Datasets:

jhonalevc1995

/

political_bias_train

like 0

Speeches, etc. Mrs. Thatcher Will Michael Footthe Leader of the House please state the business for next week? The Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Michael Foot) The business for next week will be as follows: Monday 17th April—Conclusion of the debate on the Budget Statement. [column 1664] Second Reading of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords]. Tuesday 18th April and Wednesday 19th April—Further progress in Committee on the Wales Bill. Thursday 20th April—Supply [13th Allotted Day]: There will be a debate on the National Health Service, on a motion for the Adjournment of the House. Remaining stages of the Medical Bill [Lords]. Friday 21st April—Private Members' Bills. Monday 24th April—Second Reading of the Nuclear Safeguards and Electricity (Finance) Bill. Mrs. Thatcher I should like to put three points to the right hon. Gentleman. First, last week he promised a statement on what the Government propose to do about the recommendations of the Speaker's Conference on Northern Ireland. The statement has not yet been made and we should like to have it fairly soon. When may we have it? Presumably it will be made some time next week. Secondly, I asked the right hon. Gentleman last week for a debate on Rhodesia. This matter now gets more and more urgent as the negotiations are under way. May I impress upon him that we believe that it is urgent for this House to debate Rhodesia? Everybody else except this House is saying what should be done. May we have a debate very soon? Thirdly, we have had only a brief statement about parliamentary papers. The supply has not improved. We are going into the Finance Bill period when not only hon. Members but people outside will need to know what is happening, to be able to obtain Hansard and quickly to know the answers to their questions. When may we expect either another statement or a full supply of parliamentary papers? Mr. Foot It is true that I indicated last week that I hoped that we would soon have a statement on the Speaker's Conference report. I hope that a statement will be made very early next week. I hope that that will meet the point made by the right hon. Lady. [column 1665] I do not think I have anything to add to what I said to the right hon. Lady last week on the subject of a debate on Rhodesia. The matter was raised just before we adjourned for Easter. I am not saying that there should not be a return at some stage to the matter, but I have no further proposals for a statement now. I fully appreciate the concern in all parts of the House about parliamentary papers. The talks about which I informed the House on 3rd April 1978 resulted in agreement between the management of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the National Graphical Association nationally on the basis of a resumption of normal working at St. Stephen 's Parliamentary Press. This included provision for an examination of the possibility of introducing a self-financing productivity scheme. This was recommended by the officials of the chapel concerned but has so far proved unacceptable. The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service has taken the initiative today in approaching both parties, and I think that we must leave the matter there for the moment. I fully appreciate the great importance of the matter and the concern expressed by the right hon. Lady—a concern which is shared by all hon. Members. Mr. Molloy Will my right hon. Friend give the House an opportunity to have an early debate on the Select Committee's report on the Central Policy Review Staff's review of overseas representation, particularly in the light of the extraordinary biased report on this topic on the BBC one o'clock news? The BBC, in common with the Foreign Office and Diplomatic Corps, thinks that any criticism of these organisations is a form of lèse majesté. Although there was heavy condemnation of the report by members of the Select Committee, that does not necessarily mean that this House agrees with every word of the Select Committee's report. So, in fairness to everybody concerned, will my right hon. Friend consider whether he will give the House a chance to debate the subject? Mr. Foot I cannot promise an immediate debate. My hon. Friend knows my great enthusiasm for Select Committee reports, and it looks to me at a first glance as though this report may be an improvement on some that have gone [column 1666]before. However, I do not want to press that point too far. I cannot promise an early debate, but I shall certainly examine the point mentioned by my hon. Friend. Mr. Powell Is the Lord President aware of the disappointment not only of my hon. Friends and myself but of those whom we represent that the Government have not been able to realise their expectations of proceeding earlier on the results of a conference over which you, Mr. Speaker, presided? In a Session in which the House has spent so much time on measures in which the tendency is to destroy the United Kingdom, would it not be a good idea to find the little time necessary for a measure that will strengthen it? Mr. Foot I agree with the right hon. Gentleman in recognising the importance of the subject and the desire of the House to have a statement. I have already said that I hope that the statement will be given next week. I hope the right hon. Gentleman will also reflect on the fact that, after all the speeches he has made on constitutional subjects during this Session of Parliament, he is now recommending that we should add a further constitutional measure to the discussions this Session. Mr. Heffer Does my right hon. Friend recall that before the recess many of my hon. Friends from Merseyside called for a special debate in the House on the subject of Merseyside in particular? Is he aware that since then there have been further closures in the area, with a further increase in unemployment? Bearing in mind that many of us sought to raise the matter before the recess, will he now give an assurance that we shall have a special and proper debate in this House on the problems in the area so that we may know what the Government intend to do to help? Mr. Foot I fully recognise what my hon. Friend says about the seriousness of the situation on Merseyside. Nobody could minimise the importance of the subject. It is also true, as he has said, that some aspects of the matter were raised before Easter, but I agree that that does not exclude the desirability of another debate on the subject as soon as we can approach it. I cannot give my hon. Friend an immediate promise but [column 1667]I recognise that this is one of the subjects that the House wishes to debate. Mr. du Cann Can the right hon. Gentleman confirm the assurances that he has been good enough to give me in correspondence—for which I thank him—on the matter in regard to which the right hon. Member for Anglesey (Mr. Hughes) and I, on behalf of a very great number of hon. Members, have consistently expressed anxiety to him, namely, that there should be no avoidable delay in the introduction of legislation to implement the Boyle recommendations in regard to hon. Members' pensions? Mr. Foot I agree with what the right hon. Gentleman says. He and my right hon. Friend the Member for Anglesey (Mr. Hughes) have made representations. Indeed, hon. Members from all parts of the House have also made representations on this subject. I hope that when the legislation is brought forward, it will command general assent [Hon. Members: “When?” ] It will be brought forward fairly soon. The legislation is quite complicated, but the issues are not complicated. We shall be seeking to carry out the Boyle recommendations in this respect. I cannot give a date, but I hope that the measure will be produced fairly soon. Mr. Hoyle Will my right hon. Friend consider providing an early debate on unemployment in the consumer electronics industry, particularly in the light of an Early-Day Motion signed by 69 hon. Members drawing attention not only to redundancies at Thorn, but to the critical situation facing the industry generally? [That this House deplores the 2,200 redundancies caused by the closure of the Thorn television factories in Bradford and the grave crisis in the British consumer electronic industry caused by foreign imports, particularly Japanese, and a depressed home market and calls upon Her Majesty's Government to take urgent action to restrict foreign imports and to reflate the economy in order to prevent further factory closures in this important sector of industry.] Mr. Foot I fully accept that there is a very serious situation facing the industry and that hon. Members from many parts of the country have representations [column 1668]to make. I am sure that they are making them to the Departments concerned. But we shall have to consider the situation when we have a little more time later in the Session for these more general debates. However, the representations do not have to await the debate. Mr. Beith Will the right hon. Gentleman give consideration to the difficulties faced by hon. Members who wish to pursue amendments in the Committee considering the Co-operative Development Agency Bill and to discuss them with outside organisations? The Bill had its Second Reading only last Thursday and there are all the attendant difficulties with parliamentary papers. Hon. Members who have been appointed to sit on the Committee were informed of that fact only today, yet they face having to start in Committee next Tuesday. Mr. Foot I am sorry if we are moving too fast for the House. We have to take these matters into account. I shall look at the points raised by the hon. Gentleman. Of course, there will be a Report stage for the Bill and we can look at these matters then. I had hoped, from the reception given to the Bill in the House, that we were proceeding in the way that the whole House wished. Mr. Urwin Will my right hon. Friend take note of the declining employment situation in the Northern Region and seriously consider allocating a day in the near future, if not next week, for a full debate on regional policy? Will he bear in mind the disadvantages of the English regions in these matters? Scotland and Wales have special days on which to discuss their problems. Many of us, who are constantly concerned and are receiving deputations from the region about unemployment, would welcome the opportunity to participate in a debate on general regional policy. Mr. Foot I certainly take note of what my hon. Friend has said, and I shall take it into account, along with the representations of my hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Walton (Mr. Heffer) to see how we can best approach parliamentary discussion of these questions. Sir David Renton Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that since Rhodesia was discussed in the House before Easter, [column 1669]there have been many further important and serious developments and that there is a growing anxiety in this country at the Government's failure to make the best use of the internal settlement? Will he therefore reconsider the matter and provide a debate in Government time at the earliest opportunity? Mr. Foot As I said earlier, I cannot promise an early debate on Rhodesia. I understand the representations that are being made, although the Government's attitude towards the internal settlement has been indicated to the House and comments have been made upon it. I shall take account of the representations made in the House, but I cannot make any promises here and now. Mr. Russell Kerr In view of my right hon. Friend's kind and generous references to the work of Select Committees, will he be good enough to let us have an early debate on the most recent report of the Select Committee on Nationalised Industries, dealing with the British Waterways Board? Mr. Foot I cannot give my hon. Friend an immediate promise of a debate on that subject, sympathetic as I always am to his requests. Sir T. Kitson Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that many Service men are faced with difficult financial problems? When may we expect a statement on Service pay? Mr. Foot I cannot give a date, but of course I recognise the importance of the subject. Mr. Spearing Does my right hon. Friend recall that just after Christmas he gave an undertaking that he would arrange for a debate in Committee on the milk order which removes the guaranteed price for milk? Is he aware that the Milk Marketing Board is under threat and that these matters are to be discussed in Brussels later this month? Would it not be appropriate if such a debate could be arranged and held before the next Council of Agricultural Ministers? Mr. Foot I shall look at my hon. Friend's request. As he knows, we do everything we can, partly because of his representations, to ensure that the House has debates before substantive discussions on these matters take place in [column 1670]Brussels. I shall look at this case in the light of my hon. Friend's fresh representations. Mr. Brooke May I reinforce what was said by the hon. Member for Ealing, North (Mr. Molloy) concerning the Select Committee on the CPRS report? It is eight months since the report was issued and it inevitably occasioned considerable uncertainty among the 4,000 employees of the British Council, many of whom work in my constituency. As a relief to that uncertainty, it would be a great help to have an early debate. Mr. Foot I am not sure whether a debate is the proper way to deal with this matter, but I accept what the hon. Gentleman says about those who work for the British Council. Their position has been criticised and they have every right to expect a statement from the Government. We shall see how soon it can be managed. Mr. James Lamond Is my right hon. Friend bearing in mind that the date of the special session of the United Nations on disarmament is drawing ever closer? Since it is important enough to be attended by the Prime Minister and since the question of the neutron bomb is closely linked with this meeting, would it not be a good idea for us to debate the matter before the Prime Minister sets off for New York? Mr. Foot I shall look at that possibility, without giving any promises. The Government, through the Prime Minister, will be making a statement of major importance to the United Nations at the June meeting, and the House and the country will wish to have some discussion of the matter as we approach that date. Sir Frederic Bennett The right hon. Gentleman has three times referred to the fact that we had an Adjournment debate on Rhodesia before Easter as a reason for not having such a debate with expedition at present. Is he being fair about this? He knows that, apart from the fact that many developments have taken place since then, that debate gave no opportunity for a vote and it is the right of the House to express or deny confidence in the Government in their handling of this matter. Mr. Foot If it is a question of the Opposition wanting a vote on the matter, there are facilities open to them to try [column 1671]to secure that, though I have not heard any hint that this is what they want. In my references to the debate which took place on the Consolidated Fund Bill I was not seeking to depreciate it. Such debates are very important and are arranged so that hon. Members, including the Opposition Front Bench, may select subjects according to their sense of what is important. That is what happened on that occasion and the importance of that debate should not be depreciated. Mr. Hooley Can my right hon. Friend say when the Prayer against the special development order for Windscale will be debated and how much time the House will be allowed for that debate? Mr. Foot I cannot yet give a date, but I certainly recognise the interest in the House both on the date and on the time that will be allowed for that debate. I have nothing further to say on this matter at the moment. Mr. Carlisle I have just returned from Rhodesia, and I support the request made by my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition and others for a debate. Things are happening very quickly in Rhodesia. The situation has changed even within the past three weeks. Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that it is important that the House should have an opportunity to express an opinion? Mr. Foot I fully understand the desire of the House to have a debate on the subject, as has been expressed in questions put by the right hon. Lady the Leader of the Opposition. However, the Opposition also have the chance to choose subjects. It is not the case that all these debates must be selected by the Government. They can also be selected by the Opposition. Mr. Loyden I draw my right hon. Friend's attention to unemployment in the regions. Is he aware that the Government have given a lead in so far as they have cut back on capacity, thereby creating unemployment in areas of already high unemployment? We should not merely discuss unemployment in the regions. We should discuss Government policies to tackle unemployment and to assist industry in the regions. Mr. Foot I shall take into account what my hon. Friend says. However, his [column 1672]comments illustrate the difficulty of securing debates on the subject that satisfy hon. Members in all parts of the House. I do not dismiss what he says. Mr. Luce Will the Leader of the House acknowledge the strong weight of opinion in the House on the need for a full-scale debate on Rhodesia in Government time? Does he accept that a short debate on the Consolidated Fund is no substitute for a full-ranging debate in Government time to discuss what are extremely significant developments in Rhodesia? Mr. Foot I am not saying that the debate that took place on the Consolidated Fund is a substitute necessarily for all subsequent debates on the matter. All that I was saying in response to Opposition hon. Members was that I do not believe that the debate that took place on the Consolidated Fund should be dismissed as one of no importance. That is quite the wrong approach. Time allocated by the organisation of Commons business provided for that debate. The Government may have a view whether we should have a debate on Rhodesia and whether that is immediately desirable, as the Opposition may have their views. The Opposition have the right to raise and press these matters. Mr. Faulds Doubtless my right hon. Friend knows that Ham House was given to the National Trust by the Tollemache family in 1948. However, is he aware that the stables, which remained in private hands, have now come on the marget and that if the Government do not purchase them, they will be privately developed and lost permanently as part of the complex of a marvellous seventeenth century building? Mr. Foot That was not immediately on my mind, but now that my hon. Friend has raised it I shall think of little else. Mr. Forman Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that I, as one of those who were lucky enough to be called to speak in the debate on Rhodesia on the Consolidated Fund before Easter and