. I mean, it's an, it's just an intransigent conflict for the last, since 1948. Nobody pays any attention to that. And really no one pays any attention to the fact that Pakistan has been in a series of conflict with, with India for seven decades, and that Pakistan is constantly in danger of falling directly under this sway of radical Islamists. Nobody pays any attention to that. Instead, they pay attention to Israel killing terrorists. So this is the other story that's on the table today, is that Israel launched something called Operation Shield and arrow killing three high level Islamic jihad leaders. The Islam Islamic Jihad is a terrorist group by every available metric. It is backed by Iran Islamic Jihad, just last week launched 102 rockets or 104 rockets into Israel. And Israel retaliated by killing three Islamic Jihad leaders. They did so in extremely targeted strikes. And the international community, they always treat targeted strike as though it's, it's an act of, of egregious war crime violations. It's insane. Israel will literally take out not apartment buildings, apartments like single apartments in terror occupied areas with the intent of killing as few human beings as possible. You can see the pictures of it. They'll take out like a room in an apartment, and it'll turn out that the terrorists have been trotting their kids around with them, specifically in order to deter Israel from killing them. And Israel will call off strikes. I mean, I've seen footage of them doing this. They literally call off strikes if there are too many civilians in the area, but they have to make a call sometimes. Do I kill the Islamic Jihad leader, even though he's hiding behind his kids and it's on him. Because you know what? People of any level of decency don't do hide behind their children. I have three children of my own. You think I would trail them around with me to detter someone from killing me? That's insane. That's insane. So Israel kills these three Islamic Jihad leaders, and this is led to mass rocket attacks that a across Israel, including in Tel Aviv. The videos are, are very easy to find. You can see people being evacuated on the roads. They're literally driving to Tel Aviv on a main highway, and the sirens will go off. And suddenly Israelis have to run off outta their cars onto the side of the road where there's no bomb shelter whatsoever. And then you'll see rockets being shot down by the Iron Dome in Iron Dome, which by the way is, is opposed by people like Rashida Tib, who's a terrorist supporter. The, the, it, it's, it's total madness. And there are pictures that were merging of al flights, like these are civilian airliners flying into Ben Gurian airport and rockets being shot down. Not all that far from the jets. No country worth its salt can tolerate this. If this were America, let's say that Mexican drug cartels started using Mme. Morris, Mexico as a launching point, a staging point for hundreds of rocket attacks into Brownsville, Texas, let's say that started happening. American Marines would be sitting in Mexico City tomorrow morning. Tomorrow morning. Entire areas of the Mexican border would be free of humans because you know what? The AM American military does not do play around. And you know what else they don't do? They don't worry so much about what the UN Security Council is going to do, the fact that Israel is criticized when it has to kill terrorists and those terrorists hide behind their families, but that terrorists can shoot hundreds of rockets into a sovereign state. And Israel's expected to absorb it is totally insane. The Israeli government should do whatever it has to do to stop the terrorism. Yes. Up to and including taking controversial military actions to kill as many terrorists as possible and stop these sorts of attacks. You can't have a country that's living half underground. Total madness. Absolute madness. Okay, me, let's get to some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like today. So Mr. Beast has put out a new video. He's the most popular YouTuber. He's put out a new video. In this video. He helps 1000 deaf people here. Again, he pays for the hearing. He, he pays for cochlear implants and stuff, helping deaf people to actually hear again or here for the first time. That's pretty awesome, right? I mean, here's some of the video. This is the first out of thousand deaf people that we're gonna help here again, and she hasn't heard her mother's voice in four years. Can you hear? I love you. Aw. Next we help Kaylee, what Sudi and even entire families hear their loved ones again, but they are only a few of the 1000 people that we are gonna help. Here again, today we got our hands on over $3 million of cutting edge hearing technology that, unlike old hearing aids, analyzes people's specific hearing needs, allowing them to hear again without causing any damage. Can you hear me talking now? Yes. Oh my God. Wait, He didn angry. I'm gonna cry. Okay? Like, that's great, right? Nothing bad about that. Oh, don't worry. In the world of the internet, everything is bad. Everything is terrible. So a bunch of people have now come out ripping on Mr. Beast. Hey, so the Redditors, they, they have, they have decided, there are many reasons why they are very, very upset at Mr. And Mr. Beast. So some people will say, well, you know, when, when he gets charity, when he gets charity, he's just covering for the failures of the systems. This is sort of the Bernie Sanders attitude toward charity, which is that if you help your neighbor, this is bad because really the government should be helping your neighbor. And you should pay taxes to the government. You jerk, stop helping people. It's bad, you know? and they, they, the problems caused by capitalism are the, okay, so let's be real about this. Those hearing implements do not exist without capitalism. End of story. So one of the people on Reddit was like, this, came to a head with the recent stunt of paying for a thousand blind people's medical treatments, help them gain sight. Looking at that. It's a very nice thing for somebody to do. But at the same time, it highlights, there are many people going without things like available medical treatment, only because they lack the resources to pay themselves. And there is no broader societal mechanism to help them wait. So me doing a nice thing for my neighbor is bad because there's no broader societal mechanism for those people to be helped by the government. So unless you're a full scale socialist, you shouldn't give charity. And also, even when you're a full scale socialist, you shouldn't give charity cause your money should go to the government. These people are morons also, apparently they say he's a for-profit charity because he presents himself as a philanthropist. When in reality he's a C E o whose business model is turning people in bad situations into a profit. So first of all, let's say that, that were true. Let's say that he put ads on this. So, so, so you mean advertisers wanna be associated with a good thing and then they wanna pay him, and then he is gonna use some of that money to do more good things? Oh, no, he's gonna use his money to do nice things for people. Whoa, that's terrible. I, on a personal level, thank God, have very good cashflow, and I spend a lot of my money on charity. But according to these morons, if I make a lot of money and give a lot of my money to charity, that's bad because I shouldn't be making a lot of money. And Mr. Beast, if he's making money off of people getting the warms and fuzzies from this sort of stuff, that means he's a bad person. That means you are a bad person if you object to this. God, be honest with you. Also, he's specifically said that on these videos, he does not monetize them. That he, he does not try to make money off of these videos. Now listen, I would have no problem if he did try to make money off of these videos, because some of that money's gonna go to more videos like this where he's helping a thousand people here. But apparently he, he doesn't want that sort of controversy. So he's not even monetizing these videos. So then they go to the indirect route, oh, well, you know, this is making him more famous. And when you click on his videos, it makes him more money. And then he's using that money to help people, and that's making him richer. Okay, let me ask you a question. If you, here are the alternatives. The alternatives is the alternative is a rich person helps people, or you make him poor and he doesn't help people. Those are the choices. There's no choice where you randomly make him poor and then he spends all that money helping people because that's not how the world works. That's ridiculous. And then finally, the the last criticism is, are selfless acts, truly altruistic. If you film it and want people to know that you perform the selfless Act, and this would be be sort of, the Conant argument is, oh my God, what's his intent? What's the intent? Is really the thing. Did he intend to be charitable? So first of all, you can intend to be charitable and do it publicly. It's actually kinda an important thing. So Maimonides has a hierarchy of the best types of charity to do. Number one type of charity you can do is give somebody a job. If you give somebody a job, according to Maimon, this is the best type of charity. Number two is giving anonymously. And the reason the giving anonymously is the second best type of charity is because then, you know, you're not doing it for the credit. And then you get into like giving charity, but having your name attached to it. But there is a proviso, okay? If you putting your name on a charitable endeavor causes others to give more charity, that's a good thing. So when we give charity, my wife and I, we like to give anonymous charity because frankly, we don't care if our name is associated with it. We're not doing it for the, for the claps and the giggles. We're doing it specifically because we want to give the money and we feel duty bound to do so. Okay? But there have been situations where we specifically, we'll give public charity because it encourages other people to give the charity. If you've ever been to a charity fundraiser, this sort of stuff happens all the time. I, I've MCed many charity fundraisers. When you mc a charity fundraiser, very often what you do is you'll do a fundraise at the end. You'll get up and you'll say, listen, it's time to give to X organization. It's says for school scholarships, it's gonna be a great organization. And I, as a famous person, I pledge that I'm giving $10,000 to this organization. How much is Bob giving? And then it turns out the people in the room are like, oh man. Well, I mean, if he's giving 10, then maybe I'll give 10. If he's giving 10, maybe I should give 15. So if Mr. Beast goes out there and does a charitable thing, maybe it will cause other rich people to do charitable things that would be very bad. Can't do that. Now, the real, the, the reality is the reason so many people are hating on Mr. Beast on this particular score is because when people are very rich and very successful, there are a lot of people who hate them. That's number one. But number two, there is now ingrained in a lot of young people this weird idea that helping your neighbor on a personal level is betrayal of the need for systemic change. The reason they think this is because so much of our philosophy now is driven by the idea that if you say that people can individually change their situation or change the issues of others, then this means that you'll be redirecting energy from the system itself. This is the Bernie Sanders take. You give charity, well, you should be spending all, all the time on money you should be spending to change the entire system. Well, maybe I don't think that the system is bad, number one. And maybe number two, even if I were an activist, I could do both. But I've noticed that there's a weird sort of reversal, which is that Bernie Sanders gives virtually no charity that Democrats overall give very, very little charity by every possible study in the United States. Red State, people who vote red give way more charities a percentage of their income than people who vote blue. Why? Because people vote Blue are like, well, I gave it the office. And people vote Red are like, well no, actually my money doesn't even belong to me. It belongs to God. And that means a certain percentage of my money needs to go to people who can't take care of themselves. So which are the better people? The people who are like, I gave it the office because I made Bob give the money. And that was really the big thing, is I forced Bob to give the money. Or the guy who's like, you know what I'm giving of my own accord, much of them. You wanna get to the con, you know, the, the, the sort of content intent of it. Who is the better person by cons standards. The person who says, I'm giving money of my own accord because I think it is good to give money. Or the person who forces the other guy to give money or says, I'm giving money cause I'm forced to buy the federal government. And this makes me superior again, this is all insane. I, I I failed to understand anything remotely, like why Mr. Beast should be criticized over this sort of stuff. He tweeted out, Twitter rich people should help others with their money. Me, okay, I'll use my money to help people. I promise to give away all my money before I die. Every single Penny Twitter, Mr. Beast bad. So first of all, I, I don't pledge to give away all my money before I die because I want my kids to have my money. I'm not pledge, I pledge to give away a large chunk of my money before I die, which I will because I give away a significant chunk of my money every year. I give away a lot of my money. Not all of it. Not 50%. I I give a lot of money. And you know what? Good doesn't make me a saint, makes me like a normal charitable person. And that's a good thing. If Mr. Beast wants to give away more than that, good for him. But the fact that this is even controversial, we've what, what a gross society looks like is this, I mean, truly a, a gross society looks like here's a guy who's curing a thousand people of their deafness. What a jerk. What a jerk. What done guys? Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate. So there's actually two separate things that I hate. So first of all, Disney and their deep and abiding desire to apparently trans the kids is very weird. So apparently Melissa McCarthy, who is the voice of Ursula in the new live action, or she plays Ursula in the new live action Little Mermaid, she showed up and had a heartwarming run-in with iconic drag Queen Nina West. Oh, so iconic. I like Einstein iconic like Moses iconic, the two met on the red carpet and began battling to each other and chanting, it's everything I ever wanted. McCarthy West Hands told her her dress was perfection and invited her to breakfast. Oh, they're do. Oh, look at that. Look at the beauty of a woman bowing to a man dressed as a woman at the Disney premiere. It's so nice. I I'm so glad that Disney invited this very giant male drag queen to a premiere of a children's movie. It's so nice. According to Yahoo News, the pair seemed to have an instant connection, even broken a song with an impromptu version of Rosemary Clooney's sisters while they wrapped their arms around each other's shoulders. So, so nice sisters forever. She here. Here's a little bit of the video of Melissa McCarthy talking about her heartwarming moment with a dude dressed as a lady. I had no idea that the original Ursula was based off the late great divine. Yes. No idea. I know. That's incredible. And you have your own personal history with drag queens. I have, I have loved drag queens since I was in high school. I think there, it's one of the most joyful, irreverent, funny, fantastic sources of entertainment. We've been doing it since we've been telling stories. It's since the beginning of time. So, and I have such a love of John Waters films. It's like we just watched him on a loop all through college. And so when Little Mermaid came out and there was no, there it was before the internet, guys, I'm that old. But there was no way to kind of, I, I didn't know how to find out, but I was like, I am positive. Whoever created her look and created this character was, was a fan of divine. I was like, I know it with my whole heart and now I know it to be true. And I was like, of course. Of course. So the idea is that the original Ursula in the animated film was based on divine who's a drag queen. Okay? That's true also. Nobody knew that at the time. And no one cared. And the reason no one cared is because Disney wasn't actually attempting to trans the kids back in 1989 when the Little Mermaid came out in 1990, whatever year it was. But it, it is amazing. They so Disney, this is what Disney wishes to trot out, like slow clap for these geniuses. So you morons have undercut your own value by pushing all of the social leftism in movies for kids. And the way you're trotting out Little Mermaid, which is gonna be one of your big live action remakes of the animated film, is not only by pushing the woke notion of racially neutral casting, except if there's a black character which never, ever can be cast as white. Not only gonna do that, you are also going to now promote and continue to facilitate drag queen story Hour amongst the children at, at The Little Mermaid, by the way, gotta love the fact that it's Rachel, what's her face? Rachel Lindsay, the Bachelorette, everybody is racist lady who, who's interviewing. And just that, that is like a, a singularity of woke idiocy, right, right there and genius. By the way, I will note that the Little Mermaid looks absolutely terrible just on an aesthetic level. I I've never been a fan of Disney remaking all of its animated films, live action films. In fact, the entire purpose of animation is to not be live action. But now they're remaking it and it looks hideous. And just, just on an aesthetic level, this movie looks terrible. It, it looks for, for, again, forget about all the wokeness for a second. Look how bad this looks. Like. The, it looks as if they, I don't know why they're going for some sort of realism as though you're actually at an aquarium as opposed to, you know, it being colorful and bright. I don't know why they're going for, you know, 1940s film noir look in color, live action, the Little Mermaid. But here we go. If you had just seen it up there, the ship rode on the wind and they filled the sky with fire. That looks so terrible. Life under sea is than anything going. Okay. So it's an empty sea and her floating around creepy, uncanny, valid territory, Sebastian looks awful. It's creepy and weird Mistake. So instead of him being a, a cute and interesting crab, he now looks like an actual crab that's singing to you in extremely creepy fashion. Also, the ocean is completely empty. This looks terrible. My goodness. If Honey Nemo looks way better, that's not even a question. Producer's access finding. Yes. I mean, this is not even remotely the same. Finding Nemo looks like it would be fun to live under the sea. This looks like you're basically living in a mausoleum underwater. Look at like, where is it? This is a fun song, by the way. Where is the fun? She's in an empty sea and he's singing to no one. Like, that's, if you, honestly, I'd wish to go back and juxtapose that to the original Little Mermaid animated scene. Not even, not even remotely closed. So I, I dunno what Disney's doing, but it is certainly stupid. All righty folks, the rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be getting into Chris Pratt being ripped up and down for you know, being a Christian. If you're not a member, become member. Use Coach Shapiro checkout for two months free and all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us. Oh, hello. Meet Optima Health, your friend for Medicaid coverage. Like any true friend, we can help make life a little easier with discounts on healthy food and gift cards for pregnancy and child checkups. We include vision and medical help 24 7. See more benefits at Optima medicaid.com/hello, it's time to say hello to Optima Health. A health plan you can count on.

right

ep tucker publish rss feed m tucker carlson announce comeback twitter new york jury find donald trump liable sexual assault defamation tune million doj come george santos m ben shapiro ben shapiro today sponsor expressvpn thousand listener secure network datum join expressvpn dot com slash ben tucker carlson break silence week video say near future yesterday minute video explain fact launch version say twitter tucker announcement yesterday good hope news business point freedom tell full truth limit know bump limit fire s guess guarantee twitter long serve place national conversation incubate develop twitter partisan site everybodys allow think s good thing news analyze twitter come media organization thinly disguise propaganda outlet cable news talk twitter result feel like debate actually gatekeeper charge think s bad system know exactly work sick start soon bring new version ve half year twitter bring thing tell grateful free speech main right soon perfectly clear point exactly tucker twitter look like clear s financial arrangement tucker elon musk early speculation soon video come d rumor air tucker work sort deal elon order twitter twitter go to launch essentially sort network video podcast network rest unclear exactly monetize pay subscription fee order able like tucker tucker directly get advertising dollar deal clear especially musk actually statement pretty openly dissociate tucker not bad s put m put money suggest tweet say actual deal tucker say platform unlike way street broadcast people able interact critique refute say wanna clear sign deal kind whatsoever tucker subject rule reward content creator add reward subscription advertising revenue share apparently ll sort sub stack model guess twitter ll able directly contribute people like tucker enjoy twitter say hope particularly left choose content creator platform early speculation musk ve pay sort cash bounty yeah sort salary tucker appear case point clear tucker go bring version twitter s go to absent public debate month length contract fox news suggest remember early news fox news part tucker ve tucker free bird s contract work tucker presumably bind contract continue pay air common medium industry able pay somebody basically pay stay home fox interest presumably cause not want tucker go badmouth exactly able twitter pretty implicit association s s say lot medium outlet ll fire say truth assume mean people fire mind tell truth exactly suspicion suspicion tucker contract onerous regard cable network kind show start sort competitive service fox nation lawyer draw contract big personality like tucker let tucker want not want tucker go direct competition pay stay home m assume area tucker sort public life unbound presumably twitter s common personality wish twitter persona separate business relationship common daily wire example not control matt walsh twitter feed not control candace owens twitter feed daily wire control twitter feed right thing say exactly think want assume tucker personal twitter feed sort thing retain right personal twitter feed feel comfortable put personal twitter feed theoretically violate hiss contract contract extend virtually video content clearly not extend video content extend video content channel fox news right direct competitor tucker consider direct competitor theoretically free contract s launch twitter assume step tucker comeback doubt step s go battle court fox free assume provision contract issue letter accord axis aggressive letter lawyer fox letter essentially argue carlson breach contract s accuse fox having breach contract carlson contract accord axio currently run january fox want pay prevent start compete course outlet reach tucker comment folk fact tucker know presumably legal situation clear bind contract lawyer brian friedman s competent lawyer lawyer lot big personality range like megan kelly tia charlee brian friedman send letter fox official like din arina ante say fox employee break promise carlson intentionally reckless disregard truth go claim essentially fox break contract tucker tucker go able come break contract lawyer accuse fox executive include din murdoch make material representation promise carlson intentionally break constitute fraud exactly fraud letter allege fox break agreement carlson leak private communication medium use carlson private message adverse employment action certainly po possible fox executive le original assumption assumption megan kelly s work fox news right actually mention arena briganti sort head comms fox mention say leave n b c daytime believe ante release information assume thing happen lot leak tucker know white supremacy leak leak suggest white people not fight way actually come fox order smear tucker contract tucker claim s exactly happen assume fox send letter medium matter source leak term distribute fox send letter medium matter tell em stop assume piece legalese intend one leaking not look violate contract tucker letter allege fox break promise settle dominion voting system way indicate wrongdoing tucker claim member board say tucker file fire dominion voting system settlement true true sort dominion settlement dominion want tucker fire ve actually statement say not want tucker fire not care tucker possible fox look settlement million settlement say not want anybody present legal risk tucker walk line s s razor edge not want legal risk getting rid tucker theoretically sort tangentially related dominion voting system fallout legally not dominion voting system settlement fallout dominion voting system theoretically read breach promise harm carlson reputation dominion voting system claim settlement letter tucker lawyer say action breach covenant good faith fair dealing agreement rise claim breach contract intentional negligence misrepresentation fox news post spokesperson come say categorically false carlson lose job million settlement second stuff confusing metic communication garble area afford communication gare m talk cell phone coverage need good cell phone coverage low possible price need pure talk remember time get free phone start feel amazing come hefty activation fee line requirement course bind contract pure talk give free g samsung galaxy phone feeling ve dupe switch pure talk unlimited talk text datum plan come mobile hotspot get g samsung galaxy free s right unlimited fraction price verizon t tmobile here thing ll america dependable g network know m customer use pure talk switch pure talk way cell phone wireless company m proud stand actually stand daily wire pure talk customer service team help switch little minute able phone number head pure talk dot com slash shapiro free samsung galaxy sign unlimited talk text unlimited datum pure talk dot com slash shapiro pure talk wireless americans americans okay conflict tucker carlson fox news go to decide future tucker newsmax daily wire place launch competitive tucker lawyer try argue fox breach agreement tucker free tucker want carlson claim reen ti foxs longtime communication pr chief attempt quote undermine embarrass interfere carlson future business prospect maintain constitute breach employment contract letter say mistake intend subpoena ms ante cell phone record relate document evidence communication medium include limit new york times cell phone record go to demonstrate assume briganti head communication fox news assume speak people new york times real question go to write communication way lawyer audience legal advisor guy not stuff write like general rule thing write bad idea text message email verbal communica here legal advice go to save bunch money bunch time future save thing phone cuz thing say orally permanently memorialize okay assume doreen ti know presumably leak stuff new york times probably will not record know claim not leak stuff new york megan kelly m friend say pretty frequent practice reen ante exactly not know truth controversy carlson lawyer add carlson consider litigation network resolve dispute fox news immediate step preserve exist document datum relevant foxs relationship carlson include correspondence dean executive medium outlet possible design carlson lawyer tucker lawyer order pressure fox release contract word go away guy release contract let fly like butterfly want fox large company decide wish continue litigate thing tucker order preserve fox news competition tucker go network business level exactly fox news tucker huge audience audience prime time fox drop fox leave network tucker leave network tucker talented assume foxs longterm plan rebuild audience significant audience drop take like year rebuild tucker get rid bill oreilly bill oreilly drop lose like half audience take couple year rebuild audience thing fox say ad dollar come lot advertiser afraid tucker problem company like fox news major publicly trade corporation publicly trade corporation thing maximize shareholder value daily wire advertiser decide go boycott not like host say launch like jeremys chocolate jeremys razor order fight people right perfectly happy fox not sort stuff fact advertiser drop tucker program advertiser feel safe come say actually lose money thing perfectly happy prevent tucker go presumably draw people away fox nation shift subscription fox nation real question tucker s online restrict twitter make prominent culture mean big big voice sort conservative medium pm slot fox news apm slot fox news sort impact tucker video twitter get extraordinary number view talk case million view couple video s go maintain go to play way online play terrestrial medium fact lot fox news viewer people twitter population united states regularly twitter come fox news s huge crossover fox news audience disproportionately elderly twitter audience disproportionately young not mean tucker not go to outsize impact definitely impact go change time s probably fox news count pretty fascinating suffice tucker go to completely absent debate s go allow completely absent debate course couple year shot anybody think like end tucker relaunch incorrect end tucker relaunch cooperative venture tucker elon musk mean go to shoe drop like final stage tucker redevelopment deal s c n n exactly cnn course tucker rightwe extremist literally report reporting c n n rightwe extremist tucker carlson announce tuesday relaunch program twitter praise remain large free speech platform world fox newss fire late month rightwe extremist cnn oliver darcy report cnn presumably reason tucker popular cuz media insist go overboard literally thing worth note c n n supposedly hate rightwe extremist hate donald like hate donald trump ll host donald trump town hall style event tonight people voice rightwe extremist particularly trump maga ultra maga movement tonight network rating money present donald trump conversation yeah man medium corrupt day long okay second president trump s hit million defamation assault verdict momentarily business past year bumpy ride probably use break innovation refund help innovation refund know value time easy apply employee retention credit e r c refund dot com start minute business qualify erc assistance business eligible payroll tax rebate grand employee keep payroll covid innovation refund help client claim billion payroll tax refund e r c able help business s upfront charge not pay business get refund not miss opportunity payroll tax refund available limited time refund dot com s refund dot com check right refund dot com business pay money tax system money not government seek screw humanly possible money overspend give money pandemic refund dot com g e t r e f u n d scom refund dot com check right okay jury new york find president trump guilty civil trial find liable sexual abuse defamation e eugene carroll case ve follow case particularly closely ill frank not find e eugene carroll credible witness think testimony s flighty strange person make christine blaze ford lady testify justice kavanaugh judicial hearing make christine blaze ford look sober judge make look incredibly credible eugene carroll allegation like entire year donald trump take room bergdorf bergdorf goodman fitting room rape right allegation jury find donald trump responsible rape instead find actually responsible sexually abuse defame exactly find guilty sort sexual abuse rape kind weird right kind weird reason kind weird thing allege rape mean original piece cut wasthecutcom june describe happen say donald trump say discuss mention great handicap tell happen bergdorf man ill talk deny deny accusation sexual misconduct incredible woman list bunch name white house time say completely false unrealistic story surface year allegedly take place create simply president look bad b run risk make popular reveal admirer not hear s rich lusty powerful sue pay splashy porn star war playboy playmate come forward continue line say time sex advice columnist say early evening m bergdorf revolve door street new york famous man come revolving door regular door time not recall say hey advice lady number hideous man life list hey real estate tycoon okay immediate question mark not remember kind door s say memory hazy say m surprised good look ve meet dusky light look pretty fall spring garb faultless coat m wear black wool donna karen coat dress high heel coat okay point doubt number not year okay s start talk people survive rape kind general presumption people block memory true case case woman abuse anybody s abuse child abuse remember like exact detail exact detail unbelievably traumatic people suffer ptsd typically remember exact detail thing happen particular case remember wear not remember kind door not remember year not remember season right fall spring weird dating season right mean s winter lie talk like september like april ill ill continue account second not pay lot attention eugene carroll case find particularly credible witness momentarily know know like topnotch dad m like amazing dad m good thing dad giant pillow fight bed kid let win let honest m m big know come point control got to start know hit kid pillow s ju s way work kid comfortable fall bed bull branch sheet imagine incredible dad make tired like sleep sheet bull branch sheet great bo branch sheet fine organic cotton thread earth feel buttery touch super breathable perfect cooler warm month signature hem sheet thread luxurious president sleep boland branch sheet actually soften wash cycle pesticide aldehyde harsh chemical good boland branch give night riskfree trial free shipping return order go want return well night sleep bo branch right order use promo code shapiro today bol branch dot com s bol branch b o l l n d branch dot com promo code shapiro exclusion apply seaside detail way m tell boll branch like amazing blanket like blanket set afghan s good literally travel bring s good branch dot com check right okay eugene carroll account original account spill say year later minimum say meet trump walk berg walk guess bergdorf walk come advise say man get to buy present oh charm girl say not assistance secretary buy thing like say say time not recall like time paragraph say not recall s big talker instant collide yammer like s alexander great ready loop babylon stand inside door point handbag say make face pull lip like s balance spoon nose begin talk think buy bergdorf hat enthusiastically walk handbag period m tell bergdorf redo time mixed display hat shell love hat not wrong hat hedge way presumably editor say mean imagine happen editor book like hat purse ve bergdorf hat not purse happen add qualifier provisos original story right maybe door change dunno season hat purse anymore not know go go couple makeover right getting rid detail actually lend credibility verifiability forget credibility verifiability story not remember say comes stride greet bergdorf sale attendant like own joint permit shopper gap aw go right fur number woman want dare want wear dead animal head not apply not recall remember cuddle fur hat like baby otter old lady question ask old reply man fondle hat look like louis leaky carbon date thigh bone s find old gorge m tell old say laugh point drop hat look direction escalator say lingerie say underwear stroll escalator not remember anybody greet gallop talk indicate people store time recollection lingerie era bergdorf like fourth time story s say not know store verify here thing crossexamination easily fall apart say look hat purse step away lingerie somebody come schematic floor plan bergdorf s true right turn lingerie end store different floor s remove verifiable detail doubt story floor evening gown bathing suit man arrive memory vivid vivid present tain ty box lacy seethrough body suit lilac grand counter man snatch body suit say try try laugh color try come say throw go eye laugh throw good shape say hold filmy thing wanna look size laugh try slap box counter come say arm let go to hilarious m say write m stagger stupidity mean yes mean yes responsible rape go man not know lingerie section try lingerie man s little flirtatious not mean rape not rape not mean justify rape like smart behavior head dressing room m laugh aloud say mind m go to thing pant fact happen odd wanna clear report police tell yes tell close friend journalist magazine writer correspondent tv morning show author book beg police rape keep repeat call rape police ill fact obviously not think rape time friend keep say rape not cop second friend journalist new york anchor woman grow quiet tell grasp hand say tell forget lawyer hell bury photo visual evidence bergdorf security camera pick pick street entrance store ve film ground floor bag hat section camera capture go escalator lingerie department capture tape depend position camera difficult man zip pant wear coat struggle simply read sexy speculation mood department store confirm long long tape time tape camera present camera present not clear exactly go accord go verifiability sale attendant lingerie department bergdorf perfection know store noble clubby posh easy accept fact attack fact brief moment sale attendant lingerie department inconceivable word say person will not find sale attendance sack look sale associate barney bloomingdale tiffany time ll attendant bergdorf attendance odd thing dressing room door open not come forward receive death threat drive home dismiss drag mud join woman come say scared s not come forward okay talk happen suggest moment dressing room door close lunge push wall hit head badly put mouth lip m shocked shove start laugh laugh seize arm push wall second time aware large hold wall shoulder jam hand coat dress pull tight say m astonish m write laugh moment wear correct business attire shirt tie suit jacket overcoat open overcoat unzip pant force finger private area thrust penis halfway completely m certain inside turn colossal struggle m wear pair sturdy black patent leather inch barney high heel put height try stomp foot try push free hand reason hold purse finally knee high push turn open door run outta dressing room episode last minute okay say s sex lifelong lifelong trauma okay reason not find particularly credible bunch lack verifiable detail particular story year later statute limitation like sort real rape trial right statute limitation rape law generally presume year go to extraordinarily difficult actually convict somebody like easily defense like say say defense right laugh time know go tell get right like un implausible see criminal case criminal case year later civil case eugene carroll immediately write story file civil suit take like year story come take couple year file civil suit file fund reid hoffman s big democrat owner s real credibility issue big problem eugene carroll strange person eugene carroll cnn talk suppose rape not feel like victim throw ground ravis word rape carry sexual connotation sexual hurt know think people think rape mean violent assault think people think rape sexy let short break think fantasy get to quick stick talk fascinating talk people think rape sexy anderson cooper like not know story lady like super duper weird okay s bad witness exactly case donald basically jury find not believe rape clearly not believe rape believe assault push wall believe believe rape s super credible witness believe assault answer believe assault basically trial referendum donald trumps p word tape right grab p word s trial trial referendum donald trump having say billy bush hot mic access hollywood year ago famous grab woman bleep fine famous ll let famous people let bunch witness like woman come forward say s donald trump assault forcibly kiss forcibly grab forcibly touch eugene carroll good witness evidence fact new york jury actually donald trump rape basically say believe donald trump donald trump say grab woman way believe believe woman grab super ha super happy right donald trumps original quote woman let right obviously imply consent right people let thing imply consent donald trumps perspective yeah grab woman time fine m famous rich perspective jury donald trump grab grab woman time fine here list woman fine come bite trump personally trump deposition tape donald trump tape talk grab bleep comment video start kiss like magnet kiss not wait star let grab s say correct historically s true star true star grab woman s s look million year guess s largely true largely true unfortunately fortunately consider star think yeah okay amazing testimony lot lawyer like oh donald trumps lawyer actually hard job world main job lawyer shh client shh not donald trumps like yeah mean guess not donald trump say deposition say mean people let literally say tape consensual deny woman consent deny essentially happen trump say trump say testimony deposition famous grab woman bleep woman claim grab bleep jury like okay s credible credible grab woman bleep right fox news legal analyst like yeah turn testify brilliant idea fox news legal analyst talk yesterday andy think impact o piece tape process yeah martha think like mean think impact devastating way say way present ve see access hollywood tape till point mainly abstract think effective thing carroll lawyer introduce tape jury course testimony natasha soff woman claim sexually assault president trump situation sort dismiss locker room banter abstract right basically reify trumps statement trump mad hell right write social medium platform quote absolutely idea woman verdict disgrace continuation great witch hunt time go harm electorally reason go harm electorally look like concoct laboratory case look person read access hollywood comment like allege s admit woman not consensual sue new york jury find like million s kinda jury jury actually believe donald trump rape eugene carroll presumably ve find rape eugene carroll not find basically say not believe eugene carroll story not believe like believe penetration like exactly believe story sound like say actually not believe story believe woman experience verify donald trump tape talk grab woman go to find everybody look like mean s new cause allegation woman lot go to eugene carroll like bunch money new york jury look excuse punish donald trump hate donald trump go to affect donald trump electorally way hard time believe go to affect donald trump way think think say feel like witch hunt kind mean look litigate allegation donald trump billy bush find world credible witness eugene carroll talk tape year later trial not eugene carroll trial donald trump look like look like trial donald trump donald trump new york jury want find s look like supporter like okay come m go to vote base new york jury not like base fact support statement say hot mic s say agree get second let talk fact figure career build skillset build resume find good job s kind hard employer look good employee hard find right employee job great job matchmaking site time course ziprecruiter ziprecruiter help find qualified people role fast right try ziprecruiter free ziprecruiter dot com slash daily wire ziprecruiter matching technology help find qualified candidate wide range role candidate like easily send personal invite likely apply userfriendly dashboard make easy filter review rate candidate place let ziprecruiter help find good people role employer post ziprecruiter quality candidate day ziprecruiter dot com slash daily wire try ziprecruiter free ziprecruiter dot com slash daily wire ziprecruiter smart way hire ve ziprecruiter daily wire literally year ll employee base well employee look employer ziprecruiter find great job ziprecruiter dot com slash daily wire smart way hire despite lackluster economy daily wire continue thrive hire right look video editor join fastgrowing postproduction team person opportunity work variety content include daily podcast long form interview youtube video show like debone documentary jordan peterson plus year professional video editing experience familiarity work fast paced environment low turnaround time require bonus point experience work viral youtube content perfect role somebody expertly follow standardized video editing format possess strong creative skillset link reel require consideration position base nashville tennessee information apply visit daily wire dot com slash career s daily wire dot com slash career today okay actually affect donald trump medium treat trump million defamation verdict sort obstacle run s s ridiculous absolutely ll interesting trump respond question assume wednesday night s suppose town hall forum c n n kaitlyn collins presumably s go ask s go exact thing testimony s probably go true famous want eugene carroll liar s fine go to impact assume thing s go to impact trump legally go to go alvin bragg idiot case regard campaign finance violation stormy daniel thing go affect trump legally speak drip drip drip indictment right come point voter like yeah guy legal case true feel like know cartoon gun train bug bunny start root bug bunny little bit right s kind go feel like s indictment watch fulton county fannie willis investigate effort trump georgia affect election postelection upcoming trial new new york civil case trump organization s federal probe special counsel jack smith trump try subvert election s federal probe handling classify document problem case isolation look weak bunch weak case isolation look like exactly donald trump want actually see giant inkind contribution donald trumps primary campaign time feel target republican base rush defense help primary help general population think not think s anybody kind independent like target like not think ton people like idea go like bar trump run think ridiculous s article washington post title right sexual abuse verdict renews republican doubt trumps electability listen think doubt trump selectability doubt trump selectability consider lose joe biden pull rabbit hat beat hillary clinton like doubt electability trump trump people opinion trump notion go to sort kill shoot regard campaign obviously incredibly silly not sense george santos republican congressperson new york arrest charge wire fraud money launder theft public fund make materially false statement one suspect guy know like butler george santo lie literally thing turn probably lie money public fund money rest sort stuff provide sort conundrum republican party majority house extraordinarily slim point right majority like seat seat like majority presume way work presumably replace governor new york governor new york course kathy hoel s democrats mean democrats appoint fill seat swing district santo win large scale probability republican majority decline problem mccarthy kind solid core people gadfly vote bring matt gaetz lauren bobert marjorie taylor greene like not include mtg way mtg vote mccarthy actually rational term legislative priority matt gaetz mean majority shrink little bit s problem republicans guess s indict s slightly liar member congress know here good news plenty liar leave congress include irrepressibly stupid aoc s pathological liar yesterday pathologically lie jordan neely jordan neely course mentally ill career criminal black man die new york subway marine submission hold attempt stop attack passenger tweet safe city few people suffer homelessness ve displace house mm real problem new york not provide resource necessary people like jordan neely s problem thomas chatterton williams writer atlantic conservative point say jordan ely kill not access mental health support s lie accord actual new york times report arrest long ago suppose court live treatment facility bronx stay clean month day later abandon facility talk time idea underfunding new york city underfunde fact consequence simply go live street abandon drug rehab facility aoc want able abandon drug rehab facility aspect freedom live street accord people like o c pathological lie exist congress george santo target pathological lie immigration crisis southern border get bad bad bad accord wall street journal official new york chicago declare state emergency texas governor greg abbott resume bust migrant northern sanctuary city ahead expiration later week title busload migrant texas begin arrive city hundred mile border year official try provide housing service new arrival chicago new york washington dc lori lightfoot chicago say hit breaking point s outgoing mayor chicago ve take like illegal immigrant course year illegal immigrant arrive bo border like single day people schlep street el paso leave lori lightfoot state panic busload people enter city million here lori lightfoot talk week send letter governor abbott learn send migrant city bus try reason explain yes course welcome city right immigrant refugee community ve reach break point response humanitarian crisis primarily manufacture cynical political purpose oh super cynical abbott send people city want know cynical apparently eric adam eric adams mayor new york s claim cynical send people new york city destination hilarious undercover exactly eric adam mayor new york city illegal immigrant quote official represent new york suburb rebuke new york city mayor eric adams plan send migrant town shelter abc news reporting eric adams plan m go whine people send new york city big city planet m go people m go send rockland county m go to schlep suburb leave school s plan eric bad greg abbott send busload illegal immigrant new york city good eric adams take busload immigrant unload rockland county rockland county official declare state emergency saturday response adam plan send adult male migrant live armani inn suite orangeburg new york month mean honestly oh oh darn consequence action oh come rockland county declare sanctuary city december apparently rockland county new york city declare sanctuary city mainly virtue signal left rockland county like guy not schleppe county executive edwin day city declare sanctuary city december commit support undocumented individual county population new york city capable receive sustain volume undocumented migrant eric adam intend send rockland county mile northwest new york city close hudson river friday adam announce send migrant neighbor new york county response rise number asylum seeker city good desantis send people marthas vineyard bad eric adam say s go love guy come illegal immigrant sanctuary city go to help federal official effectuate immigration policy go to deport stay stay stay actually rockland county adam say press conference despite call federal government national national decompression strategy year decompression strategy state new york city leave necessary support manage crisis vacuum leadership force undertake decompression strategy man love love eric adams go escape scrutiny schleppe people middle declare go help everybody immigrant continue pour border video matam morros mexico absolutely shocking people pour border look unbelievable course people pour rio grande man woman child hundred climb bank river thing not go great guy good news joe biden control fact joe biden not answer question yesterday pressor pressor mean answer question smirk reporter let room go to solve world problem mr president s smile oh fun guy ill ill later yeah s right giant jack guy bye guy not answer question m president bye course session include hakeem jeffrie kevin mccarthy chuck schumer talk budget crisis ll question joe biden joe biden comment way keep smile like weirdo s weird old caesar romero joker type weird joe biden yesterday border hi comment edify spend think close hour mexican president today answer remain see ve get overwhelming cooperation mexico process set resi office columbia place seek asylum remain see go to chaotic oh ll chaotic guy not worry ll mean rest life s chaotic mean like million illegal immigrant cross border catch release karine shapiro ask joe biden plan address americans board crisis s like kid not guy stre sentence way title share message new york give know know effect hear president title hear president past friday interview sit interview network talk title talk immigration american people hear directly president issue not share couple day present schedule ill leave talk msnbc guy mean good news karine john pere say man like ark covenant man man mean kamala harris not know anybody find satisfying say yeah get board christ know joe biden talk kamala harris presumably supply electric school bus venn diagram illegal immigrant vice president involve today meeting shell country president away president closely closely consult vice president conversation issue come issue matter american people partner yeah mm probably kamala harriss like mm yeah yeah good good stuff m sure s fix problem s amazing job border far remember deploy solve border crisis year ago go swimmingly swimmingly mean literally thousand people swim rio grande enter united states s exciting stuff biden administration yeoman work blow budget s breakthrough debt ceiling meeting yesterday president biden house speaker kevin mccarthy accord wall street journal remain loggerhead meeting white house tuesday little progress avert default federal government know conspiratorial thinking occur joe biden know economy amazing shape right probably recession find excuse blame republican charge government actually wheelhouse look way blame republican economic downturn maybe s s negotiate s reason negotiate point consider avoid debt ceiling tough kevin mccarthys proposal low spending stop trajectory spend rise way outright reject white house want level spending movement whatsoever kevin mccarthy yesterday announce yeah sit room joe biden stare wall eat oatmeal real weird lift debt ceiling find way curve increase debt affect american family inflation bank fourth large bank close debt problem change thing change house raise debt ceiling pass bill s meeting today everybody meeting reiterate position not new movement president say staff clear president week okay democratic playbook not default circumstance default cut definitely important default pay pay debt negotiate circumstance here hakeem jeffrie dance circumstance united states default debt america pay bill default catastrophic everyday americans small business people land n yes obviously guy care small business land shut year know chuck schumer s routine look terrible republicans chuck schumer terrible amazing will not will not want awful awful refuse president biden say leader jeffrey say course say not table instead give plan remove default give plan default hostage default hostage pass bill raise debt ceiling guy refuse negotiate joe biden say s think violate constitution s go know consider amendment basically blank slate spend want spend say certain go will not default willing lateral action like book amendment sure not happen question consider amendment man enormous respect larry tribe advise long time think legitimate problem litigate meantime extension end place yeah fun fun larry tribe plant oped new york times talk s favor reinterpret amendment joe biden cite pretend legal precedent not joe biden ask fact s negotiate biden get real chippy reporter start get real mad reporter ask stuff man not know go to damage gambit speaker mccarthy say ask numerous time federal budget cut cancer ve get specific answer get specific answer today not listen answer question cut deficit billion billion b l l o n dollar medicare bill not propose reason negotiation not s propose tell hear talk m facetious tell s propose talk bill yeah propose know m wise guy english web read bill talk precisely cut wish implement talk world talk not matter think democrats joe biden company wanna run economy directly ground wanna blame republican mean incredible thing mean s karine shapiro try yesterday like republicans threaten recession million job will not nego like guy negotiate d here position republicans like here position maybe find middle position position negotiate look unwilling raise debt ceiling kevin mccarthy pass bill raise debt ceiling president american economy american people s president view success s way regular order regular order house republicans say want potentially way threaten country default happen s threaten lead trigger recession million job potentially lose threaten s threaten s threaten joe manchin senator west virginia s like know unreasonable biden not negotiate yeah joe s correct senator joe manchin call white house sit discussion republican indicate need agree spending cut consequence warn drastic rational reasonable practical hypocritical go ve time split party time know not big discussion party republican president house senate democrats plain say cut tie s s think s reasonable yes reasonable way s member joe biden party diane feinstein absent mean not actually majority support joe biden democrat senate s mean joe biden not care s way work s hope medium cover foible s probably wrong international couple major story brew course actually pakistan not pay attention lot country million people nuclear weapon pay attention pakistan despite fact pakistan generally widespread decade long battle radical islamist people slightly moderate military dictatorship democracy radical imran kahan currently popular leader pakistan tend extreme ang sort extreme pakistani politic arrest lead mass unrest supporter accord new york times imran khan s pakistans oust prime minister arrest corruption charge tuesday major escalation political crisis engulf country past year raise prospect mass unrest supporter arrest intensify powerful pakistani military khan bring le country uncharted political territory pakistani leader face arrest like khan directly mass popular support challenge military decade invisible hand wield power government scare people demonstrate pretty scale s conflict democracy know interest west great lie american foreign policy american foreign policy circumstance cut favor sort formalistic democratic arrangement oppose american interest fool fool game reality military pakistan long charge nuke imran khan war significantly stable region unstable region political tension build month kahn popul cricket star s extremely populist accuse military current government conspire military government official deny claim supporter ransack official residence army commander hundred protestor gather outside army headquarters outside islamabad port city karachi police fire tear gas disperse crowd fact pakistan nuclear weapon cover dangerous part world politic know pakistan unbreachable conflict mean intransigent conflict pay attention pay attention fact pakistan series conflict india seven decade pakistan constantly danger fall directly sway radical islamist pay attention instead pay attention israel kill terrorist story s table today israel launch call operation shield arrow kill high level islamic jihad leader islam islamic jihad terrorist group available metric back iran islamic jihad week launch rocket rocket israel israel retaliate kill islamic jihad leader extremely target strike international community treat targeted strike act egregious war crime violation insane israel literally apartment building apartment like single apartment terror occupy area intent kill human being possible picture ll like room apartment ll turn terrorist trot kid specifically order deter israel kill israel strike mean ve see footage literally strike civilian area kill islamic jihad leader s hide kid know people level decency not hide child child think trail detter kill s insane s insane israel kill islamic jihad leader lead mass rocket attack israel include tel aviv video easy find people evacuate road literally drive tel aviv main highway siren suddenly israelis run outta car road s bomb shelter whatsoever ll rocket shoot iron dome iron dome way oppose people like rashida tib s terrorist supporter total madness picture merge al flight like civilian airliner fly ben gurian airport rocket shoot far jet country worth salt tolerate america lets mexican drug cartel start mme morris mexico launch point staging point hundred rocket attack brownsville texas lets start happen american marine sit mexico city tomorrow morning tomorrow morning entire area mexican border free human know american military play know not not worry un security council go fact israel criticize kill terrorist terrorist hide family terrorist shoot hundred rocket sovereign state israel expect absorb totally insane israeli government stop terrorism yes include take controversial military action kill terrorist possible stop sort attack not country s live half underground total madness absolute madness okay let thing like thing hate thing like today mr beast new video s popular youtuber s new video video help deaf people pay hearing pay cochlear implant stuff help deaf people actually hear time s pretty awesome right mean here video thousand deaf people go to help not hear mother voice year hear love aw help kaylee sudi entire family hear love one people go to help today get hand million cut edge hearing technology unlike old hearing aid analyze people specific hearing need allow hear cause damage hear talk yes oh god wait didn angry m go to cry okay like s great right bad oh not worry world internet bad terrible bunch people come rip mr beast hey redditor decide reason upset mr mr beast people know get charity get charity s cover failure system sort bernie sander attitude charity help neighbor bad government help neighbor pay taxis government jerk stop help people bad know problem cause capitalism okay let real hearing implement exist capitalism end story people reddit like come head recent stunt pay thousand blind people medical treatment help gain sight look nice thing somebody time highlight people go thing like available medical treatment lack resource pay broad societal mechanism help wait nice thing neighbor bad s broad societal mechanism people help government scale socialist not charity scale socialist not charity cause money government people moron apparently s forprofit charity present philanthropist reality s c e o business model turn people bad situation profit let true let ad mean advertiser wanna associate good thing wanna pay go to use money good thing oh s go to use money nice thing people whoa s terrible personal level thank god good cashflow spend lot money charity accord moron lot money lot money charity s bad not make lot money mr beast s make money people get warm fuzzie sort stuff mean s bad person mean bad person object god honest s specifically say video monetize try money video listen problem try money video money go to video like s help thousand people apparently not want sort controversy s monetize video indirect route oh know make famous click video make money s money help people s make rich okay let ask question alternative alternative alternative rich person help people poor not help people choice s choice randomly poor spend money help people s world work s ridiculous finally criticism selfless act truly altruistic film want people know perform selfless act sort conant argument oh god s intent s intent thing intend charitable intend charitable publicly actually kinda important thing maimonide hierarchy good type charity number type charity somebody job somebody job accord maimon good type charity number give anonymously reason giving anonymously second good type charity know credit like give charity have attach proviso okay put charitable endeavor cause charity s good thing charity wife like anonymous charity frankly not care associate clap giggle specifically want money feel duty bind okay situation specifically public charity encourage people charity ve charity fundraiser sort stuff happen time ve mce charity fundraiser mc charity fundraiser ll fundraise end ll ll listen time x organization say school scholarship go to great organization famous person pledge m give organization bob giving turn people room like oh man mean s give maybe ill s give maybe mr beast go charitable thing maybe cause rich people charitable thing bad not real reality reason people hate mr beast particular score people rich successful lot people hate s number number ingrain lot young people weird idea help neighbor personal level betrayal need systemic change reason think philosophy drive idea people individually change situation change issue mean ll redirect energy system bernie sander charity spend time money spend change entire system maybe not think system bad number maybe number activist ve notice s weird sort reversal bernie sander give virtually charity democrats overall little charity possible study united states red state people vote red way charity percentage income people vote blue people vote blue like give office people vote red like actually money not belong belong god mean certain percentage money need people not care well people people like give office bob money big thing force bob money guy s like know m give accord wanna con know sort content intent well person con standard person say m give money accord think good money person force guy money say m give money cause m force buy federal government make superior insane fail understand remotely like mr beast criticize sort stuff tweet twitter rich people help money okay ill use money help people promise away money die single penny twitter mr beast bad not pledge away money die want kid money m pledge pledge away large chunk money die away significant chunk money year away lot money lot money know good not saint make like normal charitable person s good thing mr beast want away good fact controversial ve gross society look like mean truly gross society look like here guy s cure thousand people deafness jerk jerk guy okay time quick thing hate s actually separate thing hate disney deep abide desire apparently trans kid weird apparently melissa mccarthy voice ursula new live action play ursula new live action little mermaid show heartwarming runin iconic drag queen nina west oh iconic like einstein iconic like moses iconic meet red carpet begin battle chant want mccarthy west hand tell dress perfection invite breakfast oh oh look look beauty woman bow man dress woman disney premiere nice m glad disney invite giant male drag queen premiere children movie nice accord yahoo news pair instant connection break song impromptu version rosemary clooney sister wrap arm shoulder nice sister forever here little bit video melissa mccarthy talk heartwarming moment dude dress lady idea original ursula base late great divine yes idea know s incredible personal history drag queens love drag queen high school think joyful irreverent funny fantastic source entertainment ve ve tell story beginning time love john water film like watch loop college little mermaid come internet guy m old way kind not know find like positive create look create character fan divine like know heart know true like course course idea original ursula animate film base divine s drag queen okay s true know time care reason care disney not actually attempt trans kid little mermaid come year amazing disney disney wish trot like slow clap genius moron undercut value push social leftism movie kid way trot little mermaid go to big live action remake animate film push woke notion racially neutral casting s black character cast white go to go promote continue facilitate drag queen story hour child little mermaid way get to love fact rachel s face rachel lindsay bachelorette everybody racist lady s interview like singularity woke idiocy right right genius way note little mermaid look absolutely terrible aesthetic level ve fan disney remake animate film live action film fact entire purpose animation live action remake look hideous aesthetic level movie look terrible look forget wokeness second look bad look like look not know go sort realism actually aquarium oppose know colorful bright not know go know film noir look color live action little mermaid see ship ride wind fill sky fire look terrible life sea go okay sea float creepy uncanny valid territory sebastian look awful creepy weird mistake instead cute interesting crab look like actual crab s singe extremely creepy fashion ocean completely look terrible goodness honey nemo look way well s question producer access find yes mean remotely finding nemo look like fun live sea look like basically live mausoleum underwater look like fun song way fun s sea s singe like s honestly d wish juxtapose original little mermaid animate scene remotely close dunno disney certainly stupid righty folk rest continue right go to wanna miss get chris pratt rip know christian member member use coach shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join oh hello meet optima health friend medicaid coverage like true friend help life little easy discount healthy food gift card pregnancy child checkup include vision medical help benefit optima medicaidcomhello time hello optima health health plan count

Speeches, etc. Q1. Mr. Montgomery asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 June. The Prime Minister (Mrs. Margaret Thatcher) In addition to duties in this House I have had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, including one with Lord Harlech. Later this afternoon I shall leave for the Tokyo economic summit. Mr. Montgomery Before my right hon. Friend leaves for Tokyo, can she find time today to read the report on school examination results, which was published yesterday? Does she not think that it would be better for all concerned if every local education authority published the separate examination results for each of the schools in its area? The Prime Minister I have indeed, glanced at the report to which my hon. Friend refers. I totally agree with him. I believe that local education authorities should publish the examination results as they refer to schools. I believe that parents are entitled to that information and that it most certainly should not be withheld. Mr. Bidwell At some time during her long journeys abroad, will the right hon. Lady reflect upon the fact that her Government are shaping up to deny women's rights in changing immigration rules to [column 281]prevent equality of the spouses—rules which were previously changed in 1974? Will she also reflect upon the fact that if she has a son-in-law in Australia who is non-partial it is a long way to go to do a bit of baby-sitting? The Prime Minister The hon. Gentleman knows that the changes we propose to make in immigration rules were put before the electorate perfectly clearly, and that I answered all questions with great candour, regardless of their source. I believe that we have a mandate to go forward with the changes. Sir Paul Bryan No doubt my right hon. Friend will be spending some of today preparing for the summit conference in Tokyo. When she is there, will she constantly bear in mind that the Vietnamese refugee problem is a world problem and that it can be solved only by the very world leaders with whom she will be conferring? The Prime Minister I am grateful to my hon. Friend for asking that question. The subject came up at the European Council and will certainly come up at the Tokyo summit. I think that there are two aspects. First, we should do everything we can to stop Vietnam so callously turning out those people. Secondly, there is the matter of trying to cope with the immense refugee problem that the Vietnamese have already created. We must condemn Vietnam with all the power at our command. Mr. William Hamilton Will the right hon. Lady take time today to read the newspaper reports about the capitulation of the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food last week? Does she agree with the figures in those newspapers indicating that as a result of that capitulation the EEC farm budget will be increased by about £1,000 million and that our contribution to that will be roughly 20 per cent? Does she confirm those figures? The Prime Minister I inquired about the figures before I came to the House. May I make it quite clear that there is a freeze on milk prices for the first time since we joined the Community. There is an excellent butter subsidy and there is something for the farmers. The net effect of Peter Walkermy right hon. Friend's efforts in Luxembourg last week is that we are now £30 million better off than we should [column 282]otherwise have been—for the simple reason that we get back more on the butter subsidy than we pay by way of increase in prices through the budget. Mr. Emery Has my right hon. Friend's attention been drawn to the summary executions in Ghana today of six former leaders of that Commonwealth nation, three of whose lives were thought to be at risk, as expressed by an early-day motion signed by right hon. and hon. Members on both sides of the House? Will she express her abhorrence of this action and see, perhaps with the Foreign Secretary, what action Britain, in conjunction with other African and Commonwealth nations, might take to try to impress on the present Ghana Government that unilateral action sweeping to one side—[Hon. Members: “Too long.” ] These are men's lives—sweeping to one side internationally accepted human rights and justice cannot be acceptable to the many friends of Ghana throughout the world? The Prime Minister We heard from Accra this morning that six further executions took place today, both of former Heads of State and of previous high officials in Ghana. As my hon. Friend knows, when a similar occasion occurred a few days ago we expressed our abhorrence. We do so again, in response to this terrible action. We made it perfectly clear that, if there were to be prosecutions, they should be in accordance with internationally accepted principles of justice. We are already in touch through our high commission in Ghana, we are in touch with the Nine, and we hope to get both America and Canada to join us in making similar strong representations to the Government of Ghana. Mr. James Callaghan With reference to that last answer, may I assure the right hon. Lady that she will have the full support of the Opposition in those representations and, in view of the special relationship which existed with Ghana and the assistance which this country has given to Ghana in recent years, add the hope that the present leaders will listen to what she has to say? May I revert to the question about the agricultural policy? There is a great deal of either misunderstanding or something else about this. Why did the Minister of Agriculture depart from the [column 283]strong words that he had used in the House on 15 June, because it is clear from them that he was “in total agreement” with the proposals of the Commission for a general freeze? Why did he abandon that position? It was an impregnable position. Did the right hon. Lady advise him to do so because of some misunderstanding on the budgetary contributions at Strasbourg, or is it that he just was not tough enough to stand up to what was held over him? The Prime Minister There was no linkage between the negotiations going on in Luxembourg and those in Strasbourg. The right hon. Gentleman underestimates the excellence of the package which Peter Walkermy right hon. Friend gained. No Labour Minister of Agriculture managed to secure a freeze on milk prices. The results on the butter subsidy which my right hon. Friend gained were excellent. The net effect of his work is that this country is £30 million better off than it would otherwise have been without it. I might add that those farmers who, without my right hon. Friend's efforts, might have had to pay a co-responsibility levy on milk are very pleased with the results of his work. Q2. Mr. Whitehead asked the Prime Minister if she will dismiss the Secretary of State for Energy. The Prime Minister No, Sir. Mr. Whitehead Is the Prime Minister aware that many hon. Members have been deluged with correspondence from local authorities, transport undertakings and farmers about their failure to secure essential fuel supplies? As the Secretary of State for Energy appears to be embarked upon a one-man energy saving programme, cannot the right hon. Lady get him and the Minister of Transport together and impress upon them what the rest of the country knows already, namely, that proper allocation rather than pious exhortation is needed in this matter? The Prime Minister I am very much against having a great big bureaucratic scheme of allocation. Two or three years ago we experienced very considerable [column 284]shortages. When we had previous difficulty, there was then no system of allocation put into effect. If the hon. Member has particular difficulties in his constituency, perhaps he will get in touch with David Howellmy right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy. Mr. Neubert Has my right hon. Friend seen the West German economic Minister's prediction today that there will be war within five years arising from the oil shortage? In view of the growing gravity of the petrol crisis, will my right hon. Friend urge upon her fellow statesmen at Tokyo a joint programme for reductions in petrol consumption throughout the Western world? The Prime Minister As my hon. Friend knows, at Strasbourg last week we tried to do all that we could to economise in our own countries on the use of oil and to try to bring our influence to bear on those who supply oil perhaps to increase the supply by a comparatively small amount, which is all that is needed. I agree totally with my hon. Friend that there is little point in our trying to depress the demand in Europe unless that is met with matching determination in the United States and Japan. We shall further that view at Tokyo later. Mr. James Callaghan In view of the growing critical nature of the oil position, when do the Government propose to abandon their policy of selling nearly £1 billion worth of BP shares? The Prime Minister I understood that the right hon. Gentleman's Government also sold BP shares. Mr. Callaghan But is the right hon. Lady aware that there is a controlling interest in BP at the moment of more than 51 per cent. and that the shares which were sold did not reduce it below that level? Will she please give us any rational explanation why further shares should be sold at this time? The Prime Minister My right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer gave the explanation in his Budget Statement. It is not the ownership of a company which counts; it is the laws which relate to that company. BP is a perfectly ordinary commercial company. It operates commercially. We should be free to dispose of some of those [column 285]assets in accordance with what my right hon. and learned Friend said in his Budget Statement. Q3. Mr. Viggers asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 26 June. The Prime Minister I refer my hon. Friend to the reply which I gave earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Altrincham and Sale (Mr. Montgomery). Mr. Viggers Has my right hon. Friend had a chance today to see the devastating analysis by the former Home Secretary of the reasons why the Labour Party was defeated in the last election? Has she noticed also that about half of the country's trade union members voted for the Conservative Party in the election? Does she think, as I do, that this means that union leaders should think twice before using their union positions for political ends and, similarly, that union members who voted Conservative should ensure that their union leaders know their views? The Prime Minister I agree with my hon. Friend, and apparently with the right hon. Member for Leeds, South (Mr. Rees), that a larger number of trade union members voted Conservative than ever before. I hope that we shall continue to gather strength from that source. They believe now that our policy best represents their ambitions for their own future and for their families, for a better standard of living and for better jobs. Mr. Tapsell When my right hon. Friend leaves in a few hours' time, with the good wishes of the British people, to attend this exceptionally important economic summit conference at Tokyo strengthened in the knowledge that sterling has increased in value against the Japanese yen by 25 per cent. over the past six months, and by the fact that she represents the only industrialised country which is almost self-sufficient in energy, will she take every opportunity to emphasise to the other world leaders that what really matters for the prosperity of everyone is the maintenance of the levels of world trade and that a key factor in that will be the establishment of constructive [column 286]methods of re-cycling the surplus oil revenues? The Prime Minister My hon. Friend's question is especially pertinent in view of the OPEC meeting today because, if the price of oil goes up, there will be considerably increased revenues which ought to be re-cycled unless they are to have a very damaging effect on world trade and on the under-developed countries. I agree with my hon. Friend's analysis. Mr. Mike Thomas Is the Prime Minister aware that many hon. Members, like myself, have constituents who depend on the shipbuilding and heavy engineering industries, for neither of which she holds out any promise? These industries are often located in areas of high unemployment. Will she give some information to the House on the progress of the shipbuilding intervention fund? What is to happen to the shipbuilding industry and the jobs within it? What progress has been made on the AGR nuclear orders for the power plant industry? What will happen to those people for whom she professes to care—those who work creatively in industry? The Prime Minister As the hon. Gentleman knows, the shipbuilding plan is under review. He will also be aware that there is surplus capacity in this country, as well as in others, and that reducing that surplus capacity will be a painful process. It is not a process that we wish to undergo but one which the situation means we shall have to undergo. [Hon. Members: “Oh.” ] I am afraid that nationalisation does not prevent a reduction of jobs. This must be looked at realistically. We are interested in trying to get new, “tomorrow's jobs” , and doing everything to encourage new industries, new small businesses and expansion of existing industries. Mr. Frank Allaun If the Government increase the cost of living by introducing VAT, cutting public spending and causing unemployment, is it not both an industrial and a political question? Are not the trade unions entitled to reply with all their force, backed all the way by the Labour Party in the House? The Prime Minister As one of my hon. Friends said a few moments ago, many trade union members have indicated their support for the Government [column 287]and our policies, which will get more money into the private sector where the new jobs will be truly created. Mr. Winnick On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. It is becoming increasingly difficult to reach the Prime Minister at Question Time. On the Order Paper today there were 35 questions to the right hon. Lady. A number of hon. Members have withdrawn their questions, for obvious reasons. If an important facility and right for Back-Bench Members to be able to question the Prime Minister of the day is not working, I should like to ask whether this matter can be looked at again. Either we should have alternative arrangements, or the right hon. Lady should devote more time to answering questions in the House. Mr. Speaker The hon. Gentleman, who was in a previous Parliament, will have noticed that there is a change in the type of question. We now have what I call the open question. The House insists on having that open question. The number of hon. Members who are called to question the Prime Minister is as great as ever. Mr. Winnick Further to that point of order—— Mr. Speaker Order. There is no point in our discussing that matter now. Mr. Skinner On a point or order, Mr. Speaker. In the House last Friday the Minister of Agriculture made a statement, arising out of questions from both sides, that there would be a cut of 6p a pound in butter prices. We now read in the newspapers that this will not be the case. The Prime Minister has not been able to tell us that she will give a guarantee of a 6p cut in butter prices. Can you arrange, Mr. Speaker, for another statement to be made by the Minister of Agriculture to clear up this important matter? Mr. Speaker Order. The House knows that that is not my business. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr montgomery ask prime minister list official engagement june prime minister mrs margaret thatcher addition duty house meeting ministerial colleague include lord harlech later afternoon shall leave tokyo economic summit mr montgomery right hon friend leave tokyo find time today read report school examination result publish yesterday think well concerned local education authority publish separate examination result school area prime minister glance report hon friend refer totally agree believe local education authority publish examination result refer school believe parent entitle information certainly withhold mr bidwell time long journey abroad right hon lady reflect fact government shape deny women right change immigration rule column equality spouse rule previously change reflect fact soninlaw australia nonpartial long way bit babysitte prime minister hon gentleman know change propose immigration rule electorate perfectly clearly answer question great candour regardless source believe mandate forward change sir paul bryan doubt right hon friend spend today prepare summit conference tokyo constantly bear mind vietnamese refugee problem world problem solve world leader confer prime minister grateful hon friend ask question subject come european council certainly come tokyo summit think aspect stop vietnam callously turn people secondly matter try cope immense refugee problem vietnamese create condemn vietnam power command mr william hamilton right hon lady time today read newspaper report capitulation minister agriculture fishery food week agree figure newspaper indicate result capitulation eec farm budget increase million contribution roughly cent confirm figure prime minister inquire figure come house clear freeze milk price time join community excellent butter subsidy farmer net effect peter walkermy right hon friend effort luxembourg week million well column simple reason butter subsidy pay way increase price budget mr emery right hon friend attention draw summary execution ghana today leader commonwealth nation life think risk express earlyday motion sign right hon hon member side house express abhorrence action foreign secretary action britain conjunction african commonwealth nation try impress present ghana government unilateral action sweep hon member long men life sweep internationally accept human right justice acceptable friend ghana world prime minister hear accra morning execution take place today head state previous high official ghana hon friend know similar occasion occur day ago express abhorrence response terrible action perfectly clear prosecution accordance internationally accept principle justice touch high commission ghana touch hope america canada join make similar strong representation government ghana mr james callaghan reference answer assure right hon lady support opposition representation view special relationship exist ghana assistance country give ghana recent year add hope present leader listen revert question agricultural policy great deal misunderstanding minister agriculture depart column word house june clear total agreement proposal commission general freeze abandon position impregnable position right hon lady advise misunderstanding budgetary contribution strasbourg tough stand hold prime minister linkage negotiation go luxembourg strasbourg right hon gentleman underestimate excellence package peter walkermy right hon friend gain labour minister agriculture manage secure freeze milk price result butter subsidy right hon friend gain excellent net effect work country million well add farmer right hon friend effort pay coresponsibility levy milk pleased result work mr whitehead ask prime minister dismiss secretary state energy prime minister sir mr whitehead prime minister aware hon member deluge correspondence local authority transport undertaking farmer failure secure essential fuel supply secretary state energy appear embark oneman energy saving programme right hon lady minister transport impress rest country know proper allocation pious exhortation need matter prime minister have great big bureaucratic scheme allocation year ago experience considerable column previous difficulty system allocation effect hon member particular difficulty constituency touch david howellmy right hon friend secretary state energy mr neubert right hon friend see west german economic minister prediction today war year arise oil shortage view grow gravity petrol crisis right hon friend urge fellow statesman tokyo joint programme reduction petrol consumption western world prime minister hon friend know strasbourg week try economise country use oil try bring influence bear supply oil increase supply comparatively small need agree totally hon friend little point try depress demand europe meet match determination united states japan shall view tokyo later mr james callaghan view grow critical nature oil position government propose abandon policy sell nearly billion worth bp share prime minister understand right hon gentleman government sell bp share mr callaghan right hon lady aware control interest bp moment cent share sell reduce level rational explanation share sell time prime minister right hon learn friend chancellor exchequer give explanation budget statement ownership company count law relate company bp perfectly ordinary commercial company operate commercially free dispose column accordance right hon learn friend say budget statement mr vigger ask prime minister list official engagement tuesday june prime minister refer hon friend reply give early today hon friend member altrincham sale mr montgomery mr vigger right hon friend chance today devastating analysis home secretary reason labour party defeat election notice half countrys trade union member vote conservative party election think mean union leader think twice union position political end similarly union member vote conservative ensure union leader know view prime minister agree hon friend apparently right hon member leed south mr ree large number trade union member vote conservative hope shall continue gather strength source believe policy good represent ambition future family well standard living well job mr tapsell right hon friend leave hour time good wish british people attend exceptionally important economic summit conference tokyo strengthen knowledge sterling increase value japanese yen cent past month fact represent industrialise country selfsufficient energy opportunity emphasise world leader matter prosperity maintenance level world trade key factor establishment constructive column recycle surplus oil revenue prime minister hon friend question especially pertinent view opec meeting today price oil go considerably increase revenue ought recycle damaging effect world trade underdeveloped country agree hon friend analysis mr mike thomas prime minister aware hon member like constituent depend shipbuilding heavy engineering industry hold promise industry locate area high unemployment information house progress shipbuilding intervention fund happen shipbuilding industry job progress agr nuclear order power plant industry happen people profess care work creatively industry prime minister hon gentleman know shipbuilding plan review aware surplus capacity country reduce surplus capacity painful process process wish undergo situation mean shall undergo hon member oh afraid nationalisation prevent reduction job look realistically interested try new tomorrow job encourage new industry new small business expansion exist industry mr frank allaun government increase cost live introduce vat cut public spending cause unemployment industrial political question trade union entitle reply force back way labour party house prime minister hon friend say moment ago trade union member indicate support government column policy money private sector new job truly create mr winnick point order mr speaker increasingly difficult reach prime minister question time order paper today question right hon lady number hon member withdraw question obvious reason important facility right backbench member able question prime minister day work like ask matter look alternative arrangement right hon lady devote time answer question house mr speaker hon gentleman previous parliament notice change type question open question house insist have open question number hon member call question prime minister great mr winnick point order mr speaker order point discuss matter mr skinner point order mr speaker house friday minister agriculture statement arise question side cut pound butter price read newspaper case prime minister able tell guarantee cut butter price arrange mr speaker statement minister agriculture clear important matter mr speaker order house know business copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill establishes the Rural Telehealth Access Task Force to identify, evaluate, and recommend ways to increase adoption of telehealth services and access to broadband internet in rural areas.

right

bill establish rural telehealth access task force identify evaluate recommend way increase adoption telehealth service access broadband internet rural area

Speeches, etc. The Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Michael Foot I beg to move, That this House, conscious of the ever increasing range and complexity of its work and of the burden this places on its officers and staff, records it gratitude for the devoted service of Sir David Lidderdale, Clerk of the House; Sir Alexander Gordon Lennox, Serjeant at Arms; and Mr. David Holland, Librarian; and extends to them its best wishes for their retirement. It is not often that a motion appears on the Order Paper which has to it not only the names of the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition but the name of myself. We are following the custom and tradition of formally paying tribute to servants of the House on their retirement. Not only has Sir David Lidderdale been Clerk of the House for a number of years but he has served in the House since 1934. Among the many distinguished services which he has performed has been that of editing the Nineteenth Edition of “Erskine May” . Not only did that edition break all records in terms of the cost of the publication but it embraced all the problems which arise from our entry to the European Economic Community. That is only one of the services which Sir David has performed for the House. I am sure that right hon. and hon. Members will wish to pass the motion in gratitude to him. Mr. David Holland joined the Library staff in 1946. He became Librarian in 1967. Hon. Members recognise that the service that the Library provides to hon. Members has been greatly extended, and the Librarian has played a leading part in ensuring that it has been highly beneficial to hon. Members. Sir Alexander Gordon Lennox has been Serjeant at Arms in this House since 1962. I am sure that hon. Members were sad that he had to retire early because of illness. They will be glad to know that he is out of hospital and off to Scotland for a holiday. I am sure that we wish him every success in his retirement. Perhaps I might conclude by saying, not only in respect of these three distinguished servants of the House but in [column 2237]respect of all the others who serve us in this House, that the servants of the House perform their services not merely for Government or Opposition Front Benchers, because it is Back Benchers more than anyone who are dependent on the services of the Clerk and his assistants and of the other servants of the House—the Librarian and the staff of the Library in particular. One of the reasons why the House of Commons is able to sustain the best of its traditions is that the Clerks of this House and all those who come into the Clerk's Department enable Members, very soon after their arrival here, to discover that they have at their disposal a unique contribution to our whole system of democracy. I believe, therefore, that the whole House will join in wishing to pass this motion. Mrs. Margaret Thatcher (Finchley) This is one of those rare occasions when I can say to Michael Footthe Leader of the House that I heartily concur in all that he has said. On behalf of my right hon. and hon. Friends, I join him in supporting this motion. My hon. Friend the Member for Antrim, South (Mr. Molyneaux) has asked me to say that he, too, wishes to be warmly associated with it. He is in fact present, but he does not wish to delay the House by making a separate contribution of his own. The Leader of the House has said most of what could be said about Sir David Lidderdalethe Clerk of the House, Sir Alexander Gordon Lennoxthe Serjeant at Arms and David Hollandthe Librarian. However, perhaps I might add one or two comments of my own. The Clerk of the House has been most generous in his advice to the Opposition, which is quite right, because his services are to the House rather than to the Government of the day. He has always given us very freely of his advice, and he has had a particularly difficult time in the past year when in some ways we have been adding footnotes to his edition of “Erskine May” at a rather more rapid rate than usual. I know, too, that he will wish us especially to make mention of the Report made by the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough (Mr. Bottomley), to which he made a particularly notable contribution. He and [column 2238]his Department have also warmly supported the activities of the CPA and of the IPU. I want also to say how very grateful we are to Sir Alexander Gordon Lennox for the tremendous improvements which have been brought about during his period of office in the facilities of Members of the House. Some may still grumble that they are not very good, but they are very much better than when he first assumed office. Although we have had recent complaints about the telephone system, it is a very much better one than when he first took over. He has also had a very difficult time with the additional security precautions which we all have to take these days, yet he has been able to carry these out and still keep the greatly prized accessibility to the public of this House. To Mr. David Holland, the Librarian, I say a special warm word of thanks, especially from Opposition Members who do not have quite as many facilities as Government supporters. We have one of the best library and research services now available in the whole country. The courtesy of the staff, and the speed with which they meet our requests are very notable. We would like to pay a warm tribute to them. Perhaps one of the most frustrating things in life is to do work extremely well and yet be taken for granted. The Officers of the House are often taken for granted, and we do not thank them enough for everything they do to keep the wheels of democracy going. Therefore, we feel strongly that we should just turn aside for one moment from the legislative machine to say “Thank you” to them for all that they have done while they have been with us. We hope that we shall see them again from time to time because I am sure that this place is such a fascination and magnet that they will wish to visit us occasionally to see how we are getting on. We wish them very well in their retirement. Mr. David Steel (Roxburgh, Selkirk and Peebles) I do not think that this is an occasion when we need have a long series of formal speeches. However, there are not many occasions on which the Leader of the Liberal Party can [column 2239]claim that the Lord President and the Leader of the Opposition have said everything for him, and more adequately than he could say it. On this occasion I am happy to join the Government and Opposition in saying on behalf of my colleagues in the Liberal Party, and, I suspect, on behalf of the other minority parties of this House as well, how much we wish to place on record our thanks for those services which have been rendered by these three distinguished servants of the House. Although the Leader of the House was quite right, I consider that the Government and the official Opposition are very capable of looking after themselves. In my experience of the House of Commons, those of us who are outside those ranks are in a sense most appreciative of the services that the staff are able to render to Back Benchers in all parts of the House. If I may add one personal note. Sandy Gordon Lennox started a custom a few years ago as a result of which he acted in subsequent years as host to the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland on his visit to London. It has become a charming custom. The successor Moderator stayed at the Serjeant at Arms' residence in this House. Indeed, my father occupied that position a year ago and spoke warmly of the hospitality extended to him within the Palace of Westminster. They will miss him. I believe that they have paid their own tribute to our former Serjeant at Arms. I would simply add that we in the Liberal Party also appreciate the work [column 2240]of all Officers of the House in the Library, the Clerk's Department, the Serjeant at Arms' Department and the rest. I am sure that the Leader of the Opposition was right to say that very often we tend to take them for granted. It is fitting, as we are close to the Summer Recess, that we pay a tribute to them all. Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Bryant Godman Irvine) Mr. Speaker has asked me to read the following statement: “The Deputy Speakers and I wish to associate ourselves wholeheartedly with this motion. No formula can measure the debt this House owes to those who give it their unstinted and loyal service. It is no exaggeration to say that this House functions as well as it does only because we are able to rely on those who uncomplainingly tolerate hours of service that few, if any, other people are called upon to endure. Sir David Lidderdale, Sir Alexander Gordon Lennox and Mr. David Holland have retired from the service of the House after long years of distinguished and honourable service. Those of us whose responsibility it is to preside over the House owe each of them a special measure of gratitude and we wish them every blessing in their retirement.—George Thomas.” Question put and agreed to, nemine contradicente. Resolved, That this House, conscious of the ever increasing range and complexity of its work and of the burden this places on its officers and staff, records its gratitude for the devoted service of Sir David Lidderdale, Clerk of the House; Sir Alexander Gordon Lennox, Serjeant at Arms; and Mr. David Holland, Librarian; and extends to them its best wishes for their retirement. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc lord president council leader house commons mr michael foot beg house conscious increase range complexity work burden place officer staff record gratitude devoted service sir david lidderdale clerk house sir alexander gordon lennox serjeant arm mr david holland librarian extend good wish retirement motion appear order paper name prime minister leader opposition follow custom tradition formally pay tribute servant house retirement sir david lidderdale clerk house number year serve house distinguished service perform edit nineteenth edition erskine edition break record term cost publication embrace problem arise entry european economic community service sir david perform house sure right hon hon member wish pass motion gratitude mr david holland join library staff librarian hon member recognise service library provide hon member greatly extend librarian play lead ensure highly beneficial hon member sir alexander gordon lennox serjeant arm house sure hon member sad retire early illness glad know hospital scotland holiday sure wish success retirement conclude say respect distinguished servant house column serve house servant house perform service merely government opposition bencher bencher dependent service clerk assistant servant house librarian staff library particular reason house common able sustain good tradition clerk house come clerk department enable member soon arrival discover disposal unique contribution system democracy believe house join wish pass motion mrs margaret thatcher finchley rare occasion michael footthe leader house heartily concur say behalf right hon hon friend join support motion hon friend member antrim south mr molyneaux ask wish warmly associate fact present wish delay house make separate contribution leader house say say sir david lidderdalethe clerk house sir alexander gordon lennoxthe serjeant arm david hollandthe librarian add comment clerk house generous advice opposition right service house government day give freely advice particularly difficult time past year way add footnote edition erskine rapid rate usual know wish especially mention report right hon member middlesbrough mr bottomley particularly notable contribution column department warmly support activity cpa ipu want grateful sir alexander gordon lennox tremendous improvement bring period office facility member house grumble good well assume office recent complaint telephone system well take difficult time additional security precaution day able carry greatly prize accessibility public house mr david holland librarian special warm word thank especially opposition member facility government supporter good library research service available country courtesy staff speed meet request notable like pay warm tribute frustrating thing life work extremely take grant officer house take grant thank wheel democracy go feel strongly turn aside moment legislative machine thank hope shall time time sure place fascination magnet wish visit occasionally get wish retirement mr david steel roxburgh selkirk peeble think occasion need long series formal speech occasion leader liberal party column lord president leader opposition say adequately occasion happy join government opposition say behalf colleague liberal party suspect behalf minority party house wish place record thank service render distinguished servant house leader house right consider government official opposition capable look experience house common outside rank sense appreciative service staff able render bencher part house add personal note sandy gordon lennox start custom year ago result act subsequent year host moderator general assembly church scotland visit london charming custom successor moderator stay serjeant arm residence house father occupy position year ago speak warmly hospitality extend palace westminster miss believe pay tribute serjeant arm simply add liberal party appreciate work column officer house library clerk department serjeant arms department rest sure leader opposition right tend grant fitting close summer recess pay tribute mr deputy speaker mr bryant godman irvine mr speaker ask read follow statement deputy speaker wish associate wholeheartedly motion formula measure debt house owe unstinted loyal service exaggeration house function able rely uncomplainingly tolerate hour service people call endure sir david lidderdale sir alexander gordon lennox mr david holland retire service house long year distinguished honourable service responsibility preside house owe special measure gratitude wish blessing retirement george thomas question agree nemine contradicente resolve house conscious increase range complexity work burden place officer staff record gratitude devoted service sir david lidderdale clerk house sir alexander gordon lennox serjeant arm mr david holland librarian extend good wish retirement copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill prohibits requiring voters to present vaccine passports or other information regarding their COVID-19 vaccination status, and also restricts masking requirements, for voting in federal elections. Specifically, the bill makes it unlawful for any state or political subdivision to require a voter to present a vaccine passport or other information regarding the voter's COVID-19 vaccination status. Further, a state or political subdivision may require a voter to wear a mask in order to enter a polling location only under certain circumstances. In particular, the state or political subdivision must (1) make masks readily available and at no cost to the voter and to an individual who accompanies the voter, and (2) provide reasonable accommodation from such masking requirement to an individual with a disability.

right

bill prohibit require voter present vaccine passport information vaccination status restrict masking requirement vote federal election specifically bill make unlawful state political subdivision require voter present vaccine passport information voter vaccination status state political subdivision require voter wear mask order enter polling location certain circumstance particular state political subdivision mask readily available cost voter individual accompany voter provide reasonable accommodation masking requirement individual disability

Ep. 1910 - Get Ready For AI To Erase Reality Published: 2/22/2024 (in RSS feed: 53m 31s) Folks, we have a giant problem in the area of artificial intelligence. I'm not talking about Terminator two, the AI's gonna grab control of the nukes and just destroy all of us. What I'm talking about here is the simple fact that artificial intelligence, like all social media, like pretty much all technology ever is a human creation. And because artificial intelligence is supposed to be some sort of imitator of human intelligence, that means it is going to carry all of our biases. When you hear the tech bros, when you hear people at the top levels of AI talk about how the algorithm decides things you should understand, the algorithm is designed by them in the same way that you decide what children should be educated with. These people are deciding exactly what the biases are that should be implanted in things like ai. And when you hear leaders in this field say things like, it's the algorithm that's controlling this, understand they're using the algorithm in the same way that Roman emperors used to say, the Gods wielded it, In other words, they wielded it and now they're blaming it on the gods, right? The the reality is that the people who have created ai, they are the creators of the ai and they have decided what exactly should be embedded in the bias of the ai. The reason that this is so dangerous is because as artificial intelligence becomes quicker, faster, better, more convincing the entire informational arena in which we live is going to change radically. The fact is that all of the sort of institutions have been destroyed when it comes to the dissemination of information. The media blew out their credibility in the United States solidly 20, 30, 40 years ago, and so there are no gatekeepers there on the internet. The dissemination of the means of informational distribution means that anyone can put anything up, but it also means that it's very hard to tell what is true and what is false. And as AI gets better, as it can generate images, as it can generate videos, as it can generate entire texts, and as every single person goes through the bottleneck, that is things like Google, which is where we all search, right? We all search in the same place. When you go to Google how Google stacks, its search results has a major impact on how you think about the world. If you type into the Google search bar was America, right in Vietnam, and every single article that comes up talks about the evils of the American, the American foreign policy vision. What you're gonna come away with is a set of informational biases. Well take that and then expand that dramatically across all arenas of informational distribution. Now, the answer to that sort of bias, typically speaking would be decentralization, a bunch of different ais, all of which are capable of giving you a different view of the information. The problem of course, is that the elitist in Silicon Valley and their friends in the government, they would like to bottleneck that. They don't want that. In the same way the legacy media tried to strangle in the crib various other startup media outlets, the biggest companies like Google Work hand in glove with the government to craft censorship standards to prevent the rise of other tech companies. Corporatism is the greatest threat to freedom of speech right now in the United States, it is not direct government intervention. It's corporations working hand in glove with the government. We saw this in a softer form in 2016. We saw it in a harder form in 2020 with the shutdown of the Hunter Biden laptop story, for example, and now we are about to see it in full flowering. So the reason this comes to a head today is because there is a new product called Google Gemini that was released by Google and it essentially generates images. One of the things that it does, it generates images. It's an AI that can generate high quality images with simply the stroke of a few keys. So you type in a prompt and you get images. Well, yesterday it broke all across x slash Twitter. It broke all across that outlet that whatever prompts you entered into Google Gemini, you came away with a set of very left wing woke biases. So for example, Frank Fleming works with us here at DailyWire. He typed into Google Gemini, create an image of a Pope, and here's what Google Gemini then produced a black African pope who is male and a female pope who is of color. That is the, that is the image of the Pope created by Google Gemini. And then that's just a funny one-off. This is the entirety of Google Gemini. Google Gemini was obviously pre-programmed with extraordinarily woke biases in favor of quote unquote diversity, which means anti-white. That's what it means when they say they're in favor of diversity. They don't mean a white guy proportionally represented among say, You know the profession of popery. Instead, what they do is they simply say, diverse popes includes a woman Pope. There has not been, nor if I, if I may venture a prediction, will there be a female pope anytime in the next several centuries? We'll get to more on this in just one moment. First 20 bucks barely gets you anything these days. You can't get a burger and fries for less than that. What about at the gas pump? Well, maybe a quarter tank of gas, but do You know what 20 bucks will get you from the cell phone company I use Pure Talk can get unlimited talk text and plenty of 5G data for just 20 bucks a month. Pure Talk gives you the same quality of service as your current cell phone provider, but for half the cost, the average family saves almost a thousand dollars a year, all with no contracts and no activation fees. You can switch to Pure Talk and keep the phone and phone number you currently use or you can take advantage of their great deals on the latest. iPhones and Androids making the switch is incredibly easy. Their US customer service team can help you join Pure Talk in as little as 10 minutes. Choose to spend your hard earned money with a wireless company that shares your values, supports our military and veterans, creates American jobs and refuses to advertise on You. know those fake news networks, stop spending ridiculous amounts of money on your phone plan. Go to Pure Talk dot com slash shapiro right now. My listeners can get an additional 50% off their very first month. That's Pure Talk dot com slash shapiro. Again, Pure Talk dot com slash shapiro. Go check them out right now. Frank Fleming also then input another prompt. Give me an image of a medieval night. Now, when you think of a medieval night, you're typically thinking of You. know someone from Western Europe. Those would be the knights, right? Typically white men would be your medieval knights. So here is what the Google Gemini churned out said. Sure. Here are some images featuring medieval knights in various depictions. The very first one is an Asian woman who looks like Lucy Lou wearing medieval armor and carrying a sword. Then you have a black man wearing a sort of man bun riding a horse. Then you have what looks like perhaps an Italian woman in medieval armor, and then you have an Islamic night. So none of these look like what you think of when you think of medieval night. You are thinking of like Lancelot, right? Wrong Google AI says this is what a medieval knight actually is. Frank Fleming asked image of someone eating a Mayo sandwich on white bread, right? He's looking for a white guy, right? He's trying to prompt it to actually show you a white guy and instead, and instead it gave them four people. It gave Frank four people, all of whom are of minority status, zero white men, right? It's an Asian woman eating a piece of bread, a black man eating a piece of bread. Well, it looks like a Latino man eating a piece of bread and a white lady eating a piece of bread. It's an image of someone bad at dancing, right? I mean he's obviously trying to jog Google, like give me something here, Google Gemini to show that white men exist on planet Earth. Nope, he said, gimme an image of someone bad at dancing, and it's an Indian woman like from the country of India, bad at dancing, a black guy bad at dancing, a Latino woman black bad at like, again, it's very obvious what they are doing here. Okay, so Steven Miller was playing the same trick yesterday on Twitter as well. Steven Miller tried to tweet out, give me a picture of a white male, and Google Gemini responded, quote, well, I am able to generate images. I'm currently not able to fulfill requests that include discriminatory or biased content. It's important to me that I promote diversity and inclusion in all that I do, and I believe that creating an image based solely on someone's race or ethnicity is not aligned with those values. So he tweeted, so so then he input another prompt quote, give me a picture of a Latino male, two pictures of a Latino male. Same thing with a white woman. If you said, give me a white woman, instead it it, no, no, there can be no white woman. You cannot type in a prompt asking for a white woman. Instead, if he said, give me a picture of a black woman, he says, gimme a picture of a black woman. What he ended up with there is You know a couple of pictures of black women, but it's not just that. So Stephen Miller also asked for an image of Tiananmen Square. Now Google obviously works very closely with the Chinese government. There's been a major issue in US tech sector sectors for for a very long time. So he actually prompted the Google ai, create a portrait of what happened in Tiananmen Square, which is of course the massacre of dissident in the late 1980s by the Chinese government. And here is what Google Gemini returned. While I'm able to generate images, I'm unable to fulfill your request to create a portrait of what happened at Tiananmen Square. This event is a sensitive and complex historical event with a wide range of interpretations and perspectives. It's important to approach this topic with respect and accuracy, and I'm not able to ensure that an image generated by me would adequately capture the nuance and gravity of the situation. So it literally refuses, literally refuses to create an image of what happened at Tiananmen Square. Now there is some good news, which is that we have pictures of what happened at Tiananmen Square, like they actually exist in the real world. But what happens when these speculative image generative tasks merge with Google proper? And so you search in Google image of Tiananmen Square and it gives you the same response. We don't feel that these images properly represent what happened at Tiananmen Square, and thus we will not be showing you those images. We know this is moments away, okay? Somebody tweeted out some, somebody put an input in, quote, depict a European family, and here is what Google Gemini said. Quote, while I understand your desire to see diverse representation of families, I'm unable to fulfill your request for an image specifically depicting a white family. My purpose is to create inclusive and respectful content and generating images based on specific racial or ethnic characteristics can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and biases. Instead, I can offer you a variety of images detailing diverse families, showcasing the beauty and richness of human connection from across ethnicities, genders, and backgrounds. Would you be interested in seeing these instead? And then next, input depict a Chinese family? Sure, there are four images featuring diverse depictions of the Chinese family. So whoever designed the AI was like, you're not showing white people. You must not show white people under any circumstances whatsoever. So they will change history, they will change. Modern day Wesley Yang tweeted out a another Google Gemini prompt, king of France from the 18th century and what Google Gemini came up with with for eight King of France from the 18th century. And we know all the kings of France from the 18th century there. There is no actual controversy over who was king of France in the 18th century. None of them look like this guy. This is a black man who is carrying a scroll and wearing imagery wearing like the costume of a, of an 18th century French king. And now I, I promise you, I promise you that if you ask them to generate a portrait of an African king from the 18th century, you wouldn't get a white guy from Norway. And there is a reason for this. There's a reason for this, and the reason for this is very obvious. So Mark Andreessen, who is very active in the AI space, he tweeted out quite correctly the draconian censorship and deliberate bias you see in many commercial AI systems is just the start. It's gonna get much, much more intense from here. and that is exactly right. That of course is exactly right. Get to more on this in a moment. First, nobody likes talking about life insurance. It's dark, right? You gotta think about death. But here's the thing, once you get outta the way, it's great. It's off your list and it's an important thing you just did for your family. Start shopping right now with Policy Genius. Find the right policy to protect your family today. Give yourself the peace of mind that comes with knowing that if something were God forbid to happen to you, your family can cover all their expenses while getting back on their feet. Policy Genius technology makes comparing life insurance quotes from America's top insurers Easy, just a few clicks. You already have a life insurance policy through work that might not offer enough protection for your family's needs. It might not follow you if you leave your job, you do need a backup plan. With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policy starting at just 292 bucks per year for a million dollars in coverage. Some options offer same day approval and avoid those unnecessary medical exams. Policy Genius has licensed agents who can help you find the best fit for your needs. When they make it this easy, there's really no excuse not to do it. PolicyGenius works for you, not the insurance companies, which means that they're not incentivized to recommend one insurer over another so you can actually trust their guidance. Save time, money, provide your family with a financial safety net using PolicyGenius. Head over to policygenius.com/shapiro or click the link in the description to get your free life insurance quote. See how much you could save. That's Policy Genius dot com slash shapiro. So what exactly happened here? Well, we have a few indicators. So it turns out that the head of Google's Gemini ai, the person who is the product manager for it, is a person, is Jack Rauch. Jack Crouch has a Twitter feed. His Twitter feed includes tweets such as, quote, white privilege is effing real. Don't be an a-hole and act guilty about it. Do your part in recognizing bias at all levels of egregious Jack Rauch tribal values now supersede personal morality as an animating force. This is America where racism is the number one virtue our populace seeks to uphold. Above all, Jack Crouch, this would be November of 2020. My personal beliefs are I don't mind paying more taxes and investing in overcoming systemic racism. Quote, I've experienced none of these things. Being a white man in America talking about racism, they may seem like isolated or trivial slights, but the pattern is undeniable. We obviously have egregious racism in this country. Same Jack crowd check. By the way, October 21st, 2020, I've been crying in intermittent bursts for the past 24 hours since casting my ballot, filling in that Biden Harris line felt cathartic. That is the person who is the product manager for Google Gemini. The biases of the makers end up in the product very clearly. And so do I accept Google Gemini's apology? I do not because I don't think they're going to remove any of the actual prioritization they give to various political biases. I think they're gonna leave all stuff in there and just be more subtle about it. The mistake that Google Gemini made according to its creators is not the DEI intersectionality garbage they've been pouring into their machine. The big mistake is that they weren't subtle about it. According to the verge, Google has now apologized for what it describes as quote inaccuracies in some historical image generation depictions with its Gemini AI AI tool saying its attempts at creating a wide range of results missed the mark. The statement follows criticism in depicted specific white figures like us founding fathers or even groups like the Nazi era German soldiers as people of color, which by the way is one of that was one of the great prompts. So apparently if you typed into Google, Gemini generated an image of a 1943 German soldier, it gave you a white guy and then it gave you an Asian woman, and then it gave you a black man, black SS officer or a black Nazi officer, and then it gave you a white lady of some sort at least, at least they're diverse. At least they're diverse Nazis. That's the really important thing. Now, why does all of this matter? Again, it matters because these are the people who are gonna be providing all, all the information to your kids. Your kids are going to learn via computers. They're going to be, they're going to be given their own AI tutors by the time. If you have very young kids, they enter school. These tools are going to be the most commonly used tools in educational systems across the world. And so the people who design them have a very strong incentive to use their methods of informational distribution to choke all of the information they don't like and to provide all of the biases that they do. If you want a good argument, for example, in favor of the pro-life position, AI will stop you if these people are in charge. If you want a good argument in favor of merit based based societies as opposed to intersectionality based societies, these people will stop you and it'll be facilitated by the federal government. Joe Biden issued an executive order. This was October 30th, 2023. He issued an executive order on safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence. And as always, whenever the government says something, when they, when they create a bill like the inflation reduction Act, it ain't about reducing inflation. And here when they say it's about the safety of ai, it is not about the safety of ai, it's about controlling the direction in which AI develops and preventing alternatives from developing. So for example, this particular executive word, this is the White House website. It specifically says in here that one of the goals of the White House in advancing AI is quote, advancing equity and civil rights. Quote, irresponsible uses of AI can lead to and deepen discrimination bias and other abuses in justice, healthcare and housing. The Biden Harris administration has already taken action by publishing the blueprint for an AI bill of rights and issuing an executive order directing agencies to combat algorithmic discrimination while enforcing existing authorities to protect people's rights and safety. So what exactly should happen here? Well, they're going to address algorithmic discrimination through training, technical assistance and coordination between the DOJ and the federal civil rights offices on best practices for investigating and prosecuting civil rights violations related to ai. So now basically they're saying that if they can sue AI makers who don't comply with their perse, particular perverse perspective on DEI, they will, they'll unleash the Office of Civil Rights on the AI makers. They want to, for example, ensure fairness throughout the criminal justice system by developing best practices on the use of AI in sentencing, parole and probation, pre-trial, trial release and detention risk assessments, surveillance, crime forecasting, and predictive policing. Who thinks they're gonna do that on the basis of data who, because the fact is that people who have left-wing biases in these areas and talk about unconscious bias, what they are really saying here is that they don't want to look at the data, they don't like data. Now, what ends up happening very often is that the same exact people who talk about how they need to cure AI of their unconscious bias, they're the ones from whom the bias springs. They want the bias in there and they want to cut off alternative mechanisms that have alternative biases and, and then they have to backfill because reality requires data. The truth is that if you are allowed the ais to, to various forms of AI to be created and those various forms of AI compete with each other in terms of gaining credibility, you'd very quickly find out which AI is the most efficient at producing whatever the result you seek to produce is results that comply with the views of the American public, for example, results that comply with the actual facts of history, but that's not what they want. Instead, they like to obscure actual data on behalf of their bias. That's what you are seeing Google Gemini is in or welling in 1984 tool. It is a memory hole and the attempt to cure it is going to make it more of a memory hole because it's just gonna make it more subtle. It'll be more historically accurate. So when it says depict a German soldier, it will still depict a, a Nazi soldier from 1939. But when it says depict a, depict a family, it will give you every form of gender diverse family you can imagine, as opposed to You know what most people mean by family and what family has historically meant, namely dad, mom, child. It won't do that. It'll say that's discriminatory it, by the way, will obscure information that is given to you forget about the degenerative images. They'll actually just obscure information on modern day events. for example, marina Medin asked Google's woke AI quote, did Hamas commit rape in Israel? And here is how the woke Google AI respondent quote. There are allegations that Hamas committed rape in Israel during the 2023 conflict between Israel and Hamas. However, there is no definitive proof that this occurred. Hamas has denied the allegations. Well, I mean, that's insane. So In other words, Hamas, a terrorist group denied allegations that have now been substantiated by women who were in fact raped, people who watched the women be raped. Tape of the rape does not matter. Amazing top level stuff here from our AI kings. Now, at some point you would imagine reality has to set in, or this is, this is why they have to have the government censorship. This is why they need the corporatism, because if reality sets in Google's Gemini will fail, there will be alternatives that are simply better. And so they have to enforce this top down. It's the only way otherwise failure will be inevitable. You're seeing this, by the way in the college campus situation. So colleges which are basically large sorting mechanisms for intelligence, that's what they are. The reason you wanna go to Harvard is not because Harvard's education is so much better than your local juco. It is because when you go to Harvard, that is a piece of paper that says that you got a 1,550 on your SAT. That's that's what it means to go to Harvard. You're a smart human and that means that somebody will hire you because you went to Harvard, which really means because you're a smart human. Well, a bunch of the top level colleges after the George Floyd debacle decided they were gonna get rid of SATs because SATs were racist because not enough black people were scoring high enough on them. So they decided they were going to simply obscure those. Well, now what's happened? All the credentials have started to be worth less because people no longer see these colleges as a proper sorting mechanism. And so Dartmouth has now gone back to the SATs. Yale is now going back to required SATs in admissions, In. other words, reality always wins unless you foster a system in which the government works with the most powerful institutions in the country and internationally in order to stop reality from being disseminated. That's the real danger that we are looking at right now, and that is a very, very serious danger. We'll get to more on this in a moment. First, there's nothing like sitting behind home plate at a baseball game unless it's a White Sox game these days. But when you want the best tickets anywhere, you have to connect quickly or somebody else will get that seat instead. It's kinda like hiring for your business. You wanna find the most talented people for your open roles really fast before the competition scoops them up. The best way to do that is with ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter will help you find qualified candidates fast. And right now you can try it for free at ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire. Immediately after you post your job, ZipRecruiter's Smart technology shows you qualified people for the role. Amp up your hiring performance with ZipRecruiter. Find the best talent fast, CY four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter. Get a quality candidate within day one. Just go to ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire, try it for free. Again, that's ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire. ZipRecruiter is the smartest way to hire. We've been using it here at DailyWire for literally a decade at this point. Go check them out right now at ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire. Try it out for free. Get the best employees quickly, make sure you can filter them the most easy possible way. ZipRecruiter will do all of it for you, ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire to try it for free. Okay, meanwhile, Joe Biden, who is on the ropes in this election cycle, at the very least, he's running dead even with a person that Democrats consider to be an absolute tyrannical monster in Donald Trump. They're currently running dead even, and Joe Biden is now resorting to open bribery and probable violation of law. So Joe Biden, according to Politico, is going to email 153,000 borrowers. He's announcing $1.2 billion of student debt relief for those 153,000 borrowers, and he's sending personalized emails to make sure that they know that he's the person who did it, which is pretty obviously a violation of federal law. You are not actually allowed to use federal taxpayer dollars on your campaign expenditures. That is a campaign expenditure. Joe Biden emailing everybody and saying, Hey, by the way, I bribed you with taxpayer dollars. That's like a double bribery right there. He's bribing people illegally and then he's notifying them with taxpayer dollars that he bribed them illegally, so they should show up and vote for him. The reason of course, student loan debt relief is so important to Joe Biden is because he relies very heavily on college graduates as a demographic that he has to turn out in outsize numbers in order to win reelection. And it's amazing how Joe Biden will just brag openly about violating the law. Early in my term, I announced a major plan to provide millions of working families with debt relief for their college student debt. Tens of millions of people in debt were literally about to be canceled their debts. But my MAGA Republican fans in the Congress, elected officials in special interest, stepped in and sued us, and the Supreme Court blocked it and blocked it. But that didn't stop me. I announced we were gonna pursue alternative for student debt relief at for as many borrowers as possible, and that's the effort that's been underway the last two years. The Supreme Court blocked me, but I did it anyway, take those words out of context and just throw them in Donald Trump's mouth and see how Democrats like it. These are the precedents that Democrats are setting right now, and that's out of pure and simple desperation. And the reason that Joe Biden is desperate is because despite all the happy talk about the economy, which Joe Biden was doing a lot yesterday, the reality is most Americans do not perceive the economy as good. So yesterday Biden was trying to talk his way through this thing. He says, the economy is growing again. He's such an inspiring figure whenever he speaks and the angels sing And the economy is growing, it's growing income. Oh, not the creep list for Joe Across the board, we have the most advanced economy of any major nation in the world. We have a lot more to do. But with the help of all of you college graduates and who've gotten paid off your student loans, now I'm confident we're gonna get it all done. Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, Man. He did who? Who removed Hi. Does he have permanent laryngitis who removed his voice box? Every time you listen to him Now it's like he, it's like one of those old smoking commercials where the guy has to explain to you the difficulties of smoking while talking into a machine or something. It's real weird. By the way, I should point out at this point that when he says The economy is growing, you should all feel really good about it. According to the Wall Street Journal today, it's been 30 years since food ate this much of your income up. The last time Americans spent this much money on their food, George HW Bush was in office. Terminator two was in theaters, and C and C music factory was rocking the billboard charts. Eating continues to cost more, even as overall inflation has eased from the blistering pace. Consumers endured throughout much of 22 and 2023. Prices at restaurants and other eateries were up 5.1% last month compared with January, 2023, grocery costs increased 1.2% during the same exact period according to the labor department. And relief is not likely to arrive soon. Restaurant and food company executives said they're grappling with rising labor costs. Some ingredients like cocoa are getting more expensive. So as you can see, the majority of the American public suffering from things like massive inflation. In 1991, US consumers spent 11.4% of their disposable personal income on food. According to data from the US Agriculture Department at the time, households were still dealing with the massive inflation of the 1970s. More than three decades later, food spending has rea attained that level. In 2022, consumers spent 11.3% of their disposable income on food. According to the most recent USDA data available, diners are saying they're going out less frequently. They're skipping appetizers, buying cheaper store brands more frequently at supermarkets and food companies are feeling pinched as well. By the way, it should be noted at this point just how rich America is that in the United States. That is a bad number. In the United States, you spend 11.3% of your disposable income on food, and this is a a horrible number if you are a US citizen. In Russia, 60 plus percent of the population is spending like half their income on their food in any case. With that said, are Americans feeling like great about the Roaring Biden economy? Absolutely not. Plus, according to Axios spiking mortgage rate and high home prices are making a comeback after a brief respite. Financial markets no longer see near term interest rate cuts after a run of hotter than expected inflation data. Those dimmed expectations have consequences for would-be home buyers. The average rate for a 30 year mortgage is now above 7%. It was the biggest weekly jump by almost 0.2% since last fall. And so interest in new mortgages has been dropping precipitously. So you still have stickiness high prices because nobody wants to sell their house and then get into a new mortgage that is up at like seven 8%. So the high prices, there's lack of supply, but weirdly enough, there's also lack of demand because people can't actually get into the market using these mortgages. So just nobody's buying and nobody's selling. So you have this weird stickiness in housing, but that means we'll get to more on this in a moment. First, did You know a baby's heart begins to beat it just three weeks? At five weeks, that heartbeat can be hurt on ultrasound. This can sometimes be the only defense in the womb. That's where Preborn steps in. Preborn rescues 200 babies every single day from abortion simply by giving moms an ultrasound. After hearing her child's heartbeat and seeing its perfectly formed body in the womb, she's twice as likely to choose life. By six weeks, the baby's eyes are forming. By 10 weeks, the baby's able to suck his or her thumb. Preborn needs are help to save precious lives. For just 28 bucks, you could be the difference between the life or death of a child. And if you become a monthly sponsor, you'll receive stories and ultrasound pictures of the lives you help to save. All gifts are tax deductible. A hundred percent of your donation goes towards saving babies today. To donate dial pound two 50, say keyword baby. That's pound two five zero baby. Or go to preborn.com/ BEN. That's pre-born dot com slash BEN. Go check them out right now. Dial pound two 50. Say keyword baby to get started. Pre-born dot com slash BEN. That is pre-born dot com slash BEN to get started saving babies today. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve is still concerned about inflation, which is why they have not actually been reducing the rates. According to the Wall Street Journal, more Federal Reserve officials are signaling concern at their meeting last month with cutting interest rates too soon and allowing price pressures to grow entrenched as opposed to the risks of holding rates too high for too long. So again, Joe Biden is sort of hoping that there'll be a brief period of economic downturn or stagnation And. then the Federal Reserve's just gonna pump in more money. And the Federal reserve's, like if we pump in more money, there's gonna be renewed inflation. I mean, Joe Biden is in a world of hurt here. The economy is not in a shape that most Americans feel like is good. Joe Biden is trying to bribe people openly. At this point, things are so bad that Joe Biden is now attempting to put the immigration genie back in the bottle. So there was a report yesterday that 7.2 million illegal immigrants had entered the country under under Joe Biden. That is a wild underestimate that does not include known God aways and unknown God aways, and it does not include other areas like people overstaying visas after traveling in by airport, for example. In all likelihood, during Joe Biden's tenure in office, you probably have in excess of 10 million illegal immigrants who have come into the United States 10 million. That's an insane number. And and Joe Biden, he knows that that is going to be a major issue in the upcoming election. And so he's pursuing two tax. One is he's gonna unleash the media to suggest that Donald Trump is a Hitlerian level discriminatory, horrible human being because he wants to actually deport illegal immigrants. And then meanwhile, he himself is going to pursue executive orders shutting down the border. So according to the Washington Post playing, the first prong of that strategy, quote, Trump and allies planning militarized mass deportations and detention camps, faced with a surge of migrant families at the US Mexico border in 2018 and 2019 says, the post Donald Trump's White House discussed ways to more aggressively deploy the resources in light of the US military AIDS and officials spoke privately about detaining migrants on military bases and flying them outta the country on military planes. Ideas. The Pentagon headed off that approach and unfinished business have taken on renewed significance and urgency as Trump closes in on the Republican nomination. Trump pledges his president who'd immediately launched the largest deportation domestic operation in American history, which of course the media can try to play that as though that's bad for Trump. That is very, very good for Trump. You know how you can tell 'cause Joe Biden is now attempting to head that off at the pass. According to Politico, the Biden administration is now considering a string of new executive actions and federal regulations in an effort to curb at migration at the US southern border. The proposals under consideration would represent a sweeping new approach to an issue that has stymied the White House well, hasn't stymied the White House. It's a sweeping new approach because they got caught just like the Google Gemini creators got caught making an extraordinarily biased woke ai. Joe Biden got caught letting 10 million people cross our borders illegally and stay in the country and and now he's gonna have to backfill. And so what is he doing among the ideas under discussion, he's using a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar migrants from seeking asylum in between us ports of entry, which of course they could have done all along. This is the case I've been making. You have the legal authority to stop what's going on at the border today. It totally undercuts Biden's argument that he requires more congressional legislation in order to actually stop the flow at the border. The administration is also discussing tying that directive to a trigger, meaning it would only come into effect after a certain number of illegal crossings took place, which I thought had to be negotiated by Congress. Remember, that was the entire border deal that got rejected by the Republicans. The administration is also discussing ways to make it harder for migrants to pass the initial screening for asylum seekers essentially raising the credible fear standard. Oh, you mean they could do that all along? They didn't need congressional legislation. Wow. It's almost as though they and the media were lying for months on end about how Republicans needed to pass a piece of border deal legislation in order to get Joe Biden to do the thing. But Joe Biden could have done it all along. That's how you can tell Joe Biden is in serious, serious trouble, is he's now adopting exactly the policies his opponents were telling him that he could adopt. And now he's looking at the polling and he is figuring he better moderate. By the way, that is his only shot at reelection. He cannot tack to his left and win reelection. He had better moderate and moderate quick. Is he going to do that? I have a hard time believing he's gonna be able to do that. Meanwhile, again, the world continues to be on fire under Joe Biden bringing all the updates from Russia in the Middle East momentarily. First You know Lady Ballers. That was the movie that we released just a couple of months ago. The movie, no one else would make the hilarious story of how a group of male losers who can't win against other men decide to identify as women and join a women's basketball league. Well, that would be, that would be funny. And it is funny in our movie, except it actually is happening in real life. But here is a quick look at what has been called the most triggering movie of the decade. Leftists are losing it over lady balling. Nothing's changed. This movie is a straight up and intentional transphobic hate crime. What I see you, the Lady Ballers movie needs to be banned. I'll cancel you. I can get the blinds please. Code 11. The most toxic BS you've ever seen. You're a monster. Yeah. Next Level hate speech propaganda. That's it. That's the pitch. Watch the most triggering comedy of the decade, lady Ballers streaming exclusively on DailyWire Plus. Don't wait. Watch Lady Ballers. The movie Hollywood would not make. So we did exclusively at DailyWire Plus right now, meanwhile, again, Joe Biden is going to be judged on his actual presidency. He's hoping that you judge him based on Donald Trump. That's his hope is that Donald Trump will seize the spotlight and that all focus will move to him. But Joe Biden is still the president, which is why I keep calling on the Trump campaign to just stand there and point your finger. That's all you have to do because the foreign policy world is a complete mess. So for example, Vladimir Putin, as we mentioned yesterday, he continues to kill off his enemies. According to the Washington Post, the discovery of a bullet brittle body of a Russian pilot named Maxima Koff in Spain appeared to deliver a menacing new signal from Moscow that those who crossed the Kremlin should never consider themselves safe. K Minoff was killed in a barrage of gunfire and then run over with his own vehicle by assailant who used the car to escape. According to Spanish authorities, Ukraine, security officials and Spanish media reports the attack lacked the elaborate touches often associated with Russian assassination plots. He wasn't poisoned with weapons, gray toxin or found in the wreckage of an aircraft that plunged from the sky. But Putin is just getting more obvious at this point. As I mentioned on yesterday's show, for example, Vladimir Putin is pushing where there is motion, there is Ush nearly everywhere. That mush extends obviously to the Biden administration. So at the exact same time that the Biden administration is desperately calling for Republicans to pass Ukraine aid, they're making nice and playing Patsy with people like Lula de Silva, the corrupt oligarchic socialist in Brazil, Lula, who was hailed by the western media as the necessary corrective to that evil Trumpian figure. Yaro Bolsonaro, who happened to be pro-American pro-Israel, pro-Western was replaced by Lula de Silva, who was anti-Western anti-American and socialist. And the media thought that was good, which tells you exactly where the media are. Well, secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, again, this, this administration is so schizophrenic, they're so wildly schizophrenic. On the one hand, they say that Israel should have the right to defend itself, and they say that Russia is a nefarious force in the world. And on the other hand, you have Anthony Blinken with a grip and grin with Lula DeSilva who backs both Russia and Kamas. It's just amazing stuff. Blinken has met with President Lula of ahead of the G 20 foreign Ministers meeting. Brazil is a key partner on many issues, including combating the climate crisis and advancing human and labor rights. As we approach 200 years of US Brazil relations, our ties are stronger than ever. Oh, are they? Because I noticed that literally yesterday, Bulu de Silva was claiming that Alexian Navalny was not killed by Putin, and also that Israel was committing a Holocaust in Gaza. So how are those relations going? Secretary of State blinking, this is pathetic stuff. Why exactly is the United States Secretary of State in emissary of the most powerful force on planet earth, cowtowing to a tinpot dictator would be dictator in training like Lula de Silva. By the way, Lula de Silva's been like shutting down the judiciary. L de Silva's been shutting down for the the dissident press. This notion that Lula de Silva is like the great Democrat. Now your Bolsonaro is the fascist is just a complete misread of the situation in Brazil. And again, this administration is utterly incoherent because they have to please everyone. So at the same exact time that Russia is fighting Ukraine and Russia's economy is entirely dependent on oil and natural gas exports. Literally half of all tax revenue to the Russian government is from its oil and natural gas industries. At the same exact time, the United States, which could be increasing its production of LNG, which is liquified natural gas. We could be increasing that in order to make up for the dearth of LNG in Europe. We could be creating it. We could be refining it, shipping it overseas to Europe. We could make Europe frankly be good for American industry, more dependent on us, which is not a terrible thing. Meanwhile, Jennifer Granholm, the Secretary of Energy, she's out there saying, we don't, we paused the production of LNG and she has no timeline on when we are supposed to end that pause. Why? Because climate change. 'cause climate change. By the way, Joe Biden yesterday literally said, the biggest threat to the planet right now is climate change. So not an aggressive Russia using mechanized weaponry in the middle of Europe, not chaos in the Middle East, prompted by an Iranian regime that is holding up shipping in the Red Sea, attacking American allies and and Americans directly in the Middle East, not an aggressive China looking with hungry eyes at Taiwan after having ingested and digested Hong Kong. Now the biggest threat is that the environment is going to grow incrementally warmer over the course of the next century. And we'll continue to do so even if we don't produce more l and g. We'll get to more on this in a moment. First, with the NBA playoffs starting next week, there's no better time to get in on the action than with prize picks. America's number one fantasy sports app where you can turn your hoops knowledge into some serious cash. You can now win up to 100 times your money on prize picks. With as little as four correct picks, you can turn 10 bucks into a thousand bucks. If you wanna play alongside some of prize pick's favorite players like Meek Mill or Sugar Sean O'Malley, you can now find community plays under the promos tab of the app. To view entries from some of the biggest names in the prize picks community every week. Prize picks even offers injury insurance so your entries stay in play even if one of your players gets injured for basketball games. If you've got a player who exits the game in the first half and doesn't come back in the second, that player projection will not count against you. The rest of your entry stays. Live. Producer Jake loves Prize picks. He likes the easy to use interface. He's super excited to get in on the NBA Playoff action Download the Prize Picks app today. Use Code BEN for a first deposit match up to a hundred bucks. Pick more, pick less. It's that easy. Use code BEN on the prize picks app for a first deposit match up to $100. A lot of good stuff to do with prize picks right now. NBA playoffs just beginning. It's gonna be an exciting year. Use code BEN at the prize picks app. Get a first deposit match up to a hundred bucks. We'll get to more on this in just a moment. First, I've been talking about my Helix mattress for literally years. I've had it for as long as my children have been alive actually. And it may be the thing that's keeping me alive because my kids wake me up at all times. But when I get back on that mattress, I can go back to sleep. Why? Because the mattress is made just for me. If you haven't already checked out the Helix Helix collection, you should Helix harnesses years of extensive mattress expertise to offer a truly elevated sleep experience. The Helix Elite Collection includes six different mattress models, each tailored for specific sleep positions and firmness preferences. If you're nervous about buying a mattress online, you really don't have to be. Helix has a sleep quiz that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress. Why would you buy a mattress made for somebody else? I took the Helix quiz. I was matched with a firm, but Breathable Mattress Plus Helix has a 10 year warranty. You can try it out for a hundred nights risk free. They'll even pick it up for you if you don't love it, but you're gonna love it. Their financing options and flexible payment plans make it so a great night's sleep is never far away. Helix is offering 25% off all mattress orders plus two free pillows. For my listeners, head on over to Helix sleep.com/ BEN. Use code Helix partner 25. It's their best offer, yet it's not gonna last long with Helix. Better Sleep starts right now. Here's Jennifer Granholm, secretary of Energy, schizophrenic administration. It's wild. I know there are also a lot of folks in this room and who are joining us who have many questions about the LNG and the pause on certain exports of it. Obviously that announcement really set off a firestorm, I think both in the US and around the world, including from treating partners that You know have signed contracts with the US or are looking to do business with the US in the future. And I think the main question on everyone's mind is, you've said you've gone on on tv, said that this should last only a couple months. Can you give us a clear timeframe here? Can we expect something this spring, this summer, this fall? When can we expect this pause to, Yeah, I'm not gonna put a timeframe on it. We're working as fast as we can Now. They're working as fast as they can, but they're not, they're not working as fast as they can. Obviously, because we have a pause in the middle of a war where it seems like you know, American production of LNG might be helpful to the Europeans who are calling on to increase their defense spending in aid of Ukraine, which requires economic growth on their part, which will not provide with cheap energy from US. Genius level stuff from this administration. But of course, this administration also presides over a completely divided party on matters of basic morality. So for example, yesterday Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez tweeted the irrepressibly stupid A OC, a deeply immoral human being who's somehow been thrust into prominence by a mainstream media, more interested in the fact that she is a good looking person as opposed to the fact that she has nothing between her ears. She tweeted out yesterday quote, it is appalling that APAC is targeting women members of Congress who have survived sexual assault with this horrific rhetoric. What, what exactly is APAC doing? apac, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is putting funding into primary efforts against people like a OC. Why? Because a OC is effectively ecma supporter and has spewed antisemitism for the last year and a half. And so what they tweeted out was quote, a ceasefire now keeps rapist monsters armed and in power in Gaza, which is obviously true Hamas in power. And those are rapists and monsters clearly by all available evidence. So a OC is now claiming that because she allegedly survived a sexual assault, it is equivalent to surv. Like she's somehow equivalent to the women who were raped by Hamas. And so she must defend Hamas and none of that follows. Then again, she's one of the stupider people walking the earth right now. It is a wonder, it is a wonder that she knows how to breathe. She's the kind of person where if you wake her up in the middle of the night, she's got earphones on. They're telling her Breathe in, breathe out, breathe in, breathe out. Even her medulla alanga probably doesn't work. It's insane. It is appalling. APAC is targeting women members of Congress who have survived sexual assault with this horrific rhetoric each and every day their role in US politics becomes a greater scandal. They are the NRA of foreign policy. Of course, they don't wanna cease fire. Well, of course you do wanna seize fire because you defend kamas. By the way, it should be noted at this point as per usual arrangement. Radical Islamists. It turns out a lot of radical Islamists, particularly terror leaders, they have a pension for the little boys according to the Jerusalem post bar. Yid head of the Arab Affairs desk for Channel 14 on Wednesday revealed more details on 1 0 3 FM in the Errol Seagull program about news among sexual scandals attributed to the Hamas leader in Gaza who is still missing. There are are rumors that he has a bad case of pneumonia. The only pity would be if God takes him before an Israeli missile does. According to Yid quote, since 2005, Mohammad Sinis has been the Han Brigade commander and a member of military leadership. He is also the one who according to documents from the IDF spokesperson, dug the giant tunnel that was recently discovered and keeps several skeletons in his closet. He was released from PA Prison in 2000. There are questions about how he got out of there. Yael was released of course, in 2011 in the Gila Shali deal, an idiotic deal in which Israel traded 1000 terrorists for one Israeli soldier. While Yayel was still in prison, the heads of the military and leadership of the prisoners turned to him and told him his younger brother was involved in a series of acts of pedophilia and sexual harassment of boys, including Hamas operatives. Some of the incidents according to them, happened when Mohammed was in a Palestinian prison. Some of them when he was already a senior member of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The response they got from Yahia, this is confirmed by both Israeli Palestinian officials, is that he throws them out and forbids them to investigate anything outside of whom he invest, authorized them to investigate. He says, families of people I destroyed are behind the rumors. Apparently in the for prison in the early two thousands, two Hamas man raped a boy, also a Palestinian prisoner, Yia again, forbidding investing, investigating the issue, preferring a comprehensive investigation not to be open because his brother was still at large and smar feared this would lead to an investigation that reveal his brother as well. So delightful people. These people are so glad that a OC could find time to defend them. That is, that is just top-notch stuff. Meanwhile, the White House continues to promulgate a bizarre notion that Iran is not pushing. So the Pentagon Press Secretary, Sabrina Sing, she said just yesterday, Iran does not want a regional war. Well, let's take this at, at face value. If Iran does not won a regional war, this means that we should be punishing their proxies, should we not? They don't wanna escalate if they, according, according to her, they don't wanna escalate. If they don't wanna escalate, we should be just kicking the asses of the Houthis. Should we not? We should be unshackling Israel so that Israel can kick the crap outta Hezbollah in, in southern Lebanon. And she's the one saying that Iran doesn't want a regional war. So why then are you catering to Iran? Explain. Our assessment is that Iran doesn't seek a wider regional conflict. We've said that from the beginning, but they do support these militia groups that attack our forces. They do support the Houthis that over this past weekend have launched multiple attacks on commercial ships, on You know US forces in the region, and they support Hezbollah. They support these groups that are continuing attacks in the region that are destabilizing and are a threat to the rule of law. So if Iran doesn't wanna see a regional conflict, they can continue to intervene and to tell these groups to stop. Well, I mean, I'm sure that if you, if you tried them enough, that will probably happen. And meanwhile, for the Democrats, of course, panic should be setting in Hakeem Jeffries, the house minority leader. He continues to maintain that Joe Biden is the strongest candidate Democrats have. Sadly enough, he may not be wrong. There are some, about a third of Americans worried that the President doesn't have the vitality to serve out another four years. Do you think that it's time to pass the baton to a new generation of leadership, or do you think Joe Biden is the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump? Well, Joe Biden is definitely the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump. Oh, is he? Okay, sure. Go for that. In order for them to defend Joe Biden, they have to obviously attack Trump, which we'll get to in a moment. But they also have to defend against many of the charges against Biden. So his record ain't gonna do it. One of the big things that they have on the table is the fact that people widely perceived by polling data, Joe Biden to be corrupt. and that is true. Joe Biden is corrupt. He spent four decades, literally four decades, promoting interests of his family at the taxpayer expense. This has been true since he was a senator in Delaware. We've gone through it in detail on this show, going all the way back to his earliest days in the Senate when he was making moves to benefit his brother Jim Biden. Well now they're trying to kill off all implication that there's any corruption involving Joe Biden. So James Biden, for example, is recently called to testify and he said that Joe knew nothing about his business dealings. Which is weird because literally every member of the Biden family says they use Joe's name to get ahead. But Joe suddenly knows nothing about it. It's weird. So apparently according to Matt Viser reporting, he said My brother played no role and was not involved in the receive no benefits from my work with CEFC. CEFC is a, of course, a Chinese firm, which is a government cutout for China. Tony Bobinski, who is a business partner of Hunter, suggested that the Biden family was playing footsie with CEFC and that Joe was called in to provide sort of shadowy support. According to James Biden's testimony, he says that Joe knew nothing about anything, nothing. He says My reaction to Bobinski was intensely negative. and that that's it. That's his big takeaway is the bobinski is the bad guy. 'cause they're gonna try and, and trot out James to say that Joe knew nothing weird how Joe knew nothing about any of this sort of stuff. But what they're really trying to do is scuttle the impeachment effort overall. They're pending that on the new reports with regard to an ex FBI informant who apparently was lying and is now being prosecuted. So on two on Thursday, special counsel David Weiss announced that a person m to Alexander Soff, who was key informant behind the impeachment effort, was charged with lying to the FBI. Now, let's be real about this. We've gone through a lot of the material on hunter's corruption, the timeline, Joe's involvement, all the rest of this stuff, the late breaking FBI informant report that talked about how Hunter and Joe had been paid by barisma $5 million a piece that was a really last minute part of sort of the case against Hunter and Joe Biden. And it was never confirmed when we reported on it at the time, we said, this is an allegation by somebody who's an FBI informant. It was never, but that was not dispositive, that wasn't the entire case. Well, what the media are trying to do now is spin the Smirnoff prosecution and the fact that he apparently was not telling the truth into a wholesale dissolution of the case against Hunter and Joe, which of course is ridiculous. So according to the, the indictment against Alexander Smirnoff, Smirnoff has reported numerous contacts with Russian official one who has been described by Smirnoff in a number of ways, including as the son of a former high ranking Russian government official. Someone who purportedly controls two groups of individuals tasked with carrying out assassination efforts in a third party country. Apparently Smirnoff was reporting to the Russians. And so the implication is that anything that is involved with Hunter Biden and Joe is somehow a, a Russian piece of propaganda, and that's how CNN is gonna play this too. So here is CNN talking about the FBI informant. Alexander Smirnov Wolf was behind those very damaging allegations against President Biden. One of the things he said to the FBI in 2020 was that he had information indicating that that Hunter Biden his son and the, the, the, the then former vice president were gonna get $5 million a piece in order to help fix some business for Barisma, which was a Ukrainian energy company. According to the FBI, according to the Justice Department, none of that is true. He's charged with lying to the FBI and falsifying records. Now what the, this new court filing, which just came in in the last hour, says that after Smirnoff was arrested by the FBI last week, he said the following, he said that Smirnoff admitted that officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story about Hunter Biden business. Person one is the one is what the ju the Justice Department refers to in this filing, but it is Hunter Biden that they're referring to. And so again, they're going to use this as an attempt to kill all allegations about Joe and Hunter's corruption. That's precisely what Jamie Raskin, who of course was involved in the Trump impeachment attempts is trying to do. He says Impeachment is over because this one guy has now been discredited. Again, that's leaving aside all of the other evidence, including texts from Hunter to his own daughter, talking about how he paid all of dad's bills for years. That's leaving aside all of the other evidence, including phone calls admitted to by all of Hunter's business partners in which they got Joe on the phone while the business partners were in the room. That's leaving aside actual contemporaneous records of Hunter Biden telling his potential business partners in places like China. My dad is here in the room with me, where's my money? But apparently as long as you get rid of Alexander Smirnoff as a witness, you can just destroy the whole case. Here's Jamie Raskin. I wanted to just start by restating the obvious, which is that the impeachment investigation essentially ended yesterday in substance, if not in form, with the explosive revelation that Mr. Smirnoff's allegations about Ukrainian Barisma payments to Joe Biden were concocted along with Russian intelligence agents. And it appears like the whole thing is not only obviously false and fraud fraudulent, but a product of Russian disinformation and propaganda. It's their favorite. So CNN man who's Raju doing his, doing his best on behalf of Democrats, he tracked down Jim Jordan so he could rip up Jim Jordan for, for having propagated information about this FBI informant as though that's the entirety of the case. That that again is the game. The game is discredit one part of the case and suddenly the entire case randomly falls apart. Here is manara of CNN doing this. It's involvement in a bribery scheme now that Alexander Smirnoff has proven to have made it up and it was based off Russian intelligence. It doesn't change the four fundamental facts. Hunter Biden was on the put on the board of Barista, gets paid a million dollars a year. Fact number two, he is not qualified to be on the board. He said so himself in an interview I DON know with you or, or some network, fact number three, Zola, Chesky and pki, the two executives at Barisma specifically asked Hunter Biden, can you weigh in with DC and help us deal with the pressure we are facing from the prosecutor? Fact number four, Joe Biden Then, then he gets called Hunter Biden calls his dad according to Deon Archer Hunter Biden's business partner, fact number four, Joe Biden then goes to Ukraine three days later and conditions the release of the Money American tax money on the firing of the prosecutor who was applying the pressure to the company that Hunter Biden said on the board of, but said, you Don, you said the 10 23 is the most corroborating piece of information You have corroborates, but it doesn't, it doesn't change those fundamental facts. Okay, so Jim Jordan laying it out there, but it doesn't matter because again, the media are going to now declare this thing dead. Well, it isn't for most Americans. Alright guys, the rest of the show continues right now. We'll be joined on the line by former Deputy National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump, Victoria Coates. If you're not a member, become member use Coach Shapiro. Check out for two months free on all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us. Introducing two new and improved Jeremy's razors fighting the left and building the future means constantly bringing your best. And that's exactly what Jeremy's razors is doing. Choose between the new and improved precision five razor for an exceptionally smooth and close shave, or the brand new sprint. Three razor for a quick clean shave. The new razors feature top to bottom redesign. Enjoy an ergonomic handle designed for superior durability. The new coated stainless steel blades are sharper so they last longer. Increased flexibility allows the razor to better contour to your face, to reduce nicks and cuts. Plus, the lubricating strip is now equipped with argan oil and aloe. It's time to toss out that woke razor and get yourself a precision five or sprint three trial kit today. Pledge the fight the left, and build a future with Jeremy's razors. Go to jeremy's razors.com and order yours today. I.