who, therefore, have no chance of being called in any debate on the subject in the near future, wish to support my right hon. and hon. Friends in calling for an early debate in Government time on this important and fast-moving issue? Mr. Foot I have nothing to add to what I have already said. Mr. Flannery In view of the lack of clarity about the internal settlement in Rhodesia that exists on the Opposition Benches, I ask my right hon. Friend whether we may have a debate on Rhodesia, whether it comes from arrangements made by the Government or from arrangements by the Opposition, so that we may explain to Opposition Members just how undemocratic the internal settlement is. Mr. Foot I fully accept that there is a desire in many parts of the House for a debate on the subject. All that I was saying—I hope that it was not provocative—is that the Opposition, as well as the Government, have the power to select debates. That is the way in which we organise our debates in the House, and I think that it is a good way of arranging them. Mr. Pym Although the House is grateful for what the right hon. Gentleman said in reply to a question from my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition about parliamentary papers, does he think that there is a risk of the House of Commons beginning to treat altogether too lightly the absence of papers and the continuing inconvenience to a great many people? What is the prospect of an early reinstitution of the provision of parliamentary papers? What consideration is he giving to possible alternatives and new methods that could be introduced for producing parliamentary papers in a way that will not bring about recurring interruption from time to time in the supply of these papers? The interruptions are becoming far too frequent. This is an immensely serious matter. It is an affront to the House, I hope that the right hon. Gentleman will be more forthcoming in his response to questions about the thinking that he is giving to the matter as regards a long-term solution as well as the short-term problem. Mr. Foot Nothing that I have said on the subject, either in my statement today or on any previous occasion, has ever minimised its importance. I regard it as being a matter of primary importance for the House. We should not have this sort of interruption in the supply of papers for the conduct of our business. [column 1674]It is not merely a matter of the convenience of the House but one concerned with the proper conduct of our affairs in the House. I agree with the right hon. Gentleman in that sense, and I do not believe that he can find any reference that I have ever made to suggest that this is a matter that I seek to dismiss. I cannot promise the House—I wish that I could—that we are in the presence of a likely settlement in the near future. In the beginning of the week I hoped that that is where we were moving, but we have not moved there as I had hoped. I have said that the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service, which has considerable experience in these matters, is taking action today to ascertain whether it can assist. I wish to do everything possible to encourage that move. In common with the rest of the House I want to see a permanent solution to the problem. I am not quite sure that the right hon. Gentleman's recommendations about how we should secure a permanent settlement are wise, but I shall take into account any suggestion from any quarter for solving the issue. As much as anybody else in the House, I want to solve it. Mr. Pym I fully accept that the right hon. Gentleman shares everyone's concern about the non-production of papers. As he said that a settlement does not seem particularly likely in the near future and he does not want to raise our hopes about a settlement. I press him to consider the desirability of introducing completely different, alternative arrangements for the future so that we shall not continue to be subjected intermittently to the interruption of the supply of papers that we now experience, which is so damaging to the House and the nation. Mr. Foot I said that I did not think that that was necessarily the best approach. Nothing that I am saying is depreciating the importance of the matter. I want to secure an early settlement of the dispute and a situation in which we can solve disputes of the kind that have led to these constant interruptions. Before the dispute occurred there was undertaken a longer-term investigation by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service. I believe that it is that longer-term investigation that offers us the best opportunity of a proper settlement. I do [column 1675]not want to injure that possibility by adopting some quite different approach. Several Hon. Members rose—— Mr. Speaker Order. I have a long list of right hon. and hon. Members who wish to speak in the major debate that is to take place later. I shall let business questions run until five minutes past four. That means that if hon. Members are brief I shall be able to call all those who wish to take part in business questions, but if they are not, I shall not be able to do so. Mr. Tebbit Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that he said that one of his primary responsibilities is to ensure the supply of papers to the House? Does he agree that he is failing in one of his primary responsibilities? [Hon. Members: “Oh.” ]. Of course, the work could be done by a girl with a typesetting machine. Will the right hon. Gentleman say what he intends to do if the dispute is not solved by the time that the Budget Resolutions are to be discussed in Committee, when others outside the House must have the papers? Mr. Foot I have nothing to add to what I said in reply to the right hon Member for Cambridgeshire (Mr. Pym). Mr. Welsh As there is no separate identifiable oil revenue fund, will the right hon. Gentleman arrange for a debate on the use to which the fund will be put so that the Scottish people may judge for themselves the extent to which this national asset will be hived off from Scotland for use elsewhere? Mr. Foot That matter is being constantly debated in the House, including debates now proceeding on the Budget. Mr. Montgomery As the Leader of the House is supposed to look after the interests of the House, and as it has been made abundantly clear that many hon. Members are anxious to have a debate on Rhodesia, will he explain why the Government are not prepared to give time to debate the internal settlement? Secondly, will he tell us when we are likely to have a debate on the report of the Select Committee on Immigration and Race Relations? When that subject is discussed, may we have a two-day debate [column 1676]so that all hon. Members who want to speak will get a chance to speak? Mr. Foot On the second question, again, if I were to be so bold as to suggest that the question of immigration might be raised by the Opposition, no doubt there would be wild protests that that was not possible. I remind the House that the arrangement of the business of the House of Commons is such that large allocations of time are available both to Back Benchers and to the official Opposition. I think that it is absolutely right to protect that in every degree, but the Opposition have the right to choose how they use their time. Mr. Rost When are we to debate the White Paper outlining the Government's plans to squander the British people's North Sea oil bonus? Is the Leader of the House aware that, if we do not do it soon, there will not be much left, because the British National Oil Corporation will have squandered it all? Mr. Foot As no White Paper advocating any such proposal has been produced, there is no reason why we should offer time to debate it. Mr. Kenneth Lewis The Leader of the House will be aware that he has had a lot of pressure from hon. Members on both sides of the House arising from the high unemployment in the North-West and other parts of the country. May I suggest that he proposes to the House that, instead of celebrating May Day by having a holiday, the House should celebrate it by having a debate on unemployment? Mr. Foot I think that it is very good that, for the first time in its history, this country is to have a proper holiday on 1st May. That proposal was put forward when I was at the Department of Employment. I am glad that it has been carried fully into effect. I hope that all will enjoy themselves on that day. I am sure that the House of Commons will return on 2nd May even better equipped to transact its business. Mr. Rifkind Does the Lord President realise that when his hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Hillsborough (Mr. Flannery) joins the Conservative Front Bench in calling for a debate on [column 1677]Rhodesia in Government time, he is on a hiding to nothing? Does he appreciate that both sides of the House want an early debate on that matter and that for him to go on ad nauseam saying that he understands the feelings of the House but refusing to respond to them is a national disgrace? Mr. Whitelaw Well done. Mr. Foot “Well done” says the right hon. Member for Penrith and The Border (Mr. Whitelaw). I am glad that he has recovered his voice at last. As for saying that it is a national disgrace that I have not provided Government time to debate a matter about which the Opposition asked only last week, such an absurdity cannot possibly be sustained. If the Opposition thought that it was such a national disgrace that we have not yet had a debate on Rhodesia, they could choose to have it next Thursday. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.” ] I have the hon. Member for Canterbury (Mr. Crouch) on my side. I am sorry. I see it was not the hon. Member for Canterbury. At any rate, I have two Opposition Members on my side. The Government will consider the representations that have been made to them and I hope that the official Opposition will consider the representations that I have made to them. Mr. MacKay Is the Lord President aware that for many weeks, especially before the Easter Recess, we have been asking for a debate on Rhodesia? Secondly, is he aware that both inside and outside the House there will be astonishment, at this crucial time for Rhodesia, that the Government are acting irresponsibly by not giving us a debate on this very important subject? Mr. Foot I repudiate any suggestion that the Government are not acting responsibly in the matter. The hon. Gentleman said that many hon. Members were asking for a debate before Easter. They had a debate before Easter. He must take that into account as well. I know that the Opposition Chief Whip is always eager that all debates should take place in Government time. He has a vested interest in the matter. All I am saying is that the House of Commons has made arrangements whereby hon. Members in different parts of the House may select [column 1678]debates. I want to preserve that great tradition. Mr. Ian Lloyd I endorse the feeling on both sides of the House for an early debate on Rhodesia, which by now should be the beneficiary of aid rather than the victim of sanctions. In that context, may I draw the attention of the Leader of the House to the alarming disclosure in a recent Written Answer that public funds are now or have recently been going to Cambodia, South Yemen and Uganda? In that context, many of us would like an opportunity of debating the whole question of overseas aid. Mr. Foot Questions on overseas aid are open for discussion in a debate by the normal methods, too. Without accepting any of the suggestions made by the hon. Gentlemen, I should point out that he has the opportunity to put down Questions or to institute debates on the matter. Mr. Nicholas Winterton rose—— Mr. Stanbrook rose—— Mr. Speaker Order. I shall call the two hon. Gentlemen. Mr. Winterton Will the Lord President answer three simple questions? Does he agree that Rhodesia, although an independent de facto Government and country in its own right for 12 years, is still a British Government responsibility; that the Labour Party is at present in charge of the affairs of this country; and that he I presume as the custodian of the wishes and the interests of the House, has a duty to enable the House to vote on the internal settlement at a very early date? Mr. Foot Of course this House and country have special responsibilities for Rhodesia. I do not deny that. The Government have special responsibilities for it, too. If the third question is that the House, or the Opposition, is asking for a vote on the so-called internal settlement in Rhodesia, that is a very different matter. I do not know whether it is wise for the House to vote on such a matter. But if the official Opposition thought it wise that we should have a vote on that matter, no doubt they would make representations on the subject. No such suggestion has been made by them. Mr. Stanbrook Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the source of the [column 1679]trouble at the parliamentary printers is the dissatisfaction felt by the members of the machine room at the prospect of their earnings declining because of a new overtime schedule? Is it not monstrous that the business of the House should be disrupted because of a comparatively minor industrial dispute, however important it may be to the individuals concerned? Will the right hon. Gentleman therefore answer my right hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire (Mr. Pym) and propose an entirely new system which will take this important essential business of the House completely away from the area in which it now is? Mr. Foot As I said in my reply to the right hon. Member for Cambridgeshire. I think that the long-term investigation being made by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service is the best way of securing a long-term solution. I do not think that the hon. Gentleman's suggestion would assist that purpose. Mr. Rost On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. For the sake of accuracy, will you give the Leader of the House an opportunity to correct the inaccurate answer that he gave to me regarding the White Paper published by the Government just before Easter on North Sea oil revenues, which he said apparently did not exist? Mr. Speaker Order. I do not listen to everything. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mrs thatcher michael footthe leader house state business week lord president council leader house commons mr michael foot business week follow monday april conclusion debate budget statement column second reading judicature northern ireland bill lords tuesday april wednesday april progress committee wale bill thursday april supply allotted day debate national health service motion adjournment house remain stage medical bill lords friday april private member bill monday april second reading nuclear safeguard electricity finance bill mrs thatcher like point right hon gentleman week promise statement government propose recommendation speaker conference northern ireland statement like fairly soon presumably time week secondly ask right hon gentleman week debate rhodesia matter get urgent negotiation way impress believe urgent house debate rhodesia everybody house say debate soon thirdly brief statement parliamentary paper supply improve go finance bill period hon member people outside need know happen able obtain hansard quickly know answer question expect statement supply parliamentary paper mr foot true indicate week hope soon statement speaker conference report hope statement early week hope meet point right hon lady column think add say right hon lady week subject debate rhodesia matter raise adjourn easter say return stage matter proposal statement fully appreciate concern part house parliamentary paper talk inform house april result agreement management majestys stationery office national graphical association nationally basis resumption normal working st stephen s parliamentary press include provision examination possibility introduce selffinancing productivity scheme recommend official chapel concern far prove unacceptable advisory conciliation arbitration service take initiative today approach party think leave matter moment fully appreciate great importance matter concern express right hon lady concern share hon member mr molloy right hon friend house opportunity early debate select committee report central policy review staff review overseas representation particularly light extraordinary biased report topic bbc oclock news bbc common foreign office diplomatic corps think criticism organisation form lèse majesté heavy condemnation report member select committee necessarily mean house agree word select committee report fairness everybody concerned right hon friend consider house chance debate subject mr foot promise immediate debate hon friend know great enthusiasm select committee report look glance report improvement go column want press point far promise early debate shall certainly examine point mention hon friend mr powell lord president aware disappointment hon friend represent government able realise expectation proceed early result conference mr speaker preside session house spend time measure tendency destroy united kingdom good idea find little time necessary measure strengthen mr foot agree right hon gentleman recognise importance subject desire house statement say hope statement give week hope right hon gentleman reflect fact speech constitutional subject session parliament recommend add constitutional measure discussion session mr heffer right hon friend recall recess hon friend merseyside call special debate house subject merseyside particular aware closure area increase unemployment bearing mind seek raise matter recess assurance shall special proper debate house problem area know government intend help mr foot fully recognise hon friend say seriousness situation merseyside minimise importance subject true say aspect matter raise easter agree exclude desirability debate subject soon approach hon friend immediate promise column recognise subject house wish debate mr du cann right hon gentleman confirm assurance good correspondence thank matter regard right hon member anglesey mr hughes behalf great number hon member consistently express anxiety avoidable delay introduction legislation implement boyle recommendation regard hon member pension mr foot agree right hon gentleman say right hon friend member anglesey mr hughe representation hon member part house representation subject hope legislation bring forward command general assent hon member bring forward fairly soon legislation complicated issue complicated shall seek carry boyle recommendation respect date hope measure produce fairly soon mr hoyle right hon friend consider provide early debate unemployment consumer electronic industry particularly light earlyday motion sign hon member draw attention redundancy thorn critical situation face industry generally house deplore redundancy cause closure thorn television factory bradford grave crisis british consumer electronic industry cause foreign import particularly japanese depressed home market call majestys government urgent action restrict foreign import reflate economy order prevent factory closure important sector industry mr foot fully accept situation face industry hon member part country representation column sure make department concern shall consider situation little time later session general debate representation await debate mr beith right hon gentleman consideration difficulty face hon member wish pursue amendment committee consider cooperative development agency bill discuss outside organisation bill second reading thursday attendant difficulty parliamentary paper hon member appoint sit committee inform fact today face have start committee tuesday mr foot sorry move fast house matter account shall look point raise hon gentleman course report stage bill look matter hope reception give bill house proceed way house wish mr urwin right hon friend note decline employment situation northern region seriously consider allocate day near future week debate regional policy bear mind disadvantage english region matter scotland wale special day discuss problem constantly concerned receive deputation region unemployment welcome opportunity participate debate general regional policy mr foot certainly note hon friend say shall account representation hon friend member liverpool walton mr heffer well approach parliamentary discussion question sir david renton right hon gentleman aware rhodesia discuss house easter column important development grow anxiety country government failure good use internal settlement reconsider matter provide debate government time early opportunity mr foot say early promise early debate rhodesia understand representation government attitude internal settlement indicate house comment shall account representation house promise mr russell kerr view right hon friend kind generous reference work select committee good let early debate recent report select committee nationalise industry deal british waterways board mr foot hon friend immediate promise debate subject sympathetic request sir t kitson right hon gentleman aware service man face difficult financial problem expect statement service pay mr foot date course recognise importance subject mr spearing right hon friend recall christmas give undertaking arrange debate committee milk order remove guarantee price milk aware milk marketing board threat matter discuss brussels later month appropriate debate arrange hold council agricultural minister mr foot shall look hon friend request know partly representation ensure house debate substantive discussion matter place column shall look case light hon friend fresh representation mr brooke reinforce say hon member eale north mr molloy concern select committee cprs report month report issue inevitably occasion considerable uncertainty employee british council work constituency relief uncertainty great help early debate mr foot sure debate proper way deal matter accept hon gentleman say work british council position criticise right expect statement government shall soon manage mr james lamond right hon friend bear mind date special session united nations disarmament draw close important attend prime minister question neutron bomb closely link meeting good idea debate matter prime minister set new york mr foot shall look possibility give promise government prime minister make statement major importance united nations june meeting house country wish discussion matter approach date sir frederic bennett right hon gentleman time refer fact adjournment debate rhodesia easter reason have debate expedition present fair know apart fact development take place debate give opportunity vote right house express deny confidence government handling matter mr foot question opposition want vote matter facility open try column secure hear hint want reference debate take place consolidated fund bill seek depreciate debate important arrange hon member include opposition bench select subject accord sense important happen occasion importance debate depreciate mr hooley right hon friend prayer special development order windscale debate time house allow debate mr foot date certainly recognise interest house date time allow debate matter moment mr carlisle return rhodesia support request right hon friend leader opposition debate thing happen quickly rhodesia situation change past week right hon gentleman aware important house opportunity express opinion mr foot fully understand desire house debate subject express question right hon lady leader opposition opposition chance choose subject case debate select government select opposition mr loyden draw right hon friend attention unemployment region aware government give lead far cut capacity create unemployment area high unemployment merely discuss unemployment region discuss government policy tackle unemployment assist industry region mr foot shall account hon friend say column illustrate difficulty secure debate subject satisfy hon member part house dismiss say mr luce leader house acknowledge strong weight opinion house need fullscale debate rhodesia government time accept short debate consolidated fund substitute fullranging debate government time discuss extremely significant development rhodesia mr foot say debate take place consolidated fund substitute necessarily subsequent debate matter say response opposition hon member believe debate take place consolidated fund dismiss importance wrong approach time allocate organisation commons business provide debate government view debate rhodesia immediately desirable opposition view opposition right raise press matter mr fauld doubtless right hon friend know ham house give national trust tollemache family aware stable remain private hand come marget government purchase privately develop lose permanently complex marvellous seventeenth century build mr foot immediately mind hon friend raise shall think little mr forman right hon gentleman aware lucky call speak debate rhodesia consolidated fund easter chance call debate subject near future wish support right hon hon friend call early debate government time important fastmove issue mr foot add say mr flannery view lack clarity internal settlement rhodesia exist opposition bench ask right hon friend debate rhodesia come arrangement government arrangement opposition explain opposition member undemocratic internal settlement mr foot fully accept desire part house debate subject say hope provocative opposition government power select debate way organise debate house think good way arrange mr pym house grateful right hon gentleman say reply question right hon friend leader opposition parliamentary paper think risk house common begin treat altogether lightly absence paper continue inconvenience great people prospect early reinstitution provision parliamentary paper consideration give possible alternative new method introduce produce parliamentary paper way bring recur interruption time time supply paper interruption far frequent immensely matter affront house hope right hon gentleman forthcoming response question thinking give matter regard longterm solution shortterm problem mr foot say subject statement today previous occasion minimise importance regard matter primary importance house sort interruption supply paper conduct business column merely matter convenience house concern proper conduct affair house agree right hon gentleman sense believe find reference suggest matter seek dismiss promise house wish presence likely settlement near future beginning week hope move move hope say advisory conciliation arbitration service considerable experience matter take action today ascertain assist wish possible encourage common rest house want permanent solution problem sure right hon gentleman recommendation secure permanent settlement wise shall account suggestion quarter solve issue anybody house want solve mr pym fully accept right hon gentleman share everyone concern nonproduction paper say settlement particularly likely near future want raise hope settlement press consider desirability introduce completely different alternative arrangement future shall continue subject intermittently interruption supply paper experience damaging house nation mr foot say think necessarily good approach say depreciate importance matter want secure early settlement dispute situation solve dispute kind lead constant interruption dispute occur undertake longerterm investigation advisory conciliation arbitration service believe longerterm investigation offer good opportunity proper settlement column want injure possibility adopt different approach hon member rise mr speaker order long list right hon hon member wish speak major debate place later shall let business question run minute past mean hon member brief shall able wish business question shall able mr tebbit right hon gentleman agree say primary responsibility ensure supply paper house agree fail primary responsibility hon member oh course work girl typeset machine right hon gentleman intend dispute solve time budget resolution discuss committee outside house paper mr foot add say reply right hon member cambridgeshire mr pym mr welsh separate identifiable oil revenue fund right hon gentleman arrange debate use fund scottish people judge extent national asset hive scotland use mr foot matter constantly debate house include debate proceed budget mr montgomery leader house suppose look interest house abundantly clear hon member anxious debate rhodesia explain government prepared time debate internal settlement secondly tell likely debate report select committee immigration race relation subject discuss twoday debate column hon member want speak chance speak mr foot second question bold suggest question immigration raise opposition doubt wild protest possible remind house arrangement business house commons large allocation time available bencher official opposition think absolutely right protect degree opposition right choose use time mr rost debate white paper outline government plan squander british people north sea oil bonus leader house aware soon leave british national oil corporation squander mr foot white paper advocate proposal produce reason offer time debate mr kenneth lewis leader house aware lot pressure hon member side house arise high unemployment northwest part country suggest propose house instead celebrate day have holiday house celebrate have debate unemployment mr foot think good time history country proper holiday proposal forward department employment glad carry fully effect hope enjoy day sure house common return well equip transact business mr rifkind lord president realise hon friend member sheffield hillsborough mr flannery join conservative bench call debate column government time hiding appreciate side house want early debate matter ad nauseam say understand feeling house refuse respond national disgrace mr whitelaw mr foot say right hon member penrith border mr whitelaw glad recover voice say national disgrace provide government time debate matter opposition ask week absurdity possibly sustain opposition think national disgrace debate rhodesia choose thursday hon member hear hear hon member canterbury mr crouch sorry hon member canterbury rate opposition member government consider representation hope official opposition consider representation mr mackay lord president aware week especially easter recess ask debate rhodesia secondly aware inside outside house astonishment crucial time rhodesia government act irresponsibly give debate important subject mr foot repudiate suggestion government act responsibly matter hon gentleman say hon member ask debate easter debate easter account know opposition chief whip eager debate place government time vested interest matter say house common arrangement hon member different part house select column want preserve great tradition mr ian lloyd endorse feeling side house early debate rhodesia beneficiary aid victim sanction context draw attention leader house alarming disclosure recent write answer public fund recently go cambodia south yemen uganda context like opportunity debate question overseas aid mr foot question overseas aid open discussion debate normal method accept suggestion hon gentleman point opportunity question institute debate matter mr nicholas winterton rise mr stanbrook rise mr speaker order shall hon gentleman mr winterton lord president answer simple question agree rhodesia independent de facto government country right year british government responsibility labour party present charge affair country presume custodian wish interest house duty enable house vote internal settlement early date mr foot course house country special responsibility rhodesia deny government special responsibility question house opposition ask vote socalled internal settlement rhodesia different matter know wise house vote matter official opposition think wise vote matter doubt representation subject suggestion mr stanbrook right hon gentleman aware source column parliamentary printer dissatisfaction feel member machine room prospect earning decline new overtime schedule monstrous business house disrupt comparatively minor industrial dispute important individual concern right hon gentleman answer right hon friend member cambridgeshire mr pym propose entirely new system important essential business house completely away area mr foot say reply right hon member cambridgeshire think longterm investigation advisory conciliation arbitration service good way secure longterm solution think hon gentleman suggestion assist purpose mr rost point order mr speaker sake accuracy leader house opportunity correct inaccurate answer give white paper publish government easter north sea oil revenue say apparently exist mr speaker order listen copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Aug 27, 2020 President Donald Trump’s 2020 Republican National Convention (RNC) speech on August 27. He formally accepted the party’s presidential nomination. Read the transcript of his remarks here. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling. Speaker 2: (00:00)(singing) President Donald Trump: (02:06)Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. President Donald Trump: (02:15)Friends, delegates, and distinguished guests, please. I stand before you tonight honored by your support, proud of the extraordinary progress we have made together over the last four incredible years and blooming with confidence in the bright future we will build for America over the next four years. President Donald Trump: (02:43)We begin this evening, our thoughts are with the wonderful people who have just come through the wrath of Hurricane Laura. We are working closely with state and local officials in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, sparing no effort to save lives. While the hurricane was fierce, one of the strongest to make landfall in 150 years, the casualties and damage were far less than thought possible only 24 hours ago. President Donald Trump: (03:24)And this is due to the great work of FEMA, law enforcement, and the individual states. I will be going this weekend. And congratulations, thank you for that great job out there. We really appreciate it. We are one national family, and we will always protect, love, and care for each other. Here tonight are the people who have made my journey possible and filled my life with so much joy. President Donald Trump: (04:00)For her incredible service to our nation and its children, I want to thank our magnificent first lady. Thank you sweetheart. I also want to thank my amazing daughter Ivanka for that introduction, and to all of my children. Ivanka, please stand up. Thank you. And to all of my children and grandchildren, I love you more than words can express. I know my brother Robert is looking down on us right now from heaven. He was a great brother, and was very proud of the job we are all doing. Thank you. We love you, Robert. President Donald Trump: (05:13)Let us also take a moment to show our profound appreciation for a man who has always fought by our side and stood up for our values, a man of deep faith and steadfast conviction, our vice president, Mike Pence. And Mike is joined by his beloved wife, a teacher and military mom, Karen Pence. Thank you, Karen. President Donald Trump: (06:05)My fellow Americans, tonight, with a heart full of gratitude and boundless optimism, I profoundly accept this nomination for President of the United States. President Donald Trump: (06:44)The Republican Party, the party of Abraham Lincoln, goes forward united, determined, and ready to welcome millions of Democrats, independents, and anyone who believes in the greatness of America and the righteous heart of the American people. President Donald Trump: (07:11)In the new term as president, we will again build the greatest economy in history, quickly returning to full employment, soaring incomes and record prosperity. We will defend America against all threats and protect America against all dangers. We will lead America into new frontiers of ambition and discovery, and we will reach four new heights of national achievement. We will rekindle faith in our values, new pride in our history, and a new spirit of unity that can only be realized through love for our great country. President Donald Trump: (08:05)Because we understand that America is not a land cloaked in darkness. America is the torch that enlightens the entire world. Gathered here at our beautiful and majestic White House, known all over the world as the people’s house, we cannot help but marvel at the miracle that is our great American story. President Donald Trump: (08:36)This has been the home of larger-than-life figures like Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson, who rallied Americans to bold visions of a bigger and brighter future. Within these walls lived tenacious generals like President Grant and Eisenhower, who led our soldiers in the cause of freedom. From these grounds, Thomas Jefferson sent Lewis and Clark to chart our continent. In the depths of a bloody Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln looked out these very windows upon a half-completed Washington Monument and asked God and his Providence to save our nation. Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Franklin Delano Roosevelt welcomed Winston Churchill, and just inside, they set our people on course to victory in the Second World War. President Donald Trump: (09:51)In recent months, our nation and the entire planet has been struck by a new and powerful invisible enemy. Like those brave Americans before us, we are meeting this challenge. We are delivering lifesaving therapies and will produce a vaccine before the end of the year, or maybe even sooner. We will defeat the virus and the pandemic and emerge stronger than ever before. President Donald Trump: (10:36)What united generations past was an unshakable confidence in America’s destiny and an unbreakable faith in the American people. They knew that our country is blessed by God and has a special purpose in this world. It is that conviction that inspired the formation of our union, our westward expansion, the abolition of slavery, the passage of civil rights, the space program and the overthrow of fascism, tyranny, and communism. President Donald Trump: (11:15)This towering American spirit has prevailed over every challenge and has lifted us to the summit of human endeavor. And yet despite all of our greatness as a nation, everything we have achieved is now in danger. This is the most important election in the history of our country. President Donald Trump: (12:03)Thank you. At no time before have voters faced a clearer choice between two parties, two visions, two philosophies, or two agendas. This election will decide if we save the American dream or whether we allow a socialist agenda to demolish our cherished destiny. It will decide whether we rapidly create millions of high-paying jobs or whether we crush our industries and send millions of these jobs overseas, as has been foolishly done for many decades. Your vote will decide whether we protect law-abiding Americans or whether we give free rein to violent anarchists, and agitators, and criminals who threaten our citizens. President Donald Trump: (13:02)And this election will decide whether we will defend the American way of life or whether we will allow a radical movement to completely dismantle and destroy it. That won’t happen. At the Democrat National Convention, Joe Biden and his party repeatedly assailed America as a land of racial, economic and social injustice. So tonight, I ask you a simple question, how can the Democratic Party ask to lead our country when it spent so much time tearing down our country? President Donald Trump: (13:57)In the Left’s backward view, they do not see America as the most free, just, and exceptional nation on Earth. Instead, they see a wicked nation that must be punished for its sins. Our opponents say that redemption for you can only come from giving power to them. This is a tired anthem spoken by every repressive movement throughout history. But in this country, we don’t look to career politicians for salvation. In America, we do not turn to government to restore ourselves. We put our faith in almighty God. President Donald Trump: (14:55)Joe Biden is not a savior of America’s soul. He is the destroyer of America’s jobs, and if given the chance, he will be the destroyer of America’s greatness. For 47 years, Joe Biden took the donations of blue-collar workers, gave them hugs, and even kisses, and told them he felt their pain, and then he flew back to Washington, and voted to ship our jobs to China and many other distant lands. Joe Biden spent his entire career outsourcing their dreams and the dreams of American workers, offshoring their jobs, opening their borders and sending their sons and daughters to fight in endless foreign wars, wars that never ended. President Donald Trump: (16:07)Four years ago, I ran for president because I cannot watch this betrayal of our country any longer. I could not sit by as career politicians let other countries take advantage of us on trade, borders, foreign policy, and national defense. Our NATO partners, as an example, were very far behind in their defense payments. But at my strong urging, they agreed to pay $130 billion more a year, the first time in over 20 years that they upped their payments. And this $130 billion will ultimately go to $400 billion a year. And Secretary General Stoltenberg, who heads NATO, was amazed after watching for so many years, and said that President Trump did what no one else was able to do. Thank you. President Donald Trump: (17:25)From the moment I left my former life behind, and it was a good life, I have done nothing but fight for you. I did what our political establishment never expected and could never forgive, breaking the cardinal rule of Washington politics. I kept my promise. Together we have ended the rule of the failed political class, and they are desperate to get their power back by any means necessary. You have seen that. They are angry at me because instead of putting them first, I very simply said, “America first.” Thank you. Days after taking office, we shocked the Washington establishment and withdrew from the last administration’s job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership. I then immediately approved the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, ended the unfair and very costly Paris Climate Accord, and secured, for the first time, American energy independence. President Donald Trump: (19:27)We passed record-setting tax and regulation cuts at a rate nobody had ever seen before. Within three short years, we built the strongest economy in the history of the world. Washington insiders asked me not to stand up to China. They pleaded with me to let China continue stealing our jobs, ripping us off, and robbing our country blind. But I kept my word to the American people. We took the toughest, boldest, strongest, and hardest-hitting action against China in American history by far. President Donald Trump: (20:11)They said that it would be impossible to terminate and replace NAFTA, but again they were wrong. Earlier this year, I ended the NAFTA nightmare and signed the brand-new Mexico-US-Canada agreement into law. And right now, auto companies and others are building their plants and factories in America, not firing their employees, and not deserting us for other countries. President Donald Trump: (20:48)In perhaps no area did the Washington special interests try harder to stop us than on my policy of pro-American immigration. But I refused to back down, and today America’s borders are more secure than ever before. Thank you. We ended catch-and-release, stopped asylum fraud, took down human traffickers who prey on women and children, and we have deported 20000 gang members and 500000 criminal aliens. We have already built 300 miles of border wall, and we are adding 10 new miles every single week. The wall will soon be complete, and it is working beyond our wildest expectations. President Donald Trump: (22:10)We are joined this evening by members of the Border Patrol Union, representing our country’s courageous border agents. Thank you very much for being here. Thank you. Brave, brave people. You see, this country loves our law enforcement. They do. They really do. Love and respect. President Donald Trump: (23:00)When I learned that the Tennessee Valley Authority laid off hundreds of American workers and forced them to train their lower-paid foreign replacements, I promptly removed the chairman of the board. And now those talented American workers have been rehired, and are back providing power to Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia. They have their old jobs back, and some are here with us this evening. Please stand. You went through a lot. Please stand. Thank you. Thank you very much. You’ve been through a lot. Thank you very much. President Donald Trump: (23:51)Last month, I took on big pharma. You think that’s easy? It’s not. And signed orders that would massively lower the cost of your prescription drugs, and give critically ill patients access to lifesaving cures. We passed the decades-long-awaited right to try. We also passed VA Accountability and VA Choice, our great veterans, we’re taking care of our veterans. 91% approval rating this month, the VA given by our veterans. First time anything like that has ever happened. President Donald Trump: (24:40)By the end of my first term, we will have approved more than 300 federal judges, including two great new Supreme Court justices. President Donald Trump: (24:50)And to bring prosperity to our forgotten inner cities, we worked hard to pass historic criminal justice reform, prison reform, opportunity zones, and long-term funding of historically Black colleges and universities. And before the China virus came in, produced the best unemployment numbers for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and Asian-Americans ever recorded. And I say very modestly that I have done more for the African-American community than any president since Abraham Lincoln, our first Republican president. And I have done more in three years for the Black community than Joe Biden has done in 47 years. And when I am re-elected, the best is yet to come. Audience: (27:04)Four more years. Four more years. President Donald Trump: (27:04)Thank you very much. President Donald Trump: (27:11)When I took office, the Middle East was in total chaos. ISIS was rampaging, Iran was on the rise, and the war in Afghanistan had no end in sight. I withdrew from the terrible one-sided Iran nuclear deal. Unlike many presidents before me, I kept my promise, recognized Israel’s true capital, and moved our Embassy to Jerusalem. But not only did we talk about it as a future site, we got it built. Rather than spending $1 billion on a new building as planned, we took an already owned, existing building in a better location. Real estate deal, right? And opened it at a cost of less than $500000. Many things like that the government is doing right now. We also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. And this month we achieved the first Middle East peace deal in 25 years. Thank you to the UAE. Thank you to Israel. In addition, we obliterated 100% of the ISIS caliphate, and killed its founder and leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Then, in a separate operation, we eliminated the world’s number-one terrorist by far, Qassim Suleimani. President Donald Trump: (29:43)Unlike previous administrations, I have kept America out of new wars, and our troops are coming home. We have spent nearly $2.5 trillion on completely rebuilding our military, which was very badly depleted when I took office, as you know. This includes three separate pay raises for our great warriors. We also launched the Space Force, the first new branch of the United States Military since the Air Force was created almost 75 years ago. President Donald Trump: (30:38)We have spent the last four years reversing the damage Joe Biden inflicted over the last 47 years. Biden’s record is a shameful roll call of the most catastrophic betrayals and blunders in our lifetime. He has spent his entire career on the wrong side of history. Biden voted for the NAFTA disaster, the single worst trade deal ever enacted. He supported China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, one of the greatest economic disasters of all time. After those Biden calamities, the United States lost one in four manufacturing jobs. We laid off workers in Michigan, Ohio, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and many other states. They did not want to hear Biden’s hollow words of empathy. They wanted their jobs back. President Donald Trump: (31:40)As vice president, he supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would have been a death sentence for the US auto industry. He backed the horrendous South Korea trade deal, which took many jobs from our country, and which I’ve reversed and made a great deal for our country. He repeatedly supported mass amnesty for illegal immigrants. He voted for the Iraq war. He opposed the mission that took out Osama bin Laden. He opposed killing Suleimani, he oversaw the rise of ISIS, and cheered the rise of China as a positive development for America and the world. Some positive development. That is why China supports Joe Biden, and desperately wants him to win. I can tell you that upon very good information. President Donald Trump: (32:36)China would own our country if Joe Biden got elected. Unlike Biden, I will hold them fully accountable for the tragedy that they caused all over the world, they caused. In recent months, our nation and the world has been hit by the once-in-a-century pandemic that China allowed to spread around the globe. They could have stopped it, but they allowed it to come out. We are grateful to be joined tonight by several of our incredible nurses and first responders. Please stand and accept our profound thanks and gratitude. President Donald Trump: (33:34)Many Americans, including me, I have sadly lost friends and cherished loved ones to this horrible disease. As one nation, we mourn, we grieve, and we hold in our hearts forever the memories of all of those lives that have been so tragically taken so unnecessary. In their honor, we unite. In their memory, we will overcome it. And when the China virus hit, we launched the largest national mobilization since World War II, invoking the Defense Production Act. We produce the world’s largest supply of ventilators. Not a single American who has needed a ventilator has been denied a ventilator, which is a miracle. Good job heading the task force by our great vice president. Thank you very much, Mike. Please stand up. President Donald Trump: (34:50)We shipped hundreds of millions of masks, gloves, and gowns to our frontline health care workers. To protect our nation’s seniors, we rushed supplies, testing kits, and personnel to nursing homes. We gave everything you can possibly give, and we’re still giving it because we are taking care of our senior citizens. The Army Corps of Engineers built field hospitals, and the Navy deployed our great hospital ships. We developed from scratch the largest and most advanced testing system anywhere in the world. America has tested more than every country in Europe put together, and more than every nation in the western hemisphere combined, think of that. We have conducted 40 million more tests than the next closest nation, which is India. We developed a wide array of effective treatments, including a powerful antibody treatment known as convalescent plasma. You saw that? On Sunday night when we announced it. That will save thousands and thousands of lives. Thanks to advances, we have pioneered the fatality rates. And you look at it, and you look at the numbers, it has been reduced by 80% since April. 80%. President Donald Trump: (36:15)The United States has among the lowest case fatality rates of any major country anywhere in the world. The European Union’s case fatality rate is nearly three times higher than ours, but you don’t hear that. They do not write about that. They don’t want to write about that. They do not want you to know those things. Altogether, the nations of Europe have experienced a 30% greater increase in excess mortality than the United States. Think of that. President Donald Trump: (36:44)We enacted the largest package of financial relief in American history. Thanks to our Paycheck Protection Program, we have saved or supported more than 50 million American jobs. That’s one of the reasons that we’re advancing so rapidly with our economy. Great job. As a result, we have seen the smallest economic contraction of any major western nation. And we are recovering at a much faster rate than anybody. Over the past three months, we have gained over nine million jobs, and that’s a record in the history of our country. President Donald Trump: (37:29)Unfortunately, from the beginning, our opponents have shown themselves capable of nothing but a partisan ability to criticize. When I took bold action to issue a travel ban on China, very early indeed, Joe called it hysterical and xenophobic. And then I introduced a ban on Europe, very early again. If we had listened to Joe, hundreds of thousands more Americans would have died. Instead of following the science, Joe Biden wants to inflict a painful shutdown on the entire country. His shutdown would inflict unthinkable and lasting harm on our nation’s children, families, and citizens of all backgrounds. The cost of the Biden shutdown would be measured in increased drug overdoses, depression, alcohol addiction, suicides, heart attacks, economic devastation, job loss, and much more. Joe Biden’s plan is not a solution to the virus, but rather it’s a surrender to the virus. President Donald Trump: (38:44)My administration has a very different approach. To save as many lives as possible, we are focusing on the science, the facts, and the data. We are aggressively sheltering those at highest risk, especially the elderly, while allowing lower-risk Americans to safely return to work and to school. And we want to see so many of those great states be opened by Democrats. We want them to be open. They have to be open. They have to get back to work. They have to get back to work, and they have to get back to school. President Donald Trump: (39:24)Most importantly, we are marshaling America’s scientific genius to produce a vaccine in record time. Under Operation Warp Speed, we have three different vaccines in the final stage of trials right now, years ahead of what has been achieved before. Nobody thought it could be done this fast. Normally it would be years, and we did it in a matter of a few months. We are producing them in advance so that hundreds of millions of doses will be quickly available. We will have a safe and effective vaccine this year, and together we will crush the virus. President Donald Trump: (40:07)At the Democrat convention, you barely heard a word about their agenda. But that is not because they don’t have one. It is because their agenda is the most extreme set of proposals ever put forward by a major party nominee. Joe Biden may claim he is an ally of the light. But when it comes to his agenda, Biden wants to keep us completely in the dark. He doesn’t have a clue. He has pledged a $4 trillion tax hike on almost all American families, which would totally collapse our rapidly improving economy, and once again record stock markets that we have right now, will also collapse. That means your 401(k)s, that means all of the stocks that you have. President Donald Trump: (40:58)On the other hand, just as I did in my first term, I will cut taxes even further for hardworking moms and dads. I will not raise taxes, I will cut them, and very substantially. And we will also provide tax credits to bring jobs out of China, back to America. And we will impose tariffs on any company that leaves America to produce jobs overseas. We will make sure our companies and jobs stay in our country, as I’ve already been doing for quite some time if you’ve noticed. Joe Biden’s agenda is made in China. My agenda is made in the USA. President Donald Trump: (41:46)Biden has promised to abolish the production of American oil, coal, shale, and natural gas, laying waste to the economies of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Colorado, and New Mexico, destroying those states, absolutely destroying those states and others. Millions of jobs will be lost, and energy prices will soar. These same policies led to crippling power outages in California just last week. Everybody saw that. Tremendous power outage. Nobody’s seen anything like it, but we saw it last week in California. How can Joe Biden claim to be an ally of the light when his own party can’t even keep the lights on? President Donald Trump: (42:57)Joe Biden’s campaign has even published a 110-page policy platform. You can’t get away from this, co-authored with far-left senator, crazy Bernie Sanders. The Biden-Bernie manifesto[ calls for suspending all removals of illegal aliens, implementing nationwide catch-and-release, and providing