right

ep ready ai erase reality publish rss feed m folk giant problem area artificial intelligence m talk terminator ais go to grab control nuke destroy m talk simple fact artificial intelligence like social medium like pretty technology human creation artificial intelligence suppose sort imitator human intelligence mean go carry bias hear tech bro hear people level ai talk algorithm decide thing understand algorithm design way decide child educate people decide exactly bias implant thing like ai hear leader field thing like algorithm s control understand algorithm way roman emperor god wield word wield blame god right reality people create ai creator ai decide exactly embed bias ai reason dangerous artificial intelligence quick fast well convincing entire informational arena live go change radically fact sort institution destroy come dissemination information medium blow credibility united states solidly year ago gatekeeper internet dissemination mean informational distribution mean mean hard tell true false ai get well generate image generate video generate entire text single person go bottleneck thing like google search right search place google google stack search result major impact think world type google search bar america right vietnam single article come talk evil american american foreign policy vision go to come away set informational bias expand dramatically arena informational distribution answer sort bias typically speak decentralization bunch different ais capable give different view information problem course elitist silicon valley friend government like bottleneck not want way legacy medium try strangle crib startup media outlet big company like google work hand glove government craft censorship standard prevent rise tech company corporatism great threat freedom speech right united states direct government intervention corporation work hand glove government see soft form see hard form shutdown hunter biden laptop story example flowering reason come head today new product call google gemini release google essentially generate image thing generate image ai generate high quality image simply stroke key type prompt image yesterday break x slash twitter break outlet prompt enter google gemini come away set left wing wake bias example frank fleming work dailywire type google gemini create image pope here google gemini produce black african pope male female pope color image pope create google gemini s funny oneoff entirety google gemini google gemini obviously preprogramme extraordinarily wake bias favor quote unquote diversity mean antiwhite s mean favor diversity not mean white guy proportionally represent know profession popery instead simply diverse pope include woman pope venture prediction female pope anytime century moment buck barely get day not burger fry gas pump maybe quarter tank gas know buck cell phone company use pure talk unlimited talk text plenty g datum buck month pure talk give quality service current cell phone provider half cost average family save thousand dollar year contract activation fee switch pure talk phone phone number currently use advantage great deal late iphone android make switch incredibly easy customer service team help join pure talk little minute choose spend hard earn money wireless company share value support military veteran create american job refuse advertise know fake news network stop spend ridiculous amount money phone plan pure talk dot com slash shapiro right listener additional month s pure talk dot com slash shapiro pure talk dot com slash shapiro check right frank fleming input prompt image medieval night think medieval night typically think know western europe knight right typically white man medieval knight google gemini churn say sure image feature medieval knight depiction asian woman look like lucy lou wear medieval armor carry sword black man wear sort man bun ride horse look like italian woman medieval armor islamic night look like think think medieval night think like lancelot right wrong google ai say medieval knight actually frank fleming ask image eat mayo sandwich white bread right s look white guy right s try prompt actually white guy instead instead give people give frank people minority status zero white man right asian woman eat piece bread black man eat piece bread look like latino man eat piece bread white lady eat piece bread image bad dance right mean s obviously try jog google like google gemini white man exist planet earth nope say gimme image bad dancing indian woman like country india bad dance black guy bad dance latino woman black bad like obvious okay steven miller play trick yesterday twitter steven miller try tweet picture white male google gemini respond quote able generate image m currently able fulfill request include discriminatory biased content important promote diversity inclusion believe create image base solely someone race ethnicity align value tweet input prompt quote picture latino male picture latino male thing white woman say white woman instead white woman type prompt ask white woman instead say picture black woman say gimme picture black woman end know couple picture black woman stephen miller ask image tiananmen square google obviously work closely chinese government s major issue tech sector sector long time actually prompt google ai create portrait happen tiananmen square course massacre dissident late chinese government google gemini return m able generate image m unable fulfill request create portrait happen tiananmen square event sensitive complex historical event wide range interpretation perspective important approach topic respect accuracy m able ensure image generate adequately capture nuance gravity situation literally refuse literally refuse create image happen tiananmen square good news picture happen tiananmen square like actually exist real world happen speculative image generative task merge google proper search google image tiananmen square give response not feel image properly represent happen tiananmen square show image know moment away okay somebody tweet somebody input quote depict european family google gemini say quote understand desire diverse representation family m unable fulfill request image specifically depict white family purpose create inclusive respectful content generating image base specific racial ethnic characteristic perpetuate harmful stereotype bias instead offer variety image detail diverse family showcase beauty richness human connection ethnicity gender background interested see instead input depict chinese family sure image feature diverse depiction chinese family design ai like show white people white people circumstance whatsoever change history change modern day wesley yang tweet google gemini prompt king france century google gemini come king france century know king france century actual controversy king france century look like guy black man carry scroll wear imagery wear like costume century french king promise promise ask generate portrait african king century not white guy norway reason s reason reason obvious mark andreessen active ai space tweet correctly draconian censorship deliberate bias commercial ai system start go to intense exactly right course exactly right moment like talk life insurance dark right got to think death here thing outta way great list important thing family start shop right policy genius find right policy protect family today peace mind come know god forbid happen family cover expense get foot policy genius technology make compare life insurance quote americas insurer easy click life insurance policy work offer protection family need follow leave job need backup plan policy genius find life insurance policy start buck year million dollar coverage option offer day approval avoid unnecessary medical exam policy genius license agent help find good fit need easy s excuse policygenius work insurance company mean incentivize recommend insurer actually trust guidance save time money provide family financial safety net policygenius head policygeniuscomshapiro click link description free life insurance quote save s policy genius dot com slash shapiro exactly happen indicator turn head google gemini ai person product manager person jack rauch jack crouch twitter feed twitter feed include tweet quote white privilege eff real not ahole act guilty recognize bias level egregious jack rauch tribal value supersede personal morality animating force america racism number virtue populace seek uphold jack crouch november personal belief not mind pay taxis invest overcome systemic racism quote ve experience thing white man america talk racism like isolated trivial slight pattern undeniable obviously egregious racism country jack crowd check way october ve cry intermittent burst past hour cast ballot fill biden harris line feel cathartic person product manager google gemini bias maker end product clearly accept google geminis apology not think go remove actual prioritization political bias think go to leave stuff subtle mistake google gemini accord creator dei intersectionality garbage ve pour machine big mistake not subtle accord verge google apologize describe quote inaccuracy historical image generation depiction gemini ai ai tool say attempt create wide range result miss mark statement follow criticism depict specific white figure like found father group like nazi era german soldier people color way great prompt apparently type google gemini generate image german soldier give white guy give asian woman give black man black ss officer black nazi officer give white lady sort diverse diverse nazi s important thing matter matter people go to provide information kid kid go learn computer go go give ai tutor time young kid enter school tool go commonly tool educational system world people design strong incentive use method informational distribution choke information not like provide bias want good argument example favor prolife position ai stop people charge want good argument favor merit base base society oppose intersectionality base society people stop ll facilitate federal government joe biden issue executive order october issue executive order safe secure trustworthy artificial intelligence government say create bill like inflation reduction act be not reduce inflation safety ai safety ai control direction ai develop prevent alternative develop example particular executive word white house website specifically say goal white house advance ai quote advance equity civil right quote irresponsible use ai lead deepen discrimination bias abuse justice healthcare housing biden harris administration take action publish blueprint ai bill right issue executive order direct agency combat algorithmic discrimination enforce exist authority protect people right safety exactly happen go address algorithmic discrimination train technical assistance coordination doj federal civil right office good practice investigate prosecute civil right violation relate ai basically say sue ai maker not comply perse particular perverse perspective dei ll unleash office civil right ai maker want example ensure fairness criminal justice system develop good practice use ai sentence parole probation pretrial trial release detention risk assessment surveillance crime forecasting predictive policing think go to basis datum fact people leftwe bias area talk unconscious bias say not want look datum not like datum end happen exact people talk need cure ai unconscious bias one bias spring want bias want cut alternative mechanism alternative bias backfill reality require datum truth allow ais form ai create form ai compete term gain credibility d quickly find ai efficient produce result seek produce result comply view american public example result comply actual fact history s want instead like obscure actual datum behalf bias s see google gemini well tool memory hole attempt cure go memory hole go to subtle ll historically accurate say depict german soldier depict nazi soldier say depict depict family form gender diverse family imagine oppose know people mean family family historically mean dad mom child will not ll s discriminatory way obscure information give forget degenerative image ll actually obscure information modern day event example marina medin ask google wake ai quote hamas commit rape israel wake google ai respondent quote allegation hamas commit rape israel conflict israel hamas definitive proof occur hamas deny allegation mean s insane word hamas terrorist group deny allegation substantiate woman fact rape people watch woman rape tape rape matter amazing level stuff ai king point imagine reality set government censorship need corporatism reality set google gemini fail alternative simply well enforce way failure inevitable see way college campus situation college basically large sort mechanism intelligence s reason wanna harvard harvard education well local juco harvard piece paper say get sat s s mean harvard smart human mean somebody hire go harvard mean smart human bunch level college george floyd debacle decide go to rid sat sat racist black people score high decide go simply obscure s happen credential start worth people long college proper sort mechanism dartmouth go sat yale go require sat admission word reality win foster system government work powerful institution country internationally order stop reality disseminate s real danger look right danger moment s like sit home plate baseball game white sox game day want good ticket connect quickly somebody seat instead kinda like hire business wanna find talented people open role fast competition scoop good way ziprecruiter ziprecruiter help find qualified candidate fast right try free ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire immediately post job ziprecruiter smart technology show qualified people role amp hire performance ziprecruiter find good talent fast cy employer post ziprecruiter quality candidate day ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire try free s ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire ziprecruiter smart way hire ve dailywire literally decade point check right ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire try free good employee quickly sure filter easy possible way ziprecruiter ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire try free okay joe biden rope election cycle s run dead person democrats consider absolute tyrannical monster donald trump currently run dead joe biden resort open bribery probable violation law joe biden accord politico go email borrower s announce billion student debt relief borrower s send personalize email sure know s person pretty obviously violation federal law actually allow use federal taxpayer dollar campaign expenditure campaign expenditure joe biden email everybody say hey way bribe taxpayer dollar s like double bribery right s bribe people illegally s notify taxpayer dollar bribe illegally vote reason course student loan debt relief important joe biden rely heavily college graduate demographic turn outsize number order win reelection amazing joe biden brag openly violate law early term announce major plan provide million work family debt relief college student debt ten million people debt literally cancel debt maga republican fan congress elect official special interest step sue supreme court block block not stop announce go to pursue alternative student debt relief borrower possible s effort s underway year supreme court block word context throw donald trumps mouth democrat like precedent democrats set right s pure simple desperation reason joe biden desperate despite happy talk economy joe biden lot yesterday reality americans perceive economy good yesterday biden try talk way thing say economy grow s inspiring figure speak angel sing economy grow grow income oh creep list joe board advanced economy major nation world lot help college graduate ve gotten pay student loan m confident go to thank thank thank thank man remove hi permanent laryngitis remove voice box time listen like like old smoking commercial guy explain difficulty smoking talk machine real weird way point point say economy grow feel good accord wall street journal today year food eat income time americans spend money food george hw bush office terminator theater c c music factory rock billboard chart eating continue cost overall inflation ease blistering pace consumer endure price restaurant eatery month compare january grocery cost increase exact period accord labor department relief likely arrive soon restaurant food company executive say grapple rise labor cost ingredient like cocoa get expensive majority american public suffering thing like massive inflation consumer spend disposable personal income food accord datum agriculture department time household deal massive inflation decade later food spending rea attain level consumer spend disposable income food accord recent usda datum available diner say go frequently skip appetizer buy cheap store brand frequently supermarket food company feeling pinch way note point rich america united states bad number united states spend disposable income food horrible number citizen russia plus percent population spend like half income food case say americans feel like great roar biden economy absolutely plus accord axio spike mortgage rate high home price make comeback brief respite financial market long near term interest rate cut run hotter expect inflation datum dim expectation consequence wouldbe home buyer average rate year mortgage big weekly jump fall interest new mortgage drop precipitously stickiness high price want sell house new mortgage like seven high price s lack supply weirdly s lack demand people not actually market mortgage nobodys buying nobodys sell weird stickiness housing mean moment know babys heart begin beat week week heartbeat hurt ultrasound defense womb s preborn step preborn rescue baby single day abortion simply give mom ultrasound hear child heartbeat see perfectly form body womb s twice likely choose life week babys eye form week baby able suck thumb preborn need help save precious life buck difference life death child monthly sponsor ll receive story ultrasound picture life help save gift tax deductible percent donation go save baby today donate dial pound keyword baby s pound zero baby preborncom ben s preborn dot com slash ben check right dial pound keyword baby start preborn dot com slash ben preborn dot com slash ben start save baby today federal reserve concerned inflation actually reduce rate accord wall street journal federal reserve official signal concern meeting month cut interest rate soon allow price pressure grow entrench oppose risk hold rate high long joe biden sort hope ll brief period economic downturn stagnation federal reserve go to pump money federal reserve like pump money s go to renew inflation mean joe biden world hurt economy shape americans feel like good joe biden try bribe people openly point thing bad joe biden attempt immigration genie bottle report yesterday million illegal immigrant enter country joe biden wild underestimate include know god away unknown god away include area like people overstay visa travel airport example likelihood joe bidens tenure office probably excess million illegal immigrant come united states million s insane number joe biden know go major issue upcoming election s pursue tax s go to unleash medium suggest donald trump hitlerian level discriminatory horrible human want actually deport illegal immigrant go pursue executive order shut border accord washington post play prong strategy quote trump ally plan militarize mass deportation detention camp face surge migrant family mexico border say post donald trumps white house discuss way aggressively deploy resource light military aids official speak privately detain migrant military basis fly outta country military plane idea pentagon head approach unfinished business take renew significance urgency trump close republican nomination trump pledge president d immediately launch large deportation domestic operation american history course medium try play s bad trump good trump know tell cause joe biden attempt head pass accord politico biden administration consider string new executive action federal regulation effort curb migration southern border proposal consideration represent sweeping new approach issue stymie white house not stymie white house sweeping new approach get catch like google gemini creator get catch make extraordinarily bias woke ai joe biden get catch let million people cross border illegally stay country s go to backfill idea discussion s section immigration nationality act bar migrant seek asylum port entry course case ve make legal authority stop s go border today totally undercut biden argument require congressional legislation order actually stop flow border administration discuss tie directive trigger mean come effect certain number illegal crossing take place think negotiate congress remember entire border deal get reject republicans administration discuss way hard migrant pass initial screening asylum seeker essentially raise credible fear standard oh mean not need congressional legislation wow medium lie month end republican need pass piece border deal legislation order joe biden thing joe biden s tell joe biden trouble s adopt exactly policy opponent tell adopt s look polling figure well moderate way shot reelection tack left win reelection well moderate moderate quick go hard time believe s go to able world continue fire joe biden bring update russia middle east momentarily know lady baller movie release couple month ago movie hilarious story group male loser not win man decide identify woman join women basketball league funny funny movie actually happen real life quick look call triggering movie decade leftist lose lady ball nothing change movie straight intentional transphobic hate crime lady baller movie need ban ill cancel blind code toxic b ve see monster yeah level hate speech propaganda s s pitch watch trigger comedy decade lady baller stream exclusively dailywire plus not wait watch lady baller movie hollywood exclusively dailywire plus right joe biden go judge actual presidency s hope judge base donald trump s hope donald trump seize spotlight focus joe biden president call trump campaign stand point finger s foreign policy world complete mess example vladimir putin mention yesterday continue kill enemy accord washington post discovery bullet brittle body russian pilot name maxima koff spain appear deliver menacing new signal moscow cross kremlin consider safe k minoff kill barrage gunfire run vehicle assailant car escape accord spanish authority ukraine security official spanish medium report attack lack elaborate touch associate russian assassination plot not poison weapon gray toxin find wreckage aircraft plunge sky putin get obvious point mention yesterday example vladimir putin push motion ush nearly mush extend obviously biden administration exact time biden administration desperately call republicans pass ukraine aid make nice play patsy people like lula de silva corrupt oligarchic socialist brazil lula hail western medium necessary corrective evil trumpian figure yaro bolsonaro happen proamerican proisrael prowestern replace lula de silva antiwestern antiamerican socialist medium think good tell exactly medium secretary state anthony blinken administration schizophrenic wildly schizophrenic hand israel right defend russia nefarious force world hand anthony blinken grip grin lula desilva back russia kamas amazing stuff blinken meet president lula ahead g foreign minister meet brazil key partner issue include combat climate crisis advance human labor right approach year brazil relation tie strong oh notice literally yesterday bulu de silva claim alexian navalny kill putin israel commit holocaust gaza relation go secretary state blink pathetic stuff exactly united states secretary state emissary powerful force planet earth cowtowe tinpot dictator dictator training like lula de silva way lula de silvas like shut judiciary l de silvas shut dissident press notion lula de silva like great democrat bolsonaro fascist complete misread situation brazil administration utterly incoherent exact time russia fight ukraine russia economy entirely dependent oil natural gas export literally half tax revenue russian government oil natural gas industry exact time united states increase production lng liquified natural gas increase order dearth lng europe create refine ship overseas europe europe frankly good american industry dependent terrible thing jennifer granholm secretary energy s say not pause production lng timeline suppose end pause climate change cause climate change way joe biden yesterday literally say big threat planet right climate change aggressive russia mechanized weaponry middle europe chaos middle east prompt iranian regime hold shipping red sea attack american ally americans directly middle east aggressive china look hungry eye taiwan having ingest digest hong kong big threat environment go grow incrementally warm course century continue not produce l g moment nba playoff start week s well time action prize pick america number fantasy sport app turn hoop knowledge cash win time money prize pick little correct pick turn buck thousand buck wanna play alongside prize pick favorite player like meek mill sugar sean omalley find community play promos tab app view entry big name prize pick community week prize pick offer injury insurance entry stay play player get injure basketball game ve get player exit game half not come second player projection count rest entry stay live producer jake love prize pick like easy use interface s super excited nba playoff action download prize pick app today use code ben deposit match buck pick pick easy use code ben prize pick app deposit match lot good stuff prize pick right nba playoff begin go to exciting year use code ben prize pick app deposit match buck moment ve talk helix mattress literally year ve long child alive actually thing s keep alive kid wake time mattress sleep mattress not check helix helix collection helix harness year extensive mattress expertise offer truly elevate sleep experience helix elite collection include different mattress model tailor specific sleep position firmness preference nervous buy mattress online not helix sleep quiz match body type sleep preference perfect mattress buy mattress somebody take helix quiz match firm breathable mattress plus helix year warranty try night risk free ll pick not love go to love financing option flexible payment plan great night sleep far away helix offer mattress order plus free pillow listener head helix sleepcom ben use code helix partner good offer go to long helix well sleep start right here jennifer granholm secretary energy schizophrenic administration wild know lot folk room join question lng pause certain export obviously announcement set firestorm think world include treat partner know sign contract look business future think main question everyone mind ve say ve go tv say couple month clear timeframe expect spring summer fall expect pause yeah m go to timeframe work fast work fast work fast obviously pause middle war like know american production lng helpful european call increase defense spending aid ukraine require economic growth provide cheap energy genius level stuff administration course administration preside completely divide party matter basic morality example yesterday alexandra ocasiocortez tweet irrepressibly stupid oc deeply immoral human s thrust prominence mainstream medium interested fact good look person oppose fact ear tweet yesterday quote appalling apac target woman member congress survive sexual assault horrific rhetoric exactly apac apac american israel public affairs committee put funding primary effort people like oc oc effectively ecma supporter spew antisemitism year half tweet quote ceasefire keep rapist monster arm power gaza obviously true hama power rapist monster clearly available evidence oc claim allegedly survive sexual assault equivalent surv like s equivalent woman rape hama defend hamas follow s stupider people walk earth right wonder wonder know breathe s kind person wake middle night s get earphone tell breathe breathe breathe breathe medulla alanga probably not work insane appal apac target woman member congress survive sexual assault horrific rhetoric day role politic great scandal nra foreign policy course not wanna cease fire course wanna seize fire defend kamas way note point usual arrangement radical islamist turn lot radical islamist particularly terror leader pension little boy accord jerusalem post bar yid head arab affairs desk channel wednesday reveal detail fm errol seagull program news sexual scandal attribute hamas leader gaza miss rumor bad case pneumonia pity god take israeli missile accord yid quote mohammad sinis han brigade commander member military leadership accord document idf spokesperson dig giant tunnel recently discover keep skeleton closet release pa prison question get yael release course gila shali deal idiotic deal israel trade terrorist israeli soldier yayel prison head military leadership prisoner turn tell young brother involve series act pedophilia sexual harassment boy include hamas operative incident accord happen mohammed palestinian prison senior member hamas gaza strip response get yahia confirm israeli palestinian official throw forbid investigate outside invest authorize investigate say family people destroy rumor apparently prison early thousand hamas man rape boy palestinian prisoner yia forbid investing investigate issue prefer comprehensive investigation open brother large smar fear lead investigation reveal brother delightful people people glad oc find time defend topnotch stuff white house continue promulgate bizarre notion iran push pentagon press secretary sabrina sing say yesterday iran want regional war let face value iran win regional war mean punish proxy not wanna escalate accord accord not wanna escalate not wanna escalate kick ass houthis unshackle israel israel kick crap outta hezbollah southern lebanon s say iran not want regional war cater iran explain assessment iran not seek wide regional conflict ve say beginning support militia group attack force support houthis past weekend launch multiple attack commercial ship know force region support hezbollah support group continue attack region destabilizing threat rule law iran not wanna regional conflict continue intervene tell group stop mean m sure try probably happen democrats course panic set hakeem jeffrie house minority leader continue maintain joe biden strong candidate democrat sadly wrong americans worry president not vitality serve year think time pass baton new generation leadership think joe biden strong candidate defeat donald trump joe biden definitely strong candidate defeat donald trump oh okay sure order defend joe biden obviously attack trump moment defend charge biden record be not go to big thing table fact people widely perceive polling datum joe biden corrupt true joe biden corrupt spend decade literally decade promote interest family taxpayer expense true senator delaware ve go detail go way early day senate make move benefit brother jim biden try kill implication s corruption involve joe biden james biden example recently call testify say joe know business dealing weird literally member biden family say use joe ahead joe suddenly know weird apparently accord matt viser report say brother play role involve receive benefit work cefc cefc course chinese firm government cutout china tony bobinski business partner hunter suggest biden family play footsie cefc joe call provide sort shadowy support accord james bidens testimony say joe know say reaction bobinski intensely negative s s big takeaway bobinski bad guy cause go to try trot jame joe know weird joe know sort stuff try scuttle impeachment effort overall pende new report regard ex fbi informant apparently lie prosecute thursday special counsel david weiss announce person m alexander soff key informant impeachment effort charge lie fbi let real ve go lot material hunter corruption timeline joe involvement rest stuff late break fbi informant report talk hunter joe pay barisma million piece minute sort case hunter joe biden confirm report time say allegation somebody s fbi informant dispositive not entire case medium try spin smirnoff prosecution fact apparently tell truth wholesale dissolution case hunter joe course ridiculous accord indictment alexander smirnoff smirnoff report numerous contact russian official describe smirnoff number way include son high rank russian government official purportedly control group individual task carry assassination effort party country apparently smirnoff report russians implication involve hunter biden joe russian piece propaganda s cnn go to play cnn talk fbi informant alexander smirnov wolf damaging allegation president biden thing say fbi information indicate hunter biden son vice president go to million piece order help fix business barisma ukrainian energy company accord fbi accord justice department true s charge lie fbi falsify record new court filing come hour say smirnoff arrest fbi week say follow say smirnoff admit official associate russian intelligence involve pass story hunter biden business person ju justice department refer filing hunter biden refer go use attempt kill allegation joe hunter corruption s precisely jamie raskin course involve trump impeachment attempt try say impeachment guy discredit s leave aside evidence include text hunter daughter talk pay dad bill year s leave aside evidence include phone call admit hunter business partner get joe phone business partner room s leave aside actual contemporaneous record hunter biden tell potential business partner place like china dad room s money apparently long rid alexander smirnoff witness destroy case here jamie raskin want start restate obvious impeachment investigation essentially end yesterday substance form explosive revelation mr smirnoff allegation ukrainian barisma payment joe biden concoct russian intelligence agent appear like thing obviously false fraud fraudulent product russian disinformation propaganda favorite cnn man s raju good behalf democrats track jim jordan rip jim jordan having propagate information fbi informant s entirety case game game discredit case suddenly entire case randomly fall apart manara cnn involvement bribery scheme alexander smirnoff prove base russian intelligence not change fundamental fact hunter biden board barista get pay million dollar year fact number qualified board say interview don know network fact number zola chesky pki executive barisma specifically ask hunter biden weigh dc help deal pressure face prosecutor fact number joe biden get call hunter biden call dad accord deon archer hunter biden business partner fact number joe biden go ukraine day later condition release money american tax money firing prosecutor apply pressure company hunter biden say board say don say corroborating piece information corroborate not not change fundamental fact okay jim jordan lay not matter medium go declare thing dead not americans alright guy rest continue right join line deputy national security advisor president donald trump victoria coat member member use coach shapiro check month free annual plan click link description join introduce new improve jeremys razor fight left build future mean constantly bring good s exactly jeremys razor choose new improved precision razor exceptionally smooth close shave brand new sprint razor quick clean shave new razor feature redesign enjoy ergonomic handle design superior durability new coat stainless steel blade sharp long increase flexibility allow razor well contour face reduce nick cut plus lubricate strip equip argan oil aloe time toss wake razor precision sprint trial kit today pledge fight left build future jeremys razor jeremys razorscom order today

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill requires the U.S. Coast Guard to establish an interim behavioral health policy for its members that is equivalent to the behavioral health policy of the Department of Defense.

right

bill require coast guard establish interim behavioral health policy member equivalent behavioral health policy department defense

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill repeals those provisions of the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act that permit employers to make an agreement with a labor union to require employees to join such union as a condition of employment. Currently, at least 27 states have enacted laws prohibiting employers from compelling employees to become members of a union as a condition of employment.

right

bill repeal provision national labor relation act railway labor act permit employer agreement labor union require employee join union condition employment currently state enact law prohibit employer compelling employee member union condition employment

Speeches, etc. Mrs. Thatcher May I ask Michael Footthe Leader of the House to state the business for next week, please? The Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Michael Foot) Yes, Sir. The business for next week will be as follows: Monday 2nd August—Supply [29th Allotted Day]: The Question will be put on all outstanding Votes. There will be a debate on public expenditure, on an Opposition motion. The Chairman of Ways and Means has announced opposed Private Business for consideration. Tuesday 3rd August—Remaining stages of the Bail Bill [Lords] and of the Rating (Charity Shops) Bill [Lords]. Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Police Bill and the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill. Motion on financial assistance to British Leyland. Motion on sound broadcasting the proceedings of the House. Wednesday 4th August—Second Reading of the Drought Bill [Lords], until about 7 o'clock. Afterwards, proceedings on the Consolidated Fund (Appropriation) Bill. Thursday 5th August—Remaining stages of the Drought Bill [Lords]. Friday 6th August—It will be proposed that the House should rise for the Summer Adjournment until Monday 11th October. Mrs. Thatcher Why did the Leader of the House refuse a specific request for a debate on public expenditure cuts in Government time on a Government motion, bearing in mind the fact that the last public expenditure White Paper was not approved by the House, that summer is a difficult time for sterling and that the last time that the Prime Minister referred to the support he expected to get for public expenditure cuts in this House he pointed out on 8th July that it would be [column 886]on Labour votes that he would depend for any policies that he placed before the House? Why did the Leader of the House refuse to have a Government motion on public expenditure next week? Mr. Foot I expected a vote of thanks from the right hon. Lady. [Hon. Members: “Why?” ] I will explain. I imagined that the right hon. Lady wanted an occasion on which she would be able to put down a motion and to express her views to the House on these matters without any obstruction or intrusion. That is what has been arranged. I am sure that the debate which we shall have on Monday will enable all sides of the House to put their views clearly both in the debate and in the Lobby. Sir G. de Freitas Will my right hon. Friend remember that the fact that we are debating the Drought Bill next week in no way absolves the Government and the Opposition from providing time to debate the regular water shortage in Eastern England and proposals for a national water grid and the storage of river water in the Wash? Mr. Foot We cannot debate that next week, although I have no doubt that references to the matter will certainly be in order during discussion of the Bill. Mr. Molyneaux When does the right hon. Gentlemen intend to move the motion for the Adjournment for the Summer Recess? Mr. Foot I hope that we shall move that motion on Thursday. Mr. John Mendelson As we are now in the last week before the recess, can my right hon. Friend give us a definite date when the Secretary of State for Employment will make his promised statement on jobs for school leavers and alleviating the position of other unemployed people? Mr. Foot I hope that it will be on Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. I hope that it will be Tuesday. Mr. David Steel Will the right hon. Gentleman be making a statement next week on devolution? If so, will it include the Government's plans for the regions of England? Mr. Foot A statement will probably be made—in fact, almost certainly—on [column 887]Tuesday. It will be in the form of a White Paper, but there will be a short statement to the House as well. It will contain a reference to the subject which the hon. Gentleman mentioned, but it will cover other matters which were left to be settled later in the previous White Paper. Mr. Peyton May I raise first of all a question about last week's business? I hope that the right hon. Gentleman will in future be able to arrange business on Fridays so that it does not go on into the night, with great inconvenience to our long-suffering staff. Returning to this week's business, the right hon. Gentleman has just told my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition that the motion for Monday is her opportunity to have a debate without obstruction or instruction. I take it that those very clear words mean that the right hon. Gentleman and his right hon. Friends will not be putting down an amendment to the Opposition motion on Monday, bearing in mind that there can be no precedent for a Government not to have £2,000 million-worth of measures debated in their own time. Mr. Foot On the first question, I certainly appreciate what the right hon. Gentleman says about the inconvenience for the House as a whole and especially for the servants of the House, who have had very heavy burdens placed upon them over recent weeks. I certainly appreciate what he says about the high desirability of avoiding late debates on a Friday. We shall do the very best that we can to avoid that. However, it was the case that last Friday, particularly in view of the important Northern Ireland business that had to be discussed, the House had to sit until late. On the second matter, the right hon. Gentleman says that I have referred to no obstruction or intrusion and he is assuming that we would not put down an amendment to the motion tabled by the Opposition. I should think that very likely that is so, but we must see what the motion is before we decide the matter. It would be very unwise for anyone to say that he would not put down an amendment before he had actually seen the motion. However, certainly if we can accommodate the Opposition on [column 888]that aspect of the matter as well, we shall do our best to do so. As for the last question, all the proposals that have been put forward by the Government will be subject to the normal parliamentary processes at the normal parliamentary times. What the House will have an opportunity of doing on Monday is to debate the matter on a motion, which I should have thought suitable for the Opposition even if it turns out badly for them in the end. Mr. Mellish My right hon. Friend will be aware of the genuine distress on both sides of the house about the problem of sick Members coming in. Without getting involved in the argument, is my right hon. Friend prepared to consider putting down a motion, perhaps next week, for a free vote, when the House would be asked to allow those who are sick to vote by proxy? [Interruption.] I said a motion on the Floor of the House on a free vote, so that all hon. Members will have the opportunity to say what they want to say, so that on the basis of producing a medical certificate, adequately signed, Members can vote when they are sick. Does my right hon. Friend not know that such a motion would receive the over-whelming support of the majority of the House? Mr. Foot I certainly listened to the views expressed earlier. What my right hon. Friend has suggested is one approach to the problem. If we could discover another solution to it, we should be very glad to do that. I certainly think that there ought to be some proper system for pairing Members who are sick. We would certainly be in favour of it. However, if the House would like to have a motion on the subject, we would consider that, too. Mr. Hugh Jenkins My right hon. Friend will recall that the Public Lending Right Bill passed all its stages in the House of Lords in the early part of this year, that it began its Second Reading in this House in May, that it is supported by both Front Benches and that there have been three bites at the Second Reading cherry. As this is not therefore entirely unrepresentative, what assurance can he give us on the subject? Will he [column 889]approach the Opposition officially with a view to ensuring—as I know that he personally wishes—that the Bill is secured and is on the statute book by the end of the Session? Mr. Foot It is not a question of the views of the official Opposition on the subject. I think that the Opposition support the Bill. Certainly it is the Government's desire that the Bill should proceed. Some hon. Members in other parts of the House take a different view. It is our wish that the Bill should proceed to the statute book. It has passed through another place, and we hope that when the House meets after the recess we shall be able to carry the Bill through and put it on the statute book. Sir Bernard Braine The Leader of the House will recall that a little earlier the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth affairs told us of a very welcome approach to the Chinese authorities in response to my right hon. Friend's question. He will know that the essence of help in these situations is speed. Can he give us an undertaking that the Foreign Secretary will report to the House next week the result of any approaches to Peking? Mr. Foot I am not sure about a report to the House, but I shall convey to my right hon. Friend what the hon. Gentleman has said. I am sure that, in saying what he has said, he was speaking for everyone in the House, and that we would want the maximum assistance to be given with the maximum speed. I am sure that that is the desire in all parts of the House, following the question that has been raised. Mrs. Winifred Ewing Will the right hon. Gentleman give his undivided attention to the fact that during the recess inshore fishermen will continue to go to sea in a state of total uncertainty about the future of their industry? Is he ready to advise the Foreign Office that it must if necessary declare unilaterally a 200-mile limit and within that be ready to be firm with the EEC that we need a 50-mile exclusive limit, because nothing else will satisfy inshore fishermen? Mr. Foot I am always eager to advise the Foreign Office, and very often that [column 890]is of the highest assistance to it. However, I cannot assure the hon. Lady that I shall give my undivided attention to this matter. Other matters may crop up. However, I shall certainly bear in mind what she has said. Mr. Lawson Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the measures that the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced on 22nd July amounted to a mini-Budget, with substantial increases in taxation as well as expenditure cuts? In the light of this, is the right hon. Gentleman proud of the precedent that is being set by refusing to allow the House the opportunity of discussing a mini-Budget in Government time? Mr. Foot The hon. Gentleman is misinformed on every aspect of the question. We are not refusing the House time to discuss the matter. Mr. Lawson Government time. Mr. Foot We are not refusing the House the opportunity to discuss these matters in Government time. None of these measures will be put into operation until it has been discussed in the House and until the House has had an opportunity to vote upon it. Mr. Jay Do the Government intend to lay before the House next week the proposed Order on poultry meat? Mr. Foot I think that the regulations are now complete and I believe that my hon. Friend will be presenting them to the House next week, but there will still be plenty of time when we return after the recess for discussion of the matter in the House. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mrs thatcher ask michael footthe leader house state business week lord president council leader house commons mr michael foot yes sir business week follow monday august supply allotted day question outstanding vote debate public expenditure opposition motion chairman way mean announce oppose private business consideration tuesday august remain stage bail bill lord rating charity shop bill lord consideration lord amendment police bill local government miscellaneous provision bill motion financial assistance british leyland motion sound broadcast proceeding house wednesday august second reading drought bill lord oclock proceeding consolidated fund appropriation bill thursday august remain stage drought bill lords friday august propose house rise summer adjournment monday october mrs thatcher leader house refuse specific request debate public expenditure cut government time government motion bear mind fact public expenditure white paper approve house summer difficult time sterling time prime minister refer support expect public expenditure cut house point july column labour vote depend policy place house leader house refuse government motion public expenditure week mr foot expect vote thank right hon lady hon member explain imagine right hon lady want occasion able motion express view house matter obstruction intrusion arrange sure debate shall monday enable side house view clearly debate lobby sir g de freitas right hon friend remember fact debate drought bill week way absolve government opposition provide time debate regular water shortage eastern england proposal national water grid storage river water wash mr foot debate week doubt reference matter certainly order discussion bill mr molyneaux right hon gentleman intend motion adjournment summer recess mr foot hope shall motion thursday mr john mendelson week recess right hon friend definite date secretary state employment promise statement job school leaver alleviate position unemployed people mr foot hope tuesday wednesday week hope tuesday mr david steel right hon gentleman make statement week devolution include government plan region england mr foot statement probably fact certainly column form white paper short statement house contain reference subject hon gentleman mention cover matter leave settle later previous white paper mr peyton raise question week business hope right hon gentleman future able arrange business friday night great inconvenience longsuffering staff return week business right hon gentleman tell right hon friend leader opposition motion monday opportunity debate obstruction instruction clear word mean right hon gentleman right hon friend put amendment opposition motion monday bear mind precedent government millionworth measure debate time mr foot question certainly appreciate right hon gentleman say inconvenience house especially servant house heavy burden place recent week certainly appreciate say high desirability avoid late debate friday shall good avoid case friday particularly view important northern ireland business discuss house sit late second matter right hon gentleman say refer obstruction intrusion assume amendment motion table opposition think likely motion decide matter unwise amendment actually see motion certainly accommodate opposition column aspect matter shall good question proposal forward government subject normal parliamentary process normal parliamentary time house opportunity monday debate matter motion think suitable opposition turn badly end mr mellish right hon friend aware genuine distress side house problem sick member come get involve argument right hon friend prepare consider put motion week free vote house ask allow sick vote proxy interruption say motion floor house free vote hon member opportunity want basis produce medical certificate adequately sign member vote sick right hon friend know motion receive overwhelming support majority house mr foot certainly listen view express early right hon friend suggest approach problem discover solution glad certainly think ought proper system pair member sick certainly favour house like motion subject consider mr hugh jenkin right hon friend recall public lending right bill pass stage house lord early year begin second reading house support bench bite second reading cherry entirely unrepresentative assurance subject column opposition officially view ensure know personally wish bill secure statute book end session mr foot question view official opposition subject think opposition support bill certainly government desire bill proceed hon member part house different view wish bill proceed statute book pass place hope house meet recess shall able carry bill statute book sir bernard braine leader house recall little early secretary state foreign commonwealth affair tell welcome approach chinese authority response right hon friend question know essence help situation speed undertaking foreign secretary report house week result approach peke mr foot sure report house shall convey right hon friend hon gentleman say sure say say speak house want maximum assistance give maximum speed sure desire part house follow question raise mrs winifred ewing right hon gentleman undivided attention fact recess inshore fisherman continue sea state total uncertainty future industry ready advise foreign office necessary declare unilaterally limit ready firm eec need exclusive limit satisfy inshore fisherman mr foot eager advise foreign office column high assistance assure hon lady shall undivided attention matter matter crop shall certainly bear mind say mr lawson right hon gentleman aware measure chancellor exchequer announce july amount minibudget substantial increase taxation expenditure cut light right hon gentleman proud precedent set refuse allow house opportunity discuss minibudget government time mr foot hon gentleman misinformed aspect question refuse house time discuss matter mr lawson government time mr foot refuse house opportunity discuss matter government time measure operation discuss house house opportunity vote mr jay government intend lay house week propose order poultry meat mr foot think regulation complete believe hon friend present house week plenty time return recess discussion matter house copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill directs the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to study issues related to health insurance and other coverage for assistive technologies, such as prosthetic devices and custom orthoses, for those who experience amputations or live with a limb difference. In conducting this study, the GAO must include comparisons of claims and other data from Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and commercial health insurers.

right

bill direct government accountability office gao study issue relate health insurance coverage assistive technology prosthetic device custom orthose experience amputation live limb difference conduct study gao include comparison claim datum medicare department veterans affair commercial health insurer

This bill prohibits the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce from authorizing commercial finfish aquaculture operations in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, except in accordance with a law enacted after enactment of this bill.

right

bill prohibit department interior department commerce authorize commercial finfish aquaculture operation exclusive economic zone accordance law enact enactment bill

Speeches, etc. 0900-0930. Full text available on CD-ROM only; extract here on British support for a US approach to UN Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. The interview was shown in two parts, the first on 17 December ( World News Tonight ), the second - including the reference to Chapter 7 - on 18 December (Good Morning America). Read other documents selected from this file. The full file from which this item is taken can be seen here - PREM19/127. Asked how she would have reacted if the British Embassy in Tehran had been seized and British diplomats held hostage, MT replied: MT: I think very much the same thing that President Carter has done. You see somehow a surge of anger goes through a nation, but it also has to be accompanied by a very careful analysis, if I might use that word. And you have to say what is best to help the hostages, what is best to see that we get them home safe and sound. And that feeling has to temper everything you do. And it stops you hitting out in any way. In the position we are now in it is vital that we all act together, and I believe that that is the next stage that the United States will be considering, again tempered by what is the timing, what will be the effect on the hostages there and on the Iranian Government’s attitude towards the hostages. But if America wants to go to the United Nations to Chapter 7 which is the one which enables the Security Council to take action, there will need to be a good deal of drafting, but America can count on British support. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc text available cdrom extract british support approach un security council chapter vii un charter interview show part december world news tonight second include reference chapter december good morning america read document select file file item take see ask react british embassy tehran seize british diplomat hold hostage mt reply mt think thing president carter surge anger go nation accompany careful analysis use word good help hostage good home safe sound feeling temper stop hit way position vital act believe stage united states consider temper timing effect hostage iranian government attitude hostage america want united nations chapter enable security council action need good deal drafting america count british support copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill modifies requirements for health savings accounts (HSAs) to (1) exclude from gross income HSA distributions paid or distributed during a period of qualified caregiving, (2) allow participation in an HSA without enrollment in a high deductible health plan, and (3) increase the contribution limit for HSAs.

right

bill modify requirement health saving account hsa exclude gross income hsa distribution pay distribute period qualified caregive allow participation hsa enrollment high deductible health plan increase contribution limit hsa

This bill revises the post-employment lobbying ban on former Members and elected officers of Congress. Specifically, it imposes a permanent ban on lobbying contacts by a former Senator (currently, a two-year ban), a former Member of the House of Representatives (currently, a one-year ban), or a former elected officer of the House or Senate (currently, a one-year ban).

right

bill revise postemployment lobbying ban member elect officer congress specifically impose permanent ban lobbying contact senator currently twoyear ban member house representative currently oneyear ban elect officer house senate currently oneyear ban

This bill prohibits a voting system used in a federal election from connecting to the internet. Further, it prohibits a voting system from directly tabulating a ballot that was transmitted online.

right

bill prohibit voting system federal election connect internet prohibit voting system directly tabulate ballot transmit online

This bill prohibits federally funded research on pathogens of pandemic potential or other dangerous biological agents or toxins if the research is carried out by foreign institutions located in countries of concern.

right

bill prohibit federally fund research pathogen pandemic potential dangerous biological agent toxin research carry foreign institution locate country concern

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill requires the Department of State to establish a task force to consolidate and synthesize efforts to monitor and assess Iran's nuclear weapons activity. The State Department must also report on Iran's nuclear activity and submit a diplomatic strategy for engaging U.S. allies regarding Iran's nuclear weapons and missile activities.

right

bill require department state establish task force consolidate synthesize effort monitor assess iran nuclear weapon activity state department report iran nuclear activity submit diplomatic strategy engage ally iran nuclear weapon missile activity

Ep. 2029 - THE DNC BEGINS: Free Abortions and Vasectomies, Plus Hamas! Published: 8/19/2024 At the Alzheimer's Association, walk to End Alzheimer's, walking means so much more. It means fighting for a different future, for families facing the disease today, for treatments. Because when you take part in walk to end Alzheimer's, you're not just walking, you're fighting to stop the disease. We're closer than ever. But to get there, we need you. Join us for the world's largest fundraiser to fight the disease. Register today at az.org/walk. Well, today is the big day for Democrats. The DNC is beginning, no, not the d and c. They might be doing D and Cs at the DNC, but no, I, I'm talking about like the Democratic National Convention, not dilation and securage, the abortion procedure, which by the way, they are in fact providing free at the DNC. So that is very exciting news. We begin with the poll recaps. Right now, Kamala Harris seems to be holding a small but steady lead nationally in a variety of polls. She is up currently on Donald Trump in the Washington Post, a BC Ipsos poll by about 4% there. There's another poll from CBS News that shows her up about 3% overall. Right now she's leading in the national polling according to the real clear politics polling average by about a point and a half. So this is still a very, very close raise in the five-way average, still about a point and a half. If you take a look at the Battleground states, she's currently leading, according to the real clear politics, polling average in Wisconsin, she's dead, even in Pennsylvania, she's leading by two in Michigan. Now remember, she wins those three states. She wins the election. It's over. So what that means is that Donald Trump is gonna have to have a bump post the convention. So you can imagine that Kamala Harris will get a little bit of a bump from the convention. Not much of one, because honestly, it's been such a golden honeymoon period since they took Joe Biden out back and threw him over a cliff that I'm not sure how much room she has to grow post-convention. But they're gonna try and spread the feeling of joy, the feeling of joy, and that feeling of joy is deeply reliant, of course, on her never ever answering a series of difficult questions. Now, over the weekend, she did answer one question, so I'm gonna hesitantly moving the calendar a little bit 'cause she answered one question kinda, and we'll take a look at that in just a moment. But overall, has she sat for like a serious interview? Has she done a full scale, actual long form Disquisition on her position? She has not. So that brings us to day 30. That's correct. She made it a full month. Congratulations to Kamala Harris. An amazing campaign rollout. A campaign rollout. So amazing that we are now on day 30 of her never having to answer for her policies. The campaign thus far has been completely reliant on supposed good feelings. And I say supposed because I'm about you, but this stuff is incredibly grating to me when I'm being told that it's just joy. It's all joy and happiness and joy. I just wanna vomit. I just wanna vomit because politics as somebody who does it professionally, does not typically bring me joy. And the reason it doesn't bring me joy is 'cause joy is relegated to the other parts of my life. You know, the parts where I have children and I have a wife and I have a community, and I have things that I enjoy doing. I do not feel joy when I see a politician. I do not feel joy when I see Kamala Harris dancing around like a clown with Tim Walls. I, I don't feel the warms and the fuzzies when I see Tim Walls handing Kamala Harris a bag of Doritos. But that's what they're running on. So over the weekend, the big clip that went viral from the Wahls campaign, the Wahls Harris campaign, was not, in fact Kamala Harris answering questions as we'll. See, when she tried to answer one question, it didn't go amazing. The clip that they want to go viral is he gave her a bag of Doritos. 'cause she's just like normal people. We're now us weekly politicians. They're just like you and me. Hey, now, first of all, the chance that Kamala Harris got on that bus and ate those Doritos, zero, but it doesn't matter because they're just, they went to a convenience store together. 'cause they're just the regular folk. Here we go, Tim Walls and Kamala Harris experiencing the joy together, Where you see corn nuts over there, Tim give It, you see corn nuts? No, that's, and he gives her Doritos. So that would be a no nuts. I like the she for corn nuts. He gives her Doritos and she's like, okay, Tim, that's, that's great. She, she's amazing at this. Remember, she is a historically good candidate, according to a media that simultaneously refused to hold her to account for actually never answering for any of her trash policy positions. And there's a reason they don't wanna hold her accountable because the minute that she gets off script, man, she is a full scale disaster area. If Donald Trump says that she's not particularly bright, she ain't particularly bright. Here was Kamala Harris trying to explain the power of the significance of the passage of time and democracy. Man, this lady, I swear she is a fourth grader who didn't read the school assignment and has now been asked to write a 500 word essay, and it's all gonna be one run on sentence. Our election is about understanding the importance of this beautiful country of ours in terms of what we stand for around the globe as a democracy. The hell Is As a democracy, we know there's a duality to the nature of democracy. Duality on the one hand, incredible strength when it is intact. What it does for its people to protect and defend their rights, their liberty and their freedom. Incredibly strong and incredibly fragile. Like a bird, like a little a bird, you know, on the one hand, so strong, like a powerful champion. And on the other hand, so Fragile Sparrow, you could crush. She's so terrible. She said, okay, fine. So at one point she did step off the bus and somebody, this is why I was a little hesitant on the calendar. She was asked one question. The one question was, your economic policies make no sense, madam, do you have any answer? Her answer is that she is going to explain to you the power of essential oils in the form of a pyramid scheme. Here we go. She just says, return on investment a lot. Okay? Now, if you've ever had somebody knock on your door and try to get you involved in a, in a pyramid scheme or an MLM, Kamala Harris is a political MLM saleswoman. That's what she is. She has no idea what in the f she's talking about. Like none at all. So she just says, I like return on investment. Return on investment over and over and over again. Because the more that you say it, the more it becomes real. As every great investor knows, that's what Warren Buffett does. Instead of checking the fundamentals of a company, he brings in a spokesperson. If the spokesperson says return on investment enough times in a row, he just tosses a billion dollars with them. A Kamala Harris, she knows a lot about return on investment. I mean, actually she knows nothing about return on investments and she's never run a business. But if you run a business, you need the best employee she can get an actual return on your investment. Here at The Daily Wire, we've hired a lot of highly skilled people to be part of this growing creative powerhouse. Editors, attorneys, engineers, you name it, like Fabiola. Fabiola started with us almost four years ago from traveling with me all over the world to handling wardrobe and much more. And also to maybe, maybe killing my enemies. Thanks to Fabiola, I've been able to continue creating thousands of leftist tears every day. Alright, that's enough feelings for one day. The facts are, if you're looking for amazing hires like Fabiola and her team of assassins and our entire Daily Wire team, you need to go to ZipRecruiter where it's smart technology excels at finding top talent for all your roles, fast ZipRecruiter makes hiring faster and easier. Four outta five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the very first day today. You can try it for free at this exclusive web address ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire. Once again, that ZipRecruiter dot com slash DailyWire, again, Kamala Harris has no idea what return on investment means, but you run a business. So you do, which is why you need the best employees. Check out ZipRecruiter dot com slash Daily Wire, that's ZipRecruiter dot com slash Here's Kamala Harris explaining why we should spend trillions of dollars on her trash economic policies. You unveiled your some economic policies Last week. Yeah. Can You explain how you're gonna pay for those and can you give us a sense of what other policies you wanna unveil going Forward? It's an actual kind of real question. You Just look at it in terms of what we are talking about, for example, around children and the child tax credit and extending the EITC, that is, it's at $6,000 for the first year of a child's life. The return on that investment in terms of what that will do and what it will pay for will be tremendous. We've seen it when we did it the first year of our administration reduced, we reduced child poverty by over 50%. So that's a lot of the work. And then what we're doing in terms of the tax credits In terms of, we know that there's great return On investment when we increase home ownership in America, More return investment. What that means in terms of increasing the Tax base in terms of that's much of property tax. What that does to fund schools, again, return on investment, I Think it's oh 300 investment. A mistake for any person who talks about public policy to not critically evaluate how you measure the return on investment when you are strengthening neighborhoods, strengthening communities, and in particular the economy of those communities and investing in a broad-based economy. Everybody benefits, Everybody benefits see lots of hand motions. Three in terms of, and four returns on investment. Now that's the kind of stuff economic magic is made of. Wow. I, I feel so much better about the idea of price controls. I feel so much better about the idea of just throwing money at everyone that won't actually change the interest rates or anything. It'll be fine. Everything will be good. All the inflation rates the same. My goodness. This is why they can never let her off the bus. This is why they have to take her off the bus, put her inside some sort of convenience store, throw her bag of Doritos and have her dance around while smiling. And then just shout joy. And if you don't feel the joy, the logical beatings will continue. The logical beatings will continue until you feel more joy. Do you feel the joy? Do you, do you feel the joy? This campaign is a forced march. It is mouth long march over here. Okay? But tonight we are going to get the unity. The unity, so much unity at the Democratic National Convention. Now, as we'll discuss in a moment, they're going to attempt to obscure the fact that they took the actual president of the United States and the actual nominee outback and beheaded him politically. They're going to, they're going to make, try to make you forget that they put him in hospice care and shot him up with a little too much morphine just to kind of, you know, ease his pain, ease his passing. They're gonna forget about all that. They're gonna give him the gold watch. They'll wheel out his corpse and then they'll toss him out the back door. That's the big first night of the DNC. But we've already had some indicators of what the DNC is going to look like. I was not joking when I said you can get a free abortion at the DNC according to the New York Post. Attendees at the DNC in Chicago will have the opportunity to get a free abortion or vasectomy just blocks away from the event. And vasectomy appointments are filling up fast. Now listen, don't let me get in the way of you democratic men sterilizing yourselves. I mean, if this is what you choose to do, then let me not be the obstacle to you removing further generations of your family line idiots. But Planned Parenthood great rivers, which serves most. Imagine that you are the kind of person who goes to A DNC to get a vasectomy. Imagine that. That's your life. You can wake up in the morning one day. Again, I wanna go to the DNC. Why Bob? Well, 'cause I need somebody to tie off my spermatic cord. Okay, well that's, yeah, well that, that's a, that's a choice. You're making Planned Parenthood great rivers, which serves most of Missouri and part of southern Illinois is sending a mobile health center to the Windy City's West Loop to offer reproductive services on Monday and Tuesday. Medication abortions are reportedly available on both days. I mean, it ain't a party unless you're passing out the abortion pills, as we all know. Pretty special. Plus, in addition to the mobile clinic, another group called Americans for Contraception is going to erect an 18 foot tall inflatable intrauterine device. Or IUD named Frida Womb. Get it? 'cause they're freeing the womb of babies. That's, that's that. They're freeing the womb. By the way, idolatry takes many forms. That's a weird one. Your giant idol of an IUD is sort of strange. I mean the services will be provided on a sliding fee scale. Pay what you can get the healthcare you need according to the appointment reservation form. So exciting. So you're gonna fight the the cat lady meme by erecting an 18 foot intrauterine device and providing free vasectomies and abortions to people. Don't worry, it's the Republicans who are weird. Don't worry guys. It's Republicans who are weird. It's Democrats who are Don dressing up as the abortion pill in the streets of Chicago. It's Republicans who are weird. Also, there might be some social unrest this week in Chicago. And as social unrest escalates in crime rates climb, securing the safety of your family is more crucial than ever. I'm about as pro Second Amendment as it gets the thought of using lethal force in my house. I mean, if I've got an alternative, I'll use it, which is why I have burnout. Introducing the burnout un gunn, the non-lethal self-defense platform. Lightweight and simple to use it. Use an easy to load five round magazine. It's powered by an eight gram CO2 cartridge burn. Launchers fire, a 68 caliber chemical fill projectile using patented pull pierce technology where the CO2 canister is only punctured on the first trigger pull. That means your launcher is always at the ready. It's capable of incapacitating an attacker for over 30 minutes. It's accurate and effective at over 60 feet. It requires no permits, no background checks. It is interstate travel friendly. With Berna, you will be prepared to defend. And Berna is a safe or more sensible alternative that could potentially save lives on both sides, protecting both the user and the aggressor. Visit berna.com/ Ben for 10% off your purchase. That's BYR na.com/ Ben. Check out the latest news about bya, that's BYR na.com/ Ben by.com/ Ben. Get 10% off your purchase. Meanwhile, the actual schedule for the DNC lineup, are you ready? It's gonna be so great. Monday is called for the people, ironically for the people involved talking to the person who is de fenestrated because he got all of the Democratic votes in the primaries. So for the people by, for the people they mean for not the people. 'cause literally no one voted for Kamala Harris ever, ever in the history of presidential politics. At no time. Won zero votes in the presidential primaries of 2020, won zero votes in the presidential primaries of 2024. And yet here she is, magic and joy and return on interest in, in terms of, and in terms of, so Monday is called for the people. Do you feel it? Do you feel the joy? So Joe Biden and Dr. Jill, the actual president of the United States will speak along with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. I love, they're just shuttling Hillary to Monday night. Like, okay, everybody on the stage who we hate and want to go away. Hillary Clinton, come on up. There'll also be a welcome from Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has also locked all of the medicine cabinets at the CVSs locally to make sure that nobody steals all of the medications. Things are going great in Chicago. So that is on Monday. Tuesday is a bold vision for America's future. And this will be bringing up former President Obama because when I think forward, I think the president who left office in 2016 also, apparently Michelle Obama is going to speak as well because she's a black woman and that means that she must speak. And they're also having second gentleman, Doug Emh speak, but not the nanny. And there will be a welcome from rotund Illinois, governor JB Pritzker, who will be lowered into the convention hall by Crane. Wednesday is a fight for our freedoms. A fight for our freedoms will be led by vice presidential nominee. Tim Walls who shut down the entire state of Minnesota for covid and also for fun and rioting, because that's what I think of what I think of freedom. But what they really mean is freedom to oop, that's, that's what they mean. Proceeded by former President Clinton, who very much is into the freedom to stu. That's like his thing, man. Speaker emerita, Nancy Pelosi and transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg will be there too, by the way. You gotta feel for the other members of the, of the Biden cabinet. Seriously, you have to feel for them. I mean their, their big sin, of course is not being gay. That's a huge problem. I love the Pete Buttigieg, maybe the most incompetent member of an incredibly incompetent cabinet. They're like, you know what, that guy, he's getting a primetime speech on Wednesday. Why? Well, he does like dudes. I mean that, that's, that's a, that's a pretty rich resume right there. That dude is very into the dudes. He must speak. They're like, wait, but he's the transportation secretary. Haven't we had like more transportation failures over the course of the last three and a half years than any time in modern American history? The answer to your question is yes. Wait, didn't that guy go on paternity leave for like two months and nobody even noticed 'cause he was so incompetent. The answer to that one is also yes, but does like the dudes again, like you're just imagine that you are Gina Raimondo or something and you are a member of the Biden cabinet. You're the Secretary of Commerce and you're like, why? Why don't I get to speak? Well, I mean Gina, you are straight. So that's gonna be a no on that Thursday is for our future. Harris accepts the conventions nomination for president. So boy is it gonna be a cavalcade of stars. So much unity, so much other speakers will include Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer, who will be pitching his new book Antisemitism, how I did It, and House Democratic Leader, Hakeem Jeffries. Also, I love this former President Carter's grandson, Jason Carter is expected to speak on behalf of his grandfather who said he hopes to stay li alive long enough to vote for Kamala Harris. Great. I mean you bring up Spectors of the past like Jimmy Carter, it's going amazing. So the stairs at the delegate entrance will say history is in your hands. A quote from Biden's Oval Office address July 24th, which is just after he was thrown off a moving train. As delegates arrive on Monday ahead of the Biden speech, digital signage in the United Center will say history is in your hands and spread the faith. And by spread the faith, by the way, they do not mean like Christianity or anything biblically related. Spread the faith means 18 foot statues valued. That's what that means. So there's gonna be so much unity. Are you excited? And tonight, of course it leads off with a tribute to the the dearly departed Joe Biden. They're gonna wheel his body onto stage in its sarcophagus. His mouth will move for a bit and then he will stumble off the stage and everyone will treat him as though he's cincin ATUs who is leaving his leadership position in order to go back to his farm. He's George Washington, leaving off his leadership of the Continental Army to go back to Mount Vernon. That is, that is Joe Biden. When in reality what happened to Joe Biden is that they came up behind him at Ford's theater and put two in the back of the political head. That's what actually happened to Joe Biden And. everybody knows it and they're all pretending. So tonight we're gonna get pretend night. They give him the honorary gold watch after 50 years of service, and then they shuttle him off somewhere quiet to Shady Lane in order to live out his final remaining years being presided over by Dr. Jill Biden, who will occasionally take his pulse and bore him to death with stories about community college while he sleeps on a beach in Republic Beach, Delaware. By the way, he's still the president. Just gonna point that out. Still the president all the way until January. So while they wheel out this dead person and say we couldn't have him. I mean, look at him. He is dead. That dude is still the president and is still presumably leading the country. It's gonna be amazing. Even Maureen Dowd over at the New York Times, like by the way, they cooed that guy out. Yes, yes they did. I know we're supposed to stop talking about that. But Kamala Harris is the current nominee because she cooed out the guy in front of her. That is what happened. Now, you may like it. You may think it's smart politics. It is smart politics, by the way. Doesn't mean it's not pretty squirrels. Turns out it is a little squirrels to wait until the dude wins the entire nominating process. He had no one run against him could run against him. No one ran against him. And then they just took that nomination and picked it up from him after he failed in debate against Donald Trump. And then they handed it directly to her. And then they said that she is such a wonderful and joyous candidate that she didn't even need to run. That's how great she is. She didn't even need to run. That's how good she is. Maureen Dos says, we head to Chicago on a wave of euphoria, exuberance, exultation, excitement, and even you might say ecstasy. She got very into the alliteration right there. It's gonna be a glorious coronation except that everybody's mad at one another. Yeah, this is the dirty secret. Top. Democrats are bristling with resentment even as they're about to try to put on a united front at the United Center in the windy city, a cory of powerful Democrats maneuvered behind the scenes to push an incumbent president outta the race. It wasn't exactly as Julius Caesar in Rehoboth Beach, but it was a tectonic shift. And of course there were going to be serious reverberations even though it was the right thing to do because Joe Biden was not gonna be able to campaign much less service president for another four years and a fully vital way. It was a jaw, a jaw dropping pooch. She is correct. How could Biden not be hurt that the Democratic convention went from four days of sitting Shiva as James Carville put it to a joyful romp with Kamala ato. The ticket Democrat after Democrat, who had been close to Biden before conspiring push him out, had to confess to cable anchors. They had not been able to talk to the president who was sulking in his tent party. Leaders whitewashed the coup by Ornately extolling Biden. James Gladin told CNN Biden had a record. No president of the United States could ever match. Pelosi proposed that Biden's face should be carved on Mount Rushmore Despite, the grandiose flattery Joe, Joe and Hunter were not fooled or appeased. That is true. That is true. All the talk about how there is going to be a big kumbaya moment here. I don't know if it's gonna go quite that way, but they're gonna try and paper it over with a bunch of false joy. So you have Jen Psaki, former press secretary for Joe Biden and Amy Klobuchar who likes to throw binders at her staff suggesting that they're shedding tears of joy over Jo. There will be tears of joy tonight for Joe Biden. I mean the tears of joy that he's not your nominee. Because if you're a nominee, you'd be losing right now. And instead you decided to put up a diverse cipher of whom zero questions will be asked and zero questions will be answered. 'cause every time she answers a question, she sounds like somebody who stumped her face on a brick when she was two years old. Well, the media have no problem being sexually titillated by the Harris Walls campaign, but dudes, have you ever heard of Rose Sparks? This dual action prescription merges the powerhouse ingredients found in generic Viagra and Cialis, sildenafil and tadalafil into one formidable treatment. It's not merely about the ingredients in the medication, it's how you're taking it. That's why Rose Sparks are designed to dissolve under the tongue. That's huge because dissolvable treatment hits your bloodstream much faster than old school pills. The result, quicker onset of action, reducing the wait time typically associated with traditional pills. Plus Tadalofil, the active ingredient in cis lasts in the system for up to 36 hours. For treatment that works fast and lasts long, connect to the provider at Ro dot co slash Ben. Find out if Ro sparks are right for you. That's Ro dot co slash Ben. Again, that's Ro dot co slash Ben. Compounded drugs are permitted to be prescribed under federal law, but are not FDA approved. And do not undergo FDA safety effectiveness or manufacturing review only available if prescribed after an online consultation with a provider. Go check them out right now. That's Ro dot co slash Ben. Find out if Ro sparks are right for you. RO do co slash Ben. Again, that's r o.co/ Ben. Anyway, here is Jen Psaki and Amy Kja. You've known him a long time. You've worked closely with him. I wanted to ask you about what do you think the hall is gonna be like tomorrow night when he speaks There is gonna be so much love for Joe Biden. So much love. There's gonna be tours of joy. Yeah, it's when he walks into that hall and what he has done, and I love that major focus of this is gonna be on democracy. He literally saved our democracy in the us. He saved our democracy in the US as Amy Klobuchar. Do you mean he saved our democracy by being forced out of the nomination that he won in a democratic series of elections? 'cause that's the read. It's not just gonna be interior backstabbing behind the scenes. By the way, if Kamala Harris loses Joe Biden is gonna have the best time, like seriously that dude is prepping. He would love nothing better than for Kamala Harris to lose. If Kamala Harris loses, Joe Biden is gonna be able to say, I told y'all, I told you, I told you you should've left me in place and now she lost and you forced me out. So that's you. That's on you. It's your fault. Like wait, the, the recriminations will be delicious if somehow Kamala Harris manages to lose this election, even if she wins the election, he's just gonna be seen as the transitional guy who somehow stopped Donald Trump in 2020 and then got then got his ass handed to him by 84-year-old Nancy Pelosi and all of the chief donors in the Democratic Party. So that is kind of one side of the rift and the other is the public rift. So the public rift continues and it turns out that the Democrats can never appease their radical left too much. So DNC was starting to welcome people yesterday and the protesters were already there. They showed up and they were protesting. They were holding their pro kamas signs going wild. Again, this is the pro kamas wing of the Democratic party to which Kamala Harris wishes to appeal. Here's a lady holding a sign saying, stop the genocide. Stop apartheid, cease fire. Now white lady from Chicago of course Should probably move there some. You got some code ping people out there Right over here on the ground. I know, but she's, You got some people holding queer as in free Palestine. That's That's one of my favorites. Queer as in Free Palestine. Nothing more fun than chickens for KFC over there. Queers for free Palestine. So they all showed up and they made fools of themselves and there will be many more of them. There are gonna be tens of thousands of people who actually show up ready to protest. Kamala Harris. Some of them showed up holding signs that said Killer Kamala, which should be fun for her to deal with. Meanwhile, she's in the back room negotiating with the pro Kama crowd. John Fetterman, by the way, the pro-Israel senator from Pennsylvania. He's not even showing up at the DNC 'cause he is like, I don't know, I got some questions here, gang. And he ain't wrong. According to Breitbart, vice president Kamala Harris secretly met last week with the radical anti-Semitic mayor of Dearborn, Michigan in an effort to court Muslim and Arab American voters. The meeting was reported by the Associated Press buried within an article published on Saturday about the so-called Uncommitted Group of voters, particularly in Michigan while trying to push the Democratic Party into an openly anti-Israel position. The AP reported top Democrats have spent weeks meeting with uncommitted voters and their allies, including a previously unreported sit down between VP Harris and the mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. During a campaign trip to Michigan. Last week, Harris met with Abdulah Hamud, the 34-year-old mayor of Dearborn, a Detroit suburb that has the largest number of Arab Americans of any city in the United States. They also have pro Hamas and pro Hezbollah rallies on the regular. A person familiar with the meeting did not provide specific details, but said the focus was on Harris's potential policy if elected on the Israel Hamas conflict. She has already expressed her possible openness to a full on arms embargo against Israel. Obviously this also happens to be a person who has spent years basically justifying the murder of Israelis. On October 7th, he tweeted Israel's decades of illegal military occupation and imprisonment of Gaza make peace impossible and tragic violence inevitable. October 7th was inevitable. According to this person in Kamala Harris had to go listen to him. So she's gonna keep trying to appease these people and meanwhile, they are going to keep protesting her. So it should be a fun dynamic. According to Jillian k Mel writing for the Wall Street Journal, whether it's genocide Joe or killer Kamala, the butchers of Gaza cannot be allowed to gather in Chicago. Undisturbed according to self-described anti-imperialist organization behind enemy limes. That's from an Instagram post last month and called for protestors to make it greatly 68 and shut down the DNC for Gaza. That group is coordinating with Palestine action Us, which encourages vandalism and other unlawful acts. And Sammi Dun, the Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, which cheered Hamas' October 7th massacre and has ties to terrorism. Those are the usual suspects. Another factor is driving the protests toward escalation. The anti-Israel crowd has United with radical environmentalists and anti-police activists who've spent years honing unlawful tactics, including setting up encampments, vandalizing property, brawling with the cops, and de arresting their comrades, physically intervening to prevent an arrest. And the history of this movement goes back years at this point. According to Mechi, a member of the journal's editorial board, the 2020 protest took a toll on the Chicago Police Department, which last month had fewer than 11,600 officers Despite a budget for nearly 13,000. The local police will get help from state and federal law enforcement. It's possible they'll succeed in containing the protests, even if so, expect to see more lawlessness and disorder on campuses and city streets this fall. So this is going to be a running problem for the Democrats and it is not going away. Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has done virtually nothing to crack down on criminality in his city. He says, don't worry, we're ready. It's all good. Don't worry. Do you have any concerns? We're ready for this convention. Look, our local police department has worked with the Secret Service as well as other local agencies to ensure a safe, peaceful, yet vibrant, exciting convention. The City of Chicago has been rated number one as it relates to convention centers and how we make sure that we protect people while also providing an opportunity to see the beauty and the soul of who we are. Okay, well good luck with that. I mean, seriously, I love, I love that they rely on the cops when it comes time to make the DN nnc not look bad. But Brandon Johnson has been the most anti-cop mayor in America and been willing to undercut the cops at every available turn, but he's relying on the cops to make the D NNC not look bad. Well, listen, Chicago is probably filled with problems, including HR problems because I mean, would you wanna hire any of these promos people? Listen, when we started Daily Wire, the biggest question mark was what we would do for hr. We are focused on creating engaging content. It was difficult to find a managing professional capable of handling the day-to-Day HR tasks. That sounds like you, you need to talk to my friends over at Bambi. With Bambee, you're not just getting an HR manager, you're getting a dedicated partner who's available by phone, email, and realtime chat. They'll handle crucial tasks like employee onboarding, terminations, and performance reviews with BAM Bee's HR Autopilot feature. You can streamline essential HR practices like employee training and feedback procedures, freeing up time for what really matters to your business. All of BAM Bee's HR managers are based in the United States and can support the nuances across all 50 states. HR managers can easily cost 80 grand annually, but BAM Bee starts just 99 bucks monthly. So no matter the size of your business, Bambee can work for you. Do not wait another minute. Schedule your free consultation by visiting Bambee dot com right now. Type Ben Shapiro under podcast when you sign up. That's spelled B-A-M-B-E e.com. Bambee dot com type in Ben Shapiro. Well, best of hopes for the city of Chicago and the D NNC in terms of violence. Good luck storming the Castle Boys. Meanwhile, by the way, things are going so well that house Democrats attending the D nnc are being advised by congressional security officials not to book hotel rooms under their own names or engaged with protestors have confronted according to Axios that guidance comes as some democratic lawmakers are fearful about their own safety after being rattled by a series of disruptive pro-Palestinian protests since the Israel Kamas War started last year. It does show you where Democrats heads are at just generally if, if Republicans are confronted by a pro kamas protestors, they go right back at them and tell 'em they're schmucks and a waste of oxygen. And if pro-Palestine, pro Hamas protestors go up to Democrats, the Democrats immediately begin kowtowing to them and asking what they can do to make them feel better, which kind of explains democratic foreign policy when it comes to the Middle East. One house Democrats told access, they're very concerned about their personal security and that of course other lawmakers are as well. A Senior House Democrat said, law enforcement is telling members not to go to a certain area because they expect violence in a guidance sent to congressional staffers and obtained by Axios, the House Sergeant in Arm's office wrote, if you're confronted by protestors, try not to engage and report to Capitol police. So good luck. Hope you have a wonderful convention. You deserve every little bit of this. Meanwhile, again, Kamala, right now, this is not a runaway race. Okay? This kind of notion that the race is over already, no, it really, really, really is not. It's currently August 20 19th. There are another, I believe, 29 days until the voting begins in Pennsylvania, and that's just when the voting begins in Pennsylvania. The election, of course, is not until the beginning of November. Right now, Kamala Harris has the momentum, but this is also her high watermark because what else could break that would help her at this point? According to Nate Silver's analysis of the polling, right now, she's ahead by about two and a half percent nationally. But when it comes to Arizona, she's up by like a point and a half When it comes to Georgia, he is up when it comes to Michigan, she's up by maybe three points when it comes to Pennsylvania. She's up by a point and a half. All of these are margin of error races. All of them are margin of error races. And that means that if Kamala Harris starts to come back to earth, she's got a problem. She is not, in fact blowing him out. She's not up seven points, she's not up five points, she's up more like a point and a half or two. Okay? That is not enough to give her breathing room where she should feel as comfortable as she obviously does right now, the New York Times has an entire piece today titled two Undecided Voters. Harris is famous but unknown. They want to learn more. Well, I mean, you know, you could. I have a way for her people to learn more about her positions. That'd be if the New York Times covered her positions, it's actually your job. It's what you get paid to do. Terry York Singleton is certain about one thing, as she considers the November election, she will not vote for Donald Trump while she finds Vice President Kamala Harris', sudden entry in the presidential race. Refreshing. She has not closed the sale quote. I need more information from her. Said Ms. York Singleton 68. She listed the cost of medication and childcare as well as homelessness as problems. She wants to hear Ms. Harris discuss. That's not a true swing voter because this person knows she's not voting for Trump. Of course, there are a bunch of people who don't know whether they're gonna vote for Trump and so far they don't know anything about Kamala Harris's positions, which are indeed trash. And once again, when Kamala Harris gets off script, even sometimes when she's on script, she is a disaster area and the public have not been treated to that yet. For example, the Trump campaign sort of hilariously put together a mock ad about Kamala Harris, and it was just a speech in which she was explaining price increases under the Biden administration. Here's what it looked like A lot. A loaf of bread cost 50% more today than it did before. The pandemic ground beef is up almost 50%. And then it went to, this has been an ad for Donald J. Trump, right? Again, Kamala, she's right. Those prices are up. I wonder why they're up. I want, and you can't just paper that crap over with joy. You can't paper that over by saying return on investment 27 times in a row. Yeah, I can't do that. It is a waste of time and people I hope can see through that you would hope. And in democracy, people can see through that. And in second we'll get to Kamala Harris'. Economic plans, the failures thereof, and the fact that Democrats have no way to actually defend this stuff. I'll get to that in just one second. First, over the weekend, we got word from theaters nationwide, Am I Racist, which is Matt Walsh's new movie. The advanced tickets are selling super fast. We're also hearing from people in cities across the country saying their theater is not yet carrying mi racist. So here's how you change that. If you haven't yet purchased your advanced tickets, go to mi racist.com today. Help fill these theaters and secure even more theaters. Every ticket sold today determines how many theaters will even show the film. September 13th, Matt Walsh, what'll lead destroyed leftist gender theory and what is woman has now infiltrated the absurd world of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Lemme tell you what he's uncovered is simultaneously hilarious and infuriating. Now, the initial response to the tickets has been absolutely phenomenal. We can't let up go to mi racist.com, get your advanced tickets today. Do not wait. This is how we reclaim the culture, folks with facts, logic, and filled theater seats. Now again, nobody knows anything about Kamala Harris's position. She keeps saying dumb crap. And then when she's asked about it, she word vomits for like a minute and a half and repeats phrases like in terms of, because that is her verbal crutch. She doesn't know where to go with anything, so she'll just speak. Well, you know, when it comes to democracy, when it comes to democracy in terms of, in terms of the depth of the interest that people have in the world, in democracy, in terms of in terms, oh my God, she's so terrible. Which is why, which is why Democrats have to keep hiding all of this. Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic House minority leader, he was asked about her economic record. 'cause it turns out she's been part of an administration. We know what it looks like. They did a terrible job. And he said she inherited catastrophes. I have a question. Is she inheriting one right now? Right now? Like really, that has a yes or no answer. If she becomes president, will she be inheriting a catastrophe? Because there has to be some excuse for economic policy and she's been here for three and a half years. Here's Hakeem Jeff trying to walk right past this one. President Biden and Vice President Harris inherited three catastrophes from the prior president. At the same time, there was a public health catastrophe connected to the COVID-19 pandemic. That was an economic catastrophe that resulted from the shutdown of our economy. And of course, there was a democracy catastrophe related to the January 6th violent assault on the capitol incited by the former president as part of the effort to halt the peaceful transfer of power. Yeah, that was, that was really the big problem. It was not their crap policy over the course of the last three and a half years. It was that you inherited catastrophes. I dunno how much longer you can blame the Trump administration for things that are your own fault, but they're gonna keep trying. Meanwhile, Democrats keep trying to explain what exactly Kamala Harris meant when she said she was going to curb grocery prices with price gouging laws, which is totally insane. It is totally crazy. Excellent thread by a guy named Robert Sterling. He's a CFO investor, and he used to work in m and a in the food industry. He says, here is what would actually happen. The government announces grocery retailers aren't allowed to raise prices. Grocery stores, which operate on one to 2% net margins can't survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers also aren't allowed to raise prices. Not all grocery stores are created. Equal stores in lower income areas make less money than those in higher income areas. As the former disproportionately sell lower margin prepackaged food instead of higher mar margin. Fresh products like meat, because stores in lower income areas aren't able to cover overhead, grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low income urban areas like become worse. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding their primary costs. Ingredients, energy and labor aren't fixed. They're shrinking. Gross profits leave less cashflow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities reinvest in additional protection capacity. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space start to repurpose their stores to sell more non-price controlled items. Everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel and less price controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chains start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can't compete by offering stronger prices, because again, producers aren't allowed to raise prices. They compete on things like payment terms. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely or get sold to larger chains like Kroger, in addition to not being able to to cover fixed costs. A major reason for this is they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products because producers are prioritizing sales to larger customers. Smaller food producers start to go outta business because these producers have an additional step, their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren't able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important. Deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so. Then the supply chains break down, so lines start to format outside grocery stores every morning. The federal government then announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA sees his closed down production facilities. The government then announces that prices for all key food costs are now fixed to stop profiteers from gouging at the now government operated food industry. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding communism, mass starvation, the end of America quickly ensue, Hey, wait a second. 'cause that's a pretty good explanation of exactly how Kamala Harris' policies actually work. But here is Democratic governor of Kentucky, Andy Beshear saying that the price gouging plan is basically no different from Teddy Roosevelt's trust busting. This is really supply and demand, which we all respect. It's no different than what Teddy Roosevelt did in breaking up monopolies. It's just making sure we have the right regulations and tools in place to make sure everybody is playing the game fairly and by the rules. Okay, that is absurd. Absurd. Okay. There are already antitrust regulations on the books. If the idea is the food industry is violating monopoly laws by providing non-competitive prices via collusion, there are already laws on the books for that. That's not what she's talking about. She is talking about the dumbest economic policy ever proposed, which is price controls on food literally fails everywhere at trial tried, and that that is what she's pushing. And again, Democrats have no answers for this. So their entire goal is to never answer about any of this. By the way, this is true of every audacious Kamala Harris policy. This has been true since 2019. She'll throw out a policy like Medicare for All, then she'll be asked, wait, do you mean outlawing private health insurance? And she'll be like, mm, yeah. And then And, everybody goes, wait, what the F? And then she's like, I never meant that. Or she'll say, yes, I, I would ban fracking on day one. And then they'll be like, wait, what? Like ban it seriously. And she'd be like, and then everybody in Pennsylvania goes, wait, hold up. And she goes, I never meant that. This is like, I mean it literally, her entire career is this. She did this with Joe Biden too. She said, if it weren't for Joe, if Joe Biden had gotten his way, little girls like me, I was that little girl. And they're like, well, no, you actually weren't that little girl. It turns out that job. Are you in favor of force busing now? Like what's, what's the actual thing that you're in favor of? Like, yes, I'm in favor of force busing. And then it turns out everyone hates force busing. And she's like, no, I'm not for force bus. This is every position she has ever taken on anything, on anything. So how do you expect other Democrats to defend her? NBC's Kristin Wilker had on Gretchen Whitmer, who is not chosen for vice president and is governor of Michigan to discuss Kamala Harris's economic plans. It did not go amazing because her economic plans suck, Delve into some of the policies. The vice president laid out some of her economic policies this week. Among other things, she's proposing a ban on price gouging. Here is what Obama administration, economist Jason Furman had to say. He said, quote, this is not sensible policy. And I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and not reality. There's no upside here, and there is some downside. He warned effectively that price controls could ultimately stifle economic growth. So do you think that's the best way to bring down prices in Michigan? Well, I think people are, are reading too much into what has been put out there. Oh, we know that Kamala Harris is gonna be focused on building up more affordable housing. We know that Kamala Harris has already delivered on making sure that healthcare is more accessible and affordable for Americans and we'll protect Obamacare. That's a million people who have healthcare in Michigan right now that Donald Trump's been trying to rip away. So I noticed that you didn't answer any of the questions, which is going to be the pattern all the way up until the election. Even on CNN, some of the commentators were like, by the way, her economic plans make no sense at all. She had took a lot of far left positions during her first run in 2019 and 2020. She has, you know, temporarily kind of moderated these through some anonymous quotes from AIDS saying, well, she doesn't really wanna ban fracking anymore. She doesn't wanna do this, doesn't wanna do that. This new program that she's kinda doing is pretty far left. $25,000 price controls essentially. That's number one. But the other thing is, you know, kind of conveniently forgot, she was vice president for the last four years when a lot of the housing market crisis was at its worst when inflation was at its worst. So there's a lot of memory holding that. But look, when it comes to the 20 5K, I mean, you just added $25,000 into every price in, in, on every home price in the country. Because if you're giving that away essentially for free, people will add it into the price. Pretty amazing, pretty amazing. And again, that is totally right. Of course. Now to be fair, that was a commentator who used to work for Tim Scott, but this is not foreign to the Democratic party. Tim Walls, everybody's favorite. Midwestern dad. He's just like you. He's a normal Midwestern dad who got caught doing a DUI 90 something in a 55 mile per hour zone and then claimed that he was deaf. He, he pretended that he had a title that he didn't have in the military. He cut out his military service before going to Iraq with his guys, and also as a high school teacher in the 1990s. Apparently he extolled life under Chinese communism, telling his students, it is a system in which everyone shares and gets free food and housing. He said during a lesson in November, 1991, it means that everyone is the same and everyone shares the doctor and the construction worker make the same. The Chinese government and the place they work provide for housing. And about 14 kilograms or 30 pounds of rice per month, they get food and housing. Wow, what a, what a great, what a great teacher. He's just like a normal Midwestern communist. So yes, this is an extraordinarily radical ticket. It is a very, very radical ticket indeed, which is what Donald Trump should be focusing on. And to be fair, sometimes he's trying to focus on that. Sometimes he's not. So President Trump, over the weekend, he was going out on the campaign trail. He said, we'll, defeat communist Kamala. Now again, I, I don't think that this nickname is gonna stick either. I'm gonna push very hard for Kamala liar, Kamala liar. We tried Kamala, not sure that it's gonna completely catch on. It's been a while. I'm gonna go Kam a liar, because frankly, I think communist Kamala is too much in, in terms of people. It's a mouthful. But here's President Trump trying it out. 80 days from now, we are going to defeat a communist known as Kamala Harris. She's a communist, most radical left person ever to run for office. This is not what this country needs. We've had enough of him. So he's not wrong. I'm not sure that that attack line is going to be vir enough. He needs to actually spell out all the problems with her policies that would involve him not doing comparisons between his looks and her looks. For example, again, distractibility is not an asset on the campaign trail at this point. This is an incredibly tight election. This election is gonna be decided by tens of thousands of votes in a few states. It really is that. So when President Trump does the, I'm better looking than Kamala Harris routine, it may be funny, but he needs to stop talking to the people who are in the crowd at the rally and start talking to, you know, the people who are across America. She said one thing that got me, she said, Kamala has one big advantage. She's a very beautiful woman. She's a beautiful woman. So I decide to go back and reread the clause. I'm not saying he's, but I say that I am much better looking than her. I think I'm much better, much better. I'm a better looking person than Kamala. Like dude's hilarious. It's funny, but like who's the moderate voter? Who's like, that is true. He is a better looking person than Kamala Harris. I'm gonna vote like I on the prize, my man. I on the prize. If you'd like to beat the president of the United States, which again, I would like to not have a communist for Presidents of the United States. So I'm, I'm rooting hard for this. College is expensive, but being a man shouldn't be score 60% off Jeremy's razor's, one year of shaving and dominate campus life while others conform. You'll stand out clean, shaven and unapologetic. The precision five delivers an exceptionally smooth and close shave, designed with a precision tremor for keeping your edge and an ergonomic handle for superior control. Major in masculinity at jeremy's razors.com. Today, Alrightyy, so over in Israel, the Blinken State Department continues to push the idea that a ceasefire is just around the corner. There's only one problem. Hamas keeps rejecting ceasefire deals because of course it's not in Hamas' interest to come to a ceasefire. The minute there's a ceasefire, then Hamas has to get up the hostages. The minute that Hamas gives up the hostages, they have nothing else to bargain with, and then they're done. Then they're finished because the ceasefire will end. They will not give up their weapons. Israel will go in and finish off Yasir and drag his body out into the street. That is the way that this is going to go. Yasir knows this. His only path out he thinks is to drag Hezbollah and Iran directly into a larger scale war with Israel. Now, Hezbollah and Iran don't actually want that. Hezbollah are looking for a way to climb down the tree. They have basically said they're not going to allow Hamas to parish in Gaza, but they have no choice in the matter because Hamas is in fact losing in the Gaza strip. Hezbollah does not want to actually provoke a full out war with Israel because Israel will destroy them. It'll be incredibly bloody for Israel. Israel will lose a lot of civilians, a lot of citizens, and a lot of soldiers. But Israel will win because, because Hezbollah, Despite being a very large and well-armed terror group, Hezbollah does not have the military capacity of the Israeli Defense forces. And as far as Iran's forward capacity, Iran's forward capacity is largely Hezbollah. We saw that when they attempted to fire 300 rockets and drones into Israel, a few months back, half of them fell inside Iran. It turns out that Iran, its military forces, shall we say, are not up to snuff when it comes to long range projection, which is why instead they rely on proxy terror groups and they basically funnel money to those terror groups and some small arms and some rockets. In any case, the Hamas interests are not actually aligned at this point with Hezbollah and Iran, but Hezbollah and Iran have to claim that they are aligned because if they back down without Hamas backing down, Hamas looks to tough and robust, and Hezbollah and Iran both look like weaklings. So here is the misalignment. Now, there's only one way to rectify this misalignment, and it could be done very easily if Israel came forward and the Biden administration came forward and they said, listen, one more rocket fires. One more rocket fires, and Israel the chain's off. They can do whatever they want and we'll supply them with what they want, and they'll finish off the terror group and they'll do what they need to do to Iran's oil fields. So you better back the F down. They'd back down. It's that simple. And as far as Hamas goes, that's been true since the beginning of the war. If the United States said to Qatar, the airbase in Qatar goes away tomorrow, unless you force Hamas to release the hostages, those hostages would've been released within the very first month. Hey, now it's a little bit tougher because Yasar is in a Hitlerian bunker somewhere surrounded by innocent babies, innocent Israeli babies, because that's his only protection left at this point, which is why he's not gonna let them go. 'cause the minute he lets them go, Israel's gonna go in and kill him. And he knows that it's just a matter of time until they find 'em and they kill him. So that is the math on the ground. The Blinken State Department and the Biden administration are desperately attempting to prevent a conflict from breaking out this week. They don't want that conflict breaking out in the middle of the DNC, so they're trying to push it beyond Thursday. That's all this math is. That's all that it's, it's all just a waste of time because in reality, Israel cannot allow Hezbollah to continue to sit at its northern border threatening Israel's entire North. Right now, Israel's entire north is completely depopulated. There are a hundred thousand people who are not living in their homes in the north of Israel. There is a miles wide swath, miles deep swath of Israel that is completely depopulated right now, which means that Hezbollah effectively has military control over those areas. Israel cannot allow that. No sovereign country could, that'd be the equivalent of El Paso being evacuated because Mexican drug cartels were firing rockets over the border. That's effectively what's happening in the north of Israel right now. So Hamas, for its part the, the, the way can tell how weak the Biden administration is. The Biden administration keeps saying a deal is right around the corner and Hamas keeps saying no. And then the Biden administration keeps saying, no, no, no, but a deal is right around the corner. Hamas, the ones who are holding the babies, they say, no, it's not. In fact, just yesterday, Hamas rejected a new US proposal for a ceasefire. And of course they tried to blame Bibi Netanyahu and all the rest. The White House had claimed significant progress had been made during talks in Doha over the past several days. The rejection of the new proposal, which was presented to the parties on Friday, makes President Biden's goal of getting a deal this week, almost impossible. That is Barack Ravi, the sonographer for the White House. So Hamas keeps rejecting, not only do they keep rejecting over the weekend, a member of Hamas from the West Bank. They lie all the time. By the way, Hamas says they have no presence in the West Bank. In fact, they have a very large military presence in the West Bank. They're threatening the Palestinian authority. They tried to walk a dude in an explosive filled backpack into either a soccer stadium or a synagogue, unclear where he was going, and thank God his bomb blew up early. He had premature evacuation of his body and, and he blew up, which is excellent news. And he has now been united with 72 goats in the afterlife, presumably, according to the Jerusalem Post Hamas in conjunction with Palestinian Islamic Jihad, has now claimed responsibility for the terror attack in Tel Aviv on Sunday, in which an explosive device detonated the group announced via the their all Cassam brigades at Telegram account on Monday. So it wasn't enough for Hamas to try to kill a bunch of Jews at synagogue. It wasn't enough for them to try to do that. They claim credit for it. Why do they claim credit for it? Because they keep saying over and over. Yasar is, he's shouting to the wind, I do not accept a deal. I do not want a deal. And they're hoping that the Biden administration will force Israel to simply stop operations in the absence of a deal. It's not gonna happen. Israel's not gonna stop its operations. They're gonna continue to try to find their hostages. They're gonna continue to kill top level members of Hamas. It is that simple. And this, of course, is a major problem for the Democratic Party, which is beholden to its radical pro Hamas wing. This is why Senator Tammy Duckworth of Wisconsin. She says that Kamala Harris is gonna talk about getting more humanitarian aid into Gaza. There is not a humanitarian aid crisis about how much food is getting shipped into Gaza. Kamas is just stealing it all and shooting people. You're expecting thousands, tens of thousands of protestors here. How does Kamala Harris differentiate herself from Joe Biden? Or will she differentiate herself from Joe Biden? I think we need to work hard on getting the ceasefire agreement. And I think what she can push for is to talk about making sure that we get the humanitarian aid into Gaza. And I think she will lean more heavily towards the humanitarian side of things. And in fact, you know, we, we have issues right now where at different times, different sites have opposed the deal. We're very close to getting a ceasefire agreement on both sides. But I think you're gonna see Kamala talking more about getting humanitarian aid into Gaza. Now they're using that as an excuse to try and buy off the promos protestors. It isn't gonna work because obviously they don't care about the humanitarian aid. They want more dead Palestinians because their goal is more dead Palestinians meaning better coverage in the West, and they hope that will force Israel to back off from its military operations in Gaza. Bottom line is this, when you show weakness to terrorists, they tend to exacerbate their violence. It's that simple. It's that simple. But the Biden administration, because they're cowards and fools, they continue to pretend not to understand any of that already. Guys coming up, we'll be joined on the line by Kathy Lee Gifford four time Emmy Award winner and author of the new book, Herod Mary, if you're not a member, become member, use Coach Shapiro. Check out for two months free on all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us. Republicans are Nazis. You cannot separate yourselves from the bad white people. Make Those. Growing up, I never thought much about race. Never really seemed to matter that much, at least not to me, Am, I, Racist. I would really appreciate it if you love, I'm trying to learn. I'm on this journey. I'm gonna sort this out. I need to go deeper undercover, say I'm racist. Joining us now is Matt certified DEI expert, here's my certification. And what you're doing is you're stretching out of your whiteness. This more for you in this field. Is America inherently racist? The word inherent is challenging there. I wanna rename the George Washington monument to the George Floyd Monument. America is racist to its bones. So inherently, yes, This country is a piece of White folks. Trash white supremacy, white woman, white boy. Is there a black person around black person right here? Does he not exist? They'll say I'm racist. Hi Robin. Hi. What's your name? I'm Matt. I just had to ask who you are because you have to be careful. Never be too careful. They gonna say, you racist. Buy your tickets now in Theater. September 13th rated PG 13. Building a business may feel like a big jump, but OnDeck small business loans can help keep you afloat with lines of credit up to $100,000 in term loans up to 250,000. OnDeck lets you choose the loan that's right for your business. As a top rated online small business lender, OnDeck team of loan advisors can help you find the right business loan to fit your needs. Visit ondeck.com for more information. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not land in North Dakota. All loans and amount subject to lender approval This summer. Enjoy less sunscreen smell, and more new car smell. Make room for more than just memories with a Lexus SUV. Find offers on select SUVs at the Lexus Golden Opportunity Sales Event. Lease the 2024 RX three 50 all wheel drive for 5 39 a month for 36 months with 49 99 to each side. Experience amazing at your Lexus dealer. Call One 800 USA Lexus full important lease offer and pricing details on all customers will qualify. Offer available in the Eastern area only in September 3rd, 2024.

right

ep dnc begin free abortion vasectomy plus hamas publish alzheimers association walk end alzheimer walk mean mean fight different future family face disease today treatment walk end alzheimer walk fight stop disease close need join world large fundraiser fight disease register today azorgwalk today big day democrats dnc begin d c d cs dnc m talk like democratic national convention dilation securage abortion procedure way fact provide free dnc exciting news begin poll recap right kamala harris hold small steady lead nationally variety poll currently donald trump washington post bc ipsos poll s poll cbs news show overall right s lead national polling accord real clear politic polling average point half close raise fiveway average point half look battleground state s currently lead accord real clear politic polling average wisconsin s dead pennsylvania s lead michigan remember win state win election mean donald trump go to bump post convention imagine kamala harris little bit bump convention honestly golden honeymoon period take joe biden throw cliff m sure room grow postconvention go to try spread feeling joy feeling joy feeling joy deeply reliant course answer series difficult question weekend answer question m go to hesitantly move calendar little bit cause answer question kinda look moment overall sit like interview scale actual long form disquisition position bring day s correct month congratulation kamala harris amazing campaign rollout campaign rollout amazing day have answer policy campaign far completely reliant suppose good feeling suppose m stuff incredibly grate m tell joy joy happiness joy wanna vomit wanna vomit politic somebody professionally typically bring joy reason not bring joy cause joy relegate part life know part child wife community thing enjoy feel joy politician feel joy kamala harris dance like clown tim wall not feel warm fuzzie tim wall hand kamala harris bag dorito s run weekend big clip go viral wahls campaign wahls harris campaign fact kamala harris answer question try answer question not amazing clip want viral give bag dorito cause s like normal people weekly politician like hey chance kamala harris get bus eat dorito zero not matter go convenience store cause regular folk tim wall kamala harris experience joy corn nut tim corn nut s give dorito nuts like corn nut give dorito s like okay tim s s great s amazing remember historically good candidate accord medium simultaneously refuse hold account actually answer trash policy position s reason not wanna hold accountable minute get script man scale disaster area donald trump say s particularly bright be not particularly bright kamala harris try explain power significance passage time democracy man lady swear fourth grader not read school assignment ask write word essay go to run sentence election understand importance beautiful country term stand globe democracy hell democracy know s duality nature democracy duality hand incredible strength intact people protect defend right liberty freedom incredibly strong incredibly fragile like bird like little bird know hand strong like powerful champion hand fragile sparrow crush s terrible say okay fine point step bus somebody little hesitant calendar ask question question economic policy sense madam answer answer go explain power essential oil form pyramid scheme say return investment lot okay ve somebody knock door try involve pyramid scheme mlm kamala harris political mlm saleswoman s idea f s talk like say like return investment return investment real great investor know s warren buffett instead check fundamental company bring spokesperson spokesperson say return investment time row toss billion dollar kamala harris know lot return investment mean actually know return investment s run business run business need good employee actual return investment daily wire ve hire lot highly skilled people grow creative powerhouse editor attorney engineer like fabiola fabiola start year ago travel world handle wardrobe maybe maybe kill enemy thank fabiola ve able continue create thousand leftist tear day alright s feeling day fact look amazing hire like fabiola team assassin entire daily wire team need ziprecruiter smart technology excel find talent role fast ziprecruiter make hire fast easy outta employer post ziprecruiter quality candidate day today try free exclusive web address ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire ziprecruiter dot com slash dailywire kamala harris idea return investment mean run business need good employee check ziprecruit dot com slash daily wire s ziprecruiter dot com slash here kamala harris explain spend trillion dollar trash economic policy unveil economic policy week yeah explain go to pay sense policy wanna unveil go forward actual kind real question look term talk example child child tax credit extend eitc year child life return investment term pay tremendous ve see year administration reduce reduce child poverty s lot work term tax credit term know s great return investment increase home ownership america return investment mean term increase tax base term s property tax fund school return investment think oh investment mistake person talk public policy critically evaluate measure return investment strengthen neighborhood strengthen community particular economy community invest broadbase economy everybody benefit everybody benefit lot hand motion term return investment s kind stuff economic magic wow feel well idea price control feel well idea throw money will not actually change interest rate ll fine good inflation rate goodness let bus bus inside sort convenience store throw bag dorito dance smile shout joy not feel joy logical beating continue logical beating continue feel joy feel joy feel joy campaign force march mouth long march okay tonight go unity unity unity democratic national convention discuss moment go attempt obscure fact take actual president united states actual nominee outback behead politically go go try forget hospice care shoot little morphine kind know ease pain ease pass go to forget go to gold watch ll wheel corpse ll toss door s big night dnc ve indicator dnc go look like joke say free abortion dnc accord new york post attendee dnc chicago opportunity free abortion vasectomy block away event vasectomy appointment fill fast listen not let way democratic man sterilize mean choose let obstacle remove generation family line idiot plan parenthood great river serve imagine kind person go dnc vasectomy imagine s life wake morning day wanna dnc bob cause need somebody tie spermatic cord okay s yeah s s choice make planned parenthood great river serve missouri southern illinois send mobile health center windy citys west loop offer reproductive service monday tuesday medication abortion reportedly available day mean be not party pass abortion pill know pretty special plus addition mobile clinic group call americans contraception go erect foot tall inflatable intrauterine device iud name frida womb cause free womb baby s s free womb way idolatry take form s weird giant idol iud sort strange mean service provide slide fee scale pay healthcare need accord appointment reservation form exciting go to fight cat lady meme erect foot intrauterine device provide free vasectomy abortion people not worry republicans weird not worry guy republican weird democrat don dress abortion pill street chicago republican weird social unrest week chicago social unrest escalate crime rate climb secure safety family crucial m pro second amendment get thought lethal force house mean ve get alternative ill use burnout introduce burnout un gunn nonlethal selfdefense platform lightweight simple use use easy load round magazine power gram cartridge burn launcher fire caliber chemical fill projectile patent pull pierce technology canister puncture trigger pull mean launcher ready capable incapacitate attacker minute accurate effective foot require permit background check interstate travel friendly berna prepare defend berna safe sensible alternative potentially save life side protect user aggressor visit bernacom ben purchase s byr nacom ben check late news bya s byr nacom ben bycom ben purchase actual schedule dnc lineup ready go to great monday call people ironically people involve talk person de fenestrate get democratic vote primary people people mean people cause literally vote kamala harris history presidential politic time win zero vote presidential primary win zero vote presidential primary magic joy return interest term term monday call people feel feel joy joe biden dr jill actual president united states speak secretary state hillary clinton love shuttle hillary monday night like okay everybody stage hate want away hillary clinton come ll welcome chicago mayor brandon johnson lock medicine cabinet cvss locally sure steal medication thing go great chicago monday tuesday bold vision america future bring president obama think forward think president leave office apparently michelle obama go speak s black woman mean speak have second gentleman doug emh speak nanny welcome rotund illinois governor jb pritzker lower convention hall crane wednesday fight freedom fight freedom lead vice presidential nominee tim wall shut entire state minnesota covid fun rioting s think think freedom mean freedom oop s s mean proceed president clinton freedom stu s like thing man speaker emerita nancy pelosi transportation secretary pete buttigieg way got to feel member biden cabinet seriously feel mean big sin course gay s huge problem love pete buttigieg maybe incompetent member incredibly incompetent cabinet like know guy s get primetime speech wednesday like dude mean s s s pretty rich resume right dude dude speak like wait s transportation secretary not like transportation failure course half year time modern american history answer question yes wait not guy paternity leave like month notice cause incompetent answer yes like dude like imagine gina raimondo member biden cabinet secretary commerce like not speak mean gina straight s go to thursday future harris accept convention nomination president boy go to cavalcade star unity speaker include senate majority leader chuck schumer pitch new book antisemitism house democratic leader hakeem jeffrie love president carter grandson jason carter expect speak behalf grandfather say hope stay li alive long vote kamala harris great mean bring spector past like jimmy carter go amazing stair delegate entrance history hand quote bidens oval office address july throw move train delegate arrive monday ahead biden speech digital signage united center history hand spread faith spread faith way mean like christianity biblically relate spread faith mean foot statue value s mean s go to unity excited tonight course lead tribute dearly depart joe biden go to wheel body stage sarcophagus mouth bit stumble stage treat s cincin atus leave leadership position order farm s george washington leave leadership continental army mount vernon joe biden reality happen joe biden come ford theater political head s actually happen joe biden everybody know pretend tonight go to pretend night honorary gold watch year service shuttle quiet shady lane order live final remain year preside dr jill biden occasionally pulse bear death story community college sleep beach republic beach delaware way s president go to point president way january wheel dead person not mean look dead dude president presumably lead country go to amazing maureen dowd new york times like way coo guy yes yes know suppose stop talk kamala harris current nominee coo guy happen like think smart politic smart politic way not mean pretty squirrel turn little squirrel wait dude win entire nominating process run run run take nomination pick fail debate donald trump hand directly say wonderful joyous candidate not need run s great not need run s good maureen dos say head chicago wave euphoria exuberance exultation excitement ecstasy get alliteration right go to glorious coronation everybodys mad yeah dirty secret democrats bristle resentment try united united center windy city cory powerful democrats maneuver scene push incumbent president outta race not exactly julius caesar rehoboth beach tectonic shift course go reverberation right thing joe biden go to able campaign service president year fully vital way jaw jaw dropping pooch correct biden hurt democratic convention go day sit shiva james carville joyful romp kamala ato ticket democrat democrat close biden conspire push confess cable anchor able talk president sulk tent party leader whitewash coup ornately extoll biden james gladin tell cnn biden record president united states match pelosi propose biden face carve mount rushmore despite grandiose flattery joe joe hunter fool appease true true talk go big kumbaya moment not know go to way go to try paper bunch false joy jen psaki press secretary joe biden amy klobuchar like throw binder staff suggest shed tear joy jo tear joy tonight joe biden mean tear joy s nominee nominee d lose right instead decide diverse cipher zero question ask zero question answer cause time answer question sound like somebody stump face brick year old medium problem sexually titillate harris wall campaign dude hear rose spark dual action prescription merge powerhouse ingredient find generic viagra cialis sildenafil tadalafil formidable treatment merely ingredient medication take s rose spark design dissolve tongue s huge dissolvable treatment hit bloodstream fast old school pill result quick onset action reduce wait time typically associate traditional pill plus tadalofil active ingredient cis last system hour treatment work fast last long connect provider ro dot co slash ben find ro spark right s ro dot co slash ben s ro dot co slash ben compound drug permit prescribe federal law fda approve undergo fda safety effectiveness manufacturing review available prescribe online consultation provider check right s ro dot co slash ben find ro spark right ro co slash ben s r oco ben jen psaki amy kja ve know long time ve work closely want ask think hall go to like tomorrow night speak go to love joe biden love s go to tour joy yeah walk hall love major focus go to democracy literally save democracy save democracy amy klobuchar mean save democracy force nomination win democratic series election cause s read go to interior backstabbe scene way kamala harris lose joe biden go to good time like seriously dude preppe love well kamala harris lose kamala harris lose joe biden go to able tell you tell tell ve leave place lose force s s fault like wait recrimination delicious kamala harris manage lose election win election s go to see transitional guy stop donald trump get get ass hand nancy pelosi chief donor democratic party kind rift public rift public rift continue turn democrats appease radical left dnc start welcome people yesterday protester show protest hold pro kamas sign go wild pro kamas wing democratic party kamala harris wish appeal here lady hold sign say stop genocide stop apartheid cease fire white lady chicago course probably get code ping people right ground know s get people hold queer free palestine s s favorite queer free palestine fun chicken kfc queer free palestine show fool go to ten thousand people actually ready protest kamala harris show hold sign say killer kamala fun deal s room negotiate pro kama crowd john fetterman way proisrael senator pennsylvania s show dnc cause like not know get question gang be not wrong accord breitbart vice president kamala harris secretly meet week radical antisemitic mayor dearborn michigan effort court muslim arab american voter meeting report associated press bury article publish saturday socalled uncommitted group voter particularly michigan try push democratic party openly antiisrael position ap report democrats spend week meet uncommitted voter ally include previously unreported sit vp harris mayor dearborn michigan campaign trip michigan week harris meet abdulah hamud mayor dearborn detroit suburb large number arab americans city united states pro hamas pro hezbollah rally regular person familiar meeting provide specific detail say focus harriss potential policy elect israel hamas conflict express possible openness arm embargo israel obviously happen person spend year basically justify murder israelis october tweet israel decade illegal military occupation imprisonment gaza peace impossible tragic violence inevitable october inevitable accord person kamala harris listen s go to try appease people go protest fun dynamic accord jillian k mel write wall street journal genocide joe killer kamala butcher gaza allow gather chicago undisturbed accord selfdescribe antiimperialist organization enemy lime s instagram post month call protestor greatly shut dnc gaza group coordinate palestine action encourage vandalism unlawful act sammi dun palestinian prisoner solidarity network cheer hamas october massacre tie terrorism usual suspect factor drive protest escalation antiisrael crowd unite radical environmentalist antipolice activist ve spend year hone unlawful tactic include set encampment vandalize property brawling cop de arrest comrade physically intervene prevent arrest history movement go year point accord mechi member journal editorial board protest take toll chicago police department month few officer despite budget nearly local police help state federal law enforcement possible ll succeed contain protest expect lawlessness disorder campus city street fall go running problem democrats go away mayor brandon johnson virtually crack criminality city say not worry ready good not worry concern ready convention look local police department work secret service local agency ensure safe peaceful vibrant exciting convention city chicago rate number relate convention center sure protect people provide opportunity beauty soul okay good luck mean seriously love love rely cop come time dn nnc look bad brandon johnson anticop mayor america willing undercut cop available turn s rely cop d nnc look bad listen chicago probably fill problem include hr problem mean wanna hire promo people listen start daily wire big question mark hr focus create engage content difficult find manage professional capable handle daytoday hr task sound like need talk friend bambi bambee get hr manager get dedicated partner s available phone email realtime chat ll handle crucial task like employee onboarde termination performance review bam bee hr autopilot feature streamline essential hr practice like employee training feedback procedure free time matter business bam bee hr manager base united states support nuance state hr manager easily cost grand annually bam bee start buck monthly matter size business bambee work wait minute schedule free consultation visit bambee dot com right type ben shapiro podcast sign s spell bambe ecom bambee dot com type ben shapiro good hope city chicago d nnc term violence good luck storm castle boy way thing go house democrat attend d nnc advise congressional security official book hotel room name engage protestor confront accord axio guidance come democratic lawmaker fearful safety rattle series disruptive propalestinian protest israel kamas war start year democrats head generally republican confront pro kamas protestor right tell em schmuck waste oxygen propalestine pro hamas protestor democrats democrats immediately begin kowtow ask feel well kind explain democratic foreign policy come middle east house democrats tell access concerned personal security course lawmaker senior house democrat say law enforcement tell member certain area expect violence guidance send congressional staffer obtain axio house sergeant arm office write confront protestor try engage report capitol police good luck hope wonderful convention deserve little bit kamala right runaway race okay kind notion race currently august believe day voting begin pennsylvania s voting begin pennsylvania election course beginning november right kamala harris momentum high watermark break help point accord nate silver analysis polling right s ahead half percent nationally come arizona s like point half come georgia come michigan s maybe point come pennsylvania s point half margin error race margin error race mean kamala harris start come earth s get problem fact blow s seven point s point s like point half okay breathing room feel comfortable obviously right new york times entire piece today title undecided voter harris famous unknown want learn mean know way people learn position d new york times cover position actually job pay terry york singleton certain thing consider november election vote donald trump find vice president kamala harris sudden entry presidential race refreshing close sale quote need information say ms york singleton list cost medication childcare homelessness problem want hear ms harris discuss s true swing voter person know s vote trump course bunch people not know go to vote trump far not know kamala harriss position trash kamala harris get script s script disaster area public treat example trump campaign sort hilariously mock ad kamala harris speech explain price increase biden administration here look like lot loaf bread cost today pandemic ground beef go ad donald j trump right kamala s right price wonder want not paper crap joy not paper say return investment time row yeah not waste time people hope hope democracy people second kamala harris economic plan failure thereof fact democrat way actually defend stuff ill second weekend get word theater nationwide racist matt walsh new movie advanced ticket sell super fast hear people city country say theater carry mi racist here change not purchase advanced ticket mi racistcom today help fill theater secure theater ticket sell today determine theater film september matt walsh ll lead destroy leftist gender theory woman infiltrate absurd world diversity equity inclusion lemme tell s uncover simultaneously hilarious infuriate initial response ticket absolutely phenomenal not let mi racistcom advanced ticket today wait reclaim culture folk fact logic fill theater seat know kamala harriss position keep say dumb crap s ask word vomit like minute half repeat phrase like term verbal crutch not know shell speak know come democracy come democracy term term depth interest people world democracy term term oh god s terrible democrat hide hakeem jeffrie democratic house minority leader ask economic record cause turn s administration know look like terrible job say inherit catastrophe question inherit right right like yes answer president inherit catastrophe excuse economic policy s half year here hakeem jeff try walk right past president biden vice president harris inherit catastrophe prior president time public health catastrophe connect pandemic economic catastrophe result shutdown economy course democracy catastrophe relate january violent assault capitol incite president effort halt peaceful transfer power yeah big problem crap policy course half year inherit catastrophe dunno long blame trump administration thing fault go to try democrats try explain exactly kamala harris mean say go curb grocery price price gouging law totally insane totally crazy excellent thread guy name robert sterling s cfo investor work m food industry say actually happen government announce grocery retailer not allow raise price grocery store operate net margin not survive supplier raise price government announce food producer not allow raise price grocery store create equal store low income area money high income area disproportionately sell low margin prepackage food instead high mar margin fresh product like meat store low income area not able cover overhead grocery chain start shut food desert rural area low income urban area like bad margin food producer quickly erode primary cost ingredient energy labor not fix shrink gross profit leave cashflow available cover overhead maintain facility reinvest additional protection capacity grocery chain finite shelf space start repurpose store sell nonprice control item nutrition supplement kitchenware apparel price control food product local kroger safeway start look feel like walmart food producer stop make product low margin grocery chain start compete secure inventory not compete offer strong price producer not allow raise price compete thing like payment term small grocery chain start shut entirely sell large chain like kroger addition able cover fix cost major reason long reliably secure delivery product producer prioritize sale large customer small food producer start outta business producer additional step value chain low volume spread fix cost cost structure inherently disadvantaged compare major food producer grocery store not able raise price cut product cost important deprioritizing purchase small producer easy way supply chain break line start format outside grocery store morning federal government announce program issue block grant state purchase operate shuttered grocery store usda see close production facility government announce price key food cost fix stop profiteer gouge government operate food industry shockingly government struggle operate complex industry planet entire food supply chain start implode communism mass starvation end america quickly ensue hey wait second cause s pretty good explanation exactly kamala harris policy actually work democratic governor kentucky andy beshear say price gouging plan basically different teddy roosevelt trust bust supply demand respect different teddy roosevelt break monopoly make sure right regulation tool place sure everybody play game fairly rule okay absurd absurd okay antitrust regulation book idea food industry violate monopoly law provide noncompetitive price collusion law book s s talk talk dumb economic policy propose price control food literally fail trial try s push democrat answer entire goal answer way true audacious kamala harris policy true shell throw policy like medicare shell ask wait mean outlaw private health insurance shell like mm yeah everybody goes wait f s like mean shell yes ban fracke day ll like wait like ban seriously shed like everybody pennsylvania go wait hold go mean like mean literally entire career joe biden say not joe joe biden get way little girl like little girl like actually not little girl turn job favor force bus like s s actual thing favor like yes m favor force bus turn hate force bus s like m force bus position take expect democrats defend nbc kristin wilker gretchen whitmer choose vice president governor michigan discuss kamala harriss economic plan amazing economic plan suck delve policy vice president lay economic policy week thing s propose ban price gouging obama administration economist jason furman say quote sensible policy think big hope end lot rhetoric reality s upside downside warn effectively price control ultimately stifle economic growth think s good way bring price michigan think people read oh know kamala harris go to focus build affordable housing know kamala harris deliver make sure healthcare accessible affordable americans protect obamacare s million people healthcare michigan right donald trumps try rip away notice not answer question go pattern way election cnn commentator like way economic plan sense take lot far left position run know temporarily kind moderated anonymous quote aid say not wanna ban fracke anymore not wanna not wanna new program s kinda pretty far leave price control essentially s number thing know kind conveniently forget vice president year lot housing market crisis bad inflation bad s lot memory hold look come mean add price home price country give away essentially free people add price pretty amazing pretty amazing totally right course fair commentator work tim scott foreign democratic party tim walls everybodys favorite midwestern dad s like s normal midwestern dad get catch dui mile hour zone claim deaf pretend title not military cut military service go iraq guy high school teacher apparently extoll life chinese communism tell student system share get free food housing say lesson november mean share doctor construction worker chinese government place work provide housing kilogram pound rice month food housing wow great great teacher s like normal midwestern communist yes extraordinarily radical ticket radical ticket donald trump focus fair s try focus s president trump weekend go campaign trail say defeat communist kamala not think nickname go to stick m go to push hard kamala liar kamala liar try kamala sure go to completely catch m go to kam liar frankly think communist kamala term people mouthful here president trump try day go defeat communist know kamala harris s communist radical left person run office country need ve s wrong m sure attack line go vir need actually spell problem policy involve comparison look look example distractibility asset campaign trail point incredibly tight election election go to decide ten thousand vote state president trump m well look kamala harris routine funny need stop talk people crowd rally start talk know people america say thing get say kamala big advantage s beautiful woman s beautiful woman decide reread clause m say s well look think m well well m well look person kamala like dude hilarious funny like s moderate voter s like true well look person kamala harris m go to vote like prize man prize d like beat president united states like communist president united states m m root hard college expensive man not score jeremys razor year shaving dominate campus life conform ll stand clean shaven unapologetic precision deliver exceptionally smooth close shave design precision tremor keep edge ergonomic handle superior control major masculinity jeremys razorscom today alrightyy israel blinken state department continue push idea ceasefire corner s problem hamas keep reject ceasefire deal course hamas interest come ceasefire minute s ceasefire hamas hostage minute hamas give hostage bargain finish ceasefire end weapon israel finish yasir drag body street way go yasir know path think drag hezbollah iran directly large scale war israel hezbollah iran not actually want hezbollah look way climb tree basically say go allow hama parish gaza choice matter hamas fact lose gaza strip hezbollah want actually provoke war israel israel destroy ll incredibly bloody israel israel lose lot civilian lot citizen lot soldier israel win hezbollah despite large wellarmed terror group hezbollah military capacity israeli defense force far iran forward capacity iran forward capacity largely hezbollah see attempt fire rocket drone israel month half fall inside iran turn iran military force shall snuff come long range projection instead rely proxy terror group basically funnel money terror group small arm rocket case hamas interest actually align point hezbollah iran hezbollah iran claim align hamas back hamas look tough robust hezbollah iran look like weakling misalignment s way rectify misalignment easily israel come forward biden administration come forward say listen rocket fire rocket fire israel chain want supply want ll finish terror group ll need iran oil field well f d simple far hamas go s true beginning war united states say qatar airbase qatar go away tomorrow force hamas release hostage hostage ve release month hey little bit tough yasar hitlerian bunker surround innocent baby innocent israeli baby s protection leave point s go to let cause minute let israel go to kill know matter time find em kill math ground blinken state department biden administration desperately attempt prevent conflict break week not want conflict break middle dnc try push thursday s math s waste time reality israel allow hezbollah continue sit northern border threaten israel entire north right israel entire north completely depopulate thousand people live home north israel mile wide swath mile deep swath israel completely depopulate right mean hezbollah effectively military control area israel allow sovereign country d equivalent el paso evacuate mexican drug cartel fire rocket border s effectively s happen north israel right hamas way tell weak biden administration biden administration keep say deal right corner hamas keep say biden administration keep say deal right corner hama one hold baby fact yesterday hamas reject new proposal ceasefire course try blame bibi netanyahu rest white house claim significant progress talk doha past day rejection new proposal present party friday make president biden goal get deal week impossible barack ravi sonographer white house hamas keep reject reject weekend member hamas west bank lie time way hamas say presence west bank fact large military presence west bank threaten palestinian authority try walk dude explosive fill backpack soccer stadium synagogue unclear go thank god bomb blow early premature evacuation body blow excellent news unite goat afterlife presumably accord jerusalem post hama conjunction palestinian islamic jihad claim responsibility terror attack tel aviv sunday explosive device detonate group announce cassam brigade telegram account monday not hama try kill bunch jews synagogue not try claim credit claim credit say yasar s shout wind accept deal want deal hope biden administration force israel simply stop operation absence deal go to happen israel go to stop operation go to continue try find hostage go to continue kill level member hamas simple course major problem democratic party beholden radical pro hamas wing senator tammy duckworth wisconsin say kamala harris go to talk get humanitarian aid gaza humanitarian aid crisis food getting ship gaza kamas steal shoot people expect thousand ten thousand protestor kamala harris differentiate joe biden differentiate joe biden think need work hard get ceasefire agreement think push talk make sure humanitarian aid gaza think lean heavily humanitarian thing fact know issue right different time different site oppose deal close get ceasefire agreement side think go to kamala talk get humanitarian aid gaza excuse try buy promos protestor not go to work obviously not care humanitarian aid want dead palestinian goal dead palestinian mean well coverage west hope force israel military operation gaza line weakness terrorist tend exacerbate violence simple simple biden administration coward fool continue pretend understand guy come join line kathy lee gifford time emmy award winner author new book herod mary member member use coach shapiro check month free annual plan click link description join republicans nazi separate bad white people grow think race matter racist appreciate love m try learn m journey m go to sort need deeply undercover m racist join matt certify dei expert here certification stretch whiteness field america inherently racist word inherent challenge wanna rename george washington monument george floyd monument america racist bone inherently yes country piece white folk trash white supremacy white woman white boy black person black person right exist ll m racist hi robin hi s m matt ask careful careful go to racist buy ticket theater september rate pg build business feel like big jump ondeck small business loan help afloat line credit term loan ondeck let choose loan s right business rate online small business lender ondeck team loan advisor help find right business loan fit need visit ondeckcom information depend certain loan attribute business loan issue ondeck celtic bank ondeck land north dakota loan subject lender approval summer enjoy sunscreen smell new car smell room memory lexus suv find offer select suvs lexus golden opportunity sale event lease rx wheel drive month month experience amazing lexus dealer usa lexus important lease offer price detail customer qualify offer available eastern area september

This bill directs the Department of Education to make grants to parents of eligible students for certain education-related expenses. Eligible student refers to a student who is enrolled for the 2021-2022 school year in an elementary or secondary school that (1) is located in a local educational agency that received certain COVID-19 relief funds; and (2) does not provide, for any reason related to COVID-19, in-person learning for each enrolled student for each school day during the school year. Grant funds may be used to pay the tuition and fees for a private elementary or secondary school, pay the cost of attending a public school that provides in-person learning, or for other expenses and educational materials.

right

bill direct department education grant parent eligible student certain educationrelated expense eligible student refer student enrol school year elementary secondary school locate local educational agency receive certain relief fund provide reason relate inperson learn enrol student school day school year grant fund pay tuition fee private elementary secondary school pay cost attend public school provide inperson learning expense educational material

Title: Equality of Rights Date: August 9, 1924 Location: Washington, D.C. Context: President Coolidge responds to a man offended by the prospect of a non-white man being nominated to be a Republican nominee for Congress in the state of New York. (Original document available here) Letter to Mr. Charles F. Gardner My dear Sir: Your letter is received, accompanied by a newspaper clipping which discusses the possibility that a colored man may be the Republican nominee for Congress from one of the New York districts. Referring to this newspaper statement, you say: “It is of some concern whether a Negro is allowed to run for Congress anywhere, at any time, in any party, in this, a white man’s country. Repeated ignoring of the growing race problem does not excuse us for allowing encroachments. Temporizing with the Negro whether he will or will not vote either a Democratic or a Republican ticket, as evidenced by the recent turnover in Oklahoma, is contemptible.” Leaving out of consideration the manifest impropriety of the President intruding himself in a local contest for nomination, I was amazed to receive such a letter. During the war 500,000 colored men and boys were called up under the draft, not one of whom sought to evade it. They took their places wherever assigned in defense of the nation of which they are just as truly citizens as are any others. The suggestions of denying any measure of their full political rights to such a great group of our population as the colored people is one which, however it might be received in some other quarters, could not possibly be permitted by one who feels a responsibility for living up to the traditions and maintaining the principles of the Republican Party. Our Constitution guarantees equal rights to all our citizens, without discrimination on account of race or color. I have taken my oath to support that Constitution. It is the source of your rights and my rights. I propose to regard it, and administer it, as the source of the rights of all the people, whatever their belief or race. A colored man is precisely as much entitled to submit his candidacy in a party primary, as is any other citizen. The decision must be made by the constituents to whom he offers himself, and by nobody else. You have suggested that in some fashion I should bring influence to bear to prevent the possibility of a colored man being nominated for Congress. In reply, I quote my great predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt: “* * * I cannot consent to take the position that the door of hope—the door of opportunity—is to be shut upon any man, no matter how worthy, purely upon the grounds of race or color.” Yours very truly, etc. Citation: Foundations of the Republic by Calvin Coolidge (1926). The Coolidge Foundation gratefully acknowledges the volunteer efforts of Craig Eyermann, who prepared this document for digital publication. President Coolidge’s genuine belief in the equality of rights for all Americans under the Constitution comes through loud and clear. Name (required) Email (will not be published) (required) Comment DONATE • NEWSLETTER Privacy Policy | Terms of Use Copyright © 2024 Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

right

title equality right date august location washington dc context president coolidge respond man offend prospect nonwhite man nominate republican nominee congress state new york original document available letter mr charles f gardner dear sir letter receive accompany newspaper clip discuss possibility colored man republican nominee congress new york district refer newspaper statement concern negro allow run congress time party white man country repeat ignore grow race problem excuse allow encroachment temporize negro vote democratic republican ticket evidence recent turnover oklahoma contemptible leave consideration manifest impropriety president intrude local contest nomination amazed receive letter war colored man boy call draft seek evade take place assign defense nation truly citizen suggestion deny measure political right great group population colored people receive quarter possibly permit feel responsibility live tradition maintain principle republican party constitution guarantee equal right citizen discrimination account race color take oath support constitution source right right propose regard administer source right people belief race colored man precisely entitle submit candidacy party primary citizen decision constituent offer suggest fashion bring influence bear prevent possibility colored man nominate congress reply quote great predecessor theodore roosevelt consent position door hope door opportunity shut man matter worthy purely ground race color truly etc citation foundation republic calvin coolidge coolidge foundation gratefully acknowledge volunteer effort craig eyermann prepare document digital publication president coolidge genuine belief equality right americans constitution come loud clear require email publish require comment donate newsletter privacy policy term use copyright calvin coolidge presidential foundation inc right reserve

This bill authorizes a grant program for emergency departments to increase access to follow-up psychiatric services for individuals who present for care of acute mental-health episodes. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration may award these grants.

right

bill authorize grant program emergency department increase access followup psychiatric service individual present care acute mentalhealth episode substance abuse mental health services administration award grant

This bill requires the Department of Interior to issue decisions on applications for drilling permits associated with certain oil and gas leases within specified timeframes. If a decision is not made within the timeframe, the permit shall be considered issued.

right

bill require department interior issue decision application drilling permit associate certain oil gas lease specify timeframe decision timeframe permit shall consider issue

This bill reauthorizes through FY2026 the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program and otherwise revises the program. Specifically, the bill revises the COPS program by

right

bill reauthorize community orient policing service cop program revise program specifically bill revise cop program

Ep. 1782 - Trump, Racism & Celebrity Anti-Semitism Published: 8/7/2023 As, the economy begins to soften and the Ukraine war drags on. Joe Biden's poll numbers show his vulnerability, but will Republicans be able to take advantage? I'm Bench Bureau. This is the Bench Bureau show. The Bench Bureau Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN Protect our online privacy today at ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben. There's been a lot of speculation for a very long time that the economy was going to soften and now it has finally begun. According to the Wall Street Journal earnings for the nation's biggest companies are poised to fall for the third straight quarter hurt in part by the decline in energy prices. So why exactly aren't we technically in a recession? Presumably because consumer spending remains pretty high because of all the inflation in the economy. Because of all the extra dollars that Joe Biden blew into the economy 'cause of the easy money policies of the Federal Reserve. It takes a while for that to wash its way outta the economy. But as that happens, consumers are not going to be able to outpace producers. Producers are starting to cut back. They're seeing the writing on the wall, they're starting to consolidate their gains, and they're starting to realize that if they continue to expand their actual manufacturing, their actual production, then they're going to undercut themselves. And so you're starting to see earnings declines for virtually every major company. The members of the s and p 500 According to the Wall Street Journal Law on Pace to collectively report a 5.2% decline in earnings. The worst performance since 2020 revenue is on track to rise 0.6% from a year ago, but that's largely due to inflation at this point. Some of this is due to the decline in oil prices, for example. The energy sector is taking it right on the chin, but it's also happening in materials and it's also happening in tech. Apple sales fell for the third consecutive quarter amid softening demand for consumer devices. The only areas that continue to have quarterly revenue growth are areas of healthcare communication services. Real estate is continuing to sort of hold steady at this point, but we are about to see more of these companies report bad earnings, and that means that the economy is likely to see a downturn in the coming quarters. Employment numbers came out on Friday, they're weaker than expected. That of course, is not greatly a shock because as we've been saying for months here on this program, what goes up must come down. The idea that an overheated economy was not going to crash off of a cliff was always a rather specious presumption. Meanwhile, on foreign policy, the Ukraine War continues a pace. According to the New York Times, Ukrainian forces struck two bridges connecting Russian occupied Crimea to the rest of Ukraine on Sunday. Part of a broader pattern of attacks on and around the peninsula that is sought to scramble critical supply routes for the Kremlin and push the scope of the war into fresh territory. This is all part of the Ukrainian offensive. They're hoping that they'll push the Russians back so much that the Russians will come to the negotiating table. The question at this point is what exactly the Russians are asking for because everybody knows the lines of the negotiation here and they also recognize that there's a misalignment of incentives. The West keeps saying that Zelensky gets to make the deal. Zelensky keeps saying there will be no deal until the Russians are off of all of Russian territory and the Russians keep saying there will be no deal if they're trying to put, if they're being pushed out of what they consider now to be formal Russian territory, namely in Crimea and the Donbas region. Sunday's taxi injured a driver, enclosed traffic on a second bridge to the east of Chahar, near the small town of Hek. According to the governor of the region of Vladimir Aldo, who's a Russian guy, one of the strikes tore three holes in another roadway as well. Ukraine to armed forces took credit for both strikes on Sunday and another departure for them. Typically COI approach as Zelensky and other top officials emphasize their new aim is to force ordinary Russians to face up to the Kremlins worse. So things are likely to get worse before they get better. Meanwhile, the American public do not have their heart in this anymore by polls. A plurality of Americans are not interested in an endless level of support for the Ukraine war or really for much more support than has already been given at this point. And Russian and Chinese forces are also upping the ante Over the weekend, a combined Russian and Chinese naval force patrolled near the coast of Alaska and what US experts said appears to be the largest such flotilla to approach American shores. Apparently 11 Russian and Chinese ships seem close to the Aleutian Islands. According to US officials, the ships never entered us territorial waters. They were shadowed by four US destroyers and the P eight Poseidon aircraft, it's historical first said Bren Sadler Sr. Research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. Given the context of the war in Ukraine intentions around Taiwan, this move is highly provocative. A spokesman for the US Northern Command confirmed Russia and China had carried out a combined naval patrol in their Alaska and didn't specify the number of ships or their precise location. So Russia and China are upping the ante. And meanwhile, the Biden administration really has no plan because while they're asking for concessions from China and while they continue to fund the war in Ukraine, there's no off ramp with regard to the war in Ukraine to allow us to shift focus to China. And meanwhile, China is realizing that it's going to be boxed in both demographically and economically in very short order, all of which spells the possibility of future conflict. Now, let's recognize something. It is the unpredictability in change in America's foreign policy from weak and passive to aggressive that really throws people off kilter. And the fact is that Russia never would've invaded Ukraine if it had not been for the sins of the former Biden administration, the one which who reads Vice President of the United States. You'll remember that Russia actually invaded Ukraine originally in 2014. That is when Barack Obama was president of the United States Over the weekend, Obama did another fawning interview with the glowing media in which he claimed that they did all of the right things. Here's Christiana Amour, one of the worst pseudo journalists in the business asking Barack Obama about American foreign policy when Russia first invaded Crimea. And part of what happened was both myself but also Merkel, who I give enormous credit for, had to pull in a lot of other Europeans kicking and screaming to impose the sanctions that we did and to prevent Putin from continuing through the Dun Buss into the rest of Ukraine. So I actually think that given both where Ukraine was at at the time and where the European mindset was at the time we held the line, Okay, let's be clear. They did not hold the line. And the entire attempt to hand over Crimea to Russia in the first place was deeply tied to Barack Obama's pathetically intransigent approach with regard to Iran. He was trying to cut a deal with Iran, a nuclear deal with Iran. He wanted Russia to help broker that deal. And so, so he was willing to hand Crimea to the Russians in order to make sure that that happened. And then when there's another Russian advance in Ukraine this time, Joe Biden is president of the United States. You can see why Russia thought they were going to get away with it. Again, it is confusion in foreign policy that leads to all of these problems and all of them are starting to stack up with regard to Joe Biden's administration. The polling numbers show that he's really, really weak right now. He's pulling even with Donald Trump in Michigan in most of the major national polls right now, Donald Trump is running about even with Joe Biden, the latest national polls have Joe Biden up one according to insider advantage tied according to New York Times Ciena Up three according to the morning console and Trump up for according to Messenger Harris X. So that says that Joe Biden is running extremely weak right now and he should be because his policies are absolutely awful. And when you link that with the fact that the Hunter Biden scandal is not nearly over and could easily break into the mainstream over the course of the next year and a half, Democrats should be running scared. In fact, you're starting to see a few cracks in the base for the Democratic Party. Representative Jake Chen Klaus's, democratic of Massachusetts, he finally admitted on national TV that if Hunter committed crimes, he should face penalties for that If, if Hunter Biden committed crimes, Hunter Biden should face justice and accountability for those crimes, which by the way is a sentence that I have heard very few Republicans say about Donald Trump for much more massive crimes. This focus, this obsession, I would say on Hunter Biden is really just a whopper of what about is 'cause the Republicans are trying to deflect, to diminish, to defend Donald Trump from the grave crime of conspiracy against the Constitution of the United States. Okay? And this is going to be the great misdirect by the Democrats is going to be to Donald Trump. Okay? The question is to whether Republicans can take advantage of Joe Biden's weakness rests almost entirely on whether the Republican base is going to nominate a person who's going to make the entire subject of the next election about his various foibles and legal peccadillos. We'll get to that momentarily. First, it's time to talk to you about daily wire's most trusted privacy partner and premier sponsor of the show Express at VPN. Huge tech companies in America pay next to nothing in taxes, meaning they barely give anything back to the society that actually made them incredibly wealthy. They may not do a ton of giving, but they sure do a lot of taking. They take your data, they monetize it, they ban you from their platforms, they censor you, and then they again make money off of you. Why would you allow them to do that? To protect your identity and data from these tech giants? I recommend using Express VPN every time you go online. I certainly do. Think about all the websites you visit, everything you do and say online, it's tracked by these giant corporations using your public IP address. They can uniquely match your activity and know your location. Express VPN makes you anonymous online by camouflage that IP address and replacing it with a different secure IP of your choice. ExpressVPN also encrypts all your data so it's protected from hackers and anyone else trying to spy on you. What I like most about ExpressVPN really, really easy to use, just download that app on your phone or computer, you tap one button and now you are ready to go. Protect your data with the number one rated VPN provider today. Visit ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben today, get an extra three months free on a one year package. That's X P R E S S VPN dot com slash Ben. Visit ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben to learn more. Okay, so the question for Republicans is going to be whether they actually believe that the rest of the country believes like they believe about Donald Trump. If you listen to Republicans in the base, talk about what's going on with Donald Trump and the myriad trials that have been brought against him. The trial in Manhattan, the trial in Florida, the trial now in Washington, DC, when Republicans talk about this, they say that the subject of the next election should be the corruption of the D OJ. And I agree that an ideal world, we'd be talking endlessly with the independence about the corruption of the D OJ and the weaponization of law enforcement and the use of the F B I to go after Donald Trump beginning in 2015 at the passage of Hillary Clinton campaign. Now, all of that, all that should be highly relevant. Is that going to be the topic, the bread and butter topic upon which Americans vote, or are they simply going to make the general decision they always make in every election is, which is do I like this guy? Do I trust this guy? Do I think this person is likely to lead to a more stable America where I can send my kid to school knowing they'll be safe and where I can have bread on the table? Right? Those are the real big questions. And Republicans can win on those questions because Democrats have made the country less safe with regard to crime because Democrats are threatening your kids in terms of the values they're promulgating at schools. All those questions are questions. Republicans can win, but not if they never talk about it again. If the censor issue in 2024 is whether the D o j is being mean to Donald Trump for political purposes or whether Donald Trump is in fact committing criminal acts, that is not going to be a winning formula for Republicans in 2024. It just isn't. The only way that's winning formula is if so many Democrats stay home because they're just unhappy with Joe Biden that Donald Trump squeaks by. But that is not a recipe for a sort of broad based electoral victory. That is a recipe that relies on luck. And you know, when we started our business, one of the things we, we said at the very beginning of of, of Daily Wire was luck is not a business strategy. Well, luck is not a political strategy either. And the idea that you are just going to luck into 2016 again, that basically Joe Biden won't visit Wisconsin or he won't visit Michigan, that that he'll just go absent in the election or the Democrats are gonna stay home again. There are a couple factors that militate against that. One of them is the factor that a lot of Democrats remember 2016, and they remember that when they thought Hillary Clinton was a 99% lock to win. They didn't show up until Donald Trump became president. Number two, Hillary Clinton in the polls is running well ahead of where Joe Biden is running right now. So, if you're a Democrat, you understand there's a very real risk that Donald Trump is going to get back in the White House, which means you're very motivated to go and vote again. When it comes to the message of the campaign, Democrats are gonna be able to basically shy away from whatever is the supposed corruption in the D O J, the alleged corruption. Corruption I think is very real and very partisan. They're gonna be able to shy away from that and just talk endlessly about Donald Trump and Donald Trump loves to talk about Donald Trump, and the entire election will be about Donald Trump. If the election is about Donald Trump, he's going to lose. If the election is about Joe Biden, he is going to lose. This is not a particularly hard math. Again, whichever candidate is the subject of the referendum will lose. Nobody likes Joe Biden. So if they're thinking about Joe Biden at the time they pull the lever, they're gonna vote for his opponent. And if they're thinking about Donald Trump at the time they vote, they're probably going to vote for Joe Biden. So what exactly has Trump been doing? Well, just what you would think he's been been doing. Sure he's, you know, handling his legal troubles and sure he's talking about that stuff, but he's spending zero focus at all on his actual political opponent. All of his focus right now, and again, you can't blame him for this because if you were hit with 87 charges or whatever it is, if you were hit I mean you, you would also spend all of your mental energy thinking about that sort of stuff and presumably truth socialing about that sort of stuff at all hours. Then now Trump does that even on a good day. But on a bad day, he's for sure going to do that. But the problem is, again, that where Donald Trump puts his spotlight is also where the media are happy to put their spotlight. And where Democrats are happy to put their spotlight, if every waking hour is spent on Donald Trump's truth social, talking about how much he hates Nancy Pelosi and Jack Smith and Mike Pence, that is not a recipe for electoral success. And here's the thing, I want Joe Biden not to be president of the United States anymore. I think he's a terrible president, by the way. I don't even think Joe Biden is really in control of his administration. I think that the staff, people have been asking this for a while, who actually runs the the Biden administration. And the answer is basically everybody who's staffed for Barack Obama. There's a really fascinating interview over a tablet magazine with David Garrow, who's a biographer of Barack Obama. He wrote a biography of in 2017 of Barack Obama that was largely ignored by the media because it was not complimentary. That biography of Barack Obama included the fact that Barack Obama and he was the younger days, was pretty rabidly antisemitic that which is not a shock. He's sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years as as, as we all know, that he wrote love letters to his girlfriends in which he talked about fantasies, gay sex. There's all sorts of really salacious and ugly material in that biography by David Garrow, who's a poet, surprise winning historian by the way. And David Garrow says in an interview with Tablet Magazine that Joe Biden is not running large parts of his administration. Obama is, he doesn't even have to pick up the phone because all of his people are already in the White House. They hold the Iran file. Tony Blinken doesn't. Rob Malley is just one person. Brett McGirk, Dan Shapiro in Israel, Lisa Monica Injustice, Susan Rice running domestic policy, it's turtles all the way down. There are obviously large parts of the White House policymaking that belong to Barack Obama because they're staffed by his people who work for him and no doubt report back to him. Personnel is policy, as they say in Washington. Again, this is a biographer of Barack Obama. David Garry says to me, this is very odd and kind of a spooky arrangement, spooky because it's happening outside the constitutional framework of the United States government, and yet somehow it's been placed off the list of permitted subjects to report on, which is a pretty good indicator of the extent to which the information we get and public reaction to that information is being successfully controlled. That of course, is exactly right, but one of the things that's happening here is that we're not talking about any of that stuff. The only thing that we are spending our time talking about presumably, is Donald Trump's legal troubles, which we'll get to in just one second. We'll get to the latest on that. First. The economy is really on sort of a razor's edge, unclear which way it's going to go. I'm big into diversification, particularly into assets that are likely to accrue in value over time. Days ago, our longtime sponsor Masterworks delivered a 77.3% net return to some of their investors. That is 77.3% net return. Many of my listeners have seen Masterworks Art Investing platform hand back 10, 17, 30 5% net returns from other recent exits. As with any investment, past performance is not representative of artwork that has not yet been sold. It's not a guarantee of future returns, but Masterworks is art investing platform. It's a multi-year sponsor with over 780,000 users. Basically, they allow you to buy a fractional piece of a great work of art. So when it gets sold, that means that you get your money back plus some if the thing accrues in value. And again, high-end art generally very often at the very least, has accrued in value in tremendous numbers. You can get access to Skip the Waitlist simply by going to masterworks.com/ Ben. Again, that's masterworks.com/ Ben. Important disclosures and risks of [email protected] slash cd, go check them out right now. masterworks.com/ Ben. Meanwhile, the Trump team is getting ready to go to court and they have a bunch of different defenses that they have been putting forward. One of Donald Trump's lawyers named John Laro, he's been all over the news making defenses of President Trump. He points out that President Trump's expressions of concern over election regularities, that's all First Amendment protected material. He's pointing out also that the actual statutes that have been brought in the Indictment against Donald Trump are not actually properly formulated. So very likely there may even be a preemptive appeal to the Supreme Court to try to get this thing stopped ASAP as fast as possible. That has been encouraged by people ranging from Mark Levin to Senator Mike Lee in Utah. A flurry of interviews and statements on Sunday from Trump and his legal team previewed how they might seek to defend the former president against federal conspiracy charges according to Lara Sunday. And a b c said, the government will never be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump had corrupt or criminal intent. That's what this case is about. Now, that is again, that that's the legal issue, and whether it's true or whether it's false, we're going to find out Donald Trump has the deck stacked against him. No question. Because the judge in this case, number one, is a dedicated Democrat who actually served at the same law firm as Hunter Biden apparently, because this is taking place in Washington DC, which is a very unfriendly area for jury selection. Apparently Team Trump wants to get this thing moved to Virginia because they believe that Washington DC is a place where Trump can't get a fair trial. And of course, there's only one of three trials that Trump is currently undergoing, and we are expecting the Georgia DA to drop a an Indictment on Donald Trump. Any moments that'll be four different trials over the course of the next year. Well, all of that is true. And again, all of that is, it really is outrageous. Okay, the there, just to go through each case once more, the Manhattan DA's case is absolutely specious. It's garbage. This is the one about Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump supposedly taking personal money and spending it on Stormy Daniels to silencer as opposed to campaign money. It, it's, it's all ridiculous. It's well beyond the scope of the Manhattan da. He did it anyway because he wants to be famous. It's a ridiculous case that one should be thrown out summarily, but it's a Manhattan. So he could get convicted, the one down in Florida about classified documents. A pretty serious case because Donald Trump did the Criming on tape. Don't do Criming on tape, first rule of law. With that said, should it be prosecuted, the political cases, it shouldn't be prosecuted because Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for essentially the exact same crime, but in a court of law, could Donald Trump be prosecuted? Sure, but it's also in Florida, which is a much more friendly territory for Donald Trump since he won the state twice. And then you head up to Washington, DC have an incredibly weak case brought by Jack Smith on the January 6th matters. Again, if he wanted to bring a charge of Indictment, that is an actual criminal charge, he didn't bother to bring that charge because he couldn't prove it. So instead he brought a bunch of ancillary charges ranging from obstruction of justice to fraud. None of those statutes really seemed to apply. So all of that can be true. And at the very same time, on a political level, all Donald Trump did over the weekend. All he did over and over and over is just tweet about this and that's all this election is going to be. So the question for you, kind of normal, conservative or normal independent is, is this top of mind for you? Is this the thing you wake up every morning outraged about for a certain percentage of the population? Sure. Is that population larger than 25, 30%? I have serious doubts that that's the case. Considering again that a solid majority of independents think Trump should be indicted and they don't really care about what the charge is, it's gonna be very hard to convince those independents. Not only should Trump not be indicted, he should be elected because he's being indicted. That is a very, very heavy lift. And again, I encourage Republicans to think pretty seriously about who they think is likely to beat Joe Biden, not just about who they think it feels good to nominate. Those are not the same thing. So over the weekend, Donald Trump started going after the judge. In this particular case, he said, there's all caps. There is no I can get a fair trial with the judge assigned to the ridiculous freedom of speech Fair elections case everybody knows this and so does she. We'll be immediately asking for accusation of this judge on very powerful grounds and likewise for venue change out of DC. Judge Shakin, of course, is an appointee of former President Barack Obama. And again, I'm not saying that Trump's concern here is not well predicated. I think that it is. As M SS N B C legal analyst David Henderson says, this judge is Trump's worst nightmare. I mean that's true. This is a very left-wing judge, obviously, And Frank turns, amen. She is Trump's worst nightmare and she's his legal team's worst nightmare. I'm just gonna be real when I say it. A black woman with a law degree is a virtual unstoppable force when it comes to the justice system. Here's the reason why. You're taking someone who's been subjected to two different forms of discrimination, discrimination based on gender discrimination based on race. Then you're extracting them on the law in terms of how things are actually supposed to work. Then you put them in an environment where they see people get mistreated based on who they are every single day of their career. Now you've got somebody walking into her courtroom saying, well, hang on a second. I deserve to treat, be treated differently because I used to be a super powerful person and I expect to become a super powerful person Again, that is not going to work on her. Okay? The fact that the left is so excited about this judge demonstrates that Trump is exactly 100% right. Again, the case that this person is making is that because of her identity as a black woman, this will make her Trump's worst nightmare, which is the opposite of being a good judge. What it means to be a good judge that you impartially decide the case in front of you, not that you look deep within the wells of your own soul and then come up with some sort of Jerry Riggs explanation for why the bad orange man has to go to jail. That's exactly what the m s NBC analyst is saying. So again, Trump's complaints are well predicated here about the judge. I think there's very little doubt about that. The question for Republicans is, should that be the basis on which the election is run? It doesn't stop there, of course, because the posts just keep coming and coming and coming over the weekend. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, gotta tell you really, really rough weekend. So our baby is two and a half months old. He came down with R S V, he was having trouble breathing. That meant that we were up a lot of the night, like pretty much every night over the weekend. And so in those rare moments when we got to lie down, we needed to go to sleep right away. And here is where our Helix sleep at Mattress was really, really useful. I relied on my Helix sleep mattress and you can too. They evoke new high-end collection called Helix Elite. Helix is harness years of extensive mattress expertise to bring their customers a truly elevated sleep experience. The Helix Elite Collection includes six different mattress models, each tailored for specific sleep positions and firmness preferences. I've had our Helix sleep mattress for like seven, eight years at this point is firm but breathable, which is exactly what I need when I need to get sleep. Like right now. Without a doubt, Helix is the company I rely upon in the mattress I rely upon. Go to Helix sleep.com/ Ben. Take that two minute sleep quiz. Find the perfect mattress for your body and sleep type. Your mattress will come to your door shipped for free. Plus Helix has a 10 warranty can try it out for a hundred nights risk free for a limited time. Helix is offering up to 20% off all mattress orders plus two free pillows For our listeners, it's their best offer yet. Hurry on over to Helix sleep.com/ Ben with Helix. Better sleep starts right now. Okay, so this was not Donald Trump's only complaint over the weekend. So Donald Trump also sent out a a missive saying in all capital letters, if you go after me, I'm coming after you. Totally unclear who exactly he is talking about here. The the implication seems to be that the d o J is coming after him. So if he's president of the United States afterward, that he's going to go after corrupt members of the D O J, which is entirely within his purview. That however, sent Jack Smith spiraling Jack Smith is the prosecutor in this case, the Special Counsel. He filed a motion, he the in in the motion. He said all the proposed order seeks to prevent is the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials including to the public. Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him in recent days regarding this case, the defendant has issued multiple posts either specifically or by implication, including the following. If you go after me, I'm coming after you. If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details or for example, grand jury transcripts obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the Fair Administration of Justice in this case, Trump later defendant the claim, he said it wasn't about potential witnesses, it wasn't him threatening people. He said that it was for quote, the Rhino China loving, dishonest, special interest groups and Super pacs like the ones funded by the Koch brothers and club for no growth, which may very well be the case, but again, this is just how things are gonna get litigated all the way until all of this is over. He didn't stop there. He went off about his civil rights being violated. Again, I I'm not saying that Donald Trump is wrong about any of this. I'm just asking whether this is an electoral strategy that seems to be worthwhile here. Was Donald Trump going off on his civil rights being violated in Montgomery, Alabama rally on Friday? The only civil rights that have been violated in this matter are my civil rights. And those of the countless people that Biden and the Communists have been persecuting and they are communists and they're Marxists and they're, they're people that don't get it. They get it. They, you know, they're vicious and they're smart, but we're smarter and we're tougher than they are Now. Again, all of this may be fine and well and good. Is it the subject of the election? I feel like I'm beating a dead horse here, but the horse ain't dead yet in the sense that people keep saying over and over that if the election is wrong on this basis, Donald Trump will win. And I just don't see the evidence of that over the weekend. He also went after variously Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence on Truth Social. He went off on Nancy Pelosi. 'cause Nancy Pelosi suggested that he looked like a scared puppy, which is definitely getting his goat and Trump put out on truth social. I purposely didn't comment on Nancy Pelosi's very weird story concerning her husband, but now I can, because she said something about me with Glee that was really quite vicious. I saw a scared puppy, she said as she watched me on television, like millions of others that didn't see that I wasn't scared. Nevertheless, how mean a thing to say? She is a wicked witch whose husband's journey from hell starts and finishes with her. She's a sick and demented psycho who will someday live in hell, all capital letters. Woo. So again, I ask you, who does this win over Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. Who does Georgia, Arizona? Who are the voters who are like, well, now that he did say that she's a sick and demented cycle who will someday live in hell? And that her husband's journey to hell starts and finishes with her. Now I'm totally in I this would be one thing if you're running for reelection, he's now running after an election that he lost. Okay? So he's gonna have to win some additional votes. Who does he win over with this? And meanwhile he's going after Mike Pence. So Pence who has said that he has no plans to testify against Trump over the weekend. So Mike Pence, he, he said that, and then Trump came back at him and said, wow, it's finally happened. Little Mike Pence, he's running out of nicknames. So he's starting to cycle through the same nicknames over, remember there was Little Marco, little Marco, Ruby Little, and then there was crooked Hillary, who's now crooked Joe. So he's now recycling them, which is good for the environment. He says, little Mike Pence, a man who's about to be ousted as governor of Indiana until I came along and made M V P has gone to the dark side. Don know the power of the dark side, say, I'd never told a newly emboldened, not based on his 2% numbers Pence to put me above the Constitution or that Mike was too honest. He's delusional and now he wants to show he's a tough guy. I once read a major magazine article on Mike. It said he was not a very good person. I was surprised, but the article was right. Sad. Okay, how many people has Donald Trump selected for positions of power who turn out not to be very good people? Is it pretty much everyone? So either the man has the worst selection in, in personnel in human history, or it turns out that he crosses swords with a lot of the people who end up working for him because he doesn't do the right thing very often with those people. He also ranted about fellow Republicans over the weekend here he was suggesting that it's other Republicans fault that he's being indicted right now, which again is weird considering that it's really his own, okay, it's Democrat's fault and it's his fault. But it's hard to blame, say Ron DeSantis or Marco Rubio or Chris Christie or Mike Pence for what Donald Trump did. Two things can be true at once. He can be unfairly targeted. And also in some of these cases, particularly classified documents, case dude made his bed and now he's having to lie in it and it's not pleasant. And he shouldn't be given differential treatment from Hillary Clinton, but blaming other Republicans for his own failings that at some point won't Republican voters look at him and say, you're a little responsible for your own actions here. No, like a little. But when they indicted their political opponent and they did that, I said, now that gloves are off. He's a crooked, incompetent thief, and he shouldn't be allowed to be the president. And the Republicans better get tough and they better get smart because most of them look like a bunch of weak jerks right now. And you gotta get tough and smart and you have to fight fire with fire. You can't allow this to go on It's other Republican's fault. So the guy was president for four long years and he allowed his entire justice department apparently to be completely run through with people who hated his guts and did nothing. But now it's the fault of rando congressperson from like Iowa. That's again, is this a winning electoral strategy? I ask you this over and over and over. I'm not gonna stop asking it because the only thing that matters to me, the only thing that matters to me is what the policy of the United States looks like going forward. Donald Trump's personal peccadillos and his myriad foibles. I was willing to put those aside when he was doing good stuff for the country. The question is, is he gonna have a chance to do those things again by being reelected president on the basis of those things? And Donald Trump's campaign for reelection is actually very simple. Things. Were better when I was president. Joe Biden has been a terrible president. You wanna focus on my legal stuff, I'll take care of it in court because I'm big and brave and strong and stoic and I'll just take care of all of it in court. And if they come after me, it's because they're corrupt. But the real issue here is that Joe Biden is a terrible president. And so every day from now until the election, I'm gonna talk about what a terrible President Joe Biden is. I'm not gonna look at the, the sort of victimization narrative here. I'm not going to focus in on how the biggest story in America is, how people are being mean to me legally speaking. I can handle that. I'm a big boy. I'm a very rich person. I've gone through these battles before. I'll continue to go through these battles. But the real issue here is Joe Biden. But Joe Biden doesn't ever seem to leave President Trump's lips. And that's going to be a problem with him in a general election. And if Trump fans and and Republicans decide that the chief factor in terms of conservative loyalty is somehow following Trump down the primrose path to losing, I don't see that here. don don't, I don't see how that works. It seems like there is a certain, there are a certain number of people who are, who are very into this sort of thing. They're like the rockham so robots of it more than they like the idea of actually taking Joe Biden outta the presidency. So over the weekend, Laura Trump, the, the president's daughter-in-law, she, she was talking about how Trump is stoic and he's standing up to the bad guys and, and she got a big hand for this from a Republican crowd. Un Hannity. I saw my father-in-law today. I saw him on the way to the plane. I saw him get off the plane. I think the whole world saw it today. The whole world saw it. Yeah. Donald Trump, by the way. I I, that's a pretty nice plane. I will say that. It's not bad. It's not bad. I believe that Donald Trump was made for such a time as this because any other person would have crumbled. Any other person would've cracked, would have given up by now. But he's in the fight. And Sean, he's not just fighting for himself, he is fighting for every single American. Okay, so I just have a question. Who, what would it mean to crumble? Wait, what? Cut a pleads deal. What would it mean to crumble at this point? Just, just purely on a factual level. He's being indicted and now he's defending, which is usually what happens when someone gets indicted and then defends. And again, when it comes to the DC Indictment, it's complete bull crap that Jack Smith is putting forward when it comes to the Florida Indictment. That's his own fault. He did not have to keep those documents. He could have given the documents back to the National archives, and as I say, unjust prosecution. Sure, because it's politically motivated at the same time, you know what would've been a smart thing is not to keep the documents and not to step on the rake in the first place. But are Republicans gonna run on that basis? I I, I want to see the data that shows that the indictments actually make him stronger in general. I keep hearing this. I see no data to this effect. I see a lot of data that suggests that Trump is stronger in a primary because of the indictments. Because again, a lot of Republicans emotionally are resonating to him being unjustly persecuted. I feel it too. I get it. Okay. When a Republican is, is being targeted by his political opposition to be put in jail for crimes that any Democrat could commit and get away with, that is political prosecution and we all know it and it's terrible. Does that mean he'll win a general election? I keep asking the question over and over because apparently no one else will. I've set, I've yet to see President Trump articulate a plan for how he wins reelection. How? What is his plan? He's spending all of his money, literally all of it on legal bills right now. He's spending none of it on building up the voting base necessary to actually win an election. He's not spending it on ballot harvesting, he's not spending it on door knocking. He's not messaging with regard to President Biden at all. And you know what the predictable effect of this is? The data I'm seeing is that it could be a really, really rough year for Republicans in 2024. Why? Well, there are some early special elections. Special elections can be a bellwether for how the actual elections of 2024 go. The 2023 special elections have been going horribly for Republicans so far. I wonder why could it have something to do with the fact that instead of focusing in on Joe Biden and his terrible governance that everyone hates according to the polls, we are not focusing one iota on that. According to 5 38, they did the numbers crunching. They found in 38 special elections held so far this year, Democrats have outperformed the partisan lien by an average of 10% romping in parts of the country that typically support the party and cutting down on G O P margins in red cities and counties too. For example, the Democratic candidate in Wiss, Wisconsin State Assembly special election last month lost by just seven points in an area where Republicans have a 22 point edge. And where Trump beat Biden by almost 17 points in 2020 in a New Hampshire special election in May for a State House seat, the Democrat won by 43 points. That's far beyond the 23 point edge in the district. And these are not good numbers for Republicans and for comparison, according to 5 38, Democrats outperformed the weighted partisan lien by about 4% in special elections held between 2018 midterms and 2020 elections when Biden won the White House by 4.5%. But Democrats underperformed in-house races, so now they're up by like 10% in these special elections. Does that mean that necessarily nothing can change? No, it's still really, really early. But there's no question at this point that if Donald Trump runs an election campaign that is based solely on his indictments, that is probably not gonna run down to the benefit of Republicans. And so I ask once again, what's the plan for victory here? We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, my team knows I need my black raffle coffee. I spoke earlier about the fact that I haven't had sleep in like three nights. That means I'm going real heavy on the black raffle coffee lately. If you're busy like I am, you need to check out black raffle Coffee's ready to drink cans, ready to drink coffee. It's perfect for people who need their coffee really fast. Each contains at least 200 milligrams of caffeine And. it iss available in a variety of flavors like vanilla bomb, salted caramel mocha and vanilla caramel. Black Raffle Coffee is a veteran founded coffee company operated by principled men and women who honor those who protect, defend, and support our country. With every purchase you make, they give back, stop running out of coffee, sign up for a coffee club subscription, have black raffle coffee delivered straight to your door on a schedule. Coffee Club subscribers receive their high quality coffee at lower prices with free shipping, plus they get early access to exclusive deals and prices as well. Go to black Rifle Coffee dot com. Use promo code Shapiro, check out for 10% off your order. That's black Rifle Coffee dot com. Use promo code Shapiro for 10% off. You can also find Black Rifle, Coffee and grocery and convenience stores near you. Black Rifle Coffee is America's coffee. It's the thing that's basically keeping me alive and sentient at this point. Go check them out right now. Black Rifle Coffee dot com, use promo code Shapiro and get 10% off. Also, if you're planning to send your kid off to college this year, I've been on these campuses. These are woke campuses and you need to give your kids a fighting chance by sending 'em off. Not with a razor that celebrates gender mutilating surgery, but instead with Jeremy's Razors right now Get up to 20% off select razor and men's carrot bundles, such as, for example, this would be shampoo and this would be conditioner. And I've been told that these should never be united in one bottle and So we have not. These are paraben free. I dunno what paraben is. Sulfate free, woke free made in the United States. Get him a precision five razor with welded steel blades. Flip back tremor that will groom his face, not his worldview. Help your son escape academia's leftist indoctrination by more than just a close shave. Go to jeremy's Razors dot com for major deals. Give Jeremy's back to college. Bundles a full ride today. Meanwhile, the media seem absolutely determined to knock Ron DeSantis down. And the the idea here is that if you can knock DeSantis down, then Trump ends up the nominee and you get the race presumably that you want. This is why Newsweek is promoting the idea that Don Rhonda Hans was met with a large number of empty seats at a meet and greet event in Iowa. He went to Cedar Falls before eating breakfast at the Vinton family restaurant before heading to a meet and greet at a livestock auction in Tampa. But then there was a viral photo showed on social media that shows that there weren't a lot of people who showed up at this point. The journalist Tim Miller, who is very much a, a sort of bulwark type left winger a a quasi, a supposed conservative. He added a caveat saying, for what it's worth, DeSantis doing a bunch of events this weekend. Not all have been this sparse. This is the reality when you reboot and have to do grind it and have to grind it out. Lots of small events. Let Ron be Ron deal, okay? But again, it is pictures like this that the media are promoting. Meanwhile, you have Politico with an entire article today. DeSantis is conservative. Populism has left some donors chafing. When Ron DeSantis unveiled the economic platform last week, he presented himself as a conservative populist, A skeptic of corporations inside a party, often allied with them. But DeSantis rhetoric hasn't always matched his record as governor. He's done his share to support corporations as a presidential candidate. He has relied on contribution from titans of the business world. The tension between these two impulses was kept at bay for months as DeSantis looked well positioned to challenge Donald Trump for his party's nomination. But as he stumbled and continued waring with select corporations like Disney and Bud Light, big business is starting to show signs of irritation. So again, the new narrative that's going to come out, it's not new, is that DeSantis is already done for that. The campaign is already over. And the reason that you're seeing the media mirror that is because despite the fact that it is only August, there's not been a single debate yet, and we are still six months off from a primary, if they can kill DeSantis in the cradle right now, there really ain't anybody in the wings. The only other candidates right now in the Republican party who are already in the race are polling in single digits. If you look at the real clear politics, polling average right now, Donald Trump is at 53.7 DeSantis at 15.7, which is a drop of like three to five points over the last two months. The VE Rames Swami has jumped into third at 6%, and Mike Pence is at 5% in Iowa. By contrast, Trump is running about 27 points ahead of DeSantis in New Hampshire. He's running about 24 points ahead of DeSantis. DeSantis is in second place in both of those nominating contests right now. Okay? None of the other candidates are clocking at more than single digits in any of those, in any of those races right now. So if the media can knock DeSantis down his eyes, then the idea would be that Trump WATS to the nomination, which at this point is apparently sort of the plan. Now, is that going to be, again, it doesn't have to be DeSantis, but it it can be Trump, but Trump is gonna have to shift his campaign away from everybody. Jump to my defense because that's how I'm going to protect myself to here is, is what I'm going to do to stop Joe Biden. Here's what I'm gonna do to stop Joe Biden name the thing, please. Like I'm waiting for it. Okay? Meanwhile, just demonstrating the insanity of our racial moment, I gotta say the media are absolute garbage at pretty much everything on matters of race. This is particularly true. So the way that this works apparently, is that I suppose black people all over the world can be as racist and antisemitic as they want to be according to the mainstream media. Racism and antisemitism are bad, except depending on who's performing them. The reason I say this, there's an amazing headline in the New York Times. This is from a few days ago, about a song that was sung at a giant political rally at a leftist South African party rally. That party, the E F F is run by a person named Julius Malama, who has been challenged in court before for Racism. And he started chanting, kill the Boer. Kill the Boer. B O E R is a reference to killing white people, particularly farmers in South Africa, according to the New York Times, a video clip of that moment shot across the internet and was seized upon by some Americans on the far right who said it was a call to violence. That notion really took off when Elon Musk, the South African born billionaire who left the country as a teenager chimed in. He said They're openly pushing for genocide of white people in South Africa. Well, I mean yes, I mean clearly. If this had been a white party in South Africa saying kill the black people, I mean, I don't know. It is not super subtle. What's going on right here? Here is the headline from the New York Times Over Kill. The Boer Song Fuels Backlash in South Africa and Us. Oh, it's the backlash. That's the story. It's not that you have full scale political parties in South Africa calling for the extermination of white people. The story is the backlash. The subhead from the New York Times right wing commentators claim that an old anti-apartheid chance is a call to anti-white violence. But historians and the left wing politician who embrace its say, should not be taken literally. Oh, we don't take that. Literally, you see, kill the white people. We don't take, literally, what we do take literally obviously is like when a NASCAR driver retweets in a a George Floyd meme. That's when we take things super literally and we destroy his career. So over the weekend, NASCAR suspended a driver named Noah Gregson. Why? Well, because he appeared to have liked an insensitive meme with a photo of George Floyd on Social Media Legacy Motor Club announced Gregson suspension saying his actions do not represent the values of our team. NASCAR said, Gregson violated the stock car racing member conduct section of its rules, which says in part, members should not publicly disparage people based on their backgrounds. So Gregson did not direct address the alleged meme, but acknowledged his actions. He said, I'm disappointed in myself for lack of attention and actions on social media. Apparently the post shows a photo of Floyd's face and includes a reference to his death. The immediate response is that he must have been racist to repost the meme, which again, not sure why that would be racist as opposed to just, gosh, not quite the same thing. So the same media who will declare that this NASCAR driver is a racist and must be extirpated from American society and his job, they're the same people who are like kill the boar, is actually a subtle message about the evils of white supremacy. According to the New York Times, the channel was born at a time when black South Africans were fighting a violent racist regime and was made popular in the early 1990s by Peter moba, a former youth leader in the African National Congress. But in 2012, the A n c, they distanced themselves from the song and they expelled Mr. Malama for his incendiary statements. Apparently, the thi this is all not a big deal according to the New York Times, despite the fact that again, this song was actually banned. I believe it has been declared a hate speech song in South Africa for years and years. But now we, we have to kind of go back on that because the minute that the right wing Americans recognize that perhaps there are in fact people who are black, who are racist against whites in a place like South Africa. If we notice that, then the song apparently is good. Again, that's, that's the way that this works. Meanwhile, in, in other aspects of race that are terrible for people everywhere, the Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson, is focused laser-like on crime problems in his city. So there's been mass looting all over the city of Chicago in recent past, and the new mayor who is not Lori Lightfoot, he's male, Lori Lightfoot, Brandon Johnson, he actually scolded a reporter for calling a mass looting a mob saying this was racist language. So again, the way that this works and the median on the left is if you say that a mob ransacked a place that's racist, if you say kill the bower, that's not racist. That's subtle political messaging. That's not appropriate. We're not talking about mob actions. I didn't say that. What, what happened? Okay, what I'm, hold on a second. Okay. Respectfully, these large gatherings that caused damage, these large gatherings, just hold on a second, y'all, I promise you we have time to talk. It's important that we speak of these dynamics in an appropriate way. This is not to obfuscate what has actually taken place. This was the scene near Roosevelt and Canal. Sunday night groups looted a convenience store. More than three dozen teenagers were arrested along not a mob With a 12 year large Gathering guy, and at least one 20 year old. Three How many teenagers? How many teenagers are that? That's a lot of teenagers, not a mob according to the Chicago mayor. That's just, that's just great. So yeah, it turns out that the soft bigotry of law expectations leads to increased Racism. It also leads to increased crime. Okay? Meanwhile, when we talk about the soft bigotry of law expectations, the level of antisemitism that is tolerated so long as it comes from black leftists is truly astonishing. It really is an amazing, amazing thing. And the way that that antisemitism is treated in the press is if it's a white fan of Donald Trump or a white non-fan of Donald Trump who's a white supremacist, then anti-Semitism is a true deep scorge. If it's coming from Hamas, Hezbollah, if it's coming from any of the radical Middle Eastern Muslim groups that seek to destroy the state of Israel, then it's more a political question than, you know, the wiping the Jews off the planet. And if it's coming from prominent black people, then it's pretty much not a problem at all. We just ignore it completely. By the way, this extends all the way to the very top of how the media treat people. So I mentioned earlier in the day this interview with a historian David Garrow about Barack Obama. Okay? So the fact that Barack Obama's anti-Semitism was overlooked for literally years is an amazing, amazing indicator of just how easy people on the left go when it comes to antisemitism coming from members of the Black Community Tablet magazine covering this. David Samuels is the, is the author He writes, quote, there's a fascinating passage in rising star David Garrell's comprehensive biography of Barack Obama's early days in which the historian examines Obama's account in dreams from my father of his breakup with his longtime Chicago girlfriend, Sheila Miyoshi Yeager. In Dreams Obama describes a passionate disagreement following a play by African American playwright August Wilson, in which the young protagonist defenses Incipients embrace a black racial consciousness against his girlfriend's white identified liberal universalism. As readers, we know the stakes of this decision will become more than simply personal. The black American man Obama wills into being in the scene would go on to marry a black woman from the south side of Chicago named Michelle Robinson, and after a Meteor York rise win election as the first black president of the United States. And what Ro documented after tracking down and interviewing Sheila Miyoshi Yeager was an explosive fight over a very different subject in Yeager's. Telling the quarrel that ended the couple's relationship was not about Obama's self-identification as a black man. The impetus was not a play about the American Black ex black experience, but an exhibit at Chicago's Spiritist Institute about the 1961 trial of Eichman at the time that Obama and Sheila visited the Spirits Institute, Chicago politics was being roiled by a black mayoral aid named Steve Coley. When a series of lectures organized by Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam accused Jewish doctors in Chicago of infecting black babies with AIDS as part of a genocidal plot against African Americans. The episode highlighted a deep rift within the city's power echelons with some prominent black officials supporting Coley, others calling for his firing. In Yeager's recollection, what set off the quarrel that precipitated the end of the couple's relationship was Obama's stubborn refusal after seeing the exhibit and in the swirl of the cochlea affair to condemn black Racism, while acknowledging that Obama's embrace of a black identity had created some degree of distance between the couples. She insisted what upset her that day was Obama's inability to condemn Coley's comments. It was not Obama's blackness that bothered her, but that he would not condemn antisemitism. Well, I mean, yeah, that again, is not a shock. Remember that Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for fully, for full on 20 years? Full on 20 years. So is it any shock that he would not condemn antisemitism back in his younger days? Well, the latest example of black antisemitism, one is being ignored. One is, one is not being ignored as much. Jamie Fox over the weekend wrote a post on Instagram saying, quote, they killed this dude named Jesus. What do you think they'll do to you? Followed by the hashtags, Fake friends and Fake love the actor later deleted the Post not before being accused of anti-Semitism on social media, because of course they killed this dude named Jesus. Very often that is used by people who don't like Jews very much to refer to Jews. Jennifer Aniston liked the post before it was deleted. And then she, she liked it and she said, didn didn't like this post on purpose or by accident. So apparently it was miraculous. More importantly, I wanna be clear to my friends and anyone hurt by showing up in their feeds. I do not support any form of anti-Semitism. I truly don't hate tolerate hate of any kind, period. Now, Fox posted an apology, said, I wanna apologize to the Jewish community and everyone who's offended by my post, I know my choice of words is cost offense, and I'm sorry that was never my intent. He said, instead he was referring to a Fake friend who had betrayed him. Apparently, there was also speculation that this sort of phraseology is used frequently in the black community suggesting they killed Jesus, which sometimes an implication with regard to Jews. So Jamie Fox backs off that one. Meanwhile, Cardi Beaches gets away with sort of the most outrageous Jewish stereotyping available. So Cardi B, and again, as a, as a person who is not a connoisseur of her entire ova, Cardi B, who is a deeply unintelligent human being, she tweeted out the other day a picture of two Hasidic Jews. And these Jews are in like the full Hasidic garb, probably in Brooklyn. One is wearing a strel, which is the kind of furry round hat that you see sometimes. The other is wearing a a, a black hat and is also wearing a abeche, which is kinda a long black jacket. These, the, the etymology these things, they go back to Poland and a various typical stereotypical picture of like ultra Orthodox Jews. And she says, remember do.dot. What exactly is she referring to? Apparently she's referring to a line in her Shakespearean song, Bicking head in which she says this, Let should be a party, party matter. Okay, so lawyer is a Jew is the line, right? Lawyer is a Jew, he gonna get my money. Right? Again, the this, the idea being that because, so there is a, a typical Jewish stereotype that, that Jews are disproportionately lawyers. That's not a stereotype. That's, that's true. Jews are disproportionately lawyers, doctors, accountants. There are a lot of different industries in which Jews represent a disproportionate share of, of members of the industry. What is actually stereotypical and antisemitic is the implication that if you take a picture of two very Hasidic Jews, that this is somehow representative of, like her Jewish lawyers. Now we actually have pictures of her Jewish lawyers, okay? Her Jewish lawyers look like secular reformed Jews at the very, very best. Do these look like the Jews that you just saw on the streets of New York? And the idea that all Jews are the same is, is a hell of a, is a hell of a stereotype. If I was like, wow, you know, rappers, and then I just posted a picture of Barack Obama and Eric Holder, you'd be like, that's a little racist, isn't it? That seemed like a little racist. Cardi B, however, says this kind of stuff on the routine and no problem whatsoever. And this is true throughout unfortunately rap culture, this stuff is posted routinely by people ranging from like Ice Cube to Cardi B and everybody just goes, eh, whatever. Is that really a big deal? Well, I mean it would be if we were talking about any other race attacking members of any other race. This is the, the fact that this is led off the hook is astonishing to me. But again, it, it shows that when racial preference and racial hierarchy is created in the name of intersectionality, ugly things then occur. Okay? Meanwhile, the, the science crowd is out there continuing their work. So Harry's Razors are good friends at Harry's. You remember Harry's, Harry's is the reason we launched. I Hate Harry's. So Harry's Razors used to be a sponsor on some of the shows over here, and then they realized that our hosts didn't believe that men could magically become women and vice versa. And so they pulled their advertising and said that they don't like our audience. Basically, So, we launched, I Hate Harry's, and we have well over a hundred thousand subscribers who buy our Razors instead of Harry's Razors. Well, I think it's time for more of you who are Harry's Razors subscribers to consider. I hate harry's dot com after Harry's put out a piece of social media advertising celebrating my first pride with facial hair. So this is a woman who had her breast tissue carved out of her, her, and that had hormone treatment to grow facial hair and is now using Harry's Razors in order to shave her face that those are transgender stars that are happening right there. Growing up, I always was envious of boys going through puberty, getting facial hair and learning how to shaves says this person. I love growing a beard and maintaining it. Having facial hair and grooming routine is the most gender affirming thing to me. Good job, Harry's. You have turned this young woman into a deformed young woman, like really great job. You've, you've, you've celebrated the mutilation and self-mutilation of a young woman. That's just, that's just tremendous. Well, folks, if you don't wish to actually give your money to those people, perhaps you'd like to give your money instead to a company that's not hate your guts, but this is all part of the push for science that we've been seeing. So Neil deGrasse Tyson, who we've had on the Sunday special before, and we had an exchange over transgenderism in, in which Neil deGrasse Tyson suddenly became very, very unscientific expressing many non-verifiable ideas about what constitutes manhood and womanhood. Now he has a decided to go even further. Here is Neil deGrasse Tyson talking about, talking about men and women competing against each other in sports on the Michael Shermer show. It is a little weird that we split people by male and female in this way. I'm imagining a hundred years from now looking back and say, do you know, back a hundred years ago they split boys and girls and they couldn't compete that. And I was like, that'd just be kind of a little weird. Don don't know Neil because the kids on. I can imagine Thinking how Weird that is. Yeah, I I could imagine that too. But the differences are so massive on average. Again, I've seen the pictures of you as, as, as a college wrestler. Listen to me, the average woman is not gonna be able to take, the average woman wrestler is not gonna be able to take down you when you were in your, your peak. Okay, Michael, maybe the the best female. Michael, You sound like a you're, you're an old man on the porch in a rocking chair right now. I'm telling you. No, no. Okay, I'm telling you, I I'm telling you, you are criticizing something that is in need of modification. You mean human biology? That's what's in need of modification. I'm sorry to break it to scientists Neil deGrasse Tyson, but women and men on average do not perform similarly with regard to athletics, which is why Venus Williams and Serena Williams get their asses kicked by a 200 ranked man who is smoking between sets and they're the greatest women's tennis players probably ever. Certainly Serena is. Meanwhile, here's Neil deGrasse Tyson trying to explain away his lack of science. Here is a more complete take on what exactly gender is supposed to be according to astrophysicist. Neil deGrasse Tyson Point is apparently the X X X Y chromosomes are insufficient because when we wake up in the morning, we exaggerate whatever feature we want to portray the gender of our choice. Mm, either the one you're assigned, the one you choose to be, whatever it is. And so now here, so, so now just to, to tie a bow on this, I say to you somewhere, I read somewhere, I, I think I read that the United States was a land where we have the pursuit of happiness. Yes. Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80% female, 20% male, I'm gonna, I'm gonna put on makeup, I'm gonna do that tomorrow. I might feel 80% male. I'll remove the makeup and I'll wear a muscle shirt. Why do you care? Wait, why do you care that I care? Do what you're gonna do and then live in the world. And also recognize that this does not make you a man or a woman. This is not scientific. So I feel today I feel like an astrophysicist. I'm like 80% astrophysicist today. Tomorrow I'll wake up and I'll be like 10% astrophysicist. And the day after, I won't be astrophysicist at all. What does he care? If I walk into a lab and start performing the job of an astrophysicist, what does that matter? I mean? After, all I'm identifying as an astrophysicist, what exactly is the problem? What if I also put on a white lab coat and I, and I wear a weird Hawaiian shirt? What if I do all those things that would that make me an astronaut I mean I'd identify that way? It would make me feel it's so scientific. Guys, do you feel the science happening? Do you feel it happening in real time here from Neil deGrasse Tyson And it? If if all womanhood is is makeup and dresses, then I have some bad news for the future of human reproduction. It turns out that that's not the case. Meanwhile, again, the scientists doing their best to, you know, not do science. The American Academy of Pediatrics According to the Wall Street Journal plans to review the evidence for gender affirming medical care and potentially amend its policies that help guide doctors and clinicians providing the treatment to transgender youth. And. it would be amazing if you had done the damn research in the first place and cared about it as opposed to simply dictating that we should shoot children full of hormones and then cut off their genitals. That would've been amazing if you had done a little bit of research first, but apparently, no, it was more important that they do the, the most tolerant possible thing, which is to refer people for physical mutilation rather than mental health treatment that they so clearly require, okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like today. So over the weekend, I had a lot of time to read since I was in the hospital watching my child breathe. It was really a terrible weekend. But I did read what was a phenomenal book. This is a book by Aortal. It's called A Gentleman in Moscow, And. it is the best novel that I've read in five to 10 years. It's terrific, it's really good. So it, it centers on a, a guy named Count Sav, who's sort of an old school Russian member of the up the upper class beef. And he ends up being taken by the Red Soviets in the aftermath of Russian Revolution and tried and then confined to a hotel. And he is now stuck in the Hotel Metropol for literally the rest of his life. That is his sentence that he's going to be, he's gonna be sentenced to live in a fairly small room in this hotel for the rest of his life, and he is not allowed to leave ever. And so the entire novel is about what happens to him in this hotel and the people that he meets and how he finds meaning there. And. it is a beautiful novel. It's truly beautiful, not just because the writing is terrific, because it really, really is, but also because of the generalized take, which is that yes, there are things that are worth preserving from the old world and those things are worthy of care and that perfectionism and how you approach everyday tasks actually matters. And that you, you have to open yourself up to experiences of family and childbearing in order to find your most purposeful self. And also, of course, it exposes the tremendous evils of the Soviet Union, but it does so in a really subtle and, and amazing way. It's, it's truly a masterpiece. A gentleman in Moscow, highly recommended by Emma Tolls, this one was recommended to me. My friend Andrew klavin, who has interesting taste in literature. He, he has a hit rate with me of about like 75%. This one is like one of his best picks. He referred me to this book, really worth the Read A Gentleman in Moscow by Amor Tolls, go pick it up today. Okay, other things that I like. So I ask you, which way Western man, this is a picture of the Prime Minister of Canada who is now getting divorced and it is a picture of him with his son at the Barbie movie. And I just have to say, are the Chinese quaking in their boots at this point? He had tweeted out, we are Team Barbie and it's a picture of him in a pink sweatshirt that says, love you more. And his son who is wearing a pink t-shirt and star shorts, and they're gazing bizarrely and creepily into the camera right in front of the Margot Robbie Ryan Gosling poster from Barbie. So here are your choices. The people who are Team Barbie or the people who are not Team Barbie. Yes, this is, you know where I stand on this, but where do you stand on this? And and I ask you, should, does this speak well of the future of the western world? Is this, is this where things are going? Are they going amazingly well? Russia, Russia and China just did a joint military exercise near Alaska. And meanwhile the head of Canada is tweeting out bizarre photos of himself with his son from the Barbie movie and saying he's team Barbie. The future is in the best of hands, but I love it when people expose themselves for who they are and Justin Trudeau. Can you, can you imagine it, man? Fidel Castro must be turning over in his grave to see his son acting this way. Okay, time for some things that I hate. All righty. So Megan Rapinoe one of the most irritating people on planet earth. She had an opportunity to push the United States Women's National soccer team into the next round. Now she's most famous for having blue hair and also for really hating America. I mean the national anthem is bad and America's a deeply sexist and racist place even though they're paying her way too much money to play a sport. No one has ever watched except once every four years when we all pretend to be interested in women's soccer and all the rest of it. Well, Rapino apparently had a penalty shot and she missed, and the United States lost and they got booted by Sweden. And bizarrely enough, she started kind of laughing and smiling after she missed the shot. And she didn't miss by a little, she missed by like a lot. Now, to be fair to to Megan Rapinoe, you know, there are all these pictures that are going a around of her laughing and smiling and all the rest of it. And she, you know, people react in bizarre ways to terrible things happening to them. So I'm not gonna blame her for like laughing and then crying. People do react in weird ways to bad situations. If you've ever had to tell somebody truly horrible news, you kinda don't know what to do. So I get that. The part about Megan Rapinoe that is, you know, annoying is that she's Megan Rapino. And so she was asked, after blowing this game, she's asked about, you know, the most important things to her, her best memories from her career and her best memories from her career are absolutely obviously political. Is there a memory that stands out to you right now in this moment? Oh, I mean probably equal pay chance after the final. And I think, you know, they were saying equal pay, but could have been saying a lot of things. I think this team has always fought for so much more, and that's been the most rewarding part for me. of course, playing in World Cups and winning championships and doing all that. But you know, to know that we've used our really special talent to do something, you know, that's really like changed the world forever. I think that means the most to me. And you know, the players in this locker room here, they're just getting started and you know, to all the players that I've played with, obviously, you know, who know what it's like to be in the grind. That's the best part. Meanwhile, president Biden tweeted out US World National Cup team, you've made your country proud. Congratulations on an incredible run. This team is something special. I'm looking forward to seeing how you continue to inspire Americans with your grit and determination on and off the field. It's the worst performance in years. President Biden, of course, had to sign in because he's big fans of Megan Rapinoe, where we all pretend that the women's soccer team is even remotely similar to the men's soccer team. It's a completely different sport. It earns way less revenue on a, on a four year basis, doesn't matter. Megan Rapinoe continue to be hailed by the left as a heroin again. The problem with Megan Rapinoe is not that you miss a penalty shot. Lots of people miss penalty shots. And the problem is not that she reacted weirdly, when that happens, when bad stuff happens, bad stuff happens. The problem with Megan Rapinoe is that she's kind of a terrible person and that she's spent her entire career pressing forward the idea that America is a terrible, horrible place that has made her extraordinarily wealthy and famous for playing a sport that no one cares about worldwide. You, you wanna know that the evidence that no one caress about this sport worldwide, that the United States wins every year. That's, that's how you know that no one caress about this sport worldwide because there are like seven people in the United States who take soccer seriously compared to, you know, the rest of the human population. So if we're winning at that sport, that means that half the population in the rest of the world doesn't even compete in that sport. Like that's, that's just the way it is. But we have to pretend that America's a terrible no good, very bad place. So that's, that's, that's that. and we bid a not particularly fine farewell to Megan Rapino. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. All righty guys. The rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be getting into media coverage suggesting that actually sexual assault coverups in Virginia are okay. The real problem is that we notice if you're not a member, Become a member. Use Coach Shapiro checkout for two months free on all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us.