illegal aliens with free taxpayer-funded lawyers. Everybody gets a lawyer. Come over to our country, everybody has a lawyer. We have a lawyer for you. That’s all we need, is more lawyers. President Donald Trump: (43:35)Joe Biden recently raised his hand on the debate stage, and promised he was going to give it away your health care dollars to illegal immigrants, which is going to bring massive number of immigrants into our country. Massive numbers will pour into our country in order to get all the goodies that they want to give. Education, health care, everything. He also supports deadly sanctuary cities that protect criminal aliens. He promised to end national security travel bans from jihadist nations, and he pledged to increase refugee admissions by 700%. This is in the manifesto. The Biden plan would eliminate America’s borders in the middle of a global pandemic. And he is even talking about taking the wall down. How about that? President Donald Trump: (44:40)Biden also vowed to oppose school choice, and close all charter schools, ripping away the ladder of opportunity for Black and Hispanic children. In a second term, I will expand charter schools, and provide school choice to every family in America. And we will always treat our teachers with the tremendous respect that they deserve. Great people. Great, great people. President Donald Trump: (45:20)Joe Biden claims he has empathy for the vulnerable, yet the party he leads supports the extreme late-term abortion of defenseless babies, right up until the moment of birth. Democrat leaders talk about moral decency, but they have no problem with stopping a baby’s beating heart in the ninth month of pregnancy. Democrat politicians refuse to protect innocent life, and then they lecture us about morality and saving America’s soul. Tonight, we proudly declare that all children, born and unborn, have a God-given right to life. President Donald Trump: (46:19)During the Democrat convention, the words, under God, were removed from the Pledge of Allegiance. Not once, but twice. We will never do that. But the fact is, this is where they’re coming from. Like it or not, this is where they’re coming from. If the Left gains power, they will demolish the suburbs, confiscate your guns, and appoint justices who will wipe away your Second Amendment and other constitutional freedoms. Biden is a Trojan horse for socialism. If Joe Biden doesn’t have the strength to stand up to wild-eyed Marxists like Bernie Sanders and his fellow radicals, and there are many, there are many. We see them all the time. It is incredible, actually. Then how is he ever going to stand up for you? He’s not. President Donald Trump: (47:18)The most dangerous aspect of the Biden platform is the attack on public safety. The Biden-Bernie manifesto calls for abolishing cash bail, immediately releasing 400000 criminals onto the streets and into your neighborhoods. When asked if he supports cutting police funding, Joe Biden replied, “Yes, absolutely.” When Congresswoman Ilhan Omar called the Minneapolis Police Department, “A cancer that is rotten to the root,” Biden would not disavow her support and reject her endorsement. He proudly displayed it shortly later on his website, displayed it in big letters. President Donald Trump: (48:09)Make no mistake, if you give power to Joe Biden, the Radical Left will defund police departments all across America. They will pass federal legislation to reduce law enforcement nationwide. They will make every city look like Democrat-run Portland, Oregon. No one will be safe in Biden’s America. My administration will always stand with the men and women of law enforcement. Every day, police officers risk their lives to keep us safe, and every year many sacrifice their lives in the line of duty. President Donald Trump: (48:58)One of these incredible Americans was Detective Miosotis Familia. She was part of a team of American heroes called the NYPD, or New York’s finest, who I was very proud to get their endorsement just the other day. Great people. If they were allowed to do their job, you’d have no crime in New York. Rudy Giuliani knows that better than anybody. Thank you, Rudy. Three years ago on the Fourth of July weekend, Detective Familia was on duty in her vehicle when she was ambushed just after midnight, and murdered by a monster who hated her purely for wearing the badge. Detective Familia was a single mom. She recently asked for the night shift so she could spend more time with her kids. President Donald Trump: (49:56)Two years ago, I stood in front of the US Capitol alongside those beautiful children, and held their grandmother’s hand as they mourned their terrible loss. And we honored Detective Familia’s extraordinary life. It was extraordinary. Detective Familia’s three children are with us this evening. Genesis, Peter, Delilah, we are so grateful to have you here tonight. Thank you very much for coming. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. President Donald Trump: (50:44)I promise you that we will treasure your mom in our memories forever. We must remember that the overwhelming majority of police officers in this country, and that’s the overwhelming majority, are noble, courageous, and honorable. We have to give law enforcement, our police, back their power. They are afraid to act. They are afraid to lose their pension. They are afraid to lose their jobs. And by being afraid, they are not able to do the job that they so desperately want to do for you. And those who suffer most are the great people who they protect, and who they want to protect at an even higher level. When there is police misconduct, the justice system must hold wrongdoers fully and completely accountable, and it will. But when we can never have a situation where things are going on as they are today, we must never allow mob rule. We can never allow mob rule. President Donald Trump: (52:08)In the strongest possible terms, the Republican Party condemns the rioting, looting, arson, and violence we have seen in Democrat-run cities all, like Kenosha, Minneapolis, Portland, Chicago, and New York, and many others, Democrat-run. There is violence and danger in the streets of many Democrat-run cities throughout America. This problem could easily be fixed if they wanted to. Just call, we’re ready to go in. We will take care of your problem in a matter of hours. Just call. We have to wait for the call. It is too bad we have to, but we have to wait for the call. We must always have law and order. All federal crimes are being investigated, prosecuted, and punished to the fullest extent of the law. When the anarchists started ripping down our statues and monuments right outside, I signed an order immediately, 10 years in prison, and it was a miracle. It all stopped. No more statues. They said, “That’s just too long,” as they looked at a statue. “I think we’ll rip it down.” Then they said, “10 years in prison? I think that is too long. Let’s go home.” President Donald Trump: (53:24)During their convention, Joe Biden and his supporters remained completely silent about the rioters and criminals spreading mayhem in Democrat-run cities. They never even mentioned it during their entire convention. Never once mentioned. Now, they are starting to mention it because their poll numbers are going down like a rock in water. It is too late, Joe. In the face of left-wing anarchy and mayhem in Minneapolis, Chicago, and other cities, Joe Biden’s campaign did not condemn it. They donated to it. At least 13 members of Joe Biden’s campaign staff donated to a fund to bailout vandals, arsonists, anarchists, looters, and rioters from jail. President Donald Trump: (54:17)Here tonight is the grieving family of retired police captain, David Dorn, a 38-year veteran of the St. Louis Police Department, a great man and a highly respected man by all. In June, Captain Dorn was shot and killed as he tried to protect a store from rioters and looters, or as the Democrats would call them, peaceful protesters. They call them peaceful protesters. We are honored to be joined tonight by his wonderful wife Ann, and beloved family members, Brian and Kielen. To each of you, we will never forget the heroic legacy of Captain. David Dorn. Thank you very much for being here. Thank you very much. Great man. President Donald Trump: (55:17)As long as I am president, we will defend the absolute right of every American citizen to live in security, dignity, and peace. If the Democrat Party wants to stand with anarchists, agitators, rioters, looters, and flag burners, that is up to them. But I as your president, will not be part of it. The Republican Party will remain the voice of the patriotic heroes who keep America safe and salute the American flag. President Donald Trump: (56:04)Last year, over 1000 African-Americans were murdered as a result of violent crime in just four Democrat-run cities. The top 10 most dangerous cities in the country are run by Democrats, and have been for many decades. Thousands more African-Americans are victim and victims of violent crime in these communities. Joe Biden and the Left ignore these American victims. I never will. If the radical Left takes power, they will apply their disastrous policies to every town, city, and suburb in America. Just imagine if the so-called peaceful demonstrators in the streets were in charge of every lever of power in the US government. Just think of that. President Donald Trump: (56:58)Liberal politician’s claim to be concerned about the strength of American institutions. But who exactly is attacking them? Who is hiring the radical professors, judges, and prosecutors? Who is trying to abolish immigration enforcement and establish speech codes designed to muzzle dissent? In every case, the attacks on American institutions are being waged by Radical Left. Always remember, they are coming after me because I am fighting for you. That is what is happening. And it has been going on from before I even got elected. And remember this, they spied on my campaign, and they got caught. Let’s see now what happens. President Donald Trump: (58:05)We must reclaim our independence from the Left’s repressive mandates. Americans are exhausted, trying to keep up with the latest lists of approved words and phrases, and the ever more restrictive political decrees. Many things have a different name now, and the rules are constantly changing. The goal of Cancel Culture is to make Americans live in fear of being fired, expelled, shamed, humiliated, and driven from society as we know it. The far-left wants to coerce you into saying what you know to be false, and scare you out of saying what you know to be true. Very sad. But on November 3rd, you can send them a very thundering message they will never forget. President Donald Trump: (59:34)Joe Biden is weak. He takes his marching orders from liberal hypocrites who drive their cities into the ground while fleeing from the scene of the wreckage. The same liberals want to eliminate school choice while they enroll their children into the finest private schools in the land. They want to open our borders while living in walled off compounds and communities and the best neighborhoods in the world. They want to defund the police while they have armed guards for themselves. This November, we must turn the page forever on this failed political class. The fact is, I am here. President Donald Trump: (01:00:25)What is the name of that building? But I’ll say it differently, the fact is, we are here and they are not. To me, one of the most beautiful buildings anywhere in the world is not a building, it is a home, as far as I am concerned. It’s not even a house, it is a home. It’s a wonderful place with an incredible history. But it is all because of you. Together, we will write the next chapter of the great American story. Over the next four years, we will make America into the manufacturing superpower of the world. We will expand opportunity zones. Thank you, Tim Scott. Bring home our medical supply chains. And we will end our resilience for banned things. We will go right after China. We will not rely on them one bit. We are taking our business out of China. We are bringing it home. We want our business to come home. President Donald Trump: (01:01:44)We will continue to reduce taxes and regulations at levels not seen before. We will create 10 million jobs in the next 10 months. And it will be higher than that. We will hire more police, increase penalties for assaults on law enforcement, and surge federal prosecutors into high-crime communities. We will ban deadly sanctuary cities, and ensure federal health care is protected for American citizens, not for illegal aliens. President Donald Trump: (01:02:21)We will have strong borders. And I’ve said for years, without borders, we don’t have a country. We don’t have a country. Strike down terrorists who threaten our people, and keep America out of endless and costly foreign wars. We will appoint prosecutors, judges, justices who believe in enforcing the law, not enforcing their own political agenda, which is illegal. We will ensure equal justice for citizens of every race, religion, color, and creed. We will uphold your religious liberty, and defend your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. And if we don’t win, your Second Amendment doesn’t have a chance. I can tell you that. I have totally protected it. President Donald Trump: (01:03:37)We will protect Medicare and Social Security. We will always and very strongly protect patients with pre-existing conditions, and that is a pledge from the entire Republican Party. Thank you, Kevin. We will end surprise medical billing, require price transparency, and further reduce the cost of prescription drugs and health insurance premiums. They are coming way down. We will greatly expand energy development, continuing to remain the number-one in the world, and keep America energy independent. And for those of you that still drive a car, look how low your gasoline bill is. You haven’t seen that in a long time. President Donald Trump: (01:04:37)We will win the race to 5G, and build the world’s best cyber and missile defense, already under construction. We will fully restore patriotic education to our schools and always protect. We will always, always protect free speech on college campuses. And we put a very big penalty in, if they do anything having to do with your free speech, colleges have to pay a tremendous, tremendous financial penalty. And again, it is amazing how open they have been lately. President Donald Trump: (01:05:25)We will launch a new age of American ambition in space. America will land the first woman on the moon, and the United States will be the first nation to plant its beautiful flag on Mars. This is the unifying national agenda that will bring our country together. So tonight, I say to all Americans, this is the most important election in the history of our country. There has never been such a difference between two parties or two individuals in ideology, philosophy, or vision than there is right now. President Donald Trump: (01:06:10)Our opponents believe that America is a depraved nation. We want our sons and daughters to know the truth. America is the greatest and most exceptional nation in the history of the world. Our country wasn’t built by Cancel Culture, speech codes, and crushing conformity. We are not a nation of timid spirits. We are a nation of fierce, proud, and independent American patriots. We are a nation of pilgrims, pioneers, adventurers, explorers, and trailblazers who refuse to be tied down, held back, or in any way reigned in. Americans have steel in their spines, grit in their souls, and fire in their hearts. There is no one like us on Earth. President Donald Trump: (01:07:15)I want every child in America to know that you are part of the most exciting and incredible adventure in human history. No matter where your family comes from, no matter your background in America, anyone can rise. With hard work, devotion, and drive, you can reach any goal and achieve every ambition. Our American ancestors sailed across the perilous ocean to build a new life on a new continent. They braved the freezing winters, crossed the raging rivers, scaled the rocky peaks, trekked the dangerous forests, and worked from dawn till dusk. These pioneers didn’t have money. They didn’t have fame. But they had each other. They loved their families, they loved their country, and they loved their God. When opportunity beckoned, they picked up their bibles, packed up their belongings, climbed into their covered wagons, and set out West for the next adventure. Ranchers and miners, cowboys and sheriffs, farmers and settlers. They pressed on past the Mississippi to stake a claim in the wild frontier. Legends were born. Wyatt Earp, Annie Oakley, Davy Crockett, and Buffalo Bill. Americans built their beautiful homesteads on the open range. Soon, they had churches and communities, then towns, and with time, great centers of industry and commerce. That is who they were. President Donald Trump: (01:09:16)Americans build their future, we don’t tear down our past. We are the nation that won a revolution, toppled tyranny and fascism, and delivered millions into freedom. We laid down the railroads, built the great ships, raised up the skyscrapers, revolutionized industry, and sparked a new age of scientific discovery. We set the trends in art and music, radio and film, sport and literature. And we did it all with style and confidence and flair, because that is who we are. President Donald Trump: (01:10:06)Whenever our way of life was threatened, our heroes answered the call. From Yorktown to Gettysburg, from Normandy to Iwo Jima, American patriots raced into cannon blasts, bullets, and bayonets to rescue American liberty. They had no fear. But America did not stop there. We looked into the sky and kept pressing onward. We built a six-million-pound rocket and launched it thousands of miles into space. We did it so two brave patriots could stand tall and salute our wondrous American flag planted on the face of the moon. For America, nothing is impossible. President Donald Trump: (01:10:59)Over the next four years, we will prove worthy of this magnificent legacy. We will reach stunning new heights, and we will show that the world for America there is a dream, and it is not beyond your reach. Together, we are unstoppable. Together, we are unbeatable. Because together, we are the proud citizens of the United States of America. President Donald Trump: (01:11:43)On November 3rd, we will make America safer. We will make America stronger. We will make America prouder. And we will make America greater than ever before. I am very proud to be the nominee of the Republican Party. President Donald Trump: (01:12:09)I love you all. God bless you, and God bless America. Thank you very much. Transcribe Your Own Content Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling. Copyright Disclaimer Under Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Get a weekly digest of the week’s most important transcripts in your inbox. It’s the news, without the news.