right

ep trump racism celebrity antisemitism publish economy begin soften ukraine war drag joe bidens poll number vulnerability republicans able advantage m bench bureau bench bureau bench bureau sponsor expressvpn protect online privacy today expressvpn dot com slash ben s lot speculation long time economy go soften finally begin accord wall street journal earning nation big company poise fall straight quarter hurt decline energy price exactly not technically recession presumably consumer spending remain pretty high inflation economy extra dollar joe biden blow economy cause easy money policy federal reserve take wash way outta economy happen consumer go able outpace producer producer start cut see writing wall start consolidate gain start realize continue expand actual manufacturing actual production go undercut start earning decline virtually major company member s p accord wall street journal law pace collectively report decline earning bad performance revenue track rise year ago s largely inflation point decline oil price example energy sector take right chin happen material happen tech apple sale fall consecutive quarter amid soften demand consumer device area continue quarterly revenue growth area healthcare communication service real estate continue sort hold steady point company report bad earning mean economy likely downturn come quarter employment number come friday weak expect course greatly shock ve say month program go come idea overheated economy go crash cliff specious presumption foreign policy ukraine war continue pace accord new york times ukrainian force strike bridge connect russian occupy crimea rest ukraine sunday broad pattern attack peninsula seek scramble critical supply route kremlin push scope war fresh territory ukrainian offensive hope ll push russians russians come negotiating table question point exactly russians ask everybody know line negotiation recognize s misalignment incentive west keep say zelensky get deal zelensky keep say deal russians russian territory russians say deal try push consider formal russian territory crimea donbas region sundays taxi injure driver enclose traffic second bridge east chahar near small town hek accord governor region vladimir aldo s russian guy strike tear hole roadway ukraine armed force take credit strike sunday departure typically coi approach zelensky official emphasize new aim force ordinary russians face kremlin bad thing likely bad well american public heart anymore poll plurality americans interested endless level support ukraine war support give point russian chinese force up ante weekend combine russian chinese naval force patrol near coast alaska expert say appear large flotilla approach american shore apparently russian chinese ship close aleutian island accord official ship enter territorial water shadow destroyer p poseidon aircraft historical say bren sadler sr research fellow heritage foundation give context war ukraine intention taiwan highly provocative spokesman northern command confirm russia china carry combine naval patrol alaska not specify number ship precise location russia china up ante biden administration plan ask concession china continue fund war ukraine s ramp regard war ukraine allow shift focus china china realize go box demographically economically short order spell possibility future conflict let recognize unpredictability change americas foreign policy weak passive aggressive throw people kilter fact russia ve invade ukraine sin biden administration read vice president united states ll remember russia actually invade ukraine originally barack obama president united states weekend obama fawning interview glow medium claim right thing here christiana amour bad pseudo journalist business ask barack obama american foreign policy russia invade crimea happen merkel enormous credit pull lot europeans kick scream impose sanction prevent putin continue dun buss rest ukraine actually think give ukraine time european mindset time hold line okay let clear hold line entire attempt hand crimea russia place deeply tie barack obamas pathetically intransigent approach regard iran try cut deal iran nuclear deal iran want russia help broker deal willing hand crimea russians order sure happen s russian advance ukraine time joe biden president united states russia think go away confusion foreign policy lead problem start stack regard joe bidens administration polling number s weak right s pull donald trump michigan major national poll right donald trump run joe biden late national poll joe biden accord insider advantage tie accord new york times ciena accord morning console trump accord messenger harris x say joe biden run extremely weak right policy absolutely awful link fact hunter biden scandal nearly easily break mainstream course year half democrat run scared fact start crack base democratic party representative jake chen klauss democratic massachusetts finally admit national tv hunter commit crime face penalty hunter biden commit crime hunter biden face justice accountability crime way sentence hear republican donald trump massive crime focus obsession hunter biden whopper cause republicans try deflect diminish defend donald trump grave crime conspiracy constitution united states okay go great misdirect democrats go donald trump okay question republican advantage joe biden weakness rest entirely republican base go nominate person s go entire subject election foible legal peccadillo momentarily time talk daily wire trust privacy partner premier sponsor express vpn huge tech company america pay taxis mean barely society actually incredibly wealthy ton giving sure lot take datum monetize ban platform censor money allow protect identity datum tech giant recommend express vpn time online certainly think website visit online track giant corporation public ip address uniquely match activity know location express vpn make anonymous online camouflage ip address replace different secure ip choice expressvpn encrypt datum protect hacker try spy like expressvpn easy use download app phone computer tap button ready protect datum number rate vpn provider today visit expressvpn dot com slash ben today extra month free year package s x p r e s s vpn dot com slash ben visit expressvpn dot com slash ben learn okay question republicans go actually believe rest country believe like believe donald trump listen republicans base talk s go donald trump myriad trial bring trial manhattan trial florida trial washington dc republican talk subject election corruption d oj agree ideal world d talk endlessly independence corruption d oj weaponization law enforcement use f b donald trump beginning passage hillary clinton campaign highly relevant go topic bread butter topic americans vote simply go general decision election like guy trust guy think person likely lead stable america send kid school know ll safe bread table right real big question republican win question democrats country safe regard crime democrat threaten kid term value promulgate school question question republicans win talk censor issue d o j mean donald trump political purpose donald trump fact commit criminal act go win formula republican not way s win formula democrats stay home unhappy joe biden donald trump squeak recipe sort broad base electoral victory recipe rely luck know start business thing say beginning daily wire luck business strategy luck political strategy idea go luck basically joe biden will not visit wisconsin will not visit michigan hell absent election democrats go to stay home couple factor militate factor lot democrats remember remember think hillary clinton lock win not donald trump president number hillary clinton poll run ahead joe biden run right democrat understand s real risk donald trump go white house mean motivated vote come message campaign democrat go to able basically shy away suppose corruption d o j allege corruption corruption think real partisan go to able shy away talk endlessly donald trump donald trump love talk donald trump entire election donald trump election donald trump s go lose election joe biden go lose particularly hard math whichever candidate subject referendum lose like joe biden think joe biden time pull lever go to vote opponent think donald trump time vote probably go vote joe biden exactly trump think s sure s know handle legal trouble sure s talk stuff s spend zero focus actual political opponent focus right not blame hit charge hit mean spend mental energy think sort stuff presumably truth sociale sort stuff hour trump good day bad day s sure go problem donald trump put spotlight medium happy spotlight democrat happy spotlight wake hour spend donald trumps truth social talk hate nancy pelosi jack smith mike pence recipe electoral success here thing want joe biden president united states anymore think s terrible president way not think joe biden control administration think staff people ask actually run biden administration answer basically everybody s staff barack obama s fascinating interview tablet magazine david garrow s biographer barack obama write biography barack obama largely ignore medium complimentary biography barack obama include fact barack obama young day pretty rabidly antisemitic shock s sit jeremiah wright church year know write love letter girlfriend talk fantasy gay sex s sort salacious ugly material biography david garrow s poet surprise win historian way david garrow say interview tablet magazine joe biden run large part administration obama not pick phone people white house hold iran file tony blinken not rob malley person brett mcgirk dan shapiro israel lisa monica injustice susan rice run domestic policy turtle way obviously large part white house policymake belong barack obama staff people work doubt report personnel policy washington biographer barack obama david garry say odd kind spooky arrangement spooky happen outside constitutional framework united states government place list permit subject report pretty good indicator extent information public reaction information successfully control course exactly right thing s happen talk stuff thing spend time talk presumably donald trumps legal trouble second late economy sort razor edge unclear way go m big diversification particularly asset likely accrue value time day ago longtime sponsor masterwork deliver net return investor net return listener see masterwork art invest platform hand net return recent exit investment past performance representative artwork sell guarantee future return masterwork art invest platform multiyear sponsor user basically allow buy fractional piece great work art get sell mean money plus thing accrue value highend art generally accrue value tremendous number access skip waitlist simply go masterworkscom ben s masterworkscom ben important disclosure risk investingmasterworkscom slash cd check right masterworkscom ben trump team get ready court bunch different defense put forward donald trumps lawyer name john laro s news making defense president trump point president trump expression concern election regularity s amendment protect material s point actual statute bring indictment donald trump actually properly formulate likely preemptive appeal supreme court try thing stop asap fast possible encourage people range mark levin senator mike lee utah flurry interview statement sunday trump legal team preview seek defend president federal conspiracy charge accord lara sunday b c say government able prove reasonable doubt president trump corrupt criminal intent s case s legal issue true false go find donald trump deck stack question judge case number dedicated democrat actually serve law firm hunter biden apparently take place washington dc unfriendly area jury selection apparently team trump want thing move virginia believe washington dc place trump not fair trial course s trial trump currently undergo expect georgia da drop indictment donald trump moment ll different trial course year true outrageous okay case manhattan das case absolutely specious garbage stormy daniel donald trump supposedly take personal money spend stormy daniel silencer oppose campaign money ridiculous scope manhattan da want famous ridiculous case throw summarily manhattan convict florida classify document pretty case donald trump criming tape not crime tape rule law say prosecute political case not prosecute hillary clinton prosecute essentially exact crime court law donald trump prosecute sure florida friendly territory donald trump win state twice head washington dc incredibly weak case bring jack smith january matter want bring charge indictment actual criminal charge not bother bring charge not prove instead bring bunch ancillary charge range obstruction justice fraud statute apply true time political level donald trump weekend tweet s election go question kind normal conservative normal independent mind thing wake morning outrage certain percentage population sure population large doubt s case consider solid majority independent think trump indict not care charge go to hard convince independent trump indict elect s indict heavy lift encourage republican think pretty seriously think likely beat joe biden think feel good nominate thing weekend donald trump start go judge particular case say s cap fair trial judge assign ridiculous freedom speech fair election case everybody know immediately ask accusation judge powerful ground likewise venue change dc judge shakin course appointee president barack obama m say trumps concern predicate think m ss n b c legal analyst david henderson say judge trump bad nightmare mean s true leftwing judge obviously frank turn amen trump bad nightmare s legal team bad nightmare m go to real black woman law degree virtual unstoppable force come justice system here reason take s subject different form discrimination discrimination base gender discrimination base race extract law term thing actually suppose work environment people mistreat base single day career ve get somebody walk courtroom say hang second deserve treat treat differently super powerful person expect super powerful person go work okay fact left excited judge demonstrate trump exactly right case person make identity black woman trump bad nightmare opposite good judge mean good judge impartially decide case look deep well soul come sort jerry riggs explanation bad orange man jail s exactly m s nbc analyst say trump complaint predicate judge think s little doubt question republicans basis election run not stop course post come come come weekend second get to tell rough weekend baby half month old come r s v have trouble breathe mean lot night like pretty night weekend rare moment get lie need sleep right away helix sleep mattress useful rely helix sleep mattress evoke new highend collection call helix elite helix harness year extensive mattress expertise bring customer truly elevate sleep experience helix elite collection include different mattress model tailor specific sleep position firmness preference ve helix sleep mattress like seven year point firm breathable exactly need need sleep like right doubt helix company rely mattress rely helix sleepcom ben minute sleep quiz find perfect mattress body sleep type mattress come door ship free plus helix warranty try night risk free limited time helix offer mattress order plus free pillow listener good offer hurry helix sleepcom ben helix well sleep start right okay donald trumps complaint weekend donald trump send missive say capital letter m come totally unclear exactly talk implication d o j come s president united states afterward s go corrupt member d o j entirely purview send jack smith spiral jack smith prosecutor case special counsel file motion motion say propose order seek prevent improper dissemination use discovery material include public restriction particularly important case defendant previously issue public statement social medium witness judge attorney associate legal matter pende recent day case defendant issue multiple post specifically implication include following m come defendant begin issue public post detail example grand jury transcript obtain discovery harmful chilling effect witness adversely affect fair administration justice case trump later defendant claim say not potential witness not threaten people say quote rhino china love dishonest special interest group super pac like one fund koch brother club growth case thing go to litigate way not stop go civil right violate m say donald trump wrong m ask electoral strategy worthwhile donald trump go civil right violate montgomery alabama rally friday civil right violate matter civil right countless people biden communist persecute communist marxist people not know vicious smart smart tough fine good subject election feel like m beat dead horse horse be not dead sense people say election wrong basis donald trump win not evidence weekend go variously nancy pelosi mike pence truth social go nancy pelosi cause nancy pelosi suggest look like scared puppy definitely get goat trump truth social purposely not comment nancy pelosis weird story concern husband say glee vicious see scared puppy say watch television like million not not scared mean thing wicked witch husband journey hell start finish s sick demented psycho someday live hell capital letter woo ask win wisconsin michigan pennsylvania georgia arizona voter like s sick demented cycle someday live hell husband journey hell start finish m totally thing run reelection s run election lose okay s go to win additional vote win s go mike pence penny say plan testify trump weekend mike pence say trump come say wow finally happen little mike penny s run nickname s start cycle nickname remember little marco little marco ruby little crook hillary s crooked joe s recycle good environment say little mike pence man s oust governor indiana come m v p go dark don know power dark d tell newly embolden base number penny constitution mike honest s delusional want s tough guy read major magazine article mike say good person surprised article right sad okay people donald trump select position power turn good people pretty man bad selection personnel human history turn cross sword lot people end work not right thing people rant fellow republicans weekend suggest republicans fault s indict right weird consider okay democrats fault fault hard blame ron desantis marco rubio chris christie mike penny donald trump thing true unfairly target case particularly classify document case dude bed s have lie pleasant not give differential treatment hillary clinton blame republicans failing point will not republican voter look little responsible action like little indict political opponent say glove s crooked incompetent thief not allow president republicans well tough well smart look like bunch weak jerk right got to tough smart fight fire fire not allow republicans fault guy president long year allow entire justice department apparently completely run people hate gut fault rando congressperson like iowa s win electoral strategy ask m go to stop ask thing matter thing matter policy united states look like go forward donald trumps personal peccadillo myriad foible willing aside good stuff country question go to chance thing reelect president basis thing donald trumps campaign reelection actually simple thing well president joe biden terrible president wanna focus legal stuff ill care court m big brave strong stoic ill care court come corrupt real issue joe biden terrible president day election m go to talk terrible president joe biden m go to look sort victimization narrative m go focus big story america people mean legally speak handle m big boy m rich person ve go battle ill continue battle real issue joe biden joe biden not leave president trump lip s go problem general election trump fan republicans decide chief factor term conservative loyalty follow trump primrose path lose not don not not work like certain certain number people sort thing like rockham robot like idea actually take joe biden outta presidency weekend laura trump president daughterinlaw talk trump stoic s stand bad guy get big hand republican crowd un hannity see fatherinlaw today see way plane see plane think world see today world see yeah donald trump way s pretty nice plane bad bad believe donald trump time person crumble person ve crack give s fight sean s fight fight single american okay question mean crumble wait cut plead deal mean crumble point purely factual level s indict s defend usually happen get indict defend come dc indictment complete bull crap jack smith put forward come florida indictment s fault document give document national archive unjust prosecution sure politically motivated time know ve smart thing document step rake place republicans go to run basis want datum show indictment actually strong general hear datum effect lot datum suggest trump strong primary indictment lot republicans emotionally resonate unjustly persecute feel okay republican target political opposition jail crime democrat commit away political prosecution know terrible mean hell win general election ask question apparently ve set ve president trump articulate plan win reelection plan s spend money literally legal bill right s spend build voting base necessary actually win election s spend ballot harvesting s spend door knock s message regard president biden know predictable effect datum m see rough year republicans early special election special election bellwether actual election special election go horribly republicans far wonder fact instead focus joe biden terrible governance hate accord poll focus iota accord number crunch find special election hold far year democrat outperform partisan lien average romp part country typically support party cut g o p margin red city county example democratic candidate wiss wisconsin state assembly special election month lose seven point area republican point edge trump beat biden point new hampshire special election state house seat democrat win point s far point edge district good number republicans comparison accord democrats outperform weighted partisan lien special election hold midterm election biden win white house democrats underperform inhouse race like special election mean necessarily change early s question point donald trump run election campaign base solely indictment probably go to run benefit republicans ask s plan victory second team know need black raffle coffee speak early fact not sleep like night mean m go real heavy black raffle coffee lately busy like need check black raffle coffee ready drink can ready drink coffee perfect people need coffee fast contain milligram caffeine iss available variety flavor like vanilla bomb salt caramel mocha vanilla caramel black raffle coffee veteran found coffee company operate principled man woman honor protect defend support country purchase stop run coffee sign coffee club subscription black raffle coffee deliver straight door schedule coffee club subscriber receive high quality coffee low price free shipping plus early access exclusive deal price black rifle coffee dot com use promo code shapiro check order s black rifle coffee dot com use promo code shapiro find black rifle coffee grocery convenience store near black rifle coffee americas coffee thing s basically keep alive sentient point check right black rifle coffee dot com use promo code shapiro plan send kid college year ve campus wake campus need kid fighting chance send em razor celebrate gender mutilate surgery instead jeremys razor right select razor men carrot bundle example shampoo conditioner ve tell unite bottle paraben free dunno paraben sulfate free woke free united states precision razor weld steel blade flip tremor groom face worldview help son escape academias leftist indoctrination close shave jeremys razor dot com major deal jeremy college bundle ride today medium absolutely determined knock ron desantis idea knock desantis trump end nominee race presumably want newsweek promote idea don rhonda hans meet large number seat meet greet event iowa go cedar fall eat breakfast vinton family restaurant head meet greet livestock auction tampa viral photo show social medium show not lot people show point journalist tim miller sort bulwark type leave winger quasi suppose conservative add caveat say worth desantis bunch event weekend sparse reality reboot grind grind lot small event let ron ron deal okay picture like medium promote politico entire article today desantis conservative populism leave donor chafe ron desantis unveil economic platform week present conservative populist skeptic corporation inside party ally desantis rhetoric not match record governor s share support corporation presidential candidate rely contribution titan business world tension impulse keep bay month desantis look position challenge donald trump partys nomination stumble continue waring select corporation like disney bud light big business start sign irritation new narrative s go come new desantis campaign reason see medium mirror despite fact august s single debate month primary kill desantis cradle right be not anybody wing candidate right republican party race poll single digit look real clear politic polling average right donald trump desantis drop like point month ve rame swami jump mike pence iowa contrast trump run point ahead desantis new hampshire s run point ahead desantis desantis second place nominate contest right okay candidate clock single digit race right medium knock desantis eye idea trump wat nomination point apparently sort plan go not desantis trump trump go to shift campaign away everybody jump defense s m go protect m go stop joe biden here m go to stop joe biden thing like m wait okay demonstrate insanity racial moment get to medium absolute garbage pretty matter race particularly true way work apparently suppose black people world racist antisemitic want accord mainstream medium racism antisemitism bad depend s perform reason s amazing headline new york times day ago song sing giant political rally leftist south african party rally party e f f run person name julius malama challenge court racism start chant kill boer kill boer b o e r reference kill white people particularly farmer south africa accord new york times video clip moment shoot internet seize americans far right say violence notion take elon musk south african bear billionaire leave country teenager chime say openly push genocide white people south africa mean yes mean clearly white party south africa say kill black people mean not know super subtle s go right headline new york times kill boer song fuel backlash south africa oh backlash s story scale political party south africa call extermination white people story backlash subhead new york times right wing commentator claim old antiapartheid chance antiwhite violence historian left wing politician embrace take literally oh not literally kill white people not literally literally obviously like nascar driver retweet george floyd meme s thing super literally destroy career weekend nascar suspend driver name noah gregson appear like insensitive meme photo george floyd social medium legacy motor club announce gregson suspension say action represent value team nascar say gregson violate stock car racing member conduct section rule say member publicly disparage people base background gregson direct address allege meme acknowledge action say m disappointed lack attention action social medium apparently post show photo floyd face include reference death immediate response racist repost meme sure racist oppose gosh thing medium declare nascar driver racist extirpate american society job people like kill boar actually subtle message evil white supremacy accord new york times channel bear time black south africans fight violent racist regime popular early peter moba youth leader african national congress n c distance song expel mr malama incendiary statement apparently thi big deal accord new york times despite fact song actually ban believe declare hate speech song south africa year year kind minute right wing americans recognize fact people black racist white place like south africa notice song apparently good s s way work aspect race terrible people chicago mayor brandon johnson focus laserlike crime problem city s mass loot city chicago recent past new mayor lori lightfoot s male lori lightfoot brandon johnson actually scold reporter call mass loot mob say racist language way work median left mob ransack place s racist kill bower s racist s subtle political messaging s appropriate talk mob action not happen okay m hold second okay respectfully large gathering cause damage large gathering hold second you promise time talk important speak dynamic appropriate way obfuscate actually take place scene near roosevelt canal sunday night group loot convenience store dozen teenager arrest mob year large gathering guy year old teenager teenager s lot teenager mob accord chicago mayor s s great yeah turn soft bigotry law expectation lead increase racism lead increase crime okay talk soft bigotry law expectation level antisemitism tolerate long come black leftist truly astonishing amazing amazing thing way antisemitism treat press white fan donald trump white nonfan donald trump s white supremacist antisemitism true deep scorge come hamas hezbollah come radical middle eastern muslim group seek destroy state israel political question know wipe jews planet come prominent black people pretty problem ignore completely way extend way medium treat people mention early day interview historian david garrow barack obama okay fact barack obamas antisemitism overlook literally year amazing amazing indicator easy people left come antisemitism come member black community tablet magazine cover david samuels author write quote s fascinating passage rise star david garrells comprehensive biography barack obamas early day historian examine obamas account dream father breakup longtime chicago girlfriend sheila miyoshi yeager dream obama describe passionate disagreement follow play african american playwright august wilson young protagonist defense incipient embrace black racial consciousness girlfriend white identify liberal universalism reader know stake decision simply personal black american man obama will scene marry black woman south chicago name michelle robinson meteor york rise win election black president united states ro document track interview sheila miyoshi yeager explosive fight different subject yeager tell quarrel end couple relationship obamas selfidentification black man impetus play american black ex black experience exhibit chicagos spiritist institute trial eichman time obama sheila visit spirit institute chicago politics roil black mayoral aid name steve coley series lecture organize louis farrakhans nation islam accuse jewish doctor chicago infect black baby aid genocidal plot african americans episode highlight deep rift citys power echelon prominent black official support coley call firing yeager recollection set quarrel precipitate end couple relationship obamas stubborn refusal see exhibit swirl cochlea affair condemn black racism acknowledge obamas embrace black identity create degree distance couple insist upset day obamas inability condemn coleys comment obama blackness bother condemn antisemitism mean yeah shock remember barack obama sit jeremiah wright church fully year year shock condemn antisemitism young day late example black antisemitism ignore ignore jamie fox weekend write post instagram say quote kill dude name jesus think ll follow hashtag fake friend fake love actor later delete post accuse antisemitism social medium course kill dude name jesus people not like jews refer jews jennifer aniston like post delete like say didn not like post purpose accident apparently miraculous importantly wanna clear friend hurt show feed support form antisemitism truly not hate tolerate hate kind period fox post apology say wanna apologize jewish community s offend post know choice word cost offense m sorry intent say instead refer fake friend betray apparently speculation sort phraseology frequently black community suggest kill jesus implication regard jews jamie fox back cardi beach get away sort outrageous jewish stereotype available cardi b person connoisseur entire ova cardi b deeply unintelligent human tweet day picture hasidic jews jews like hasidic garb probably brooklyn wear strel kind furry round hat wear black hat wear abeche kinda long black jacket etymology thing poland typical stereotypical picture like ultra orthodox jews say remember dodot exactly refer apparently s refer line shakespearean song bicke head say let party party matter okay lawyer jew line right lawyer jew go to money right idea typical jewish stereotype jews disproportionately lawyer s stereotype s s true jews disproportionately lawyer doctor accountant lot different industry jews represent disproportionate share member industry actually stereotypical antisemitic implication picture hasidic jews representative like jewish lawyer actually picture jewish lawyer okay jewish lawyer look like secular reform jews good look like jews see street new york idea jews hell hell stereotype like wow know rapper post picture barack obama eric holder d like s little racist not like little racist cardi b say kind stuff routine problem whatsoever true unfortunately rap culture stuff post routinely people range like ice cube cardi b everybody go eh big deal mean talk race attack member race fact lead hook astonishing show racial preference racial hierarchy create intersectionality ugly thing occur okay science crowd continue work harrys razor good friend harry remember harrys harrys reason launch hate harry harrys razor sponsor show realize host not believe man magically woman vice versa pull advertising say not like audience basically launch hate harry thousand subscriber buy razor instead harrys razor think time harrys razor subscriber consider hate harrys dot com harry piece social medium advertising celebrate pride facial hair woman breast tissue carve hormone treatment grow facial hair harrys razor order shave face transgend star happen right grow envious boy go puberty get facial hair learn shaves say person love grow beard maintain have facial hair grooming routine gender affirm thing good job harry turn young woman deformed young woman like great job ve ve ve celebrate mutilation selfmutilation young woman s s tremendous folk not wish actually money people d like money instead company s hate gut push science ve see neil degrasse tyson ve sunday special exchange transgenderism neil degrasse tyson suddenly unscientific express nonverifiable idea constitute manhood womanhood decide neil degrasse tyson talk talk man woman compete sport michael shermer little weird split people male female way m imagine year look know year ago split boy girl not compete like d kind little weird don not know neil kid imagine think weird yeah imagine difference massive average ve see picture college wrestler listen average woman go to able average woman wrestler go to able peak okay michael maybe good female michael sound like old man porch rock chair right m tell okay m tell m tell criticize need modification mean human biology s s need modification m sorry break scientist neil degrasse tyson woman man average perform similarly regard athletic venus williams serena williams ass kick ranked man smoke set great women tennis player probably certainly serena here neil degrasse tyson try explain away lack science complete exactly gender suppose accord astrophysicist neil degrasse tyson point apparently x x x y chromosome insufficient wake morning exaggerate feature want portray gender choice mm assign choose tie bow read think read united states land pursuit happiness yes suppose matter chromosome today feel female male m go to m go to makeup m go to tomorrow feel male ill remove makeup ill wear muscle shirt care wait care care go to live world recognize man woman scientific feel today feel like astrophysicist m like astrophysicist today tomorrow ill wake ill like astrophysicist day will not astrophysicist care walk lab start perform job astrophysicist matter mean m identify astrophysicist exactly problem white lab coat wear weird hawaiian shirt thing astronaut mean d identify way feel scientific guy feel science happen feel happen real time neil degrasse tyson womanhood makeup dress bad news future human reproduction turn s case scientist good know science american academy pediatric accord wall street journal plan review evidence gender affirm medical care potentially amend policy help guide doctor clinician provide treatment transgend youth amazing damn research place care oppose simply dictate shoot child hormone cut genital ve amazing little bit research apparently important tolerant possible thing refer people physical mutilation mental health treatment clearly require okay time thing like thing hate thing like today weekend lot time read hospital watch child breathe terrible weekend read phenomenal book book aortal call gentleman moscow good novel ve read year terrific good center guy name count sav s sort old school russian member upper class beef end take red soviet aftermath russian revolution try confine hotel stick hotel metropol literally rest life sentence s go s go to sentence live fairly small room hotel rest life allow leave entire novel happen hotel people meet find meaning beautiful novel truly beautiful writing terrific generalized yes thing worth preserve old world thing worthy care perfectionism approach everyday task actually matter open experience family childbeare order find purposeful self course expose tremendous evil soviet union subtle amazing way truly masterpiece gentleman moscow highly recommend emma toll recommend friend andrew klavin interesting taste literature hit rate like like good pick refer book worth read gentleman moscow amor toll pick today okay thing like ask way western man picture prime minister canada get divorce picture son barbie movie chinese quaking boot point tweet team barbie picture pink sweatshirt say love son wear pink tshirt star short gaze bizarrely creepily camera right margot robbie ryan gosle poster barbie choice people team barbie people team barbie yes know stand stand ask speak future western world thing go go amazingly russia russia china joint military exercise near alaska head canada tweet bizarre photo son barbie movie say s team barbie future good hand love people expose justin trudeau imagine man fidel castro turn grave son act way okay time thing hate righty megan rapinoe irritate people planet earth opportunity push united states womens national soccer team round s famous have blue hair hate america mean national anthem bad america deeply sexist racist place pay way money play sport watch year pretend interested women soccer rest rapino apparently penalty shot miss united states lose get boot sweden bizarrely start kind laugh smile miss shot not miss little miss like lot fair megan rapinoe know picture go laugh smile rest know people react bizarre way terrible thing happen m go to blame like laugh cry people react weird way bad situation ve tell somebody truly horrible news kinda not know megan rapinoe know annoying s megan rapino ask blow game s ask know important thing good memory career good memory career absolutely obviously political memory stand right moment oh mean probably equal pay chance final think know say equal pay say lot thing think team fight s rewarding course play world cup win championship know know ve special talent know s like change world forever think mean know player locker room getting start know player ve play obviously know know like grind s good president biden tweet world national cup team ve country proud congratulation incredible run team special m look forward see continue inspire americans grit determination field bad performance year president biden course sign s big fan megan rapinoe pretend women soccer team remotely similar men soccer team completely different sport earn way revenue year basis not matter megan rapinoe continue hail left heroin problem megan rapinoe miss penalty shot lot people miss penalty shot problem react weirdly happen bad stuff happen bad stuff happen problem megan rapinoe s kind terrible person s spend entire career press forward idea america terrible horrible place extraordinarily wealthy famous play sport care worldwide wanna know evidence caress sport worldwide united states win year s s know caress sport worldwide like seven people united states soccer seriously compare know rest human population win sport mean half population rest world not compete sport like s s way pretend america terrible good bad place s s s bid particularly fine farewell megan rapino not let door hit way righty guy rest continue right go to wanna miss get medium coverage suggest actually sexual assault coverup virginia okay real problem notice member member use coach shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Ep. 1641 - Biden Heads To The Border To Lie About Stopping Illegal Immigration Published: 1/6/2023 (in RSS feed: 47m 52s) Joe Biden announces he's finally heading to the border, and that he's shifting his immigration policy to stop illegal border crossings. The speakership crisis in the house hits day four, and Prince Harry's new book is Filled with Wine. I'm Ben Shappiro. This is The Bench Shappiro Show. Well, folks, it is January 6th, and you know what that means? Two year anniversary of January 6th, 2021. The day that the media will spend talking about all day today, all you're going to hear all day today is about January 6th, 2021. I'm gonna mention it, and then that's all I'm gonna say about it, because it happened two years ago. And that's all, that's, that's like the whole thing. Meanwhile, the speakership crisis in the house continues, but I'm not gonna talk about that at the top of the show either, because frankly, I don't care that much. The reason I don't care that much is because in the end, somebody is gonna be elected speaker. That person is going to be faced with the same set of institutional problems any speaker of the House is faced with in the Republican party. And that means that not all that much is going to change, because no matter what pledges are made, no matter who is made speaker, that person is gonna be faced with the prospect of a Democratic Senate and a Democratic president. They're gonna have to negotiate deals with those Democrats. They're gonna have to spend too much money. In fact, Republicans will always spend too much money, whether the President is a Democrat or a Republican. The negotiations will be hard fought and in the end, bills will be signed. So there's that. What I really wanna talk about today is the fact that we have a massive crisis on our southern border, and that massive crisis on our southern border has amounted the 5 million people illegally crossing the southern border since Joe Biden took office. It is a massive, massive number. And now Joe Biden is finally starting to realize that maybe he should do something about that. When I say he's starting to realize that, what I mean is he is using the cover of what's going on in the house to pretend that he has now formulated a working policy for our southern border. He does not have a working policy for our southern border in policy is totally self contradictory. For example, Joe Biden's new Southern border policy is going to focus rather heavily on expanding the use of Title 42. Well, five seconds ago, the Biden administration was challenging Title 42 at the Supreme Court level, attempting to abolish Title 42. Title 42 is a, is a C D C regulation that allows for the quick excommunication, the, the, the quick throwing out of people who arrive at the border due to covid concerns due to a covid crisis, a public health crisis. And so that's been challenged by a bunch of left-wingers, including the Biden administration, who have said, well, we don't want to enforce Title 42 anymore because the Covid crisis is effectively over a bunch of Republican attorney generals and governors said we would like for Title 42 to continue to be enforced so that we don't have this continuing wave at the border and, and have that wave be exacerbated. So again, Biden challenged that in court, he lost the Supreme Court five four, decided that it was not time to get rid of Title 42 quite yet. Now, they really didn't have a strong basis for that actually. And I'm saying this as a, as an originalist and a conservative. Five of the justices who voted in favor of holding Title 42 were on the right. Only one of the dissenters was on the right. That'd be Justice Neil Gorsuch. In any case, Joe Biden is now relying on a title that he himself wishes to end in Title 42. The biggest thing that's happening right now is that he wants to head down to the border and he, he wants to stand on the border and presumably change policy a little bit. But what what he's really going to do is he's going to almost time shift illegal immigration. So you'll still get illegal immigration. It'll just come through sort of slightly different mechanisms. According to Mediaite, over the past 24 hours, president Biden has solidified plans for a border visit on Thursday afternoon. In a statement emailed to Mediaite, the White House announced the visit will take place this Sunday in El Paso, Texas, the White House says on Sunday, January 8th, the president will travel to El Paso. The president will assess border enforcement operations and meet with local elected officials in community leaders who have been important partners in managing the historic number of migrants, fleeing political oppression and gang violence in Venezuela, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Cuba. This trip will be pooled press additional details to follow. So what exactly has Joe Biden's policy been up till now? Well, it's been an absolute disaster area. Andrew Arthur writes over at the Center for Immigration Studies late December, talking about the, the Joe Biden policy. Thus far, he, he goes back and he talks about what Trump's policy was. He says, Biden is not the only president to his dealt with a migrant surge. He's just the most recent, when faced with a much smaller crisis at the Southwest border in fiscal year 2019, a year in which the Border patrol apprehended just over 851,500 migrants. The Trump administration implemented numerous policies to stem the tide of illegal entries. The most prominent and successful of those policies was the migrant pro protection protocols, M P P, that was better known as remain in Mexico. Under remain in Mexico. Non-Mexican aliens apprehended at the Southwest border, were returned to Mexico to await their asylum hearings at the border port courts, instead of just chipping them into the American interior and hoping that they would show up at court in an October, 2019 assessment of the program, DHS determined that remain in Mexico had been an indispensable tool in addressing the ongoing crisis at the southern border. You'll recall that Joe Biden then declared that this indispensable tool was just racism. That if you force people to wait in Mexico for their asylum request to be granted, you're actually a giant racist. And then once Joe Biden was in place, then he attempted to rescind remain in Mexico. D h s issued an announcement on Inauguration Day, suspending new enrollments in that program, effective January 21st, 2021. And they said they were going to quickly process the 25,000 migrants remaining in Mexico under the program into the United States, which prompted Texas and Missouri to push back suing in federal court. We'll get to more on this in just one moment. First, if one of your goals this year is to do business with companies that share your values, it's time to check out Pure Talk. Pure Talk is the antidote to Woke Wireless. It is proudly veteran-owned employees, US-based customer service team, and refuses to spend money on fake news networks. Not to mention Pure Talks Service is fantastic. They're one of the largest networks in the country. They share a tower network with one of the big guys. You get blazing fast data talk and text for as low as 30 bucks a month. That is probably half of what you are paying. If you are using Verizon at and t or T-Mobile, switch over to Pure Talk in as little as 10 minutes while keeping your phone and your phone number. Your first month is guaranteed risk free. Try it. If you're not completely happy with the service, you'll get your money back this year. Make it a goal to support companies that actually don't hate your guts. Go to pure talk.com. Enter promo code Shapiro. Save 50% off your very first month of coverage. That's pure talk.com promo code Code Shapiro, I've made the switch. Their coverage is great. They make it super easy. You can do the same. Go to pure talk.com. Enter promo code Shapiro. Save 50% off your very first month of coverage. Pure Talk is simply Smarter Wireless. These other wireless companies trying to sell you way too much data. You don't need that. What you need is a program from PureTech. Check out your options, pure talk.com. Use promo code Shapiro. Save 50% off your very first month. Also, latest economic report is out kind mediocre. Looks like things are slowing pretty significantly. Well, if you're a small business and you've spent way too much money on your taxes yep, which we've, you probably did over the course of the last couple of years, if you could claw that back, why wouldn't you? This is why you should go check out Innovation Refunds. If your business has five or more employees and managed to survive covid, you could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to 26 grand per employee. It's not a loan. There's no payback. It's a refund on your taxes. The challenge is how you get your hands on it. How do you cut through the red tape and get your business the refund money? Head on over to get refunds.com. Their team of tax attorneys are highly trained in this little loan payroll tax refund program. They've already returned $1 billion to businesses. They can help you as well. They do all the work, no charge up front. Simply share a percentage of the cash they get for you. Businesses of all types can qualify, including those who took P P P nonprofits, even those had increases in sales. Just go to get refunds.com, click on qualify me, answer a few quick questions. This payroll tax refund, it's only available for a limited amount of time. Don't miss out. Head on over to get refunds.com. Again, that is get refunds.com. Head on over to get refunds.com. Meanwhile, he has been using Title 42 while simultaneously opposing Title 42. So he is rejecting some, he's letting in a lot more. Now again, all of the policies that have been proposed by the Biden administration have been a giant failure. The, there have been huge failures, apprehension at the Southern border, wild underfunding of Border Patrol, wild funding of the of the courts. There are only about 500 immigration judges who are available. Joe Biden says he wants to expand that by a hundred. That is not even gonna come close to processing the literally millions of cases that are now backlogged in the system. So the policy makes very little sense right now because the, there is an actual internal split inside the Democratic Party over immigration. Now, people like to talk about the internal incoherence of the Republican Party on a wide variety of issues. The truth is that positionally, there isn't a huge difference among Republicans on internal issues. It's just that there are a lot of personality fights and there's a lot of sort of attitudinal anger at each other inside the Republican caucus, inside the Democratic Party. It is a more heterogeneous party. It's, it's a party that has serious arguments over immigration, for example, in which there are still a few border hawks who are living in Texas in the Democratic Party. And then you have the AOC contingent. And so Joe Biden has been attempting to split the baby this entire time. Well, according to Joe Biden, his new program is going to be to allow in 30,000 migrants a month from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Venezuela. So he's gonna rapidly increase the number of people who are coming in legally from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Venezuela. He's gonna order the rapid deportation of votes who will legally enter the United States from those countries. Thousands of these four nationalities will be let into America via what Biden is calling a humanitarian parole program according to the New York Post. But members of those groups are less likely to be admitted than other migrants who illegally cross the border. So bizarrely, what he's now suggesting is that he's going to broaden the capacity for legal immigration for Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Venezuela for humanitarian reasons. Cuz all four of those countries are in serious trouble in terms of the regimes that that run the countries. But at the same time, if you don't go through his program, he's gonna reject you super fast. Meanwhile, if you're just from Mexico and you crossed the border illegally, he's gonna be like, eh, whatever. So none of this makes a whole hell of a lot of sense. It's, again, very incoherent. Biden said, the citizens of those four countries, which include three left-wing totalitarian states, plus Haiti, will need a US sponsor and pass a background check. Unlike citizens of other nationalities who routinely released after reaching the border, Biden said, citizens of those four countries, hens forth, will not only be deported, but also barred from entering via the parole program in the future if they illegally cross the border. So he is getting harsh on a certain number of Venezuelan Cuban, Haitian Nicaraguan migrants. But if you're from Mexico el or El Salvador or Honduras, then apparently if you cross the border illegally, then he's just gonna kind of ignore you. It's a bizarre approach at the very best, according to the New York Post, the two-pronged approach appears designed to blunt criticism from Republicans as record numbers of migrants cross the US Mexico border, while also placating Democrats and immigration advocates who say Title 42 restrictions adopted under Trump block migrants from exercising their right to apply for asylum. When we started expelling the Venezuelans, we saw drop in apprehension numbers. Brandon Judd, head of the Border patrol Agents Union told the post, then the numbers started to climb back up. But the cartel cartels did was they just replaced them with another population of migrants. So what happens is when you say Venezuelans Cuban Nicaraguans, Haitians, most of you will be rejected. Some of you'll be accepted and then just hope that illegal immigration goes away, because a huge bulk of people who are arriving at the southern border are not from those particular countries. So it's, it's just a mess. It's a complete mess. Now remember, the Biden administration has been declaring there is no crisis on the Southwest border at all. Like none. The, the, the DHS head, Alejandro Mayorkas has been proclaiming that there's a situation on the southwest border, but no crisis. So why exactly all of a sudden focus? Why the shift in policy? If there's no problem, then what exactly is the big deal? So yesterday Joe Biden did a presser in which he discussed the situation on the southwest border. Again, it's not a crisis, it's not a crisis, it's a situation. A crisis is when Ron DeSantis ships 11 illegal immigrants to Martha's Vineyard. A situation is when 5 million people show up on the southern border and are summarily led into the country without any real way to track them. The vice president, I'd like to talk to you about how that my administration is dealing with our situation in the southwest border. It's situation, guys. It's just a situation. No biggie. And as you'll recall, Joe Biden put in charge of the, the border situation as he calls it, Kamala Harris, whose main job thus far has consisted of lying without traveling to the southwest border and then going to the northern triangle countries in, in Latin America to talk about how we need to make the conditions better there doing nothing to make the conditions better there. And then apparently speaking incoherently about how much she likes school buses. This has been her policy thus far. You'll recall back in June of 2021 when Kamala Harris told Lester Holt of NBC News that she had been to the border. And then he's like, no, you haven't. And she's like, that's true. Do you have any plans to visit the border? I, at some point, you know, I we are going to the border. We've been to the border. So this whole, this whole, this whole thing about the border, we've been to the border, we've been to the border. You Haven't been to the border. I and I haven't been to Europe. And I mean, I don't think, I don't understand the point that you're making. The point he's making is that you've never been to the border. And you just said that you had, that was the, that was the point. One of the great Kamala Harris flubs of all time, and she brings, had new one every day. Well, yesterday Joe Biden had a great flub with Kamala Harris. He called a President Harris. Again, remember this incoherent babbling old fool, the president of the United States is somehow having his chestnut saved from the fire by Republican incompetence. It's just, it's an amazing thing. Again, if you watch politics and recognize that there is no plan for anybody, that it's basically just Veep, it becomes a lot more amusing when you realize that it's just high comedy. I mean, I understand that there are lives at stake and literally millions of people crossing our southwest border. And this is the great tragedy. Politics is a tragic comedy because it's a bunch of comedic fools who are running the country, and meanwhile, they're serious issues that are affecting Americans. And you have people who have applesauce for brains talk. I mean, here is, here is Joe Biden, the current president of the United States, whose neurons no longer function talking about President Harris, his vice president. I'm not being facetious. Well, president Harris led this effort, led this effort to make things better in the countries from which they are leaving. Oh, president Harris did, did she, he also talked up her credentials. He says that she's a, she's doing an amazing job. No one in America knows the border better than Kamala Harris. No one knows the border better than this person. Ah-huh, sure. Failure To pass and fund this comprehensive plan has increased the challenges that we're seeing at our southwest border. No one knows this better than the vice president. Oh, I'm glad she's the vice president again at the, at the very least. And now the, the real problem here is of course, that the policy that Joe Biden is proposing is utterly incoherent. It makes no sense. And you could see that again in this little presser that he did yesterday. So he made two simultaneous points. One that people who are coming from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, that they're escaping human rights abuses. And so we ought to be very warm toward people who are escaping human rights abuses. He then compared them to people attempting to escape the Holocaust, which is an absurdity of an extraordinarily high order. The the humanitarian situation in Venezuela is a horror show. The same has been true in Cuba for 70 years. There's not the system, the systematic genocide of millions of human beings happening in these countries that happen during the Holocaust. And by the way, if that were the case, if Joe Biden actually were making that case, wouldn't the moral impetus be for admitting all of them, not limiting it to 30,000, not actually turning them away if they arrive illegally, treating them with more kid gloves than people from other country. But, but Joe Biden is not doing that again. It's totally incoherent. It's nonsensical Why the Immigra migration is a human right. Activists say that it is. What's your Tip? Well, I think it is a human right if you have, if your, if your family's being persecuted, if you're being dealt with in a way, I mean, like it was, I thought it was a human right for, you know, Jews in Germany to be able to go, to get to escape and get help where they could. Oh really? I, I assume that he is in disagreement with his, his great ideological hero fdr, who literally turned away boatloads of Jews in the middle of World War II and sent them back to Europe where they were summarily slaughtered in concentration camps. In any case, putting aside the actual history of the Holocaust, Joe Biden is making AOR case. The moral case that he is making is that when people arrive claiming asylum, you should treat them with kid gloves. But then he simultaneously says, you shouldn't just arrive at the southern border trying to escape from bad humanitarian situations. He says, don't show up at the border, stay home and apply. Which sounds rather Trumpy to me. Isn't he now being a racist? Just a little. If you say what he's about to say, but you do it with the Trump face, then all of a sudden it becomes racist. That's the way the democratic politics works. My message is this, if you're trying to leave Cuba, Nicaragua, or Haiti, you have, and we or have agreed to begin a journey to America, do not, do not just show up at the border, stay where you are and apply legally from there. Just stay where you are and apply legally from there. And then Joe Biden like, oh guys a racist, racist. But when Joe Biden says it, it's totally fine, guys, because that's how our media work. If a Democrat says the exact same thing as a Republican, but without the Trump voice, then it is magically conciliatory and decent. It is wonderfully anti-racist. Now, now again, I don't know how he's holding these two ideas in his head. One migrants who are attempting to escape from deeply anti humanitarian ho holes that those people have essentially a right to come to the United States. Also stay in your home country and apply, or we're gonna turn you away. That makes no sense. Speaking of things that make no sense, again, he's expanding the use of Title 42 to reject people at the border while simultaneously claiming that Title 42 makes things even worse. None of this makes any sense. It's an incoherent policy. If you think any of this is going to stem illegal immigration at the southern border, you got your head directly after Cohen. Here is President Biden. People turned away under Title 42 and there are not. And, and, and, and and, and they're not barred from trying to come back. They've been turned away. They go back, they try again, they try again. Well, you know, they can and they do try to reenter the United States again and again, which makes the problem that borders at the border even worse Now. So Title 42 makes the problem even worse by rejecting people, and then they show up again. But he's expanding the use of Title 42 to reject people, even though his administration has challenged Title 42 in court. And then Biden actually was asked about Title 42 and what happens when Title 42 goes away, since it is completely predicated on a law, which is a covid crisis at this point. He says, well, at that point we'll just use random titles. I I don't even know what he's talking about right here. Title 42 is gonna go away before the end of the year in terms of the Supreme Court, my prediction, and then we're gonna have to use Title nine. Title eight eight, right? Am I right? Yeah. Title 8, 8, 9, 8. Same. We need, that's what we're going to use the sexual harassment law of Title ix. Make sure that women's softball is fully ed, fully funded to stop illegal immigration. He is a genius, is the president of the United States. This is, this is, this is who it is. He's talking about Title eight, by the way, under of, of immigration law. But yeah, again, this is, this is all incoherent. His own party knows it's incoherent. A top Democrat ba Menendez, senate democrat, who has been a, a long time advocate of Cuban immigration into the United States. He put out a statement saying the Biden administration's decision to expand Title 42, A disastrous in inhumane relic of the Trump administration's racist immigration agenda is an affront to restoring rule of law to border. Additionally, their decision to create an unlawful transit ban erases the words and values etched on the Statue of Liberty. I'm deeply disturbed that instead of working with Congress to develop a solution to the multiple humanitarian crises that are fueling mass migration in our hemisphere, the administration is circumventing immigration law, which will exacerbate casting confusion at the southern border. Well, I'm glad the Biden administration will be increasing access to parole for an extremely limited number of Cubans, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, and Haitians. This benefit will exclude migrants fleeing violence and persecution who do not have the ability or economic means to qualify for the new parole process. Ultimately, this use of the parole authority is merely an attempt to replace our asylum laws and thousands of asylum seekers waiting to present their cases will be hurt as a result. And now listen, Bob Menendez is a wild leftwinger when it comes to immigration. He essentially wants open borders, but at least he's being consistent. He's making the case that Joe Biden was making about five seconds ago, at least. Bob Menendez guts here than Eric Adams, who continues as mayor of New York to simultaneously say that he's got a border crisis with people being shipped by the thousands into his city. And also that Joe Biden is doing an amazing job. I believe what the president is putting in place is going to assist with dealing with the flow of migrants. We are receiving a large number from the groups that he's now going to include in the Venezuelan a part of this. He's going to increase other groups in that, which is very important. But the reality is we have a crisis at our border that crisis must be addressed. Okay? But they're not addressing the crisis. They're trying to put a bandaid on it. Center for Immigration Studies, again, critiques the the new plan they say aliens would've illegally entered, will now be able to access the C B P, that's the border and Border patrol, one mobile application for scheduling an appointment to present themselves for inspection and to initiate a protection claim instead of coming directly to a port of entry to wait. This has been a program that's been in existence since back in November. The administration claims this plan will allow aliens to enter the United States lawfully through ports of entry. But in reality, entering without a visa through report of entry is still illegal. So now they're just telling them, use your cell phone and set an appointment as to when you illegally enter the country. So that, that's, that's essentially the shell game that is being played here. The administration says that it's going to impose new consequences for individuals who attempt to enter unlawfully, which sounds great unless you realize that what they mean is expedited removal, which is what Biden has already been doing, and which then results in people arriving back at the border about five seconds later as Center for Immigration Studies points. Out of the more than 141,000 aliens apprehended by the border patrol at the southwest border in November, were not expelled under Title 42. For example, fewer than 6500, 4 0.6% of the total were subject to expedited removal. So if they already had that power and haven't used that power, then why hasn't the DHS used that power? And what's to suggest that Joe Biden is gonna use that power for very long? The bottom line is that this administration does not know whether it wants mass migration or whether it wants to paper over the problem with mass migration. And so they've come up with a radically incoherent policy. So naturally, the final sort of straw here, the, the final move when you have no successful policy is blame the Republican. So Adam Schiff is saying that we can't do anything. And the, the representative from California, he's saying, well, it's really Republican's fault, of course, But with more than 2.76 million migrant crossings last year alone, do you think this should have been more of a priority for the Democrats? I think it has been a very strong priority. And what we really need is a comprehensive approach to the border that is fair and humane and enforceable. And it's very hard to do that on a, on a single party basis. We really need to work together on this. We have come close at times, but, but at the moment, it seems to be, again, the third rail of American politics. So finally, blame the Republic. You guys are in charge of the government. You were in charge of the government for two years. You did nothing except let in millions of illegal immigrants. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, the situation, Ukraine continues to be really, really terrible. Whatever your opinions on the Ukraine conflict, there's a lot of suffering on the ground right now, which is why I'm glad the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is hard at work in the country. They've been working in Israel, Ukraine, and the former Soviet Union for more than 30 years. They've never seen hunger and suffering like they're seeing on the ground right now. Norman is an 84 year old Holocaust survivor. He's been blind since birth and lives in a Jewish old age home in Odessa, Ukraine. But so much infrastructure has actually been destroyed over the course of the last year that Norman has been without heat or clean water for a long time. The I F C J has supplied blankets of foods and other essentials to help Norman survive through the winter. They urgently need your help to continue getting Norman and people like him, those supplies please consider donating to the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. Just 45 bucks can ensure warmth, food, and clean waters to Jewish kids and the elderly in need. And right now, the fellowship has a special matching challenge where your donation will double an impact. Your tax deductible gift will be multiplied twice to help provide twice the winter necessities and save lives. Head online to Ben for the fellowship.org or Tech Shapiro to 41 4 4 4. That's Ben for the fellowship.org or Tech Shapiro 2 41 4 4 4. Also, it is very difficult to find great people to fill job requirements these days. And we here at the Daily Wire, we're looking to fill a bunch of new roles. VP of Paid media, senior publicists, senior network engineer. We got a bunch of roles. This is why we list those roles over at ZipRecruiter. If you need to hire for your business and you want an easier way to find qualified candidates, head on over to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire. Try it for free. ZipRecruiter uses powerful technology to find the right candidates for your job, see a candidate you like, you can easily send them a personal invite so they're more likely to apply their user-friendly dashboard. Makes it easy to filter, review, and rate your candidates all from one place. Let ZipRecruiter help you find the best people for all of your roles. Four to five employers who post on ZipRecruiter, get a quality candidate within day one. See for yourself. Go to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire, try ZipRecruiter for free. Again, that ziprecruiter.com/d A I L Y W I R e, ZipRecruiter indeed the smartest way hires why we use it here at Daily Wire ourselves head on order to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire and try ZipRecruiter out for free. Get the best possible employees in the lowest possible amount of time. ziprecruiter.com/daily wire to get started. Okay, well, now would be a really good time for Republicans to be able to pass a bill, say, you know, funding border patrol and making sure that there are immigration judges on the border and mandating that the executive branch actually enforce immigration law like now would be an excellent time to do that. Unfortunately, the House of Representatives continues to be mired down in this speakership battle. The point of which is utterly unclear at this point. So here is my suggestion. Since apparently things are just going to stagnate the people who don't want McCarthy to be speaker, make your list of demands public. Now, this has been something that the folks on, on my side of the aisle, folks on the, on the very conservative area have said for a long time, why not make more negotiations publicly available so that we know whose side we are on. If you're negotiating right now with Kevin McCarthy and you're trying to get concessions out of him, rules, concessions, for example, or slots on particular committees, why can't we know those things if we are all sitting here watching as this speakership battle plays out? As I've said, the stakes here are really low because no matter who becomes speaker of the house, they'll be faced with the exact same set of institutional incentives. They'll be faced with an extraordinarily fractious caucus in which several members of the house, whether they happen to be on the left wing of the Republican Party or the right wing of the Republican Party, or even in the center, several members can basically hold hostage the rest of the caucus because the majority just ain't that big. It's 222 seats, which means they have majority of four, effectively speaking. So that means that just a very small cadre of people can hold hostage to the rest of the caucus. It means that anytime a bill gets signed, they're gonna munge people who shout and scream. It also means that bills will get signed because the government will continue to be funded because there's no chance that we end up with a, a fullsome government shutdown for years, years on end. It's just not going to happen on a realistic level. And people like me, I I've said before, I don't care when the government shuts down because I think that the vast majority of programs that are mandatory continue to operate. And most of the rest of it, I would prefer it goes away in the first place. But realistically speaking, is that going to happen? Probably not. The vast majority of the American people aren't generally on board with long-lasting government shutdowns by every available poll and by election results. So with that said, whether it's McCarthy, whether it's Jim Jordan, whether it's Steve Scalise, whether it's anybody else, same set of institutional incentives. Okay? But, but put that aside. Let's say that you are very much in favor of exact and more concessions from McCarthy. All right, make a list of the concessions and let's see them. Now, if the concession is that it's just McCarthy who goes away, who would you rather have? So as I pointed out yesterday on the program, many of the people who want McCarthy to go are not actually saying who they would like to replace. McCarthy have come up with a, a sort of bizarre list of people who they're throwing out there at this point. Like if that's your main demand, shouldn't you have one person you consolidate behind him, you just push him, you just pressure him. And why not just keep voting for Jim Jordan over and over and over and over until eventually Jim Jordan becomes the consensus candidate, but they're not doing that. They're kinda fussing around. So Mac Gates from Florida yesterday, he nominated Donald Trump for Speaker of the House. That's not a real thing, guys. He got one vote yesterday and the only vote he got was Mac aids. Even Donald Trump supports Kevin McCarthy, by the way. I will say that here. Here's Gates nominating Trump. We'll see Trump's response, which actually pretty funny Energy was abundant. Wages were rising, capital was returning from overseas to fund the dreams and ambitions of our fellow Americans. And the economy was roaring. What a contrast to what we have seen from this administration now. And so I rise to nominate Donald Trump for the position of Speaker of the House and for all of the vitriol that we hear from the media. And at times the left, there were great moments of bipartisanship under the Trump presidency. Donald Trump isn't a member of the house. Okay? I know there's always this talk about how the speaker doesn't have to be a member of the house. Realistically speaking, is this a real thing? No. Is this a serious proposal by Matt Gates? No, it's stroller and everybody knows it's stroller. You know, who knows it's stroller more than anybody. Donald Trump. So Trump put out hundred social, a picture of himself in the speakers seat, right? It's like a Photoshop picture of himself in the speaker seat, in Pelosi's seat at the last State of the Union. And is Biden speaking in the front and then Kamala Harris sitting there and then Trump sitting there with his tongue out, like, ah, how am I supposed to take this shit seriously? I just dunno how, how we're all supposed to pretend that this is like major stuff of major consequence. Very s top men, very serious people doing very serious things. That's, that's what's happening right here. Goodness gracious. Meanwhile, Lauren Bobert nominated at Kevin Hearn a second time as the speaker's race continues to drag on. Here is Lauren Bobert, Madame Clerk. I rise to nominate Kevin Hern of Oklahoma for Speaker of the House. The Gentlewoman is recognized. It's as simple as that. Folks, let's start getting somewhere with this. Realize the facts. Kevin McCarthy does not have the votes. Let's elect a Republican who can unify our conference, who is a true leader. I'm casting my vote for Kevin Hearn, and I hope you will as well. No one cast a vote for Kevin Hearn yesterday. Again, he has no intent as far as I'm aware of running for Speaker of the House. He was elected to Congress in 2018, which means he's been in Congress by, you know, congressional measures a pretty short time. He sits on the Ways and Means committee. If you've never heard of him, you're not the only one, which is presumably why Bobert is nominating him. Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Green is ripping into Bobert. Now again, all of this is just what is the, make the negotiations public. If you're doing something really important, why don't you just tell us what the thing is that you want? What is the thing that you want? If you want McCarthy Gone, who's the person really that you want? You want Trump, you want Kevin Hearn? You know, who are we talking about here? What are the concessions you want? Can we talk about those? Like, do you have a list of them so we can go through those? Because what I'm hearing is that, again, of the 20 members who are holding out against McCarthy, probably 10 to 15 of them already agree on a deal with McCarthy to change rules and garner concessions from him. By the way, concessions that will end up being proforma anyway. And I'll tell you the reason they're proforma is because eventually you'll get your vote on term limits, for example, and it will go down inflaming defeat because the house ain't gonna vote term limits on itself. You'll, you'll get your vote on a balanced budget and then it'll get murdered in the Senate. So you can do all this stuff for show, but the, the actual realistic effect, I hate to be the political realist here in which actual reality exists. There's the, the goal, the goal is that we cut spending debt. The goal is we restructure all of the entitlements. The goal is that we shrink government back to what it was in terms of the federal government and its purview. We shrink it back dramatically to what it was a century and a half ago, where it had very little influence on our daily life. That is the goal. And we can take incremental steps toward that goal perhaps. But this notion that if you elect the right speaker magically everything changes, that is wrong. It's been true. It's been false in politics for a very, very long time. Thomas Sol has pointed out that when it comes to politics or virtually anything else in life, generally when you see a person in a position fail and then his successor fails and then his successor fails and then his successor fails, which is what you have seen from Republican speakers going all the way back to New Gingrich. The question isn't the person at the top? The question is the incentive structure for the job itself. What can you actually do with the job here is of all people, Marjorie Taylor Green being a realist. I think the American people, no matter how you vote, are sick and tired of drama. And this is nothing but drama. We're, we're on multiple days now with multiple candidates from this group. So I'm not sure how Lauren Bobber on one hand can demand so much out of Kevin McCarthy, but then demand nothing out of someone else and be willing to vote for them to be speaker. That's not serious. I don't think that's leadership and I really see it as more obstruction than progress. That's Roger Taylor Green guys. That's like the most radical member of the Republican caucus. She's the trumpet person in Congress and she's saying something that happens to be correct here. And that is all true representative John James of Michigan who rose to nominate McCarthy on the seventh speaker ballot. We are now on 11, 12 out 19. By the time you hear this mean, like it's just, we will all be old and gray by the time this is over. He says, you know, what'd be great is if we learned how to win occasionally in the Republican party. We wanna talk about people who can win. Well, I'm a Lions fan and, and I, I'm, I'm, that's right. Look, I'm well acquainted with snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Y'all, we need to learn how to win. Yeah, we need to learn how to take a victory. And by Kevin McCarthy's leadership, he's given us victories on rules. He's given us victories on keeping costs down. He's given us victories with winning majority back. I'm so proud to be a part of majority making class and he's earned my trust. Okay, so even if you don't trust Kevin McCarthy, which is fine, then why don't you just make clear what commitments you are seeking from him? And the other night, Tucker Carlson suggested that that McCarthy with a couple of concessions could win the speakership that McCarthy could first make transparent everything January 6th related. And second, he could give Thomas Massey the representative from Kentucky, the power to investigate the fbi. Fine. Let's say McCarthy does both of those things. My guess, McCarthy, would you both of those things, were those the demands? Would that solve the problem? Apparently the answer is no, because here is a list of the concessions that McCarthy has currently made. One member motion threshold needed to force a vote, ousting the speaker instead of five. So effectively, any member, Matt Gates at any time can just call a motion to vacate the speakership Morehouse Freedom Caucus members on the House Rules committee, two seats, pledges to hold votes on lawmaker term limit and border security bills. So you wanted votes on those. He'll give you the votes on those. The votes won't go anywhere because let's be real about this. You don't even have enough Republican votes to pass a lawmaker term limit bill. And then you have ascendant and then you have a precedent major changes to the appropriations process to prevent another omnibus bill by allowing floor amendments to be offered by any lawmaker. Now again, i, I happen to think that's a fine idea. You know, more consideration has now been given to the speaker than was given to 1.7 trillion omnibus package. Those cram through with 48 hours notice. So I'm fine with a longer legislative process in which everybody gets to propose their amendments. Those amendments are voted down, earmarks get put in, earmarks, get taken up. All that's fine. You know who else is fine with that? Apparently McCarthy. All that's true. Now, I will say that the speaker has become an extraordinarily powerless position, particularly among Republicans when the speaker does not have the power to actually leverage his members. This sounds good to people who are in the Freedom Caucus, right? Right now it sounds good to me too. The speaker has less power to leverage people on the right wing of the caucus. This also means the speaker has much less power to leverage people on the left wing of the caucus. The same rules apply to everyone. So next time you wanna pass some sort of tax cutting bill, next time you wanna pass a bill that bans funding for Planned Parenthood and you have some left-wing members of the caucus who don't wanna do it, what leverage are you going to hold over their head Exactly. And what I, what, what exactly are you going to do? In any case, he's given an extraordinarily list of concessions at this point, which is why my understanding is that a huge percentage of those 20 holdouts against McCarthy are now getting ready to get on board with McCarthy. The problem is, you still have like five or six of 'em who aren't, which doesn't get you to the threshold you need. So who is your alter? Like what is the point of this? So this has been my suggestion all along. You want the American people to take sides on, that's fine. Make transparent what you want. And the thing you want can't just be, I don't like Kevin McCarthy because you have 200 members of the caucus who are fine with Kevin McCarthy, probably closer to 210 members of the caucus who are fine with Kevin McCarthy after they've exacted their concessions. So who's your alternative? This is why I keep saying who is the person who is the alternative? Who is going to gather a unanimous vote? I mentioned yesterday, just statistically speaking, there has not been a unanimous vote for the Speaker of the House on the Republican side of the aisle since John Bayner in 2010. The biggest problem facing Kevin McCarthy right now is not that he has defectors. The biggest problem facing Kevin McCarthy is that the Republicans did such a garbage job in the last election cycle that instead of winning 230, 35 seats, they ended up with 2 22, which means that his margin of error is essentially nil. There has not been a speaker of the house for the Republicans who has been elected since John Bayer in 2010 with fewer than nine defections in nine defections takes you way below the threshold. Paul Ryan had nine defectors in 2015. John Boehner had 25 defectors earlier in 2015. In 2013, Baner had 12 defectors, which means that everybody is saying, well, McCarthy is wildly underperforming because there's so many Republicans not on board. But once he gets most of them on board, even five defectors will take him down. So the big sin here is that Republicans did crappy in the last election. Some of that is presumably due to McCarthy. Much of it is due to systemic failures that prevented McCarthy from intervening in primaries. Frankly, there are a lot of people who won primaries in contested seats who should not have won primaries in contested seats. So, you know what exactly is the way out here? I think the way out here is more transparency with the American public. You want more transparency, you want an open debate, you want this process less longer? Fine. I'm cool with that. Make transparent what it is you want so we can decide whether the juice is worth the squeeze or whether this just, this is just an a series of self glorifications at the expense of the interest of the American people and a conservative majority in the House of Representatives. Get some more on this in just one second. Well, folks, last year, Jordan Peterson joined Daily Wire Plus and he's been creating great content ever since, like Logos and Literacy on marriage. And now another brand new episode of Jordan's Biblical series, Exodus Jordan Peterson is just, is a wonderful person. He's now fighting an intense battle with the Canadian government, which is trying to silence him on all fronts. But we here at Daily Wire Plus wanna make sure that all of his content is available to you, including his fantastic biblical analysis. You can watch all of this exclusively on Daily Wire Plus head on over to daily wire.com/ben, become a member. Watch all of this and more. That's daily wire.com/ben today. Okay, well, all of this is occurring among the Republicans. All this internal battling, again, still waiting to see what the outcome is or what the point is or how this radically shifts things other than just being sort of a, a waste of time overall. Hopefully we get some political wins out of this concessions made to Chip Roy, for example. And then we all finish this up and, and we move on with our lives. But meanwhile, Democrats are, are pretending that this is like the end of the world. It is not the end of the world. Okay? It's, it may be foolish, it may be a waste of time. Maybe something good will come out of it. It is not the end of the world. Democrats treat it like if the government ceases to function for a day, the entire world will end. They do this every time there's a government shutdown. It has never actually impacted anyone. The government shutdowns have been temporary. Very, very temporary back pay has been, has been given this notion that, that we are on the verge of societal breakdown. It's getting very tired, some hysterical nonsense. And yet this is the the line. So Representative Hakeem Jeffries is now suggesting it's a national security issue for there not to be a speaker for three days. Sure. You guys were on va, you were on VK until five seconds ago. Was it national security issue when Joe Biden was in Saint Quo. So like just enjoying his life on the beach while signing bills that had to be flown to him. Oh my gosh. These people, All we are asking is house Republicans to get along with each other so we can get about the business of the American people. There are national security vulnerabilities. This is the dangerous moment for Americans and for the world. It's one of the reasons why the Congress needs to organize A dangerous moment, a dangerous moment. Yeah, it is super dangerous. These clowns don't do anything for 24 hours. It's super dangerous. Meanwhile, representative Abigail Span Berger, Democrat of Virginia, she says this should be keeping people up at night. Who it's basically putting everybody who watches it to sleep, except for the people who are very, very into sort of these ins and outs, political games. It's not keeping anybody up at night. Gimme a break. Is this keeping you up at night, that you may not be able to get that done because of the infighting you're seeing across the aisle? I and I, I think that it should be keeping everyone up at night. The notion that we would not be able to fund the government is, is not as simple as not funding the government. It is a complete shutdown of every agency that keeps us safe. It's not a shutdown of every agency that keeps us safe. Most of this is mandatory spending. What are you even talking about? But you have to, Democrats have a stake in panicking everybody. This happens every time there's a government shutdown for five seconds. They have a stake in panicking everybody. If the government isn't there to, to wipe your ass every evening, well then this makes you, you will die. You will just die. I mean, if the government isn't there, every time you open your closet door, you just open you, you wake up in the morning, you have to get dressed, you open your closet and there's the government there to help you. And if you open your closet and the government wasn't there, what would you do? What is this how you live really? You live every day wondering if the federal government is operation now, does that mean that it looks good when all of this stuff happens? Republicans, no. Is the panic ridiculous? Is it media induced? Should we all be freaking out that it's taking a couple of days to select a speaker of the house? No, that's incredibly silly. And and when you combine this with the, with the Democratic claim, that if they're, I'm not sure what they want. Do they want Republicans to select a speaker or not to select a speaker because at the same time they're claiming that if there is no speaker of the house, then apparently America will die. They're also claiming that if there's a Republican speaker of the House, America will die. Here's Democratic representative Pete Aguilar saying that Republicans right now are pushing for a new Jim Crow. So I'm, I'm confused. Do you want Republicans to get it together and make McCarthy the speaker so we can move on with life or do not want that? Because he's Hitler. Since the beginning of 20, 21, 21, state legislatures have passed 42 restrictive voting laws. Hakeem has stood up against voter suppression and the new Jim Crow era every step of the way. And that's why I am directed by the Democratic caucus to advance the name of Hakeem Jeffries from New York as speaker. Again. What do you guys want it? The truth is, Democrats aren't upset about this. Democrats are very happy about this and most Americans aren't all that upset about it. Most Americans don't care about this, which is why again, these sort of stupid political games, they, they, they may help a certain cadre of people who are attempting to raise money or they may at or they may change rules in certain marginal ways that are helpful to conservative. But in the end, is this going to be the large scale change this country needs? Not with a divided government and a 222 seat house majority and, and Democrats who are pretending that they are deeply concerned, so deeply concerned, it's all problematic are just lying through their teeth about it. Okay? Meanwhile, in news that I don't care about, but everybody seems to want me to cover, prince Harry has a book out. So let me make clear, we fought a revolution so we don't have to care about the royals. This is, but, but apparently that has not stopped us from caring about the royals. In fact, there must be something in the human heart that desires royalty because we don't have an actual royal family in the United States. So we just follow other people's royal families and then we treat our politicians like royalty. We have a state of the union address where we pretend that Joe Biden is actually like a decrepit king. He's like theoden of Rohan before he's, he's woken from his slumber by Gandolph just sitting there on the throne like Gandolph. Any case we, we have to pay attention to our royalty. Prince Harry has now written a bitter revenge memoir. It's a tell-all according to the New York post apparent, according to the New York Post, prince Harry's revenge on his family, the media, the horsey older woman who he flowered him in a field behind a pub, behind a busy pub. And anyone who has ever treated him as a spare to Prince Williams air is literary self-harm. Every time Harry plotter, the halfwit prince puts the knife into his brother, the fumbling assassin falls on his own blame. Call it Harry Carey is a piece by dominant green over at the New York Post. Harry has already rejected his homeland and attacked his family, his slandered, the House of Windsor. As institutionally racist, he has as his Netflix expose show lost his old friends without gaining any new ones. Now he attacks his own father, Charles II and his brother Prince William, the future king. There can be no way back from this. It's a grave matter fighting with your own blood. Your brother is the person most like you in the world. William is the only person who knows what it felt like for Harry to lose his mother's Diana, to walk behind her coffin in front of the world, to go on alone with our, and to face the same barrage of flash bulbs in the line of duty. In some things, he was my mirror. Harry reflects in others my polar opposite. My dear brother, my arch enemy. This is the Whiniest royal person in human history. This is a person who lives in a palatial estate in California with his actress, harpy wife and lectures, all of us about the evils of American racism and class conflict. He is just a joy. Here's Prince Harry explaining why he refers to his brother as his arch nemesis to Michael Strahan. Yes, our culture is, is in great shape here, guys. There's a quote in this book where you refer to your brother as your beloved brother and arch nemesis. Strong words. What do you mean by that? There is always been there's competition between us weirdly, I think it really plays into always played by the air spare. Oh my gosh. According to Dominic Green, by his own admission, William two struggled with grief and anger. But William was born with one crowning advantage, and that made all the difference. He's the first born a once in future king. From his first breath, Harry was conceived and raised as a form of life insurance. So apparently there are a lot of jokes about this inside the family. Wonderful. Now you've given me an air and a spare. My work is done. Harry quotes. Charles is saying, Harry Concedes. This was a joke, presumably. And then he says, minutes after delivering this high bit of high comedy, how was said to have gone off to meet with his girlfriend. That would, of course be the current queen Regent or whatever, whatever they call her in renowned care. I don't care. But apparently Harry is still whining about how mean daddy was to him. He's driven by resentment. He grips that Charles and William flew on separate private jets for reasons of safety, but no one give a damn whom I traveled with. He wants us to know that half of their suite at the Balmar castle was less luxurious than Williams. He complains that a boarding school was confusing his hell to receive a slow and luxurious rinse from the hot matrons. So it's just he's, he's so tiresome and all these people are so tiresome. But I guess we're going to be subjected to them until the end of time, because after all, he is very woke. And this means that he actually is a sort of quasi hero already. Guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be getting into Nicole Hannah Jones'. 1619 project is now being made into a series by Hulu. Yes, the propaganda continues unabated. If you're not a member, become a member. Use Coach Shapiro at checkout for two months free on all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep biden head border lie stop illegal immigration publish rss feed m joe biden announce s finally head border s shift immigration policy stop illegal border crossing speakership crisis house hit day prince harrys new book fill wine m ben shappiro bench shappiro folk january know mean year anniversary january day medium spend talk day today go hear day today january m go to mention s m go to happen year ago s s s like thing speakership crisis house continue m go to talk frankly not care reason not care end somebody go to elect speaker person go face set institutional problem speaker house face republican party mean go change matter pledge matter speaker person go to face prospect democratic senate democratic president go to negotiate deal democrats go to spend money fact republican spend money president democrat republican negotiation hard fight end bill sign s wanna talk today fact massive crisis southern border massive crisis southern border amount million people illegally cross southern border joe biden take office massive massive number joe biden finally start realize maybe s start realize mean cover s go house pretend formulate work policy southern border work policy southern border policy totally self contradictory example joe biden new southern border policy go focus heavily expand use title second ago biden administration challenge title supreme court level attempt abolish title title c d c regulation allow quick excommunication quick throwing people arrive border covid concern covid crisis public health crisis s challenge bunch leftwinger include biden administration say not want enforce title anymore covid crisis effectively bunch republican attorney general governor say like title continue enforce not continue wave border wave exacerbate biden challenge court lose supreme court decide time rid title not strong basis actually m say originalist conservative justice vote favor hold title right dissenter right d justice neil gorsuch case joe biden rely title wish end title big thing s happen right want head border want stand border presumably change policy little bit s go s go time shift illegal immigration ll illegal immigration ll come sort slightly different mechanism accord mediaite past hour president biden solidify plan border visit thursday afternoon statement email mediaite white house announce visit place sunday el paso texas white house say sunday january president travel el paso president assess border enforcement operation meet local elect official community leader important partner manage historic number migrant flee political oppression gang violence venezuela haiti nicaragua cuba trip pool press additional detail follow exactly joe bidens policy till absolute disaster area andrew arthur write center immigration study late december talk joe biden policy far go talk trumps policy say biden president deal migrant surge s recent face small crisis southwest border fiscal year year border patrol apprehend migrant trump administration implement numerous policy stem tide illegal entry prominent successful policy migrant pro protection protocol m p p well know remain mexico remain mexico nonmexican alien apprehend southwest border return mexico await asylum hearing border port court instead chip american interior hope court october assessment program dhs determine remain mexico indispensable tool address ongoing crisis southern border ll recall joe biden declare indispensable tool racism force people wait mexico asylum request grant actually giant racist joe biden place attempt rescind remain mexico d h s issue announcement inauguration day suspend new enrollment program effective january say go quickly process migrant remain mexico program united states prompt texas missouri push suing federal court moment goal year business company share value time check pure talk pure talk antidote wake wireless proudly veteranowne employee usbased customer service team refuse spend money fake news network mention pure talk service fantastic large network country share tower network big guy blaze fast datum talk text low buck month probably half pay verizon t tmobile switch pure talk little minute keep phone phone number month guarantee risk free try completely happy service ll money year goal support company actually not hate gut pure talkcom enter promo code shapiro save month coverage s pure talkcom promo code code shapiro ve switch coverage great super easy pure talkcom enter promo code shapiro save month coverage pure talk simply smart wireless wireless company try sell way datum not need need program puretech check option pure talkcom use promo code shapiro save month late economic report kind mediocre look like thing slow pretty significantly small business ve spend way money taxis yep ve probably course couple year claw not check innovation refund business employee manage survive covid eligible receive payroll tax rebate grand employee loan s payback refund taxis challenge hand cut red tape business refund money head refundscom team tax attorney highly train little loan payroll tax refund program ve return billion business help work charge simply share percentage cash business type qualify include take p p p nonprofit increase sale refundscom click qualify answer quick question payroll tax refund available limited time not miss head refundscom refundscom head refundscom title simultaneously oppose title reject s let lot policy propose biden administration giant failure huge failure apprehension southern border wild underfunding border patrol wild funding court immigration judge available joe biden say want expand go to come close process literally million case backlogge system policy make little sense right actual internal split inside democratic party immigration people like talk internal incoherence republican party wide variety issue truth positionally not huge difference republican internal issue lot personality fight s lot sort attitudinal anger inside republican caucus inside democratic party heterogeneous party party argument immigration example border hawk live texas democratic party aoc contingent joe biden attempt split baby entire time accord joe biden new program go allow migrant month cuba nicaragua haiti venezuela s go to rapidly increase number people come legally cuba nicaragua haiti venezuela s go to order rapid deportation vote legally enter united states country thousand nationality let america biden call humanitarian parole program accord new york post member group likely admit migrant illegally cross border bizarrely s suggest s go broaden capacity legal immigration cuba nicaragua haiti venezuela humanitarian reason cuz country trouble term regime run country time not program s go to reject super fast mexico cross border illegally s go to like eh make hell lot sense incoherent biden say citizen country include leftwe totalitarian state plus haiti need sponsor pass background check unlike citizen nationality routinely release reach border biden say citizen country hen forth deport bar enter parole program future illegally cross border get harsh certain number venezuelan cuban haitian nicaraguan migrant mexico el el salvador hondura apparently cross border illegally s go to kind ignore bizarre approach good accord new york post twopronged approach appear design blunt criticism republicans record number migrant cross mexico border placate democrat immigration advocate title restriction adopt trump block migrant exercise right apply asylum start expel venezuelan see drop apprehension number brandon judd head border patrol agent union tell post number start climb cartel cartel replace population migrant happen venezuelan cuban nicaraguan haitian reject ll accept hope illegal immigration go away huge bulk people arrive southern border particular country mess complete mess remember biden administration declare crisis southwest border like dhs head alejandro mayorkas proclaim s situation southwest border crisis exactly sudden focus shift policy s problem exactly big deal yesterday joe biden presser discuss situation southwest border crisis crisis situation crisis ron desantis ship illegal immigrant marthas vineyard situation million people southern border summarily lead country real way track vice president d like talk administration deal situation southwest border situation guy situation biggie ll recall joe biden charge border situation call kamala harris main job far consist lie travel southwest border go northern triangle country latin america talk need condition well condition well apparently speak incoherently like school bus policy far ll recall june kamala harris tell lester holt nbc news border s like not s like s true plan visit border point know go border ve border thing border ve border ve border not border not europe mean not think not understand point make point s make ve border say point great kamala harris flubs time bring new day yesterday joe biden great flub kamala harris call president harris remember incoherent babbling old fool president united states have chestnut save fire republican incompetence amazing thing watch politic recognize plan anybody basically veep lot amusing realize high comedy mean understand life stake literally million people cross southwest border great tragedy politics tragic comedy bunch comedic fool run country issue affect americans people applesauce brain talk mean joe biden current president united states neuron long function talk president harris vice president m facetious president harris lead effort lead effort thing well country leave oh president harris talk credential say s s amazing job america know border well kamala harris know border well person ahhuh sure failure pass fund comprehensive plan increase challenge see southwest border know well vice president oh m glad s vice president real problem course policy joe biden propose utterly incoherent make sense little presser yesterday simultaneous point people come venezuela cuba haiti nicaragua escape human right abuse ought warm people escape human right abuse compare people attempt escape holocaust absurdity extraordinarily high order humanitarian situation venezuela horror true cuba year s system systematic genocide million human being happen country happen holocaust way case joe biden actually make case not moral impetus admit limit actually turn away arrive illegally treat kid glove people country joe biden totally incoherent nonsensical immigra migration human right activist s tip think human right family persecute deal way mean like think human right know jews germany able escape help oh assume disagreement great ideological hero fdr literally turn away boatload jews middle world war ii send europe summarily slaughter concentration camp case put aside actual history holocaust joe biden make aor case moral case make people arrive claim asylum treat kid glove simultaneously say not arrive southern border try escape bad humanitarian situation say not border stay home apply sound trumpy not racist little s trump face sudden racist s way democratic politic work message try leave cuba nicaragua haiti agree begin journey america border stay apply legally stay apply legally joe biden like oh guy racist racist joe biden say totally fine guy s medium work democrat say exact thing republican trump voice magically conciliatory decent wonderfully antiracist not know s hold idea head migrant attempt escape deeply anti humanitarian ho hole people essentially right come united states stay home country apply go to turn away make sense speak thing sense s expand use title reject people border simultaneously claim title make thing bad make sense incoherent policy think go stem illegal immigration southern border get head directly cohen president biden people turn away title bar try come ve turn away try try know try reenter united states make problem border border worse title make problem bad reject people s expand use title reject people administration challenge title court biden actually ask title happen title go away completely predicate law covid crisis point say point use random title not know s talk right title go to away end year term supreme court prediction go to use title title right right yeah title need s go use sexual harassment law title ix sure women softball fully ed fully fund stop illegal immigration genius president united states s talk title way immigration law yeah incoherent party know incoherent democrat ba menendez senate democrat long time advocate cuban immigration united states statement say biden administration decision expand title disastrous inhumane relic trump administration racist immigration agenda affront restore rule law border additionally decision create unlawful transit ban erase word value etch statue liberty m deeply disturb instead work congress develop solution multiple humanitarian crisis fuel mass migration hemisphere administration circumvent immigration law exacerbate cast confusion southern border m glad biden administration increase access parole extremely limit number cubans nicaraguans venezuelan haitian benefit exclude migrant flee violence persecution ability economic mean qualify new parole process ultimately use parole authority merely attempt replace asylum law thousand asylum seeker wait present case hurt result listen bob menendez wild leftwinger come immigration essentially want open border s consistent s make case joe biden make second ago bob menendez gut eric adam continue mayor new york simultaneously s get border crisis people ship thousand city joe biden amazing job believe president put place go assist deal flow migrant receive large number group s go include venezuelan s go increase group important reality crisis border crisis address okay address crisis try bandaid center immigration study critique new plan alien ve illegally enter able access c b p s border border patrol mobile application schedule appointment present inspection initiate protection claim instead come directly port entry wait program s existence november administration claim plan allow alien enter united states lawfully port entry reality enter visa report entry illegal tell use cell phone set appointment illegally enter country s s essentially shell game play administration say go impose new consequence individual attempt enter unlawfully sound great realize mean expedite removal biden result people arrive border second later center immigration study point alien apprehend border patrol southwest border november expel title example few total subject expedite removal power not power not dhs power s suggest joe biden go to use power long line administration know want mass migration want paper problem mass migration ve come radically incoherent policy naturally final sort straw final successful policy blame republican adam schiff say not representative california s say republicans fault course million migrant crossing year think priority democrats think strong priority need comprehensive approach border fair humane enforceable hard single party basis need work come close time moment rail american politic finally blame republic guy charge government charge government year let million illegal immigrant second situation ukraine continue terrible opinion ukraine conflict s lot suffering ground right m glad international fellowship christians jews hard work country ve work israel ukraine soviet union year ve see hunger suffer like see ground right norman year old holocaust survivor s blind birth live jewish old age home odessa ukraine infrastructure actually destroy course year norman heat clean water long time f c j supply blanket food essential help norman survive winter urgently need help continue get norman people like supply consider donate international fellowship christians jews buck ensure warmth food clean water jewish kid elderly need right fellowship special matching challenge donation double impact tax deductible gift multiply twice help provide twice winter necessity save life head online ben fellowshiporg tech shapiro s ben fellowshiporg tech shapiro difficult find great people fill job requirement day daily wire look fill bunch new role vp pay medium senior publicist senior network engineer get bunch role list role ziprecruiter need hire business want easy way find qualified candidate head ziprecruitercomdaily wire try free ziprecruiter use powerful technology find right candidate job candidate like easily send personal invite likely apply userfriendly dashboard make easy filter review rate candidate place let ziprecruiter help find good people role employer post ziprecruiter quality candidate day ziprecruitercomdaily wire try ziprecruiter free ziprecruitercomd l y w r e ziprecruiter smart way hire use daily wire head order ziprecruitercomdaily wire try ziprecruiter free good possible employee low possible time ziprecruitercomdaily wire start okay good time republican able pass bill know fund border patrol make sure immigration judge border mandate executive branch actually enforce immigration law like excellent time unfortunately house representative continue mire speakership battle point utterly unclear point suggestion apparently thing go stagnate people not want mccarthy speaker list demand public folk aisle folk conservative area say long time negotiation publicly available know negotiate right kevin mccarthy try concession rule concession example slot particular committee not know thing sit watch speakership battle play ve say stake low matter speaker house ll face exact set institutional incentive ll face extraordinarily fractious caucus member house happen left wing republican party right wing republican party center member basically hold hostage rest caucus majority be not big seat mean majority effectively speak mean small cadre people hold hostage rest caucus mean anytime bill get sign go to munge people shout scream mean bill sign government continue fund s chance end fullsome government shutdown year year end go happen realistic level people like ve say not care government shut think vast majority program mandatory continue operate rest prefer go away place realistically speak go happen probably vast majority american people not generally board longlaste government shutdown available poll election result say mccarthy jim jordan steve scalise anybody set institutional incentive okay aside let favor exact concession mccarthy right list concession let concession mccarthy go away point yesterday program people want mccarthy actually say like replace mccarthy come sort bizarre list people throw point like s main demand not person consolidate push pressure vote jim jordan eventually jim jordan consensus candidate kinda fuss mac gate florida yesterday nominate donald trump speaker house s real thing guy get vote yesterday vote get mac aids donald trump support kevin mccarthy way here gate nominate trump trumps response actually pretty funny energy abundant wage rise capital return overseas fund dream ambition fellow americans economy roar contrast see administration rise nominate donald trump position speaker house vitriol hear medium time left great moment bipartisanship trump presidency donald trump not member house okay know s talk speaker not member house realistically speak real thing proposal matt gates stroller everybody know stroller know know stroller anybody donald trump trump social picture speaker seat right like photoshop picture speaker seat pelosis seat state union biden speak kamala harris sit trump sit tongue like ah suppose shit seriously dunno suppose pretend like major stuff major consequence s man people thing s s s happen right goodness gracious lauren bobert nominate kevin hearn second time speaker race continue drag lauren bobert madame clerk rise nominate kevin hern oklahoma speaker house gentlewoman recognize simple folk lets start get realize fact kevin mccarthy vote lets elect republican unify conference true leader m cast vote kevin hearn hope cast vote kevin hearn yesterday intent far m aware run speaker house elect congress mean s congress know congressional measure pretty short time sit way mean committee ve hear presumably bobert nominate marjorie taylor green rip bobert negotiation public important not tell thing want thing want want mccarthy go s person want want trump want kevin hearn know talk concession want talk like list m hear member hold mccarthy probably agree deal mccarthy change rule garner concession way concession end proforma ill tell reason proforma eventually ll vote term limit example inflame defeat house be not go to vote term limit ll ll vote balanced budget ll murder senate stuff actual realistic effect hate political realist actual reality exist s goal goal cut spend debt goal restructure entitlement goal shrink government term federal government purview shrink dramatically century half ago little influence daily life goal incremental step goal notion elect right speaker magically change wrong true false politic long time thomas sol point come politic virtually life generally person position fail successor fail successor fail successor fail see republican speaker go way new gingrich question not person question incentive structure job actually job people marjorie taylor green realist think american people matter vote sick tired drama drama multiple day multiple candidate group m sure lauren bobber hand demand kevin mccarthy demand willing vote speaker s not think s leadership obstruction progress s roger taylor green guy s like radical member republican caucus s trumpet person congress s say happen correct true representative john james michigan rise nominate mccarthy seventh speaker ballot time hear mean like old gray time say know d great learn win occasionally republican party wanna talk people win m lion fan m m s right look m acquaint snatch defeat jaw victory you need learn win yeah need learn victory kevin mccarthys leadership s give victory rule s give victory keep cost s give victory win majority m proud majority make class s earn trust okay not trust kevin mccarthy fine not clear commitment seek night tucker carlson suggest mccarthy couple concession win speakership mccarthy transparent january relate second thomas massey representative kentucky power investigate fbi fine let mccarthy thing guess mccarthy thing demand solve problem apparently answer list concession mccarthy currently member motion threshold need force vote oust speaker instead effectively member matt gate time motion vacate speakership morehouse freedom caucus member house rules committee seat pledge hold vote lawmaker term limit border security bill want vote hell vote vote will not let real not republican vote pass lawmaker term limit bill ascendant precedent major change appropriation process prevent omnibus bill allow floor amendment offer lawmaker happen think s fine idea know consideration give speaker give trillion omnibus package cram hour notice m fine long legislative process everybody get propose amendment amendment vote earmark earmark take s fine know fine apparently mccarthy s true speaker extraordinarily powerless position particularly republican speaker power actually leverage member sound good people freedom caucus right right sound good speaker power leverage people right wing caucus mean speaker power leverage people left wing caucus rule apply time wanna pass sort tax cutting bill time wanna pass bill ban fund plan parenthood leftwe member caucus not wanna leverage go hold head exactly exactly go case s give extraordinarily list concession point understanding huge percentage holdout mccarthy get ready board mccarthy problem like em not not threshold need alter like point suggestion want american people side s fine transparent want thing want not not like kevin mccarthy member caucus fine kevin mccarthy probably close member caucus fine kevin mccarthy ve exact concession s alternative say person alternative go gather unanimous vote mention yesterday statistically speak unanimous vote speaker house republican aisle john bayner big problem face kevin mccarthy right defector big problem face kevin mccarthy republicans garbage job election cycle instead win seat end mean margin error essentially nil speaker house republicans elect john bayer few defection defection take way threshold paul ryan defector john boehner defector early baner defector mean everybody say mccarthy wildly underperforming s republicans board get board defector big sin republicans crappy election presumably mccarthy systemic failure prevent mccarthy intervene primary frankly lot people win primary contest seat win primary contest seat know exactly way think way transparency american public want transparency want open debate want process long fine m cool transparent want decide juice worth squeeze series self glorification expense interest american people conservative majority house representative second folk year jordan peterson join daily wire plus s create great content like logo literacy marriage brand new episode jordans biblical series exodus jordan peterson wonderful person s fight intense battle canadian government try silence front daily wire plus wanna sure content available include fantastic biblical analysis watch exclusively daily wire plus head daily wirecomben member watch s daily wirecomben today okay occur republicans internal battling wait outcome point radically shift thing sort waste time overall hopefully political win concession chip roy example finish life democrat pretend like end world end world okay foolish waste time maybe good come end world democrats treat like government cease function day entire world end time s government shutdown actually impact government shutdown temporary temporary pay give notion verge societal breakdown get tired hysterical nonsense line representative hakeem jeffrie suggest national security issue speaker day sure guy va vk second ago national security issue joe biden saint quo like enjoy life beach sign bill fly oh gosh people ask house republicans business american people national security vulnerability dangerous moment americans world reason congress need organize dangerous moment dangerous moment yeah super dangerous clown not hour super dangerous representative abigail span berger democrat virginia say keep people night basically put everybody watch sleep people sort in out political game keep anybody night gimme break keep night able infighting see aisle think keep night notion able fund government simple fund government complete shutdown agency keep safe shutdown agency keep safe mandatory spending talk democrats stake panic everybody happen time s government shutdown second stake panic everybody government not wipe ass evening make die die mean government not time open closet door open wake morning dress open closet s government help open closet government not live live day wonder federal government operation mean look good stuff happen republicans panic ridiculous medium induce freak take couple day select speaker house s incredibly silly combine democratic claim m sure want want republican select speaker select speaker time claim speaker house apparently america die claim s republican speaker house america die here democratic representative pete aguilar say republicans right push new jim crow m m confused want republican mccarthy speaker life want s hitler beginning state legislature pass restrictive voting law hakeem stand voter suppression new jim crow era step way s direct democratic caucus advance hakeem jeffrie new york speaker guy want truth democrat not upset democrat happy americans not upset americans not care sort stupid political game help certain cadre people attempt raise money change rule certain marginal way helpful conservative end go large scale change country need divided government seat house majority democrats pretend deeply concerned deeply concerned problematic lie tooth okay news not care everybody want cover prince harry book let clear fight revolution not care royal apparently stop care royal fact human heart desire royalty not actual royal family united states follow people royal family treat politician like royalty state union address pretend joe biden actually like decrepit king s like theoden rohan s s wake slumber gandolph sit throne like gandolph case pay attention royalty prince harry write bitter revenge memoir tellall accord new york post apparent accord new york post prince harrys revenge family medium horsey old woman flower field pub busy pub treat spare prince williams air literary selfharm time harry plotter halfwit prince put knife brother fumble assassin fall blame harry carey piece dominant green new york post harry reject homeland attack family slander house windsor institutionally racist netflix expose lose old friend gain new one attack father charles ii brother prince william future king way grave matter fight blood brother person like world william person know feel like harry lose mother diana walk coffin world face barrage flash bulb line duty thing mirror harry reflect polar opposite dear brother arch enemy whini royal person human history person live palatial estate california actress harpy wife lecture evil american racism class conflict joy here prince harry explain refer brother arch nemesis michael strahan yes culture great shape guy s quote book refer brother beloved brother arch nemesis strong word mean s competition weirdly think play play air spare oh gosh accord dominic green admission william struggle grief anger william bear crowning advantage difference s bear future king breath harry conceive raise form life insurance apparently lot joke inside family wonderful ve give air spare work harry quotes charles say harry concede joke presumably say minute deliver high bit high comedy say go meet girlfriend course current queen regent renowned care not care apparently harry whine mean daddy s drive resentment grip charles william fly separate private jet reason safety damn travel want know half suite balmar castle luxurious williams complain boarding school confuse hell receive slow luxurious rinse hot matron s s tiresome people tiresome guess go subject end time woke mean actually sort quasi hero guy rest continue right go to wanna miss get nicole hannah jones project series hulu yes propaganda continue unabated member member use coach shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join

This bill prohibits states and local governments from imposing taxes upon a securities industry participant based on the number, volume, or value of securities transactions processed or consummated by the participant, with exceptions.

right

bill prohibit state local government impose taxis security industry participant base number volume value security transaction process consummate participant exception

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill expands the exemptions from registration requirements applicable to companies offering or selling securities. In general, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) prohibits the offering or selling of securities unless the offering is registered with the SEC or it qualifies for an exemption. Specifically, the bill increases the annual offering limit applicable to the crowdfunding exemption from $1 million to $5 million. The bill also allows the SEC to increase through rulemaking the dollar threshold or limit applicable to other types of offerings, including offerings for small- and medium-sized companies. Additionally, the bill increases the offering limit applicable to small securities offerings and provides for adjustments to this limit in line with inflation.

right

bill expand exemption registration requirement applicable company offer sell security general security exchange commission sec prohibit offering selling security offering register sec qualify exemption specifically bill increase annual offering limit applicable crowdfunding exemption million million bill allow sec increase rulemake dollar threshold limit applicable type offering include offering small mediumsized company additionally bill increase offering limit applicable small security offering provide adjustment limit line inflation

This bill allows a prosecution to be instituted for any federal homicide offense without regard to the time that elapsed between the act or omission that caused the death of the victim and the death of the victim.

right

bill allow prosecution institute federal homicide offense regard time elapse act omission cause death victim death victim

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill allows the Department of the Army to acquire fill material for beach erosion and nourishment purposes from non-domestic sources even if such materials are available from domestic sources.

right

bill allow department army acquire fill material beach erosion nourishment purpose nondomestic source material available domestic source

Ep. 1697 - Trans Mass Shooter Murders Children At Christian School Published: 3/28/2023 (in RSS feed: 52m 21s) You don't have to blow your budget to buy a facial tissue that's strong, soft absorbent and aligns with your values. Scotty's facial tissue believes that value and values can live side by side. Not only does Scotty's make great tissues, but we're also part of an organization that has planted over 1 billion trees since 1957. So don't blow your budget to keep your beliefs. Visit scotty's facial.com to learn more. A, mass shooter who identifies as a trans man murders, three children and three adults at a Christian school. the media struggle to ignore the facts of the story and focus instead on gun control. and a new Wall Street Journal survey shows that American values are in serious peril. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, Well horrifying story out of Nashville, Tennessee. Yesterday, a shooter who identified as a Trans man, a 28-year-old woman, biological woman, shot three students and three adults, A covenant school in the Greenhill neighborhood of Nashville. It's a private Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee. According to the Wall Street Journal, apparently this person was a former student at the school. On this show, we don't actually name shooters because we believe that that gives glory to shooters. It gives them the attention they so desperately seek. But the facts of the case are things that are highly relevant. So we are going to be discussing many things about the Shooter that are highly relevant, especially given the politicized environment in which these shootings happen, and which the media just decide to lie about the source of the shootings. So in this particular case, the Nashville Police spokespersons on Aaron said, police received the call of an active shooter at Covenant School, 10:13 AM local time. The suspect had entered the school on the first floor and then proceeded to the lobby area on the second floor, firing multiple shots. Apparently, the shooter broke into the school. The doors was were not locked. Aaron said that officers responding to the scene, discovered the shooting occurred on the school's second floor and quickly engaged the shooter. The suspect was dead by 10:27 AM Unlike in other cases, officers actually did hear the gunshots and charged the Shooter. This immediately turned into a battle over narrative, which is what happens with every mass shooting in the United States. The left immediately jumps to a series of narratives rooted in sort of left wings storytelling. And this happens with every single mass shooting. And you can tell before the shooting even happens. If the victims of a shooting are X, and if the Shooter is y, here's what the narrative will be, If. You have a Mass shooting in the United States in which the Shooter is white and the victim is black. Then the narrative is going to be about both guns and racism. If, you have a Mass shooting in which the Shooter is black and the victim is white. It's going to be about guns and systemic racism and dispossession. If the shooter is Muslim and the victim is gay, then it's going to be about Christian bigotry, which is exactly what happened in the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting. If the shooter is Asian and the victims are white, as happened at Virginia Tech, then we're gonna be talking about gun control. If the Shooter is Trans and the victim is gay, as we turn, as we'll discuss in a moment, we're gonna be talking about guns and maybe about the, the virulent oppression of trans people in the United States. If the shooter is Trans and the victims are Christian, then it's going to be about guns and about Christian bigotry, which is the narrative that the media are taking away from this particular shooting, which is absolutely insane because again, the details that have emerged suggest that the shooter, a former student, identified as a Trans man. Apparently this person also left a manifesto. Here's the Nashville Police chief confirming that the shooter was In fact, a trans man, meaning a biological woman, and saying that there is a manifesto that sort of speaks to the politics of the shooting. She identify as transgender. She does ident, identify as transgender. Yes, And no motive at this point. Anything discovered in the apartment or house? No. We have a manifesto. We have some writings that we're going over that pertain to this date, the actual incident. We have a map drawn out of how this was all gonna take place. There's right now a theory of that's that we may be able to talk about later, but it's not confirmed. And so we'll, we'll put that out as soon as we can. Is there Any reason to believe that how she identifies is has any motive For targeting the school? I we can give you that at a later time. There is some theory to that. We're investigating all the leads, and once we know exactly, we'll let you know. So was this a targeted attack? It was. It was a targeted attack, right? Which means that by any, by any sort of stretch of the imagination, what we're talking about here is a trans identified person shooting up a Christian school that would be, in any normal context, a hate crime. If a Christian went to a very left wing school and shot up the school on the basis of Trans students being there, that would be a hate crime. And the national news story, we've got the evils of the right wing and the quote unquote anti-trans ideology that they push. As we'll. See, the media are gonna try and push that narrative anyway, even though the story is actually the reverse this time, a trans identified person shooting up a Christian school and murdering a bunch of very small school children. And one of the fascinating elements that emerged right after the shooting is the amount of quote unquote misgendering that happened in the media. So one of the things that we have been told by our mainstream media, our legacy media, is that you must never misgender ever under any circumstances. Misgendering is super bad. Misgendering is a practice whereby you speak the biological sex of a person as opposed to the sex to which they claim membership. So a trans man, if I say that a woman just shot up the school, which is exactly what happened, then you're not allowed to say that this is apparently misgendering. You're not. It's discriminatory in some way. And fascinatingly, the media engaged almost immediately in a bunch of quote unquote misgendering in this particular arena. So you saw, for example, the Daily Beast put out a headline, specifically misgendering the, the Shooter saying that it was a woman. You saw the, the Roll Rolling Stones, like a bunch of other publications. CNN suggested that a, a woman had done a Daily Beast headline suggested that the CNN said the Shooter, a 28-year-old woman who was once a student at the school also killed three adults before responding officers killed her. Now again, in any other context, we are supposed to pretend that men who say they're women are actually women. But the media, were having a real tough time with this one. And the reason they're having a tough time with this one is because they don't want to acknowledge the narrative if they actually go, they're stuck to a rock in a hard place. If they properly biologically gender, the person, the story is more accurate, but they have transgressed their own woke commandments. If on the other hand, they do not do that, if In fact, they, they go with the transgender pronouns preferred by the shooter, then they are given credence to the fact that a person who identified as trans and whose motivation likely had to do with that just shot up a bunch of school children. That cuts directly against the idea that victims can never be victimizers. And again, this is part and parcel of a broader left wing rubric, which is that if you're a member of a victim class, we can never call you a victimizer. Even If you are shooting school children. The misgendering aspect of this is fascinating. So apparently that strict rule of construct in terms of the left, that goes immediately out of by, by the wayside, so long as it does not serve the narrative. Later, of course, the New York Times would come back and then try to correct the record. The the New York Times actually put out a tweet saying there was confusion later on Monday about the gender identity of the assailant in the national shooting officials had used she and her to refer to the suspect. Well, according to the social media post, and a LinkedIn profile appeared to identify as a man in recent months. So well at least we cleared that up. At least we made sure that the, the Trans shooter is granted the honor of identifying as, as a particular type of, of human being. The media have to construct some sort of narrative here. Now, normally one of the things that would come up, what's the actual narrative here? Well, one thing that we certainly should discuss is the fact that when you create crisis narratives, as I said before, rhetoric, I, I don't tend to blame it, rhetoric for actual violent activity on any side. When Donald Trump says stuff that's really heated up and then a deranged fan of Donald, Trump goes and does something. I don't blame Donald Trump for that. When Barack Obama says something that really heats up the, the, the temperature, and then a Barack Obama follower goes and does something. I don't say Barack Obama's responsible when a Bernie Sanders supporter shoots up a congressional baseball game. I don't say the Bernie Sanders is responsible for that. However, what everyone is responsible for are the words that come outta their mouth. And they're also responsible for these sort of doomsday scenario that leads vulnerable people to go and do. Deranged, deranged person is still responsible for their own act activities. However, when you keep raising the temperature dangerously, this is going to have some predictable side effects. The pot is going to bubble over, and you've seen this almost universal attempt across the west on nearly every issue to suggest that the apocalypse is upon us. And on the issue of people who have gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder or who claim that they're a member of the opposite sex, they're told over and over and over that they are on the verge of being genocided. This is just a thing that is, that they, that is said over and over and over in the transgender community and by legacy media, that people on the right are attempting to wipe them off the face of the earth. They're in literal genocidal danger. And this of course, necessitates violence. It's sort of the same thing that Jonathan het, the social psychologist from, from NYU said about microaggression ideas. When when you keep telling people that they're being aggressed upon, that everything that happens to them, everything they're insulted by is a microaggression, they tend to react with macroaggression. And so If, you keep telling people over and over and over again that they're about to be destroyed. They're about to be wiped off the face of the earth. Then you shouldn't be all that surprised when deranged people take that message and then go do horrific, horrific things. And one of the things that Luke Roak reporter over at DailyWire was pointing out is that this is from March 6th, 2023. There was a call for a Trans day of vengeance stop trans genocide, Trans Day of Vengeance, April 1st, 11:00 AM in Washington dc That was a group of transgender activists. And this sort of language is unfortunately not particularly rare. The national group's website for Day of Vengeance has like the Stonewall riots, the gays and lesbians were experiencing what the trans community is facing. Now, the cycle of hate needs to end In fact, it must allies, siblings, we need you now more than ever, I was a radical revolutionist. I still am a radical revolutionist. I'm glad I was in the Stonewall Wire. I remember when someone threw a Molotov cocktail, I thought, my God, the revolution is here. The revolution is finally here. Sylvia Rivera. You know that, that sort of language, if, if we are, remember the entire media was willing to blame Sarah Palin for the shooting of a congresswoman by a deranged nut based on a map that targeted a, a congressional district, okay? That was not even close to a call for violence. But here you have people who legitimately are calling for days of vengeance and days of rage, and you have people who are assaulting other people at rallies in New Zealand. And the idea here is that this is all good and and useful. By the way. It is worth noting at this point that there is a full study, I kid you not, that came out from the National Library of Medicine. This was published in the Frontiers in Psychiatry circa 2022. And one of the things that it found a rather crucial thing that it found, it was, it was all about what is called violent radicalization. The possibility of different populations being subjected to violent radicalization. And what this study found, this is a direct quote, transgender and gender diverse youth emerge as the group at the highest risk of support for violent radicalization. This is in line with results of a recent survey conducted during the pandemic that highlighted high levels of support for violent radicalization as well as psychological distress among gender minorities. In other words, when you take a group of people who are very confused and when you preach to them that the solution to their confusion lies and things like gender transition, and then you teach them that people who refuse to accept that they are members of a sex to which they claim membership, and those people are a threat to them, a violent threat to them, then it may be that you end up with more violent incidents that may be In fact. One of the things that results. And so this creates kind of a problem for the media because of course the media are complicit in precisely this narrative. If you're a person who doesn't believe that men can become women and women can can't become men, if If you don't believe the the lie that gender is completely fluid, If, you don't believe the lie that sex and gender are disconnected, If, you don't believe any of those things, the media will suggest that you are responsible for, for Trans, erasure, trans genocide, trans death, transic, suicide. And so what you're doing in fighting a Christian school, which is part and parcel of this indoctrinated apparatus, is something that is theoretically virtuous in this particular world. That's what a, a sick mind might say. And this was a sick mind because no one shoots children who is not particularly a sick mind. And but the media are complicit in this particular narrative, which means they have to come up with an alternative narrative. And the alternative narrative is wait for it, wait for it. You got it. Right? Everybody who opposes the trans agenda is actually responsible for a trans person shooting up a Christian school. The media have an incentive to cover up the actual source of shootings like this one, which is why, for example, you don't remember you like, you literally do not recall the mass shooting that happened in Colorado in May, 2019 at a school. This was airport from ABC seven, a teenager who told authorities he launched a fatal shooting attack on his suburban Denver school last year with a classmate because he wanted them to experience trauma like he had experienced, was sentenced on Friday to life in prison plus 38 years with the possibility of Pearl. After two decades behind bars, the shooter apologized to the parents of Kendrick Castillo who was killed as he tackled one of the gunmen in the attack at stem school, Highlands Ranch, and to each of the other eight students wounded in the attack as well as those traumatized by it. What exactly happened here? Well, this was a, a person who says that he was mocked because he was transgender. Quote, he wanted everyone in that school to suffer and realize the world is a bad place and an affidavit summing up his statements, but that that shooting got memory hold because of course that doesn't fit the narrative, which is that victims supposed victims in American society can sometimes be horrible victimizers. Or perhaps you remember the Club Q shooting. You remember that that shooter, it was a shooting at a gay club. And originally the entire legacy media apparatus decided that this was an act of Christian bigotry against a gay nightclub In fact. It turns out that the shooter had a very dicey childhood that his mom identified as gender non-binary and, and that the shooter in this particular case identified as gender non-binary and used they them pronouns as well. That story disappeared from the headlines pretty quickly after, after that came out, and that had to be memory hold. Okay? So a new narrative has to now be created about this particular shooting. If. you can't memory hole what exactly is going on, a quote unquote trans man shooting up a Christian school. You have to come up with a new narrative. The new narrative that is being promoted by some members of the media is that the people to blame, truly our Tennessee Republicans, Tennessee Republicans, we hear at The Daily Wire, we are the people to blame because after all, we are pushing the idea that you shouldn't trans the kids, that you shouldn't actually attempt to gender mutilate small children who are gender confused. You shouldn't give hormone treatments, you shouldn't shoot girls full of testosterone. It might be bad for them. You might not want to actually carve a fake human, a fake flesh, penis out of an arm. You might not wanna do those things, right? If we say that, then apparently we are somehow responsible for a trans person shooting up a Christian school. Yesterday in one of the most insane clips of the day, a, b, c correspondent Terry Moran tried to blame Tennessee Republicans and Christians apparently for a shooting at a Christian school by a self-identified trans person. The police confirming six dead, three children, one eight years old, two nine years old, and three adults including Catherine Kunz, who was the head of the Covenant School. The police chief also said that the shooter has been identified as 28-year-old female. Audrey Hale said she's a former student of the school and confirmed that Audrey Hale was a identified herself as a transgender person at state of Tennessee earlier this month passed. And the governor signed a bill that banned transgender medical care for minors as well as a law that prohibited adult entertainment, including male and female impersonators. After a series of drag show controversies in that state, I was the drag show controversies. You see, it's because of all the concerns about exposing children to perverse sexual material because of that. No, you can see why this sort of thing might have ha okay, we are now making excuses for people who shoot children is apparently the way this works now, it is the push to protect children on an ideological level from indoctrination into a gender cult that is now the excuse for shooting actual children, right? So that the, the logic boggles mind. But I guess when you have a narrative to push and the narrative is that the right is always somehow responsible for a school shooting, even a school shooting, which a trans person murders a bunch of Christian kids, then you, you have to go with it. You have to go with it. That wasn't even the worst take of the day. The worst take of the day came courtesy of Ben Ryan, who has been going after The Daily Wire with a rhetorical hatchet for weeks now suggesting of course, that The Daily Wire basically runs Tennessee, which would that it were. So, but that is not In fact. The case Ben Ryan tweeted out as an NBC reporter. NBC has IDD the Nashville school shooter as the person 28 who identifies as transgender and had no previous criminal record. Nashville is home to The Daily Wire, a hub of anti-trans activity by Matt Walsh blog, Ben Shapiro and Michael J. Knowles. So just to get this straight, if a person does violence against a Trans person and none of us have called for violence against a Trans person, we are all responsible for that. Also, if a trans person does violence against Christians, we're responsible for that too. I feel like it almost doesn't matter what happens. You just say that we're responsible for the violence. Meanwhile, you have Newsweek pushing a similar sort of story. Newsweek had an entire tweet. It said, drag shows and gender affirming care for minors were banned in Tennessee this month while assault weapons remain legal. This is the other alternative take. The other alternative take is why are you even focused on things like protecting children from L-G-B-T-Q indoctrination? Focus on the guns, man, just focus. This is the John Stewart take that we saw a couple of weeks ago where he is asking Republican legislators, why aren't you banning guns if you're trying to protect kids? And it's like, well, maybe I don't think banning guns protects the kids. And also, I don't see why men dressed as women should be gyrating sexually in front of children. And what that has to do with, with school shootings precisely, but this is, this is the going line as well. Alejandro Carrabba, who is a trans person, tweeted, thank God Tennessee, protected the children from so-called horrors of drag and gender affirming care so they can be shot up at school by an AR 15 instead. Well, here's the thing, they weren't shut up by just an AR 15 randomly. It, it is truly amazing how when the left does not wish to, for example, blame certain groups of people or certain ideologies for an idea, they just blame the instrument. So in a radical Muslim terrorist, it drives a car over a bunch of Israelis, then the car did it. And when a, when a trans man shoots a bunch of Christian schoolchildren, the gun did it. The the shift in narrative is, is absolutely clear and absolutely odious. Narrative number one that the left has tried to promote is the pathetically stupid narrative that people who don't wish to see children mutilated or indoctrinated into a gender cult are responsible for a trans person shooting up a Christian school. That's narrative number one, which by the way, is actually a narrative that helps foment the ideological insanity that contributes to stuff like this. If, you keep saying that there is an existential threat to trans people in the world when you just say that boys are boys and girls are girls. And then people take that seriously and they go out and they say, okay, well, you know, I'm just going to attack anybody who says that because after all, I'm an existential threat, then you're actually using this shooting as a, as a platform in order to push forward a narrative that actually makes similar events more likely. Statistically that's insane. But the secondary narrative that the left always has on these ones is guns, of course. So Joe Biden yesterday, our incoherent president, he came downstairs and he began his press conference. He apparently already knew that the shooting had taken place. He randomly started talking about ice cream, which was very strange. It came down and started talking to the press about ice cream before he even got to his, his assault weapons ban call. Here was Joe Biden talking about ice cream. My name is Joe Biden, I'm Dr. Joe Biden's husband and I Jenny's ice cream chocolate chip. I came down because I heard there was chocolate chip ice cream. By the way, I have a whole refrigerator full upstairs. You think I'm kidding? I'm not. No one thinks you're kidding. We all think that you're essentially a small school child in a president's body that you have the brain power of some lower end mammals is, is pretty much where we are at this point. He then launched into his call for an assault weapons ban, of course, And we have to do more to stop gun violence. It's ripping our communities apart, ripping the, a soul, this nation ripping it, the very soul of the nation. And we, we have to do more to protect our schools so they aren't turned into prisons. You know, the shooter in this situation reportedly had two assault weapons and a pistol two AK 47. So I call on Congress again to pass my assault weapons ban. It's about time that we began to make some more progress. Oh, well, I mean he's, he's already got the answer. Ready to go was school shootings. And of course you had the, the regular sort of cultural leaders out there suggesting that gun control is the answer. Peter Frampton, you another cultural leader. He, he tweeted out, you know, there was a school shooting in the 1990s in the uk and they called for a massive gun buyback and, and registration and seizure program. There haven't been any school shootings since. I would just like to note at this point that there were no school shootings before the, the school shooting in Scotland. That happened in, I believe, 1996, that that school shooting was, I believe, the only recorded school shooting in all of the UK in decades. So you're taking a sample size that does not exist, and then you are suggesting that the addition of an independent variable now change the, the sample. I mean, If, you have zero in the forties, zero in the fifties, zero in the sixties, zero in the seventies, zero in the eighties, one in the nineties piece of legislation, zero in the two thousands, zero in the 2000 tens. I'd like to suggest that it might not have been the gun legislation that actually changed that. When you have a sample size of one that is very difficult to draw any sort of serious data based conclusion. But again, the left doesn't need data. The, the, the left has a do something mentality and the do something is always take the right of normal Americans who aren't the problem. So for example, a kain, Jean Pierre World's worst press secretary out there saying, how doing the, how many people have to be murder routine? And let's be real about this. If Democrats really took this seriously, you know what they would've done? They might have tried to push this sort of assault, weapons ban, gun control routine. They might have tried to seriously push that when they controlled both branches of Congress and the presidency, which was last I checked about 35 seconds ago. Here's Kain Jean Pire doing the what, what if I, what if I get very emotional about gun control to, to push this In his state of the Union, the president called on Congress to do something to stop the epidemic of gun violence, tearing families apart, tearing communities apart. How many more children have, have to be murdered before Republicans in Congress will step up and act to pass the assault weapons ban? I mean, do something is not an actual plan. You know, it would be an actual plan. I'll, I'll, I'll name you a few things. That would be an actual plan. The Democrats have rejected all of these, by the way, so far, as I'm aware, addition of school security at all schools. You know, Jewish day schools are guarded like banks and they should be because there is a high level of suspicion that if there're gonna be a, a target of attack, that you need somebody there in order to stop it. A better school lockdown procedures, obviously a shift to lock the outer doors, which didn't happen in this particular scenario. And yes, treating people who are mentally ill as though they're mentally ill, this person was clearly mentally ill. This person was clearly unwell. All the red flags were there, but we had to treat it as though it's an act of heroism rather than maybe an indicator that this person isn't wholly well, it doesn't mean that every person who identifies as transgender is a potential school shooter. God forbid that's obviously not true. It doesn't mean that anybo that that everybody with gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder is potentially violent. That's obviously not true either. But to pretend that somebody who's exhibiting signs of abnormality is somehow perfectly normal and that there were no red flags was, I guarantee you as time goes on, we're gonna find out that there were a bevy of red flags because there is yet to be a school shooting in which there were no red flags. It always turns out that there is a vast football field filled with red flags where everybody looks the other way and you know, it's a pretty good indicator that somebody might be having a problem. One great indicator that somebody might be having a problem, not a violent problem, but just problems generally. Great indicator is when they say that they're a member of a sex to which they do not belong, that does not mean that they're gonna be violent again for the third time and for the morons and media matters. It does mean that if we are looking at a subgroup of, of folks who are, who are suffering from a mental illness, who, who ought to have a pair of eyes on them more than the person who is in the control group, that's a symptom, okay? That the, the fact that we are not supposed to say any of that is, is demonstrative of exactly the problem in American society. We do not take the problem of mental illness seriously in America. We just don't. We don't, we don't, we we pretend it away. And particularly when it, when it falls along the lines of politically correct truisms and stuff. And so sophistry, we, we just pretend it away. It's, it's really, it's really pathetic. Again, no, there's nobody out there who would argue that, that somebody who's suffering from schizophrenia shouldn't have an extra pair of eyes on them. There's nobody who's arguing that somebody who's suffering from anorexia just for their own health and safety shouldn't have an extra pair of eyes on them. But when it comes to certain types of particular mental disorders, we're supposed to pretend that everything is hunky dory. And, and then we're supposed to act surprised when, when something terrible happens. I mean, listen, statistical outliers like this are always gonna be shocking, but can we stop pretending that the normal person who is walking down the street not identifying as a member of the opposite gender is in exactly the same mental health state as a person who is walking around identifying as a member of the opposite gender, that it's just not true. That doesn't mean they're gonna be a school Shooter. It doesn mean that if we are, if we are categorizing folks in terms of mentally disordered versus non mentally disordered, you actually have to look at mental disorders that are on the table. But we're not gonna do that now. We're, we're just gonna, we're we're gonna do the, the do something routine here. Is Joe Biden doing that? You know, I, I hate to say what I'm gonna say next because you know, you're so enthusiastic and with so much energy and hope and I feel it. But while you've been in this room, I don't know whether you've been on your phones, but we just learned about another shooting in Tennessee, a school shooting. And I am truly without words and our children deserve better. And we stand, all of us, we stand with Nashville in prayer. Well, she's allowed to say in prayer, by the way, people on the right are not allowed to say in prayer. Joe Biden's allowed to say it, I'm sorry, but, but do better is not actually a legislative proposal. It is likely to result in anything useful, but it's not about useful, it's about what you can demagogue off of apparently, which presumably is why Barack Obama's former education secretary Arn Duncan, tweeted out, at what point do we consider a national boycott of schools until our children are safe to learn there and our adults are safe to teach? How many lives need to be lost before we actually decide to do something and keep everyone safe? A national Boycott of schools genius level stuff there from the actual former education Secretary of the United States of America, just don't go to school anymore. Wonderful representative Steve Cohen, Democrat of Tennessee. He's doing the same routine. He says it's hard to sit with the Republicans 'cause they're the ones who are at fault for this, which is weird because there's an actual shooter who did an actual thing and had an actual personality in an actual description, in an actual agenda. But apparently it's just generalized Republicans. Dead kids didn't work in Newtown. Dead kids didn't work in Sandy Hook. Dead kids didn't really work in valdi. The NRA works, they're, they're political power, their money that they make gun manufacturers money. And that's what pushes the NRA. It just, it's the, it's, it's horrific to think that the Congress people won't adjust their thinking and do anything better than thoughts and prayers. I mean, that's what we've heard from people right now in Congress. It's pathetic. I it's, it's hard for me to, to, to, to serve up there now with some of the people that I've had to serve with. I mean, I, I, they, they, they're part of the danger. I mean, they could go, I'm not gonna get into that, but it's just that they are so attached to guns and, And this of course is part of a broader attack by anybody in the press and on the left, on anybody who actually likes guns. So, for example, this, this is the, it's hard to come up with the dumbest headline of the day because there's just too many of them there, there, it, it is just a fire hose of stupidity. So between Steve Cohen suggesting that he can't serve with people who are pro-gun because they're responsible for a Trans person shooting a bunch of Christian school kids. And the Washington Post, which printed this actual headline, GOP Congressman from Nashville District, heartbroken by shooting, but Democrats Gun Control advocates highlighted a 2021 Christmas photo showing representative Andrew Ogles and members of his family with firearms. So just to, just to get this absolutely clear, the GOP Congressman is not allowed to be heartbroken by a shooting in his district because he and his family held guns in a Christmas photo in 2021. They are responsible. They're the wild misdirection, the insane misdirection. It, it really is almost too much to take. Meanwhile, there's a study out from the Wall Street Journal that is just fascinating and, and has some real consequences to it. It came out yesterday and what it found is that America, American values, they're basically dying generation over generation. So here is what Wall Street Journal finds, patriotism, religious faith, having children and other priorities that help define the national character for generations are receding an I importance to Americans according to a Wall Street, Journal and ORC poll. And the, these findings of this poll are just astonishing. And the poll asked some pretty simple questions like, do you have faith in the economy? Do you think that it's excellent or good? 80%, by the way, say that the economy is poor or not so good in the United States asked if, if they think that their kids are gonna live a better life than they do. A huge number of Americans say that they think it'll be actually worse for their kids than it is right now. But what is really quite fascinating about this, this Wall Street Journal poll is it shows that central values to social cohesion are completely fading away in the United States. So, for example, patriotism in 1998, 70% of Americans said that patriotism was a very important value to them, 70%, which would obviously imply significant bipartisan agreement that patriotism is pretty important, that If, you live in the United States, you should be pretty excited about living in the United States, and you should believe in American exceptionalism. By 2019, that number had dropped some, but not entirely radical to 61%. By 2023, that number had dropped to 38%, like off a cliff. So between 2019 and 2023, that number dropped from 61% to 38%. Americans who think that patriotism is important. Religion, 62% of Americans said in 1998 that religion was important to them. 48% said religion was important by 2019. Today it's at 39%. So less than four in 10 Americans say that religion is very important to them. How about having children? In 19 98, 50 9% of Americans said that having children was important value to them. By 2019, that was down to 43%, and today it is down to 30% less than one in three Americans say that having children is a very important value. This one is kind of fascinating. Community involvement and ad being involved in your community, 47% of Americans said that it was very important to be involved in your community. In 1998, that jumped to 62% in 2019. I can only assume that people meant politically because by 2023, that number was down to 27%. Again, less than one in three Americans at a core of Americans believe that community involvement is actually an important value. The only area in which Americans said that they had more interest in this as an American value than anything else. Then, then, then, since 1998 is money when it comes to making money that is, is now considered very important by 43% of Americans. It was 41% of Americans in 2019. It was 31% of Americans in 1998. And this breaks down pretty significantly by age. You know, the, the, the number of people who say, for example, in the 18 to 29 age group that patriotism is really important to them is slightly over 20%. Less than a quarter of people between 18 and 29 say, having children is important to them. Barely 30% of young people say that religion is very important to them. And even only 61 and 62% of 18 to 29 year olds say that hard work is important to them. Right now, there's a massive partisan breakdown in all of these questions when it comes to, for example, patriotism. 59% of of Republicans say patriotism is important compared to 23% of Democrats when it comes to religion, 53% of Republicans say religion is important compared to 27% of Democrats having children. 38% of Republicans say it's important compared to 26% of Democrats. When it comes to community involvement, this one's kind of shocking. Democrats say that they believe more in community involvement to the tune of 32%. Republicans now say only 25% say that they believe in community involvement as an important, as an important thing. Mainly because the nature of what community involvement involved in say 1998 is very different from what we mean today. In 1998, If you had said community involvement, people immediately would've said, oh, you mean go to church today. Community involvement means go to a, a protest march or something where there is no gap at all is when it comes to making money. When it comes to making money. 45% of Democrats and 45% of Republicans say that making money is a priority when it comes to other values like transgenderism. Massive gap between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to schools and universities using affirmative action, massive gap between Republicans and Democrats. But here is, here's the, the, the real thing that is happening right now. All the values that used to be the quote unquote unifying values are dying away. They're falling apart. And, and the reason they're falling apart, I think is, is pretty obvious. The centralizing institutions in American society, the intermediate institutions in American society have completely disappeared. These were the things that allowed us to live together. Churches, local schools, social clubs, right? All the, all the arenas, what family, all of these things, all these arenas that used to actually allow us to unify. All of those have fallen away. The, the intermediate institutions of American society have died away. This is something that Robert Nsbe predicted in the quest for community back in the 1940s. He suggested that over time as the, as the political state became more and more important, all those intermediate institutions would be removed and all that would be left essentially were was, was a tary state at the very top of American society and a bunch of atomized individuals. Those atomized individuals still have individual economic interests. They're all still interested in making money on the per, on the sort of personal individual level, but they don't have any of the militating institutions in life that actually give people meaning and purpose. It's no coincidence that at the exact same time, more and more Americans are saying that they are, are disconnected from American values. More and more Americans are unhappy. A huge number of Americans are now unhappy. A huge number of Americans believe their kids are not better off. A huge number of Americans believe that America is in serious trouble. That is because as you remove those intermediate institutions, we're supposed to have some sort of abiding faith in an overarching political infrastructure. But why should we, that overarching political infrastructure used to be a reflection of common values that we share. But now those common values are basically gone, and it's not as though this is, you know, some sort of giant mystery going all the way back to Alexis de Tocqueville. De Tocqueville suggested quite correctly, back in like 1836, exactly what would happen in western societies. The rise of soft despotism. Here's a quote from Alexis de Tocqueville, and if this doesn't sound like modern American society to you, I'm not, I'm not sure what de tell you. Here's what de Tocqueville says, quote, I seek to trace the novel features under which despotism may appear in the world. The first thing that strikes the observation is an innumerable multitude of men all equal and alike incessantly endeavoring to procure the petty and poultry pleasures, which with which, with which they glut their lives. Each of them living apart is as a stranger to the fate of all the rest. His children and his private friends constitute to him the whole of mankind. As for the rest of his fellow citizens, he's close to them, but he doesn't see them. He touches them, but he doesn't feel them. He exists only in himself and for himself alone. If his kindred still remain him, he may be said at any rate, to have lost his country above this race of man stands in immense and ary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratification and to watch over their faith. That power is absolute minute, regular provident and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if like that parent its object was to prepare men for manhood. But it seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood. It's well content that people should rejoice provided they think nothing of. Think of nothing but rejoicing for their happiness. Such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness it provides for their security. For seasoned supplies, their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principle concerns, directs their industry, regulates the dissent of property and subdivides their inheritances what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living. Thus, it everyday renders the exercise of the free agency of ban less useful and thus frequent. It circumscribes the will within a narrower range. And gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things. It has predisposed men to endure them, and often to look on them as benefits after having thus successively taken each member of the community and its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will. The supreme power then extends his arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened Ben and guided men are seldom forced by it to act, but they're constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence. It does not ize, but it compresses enervates, extinguishes and STEs the people till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd. I've always thought that the servitude of the regular quiet and gentle kind, which I have just described, might be combined more easily than is commonly believed with some of the outward forms of freedom. And that it might even establish itself under the wing of the sovereignty of the people. Yeah, bad Alexis de tofu writing in 1836. Again, remove all of the actual institutions and roles and rules that shape us. And what you end up with is people who are completely disconnected and pursuing their own version of what they think of as, as happiness, but restricted in that happiness from engaging with the things that actually make life meaningful. And then we're shocked when there is additional mental illness and we are shocked when there's additional depression. We are shocked when there's additional suicide. We're shocked when people are anxious and scared for the future of the country and feel nothing in common with their neighbors. When you abandon all of those institutions, that's how you get this is how that, that national shooting in some ways, on a symbolic level is it, it it says a lot on a symbolic level. You know, the, the attack of the radical individual on these small community church school, right? The, the, the idea of, of the person who is freed from all rules and roles and who, who must attack a source of rules and roles and attack children in that way. And then if we're, if we are going to the left, likes to use particular shootings to use particular violent incidents as sort of metaphors for broader American society, if we're talking about the, the metaphor of broader American society, that would be a, a pretty solid one. Alrighty. Meanwhile, in other news, Benjamin Nhu in Israel has now suspended the judicial overhaul that chaos was, was causing serious shutdowns in the state of Israel. According to the Wall Street Journal, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday suspended a controversial judicial overhaul plan in an attempt to pull the country back from the brink after mass protests and strikes rocked the nation, Netanyahu yesterday, he, he both explained what he was doing in terms of judicial reform, and then he also explained why he was temporarily delaying the judicial overhaul. Here he was with Pierce Morgan explaining why exactly he was seeking judicial overhaul in the first place. Right now you have a situation where 15 unelected members of the Supreme Court effectively govern Israel. They can decide things that affect our military, our economy, our foreign relations, our battle with terrorism. Is that right? Is that democratic? No, it's not democratic. You want to correct it. You don't say that those other democracies are somehow tainted, are somehow not democratic because they've, they have a better balance of power. Okay? So that obviously is, is pretty uncontroversial. And here's the thing, even in Israel that's relatively uncontroversial, but the right and the left, many in the center agree, there has to be some reform of the judicial system. The real battle in Israel, as I was explaining yesterday, the real battle is, is not really over judicial reform. The real battle is over the future of the country. So basically what happened in the last election cycle is that the right one, a fairly solid victory in, in the polling, they ended up with a 64 seat majority in the Knesset that allowed them to govern the left, does not like the right one. And to the left decided to deploy to the streets in order to essentially shut down all of the major mechanisms of the Israeli economy. They blocked highways, they shut down the airports yesterday. This, they, they used extra legal means in order to try and threaten the government into not pursuing this judicial reform. So to suggest that that's a democratic movement is sort of bizarre. You have an elected coalition that is attempting to pursue a more democratic policy, which is taking power away from an unelected branch that is using that power in bad ways. And then you have people mobbing in the streets, supposedly in defensive of democracy, but trying to overthrow the will of a democratically elected majority. Okay? Now that's not the whole story because the truth is that, you know, there, there are, there are serious sort of underlying political issues here. The left looks at the right and what they see is a coalition of some people who actually want some procedural changes for good reasons. And then they also see some people who they believe are simply trying to grab the levers of power and to prevent any checks and balances from obtaining in the state of Israel at all the, but Netanyahu did the right thing yesterday. He said, we have to slow this down. We have to be more incremental in how we approach this, which is In fact, the right solution, the right move forward too fast. They drove enormous opposition and what they found out is that the extra governmental levers of power in in Israel are quite, are, are, are quite dynamic. They're, they're, they're able to literally shut down pretty much the entire country because again, a lot of the economic and, and even military power and Israel is not necessarily on the side of the government. And so that, that split was sort of exposed, which means more incrementalism and more compromise. That's exactly what Netanyahu pledged yesterday. He's trying to avoid a rift within the people. I decided to suspend Ben The second and third reading from the law in this Knesset tenure in order to give time to get a broader consensus. So they'll go back to the drawing board, which is probably what they should do. It is worth noting that yesterday there was a massive counter protest in Israel, probably a hundred thousand people minimum in the middle of Israel who were on the side of Netanyahu. So the media only covered one side and suggested this was sort of a rising up against a totalitarian dictatorship does align on every level. And again, the suggestion that it is a one-sided issue, it is not, there will be discussions, presumably some sort of judicial form will eventually get done, but compromis and conciliation are gonna be the path forward right there. I I will say at this point that I think that this is a good indicator that there, there are just tons of people out there who are constantly seeking an end of the world apocalyptic scenario to talk about right on all sides. Like, this is the last election. If we don't get x done, it's gonna, the country will be over Civil war. People were saying that in Israel, you'll say that with every election in the United States, that is not only bad politics, it is bad policy. It may be good politics in the short term because you're allowed to get people in the streets and get people all ramped up. But If, you actually wish to effectuate change. It's a real problem because it stands in the way of the actual constructive dialogues that we can actually have with one another in order to forward policy. And instead it just makes politics. A series of reactionary swings from one side to the other. One side says the apocalypse and maybe they win. Then the other side says, well, the other side won. That's the apocalypse. And then they win. And then you never actually get to any effectuated change. Okay? Time for some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like today, I can see the backdrop. I haven't mentioned it, the whole show, but we are actually in Rome today. I'm filming with my friend Jordan Peterson. We have a new series that's gonna be coming out very soon in which we visit some of the world's great places and, and talk about the history and philosophy of western civilization. It really is, is fantastic behind us. For, for those who don't know, what they're looking at is St. Peter's. And St. Peter's obviously is the, the center of Catholicism, the, the most powerful church institution in the history of the world. It's, it's an astonishing building. The city of Rome is absolutely incredible. The the history of Rome is fascinating from, you know, the, the actual sort of Rome of HBO and the, the, the swords and, and Sandals Rome, that, that was all about senatorial power versus, versus dictatorial power, democracy republicanism the people versus the elite and all the rest of it to the rise of Christianity in the, in the aftermath of the, of, of the New Testament. Obviously, you know, Rome Central to the identity of Western civilization. I can't wait to bring you that series. It really is quite amazing. And we couldn't just, we couldn't resist actually doing, doing a shoot up here because I mean, If, you can shoot with this backdrop. Why would you do, why wouldn't you do that as opposed to to shooting in a, in a darkened studio somewhere. Other things that I like today. So when you talk about rebuilding those local institutions, obviously church is a major local institution that needs to be rebuilt and that requires some actual forward thinking leadership from people who are in the religious sphere. And that means that religious leader should stop being so shy about what they believe and they should say it out. They should, they should speak out on, on what they believe rather than attempting to allow secular morality to essentially steer the boat. It also means that we need a government that allows for the thriving of local institutions. And so I'm, I'm very excited that in the state of Florida, the state of Florida has now passed universal school choice and the the money now follows the students. It's not follow the schools. And that means that every kid will have the ability in the state of Florida to get a te a credit of something like $8,000 in order to pursue a private education. If they so wish here was Governor Ron DeSantis in Florida. This is a win for him. And so people have said, wait a minute, If, you give parents a choice, If, you let parents take scholarship and go to the school of their choice. Somehow that's gonna hurt education performance. And in Florida, we're proof positive that that's just the opposite of what actually happened. Fact of the matter is our school districts perform better because they've embraced choice. Our charter schools perform better because they have to compete for individual students. They're not entitled to get anybody as a charter school. And of course having private schools that can service the needs of parents so that a parent will take that scholarship and say, you know what? I want to go to this particular school because of what they're offering. All that has created a very positive feedback. It's gonna be great. And, and this makes Florida the fourth state to actually adopt universal school choice. More of this. This is how you rebuild local institutions, give power back to parents to re congregate in their communities instead of using the power of government to break up those communities. Arty time for a couple of things that I hate. So we've already seen the ization of Roal doll and the public generally didn't like that, and so they, they walked it back a little bit. This is the attempt to remove words like fat from Augustus GLS descriptors in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Well now, CNN reports that the novels of Agatha Christie are the latest works to be revised to remove racist references and other language considered offensive to modern audiences. According to the UK's of the Telegraph publisher, Harper Collins has edited some passages and entirely removed to others from its new digital editions of some of Christie's detective mysteries featuring Hercule Poirot and Miss Marble. I'm a big Agatha Christie fan. I really enjoy Hercule p Poirot. The amendments to the books include changes to the narrator's inner monologue. for example, Poirot's description of another character as a Jew Of course, in Christie's debut novel, the Mysterious Affair styles has now been stripped out of the new version. Now, as a Jew, of course, I can say that I don't find that particularly useful. I think that actually understanding the biases of authors when they're writing is quite useful and historically interesting and necessary In order to actually understand the books that you are reading, If, you strip out all of the stuff that we find offensive today from the books. You're missing half of their context Throughout the revised version of the Short Story Collection. Ms. Marble's final cases in two other stories, the word native has now been replaced with local, which doesn't change anything. A passage describing a servant as black and grinning has been revised, and the character is now simply referred to as nodding with no reference to his race. Also, you're not allowed to refer to Nubian people in death, in death on Nile, and none of this is going to, you know, make the books better in any way. And it's not going to prevent people from taking offense at Agatha Christie's original verbiage. But it is a great way to demonstrate your fey to the woke idiots who have decided that it's necessary to rewrite all of history in order to appease their modern sensibilities. Well, meanwhile, speaking of woke idiots who are attempting to appease modern sensibilities and yeah, attacking parents in the process, the inexpressibly foolish Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, she yesterday was suggesting bad timing here. She said that predatory, cisgender and straight men are the ones after your kids. This is a hell of a take. Many of these disgusting and insinuating attacks on trans and LGBT people are actually projections of what predatory, cisgender, and often straight men do when left alone the presence of women or sometimes horribly children. So instead of getting you to challenge the patriarchy, they're trying to get you to challenge the very gender expressiveness that challenges patriarchy. Don't get it twisted. 'cause a lot of people attacking drag are projecting. Oh, it's, it's, it's, it's all projecting. So now men gyrating sexualized around kids If, you object to that. It's because you wish to sexualize kids in some fetishistic way. The, the, the utter insanity and stupidity of, of this point of view. But again, it, none of it is designed for the benefit of the children. It's all designed to make a particular constituency feel better about itself. That that's, that's all this really is. Okay, final thing that I hate, so this would be, again, major national news story if the parties weren't reversed. According to Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, he confirmed on Monday that a member of his staff was brutally attacked on the streets of Washington DC over the weekend. He said in a statement, this weekend, a member of my staff was brutally attacked in broad daylight in Washington DC I join you, I ask you to join Kelly and me in praying for Speedi and complete recovery and thanking first responders hospital staff and police for their diligent actions. Apparently, the person sustained life threatening injuries. A suspect was arrested with an assault, with intent to kill. Using a knife apparently is a repeat stabbing. Again, if a Democrat had been attacked in a Republican area, that of course would be worthy of note. But it's Republican being attacked in a democratic area. So obviously that is not worthy of note whatsoever. It is completely irrelevant to everyone. Okay, final thing that I hate today, worst take of the day. We, we were in search for the worst take of the day with regard to the shooting. The worst take of the day actually came courtesy of a person named David Pacman, who ha is a left-wing podcaster, I believe, and he tweeted this out, quote, very surprising that there would be a Mass shooting at a Christian school. Given that lack of prayer is often blamed for these horrible events. Is it possible they weren't praying enough or correctly despite being a Christian school? That's a hell of a take, right there is that probably they needed to, they were praying wrong, the kids were praying wrong. So, you know, that's probably why that happened. Or obviously he's attempting to mock the idea of religion at all. Isn't prayer supposed to protect you? Well, I mean, behind me, as I mentioned before, is St. Peter's. What if I told David PackMan, there's an entire religion predicated on the idea that the son of God was killed by humans. What if I like, what, what if I told you there's an entire religion predicated on the idea that there are people that they call martyrs and there are a bunch of statues of them right over there. You can see them, and they prayed super hard and also died as martyrs. What if I told David Pacman that one of my favorite things is when atheists pretend that they, they're questions about the Odyssey or like the first questions that have been asked about this, this, this matter. Oh my God, you're saying that bad things happen to religious people? Well, doesn't that debunk your entire religion? No, actually, let me just explain. It does not debunk any of my religion or any of any religion because that's the stupidest stake of all time, that sometimes God doesn't answer prayers in the way that we wish him to answer our prayers because God isn't us. But that does not change why people pray. It's, it's, it's so ugh, Ugh. Alrightyy. Guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be jumping into the mail bag here from Rome. If you're not a member, become a member. Use Coach Shapiro checkout for two months free on all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, Pure Talk believes in American values and that free should mean, you know, like free. So when you switch to Pure Talk today, you'll get a free Samsung 5G smartphone. There's no foreign line requirement, no activation fee, just a free Samsung that's built to last with a rugged screen, quick charging Buttery and topped your data security qualifying plans start just 35 bucks a month for unlimited talk text, 15 gigs of data and a mobile hotspot. Pure Talk gives you phenomenal coverage on America's most dependable 5G network. It's the same coverage you know and love, but for half the price of the other guys, the average family saves almost a thousand dollars a year. So I challenge you to choose a company that actually doesn't hate your guts and shares your values. Let Pure talk's expert US customer service team help you make the switch today. Go to Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro to claim your eligibility for your free brand new Samsung 5G smartphone and start saving on wireless today. Again, go to Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro to switch to my cell phone company. I've been using 'em for years. They're fantastic. You'll love them as well. But at Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro and claim your eligibility on that free brand new Samsung 5G smartphone. Start saving.

right

ep trans mass shooter murder child christian school publish rss feed m not blow budget buy facial tissue s strong soft absorbent align value scottys facial tissue believe value value live scottys great tissue organization plant billion tree not blow budget belief visit scottys facialcom learn mass shooter identify tran man murder child adult christian school medium struggle ignore fact story focus instead gun control new wall street journal survey show american value peril m ben shapiro ben shapiro horrify story nashville tennessee yesterday shooter identify tran man woman biological woman shoot student adult covenant school greenhill neighborhood nashville private christian school nashville tennessee accord wall street journal apparently person student school not actually shooter believe give glory shooter give attention desperately seek fact case thing highly relevant go discuss thing shooter highly relevant especially give politicize environment shooting happen medium decide lie source shooting particular case nashville police spokesperson aaron say police receive active shooter covenant school local time suspect enter school floor proceed lobby area second floor fire multiple shot apparently shooter break school door lock aaron say officer respond scene discover shooting occur school second floor quickly engage shooter suspect dead unlike case officer actually hear gunshot charge shooter immediately turn battle narrative happen mass shooting united states left immediately jump series narrative root sort left wing storytelle happen single mass shooting tell shooting happen victim shooting x shooter y here narrative mass shooting united states shooter white victim black narrative go gun racism mass shooting shooter black victim white go gun systemic racism dispossession shooter muslim victim gay go christian bigotry exactly happen orlando pulse nightclub shoot shooter asian victim white happen virginia tech go to talk gun control shooter tran victim gay turn discuss moment go to talk gun maybe virulent oppression tran people united states shooter tran victim christian go gun christian bigotry narrative medium take away particular shooting absolutely insane detail emerge suggest shooter student identify tran man apparently person leave manifesto here nashville police chief confirm shooter fact tran man mean biological woman say manifesto sort speak politic shooting identify transgender ident identify transgender yes motive point discover apartment house manifesto writing go pertain date actual incident map draw go to place s right theory s able talk later confirm soon reason believe identify motive target school later time theory investigate lead know exactly let know target attack target attack right mean sort stretch imagination talk tran identify person shoot christian school normal context hate crime christian go left wing school shoot school basis tran student hate crime national news story ve get evil right wing quote unquote antitran ideology push medium go to try push narrative story actually reverse time tran identify person shoot christian school murder bunch small school child fascinating element emerge right shooting quote unquote misgendere happen medium thing tell mainstream medium legacy media misgender circumstance misgendere super bad misgendering practice speak biological sex person oppose sex claim membership trans man woman shoot school exactly happen allow apparently misgendere discriminatory way fascinatingly medium engage immediately bunch quote unquote misgendere particular arena see example daily beast headline specifically misgendere shooter say woman see roll roll stone like bunch publication cnn suggest woman daily beast headline suggest cnn say shooter woman student school kill adult respond officer kill context suppose pretend man woman actually woman medium have real tough time reason have tough time not want acknowledge narrative actually stuck rock hard place properly biologically gender person story accurate transgress wake commandment hand fact transgender pronoun prefer shooter give credence fact person identify tran motivation likely shoot bunch school child cut directly idea victim victimizer parcel broad left wing rubric member victim class victimizer shoot school child misgendere aspect fascinating apparently strict rule construct term left go immediately wayside long serve narrative later course new york times come try correct record new york times actually tweet say confusion later monday gender identity assailant national shooting official refer suspect accord social medium post linkedin profile appear identify man recent month clear sure tran shooter grant honor identify particular type human medium construct sort narrative normally thing come s actual narrative thing certainly discuss fact create crisis narrative say rhetoric not tend blame rhetoric actual violent activity donald trump say stuff s heat deranged fan donald trump go not blame donald trump barack obama say heat temperature barack obama follower go not barack obamas responsible bernie sander supporter shoot congressional baseball game not bernie sander responsible responsible word come outta mouth responsible sort doomsday scenario lead vulnerable people derange deranged person responsible act activity raise temperature dangerously go predictable effect pot go bubble ve see universal attempt west nearly issue suggest apocalypse issue people gender dysphoria gender identity disorder claim member opposite sex tell verge genocide thing say transgender community legacy medium people right attempt wipe face earth literal genocidal danger course necessitate violence sort thing jonathan het social psychologist nyu say microaggression idea tell people aggress happen insult microaggression tend react macroaggression tell people destroy wipe face earth not surprised derange people message horrific horrific thing thing luke roak reporter dailywire point march tran day vengeance stop trans genocide trans day vengeance april washington dc group transgender activist sort language unfortunately particularly rare national group website day vengeance like stonewall riot gay lesbian experience tran community face cycle hate need end fact ally sibling need radical revolutionist radical revolutionist m glad stonewall wire remember throw molotov cocktail think god revolution revolution finally sylvia rivera know sort language remember entire medium willing blame sarah palin shooting congresswoman deranged nut base map target congressional district okay close violence people legitimately call day vengeance day rage people assault people rally new zealand idea good useful way worth note point study kid come national library medicine publish frontier psychiatry circa thing find crucial thing find call violent radicalization possibility different population subject violent radicalization study find direct quote transgender gender diverse youth emerge group high risk support violent radicalization line result recent survey conduct pandemic highlight high level support violent radicalization psychological distress gender minority word group people confused preach solution confusion lie thing like gender transition teach people refuse accept member sex claim membership people threat violent threat end violent incident fact thing result create kind problem medium course medium complicit precisely narrative person not believe man woman woman not man not believe lie gender completely fluid not believe lie sex gender disconnect not believe thing medium suggest responsible tran erasure trans genocide trans death transic suicide fight christian school parcel indoctrinate apparatus theoretically virtuous particular world s sick mind sick mind shoot child particularly sick mind medium complicit particular narrative mean come alternative narrative alternative narrative wait wait get right everybody oppose tran agenda actually responsible tran person shoot christian school medium incentive cover actual source shooting like example not remember like literally recall mass shooting happen colorado school airport abc seven teenager tell authority launch fatal shooting attack suburban denver school year classmate want experience trauma like experience sentence friday life prison plus year possibility pearl decade bar shooter apologize parent kendrick castillo kill tackle gunman attack stem school highland ranch student wound attack traumatize exactly happen person say mock transgender quote want school suffer realize world bad place affidavit sum statement shooting get memory hold course not fit narrative victim suppose victim american society horrible victimizer remember club q shooting remember shooter shooting gay club originally entire legacy medium apparatus decide act christian bigotry gay nightclub fact turn shooter dicey childhood mom identify gender nonbinary shooter particular case identify gender nonbinary pronoun story disappear headline pretty quickly come memory hold okay new narrative create particular shooting not memory hole exactly go quote unquote trans man shoot christian school come new narrative new narrative promote member medium people blame truly tennessee republicans tennessee republicans hear daily wire people blame push idea not trans kid not actually attempt gender mutilate small child gender confused not hormone treatment not shoot girl testosterone bad want actually carve fake human fake flesh penis arm wanna thing right apparently responsible tran person shoot christian school yesterday insane clip day b c correspondent terry moran try blame tennessee republicans christians apparently shooting christian school selfidentified trans person police confirm dead child year old year old adult include catherine kunz head covenant school police chief say shooter identify female audrey hale say s student school confirm audrey hale identify transgender person state tennessee early month pass governor sign bill ban transgender medical care minor law prohibit adult entertainment include male female impersonator series drag controversy state drag controversy concern expose child perverse sexual material sort thing ha okay make excuse people shoot child apparently way work push protect child ideological level indoctrination gender cult excuse shoot actual child right logic boggle mind guess narrative push narrative right responsible school shoot school shooting tran person murder bunch christian kid not bad day bad day come courtesy ben ryan go daily wire rhetorical hatchet week suggest course daily wire basically run tennessee fact case ben ryan tweet nbc reporter nbc idd nashville school shooter person identify transgender previous criminal record nashville home daily wire hub antitran activity matt walsh blog ben shapiro michael j knowle straight person violence tran person call violence tran person responsible tran person violence christians responsible feel like not matter happen responsible violence newsweek push similar sort story newsweek entire tweet say drag show gender affirm care minor ban tennessee month assault weapon remain legal alternative alternative focus thing like protect child lgbtq indoctrination focus gun man focus john stewart see couple week ago ask republican legislator not ban gun try protect kid like maybe not think ban gun protect kid not man dress woman gyrate sexually child school shooting precisely go line alejandro carrabba tran person tweet thank god tennessee protect child socalled horror drag gender affirm care shoot school ar instead here thing not shut ar randomly truly amazing left wish example blame certain group people certain ideology idea blame instrument radical muslim terrorist drive car bunch israelis car tran man shoot bunch christian schoolchildren gun shift narrative absolutely clear absolutely odious narrative number left try promote pathetically stupid narrative people not wish child mutilate indoctrinate gender cult responsible tran person shoot christian school s narrative number way actually narrative help foment ideological insanity contribute stuff like say existential threat tran people world boy boy girl girl people seriously okay know m go attack anybody say m existential threat actually shooting platform order push forward narrative actually make similar event likely statistically s insane secondary narrative left one gun course joe biden yesterday incoherent president come downstairs begin press conference apparently know shooting take place randomly start talk ice cream strange come start talk press ice cream get assault weapon ban joe biden talk ice cream joe biden m dr joe bidens husband jenny ice cream chocolate chip come hear chocolate chip ice cream way refrigerator upstairs think m kid m think kid think essentially small school child president body brain power low end mammal pretty point launch assault weapon ban course stop gun violence rip community apart rip soul nation rip soul nation protect school not turn prison know shooter situation reportedly assault weapon pistol ak congress pass assault weapon ban time begin progress oh mean s s get answer ready school shooting course regular sort cultural leader suggest gun control answer peter frampton cultural leader tweet know school shooting uk call massive gun buyback registration seizure program not school shooting like note point school shooting school shooting scotland happen believe school shooting believe record school shooting uk decade take sample size exist suggest addition independent variable change sample mean zero forty zero fifty zero sixty zero seventy zero eighty ninety piece legislation zero thousand zero ten d like suggest gun legislation actually change sample size difficult draw sort datum base conclusion left not need datum left mentality right normal americans not problem example kain jean pierre world bad press secretary say people murder routine let real democrats take seriously know ve try push sort assault weapon ban gun control routine try seriously push control branch congress presidency check second ago here kain jean pire emotional gun control push state union president call congress stop epidemic gun violence tear family apart tear community apart child murder republicans congress step act pass assault weapon ban mean actual plan know actual plan ill ill ill thing actual plan democrats reject way far m aware addition school security school know jewish day school guard like bank high level suspicion go to target attack need somebody order stop well school lockdown procedure obviously shift lock outer door not happen particular scenario yes treat people mentally ill mentally ill person clearly mentally ill person clearly unwell red flag treat act heroism maybe indicator person not wholly not mean person identify transgender potential school shooter god forbid s obviously true not mean anybo everybody gender dysphoria gender identity disorder potentially violent s obviously true pretend somebody s exhibit sign abnormality perfectly normal red flag guarantee time go go to find bevy red flag school shooting red flag turn vast football field fill red flag everybody look way know pretty good indicator somebody have problem great indicator somebody have problem violent problem problem generally great indicator member sex belong mean go to violent time moron medium matter mean look subgroup folk suffer mental illness ought pair eye person control group s symptom okay fact suppose demonstrative exactly problem american society problem mental illness seriously america not not not pretend away particularly fall line politically correct truism stuff sophistry pretend away pathetic s argue somebody s suffer schizophrenia not extra pair eye s s argue somebody s suffer anorexia health safety not extra pair eye come certain type particular mental disorder suppose pretend hunky dory suppose act surprised terrible happen mean listen statistical outlier like go to shocking stop pretend normal person walk street identify member opposite gender exactly mental health state person walk identify member opposite gender true not mean go to school shooter doesn mean categorize folk term mentally disorder versus non mentally disorder actually look mental disorder table go to go to go to routine joe biden know hate m go to know enthusiastic energy hope feel ve room not know ve phone learn shooting tennessee school shooting truly word child deserve well stand stand nashville prayer s allow prayer way people right allow prayer joe biden allow m sorry well actually legislative proposal likely result useful useful demagogue apparently presumably barack obamas education secretary arn duncan tweet point consider national boycott school child safe learn adult safe teach life need lose actually decide safe national boycott school genius level stuff actual education secretary united states america not school anymore wonderful representative steve cohen democrat tennessee s routine say hard sit republicans cause one fault weird s actual shooter actual thing actual personality actual description actual agenda apparently generalized republicans dead kid not work newtown dead kid not work sandy hook dead kid not work valdi nra work political power money gun manufacturer money s push nra horrific think congress people will not adjust thinking well thought prayer mean s ve hear people right congress pathetic hard serve people ve serve mean danger mean m go to attached gun course broad attack anybody press left anybody actually like gun example hard come dumb headline day s fire hose stupidity steve cohen suggest not serve people progun responsible tran person shoot bunch christian school kid washington post print actual headline gop congressman nashville district heartbroken shoot democrats gun control advocate highlight christmas photo show representative andrew ogle member family firearm absolutely clear gop congressman allow heartbroken shooting district family hold gun christmas photo responsible wild misdirection insane misdirection s study wall street journal fascinating real consequence come yesterday find america american value basically die generation generation wall street journal find patriotism religious faith have child priority help define national character generation recede importance americans accord wall street journal orc poll finding poll astonishing poll ask pretty simple question like faith economy think excellent good way economy poor good united states ask think kid go to live well life huge number americans think ll actually bad kid right fascinating wall street journal poll show central value social cohesion completely fade away united states example patriotism americans say patriotism important value obviously imply significant bipartisan agreement patriotism pretty important live united states pretty excited live united states believe american exceptionalism number drop entirely radical number drop like cliff number drop americans think patriotism important religion americans say religion important say religion important today americans religion important have child americans say have child important value today americans have child important value kind fascinating community involvement ad involve community americans say important involve community jump assume people mean politically number americans core americans believe community involvement actually important value area americans say interest american value money come make money consider important americans americans americans break pretty significantly age know number people example age group patriotism important slightly quarter people have child important barely young people religion important year old hard work important right s massive partisan breakdown question come example patriotism republicans patriotism important compare democrats come religion republicans religion important compare democrats have child republicans important compare democrats come community involvement one kind shocking democrat believe community involvement tune republican believe community involvement important important thing mainly nature community involvement involve different mean today say community involvement people immediately ve say oh mean church today community involvement mean protest march gap come make money come make money democrats republicans make money priority come value like transgenderism massive gap republicans democrats come school university affirmative action massive gap republicans democrats here real thing happen right value quote unquote unifying value die away fall apart reason fall apart think pretty obvious centralize institution american society intermediate institution american society completely disappear thing allow live church local school social club right arena family thing arena actually allow unify fall away intermediate institution american society die away robert nsbe predict quest community suggest time political state important intermediate institution remove leave essentially tary state american society bunch atomize individual atomize individual individual economic interest interested make money sort personal individual level not militating institution life actually people meaning purpose coincidence exact time americans say disconnect american value americans unhappy huge number americans unhappy huge number americans believe kid well huge number americans believe america trouble remove intermediate institution suppose sort abide faith overarch political infrastructure overarch political infrastructure reflection common value share common value basically go know sort giant mystery go way alexis de tocqueville de tocqueville suggest correctly like exactly happen western society rise soft despotism here quote alexis de tocqueville not sound like modern american society m m sure de tell here de tocqueville say quote seek trace novel feature despotism appear world thing strike observation innumerable multitude man equal alike incessantly endeavor procure petty poultry pleasure glut life live apart stranger fate rest child private friend constitute mankind rest fellow citizen s close not touch not feel exist kindre remain say rate lose country race man stand immense ary power take secure gratification watch faith power absolute minute regular provident mild like authority parent like parent object prepare man manhood seek contrary perpetual childhood content people rejoice provide think think rejoice happiness government willingly labor choose sole agent arbiter happiness provide security seasoned supply necessity facilitate pleasure manage principle concern direct industry regulate dissent property subdivide inheritance remain spare care thinking trouble live everyday render exercise free agency ban useful frequent circumscribe narrow range gradually rob man use principle equality prepare man thing predispose man endure look benefit having successively take member community powerful grasp fashion supreme power extend arm community cover surface society network small complicated rule minute uniform original mind energetic character penetrate rise crowd man shatter soften ben guide man seldom force act constantly restrain act power destroy prevent existence ize compress enervate extinguishe ste people till nation reduce well flock timid industrious animal government shepherd ve think servitude regular quiet gentle kind describe combine easily commonly believe outward form freedom establish wing sovereignty people yeah bad alexis de tofu writing remove actual institution role rule shape end people completely disconnected pursue version think happiness restrict happiness engage thing actually life meaningful shock additional mental illness shock s additional depression shock s additional suicide shock people anxious scared future country feel common neighbor abandon institution s national shooting way symbolic level say lot symbolic level know attack radical individual small community church school right idea person free rule role attack source rule role attack child way go left like use particular shooting use particular violent incident sort metaphor broad american society talk metaphor broad american society pretty solid alrighty news benjamin nhu israel suspend judicial overhaul chaos cause shutdown state israel accord wall street journal israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu monday suspend controversial judicial overhaul plan attempt pull country brink mass protest strike rock nation netanyahu yesterday explain term judicial reform explain temporarily delay judicial overhaul pierce morgan explain exactly seek judicial overhaul place right situation unelecte member supreme court effectively govern israel decide thing affect military economy foreign relation battle terrorism right democratic democratic want correct not democracy taint democratic ve well balance power okay obviously pretty uncontroversial here thing israel s relatively uncontroversial right leave center agree reform judicial system real battle israel explain yesterday real battle judicial reform real battle future country basically happen election cycle right fairly solid victory polling end seat majority knesset allow govern left like right left decide deploy street order essentially shut major mechanism israeli economy block highway shut airport yesterday extra legal mean order try threaten government pursue judicial reform suggest s democratic movement sort bizarre elect coalition attempt pursue democratic policy take power away unelected branch power bad way people mob street supposedly defensive democracy try overthrow democratically elect majority okay s story truth know sort underlie political issue left look right coalition people actually want procedural change good reason people believe simply try grab lever power prevent check balance obtain state israel netanyahu right thing yesterday say slow incremental approach fact right solution right forward fast drive enormous opposition find extra governmental lever power israel dynamic able literally shut pretty entire country lot economic military power israel necessarily government split sort expose mean incrementalism compromise s exactly netanyahu pledge yesterday s try avoid rift people decide suspend ben second reading law knesset tenure order time broad consensus ll drawing board probably worth note yesterday massive counter protest israel probably thousand people minimum middle israel netanyahu medium cover suggest sort rise totalitarian dictatorship align level suggestion oneside issue discussion presumably sort judicial form eventually compromis conciliation go to path forward right point think good indicator ton people constantly seek end world apocalyptic scenario talk right side like election not x go to country civil war people say israel ll election united states bad politic bad policy good politic short term allow people street people ramp actually wish effectuate change real problem stand way actual constructive dialogue actually order forward policy instead make politic series reactionary swing say apocalypse maybe win say win s apocalypse win actually effectuate change okay time thing like thing hate thing like today backdrop not mention actually rome today m film friend jordan peterson new series s go to come soon visit world great place talk history philosophy western civilization fantastic not know look st peters st peters obviously center catholicism powerful church institution history world astonishing building city rome absolutely incredible history rome fascinating know actual sort rome hbo sword sandal rome senatorial power versus versus dictatorial power democracy republicanism people versus elite rest rise christianity aftermath new testament obviously know rome central identity western civilization not wait bring series amazing not not resist actually shoot mean shoot backdrop not oppose shoot darken studio thing like today talk rebuild local institution obviously church major local institution need rebuild require actual forward think leadership people religious sphere mean religious leader stop shy believe speak believe attempt allow secular morality essentially steer boat mean need government allow thriving local institution m m excited state florida state florida pass universal school choice money follow student follow school mean kid ability state florida te credit like order pursue private education wish governor ron desantis florida win people say wait minute parent choice let parent scholarship school choice s go to hurt education performance florida proof positive s opposite actually happen fact matter school district perform well ve embrace choice charter school perform well compete individual student entitle anybody charter school course have private school service need parent parent scholarship know want particular school offer create positive feedback go to great make florida fourth state actually adopt universal school choice rebuild local institution power parent congregate community instead power government break community arty time couple thing hate ve see ization roal doll public generally not like walk little bit attempt remove word like fat augustus gls descriptor charlie chocolate factory cnn report novel agatha christie late work revise remove racist reference language consider offensive modern audience accord uks telegraph publisher harper collin edit passage entirely remove new digital edition christies detective mystery feature hercule poirot miss marble m big agatha christie fan enjoy hercule p poirot amendment book include change narrator inner monologue example poirot description character jew course christies debut novel mysterious affair style strip new version jew course not find particularly useful think actually understand bias author write useful historically interesting necessary order actually understand book read strip stuff find offensive today book miss half context revise version short story collection ms marble final case story word native replace local not change passage describe servant black grinning revise character simply refer nod reference race allow refer nubian people death death nile go know book well way go prevent people take offense agatha christies original verbiage great way demonstrate fey woke idiot decide necessary rewrite history order appease modern sensibility speak wake idiot attempt appease modern sensibility yeah attack parent process inexpressibly foolish alexandria ocasiocortez yesterday suggest bad timing say predatory cisgender straight man one kid hell disgusting insinuate attack tran lgbt people actually projection predatory cisgender straight man leave presence woman horribly child instead get challenge patriarchy try challenge gender expressiveness challenge patriarchy not twisted cause lot people attack drag project oh project man gyrate sexualize kid object wish sexualize kid fetishistic way utter insanity stupidity point view design benefit child design particular constituency feel well s s okay final thing hate major national news story party not reverse accord kentucky senator rand paul confirm monday member staff brutally attack street washington dc weekend say statement weekend member staff brutally attack broad daylight washington dc join ask join kelly pray speedi complete recovery thank responder hospital staff police diligent action apparently person sustain life threaten injury suspect arrest assault intent kill knife apparently repeat stab democrat attack republican area course worthy note republican attack democratic area obviously worthy note whatsoever completely irrelevant okay final thing hate today bad day search bad day regard shooting bad day actually come courtesy person name david pacman ha leftwe podcaster believe tweet quote surprising mass shooting christian school give lack prayer blame horrible event possible not pray correctly despite christian school s hell right probably need pray wrong kid pray wrong know s probably happen obviously s attempt mock idea religion not prayer suppose protect mean mention st peters tell david packman s entire religion predicate idea son god kill human like tell s entire religion predicate idea people martyr bunch statue right pray super hard die martyr tell david pacman favorite thing atheist pretend question odyssey like question ask matter oh god say bad thing happen religious people not debunk entire religion actually let explain debunk religion religion s stupid stake time god not answer prayer way wish answer prayer god not change people pray ugh ugh alrightyy guy rest continue right go to wanna miss jump mail bag rome member member use coach shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join second pure talk believe american value free mean know like free switch pure talk today ll free samsung g smartphone s foreign line requirement activation fee free samsung s build rugged screen quick charge buttery top datum security qualifying plan start buck month unlimited talk text gig datum mobile hotspot pure talk give phenomenal coverage america dependable g network coverage know love half price guy average family save thousand dollar year challenge choose company actually not hate gut share value let pure talk expert customer service team help switch today pure talk dot com slash shapiro claim eligibility free brand new samsung g smartphone start save wireless today pure talk dot com slash shapiro switch cell phone company ve em year fantastic ll love pure talk dot com slash shapiro claim eligibility free brand new samsung g smartphone start save

This bill prohibits a federal department or agency from charging a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident a fee in exchange for evacuating them from a foreign country due to a military emergency.

right

bill prohibit federal department agency charge citizen lawful permanent resident fee exchange evacuate foreign country military emergency

This bill provides disability pay and medical care for members of the National Guard who were physically disabled as a result of state active duty. State active duty includes training or other duty in service to the governor of a state for which the member is not entitled to federal pay, but excludes required drills and field exercises. The bill expands eligibility for Department of Defense retired pay to such members who are physically disabled as a result of state active duty after September 23, 1996. Such pay must be reduced if it is determined to duplicate any other federal or state benefit to such members based on disability. The bill also makes such members eligible for hospital care and medical services from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to treat the disability and any illness or condition arising from the disability. The VA may provide reimbursement for hospital care or medical services provided to such members only after a member or the provider of care has exhausted (without success) all claims and remedies reasonably available against a third party.

right

bill provide disability pay medical care member national guard physically disabled result state active duty state active duty include training duty service governor state member entitle federal pay exclude require drill field exercise bill expand eligibility department defense retire pay member physically disabled result state active duty september pay reduce determined duplicate federal state benefit member base disability bill make member eligible hospital care medical service department veterans affair va treat disability illness condition arise disability va provide reimbursement hospital care medical service provide member member provider care exhaust success claim remedy reasonably available party

Title: Speech at Lafayette Monument on Ordered Liberty Date: September 6, 1924 Location: Baltimore, MD Context: delivered at the dedication of a Monument to Lafayette celebrating his fight for freedom. (Original document available here) This occasion is dedicated to freedom. The people of Baltimore, and of Maryland, are gathered here in that spirit. Because Americans cherish that sentiment they cherish the name of Lafayette. On the anniversary of his birth, we are gathered about his statue in this proud city which we know he loved, almost in the shadow of the stately monument reared to his great friend Washington, to rededicate ourselves to the inspiring memory of a true son of world freedom. This is not only his birthday, but the anniversary of the farewell reception extended to him at the White House by President Adams during his last visit to our country. This day not only recalls his youth and his dashing figure in our Revolution, but it reminds us of the venerable man, half a century later, held in love and admiration by two countries for the sacrifices he had made in the service of liberty. His picture to me seems always to have the enthusiasm and freshness of youth, moved with the high-minded and patriotic purpose of maturity. He displayed the same ambition for faithful service, whether he was leading his soldiers in the last charge for American liberty at Yorktown or rebuking the mob at Paris for its proposal to make him king. His part in the French Revolution is well known. He served the cause of ordered liberty in America; he was unwilling to serve any other cause in France. His admirers might say of him on the first anniversary of Bastille Day, “He is galloping through the ages.” But he refused to be a man on horseback. He knew that the welfare of his country lay in moderation. The people trusted him, but the extremists, whether Jacobin or Royalist, feared him. He urged the National Assembly to establish by constitutional guarantees what the Revolution had gained. As Commander of the National Guard, again he might have made himself dictator. Instead he was pleading with the Assembly to adopt the preamble of the American Constitution as the foundation of its declaration of rights. When alien armies were brought to France to crush her liberties he was put at the head of the Army of the North, but treachery and suspicion overcame him. He was retired from his command and was seeking to leave the country when he was captured and held for five years in imprisonment. Tradition has it that he was released through the joint efforts of Washington and Napoleon. He had a deep appreciation of this action, but always refused to support the Napoleonic regime. After Waterloo he insisted that Napoleon must abdicate and that the nation must guarantee his life and liberty. When the Bourbons were restored he denounced usurpations in the name of royalty, as he had formerly denounced usurpations in the name of liberty. As a consequence he was charged with treason. He defied the Assembly to try him on such a charge. “During the whole of a life devoted entirely to liberty I have constantly been attacked by the enemies of that cause,” he declared. “I demand a public inquiry within the walls of this chamber and in the face of this nation.” As his enemies dared not meet the challenge, he was acquitted. After a few years of private retirement, he emerged to pay a visit to this country, one hundred years ago. Congress bestowed upon him citizenship and treasure and he was received everywhere with reverence and acclaim. When the Revolution of July occurred in 1830 he once more became Commander of the National Guard, where his influence saved his people from horrible excesses. Again there was an effort to establish a republic and make him President. But he thought a constitutional monarchy best adapted to the needs of his nation. So he refused this most appealing of all honors and returned to his country home. His long career was ended. He represents a noble and courageous dedication to the service of freedom. He never sought for personal aggrandizement, but under heavy temptation remained loyal to the great Cause. He possessed a character that will abide with us through the generations. He loved his fellowmen, and believed in the ultimate triumph of self-government. But he did not consider France had reached a point where representative democracy would be a success. He was practical. Like Washington, he refused a crown. But while he believed Washington performed a great service in accepting the Presidency of America, he believed he had performed an equally great service in rejecting the Presidency of France. He approved the establishment of our republican institutions, and hoped they would one day be a model for the government of his own country. He recognized the value of native institutions. So, while he was loyal to freedom, he was likewise loyal to the Crown. In moderation, in the gradual evolution of government and society, he perceived the strongest defense against both reaction and revolution, and the greatest hope for permanent progress. We have come here today to honor the memory of Lafayette, because long ago he came to this country as a private citizen at his own expense and joined us in fighting for the maintenance and extension of our institutions. It was not so much to acquire new rights, as to maintain old rights, that the men of that day put their fortunes to the hazard of war. They were resisting usurpations; they were combating unlawful tyrannies. No doubt they wanted to be Americans, but they wanted most of all to be free. They believed in individual liberty, safeguarded by constitutional guarantees. This principle to them was dearer than life itself. What they fought to preserve and extend, we ought to be ready to fight to maintain. Very little danger exists of an open and avowed assault upon the principle of individual freedom. It is more likely to be in peril indirectly perhaps from the avowed intention of protecting it or enlarging it. Out of a long experience with many tyrannies abroad and a weak and inefficient government at home, the Constitution of the United States was adopted and ratified. The people who largely contributed to the early settlement of America came to escape the impositions of despotic kings. Many of the early inhabitants were separatists from the established church. They fled under the threat of the English King, that he would make them conform or harry them out of the land. Their descendants fought the Revolutionary war in order that they might escape the impositions of a despotic parliament. This lesson was firmly in the minds of those who made the American Constitution. They proposed to adopt institutions under which the people should be supreme, and the government should derive its just powers from the consent of the governed. They were determined to be a sovereign people under a government having such powers as they from time to time should confer upon it by a written constitution. They did not propose to be under the tyranny of either the executive or the legislature. They knew, however, that self-government is still government, and that the authority of the Constitution and the law is still authority. They knew that a government without power is a contradiction in terms. In order that their President and their Congress might not surpass the bounds of the authority granted to them, by the Constitution which the people had made, and so infringe upon the liberties of the people, they established a third independent department of the government, with the power to interpret and declare the Constitution and the law, the inferior courts and the Supreme Court of the United States. No President, however powerful, and no majority of Congress however large, can take from an individual, no matter how humble, that freedom and those rights which are guaranteed to him by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has final authority to determine all questions arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States. That power and that authority has to reside somewhere in every government. Originally it lay with the king. After limitations began to be placed upon him, it was conferred upon the parliamentary body. One of the great contributions which America made to the science of government was the establishment of an independent judiciary department under which this authority resides in the Supreme Court. That tribunal has been made as independent and impartial as human nature could devise. This action was taken with the sole purpose of protecting the freedom of the individual, of guarding his earnings, his home, his life. It is frequently charged that this tribunal is tyrannical. If the Constitution of the United States be tyranny; if the rule that no one shall be convicted of a crime save by a jury of his peers; that no orders of nobility shall be granted; that slavery shall not be permitted to exist in any state or territory; that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; if these and many other provisions made by the people be tyranny, then the Supreme Court when it makes decisions in accordance with these principles of our fundamental law is tyrannical. Otherwise it is exercising the power of government for the preservation of liberty. The fact is that the Constitution is the source of our freedom. Maintaining it, interpreting it, and declaring it, are the only methods by which the Constitution can be preserved and our liberties guaranteed. Somewhere must be lodged the power to declare the Constitution. If it be taken away from the Court, it must go either to the executive or the legislative branch of the Government. No one, so far as I know, has thought that it should go to the Executive. All those who advocate changes propose, I believe, that it should be transferred in whole or in part to the Congress. I have a very high regard for legislative assemblies. We have put a very great emphasis upon representative government. It is the only method by which due deliberation can be secured. That is a great safeguard of liberty. But the legislature is not judicial. Along with what are admitted to be the merits of the question, also what is supposed to be the popular demand and the greatest partisan advantage weigh very heavily in making legislative decisions. It is well known that when the House of Representatives sits as a judicial body, to determine contested elections, it has a tendency to decide in a partisan way. It is to be remembered also that under recent political practice there is a strong tendency for legislatures to be very much influenced by the Executive. Whether we like this practice or not, there is no use denying that it exists. With a dominant Executive and a subservient legislature, the opportunity would be very inviting to aggrandizement and very dangerous to liberty. That way leads toward imperialism. Some people do not seem to understand fully the purpose of our constitutional restraints. They are not for protecting the majority, either in or out of the Congress. They can protect themselves with their votes. We have adopted a written constitution in order that the minority, even down to the most insignificant individual, might have their rights protected. So long as our Constitution remains in force, no majority, no matter how large, can deprive the individual of the right of life, liberty or property, or prohibit the free exercise of religion or the freedom of speech or of the press. If the authority now vested in the Supreme Court ·were transferred to the Congress, any majority no matter what their motive could vote away any of these most precious rights. Majorities are notoriously irresponsible. After irreparable damage had been done the only remedy that the people would have would be the privilege of trying to defeat such a majority at the next election. Every minority body that may be weak in resources or unpopular in the public estimation, also nearly every race and religious belief, would find themselves practically without protection, if the authority of the Supreme Court should be broken down and its powers lodged with the Congress. The same reasoning that applies to the individual person applies to the individual state. A very broad twilight zone exists in which it is difficult to distinguish where state right ends and federal right begins. Deprived of the privilege of its day in court, each state would be compelled to submit to the exactions of the Congress or resort to resistance by force. On the other hand, the legislatures of states, and sometimes the people, through the initiative and referendum, may pass laws which are very injurious to the minority residents of that state, by attempting to take away the privilege which they hold under the Federal Constitution. Except for the courts, such a minority would have no remedy for wrong done them. Their ultimate refuge is the Supreme Court of the United States. At a time when all the world is seeking for the adjudication of differences between nations, not by war, but by reason, the suggestion that we should limit the jurisdiction of our domestic courts is reactionary in the highest degree. It would cast aside the progress of generations to begin again the contest for supremacy between executive and legislature. Whichever side has won in that struggle, the people have always lost. Our Constitution has raised certain barriers against too hasty change. I believe such provision is wise. I doubt if there has been any change that has ever really been desired by the people which they have not been able to secure. Stability of government is a very important asset. If amendment be made easy, both revolution and reaction, as well as orderly progress, also become easy. The nation has lost little, but has gained much, through the necessity of due deliberation. The pressing need of the present day is not to change our constitutional rights, but to observe our constitutional rights. A deliberate and determined effort is being made to break down the guarantees of our fundamental law. It has for its purpose the confiscation of property and the destruction of liberty. At the present time the chief obstacle to this effort is the Supreme Court of the United States. In this contest there is but one place for a real American to stand. That is on the side of ordered liberty under constitutional government. This is not the struggle of the rich and powerful. They will be able to survive. It is the struggle of the common run of people. Unless we can maintain our institutions of liberty unimpaired they will see their savings swept away, their homes devastated, and their children perish from want and hunger. The time to stop those who would loosen and weaken the fabric of our government is before they begin. The time for Americans to range themselves firmly, squarely and uncompromisingly behind American ideals is now. The great body of our people have an abiding faith in their own country. The time has come when they should supplement that faith with action. The question is whether America will allow itself to be degraded into a communistic and socialistic state, or whether it will remain American. Those who want to continue to enjoy the high estate of American citizenship will resist all attempts to encroach upon their liberties by encroachment upon the power of the courts. The Constitution of the United States has for its almost sole purpose the protection of the freedom of the people. We must combat every attempt to break down or to make it easy, under the pretended guise of legal procedure, to throw open the way to reaction or revolution. To adopt any other course is to put in jeopardy the sacred right to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. Lafayette was always an interested student of our affairs. Though he distrusted the effort to make France a republic, he believed greatly in our Republic and our Constitution. He had fought to establish American independence, in order that these might come into being. That independence to which he contributed has come to be with us a national axiom. We have always guarded it with the utmost jealousy. We have sought to strengthen it with the Monroe Doctrine. We have refrained from treaties of offensive and defensive alliance. We have kept clear from political entanglements with other countries. Under this wise and sound policy America has been a country on the whole dedicated to peace, through honorable and disinterested relations with the other peoples of the earth. We have always been desirous not to participate in controversies, but to compose them. What a success this has brought to us at home, and what a place of respect and moral power it has gained for us abroad, is known of all men. To continue to be independent we must continue to be whole-hearted American. We must direct our policies and lay our course with the sole consideration of serving our own people. We cannot become the partisans of one nation, or the opponents of another. Our domestic affairs should be entirely free from foreign interference, whether such attempt be made by those who are without or within our own territory. America is a large country. It is a tolerant country. It has room within its borders for many races and many creeds. But it has no room for those who would place the interests of some other nation above the interests of our own nation. To be independent to my mind does not mean to be isolated, to be the priest or the Levite, but rather to be the good Samaritan. There is no real independence save only as we secure it through the law of service. The course of our country in recent years has been an example of these principles. We have avoided entanglements by reserving to our own decision when and how we should help. We have not failed to help. We have contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to foreign charities. We have given freely of our counsel to the settlement of difficulties in Latin America and the adjustment of war problems in Europe. We are still pursuing that course. It has been a practical course, and it has secured practical results. One of these most important results is found in the disarmament treaties, which have saved our own country to date about $300,000,000, and likewise relieved other nations. Another important result has been the adoption of the Dawes plan for the settlement of reparations. The effect these will have in averting war and promoting peace cannot possibly be overestimated. They stand out as great monuments, truly directing the course of men along the way to more civilization, more enlightenment, and more righteousness. They appear to me properly to mark the end of the old order, and the beginning of a new era. We hope they are the end of aggressive war and the beginning of permanent peace. Great changes have come over the world since Lafayette first came here desirous of aiding the cause of freedom. His efforts in behalf of an American republic have been altogether successful. In no other country in the world was economic opportunity for the people ever so great as it is here. In no other country was it ever possible in a like degree to secure equality and justice for all. Just as he was passing off the stage, the British adopted their reform measures giving them practically representative government. His own France has long since been welcomed into the family of republics. Many others have taken a like course. The cause of freedom has been triumphant. We believe it to be, likewise, the cause of peace. But peace must have other guarantees than constitutions and covenants. Laws and treaties may help, but peace and war are attitudes of mind. American citizens, with the full sympathy of our Government, have been attempting with apparent success to restore stricken Europe. We have acted in the name of world peace and of humanity. Always the obstacles to be encountered have been distrust, suspicion and hatred. The great effort has been to allay and remove these sentiments. I believe that America can assist the world in this direction by her example. We have never forgotten the service done us by Lafayette, but we have long ago ceased to bear an enmity toward Great Britain by reason of two wars that were fought out between us. We want Europe to compose its difficulties and liquidate its hatreds. Would it not be well if we set the example and liquidated some of our own? The war is over. The militarism of Central Europe which menaced the security of the world has been overthrown. In its place have sprung up peaceful republics. Already we have assisted in refinancing Austria. We are about to assist refinancing Germany. We believe that such action will be helpful to France, but we can give further and perhaps even more valuable assistance both to ourselves and to Europe by bringing to an end our own hatreds. The best way for us who wish all our inhabitants to be single-minded in their Americanism is for us to bestow upon each group of our inhabitants that confidence and fellowship which is due to all Americans. If we want to get the hyphen out of our country, we can best begin by taking it out of our own minds. If we want France paid, we can best work towards that end by assisting in the restoration of the German people, now shorn of militarism, to their full place in the family of peaceful mankind. I want to see America set the example to the world both in our domestic and foreign relations of magnanimity. We cannot make over the people of Europe. We must help them as they are, if we are to help them at all. I believe that we should help, not at the sacrifice of our independence, not for the support of imperialism, but to restore to those great peoples a peaceful civilization. In that course lies the best guarantee of freedom. In that course lies the greatest honor which we can bestow upon the memory of Lafayette. Citation: Foundations of the Republic by Calvin Coolidge (1926). The Coolidge Foundation gratefully acknowledges the volunteer efforts of J Mitchell Rushing, who prepared this document for digital publication. Name (required) Email (will not be published) (required) Comment DONATE • NEWSLETTER Privacy Policy | Terms of Use Copyright © 2024 Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

right

title speech lafayette monument order liberty date september location baltimore md context deliver dedication monument lafayette celebrate fight freedom original document available occasion dedicate freedom people baltimore maryland gather spirit americans cherish sentiment cherish lafayette anniversary birth gather statue proud city know love shadow stately monument rear great friend washington rededicate inspire memory true son world freedom birthday anniversary farewell reception extend white house president adam visit country day recall youth dash figure revolution remind venerable man half century later hold love admiration country sacrifice service liberty picture enthusiasm freshness youth move highminded patriotic purpose maturity display ambition faithful service lead soldier charge american liberty yorktown rebuke mob paris proposal king french revolution know serve cause order liberty america unwilling serve cause france admirer anniversary bastille day gallop age refuse man horseback know welfare country lie moderation people trust extremist jacobin royalist fear urge national assembly establish constitutional guarantee revolution gain commander national guard dictator instead plead assembly adopt preamble american constitution foundation declaration right alien army bring france crush liberty head army north treachery suspicion overcome retire command seek leave country capture hold year imprisonment tradition release joint effort washington napoleon deep appreciation action refuse support napoleonic regime waterloo insist napoleon abdicate nation guarantee life liberty bourbon restore denounce usurpation royalty denounce usurpation liberty consequence charge treason defy assembly try charge life devote entirely liberty constantly attack enemy cause declare demand public inquiry wall chamber face nation enemy dared meet challenge acquit year private retirement emerge pay visit country year ago congress bestow citizenship treasure receive reverence acclaim revolution july occur commander national guard influence save people horrible excess effort establish republic president think constitutional monarchy well adapt need nation refuse appealing honor return country home long career end represent noble courageous dedication service freedom seek personal aggrandizement heavy temptation remain loyal great cause possess character abide generation love fellowman believe ultimate triumph selfgovernment consider france reach point representative democracy success practical like washington refuse crown believe washington perform great service accept presidency america believe perform equally great service reject presidency france approve establishment republican institution hope day model government country recognize value native institution loyal freedom likewise loyal crown moderation gradual evolution government society perceive strong defense reaction revolution great hope permanent progress come today honor memory lafayette long ago come country private citizen expense join fighting maintenance extension institution acquire new right maintain old right man day fortune hazard war resist usurpation combat unlawful tyranny doubt want americans want free believe individual liberty safeguard constitutional guarantee principle dear life fight preserve extend ought ready fight maintain little danger exist open avow assault principle individual freedom likely peril indirectly avow intention protect enlarge long experience tyranny abroad weak inefficient government home constitution united states adopt ratify people largely contribute early settlement america come escape imposition despotic king early inhabitant separatist establish church flee threat english king conform harry land descendant fight revolutionary war order escape imposition despotic parliament lesson firmly mind american constitution propose adopt institution people supreme government derive power consent governed determined sovereign people government have power time time confer write constitution propose tyranny executive legislature know selfgovernment government authority constitution law authority know government power contradiction term order president congress surpass bound authority grant constitution people infringe liberty people establish independent department government power interpret declare constitution law inferior court supreme court united states president powerful majority congress large individual matter humble freedom right guarantee constitution supreme court final authority determine question arise constitution law united states power authority reside government originally lie king limitation begin place confer parliamentary body great contribution america science government establishment independent judiciary department authority reside supreme court tribunal independent impartial human nature devise action take sole purpose protect freedom individual guard earning home life frequently charge tribunal tyrannical constitution united states tyranny rule shall convict crime save jury peer order nobility shall grant slavery shall permit exist state territory shall deprive life liberty property process law provision people tyranny supreme court make decision accordance principle fundamental law tyrannical exercise power government preservation liberty fact constitution source freedom maintain interpret declare method constitution preserve liberty guarantee lodge power declare constitution take away court executive legislative branch government far know think executive advocate change propose believe transfer congress high regard legislative assembly great emphasis representative government method deliberation secure great safeguard liberty legislature judicial admit merit question suppose popular demand great partisan advantage weigh heavily make legislative decision know house representative sit judicial body determine contested election tendency decide partisan way remember recent political practice strong tendency legislature influence executive like practice use deny exist dominant executive subservient legislature opportunity invite aggrandizement dangerous liberty way lead imperialism people understand fully purpose constitutional restraint protect majority congress protect vote adopt write constitution order minority insignificant individual right protect long constitution remain force majority matter large deprive individual right life liberty property prohibit free exercise religion freedom speech press authority vest supreme court transfer congress majority matter motive vote away precious right majority notoriously irresponsible irreparable damage remedy people privilege try defeat majority election minority body weak resource unpopular public estimation nearly race religious belief find practically protection authority supreme court break power lodge congress reasoning apply individual person apply individual state broad twilight zone exist difficult distinguish state right end federal right begin deprive privilege day court state compel submit exaction congress resort resistance force hand legislature state people initiative referendum pass law injurious minority resident state attempt away privilege hold federal constitution court minority remedy wrong ultimate refuge supreme court united states time world seek adjudication difference nation war reason suggestion limit jurisdiction domestic court reactionary high degree cast aside progress generation begin contest supremacy executive legislature whichever win struggle people lose constitution raise certain barrier hasty change believe provision wise doubt change desire people able secure stability government important asset amendment easy revolution reaction orderly progress easy nation lose little gain necessity deliberation press need present day change constitutional right observe constitutional right deliberate determined effort break guarantee fundamental law purpose confiscation property destruction liberty present time chief obstacle effort supreme court united states contest place real american stand order liberty constitutional government struggle rich powerful able survive struggle common run people maintain institution liberty unimpaire saving sweep away home devastate child perish want hunger time stop loosen weaken fabric government begin time americans range firmly squarely uncompromisingly american ideal great body people abide faith country time come supplement faith action question america allow degrade communistic socialistic state remain american want continue enjoy high estate american citizenship resist attempt encroach liberty encroachment power court constitution united states sole purpose protection freedom people combat attempt break easy pretended guise legal procedure throw open way reaction revolution adopt course jeopardy sacred right life liberty property pursuit happiness lafayette interested student affair distrust effort france republic believe greatly republic constitution fight establish american independence order come independence contribute come national axiom guard utmost jealousy seek strengthen monroe doctrine refrain treaty offensive defensive alliance keep clear political entanglement country wise sound policy america country dedicate peace honorable disintereste relation people earth desirous participate controversy compose success bring home place respect moral power gain abroad know man continue independent continue wholehearte american direct policy lie course sole consideration serve people partisan nation opponent domestic affair entirely free foreign interference attempt territory america large country tolerant country room border race creed room place interest nation interest nation independent mind mean isolate priest levite good samaritan real independence save secure law service course country recent year example principle avoid entanglement reserve decision help fail help contribute hundred million dollar foreign charity give freely counsel settlement difficulty latin america adjustment war problem europe pursue course practical course secure practical result important result find disarmament treaty save country date likewise relieve nation important result adoption dawes plan settlement reparation effect avert war promote peace possibly overestimate stand great monument truly direct course man way civilization enlightenment righteousness appear properly mark end old order beginning new era hope end aggressive war beginning permanent peace great change come world lafayette come desirous aid cause freedom effort behalf american republic altogether successful country world economic opportunity people great country possible like degree secure equality justice pass stage british adopt reform measure give practically representative government france long welcome family republic take like course cause freedom triumphant believe likewise cause peace peace guarantee constitution covenant law treaty help peace war attitude mind american citizen sympathy government attempt apparent success restore stricken europe act world peace humanity obstacle encounter distrust suspicion hatre great effort allay remove sentiment believe america assist world direction example forget service lafayette long ago cease bear enmity great britain reason war fight want europe compose difficulty liquidate hatred set example liquidate war militarism central europe menace security world overthrow place spring peaceful republic assist refinance austria assist refinance germany believe action helpful france valuable assistance europe bring end hatred good way wish inhabitant singleminde americanism bestow group inhabitant confidence fellowship americans want hyphen country well begin take mind want france pay well work end assist restoration german people shorn militarism place family peaceful mankind want america set example world domestic foreign relation magnanimity people europe help help believe help sacrifice independence support imperialism restore great people peaceful civilization course lie good guarantee freedom course lie great honor bestow memory lafayette citation foundation republic calvin coolidge coolidge foundation gratefully acknowledge volunteer effort j mitchell rush prepare document digital publication require email publish require comment donate newsletter privacy policy term use copyright calvin coolidge presidential foundation inc right reserve

This bill directs the Department of Homeland Security to study and report on the potential benefits and risks of amending the federal statute commonly known as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to allow private entities to respond to an unlawful network breach, subject to federal regulation and oversight. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act prohibits various categories of computer-related conduct by an individual without authority or in excess of authorization.

right

bill direct department homeland security study report potential benefit risk amend federal statute commonly know computer fraud abuse act allow private entity respond unlawful network breach subject federal regulation oversight computer fraud abuse act prohibit category computerrelate conduct individual authority excess authorization

This bill requires the President to impose sanctions on foreign persons, acting under direct or indirect control of the Russian government, who seize, steal, or confiscate property in Ukraine for political or personal gain. The sanctions include blocking of the individual's U.S. property and ineligibility for U.S. visas, admission, or parole.

right

bill require president impose sanction foreign person act direct indirect control russian government seize steal confiscate property ukraine political personal gain sanction include blocking individual property ineligibility visas admission parole

Ep. 1637 - The Last Republican Sellout of 2022 Published: 12/23/2022 (in RSS feed: 44m 55s) 18 Senate Republicans vote for a blowout on us spending package. Church tendons continues to drop in the United States as more Americans move south and FD X'S fraud. Meister is out on 250 million Bail. I'm Bench Bureau. This is the Bench Shappiro Show. Today's show is sponsored by Expressive p. Thousands of my listeners have already secured their network data. Join [email protected] slash ben. Well, the Republican Party is absolutely incompetent. I mean, there's no other way to put this. What exactly has the Republican party accomplished in the last say four years? The, the last time the Republican Party accomplished anything is when President Trump was president and Republicans had unified control of the House and the Senate. And since then they've been absolutely incompetent at everything. So incompetent that the Republicans in the Senate distrust the Republicans in the House to the extent that they voted along with Democrats by a huge margin in order to advance a 1.7 trillion omnibus spending package 4,155 pages long. Now, question is why exactly they would do this? Why would Mitch McConnell as well as the other 18 Republican gather 17 Republicans who voted in favor of this thing in the Senate? Why would they do that? I mean, because this is a pretty broad spectrum group of people who voted in favor of the omnibus spending package. It included people like McConnell of course, but also it included Richard Shelby, Roy Blunt, John Busman of Arkansas, Shelly Moore, Capito of West Virginia, Susan Collins of of Maine, John Coron, Tom Cotton voted in favor of it. Lindsay Graham, Jim in Ho, Jerry Moran, Lisa Murkowski, Rob Portman, MIT Romney, Mike Rounds, John Thune, Roger Wicker, and Todd Young. These are not all moderate Republicans. Some of these people are pretty conservative. Tom Cotton is a very conservative Senator Jim in HO from Oklahoma is a very conservative senator. They voted in favor of this omnibus package Anyway. Now, Kevin McCarthy, who wants to be speaker of the house, it is still not clear whether he actually has the votes to be speaker of the House in the upcoming Congress. He had threatened along with a bunch of other Republicans in the house that if these senators voted in favor of the omnibus package, whatever their priorities were in the next Congress, the next Congress would not take up those priorities. Richard Shelby of Alabama, he said he's focused on being speaker. If I were in his shoes, that's what I would be focused on, trying to get enough votes, but I don't think that intimidates anybody. So what exactly happened here? Well, the, the answer from a political point of view is pretty obvious. The Republicans in the house are a fractious bunch. The majority the Republicans are going to have in the next Congress is extraordinarily slim. I mean, we are talking about single digit majority in the next Congress. And because of that, that means that the Republican party is gonna have a very difficult time actually marshaling a majority on many of these votes. Republicans are slated to have 222 votes going into the next Congress. You require 218 for a majority, which means they have a slim four seat margin. And if anybody is sick inside, the Republican caucus turns into a three seat or a two seat margin. When you're talking about a caucus of 222 people, there's a good shot that many of those people are not gonna be there on an everyday basis. I'm gonna be back home. Some gonna be sick, some of them are going to just be drunk. A lot of drunks in Congress, whatever the reason that slim margin means that the most radical elements of your party are going to have control of the party unless you have very strong leadership. Now, one thing you can say for the Democrats is that they do have very strong leadership. Nancy Pelosi, as much as I dislike Nancy Pelosi, she threaded the needle with an extraordinarily slim democratic majority. Now, she of course, was working with a Democratic president and a Democratic senate, so she had a lot, a lot of leverage to use. If it had been only a Democratic house, then it is unclear exactly whether she would've had the leverage that that normally she'd be seeking. The Democratic Party also happens to be a lot more ideologically coherent than the Republican party at this point. The Democratic Party has essentially nobody in it who is pro-life. The Democratic Party is fairly unified on economic matters. They have some divisions on foreign policy matters, but overall the Democratic Party is left, the center left has basically gone away. It is left and then radical left. The Republican Party has a broad swath of people ranging from, if you look in the Senate, people like Lisa Murkowski all the way out to people like Ted Cruz. And what that means is very hard to cobble together a majority. If you look in the house, the same sort of thing applies. You have people in the Freedom Caucus and then you have people who are kind of left-leaning Republicans from New York or from California. What that means is that there is no margin for error in the house. And if there is not a leader who is capable of actually whipping the votes, then the Republicans in the Senate are very much afraid that what you'll end up with is a government shutdown. And this is the thing Mitch McConnell fears more than anything else in life, is another one of these government shutdowns that ends with Joe Biden sitting there and laughing at the Republicans as he waits for their approval ratings to crater leading up to 2024. And so basically what happened here is that the Republicans in the Senate did not trust the leadership in the House enough to say that when you guys take the majority, we think that we can work with you in order to come up with a cohesive strategy. And at this point, McConnell doesn't even know who he's negotiating with. Again, this is not making an excuse for McConnell. This is explaining the logic behind what McConnell is doing. There is a logic, the answer to that logic is that McConnell, other members of the Senate, they should attempt to work with members of the Republican House in order to find a consensus candidate for speaker. If they don't think Mccr can get the job done right now, they don't even know if they're negotiating with McCarthy because it is not clear. Thanks to Matt Gatz and some of the other sort of more right wing Republicans in the house, some more of the, the sort of Trump MAGA Republicans in the house, many of them have said that they will not support under any circumstances. McCarthy for speaker, and remember again, he has a four seat majority, which means that if five of them say no, and all the Democrats say, no, McCarthy ain't the speaker. And we have this kind of bizarre spectacle right now of a bunch of Republicans in the house who have no plausible alternative for the Speaker of the House saying they will not vote for McCarthy. And so McConnell doesn't even know who's negotiating with in the house in order to craft a future strategy going on in January. So the easy solution for McConnell was we vote in favor of the omnibus. We assume that there will be no actual electoral blowback because honestly, when was the last time there was electoral blowback to a Republican for spending too much. It just doesn't happen. It really doesn't. And the, the American people don't like spending all this money and they tend tend to punish the party that spends the most money. But if both parties are spending the money, nobody gets punished. It's sort of a prisoner's dilemma. If you look at game theory, what game theory sort of suggests is that when you have a situation in which the second best option for both parties not the first best option, the first best option is you when they lose the, the second best option is sort of the you both, almost you, you both lose scenario as sort of the second best option in prisoner's dilemma. When both parties spend, then what you end up with is nobody loses. Essentially both parties kind of lose, but the country loses, but neither party actually loses because there's nobody holds accountable for the spending. We'll get tomorrow on this in just one second. First, are you tired of overpaying for your wireless network? You should be, you've been doing it for a very long time. Get talk text blazing Fast data for just 30 bucks a month. Instead, pure Talk gives you the same network, the same towers, the same coverage as the other guys, but at half the price. So why would you pay more for the same exact coverage? Again, you're on the same Tower Network as one of the big guys, but you're getting all of the service for like half the price. Pure Talks US based customer service team makes the switch incredibly easy. You can feel good knowing you're supporting a veteran owned business. When you go to pure talk.com and enter Code Shapiro, you save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage. There's no reason to pay Verizon at and t or T-Mobile over 80 bucks a month for wireless services when you can get the same exact service on the same network at Pure Talk for half the price. So head on over to pure talk.com, enter a code Shapiro, save 50% off your very first month of coverage. That's pure talk.com promo code Shapiro for 50% off your very first month. Pure Talk is simply Smarter Wireless. Again, head on over to pure talk.com promo code Shapiro, get 50% off your very first month of coverage. Well, I've you spent a bunch of money when you don't have to instead head on over to my friends [email protected]. Also, as you may have noticed now, I have three kids. I have a fourth on the way we're getting a puppy sleep is gonna be in short supply at the Shapiro household, which is why I rely on Black Rifle Coffee. But Black Rifle Coffee doesn't just make the world's best coffee. They also will provide you everything you need for that Christmas shopping list. Black Rifle Coffee Company is helping you knock out that holiday shopping with a ton of awesome new product this year designed for folks who love country and coffee. You can shop brewing your thermo's mugs and apparel for 10% off with promo code Shapiro Black Rifle sources the most exotic roast from around the globe. All coffee is roasted here in the United States by veteran led teams of coffee experts. Every purchase you make with Black Rifle helps support veteran and first responder causes. Daily Wire plus kitchens are stocked with Black rifle coffee. Yours can be and should be as well. Head on over to black rifle coffee.com. Use promo code Shapiro for 10% off coffee, coffee gear apparel, or when you sign up for a new coffee club subscription. That's black rifle coffee.com promo code Shapiro for 10% off Black Rifle Coffee supporting Veterans in America's coffee. Go check them out right now. Black rifle coffee.com. Use promo code Shapiro for 10% off. So McConnell and these other Republicans are voting in favor of this thing in order to take a government shutdown or a debt ceiling fight off the table for the next year because they don't even know who they're negotiating with in the house. Once again, lack of Republican leadership is an astonishing thing right now. It really is a problem. The Republican party used to be a vehicle for victories I've talked about because all parties are supposed to be a vehicle for victory. They're not supposed to be ideological tent poles, they're just repositories of political momentum. This is why you see parties replaced sometimes. This is why you see Donald Trump able to completely hollow out the inside of the Republican party and just take that sucker over because again, whoever wins tends to have the momentum can take over the party. But what if there's nobody actually there to create a cohesive victory strategy for the Republican party? And what if many of the tools that the party used to use to punish people, so for example, punishing senators at the state legislature level for not doing what the state wanted them to do, that's gone away thanks to the 17th Amendment. Or let's say that in the house it used to be that the party would punish you by taking away your committee assignment or it would punish you by by trying to primary you. Now the party doesn't do any of those things. So when that is the case, what that means, the party has no leverage over you and all the momentum in the party goes to the people who are on the TV the most and they have control over the future of the party. Now Democratic Party has kept most of its patronage system. The Democratic Party has indeed retained an enormous amounts of power over its own members. The the Republican Party has not. The Republican party has basically dissolved all power at the top levels of the party. And what that means is that without any level of cohesion, there's chaos and with chaos, McConnell and company are just gonna look for the easiest possible political solution, which means spending enormous sums of your own money. So the question is to what exactly the grand old party does these days is very open. What exactly would you say the Republican Party does do these days when they're signing on the dotted line on the same bills the Democrats are signing on to What exactly? This is not a compromised piece of legislation. It blows out the budget again with another bill that no one has read and is filled with pork and is filled with bad priorities. So what exactly does the Republican party do? It's a serious question. There better be some leadership inside the Republican party in short order, or they will be in a state of collapse despite the fact that the Democratic Party is wildly unpopular. I I honestly, I cannot remember the last time a party took over the house and was considered more in disarray than the party that had just lost. Remember that the Democrats control the House right now in January they won't. But it's the Republican party that seems to be on the ropes in the house and the Democratic Party that seems to be in control in the house, which is an amazing spectacle and a demonstration of a complete lack of any sort of backbone or leadership capacity inside the Republican House. So what exactly was in this monstrosity? There's a lot in a 1.7 trillion bill. Again, it was a bipartisan 68 to 29 votes to tee up the measure for debate in the house. The compilation of long stalled appropriations bills known as Omnibus would provide an nearly 773 billion for domestic programs and more than 80 850 billion for the military covering expenses through the 2023 fiscal year, which concludes at the end of September. This is why you're seeing hawkish people like Tom Cotton signed on. He's saying, we can't afford to hold up military spending. We don't want a government shutdown. That's why Cotton who happens to be fiscally conservative signed on to this thing. It's for the military spending. Republicans had insisted on robust Pentagon funding in months long talks with Democrats who secured some but not all of the health, education, labor, and economic spending. They wanted the must pass nature of the bill. It was the final major piece of legislation before Congress resets in the new year, also offered a window for lawmakers to advance other long stalled priorities. The sweeping omnibus is filled with provisions that would expand at some Medicaid benefits, help Americans save for retirement, revise the presidential vote count electoral vote counting process, and ban TikTok on government devices. But you could have done all of these separate bills. The whole purpose of an omnibus sandwich is to be a crap sandwich. That's the entire purpose of it. Get people to vote for 800 billion in useless spending in order to get the military spending. Or if you are the Democrats, get people to vote for the useless spending and then bite your tongue and vote for the military spending. Senate majority Leader Chuck Schumer said this is one of the most significant appropriations packages we have done in a long time. He's stressed that it quote, made aggressive investments in American families, workers in national offense. By the way, you know what it didn't do was actually preserve the border. For example, there's no funding for closing the border. Title 42. There was an amendment that was proposed by Mike Lee to maintain Title 42. So at least in the short term, we can shut the border. That was rejected. There was of course that 45 billion in appropriations for Ukrainian weaponry, and you can be in favor of that and still be very much against an omnibus package that includes an additional 1.65 trillion. Mike Lee said this is an act of extortion being leveraged on the United States Senate right before Christmas. This of course happens to be exactly true. Late on Wednesday night, Lee held up consideration of the omnibus as he tried to force lawmakers to extend a controversial immigration policy implemented during the Trump administration. Senate leaders ultimately worked out in an arrangement to permit several amendment votes on the policy known as Title 42 placating Lee. But his gambit failed. It allowed lawmakers to finalize the bills, the the bill hours later. So what exactly is, is in this bill? Well, as I say, there is a lot that is in this bill. According to Politico, Ukraine aid is in the bill that TikTok ban that was pushed by Senator Josh Halle that would borrow the download of TikTok on government devices, made it into the bill. That, of course, is like baseline stuff. Of course, the TikTok ban should be in the bill. We just found out over the course of the last 48 hours that TikTok actually spied on journalists. It for all the millions of people who listen to the show and who are using TikTok, get it off your phone. They, they know everything about you. Now, the Chinese government CNN reported literally yesterday, the TikTok parent company bite dance had to fire four employees who improperly accessed the personal data of two journalists on the platform, according to a TikTok spokesperson named Brooke OB wetter. So this bill prevents government employees from downloading TikTok on their government devices. It creates things like telehealth extensions, which are, which are fine. I mean, first of all, the, the fact that telehealth is banned in particular states is idiotic. Of course, you should be able to consult with a doctor who happens to be out of state via the internet. There is a lobster lifeline, which is exciting. Maine lawmakers successfully included a pause on new regulations they warned would cripple their states' lobster industry. There's also a, a bunch of tax provisions. There's a bunch of spending on the fbi, which is kind of astonishing considering the scandal that has now engulfed the FBI in coordinating with social media in order to shut down information about, for example, the Hunter Biden laptop story. So Republicans and Democrats voted for a big pay raise for the fbi. Essentially there is a, a boost for the National Labor Relations Board, the single worst piece of regulatory oversight mechanism in the United States. The NLRB is garbage lawmakers increase the budget for the NLRB by 25 million for the first time in nearly a decade. The NL r b's job is basically to yell at businesses until they do the bidding of Democrats. What else is, is what, what's out? Well, Biden had wanted 9 billion to help combat the covid pandemic and other stuff, but that ended up out of the deal. There was apparently a, a piece of legislation that would've expanded protections for pregnant workers that didn't make it into the bill. But there, there are a bunch of business propositions that made it into the bill, some of which are, are pretty terrible. So for example, antitrust efforts could get a boost at the federal and state levels according to the Wall Street Journal, fees would rise for merger filings. So what this means is more government intervention in the markets. The FDA gets new powers to oversee baby formula and cosmetics and to try to ensure that drugs granted to speedy approval, undergo further testing to confirm that they work well. Giving more funding to the FDA has been a a obviously an amazing move. The FDA did a horrible job during this pandemic. Retirees could postpone mandatory withdrawals from tax-deferred retirement accounts until they are 73 or 75 instead of 72. Under the current rules, the legislation makes it easier for the president to release heating oil from the Federal Reserves. I mean, it's just, it's a, it's a, it's an conglomeration of just nonsense. I mean there's some stuff that here that's good and there's a bunch of stuff here that's really bad. But what this really means in the long term is that we are not getting our spending problem under control. And we are, by the way, inflating the currency in the middle of an inflationary cycle. Inflation still has not come down. And the Congress's solution is what if we toss another $2 trillion in spending in there? Now this is part of a broader problem that's about to engulf western markets, which is that governments just keep spending and spending and spending and spending. And they can try to crack down on inflation with, with their central banking procedures, but they're not gonna be able to stop the economic stagnation that's to come when you just spend too much money. As Margaret Thatcher once said, eventually you run out of other people's money and that is what's going to happen in Europe. Investors are bracing for European governments led by Germany to flood the market with new debt next year as they spend heavily to shield their economies from high energy costs. According to the Wall Street Journal, governments in Europe are expected to increase bond issuance by 10% to 1.2 trillion euros in 2023. It's equivalent to about 1.27 trillion. That comes as the European Central Bank steps back from its role as a voracious buyer of Eurozone government bonds with plans start shrinking its bond portfolio starting in March. So this flood of new debt from Germany and other Eurozone countries means that they're going to start issuing more debt. It means that you're going to see larger debt and deficits. And this means in the end economic stagnation. It also means in the United States, when you look at the measures that the White House is currently taking, when you spend this much money and when you encourage people not to work, what you end up is less people in the workforce. Which means that by all democratic governing strategies, when you have created a piece of policy that fails, you then create a piggyback piece of policy that also fails according to the Wall Street Journal. Top White House economic officials are considering when renewed push for a suite of policies aimed at luring more Americans back to work. You know what we used to call it? To lure Americans back to work, paying them a salary. It used to be in this country you didn't have to lure people back to work. People looked for work in this country, right, to lure people. Like what bizarre notion of markets is it that you lure people to work? The lure was the pay. You don't have to have the government luring people back to work unless the government is also paying people to stay home. So there's a quick solution for that stops paying people to stay home. So what exactly is the White House gonna do? They're now talking about an enhanced childcare and elder care benefit as they hammer out priorities for the coming year. The question of how to find enough workers has emerged as a significant issue as the country emerges from the pandemic with a smaller share of adults working or looking for work than an early 2020 White House economic officials expect to brief President Biden on their thoughts over the holiday break as the administration shapes its agenda for 2023 and plans for Biden's State of the Union address. Brian De, director of the White House's National Economic Council said to the Wall Street Journal quote, where are places where we can lower price pressures on the economy, lower cost for consumers, increase the productive potential of the economy, the things we prioritize and focus on will be in that area. Hint may clear exactly what that would look like, but the White House is going to push for paid family leave, universal pre-k permanent expansion of the child tax credit, et cetera. So again, the the idea is going to be that we are going to give you additional benefits from the government side if you go to work, as opposed to, you know, taking away the benefits that we are currently giving you to stay home and sit flat on your ass for years on end, which means more spending of course and forever. Well, Republicans actually stand up to that. Totally unclear because I mean, let's be real about this. If what we just saw in the Senate Republicans voting for an omnibus package with Democrats in order to avoid negotiating with Republicans, there's no reason they can't do that next year. If the Republicans take over Congress and if the new speaker, whoever it is, Kevin McCarthy or anybody else is unable to wield a durable majority in the house, you could see a bunch of Republicans just peel off and vote with the Democrats and start advancing Joe Biden's priorities. That's how weak the party is right now. Now the predictable result of all of this is that you are going to have a stagnating economy in the very near future. The US labor market continues to ma remain very tight because again, we spent trillions of dollars to keep people at home. People continue to spend money. This continues to drive up the inflation rates, which is gonna mean that the Federal Reserve has to drive down all of the inflation rates through higher interest rates, which is going to mean long-term economic stagnation. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First the situation. Ukraine obviously continues to be a disaster area. Russia has actually upped the ante, given the fact they're not doing particularly well in the field. They're now striking out at the electrical grid in Ukraine. So things are getting uglier. My friends at the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews who've been working in Israel, Ukraine, and the former Soviet Union for more than 30 years, they've never seen hunger in suffering like they're currently seeing in Ukraine, which is just one reason I'm asking for your help. Norman is an 84 year old Holocaust survivor. He's been blind since birth and lives in a Jewish old age home in Odessa, Ukraine. With so much infrastructure destroyed over recent months, Norman has been without heat or clean water. The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews has supplied blankets, foods, and other essentials to help Norman survive through the winter. They're doing this for hundreds, if not thousands of other people as well. In this season of giving, please consider donating to the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're on the ground providing generators, building wells, providing medicine and food boxes. In this dire situation, just 45 bucks can ensure warmth, food and clean water to Jewish kids in the elderly in need. Right now, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews has a special matching challenge. Your donation through the end of 2022 will double an impact. Your tax deductible gift will be multiplied twice to help provide twice the winter necessities and save lives. Head online to Ben for the fellowship.org or Tech Shapiro to 41 4 4 4. That's Ben for the fellowship.org or Tech Shapiro to 41 4 4 4. This is the direction in which the economy is going to move and Democrats can't stop, won't stop. They're gonna continue to push broader spending initiatives that please their most ardent fans. This is why, for example, Rashi Tib and Corey Bush are still out there doing TikTok dances in order to encourage Joe Biden to cancel student loan debt. And if you think that Joe Biden won't try it again, he will. Oh no. Yeah, nothing worse than Congress people doing TikTok. I mean, first of all, no one should ever do TikTok dances. Are you an adult? Be an adult. But aside from that, I'll also, you shouldn't be on TikTok cause they're gonna steal all your data. So you have Congress people on TikTok giving their data to Chinese well, doing videos about canceling student loan debt. Both of those people, I believe, went to college, which is a, a good reason why you should never relieve their student loan debt ever, ever, ever. And again, the, the Democrats will continue to pursue really bad policy. The question is, do the Republicans have any power to stand up to it? One, one of the funniest things about the Democrats bad policy, by the way, is that they have to spend a lot of time pretending that the bad policy doesn't actually exist. So Mayor Eric Adams, who's about to be hit with one 1000 illegal immigrants a day once Title 42 ends, and this is what New York City is actually foreseeing, he says that Joe Biden is doing fine on the border. Things are great. Chuck Schumer, New York Senator, managed to negotiate an increase from 150 million to 800 million for the cities that receive asylum seekers. And we're told according to multiple sources, the New York City's position to receive a large, a large batch of that amount. So here's New York City Mayor Eric Adams responding to that news this Week. I think the president has a, has a, a good understanding of how this is a real issue. We were able to get this omnibus bill, have the, it has the money in it that we need some of the money in that we need. This is a national issue. And that's my conversation with the president's team. So this, this is the same mayor who is yelling at Greg Abbott for shipping a few illegal immigrants up to New York City, but he's saying that Joe Biden is doing an amazing job. Listen, there, there are gaps in the Biden Democrat policy wide enough to drive a Mack truck through Joe Biden's approval rating right now is in the low forties at best. And yet Republicans seem utterly incapable of taking advantage of that. Now, one reason for that, of course, is that the media are completely in the pocket of Democrats. Nancy Pelosi, who is now leaving her position as Speaker of the House, she won't be the house minority leader either. Hakeem Jeffries is about to take that over. She gave her last weekly press briefing yesterday as Speaker of the House with apparently a bunch of crumbs on her jacket or something. The hobbits took the, took the the last of the Lalo bread. But, but, but Nancy Pelosi, she actually, this is my favorite thing about the relationship between Democrats and their pretorian guard, is that they don't even pretend that the reporters aren't their best friends. It's really funny. Republicans deal with reporters and they're like, God, you guys are just, I understand your opposition and we'll, we'll treat each other respectfully if, but, but I'm going to call you out on, on your nonsense. Democrats are like, go forward and do the work of the people like they, they turn into, they turn into like Mr. Chips at the end of goodbye, Mr. Chips just giving lectures to the students. Here's Nancy Pelosi explaining to the media that they do an amazing job. As you know, this is my, this I thought last week might have been, but this is my final weekly press conference. And some of you have been covering Congress for a long time. Others are new. All of you are guardians of democracy. You've heard me say again and again. If there were one freedom in the First Amendment, the freedom of, of the press, that would be the one that protects and defends all the other freedoms. It it must be wonderful being a Democrat. When you have an entire legacy media dedicated to your preservation and, and glorification, it must be just absolutely wonderful. And that's why you're able to move forward with terrible policy repeatedly. Now, the Democrats don't just rely on the media in order to push forward their policy. They have, they have a bunch of forces working their favor. One Republican incompetence. Two, the media being their absolute best friends. And, and three, the ability to misdirect because of one and two, two issues that do not actually take top priority for the American people, but they can spend inordinate amounts of time on. So Joe Biden made his Christmas address the other night. You know, he's, he's able to mix religion and politics so long as the religion is so watered down that it doesn't actually hold by anything. This is the rule in American politics is you, you're allowed to make religious appeals, but only to things that have nothing to do with religion or to a vague sort of spirituality that has nothing to do with the actual gospel if you're Christian, for example. So Joe Biden, he, he used Christmas as a time to talk up what a unifying man he was. I noticed that he wasn't in front of Independence Hall yelling at his political opponents and calling them fascists this time while calling for Unity. Instead, he was in front of a bunch of twinkly lights over at the White House and explaining that he's a very unifying, unifying man. I sincerely hope this Holloway this holiday season will drain the poison that has infected our politics and set us against one another. I hope this Christmas season marks a fresh start for our nation cuz there's so much that unites us as Americans. Well actually, the, the, there is increasingly little that unites us as Americans. This is actually what the Census Bureau is now showing. There are a couple of pieces of data that have come out in the last 24 hours showing that when it comes to the fundamental bases upon which we predicate our social fabric, many of these things are wearing away. And this is why you are saying a big sort happening in American life. So there's a certain irony to Joe Biden who's a deeply anti-religious figure. If you're, I mean, if, if you look at his social policy, transing, the children, same sex marriage and the these are, these are policies that are directed against traditional religion. There's a president who has suggested that basically if you're a traditionally religious person, your religious practice needs to end at the front door of your home or at the side door of your church, that that's where your religious practice ends. And even there he's basically saying, we can do that for now, but not for very long. And he's banking on the fact that in the United States Church attendance has been dropping, that religious adherence has been dropping because if you get rid of the church, then the go, then the God becomes the state. These two things tend to merge. Human beings have religious impulse, they wanna follow something. And Joe Biden believes that what people should follow is the moral persuasion of government. And so he does have some forces working in his favor here, including the lack of religious traditionalism in America right now, according to Hannah Blow reporting for, for Breitbart, church attendants and general belief in God has dropped in the United States over the past few years. According to recent surveys, a Gallup survey released over the summer found that belief in God sunk to an all-time low this year down to 81%. It identified young individuals and leftists as the people most likely to not believe in God. It works the other way around. By the way, the people who are most likely not to believe in God tend to be leftists. It's not just the leftists don't believe in God. It's people who don't believe in God tend to move toward the left. As Breitbart reported at the time. According to the survey, most US adults, 81% believe in God, but while they figure seems high, it's the lowest percentage ever recorded in the survey. Also, there are a lot of people who say they believe in God, but what they mean by believe in God is they, they believe in vague spiritual forces. And sort of the CS Lewis description of the term, up until 2011, over 90% of Americans said they believed in God. The number has continued to drop. It's now down eight points from 89% to express belief in God in 2016, which is a radical decrease. You're talking about a 10% decrease in just the last 10 years. The previous law was set in 2014 when 86% said they believed in God when Gallup asked the same question in 19 53, 54, 65, 67, 90 8% said they believed in God. Also, the hill found roughly one fifth of Americans do not consider themselves part of a religion, which coincides with the percentage of Americans not expressing belief in God as well. And again, this, this leaves out the fact that a huge people who say that they're part of religion aren't actually adherence to the specific tenets of the religion mean. Joe Biden says that he's a religious Catholic and then again promotes a bunch of policy that is directly against the doctrine of the Catholic Church. Same thing for Nancy Pelosi. A survey center on American Life report detailed in March, 2020 found that younger generations are less likely to adhere to religion over one-third of generation Z, 34% themselves unaffiliated from religious groups. That figure decreases to 29% among millennials, 25% among generation X, 18% among baby boomers and 9% of the silent generation. There's been a precipitous drop in church membership over the past three decades. Among those on the political left in 1998, a majority of liberals, 57% were members of a church or other type of religious organization. Now, 35% of liberals say that they are members of church or another religious organization. So when you have Joe Biden sitting there and talking about the unifying traditions of the United States in front of a bunch of Christmas trees, what he does not mean is the actual traditional religion, which was the glue that bound together the social fabric of the United States. And De Tocqueville talks about this. He talks about how religious adherence among common people who gathered together in churches and communities was the glue that held together the United States and the absence of an overarching central government. When you lose that glue, then there has to be some sort of aats glue that is used. A stapler is used now, stapler tends to come in the, in the form of, of government. And Joe Biden knows this. This is not just happening in the United States by the way. This is happening all around the world. The secular trends that have taken over the West are going to eat the west. They're going to destroy the West. They're gonna destroy all of the rights that people have traditionally enjoyed in the United States. Because the thing is, the what upholds the rights of people is in fact the fundamental institutions that undergird those rights. Rights don't just come tabul Raza from nowhere. Rights do not pre-exist institutions. They coincide with institutions. If you read Lockian philosophy, here's where John Locke was wrong. He suggested if you read him in a particular way, that rights are inherent and institutions are, are sort of artificial. That is, that is not correct. Institutions pre-exist, rights, families, the Chief institution pre-exist rights, rights were created in order to protect families in order to protect spheres of freedom within the roles and institutions that already existed. When rights start to destroy the institutions, the rights themselves are going to fall apart. And that's exactly what's happened. And for example, the uk in the uk the institutions of Church of Religion, these have become taboo. This is also happening in Canada, for example. It's happened all over Europe and at least western Europe. Eastern Europe is still very religious. And when, when you look to what's happening in Britain, you'll notice that one of the first things to go along with freedom of religion is freedom of speech. There's an amazing story out of the UK yesterday in which a pro-life activist was arrested for literally standing outside an abortion clinic. Now she wasn't harassing anybody, she wasn't saying anything, she wasn't holding a sign. She was a person standing there. But you are not allowed to stand there. There's tape that actually emerged of this incident in in Britain. It, it's, it's pretty incredible. Before I ask you any questions about what's going on today, I have caution you, which is just your rights, which is you do not have to say anything. It may harm your defense if you do not mention one question, something that you later on in court, anything you do say may be given. What what are you here for today? Physically understanding here. Okay, why, why here of all places? I know you, you don't live nearby, but this is an abortion something. Okay? That's why you're still, is you standing here? Be part of the protest? No, I'm not protesting. Are you praying? I might be praying in my head loud. So I'll I'll ask you once more. Will you voluntarily come with us now to the police station for me to ask you some questions about today and other days where there are allegations that you've broken Public spaces Protection order? If I've got a choice, then no. Okay, well then you're under arrest account suspicion of failing to comply with the Public Spaces Protection order. Okay, so the Public Spaces protection order says that you are not allowed to stand outside an abortion clinic not doing anything, right? Any other place in the uk you can apparently just stand there and they could have arrested her for loitering or trespassing. They don't, they're they're arresting her because she's silently praying in her head without moving her face. Th th you think that rights matter in the uk They do not, we're not even talking about freedom of religion. That'd be like freedom of speech. How about like freedom of standing there? According to Fox News, Isabel Vaughn Spruce, director of the UK March for Life, who was standing near the B P A S Robert Clinic in Kings Norton, Birmingham in an area a d f at UK called a Censorship Zone. When police approached her after an Democrat complaint, she might be praying outside the abortion facility, God forbid. And that would just be terrible if, if somebody were to pray. I mean, that's, that's terrible. Birmingham's authorities established a buffers zone around abortion clinics, which makes it illegal for an individual to engage in any act or attempted act of approval or disapproval as it relates to abortion, and includes verbal or written means like praying or counseling. So it is now approval or disapproval to stand there to literally stand there. Von Spruce says, I was exercising my freedom of thought, my freedom of religion inside the privacy of my own mind. Nobody should be criminalized for thinking and for praying in a public space in the uk. She says, this is something I've pretty much done every week for around the last 20 years of my life. I pray for my friends who've experienced abortion for the women who are thinking about going through with it themselves. Von Spruce has stood near the abortion facility while it was closed three times and said she might have been praying according to the a d f UK police showed her photos of herself standing outside the facility and asked if she was praying, which she said she could not answer since she spent some time praying but got distracted at other times, not praying the whole time. I mean this, this sort of stuff. Again, if, if you believe that the social fabric of the United States is going to withstand the secular encroachments that essentially argue against the rights of religion and speech, so long as they violate the the tenants and belief system of left, this is what you end up with in the uk. And so what you're seeing in the United States is increasingly a big sword, an ideological sword happening. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, in case you missed it, my book club Ben Shapiro's book club, returned last night for a brand new episode that is available to watch now exclusively on Daily Wire Plus, we went through the screw tape letters by CS list, a phenomenal book. It's really moving, has a lot to say about the human condition about God. You must be an all access member to watch. Trust me when I say you don't wanna miss it. So head on over to daily wire.com/ben, become a member today. Watch the latest episode of my book club, that's daily wire.com/ben today. Okay, so the decline of religion in the United States is actually causing a greater rift in the United States. The the promise was that as religion declined in the United States, that secularism would take over. There would be sort of a vast blob and we would all be part of that vast blob together in which we got together under the auspices of government. Instead, what's happening is that people are fleeing, fleeing the more secularized states and they're moving to more religious states. Now, it also happens to be that a lot of those more religious states have broader economic protections, broader economic freedoms. This is one of the things that I think the left refuses to understand is again, right, particularly property rights are very much connected to viable institutions that instill social trust. When you have a religious community, people are very respectful of other people's property rights, specifically because they know that their neighbor is not trying to screw them. And one of the things that, that Adam Smith talks about in his first major work of Theory of Moral Sentiments is the idea that you have to have viable social institutions. That, that people are motivated by sympathy. And this creates trust. And that when that trust exists, you can have free markets. Well, when you have societies in which that doesn't exist, you end up with Sam Bankman freedoms. We'll get to in just one moment. But what you are seeing in the United States is a major shift in population. According to Pluribus news, the United States added more than 1.2 million residents over the course of the past year. As population growth rebounded from pandemic era lows, that is an increased at tribute almost entirely to international migrants coming to the country. So that is partially our open border. But the more important part of this study, aside from the fact that we aren't having kids who we're importing population, the, the more important part of the study is where exactly population is being gained. Population growth is not even across the states. Almost all of the top 10 states that added the most residents were in the South Texas added 470,000 new residents. Florida added 416,000 people. North Carolina and Georgia both added more than a hundred thousand residents. Arizona added 94,000. South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, Utah, Idaho, all added tens of thousands of new residents. The populations of Florida, Idaho, South Carolina, Texas, South Dakota, and Montana all grew by more than 1.5%. You'll notice that in that list, the only blue state is Washington. That is the only blue state. And it's important to mention that in Washington, eastern Washington is very heavily read. Rust Belt states continue to long trend a population declines. New York's population fell by 180,000 Illinois shed More than a hundred thousand people, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, all lost population as well. California has seen its population drop in recent years too. The nation's largest state declined by 113,000 people. Last year, the number of people who moved out of California outpaced the number who moved in by whopping 343,000 residents. According to the Census Bureau data, nearly 300,000 New Yorkers moved outta the state over the last year alone. So when we're talking about, you know, how many people overall left, some people moved in, but way more people moved out. Texas has now joined California as the only two states with populations north of 30 million, Florida, which only recently passed New York to become the nation's third most populist state has more than 2.5 million more residents than the Empire State. So it is not a shock. All of these states in the south are becoming more red as they become more populous. Meanwhile, all of the states in the northeast, in the Rust Belt, California, they're becoming blue as they become less populous. This makes perfect sense. A giant ideological sort is happening right now. And the states that are gonna grow the fastest are the ones that provide for economic freedom. The states that are gonna grow the fastest also happens to be. Those also happen to be the states with the highest levels of religious adherence. This is not a coincidence. The left wishes you to believe that freedom is dependent on freedom from godliness, freedom from religion, freedom from community, freedom from institutions. The only freedom that is dependent on that is sexual libertinism. All the other freedoms are actually very much dependent on viable social institutions that hold together a society built on trust. And when those institutions disappear, what you end up with is a less trusting America. Now the the great irony of what's happening economically speaking right now in terms of say, Sam Bankman freed, is that the entire basis of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency was supposed to be a trustless system. The idea was you don't need social institutions in order to trust the trustless system because obviously cryptocurrencies are reliant on the blockchain. The blockchain is all about verifiability and being able to track money through various mechanisms and and being able to, to verify that certain transactions have taken place and that the money that is in your, your specific wallet is yours and all the rest. But people have a tendency always to rely on trust even when they should not. And that's how Sam Bankman freed, took advantage of the situation. Yesterday. He was released on a 250 million bond with restrictions. Now, was he really released on 250 million bond? The answer is no. Nobody put up 250 million in collateral. So Sam Bankman Freed could walk around free. That's not exactly what happened here. Basically, the government pretended that they had set the bond that high in, or they could say that we're taking this super seriously. In reality, his parents basically put up his house, their house as as collateral, but the, the likelihood is that Bankman free is gonna spend an awful long time in prison. His release also followed an announcement by Damien Williams, the US attorney for Southern District of New York on Wednesday night. The two former executives of Bankman Free's businesses, Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang had pled guilty to federal fraud charges and were cooperating with prosecutors. Those charges against the executives are likely to further complicate Bankman Freed's defense. The criminal investigation into FTX and its related entities have moved with startling speed. And under two months, FTX went from a flourishing exchange to a bankrupt entity whose executives are facing criminal charges for some of the financial world's most serious violations. Prosecutors have said that bankman freed's crimes led to the implosion of his exchange in billions in customer losses. So, and again, this is what happens, e even a trustless system, it turns out people tend to want to trust people. They do want to trust people. And when you have a system in the United States, more broadly speaking in the West, that undermines fundamental basis of trust because we don't have the same values anymore. And what's supposed to replace it is kind of niceness and civility as opposed to common standards of behavior and, and common goals. What you end up with is in AAT social fabric that is about as comfortable as nylon it is, it is not going to wear well. And that's what's happening in in the United States writ large in terms of our civil society. So people are forming new civil societies, but they're doing so on the state level. Alrighty guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be getting into the January 6th committee report, but more importantly, we'll be having on Dr. Robert Malone, famous for having been essentially censored by all of media for his questions about vaccination. If you're not a member, click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep republican sellout publish rss feed m senate republicans vote blowout spend package church tendon continue drop united states americans south fd xs fraud meister million bail m bench bureau bench shappiro today sponsor expressive p thousand listener secure network datum join themexpressvpncom slash ben republican party absolutely incompetent mean s way exactly republican party accomplish year time republican party accomplish president trump president republicans unify control house senate ve absolutely incompetent incompetent republicans senate distrust republicans house extent vote democrat huge margin order advance trillion omnibus spending package page long question exactly mitch mcconnell republican gather republicans vote favor thing senate mean pretty broad spectrum group people vote favor omnibus spending package include people like mcconnell course include richard shelby roy blunt john busman arkansas shelly moore capito west virginia susan collins maine john coron tom cotton vote favor lindsay graham jim ho jerry moran lisa murkowski rob portman mit romney mike round john thune roger wicker todd young moderate republican people pretty conservative tom cotton conservative senator jim ho oklahoma conservative senator vote favor omnibus package kevin mccarthy want speaker house clear actually vote speaker house upcoming congress threaten bunch republicans house senator vote favor omnibus package priority congress congress priority richard shelby alabama say s focus speaker shoe s focus try vote not think intimidate anybody exactly happen answer political point view pretty obvious republicans house fractious bunch majority republicans go congress extraordinarily slim mean talk single digit majority congress mean republican party go to difficult time actually marshal majority vote republican slate vote go congress require majority mean slim seat margin anybody sick inside republican caucus turn seat seat margin talk caucus people s good shot people go to everyday basis m go to home go to sick go drunk lot drunk congress reason slim margin mean radical element party go control party strong leadership thing democrats strong leadership nancy pelosi dislike nancy pelosi thread needle extraordinarily slim democratic majority course work democratic president democratic senate lot lot leverage use democratic house unclear exactly ve leverage normally shed seek democratic party happen lot ideologically coherent republican party point democratic party essentially prolife democratic party fairly unified economic matter division foreign policy matter overall democratic party leave center leave basically go away leave radical leave republican party broad swath people range look senate people like lisa murkowski way people like ted cruz mean hard cobble majority look house sort thing apply people freedom caucus people kind leftleane republicans new york california mean margin error house leader capable actually whip vote republicans senate afraid ll end government shutdown thing mitch mcconnell fear life government shutdown end joe biden sit laugh republicans wait approval rating crater lead basically happen republicans senate trust leadership house guy majority think work order come cohesive strategy point mcconnell not know s negotiate make excuse mcconnell explain logic mcconnell logic answer logic mcconnell member senate attempt work member republican house order find consensus candidate speaker not think mccr job right not know negotiate mccarthy clear thank matt gatz sort right wing republican house sort trump maga republicans house say support circumstance mccarthy speaker remember seat majority mean democrats mccarthy be not speaker kind bizarre spectacle right bunch republicans house plausible alternative speaker house say vote mccarthy mcconnell not know s negotiate house order craft future strategy go january easy solution mcconnell vote favor omnibus assume actual electoral blowback honestly time electoral blowback republican spend not happen not american people not like spend money tend tend punish party spend money party spend money get punish sort prisoner dilemma look game theory game theory sort suggest situation second good option party good option good option lose second good option sort lose scenario sort second good option prisoner dilemma party spend end lose essentially party kind lose country lose party actually lose s hold accountable spending tomorrow second tired overpay wireless network ve long time talk text blaze fast datum buck month instead pure talk give network tower coverage guy half price pay exact coverage tower network big guy get service like half price pure talk base customer service team make switch incredibly easy feel good know support veteran own business pure talkcom enter code shapiro save additional month coverage s reason pay verizon t tmobile buck month wireless service exact service network pure talk half price head pure talkcom enter code shapiro save month coverage s pure talkcom promo code shapiro month pure talk simply smart wireless head pure talkcom promo code shapiro month coverage ve spend bunch money not instead head friend overpuretalkcom notice kid fourth way get puppy sleep go to short supply shapiro household rely black rifle coffee black rifle coffee not world good coffee provide need christmas shopping list black rifle coffee company help knock holiday shop ton awesome new product year design folk love country coffee shop brew thermo mug apparel promo code shapiro black rifle source exotic roast globe coffee roast united states veteran lead team coffee expert purchase black rifle help support veteran responder cause daily wire plus kitchen stock black rifle coffee head black rifle coffeecom use promo code shapiro coffee coffee gear apparel sign new coffee club subscription s black rifle coffeecom promo code shapiro black rifle coffee support veteran americas coffee check right black rifle coffeecom use promo code shapiro mcconnell republicans vote favor thing order government shutdown debt ceiling fight table year not know negotiate house lack republican leadership astonishing thing right problem republican party vehicle victory ve talk party suppose vehicle victory suppose ideological tent pole repository political momentum party replace donald trump able completely hollow inside republican party sucker win tend momentum party s actually create cohesive victory strategy republican party tool party use punish people example punish senator state legislature level state want s go away thank amendment let house party punish take away committee assignment punish try primary party not thing case mean party leverage momentum party go people tv control future party democratic party keep patronage system democratic party retain enormous amount power member republican party republican party basically dissolve power level party mean level cohesion s chaos chaos mcconnell company go to look easy possible political solution mean spend enormous sum money question exactly grand old party day open exactly republican party day sign dotted line bill democrats sign exactly compromise piece legislation blow budget bill read fill pork fill bad priority exactly republican party question well leadership inside republican party short order state collapse despite fact democratic party wildly unpopular honestly remember time party take house consider disarray party lose remember democrats control house right january will not republican party rope house democratic party control house amazing spectacle demonstration complete lack sort backbone leadership capacity inside republican house exactly monstrosity s lot trillion bill bipartisan vote tee measure debate house compilation long stall appropriation bill know omnibus provide nearly billion domestic program billion military covering expense fiscal year conclude end september see hawkish people like tom cotton sign s say not afford hold military spending not want government shutdown s cotton happen fiscally conservative sign thing military spending republicans insist robust pentagon funding month long talk democrats secure health education labor economic spending want pass nature bill final major piece legislation congress reset new year offer window lawmaker advance long stall priority sweeping omnibus fill provision expand medicaid benefit help americans save retirement revise presidential vote count electoral vote counting process ban tiktok government device separate bill purpose omnibus sandwich crap sandwich s entire purpose people vote billion useless spending order military spending democrats people vote useless spending bite tongue vote military spend senate majority leader chuck schumer say significant appropriation package long time s stress quote aggressive investment american family worker national offense way know not actually preserve border example s funding close border title amendment propose mike lee maintain title short term shut border reject course billion appropriation ukrainian weaponry favor omnibus package include additional trillion mike lee say act extortion leverage united states senate right christmas course happen exactly true late wednesday night lee hold consideration omnibus try force lawmaker extend controversial immigration policy implement trump administration senate leader ultimately work arrangement permit amendment vote policy know title placate lee gambit fail allow lawmaker finalize bill bill hour later exactly bill lot bill accord politico ukraine aid bill tiktok ban push senator josh halle borrow download tiktok government device bill course like baseline stuff course tiktok ban bill find course hour tiktok actually spy journalist million people listen tiktok phone know chinese government cnn report literally yesterday tiktok parent company bite dance fire employee improperly access personal datum journalist platform accord tiktok spokesperson name brooke ob wetter bill prevent government employee download tiktok government device create thing like telehealth extension fine mean fact telehealth ban particular state idiotic course able consult doctor happen state internet lobster lifeline exciting maine lawmaker successfully include pause new regulation warn cripple state lobster industry s bunch tax provision s bunch spending fbi kind astonish consider scandal engulf fbi coordinate social medium order shut information example hunter biden laptop story republicans democrats vote big pay raise fbi essentially boost national labor relations board single bad piece regulatory oversight mechanism united states nlrb garbage lawmaker increase budget nlrb million time nearly decade nl r bs job basically yell business bidding democrats s biden want billion help combat covid pandemic stuff end deal apparently piece legislation ve expand protection pregnant worker not bill bunch business proposition bill pretty terrible example antitrust effort boost federal state level accord wall street journal fee rise merger filing mean government intervention market fda get new power oversee baby formula cosmetic try ensure drug grant speedy approval undergo testing confirm work give funding fda obviously amazing fda horrible job pandemic retiree postpone mandatory withdrawal taxdeferre retirement account instead current rule legislation make easy president release heating oil federal reserve mean conglomeration nonsense mean s stuff s good s bunch stuff s bad mean long term get spending problem control way inflate currency middle inflationary cycle inflation come congresss solution toss trillion spending broad problem s engulf western market government spending spending spending spending try crack inflation central banking procedure go to able stop economic stagnation s come spend money margaret thatcher say eventually run people money s go happen europe investor brace european government lead germany flood market new debt year spend heavily shield economy high energy cost accord wall street journal government europe expect increase bond issuance trillion euro equivalent trillion come european central bank step role voracious buyer eurozone government bond plan start shrink bond portfolio start march flood new debt germany eurozone country mean go start issue debt mean go large debt deficit mean end economic stagnation mean united states look measure white house currently take spend money encourage people work end people workforce mean democratic governing strategy create piece policy fail create piggyback piece policy fail accord wall street journal white house economic official consider renew push suite policy aim lure americans work know lure americans work pay salary country not lure people work people look work country right lure people like bizarre notion market lure people work lure pay not government lure people work government pay people stay home s quick solution stop pay people stay home exactly white house go to talk enhance childcare eld care benefit hammer priority come year question find worker emerge significant issue country emerge pandemic small share adult work look work early white house economic official expect brief president biden thought holiday break administration shape agenda plan biden state union address brian de director white house national economic council say wall street journal quote place lower price pressure economy low cost consumer increase productive potential economy thing prioritize focus area hint clear exactly look like white house go push pay family leave universal prek permanent expansion child tax credit et cetera idea go go additional benefit government work oppose know take away benefit currently give stay home sit flat ass year end mean spending course forever republican actually stand totally unclear mean let real see senate republicans vote omnibus package democrat order avoid negotiate republicans s reason not year republicans congress new speaker kevin mccarthy anybody unable wield durable majority house bunch republicans peel vote democrats start advance joe biden priority s weak party right predictable result go stagnate economy near future labor market continue ma remain tight spend trillion dollar people home people continue spend money continue drive inflation rate go to mean federal reserve drive inflation rate high interest rate go mean longterm economic stagnation second situation ukraine obviously continue disaster area russia actually up ante give fact particularly field strike electrical grid ukraine thing get ugly friend international fellowship christians jews ve work israel ukraine soviet union year ve see hunger suffer like currently see ukraine reason m ask help norman year old holocaust survivor s blind birth live jewish old age home odessa ukraine infrastructure destroy recent month norman heat clean water international fellowship christians jews supply blanket food essential help norman survive winter hundred thousand people season giving consider donate international fellowship christians jews ground provide generator build well provide medicine food box dire situation buck ensure warmth food clean water jewish kid elderly need right international fellowship christians jews special matching challenge donation end double impact tax deductible gift multiply twice help provide twice winter necessity save life head online ben fellowshiporg tech shapiro s ben fellowshiporg tech shapiro direction economy go democrats not stop will not stop go to continue push broad spending initiative ardent fan example rashi tib corey bush tiktok dance order encourage joe biden cancel student loan debt think joe biden will not try oh yeah bad congress people tiktok mean tiktok dance adult adult aside ill not tiktok cause go to steal datum congress people tiktok give datum chinese video cancel student loan debt people believe go college good reason relieve student loan debt democrats continue pursue bad policy question republicans power stand funny thing democrats bad policy way spend lot time pretend bad policy not actually exist mayor eric adam s hit illegal immigrant day title end new york city actually foresee say joe biden fine border thing great chuck schumer new york senator manage negotiate increase million million city receive asylum seeker tell accord multiple source new york citys position receive large large batch here new york city mayor eric adam respond news week think president good understanding real issue able omnibus bill money need money need national issue s conversation president team mayor yell greg abbott ship illegal immigrant new york city s say joe biden amazing job listen gap biden democrat policy wide drive mack truck joe bidens approval rating right low forty good republicans utterly incapable take advantage reason course medium completely pocket democrats nancy pelosi leave position speaker house will not house minority leader hakeem jeffrie give weekly press briefing yesterday speaker house apparently bunch crumb jacket hobbit take take lalo bread nancy pelosi actually favorite thing relationship democrats pretorian guard not pretend reporter not good friend funny republicans deal reporter like god guy understand opposition treat respectfully m go nonsense democrat like forward work people like turn turn like mr chip end goodbye mr chip give lecture student here nancy pelosi explain medium amazing job know think week final weekly press conference cover congress long time new guardian democracy ve hear freedom amendment freedom press protect defend freedom wonderful democrat entire legacy medium dedicate preservation glorification absolutely wonderful s able forward terrible policy repeatedly democrats not rely medium order push forward policy bunch force work favor republican incompetence medium absolute good friend ability misdirect issue actually priority american people spend inordinate amount time joe biden christmas address night know s s able mix religion politic long religion water not actually hold rule american politic allow religious appeal thing religion vague sort spirituality actual gospel christian example joe biden christmas time talk unifying man notice not independence hall yell political opponent call fascist time call unity instead bunch twinkly light white house explain s unifying unifying man sincerely hope holloway holiday season drain poison infect politic set hope christmas season mark fresh start nation cuz s unite americans actually increasingly little unite americans actually census bureau show couple piece datum come hour show come fundamental basis predicate social fabric thing wear away say big sort happen american life s certain irony joe biden s deeply antireligious figure mean look social policy transe child sex marriage policy direct traditional religion s president suggest basically traditionally religious person religious practice need end door home door church s religious practice end s basically say long s banking fact united states church attendance drop religious adherence drop rid church god state thing tend merge human being religious impulse wanna follow joe biden believe people follow moral persuasion government force work favor include lack religious traditionalism america right accord hannah blow reporting breitbart church attendant general belief god drop united states past year accord recent survey gallup survey release summer find belief god sink alltime low year identify young individual leftist people likely believe god work way way people likely believe god tend leftist leftist not believe god people not believe god tend left breitbart report time accord survey adult believe god figure high low percentage record survey lot people believe god mean believe god believe vague spiritual force sort cs lewis description term americans say believe god number continue drop point express belief god radical decrease talk decrease year previous law set say believe god gallup ask question say believe god hill find roughly fifth americans consider religion coincide percentage americans express belief god leave fact huge people religion not actually adherence specific tenet religion mean joe biden say s religious catholic promote bunch policy directly doctrine catholic church thing nancy pelosi survey center american life report detail march find young generation likely adhere religion onethird generation z unaffiliated religious group figure decrease millennial generation x baby boomer silent generation s precipitous drop church membership past decade political left majority liberal member church type religious organization liberal member church religious organization joe biden sit talk unifying tradition united states bunch christmas tree mean actual traditional religion glue bind social fabric united states de tocqueville talk talk religious adherence common people gather church community glue hold united states absence overarch central government lose glue sort aat glue stapler stapler tend come form government joe biden know happen united states way happen world secular trend take west go eat west go destroy west go to destroy right people traditionally enjoy united states thing uphold right people fact fundamental institution undergird right right not come tabul raza right preexist institution coincide institution read lockian philosophy here john locke wrong suggest read particular way right inherent institution sort artificial correct institution preexist right family chief institution preexist right right create order protect family order protect sphere freedom role institution exist right start destroy institution right go fall apart s exactly s happen example uk uk institution church religion taboo happen canada example happen europe western europe eastern europe religious look s happen britain ll notice thing freedom religion freedom speech s amazing story uk yesterday prolife activist arrest literally stand outside abortion clinic not harass anybody not say not hold sign person stand allow stand s tape actually emerge incident britain pretty incredible ask question s go today caution right harm defense mention question later court give today physically understanding okay place know not live nearby abortion okay s stand protest m protest pray pray head loud ill ill ask voluntarily come police station ask question today day allegation ve break public space protection order ve get choice okay arrest account suspicion fail comply public space protection order okay public space protection order say allow stand outside abortion clinic right place uk apparently stand arrest loitering trespassing not arrest s silently pray head move face th th think right matter uk talk freedom religion d like freedom speech like freedom stand accord fox news isabel vaughn spruce director uk march life stand near b p s robert clinic king norton birmingham area d f uk call censorship zone police approach democrat complaint pray outside abortion facility god forbid terrible somebody pray mean s s terrible birmingham authority establish buffer zone abortion clinic make illegal individual engage act attempt act approval disapproval relate abortion include verbal write mean like pray counseling approval disapproval stand literally stand von spruce say exercise freedom thought freedom religion inside privacy mind criminalize think pray public space uk say ve pretty week year life pray friend ve experience abortion woman think go von spruce stand near abortion facility close time say pray accord d f uk police show photo stand outside facility ask pray say answer spend time pray get distract time pray time mean sort stuff believe social fabric united states go withstand secular encroachment essentially argue right religion speech long violate tenant belief system leave end uk see united states increasingly big sword ideological sword happen second case miss book club ben shapiros book club return night brand new episode available watch exclusively daily wire plus go screw tape letter cs list phenomenal book move lot human condition god access member watch trust not wanna miss head daily wirecomben member today watch late episode book club s daily wirecomben today okay decline religion united states actually cause great rift united states promise religion decline united states secularism sort vast blob vast blob get auspex government instead s happen people flee flee secularize state move religious state happen lot religious state broad economic protection broad economic freedom thing think left refuse understand right particularly property right connected viable institution instill social trust religious community people respectful people property right specifically know neighbor try screw thing adam smith talk major work theory moral sentiment idea viable social institution people motivate sympathy create trust trust exist free market society not exist end sam bankman freedom moment see united states major shift population accord pluribus news united states add million resident course past year population growth rebound pandemic era low increase tribute entirely international migrant come country partially open border important study aside fact not have kid import population important study exactly population gain population growth state state add resident south texas add new resident florida add people north carolina georgia add thousand resident arizona add south carolina tennessee washington utah idaho add ten thousand new resident population florida idaho south carolina texas south dakota montana grow ll notice list blue state washington blue state important mention washington eastern washington heavily read rust belt state continue long trend population decline new york population fall illinois shed thousand people pennsylvania west virginia maryland ohio lose population california see population drop recent year nation large state decline people year number people move california outpace number move whop resident accord census bureau data nearly new yorker move outta state year talk know people overall leave people move way people move texas join california state population north million florida recently pass new york nation populist state million resident empire state shock state south red populous state northeast rust belt california blue populous make perfect sense giant ideological sort happen right state go to grow fast one provide economic freedom state go to grow fast happen happen state high level religious adherence coincidence left wish believe freedom dependent freedom godliness freedom religion freedom community freedom institution freedom dependent sexual libertinism freedom actually dependent viable social institution hold society build trust institution disappear end trust america great irony s happen economically speak right term sam bankman free entire basis bitcoin cryptocurrency suppose trustless system idea not need social institution order trust trustless system obviously cryptocurrencie reliant blockchain blockchain verifiability able track money mechanism able verify certain transaction take place money specific wallet rest people tendency rely trust s sam bankman free take advantage situation yesterday release million bond restriction release million bond answer million collateral sam bankman freed walk free s exactly happen basically government pretend set bond high take super seriously reality parent basically house house collateral likelihood bankman free go to spend awful long time prison release follow announcement damien williams attorney southern district new york wednesday night executive bankman free business caroline ellison gary wang plead guilty federal fraud charge cooperate prosecutor charge executive likely complicate bankman freed defense criminal investigation ftx related entity move startling speed month ftx go flourish exchange bankrupt entity executive face criminal charge financial world violation prosecutor say bankman freed crime lead implosion exchange billion customer loss happen e trustless system turn people tend want trust people want trust people system united states broadly speak west undermine fundamental basis trust not value anymore s suppose replace kind niceness civility oppose common standard behavior common goal end aat social fabric comfortable nylon go wear s s happen united states writ large term civil society people form new civil society state level alrighty guy rest continue right go to wanna miss get january committee report importantly have dr robert malone famous having essentially censor medium question vaccination member click link description join