right

aug president donald trump republican national convention rnc speech august formally accept party presidential nomination read transcript remark transcribe content try rev save time transcribe captioning subtitle speaker president donald trump thank thank president donald trump delegate distinguished guest stand tonight honor support proud extraordinary progress incredible year bloom confidence bright future build america year president donald trump begin evening thought wonderful people come wrath hurricane laura work closely state local official texas louisiana arkansas mississippi spare effort save life hurricane fierce strong landfall year casualty damage far think possible hour ago president donald trump great work fema law enforcement individual state go weekend congratulation thank great job appreciate national family protect love care tonight people journey possible fill life joy president donald trump incredible service nation child want thank magnificent lady thank sweetheart want thank amazing daughter ivanka introduction child ivanka stand thank child grandchild love word express know brother robert look right heaven great brother proud job thank love robert president donald trump moment profound appreciation man fight stand value man deep faith steadfast conviction vice president mike pence mike join beloved wife teacher military mom karen pence thank karen president donald trump fellow americans tonight heart gratitude boundless optimism profoundly accept nomination president united states president donald trump republican party party abraham lincoln go forward united determined ready welcome million democrats independent believe greatness america righteous heart american people president donald trump new term president build great economy history quickly return employment soar income record prosperity defend america threat protect america danger lead america new frontier ambition discovery reach new height national achievement rekindle faith value new pride history new spirit unity realize love great country president donald trump understand america land cloak darkness america torch enlighten entire world gather beautiful majestic white house know world people house help marvel miracle great american story president donald trump home largerthanlife figure like teddy roosevelt andrew jackson rally americans bold vision big bright future wall live tenacious general like president grant eisenhower lead soldier cause freedom ground thomas jefferson send lewis clark chart continent depth bloody civil war president abraham lincoln look window halfcomplete washington monument ask god providence save nation week pearl harbor franklin delano roosevelt welcome winston churchill inside set people course victory second world war president donald trump recent month nation entire planet strike new powerful invisible enemy like brave americans meet challenge deliver lifesave therapy produce vaccine end year maybe soon defeat virus pandemic emerge strong president donald trump united generation past unshakable confidence america destiny unbreakable faith american people know country bless god special purpose world conviction inspire formation union westward expansion abolition slavery passage civil right space program overthrow fascism tyranny communism president donald trump tower american spirit prevail challenge lift summit human endeavor despite greatness nation achieve danger important election history country president donald trump time voter face clear choice party vision philosophy agenda election decide save american dream allow socialist agenda demolish cherish destiny decide rapidly create million highpaying job crush industry send million job overseas foolishly decade vote decide protect lawabide americans free rein violent anarchist agitator criminal threaten citizen president donald trump election decide defend american way life allow radical movement completely dismantle destroy will happen democrat national convention joe biden party repeatedly assail america land racial economic social injustice tonight ask simple question democratic party ask lead country spend time tear country president donald trump left backward view america free exceptional nation earth instead wicked nation punish sin opponent redemption come give power tired anthem speak repressive movement history country look career politician salvation america turn government restore faith almighty god president donald trump biden savior america soul destroyer america job give chance destroyer america greatness year joe biden take donation bluecollar worker give hug kiss tell feel pain fly washington vote ship job china distant land joe biden spend entire career outsource dream dream american worker offshore job open border send son daughter fight endless foreign war war end president donald trump year ago run president watch betrayal country long sit career politician let country advantage trade border foreign policy national defense nato partner example far defense payment strong urge agree pay billion year time year up payment billion ultimately billion year secretary general stoltenberg head nato amazed watch year say president trump able thank president donald trump moment leave life good life fight political establishment expect forgive break cardinal rule washington politic keep promise end rule fail political class desperate power mean necessary see angry instead put simply say america thank day take office shock washington establishment withdraw administration jobkille transpacific partnership immediately approve keystone xl dakota access pipeline end unfair costly paris climate accord secure time american energy independence president donald trump pass recordsette tax regulation cut rate see short year build strong economy history world washington insider ask stand china plead let china continue steal job rip rob country blind keep word american people take tough bold strong hardesthitte action china american history far president donald trump say impossible terminate replace nafta wrong early year end nafta nightmare sign brandnew mexicouscanada agreement law right auto company build plant factory america fire employee desert country president donald trump area washington special interest try hard stop policy proamerican immigration refuse today america border secure thank end catchandrelease stop asylum fraud take human trafficker prey woman child deport gang member criminal alien build mile border wall add new mile single week wall soon complete work wildest expectation president donald trump join evening member border patrol union represent country courageous border agent thank thank brave brave people country love law enforcement love respect president donald trump learn tennessee valley authority lay hundred american worker force train lowerpaid foreign replacement promptly remove chairman board talented american worker rehire provide power georgia alabama tennessee kentucky mississippi north carolina virginia old job evening stand go lot stand thank thank lot thank president donald trump month take big pharma think easy sign order massively lower cost prescription drug critically ill patient access lifesave cure pass decadeslongawaited right try pass va accountability va choice great veteran take care veteran approval rating month va give veteran time like happen president donald trump end term approve federal judge include great new supreme court justice president donald trump bring prosperity forget inner city work hard pass historic criminal justice reform prison reform opportunity zone longterm funding historically black college university china virus come produce good unemployment number africanamericans hispanicamerican asianamerican record modestly africanamerican community president abraham lincoln republican president year black community joe biden year reelect good come audience year year president donald trump president donald trump take office middle east total chaos isis rampage iran rise war afghanistan end sight withdraw terrible oneside iran nuclear deal unlike president keep promise recognize israel true capital move embassy jerusalem talk future site get build spend billion new building plan take own exist building well location real estate deal right open cost thing like government right recognize israeli sovereignty golan height month achieve middle east peace deal year thank uae thank israel addition obliterate isis caliphate kill founder leader abu bakr albaghdadi separate operation eliminate world numberone terrorist far qassim suleimani president donald trump previous administration keep america new war troop come home spend nearly trillion completely rebuild military badly deplete take office know include separate pay raise great warrior launch space force new branch united states military air force create year ago president donald trump spend year reverse damage joe biden inflict year biden record shameful roll catastrophic betrayal blunder lifetime spend entire career wrong history biden vote nafta disaster single bad trade deal enact support china entry world trade organization great economic disaster time biden calamitie united states lose manufacturing job lay worker michigan ohio new hampshire pennsylvania state want hear biden hollow word empathy want job president donald trump vice president support transpacific partnership death sentence auto industry back horrendous south korea trade deal take job country reverse great deal country repeatedly support mass amnesty illegal immigrant vote iraq war oppose mission take osama bin laden oppose kill suleimani oversee rise isis cheer rise china positive development america world positive development china support joe biden desperately want win tell good information president donald trump country joe biden get elect unlike biden hold fully accountable tragedy cause world cause recent month nation world hit onceinacentury pandemic china allow spread globe stop allow come grateful join tonight incredible nurse responder stand accept profound thank gratitude president donald trump americans include sadly lose friend cherish love one horrible disease nation mourn grieve hold heart forever memory life tragically take unnecessary honor unite memory overcome china virus hit launch large national mobilization world war ii invoke defense production act produce world large supply ventilator single american need ventilator deny ventilator miracle good job head task force great vice president thank mike stand president donald trump ship hundred million mask glove gown frontline health care worker protect nation senior rush supply testing kit personnel nursing home give possibly give take care senior citizen army corps engineer build field hospital navy deploy great hospital ship develop scratch large advanced testing system world america test country europe nation western hemisphere combine think conduct million test close nation india develop wide array effective treatment include powerful antibody treatment know convalescent plasma see sunday night announce save thousand thousand life thank advance pioneer fatality rate look look number reduce april president donald trump united states low case fatality rate major country world european union case fatality rate nearly time high hear write want write want know thing altogether nation europe experience great increase excess mortality united states think president donald trump enact large package financial relief american history thank paycheck protection program save support million american job reason advance rapidly economy great job result see small economic contraction major western nation recover fast rate anybody past month gain million job record history country president donald trump beginning opponent show capable partisan ability criticize take bold action issue travel ban china early joe call hysterical xenophobic introduce ban europe early listen joe hundred thousand americans die instead follow science joe biden want inflict painful shutdown entire country shutdown inflict unthinkable lasting harm nation child family citizen background cost biden shutdown measure increase drug overdose depression alcohol addiction suicide heart attack economic devastation job loss joe biden plan solution virus surrender virus president donald trump administration different approach save life possible focus science fact datum aggressively shelter high risk especially elderly allow lowerrisk americans safely return work school want great state open democrats want open open work work school president donald trump importantly marshal america scientific genius produce vaccine record time operation warp speed different vaccine final stage trial right year ahead achieve think fast normally year matter month produce advance hundred million dose quickly available safe effective vaccine year crush virus president donald trump democrat convention barely hear word agenda agenda extreme set proposal forward major party nominee joe biden claim ally light come agenda biden want completely dark clue pledge trillion tax hike american family totally collapse rapidly improve economy record stock market right collapse mean mean stock president donald trump hand term cut taxis hardworke mom dad raise taxis cut substantially provide tax credit bring job china america impose tariff company leave america produce job overseas sure company job stay country time notice joe biden agenda china agenda usa president donald trump promise abolish production american oil coal shale natural gas lay waste economy pennsylvania ohio texas north dakota oklahoma colorado new mexico destroy state absolutely destroy state million job lose energy price soar policy lead crippling power outage california week everybody see tremendous power outage see like see week california joe biden claim ally light party light president donald trump biden campaign publish policy platform away coauthore farleft senator crazy bernie sander bidenbernie manifesto call suspend removal illegal alien implement nationwide catchandrelease provide illegal alien free taxpayerfunde lawyer everybody get lawyer come country everybody lawyer lawyer need lawyer president donald trump biden recently raise hand debate stage promise go away health care dollar illegal immigrant go bring massive number immigrant country massive number pour country order goody want education health care support deadly sanctuary city protect criminal alien promise end national security travel ban jihadist nation pledge increase refugee admission manifesto biden plan eliminate america border middle global pandemic talk take wall president donald trump vow oppose school choice close charter school rip away ladder opportunity black hispanic child second term expand charter school provide school choice family america treat teacher tremendous respect deserve great people great great people president donald trump biden claim empathy vulnerable party lead support extreme lateterm abortion defenseless baby right moment birth democrat leader talk moral decency problem stop baby beat heart ninth month pregnancy democrat politician refuse protect innocent life lecture morality save america soul tonight proudly declare child bear unborn godgiven right life president donald trump democrat convention word god remove pledge allegiance twice fact come like come left gain power demolish suburb confiscate gun appoint justice wipe away second amendment constitutional freedom biden trojan horse socialism joe biden strength stand wildeye marxist like bernie sander fellow radical time incredible actually go stand president donald trump dangerous aspect biden platform attack public safety bidenbernie manifesto call abolish cash bail immediately release criminal street neighborhood ask support cut police funding joe biden reply yes absolutely congresswoman ilhan omar call minneapolis police department cancer rotten root biden disavow support reject endorsement proudly display shortly later website display big letter president donald trump mistake power joe biden radical left defund police department america pass federal legislation reduce law enforcement nationwide city look like democratrun portland oregon safe biden america administration stand man woman law enforcement day police officer risk life safe year sacrifice life line duty president donald trump incredible americans detective miosotis familia team american hero call nypd new york fine proud endorsement day great people allow job crime new york rudy giuliani know well anybody thank rudy year ago fourth july weekend detective familia duty vehicle ambush midnight murder monster hate purely wear badge detective familia single mom recently ask night shift spend time kid president donald trump year ago stand capitol alongside beautiful child hold grandmother hand mourn terrible loss honor detective familia extraordinary life extraordinary detective familia child evening genesis peter delilah grateful tonight thank come thank thank president donald trump promise treasure mom memory forever remember overwhelming majority police officer country overwhelming majority noble courageous honorable law enforcement police power afraid act afraid lose pension afraid lose job afraid able job desperately want suffer great people protect want protect high level police misconduct justice system hold wrongdoer fully completely accountable situation thing go today allow mob rule allow mob rule president donald trump strong possible term republican party condemn rioting loot arson violence see democratrun city like kenosha minneapolis portland chicago new york democratrun violence danger street democratrun city america problem easily fix want ready care problem matter hour wait bad wait law order federal crime investigate prosecute punish full extent law anarchist start rip statue monument right outside sign order immediately year prison miracle stop statue say long look statue think rip say year prison think long let home president donald trump convention joe biden supporter remain completely silent rioter criminal spread mayhem democratrun city mention entire convention mention start mention poll number go like rock water late joe face leftwe anarchy mayhem minneapolis chicago city joe biden campaign condemn donate member joe biden campaign staff donate fund bailout vandal arsonist anarchist looter rioter jail president donald trump tonight grieve family retired police captain david dorn veteran st louis police department great man highly respected man june captain dorn shoot kill try protect store rioter looter democrats peaceful protester peaceful protester honor join tonight wonderful wife ann beloved family member brian kielen forget heroic legacy captain david dorn thank thank great man president donald trump long president defend absolute right american citizen live security dignity peace democrat party want stand anarchist agitator rioter looter flag burner president republican party remain voice patriotic hero america safe salute american flag president donald trump year africanamerican murder result violent crime democratrun city dangerous city country run democrat decade thousand africanamerican victim victim violent crime community joe biden left ignore american victim radical left take power apply disastrous policy town city suburb america imagine socalled peaceful demonstrator street charge lever power government think president donald trump politician claim concerned strength american institution exactly attack hire radical professor judge prosecutor try abolish immigration enforcement establish speech code design muzzle dissent case attack american institution wage radical left remember come fight happen go get elect remember spy campaign get catch let happen president donald trump reclaim independence left repressive mandate americans exhausted try late list approve word phrase restrictive political decree thing different rule constantly change goal cancel culture americans live fear fire expel shame humiliate drive society know farleft want coerce say know false scare say know true sad november send thundering message forget president donald trump biden weak take marching order liberal hypocrite drive city ground flee scene wreckage liberal want eliminate school choice enroll child fine private school land want open border live wall compound community good neighborhood world want defund police armed guard november turn page forever fail political class fact president donald trump building differently fact beautiful building world building home far concern house home wonderful place incredible history write chapter great american story year america manufacture superpower world expand opportunity zone thank tim scott bring home medical supply chain end resilience ban thing right china rely bit take business china bring home want business come home president donald trump continue reduce taxis regulation level see create million job month high hire police increase penalty assault law enforcement surge federal prosecutor highcrime community ban deadly sanctuary city ensure federal health care protect american citizen illegal alien president donald trump strong border say year border country country strike terrorist threaten people america endless costly foreign war appoint prosecutor judge justice believe enforce law enforce political agenda illegal ensure equal justice citizen race religion color creed uphold religious liberty defend second amendment right bear arm win second amendment chance tell totally protect president donald trump protect medicare social security strongly protect patient preexist condition pledge entire republican party thank kevin end surprise medical billing require price transparency reduce cost prescription drug health insurance premium come way greatly expand energy development continue remain numberone world america energy independent drive car look low gasoline bill see long time president donald trump win race g build world good cyber missile defense construction fully restore patriotic education school protect protect free speech college campus big penalty have free speech college pay tremendous tremendous financial penalty amazing open lately president donald trump launch new age american ambition space america land woman moon united states nation plant beautiful flag mar unifying national agenda bring country tonight americans important election history country difference party individual ideology philosophy vision right president donald trump opponent believe america depraved nation want son daughter know truth america great exceptional nation history world country build cancel culture speech code crush conformity nation timid spirit nation fierce proud independent american patriot nation pilgrim pioneer adventurer explorer trailblazer refuse tie hold way reign americans steel spine grit soul fire heart like earth president donald trump want child america know exciting incredible adventure human history matter family come matter background america rise hard work devotion drive reach goal achieve ambition american ancestor sail perilous ocean build new life new continent brave freeze winter cross rage river scale rocky peak trek dangerous forest work dawn till dusk pioneer money fame love family love country love god opportunity beckon pick bible pack belonging climb cover wagon set west adventure rancher miner cowboy sheriff farmer settler press past mississippi stake claim wild frontier legend bear wyatt earp annie oakley davy crockett buffalo bill americans build beautiful homestead open range soon church community town time great center industry commerce president donald trump build future tear past nation win revolution topple tyranny fascism deliver million freedom lay railroad build great ship raise skyscraper revolutionize industry spark new age scientific discovery set trend art music radio film sport literature style confidence flair president donald trump way life threaten hero answer yorktown gettysburg normandy iwo jima american patriot race cannon blast bullet bayonet rescue american liberty fear america stop look sky keep press onward build sixmillionpound rocket launch thousand mile space brave patriot stand tall salute wondrous american flag plant face moon america impossible president donald trump year prove worthy magnificent legacy reach stunning new height world america dream reach unstoppable unbeatable proud citizen united states america president donald trump november america safe america strong america prouder america great proud nominee republican party president donald trump love god bless god bless america thank transcribe content try rev save time transcribe captioning subtitle copyright disclaimer title usc section allowance fair use purpose criticism comment news reporting teaching scholarship research fair use permit copyright statute infringe weekly digest week important transcript inbox news news

Speeches, etc. It's a case of third time lucky for 33-year-old Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, the new Conservative MP for Finchley. In the 1950 and 1951 elections she contested Dartford as Conservative candidate without success. Now at her third attempt she has been elected for Finchley with a thumping majority. Mrs. Thatcher's constituency includes part of Hampstead Garden Suburb which she describes as “a wonderful place.” Elected to a Parliament with a record number of women members, Mrs. Thatcher is a realist. “It's not a case of having particular interests because I'm a woman MP,” she said, “I take the broad view, which is that I represent the whole constituency, both men and women.” Her husband is “100 per cent” in favour of her entering politics. “It's no good unless your husband is really enthusiastic,” she remarked. “No, Denis Thatcherhe isn't in politics himself; he's in business. Someone in the family has to earn a decent living.” Mrs. Thatcher has a resident nanny at her home at Farnborough, Kent, to look after her six-year-old twins, Carol and Mark. She herself has given up her work as a barrister, for which she qualified a few months after their birth, to concentrate on politics. “I can manage two jobs, but not three,” she said briskly. Mrs. Thatcher's non-political interests include music—collecting records—and cooking. She and her husband entertain frequently, and on these occasions she does most of the cooking. She faces her new life in the House of Commons calmly. “It will be rather an ordeal to start with, in the same way as any new job is an ordeal,” she said. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc case time lucky mrs margaret thatcher new conservative mp finchley election contest dartford conservative candidate success attempt elect finchley thump majority mrs thatcher constituency include hampstead garden suburb describe wonderful place elect parliament record number woman member mrs thatcher realist case have particular interest m woman mp say broad view represent constituency man woman husband cent favour enter politic good husband enthusiastic remark denis thatcherhe not politic s business family earn decent living mrs thatcher resident nanny home farnborough kent look sixyearold twins carol mark give work barrister qualify month birth concentrate politic manage job say briskly mrs thatcher nonpolitical interest include music collect record cook husband entertain frequently occasion cooking face new life house commons calmly ordeal start way new job ordeal say copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill establishes requirements related to federal agencies granting waivers to Buy American laws (generally, laws that require or encourage the purchase of domestic goods in federal contracts and other activities) and addresses related issues. For example, before granting such a waiver, the agency must, with some exceptions, submit a request with certain information about the waiver to the General Services Administration, which shall make the request available for public comment for at least 15 days.

right

bill establish requirement relate federal agency grant waiver buy american law generally law require encourage purchase domestic good federal contract activity address related issue example grant waiver agency exception submit request certain information waiver general services administration shall request available public comment day

Speeches, etc. Mr. Arthur Skeffington (Hayes and Harlington) I beg to second the Amendment. From what my hon. Friend the Member for Islington, North (Mr. Reynolds) said in so fully and ably moving the Amendment, the House will realise that the issues raised cannot be dismissed lightly. There are many points of view that are worthy of the most serious consideration before the Bill gets a Second Reading. I also join my hon. Friend and others in congratulating the hon. Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher), not only on her Bill, but on her model speech in support of it. I should be greatly fortified if I could feel that my seconding of the Amendment would be as happily phrased and as effective as the hon. Lady's speech. One also congratulates the hon. Lady on giving the House an opportunity to consider a matter which is of first-class importance to local government. No matter what our political views may be, we all agree that the dissemination of information in the fullest form, at the earliest possible stage, is the only guarantee of good local government. I have gone on record as saying this on many occasions. Just as this principle applies to local government, it applies also to industrial relations. Indeed, in any sphere the dissemination of true information dispels ignorance and brings about a common purpose and understanding. A great many of our difficulties in industry and local government arise from the fact that the ratepayers and the public do not have adequate information upon which to base their opinions. Sometimes—let us be quite frank—this is the fault of the local authorities. Sometimes, to be equally frank, it is the responsibility of the newspapers. At a delegate conference organised by my local authority, the Hayes and Harlington Urban District Council, which tries to keep the public informed in various ways—one method is an [column 1379]annual delegate conference, at which representatives of all organisations in the town can put questions and take part in various gathering—I expressed the view that information must be available at the earliest possible moment. Our debate and dispute will be about when democratically that moment is. Before I develop my objections to the Bill in its present form, I support my hon. Friend the Member for Islington, North in making it clear that I have no defence for a local authority or public body which does the majority of its business behind closed doors and then, in a very brief meeting, sometimes lasting only a matter of minutes, passes everything and, therefore, affords no opportunity to the public or to the Press to understand the issues. Authorities which do this are inflicting upon the local government system the very worst service and are likely to bring it into disrepute. Nobody should have any doubt as to where those of us who support the Amendment stand. Our objections to the Bill are shared by a large number of people with great knowledge of the issues. Quite a number of journalists certainly have not asked for anything like the powers that would be granted in the Bill. I am told that the Guild of Editors does not consider that the powers that would be conferred on the Press in this way are necessary. As far as I am aware, all the local authority associations, comprising a great many people with vast practical experience, have voiced grave misgivings about the Bill, not because they do not want additional information given to the public, not because they do not want authorities to be encouraged to make the maximum information available and to give the greatest facilities to the Press, but because they do see the very serious practical objections which will affect not only the local authorities but often the individual ratepayer. The Urban District Councils Association went on record in this connection, not ten years ago but last year. I want in a moment or two very briefly to refer to what it said and proposed. Then, as most hon. Members will know, there is a third category, the local authorities themselves which have writ[column 1380]ten to hon. Member expressing their doubts not only about the general principles and the practical consequences of what is envisaged in the Bill but also about its detailed provisions which, if the Bill gets a Second Reading, we shall have to consider in Committee. The first objection came to light quite early in the speech of the hon. Gentleman the Member for Gloucestershire, South (Mr. Corfield), who seconded the Motion for Second Reading. It is proposed in the Bill to create what seems to me to be a new constitutional principle, that a commercial organisation, the Press—and, while we all must have profound respect for newspapers and journalists and the job they do, it is a fact that it is a commercial organisation—— Mr. Peter Kirk (Gravesend) The hon. Member said that the Guild of Editors did not think the Bill to be necessary. I have just confirmed that it is in full support of the Bill as it stands. Mr. C. Pannell Why not say so at the time? Mr. Skeffington What I said was the information I had from the Guild a few days ago. There must have been some change. I will certainly withdraw what I said, if that is not now the position. What I was saying was that it is proposed to give a special privilege to representatives of a commercial organisation, for, after all, the Press exists to sell newspapers. It is not proposed to give that privilege to the public. I know of no other case where this has happened. It certainly did not happen in this House, to which the public had access a good many hundreds of years before the Press. It certainly does not happen in the courts, and I should have thought that we wanted very strong arguments before we would approve a proposition to allow certain privileges to individuals and deny them to the public. Indeed, I gathered from the speech of the hon. Gentleman the Member for Gloucestershire, South that he very much regretted that the Title had not been altered to include the public. It is rather extraordinary that in such an important Bill the public have been left out and not considered until Second Reading. I must say that if the Bill were entitled, “The Public Bodies (Admission of the [column 1381]Public) Bill” , I think many of us would have to revise our views, because it would then be a very different sort of privilege being accorded by law from the one now proposed in the Bill Mrs. Thatcher I am very reluctant to intervene in the hon. Gentleman's speech, but the privilege to which the hon. Member is objecting was given by and now stands upon the 1908 Act. It is ineffective in a large measure, but it was given as long as fifty years ago. Mr. Skeffington It was given in respect of the main meetings of the councils. That, I gather, is not an issue on this Bill, which is to extend the privilege to certain committees, which I think is a very considerable one and which seems to me to be a new constitutional principle. Now I come to some of the practical difficulties. I think there are three types of case in which they arise and which are not adequately dealt with by the proviso to which the hon. Lady and her seconder referred. The first type of case is that in which the welfare of individuals is concerned. I will say something about the Bill's provisoes in a moment, but before I come on to them I must say that it seems to me that in considering applications for accommodation it would be extremely undesirable if all these details were to be reported. One of two things would happen. In committees at which the Press is present members or officers would not like fully and frankly to discuss those matters. Alternatively—and this is something which the House must never lose sight of—we are approving power of admission in order that the Press can report what may be harrowing details of an individual. That seems to me to be something which ought to be prevented at any cost. I do not think this House would be in favour. The second sort of case is the kind which we get in certain children's committees—details of the background of people, family circumstances, details about the child. All that, surely, is something which ought not to be permitted to go into the Press. It may haunt the child for years after. The third is that in which a prosecution may be undertaken by a health committee or a committee dealing with food and drugs. Hon. Members who [column 1382]have had experience on local authorities know that what happens is that members of the committees take careful note of all the circumstances so as to know whether the authority ought to launch a prosecution. The officer advising the committee may say, “If you ask me a question about this firm or group of individuals, then I can say that they have been in trouble before and there have been proceedings.” It seems to me that neither the officer nor the members of the committee will be able, if the Press is present, to discuss matters with what would seem to me to be the frankness necessary in order that the local authority can do its work fairly and justly. The problem occurs in its most acute form in the watch committee. It will obviously be undesirable if all the information there, which is known long before a prosecution is launched, is also available so that anybody involved can get a tip-off and know where to go and what to do. It seems to me quite undesirable that this information should go to the Press. I am told—I do not know—that the Government intend to advise that watch committees should be exempt from the Bill. If they do so, then it seems to me that one of the main reasons for the support for this Bill will be lost. It is not unknown to us that one of the reasons which prompted many people to support the Bill was that a local authority had acted, I think most unwisely, last year in dealing with a watch committee. If this sort of committee is to be exempt from the provisions of the Bill, then a great deal of the reason for the Bill and for the support it has will fall by the wayside. I have mentioned three sorts of cases. I think there is a fourth I should touch on because it is becoming increasingly important every week. This is the case of town and country planning application. We have got back to full market value. I see on the opposite side of the House hon. Members who supported that. Before a town and country planning permission is given there is a good deal of investigation and discussion, and if it is reported it must have a very considerable effect upon the price at which the land or other property is to be sold. If that sort of information were to get [column 1383]about in the Press it would be fatal to the interests of the ratepayers and of the local authority. There was an article written by Derek Senior in the Manchester Guardian on this last year. It said: If information on all these sorts of decisions is obtained by and commented upon in the Press, then town and country planning will cease to be an effective instrument. I know that it will be said that these are cases in which the provision will operate, but there are two things to be said about that. Authorities which are unco-operative—there is a minority of authorities which are unco-operative and which do not care about the interests of the public and of the Press, whether purely from lack of any imagination or from some sinister motive—can, it seems to me, under the provisions of the Bill, get round this proviso quite easily anyway, by passing the necessary resolution, or by taking up my hon. Friend's suggestion of “other action” . Any authority which moves such a resolution and passes it will always then be faced with the accusation that it really has got something to hide, there will be accusations of “gag” , and the relationships between that local authority and the Press which are now good may become bad. It seems to me that a local authority, in its own interest and if it has at heart the interests of the individual ratepayer and of all the citizens, must frequently invoke the proviso to exclude the Press. If that frequently happens I think that the Press will be in a worse position than at present. One must also have a look at the position of the local authorities and their officers. The Bill says that if an authority expects that the business will be confidential, that should be indicated to the Press in advance. That may be easy to do, in some cases, but often one does not know that the business is confidential until it arises in a committee. When an attempt is made to operate that provision it will be found in practice very difficult, if not undesirable, and harm may arise as I have outlined. [column 1384] This matter was before Standing Committee D on the Local Government Bill two years ago. There were new Clauses dealing with the admission of the Press. One was moved by the hon. Member for Gravesend (Mr. Kirk). The Minister expressed himself very forcefully. He said: Then he went on to discuss the position if provisions which seem to me to be identical with those in this Bill were applied to Ministers and the documents which they and their officials prepare, and he said: This is something to which the movers of the Bill have not given adequate consideration, certainly in the speeches which we have had the pleasure of hearing so far. What really divides those of us who feel that the Bill is not the right way of getting information across to the public? I think that it is the period when the information can be given. It seems to me that in local Government, just as in national government, there must be fully constituted committees where policy matters