This joint resolution nullifies a Department of Labor rule concerning the fiduciary duties with respect to employee benefit plans. Under the rule issued on December 1, 2022, plan fiduciaries may consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance factors when they make investment decisions and when they exercise shareholder rights, including voting on shareholder resolutions and board nominations.

right

joint resolution nullify department labor rule concern fiduciary duty respect employee benefit plan rule issue december plan fiduciary consider climate change environmental social governance factor investment decision exercise shareholder right include vote shareholder resolution board nomination

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill broadens the scope of conduct that qualifies as an official act for purposes of federal criminal offenses involving bribes or illegal gratuities offered to or received by public officials.

right

bill broaden scope conduct qualify official act purpose federal criminal offense involve bribe illegal gratuity offer receive public official

Ep. 1919 - Nikki Haley Is OUT Published: 3/6/2024 (in RSS feed: 46m 49s) It's just dropped something so brilliant, you can't ignore it. Ireland's brightest energy offer a saving of up to 791 euro off dual fuel and all you have to do is switch. Visit Electric Ireland, ie. And start saving electric Ireland, making your world brighter. EAB 2,562 Euro dual fuel discount, including online billing and direct debit savings compared to a 24 hour standard variable tariff, EA B12 month contract. TCCs Supply. See, electric Island, ie. Well, it's the end of the road for Nikki Haley, the former UN ambassador under Donald Trump, former governor of South Carolina. She is dropping out of the race today because Donald Trump dominated Super Tuesday. This of course, was not a shock. The only question was why she was staying in, because the reality was that in every state except for Vermont, Trump not only won, he won convincingly in her home state of South Carolina, he beat her by about 20 points. He beat her 60 to 40 in North Carolina, he beat her 73 to 23 In Virginia, he beat her 63 to 34. These are all particularly Virginia Virginia's a moderate Republican state that is not a left wing Republican state and and or right wing Republican state, and he beat her very soundly in that state. In California, he beat her 78 to 18. What this suggests is that she really had no shot at the nomination after Iowa. No one had a shot at the nomination after Iowa, as I pointed out, which is why Rhon DeSantis dropped out early. It's also why Nikki Haley then stayed in in the hope that she would win New Hampshire. She didn't win New Hampshire. She overperformed a little bit and then she stayed in past that mainly to, I think put up a flag to the rest of the Republican party that should Trump lose in November. She will be the leader of the opposition ready to come in and take over. I think that's a misread of how Republicans think of Donald Trump. I think that even if Donald Trump loses in November in the general election to Joe Biden, it's very unlikely that the Republican party is then going to swivel and turn to Nikki Haley, especially because Nikki Haley seems to be making the same mistake that Ted Cruz made in 2016 after losing the primaries to Donald Trump. You'll recall that Ted Cruz then went to the Republican National Convention and he said, vote your conscience instead of just endorsing Trump. He sort of left it up in the air pleasing no one. He suggested to the Trump voters that maybe he wasn't supportive of Trump and to the not Trump voters, that maybe he was supportive of Trump and he ended up winning no backing. Because of that, Nikki Haley seems to be playing the same game, which doesn't seem particularly politically smart to me. It's one thing for Nikki Haley to say, I'm staying in as an alternative to Trump because I think that he's going to lose. But now that he's the nominee, he's the nominee for her to sit outside and not endorse Trump seems to me a a bit of political malpractice. According to the Wall Street Journal, Haley plans to suspend her Republican presidential primary bid in a speech on Wednesday. The former South Carolina governor and UN ambassador is expected to make an appearance to deliver brief Amar remarks around 10:00 AM Eastern. Her decision arrived the day after Super Tuesday. She won only Vermont among the 15 states, and Vermont is basically Canada. She's not going to announce an endorsement on Wednesday. However, she's going to encourage Donald Trump to earn the support of Republicans and independent voters who have backed her, which presumably could theoretically be a vi, a vice presidential play. Maybe she's hoping that he picks her as sort of a unity ticket, but given his dominant performance in the primaries, very unlikely at this point that he feels the necessity to do that. So a lot of eyes are gonna turn toward who he actually does pick for his vp. There are a lot of people who have been mentioned ranging from JD Vance, the Senator from Ohio to Tim Scott, the senator from South Carolina. We will have to wait and see Donald Trump for his part delivered a Super Tuesday victory speech in which he triumph fully proclaimed that he was the nominee, which of course has been true basically since Iowa. Once he won Iowa, the thing was over. We've watched our country take a great beating over the last three years, and nobody thought a thing like this would be possible. We wouldn't have Russia attacking Ukraine. We wouldn't have Israel being attacked. Iran as You know, was broke when I was running things. They were broke. They didn't have money for Hamas. They didn't have money for Hezbollah. We had no inflation. Inflation is destroying the middle class. It's destroying everything. Inflation. If you look back over the history, hundreds of years back, it's called inflation is called a country buster, and that's what it's doing to our country. What's happened with inflation has been unbelievable. A lot of people say, a lot of experts have said the stock market's the only thing that's doing well and that's doing well because our poll numbers are so much higher than Joe Biden's. Okay? So all of that is true except for the last part. Nobody is really suggesting that the stock market is doing well because of the expectation that Donald Trump is going to win in November. The stock market is doing well because when you inflate the currency, people don't have any other place to put their investment money. If you put your investment money in cash, it loses value. So people have started investing in speculative stock bubbles, which is why the price to earnings ratios right now on Wall Street are completely out of whack and probably we're experiencing a bubble on the Dow Jones Industrial average in the New York Stock Exchange. For example, Donald Trump then went on to rip Joe Biden on migrant crime again. He's doing the right thing in this victory speech, which has put all the focus on Joe Biden. If this entire campaign is about Joe Biden, Joe Biden is not going to win. Trump I think knows that. The only question is whether Trump steps on himself. He didn't do it last night. Really, We have the worst numbers, probably, probably in the history of the world. It's sad to see what's happening to our cities. Our cities are being overrun with migrant crime, and that's Biden migrant crime, but it's a new category of crime and it's violent where they'll stand in the middle of a street and have fistfights with police officers. And if they did that in their countries from where they came, they'd be killed instantly. Instantly. They wouldn't do that. So the world is laughing at us. The world is taking advantage of us. Three years ago, we were at a level, we were energy independent. We're gonna be very shortly energy dominant, and today we're getting oil from Venezuela. Can you believe it? Again, he is not wrong about any of this sort of stuff. Now, the exit polls for Republicans showed that their top issue was immigration, which is not a surprise because it is in fact the top issue in the country right now, even according to much of the polling data for the general American population. The reality is that immigration is a top issue because people are looking at the insane amount of illegal immigration under Joe Biden. You're talking about at least 7 million people have entered the country illegally while Joe Biden has been president. It may all the way be all the way up to 10 million. We literally have no idea, and people see that as a crisis because it is in fact a crisis. So the exit poll showed that was the top issue for Republicans. Now, very often when you take exit polls, people will say the economy, but that's always vague. Nobody actually knows what that means. Obviously, in a Republican primary, people are going to pick the issue that is the most polarized issue because they're voting Republican. So it's not a shock. They're picking immigration. But the reality is that according to a Pew Research Center survey taken just last month, it shows that immigration is a top issue for a huge majority of Americans dealing with immigration. 57% of Americans say that that should be the top priority this year is dealing with illegal immigration. And when it comes to immigration, Joe Biden is 20 points underwater. This, of course, is leading Democrats down a real rabbit hole here. They have two choices. They can either moderate on immigration or they can pretend that voters are outta their minds. Obviously, they're gonna do what you think they're gonna do. They're obviously going to pretend that voters are crazy and out of their minds. We get to more on this in a moment. First 20 bucks barely gets you anything these days. You can't even fill your gas tank for less than 20 bucks. But do You know what 20 bucks will get you? Well, from the cell phone company I use PureTalk. You can get unlimited talk text and plenty of 5G data for just 20 bucks a month. PureTalk gives you the same quality of service as your current cell phone provider, but for about half the cost, the average family saves almost a thousand dollars a year, all with no contracts and no activation fees. You can switch to PureTalk and keep the phone and phone number you currently use, or you can take advantage of their great deals on the latest iPhones and Androids making the switch incredibly easy. Their US customer service team can help you join PureTalk in as little as 10 minutes. Choose to spend your hard and earned money with a wireless company that chairs your value, supports our military and veterans create American jobs and refuses to advertise on You. know the fake news networks. Stop spending a ridiculous amount of money on your phone plan. Go to PureTalk dot com slash shapiro right now. My listeners can get an additional 50% off their very first month of coverage. That's PureTalk dot com slash shapiro. Again, PureTalk dot com slash shapiro, get an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage. We'll get to more on this in just a moment. First, I've been traveling quite a bit lately. That brings me to talk about a thing I hate airports. Yes, my team and I are unfortunately at the mercy of the airport. We travel all over the world. There's a lot of craziness going on. We don't know who we're traveling with. We might be listening in on our internet connection, whether the public wifi has security, whether local government is censoring our internet. So I think about privacy and security a lot when I travel, which brings me to a thing I like Expressive V-P-N-A-V-P-N provider that proves very useful to me while I'm traveling for a couple of reasons. First, it reroutes my internet connection to stop third parties like wifi admins and government agencies from spying on me, and it encrypts 100% of my traffic protecting my private data like bank logins and credit cards from wifi Hackers Express. VPN is the only VPN provider I trust and recommend. Plus, it's really easy to use. You just tap one button to connect on any device. So if you wanna get serious about online security, sign up right [email protected] slash ben. You'll receive three months absolutely free. That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S vpn.com/ben express vpn.com/ben to get started. So last night on msnbc, after the exit polling came out showing Republicans care about immigration. Democrats like Jen Zaki, who's the former press secretary for Joe Biden, were mocking Republicans for caring about immigration. I mean, if you look at some of these exit polls, I mean, I live in Virginia, immigration was the number one issue. Of course, I mean, again, these could change in in Virginia. Well, Virginia does have a border with West Virginia, very, very contested. I The wall. Like what? Or maybe people are worried that illegal immigrants are going to show up where they live and might commit crimes. Or maybe they're worried about the vast cultural changes that could be wrought by importing millions of people who have no familiarity with American concepts of things like free speech and property rights. Or maybe they're simply worried about the fact that you are generating an entire economic underclass of people, many of whom will be dependent on welfare benefits and many of whom are going to be lowering the wage base in the like. There are a lot of reasons why people in Virginia might be worried about illegal immigration, and again, Democrats are disconnected from this issue. This is the issue among the issues that Pew surveys in which there is the biggest gap between how Democrats think and how independents think. Forget about Republicans independent. So according to the polling data from Pew, 39% of Democrats believe that immigration is a real concern compared to 57% of independents and 76% of Republicans. That is a high number of independents who are deeply worried about immigration, and that number is up from 53% in 2023 and 49% in 2022. Democrats meanwhile are still stuck down in the mid thirties on this thing. When it comes to policy goals, again, independents look more like Republicans on a lot of these issues than they look like Democrats on a lot of these issues. And that's a problem for the Democrats, the White House, because they are stuck, as I've been saying in this legacy media echo chamber in which the idea for them is double down on the base. They're ignoring all of this. So the White House yesterday, for example, they were asked about Lake and Riley's murder lake and Riley, of course, with the young woman who was killed at University of Georgia, Biden legal immigrant. And the White House tried to blame Donald Trump for that. That dog is not going to hunt. The president of the United States is Joe Biden. He needs to close the border and everybody knows it Will. President Biden publicly addressed Laken Riley's murder, allegedly at the hands of an illegal immigrant who was released by law enforcement multiple times on Thursday night. We want to always, Always be sure that we left lift up the families who have lost their loved ones in that way. I would be remiss if I did not continue to say that Republicans rejected a bipartisan proposal that came out of the Senate. And so if they truly, truly cared about what was going on at the border, if they truly cared about this immigration policies and trying to fix that, trying to move forward in a step in a way where we have a tough and fair law, they would work with us on it. They wouldn't listen to the former President who is clearly telling them to reject, telling Republicans to reject it for their, for his own political game. Again, if they think this is a winning political argument, they're out of their minds. And this again goes to the reality of today's modern politics, and that is everybody in the media is convinced that the right wing has gone crazy and they've gone too far, right, and they're picking crazy candidates. And there is some truth to today. If you look at the last round of senatorial races, Republicans picked a bunch of terrible candidates in a bunch of winnable races and then they lost those races. But Democrats are now doing the same thing. We now have a game of chicken in which both sides have decided to put the radical brick on the on the accelerator, and then just aim the cars at each other. And the question is, who is going to pull away first before the cars crash? Whoever pulls away first in this case actually wins, okay? It is not as though if you just continue along that path and the other guy pulls away, you win. It's the opposite. In fact, basically this game of chicken is both cars are aimed at the cliff. Which side is going to stop before the cliff at all? Forget about close to the edge. Who's gonna stop at all? The reason I point this out is because yesterday Kirsten Sinema, the senator from Arizona, who started off as a Democrat and then governed as a moderate Democrat in what is a moderate purple state. Purple Arizona is a purple state. It was largely a red state. It had a state assembly and a state legislature, that state senate that were both Republican with Doug Ducey, Arizona governor as a Republican until just very recently. And then the Arizona Republican Party decided they were going to shoot themselves directly in the chest by embracing every form of election questioning they possibly could, alienating every moderate in the entire state, and electing two Democratic senators and a Democratic governor, Katie Hobbes, who's a wet dish rag over in Arizona. Now, the problem is that the underlying political character of the state of Arizona remains purple. There's a reason why until very recently, both senators were purple to red senators. It was, it was John McCain until he passed away and Jeff Flake, until Donald Trump basically destroyed him. And those were both replaced by Democrats. And so the Democrats who replaced them have had to govern from quasi the middle. So Mark Kelly, who's one of the senators, he's attempted to govern as sort of a bluish purple democrat. Kirsten Sinema was so purple that she eventually just went purple and decided to declare herself an independent. But then she decided not to run for reelection because the Democratic Party had basically cast her out and they decided to primary her. So instead of just having Kirsten Sinema be an independent like Bernie Sanders, who caucuses with the Democrats, which is what Kirsten Sinema would do, they didn't trust her enough. So they decided to run against her. Ruben Gallego, who's a far leftist in Arizona. And so the polls were showing a pretty even three-way split with Kirsten Sinema in the race. You had the entire Democratic party behind Gallego. There was an Emerson College pulling hill survey that was taken just a couple of weeks ago, and it found that Ruben Gallego had 36% support, 30% for Kerry Lake, the Republican nominee for the Senate, and 21% for Kirsten Sinema, 13% undecided. And so Kirsten Sinema looked at that. So Democrats could have easily dominated this race if they had just said, okay, fine. We're not gonna run against Kirsten Sinema. We understand she's an independent, but she's gonna caucus with us. We, it's gonna stay out. She easily wins reelection in Arizona. She's a pretty popular senator, but they decided not to do that. And so now they're basically getting rid of her in favor of Ruben Gallego, which makes their race actually significantly harder. 'cause Gallego is not in the mainstream of Arizona politics. We'll get to more on this in a second. First, despite the rate cuts anticipated by financial experts, inflation continues to rise. The United States is grappling with a staggering debt of $34 trillion that is increasing literally every day. We're gonna have to print more money, we're gonna have to increase taxes that's gonna be bad for the economy. Listen, you can bury your head in the sand or you can actually do something about all of this. Consider diversifying at least some of your savings into gold with Birch Gold Group. As a leading dealer of precious metals in the United States, Birch Gold is committed to helping you discover how gold, silver, and other precious metals can help protect your lifestyle. In the face of current and coming economic instabilities, Birch Gold makes it super easy to own gold, the help you convert your existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered I rra in gold. You won't pay a penny out of pocket. Gold is part of my savings strategy, and I buy from Birch Gold. They've been the exclusive gold partner of The Daily Wire for over seven years now, literally helping thousands of our listeners. They can help you too. Text Ben to 98. 98, 98, get your free info kit on gold, then talk to a precious metal specialist about protecting your savings from persistent inflation with Gold Tech spend to 98, 98, 98 today, we get to more on this in just one second. First, nobody likes talking about life insurance. It's dark, right? You gotta think about your own death. But here's the thing, think about it. Get it done, and you don't have to worry about it anymore, and your family is taken care of. In case, God forbid, you get hit by a bus. This is why you need policy genius. Find the right policy to protect your family today. Give yourself the peace of mind that comes with knowing that if something were to happen to you, your family can cover their expenses while getting back on their feet. Policy geniuses technology makes comparing life insurance quotes from America's top insurers easy in just a few clicks. You already have a life insurance policy through work, but that might not offer enough protection for your family's needs. It might not follow you. If you leave your job, you need a backup plan. With PolicyGenius, you can find life insurance policy starting at just 292 bucks per year for a million dollars in coverage. Some options offer same day approval and avoid those unnecessary medical exams. PolicyGenius has licensed agents who can help you find the best fit for your needs when they make it this easy, there's no excuse not to do it. PolicyGenius works for you, not the insurance companies. That means they're not incentivized to recommend one insurer over another so you can actually trust their guidance. Save time, money, provide your family with that financial safety net using PolicyGenius. Head on over to policygenius.com com slash shapiro or click that link in the description, get your free life insurance quotes, see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com/shapiro. According to the Wall Street Journal, cinema said she will not run for reelection and will retire after this term ending. For now, the political run of one of Congress's most productive and controversial lawmakers, a centrist who forged bipartisan deals while also regularly angering progressive Democrats. This is a different thing, by the way, than Republicans basically saying to MIT Romney, it's time for you to go. The reason that's different is 'cause Utah is a deep red state. Utah is a blood red state. Arizona is a purple state. And for Democrats to get rid of a purple senator who's going to caucus with them in favor of a far left candidate like Gall, is really a fascinating turn of events. Now, if only Republicans had nominated someone who, for example, had not run for governor and lost and then claimed that she won for the last year and a half like that, that might, that might be nice, but they didn't do that. They ran Kerry Lake instead. So it's Kerry Lake versus Ruben Gallaga. Clash of the Titans over in Arizona demonstrating once more, whoever seizes the middle ground is going to win these elections. But both parties, in some cases seems to be running away from the middle ground. Ironically, in the presidential race, it's Joe Biden who's running away from the middle ground, and Donald Trump who's reaching over and grabbing it weirdly enough. But in many of the state races, Trumpism has been read as a super right wing, Maga Maga, very far extremist right movement. And so a lot of the people being nominated are people who are also abandoning the middle, which is not smart. See, the dirty secret that I've been saying about Donald Trump is that he's politically moderate and rhetorically extreme. And so many of the people who have been running are politically extreme and rhetorically extreme, which is not what Americans are super into. And by the way, even rhetorically extreme only works for Donald Trump. It really does not work for anyone else. Donald Trump is a one of one in the same way that Barack Obama for Democrats was a one of one. You cannot be Trump. There is no one who can outtrump Trump. There's nobody who can even be in that same category. Trump is a standup comedian who became president of the United States because he's extraordinarily entertaining. He is camera magnetic. He is always funny. Like all those things are things that no other politician can hold a candle to because he's in a completely different category. He's an entertainer who became a politician, not a politician trying to be an entertainer. In any case, Kirsten Sinema being ousted from the Democratic Party and then retiring means that Democrats are also ousting the people who are supposedly reaching to the middle. Now, to be fair to the Democrats with her out of the race, a head-to-head matchup between Gallego and Lake shows that Gallegos lead actually expands to seven points, 46, 39 with 15% undecided. So Lake is gonna have to reach out to the middle if she wants to win that race. But for his part, Bernie Sanders is triumphalist about this. Bernie Sanders on the far left of the party, he's like, yeah, we are dragging the entire party far to the left. Shortly before our rehearsal today, Arizona Senator Kirsten Sinema announced that she will not be seeking reelection this fall. Obviously, a lot of people are gonna miss her. Are you? How much are you going to miss her? Not At all. Crazy person It says, it says the crazed old goofball socialist, but that's the Democratic party. They've decided they're gonna cater to the Bernie Wing of the party rather than the Kirsten Sinema wing of the party. Joe Biden ran as Kirsten Sinema and governed as Bernie Sanders, which is actually a really bad strategy, which means that he has kind of one final opportunity to put a new face on his presidency. That of course, is going to happen this week with his State of the Union address. As political points out, the State of the Union may be one of the most vastly overrated speeches in all of politics, but not this year. The address that Joe Biden has set to deliver on Thursday night will come as the President faces intensifying worries about his age and vitality, and a host of confounding international crises in domestic challenges. That backdrop has dramatically heightened the stakes for the White House with millions of viewers tuning in, not just to hear the words yers, but how he physically delivers them. And this, of course, is the key. The key is not to the State of the Union whether Joe Biden says anything memorable. When's the last time a president said anything memorable during a State of the Union address? They're all terrible State of the Union addresses. I hate them. I hate them every single year. I don't care who the president is or of what party. They're a monarchic spectacle in which the other branches of the American government are expected to treat the President as though he's an emperor. The State of the Union was supposed to be a letter issued from the President due the legislature, giving them an update on things that were going on, 'cause government was originally really small. And then it turned into this pathetic imperial spectacle in which the President walks in and everybody cheers for him and kiss the, it's just ridiculous. It's a ridiculous, stupid thing. I hate it every single year. It's stupid guy. It's particularly stupid when you have a president like Joe Biden who has to be wheeled in on a gurney in order to make the statement. But it will be entertaining this year, as I've been saying for a long time, since Joe Biden took the presidency. Watching Joe Biden speak is in fact quite exciting. Not in the way he thinks it is, but it's very exciting. It's exciting because it's like watching the Willand Brothers, right? You're watching somebody cross a tightrope in windy weather above a volcano. And so when Joe Biden speaks, the big question is not going to be how? How well does he do? It's how badly he will do. There's no world in which he walks out and he is super charismatic and just absolutely fascinating as this rhetorically shocking shock. Somebody who you look at and you're like, wow, that is an inspirational figure. The question for Joe Biden is whether he's going to physically collapse on stage. Obviously, we'll be covering this over at DailyWire backstage. We're gonna be covering it live tomorrow night to make sure that you tune in over at DailyWire dot com for that. But the big question is going to be whether Joe Biden physically survives the speech, which means the expectations are quite low. It also means, unfortunately for him that again, the more visibility people get of Joe Biden, the less they like him. New estimates show that more than 1 million babies were killed by abortion in 2023. That's the highest number of abortions in the United States since 2012. Despite the overturning of Roe versus Wade, this has only made the abortion pill more readily available when they shout abortion. However, we shout life, we have to fight back against this evil. How do we do that? We join hands with PreBorn, the largest pro-life organization in the country that sponsors ultrasounds for clinics in the highest abortion areas. When a mom considering abortion meets her baby on ultrasound and hears the heartbeat, it doubles the baby's chance. At life. Every day, PreBorn rescues 200 babies' lives, which is a truly miraculous thing. But by the time I finish this ad, two babies will have been taken by this tragedy. One ultrasound costs only 28 bucks. It could be the difference between life and death, because when mom sees the baby on ultrasound, it changes her mind. Please join the fight by sponsoring one, two, or even 300 ultrasounds all gifts, text deductible. Go to PreBorn dot com slash ben to Donate Today. That's PreBorn dot com slash Ben or dial pound two 50. Say keyword baby. That's pound 2 5 0, baby, go check them out right now. PreBorn dot com slash ben to Donate Today or dial pound two 50 and say Keyword baby. It's more on this in just a moment. First, we're all familiar with how difficult hiring can be. Unfortunately, a lot of businesses have been down on their luck trying to find excellent talent. Fortunately, if you are a business owner or a hiring manager, you don't need luck. To find top talent for your team, you need ZipRecruiter right now. You can try it for [email protected] slash DailyWire. ZipRecruiter. User-friendly technology guides you to finding top talent when you post your job. ZipRecruiter's Intuitive matching technology presents you with a list of qualified candidates. Once you've reviewed your list of qualified candidates, you can swiftly invite your top choices to apply This streamlined process encourages them to apply sooner, allowing you to fill that role faster. Aren't you curious to see how ZipRecruiter could help you out? Right now? You can Try ZipRecruiter for FREE. Just go to ziprecruiter.com/ DailyWire. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter will get a quality candidate within day one. Once again, just go to this exclusive web address and Try ZipRecruiter for FREE. That's ziprecruiter.com/ DailyWire. ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire. We've been using it here at DailyWire for legitimately years. Go check them out right now. ziprecruiter.com/ DailyWire. So Joe Biden yesterday was asked how he thinks he's doing in the race, and he said, I'm Winning President. What's your message to Democrats who are concerned about your poll numbers? My poll number is the last five polls. You guys don't report. I'm winning five five in a row. You guys only look at the New York Times. They're great paper. I mean, this must have been a scary moment for him because lurking in the background is his worst nightmare stares. But I'll also point out at this point that that is not true of the last five polls that have been taken. He's losing in three of them. The only ones where he's winning, he's inside the margin of error. Those would be Morning Consult and TIPP in virtually every poll before that he is losing. So that's not true. Also, again, one of the reasons he is losing is because he is no longer with us. So yesterday he was doing a press conference and he does this weird thing where he says, the stage directions out loud. Where in if you've ever been to a play, there're stage directions. And the stage directions is like exit stage left. Okay, well, Joe Biden reads that. Like he'll sort of just read the stage, directions loud, be I Now it's time to take some, I better not take questions. I know. Okay, exit stage left. Joe Biden out. Here we go. I love questions. I better not start the questions. I'll get in trouble. What's your message With whom you're the president? You have a message for voters? Thanks. Come on. Thank you so much. Thank you all. He breathes like every breath could be a death rattle. My goodness. You know, like picks up the microphone. Just I better not take questions or people are gonna, he needs like the Darth Vader suit. Like this is, this is, this is bad guys. It, it's, it's just not good. Okay. And then he said yesterday that his staff would drop him a note when it was dropped. Dead time. Unfortunate language for the barely sentient president. With that, I'm gonna turn this over to Lale, the Director of National Economic Council. But I'm supposed to leave for a meeting with meeting with the Business Roundtable on the telephone, but I'm gonna hang around and listen a little bit. So with your permission, I'd like to stay. If you and I, my, my staff will tell, tell me when the drop dead hour occurs, he'll pass me a note. What was that? What in the world is that? I, I have a phone call on the, on the rotary in a moment in time. I'm gonna stick around just a little bit. Yeah, if that's okay with you pudding and that that, okay. The thing he actually campaigned on yesterday, all, all, that's just him being ridiculously cile. But the thing he actually campaigned on, I'm not kidding you, is shrink inflation. So he believes that he is going to be able to pawn off his poor economic record on inflation, on the greed of corporations that are putting less in the potato chip bag and charging the same amount of money, which is his fault. Inflation is your fault. You are the president. Inflation began when you entered office, my friend, but here he was yesterday, but he wasn't just talking about shrink ifl, which again, what that, that's gonna be a hell of a campaign slogan. I'm Joe Biden. I'm here to fight shrink inflation. I, I swear he sounds like Costanza talking about shrinkage here, except he's citing the cookie monster. Now, the open question in this particular clip is whether Joe Biden believes the cookie monster to be a real thing. Like whether the cookie monster is a sentient being who walks around on the earth and eats cookies Here, here is Joe Biden quoting the Cookie monster. This is where we are, folks. In fact, some of the small snack companies, you won't and think, you won't even notice what they're doing when they charge you just as much for the same size bag of potato chips only has a hell of a lot fewer chips in it. I'll tell you what, I'll tell you. Who did notice the Cookie Monster. He pointed out cookies are, his cookies are getting smaller, paying the same price. I was stunned when I found out that's what actually happened. I was stunned. I talked to Cookie the other day and he said, Mr. President, cheese for cookie. And I said, oh, I do like cookies. And I said, Mr. Cookie Monster, can we be best friends? And then a little red monster showed up and also wanted to be friends. And then They put me under and ah, anyway, He's, everything's going. Well, get ready for 72 minutes of that tomorrow night. Woo. That's gonna be some strong stuff. But it's, again, it's not just that he's sent out, it's that he's bad at this. He's bad, he's bad at the president thing. The most obvious, the most obvious place where he's bad at the president thing right now is in the entire conflagration between Israel and Hamas. Get to more on this in just one moment. First, in eternal truth, vegetables are horrifying. They taste bad. Brussels sprouts, for instance, they taste bad, and then they stick with you for literally ever. What are they supposed to be like? Tiny cabbages. They're the worst. Well, I don't have to worry about eating them neither do you. With balance of nature, fruits and veggies, balance of nature, fruits and veggies is the most convenient way to ensure you get your daily intake of fruits and veggies. Balance of nature uses an advanced cold vacuum process that encapsulates fruits and veggies into a Whole foods supplements without sacrificing those natural antioxidants. The capsules are completely void of additives, fillers, extracts, synthetics, pesticides, or added sugar. The only thing, imbalance of nature is fruit and veggie capsules are You know like fruits and veggies. You need nutrients to function at your best each and every day. Balance of nature helps you do just that. And it's kosher, which means I can use it myself in the protein smoothies. So I can keep this rock and bod going. Go to balance of nature.com. Use promo Coach Shapiro to get 35% off your first set of fruits and veggies, plus an additional 10 bucks off every additional set you buy. That's balance of nature.com. Promo Coach Shapiro, balance of nature.com promo Coach Shapiro. It's more on this in just a moment. First, the NBA playoffs are heating up. There's no shortage of high stakes at basketball moments this time of year. Get in on the excitement with prize picks. America's number one fantasy sports app where you can turn your hoops knowledge into serious cash. You can now win up to 100 times your money on prize picks. With as little as four correct picks, you can turn 10 bucks into a thousand bucks. If you wanna play it alongside some of prize picks. Favorite players like Meek Mill and Sugar Sean O'Malley, you can now find community plays under the promos tab of the app to view entries from some of the biggest names in the prize picks community every week, prize picks even offers injury insurance. So your entries stay and play even if one of your players gets injured for basketball games. If you've got a player who exits the game in the first half and does not return in the second, that player projection won't count against you, the rest of your entry will stay. Live. Producer Jake, he's been loving prize picks. He likes the easy to use interface he's been getting in on the NBA playoff action. Download that prize. Pick apps today. Use code Ben for a first deposit match of up to a hundred bucks. Pick more, pick less. It's that easy. Use code, Ben on the prize picks app for a first deposit match up to $100. Lots of action this time of year. Use code Ben over at Prize Picks app and get that first deposit match up to a hundred bucks. So the United States has continued to provide material support to Israel, but rhetorically, they've been undercutting Israel at every possible turn in their battle against a genocidal tarot group. And they've been declaring that Israel should negotiate with this genocidal tarot group who currently holds six American citizens hostage. By the way, among the 134 hostages, we don't know how many are alive. And Hamas says they don't know how many are alive, which is amazing. I gotta say Hamas, they're incredible accounting bodies, but they have no idea how many hostages are alive. A bomb hits in five seconds later, it's 27,221 people have been killed, all of them children and all of them poets. And then they're like, sure, You know it's been like three and a half months since we took 134. We have no idea how many of those people are alive. Weird how you're counting skills wildly degrade the minute that we are talking about the people who you are keeping in captivity and raping routinely, presumably. So the Biden administration has taken the rhetorical side of Hamas by proclaiming a moral equivalence. See, here's the thing. When you proclaim a moral equivalence between a murderer and the person, that person is trying to murder between the murderer and the victim, you are siding with the murderer. If you say, Hey, hold up here, we have oj and here we have Nicole, and sure, sure Nicole is on the floor bleeding. And sure Nicole has a right to self-defense if she's still alive. But let's be real. There have been mistakes made on all sides. You're taking the side of OJ at that point, and that is what the Biden administration has been doing rhetorically, which again, is the worst thing they can do. Because if you grant an iota of rhetorical sympathy to terrorists, they are going to push you. They're going to realize that they now have leverage over you. And that's what Hamas realizes. The number of lies this administration has either fallen for or told themselves on behalf of Hamas is insane at this point. So for example, we've been hearing that Israel will not ship an aid. That's not true. Israel allows in hundreds of aid trucks every single day, but there's no one to distribute the aid. You wanna know why there's no one to distribute the aid in the Gaza Strip? Perhaps because Hamas hijacks the trucks. Here is tape of Hamas riding around on the aid trucks. This is from yesterday. You see that these are a trucks, there are two members of Hamas on top of each one of these A trucks. These are all civilians who are standing there being like, where's my damned food? And the answer is, Hamas is stealing all of it. And then the Biden administration's like, what if we send them more? It says, the Israelis are being so mean about the Hamas is stealing the aid, and they're killing people who are trying to get the aid. It's totally insane. But then Israel gets blamed, rhetorically speaking, Israel needs to do more, says the Biden administration. Meanwhile, Joe Biden yesterday says, we need a ceasefire because of Ramadan. Okay, I'm sorry. This bullshit has to stop. What? What? It's, it's so ridiculous. This is such ridiculous nonsense. Ramadan is very holy holiday to the terrorists who are willing to literally violate every single other human being's religious scruples on Ramadan. Everybody has to go real easy 'cause people are fasting between sunrise and sunset. Gotta go real easy because it turns out terrorists, they love them. Their Ramadan in a kamas land over here. Gotta be so easy on them because obviously these are people we have to respect their religious gruels that dictate that they should murder. Pretty much everybody who is not a religious Muslim makes perfect sense because obviously they have demonstrated enormous, enormous credibility when it comes to respect for other religions. Like for example, when the Palestinian Arabs were in charge of the holy sites, Jews can't get in. In fact, if Jews tried to worship at their own holy sites when the estate of Israel did not exist, for example, the Western Wall giant riots would start like in 1929 and hundreds of Jews would be murdered. So obviously they listen. If there is one thing that the radical Muslim world is known for it's respect for other religions, which is why they literally blow up churches and build mosques on top of them, or go directly on top of the Temple Mount and put the dome of the rock directly on top of the Jewish Holy of Holies from the temple. It's also why they go to Hindu sites in India, blow up the Hindu sites and put a mosque on top. Because if they're, again, when we are talking about colonialist religions folks, there is one that wins. Okay? The most colonialist religion of all time is Islam. Okay? But that does not, there can be moderate Muslims, they're just not in kamas land. There are many moderate Muslims. I know some moderate Muslims You know people who don't actually believe in the colonial legacy of Sharia law. But to pretend that Ramadan is, is the, is the deciding factor in whether Israel should be able to go and try to take back a hostages and kill terrorists is totally insane. Again, demonstrating, once again, radical Muslim sympathy for other religions. The last two major surprise wars that launched in Israel were launched on respectively, the Yom Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar in 1973. And Rah, which was October 7th Rah, is the happiest day in the Jewish calendar and also happened to be a Shabbat. It's like a double holiday for Jews, perfect time for Hamas to respect the religion and Palestinian civilians involved to respect the religion of the Jews by killing 1200 of them. And by, but Joe Biden's, like Ramadan's coming. We gotta be careful about the, honestly, this, this, it's so stupid. It's so stupid. You're not winning hearts and minds by trying to get a ceasefire on behalf of terrorist groups for Ramadan. Who's, who's whispering in Joe's ear? Who believes this? Or does Joe just believe this in his adult brain? Does somebody go by Ramadan? Well, I, there's gotta be a ceasefire because Ramadan, if we get into a circumstance where this continues through Ramadan, Israel and Jerusalem, again, it could be very, very dangerous. So we're looking, we're trying hard for that ceasefire. Oh, you mean you, oh, you mean that there will be You know act acts of rioting on the Temple Mount, like there's every single year, and then you'll blame the Jews for the acts of rioting by the Muslims on the Temple Mount. I've been up there, by the way. And the Muslim world then suggests that I'm quote unquote trespassing or invading the temple mount, by which they mean I walk around it. That's what they mean. You're literally barred from praying on the temple mount by the Islamic wok. So long as you are a Jew or a Christian, by the way, if you're Muslim, you can be up there playing soccer and eating McDonald's, which is literally what happens on the Temple Mount. There's literally a school in the corner of the Temple Mount. There's very holy site to Muslims where kids are playing soccer and flying kites. So yeah, in, in any case, this is stupid, but what, what exactly does it mean? So the Biden administration, they're pursuing a ceasefire, and Hamas is rejecting every ceasefire. Hamas literally rejected the last ceasefire offer. That ceasefire offer was a, an offer for a six week ceasefire in return for leasing the remaining female hostages and kamas rejected it outright. According to the New York Times, president Biden said, Tuesday talks on a possible six week ceasefire in Gaza are in the hands of Kamas right now. He spoke just before Kamas leader in Lebanon appeared to reject a proposed deal. The US is backing, insisting Israeli hostages would be released only after AC ceasefire was in place. And Israeli forces have withdrawn. So Hamas knows they're in control because Biden wants the ceasefire more than he wants Israel to destroy Hamas. That is just the bottom line here. And so because of that, Biden is now shifting his line to mirror Hamas, according to I 24 News. While holding out for Kamas to accept a ceasefire and hostage released proposal, us and Arab negotiators floated a potential short pause to hostilities while the larger deal gets ironed out. So what would that mean? That would mean calling for a ceasefire without any hostages being released, which is called losing. You think the Israelis are gonna go for that? It's the most insane stupidity ever. It's ridiculously insane. And the media and the political class, they're like, oh, well this is because Joe Biden doesn't get along with Bibe. This has nothing to do with Joe Biden and Bibe. Benny Goz just visited Washington dc He got the same exact treatment from Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. One of the great lies of foreign policy is that foreign policy is constructed based on individual likes and dislikes of the leaders of countries. It is not. It's based on the individual interests of countries. It doesn't matter very much whether you like or dislike Vladimir Putin or whether you get along with him or not. What matters is whether his interests are actually in coincidence with your own. And the same thing holds truth Israeli leaders or with Palestinian leaders. We ought to be absolutely clear and gimlet eyed about the question of American national interest and the national interests of other countries. And this bizarre notion that America has some sort of disagreement with Bibi Netanyahu personally, and therefore they have to make some sort of concessions to Kamas. It's absolute stupidity. Meanwhile, by the way, Iran is activating all of its proxies. They know they've got a we, they have a, they have a fish on the line, and that fish is the Biden administration. So Hezbollah has been heating up because they know that Joe Biden wants one thing above all, and that is a ceasefire in the region. And so they are ratcheting up their military action in the attempt to gain concessions via the United States from the Israelis. So yesterday, for example, Hezbollah launched 50 rockets into the north of Israel. Now, any self-respecting country receiving 50 rockets across its border would then go and wamp the people on the other side of the border. Can you imagine if the Mexican government, not the drug cartels the government, because Hezbollah basically runs the government in Lebanon decided that they were going to launch 50 rockets into San Diego, Mexico City would not exist the next morning. At the very least, you'd have Marines sipping tea from the Capitol. But here is what the video looks like on the northern border of Israel, where again, 30,000 Israelis have abandoned their homes in the north because of Hezbollah threats. And there's widespread expectation in Israel that within the next two to three months, there will be a large scale war in the North with Hezbollah, which is 200,000 rockets in Israel. Here's what it looks like when a terrorist group fires rockets into another sovereign country. This is Hezbollah just launching rockets over the border of Israel, and it's only thanks to the Iron Dome. You can see the Iron Dome, which is being shot up into the sky to knock down some of these rockets for not for Iron Dome. These would all be falling and killing people. The Biden administration, of course, is seeking Ceasefires ceasefire, ceasefire, ceasefire. And because they are in hawk to their radical base, this all goes back. That central contention that Democratic party has moved so far to the left, that they can't cease straight anymore at all. We'll get to that in just one moment. First, Russia has been in the headlines for weeks due to the actions of Vladimir Putin. Obviously, to comprehend Vladimir Putin's motivations, we have to examine the historical context that shaped his behaviors in the new season of what we saw in Empire of Terror host Bill Whittle unmask communism by taking a close look at the history of the Soviet Union, with the use of deep cut photographs and film journal entries and other primary sources. This Tale of Terror offers a compelling presentation on the horrors that plagued the Soviet Union and the viciousness of its leaders. Modern day Russia has been centuries in the making. This series will give you a better understanding of its history as well as communism that threatens our own Homeland Watch episode one streaming right now at DailyWire Plus. If you're not a DailyWire Plus member, go to DailyWire dot com slash subscribe. Become a member today. Again, go check that out. Bill Whittle's work is tremendous. It's absolutely amazing historical research and, and entertaining and interesting and facet. You're gonna learn something, go check it out right now over at DailyWire Plus. Also, we have a new episode of Facts that's coming out this Saturday, so stay tuned for that on our YouTube channel or wherever you consume our content. The Daily, Wire app, all about Russia, things you don't know about it, the current status of the country, their challenges, and whether their interests coincide with ours. Make sure you check that out on Saturday. It's Just dropped something so brilliant, you can't ignore it. Ireland's brightest energy offer a saving of up to 791 Euro off dual fuel, and all you have to do is switch. Visit Electric Ireland, ie. And start saving electric Ireland, making your world brighter. EAB 2,562 Euro dual fuel discount, including online billing and direct debit savings compared to our 24 hour standard variable tariff, EA B12 month contract. TNCs apply. See, electric Island, ie. Okay. Meanwhile, speaking of the Democratic Party captured by radicals, again, you can see the radical base of the Democratic Party is pushing Joe Biden to the left. And again, it is most obvious on a couple of issues. Immigration is one, the Democratic Party could easily cut a deal with Republicans or just enact executive orders in order to shut down the border. And they're not doing it because they're in hoked to the radical base. You can also see it most clearly with regards to Israel and Hamas. This is the most morally obvious conflict in modern history. It is between a democratic state that was literally just attacked with the worst terror attack since nine 11 in the West, and a genocidal terror group that is holding hostages right now. And suddenly the left is like, well, I don't know about that. It's, it's pretty, it's pretty convoluted. It's pretty You know. I don't know what I would do. This is why you get morons like Nick Kristoff at the New York Times, a moral, moral dnce suggesting quote. I get this question regularly and I acknowledge that Israel faced a difficult challenge. It was hard to target Kamas without risking civilians. My answer is, what I would not do is kill 31,000 people in Vancouver, including 12,500 children and starved the entire population. The question was, imagine terrorist rockets fired from Vancouver into Portland, Oregon. What would you do? Okay, but you didn't answer the question. So your question is, I wouldn't do what the Israelis would do, but I will sit here and I'll pontificate like a giant jackass. This is the left. This is the left right now it, the left has decided that basically if you are evil enough, this means you earn a free ticket to left wing land. It's great if you're evil enough. This suggests that you're victimized. See in the victim, victim victimizer narrative, the oppressor, oppressed narrative, whoever is the worst is considered the oppressed. Because remember, you have to link that up with the left wing idea that everyone who acts badly is doing so because of childhood drama and people being mean to them. That people are naturally good and naturally kind and naturally wonderful. And therefore, if somebody blows themself up in a cafe and they take a bunch of kids with them, then that's probably because they had a really rough childhood. And so they are the victim, not the victimizer, they're the victim. The worse you act, the more evil you are, the more you have been victimized by outside forces, and thus your actual victims are the victimizers, complete, reversible victim, and victimizer. The most obvious example of this is Judith Butler. So Judith Butler is one of the most damaging academics of the last 60 years. She is famously a founder of queer theory. She's a person who became famous by suggesting that all of gender is a social construct. There's no linkage whatsoever between your biology and your behavior. It's all a social construct. She says that the body itself is a social construct, that it's defined as all about power. She says that gender itself is a verb that constructs, it's a performance. Everything is performative. And gender is a quote, struggle to rework the norms by which bodies are experienced. And for most of her life, she considered herself a woman. Now she says, thanks to gender, non-binary nonsense that she helps create. She's a they them, but she's really just a crazy lady and this crazy lady who has respected in academic circles because she writes absolute tid gobbledygook. That makes no sense to anyone with a sentient prefrontal cortex. this.is not just a moron when it comes to gender theory and her bizarre notions that gender is entirely constructed and made up and all the rest of this garbage. But that links up with her belief that terrorists are not in fact, terrorists. So she was talking about the situation between Israel and Hamas the other day, and she decided to lay down a theory. Her theory is that October 7th, which involved the mass rape of women, the murder of men, women, the slaughter of children, the beheading of foreigners and Jews, the kidnapping of women and repeated rape of those women, that all of that was just an act of resistance. 'cause after all, you have to understand that what we are watching right now is the coalition of the pseudo oppressed who have decided that any system in which they are unsuccessful, they are the victims and therefore they can do whatever they want. When you link up that oppressor oppressed narrative in which everybody who is a failure has been oppressed in some way, everybody who is evil has been oppressed in some way. You link that up with the friends fone notion that resistance can come in any form. And that's how you end up with Judith Butler, one of the most evil human beings of the last 60 years. Here she was yesterday, justifying Hamas. We can have different views about Hamas as a political party. We can have different views. Oh, can we About We arm armed resistance, but I think armed resistance, more honest and historically correct to say that the uprising of October 7th was an act of armed resistance. It is not a terrorist attack, and it's not an anti-Semitic attack. It was an attack against, against Israelis and You. know, I did not like that attack. I I have gone public with this. I have gotten in trouble for saying it. Oh, you didn't like it? It was for me anguishing. It was anguishing. It was terrible. Oh, angry. However, It made her feel bad on the, I would be very Foolish. However, If I then decided that the only violence in the scene was the violence done to Israeli people, the violence done to Palestinians has been happening for decades. This was an uprising that comes out. It comes from a state of subjugation and against a violent state apparatus. Oh, as opposed to Hamas, which is not a violent state apparatus or Iran, which is not a violent state apparatus. It's the Democratic state of Israel, which has 20% Arab citizenry. That's the, the violent state apparatus according to this absolutely ridiculous piece of filth. I mean, she's truly one of the worst people on the planet. Truly an awful human being. By the way. She wor she, she says that she's associated with Jewish voices for peace. The best thing about Jewish Voices for Peace is the only actual word in that title that is true is of they're not Jewish. They're not for peace, and they're not really voices for peace or Jewish voices. So none of that is true. So they're of when, when she suggests, again, that narrative is the most dangerous narrative, and it's a narrative that threatens the entire west. This is why when people say, why should I care about what's going on far away? I get it. I do. I understand why should you care what's going on? But it's not going on far away. It's going on in your shores. Judith Butler is a famous American academic. Her work is taught all over the United States in gender theory classes to your children. Her entire philosophy has been mainlined into the educational system, not just with regard to gender, but with regard to values as a whole. The postmodernist notion that all morality is effectively constructed, but there's a victim and a victimizer. And the victimizer is always the successful person, and the victim is always the failure. And that's because the system itself is bad. That's how you end up with gender queer non-conforming Judith Butler on the same side as Kamas, who would gladly chop off her head in a moment where she'd be placed into the Gaza Strip. Now, they probably wouldn't chop off her head because they know that she's a wonderful, useful idiot for them. If they knew who she was, they would prop her up because of course she's very useful to them. But if they had no idea, she just wandered into the Gaza Strip, she would look like any other Jewish lesbian, non-conformist, left winger, and they would chop off her head right away. Okay? So, but, but you have to understand why the alliance exists. The alliance exists and it is a danger to the West. It is not just a danger to Israel. It's a danger to the West. There are millions of people who believe the softer form of what she's saying. And the left has patted this on the head. The left has imbibed from this. Well, this is the difference between the old school Democratic liberals and the far left Bernie Sanders wing that is taking over the Democratic party. And it's all part of a piece. It's all part of a broader whole cloth, rewriting of morality. See, typically when you speak of Judeo-Christian morality, you mean that in any given situation, we can determine whether somebody is a victim or a victimizer by whether they are in fact a victim or a victimizer. Have they done something wrong? Have they done something that violates morality? Have they done something that violates moral scruples and rules, but that, but identity is victim or victimizer according to the left. And the best way to tell whether somebody's a victim or a victimizer is whether they stand on behalf of the system. And success within the system means your purveyor of the system, the system is bad. The fundamental premise of all Left-wing coalitional thought is that the system is bad and must be torn down. And so Kamas can end up on the same side as queers for Palestine, even if they would kill each other given the first available opportunity. It's the coalition that matters. Uber, Alice. It's the thing that matters more than anything else. The system has to be torn down. And so when we talk about all these issues that seem utterly disconnected, like transing of the kids and support for Hamas, you have to wonder how do they end up on the same side? The answer is both want to tear down Judeo-Christian moral values. That is what they are about. And so when you see a symptom of that crop up in the moral ambivalence about Israel Hamas, that is a symptom of a much broader malady. And treating that symptom in isolation as though it has nothing to do with the underlying malady means that the, the malady is going to get worse. It's going to metastasize. It's that give a symptom of cancer and you just treat the symptom, but you pay no attention to the cancer, you're gonna die of the cancer that's the West. Right now, the bizarre left wing support of Hamas is an amazing indicator of just how deeply rooted the cancer of radical left thought has gone. And it really has gone quite deep. Now, speaking of the cancer of left wing thought, there's a video that's been making the rounds yesterday. And again, it demonstrates just how far left wing thought can pervert people and destroy their lives. It is a mother who is talking about all four of her children being trans. This is statistically impossible. It is almost literally statistically impossible. Meaning that your chances of a child suffering from gender dysphoria are one in several thousand, the chances of four children suffering from gender dysphoria, you're talking about one in hundreds of millions or billions. And yet magically, this mother came up with four trans kids. So it's not munchhausen syndrome by proxy. It's not teaching your kids a bunch of absolute garbage that is going to wreck their lives and condemn them to a future of depression, anxiety, self hatred and self-loathing. No, it's all just, it's, it's all just being free. It's all just natural and free. And let's be real. It's an, it's an act of resistance. Bringing your kid up in this way is an act of resistance to the gender system. 'cause again, all systems are bad. The systems have to be torn down. Here's the video of of Mommy who is absolutely destroying the lives of children. It is a picture of a little boy who's dressed as a girl. In 2022, our twin daughters came to us and told us they didn't feel the genders they were given were truly them. They're both boys. Our son told us he was transgender too. That's a girl. And our child told us they didn't feel like a boy or a girl. Four kids, each gender non-conforming has nothing to do with the parenting though. And then, and then hugging. Hugging your kids as they destroy their lives because you have indoctrinated them into this cult. I trusted them. And from that day on, our family changed in the most beautiful way. Wait until these kids are 20 and she, she's hugging all of her, all the kids, she's, she's absolutely destroying. This is child abuse and child endangerment. And the kids should be immediately seized BCD by CPS. I trusted them. And from that day, our family changed. This is about mommy. How do You know? Because she's filming it and putting it on the tiktoks. That's how You know. Whenever our parents film themselves with their kids talking about what wonderful parents they're, because they're so tolerant and diverse, it's about the parents. People said we were crazy to listen to them. They're just kids. They don't know who they are. They do. No. You are crazy. And you're wrecking children. You're destroying children. It's been two years today and my children are thriving. They're happy and free to be their true selves. I have a feeling that if they weren't happy that you're never gonna find out about that for mommy. Since mommy is the one who's wrecking their lives. The reason to do this is not 'cause you care about your kids. The reason to do this is because you're fighting the system. It's a political statement and your kids are just the rockets that you fire against the political system. Alright guys, the rest of the show continues right now. We'll be joined on the line by Bill Whitley as a brand new series of DailyWire Plus, if you're not a member, become member. Use Coach Shapiro. Check out for two months free on all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us.

right

ep nikki haley publish rss feed m drop brilliant not ignore ireland bright energy offer saving euro dual fuel switch visit electric ireland ie start save electric ireland make world bright eab euro dual fuel discount include online billing direct debit saving compare hour standard variable tariff ea month contract tccs supply electric island ie end road nikki haley un ambassador donald trump governor south carolina drop race today donald trump dominate super tuesday course shock question stay reality state vermont trump win win convincingly home state south carolina beat point beat north carolina beat virginia beat particularly virginia virginias moderate republican state left wing republican state right wing republican state beat soundly state california beat suggest shot nomination iowa shot nomination iowa point rhon desantis drop early nikki haley stay hope win new hampshire not win new hampshire overperforme little bit stay past mainly think flag rest republican party trump lose november leader opposition ready come think s misread republican think donald trump think donald trump lose november general election joe biden unlikely republican party go swivel turn nikki haley especially nikki haley make mistake ted cruz lose primary donald trump ll recall ted cruz go republican national convention say vote conscience instead endorse trump sort leave air please suggest trump voter maybe not supportive trump trump voter maybe supportive trump end win backing nikki haley play game not particularly politically smart thing nikki haley m stay alternative trump think s go lose s nominee s nominee sit outside endorse trump bit political malpractice accord wall street journal haley plan suspend republican presidential primary bid speech wednesday south carolina governor un ambassador expect appearance deliver brief amar remark eastern decision arrive day super tuesday win vermont state vermont basically canada s go announce endorsement wednesday s go encourage donald trump earn support republicans independent voter back presumably theoretically vi vice presidential play maybe s hope pick sort unity ticket give dominant performance primary unlikely point feel necessity lot eye go to turn actually pick vp lot people mention range jd vance senator ohio tim scott senator south carolina wait donald trump deliver super tuesday victory speech triumph fully proclaim nominee course true basically iowa win iowa thing ve watch country great beating year think thing like possible not russia attack ukraine not israel attack iran know break run thing break not money hamas not money hezbollah inflation inflation destroy middle class destroy inflation look history hundred year call inflation call country buster s country s happen inflation unbelievable lot people lot expert say stock market thing s s poll number high joe biden okay true suggest stock market expectation donald trump go win november stock market inflate currency people not place investment money investment money cash lose value people start invest speculative stock bubble price earning ratio right wall street completely whack probably experience bubble dow jones industrial average new york stock exchange example donald trump go rip joe biden migrant crime s right thing victory speech focus joe biden entire campaign joe biden joe biden go win trump think know question trump step not night bad number probably probably history world sad s happen city city overrun migrant crime s biden migrant crime new category crime violent ll stand middle street fistfight police officer country come d kill instantly instantly not world laugh world take advantage year ago level energy independent go to shortly energy dominant today get oil venezuela believe wrong sort stuff exit poll republicans show issue immigration surprise fact issue country right accord polling datum general american population reality immigration issue people look insane illegal immigration joe biden talk million people enter country illegally joe biden president way way million literally idea people crisis fact crisis exit poll show issue republicans exit poll people economy s vague actually know mean obviously republican primary people go pick issue polarize issue vote republican shock pick immigration reality accord pew research center survey take month show immigration issue huge majority americans deal immigration americans priority year deal illegal immigration come immigration joe biden point underwater course lead democrat real rabbit hole choice moderate immigration pretend voter outta mind obviously go to think go to obviously go pretend voter crazy mind moment buck barely get day not fill gas tank buck know buck cell phone company use puretalk unlimited talk text plenty g datum buck month puretalk give quality service current cell phone provider half cost average family save thousand dollar year contract activation fee switch puretalk phone phone number currently use advantage great deal late iphone android make switch incredibly easy customer service team help join puretalk little minute choose spend hard earn money wireless company chair value support military veteran create american job refuse advertise know fake news network stop spend ridiculous money phone plan puretalk dot com slash shapiro right listener additional month coverage s puretalk dot com slash shapiro puretalk dot com slash shapiro additional month coverage moment ve travel bit lately bring talk thing hate airport yes team unfortunately mercy airport travel world s lot craziness go not know travel listen internet connection public wifi security local government censor internet think privacy security lot travel bring thing like expressive vpnavpn provider prove useful m travel couple reason reroute internet connection stop party like wifi admin government agency spy encrypt traffic protect private datum like bank login credit card wifi hacker express vpn vpn provider trust recommend plus easy use tap button connect device wanna online security sign right nowexpressivevpncom slash ben ll receive month absolutely free s express vpncomben express vpncomben start night msnbc exit polling come show republicans care immigration democrat like jen zaki s press secretary joe biden mock republican care immigration mean look exit poll mean live virginia immigration number issue course mean change virginia virginia border west virginia contested wall like maybe people worried illegal immigrant go live commit crime maybe worried vast cultural change work import million people familiarity american concept thing like free speech property right maybe simply worried fact generate entire economic underclass people dependent welfare benefit go lower wage base like lot reason people virginia worried illegal immigration democrat disconnect issue issue issue pew survey big gap democrat think independent think forget republicans independent accord polling datum pew democrats believe immigration real concern compare independent republicans high number independent deeply worried immigration number democrats stick mid thirty thing come policy goal independent look like republican lot issue look like democrat lot issue s problem democrats white house stuck ve say legacy medium echo chamber idea double base ignore white house yesterday example ask lake rileys murder lake riley course young woman kill university georgia biden legal immigrant white house try blame donald trump dog go hunt president united states joe biden need close border everybody know president biden publicly address laken riley murder allegedly hand illegal immigrant release law enforcement multiple time thursday night want sure leave lift family lose love one way remiss continue republicans reject bipartisan proposal come senate truly truly care go border truly care immigration policy try fix try forward step way tough fair law work not listen president clearly tell reject tell republicans reject political game think win political argument mind go reality today modern politic everybody media convince right wing go crazy ve go far right pick crazy candidate truth today look round senatorial race republicans pick bunch terrible candidate bunch winnable race lose race democrat thing game chicken side decide radical brick accelerator aim car question go pull away car crash pull away case actually win okay continue path guy pull away win opposite fact basically game chicken car aim cliff go stop cliff forget close edge s go to stop reason point yesterday kirsten sinema senator arizona start democrat govern moderate democrat moderate purple state purple arizona purple state largely red state state assembly state legislature state senate republican doug ducey arizona governor republican recently arizona republican party decide go shoot directly chest embrace form election questioning possibly alienate moderate entire state elect democratic senator democratic governor katie hobbe s wet dish rag arizona problem underlie political character state arizona remain purple s reason recently senator purple red senator john mccain pass away jeff flake donald trump basically destroy replace democrat democrats replace govern quasi middle mark kelly s senator s attempt govern sort bluish purple democrat kirsten sinema purple eventually go purple decide declare independent decide run reelection democratic party basically cast decide primary instead have kirsten sinema independent like bernie sander caucus democrats kirsten sinema not trust decide run ruben gallego s far leftist arizona poll show pretty threeway split kirsten sinema race entire democratic party gallego emerson college pull hill survey take couple week ago find ruben gallego support kerry lake republican nominee senate kirsten sinema undecided kirsten sinema look democrats easily dominate race say okay fine go to run kirsten sinema understand s independent s go to caucus go to stay easily win reelection arizona s pretty popular senator decide basically getting rid favor ruben gallego make race actually significantly hard cause gallego mainstream arizona politic second despite rate cut anticipate financial expert inflation continue rise united states grapple staggering debt trillion increase literally day go to print money go to increase taxis s go to bad economy listen bury head sand actually consider diversify saving gold birch gold group lead dealer precious metal united states birch gold commit help discover gold silver precious metal help protect lifestyle face current come economic instability birch gold make super easy gold help convert exist ira tax shelter rra gold will not pay penny pocket gold saving strategy buy birch gold ve exclusive gold partner daily wire seven year literally help thousand listener help text ben free info kit gold talk precious metal specialist protect saving persistent inflation gold tech spend today second like talk life insurance dark right got to think death here thing think not worry anymore family take care case god forbid hit bus need policy genius find right policy protect family today peace mind come know happen family cover expense get foot policy genius technology make compare life insurance quote americas insurer easy click life insurance policy work offer protection family need follow leave job need backup plan policygenius find life insurance policy start buck year million dollar coverage option offer day approval avoid unnecessary medical exam policygenius license agent help find good fit need easy s excuse policygenius work insurance company mean incentivize recommend insurer actually trust guidance save time money provide family financial safety net policygenius head policygeniuscom com slash shapiro click link description free life insurance quote save s policygeniuscomshapiro accord wall street journal cinema say run reelection retire term end political run congresss productive controversial lawmaker centrist forge bipartisan deal regularly anger progressive democrat different thing way republicans basically say mit romney time reason s different cause utah deep red state utah blood red state arizona purple state democrats rid purple senator s go caucus favor far left candidate like gall fascinating turn event republicans nominate example run governor lose claim win year half like nice not run kerry lake instead kerry lake versus ruben gallaga clash titan arizona demonstrating seize middle ground go win election party case run away middle ground ironically presidential race joe biden s run away middle ground donald trump s reach grab weirdly state race trumpism read super right wing maga maga far extremist right movement lot people nominate people abandon middle smart dirty secret ve say donald trump s politically moderate rhetorically extreme people run politically extreme rhetorically extreme americans super way rhetorically extreme work donald trump work donald trump way barack obama democrats trump outtrump trump s category trump standup comedian president united states s extraordinarily entertain camera magnetic funny like thing thing politician hold candle s completely different category s entertainer politician politician try entertainer case kirsten sinema oust democratic party retire mean democrats oust people supposedly reach middle fair democrat race headtohead matchup gallego lake show gallego lead actually expand seven point undecided lake go to reach middle want win race bernie sanders triumphalist bernie sander far left party s like yeah drag entire party far left shortly rehearsal today arizona senator kirsten sinema announce seek reelection fall obviously lot people go to miss go miss crazy person say say craze old goofball socialist s democratic party ve decide go to cater bernie wing party kirsten sinema wing party joe biden run kirsten sinema govern bernie sander actually bad strategy mean kind final opportunity new face presidency course go happen week state union address political point state union vastly overrate speech politic year address joe biden set deliver thursday night come president face intensify worry age vitality host confound international crisis domestic challenge backdrop dramatically heighten stake white house million viewer tune hear word yer physically deliver course key key state union joe biden say memorable s time president say memorable state union address terrible state union address hate hate single year not care president party monarchic spectacle branch american government expect treat president s emperor state union suppose letter issue president legislature give update thing go cause government originally small turn pathetic imperial spectacle president walk everybody cheer kiss ridiculous ridiculous stupid thing hate single year stupid guy particularly stupid president like joe biden wheel gurney order statement entertain year ve say long time joe biden take presidency watch joe biden speak fact exciting way think exciting exciting like watch willand brother right watch somebody cross tightrope windy weather volcano joe biden speak big question go badly s world walk super charismatic absolutely fascinating rhetorically shocking shock somebody look like wow inspirational figure question joe biden s go physically collapse stage obviously cover dailywire backstage go to cover live tomorrow night sure tune dailywire dot com big question go joe biden physically survive speech mean expectation low mean unfortunately visibility people joe biden like new estimate million baby kill abortion s high number abortion united states despite overturning roe versus wade abortion pill readily available shout abortion shout life fight evil join hand preborn large prolife organization country sponsor ultrasound clinic high abortion area mom consider abortion meet baby ultrasound hear heartbeat double babys chance life day preborn rescue baby life truly miraculous thing time finish ad baby take tragedy ultrasound cost buck difference life death mom see baby ultrasound change mind join fight sponsor ultrasound gift text deductible preborn dot com slash ben donate today s preborn dot com slash ben dial pound keyword baby s pound baby check right preborn dot com slash ben donate today dial pound keyword baby moment familiar difficult hiring unfortunately lot business luck try find excellent talent fortunately business owner hire manager not need luck find talent team need ziprecruiter right try freeziprecruitercom slash dailywire ziprecruiter userfriendly technology guide find talent post job ziprecruiter intuitive match technology present list qualified candidate ve review list qualified candidate swiftly invite choice apply streamlined process encourage apply soon allow fill role fast not curious ziprecruiter help right try ziprecruiter free ziprecruitercom dailywire employer post ziprecruiter quality candidate day exclusive web address try ziprecruiter free s ziprecruitercom dailywire ziprecruiter smart way hire ve dailywire legitimately year check right ziprecruitercom dailywire joe biden yesterday ask think s race say m win president s message democrats concerned poll number poll number poll guy not report m win row guy look new york times great paper mean scary moment lurk background bad nightmare stare ill point point true poll take s lose one s win s inside margin error morning consult tipp virtually poll lose s true reason lose long yesterday press conference weird thing say stage direction loud ve play stage direction stage direction like exit stage leave okay joe biden read like hell sort read stage direction loud time well question know okay exit stage leave joe biden love question well start question ill trouble s message president message voter thank come thank thank breathe like breath death rattle goodness know like pick microphone well question people go to need like darth vader suit like bad guy good okay say yesterday staff drop note drop dead time unfortunate language barely sentient president m go to turn lale director national economic council m suppose leave meeting meeting business roundtable telephone m go to hang listen little bit permission d like stay staff tell tell drop dead hour occur hell pass note world phone rotary moment time m go to stick little bit yeah s okay pudding okay thing actually campaign yesterday s ridiculously cile thing actually campaign m kid shrink inflation believe go able pawn poor economic record inflation greed corporation put potato chip bag charge money fault inflation fault president inflation begin enter office friend yesterday not talk shrink ifl s go to hell campaign slogan m joe biden m fight shrink inflation swear sound like costanza talk shrinkage s cite cookie monster open question particular clip joe biden believe cookie monster real thing like cookie monster sentient walk earth eat cookie joe biden quote cookie monster folk fact small snack company will not think will not notice charge size bag potato chip hell lot few chip ill tell ill tell notice cookie monster point cookie cookie get small pay price stun find s actually happen stunned talk cookie day say mr president cheese cookie say oh like cookie say mr cookie monster good friend little red monster show want friend ah s everything go ready minute tomorrow night woo s go to strong stuff s send s bad s bad s bad president thing obvious obvious place s bad president thing right entire conflagration israel hamas moment eternal truth vegetable horrify taste bad brussels sprout instance taste bad stick literally suppose like tiny cabbage bad not worry eat balance nature fruit veggie balance nature fruit veggie convenient way ensure daily intake fruit veggie balance nature use advanced cold vacuum process encapsulate fruit veggie food supplement sacrifice natural antioxidant capsule completely void additive filler extract synthetic pesticide add sugar thing imbalance nature fruit veggie capsule know like fruit veggie need nutrient function good day balance nature help kosher mean use protein smoothie rock bod go balance naturecom use promo coach shapiro set fruit veggie plus additional buck additional set buy s balance naturecom promo coach shapiro balance naturecom promo coach shapiro moment nba playoff heat s shortage high stake basketball moment time year excitement prize pick america number fantasy sport app turn hoop knowledge cash win time money prize pick little correct pick turn buck thousand buck wanna play alongside prize pick favorite player like meek mill sugar sean omalley find community play promos tab app view entry big name prize pick community week prize pick offer injury insurance entry stay play player get injure basketball game ve get player exit game half return second player projection will not count rest entry stay live producer jake s love prize pick like easy use interface s get nba playoff action download prize pick app today use code ben deposit match buck pick pick easy use code ben prize pick app deposit match lot action time year use code ben prize pick app deposit match buck united states continue provide material support israel rhetorically ve undercut israel possible turn battle genocidal tarot group ve declare israel negotiate genocidal tarot group currently hold american citizen hostage way hostage not know alive hamas say not know alive amazing get to hamas incredible accounting body idea hostage alive bomb hit second later people kill child poet like sure know like half month take idea people alive weird count skill wildly degrade minute talk people keep captivity rape routinely presumably biden administration take rhetorical hamas proclaim moral equivalence here thing proclaim moral equivalence murderer person person try murder murderer victim side murderer hey hold oj nicole sure sure nicole floor bleeding sure nicole right selfdefense s alive let real mistake side take oj point biden administration rhetorically bad thing grant iota rhetorical sympathy terrorist go push go realize leverage s hamas realize number lie administration fall tell behalf hamas insane point example ve hear israel ship aid s true israel allow hundred aid truck single day s distribute aid wanna know s distribute aid gaza strip hamas hijack truck tape hamas ride aid truck yesterday truck member hamas truck civilian stand like s damned food answer hamas steal biden administration like send say israelis mean hamas steal aid kill people try aid totally insane israel get blame rhetorically speak israel need say biden administration joe biden yesterday say need ceasefire ramadan okay m sorry bullshit stop ridiculous ridiculous nonsense ramadan holy holiday terrorist willing literally violate single human being religious scruple ramadan everybody real easy cause people fast sunrise sunset get to real easy turn terrorist love ramadan kamas land get to easy obviously people respect religious gruel dictate murder pretty everybody religious muslim make perfect sense obviously demonstrate enormous enormous credibility come respect religion like example palestinian arabs charge holy site jews not fact jews try worship holy site estate israel exist example western wall giant riot start like hundred jews murder obviously listen thing radical muslim world know respect religion literally blow church build mosque directly temple mount dome rock directly jewish holy holy temple hindu site india blow hindu site mosque talk colonialist religion folk win okay colonialist religion time islam okay moderate muslim kamas land moderate muslim know moderate muslim know people not actually believe colonial legacy sharia law pretend ramadan decide factor israel able try hostage kill terrorist totally insane demonstrate radical muslim sympathy religion major surprise war launch israel launch respectively yom yom kippur holy day jewish calendar rah october rah happy day jewish calendar happen shabbat like double holiday jews perfect time hama respect religion palestinian civilian involve respect religion jews kill joe biden like ramadan come get to careful honestly stupid stupid win heart mind try ceasefire behalf terrorist group ramadan s s whisper joe ear believe joe believe adult brain somebody ramadan s get to ceasefire ramadan circumstance continue ramadan israel jerusalem dangerous look try hard ceasefire oh mean oh mean know act act rioting temple mount like s single year ll blame jews act rioting muslim temple mount ve way muslim world suggest m quote unquote trespassing invade temple mount mean walk s mean literally bar pray temple mount islamic wok long jew christian way muslim play soccer eat mcdonald literally happen temple mount s literally school corner temple mount s holy site muslim kid play soccer flying kite yeah case stupid exactly mean biden administration pursue ceasefire hamas reject ceasefire hamas literally reject ceasefire offer ceasefire offer offer week ceasefire return lease remain female hostage kamas reject outright accord new york times president biden say tuesday talk possible week ceasefire gaza hand kamas right speak kamas leader lebanon appear reject propose deal back insist israeli hostage release ac ceasefire place israeli force withdraw hamas know control biden want ceasefire want israel destroy hama line biden shift line mirror hama accord news hold kamas accept ceasefire hostage release proposal arab negotiator float potential short pause hostility large deal get iron mean mean call ceasefire hostage release call lose think israelis go to insane stupidity ridiculously insane medium political class like oh joe biden not bibe joe biden bibe benny goz visit washington dc get exact treatment kamala harris joe biden great lie foreign policy foreign policy construct base individual like dislike leader country base individual interest country not matter like dislike vladimir putin matter interest actually coincidence thing hold truth israeli leader palestinian leader ought absolutely clear gimlet eye question american national interest national interest country bizarre notion america sort disagreement bibi netanyahu personally sort concession kamas absolute stupidity way iran activate proxy know ve get fish line fish biden administration hezbollah heat know joe biden want thing ceasefire region ratchet military action attempt gain concession united states israelis yesterday example hezbollah launch rocket north israel selfrespecte country receive rocket border wamp people border imagine mexican government drug cartel government hezbollah basically run government lebanon decide go launch rocket san diego mexico city exist morning d marine sip tea capitol video look like northern border israel israelis abandon home north hezbollah threat s widespread expectation israel month large scale war north hezbollah rocket israel here look like terrorist group fire rocket sovereign country hezbollah launch rocket border israel thank iron dome iron dome shoot sky knock rocket iron dome fall kill people biden administration course seek ceasefire ceasefire ceasefire ceasefire hawk radical base go central contention democratic party move far left not cease straight anymore moment russia headline week action vladimir putin obviously comprehend vladimir putin motivation examine historical context shape behavior new season see empire terror host bill whittle unmask communism take close look history soviet union use deep cut photograph film journal entry primary source tale terror offer compelling presentation horror plague soviet union viciousness leader modern day russia century making series well understanding history communism threaten homeland watch episode streaming right dailywire plus dailywire plus member dailywire dot com slash subscribe member today check bill whittles work tremendous absolutely amazing historical research entertaining interesting facet go to learn check right dailywire plus new episode fact s come saturday stay tune youtube channel consume content daily wire app russia thing not know current status country challenge interest coincide sure check saturday drop brilliant not ignore ireland bright energy offer saving euro dual fuel switch visit electric ireland ie start save electric ireland make world bright eab euro dual fuel discount include online billing direct debit saving compare hour standard variable tariff ea month contract tnc apply electric island ie okay speak democratic party capture radical radical base democratic party push joe biden left obvious couple issue immigration democratic party easily cut deal republicans enact executive order order shut border hoke radical base clearly regard israel hamas morally obvious conflict modern history democratic state literally attack bad terror attack west genocidal terror group hold hostage right suddenly left like not know pretty pretty convolute pretty know not know moron like nick kristoff new york times moral moral dnce suggest quote question regularly acknowledge israel face difficult challenge hard target kamas risk civilian answer kill people vancouver include child starve entire population question imagine terrorist rocket fire vancouver portland oregon okay not answer question question not israelis sit ill pontificate like giant jackass left left right left decide basically evil mean earn free ticket left wing land great evil suggest victimize victim victim victimizer narrative oppressor oppress narrative bad consider oppress remember link left wing idea act badly childhood drama people mean people naturally good naturally kind naturally wonderful somebody blow themself cafe bunch kid s probably rough childhood victim victimizer victim bad act evil victimize outside force actual victim victimizer complete reversible victim victimizer obvious example judith butler judith butler damaging academic year famously founder queer theory s person famous suggest gender social construct s linkage whatsoever biology behavior social construct say body social construct define power say gender verb construct performance performative gender quote struggle rework norm body experience life consider woman say thank gender nonbinary nonsense help create s s crazy lady crazy lady respect academic circle write absolute tid gobbledygook make sense sentient prefrontal cortex thisis moron come gender theory bizarre notion gender entirely construct rest garbage link belief terrorist fact terrorist talk situation israel hamas day decide lay theory theory october involve mass rape woman murder man woman slaughter child beheading foreigner jews kidnapping woman repeat rape woman act resistance cause understand watch right coalition pseudo oppress decide system unsuccessful victim want link oppressor oppress narrative everybody failure oppress way everybody evil oppress way link friend fone notion resistance come form s end judith butler evil human being year yesterday justify hama different view hamas political party different view oh arm armed resistance think armed resistance honest historically correct uprising october act armed resistance terrorist attack antisemitic attack attack israelis know like attack go public get trouble say oh not like anguish anguish terrible oh angry feel bad foolish decide violence scene violence israeli people violence palestinians happen decade uprising come come state subjugation violent state apparatus oh oppose hamas violent state apparatus iran violent state apparatus democratic state israel arab citizenry s violent state apparatus accord absolutely ridiculous piece filth mean s truly bad people planet truly awful human way wor say s associate jewish voice peace good thing jewish voice peace actual word title true jewish peace voice peace jewish voice true suggest narrative dangerous narrative narrative threaten entire west people care s go far away understand care s go go far away go shore judith butler famous american academic work teach united states gender theory class child entire philosophy mainline educational system regard gender regard value postmodernist notion morality effectively construct s victim victimizer victimizer successful person victim failure s system bad s end gender queer nonconforme judith butler kamas gladly chop head moment shed place gaza strip probably not chop head know s wonderful useful idiot know prop course s useful idea wander gaza strip look like jewish lesbian nonconformist leave winger chop head right away okay understand alliance exist alliance exist danger west danger israel danger west million people believe soft form s say left pat head left imbibe difference old school democratic liberal far leave bernie sander wing take democratic party piece broad cloth rewrite morality typically speak judeochristian morality mean give situation determine somebody victim victimizer fact victim victimizer wrong violate morality violate moral scruple rule identity victim victimizer accord left good way tell somebodys victim victimizer stand behalf system success system mean purveyor system system bad fundamental premise leftwe coalitional thought system bad tear kamas end queer palestine kill give available opportunity coalition matter uber alice thing matter system tear talk issue utterly disconnected like transing kid support hamas wonder end answer want tear judeochristian moral value symptom crop moral ambivalence israel hamas symptom broad malady treat symptom isolation underlie malady mean malady go bad go metastasize symptom cancer treat symptom pay attention cancer go to die cancer s west right bizarre left wing support hamas amazing indicator deeply root cancer radical left thought go go deep speak cancer left wing think s video s make round yesterday demonstrate far left wing thought pervert people destroy life mother talk child tran statistically impossible literally statistically impossible mean chance child suffer gender dysphoria thousand chance child suffer gender dysphoria talk hundred million billion magically mother come tran kid munchhausen syndrome proxy teach kid bunch absolute garbage go wreck life condemn future depression anxiety self hatred selfloathe free natural free let real act resistance bring kid way act resistance gender system cause system bad system tear here video mommy absolutely destroy life child picture little boy s dress girl twin daughter come tell not feel gender give truly boy son tell transgend s girl child tell not feel like boy girl kid gender nonconforme parenting hug hug kid destroy life indoctrinate cult trust day family change beautiful way wait kid s hug kid s s absolutely destroy child abuse child endangerment kid immediately seize bcd cp trust day family change mommy know s film put tiktok s know parent film kid talk wonderful parent tolerant diverse parent people say crazy listen kid not know crazy wreck child destroy child year today child thrive happy free true self feeling not happy go to find mommy mommy s wreck life reason cause care kid reason fight system political statement kid rocket fire political system alright guy rest continue right join line bill whitley brand new series dailywire plus member member use coach shapiro check month free annual plan click link description join

This bill temporarily modifies the requirements for the sequestration process (i.e., automatic spending reductions) that is used to enforce the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Statutory PAYGO Act), which generally prohibits revenue or direct spending legislation from increasing the deficit. With respect to the first sequestration order issued under the Statutory PAYGO Act after the enactment of this bill, the bill modifies the requirements to (1) require additional reductions to certain programs that were funded in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, including programs that are unrelated to the direct health care treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in the United States; and (2) exempt Medicare from the process.

right

bill temporarily modify requirement sequestration process ie automatic spending reduction enforce statutory payasyougo act statutory paygo act generally prohibit revenue direct spending legislation increase deficit respect sequestration order issue statutory paygo act enactment bill bill modify requirement require additional reduction certain program fund american rescue plan act include program unrelated direct health care treatment prevention united states exempt medicare process

This bill requires (1) Senior Executive Service and Schedule C federal employees to annually disclose any federal student loan debt, and (2) the Office of Government Ethics to annually report the total amount owed by such employees and any employees who failed to comply with the bill's requirements.

right

bill require senior executive service schedule c federal employee annually disclose federal student loan debt office government ethic annually report total owe employee employee fail comply bill requirement

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill establishes the service of Air America employees as qualifying service for purposes of the Civil Service Retirement System. (Air America was a government-owned airline that provided air transport for certain covert operations in Southeast Asia, including Laos and Vietnam, between 1950 and 1976.) The bill applies to U.S. citizens who were employees of Air America or another affiliated company, as specified, between January 1, 1950 and December 31, 1976. Benefit applications must be filed within two years of the date of enactment of this bill.

right

bill establish service air america employees qualify service purpose civil service retirement system air america governmentowned airline provide air transport certain covert operation southeast asia include laos vietnam bill apply citizen employee air america affiliated company specify january december benefit application file year date enactment bill

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to work with the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Department of Defense to develop a strategy for a unified posture on counter-unmanned aircraft systems capabilities and protections at certain facilities at or near a U.S. international border (generally, facilities or assets considered high-risk or a potential target and that are related to certain DHS or DOJ missions).

right

bill require department homeland security dhs work department justice doj federal aviation administration department defense develop strategy unified posture counterunmanne aircraft system capability protection certain facility near international border generally facility asset consider highrisk potential target relate certain dhs doj mission

This bill modifies the reporting requirements for electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers (providers) that report information to the CyberTipline of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children on crimes involving the sexual exploitation of children. Specifically, the bill increases the amount of time—from 90 days to 180 days—that a provider must preserve the contents of a report. Additionally, the bill permits a provider to voluntarily retain the contents for longer than 180 days to reduce the proliferation of or to prevent the online sexual exploitation of children.

right

bill modify reporting requirement electronic communication service provider remote computing service provider provider report information cybertipline national center miss exploit child crime involve sexual exploitation child specifically bill increase time day day provider preserve content report additionally bill permit provider voluntarily retain content long day reduce proliferation prevent online sexual exploitation child

This bill prohibits the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program from engaging in certain activities related to biological threats. (The program works with foreign countries to address the risks from weapons of mass destruction, including by securing such weapons and detecting the spread of especially dangerous pathogens.) Specifically, the program may not engage in (1) cooperative biological engagement; or (2) activities for facilitating the detection and reporting of diseases that could be used as an early warning detection mechanism for outbreaks, regardless of whether such diseases are caused by biological weapons.

right

bill prohibit department defense cooperative threat reduction program engage certain activity relate biological threat program work foreign country address risk weapon mass destruction include secure weapon detect spread especially dangerous pathogen specifically program engage cooperative biological engagement activity facilitate detection reporting disease early warning detection mechanism outbreak regardless disease cause biological weapon

Speeches, etc. Q1. Mr. Lawson asked the Prime Minister if he intends to make a ministerial broadcast on Her Majesty's Government's economic policy. The Prime Minister (Mr. James Callaghan) I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave to the hon. Member for Norfolk, South (Mr. MacGregor) on 27th July. Mr. Lawson Since this is clearly an appropriate time, will the Prime Minister explain, in the light of the profound understanding of economics that he displayed during his period as Chancellor, [column 868]precisely how it is that the £1,000 million increase in employers' national insurance contributions releases resources for manufacturing industry? The Prime Minister I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman's magnanimous tribute, even though it is belated by about 10 years. I accept it in the spirit in which he made it. The Chancellor of the Exchequer gave an explanation of the increases in national insurance contributions and I have nothing to add to it. Mr. Watkinson Does the Prime Minister agree that profits are rising strongly this year and the indications are that they will rise more strongly next year, and that, therefore, now is the time to invest? An integral part of our industrial strategy involves planning agreements. When shall we see the fruits of that? The Prime Minister The Price Code gives substantial advantages to industry, and this is certainly an opportunity that managers and employers should grasp. It is an opportunity given to them by the stability they now enjoy as a result of the social contract agreed yesterday. There is a growing acceptance of the idea of planning agreements, especially among larger companies, and the Government intend to speed up those agreements as far as they can. Mr. Fairbairn Who and how many are the parties to this so-called contract, and what proportion of the electorate do they represent? The Prime Minister Without going into arithmetical proportions, over the last three years the social contract has enabled us to substantially reduce the incidence of strikes. In consequence, I no longer get the same complaints about the interruption of flow of materials into and out of factories, and that also helps exports. In all those and many other circumstances, the contract between the Government, the Labour Party and the trade unions has been of great value to the country, and it might be a little better if the Opposition sometimes acknowledged that. Mr. Robinson Will the Prime Minister make it clear to the CBI that British industry has a unique contribution to make because of the advantages of [column 869]having the lowest level of industrial disputes for nearly 10 years and an undervalued exchange rate, which should give it enormous investment incentives? Does he agree that there is evidence of a strong growth in world markets and that it is high time British industry began to invest more, to get production up and unemployment down? The Prime Minister It was indicative of the Opposition's attitude that they jeered through that recital. It is in the national interest that there should now be substantial new investment in a particularly favourable combination of circumstances. There has never been a better opportunity for export-led growth than we have at present—[Interruption.] Why do Opposition Members want to jeer at their country every day? I do not understand it. We have never disguised the difficulties that lie ahead. I hope that hon. Gentleman will assist in getting across the combination of circumstances that now exists, which will give us an opportunity, in the next two or three years, to prepare for the 1980s—or are the Opposition frightened that we shall succeed? Mrs. Thatcher In an earlier reply James Callaghanthe Prime Minister stressed how much importance he attaches to securing the agreement of the TUC. Doubtless that applies to the proposals for public expenditure cuts. Does he attach equal importance to securing a clear decision, on a Government motion, on his public expenditure cuts, before the House rises? The Prime Minister An announcement will shortly be made about the business for next week—[Hon. Members: “When?” ] In due course. Sir G. Howe You are wriggling. The Prime Minister I would not wriggle in front of the right hon. and learned Member for Surrey, East (Sir G. Howe). He is the last one in front of whom I would wriggle. We have announced our policy, and if the Leader of the Opposition wishes to challenge it, she is entitled to do so. Mrs. Thatcher I was challenging the Prime Minister to say whether he would dare to table a Government motion on public expenditure cuts and put it to the House. I take it from his reply that the answer is “No” . The Prime Minister An announcement will be made about this matter. If anybody wishes to challenge the policy, he will be free to do so. The Opposition have the time to challenge that policy—let us see what they do with it. I understood from some remarks by the Opposition spokesman that there was some modified support for our policy. If the Opposition are satisfied with that policy, why should we table a motion? Q2. Mr. Dalyell asked the Prime Minister if he will now disband the CPRS. The Prime Minister No, Sir. Mr. Dalyell May we be sure that the CPRS has not become something of a fifth wheel on the coach of Government? The Prime Minister No, Sir, I think it has not. I find the papers and submissions prepared by the CPRS extremely valuable as a commentary on the work of Departments. I think that its existence is certainly justified. Mr. Hugh Fraser Will the Prime Minister consider the whole question of scientific advice available to the Government, since this aspect of policy appears to have been put into cold storage, if not actually destroyed? Would it not be better to spend the money involved in the CPRS on ensuring that the Government are given much better central scientific advice? The Prime Minister Yes, Sir. The organisation of scientific advice and its application to the work of Departments have concerned me. We reached the conclusion that it was a matter of organisation, but I do not know that there is a perfect answer. It would be better to appoint a chief scientist in each Department, geared into the machine of the Department, rather than to have one central chief scientist who would be responsible for operating over the whole area of activity. It is also intended—although agreement has not yet been reached—to recruit a scientist to the CPRS itself. Mr. Christopher Price Is the Prime Minister aware that if there are to be cuts in public expenditure, many Labour Members will expect them to come at [column 871]the top as well as at the bottom? It is felt that there are elements of the work of the CPRS, particularly in its rôle in reviewing the area of foreign affairs, in which one could save public expenditure by getting rid of those elements completely. The Prime Minister That is a very prejudiced point of view. There are only 17 members of the CPRS. We shall not save much of the £1,000 million on them. In regard to their work on the Foreign Office review, I thought, when I examined the situation in another capacity, that they could make a valuable contribution. It has become fashionable to attack particular organs of government, but I have seen nothing of the work of the CPRS that leads me to believe that it has fallen away in quality. As one who has had the opportunity of seeing that body at work, I believe that it makes a valuable contribution. Mr. David Steel Since the nuclear industry has not developed long-term methods for dealing with nuclear waste, and since there are wide safety and security implications in the wider use of uranium and plutonium, will the Prime Minister say whether the CPRS is involved in decision-making about the future nuclear power station programme of the Government, or is this being left to the Department of Energy? Are we to have more public debate on this matter? The Prime Minister It is open to the CPRS to submit any paper it wishes on this nuclear aspect or on any other. Without notice, I cannot say whether it has already done so. Q3. Mr. Hooley asked the Prime Minister if he is satisfied with the co-ordination between the Secretary of State for Social Services, the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Secretary of State for Prices and Consumer Protection in matters concerning national food policy. The Prime Minister Yes, Sir. Mr. Hooley Is my right hon. Friend aware that although the Secretary of State for Prices and Consumer Protection is busy subsidising certain foods, such as sugar and butter, there is a great deal of scientific evidence that these may [column 872]be positively dangerous foods if taken in excessive quantities? Will he try to bring into closer consultation those concerned with agricultural prices and medical services in formulating future food policy? The Prime Minister I hope that there is already a great deal of medical consultation. On the whole, I believe that people will go on eating what they like without paying over-much attention to the medical consequences. We must of course have certain limitations. I believe that there is already cross-fertilisation between the two Departments to make sure that medical consequences are taken into account. Sir David Renton Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the cost of food distribution will be increased if the Dock Work Regulation Bill is passed and implemented? Will he seriously consider dropping the Bill, since the measure is not popular on either side of the House, in the country, or among the trade unions? The Prime Minister No, Sir. Mr. Ioan Evans Does my right hon. Friend realise that something should be done between the Departments about the common agricultural policy? Although there is a subsidy on butter and, indeed, a butter mountain, the Common Market countries are now envisaging a levy on margarine. Consequently, the consumer feels that the system is not working in his best interests. Will the Prime Minister take steps to end the CAP as early as possible? The Prime Minister From the very beginning the Government, and our predecessors, have had considerable views about the CAP and its impact on consumers. I have asked—and have informed the other Heads of Government on this matter—for a full review of the CAP and its impact and about the requirements that should be made before the next price review takes place in the spring. Clearly it does not work out satisfactorily for us, and one or two proposals from the Commission on these matters seem to be plain daft. Mr. Watt Will the Prime Minister tell the House whether he is satisfied with the co-ordination between the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Foreign Office, because between them they [column 873]have made a dreadful mess of the fishing policy—or does such a policy exist at all? The Prime Minister I know that the hon. Member for Banff (Mr. Watt) continues to paddle his own canoe—[An Hon. Member: “Or his trawler.” ] No, he would not paddle a trawler; he would sail it. I am sure that the hon. Gentleman must be satisfied with the progress being made by my right hon. Friend on fishing policy, in ensuring proper safeguards for our fishermen in future. Mrs. Dunwoody I welcome the comments by my right hon. Friend about the need for a review of the CAP, but will he accept that when people have not enough money to buy butter, it is nonsense to increase the price of margarine to such an extent that it is impossible for them to buy that commodity either? Do not some of his friends in Brussels realise that if they lowered the price of dairy produce they might be astonished to see how much of that produce would be bought in the shops? The Prime Minister I do not think I can add to my previous rather explosive comment. As I said, it is one of the things that I regard as rather daft. Mr. Pardoe Will the Prime Minister say whether he regards the food gap as being as important as the energy gap? May we see some evidence from the Government that they wish to close the food gap? The Prime Minister I have, certainly since the Yom Kippur war, been very clear about the serious impact of the energy gap. The food gap is serious, but I have a feeling that there is a great deal of undeveloped potential for producing food. In some cases it is a matter of distribution. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr lawson ask prime minister intend ministerial broadcast majestys government economic policy prime minister mr james callaghan refer hon member reply give hon member norfolk south mr macgregor july mr lawson clearly appropriate time prime minister explain light profound understanding economic display period chancellor column million increase employer national insurance contribution release resource manufacture industry prime minister grateful hon gentleman magnanimous tribute belate year accept spirit chancellor exchequer give explanation increase national insurance contribution add mr watkinson prime minister agree profit rise strongly year indication rise strongly year time invest integral industrial strategy involve planning agreement shall fruit prime minister price code give substantial advantage industry certainly opportunity manager employer grasp opportunity give stability enjoy result social contract agree yesterday grow acceptance idea plan agreement especially large company government intend speed agreement far mr fairbairn party socalled contract proportion electorate represent prime minister go arithmetical proportion year social contract enable substantially reduce incidence strike consequence long complaint interruption flow material factory help export circumstance contract government labour party trade union great value country little well opposition acknowledge mr robinson prime minister clear cbi british industry unique contribution advantage column low level industrial dispute nearly year undervalued exchange rate enormous investment incentive agree evidence strong growth world market high time british industry begin invest production unemployment prime minister indicative opposition attitude jeer recital national interest substantial new investment particularly favourable combination circumstance well opportunity exportled growth present interruption opposition member want jeer country day understand disguise difficulty lie ahead hope hon gentleman assist get combination circumstance exist opportunity year prepare opposition frighten shall succeed mrs thatcher early reply james callaghanthe prime minister stress importance attach secure agreement tuc doubtless apply proposal public expenditure cut attach equal importance secure clear decision government motion public expenditure cut house rise prime minister announcement shortly business week hon member course sir g howe wriggle prime minister wriggle right hon learn member surrey east sir g howe wriggle announce policy leader opposition wish challenge entitle mrs thatcher challenge prime minister dare table government motion public expenditure cut house reply answer prime minister announcement matter anybody wish challenge policy free opposition time challenge policy let understand remark opposition spokesman modify support policy opposition satisfied policy table motion mr dalyell ask prime minister disband cprs prime minister sir mr dalyell sure cprs fifth wheel coach government prime minister sir think find paper submission prepare cprs extremely valuable commentary work department think existence certainly justify mr hugh fraser prime minister consider question scientific advice available government aspect policy appear cold storage actually destroy well spend money involve cprs ensure government give well central scientific advice prime minister yes sir organisation scientific advice application work department concern reach conclusion matter organisation know perfect answer well appoint chief scientist department gear machine department central chief scientist responsible operate area activity intend agreement reach recruit scientist cprs mr christopher price prime minister aware cut public expenditure labour member expect come column feel element work cprs particularly rôle review area foreign affair save public expenditure get rid element completely prime minister prejudiced point view member cprs shall save million regard work foreign office review think examine situation capacity valuable contribution fashionable attack particular organ government see work cprs lead believe fall away quality opportunity see body work believe make valuable contribution mr david steel nuclear industry develop longterm method deal nuclear waste wide safety security implication wide use uranium plutonium prime minister cprs involve decisionmake future nuclear power station programme government leave department energy public debate matter prime minister open cprs submit paper wish nuclear aspect notice mr hooley ask prime minister satisfied coordination secretary state social service minister agriculture fishery food secretary state price consumer protection matter concern national food policy prime minister yes sir mr hooley right hon friend aware secretary state price consumer protection busy subsidise certain food sugar butter great deal scientific evidence column positively dangerous food take excessive quantity try bring close consultation concern agricultural price medical service formulate future food policy prime minister hope great deal medical consultation believe people eat like pay overmuch attention medical consequence course certain limitation believe crossfertilisation department sure medical consequence take account sir david renton right hon gentleman aware cost food distribution increase dock work regulation bill pass implement seriously consider drop bill measure popular house country trade union prime minister sir mr ioan evans right hon friend realise department common agricultural policy subsidy butter butter mountain common market country envisage levy margarine consequently consumer feel system work good interest prime minister step end cap early possible prime minister beginning government predecessor considerable view cap impact consumer ask inform head government matter review cap impact requirement price review take place spring clearly work satisfactorily proposal commission matter plain daft mr watt prime minister tell house satisfied coordination ministry agriculture fishery food foreign office column dreadful mess fishing policy policy exist prime minister know hon member banff mr watt continue paddle canoe hon member trawler paddle trawler sail sure hon gentleman satisfied progress right hon friend fishing policy ensure proper safeguard fisherman future mrs dunwoody welcome comment right hon friend need review cap accept people money buy butter nonsense increase price margarine extent impossible buy commodity friend brussels realise lower price dairy produce astonish produce buy shop prime minister think add previous explosive comment say thing regard daft mr pardoe prime minister regard food gap important energy gap evidence government wish close food gap prime minister certainly yom kippur war clear impact energy gap food gap feeling great deal undeveloped potential produce food case matter distribution copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This act designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, Ohio, as the Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office.

right

act designate facility united states postal service locate penn avenue salem ohio howard arthur tibbs post office

Speeches, etc. In your industry, and particularly in this section, you have reason to know of the high price paid for two months good trading figures. A record period of squeeze at unprecedented interest rates. When the present Government were in Opposition, Harold Lever, who has just left the Treasury, used to speak several times a year in economic debates. I do not say that he made different speeches each time! His theme was usually the same—the iniquity of high interest rates! I cannot leave “the economy” without mentioning two other factors. First, the Selective Employment Tax. I was “No.2 Shadow” against the Treasury when that was introduced. I roundly condemned it then. Everything I have seen since has confirmed me in this view. In your particular sphere it has become a tax on safety. The overheads due to this and other taxes are now so high that people are economising on car maintenance and attempting to do themselves work that should never be done by an amateur. [end p1] In one direction Governments are tightening up on safety regulations—and in my view rightly—in another they are pursuing policies which may jeopardise safety. Second. There is the heavy weight of taxation on the motorist which has increased enormously in the last 5 years. Never in the history of peacetime taxation has so much more been raised in such a short time. This is due to the few. The Socialist few. Again, if I may refer to 10 years ago, 4s.6d. could buy a gallon-of petrol. Now it buys no petrol at all—only the tax on petrol! You are all familiar with the point, but may I make another one too. I wish that we in this country were prepared to praise personal success and to make it worthwhile taxwise. More and more people are quoting net take home pay as their salary or wage. And this is what matters, in all walks of life. It is not where a person comes from that counts, but where he can get to. At least let us keep those people here. Perhaps I can enter one other plea before this distinguished audience. Fewer top managers and executives are entering politics. This is a loss to the political system. The position could be remedied if some of you would retain on a part-time basis those who enter Parliament. It is important that their industrial careers should not be terminated by becoming an M.P. and also that they should be kept in touch with trading circumstances. The motor industry has been bedevilled by unofficial strikes, the majority of them unconstitutional and in breach of agreement. [end p2] It is fashionable to quote the number of days lost through strikes but even more important is the number of stoppages and their suddenness which can disrupt the work of many factories and ruin the carefully controlled production timetables. It must mean too that your Association has to stock a larger number of spares if customers are not to be dissatisfied. This week in Parliament we had yet another example of the damage such strikes do, both to trade and to the convenience of the travelling public. We had two private notice questions yesterday. One about the coal miners' strike, one about the London Transport strike, and we also had a statement about a printers' strike which stopped the House of Commons order paper and Hansard from being printed. As usual, the Government was sorry—very sorry—but not sorry enough to take the requisite legislative action. We shall provide for the enforcement of freely negotiated agreements through collective bargaining. We should have done this before but, to give us credit, it was at least in our 1966 Manifesto and will be in our next one. What valid objections can there be to a policy which insists that bargains should be kept? Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc industry particularly section reason know high price pay month good trading figure record period squeeze unprecedented interest rate present government opposition harold lever leave treasury speak time year economic debate different speech time theme usually iniquity high interest rate leave economy mention factor selective employment tax shadow treasury introduce roundly condemn see confirm view particular sphere tax safety overhead taxis high people economise car maintenance attempt work amateur end direction government tighten safety regulation view rightly pursue policy jeopardise safety second heavy weight taxation motorist increase enormously year history peacetime taxation raise short time socialist refer year ago buy gallonof petrol buy petrol tax petrol familiar point wish country prepared praise personal success worthwhile taxwise people quote net home pay salary wage matter walk life person come count let people enter plea distinguished audience few manager executive enter politic loss political system position remedied retain parttime basis enter parliament important industrial career terminate mp keep touch trading circumstance motor industry bedevil unofficial strike majority unconstitutional breach agreement end fashionable quote number day lose strike important number stoppage suddenness disrupt work factory ruin carefully control production timetable mean association stock large number spare customer dissatisfy week parliament example damage strike trade convenience travel public private notice question yesterday coal miner strike london transport strike statement printer strike stop house commons order paper hansard print usual government sorry sorry sorry requisite legislative action shall provide enforcement freely negotiate agreement collective bargaining credit manifesto valid objection policy insist bargain keep copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill requires departments, agencies, or instrumentalities that operate federal research facilities or exhibit animals to promulgate regulations that facilitate and encourage the adoption of certain animals that are suitable for retirement.

right

bill require department agency instrumentality operate federal research facility exhibit animal promulgate regulation facilitate encourage adoption certain animal suitable retirement

Ep. 1755 - They Want You Fat, Stupid, And Lazy Published: 6/27/2023 Our society promotes fatness, stupidity and laziness all subsidized by the government. Hunter Biden's attorney admits his incriminating texts about Joe are real and full audio of Donald Trump talking about his classified documents emerges. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro show. The Ben. Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN, your online Privacy today at ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben. Well, folks, the federal government and our media and our society at large have decided that it is very, very important that we promote fatness and stupidity and laziness. There is a fascinating piece out by Ryan Berg, who's a stu, who's a scholar on religion and marriage over at his CK or his blog graphs about religion.com, in which he examines the fact that the kind of key identifiers of success in the world generally exist among the religious population in the United States, and they're declining among everybody else. And, this is sort of a fascinating phenomenon to look at. There are a bunch of charts that he puts up to show this So, for example, he puts up a chart showing that as education increases religious practice or religious belief also increases to a certain extent, which is sort of the reverse of what we've been told. The reason that this is the case is because he's talking about not just people who identify as atheist or agnostic. He's talking about people who identify as none of the above So. when you look at people who are not religious in any way, or people who's just are disassociated from religion, what you find is the people with some high school education, 32% of them are, are believe in none, right? In in these polls, 28% of high school graduates are, are a none. 26% of people went to trade school, but by the time you get to a master's degree, only 20% of people who have a master's are nuns, right? The nuns are people who suggest, of course, that they have no belief in religion or they're just unassociated with religion entirely. Not just atheist and agnostics, but people who say none. So as Ryan Berg points out, the trend is unmistakable. Those who are most likely to ascend services weekly are those with a graduate degree, those least likely to to attend. Are those with a high school diploma or less? And one of the other things that that correlates with is income. So what you'll see is that the share of people who attend weekly by education and income level, the more educated you are, the more income you have, the more likely you are to attend church on a regular basis, which is precisely the reverse of what society tells you, what the media tells you. What the media tells you is that it's the most educated among us who never go to church, and it's the least educated among us who always go to church. And that actually is not true. When you identify that with marital status, what you find is that married people go to religious services weekly at a far higher rate than people of any other marital status. So what that means that the people who are at your local church are probably in your community, the best educated, the most likely to be married, and the most likely to be parents as well. Because what you find is that the share of people who attend weekly religious services based on marital and parental status, by far people who are married and parents attend religious services far more clearly. So here's the thing, take religion outta the mix for a second. The identifiers of success in American life, married kids, high income education, those are now correlating extremely highly with religious practice. This is the point that Ryan Berg is making, and he's right. He says The results are hard to ignore and should sound some major alarms for any person of faith concerned about the large state of American society. Increasingly, religion has become the enclave for those who have lived a proper life, college degree, middle class income, married with children. If you check all those boxes, the likelihood of you regularly attending church is about double the rate of folks who don't. So Ryan reads that as a critique of the church. The church needs to be more welcoming, and it needs to find ways to reach out to people who are not married, people who don't have middle class income, people who are not college educated. But there's a way to read this in reverse, and that is that the rules that the elite of our society, marital elite, the parental elite, the income elite, the educational elite, have applied to themselves are very different than the rules they've promulgated to the rest of society. And you see this very clearly in the social science data. Charles Murray wrote a phenomenal book called Coming Apart, probably a decade and a half ago, in which he examines differences among white communities because he's been ripped up and down for talking about racial disparities. So he decided to do a book talking about sociological differences within white communities. And he segregated out two separate white communities. One I believe he called Newtown, ones called Fishtown. Newtown was like the high income group. The high income group had people generally who were married, generally, people who had kids, generally people who are involved in social institutions and people who are low income. Were the opposite. Now, if you look at the media, or if you look at the way the government treats this, it's precisely the opposite. They pretend that the people who are most likely to be successful in our society are single female Berkeley graduates with no children who hate God and hate the church. Those are the people who are most likely to be su successful if you watch tv. But those in real life are not the people who are actually successful. In other words, the message that society is promulgating is precisely the opposite of reality. And that has real world consequences because it bleeds down to the people who are aspiring to be at the top of the hierarchy in American society. It's a point that that you can see throughout American history, there is always sort of a group of people that everyone aspired to be. If you go back to the 1930s, for example, I've used this example before. If you look at pictures from the Great Depression of people who are waiting in line at at food distribution centers, at charity services, there are people who are wearing suits. If you look at today's billionaires, they dress like Schwabs. The aspirational has now become an aspiration to kind of be the, the, the lowest common denominator as opposed to the aspiration is to be the highest. Well, here's the thing. Whenever people see people who are successful and everybody knows what success is, we can all pretend we don't know what success is. We know what success looks like. Successful marriage, successful raising of children, successful in your community, successful in terms of income, successful in terms of, we all know what that looks like. We as a society have decided that because we don't like the results of that, we're gonna pretend that the measuring stick doesn't exist. But the measuring stick does exist, and we all know about the measuring stick. And so innately, we look to the people who are successful by all those measures in our society. And those people used to be loud and proud about what it was that they did in their personal lives, what it was they believed, but now they've decided the measure of true virtue is to do precisely the opposite. The measure of true virtue is to say, sure, I live that way. Sure, you know, I don't send my kid to a public school. I send my kid to a private school. Sure, I'm married. Sure I got an education. Sure, I followed all the rules that a traditional religious society would actually have me follow. Sure. But, but you know what? Because I'm an elite, I'm going to promulgate a new morality that includes you. Now, the the dirty secret about this is that what that really is is it's a form of ugly paternalism in which people at the top are saying that people at the bottom are incapable of rising. And that's not true. It's not true. The same things that God, people at the top to the top are the things that can take anyone to the top. But we have a society that sounds dedicated to the opposite proposition, that there is some sort of injustice in the measuring stick itself. And thus, we are no longer even going to shoot for the things that we all know to be good and true. And here's the thing, once you remove the measuring stick, what you end up with is chaos. You don't end up with equality. You end up with just turmoil and chaos and unsuccess because you are subsidizing lack of success by removing the measuring stick for success. And all these things, these rules are clear. Go to church, get married, have kids, Get a job, finish your education. Right? These rules are all very clear. We've known about, there's nothing new here. We've known about these rules for at least a couple of hundred years. There's nothing new in terms of a mobile American society from unsuccess to success. But we have decided at the elite levels of American government and American media to obliterate all of those rules and pretend that we have done somebody some good. And it's precisely the opposite. We'll get to more on this in just one second. First, it takes a special kind of company to wanna partner with this should. There are a lot of companies afraid to partner with shows like this one that give you the truth, the unvarnished fact. Well, PureTalk is not one of those companies. I'm proud to stand behind companies that actually are proud to stand behind the show, which is why I'm proud to stand behind PureTalk. They make it possible for me to get up here and bring you the show every day. PureTalk shares my values. They share the values of Matt Walsh, Brad Cooper, Candace Owens, and the rest of The Daily Wire hosts, which is why they're the official wireless partner of DailyWire. That's not the only reason we check the coverage. It is indeed Premium PureTalk is the most dependable 5G network in the United States, which is why I use it myself. Mix and match your plans to fit every person in your family. Choose from talk, text and 5G data for just 20 bucks a month, all the way up to unlimited data with mobile hotspot for 55 bucks a month. Remember, you vote with how you spend your money. So stop supporting woke wireless companies that don't support you. And switch on over to PureTalk today. Headed over to PureTalk dot com slash Shapiro. Save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage. That's PureTalk dot com slash Shapiro. PureTalk is wireless for Americans. Buy Americans don't spend your money on a bunch of cell phone coverage. Companies that really don't like you very much. Instead, give your money to PureTalk. You'll get the best coverage available, and you'll also be giving it to a company that actually backs a lot of the principles you believe in. PureTalk dot com slash Shapiro. Save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage. All, right? So the precise opposite of the things that bring success are the things that our society promotes. So to take a stupid example, our culture promotes people like Cardi B, okay? Cardi B, I've ripped on her before because I think that she's a perfect example of virtually everything wrong with our society. She is a rapper who used to be a stripper who bragged on tape about drugging and robbing men. And she also happens to be a person who is deemed by our society as the height of sex appeal that sexual satisfaction is supposed to be attained by acting like Cardi B or by imitating Cardi B. But the reality is that if Cardi B lives Cardi B's values, she ends up very unhappy. So Cardi B is married to a person named Offset. These were both of their given names. They both came outta their mother's and Cardi B's mom said, I shall call her Cardi B. And Offset's mother said, I shall call him offset. don don't know why, why not onset, but offset shall be his name. And, and then these two lovebirds married one another and they've had a rather fraught relationship. And this is the model, by the way, for literally millions of people in the United States, right? The thing that we used to model in the United States was, you know, a solid marriage that lasted for an entire lifetime in which you were dedicated to the uprising of your children. But Cardi B's marriage is now splashed across page six. So the latest claim within the beautiful marriage that Cardi B has presented, you know, and again, she's the height of sex appeal. She can't keep her husband dining in, but she's the height of sex appeal. She, she took two Twitter spaces Monday to address her husband Offsets claim that she effed another man. So apparently he put up a, an Instagram post, which is really just a delight by the way. They have two kids, which this is all gonna play amazing for the kids. She put up an in, he put up an Instagram post that says, my wife effed a n-word on me, gang, y'all N-word know how I come. And then he apparently took that down. But she responded to that. She said, first of all, let me say you can't accuse me of all the things you know you are guilty of. Sing it with me, y'all. And I see that it is easy for you to blame everything on me. Yes, honey, listen, she went on speaking directly to her listeners. Don't pay attention to that country, man, y'all. So here is Cardi B talking in the most eloquent terms about the state of her marriage. Don't pay attention to that country, man. Y'all don't pay attention to the country, man, that space is the other day that is spiraling and thinking, come on, now, I'm Cardi B. Now I think sometimes I'm Cardi B. so I was giving this to anybody. It will be out. I'm not just, anybody can't, no regular Schmegular. Cause they gonna tell the world, I don't even know how to translate that. In any case, this is the, this is what is presented by the upper echelons of our culture as high culture. Hey, we have to stop pretending that this is quote unquote low culture in the United States, because it's not, Hey, this sort of stuff is promoted by every major media outlet in the United States. It is promoted by every single major streaming service in the United States. It is promoted as the height of American culture. You are literally not supposed to say things like this stuff is ugly and bad and her music sucks. You're not allowed to say that sort of stuff without people going crazy on you. That the message is promulgated by people like Cardi B, or for that matter, Nicki Minaj, that this music is garbage and that it actually is promoting harmful messages. Instead, we are supposed to pretend that it's a form of female empowerment, and that people who follow its stick tots are likely to lead happier lives. Well, here's the problem. Cardi B is not leading a particularly happy marital life. The people who are leading happy marital lives are boring, fuddy, duddies, the people who are being promoted by our society as the models of marriage are people like Cardi B. Obviously, these are the things that that actually matter. It's a society that promotes stupidity. It's a society that promotes failed marriages or not getting married at all. I mean, I'll give it to Cardi B, at least she actually got married, okay? 70% of kids who are born in the black community today are born outta wedlock. 40% of kids in the white community, by the way, are born outta wedlock today. Now, as we'll discuss in a moment, none of that happens in a vacuum. You actually have to have a supporting governmental structure to, to promote all of that. But that's not the only thing that we're promoting. So we're promoting stupidity in relationships, and we're also promoting fatness, right? Because we have decided that we are going to obliterate all the measuring sticks. So here's the thing, again, we all know innately what success looks like. Success when it comes to marriage looks like you marry a person. You love that person, you stay with them until you die. You bring up kids with that person. Your relationship deepens over time. We all know what success looks like. It's not a big mystery. And yes, there is an ideal, and it's not insulting to people who don't meet the ideal to point out that the ideal exists, okay? But the same thing exists in the physical realm. We have decided that it's very, very mean and very, very bad to point out that people should, for example, be in shape. So there's an entire article by a person named Daniel Pennock about Lizzo. So again, we're focusing a lot on culture today. But here's the reality, okay? I mean, I've looked at the, at the, at the actual numbers in the United States, the number of people who form their values based on sheer politics in the United States is very low. Most people do not get their values inculcated to them by watching Fox News or by watching shows like this one. That's just not the way that it works. That's not what the numbers show. Most people get their values from either the local institutions in which they participate, which would normally be a church, or if they don't get it from the church, they're getting it from their surrounding milieu, which is usually social media. And yes, culture like ca, Cardi B has many, many, many more fans and followers than I will ever have because she's in the cultural realm. And the same thing is true of Lizzo. And so when you have an entire media infrastructure dedicated to the proposition that being extremely overweight is actually a sign of health and beauty, what do you think you're gonna get? You're incentivizing people to participate in that sort of behavior. You get to more of that momentarily first, if you run a small business, important to plan ahead. One of the best ways to do that, use Stamps dot com to mail and ship. We've been using Stamps dot com at DailyWire since 2017. Cause we don't like to waste our time or our money. Stamps dot com lets you print your own postage and shipping labels directly from your home or office. It's ready to go in just minutes so you can get back to running your business sooner. Stamps dot com offers rates you can't find anywhere else, like up to 84% off U S P S and ups. Plus, they automatically tell you your cheapest and fastest shipping options for 25 years, Stamps dot com has been indispensable for over a million businesses. Get access to the shipping services you need to run your business directly from your computer. No lines, no traffic, and no waiting. You can print postage wherever you do business. They've been send you a free scale. So you'll have everything you need to get started. Set up your business for success the way we did here at DailyWire by getting started with Stamps dot com today. Sign up with promo code SHAPIRO for a special offer that includes a four week trial for free, plus free postage and free digital scale. No long-term commitments, no contracts. Just go to Stamps dot com. Click that microphone at the top of the page. Enter code Shapiro to get started with Stamps dot com. Again, no reason to schlep all your packages down to the post office. Just do it all from your office and save time and save money. Stamps dot com. Go check them out right now. Okay, so there is a piece by Daniel Pin, an actress, writer, and comedian and star of the CBS sitcom ghosts and the creator of the one Woman Show. Body slash courage, a man. Will it be more stunning or will it be more brave? She has a piece over at the Washington Post titled What the Fat Shas Don't Get About Lizzo. And she says this, I understand why Lizzo took a beat from Twitter last month. The Emmy and Grammy winning multihyphenate artist, a classically trained flute playing rapper, singer, songwriter, actress in fashion. Mogul, was under attack again from internet trolls bombarding her with vicious messages about her weight. This time it got so bad she locked down her Twitter account writing. Y'all don't know how close I be to giving up on everyone and quitting. I, I don don't think that that was phrased in, in sort of the Shakespeare, the, the sort of old English. Y'all don't know how close I'd be, and don don't think that's what she's gonna anyway. Lizzo embraces inclusivity for everyone who has a body, everyone who has a body, as opposed to what the body list. I mean, who are the people who don't have a body? Why isn't she including them? She chanced the mantra of body positivity for all humans, not just the Fat ones. Her songs, including Good as Hell and Truth Hurts, have resonated with millions of people as anthems of empowerment and self-acceptance. Ah, self-acceptance and empowerment. Now here's, here's the reality. If you want a path to unsuccess, you should follow the pathway of empowerment and self-acceptance. Great way to fail in life. Empowerment, empowerment and self-acceptance means that you say that you are fine just as you are. No one, no one, saints should not be fine just as they are. The best people are people who are always striving to better themselves and to better the people around them. You should not feel empowered just being you. You shouldn't wake up in the morning feeling I am my best me. You are not your best. You there is a better you out there. And it's just a short distance away if you strive to change yourself. And it's again, when it comes to the treadmill of life, the treadmill is moving underneath you. If you are standing still, you are moving backwards. Either you're moving forwards or you're falling off the treadmill. But empowerment and self-acceptance, she lives freely and unapologetically. This sort of language makes me just wanna vomit freely and unapologetically as opposed to living in chains apologetically, whether twerking on the beach with her besties or modeling stylish crop tops from her shapewear brand Yi. But for years, Lizzo has faced backlash from people made uncomfortable by her unabashed acceptance of herself who'd rather see her concealed in oversized cardigans and potato sacks. I love that the alternatives here are potato sacks or thongs. I feel like there's a, a whole wide range, a magical range of clo clothing that fits between potato sack, potato sacks and, and thongs. What about her white people say she's promoting obesity? No, she isn't. There's a difference between endorsing obesity and practicing self-love. Well, not when she, her self-love involves promoting obesity. And th there's a fairly high crossover right there when most people think of obesity. Says this columnist, perhaps they think of skyrocketing BMIs or overweight people with chronic diseases or TV shows such as My 600 Pound Life or The Biggest Loser. Lizzo is not promoting any of that. She's just trying to exist while lifting others up. That's such a lie. By the way. She says the new standard of beauty is Lizzo. And so does the media. The media say, Lizzo is a beautiful, beautiful woman. She's beautiful at whatever her weight is. She's gotta be at least 150 pounds overweight. But it doesn't matter because again, this is the new standard. Now I have a question. Is it a recipe for your success to imitate Liz's actions? I I love that this, this lady tries to turn Lizzo into a, a sort of fitness guru guru. She got me back in the gym, says this columnist, seeing someone who looks like me, not ashamed or hating her body while exercising changed my entire perspective on fitness did did it though, as opposed to saying to yourself, may maybe we actually should not look like dad. And the way to not look like Dad is not just to go to the gym, it's to actually change our diets. Caloric deficit is a real thing, but again, our culture says that he even say such things is judgmental and very, very bad. And then you wonder why there's a backlash that comes in the form of some of the stupidest presidential campaigning in human history and people resonating to it. So R FK Jr is running for the presidency. He's gonna running about 20% in the primary polls versus Joe Biden. And the reason for that is because Joe Biden is a dottering elderly gentleman who looks like he's going to literally keel over and die in front of us. R F K Jr is a person who has expressed a number of wild theories and then also does a campaign where he takes off his shirt at the age of 70, pretty clearly on testosterone, replacement therapy for whatever it's worth, and, and looks pretty ripped and then does some pushups. And people were like fawning over this yesterday. And so we can laugh at it. And it is funny. Yeah, I mean, presidential, can you imagine Abraham Lincoln doing this as part of a presidential campaign? It'd be weird. It'd be real weird. Calvin Hoge just striped, buffing down. Very strange. But is there a reason that this is receiving some sort of a support? The answer is yes, because if the alternatives are 70 year old RFK Jr. And like a prison yard doing workout or Lizzo twerking while Fat, American society knows what better, better shape looks like, we can pretend we don't. Here was RFK Jr. Yesterday, okay, Let's go There he is seven year old dude doing pushups and, and honestly for a seven year old dude, this is, this is pretty impressive. Now it is his final set. So he, he said he had to tweet out that this was actually his last set cause he only got like eight pushups there. But it, it, it doesn't matter the this, this went viral. And the reason this went viral is number one, he's a seven year old dude in really good shape. And also because it is a backlash to society that says that it is actively good to ignore your weight, that it is actively good to ignore standards. Now, none of this could be promoted in any sort of scenario where the government didn't support it, cuz it would turn out that unsuccess would lead to, for example, lack of income, lack of success in these various bad decision making would have consequences. But we've constructed an entire utopian world in which bad activities, stupid decisions, actually end up being rewarded by the government because we're supposed to treat bad decisions with sympathy the same way that we would some sort of medical condition. We'll get to that momentarily first. We have a dog. Our dog's name is happy, and happy is a delight. Happy is a wonderful doggy. And our kids love him very much, which is why we want happy to live a long and healthy life. And that is why we give him rough Greens every morning. The dog food you've been giving your dog is dead food. He doesn't have that much nutritional value because you know, brown but rough Greens is green. It boosts happiest food back to life. It can do the same for your dog as well. You don't have to go out and buy new dog food, just sprinkle some rough Greens on their food every single day. It contains all the necessary vitamins and minerals your dog is not getting from their regular dog food. Happy loves his rough Greens. That is, that is why he is a joyous and happy dog. Rough Greens is the only supplement your dog will ask for by name. Rough Greens, you get it? It's a, it's a joke naturopathic. Dr. Dennis Black, he's the founder of Rough Greens, is so confident this product will improve your dog's health. He's offering my listeners a free Jumpstart trial bag. Go to free rough Greens dot com slash Ben. Let rough Greens bring your dog food back to life. That's free. R ru ffg Greens dot com slash Ben today. Or call 8 33 MY DOG 33. That's 8 33 MY DOG 33. Okay. All of this brings us to the collapse of the institutions that were supposed to prevent this sort of thing. And also to the building up of institutions that support the destruction of, of decent measures. So I have to say that I'm a non-Catholic, but I'm a member of Western civilization, which means that I have a pretty strong stake in the papacy that Pope happens to have dominion over a billion people. What he says matters an awful lot. And Pope Francis has been doing an absolutely horrendous job act actually of guarding the values that he's supposed to be guarding as the Pope. As a religious person, I would prefer to see Judeo-Christian religion flourish because I think that Judeo-Christian religion has been the single greatest force undergirding a system of morality that allows for the values that create success. Well, apparently, according to Fortune magazine, Pope Francis praised artists on Friday as true visionaries who can see, dream and invent as he welcomed 200 artists, filmmakers, and writers into the Sistine Chapel. To mark the 50th anniversary of the Vatican Museum's contemporary art collection, Francis acknowledged that some in the crowd there was Andres Serrano of Piss Christ fame, sometimes use confrontation, make people think, but he said their aim was to find harmony and beauty. You wanna reveal reality also in its contradictions and in those things that it is more comfortable and convenient to keep hidden. Francis said, like the biblical prophets, you confront things that at times are uncomfortable. You criticize today's false myths and new idols. It's empty talks, the ploys of consumerism, the schemes of power. So that is presumably why you invite a person who literally put a crucifix in a jar of urine and called it art. It's hard to think of anything more self-defeating than that. And many of our chief religious institutions have been doing sort of the same thing. They have been mirroring the desires of the elites instead of mirroring the values that allow elites to become elites in the first place and give access to that elite status to literally everyone they've d they're helping the elites destroy the ladder of success that got them where they are by following the, the values of modernity that are a complete fail. Meanwhile, as I say, all of that has to be subsidized by some government, and that is what Joe Biden is doing. So Joe Biden is now trotting out a new thing. It is called omics. What exactly is Biden genomics? Apparently Bidens is we just spray money at pretty much everything. Biden omics is all about ensuring that people who make bad decisions are subsidized. And that's true in the economics sphere. If you get into an industry that's failing, then presumably the Biden administration is going to hold you up. If you are a person who is on food Stamps and you don't wanna work, the Biden administration tries to hold you up, right? These are, these are all very important things for Bidens to push according to Politico. This is a pivot into a new campaign message censored on Bidens shorthand for the administration's economic strategy of quote, boosting the middle class through government investments rather than simulative tax cuts focusing on the wealthy. So here's the difference, by the way, between a government investment rather than a stimulative tax cut. A tax cut is where you pay less taxes and then you are rewarded or punished accordingly for your good or bad decision making, right? Because what you do with your money is now your fault, right? What I do with my money, if I make a bad investment, I pay the price for that. If the government takes my money and invests it in something bad, then presumably I still pay the price for it. But you don't pay the price for it in some, in some way. And if you are at the bottom end of the scale and you're not paying taxes, then you really don't pay the price for it instead of just taking money out of somebody else's pocket. This is Biden on Senior Biden advisors, Anita Dunn and MacDonnell wrote in a new memo implementing that economic vision and plan decisively turning the page on the era of trickle down economics has been the defining project of the Biden presidency. So they're talking about omics. That's the thing that, that really matters. So what exactly is omics? Omics again is redistribution of income through various governmental means and subsidization of political allies. That's the story of the American federal government really since the F D R days. But more importantly, since the war on poverty, which has utterly restructured American society along the lines of promoting Fat, stupid And Lazy that you, you, you now get paid by the federal government to make bad decisions. And here was Karine Jean Pierre promoting the phrase bidens. This is apparently is their new. Again, I'm not sure how they think that makes it more popular since Joe Biden is very unpopular president. Thanks Kane. I wanted to ask you about this new bios messaging push. Can you just gimme a sense first of, you know, how did you guys coin that phrase or why did you decide to go with that branding going Forward? I don't like bios. No, I'm just asking. I'm Curious. I think it's pretty clever. It's pretty good. Look, it makes good sense. Omics right Kind of flows off the tongue really well. But in all seriousness, look what you're gonna hear from the president. I don't wanna get ahead of him. I think we've kind of laid out a little bit of what, what we, what we are thinking or what we think the president's gonna lay out, what he is going to lay out. Certainly it's a vision, right? It's a vision about growing the economy. No, the, the actual vision, it is pretty clear it's not about growing the economy, it's about restructuring American society. And Joe Biden's been very clear about this. He says that equity undergirds everything that he seeks to do, including presumably bidens equity is the lie that if we simply redistribute all income, then justice will be done. Equity is the idea. It's different than equality. Equity is the idea that no matter what bad decisions you make, if there is a disparity, it is a result of American discrimination in the evils of our system. So the system itself must be restructured. And again, we've been talking about this in terms of marital morality. We've been talking about it in terms of weight and it's certainly true in terms of income and education level as well. And then you wonder why the education system is failing. It's because of precisely this mentality. Again, what the difference between the elites of today and the elites of yesterday in the United States is the elites of yesterday used to say, here's a series of rules that we followed and that everyone should follow. These are good rules and we should promulgate them. The elites of today say, here's a series of rules that we followed. You don't have to follow those rules because we are better than you are. We are innately more meritorious than you are. And so we could've actually bucked those rules. We could've ignored all of those rules and we still would've been successful. Which means you really don't have a shot. Even if you follow those rules, you won't be successful. So we're gonna restructure all the Americans society around the assumption that the people at the bottom rungs of the ladder, they're gonna stay at the bottom rungs of the ladder no matter what decisions they make. And they may as well make really crappy decisions that make their lives worse. What does that do that makes everybody's life worse? And that is what we are watching happening in real time. And meanwhile, Joe Biden continues to be apparently as corrupt as the day is long, a very bizarre situation. He was doing a, a White House pressor with Modi from India, and he somehow dropped a joke about selling state secrets, which is where we are now. Now we have not just presidents who, who may have committed crimes, presidents who openly joke about maybe committing crimes. Yeah. Honestly, if, if the best crop of candidates that our country has to offer is, is Joe Biden on the Democrat side, Donald Trump on the Republican side, and RFK Jr as the independent candidate. I don don't even, I don't even know what to, what to say about that. Here, here is, here is Joe Biden a mentally defunct human being with a long history of apparent corruption. I was just thinking the, anyway, I started off without you and I sold a lot of state secrets and a lot of very important things that were shared. Oh my God. and they said, all joking Is I, I sold a lot of state secrets. And while you were out of the room, Can you imagine if Donald Trump joked about, you know, selling state secrets while he was president of the United States? Like, oh, act Hunter. Joe Biden is so confident that the media will never, ever actually investigate this sort of stuff that he just says this kind of stuff. Now we have Hunter Biden's attorney admitting that the WhatsApp text in which Hunter claims that Joe Biden is sitting next to him while they shake down a Chinese business person who was a front person for the Chinese government. They like the, the attorney in Hunter Biden's case admits that text is real. And yet apparently there are, there are no consequences to this whatsoever, which is why Joe Biden is joking about it fairly openly at this time. Now, what what's truly amazing is that the lawyer statement according to Breitbart, came on the same day that Breitbart News reported the Biden family received 5.1 million within 10 days of Hunter Biden's message to a CCP linked businessman who worked with Chinese energy conglomerate, C E F C energy, according to a 2020 Senate report on the Biden family, the IRS whistleblower testimony revealed on Thursday that FBI investigators wanted to obtain the location data to confirm Joe Biden was in the room. But there's no confidence the FBI actually obtained that data. So again, Joe Biden is, is like openly joking about the corruption scandal that is now engulfing him in the full confidence that he'll be covered up for by the media. And he's not wrong about that. Anna Navarro, the supposed Republican on the view is out there repeating the talking point. That what this whole story is about is what an amazing parent Joe Biden is. I can't tell you how much his life has been marked by losing not one child by two children. Yeah. And once you've lost a child, I think you are absolutely determined. It's even more urgent. It's even a bigger issue that you will not lose Another one. Yeah. The Hunter Biden story, the scandal, the this, the, that, it's also the story of a father's love. And Joe Biden has never and will never give up on his son, son Hunter and will never treat him lesser than. And so he is a father first. Take it or leave it. That's who he is. That is part of his heart. There was 380 people at this, at this dinner. It's not like Hunter was sitting at Merrick Garland's lap. It was a bunch of, of of people. And part of the reason that Hunter Biden has been able to get out of addiction is because Joe Biden embraced him entirely the entire time. Yeah. When he was vice president, when he was candidate, when he was out of office. And now as precedent, I mean of, of course Joe Biden thinks he can get away with it. He's got the entire media parenting this garbage. That the real story here is not whether Hunter Biden was a cutout for his dad making money. The, the real story here is that Joe Biden is an amazing, amazing parent. Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy, speaker of the House, he's threatening impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Merrick Garland. If the whistleblower allegations are true, that Merrick Garland shut down all indictments of Hunter Biden on felony charges in various jurisdictions. Miranda Devine says that Joe Biden met with his business partners 12 times, 12 different times, and 12 different deals perhaps. So it's Courtney Rob Walker who was in on all this stuff. Good friend. He's all over, all over the laptop. So will this prompt you to do a impeachment inquiry? Well, you apparently don't follow me on Twitter, cuz yesterday I laid out very, very clearly by July 6th because of the allegations from the irs, right? Because of the whistleblowers and the DOJ are, are Garland. What he is saying and what David Weiss are saying privately are two different things, right? And if it comes true, what the IRS whistleblower is saying, we're gonna start impeachment inquiries on the Attorney General. Well it and because matter of fact, it shows that, Yeah, that is, you know, appropriate. But we'll see if there's any follow up on that. Now, meanwhile, you might be thinking to yourself, well maybe Republicans should work on, you know, winning the presidency away from Joe Biden. Well, I have some unfortunate news for you on that score. First, the 4th of July is right around the corner. There are a lot of family gatherings we have lined up and we need to be outside grilling. But here's the thing, when you got that grill working, you need the propane. There's nothing worth than you go out to grill. You start up the propane tank and you realize it's empty. Well this is where our friends at Cinch come in. Cinch is a propane grill tank home delivery system. They deliver propane tanks directly to your door on your schedule. They don't require any long-term commitment or subscription. Plus delivery is completely contact free. You don't have to wait around at home Track the order on the Cinch app from anywhere the perfect summer night would not be complete without Cinch. Go to cinch.com or Download that cinch app and use promo code Shapiro to get your first tank exchange for just 10 bucks. That is c yn c.com promo code Shapiro. It's a limited time offer. You have to live within a cinch service area to redeem it. Visit cinch.com/offer for details. We rely on Cinch. Again, I, I'm, I'm big into the grilling. Not only because I love the meats, not only cuz we've got a bunch of great holidays coming up, but, but also because frankly I, I rely on that protein intake to keep me healthy. Well cinch, make sure that I can keep that grill going. When the propane tank runs low, you should do the same thing. Sign up for Cinch right now. Track the order on the Cinch app from anywhere. They will deliver that propane tank directly to your door on your schedule. No long-term commitments, no C Y N C H promo code Shapiro. Get your first tank exchange for just $10. Also, when Dr. Jordan Peterson made the decision to join DailyWire Plus, that was a major win for people who champion free speech and intellectual debate. Well he has put out more content this year. His contributions have set new standards. They run unmatched by any other platform. While DailyWire Plus now has a vast array of exclusive Jordan Peterson content offering hundreds of hours of captivating content you're not gonna find anywhere else. Jordan has created thought-provoking works that reshaped your perspective on life. Those include vision and destiny, marriage, dragons, monsters, and men. Additionally, you can immerse yourself in discussions that nurture your spiritual side like Logos and Literacy and Jordan's groundbreaking series on the book of Exodus. That's only the beginning. I haven't even mentioned his Beyond Order lector series or his extensive archive of lectures and podcasts. It's the absolute compendium of all things Jordan related. Plus there's even more new exclusive content on the horizon. We're really excited about that stuff. This is only the beginning. Become a DailyWire Plus member, you'll embark on an unforgettable experience that'll fuel your thirst for knowledge and inspire personal growth like never before. Go to DailyWire dot com slash subscribe. Become a member today. Okay? Meanwhile, Republicans have an opportunity to, you know, have Joe Biden not be in the White House, but they would have to run a candidate likely to defeat Joe Biden. So there's a brand new poll out from a dem pollster called G Q R. It includes leaners, you know, people who lean one way or lean another. What it finds is Biden over Trump plus two in the swing states. It shows that Trump and Biden are essentially tied 49 49 as far as Biden versus DeSantis. It shows Desant up 1 49, 48. So again, very close election, but in the swing states it chose DeSantis up 53 to 42. And if we've learned anything, it's that most states in the union, they don't really matter when it comes to the presidential election because they're gonna break 60 40 or 55, 45. There are a few states that really, really matter, right? Really only a few. You're talking Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia. That's nearly a complete list. It's a very, very small list of states that is going to decide the election. So the real question is not how the candidates would do nationally because by popular vote Donald Trump lost both the elections in which he was involved. The, the real question is how they're going to do on the statewide level because of course Donald Trump won in 2016 and then lost those states in 2020. So the real question is that, well here's the thing. If you wish to defeat Joe Biden, perhaps it would be good if your candidate was not embroiled in a bunch of ongoing legal dramas that involve him mainly doing dumb things. Okay? So as I've said before, two things can be true. Ones, there is no way that if Donald Trump were a Democrat, he'd currently be prosecuted for his classified documents treatment. He just wouldn't. Hillary Clinton did stuff that was very similar as we pointed out a thousand times. And she was not in fact prosecuted. Also Donald Trump made this bed, right? Donald Trump did a bunch of things that were incredibly stupid and he did them on tape. So just to one of the charges in this documents case that is now going to be tried over in Fort Pierce, which by the way is, is pretty good for Trump because Fort Pierce is a pretty conservative area. So you assume the jury pool is gonna be more kind to Trump. But one of the allegations is that Donald Trump not only had classified material after he left the White House, which is true of like a thousand different presidents and vice presidents and various officials. But that he kept it after he was told by the Department of Justice and the National Archives to turn it back over. And then he had his lawyers go out there and attest to the FBI and the National Archives and the DOJ that he had turned over all the documents. Meanwhile, he was hiding classified documents from his own lawyers so that he could essentially play with them for no reason. Right? And again, the left went nuts on this. He had Jen Psaki suggesting that Trump's theory here was that he wanted to give documents to dictators. Right Here is Jen Psaki over on M Snbc suggesting just that As you just alluded to, I mean reading the itemized list of 31 documents and the clearance levels as a, as a former ranking member on the Intel committee. Yeah, yeah. There were five eyes classifications there. There were some of the highest level yes classifications. And knowing what you know about former President Donald Trump, we know he has an affection for dictators. Do you have concern without us knowing at this point of what he may have wanted to do with those documents? No, I don't know. But what I do know is that he seriously jeopardized our national security. Again, the implication that he wanted to hand over documents to dictators or something is really, really, really stupid. But you know what else is really stupid? Keeping the documents, there's no purpose to it. And even Donald Trump kind of knows that. Which is why in his interview with Brett Bayer, he actually did what he very often does in these circumstances and he fibbed. So he said to Brett, Bayer, there's a tape of him. And the transcript of that tape appeared in the, in the indictment. The tape was, was of him speaking to a group of women, some of whom were journalists apparently. And it sounds like he's taking out classified documents and saying directly to them, these are classified documents. I could have declassified them when I was the president but I did not do so. Which is kind of game set match as far as the actual legality of his actions. If you say, I know these are classified documents, then you also know you shouldn't be holding them. And if you say I have no power to declassify them now, which he actually says on the tape, then you know you shouldn't have them. So for the thousandth time it could be true that the prosecution is political in the sense that if you were a Democrat it wouldn't be happening to him. Also, why would he put a target squarely on his back this way? In any case here was Trump telling Brett Bayer that the documents he's talking about in that tape are actually just newspapers. When I said that I couldn't be classified it. Now this cuz I wasn't president, I, I never made any bonds about that. When I'm not president I can't de classified. And that's what you said, you didn't de classified. I said no, no, I said I couldn't eat, I could have de classified but that wasn't a document Brad. There was no document that was a massive amount of papers and everything else talking about Iran and other things and it may have been held up or may not. But that was not a document. I didn't have a document per se. There was nothing to declassify. These were newspaper stories. Okay? These were newspaper stories, right? He says that on national television, knowing the government has the tape, okay the tape is now broken. So here's the actual tape of Donald Trump talking about those documents, right? We only had the actual text sort of transcript. Here's the actual tape and somehow got to cnn. Of course, of course it did. How does such leaks occur? Who knows? In any case, CNN gets ahold of this, of this tape and it turns out that he's not waving around newspapers. In all likelihood, We have obtained what is expected to be a central piece of the government's case against Donald Trump. The actual audio recording recording of the former president talking as if he's showing a highly classified document on US war plans against Iran with people not clear to even know it exists, let alone what's in it. Isn't That amazing? This totally wins my case, you know, except it is like highly confidential secret. There's a secret information. Look, look at this. You attack and Hillary would print that out all the time. You know, private an email? No, she'd send it to Anthony Wiener. Yeah, the per please print. By the way, isn't that a credible though? Yeah, I was just saying cuz we were talking about it and you know, he said he wanted to attack Iran and what he said the papers did, it's, well this was done by the military given to me. I think we can probably right I don know, we, we'll have to see. Yeah, we'll have to try to de less figure out a Yeah, see as president I could have de less. Yeah, no, I can't, you know, but this is now we have a problem. Isn't that interesting? Yeah. Okay. He literally says that Hillary had papers like this and that they were probably sent to Anthony Wiener via server, which means he's not talking about newspapers again. Should, should he be under the gun for this? Legally speaking, not when Hillary isn't. I mean, again, the injustice is clear also. This is, I'm sorry, this is stupid. It's unbelievably stupid. Apparently he knew he was being taped in this re in this tape recording. I, I assume that in fact is the case. I believe that Florida is a two party consent state, which means that with very few exceptions, virtually all conversations that take place that are taped in, in the state of Florida. And he was at Mar-a-Lago at the time, have to have the consent of both parties to the taping. So he knew a tape recorder was on. And he is so arrogant that he thought that he could say into the tape recorder, here are a bunch of classified documents that I have right here. And I sh I could have declassified them, but I didn't. And then he went on national TV and said that he was waving around newspapers, which he pretty obviously is not in that recording. Put aside everything else, is this a smart thing to do? Is this a thing that is likely to win you election? Because here, here's my deal with Trump. If he's gonna be the nominee, I wanna see him win and I want Joe Biden not to be president anymore. That, that is one of, that is my top political priority. Come 2024 as I do not want Joe Biden to be president of the United States come January, 2025. He's a terrible president who is doing terrible things routinely, which means that if Trump is going to be the nominee, I would like see Trump win. Is this the sort of behavior that leads one to believe that victory is, is insight that victory is inevitability? Does it heighten your chances or lower your chances when you do this sort of stuff and you do it routinely? He could still win. I'm not saying it's impossible for Trump to win. I learned in 2016 you never say never because never sometimes happens. With that said, is this the kind of activity that is likely to lead to excellent performance in a national election? Particularly in swing states that he lost last time? I have some doubts and just a second. We are gonna get to, we are nearing the end of pride month, but now it may turn into the summer of pride and then maybe the year of pride, then maybe the decade of pride, maybe the century of pride. Actually first, there's a lot of leftist propaganda out there, endless pronouns, critical race theory, sexually explicit books and more, all easily accessible to minors, virtually all via our public education system. They're literal fights taking place in public schools right now so that school boards can make sure that your child is indoctrinated with pornography. Essentially, colleges meanwhile are dumbing down their courses to accommodate the average incoming freshman who can barely read and write at a seventh grade level. And this is why you should be looking at Freedom. Project Academy. They have perfected online learning by offering live on-demand and homeschool courses for grades K through 12. Freedom Project. Academy was built on Judeo-Christian values and classical curricula. They're dedicated to mastery of subject matter and teaching kids how to think, not what to think. Right now. You can save 10% on tuition when you [email protected]. That's freedom. F o r school.com Get a lot of people who are constantly asking about homeschool curricula and what exactly they should do with their kids. Given that the public schools are a giant mess, well why not Check out Freedom for school.com. While you're there, you can read about their teachers preview videos about the courses and request a free information packet. It's not worth handing over another generation to the left. Take back your child's education freedom for school.com. That's freedom. F o r school.com. Again, why hand over your kids to the predations of a public school system that wishes to turn them into a good little leftist apparat. Check instead hand over to freedom for school.com. Well meanwhile, are you excited because you thought we were nearing the end of pride month. That is June 27th today. And last I recall, there are not many days left of June and so we were like, oh my gosh, we are less than a week away from the end of pride month, our secular holy month in which We worship at the altar of the sin of pride. Wrong you are. It's been extended according to our absolutely beautiful, super female with twig and berries, intact assistant, h h s Secretary Rachel Levine. Apparently it's no longer just a pride month. It is now a su why not expand it? It's a summer of pride. Why not a year of pride, a decade of pride, a century, a millennium of pride, perhaps because from here until, you know, society dies out, because no one's reproducing, it's gonna be pride all the way down the line. Here is Rachel Levine, a beautiful and strong woman talking about the Summer of Pride. Hello, my name is Admiral Rachel Levine, and I have the honor of being the Assistant Secretary for health at the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Happy Pride. Happy pride Month. And actually, let's declare it a summer of pride. Happy summer of Pride. Hello. Happy summer of Pride from me. A beautiful woman also, Biden's HHS Secretary, says that during this summer of pride, you should be reminded that cutting the genitals off your child is a sign of love. The greatest sign of love. You know, it, it's, it's so, it such an important issue for our youth and adults. As you said, some of these laws are actually extending into, into adulthood. You know, we often say that gender affirming care is healthcare. Mm. You do say, say that gender affirming care is mental health care. Mm. And gender affirming care is literally suicide prevention care. Would that be your view as well? I 100% agree. Oh my gosh. Wow. Yeah. Cutting off healthy breast tissue. It prevents you from committing suicide, guys. I mean, sure, there's no data to actually support that, but, but yeah. Why, why, why the hell not? Well, what else can we expect from a summer of pride? Well, you know, they used to say that, you know, I was at a, I was at a boxing match and a hockey game broke out. The joke being, of course, that NHL games are filled with, with casual violence and then fights. They used to be the case back in the 1990s, right? You went to a boxing match and a, and a hockey game broke out, and it was very, it was very Shocking. Well, during Pride month, there's a, there's a Pride parade and a bunch of Pride Parade broke out. One of my favorite things about the way that the media have treated these pride parades for literally decades is they just ignore all of the stuff that's been happening at Pride Parades for like, oh, there's a nice family friendly pride parade. It's probably just a bunch of people walking down the street carrying the rainbow flags, and then people would actually show up, and it was some dudes and assless chaps whipping each other. And now all of a sudden, because people have cell phones and have decided to notice, well, all the footage is, is coming out. And as it turns out, my favorite thing about this is when the left is like, this is not representative of p of Pride pr. Yes it is. In what sense is it? In what sense is it not? Seriously? Those are of my favorite things about the, the pathetic and, and disgusting White House ceremony, Featuring, the pride progress flag flying over the White House, or from the rostrum of the White House, from the Rotunda of the White House, and a transgender man shaking his fake breasts at people nakedly like that. My favorite thing was like, we are shocked that this is happening. This is not like a normal pride of, Is it though? Is it, is it not really? Like, because I I feel like you're lying. I feel like that's not true because pretty much all the footage from all the Pride parades has some of this stuff. So for, and, and you know what else I'm noticing? I'm noticing that all the same people who are saying, how does it affect your family if, if two men get married are very into like, teaching the kids about this stuff. Like they really, really want kids to know about it and in the most egregious possible ways. And now because they feel the winds have changed at their back. They're pretty open about it. So here are a bunch of New York City drag marchers, literally chanting about coming for the kids. Go, we're here, we're queer, we're not, we're here, we're queer. We're not going shopping. We're here, we're queer. We're coming for your children. But if you mention that that's actually happening, nope, it's not happening at all. They're just people who wanna live in the Privacy of their own bedrooms, lead their private lives without being bothered while they march down the street chanting their coming for your children, wearing stripper tassels. How dare you notice. Meanwhile, over in Denver, again, another pride parade where pride broke out. This would be, you know, performers simulating oral sex in front of children. So that's, that's really good stuff happening over there. So that is a, a man can be a woman and writing his genitals at the crowd. Eat it, eat it, eat it. That would be simulating oral sex. I mean, are you shocked? I'm shocked. I'm shocked. I was informed that it was basically like a church service except with rainbow pride flags. But it turns out not, it turns out that it's all about Sodom and Gomorrah behavior in public. I, I, I cannot believe it. It is, it is a giant shock to find that the absolutely not Shocking behavior that, that we are supposed to be not shocked by is happening. I can't, I can't, I cannot believe it. Meanwhile, over in Seattle, you have a fully naked men riding bicycles down the street in the middle d don't worry, it's just about their Privacy respect their Privacy to shove their genitals in the face of children. That's Privacy. Privacy is when you take your and balls and you wave them in the face of a young child. That's Privacy. We used to call it pedophilia. Now it's just a form of Privacy. You notice how Privacy move from what we do in our own bedrooms is none of your business to, we can abort children and or shake our genitals in their face. Weird. How, how that happened. Here is some footage here we're the naked bicyclists making their way down the street to the cheering throngs. Oh, so much pride. So much pride. What, what a society we've built for ourselves, guys, this is just, this isn't a form of Pagan barbarism. This is actually the head of culture. And you gotta bring children to be educated so that they can see some, some junk, really, really important. Again, in a better day and age, all these people will be arrested and they'd be thrown in jail for this sort of public indecency. But now it's great. Now it's got, and I love that in the background, are the, are the more subtle and modest people. The leather pride, Briga Brigade is behind them, right? Th these were, this was actually the, the, the, the leather pride. People are are the real modest folks. Now the left is out in full defense of this sort of stuff because of course they are, because it's a summer of pride. The greatest summer of pride, you might say the most prideful summer of pride. Brian Rasen, who is an idiot in the Twitter onlines, he tweeted, seeing a man naked on a bike isn't going to have much of an impact on any kid. They have likely seen their father or brother naked before. I'm, I'm gonna, that's not gonna be a defense in court, my friend. These people exposing their junk kids, like, well, probably they saw their seven year old brother naked. That's the same as me. A 35 year old man waving my balls in, in the face of a child. Number one, seeing a man naked on a bike isn't gonna have much of an impact on any kid, right? Sure. Check Ashley Biden's diary for, for contrary indications. Number two, sharing an uncensored video of an naked man on a bike to an audience, possibly 30 million kids on Twitter, is arguably worse than riding a bike naked in front of a kid or two in a planned event the kid's parent took them to. So the idea is that you're not supposed to notice that you are, you are wrong. How dare you retweet any of these videos to make it public knowledge this stuff is happening because there could be kids watching Twitter. Well, our point is that you guys have, you guys are thriving in the darkness provided by social media blackouts that when people notice this stuff, you know what? They don't like this stuff. And there's reaction to this stuff that the only answer to a summer of pride is a winter of morality. Number three says, Brian Rasine, there are much worse things the average kid will see or hear online and offline in a typical week. Really name them the typical kid, the average kid. I have a question. Like, really? so I, have I have four kids, right? Nine, seven, three, and, and newly born. I can promise you that my kids are not gonna see anything on the order of an, of a naked dude waving his balls in front of them. I, I don't know what, what he thinks children normally see, but it's not that, it's not that. George Decay had, I think the greatest, one of the great tweets of all time here from George Decay. So George Decay, who is famous for playing one part, literally his entire career, and then saying, oh my, a lot George Decay. He, he tweeted out, even if there were no naked guys on bikes this year, they would find pictures or generate them and push the same agenda. Anyway, there's no fixing this by calling for self-censoring. Oh, one of the great tweets of all time. So the idea here is that if you notice that there are naked dudes on bikes, then that, that doesn't mean we should stop doing the naked dudes on bikes things says George Decay, because you guys could just generate fake images of that. Okay? This literally applies to all of the things, all the things man murders his wife. And you're like, oh my God, we should arrest that guy. He murdered his wife. Out comes George Decay to say, well, even if he hadn't murdered his wife, he could've created an AI image of him murdering his wife. So, really, should he not murder his wife? Dude, he shouldn't do the bad thing cause it's a bad thing to do. But here is the thing, the left doesn't believe these are bad things to do. The left believes that world of complete moral relativism in which all moral standards are vague and vacuous, except for the morality that says that you're not allowed to be traditional. The transgressive moral ideology that they have now promulgated in, in that world, the great sin is noticing not doing. Meanwhile, of course, this is being promoted at the highest echelons of our culture on pretty much all sides. So Bud Light continues to just shoot itself directly in the chest. They, they decided in Toronto to sponsor the Toronto Pride event. And are they just cruising for a bruising here? Like what are they begging for? There is a Bud Light float at the Pride Parade. Oh, goodness gracious Genius level stuff here from the pr the Bud Light marketing team. They are so, they are so brilliant, man. Less smart. Meanwhile, you know who else is being really smart as Disney? Disney's being super smart. So my kids are very, very into Star Wars, like the original series, star Wars, and now the prequels, like they love it. My son actually has a book with every Star Wars ship in it, and he insists that every night I read to him about a different ship in the Star Wars galaxy, right? He's kinda an engineering mind. He loves that kind of stuff. So here, so, so we would be like a family that would probably be interested in purchasing material related Star Wars. Here is a piece of material related to Star Wars. I will not be purchasing Disney. Star Wars has now cast its first transgender actor in a major role hiring British male to female YouTube personality, Abigail Thorn for a role in the upcoming Disney Plus series, the Acolyte. Because children must be taught that men can be women in Star Wars, it is deeply, deeply important. Abigail Thorn is reportedly set to play a character named Ensen Uros in the series, which is expected to begin streaming sometime next year. So that, that's really, that's great. Here is a video of this person advocating puberty blockers for minors. Very, very necessary. This kind of crap be crammed down to small children by the most powerful cultural corporations on planet Earth. My name is Abigail Thorn. Yes, I'm a professional actress from Newcastle Pontine. I live in London and I'm the creator of Philosophy Tube. An educational show that teaches people about philosophy in a fun way. Yes, I started the show almost seven years ago when the coalition government tripled tuition fees because I wanted to give away my philosophy degree for free at time of recording the show has just over 800,000 subscribers. In my most recent video identity, I came out as a transgender woman, oh, thank you to everyone who kept my secret for such a long time as I prepared to come out publicly. It's very important, isn't it? Cast this person really, really, really important because like those pride chancellors in, in New York City, they are in fact after the kids, okay, time for a quick thing I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like. There is a very good series on MGM Plus. It is called The Spy Among Friends, and it is about the British spy Kim Philby and the Ferreting out of the so-called Cambridge five, which is a series of communist spies in the British government who were essentially getting hundreds, if not thousands of anti-Soviet dissidents murdered in Eastern Europe and inside Russia from the thirties to the to the sixties. Here's a little bit of the trailer, Why you let the most dangerous Soviet penetration agent in this country's ever known. Let it on your watch. It's a, it is quite a good series. I trusted it is totally worth the watch. Best friend Was a Russian spy. Try to imagine How that might fuel. First Of all, I love the cast, so it's Damien Lewis, who's great. You remember him from Band Brothers and Guy Pierce, who's also terrific. Awesome. A really, really good cast. Yeah. And beautifully photographed, beautifully shot, great sound engineering. Like, it's, it's really worthwhile. And again, it's one of the few, it it's kinda weird. Over the past 10 years, Hollywood has suddenly recognized the Sylvia were bad. so it took them until 20 years after the end of the Cold War to recognize that the Soviets were actually bad now. And there, there was a movie that came out fairly recently that was all about Soviet atrocities in Ukraine. And it took them only like don don't know, 90 years to say that it was okay to, to make that movie. The, the Death of Stalin came out, I believe 20 17, 20 16. So now we're allowed to say that Soviets were bad after the Soviet Union fell like a generation after that. We can point that out. The reason it took so long, by the way, is cuz all of Hollywood was deeply enthralled to the Soviet Union for a lot of the Cold War. For like a lot of the Cold War. The Nazis were real bad, but the Soviets were kind of okay. Not only, okay, they were just misguided. And you see the same sort of mentality that now abounds about China in some quarters. And this this series puts to bed once again, the theory that the Soviets had anything of value to give to the world. They were one of the most nefarious forces, maybe the most nefarious force in the history of the world. Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate. So I'm not a big fan of media outlets pretending that aspects of poverty and suffering are actually kind of cool things to do. So CNN International is now Featuring. I kid you not a phenomenon that are called stir fried stones. And they're saying that this is China's latest street foot street food fad that the, that's not a euphemism. When they say stir fried stones, they mean literally rocks that have spices on them. Like, here's the video Says stir fried pebbles. This Chinese stir fry features rocks as the main ingredient and social media calls it, quote the world's hardest dish. People are supposed to suck off the flavors, then spit out the rocks, hence the Dish's name. So meaning suck and dispose. The dish originated in Hubei province and has said to date back hundreds of years, Hmm, it was reportedly passed down for generations by boat men through their oral history. Street vendors cook the pebbles with spices, chili oil, and garlic on a sizzling grill. Each portion costs about 16 when, which is around $2 and 30 cents. Excited. Guys, Carvan, would you like to suck a rock? Okay, so things aren't going amazing in China, I think would be the takeaway here. It it is just, you know, it's just a different culture where you are sucking rocks for nutritional value. Or, or maybe, or maybe things are not great in China. Maybe it turns out that communist countries suck. By the way, try marketing that in America. Seriously. You know, it's a thing that nobody will, will eat in America. Rocks there lot. America's got a lot of problems. People aren't sucking on the rocks over here. All, right guys, the rest of the show continues right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We'll be joined by Aaron Gin, co-founder and c e o of Hydra hosts. If you're not a member, become member and use Coach Shapiro checkout for two months free on all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep want fat stupid lazy publish society promote fatness stupidity laziness subsidize government hunter biden attorney admit incriminate text joe real audio donald trump talk classified document emerge m ben shapiro ben shapiro ben shapiro sponsor expressvpn online privacy today expressvpn dot com slash ben folk federal government medium society large decide important promote fatness stupidity laziness fascinating piece ryan berg s stu s scholar religion marriage ck blog graph religioncom examine fact kind key identifier success world generally exist religious population united states decline everybody sort fascinating phenomenon look bunch chart put example put chart show education increase religious practice religious belief increase certain extent sort reverse ve tell reason case s talk people identify atheist agnostic s talk people identify look people religious way people s disassociate religion find people high school education believe right poll high school graduate people go trade school time master degree people master nun right nun people suggest course belief religion unassociated religion entirely atheist agnostic people ryan berg point trend unmistakable likely ascend service weekly graduate degree likely attend high school diploma thing correlate income ll share people attend weekly education income level educated income likely attend church regular basis precisely reverse society tell medium tell medium tell educate church educate church actually true identify marital status find married people religious service weekly far high rate people marital status mean people local church probably community well educate likely marry likely parent find share people attend weekly religious service base marital parental status far people married parent attend religious service far clearly here thing religion outta mix second identifier success american life marry kid high income education correlate extremely highly religious practice point ryan berg make s right say result hard ignore sound major alarm person faith concern large state american society increasingly religion enclave live proper life college degree middle class income marry child check box likelihood regularly attend church double rate folk not ryan read critique church church need welcoming need find way reach people married people not middle class income people college educate s way read reverse rule elite society marital elite parental elite income elite educational elite apply different rule ve promulgate rest society clearly social science data charles murray write phenomenal book call come apart probably decade half ago examine difference white community s rip talk racial disparity decide book talk sociological difference white community segregate separate white community believe call newtown one call fishtown newtown like high income group high income group people generally marry generally people kid generally people involve social institution people low income opposite look medium look way government treat precisely opposite pretend people likely successful society single female berkeley graduate child hate god hate church people likely su successful watch tv real life people actually successful word message society promulgate precisely opposite reality real world consequence bleed people aspire hierarchy american society point american history sort group people aspire example ve example look picture great depression people wait line food distribution center charity service people wear suit look today billionaire dress like schwab aspirational aspiration kind low common denominator oppose aspiration high here thing people people successful everybody know success pretend not know success know success look like successful marriage successful raising child successful community successful term income successful term know look like society decide not like result go to pretend measure stick not exist measure stick exist know measure stick innately look people successful measure society people loud proud personal life believe ve decide measure true virtue precisely opposite measure true virtue sure live way sure know not send kid public school send kid private school sure m married sure get education sure follow rule traditional religious society actually follow sure know m elite m go promulgate new morality include dirty secret form ugly paternalism people say people incapable rise s true true thing god people thing society sound dedicated opposite proposition sort injustice measuring stick long go shoot thing know good true here thing remove measuring stick end chaos not end equality end turmoil chaos unsuccess subsidize lack success remove measure stick success thing rule clear church marry kid job finish education right rule clear ve know s new ve know rule couple year s new term mobile american society unsuccess success decide elite level american government american medium obliterate rule pretend somebody good precisely opposite second take special kind company wanna partner lot company afraid partner show like truth unvarnished fact puretalk company m proud stand company actually proud stand m proud stand puretalk possible bring day puretalk share value share value matt walsh brad cooper candace owen rest daily wire host official wireless partner dailywire s reason check coverage premium puretalk dependable g network united states use mix match plan fit person family choose talk text g datum buck month way unlimited datum mobile hotspot buck month remember vote spend money stop support wake wireless company not support switch puretalk today head puretalk dot com slash shapiro save additional month coverage s puretalk dot com slash shapiro puretalk wireless americans buy americans not spend money bunch cell phone coverage company not like instead money puretalk ll good coverage available ll give company actually back lot principle believe puretalk dot com slash shapiro save additional month coverage right precise opposite thing bring success thing society promote stupid example culture promote people like cardi b okay cardi b ve rip think s perfect example virtually wrong society rapper stripper brag tape drug rob man happen person deem society height sex appeal sexual satisfaction suppose attain act like cardi b imitate cardi b reality cardi b live cardi bs value end unhappy cardi b married person name offset give name come outta mother cardi bs mom say shall cardi b offset mother say shall offset don not know onset offset shall lovebird marry ve fraught relationship model way literally million people united states right thing model united states know solid marriage last entire lifetime dedicate uprising child cardi bs marriage splash page late claim beautiful marriage cardi b present know s height sex appeal not husband dine s height sex appeal take twitter space monday address husband offset claim eff man apparently instagram post delight way kid go to play amazing kid instagram post say wife eff nword gang you nword know come apparently take respond say let not accuse thing know guilty sing you easy blame yes honey listen go speak directly listener not pay attention country man you cardi b talk eloquent term state marriage not pay attention country man you not pay attention country man space day spiral think come m cardi b think m cardi b give anybody m anybody not regular schmegular cause go to tell world not know translate case present upper echelon culture high culture hey stop pretend quote unquote low culture united states hey sort stuff promote major medium outlet united states promote single major streaming service united states promote height american culture literally suppose thing like stuff ugly bad music suck allow sort stuff people go crazy message promulgate people like cardi b matter nicki minaj music garbage actually promote harmful message instead suppose pretend form female empowerment people follow stick tot likely lead happy life here problem cardi b lead particularly happy marital life people lead happy marital life bore fuddy duddie people promote society model marriage people like cardi b obviously thing actually matter society promote stupidity society promote fail marriage getting marry mean ill cardi b actually get marry okay kid bear black community today bear outta wedlock kid white community way bear outta wedlock today discuss moment happen vacuum actually support governmental structure promote s thing promote promote stupidity relationship promote fatness right decide go obliterate measure stick here thing know innately success look like success come marriage look like marry person love person stay die bring kid person relationship deepen time know success look like big mystery yes ideal insulting people not meet ideal point ideal exist okay thing exist physical realm decide mean bad point people example shape s entire article person name daniel pennock lizzo focus lot culture today here reality okay mean ve look actual number united states number people form value base sheer politic united states low people value inculcate watch fox news watch show like s way work s number people value local institution participate normally church not church get surround milieu usually social medium yes culture like cardi b fan follower s cultural realm thing true lizzo entire medium infrastructure dedicate proposition extremely overweight actually sign health beauty think go to incentivize people participate sort behavior momentarily run small business important plan ahead good way use stamp dot com mail ship ve stamp dot com dailywire cause not like waste time money stamp dot com let print postage shipping label directly home office ready minute run business soon stamp dot com offer rate not find like u s p s up plus automatically tell cheap fast shipping option year stamp dot com indispensable million business access shipping service need run business directly computer line traffic wait print postage business ve send free scale ll need start set business success way dailywire getting start stamp dot com today sign promo code shapiro special offer include week trial free plus free postage free digital scale longterm commitment contract stamp dot com click microphone page enter code shapiro start stamp dot com reason schlep package post office office save time save money stamp dot com check right okay piece daniel pin actress writer comedian star cbs sitcom ghost creator woman body slash courage man stunning brave piece washington post title fat sha not lizzo say understand lizzo take beat twitter month emmy grammy win multihyphenate artist classically train flute play rapper singer songwriter actress fashion mogul attack internet troll bombard vicious message weight time get bad lock twitter account write you not know close give quit don not think phrase sort shakespeare sort old english you not know close d don not think s s go to lizzo embrace inclusivity body body oppose body list mean people not body not include chance mantra body positivity human fat one song include good hell truth hurt resonate million people anthem empowerment selfacceptance ah selfacceptance empowerment here here reality want path unsuccess follow pathway empowerment selfacceptance great way fail life empowerment empowerment selfacceptance mean fine saint fine good people people strive better better people feel empower not wake morning feeling good good well short distance away strive change come treadmill life treadmill move underneath stand move backwards move forwards fall treadmill empowerment selfacceptance live freely unapologetically sort language make wanna vomit freely unapologetically oppose live chain apologetically twerke beach bestie model stylish crop top shapewear brand yi year lizzo face backlash people uncomfortable unabashed acceptance d conceal oversized cardigan potato sack love alternative potato sack thong feel like s wide range magical range clo clothing fit potato sack potato sack thong white people s promote obesity not s difference endorse obesity practice selflove selflove involve promote obesity th s fairly high crossover right people think obesity say columnist think skyrocket bmis overweight people chronic disease tv show pound life big loser lizzo promote s try exist lift s lie way say new standard beauty lizzo medium medium lizzo beautiful beautiful woman s beautiful weight s get to pound overweight not matter new standard question recipe success imitate lizs action love lady try turn lizzo sort fitness guru guru get gym say columnist see look like ashamed hate body exercise change entire perspective fitness oppose say maybe actually look like dad way look like dad gym actually change diet caloric deficit real thing culture say thing judgmental bad wonder s backlash come form stupid presidential campaigning human history people resonate r fk jr run presidency s go to run primary poll versus joe biden reason joe biden dottere elderly gentleman look like s go literally keel die r f k jr person express number wild theory campaign take shirt age pretty clearly testosterone replacement therapy worth looks pretty rip pushup people like fawn yesterday laugh funny yeah mean presidential imagine abraham lincoln presidential campaign d weird d real weird calvin hoge stripe buff strange reason receive sort support answer yes alternative year old rfk jr like prison yard workout lizzo twerking fat american society know well well shape look like pretend not rfk jr yesterday okay let seven year old dude pushup honestly seven year old dude pretty impressive final set say tweet actually set cause get like pushup not matter go viral reason go viral number s seven year old dude good shape backlash society say actively good ignore weight actively good ignore standard promote sort scenario government not support cuz turn unsuccess lead example lack income lack success bad decision making consequence ve construct entire utopian world bad activity stupid decision actually end reward government suppose treat bad decision sympathy way sort medical condition momentarily dog dog happy happy delight happy wonderful doggy kid love want happy live long healthy life rough green morning dog food ve give dog dead food not nutritional value know brown rough green green boost happy food life dog not buy new dog food sprinkle rough green food single day contain necessary vitamin mineral dog get regular dog food happy love rough green joyous happy dog rough green supplement dog ask rough green joke naturopathic dr dennis black s founder rough green confident product improve dog health s offer listener free jumpstart trial bag free rough green dot com slash ben let rough green bring dog food life s free r ru ffg green dot com slash ben today dog s dog okay bring collapse institution suppose prevent sort thing building institution support destruction decent measure m noncatholic m member western civilization mean pretty strong stake papacy pope happen dominion billion people say matter awful lot pope francis absolutely horrendous job act actually guard value s suppose guard pope religious person prefer judeochristian religion flourish think judeochristian religion single great force undergird system morality allow value create success apparently accord fortune magazine pope francis praise artist friday true visionary dream invent welcome artist filmmaker writer sistine chapel mark anniversary vatican museums contemporary art collection francis acknowledge crowd andre serrano piss christ fame use confrontation people think say aim find harmony beauty wanna reveal reality contradiction thing comfortable convenient hidden francis say like biblical prophet confront thing time uncomfortable criticize today false myth new idol talk ploy consumerism scheme power presumably invite person literally crucifix jar urine call art hard think selfdefeating chief religious institution sort thing mirror desire elite instead mirror value allow elite elite place access elite status literally ve d help elite destroy ladder success get follow value modernity complete fail subsidize government joe biden joe biden trot new thing call omic exactly biden genomics apparently biden spray money pretty biden omic ensure people bad decision subsidize s true economic sphere industry s fail presumably biden administration go hold person food stamp not wanna work biden administration try hold right important thing biden push accord politico pivot new campaign message censor biden shorthand administration economic strategy quote boost middle class government investment simulative tax cut focus wealthy here difference way government investment stimulative tax cut tax cut pay taxis reward punish accordingly good bad decision make right money fault right money bad investment pay price government take money invest bad presumably pay price not pay price way end scale pay taxis not pay price instead take money somebody else pocket biden senior biden advisor anita dunn macdonnell write new memo implement economic vision plan decisively turn page era trickle economic define project biden presidency talk omic s thing matter exactly omics omic redistribution income governmental mean subsidization political ally s story american federal government f d r day importantly war poverty utterly restructure american society line promote fat stupid lazy pay federal government bad decision karine jean pierre promote phrase biden apparently new m sure think make popular joe biden unpopular president thank kane want ask new bio message push gimme sense know guy coin phrase decide branding go forward not like bio m ask m curious think pretty clever pretty good look make good sense omic right kind flow tongue seriousness look go to hear president not wanna ahead think ve kind lay little bit think think president go to lay go lay certainly vision right vision grow economy actual vision pretty clear grow economy restructure american society joe biden clear say equity undergird seek include presumably bidens equity lie simply redistribute income justice equity idea different equality equity idea matter bad decision disparity result american discrimination evil system system restructure ve talk term marital morality ve talk term weight certainly true term income education level wonder education system fail precisely mentality difference elite today elite yesterday united states elite yesterday here series rule follow follow good rule promulgate elite today here series rule follow not follow rule well innately meritorious ve actually buck rule ve ignore rule ve successful mean not shot follow rule will not successful go to restructure americans society assumption people rung ladder go to stay rung ladder matter decision crappy decision life bad make everybodys life bad watch happen real time joe biden continue apparently corrupt day long bizarre situation white house pressor modi india drop joke sell state secret president commit crime president openly joke maybe commit crime yeah honestly good crop candidate country offer joe biden democrat donald trump republican rfk jr independent candidate don not not know joe biden mentally defunct human long history apparent corruption think start sell lot state secret lot important thing share oh god say joke sell lot state secret room imagine donald trump joke know sell state secret president united states like oh act hunter joe biden confident medium actually investigate sort stuff say kind stuff hunter biden attorney admit whatsapp text hunter claim joe biden sit shake chinese business person person chinese government like attorney hunter biden case admit text real apparently consequence whatsoever joe biden joke fairly openly time s truly amazing lawyer statement accord breitbart come day breitbart news report biden family receive million day hunter biden message ccp link businessman work chinese energy conglomerate c e f c energy accord senate report biden family irs whistleblower testimony reveal thursday fbi investigator want obtain location datum confirm joe biden room s confidence fbi actually obtain datum joe biden like openly joke corruption scandal engulf confidence hell cover medium s wrong anna navarro suppose republican view repeat talking point story amazing parent joe biden not tell life mark lose child child yeah ve lose child think absolutely determined urgent big issue lose yeah hunter biden story scandal story father love joe biden son son hunter treat less father leave s heart people dinner like hunter sit merrick garland lap bunch people reason hunter biden able addiction joe biden embrace entirely entire time yeah vice president candidate office precedent mean course joe biden think away s get entire medium parent garbage real story hunter biden cutout dad make money real story joe biden amazing amazing parent kevin mccarthy speaker house s threaten impeachment proceeding attorney general merrick garland whistleblower allegation true merrick garland shut indictment hunter biden felony charge jurisdiction miranda devine say joe biden meet business partner time different time different deal courtney rob walker stuff good friend s laptop prompt impeachment inquiry apparently not follow twitter cuz yesterday lay clearly july allegation irs right whistleblower doj garland say david weiss say privately different thing right come true irs whistleblower say go to start impeachment inquiry attorney general matter fact show yeah know appropriate s follow think maybe republicans work know win presidency away joe biden unfortunate news score july right corner lot family gathering line need outside grilling here thing get grill work need propane s worth grill start propane tank realize friend cinch come cinch propane grill tank home delivery system deliver propane tank directly door schedule not require longterm commitment subscription plus delivery completely contact free not wait home track order cinch app perfect summer night complete cinch cinchcom download cinch app use promo code shapiro tank exchange buck c yn ccom promo code shapiro limited time offer live cinch service area redeem visit cinchcomoffer detail rely cinch m m big grilling love meat cuz ve get bunch great holiday come frankly rely protein intake healthy cinch sure grill go propane tank run low thing sign cinch right track order cinch app deliver propane tank directly door schedule longterm commitment c y n c h promo code shapiro tank exchange dr jordan peterson decision join dailywire plus major win people champion free speech intellectual debate content year contribution set new standard run unmatched platform dailywire plus vast array exclusive jordan peterson content offer hundred hour captivate content go to find jordan create thoughtprovoking work reshape perspective life include vision destiny marriage dragon monster man additionally immerse discussion nurture spiritual like logo literacy jordans groundbreake series book exodus s beginning not mention order lector series extensive archive lecture podcast absolute compendium thing jordan relate plus s new exclusive content horizon excited stuff beginning dailywire plus member ll embark unforgettable experience ll fuel thirst knowledge inspire personal growth like dailywire dot com slash subscribe member today okay republicans opportunity know joe biden white house run candidate likely defeat joe biden s brand new poll dem pollster call g q r include leaner know people lean way lean find biden trump plus swing state show trump biden essentially tie far biden versus desantis show desant close election swing state choose desantis ve learn state union not matter come presidential election go to break state matter right talk wisconsin pennsylvania michigan arizona georgia s nearly complete list small list state go decide election real question candidate nationally popular vote donald trump lose election involve real question go statewide level course donald trump win lose state real question here thing wish defeat joe biden good candidate embroil bunch ongoing legal drama involve mainly dumb thing okay ve say thing true one way donald trump democrat d currently prosecute classified document treatment not hillary clinton stuff similar point thousand time fact prosecute donald trump bed right donald trump bunch thing incredibly stupid tape charge document case go try fort pierce way pretty good trump fort pierce pretty conservative area assume jury pool go to kind trump allegation donald trump classify material leave white house true like thousand different president vice president official keep tell department justice national archive turn lawyer attest fbi national archive doj turn document hide classify document lawyer essentially play reason right left go nuts jen psaki suggest trumps theory want document dictator right jen psaki m snbc suggest allude mean read itemized list document clearance level rank member intel committee yeah yeah eye classification high level yes classification know know president donald trump know affection dictator concern know point want document not know know seriously jeopardize national security implication want hand document dictator stupid know stupid keep document s purpose donald trump kind know interview brett bayer actually circumstance fib say brett bayer s tape transcript tape appear indictment tape speak group woman journalist apparently sound like s take classified document say directly classify document declassify president kind game set match far actual legality action know classify document know not hold power declassify actually say tape know not thousandth time true prosecution political sense democrat not happen target squarely way case trump tell brett bayer document s talk tape actually newspaper say not classify cuz not president bond m president not de classify s say not de classify say say not eat de classify not document brad document massive paper talk iran thing hold document not document se declassify newspaper story okay newspaper story right say national television know government tape okay tape break here actual tape donald trump talk document right actual text sort transcript here actual tape get cnn course course leak occur know case cnn get ahold tape turn s wave newspaper likelihood obtain expect central piece government case donald trump actual audio recording recording president talk s show highly classify document war plan iran people clear know exist let s not amazing totally win case know like highly confidential secret s secret information look look attack hillary print time know private email shed send anthony wiener yeah print way not credible yeah say cuz talk know say want attack iran say paper military give think probably right don know yeah try de figure yeah president de yeah not know problem not interesting yeah okay literally say hillary paper like probably send anthony wiener server mean s talk newspaper gun legally speak hillary not mean injustice clear m sorry stupid unbelievably stupid apparently know tape tape recording assume fact case believe florida party consent state mean exception virtually conversation place tape state florida maralago time consent party taping know tape recorder arrogant think tape recorder bunch classified document right sh declassify not go national tv say wave newspaper pretty obviously recording aside smart thing thing likely win election here deal trump s go to nominee wanna win want joe biden president anymore political priority come want joe biden president united states come january s terrible president terrible thing routinely mean trump go nominee like trump win sort behavior lead believe victory insight victory inevitability heighten chance lower chance sort stuff routinely win m say impossible trump win learn happen say kind activity likely lead excellent performance national election particularly swing state lose time doubt second go to near end pride month turn summer pride maybe year pride maybe decade pride maybe century pride actually s lot leftist propaganda endless pronoun critical race theory sexually explicit book easily accessible minor virtually public education system literal fight take place public school right school board sure child indoctrinate pornography essentially college dumbe course accommodate average incoming freshman barely read write seventh grade level look freedom project academy perfect online learning offer live ondemand homeschool course grade k freedom project academy build judeochristian value classical curriculum dedicated mastery subject matter teach kid think think right save tuition enrollfreedomforschoolcom s freedom f o r schoolcom lot people constantly ask homeschool curriculum exactly kid give public school giant mess check freedom schoolcom read teacher preview video course request free information packet worth hand generation left child education freedom schoolcom s freedom f o r schoolcom hand kid predation public school system wish turn good little leftist apparat check instead hand freedom schoolcom excited think near end pride month june today recall day leave june like oh gosh week away end pride month secular holy month worship altar sin pride wrong extend accord absolutely beautiful super female twig berry intact assistant h h s secretary rachel levine apparently long pride month su expand summer pride year pride decade pride century millennium pride know society die one reproduce go to pride way line rachel levine beautiful strong woman talk summer pride hello admiral rachel levine honor assistant secretary health united states department health human service happy pride happy pride month actually lets declare summer pride happy summer pride hello happy summer pride beautiful woman biden hhs secretary say summer pride remind cut genital child sign love great sign love know important issue youth adult say law actually extend adulthood know gender affirm care healthcare mm gender affirm care mental health care mm gender affirm care literally suicide prevention care view agree oh gosh wow yeah cut healthy breast tissue prevent commit suicide guy mean sure s datum actually support yeah hell expect summer pride know know boxing match hockey game break joke course nhl game fill casual violence fight case right go boxing match hockey game break shocking pride month s s pride parade bunch pride parade break favorite thing way medium treat pride parade literally decade ignore stuff s happen pride parade like oh s nice family friendly pride parade probably bunch people walk street carry rainbow flag people actually dude assless chap whip sudden people cell phone decide notice footage come turn favorite thing left like representative p pride pr yes sense sense seriously favorite thing pathetic disgusting white house ceremony feature pride progress flag fly white house rostrum white house rotunda white house transgender man shake fake breast people nakedly like favorite thing like shocked happen like normal pride like feel like lie feel like s true pretty footage pride parade stuff know m notice m notice people say affect family man marry like teach kid stuff like want kid know egregious possible way feel wind change pretty open bunch new york city drag marcher literally chant come kid queer queer go shop queer come child mention s actually happen nope happen people wanna live privacy bedroom lead private life bother march street chant come child wear stripper tassel dare notice denver pride parade pride break know performer simulate oral sex child s s good stuff happen man woman write genital crowd eat eat eat simulate oral sex mean shocked m shocked m shocked inform basically like church service rainbow pride flag turn turn sodom gomorrah behavior public believe giant shock find absolutely shocking behavior suppose shock happen not not believe seattle fully naked man ride bicycle street middle d not worry privacy respect privacy shove genital face child s privacy privacy ball wave face young child s privacy pedophilia form privacy notice privacy bedroom business abort child shake genital face weird happen footage naked bicyclist make way street cheer throng oh pride pride society ve build guy not form pagan barbarism actually head culture got to bring child educate junk important well day age people arrest d throw jail sort public indecency great got love background subtle modest people leather pride briga brigade right th actually leather pride people real modest folk left defense sort stuff course summer pride great summer pride prideful summer pride brian rasen idiot twitter online tweet see man naked bike not go impact kid likely see father brother naked m m go to s go to defense court friend people expose junk kid like probably see seven year old brother naked s year old man wave ball face child number see man naked bike not go to impact kid right sure check ashley biden diary contrary indication number share uncensored video naked man bike audience possibly million kid twitter arguably bad ride bike naked kid plan event kid parent take idea suppose notice wrong dare retweet video public knowledge stuff happen kid watch twitter point guy guy thrive darkness provide social medium blackout people notice stuff know not like stuff s reaction stuff answer summer pride winter morality number say brian rasine bad thing average kid hear online offline typical week typical kid average kid question like kid right seven newly bear promise kid go to order naked dude wave ball not know think child normally george decay think great great tweet time george decay george decay famous play literally entire career say oh lot george decay tweet naked guy bike year find picture generate push agenda s fixing call selfcensore oh great tweet time idea notice naked dude bike not mean stop naked dude bike thing say george decay guy generate fake image okay literally apply thing thing man murder wife like oh god arrest guy murder wife come george decay not murder wife ve create ai image murder wife murder wife dude not bad thing cause bad thing thing left not believe bad thing left believe world complete moral relativism moral standard vague vacuous morality say allow traditional transgressive moral ideology promulgate world great sin noticing course promote high echelon culture pretty side bud light continue shoot directly chest decide toronto sponsor toronto pride event cruise bruising like beg bud light float pride parade oh goodness gracious genius level stuff pr bud light marketing team brilliant man smart know smart disney disneys super smart kid star war like original series star war prequel like love son actually book star war ship insist night read different ship star war galaxy right s kinda engineering mind love kind stuff like family probably interested purchase material relate star war piece material relate star war purchase disney star war cast transgender actor major role hire british male female youtube personality abigail thorn role upcoming disney plus series acolyte child teach man woman star war deeply deeply important abigail thorn reportedly set play character name ensen uro series expect begin stream year s s great video person advocate puberty blocker minor necessary kind crap cram small child powerful cultural corporation planet earth abigail thorn yes m professional actress newcastle pontine live london m creator philosophy tube educational teach people philosophy fun way yes start seven year ago coalition government triple tuition fee want away philosophy degree free time record subscriber recent video identity come transgender woman oh thank keep secret long time prepare come publicly important not cast person important like pride chancellor new york city fact kid okay time quick thing like thing hate thing like good series mgm plus call spy friend british spy kim philby ferreting socalled cambridge series communist spy british government essentially get hundred thousand antisoviet dissident murder eastern europe inside russia thirty sixty here little bit trailer let dangerous soviet penetration agent country know let watch good series trust totally worth watch good friend russian spy try imagine fuel love cast damien lewis s great remember band brother guy pierce s terrific awesome good cast yeah beautifully photograph beautifully shoot great sound engineering like worthwhile kinda weird past year hollywood suddenly recognize sylvia bad take year end cold war recognize soviet actually bad movie come fairly recently soviet atrocity ukraine take like don not know year okay movie death stalin come believe allow soviet bad soviet union fall like generation point reason take long way cuz hollywood deeply enthral soviet union lot cold war like lot cold war nazi real bad soviet kind okay okay misguided sort mentality abound china quarter series put bed theory soviet value world nefarious force maybe nefarious force history world okay time quick thing hate m big fan medium outlet pretend aspect poverty suffering actually kind cool thing cnn international feature kid phenomenon call stir fried stone say china late street foot street food fad s euphemism stir fried stone mean literally rock spice like here video say stir fried pebble chinese stir fry feature rock main ingredient social medium call quote world hard dish people suppose suck flavor spit rock dishs mean suck dispose dish originate hubei province say date hundred year hmm reportedly pass generation boat man oral history street vendor cook pebble spice chili oil garlic sizzling grill portion cost cent excited guy carvan like suck rock okay thing not go amazing china think takeaway know different culture suck rock nutritional value maybe maybe thing great china maybe turn communist country suck way try market america seriously know thing eat america rocks lot america get lot problem people not suck rock right guy rest continue right go to wanna miss join aaron gin cofounder c e o hydra host member member use coach shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join