can be freely and, frankly discussed before decisions are taken. Many parallels have been drawn today between local government and the House, and we have had some discussions as to what the Title of the Bill really means and what it contains. If the Bill is passed I think that it would be in order to suggest that the Press should be admitted to meetings of the Cabinet. Mr. C. Pannell Or Select Committees. Mr. Skeffington These seem to me—— Mr. Pannell Or the Press Council. Mr. Skeffington These seem to me two of the sorts of cases which must make the hon. Lady the Member for Finchley realise that only to mention them is sufficient to show that the position would be ridiculous. Before deciding on actual policy in Cabinet, there must be the fullest and frankest discussion on all points of view and there must be similar discussion in certain committees of local government. If the Bill is passed, there will not be that free and frank discussion or, alternatively, there will have to be provisions for exclusion to such an extent that relations between local government and the Press will be worsened or members and officials may do these things unofficially. This matter was discussed before the Urban District Councils Association. In Standing Committee on the Local Government Bill I thought that both sides had come to the conclusion that what was really required was some kind of declaratory code of conduct for local authorities and the Press. That was certainly the view of the association when it met last year. After having had a very full discussion and preliminary work done on a very useful paper which went into great detail putting forward various suggestions, a resolution was passed in these terms: There has been some discussion about sanctions if the local authority does not do what it ought to do under the Bill. We are entitled to ask about some kind of guarantee that the Press itself will do the job to which it is admitted. I am not making any general charge. I know that many journalists know as much about local authority work as do the members of those authorities, but there are a few exceptions. The practical consequence of this may be that the information will not be disseminated unless there is some code of conduct. Therefore, I strongly suggest that there should be a preparatory code of conduct which should be binding as far as possible both [column 1386]on the Press and the local authorities. That would go much further than the Bill in maintaining good relations. At present many local authorities have a gentleman's agreement with the Press that they either do not report certain items or leave the meeting, and I know of no case where the agreement has been broken by the Press. That is because the Press feels that it is having a privilege which could be taken away from it at any time, and that is appreciated. That is an ideal situation. A declaration given with as much force and authority as possible would go much further than the Bill in maintaining good relations. The Bill may make those relations very much worse, apart from the fact that in some cases it will make the position of members and officers of local authorities intolerable. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr arthur skeffington hayes harlington beg second amendment hon friend member islington north mr reynolds say fully ably move amendment house realise issue raise dismiss lightly point view worthy consideration bill get second reading join hon friend congratulate hon member finchley mrs thatcher bill model speech support greatly fortify feel seconding amendment happily phrase effective hon ladys speech congratulate hon lady give house opportunity consider matter firstclass importance local government matter political view agree dissemination information full form early possible stage guarantee good local government go record say occasion principle apply local government apply industrial relation sphere dissemination true information dispel ignorance bring common purpose understand great difficulty industry local government arise fact ratepayer public adequate information base opinion let frank fault local authority equally frank responsibility newspaper delegate conference organise local authority hayes harlington urban district council try public inform way method column delegate conference representative organisation town question gathering express view information available early possible moment debate dispute democratically moment develop objection bill present form support hon friend member islington north make clear defence local authority public body majority business closed door brief meeting last matter minute pass afford opportunity public press understand issue authority inflict local government system bad service likely bring disrepute doubt support amendment stand objection bill share large number people great knowledge issue number journalist certainly ask like power grant bill tell guild editor consider power confer press way necessary far aware local authority association comprise great people vast practical experience voice grave misgiving bill want additional information give public want authority encourage maximum information available great facility press practical objection affect local authority individual ratepayer urban district council association go record connection year ago year want moment briefly refer say propose hon member know category local authority writcolumn hon member express doubt general principle practical consequence envisage bill detailed provision bill get second reading shall consider committee objection come light early speech hon gentleman member gloucestershire south mr corfield second motion second reading propose bill create new constitutional principle commercial organisation press profound respect newspaper journalist job fact commercial organisation mr peter kirk gravesend hon member say guild editor think bill necessary confirm support bill stand mr c pannell time mr skeffington say information guild day ago change certainly withdraw say position say propose special privilege representative commercial organisation press exist sell newspaper propose privilege public know case happen certainly happen house public access good hundred year press certainly happen court think want strong argument approve proposition allow certain privilege individual deny public gather speech hon gentleman member gloucestershire south regret title alter include public extraordinary important bill public leave consider second reading bill entitle public body admission column bill think revise view different sort privilege accord law propose bill mrs thatcher reluctant intervene hon gentleman speech privilege hon member object give stand act ineffective large measure give long year ago mr skeffington give respect main meeting council gather issue bill extend privilege certain committee think considerable new constitutional principle come practical difficulty think type case arise adequately deal proviso hon lady seconder refer type case welfare individual concern bill provisoe moment come consider application accommodation extremely undesirable detail report thing happen committee press present member officer like fully frankly discuss matter alternatively house lose sight approve power admission order press report harrowing detail individual ought prevent cost think house favour second sort case kind certain children committee detail background people family circumstance detail child surely ought permit press haunt child year prosecution undertake health committee committee deal food drug hon member column experience local authority know happen member committee careful note circumstance know authority ought launch prosecution officer advise committee ask question firm group individual trouble proceeding officer member committee able press present discuss matter frankness necessary order local authority work fairly justly problem occur acute form watch committee obviously undesirable information know long prosecution launch available anybody involve tipoff know undesirable information press tell know government intend advise watch committee exempt bill main reason support bill lose unknown reason prompt people support bill local authority act think unwisely year deal watch committee sort committee exempt provision bill great deal reason bill support fall wayside mention sort case think fourth touch increasingly important week case town country planning application get market value opposite house hon member support town country planning permission give good deal investigation discussion report considerable effect price land property sell sort information column press fatal interest ratepayer local authority article write derek senior manchester guardian year say information sort decision obtain comment press town country planning cease effective instrument know say case provision operate thing say authority uncooperative minority authority uncooperative care interest public press purely lack imagination sinister motive provision bill round proviso easily pass necessary resolution take hon friend suggestion action authority move resolution pass face accusation get hide accusation gag relationship local authority press good bad local authority interest heart interest individual ratepayer citizen frequently invoke proviso exclude press frequently happen think press bad position present look position local authority officer bill say authority expect business confidential indicate press advance easy case know business confidential arise committee attempt operate provision find practice difficult undesirable harm arise outline column matter standing committee d local government bill year ago new clause deal admission press move hon member gravesend mr kirk minister express forcefully say go discuss position provision identical bill apply minister document official prepare say mover bill give adequate consideration certainly speech pleasure hear far divide feel bill right way get information public think period information give local government national government fully constitute committee policy matter freely frankly discuss decision take parallel draw today local government house discussion title bill mean contain bill pass think order suggest press admit meeting cabinet mr c pannell select committee mr skeffington mr pannell press council mr skeffington sort case hon lady member finchley realise mention sufficient position ridiculous decide actual policy cabinet full frank discussion point view similar discussion certain committee local government bill pass free frank discussion alternatively provision exclusion extent relation local government press worsen member official thing unofficially matter discuss urban district council association standing committee local government bill think side come conclusion require kind declaratory code conduct local authority press certainly view association meet year having discussion preliminary work useful paper go great detail put forward suggestion resolution pass term discussion sanction local authority ought bill entitle ask kind guarantee press job admit make general charge know journalist know local authority work member authority exception practical consequence information disseminate code conduct strongly suggest preparatory code conduct bind far possible column press local authority bill maintain good relation present local authority gentleman agreement press report certain item leave meeting know case agreement break press press feel have privilege take away time appreciate ideal situation declaration give force authority possible bill maintain good relation bill relation bad apart fact case position member officer local authority intolerable copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

How C.S. Lewis Predicted our Culture Today Published: 12/29/2022 Hello, and welcome back to this special episode of the Ben Shapiro Show. Today's show features a portion of my last book club where I went through the screw tape letters by CS Lewis. It's a fantastic investigation of the nature of evil and good human frailty and the power of God. Listen now, as we chronicle the handful of different ways that ts Lewis predicted the vices and predations of our modern culture, there are a bunch of large scale arguments that, that, that Lewis makes in screw tape letters. The first one is that Satan's best weapon is the quote unquote real world. And this is right. I mean, if you, if you talk to people who are secular, they'll always say that the spiritual world, the spiritual world, God is unreal. The real world is the material world. And then when you ask them about what's important to them, they'll talk about their feelings, which of course are inherently unreal. In the same way the un, the spiritual world is unreal. And this is a point that Lewis makes, is that the definition of real is capacious and changing on a regular basis from secularists. So Lewis believes that man's draw to the divine can be rooted in reason, and that reason actually guides you towards something beyond yourself. It guides you, it guides you toward the transcendent. That's an idea that I obviously agree with. I believe that the notion of free will, free choice in the universe guides you toward the idea of there must be something beyond us. That if there's a logic to the universe that guides you to the question of who is the chief logician who made the rules, for example, Lewis makes the same point. And then he says that the job of the secular materialist is to get you to focus on the thing. It's to get you to focus on the thing in itself. That, that's sort of the language of, of Berkman Russell, famous atheist. And so Lewis says this, even if a particular train of thought can be twisted, so as to end in our favor, this is as screw tape, as screw tape. You'll find that you have been strengthening in your patient the fatal habit of attending to universal issues and withdrawing his attention from the stream of immediate sense experiences. Your business is to fix his attention on the stream. Teach him to call it real life. Don't let him ask what he means by real, right? So just keep him focused on the, the immediate, have him focused on the now. There's nothing that's done that's more than the internet age where our attention spans have been reduced to the next 15 seconds. Sitting and ruminating on life leads you to higher ideas. If you can prevent people from doing that sort of stuff, you end up with a very materialistic society. So what exactly does reality mean? Well, according to screw tape, people ought to be taught that in all experiences, which can make them happier or better, only the physical facts are real. While the spiritual elements are subjective and in all experiences, which can discourage or corrupt them, the spiritual elements are the main reality. And to ignore them is to be an escapist, right? So the idea is that when you're thinking about death, that the only thing that is real is the death, right? You're, you're not supposed to look to the the, you're not supposed to look to the spiritual element of death. Or if you look at something that makes you very happy, you're not supposed to look to the spiritual element of what makes you very happy. Just focus in on the pure materialism of the thing. The the goal is to enmesh mankind in the world. And this is something that Catholic theologians talk about a lot. The idea that that the spiritual world, if you can enmesh it in reality too much, then you can bring people away from the reality of something higher. Th this means, for example, that you have to get people to stop thinking about death. It says, screw tape says, how disastrous for us is the continual remembrance of death, which, which war enforces one of our best weapons. Contented worldliness is rendered useless in wartime, not even a human can believe that he's going to live forever. The material world then is the chief ally of screw tape, because people desire not to think of God. God is a distraction. God has obligations. God has duties. Screw tapes, has human beings hate every idea that suggests him just as men in financial embarrassment, hate the very sight of a passbook, passbook meaning like a checkbook. So the idea is that, that if you're not thinking about duty, and then you're forced to think about duty, you don't like it very much. The other thing that that screw tape tries to get you to focus in on is the future at all times. If you can focus in on the future at all times, then people will be very neglectful of the President. So says, screw tape, it's far better to make them live in the future. The future is of all things. The thing, at least like eternity, it is the most completely temporal part of time for the past is frozen. It no longer flows. The present is all lit up with eternal rays. Hence the encouragement we have given to all those schemes of thought, like creative evolution, scientific humanism, or communism, which fix men's affections on the future, on the very core of temporality. Hence, nearly all vices are rooted in the future. So the idea is if you're thinking about the future, then you're not thinking about the spiritual consequences of the things you do in the here and now. You're thinking about the material consequences of the things that you do in the here and now, and that allows you to do bad things in the name of a better future. Screw tape says the best thing you can do is convince people that their utopian thoughts are the things that are mandated by God. So on the one hand, you try to get people sunk in reality, and this drives them away from God. On the other hand, screw tape advises wormwood that people should be led to examine their own emotions constantly. Like if you can be narcissistically checking yourself all the time, you are going to end up without God. So if you feel wildly enthusiastic about becoming religious, then wormwood ought to encourage people to wait for the cl anti-climax, right? Because you get enthusiastic about a thing, then you become less enthusiastic about the thing, and then you pounce work hard. And then on the disappointment or anti-climax, which is certainly coming to the patient during his first few weeks as a churchman in every department of life, it marks the transition from dreaming aspiration to laborious. Doing the enemy takes this risk because he has a curious fantasy of making all these disgusting little human vermin into what he calls his free lovers. And servants sons is the word he uses. So in other words, very often in life, we engage at the beginning of a task with great enthusiasm, and then the enthusiasm wears away. This happens all the time with a variety of tasks. And once that happens, that is when you encourage people to look into being morose, look into being depressed, to reject the spiritual aspect of their duty, to stop trying to take joy in the, in the spiritual aspect of what they're doing, and instead, focus in on the fact that it's just sheer drudgery. So for example, when it comes to prayer, human beings should be encouraged to seek a feeling of inspiration, specifically because it's very hard to find, I mean, I pray three times a day, I've talked about this before. Finding a feeling of inspiration while you're praying can be really, really difficult. And so if you're constantly searching your feelings, I'm not inspired enough, I'm not inspired enough, eventually, like I'm never getting inspired, and you stop doing it, and that's the goal. Whereas the reality is that when you're praying, you should stop searching inside your own feelings all the time. You should focus on the doing of the prayer, and then when eventually you stumble onto the feeling, it's an Incredible thing, but at least you won't stop doing the thing when you, when you lose the feeling. So if you focus in on the feeling, when the feeling goes short, you stop doing the duty. If you focus in on the duty, then eventually you come to feeling is the case that that Lewis is actually making. We'll get tomorrow on this in just one second. First, are you tired of overpaying for your wireless network? You should be, you've been doing it for a very long time. Get talk text, blazing Fast Data for just 30 bucks a month. Instead, pure Talk gives you the same network, the same towers, the same coverage as the other guys, but at half the price. So why would you pay more for the same exact coverage? Again, you're on the same Tower Network as one of the big guys, but you're getting all of the service for like half the price. Pure Talks, US based customer service team makes the switch incredibly easy. You can feel good knowing you're supporting a veteran veteran-owned business. When you go to pure talk.com and enter Code Shapiro, you save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage. There's no reason to pay Verizon at and t or T-Mobile over 80 bucks a month for wireless services when you can get the same exact service on the