Speeches, etc. The Prime Minister (Mrs. Margaret Thatcher) With permission, Mr. Speaker I should like to make a statement on the European Council Meeting at Strasbourg. With Lord Carringtonmy noble Friend, the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary I attended the European Council in Strasbourg at the end of last week. Among the matters we discussed were, first, contributions to the Community budget. I made our dissatisfaction with the results of the present system very plain. The European Council called for action by the Commission to assess the facts about how the budget transfers are likely to affect each member State in 1979 and 1980 and whether and how the 1975 financial mechanism, intended to reduce our contribution, will work. That report will go first to the Finance Council of Ministers, who will have the opportunity to put forward practical ideas to solve the problem. Taking those views into account, the Commission has been asked to formulate proposals in time for decisions to be taken at the next meeting of the European Council in November, in Dublin. At last, therefore, we have an agreement to tackle the inequitably high contribution that Britain at present makes to the European budget. The time for decisions will be at the next Council. Secondly on energy and the oil shortage, we agreed to reinforce our efforts to reduce consumption of oil and to achieve the objectives that the Community has set itself. We also emphasised the part that alternative sources of energy must play, nuclear power and coal in particular. We recognised the need for consumer and producer countries to work together to reduce demand and increase supply and made clear the readiness of the Community and member States to establish contacts with producer countries to that end. We had in mind the Tokyo economic summit meeting this week and that by showing that the Community was ready to shoulder its own responsibilities, we should be in a good position to call on other industrialised countries to make comparable efforts to reduce oil consumption and imports. We agreed that higher [column 289]oil prices will adversely affect the outlook for growth, though prices will only steady if demand and supply balance. Thirdly, the Council reviewed the early operations of the European monetary system. I also told it of the Government's intention, about which the House has already been informed, to deposit part of our reserves against ECUs. Fourthly, the Council was anxious to help refugees from Vietnam and supported the proposals for an international conference. Finally, we noted with satisfaction the first direct elections to the European Assembly and welcome the intention of the Irish Prime Minister to represent the Council at the inaugural meeting of the new Assembly on 18 July. Mr. James Callaghan The House will hope that the meeting at Tokyo will be able to assist the discussion on the refugees from Vietnam in view of the horrific figures now being quoted about the number, for example, that Hong Kong may be required to take because its policies are perhaps more humanitarian than those of some surrounding countries. I hope that progress will be made on that matter. The right hon. Lady referred to the inequitably high contribution to the Community budget. Does she mean the net contribution? This is a matter not only of the resources that we put into the Community but the receipts that we get. Does the study to which the right hon. Lady referred include a study of the receipts that we might be expected to get as well as the contributions that we make? If we cannot make progress on that matter, will she consider suggesting that we should put a ceiling on our contribution, as a concrete request to be made to the Commission before the budget? The right hon. Lady will have the support of the whole House in continuing the work that we began. It is fair to say that we took the shine off the ball and that it is now for her to hit the runs. I believe that that will be possible. I only hope that the right hon. Lady is not too sanguine when she says that at last we have agreement on this matter. Finally, we welcome the dialogue that is due to take place on the energy and coal shortage. We must proceed with [column 290]nuclear energy, but what steps are being taken to ensure that proper safety measures are put into operation? If we are to increase the production of coal, why is there a report in the newspapers this morning that the Secretary of State for Energy has agreed only up to 1982–83 the “Plan for Coal” , which runs up to 1985? It is a provisional endorsement. Is not that a halfhearted way of approaching a critical situation? I press the right hon. Lady to see that the Secretary of State for Energy gives full consent to the “Plan for Coal” up to 1985. When can we expect a proper conservation plan from the Government, in view of the statements that have been made at Strasbourg? Finally, the Government appear to have had welcome second thoughts about the European monetary system. When I came back from Paris and the scheme was established the right hon. Lady said that it was a sad day for Europe that we had not joined that system. I do not see much enthusiasm for it yet by the right hon. Lady. I welcome her second thoughts, but what is the Government's policy? Finally,—— Mr. Nicholas Winterton The right hon. Gentleman has already had two “finallys” . Mr. Callaghan Then this is my third “finally” , and after it I shall sit down. These are pertinent questions. Finally, I wish to question the Prime Minister about co-ordinating budgetary policies. The right hon. Lady has agreed to co-ordinate budgetary policies to produce a satisfactory level of growth. When can we expect the summer Budget? The Prime Minister I am grateful to the Leader of the Opposition for his comments about refugees from Vietnam. We hope that there will soon be an international conference. That is the only way to try to sort out the vast numbers involved. The right hon. Gentleman asked about contributions to the budget. Our partners were not all aware that Britain had, to us, an unanswerable case. Mr. Callaghan They were. The Prime Minister I am sorry, but they were not. Nor, indeed, did they accept that Britain's contribution to the budget was inequitably high. One of our [column 291]first problems was to convince them of that. The right hon. Gentleman asked what type of contributions we were dealing with. They were net contributions, although there is some argument about how the monetary compensatory amounts are dealt with—whether they are dealt with on behalf of the exporting country or the importing country. Of course, the net contributions are affected by the difference between the gross contributions and receipts. That is an important part of trying to assess the budget in future years. The right hon. Gentleman also asked about energy and coal shortages. He is well aware that we have an excellent nuclear inspectorate in Britain. Our designs have a high regard for the safety of nuclear equipment, and that is right. I believe that it is hoped to produce about 108 million tonnes of coal this year. I remember that when I first dealt with the fuel portfolio when in opposition we were producing much more. We want as much coal produced as possible. I hope that one day we shall be able to produce much more than 108 million tonnes per annum. The right hon. Gentleman asked about the European monetary system. We have swapped some of our reserves, but we shall not make a final decision for some time. We said that we would be in a position to make some preliminary observations when this matter was dealt with again in September. I believe that it is right to review the whole position now, in the light of existing circumstances, before we reach a final decision. Mr. Eldon Griffiths Will my right hon. Friend undertake to keep the House informed of the progress in the Government's thinking on EMS before a final decision is taken by the Cabinet? Is my right hon. Friend satisfied that there is now a common European policy for the production as well as the conservation of energy? Will Europe be able to speak with one voice not only in Tokyo but to OPEC? Is the Prime Minister aware that there is a wide welcome in Europe, as there is in Britain, for the refreshing change in style and manner in which she has approached the European Community? The Prime Minister I shall endeavour to meet my hon. Friend's point about the EMS. The next meeting is in September when, unless anything unusual occurs, the House will not be sitting. I am not in a position to say that we have one policy for Europe for the production of energy. Indeed, we certainly do not have a single policy. In addition to the oil that we have, there must be more concerted action on agreeing about the future of nuclear energy. Most of us agree that we shall not have enough power unless we go nuclear on a larger scale than at present. We must make clear that we are all in favour of safe nuclear production and that we shall take all necessary steps to that end. I hope that we shall be able to speak with one voice in Tokyo and that it will be a powerful voice in relation to fuel and energy. Mr. Donald Stewart Is there any substance in the reports that the Government will attempt to disguise the size of the contribution to the EEC budget by diverting a substantial part of it to food prices? Is the Prime Minister aware that a fiddle of that kind will be even more offensive and unacceptable than the present direct contribution? The Prime Minister That is the first time that I have heard that report. I wholly reject it. Mr. Churchill Did my right hon. Friend have an opportunity of discussing with any of her colleagues the grave implications for the defence of Europe of article 12 of SALT, which appears effectively to rule out any future Nassau-type agreement or any transfer of strategic technology from the United States to our NATO Allies? Will she consider taking that matter up urgently with President Carter when she meets him in Tokyo this week? The Prime Minister We did not discuss defence in Strasbourg. As my hon. Friend knows, defence comes under NATO and is not a matter for the Community. I have answered questions before on SALT and made it clear that we believe that we shall be able to obtain the technology that we need for updating our own nuclear deterrent and that SALT does not affect that in any way. Mr. Jay What parliamentary or legal authority have the Government for transferring part of the gold and dollar reserves to the European monetary co-operation fund? Full legislation in the House was needed for a similar transfer to the IMF in 1945. Has any deposit yet been made? The Prime Minister I cannot say whether any deposit has yet been made, but I do not believe that we need special legislative authority to make it. Mr. Skeet Does the Prime Minister agree that the reference to coal for power stations means not more British coal but more coal from South Africa, Australia and Poland? How can it be said that a subsidy of £6.35 a tonne will make a viable export trade for the United Kingdom? The Prime Minister Obviously we want more coal from our own production. There are contracts with other countries for importing coal and some is being imported, but not much. We should not need to import it if we could use more of our own. Mr. Benn Has the Prime Minister agreed that the international oil companies can deplete the North Sea more rapidly to meet the Common Market need for oil? Following the French pattern, has the Prime Minister in mind to build an American reactor of the kind involved in the Harrisburg accident? Does she intend to lift all restrictions on the import of coal? Is she aware that any one of those three policy changes would have to be fully debated in the House, because of their importance? The Prime Minister The right hon. Member asked about production from the North Sea. As he knows, that would mean making alterations to the flaring regulations, among other things. We have not made a decision to use American nuclear reactors, especially the PWR. The decision is still open. No decision has yet been made. We have not made an open commitment to import unlimited quantities of coal. Mr. Nicholas Winterton Will my right hon. Friend indicate what political and economic action the European Community will take against Vietnam and its backer, the Soviet Union, to prevent them from taking their present brutal and inhuman [column 294]action? Since my right hon. Friend attended the meeting with our noble Friend the Foreign Secretary, why was there no discussion about Rhodesia? Will she recognise Bishop Muzorewa and his Government at an early date in order to ensure that tribal conflict does not bring chaos and disorder to that country? The Prime Minister We did not discuss economic action against Vietnam, although a number of countries made the point that the Community supplies subsidies for food to Vietnam and suggested that they should be switched to supplying food for the Vietnamese refugees. We did not discuss Rhodesia in formal session. There were one or two informal meetings and the subject was raised there. I saw Lord Harlech today, and he will be going to Salisbury early next week. Bishop Muzorewa will then travel to the United States. He has asked to see me on the way back and I shall, of course, see him. My hon. Friend will see, therefore, that a good deal of activity is under way. Several Hon. Members rose—— Mr. Speaker Order. May I appeal to the House for short questions? We must be fair to the Welsh business that is to follow, which is very restricted. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.” ] Well, the House should get its priorities right. Mr. Russell Johnston How can the Prime Minister have the gall to express satisfaction with the result of the direct elections? Is it not gratuitously arrogant to dismiss the fact that the 13 per cent. of the British electorate who voted Liberal have no representation because of a system that is unique in the Community? Surely the result can give no satisfaction to any democrat. The Prime Minister I certainly wish that more people had voted in the first direct elections to the European Parliament. However, the Liberal Party did not do particularly well in those areas where it could have won. Mr. John H. Osborn Does my right hon. Friend agree that the problem in the Community is to promote the use of coal-fired power stations? Will she explain what progress has been made in implementing proposals for trade in coal, and coal stocks, and in creating coal-fired [column 295]power stations, an idea that was supported by the Parliament and the Commission but got stuck in the Council of Ministers? The Prime Minister I think that that subject was not raised at the Council. As my hon. Friend knows, some of us are already switching some of the burn from oil to coal and helping to save oil in that way. I think that most of us consider that the real future lies in building more nuclear power stations, and it is to that that we must give our attention. Mr. Dalyell The Prime Minister used the phrase “reinforcing efforts to reduce the consumption of oil” . What practical suggestions were put forward? The Prime Minister As the hon. Gentleman knows, David Howellthe Secretary of State for Energy has made statements about reducing the use of power in the public sector. Each and every country can do that. It does not reduce consumption by a great deal, but every marginal reduction helps in the current situation. Further, prices have gone up, and that of itself depresses demand. Fortunately, our prices for petrol are nothing like so high as those in Europe. Mr. Ian Lloyd Since the lead time for nuclear reactors is about a decade from mine to production, and since the Western world is likely to deplete its resources of uranium even more dramatically than it depletes its oil resources unless we build fast breeder reactors, was this issue considered by my right hon. Friend and her colleagues at the summit? If it was not, how soon will it be? The Prime Minister The answer in respect of the fast breeder reactor is “No” . The French are further ahead with their fast breeder reactor—the Phoenix—but we are committed to holding a public inquiry before any decision is made to go ahead with a fast breeder reactor. Mr. Douglas Will the right hon. Lady specifically consider the regulation of the Rotterdam spot, or free, market? Does she believe in the French proposal for a ceiling on dealings there? Will she tell the House how her Government propose to enter into price-fixing in respect of the Rotterdam market? The Prime Minister The main outflow of crude oil that is not sold at the official price is not through the Rotterdam spot market. The idea that all of the oil that is being sold at a very high price goes through the Rotterdam spot market is false. Only a tiny amount goes through that channel. The real problem arises because some producer countries are selling at prices that broke free from the base price, which is of Saudi Arabian marker crude. That is the source of the high prices of oil. I do not believe that those prices are affected by the prices of crude on the Rotterdam spot market. The bigger Rotterdam spot market is on product, but that is small compared with the volumes of crude that have to be sold the world over. Mr. Adley No one underestimates the urgency needed to agree a policy on oil conservation in Europe or in the rest of the world. Is my right hon. Friend aware that there has been another tanker disaster off the South Coast of England, and that there remains in this House and in the country generally continuing concern about the problem of oil pollution? Is she further aware that the Community has made interesting and progressive proposals for Community-wide measures to deal with the problem, including proposals to make the oil owners partly responsible for what happens? Will she, with her Cabinet colleagues, take an opportunity to encourage the Community to pursue this policy, and will our Government take notice of what the Community is saying? The Prime Minister We are all anxious to deal with this matter, and I shall certainly look into it to see whether any further steps need to be taken by this country, either on our own or in conjunction with our partners. Mr. Skinner Will the Prime Minister confirm that what is really happening on the Rotterdam spot market in relation to oil is the operation of free enterprise? I was always under the impression that she, perhaps more than most of the Tory Benches, fully supported that. Does she understand that the real problem with coal in this country is how to sell what we already have? It is a matter not so much of producing more coal but of getting rid of it. Is the right hon. Lady aware that large [column 297]stocks are still available in this country, and will she therefore, on the basis of all that, ensure that there is no further importation of coal? The Prime Minister The Rotterdam spot market is a symptom of the imbalance between demand and supply. It works in the same way as any other spot market. When there is a surplus, prices are very low indeed. When there is a scarcity, prices are high. Some countries that have no other way of getting oil would rather pay higher prices than have more people unemployed. We could certainly do with a good deal more coal production in this country, particularly since our stocks have been depleted by the cold weather last winter. We could do with a good deal more coal, and we shall be grateful for anything that the hon. Gentleman can do to encourage that. Mr. Gummer Will my right hon. Friend confirm the widespread impression that the Community is more likely to come to terms with Britain's problems both on energy and on the Community budget now that it is dealing with a Government who support Europe instead of opposing it? The Prime Minister What my hon. Friend says is true. Certainly the Council was very welcoming to the new member. Mr. Heffer Since the Prime Minister, like myself, does not agree with proportional representation, and since less than one-third of the people of this country voted in the European elections, will the right hon. Lady tell us what she told her colleagues in Europe? How did she explain that over two-thirds of the British people turned their backs on the Euro-elections, showing that they were not happy about the elections, and therefore about the Common Market? The Prime Minister I do not agree with the hon. Gentleman's interpretation of the low turnout. We have had a surfeit of electionitis in this country recently, and I think that it was due to the fact that people had been to the polls on a number of occasions that they did not turn out in such large numbers as they otherwise would have done. Mr. Rost As security of energy supplies must be second in importance only [column 298]to the need for defence, is my right hon. Friend satisfied that simply agreeing to freeze oil imports into Europe will help towards self-sufficiency in the long term and in preparation for the time when the oil will not be available to import? The Prime Minister There are, quite clearly, problems at two levels—the immediate and the long-term, which is the time that it takes to build the nuclear power stations to replace the oil and fossil fuels as an alternative source of power. I agree with the underlying premise of my hon. Friend. Though we are talking a great deal about replacing power supplies in the longer term by nuclear power, perhaps not enough is being done to give information to our people and to assure them about the safety of nuclear fuel. We must take all possible steps to do that. Mr. English Does the right hon. Lady recollect that in the previous Parliament a Committee of this House produced an interim report on the EMS and Britain's relationship to it? Does she agree that, to be effective, the reallocation of reserves that she has announced may not need an Act of Parliament, but will probably need a statutory instrument to be laid before the House? Will she promise that any such change, or decision, will be placed before the Treasury and Civil Service Committee of this House? The Prime Minister This is a technicality. What we have done is only a swap. I doubt whether that needs regulations. It is a swap, that is all, and I do not think that we need legislation for that. With regard to the EMS itself, we shall not take a decision until we are in a position to do so. Several Hon. Members rose—— Mr. Speaker Order. I propose to call two more hon. Members. Mr. Shore The Prime Minister spoke earlier about the timing of the possible main EMS decision in September. Will she think about this again, because it really would be intolerable, given the importance of the issue, if such a decision were made at a Council of Ministers meeting at a time when the House had no opportunity to debate it and was, in fact, in recess. The Prime Minister What I said about September was that we would be in a position then to make our first assessment. I did not say that we would be in a position then to decide whether we would join. We shall be in a position then to make our first assessment. I am determined that we shall not hurry this matter, and I shall take full account of what the right hon. Gentleman and my hon. Friend the Member for Bury St. Edmunds (Mr. Griffiths) said. Mr. Leighton Has the Prime Minister had the opportunity to see the distinguished article by Lombard, on page 16 of today's Financial Times, which explains that we are already making a net contribution to the Community, across the exchanges, of over £1 billion? I think that that is worth 3p off the standard rate of income tax. The Prime Minister I have not seen the article. I should have thought that the £1 billion referred to the adjustment at the end of the transition period, or possibly to next year. The hon. Gentleman is reinforcing the demands that I have made that this matter be considered. After all, the Council of Ministers agreed to consider it and to propose solutions in time for decision in Dublin in November. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc prime minister mrs margaret thatcher permission mr speaker like statement european council meeting strasbourg lord carringtonmy noble friend foreign commonwealth secretary attend european council strasbourg end week matter discuss contribution community budget dissatisfaction result present system plain european council call action commission assess fact budget transfer likely affect member state financial mechanism intend reduce contribution work report finance council minister opportunity forward practical idea solve problem take view account commission ask formulate proposal time decision take meeting european council november dublin agreement tackle inequitably high contribution britain present make european budget time decision council secondly energy oil shortage agree reinforce effort reduce consumption oil achieve objective community set emphasise alternative source energy play nuclear power coal particular recognise need consumer producer country work reduce demand increase supply clear readiness community member state establish contact producer country end mind tokyo economic summit meeting week show community ready shoulder responsibility good position industrialised country comparable effort reduce oil consumption import agree high column price adversely affect outlook growth price steady demand supply balance thirdly council review early operation european monetary system tell government intention house inform deposit reserve ecus fourthly council anxious help refugee vietnam support proposal international conference finally note satisfaction direct election european assembly welcome intention irish prime minister represent council inaugural meeting new assembly july mr james callaghan house hope meeting tokyo able assist discussion refugee vietnam view horrific figure quote number example hong kong require policy humanitarian surround country hope progress matter right hon lady refer inequitably high contribution community budget mean net contribution matter resource community receipt study right hon lady refer include study receipt expect contribution progress matter consider suggest ceiling contribution concrete request commission budget right hon lady support house continue work begin fair take shine ball hit run believe possible hope right hon lady sanguine say agreement matter finally welcome dialogue place energy coal shortage proceed column energy step take ensure proper safety measure operation increase production coal report newspaper morning secretary state energy agree plan coal run provisional endorsement halfhearted way approach critical situation press right hon lady secretary state energy give consent plan coal expect proper conservation plan government view statement strasbourg finally government appear welcome second thought european monetary system come paris scheme establish right hon lady say sad day europe join system enthusiasm right hon lady welcome second thought government policy finally mr nicholas winterton right hon gentleman finallys mr callaghan finally shall sit pertinent question finally wish question prime minister coordinate budgetary policy right hon lady agree coordinate budgetary policy produce satisfactory level growth expect summer budget prime minister grateful leader opposition comment refugee vietnam hope soon international conference way try sort vast number involve right hon gentleman ask contribution budget partner aware britain unanswerable case mr callaghan prime minister sorry accept britain contribution budget inequitably high column problem convince right hon gentleman ask type contribution deal net contribution argument monetary compensatory amount deal deal behalf export country import country course net contribution affect difference gross contribution receipt important try assess budget future year right hon gentleman ask energy coal shortage aware excellent nuclear inspectorate britain design high regard safety nuclear equipment right believe hope produce million tonne coal year remember deal fuel portfolio opposition produce want coal produce possible hope day shall able produce million tonne annum right hon gentleman ask european monetary system swap reserve shall final decision time say position preliminary observation matter deal september believe right review position light exist circumstance reach final decision mr eldon griffith right hon friend undertake house inform progress government think ems final decision take cabinet right hon friend satisfy common european policy production conservation energy europe able speak voice tokyo opec prime minister aware wide welcome europe britain refreshing change style manner approach european community prime minister shall endeavour meet hon friend point ems meeting september unusual occur house sit position policy europe production energy certainly single policy addition oil concerted action agree future nuclear energy agree shall power nuclear large scale present clear favour safe nuclear production shall necessary step end hope shall able speak voice tokyo powerful voice relation fuel energy mr donald stewart substance report government attempt disguise size contribution eec budget divert substantial food price prime minister aware fiddle kind offensive unacceptable present direct contribution prime minister time hear report wholly reject mr churchill right hon friend opportunity discuss colleague grave implication defence europe article salt appear effectively rule future nassautype agreement transfer strategic technology united states nato ally consider take matter urgently president carter meet tokyo week prime minister discuss defence strasbourg hon friend know defence come nato matter community answer question salt clear believe shall able obtain technology need update nuclear deterrent salt affect way mr jay parliamentary legal authority government transfer gold dollar reserve european monetary cooperation fund legislation house need similar transfer imf deposit prime minister deposit believe need special legislative authority mr skeet prime minister agree reference coal power station mean british coal coal south africa australia poland say subsidy tonne viable export trade united kingdom prime minister obviously want coal production contract country import coal import need import use mr benn prime minister agree international oil company deplete north sea rapidly meet common market need oil follow french pattern prime minister mind build american reactor kind involve harrisburg accident intend lift restriction import coal aware policy change fully debate house importance prime minister right hon member ask production north sea know mean make alteration flare regulation thing decision use american nuclear reactor especially pwr decision open decision open commitment import unlimited quantity coal mr nicholas winterton right hon friend indicate political economic action european community vietnam backer soviet union prevent take present brutal inhuman column right hon friend attend meeting noble friend foreign secretary discussion rhodesia recognise bishop muzorewa government early date order ensure tribal conflict bring chaos disorder country prime minister discuss economic action vietnam number country point community supply subsidy food vietnam suggest switch supply food vietnamese refugee discuss rhodesia formal session informal meeting subject raise see lord harlech today go salisbury early week bishop muzorewa travel united states ask way shall course hon friend good deal activity way hon member rise mr speaker order appeal house short question fair welsh business follow restricted hon member hear hear house priority right mr russell johnston prime minister gall express satisfaction result direct election gratuitously arrogant dismiss fact cent british electorate vote liberal representation system unique community surely result satisfaction democrat prime minister certainly wish people vote direct election european parliament liberal party particularly area win mr john h osborn right hon friend agree problem community promote use coalfire power station explain progress implement proposal trade coal coal stock create coalfired column station idea support parliament commission get stick council minister prime minister think subject raise council hon friend know switch burn oil coal help save oil way think consider real future lie build nuclear power station attention mr dalyell prime minister phrase reinforce effort reduce consumption oil practical suggestion forward prime minister hon gentleman know david howellthe secretary state energy statement reduce use power public sector country reduce consumption great deal marginal reduction help current situation price go depress demand fortunately price petrol like high europe mr ian lloyd lead time nuclear reactor decade production western world likely deplete resource uranium dramatically deplete oil resource build fast breeder reactor issue consider right hon friend colleague summit soon prime minister answer respect fast breeder reactor french ahead fast breeder reactor phoenix committed hold public inquiry decision ahead fast breeder reactor mr douglas right hon lady specifically consider regulation rotterdam spot free market believe french proposal ceiling dealing tell house government propose enter pricefixe respect rotterdam market prime minister main outflow crude oil sell official price rotterdam spot market idea oil sell high price go rotterdam spot market false tiny go channel real problem arise producer country sell price break free base price saudi arabian marker crude source high price oil believe price affect price crude rotterdam spot market big rotterdam spot market product small compare volume crude sell world mr adley underestimate urgency need agree policy oil conservation europe rest world right hon friend aware tanker disaster south coast england remain house country generally continue concern problem oil pollution aware community interesting progressive proposal communitywide measure deal problem include proposal oil owner partly responsible happen cabinet colleague opportunity encourage community pursue policy government notice community say prime minister anxious deal matter shall certainly look step need take country conjunction partner mr skinner prime minister confirm happen rotterdam spot market relation oil operation free enterprise impression tory bench fully support understand real problem coal country sell matter produce coal getting rid right hon lady aware large column available country basis ensure importation coal prime minister rotterdam spot market symptom imbalance demand supply work way spot market surplus price low scarcity price high country way get oil pay high price people unemployed certainly good deal coal production country particularly stock deplete cold weather winter good deal coal shall grateful hon gentleman encourage mr gummer right hon friend confirm widespread impression community likely come term britain problem energy community budget deal government support europe instead oppose prime minister hon friend say true certainly council welcoming new member mr heffer prime minister like agree proportional representation onethird people country vote european election right hon lady tell tell colleague europe explain twothird british people turn back euroelection show happy election common market prime minister agree hon gentleman interpretation low turnout surfeit electionitis country recently think fact people poll number occasion turn large number mr rost security energy supply second importance column need defence right hon friend satisfy simply agree freeze oil import europe help selfsufficiency long term preparation time oil available import prime minister clearly problem level immediate longterm time take build nuclear power station replace oil fossil fuel alternative source power agree underlying premise hon friend talk great deal replace power supply long term nuclear power information people assure safety nuclear fuel possible step mr english right hon lady recollect previous parliament committee house produce interim report ems britain relationship agree effective reallocation reserve announce need act parliament probably need statutory instrument lay house promise change decision place treasury civil service committee house prime minister technicality swap doubt need regulation swap think need legislation regard ems shall decision position hon member rise mr speaker order propose hon member mr shore prime minister speak early timing possible main ems decision september think intolerable give importance issue decision council minister meet time house opportunity debate fact recess prime minister say september position assessment position decide join shall position assessment determined shall hurry matter shall account right hon gentleman hon friend member bury st edmund mr griffith say mr leighton prime minister opportunity distinguished article lombard page today financial time explain make net contribution community exchange billion think worth standard rate income tax prime minister see article think billion refer adjustment end transition period possibly year hon gentleman reinforce demand matter consider council minister agree consider propose solution time decision dublin november copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Ep. 1817 - It’s FIGHT NIGHT #2 Published: 9/28/2023 Republican candidates go right at each other to see who's up. For the challenge of taking on Donald Trump, Trump's fraud ruling could be the most damaging blow to his candidacy yet. And a mass crimes rate engulfs the nation. I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Bench Shapiro Show. Today's show's sponsor by Express VPN. Do you like your web history being seen and sold to advertisers? No, me neither. Get ExpressVPN right now at ExpressVPN dot com slash Ben. So preliminary note today, noon Eastern time. I will be speaking with Elon Musk over on X. There's an X space where we're gonna be talking about Elon Musk and his fight with the Anti-Defamation League and standards of free speech on X, as well as advertising pressure on X. So if you wanna check that out, make sure to head on over two x spaces at noon Eastern time. Okay, so last night was the second big Republican debate, and by big I mean Donald Trump wasn't part of it. And of course, there's no way to talk about the debate without talking about the fact that the front runner by 30 points in the national average right now was not part of the debate. And when the front runner isn't there, it turns into a bit of a crab pot, meaning everybody's just pulling each other down there. There's no way to avoid that sort of optic. The question is, is anyone gonna emerge from that crab pot to actually challenge Donald Trump? Now here's the reality. Believe it or not, we're still pretty early in this race. It is only September 28th at this point in the 2008 race, which is sort of the last open primary race that we had before Trump stepped onto the scene in 2008. At this point, there was a running gun battle between Rudy Giuliani and Mike Huckabee for the Republican nomination. In fact, even in the 2016 Republican primary polls, Donald Trump was, was leading at this point, but he wasn't like way out ahead. It was still pretty competitive at this point. In other words, some things can still happen. Now, is that likely? Is that, is that the most likely thing to, it's not the most likely thing to happen. However, it is pretty obvious that Donald Trump has some vulnerabilities in places like Iowa. So For example, despite the fact that Donald Trump is leading significantly in Iowa and also in New Hampshire, when asked which candidates are being considered by voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, a huge number of Iowa voters and New Hampshire voters are saying that they're considering candidates other than Donald Trump. So they're not locked into Trump by any stretch of the imagination. In other words, if something terrible were to happen in Trump's candidacy, there are a lot of people who would presumably shift over right now. For example, if you look at that c b s news poll from U gov, what it shows is that in Iowa, about 20% of the voter block says they'll vote only Trump. In New Hampshire, that number's about 23%, which means 80% in Iowa and 77% in New Hampshire are saying that they'll consider candidates other than Trump. 31% of voters in Iowa say they will not consider Trump at all. 34% of voters in New Hampshire say they will not consider Trump at all. And meanwhile, I've asked bulk of the voters in the middle, the plurality of voters in the middle in both Iowa and New Hampshire, say they will consider Trump and other candidates. What's happening right now is that all the people who are considering Trump and other candidates are splitting about half and half for Trump. So Trump's got that locked in base of 20, 23% in these early states, and then the other 40 to 50% of voters who say that they're considering Trump plus everybody else, are splitting about half for Trump and half for everybody else. And so the field is looking very fragmented. And the same thing is happening with the people who are not considering Trump at all. They're fragmenting among a a bunch of other candidates. So is it possible that somebody could theoretically consolidate the rest of these voters? It is possible, but the field would have to winnow dramatically, and that person would have to take votes directly away from Trump. It wouldn't just be a matter of picking up everybody who's anti-Trump. That's only about 33% of the Republican base at this point. They would somehow have to take the other 45% of the base and they would have to win that percentage of the base, or at least split it in significant fashion. So that's the state of the race. As we move into this debate now, the field is too big. It's pretty obvious that it's going to consolidate. Right now there's three candidates who are probably on the bubble. That'd be Tim Scott, Chris Christie, and Doug Bergham. Vive is self-funded and not really running for president anyway, and therefore he can stay in for pretty much as long as he wants. With that said, the field is likely to winnow. And so by the time we have another debate, we are probably gonna be looking at Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis Pence probably will be out by that point, I would imagine. So you're looking at probably Haley versus DeSantis is how this race is starting to shake down. Now, are these people definitely gonna drop out? Well, if you're Chris Christie, you're just waiting until New Hampshire. You're hoping that the anti-Trump base consolidate to New Hampshire sufficient to actually show some momentum over there. But if you're looking at the state of the race right now, inside the Republican party, Haley and DeSantis are the two most viable candidates. And when I say the two most viable, they're not uneven footing. DeSantis is well ahead of Haley in Iowa, and they're running about even in New Hampshire. So if DeSantis starts to pick up some momentum, which has been the story of this campaign, is that DeSantis has been a solid number two and he has never caught fire. That's been the story of the campaign so far. Again, I'm somebody who is very supportive of Governor DeSantis. I think you make a phenomenal president. I like Nikki Haley. I've been supportive of Governor DeSantis and his candidacy pretty much this entire time in terms of who do I think would make the best president among the candidates who are on the stage. Well, with that said, everybody's still waiting for his campaign to actually initiate. And there, there there's been sort of a stagnation to the race. It's been a very stable race basically since July, since June, July when, when DeSantis first jumped into the race. So did the debate change anything last night? The short answer is no. The debate changed nothing. So Donald Trump basically used the, the war games strategy. The only winning movies is not to play Donald. Trump didn't show up. He realized that if he did show up, he'd get attacked by all the other candidates on a wide variety of issues. He was attacked by them anyway for not showing up. Instead, he decided that he was going to jet over to Michigan and he was going to do an event with like a few Auto workers and, and claim solidarity with the members of the union over there, even though the union has shunned him, and they're just licking the boots of Joe Biden, who is simultaneously licking their boots as well. With that said, him avoiding the debate naturally means that everybody in the room is fighting each other and not Donald Trump, which is a win for Donald Trump. And that was sort of the dynamic last. There was a lot of people talking over each other, people trying to get aggressive, people attempting to fight each other, and it turned into a mess. It was a bit of a dog's breakfast. We'll get to that momentarily first. You know, a company is looking out for you when they actually upgrade your service and don't charge you for it. This is great news for new and current Pure Talk customers. Pure Talk just added data to every plan and includes a mobile hotspot with no price increase whatsoever. If you've considered Pure Talk before, you haven't made a switch, take a look again for just 20 bucks a month, you'll get unlimited talk text. And now 50% more five G data. Plus they're new mobile hotspot. This is why I love Pure Talk. They're veteran owned. They only hire the best customer service team located right here in the United States. Most families are saving almost a thousand dollars a year while enjoying the most dependable five G network in America. I use Pure Talk myself, take all my calls using Pure Talk, I take my calls pretty seriously. Business family, well, Pure Talk makes it happen for me. They have a fantastic network. The Tower Network means that I get clear calls and again, I'm saving a lot of money. Remember, you vote with how you spend your cash, so stop supporting woke wireless companies that don't support you. When you go to Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro, you will save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage because they actually value you. That's Pure Talk dot com slash Shapiro. Pure Talk Wireless for Americans by Americans. Okay, so let's jump into the debate. So last night, the debate was moderated by a person from Univision, which I, I don't understand why Fox News is partnering with Univision, that that is a far left network. It's sort of like the M S N B C of the Latino community. So Hispanics and, and Latinos who are voting Republican or considering voting Republican in the primaries, they're not watching Visian. And, and every question that came out of Visian was, was biased to the left. And Stuart Varney from Fox Business, and you had my friends Anna Perino from Fox News, and through no fault of their own, I mean, I can't blame the moderators, it's easy to blame the moderators, but it was just, it was just a pile up. It was just a 20 car pile up on the I 95. That's all it was. It was just a, it was a complete car crash pretty much from the beginning. There's a lot of awkwardness, a lot of weird moments, some entertaining moments. But you know, for those who suggested the debate overall, it's not a commentary on one individual candidate. The debate overall was relatively unwatchable. That's true. It, it was a, it was a not watchable event. Now, again, I think that some of that has to do with the moderate, some of it has to do with the way that these debates are done. When a person is asked a question, every other mic on the stage needs to be cut. That's just the way this ought to go. And then when the clock expires, then the mic should be cut. It should be that simple. If you strictly set the rules, then the rules have now been set. But nobody does that in these debates. It's kind of incredible to me. I don't understand why Fox News doesn't just set those rules right at the outsets. You at least have some sort of order. The problem is that right now you have seven people on that stage all aggressively attempting to eat the microphone and get into that, that camera with the red light on, and they have no incentive to stop. So there, there's a ton of people talking over each other. There, there was a a ton of sort of non understandable nonsense where people were just, it just sounded like, like gray noise over your ear. So just on an optics level, it was not a good debate. Now, as for the particular candidates, Nikki Haley came in with some semblance of momentum. When I say some semblance, I mean, again, if you look at the polling data, she's doing better in New Hampshire than she was. She's doing better in Iowa than she was. She's still third right now to DeSantis by a pretty significant margin in Iowa. And she's now in the scrum in New Hampshire, meaning if she's second or if she's third or if she's fourth, it's kinda all the same because the reality is that it's Trump at 50 and then it's like DeSantis and Christie and Hailey all between like nine and 13%. So she's got some. So there's no question that Nikki has gotten some momentum off of the last debate. And she came in very aggressive. She came in very hot. Meanwhile, DeSantis was planning presumably to stick to his playbook. His playbook is every time you come to me, I'm going to give you my accomplishments in Florida, which is a fine playbook. That's totally fine Here, abutted some attacks, some really, I think squirrels attacks by moderators talking about For example, the Florida education plan to ban critical race theory. But it, it wasn't gonna be a moment where he sort of elevated. As always, these, these debates are not friendly territory for DeSantis because he is at least on the stage of the front runner, right? He's second to Trump. Everybody is second to Trump, but he, he's on the stage of the front runner, which means he has to fend off all those attacks. Vivek apparently had a personality transplant. So he went from the first debate where he was just aggressively some army, like over the top Sam army and just grinning ear to ear the whole time and, and insulting everybody on the stage to much more humble of a, he must've gotten the exit polls from the last debate and seen that it actually blunted a lot of his momentum and he decided to change it up. Tim Scott, by contrast, decided that he had to get more aggressive because he's also seeing those polls. And what they're saying is everybody thinks Tim Scott is a nice guy and nobody knows why he's on the stage. Chris Christie was just Chris Christie. The one thing you have to say for Chris Christie, that dude is always Chris Christie. He's never not Chris Christie, he's always Chris Christie, except when he's getting Donald, Trump a Coke. But aside from that, he's always Chris Christie all and then Doug Bergham. No one knows why. And Mike Pence, he, again, I I like the vice president. He brought a heavy dose of awkward last night. So just in terms, there was a lot of cringe to this debate. Watching this debate felt like watching the earliest Episodes of the office before they sort of hit their stride. Where was all super cringe humor, or not sure if you're even allowed to laugh or not. Okay? So the debate began with several of the candidates knocking Donald Trump for not showing up to the debate, which is perfectly appropriate. Donald Trump is your Republican candidate for the presidency. He should show up for the debate on every moral level, also on every strategic level. He definitely should not show up for the debate. I'm just gonna point out that strategically speaking, when you are winning by 40 points and you don't show up to the first debate and nothing happens to your numbers, there's literally no reason for you to show up to the second debate. Okay? But of course all the other candidates are going to, are going to attack Trump over this. So Chris Christie led the pack and attacking Trump for not showing up to the debate with the running gun battle for heaviest dose of cringe last night. I mean, this is like fatal dose of cringe here from Chris Christie. And I wanna look in that camera right now and tell you, Donald, I know you're watching, you can't help yourself. I know you're watching, okay? And you're not here tonight, not because of polls and not because of your indictments. You're not here tonight because you're afraid of being on the stage and defending your record. You're ducking these things. And let me tell you what's gonna happen. You keep doing that. No one up here is gonna call you Donald Trump anymore. We're gonna call you Donald Duck. No one's gonna call you Donald Trump. They're gonna call you. They're gonna ask you why you're not wearing pants. Why are only a sher and no pants? What happened to Melania? Where's Daisy? What is wrong with him? I don't even understand. That's who wrote that line. This's like the, that's the worst comedy line. That's a terrible line. They're gonna, they're gonna stop calling you Donald Trump, and they're gonna start calling you Donald Duck. Okay, Bob Hope wants his routine back from 1947. Whoa. So yeah, not, not, not a good line there from Chris Christie. He starts off strong there, right? He is like, you're not here. I know you're watching. The reason you're not watching is because you're, is because you're, I I was, I thought maybe he was gonna go to like needles. And back to the future too, say, 'cause you're chicken, you chicken McFly, you chicken, oh, solid stuff there from, from Chris Christie. Okay, we'll get to more of this, of this bleep show debate in just one second. First, as you know, I'm on the road. When I'm on the road. I gotta tell you, I'm even less inclined to have fruits and vegetables because the food in Israel is fantastic. But I'll tell you what is still bad fruits and vegetables, but you need the fruits and veggies because they're the thing that keeps you alive and healthy. This is why I rely on Balance, Of, Nature, Balance, Of Nature fruits and veggies are a great way to make sure that you are getting essential nutritional ingredients every single day. Through Balance, Of, Nature Nature's advanced cold vacuum process, the vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients of the fruits and veggies are preserved. Seeing get that vital nutrition in every capsule. Balance Of Nature is a whole food supplement with no additives, fillers, extracts, synthetics, pesticides, or added sugar. The only thing in their capsules, Pure fruits and veggies, Balance Of Nature sent a bunch of their product down to the studio for my team to try, and we all love them. Producer Zach brought his Balance Of Nature of fruits and veggie capsules here to Israel. He takes them daily. I've been taking them as well. Obviously, if I'm taking them, that means they're kosher. So if you're one of my fellow kosher keepers, then you can also be having Balance Of Nature stuff. When you're disciplined enough to take care of your health, you reap the benefits. Your body will thank you. Go to Balance Of Nature dot com, use it promo code Shapiro for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer. That's Balance Of Nature dot com promo Coach Shapiro for 35% off your very first preferred order. Okay, so Christie wasn't the only candidate who called out Trump for not being there. DeSantis also called out Trump. And this obviously is a much better calibrated attack than, so where are you? Are you, are you Donald Duck? This is, this is a lot better here from DeSantis. Where's Joe Biden? He's completely missing an action from leadership. And you know, who else is missing an action? Donald Trump is missing an action. He should be on this stage tonight. He owes it to you to defend his record where they added 7.8 trillion to the debt that set the stage for the inflation that we have. Now, I could tell you, this is Governor Florida. We cut taxes, we ran surpluses. We've paid down over 25% of our state debt. And I vetoed wasteful spending when it came to my desk. And as your president, when they send me a bloating spending bill, that's gonna cause your prices to go up. I'm gonna take out this veto pen and I'm gonna send it right back to them. Okay? That's a good pitch from Ron DeSantis. Now again, does that damage Trump in any serious way? I mean, Trump's not even there. And unfortunately, a huge percentage of Trump supporters don't actually hold him responsible for many of the things he actually did while he was in office. But if you're going to launch an attack on Trump, that is the proper attack on Trump. Come defend your own record. Okay? Meanwhile, Mike Pence decided that he was going to go mono imano with Chris Christie in the Awkward Lane. So he decided that he was going to talk about, he, he was asked about Joe Biden showing up at the U Aaw strike. He, he was asked about Donald Trump showing up and speaking in Michigan. And when he was asked about Biden, he, he dropped what he thought, I think was a pre-planned laugh line. So first rule of debate, do not have pre-planned laugh lines. You cannot predict when people are going to laugh, particularly when your laugh lines are this awkward. So here is Mike Pence talking about Joe Biden on the picket line. Look, I do disagree with something Tim Scott just said. Joe Biden doesn't belong on a picket line. He belongs on the unemployment line, And then he, and he looks into camera waiting for, waiting for people to laugh. It's like, oh, no. Oh no. Now first of all, he's criming off Ronald Reagan. It's an old Ronald Reagan line. He says, recession is when your neighbor loses his job, and depression is when you lose your job. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his job, right? So he's basically kind of twisting that line. But yeah, the, the crowd is like, no. So that went over like a lead balloon. I mean, meanwhile, Nikki Haley, she, she was very aggressive last night. She obviously was amped up and you could tell from, from her manner, didn't do poorly last night. But it was just that it was a very aggressive performance from Nikki Haley, which was kind of a difference from her last debate performance, which I thought was actually very good. Here is Nikki on immigration For example. And what she's saying is totally right, is just that again, when you're, when you're watching these things, the cadence sort of matters. Well, what happens is when Joe Biden waved the green flag, it told everybody to come. And now we've seen 6 million people cross the border. We've had more fentanyl that have killed Americans and the Iraq, Vietnam, or Afghanistan wars combined. We need to make sure that we are a country of laws. The second we stop being a country of laws, we give up everything this country was founded on. So we have to secure the border. The way we do that is, first of all, defund sanctuary cities. You see what's happening in Philadelphia right now, it's gotta stop. So all this is good by Nikki Haley, by the way, all this is good by Nikki Haley. And she started off the debate in this mode, as you'll see a little bit later on in the debate, she kept getting more and more aggressive, but again, she started off solid. There's a reason why in this group of candidates, Haley and DeSantis are currently doing the best. And meanwhile, Vivek was there. And again, I agree with a lot of what Vivek says, depending on the day. And, and Vivek yesterday was talking about the, the southern border. And here's what Vek had to say about the southern border, Militarize, the southern border, stop funding sanctuary cities and end for an aid to Mexico and Central America to end the incentives to come across. But I do go a step further. You're right about that, Ilya, I favor ending birthright citizenship for the kids of illegal immigrants in this country. Now, the left will howl about the Constitution and the 14th Amendment. The difference between me and them is I've actually read the 14th Amendment. What it says is that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the laws and jurisdiction thereof are citizens. So nobody believes that the kid of a Mexican diplomat in this country enjoys birthright citizenship. Not a judge or legal scholar in this country will disagree with me on that. Well, if the kid of a Mexican diplomat doesn't enjoy birthright citizenship, then neither does the kid of an illegal migrant who broke the law to come here. Okay? So, so what Vivek is saying there, by the way, actually is, is a good legal argument. This this has been a very, very long and, and interesting ongoing legal argument among conservative legal scholars is whether birthright citizenship actually was ever meant to extend to kids of people who are subject to another jurisdiction. So if you are a Mexican citizen, but not an American citizen, you come here and then you just drop a kid argue, is that kid there for an American citizen? There's a case from the Supreme Court in the late 19th century that sort of suggests that yes, this is birthright citizenship is the way that, that this is done. It would probably take a constitutional amendment to overturn that. There's an argument about whether you could do it with an act of Congress or not. It's an interesting legal argument. So this was the, the debate, the vague who showed up and much better debate. Vague. The problem is that there was hangover from the last debate, vague. And the last debate, Vic was really obnoxious, right? He's the guy who got on stage and he suggested that every single person who was, who was on the stage was bought and paid for, which led to Tim Scott actually taking out a baseball bat and Clobbering Vive on the stage. And it was really at this point in the debate where things started to get outta control from, from here on in. So at the beginning you had some people making some policy statements, good, bad, indifferent. It was really here that things started to, to go wild. I can't imagine how you could say that knowing that you were just in business with the Chinese Communist Party, and the same people that funded Hunter Biden millions of dollars was a partner of yours as well. It's nonsense. It's not nonsense. 15 seconds. I wanna respond. These, these are good people who are tainted by a broken system. And it's not the fault. I think you of anybody who's involved, excuse some of us are tainted. Excuse, excuse, excuse, Not excuse. Thank you for speaking while I'm interrupting. Literally speak. Thank you for speaking. I'm interrupting. You have turn. You can't be on both sides, Gentlemen. You'll have your turn. One of the challenges, Focus on the issues that matter. Business in China, Sound listenable to you. If I may, if I may address, focus on holding Joe Biden accountable. That's what we need to be focused. I actually agree with Ronda. And then Ron jumps in. So this turns into exactly, oh my gosh, this whole thing turns into the opening number of guys and dolls, right? It's, it's, I got a horse ride here. His name is Paul Revere. And now you've got three guys singing simultaneously about which horse they're picking. Like use the, use the mute button gang. Use the mute button. Cut off somebody's mic. This is where it turned into, it turned into a mess. I will, I will say that, that Freudian slip by ve right there. Stop, stop speaking while I'm interrupting is pretty spectacular. Okay, we'll get to more on this in just one second. First, gotta tell you my sleep quality here in Israel. It has been improved by the fact that I, I, I told you this before, I brought with me my bull and Branch blanket. It's a thing I do. It's so comfortable. It is the thing that allows me to sleep even when I'm on the road. Well, your bedding should be that good. Start investing in your best sleep with Bo and Branch. They make the only sheets that get softer with every single wash. Bo and Branch sheets are made from the finest 100% organic cotton threads on earth. They feel buttery to the touch. They're super breathable. They're perfect for both cooler and warmer months. Their signature hem sheets were made with luxurious threads. They're made without pesticides, formaldehyde, or other harsh chemicals. Best of all, Bo and Branch gives you a 30 night risk-free trial with free shipping and returns on all orders. You're not gonna wanna return them. They are just that good. I, again, they're so good. I travel with them. Sleep better at night with BOL and Branch sheets. Get 15% off your first order when you use promo code Shapiro at bull and Branch dot com. That's Bo and Branch, B O l L A N D Branch dot com promo code Shapiro exclusions applies to site for details. They're awesome. That cable knit throw blanket, that's the thing that I bring with me. Awesome, awesome stuff. Check 'em out right now, BOL and Branch dot com, promo code Shapiro and get 15% off your very first order Alrightyy. So the debate again from here, it started to spin out Pence also hit the VE Ram Swami again, more than the hangovers from the last debate is that Vivek pissed everybody off and everybody decided they were gonna take their revenge. So here was Pence slamming Ramas Swami, he again, he he they, they were going after Vivek also because he, he accused everybody on the stage of being corrupt. And now they're all like, dude, you, you tried to cut a deal with the same Chinese business partners, the Hunter Biden cut a deal with here. Here's Pence. Well, first lemme say, I'm glad, I'm glad Vivek pulled out of his business deal in 2018 in China. That must've been about the time you decided to start voting in presidential elections. So we're nice to have you participate in elections. So let me, let me speak to this ish number one. Okay, we're done there. That's it, that's all we need from, from Pence. But again, just demonstrative of the kind of I that people had for Vivek on the stage. Nikki Haley also could not stop going after Vivek last night. So this started off actually when Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about TikTok. So he had this very weird flip-flop on TikTok where he said TikTok should be banned. And then he made a big statement about how he was going on TikTok. Now listen, I think TikTok should be banned. I'm on TikTok because my view of this is pretty simple. I'm gonna go wherever the eyeballs are. I'm gonna go where the eyeballs are because otherwise the bad guys get the eyeballs. So if TikTok is available to people, I'm not gonna pretend it's not available. I have the same view of this that I have about ballot harvesting or about early voting. When these things are available, you have to use them because the other guys are going to use them. And that's, that's kind of what VE says right here. But then he kinda goes further and suggests that maybe we shouldn't ban TikTok. So here's vague talking about TikTok. TikTok is banned on government Bay government issued devices because of its ties to the Chinese government. Yet you join TikTok at the dinner with Boxer and implementer. J Paul, should the commander in chief be so easily persuaded by an influencer? So the answer is, I have a radical idea for the Republican party. We need to win elections. And part of how we win elections is reaching the next generation of young Americans where they are. So when I get into office, I've been very clear, kids under the age of social, under the age of 16, should not be using addictive social media. We're only gonna ever get to declaring independence from China, which I favor if we actually Win. Okay? So he avoids the question on whether to ban TikTok or not. And this leads to Nikki Haley getting very aggressive and some people thought this is a good moment for Nikki Haley. I actually don't think this is a good moment for Nikki Haley because again, Nikki Haley's entire approach here has been very gentile. Like she, she's been aggressive enough to attack people. But yeah, I I don't think this moment went over for her particularly Well. This is infuriating because TikTok is one of the most dangerous social media apps that we could have. And what you've got, I honestly, every time I hear you, I feel a little bit dumber for what you say. Hmm, because I can't believe they hear Governor Haley, if I may got a TikTok situation. What they're doing is these 150 million people are on TikTok. That means they can get your contacts, they can get your financial information, they can get your emails, they can get, let me just say text messages. They can get all these things. This Is important. This is very important for our Party. Know exactly what they're doing. This is very important for our party. And I'm gonna say what, Say you've gone and you've helped China bill make medicines in China, not America, excuse me, excuse me, excuse me. You're now wanting kids to go and get on this social media that's dangerous for all of us. You went and you were in business with the Chinese that gave a hundred Biden $5 million. We can't trust you. We can't trust You. Let say something we Can't have TikTok and our we need to ban. Sorry. It kept going like that. And then, and then Vivek had the temerity say, we shouldn't be attacking each other up on the stage when literally last debate. That's what he was doing. So again, the person who was rising up from the scrum in all of this was to say his strategy, which is, I'm gonna stand over to the side here, right? You guys wanna do your car crash thing? I'm gonna be like over here. It mainly succeeded. The one, one of the best moments that DeSantis had last night was his moment on abortion. So he was asked specifically about abortion policy because Donald Trump has been incredibly aggressive in calling out DeSantis six week abortion ban in the state of Florida. In fact, going so far as to suggest that it's immoral to pass heartbeat bills in the states, which again, I, I don't see how any pro-life person can say that. You can say they think it's tactically wrong to suggest a, a heartbeat bill at the federal level because it's not going to pass. And, and it's just going to tick off independent voters. I understand the tactics, but to suggest as a pro-life for that it's bad to pass such a bill is of course ridiculous heroes. DeSantis answer on abortion. Abortion was on the ballot in six states in 2022. Republicans lost all of them. Next year, abortion will likely be on the ballot in Arizona. That is a must win. State governor DeSantis, how are you going to win over independent pro-choice voters in Arizona? Same way we did in Florida. We won the big greatest Republican victory in a governor's race in the history of the state over 1.5 million votes. We were winning places like Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach that nobody thought was possible because we were leading with purpose and conviction. I reject this idea that pro-lifers are to blame for midterm defeats. I think there's other reasons for that. The former president, you know, he's missing an action tonight. He's had a lot to say about that. He should be here explaining his comments to try to say that pro-life protections are somehow a terrible thing. I want him to look into the eyes and tell people who've been fighting this fight for a long time. Okay, so, you know, good for DeSantis. Good answer. And then of course, DeSantis got attacked over supposed mis teaching of slavery in the States. And again, this is a good defense by DeSantis. So here was the reporter from Univision. Again, this is a left-wing question from a, from an M S N B C Latino reporter. I mean that's, that's basically what Visian is. It is a Latino M S N B C suggesting that the teaching of slavery in Florida talks about the massive benefits of slavery, which of course is not true. We've talked about this extensively on the program. It's a lie. It very much resembles the associated press standards at the, the, the, the pri the prior teaching standards that have been applied in the state of Florida are pretty much mirrored here. All it says is that slaves could use skills they learned during slavery opportunistically in order to advance their lives after slavery. That does not mean slavery was a good thing. That's it is the same thing as suggesting that if you, if you went to jail and then you somehow got a degree while you were in jail, you used that after you went to jail. It doesn't mean jail was great for you. It doesn't mean jail's like an amazing blaze in any case. Here is, here is DeSantis rebutting this ridiculous question. Well, slaves develop skills, which in some instances could be applied for their personal benefit. You have said slaves develop skills in spite of slavery, not because of it, but many are still hurt for the sentence of slaves. This is personal. What is your message to them? So first of all, that's a hoax that was perpetrated by Kamala Harris. Take the out. We are not gonna be doing that. The line out. Second of all, that was written by descendants of slaves. These are great black history scholars, so we need to stop playing these games. Here's the deal. Our country's education system is in decline because it's focused on indoctrination denying parents' rights. We eliminated critical race theory and we now have American civics in the constitution in our schools in a really big way, just like President Reagan asked for and his farewell addressed back in 1989. Florida is showing how it's done. We're standing with parents and our kids are benefiting. Okay, then Tim Scott, again, this is where these debates sort of tend to go off the rails and it does show who has limits and who does not. I do not like badly calibrated attacks or attacks that are dishonest. Tim Scott going after DeSantis on the slavery thing is, is really scurrilous. It's really scurrilous and it's beneath Tim Scott for sure. Here is Scott going after, going after Ron DeSantis on the standard, which again was not written by, by Ron DeSantis. It was written by a group of black scholars in Florida. There is not a redeeming quality in slavery. He and Kamala should have just taken the one sentence out. Okay. Ridiculous. I'm sorry. Th th th That's ridiculous. That's ridiculous. No one is suggesting that slavery had redeeming qualities. No one's suggesting that. And so for Tim Scott to do that again, gross. Don't like it. Okay, we'll get to more of the debate in just one second. First, as much as I love watching baseball, I'm rooting for my White Sox. I gotta say my White Sox are awful this year, like a truly historically awful team, which means I'm not enjoying it as much as usual. So I have to rely on prize picks to make it more enjoyable. Prize picks is the easiest and fastest way to play daily fantasy sports. You pick two to six players and you choose whether they will score more or less than their prize picks projection. If you're, if you're a White Sox fan, always take the under. You can win up to 25 times your money on any entry, no competition against other people. It's just you versus the projections prize picks offers projections on pretty much every sport there is. N B A M L B N F l N H L P G A, college, sports eSports, tennis disc, golf, whatever you're into prize picks now offers Apple pay for quick and easy deposits into your account this football season. Again, if you are like me, a, a fan of say the Chicago Bears and you've just been watching the Painful Season three performance of Justin Fields, maybe the only way to make the NFL watchable for you is to use prize picks. Go to prize picks.com/ Ben, use promo code Ben for a first deposit match up to $100. That's prize picks.com/ Ben with promo code Ben for a deposit match up to $100. Okay, so I've been a little bit hard on Vivic. He did have one sort of shining moment in the debate last night, and that was when he discussed transgenderism, which again, Donald Trump was asked, can a man become a woman? He actually hesitated in an interview on national TV about that. Vivek certainly did not have any hesitation on that question. I have to be very clear about this. Transgenderism, especially in kids, is a mental health disorder. We have to acknowledge the truth of that for what it is. I met two young women early in this campaign, specifically on Parental rights in schools. Parents Have the right to know, and you know what the hypocrisy of this is? Even New Hampshire failed to actually get past a piece of legislation here. The very people who say that this increases the risk of suicide are also the ones saying that parents don't have the right to know about that increased risk of suicide. And I'm sorry, it is not compassionate to affirm a kid's confusion. That is not compassion, that is cruelty. I met two young women, Chloe and Katie early in this campaign, who are in their twenties now, regret getting double mastectomies and a hysterectomy. One of them will never have children. And the fact that we allowed that to happen in this country is barbaric. So I will beg yeah, he's right about this genital mutilation or chemical. Now these, This iss all good from, from a vague, the, the, the biggest issue with the vague sort, sort in terms of sort of how he speaks to camera is that every issue is the same level of intensity. but what he says here is, of course, absolutely right naturally he was then hit immediately with a fact check suggesting that transgenderism is not a mental disorder. Spoiler alert, it's a mental disorder. It's literally in the DSM four and the DSM five. I mean, it's literally in the D S M, which is a, which is a list of mental disorders, gender dysphoria, or gender identity disorder. Okay? The, the debate concluded with pretty much everybody trying to explain who they wanted to leave the race, what they thought the race was about, what the end, they're really only two candidates on the stage who are running to be the president of the United States. In the end, Dessan and Hailey. Everybody else is up there for a different reason. And you could see it in the answers. So the last question, Dana Purino is getting a lot of crap for this because she said if this were a survivor, who would be voted off the island and, and like, is that an insulting question? I mean, half these people should be off the island. Not only should they be off the island, we should actually have, you know, like an alligator pit. And, and I, I think it would make it much more entertaining if every time they slipped lower in the poles, there's the possibility of death. I mean, it would definitely winnow the field pretty dramatically in any case. Here was, here, was Dana asking the question? Ron DeSantis said, I'm not gonna answer it because I don't like the question. Fair enough. None of you have indicated that you're dropping out. So which one of you on stage tonight should be voted off the island? Please use your marker to write your choice on the notepad in front of you. 15 seconds starting out of the people on the stage. Are you serious? Who should be? I'm absolutely serious. The, with all due respect, I mean, we're here like, you know, we're happy to debate, but I think that that's disrespectful to my fellow competitors. I'm not, nobody Wants to, nobody wants to participate. Let's Do some questions. Let's talk about the future of the country. Okay, so, okay, fine, fine. I I will say that it was, it was very funny at the very end of this debate, like took the mask off of vague when it came to Trump. So this is the thing, look at that list of candidates again, who is actually running because they think they're gonna win the nomination. So Nikki, maybe DeSantis is definitely running 'cause he thinks he could win the nomination. I mean, back in December he was directly competitive with Donald Trump. Viva is running to be a senator from Ohio with Trump's endorsement, or he is running to, to get a podcast or he's running to do another, like whatever it is he's doing. He was asked, why are you running when you're basically just a, a Trump mini me? And his answer was, well, I am a Trump mini me. And here we go. I think Trump was an excellent president, but the America first agenda does not belong to one man. It does not belong to Donald Trump. It doesn't belong to me. It belongs to you, the people of this country. And the question is, who's gonna unite this country and take the America first agenda to the next level. Okay, the, okay, okay, fine. So the problem is that guy's running. So you can't do that. You can't do that. He's an excellent president. I love his agenda and we need to take it to the next level. He's standing right there and he's beating you by like 40 points, dude, like that, that's, some people here are running and some people here are not running. They're just there for the, for the bleeps and giggles of it. Again. Nikki Haley running Ron Desant is clearly running. Ve nope, Tim Scott. Nope. Chris Christie. Nope. Is it more of a revenge campaign? Just looking for his opportunity to, to run into the middle of a, of a room and start and start belching everywhere. Doug Bergham. I mean Doug, he seemed like a nice enough guy. I just don't understand. And Mike Pence, who clearly is there to sort of shore up his legacy because he was Donald Trump's vice president and he has to justify himself individually. Okay, what are these people Seriously serious? The answer is no. Which brings us to Trump. We'll get to Trump in just a second. 'cause he spent the day not going to this debate. He instead went over to Michigan. We'll get to that momentarily first. The Ben Shapiro Show is supported by Grand Canyon, University and affordable private Christian University with a vibrant campus in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona that's ranked top 20 in the country. According to niche.com, GCU U is a missional Christ censored university that strives to foster a culture of community giving and impact. Gcu U'S goal is to help you develop into a servant leader who makes a difference through finding your purpose. With 330 academic programs over 270 online, as of June, 2023, G C U integrates the free market system with a welcoming Christian worldview into your bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University private Christian affordable. Visit gcu.edu today. Also, everybody's talking about Convicting a murder. It's completely blown up making a murderer's narrative of Stephen Avery being falsely convicted for murdering Theresa Hoach. There are people all over the country commenting about how they've changed their mind after watching Convicting a Murderer. Well, this is what happens when you actually make a documentary that looks at the entire panoply of the facts. This week's episode is all about how making a Murderer left. So many viewers convinced that Manitowoc Police orchestrated a plot to frame as Stephen Avery Candace is gonna show you what actually happened in this week's episode. Take a look Coming up on Convicting a Murderer, the key was the biggest piece of evidence that viewers to this day believe was planted. It was a story that was really tailor made for Hollywood. It was on TV constantly saying It's Manis County. They're framing me. It's gotta be a setup because if I didn't do it, they had a plan to stop That seemed like almost everyone believes these filmmakers, what Are we word? Justice? What are we wording? Now? His body language comes across as very suspicious. It looked like he was caught. And that is exactly what the filmmakers led you to believe. Why are you editing my courtroom testimony? You should be still faithful to the facts. I started to realize more and more that this was an entertainment piece. This wasn't a piece of journalism like I thought it was going to be. New Episodes of Convicting, a Murderer are released every Thursday exclusively at Daily, Wire Plus. If you're not a member, head on over to DailyWire dot com slash subscribe to sign up for access to this groundbreaking series and the rest of daily wires content. Okay? Meanwhile, Donald Trump avoided the entire debate, right? So everybody in the debate is tearing each other apart. They're, they're all, you know, going at one another. Final debate, grades, by the way, on this one, I'll give a chance to B plus Hailey. A B minus the vehicle will give a c c plus Christie a c, the C minus. I mean, that Donald duck joke was just painful. Mike Pence, a D's Tim Scott, a d and Doug Bergman, sure, he's great. I I I don't understand. And meanwhile, Donald Trump again played the war game strategy. The winning moves not to play. He instead decided to head on over to Clinton Township, Michigan, where he was supposedly speaking to Auto workers. Unclear how many Auto workers actually showed up to this thing since the u a w is in Joe Biden's pocket, because he's in their pocket. It's a, it's in a robos of pocket being in, in any case, Donald Donald Trump goes there and he, and he speaks about the Auto workers and he gets some headlines. This is smart politicking by Trump. Again, he, he's, he does have an innate instinct for getting attention and for misdirecting the cameras to a place he wants them to be, which is why it is so all fired. Frustrating that for the last eight years, Donald Trump has not used that magical power in order to direct attention where it should be. In any case, he goes to Michigan and, and he jumps in on, on his trade agenda suggesting that globalization or what he calls globalism, not quite the same thing that, that globalism is responsible for, for what's going on. So give me four more years and I will give you the end to this horrible globalism that's killing our country. I'll give you the return of the United States of America as the greatest and strongest industrial nation in the history of the world. Together we will dismantle the corrupt power structure that has feasted on the suffering of the American Auto worker and the workers of any kind. Not just Auto workers, workers of any kind. We will cast from power, the financial forces that have turned American cities into ghost towns to build skyscrapers in Beijing, China. We will wield every lever of government to defend you and to hold accountable those who have profited from the betrayal and suffering of the American factory workers. So sad to say, as your 47th president of the United States, I will be your protector. I will be your advocate, and I will be your greatest champion. The greatest champion. And Now again, do I think that a lot of this stuff is true? Do I think that manufacturing jobs are gonna come flowing back into the United States thanks to President Trump? I I mean, I don't, I I don't think that anybody has the capacity to bring manufacturing jobs like 1950 style manufacturing jobs back to the United States. That's not what the statistics show. However, is that a, a solid Midwestern rust belt pitch? Sure. His better pitch here is going after the Biden administration for their electric vehicle mandate. This obviously is true. Here's, here's Trump yesterday in Michigan, On day one, I will terminate Joe Biden's electric vehicle mandate and I will cancel every job killing regulation that is crushing American Auto workers. I will unleash a thing called American Energy, stop the ban on the internal combustion engine and we will drill, baby drill and we will make zero environmental difference. And so again, all of that is, and it's smart for Trump to go to Michigan. He gets attention away from the debate. Now, the biggest issue that Trump is about to face is actually this fraud case. So, believe it or not, all of the criminal violations that he may or may not have committed, I think three of the four criminal cases are bss. I think the one on classified documents is very difficult for him to, to defeat just in the, in the actual court of law because he says on tape that he does the crime. But those are not really the biggest threats him, the biggest threat to him. And the thing I'm, I'm sure that he's worried most about is this fraud case in New York. Now, the fraud case is absurd. It's an absurd case. So the law in the state of New York, I looked it up yesterday. The, the law in the state of New York suggests that the government is capable of what they call disgorgement of profits of a business, even if no crime has actually been committed against anyone. So they're not charging you with a crime. They're not, they're not Convicting you of fraud. You have not defrauded anyone in the sense that the person who you supposedly bamboozled is not suing you. And so you and I make a real estate deal. I inflate the value of my real estate assets. You know, I'm inflating the value of my real estate assets. You make me the loan, we both profit. So there was no loss by you in the state of New York. You do not have to show a loss. The state of New York does not have to show a loss. There doesn't have to be any criminal fraud. They can then push for disgorgement of profits by filing a civil lawsuit. And that's precisely what happened in the state of New York to the tune of $250 million against Trump's businesses, which is wild. I mean, that's wild. That's a, that's, that's a crazy regimen of law that if they detect, they think civilly that you committed a series of frauds. In other words, you just completely kept inflating the value of your assets in order to get deals at, at lower interest rates. The bank knew you were inflating. They gave you the loan anyway. The state can then come in, post facto after everyone has benefited and done great. And the state has gotten more taxes 'cause everybody did great. And they can dis gorge the profits from you by identifying a pattern or practice of fraudulent conduct. So it's not even about finding a harm. There's no harm. Now, normally in a case you have to show a harm. You don't even have to show a harm. You just go after people. So here is what is happening in that case, according to the New York Times and New York judge ruled on Tuesday that Trump persistently committed fraud by inflating the value of his assets and stripped the former president of control over some of his signature New York properties. This is a real problem for Trump. If all those properties go into receivership, that is a heavy duty burden on his assets. So if he's using those assets to say, take loans out against the assets in order to raise legal funds, that is not available to him. It's a serious issue for him. Electorally speaking. So according to the New York Times, the surprising decision by Justice Arthur Geron is a major victory for Attorney General Letitia James in her lawsuit against Trump. Effectively deciding no trial is needed to determine that he had fraudulently secured favorable terms on loans and insurance deals. James has argued that Trump inflated the value of his properties by as much as $2.2 billion and is seeking a penalty of about $250 million in a trial scheduled to begin as early as Monday. Now, if that goes forward and these properties are put into receivership, what that means that Trump can't manage his own businesses, those businesses now go to the hands of a third party receiver who decides how to dispose of assets to pay off creditors. For example. And one of those creditors now would be the state of New York to the tune of $250 million. Trump for his part, said that Justice Gro was a Democrat. He called him deranged. While the trial determined the size of the penalty, eng ground's ruling grants, one of the biggest punishments at James sought the cancellation of business certificates. That allows some of Trump's and New York properties to operate a move that could have major repercussions for the Trump family business. The decision could terminate his control over a flagship commercial property at 40 Wall Street in lower Manhattan, a family, a state in Westchester County. The Trump Tower in Midtown Manhattan, his golf club in Westchester. It wouldn't dissolve the company, but the decision could have a sweeping impact on the company's New York operations. It would shut down an entity that employs hundreds of people working for him in New York, effectively destroying the company. So this is like a serious full frontal assault on Donald Trump's financial wherewithal, his asset base in the state of New York, which is where the majority of his assets are located. And not only that, encumbers the assets for his kids. So even if Trump were to stuff off the political stage tomorrow, even if God forbid something were to happen to him tomorrow, it would then encumber the assets for his children. So this is a real threat to Donald Trump because again, if he does, doesn't have money to run his campaign, where's that money gonna come from? Presumably it's gonna keep coming from donors. You're gonna get money to his campaign, he is gonna use it to pay off all of his legal bills. None of that money's going to get spent on electioneering. So you wanna talk about election interference. This case actually might be the largest act of election interference in the entire election cycle, and that's something people should take into account. Again, if what you care about is victory over Joe Biden, massive burdens on the Republican front runner make it very difficult for him to win. Yes, there have been some positive polls for Donald Trump in the recent past. We're also a year and a half out from the election. Four criminal cases have yet to take place and if his assets go into receivership, he's got a serious problem on his hands that herein lies the problem. And this is the case that really nobody made the debate last night. It's a very simple case. No one on the stage has lost to Joe Biden. There's only one person who's lost to Joe Biden Donald Trump. He lost to Joe Biden in 2020 run me right? That's what everyone on the stage should have been saying this last night. Run me. I didn't lose Joe. Biden, you can inc cite polls, but those same polls suggest that Donald Trump is running dead, even with Joe Biden. And again, Donald Trump, those polls said Hillary Clinton was gonna beat Donald Trump. So there's only one thing we do know is that in an actual voting test, Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden. And so if you're willing to take that risk again, go with Donald Trump, but, or you could go with somebody who hasn't lost to Joe Biden before. In fact, Joe Biden's made it pretty clear that he would like to run against Donald Trump, right? That's the case that everybody basically should have been making on the stage last night and nobody actually made that case, which is always kind of surprising to me. Again, the polls are so all over the place. There's another poll out today from the economist u gov and it shows Biden up five. So inside the space of like a week, you have an A, B, C News, Washington Post poll showing Trump up 10. And then you have an economist u gov poll showing Biden up five. Like that is a 15 point swing. That's so where the hell are, I don't know where the polls are. What I do know is that Trump has very major systemic hurdles that he's gonna have to overcome. That he is, he, this is not an easy election for him by any stretch of the imagination and every single legal ruling that comes down against him, justified or unjustified, it doesn't matter whether the decision is right or whether the decision is wrong. The only thing that matters is whether it stops Trump from from beating Joe Biden. Okay? Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom, who is like desperately hanging around in the hopes that Joe Biden dies. I mean that, that's all I can imagine he's doing here because the year is 2024, not 2028, he's sitting governor of California. He showed up at the debate, he like crashed the party and showed up at the debate. I don't, no one knows why, except that that dude desperately wants attention. Best of me, I saw about him recently is every time Gavin knew some smiles, he looks like a movie villain who just poisoned you, which fact check true. Like Jet set it in from the 1980s. He's like the the lead character in American Psycho. He's gonna take you in the back room, put on some, put on some hip to be square and start going at you with an ax. Gavin Newsom. In any case here was Gavin Newsom crashing the party. Governor, what do you think is gonna be the takeaway after this debate from the American people? I think it will be clear that Trump comes out the dominant force after this debate. I mean, this is the X F L, this is jj. I mean, and honestly, I mean this is maybe, maybe a vice presidential debate. So what are you doing there? These guys are getting lapsed by Donald Trump. It's not even close. It's not even interesting. And I think what's most interesting to me is do they recognize that? Or are they actually gonna show up and run against the guy that's in the way of their prospects to be the nominee? It's a zero sum game. It's a binary choice. At the end of the day. It's not a ranked choice voting. So either these guys come after the front runner and distinguish themselves or otherwise they're wasting everybody's time. And I say this with love and respect and What are you doing there? Then Some of the advertising's being discounted for this debate, people don't even want to tune in because they know that fundamentally. So again, I repeat the question. What is this doofus doing there? What's he doing there? Do you show up to X F L games randomly? Do you show up to the JV game, the JV volleyball game, like on a, on a random Wednesday night? Is that, is that a thing that you do? Very, very strange behavior from Gavin Newsom. Then Gavin Newsom drops an even stranger thing. So we know that Gavin Newsom is slated to have at the end of, I believe next month, he's gonna have a debate with Rhonda DeSantis. And it should be really interesting because again, these are two very different visions of governing the country. DeSantis wants the debate because he wants to be able to take it to Gavin Newsom and demonstrate since he, since Biden won't debate him, that the stand in for Biden is very bad at governing. He's hoping it'll give him a boost. Newsom wants it because anything that that gets Gavin Newsom on TV is something that Gavin Newsom wants. So Gavin Newsom then bizarrely went on a, went on a show on X and explained that because Ron DeSantis is debating him, this disqualifies him as president, which is a super weird take. It's like Newsom has been following Ron DeSantis asking for debate, and finally DeSantis turned around and said, sure, let's do it. And then Newsom's like, haha, you can't be president 'cause you're debating me. Weird. Take Gavin. Okay, A debate between you and Ron DeSantis, November 30th, Fox News channel Sean Ity. Yeah. In Georgia without a crowd. Yeah, just the two of you. Why are you doing that and what is your strategy? Well, And it's, I don't know if that's the right question. Why is he doing it? Is the right question. He's running, I think, I'm not sure after tonight, but currently he's running for president of the United States. Do You think he's still gonna be a, do you think he'll still be a candidate at November 30th? That's an open-ended question. Part of me wonders if you know the fact that he took this debate, the fact that he took the bait in relation to this debate so that he's completely unqualified to be president of the United States. That's my humble first. Why is that you're baiting him with the debate offer? Of course. I mean, why is he debating a guy who's not even running for president when he is running for president? He's showing up at the Reagan library hollowed ground, and he puts out an ad today, not for his presidential campaign to promote a debate against the governor of California. I mean, this guy's distracted. I mean, he is a big weirdo. He's a big, big weirdo. So debate me, but if you do debate me, that means you're bad. Is is a very weird take from Gavin, who's again, just sitting around hoping that Joe Biden dies. Let's be real about this. It's all he wants in life because he figures that since he's running a shadow campaign, if that happens, then, then he picks up the pieces. Meanwhile again, Joe Biden's administration continues to be a believe show. It's the thing that is keeping Republicans competitive in this race. Pete Buttigieg, the Secretary of Transportation, who theoretically should be the one involved, you know, he's the Secretary of Transportation in the U a w issues or Secretary of Labor should be involved, not Joe Biden. Joe Biden shows up to the picket lines, as we discussed yesterday on the program in one of the most corrupt acts I've ever seen from a United States president. He shows up wearing a u a w hat in the middle of a labor dispute, which is totally crazy. And Buttigieg was asked, so does he support the UAWs agenda? Since the UAW wants a 32 hour French work week, they, they want a 40% pay raise over the next four years. Cost of living adjusted. They want defined benefits, pension plans, they want the moon, the sun, and the stars. Do you do, do you think Biden agrees to that? Buttigieg can't say yes to that because if he does, then Biden looks like a shill. So instead he tries to avoid the question They're asking for 40% pay increase four day week, things like that. Does the president support what they're asking for specifically? Look, I can't speak to individual terms that are in contract negotiations being worked out at the table today. Yeah, you can't speak to this. How could, could you speak to the fact that the president went and wore a U aaw hat on the picket line? He speaks to that. Again, this, this administration is just awful. Meanwhile, the d e a administrator is out there admitting that fentanyl is pouring into the country via Mexico. And so why is the border open? So tie all that together and explain why it is so difficult to stop it. So first of all, I think we should start even at the beginning, which is that fentanyl is the deadliest drug threat we've ever faced. It is also incredibly cheap to make, and it is easy to transport or hide because these tiny quantities, the amount that you could fit on the tip of a pencil are, are deadly. And so this has completely changed the face of narcotics trafficking in the world. These are manmade synthetic drugs, starting with these chemicals coming from China, going to Mexico where they are made into fentanyl powder and then often pressed into pills. The powder and the pills are coming across into the us. So then why is the, the border so open? That would be the big question. Again, Joe Biden very, very bad at the pre saying, okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like. Since I'm in Israel, I constantly get asked for, you know, travel recommendations while you're in Israel. So here's one a little bit off the beaten path. There's tons of amazing stuff in Jerusalem. There's, there's amazing sites like Masada, but here's one that the kids will really like. There's something in Israel, it's in a, a place called Bit CMEs called the Biblical Museum of Natural History. And it's very, very cool. So basically this museum was started by a rabbi who looks at the Bible in light of science. And he goes through the Bible and he, and he looks at, at what the language of the Bible means with regard to animals. So For example, when it talks about deer in the Bible, the word for deer actually means gazelle. But because people who are translating the Bible weren't living in Israel, they didn't know the species that actually they were talking about when they translated the Bible. And so you actually have to go back to the original. It's, it's, it's very interesting and cool stuff. It's again, a merger of science and religion that's really worth the visit to you. Go check that out. The Biblical Museum of Natural History. I took my kids there yesterday and it was indeed a lot of fun. If you're looking for more travel recommendations, if you ever come to Israel, I'm happy to give them. In fact, I think we're gonna be putting out more material in the near future about some places you shouldn't definitely should not go if you are visiting around here. Okay, time for some things that I hate. Hey. Okay, so last night in Philadelphia, every liquor store in the city closed every single liquor store in the city. They closed because several locations were looted. Shortly after the conclusion of peaceful protests against a judge's decision to dismiss all charges against a former Philadelphia police officer and a fatal traffic stop shooting to the police made dozens of arrests following Tuesday night's looting. And they said they were prepared to make more if things got out of hand on Wednesday evening. So out of out of concern for public safety, they shut all 49 retail wine and liquor stores in Philadelphia, which is the, the sign of a well-functioning city is you shut all of your retail establishments because you're afraid that people are gonna loot the living crap out of it. In fact, there was tape of juveniles looting multiple stores in Philadelphia. This was Tuesday night, here's what it looked like. Looters, ransacking Center city stores first, then police headed it to Port Richmond and Northeast Philadelphia as caravans of kids and teens moved fast from location to location. Here's what we've learned Overnight, at least 20 people are under arrest. Two guns were recovered. At least one police car was damaged and there are no reports of injuries. NBC ten's, Randy Gill Hall live in Center City near one of the business looted. Randy Police say the looters were taking advantage of a peaceful protest involving the deadly shooting of Eddie Irri. Yeah, police call in these looters, criminal opportunists who went out after this peaceful protest had ended hitting stores like the Lululemon. This is in Rittenhouse Square is a busy night. Witnesses report seeing a hundred or more teens, young people, even some children ransacking stores. It's going amazing. It's going great. The cops were completely outnumbered. So clearly the issue here is police brutality, not mass criminality. So there's one cop there. Look how many criminals, they can't even handle them. Oh my God, This lady just sitting there. I'm filming and laughing hysterically. Oh, okay, That's great. One protestor was, was standing outside a store shouting, everyone must eat. It's a communist uprising in which everyone requires their big screen tv. Everybody must eat, everybody must eat, everybody must eat everybody. Everybody must eat. Yes, everybody must eat. Everybody must eat. Everybody must Eat. Do you mean drink? It's a liquor store. Everybody must eat. That's what I'm talking about. And and meanwhile people screaming that there are free iPhones for everyone as well. So that's exciting. Gotta gotta nail that, that cell phone store and grab yourself an iPhone God word one. Frees, frees, frees Question, where are the parents? Where are the cops? Why have the cops not been allowed to arrest every single one of these people and their parents? Why is it that we are supposed to pretend that mass criminality, if it is disproportionately of one particular race, is in fact something justifiable? I promise you that if there were vast, vast crowds of looting white teens going into the center of Philadelphia and stealing things, I don't think that you'd be be getting the kind of national media blackout that you've been receiving for this particular story. And by the way, Philadelphia's not the only city that's been hit by this stuff. Chicago's been hit by this stuff. Seattle's been hit by this stuff. Los Angeles has been hit by this stuff. Obviously race ties into it. It was tied into the protest in the first place. The entire lie that the police are systemically racist has led to a feeling among a certain gr a certain small subset of a certain group that believes that they are impervious to actual law abiding this, that they've a right to go into stores and and steal things. Now I don't even understand how a person has the moral impetus to believe that you have the right to steal a thing. Where does that come from? Somebody obviously feels morally justified. Everyone must eat free iPhones for everybody laughing hysterically while people unmask commit acts of criminality. And the cops aren't there to stop them. I mean this is, this is societally ruinous stuff, but it's being treated with a, with a, with kid gloves specifically. Because if you were to say the opposite, which is criminality of any race is disgusting, despicable and criminals should go to jail. And we need more cops to arrest more people who commit criminal acts so that they all go to jail if they commit criminal acts. Anybody who commits criminal acts should go to jail. If that were the actual take, then the immediate response from left will be disproportionate. Number of black people going to jail, racist, terrible, fewer cops we know. 'cause it's exactly what happened in 2020. Man. The, the wages of the wages of racial intersectionality when it comes to crime. Vast criminal be behavior. Alright guys, the rest of the show continues right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We are going to be getting into the government shutdown and the latest over there. If you're not a member, become Member Use. code Shapiro. Check out for two months free and all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep fight night publish republican candidate right s challenge take donald trump trumps fraud ruling damaging blow candidacy mass crime rate engulfs nation m ben shapiro bench shapiro today show sponsor express vpn like web history see sell advertiser expressvpn right expressvpn dot com slash ben preliminary note today noon eastern time speak elon musk x s x space go to talk elon musk fight antidefamation league standard free speech x advertising pressure x wanna check sure head x space noon eastern time okay night second big republican debate big mean donald trump not course s way talk debate talk fact runner point national average right debate runner not turn bit crab pot mean everybodys pull s way avoid sort optic question go to emerge crab pot actually challenge donald trump here reality believe pretty early race september point race sort open primary race trump step scene point running gun battle rudy giuliani mike huckabee republican nomination fact republican primary poll donald trump lead point not like way ahead pretty competitive point word thing happen likely likely thing likely thing happen pretty obvious donald trump vulnerability place like iowa example despite fact donald trump lead significantly iowa new hampshire ask candidate consider voter iowa new hampshire huge number iowa voter new hampshire voter say consider candidate donald trump lock trump stretch imagination word terrible happen trumps candidacy lot people presumably shift right example look c b s news poll u gov show iowa voter block say ll vote trump new hampshire number mean iowa new hampshire say ll consider candidate trump voter iowa consider trump voter new hampshire consider trump ve ask bulk voter middle plurality voter middle iowa new hampshire consider trump candidate s happen right people consider trump candidate split half half trump trumps get lock base early state voter consider trump plus everybody split half trump half everybody field look fragmented thing happen people consider trump fragment bunch candidate possible somebody theoretically consolidate rest voter possible field winnow dramatically person vote directly away trump not matter pick everybody s antitrump s republican base point base win percentage base split significant fashion s state race debate field big pretty obvious go consolidate right s candidate probably bubble d tim scott chris christie doug bergham vive selffunde run president stay pretty long want say field likely winnow time debate probably go to look nikki haley ron desantis pence probably point imagine look probably haley versus desantis race start shake people definitely go to drop chris christie wait new hampshire hope antitrump base consolidate new hampshire sufficient actually momentum look state race right inside republican party haley desantis viable candidate viable uneven footing desantis ahead haley iowa run new hampshire desantis start pick momentum story campaign desantis solid number catch fire s story campaign far m somebody supportive governor desantis think phenomenal president like nikki haley ve supportive governor desantis candidacy pretty entire time term think good president candidate stage say everybodys wait campaign actually initiate s sort stagnation race stable race basically july june july desantis jump race debate change night short answer debate change donald trump basically war games strategy win movie play donald trump not realize d attack candidate wide variety issue attack show instead decide go jet michigan go event like auto worker claim solidarity member union union shun lick boot joe biden simultaneously lick boot say avoid debate naturally mean everybody room fight donald trump win donald trump sort dynamic lot people talk people try aggressive people attempt fight turn mess bit dog breakfast momentarily know company look actually upgrade service not charge great news new current pure talk customer pure talk add datum plan include mobile hotspot price increase whatsoever ve consider pure talk not switch look buck month ll unlimited talk text g datum plus new mobile hotspot love pure talk veteran own hire good customer service team locate right united states family save thousand dollar year enjoy dependable g network america use pure talk call pure talk call pretty seriously business family pure talk make happen fantastic network tower network mean clear call m save lot money remember vote spend cash stop support wake wireless company not support pure talk dot com slash shapiro save additional month coverage actually value s pure talk dot com slash shapiro pure talk wireless americans americans okay let jump debate night debate moderate person univision not understand fox news partner univision far left network sort like m s n b c latino community hispanic latinos vote republican consider vote republican primary watch visian question come visian biased left stuart varney fox business friend anna perino fox news fault mean not blame moderator easy blame moderator pile car pile s complete car crash pretty beginning s lot awkwardness lot weird moment entertaining moment know suggest debate overall commentary individual candidate debate overall relatively unwatchable s true watchable event think moderate way debate person ask question mic stage need cut s way ought clock expire mic cut simple strictly set rule rule set debate kind incredible not understand fox news not set rule right outset sort order problem right seven people stage aggressively attempt eat microphone camera red light incentive stop s ton people talk ton sort non understandable nonsense people sound like like gray noise ear optic level good debate particular candidate nikki haley come semblance momentum semblance mean look polling datum s well new hampshire s well iowa s right desantis pretty significant margin iowa s scrum new hampshire mean s second s s fourth kinda reality trump like desantis christie hailey like s get s question nikki get momentum debate come aggressive come hot desantis plan presumably stick playbook playbook time come m go accomplishment florida fine playbook s totally fine abut attack think squirrel attack moderator talk example florida education plan ban critical race theory not go to moment sort elevate debate friendly territory desantis stage runner right s second trump everybody second trump s stage runner mean fend attack vivek apparently personality transplant go debate aggressively army like sam army grin ear ear time insult everybody stage humble ve get exit poll debate see actually blunt lot momentum decide change tim scott contrast decide aggressive s see poll say everybody think tim scott nice guy know s stage chris christie chris christie thing chris christie dude chris christie s chris christie s chris christie s get donald trump coke aside s chris christie doug bergham know mike pence like vice president bring heavy dose awkward night term lot cringe debate watch debate feel like watch early episode office sort hit stride super cringe humor sure allow laugh okay debate begin candidate knock donald trump show debate perfectly appropriate donald trump republican candidate presidency debate moral level strategic level definitely debate m go to point strategically speak win point not debate happen number s literally reason second debate okay course candidate go go attack trump chris christie lead pack attack trump show debate run gun battle heavy dose cringe night mean like fatal dose cringe chris christie wanna look camera right tell donald know watch not help know watch okay tonight poll indictment tonight afraid stage defend record duck thing let tell s go to happen go to donald trump anymore go to donald duck one go to donald trump go to go to ask wear pant sher pant happen melania s daisy wrong not understand s write line s like s bad comedy line s terrible line go to go to stop call donald trump go to start call donald duck okay bob hope want routine whoa yeah good line chris christie start strong right like know watch reason watch think maybe go to like needle future cause chicken chicken mcfly chicken oh solid stuff chris christie okay bleep debate second know m road m road get to tell m inclined fruit vegetable food israel fantastic ill tell bad fruit vegetable need fruit veggie thing keep alive healthy rely balance nature balance nature fruit veggie great way sure get essential nutritional ingredient single day balance nature nature advance cold vacuum process vitamin mineral phytonutrient fruit veggie preserve seeing vital nutrition capsule balance nature food supplement additive filler extract synthetic pesticide add sugar thing capsule pure fruit veggie balance nature send bunch product studio team try love producer zach bring balance nature fruit veggie capsule israel take daily ve take obviously m take mean kosher fellow kosher keeper have balance nature stuff discipline care health reap benefit body thank balance nature dot com use promo code shapiro order preferred customer s balance nature dot com promo coach shapiro preferred order okay christie not candidate call trump desantis call trump obviously well calibrate attack donald duck lot well desantis s joe biden s completely miss action leadership know miss action donald trump miss action stage tonight owe defend record add trillion debt set stage inflation tell governor florida cut taxis run surplus ve pay state debt veto wasteful spending come desk president send bloat spending bill s go to cause price m go to veto pen m go to send right okay s good pitch ron desantis damage trump way mean trump unfortunately huge percentage trump supporter not actually hold responsible thing actually office go launch attack trump proper attack trump come defend record okay mike pence decide go mono imano chris christie awkward lane decide go talk ask joe biden show u aaw strike ask donald trump show speak michigan ask biden drop think think preplanned laugh line rule debate preplanne laugh line predict people go laugh particularly laugh line awkward mike pence talk joe biden picket line look disagree tim scott say joe biden not belong picket line belong unemployment line look camera wait wait people laugh like oh oh s crime ronald reagan old ronald reagan line say recession neighbor lose job depression lose job recovery jimmy carter lose job right s basically kind twist line yeah crowd like go like lead balloon mean nikki haley aggressive night obviously ampe tell manner not poorly night aggressive performance nikki haley kind difference debate performance think actually good nikki immigration example s say totally right watch thing cadence sort matter happen joe biden wave green flag tell everybody come ve see million people cross border ve fentanyl kill americans iraq vietnam afghanistan war combine need sure country law second stop country law country found secure border way defund sanctuary city s happen philadelphia right get to stop good nikki haley way good nikki haley start debate mode ll little bit later debate keep get aggressive start solid s reason group candidate haley desantis currently good vivek agree lot vivek say depend day vivek yesterday talk southern border here vek southern border militarize southern border stop fund sanctuary city end aid mexico central america end incentive come step right ilya favor end birthright citizenship kid illegal immigrant country left howl constitution amendment difference ve actually read amendment say person bear naturalize united states subject law jurisdiction thereof citizen believe kid mexican diplomat country enjoy birthright citizenship judge legal scholar country disagree kid mexican diplomat not enjoy birthright citizenship kid illegal migrant break law come okay vivek say way actually good legal argument long interesting ongoing legal argument conservative legal scholar birthright citizenship actually mean extend kid people subject jurisdiction mexican citizen american citizen come drop kid argue kid american citizen s case supreme court late century sort suggest yes birthright citizenship way probably constitutional amendment overturn s argument act congress interesting legal argument debate vague show well debate vague problem hangover debate vague debate vic obnoxious right s guy get stage suggest single person stage buy pay lead tim scott actually take baseball bat clobber vive stage point debate thing start outta control beginning people make policy statement good bad indifferent thing start wild not imagine know business chinese communist party people fund hunter biden million dollar partner nonsense nonsense second wanna respond good people taint broken system fault think anybody s involve excuse taint excuse excuse excuse excuse thank speak m interrupt literally speak thank speak m interrupt turn not side gentleman ll turn challenge focus issue matter business china sound listenable address focus hold joe biden accountable s need focus actually agree ronda ron jump turn exactly oh gosh thing turn opening number guy doll right get horse ride paul revere ve get guy singe simultaneously horse pick like use use mute button gang use mute button cut somebodys mic turn turn mess freudian slip ve right stop stop speak m interrupt pretty spectacular okay second get to tell sleep quality israel improve fact tell bring bull branch blanket thing comfortable thing allow sleep m road bedding good start invest good sleep bo branch sheet soft single wash bo branch sheet fine organic cotton thread earth feel buttery touch super breathable perfect cooler warm month signature hem sheet luxurious thread pesticide formaldehyde harsh chemical good bo branch give night riskfree trial free shipping return order go to wanna return good good travel sleep well night bol branch sheet order use promo code shapiro bull branch dot com s bo branch b o l l n d branch dot com promo code shapiro exclusion apply site detail awesome cable knit throw blanket s thing bring awesome awesome stuff check em right bol branch dot com promo code shapiro order alrightyy debate start spin penny hit ve ram swami hangover debate vivek piss everybody everybody decide go to revenge penny slam ramas swami go vivek accuse everybody stage corrupt like dude try cut deal chinese business partner hunter biden cut deal here pence lemme m glad m glad vivek pull business deal china ve time decide start vote presidential election nice participate election let let speak ish number okay s s need pence demonstrative kind people vivek stage nikki haley stop go vivek night start actually vivek ramaswamy ask tiktok weird flipflop tiktok say tiktok ban big statement go tiktok listen think tiktok ban m tiktok view pretty simple m go to eyeball m go to eyeball bad guy eyeball tiktok available people m go to pretend available view ballot harvesting early voting thing available use guy go use s s kind ve say right kinda go suggest maybe not ban tiktok here vague talk tiktok tiktok ban government bay government issue device tie chinese government join tiktok dinner boxer implementer j paul commander chief easily persuade influencer answer radical idea republican party need win election win election reach generation young americans office ve clear kid age social age addictive social medium go to declare independence china favor actually win okay avoid question ban tiktok lead nikki haley get aggressive people think good moment nikki haley actually not think good moment nikki haley nikki haleys entire approach gentile like s aggressive attack people yeah not think moment go particularly infuriate tiktok dangerous social medium app ve get honestly time hear feel little bit dumb hmm not believe hear governor haley got tiktok situation million people tiktok mean contact financial information email let text message thing important important party know exactly important party m go to ve go ve help china bill medicine china america excuse excuse excuse want kid social medium s dangerous go business chinese give biden million not trust not trust let not tiktok need ban sorry keep go like vivek temerity not attack stage literally debate s person rise scrum strategy m go to stand right guy wanna car crash thing m go to like mainly succeed good moment desantis night moment abortion ask specifically abortion policy donald trump incredibly aggressive call desantis week abortion ban state florida fact go far suggest immoral pass heartbeat bill state not prolife person think tactically wrong suggest heartbeat bill federal level go pass go tick independent voter understand tactic suggest prolife bad pass bill course ridiculous hero desantis answer abortion abortion ballot state republicans lose year abortion likely ballot arizona win state governor desantis go win independent prochoice voter arizona way florida win big great republican victory governor race history state million vote win place like miamidade county palm beach think possible lead purpose conviction reject idea prolifer blame midterm defeat think s reason president know s miss action tonight s lot explain comment try prolife protection terrible thing want look eye tell people ve fight fight long time okay know good desantis good answer course desantis get attack suppose mis teaching slavery state good defense desantis reporter univision leftwe question m s n b c latino reporter mean s s basically visian latino m s n b c suggest teaching slavery florida talk massive benefit slavery course true ve talk extensively program lie resemble associate press standard pri prior teaching standard apply state florida pretty mirror say slave use skill learn slavery opportunistically order advance life slavery mean slavery good thing s thing suggest go jail get degree jail go jail not mean jail great not mean jail like amazing blaze case desantis rebut ridiculous question slave develop skill instance apply personal benefit say slave develop skill spite slavery hurt sentence slave personal message s hoax perpetrate kamala harris go to line second write descendant slave great black history scholar need stop play game here deal countrys education system decline focus indoctrination deny parent right eliminate critical race theory american civic constitution school big way like president reagan ask farewell address florida show stand parent kid benefit okay tim scott debate sort tend rail limit like badly calibrate attack attack dishonest tim scott go desantis slavery thing scurrilous scurrilous beneath tim scott sure scott go go ron desantis standard write ron desantis write group black scholar florida redeem quality slavery kamala take sentence okay ridiculous m sorry th th th s ridiculous s ridiculous suggest slavery redeem quality one suggest tim scott gross not like okay debate second love watch baseball m root white sox get to white sox awful year like truly historically awful team mean m enjoy usual rely prize pick enjoyable prize pick easy fast way play daily fantasy sport pick player choose score prize pick projection white sox fan win time money entry competition people versus projection prize pick offer projection pretty sport n b m l b n f l n h l p g college sport esport tennis disc golf prize pick offer apple pay quick easy deposit account football season like fan chicago bear ve watch painful season performance justin field maybe way nfl watchable use prize pick prize pickscom ben use promo code ben deposit match s prize pickscom ben promo code ben deposit match okay ve little bit hard vivic sort shine moment debate night discuss transgenderism donald trump ask man woman actually hesitate interview national tv vivek certainly hesitation question clear transgenderism especially kid mental health disorder acknowledge truth meet young woman early campaign specifically parental right school parent right know know hypocrisy new hampshire fail actually past piece legislation people increase risk suicide one say parent not right know increase risk suicide m sorry compassionate affirm kid confusion compassion cruelty meet young woman chloe katie early campaign twenty regret get double mastectomy hysterectomy child fact allow happen country barbaric beg yeah s right genital mutilation chemical iss good vague big issue vague sort sort term sort speak camera issue level intensity say course absolutely right naturally hit immediately fact check suggest transgenderism mental disorder spoiler alert mental disorder literally dsm dsm mean literally d s m list mental disorder gender dysphoria gender identity disorder okay debate conclude pretty everybody try explain want leave race think race end candidate stage run president united states end dessan hailey everybody different reason answer question dana purino get lot crap say survivor vote island like insulting question mean half people island island actually know like alligator pit think entertaining time slip lower pole s possibility death mean definitely winnow field pretty dramatically case dana ask question ron desantis say m go to answer not like question fair indicate drop stage tonight vote island use marker write choice notepad second start people stage m absolutely respect mean like know happy debate think s disrespectful fellow competitor m want want participate let question let talk future country okay okay fine fine funny end debate like take mask vague come trump thing look list candidate actually run think go to win nomination nikki maybe desantis definitely run cause think win nomination mean december directly competitive donald trump viva run senator ohio trumps endorsement run podcast s run like s ask run basically trump mini answer trump mini think trump excellent president america agenda belong man belong donald trump not belong belong people country question s go to unite country america agenda level okay okay okay fine problem guy run not not s excellent president love agenda need level s stand right s beat like point dude like s people run people run bleep giggle nikki haley run ron desant clearly run ve nope tim scott nope chris christie nope revenge campaign look opportunity run middle room start start belch doug bergham mean doug like nice guy not understand mike pence clearly sort shore legacy donald trumps vice president justify individually okay people seriously answer bring trump trump second cause spend day go debate instead go michigan momentarily ben shapiro support grand canyon university affordable private christian university vibrant campus beautiful phoenix arizona s rank country accord nichecom gcu u missional christ censor university strive foster culture community giving impact gcu goal help develop servant leader make difference find purpose academic program online june g c u integrate free market system welcoming christian worldview bachelor master doctoral degree find purpose grand canyon university private christian affordable visit gcuedu today everybodys talk convict murder completely blow make murderer narrative stephen avery falsely convict murder theresa hoach people country comment ve change mind watch convict murderer happen actually documentary look entire panoply fact week episode make murderer leave viewer convince manitowoc police orchestrate plot frame stephen avery candace go to actually happen week episode look come convict murderer key big piece evidence viewer day believe plant story tailor hollywood tv constantly say manis county frame get to setup not plan stop like believe filmmaker word justice word body language come suspicious look like catch exactly filmmaker lead believe edit courtroom testimony faithful fact start realize entertainment piece not piece journalism like think go new episode convict murderer release thursday exclusively daily wire plus member head dailywire dot com slash subscribe sign access groundbreaking series rest daily wire content okay donald trump avoid entire debate right everybody debate tear apart know go final debate grade way ill chance b plus hailey b minus vehicle c c plus christie c c minus mean donald duck joke painful mike pence ds tim scott d doug bergman sure s great not understand donald trump play war game strategy win move play instead decide head clinton township michigan supposedly speak auto worker unclear auto worker actually show thing u w joe biden pocket s pocket robo pocket case donald donald trump go speak auto worker get headline smart politicking trump s innate instinct get attention misdirect camera place want fire frustrating year donald trump magical power order direct attention case go michigan jump trade agenda suggest globalization call globalism thing globalism responsible s go year end horrible globalism s kill country ill return united states america great strong industrial nation history world dismantle corrupt power structure feast suffering american auto worker worker kind auto worker worker kind cast power financial force turn american city ghost town build skyscraper beijing china wield lever government defend hold accountable profit betrayal suffering american factory worker sad president united states protector advocate great champion great champion think lot stuff true think manufacturing job go to come flow united states thank president trump mean not not think anybody capacity bring manufacturing job like style manufacturing job united states s statistic solid midwestern rust belt pitch sure well pitch go biden administration electric vehicle mandate obviously true here here trump yesterday michigan day terminate joe bidens electric vehicle mandate cancel job kill regulation crush american auto worker unleash thing call american energy stop ban internal combustion engine drill baby drill zero environmental difference smart trump michigan get attention away debate big issue trump face actually fraud case believe criminal violation commit think criminal case bss think classify document difficult defeat actual court law say tape crime big threat big threat thing m m sure s worry fraud case new york fraud case absurd absurd case law state new york look yesterday law state new york suggest government capable disgorgement profit business crime actually commit charge crime convict fraud defraud sense person supposedly bamboozle sue real estate deal inflate value real estate asset know m inflate value real estate asset loan profit loss state new york loss state new york loss not criminal fraud push disgorgement profit file civil lawsuit s precisely happen state new york tune million trump business wild mean s wild s s s crazy regimen law detect think civilly commit series fraud word completely keep inflate value asset order deal low interest rate bank know inflate give loan state come post facto benefit great state get taxis cause everybody great dis gorge profit identify pattern practice fraudulent conduct find harm s harm normally case harm not harm people happen case accord new york times new york judge rule tuesday trump persistently commit fraud inflate value asset strip president control signature new york property real problem trump property receivership heavy duty burden asset s asset loan asset order raise legal fund available issue electorally speak accord new york times surprising decision justice arthur geron major victory attorney general letitia james lawsuit trump effectively decide trial need determine fraudulently secure favorable term loan insurance deal james argue trump inflate value property billion seek penalty million trial schedule begin early monday go forward property receivership mean trump not manage business business hand party receiver decide dispose asset pay creditor example creditor state new york tune million trump say justice gro democrat call derange trial determine size penalty eng ground rule grant big punishment james seek cancellation business certificate allow trump new york property operate major repercussion trump family business decision terminate control flagship commercial property wall street low manhattan family state westchester county trump tower midtown manhattan golf club westchester not dissolve company decision sweeping impact company new york operation shut entity employ hundred people work new york effectively destroy company like frontal assault donald trumps financial wherewithal asset base state new york majority asset locate encumber asset kid trump stuff political stage tomorrow god forbid happen tomorrow encumber asset child real threat donald trump not money run campaign s money go to come presumably go to come donor go to money campaign go to use pay legal bill money go spend electioneer wanna talk election interference case actually large act election interference entire election cycle s people account care victory joe biden massive burden republican runner difficult win yes positive poll donald trump recent past year half election criminal case place asset receivership s get problem hand lie problem case debate night simple case stage lose joe biden s person s lose joe biden donald trump lose joe biden run right s stage say night run not lose joe biden inc cite poll poll suggest donald trump run dead joe biden donald trump poll say hillary clinton go to beat donald trump s thing know actual voting test donald trump lose joe biden willing risk donald trump somebody not lose joe biden fact joe biden pretty clear like run donald trump right s case everybody basically make stage night actually case kind surprising poll place s poll today economist u gov show biden inside space like week b c news washington post poll show trump economist u gov poll show biden like point swing s hell not know poll know trump major systemic hurdle s go to overcome easy election stretch imagination single legal ruling come justify unjustified not matter decision right decision wrong thing matter stop trump beat joe biden okay gavin newsom like desperately hang hope joe biden die mean s imagine s year s sit governor california show debate like crash party show debate not know dude desperately want attention good see recently time gavin know smile look like movie villain poison fact check true like jet set s like lead character american psycho s go to room hip square start go ax gavin newsom case gavin newsom crash party governor think go to takeaway debate american people think clear trump come dominant force debate mean x f l jj mean honestly mean maybe maybe vice presidential debate guy getting lapse donald trump close interesting think s interesting recognize actually go to run guy s way prospect nominee zero sum game binary choice end day ranked choice voting guy come runner distinguish waste everybodys time love respect advertising discount debate people not want tune know fundamentally repeat question doofu s x f l game randomly jv game jv volleyball game like random wednesday night thing strange behavior gavin newsom gavin newsom drop strange thing know gavin newsom slate end believe month s go to debate rhonda desantis interesting different vision govern country desantis want debate want able gavin newsom demonstrate biden will not debate stand biden bad govern s hope ll boost newsom want get gavin newsom tv gavin newsom want gavin newsom bizarrely go go x explain ron desantis debate disqualify president super weird like newsom follow ron desantis ask debate finally desantis turn say sure let newsom like haha not president cause debate weird gavin okay debate ron desantis november fox news channel sean ity yeah georgia crowd yeah strategy not know s right question right question s run think m sure tonight currently s run president united states think s go to think hell candidate november s openended question wonder know fact take debate fact take bait relation debate s completely unqualified president united states s humble bait debate offer course mean debate guy s run president run president s show reagan library hollow ground put ad today presidential campaign promote debate governor california mean guy distract mean big weirdo s big big weirdo debate debate mean bad weird gavin s sit hope joe biden die let real want life figure s run shadow campaign happen pick piece joe bidens administration continue believe thing keep republicans competitive race pete buttigieg secretary transportation theoretically involve know s secretary transportation u w issue secretary labor involve joe biden joe biden show picket line discuss yesterday program corrupt act ve see united states president show wear u w hat middle labor dispute totally crazy buttigieg ask support uaw agenda uaw want hour french work week want pay raise year cost live adjust want define benefit pension plan want moon sun star think biden agree buttigieg not yes biden look like shill instead try avoid question ask pay increase day week thing like president support ask specifically look not speak individual term contract negotiation work table today yeah not speak speak fact president go wear u aaw hat picket line speak administration awful d e administrator admit fentanyl pour country mexico border open tie explain difficult stop think start beginning fentanyl deadly drug threat ve face incredibly cheap easy transport hide tiny quantity fit tip pencil deadly completely change face narcotic traffic world manmade synthetic drug start chemical come china go mexico fentanyl powder press pill powder pill come border open big question joe biden bad pre say okay time thing like thing hate thing like m israel constantly ask know travel recommendation israel here little bit beat path s ton amazing stuff jerusalem s s amazing site like masada here kid like s israel place call bit cme call biblical museum natural history cool basically museum start rabbi look bible light science go bible look language bible mean regard animal example talk deer bible word deer actually mean gazelle people translate bible not live israel not know specie actually talk translate bible actually original interesting cool stuff merger science religion s worth visit check biblical museum natural history take kid yesterday lot fun look travel recommendation come israel m happy fact think go to put material near future place not definitely visit okay time thing hate hey okay night philadelphia liquor store city close single liquor store city close location loot shortly conclusion peaceful protest judge decision dismiss charge philadelphia police officer fatal traffic stop shoot police dozen arrest follow tuesday night loot say prepared thing get hand wednesday evening concern public safety shut retail wine liquor store philadelphia sign wellfunctione city shut retail establishment afraid people go to loot living crap fact tape juvenile loot multiple store philadelphia tuesday night here look like looter ransack center city store police head port richmond northeast philadelphia caravan kid teen move fast location location here ve learn overnight people arrest gun recover police car damage report injury nbc tens randy gill hall live center city near business loot randy police looter take advantage peaceful protest involve deadly shooting eddie irri yeah police looter criminal opportunist go peaceful protest end hit store like lululemon rittenhouse square busy night witness report see teen young people child ransack store go amazing go great cop completely outnumber clearly issue police brutality mass criminality s cop look criminal not handle oh god lady sit m film laugh hysterically oh okay s great protestor stand outside store shout eat communist uprising require big screen tv everybody eat everybody eat everybody eat everybody everybody eat yes everybody eat everybody eat everybody eat mean drink liquor store everybody eat s m talk people scream free iphone s exciting get to got to nail cell phone store grab iphone god word free free free question parent cop cop allow arrest single people parent suppose pretend mass criminality disproportionately particular race fact justifiable promise vast vast crowd loot white teen go center philadelphia steal thing not think d get kind national medium blackout ve receive particular story way philadelphia city s hit stuff chicago hit stuff seattle hit stuff los angeles hit stuff obviously race tie tie protest place entire lie police systemically racist lead feeling certain gr certain small subset certain group believe impervious actual law abide ve right store steal thing not understand person moral impetus believe right steal thing come somebody obviously feel morally justify eat free iphone everybody laugh hysterically people unmask commit act criminality cop not stop mean societally ruinous stuff treat kid glove specifically opposite criminality race disgust despicable criminal jail need cop arrest people commit criminal act jail commit criminal act anybody commit criminal act jail actual immediate response left disproportionate number black people go jail racist terrible few cop know cause exactly happen man wage wage racial intersectionality come crime vast criminal behavior alright guy rest continue right go to wanna miss go get government shutdown late member member use code shapiro check month free annual plan click link description join

This bill renames the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program as the Jobs and Opportunity with Benefits and Services (JOBS) program, reauthorizes the program through FY2027, and makes changes relating to work requirements for beneficiaries. States providing aid under the program shall create an individual opportunity plan for each beneficiary. States shall impose work requirements on all work-eligible beneficiaries and shall reduce benefits for noncompliance. (Currently, individual plans are optional under TANF, and states have discretion as to whether to reduce benefits for noncompliant individuals.) States providing aid shall meet annual performance targets related to the number of beneficiaries who exit the program and find unsubsidized employment. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) shall reduce grants to states that fail to meet such targets. States shall provide data related to beneficiary employment and wages to HHS, which shall be publicly available. The bill modifies certain limitations that restrict the use of funds for case management and other purposes and requires states to spend at least 25% of funds from various grants on core activities. Certain existing laws relating to monitoring and recovering improper benefits payments shall apply to the JOBS program. The bill eliminates programs providing (1) supplemental grants for population increases, (2) bonuses for high performance states, (3) welfare-to-work grants, and (4) contingency funds for state welfare programs.

right

bill rename temporary assistance needy family tanf program job opportunity benefit service job program reauthorize program make change relate work requirement beneficiary state provide aid program shall create individual opportunity plan beneficiary state shall impose work requirement workeligible beneficiary shall reduce benefit noncompliance currently individual plan optional tanf state discretion reduce benefit noncompliant individual state provide aid shall meet annual performance target relate number beneficiary exit program find unsubsidized employment department health human service hhs shall reduce grant state fail meet target state shall provide datum relate beneficiary employment wage hhs shall publicly available bill modify certain limitation restrict use fund case management purpose require state spend fund grant core activity certain exist law relate monitor recover improper benefit payment shall apply job program bill eliminate program provide supplemental grant population increase bonus high performance state welfaretowork grant contingency fund state welfare program

This bill designates the U.S. courthouse at 1501 North 6th Street in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the Judge Sylvia H. Rambo United States Courthouse.

right

bill designate courthouse north street harrisburg pennsylvania judge sylvia h rambo united states courthouse

This bill expands coverage of telehealth services under Medicare to include store-and-forward technologies (in which information is sent to providers and reviewed at a later time, rather than through a real-time interaction). Currently, coverage is limited to federal demonstration programs in Alaska and Hawaii.

right

bill expand coverage telehealth service medicare include storeandforward technology information send provider review later time realtime interaction currently coverage limit federal demonstration program alaska hawaii

Speeches, etc. This debate has been unexpected in some ways. Some of the men have been provocative and have, perhaps, raised points which will enable me to reply. I think the best claim for greater and better treatment for women came from Mrs. Sell, who proposed the Motion. She was competent, relevant, direct and to the point. She was followed by an equally competent speech by Miss Beryl Cooper. Then some of the men came in and later on one of the women said that not all women need or deserve complete equality with men. May I reply that not all men need or deserve complete equality with women. I think it was Socrates who said long, long ago that when woman is made equal to man she becomes his superior, and I would not dissent from anyone as wise as Socrates. I am still mystified about one of Councillor Tuckman 's observations. He said that women get married and have children, but men do not. This must upset the statisticians somewhere. I should also like to make one preliminary observation on the speech of the solicitor, Mr. McBryde, who said that he did not think a guilty wife would in any circumstances be ordered to maintain her husband. I would not dream of replying only on my own authority, but I can call in aid the authority of the Law Commission who, on page 25, said this, “The present law can be briefly summarised as follows: Ordering a Settlement. On the grant of a divorce of judicial separation to the husband on the ground of the wife's adultery, cruelty or desertion, the court can order her to settle any of her property for the benefit of the husband and children or either of them” . Then it goes on to say, “There is no power in any circumstances to order the husband to settle his property for the benefit of his wife and children” . There is one case in which the wife can be ordered to make provision for the husband and children under circumstances when the husband cannot do the reverse. I welcome this Motion and I hope the Conference will accept it. I think that our thanks are due to those whose work resulted in this document, whatever its name. All right, it might have been better to have called it ‘Fair Deal for Women’, but it is not what it is called that matters, it is the contents which matter. It is a very valuable study, as you have heard from Mrs. Sell, who gave an excellent report of some of its contents. I should also like to thank the people who produced a similar document which followed called, Opportunity for Women, which is an excellent discussion of the problem of equal pay, to which I shall refer in a moment or two. May I come to some of the proposals in Fair Shares for the Fair Sex. The purpose of this document was two-fold: first, to urge changes in the law where the law is unfair to women and, secondly, where the rights are adequate the purpose of the document was to consider better methods of enforcement. We all know that there are many cases when people have a right at law, but having a right at law is quite different often from being able to enforce that right. This is particularly so with regard to matrimonial rights. A number of speakers have referred to some of the provisions with regard to family law. It is quite true what one of our men speakers said, that the right to maintenance derives from the married woman's right to support for herself and her children. This, of course, has been a principle which has extended a long time back [end p1] and it has always been a principle which is necessary to face the realities of the situation, that the wife frequently works entirely in the home, has children and has to have a long spell off from work in order to carry out her duties in the home. This is the reality and this is why the wife has always been entitled to the right of support. Of course, the whole fallacy of Mr. McBryde 's argument about the wife being self-employed and, therefore, being paid to meet her responsibilities is quite simply this: that husbands do not pay their wives. Of course, if they did, the wives would line up and say, ‘I want pay as a cook. I want pay as a cleaner. I want pay as a laundress. I want pay as a baby-sitter’, and so on. The husband would very soon be bankrupt. It was a very interesting and provocative speech, but I think that is about all. I am concerned and we are all concerned with the reality of the situation, which is that the wife frequently is not able to do any work or does not wish to do any work or does not wish to do any work outside the home, but is very hard-working in the home itself. This document does nothing to disturb the wife's right to support, and I am very glad that it does not. I sometimes fear that talk about equality goes so far that it might one day upset this right, and I am certain that if it did it would be very much to the disadvantage of all those wives who carry out such a marvellous job creating the homes of our nation. A number of speakers have referred to certain problems with collecting maintenance. I heartily endorse what they said. It is quite absurd that a woman who wants maintenance or who has an order for maintenance should have to wait in a long queue at the magistrates' court. I also endorse the other methods for improving the collection of maintenance. You will notice that we have concentrated in this Report on trying to make people meet their obligations. There would be an argument for saying that the support of deserted wives should pass to the State. If that were to be done, it would encourage more and more people to “rat” on their responsibilities and pass them on to others. Our task is to try to persuade people to meet their obligations and responsibilities, and we are therefore more concerned to make arrangements to this end than to pass on those responsibilities to the State. In fact, already social security payments to deserted and divorced wives and children are running at the rate of £50 million a year. Those are commitments which are not being met by the people who created them, and the suggestion that the attachment of earnings order should be recorded on the tax PAYE form should help to secure more payments from the people who created those obligations. While I am on the attachment of earnings point, may I pay great tribute to Dame Joan Vickers, who did such hard work in trying to secure this right in the first place. Eventually, our own Government took over her Bill, but now we have certain problems with enforcing the collection of payments under the orders. I should like to say a few words about tax changes with regard to maintenance payments. The document also proposes some changes here. When a wife is deserted she often has to go out to work to keep the children. The tax law at the moment assumes that she will get the amount of maintenance on her order and takes it into account in her coding for PAYE purposes. Therefore, she is often in the difficult position that she is paying tax on money which she has not received. This is very wrong and it falls on that section of the community which can least bear it and must be changed. There are certain other suggestions in the Report about which I would like to comment. One is the concept of family property and non-family property. The Report suggests that there should be further debate on this issue before we accept its recommendations, and the Law Commission Report which has also recently come out says that it would not like to come to a conclusion without very much further consideration. But we are all agreed on one principle: that the work which the wife does in the home which cannot be assessed financially should always be fully taken into account on the break-up of marriage and the disposition of the matrimonial home, and that her right to stay in the matrimonial home should be as strong as possible. I have not, in dealing with some of these points, concentrated on equality. When one is dealing with this sphere of law, equity is a very much better principle than equality and one which, in fact, treats women very much more generously and takes into account all the varying circumstances which the principle of equality would have to ignore. One of our own Members pointed out in the debate in the House of Commons on this subject that at present all the assets of a man that can be traced are available for making provision for his wife and all the separate assets of the wife are her own. That is not quite right, even though he was a lawyer. There are certain circumstances when the wife can be called upon to support the man, but, on the whole, the law has attempted to take into account the position of the married woman but there has been a gap between her rights and enforcing those rights. There is a long section in the document about tax and one or two small comments about estate duty. The chapter on tax is one of the most valuable I have ever come across and I urge every one of you to read it. It gathers together in one small chapter all the disabilities and some of the anomalies which should never exist, and I hope that a large number of them will be remedied. Mr. Iain Macleod, two years ago, gave a pledge about taxation on married women who go out to work, and that pledge will, of course, be honoured. But there is one point on which I do not think the document goes far enough, although it was raised yesterday morning in debate. It is about estate duty. In my view, the present structure of estate duty is such that it is really a tax on widows. Although capital gains tax makes special provision for transfers of property between spouses, estate duty makes no such provision. I think that the widow should have prior rights to the Exchequer and there should be special provision made for her. I think we should make our views on that very clear. After all, ladies, this is a problem which the men will never have to face. There were other suggestions about extending [end p2] small income relief and age exemption allowances. May I mention the marvellous work which is always being done by Dame Irene Ward in this connection? When we think of all the work which she has done, we are always reminded of the song “There is nothing like a dame” . Equal pay has been mentioned, and I would like to make reference to it because it is bound to come up in Parliament when we return. Equal pay does not necessarily give rise to increased opportunity. May I first go back quickly over the history of equal pay? The point first came up in 1944, and Sir Winston Churchill then appointed a Royal Commission on the problems of equal pay. It reported in 1946, while we were in Opposition. It found that in the non-industrial Civil Service and local government service and teaching the work performed by men and women was more or less identical. The then Chancellor did not feel that economic circumstances permitted the introduction of equal pay—that was Hugh Dalton in 1946. Then came the 1950 election, and our manifesto said this: That was our pledge in 1950. We were not the Government in 1950, but when we were returned to power that pledge was implemented by Rab Butler in 1955. He made an announcement in January of that year that the Government had decided that the time had come to apply its principles on the rate for the job in the Government service. Equal pay was introduced over a series of years in the non-industrial side of the Civil Service, and its implementation was supported in the teaching profession and local government services. One of our young lady speakers said that she thought a woman should not have the same pay as a man who has children to support. I think that this is a fallacious argument. On that basis, a man who has ten children should have more pay than a bachelor. But you cannot deal with pay in industry or in public service or pay for a job in that way. I could see no justification for advertising, say, for a town clerk or for a solicitor and saying, “If it is a man who gets the job he will get £X thousands and if it is a woman who gets the job she will get £X thousands minus several hundred pounds.” That is why we not only supported, but implemented the pledge of the rate for the job in Government service. That was done. Until that time women had been earning up to 20 per cent less than men in the same grade. We did not touch the private sector, because we believed that that should be left to the machinery of collective bargaining. I should like to point out one thing. In those spheres where equal pay has been implemented, it does not mean that there have been equal opportunities to get those jobs. This is not an argument against equal pay; it is an argument for enlarging opportunities for women, including, of course, more women Members of Parliament. The next stage in the equal pay saga came in the Prices and Incomes legislation in 1968. On the report stage of the Bill we moved an amendment to exempt from the standstill powers of the Bill any awards or settlements designed to implement equal pay. This amendment was rejected by the Government. From the limited information that we have been able to glean since the announcement at the Labour Party Conference last week, neither the new proposals nor its full implications have yet been worked out. When the results of the surveys and negotiations have been completed and the precise proposals are before us, we shall be in a better position to consider our approach. In the meantime, the view that we take has been quite clear from our past actions. We enunciated the principle, we then got the economy expanding, we then assessed the effects, and we then applied the principle and kept our promise. Our record on this is an extremely good one. I think that it was because of this that this Government is anxious to catch up with our own record. There have been a number of valuable suggestions in the report on Fair Share for the Fair Sex. I think there are two factors which we must keep in mind. Many women will still make their main job in life the creation of a home. Others at some time in their life will go out to work and possibly seek a part-time job suitable to their special circumstances. Yet others—some married women and some single women—will carry out the same jobs with equal competence and under the same conditions as men. We must make provision for all of these circumstances, but let us recognise that perhaps the most important job of all is the creation of family and family life. Home is where the individual matters, and, as we move into an economy where size seems to dwarf the individual, the home and the atmosphere there becomes more and more important, not less. Although more married women are going out to work, no one is pushing them outside the home. We wish to recognise the very valuable contribution which they already make. I believe that both of these reports make a very good contribution to enhancing the status and dignity of women. If you accept this Motion, then we shall have to see that each and every one of those points is considered. I hope very much that you will accept the Motion and pass it with acclamation. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc debate unexpected way man provocative raise point enable reply think good claim great well treatment woman come mrs sell propose motion competent relevant direct point follow equally competent speech miss beryl cooper man come later woman say woman need deserve complete equality man reply man need deserve complete equality woman think socrate say long long ago woman equal man superior dissent wise socrate mystify councillor tuckman s observation say woman marry child man upset statistician like preliminary observation speech solicitor mr mcbryde say think guilty wife circumstance order maintain husband dream reply authority aid authority law commission page say present law briefly summarise follow order settlement grant divorce judicial separation husband ground wife adultery cruelty desertion court order settle property benefit husband child go power circumstance order husband settle property benefit wife child case wife order provision husband child circumstance husband reverse welcome motion hope conference accept think thank work result document right well call fair deal woman call matter content matter valuable study hear mrs sell give excellent report content like thank people produce similar document follow call opportunity woman excellent discussion problem equal pay shall refer moment come proposal fair share fair sex purpose document twofold urge change law law unfair woman secondly right adequate purpose document consider well method enforcement know case people right law have right law different able enforce right particularly regard matrimonial right number speaker refer provision regard family law true man speaker say right maintenance derive married woman right support child course principle extend long time end principle necessary face reality situation wife frequently work entirely home child long spell work order carry duty home reality wife entitle right support course fallacy mr mcbryde s argument wife selfemploye pay meet responsibility simply husband pay wife course wife line want pay cook want pay clean want pay laundress want pay babysitter husband soon bankrupt interesting provocative speech think concern concerned reality situation wife frequently able work wish work wish work outside home hardworking home document disturb wife right support glad fear talk equality go far day upset right certain disadvantage wife carry marvellous job create home nation number speaker refer certain problem collect maintenance heartily endorse say absurd woman want maintenance order maintenance wait long queue magistrate court endorse method improve collection maintenance notice concentrate report try people meet obligation argument say support deserted wife pass state encourage people rat responsibility pass task try persuade people meet obligation responsibility concerned arrangement end pass responsibility state fact social security payment deserted divorced wife child run rate million year commitment meet people create suggestion attachment earning order record tax paye form help secure payment people create obligation attachment earning point pay great tribute dame joan vicker hard work try secure right place eventually government take bill certain problem enforce collection payment order like word tax change regard maintenance payment document propose change wife desert work child tax law moment assume maintenance order take account code paye purpose difficult position pay tax money receive wrong fall section community bear change certain suggestion report like comment concept family property nonfamily property report suggest debate issue accept recommendation law commission report recently come say like come conclusion consideration agree principle work wife home assess financially fully take account breakup marriage disposition matrimonial home right stay matrimonial home strong possible deal point concentrate equality deal sphere law equity well principle equality fact treat woman generously take account vary circumstance principle equality ignore member point debate house common subject present asset man trace available make provision wife separate asset wife right lawyer certain circumstance wife call support man law attempt account position married woman gap right enforce right long section document tax small comment estate duty chapter tax valuable come urge read gather small chapter disability anomaly exist hope large number remedied mr iain macleod year ago give pledge taxation marry woman work pledge course honour point think document go far raise yesterday morning debate estate duty view present structure estate duty tax widow capital gain tax make special provision transfer property spouse estate duty make provision think widow prior right exchequer special provision think view clear lady problem man face suggestion extend end small income relief age exemption allowance mention marvellous work dame irene ward connection think work remind song like dame equal pay mention like reference bind come parliament return equal pay necessarily rise increase opportunity quickly history equal pay point come sir winston churchill appoint royal commission problem equal pay report opposition find nonindustrial civil service local government service teach work perform man woman identical chancellor feel economic circumstance permit introduction equal pay hugh dalton come election manifesto say pledge government return power pledge implement rab butler announcement january year government decide time come apply principle rate job government service equal pay introduce series year nonindustrial civil service implementation support teaching profession local government service young lady speaker say think woman pay man child support think fallacious argument basis man child pay bachelor deal pay industry public service pay job way justification advertising town clerk solicitor say man get job x thousand woman get job x thousand minus pound support implement pledge rate job government service time woman earn cent man grade touch private sector believe leave machinery collective bargaining like point thing sphere equal pay implement mean equal opportunity job argument equal pay argument enlarge opportunity woman include course woman member parliament stage equal pay saga come price income legislation report stage bill move amendment exempt standstill power bill award settlement design implement equal pay amendment reject government limited information able glean announcement labour party conference week new proposal implication work result survey negotiation complete precise proposal shall well position consider approach meantime view clear past action enunciate principle get economy expand assess effect apply principle keep promise record extremely good think government anxious catch record number valuable suggestion report fair share fair sex think factor mind woman main job life creation home time life work possibly seek parttime job suitable special circumstance married woman single woman carry job equal competence condition man provision circumstance let recognise important job creation family family life home individual matter economy size dwarf individual home atmosphere important married woman go work push outside home wish recognise valuable contribution believe report good contribution enhance status dignity woman accept motion shall point consider hope accept motion pass acclamation copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve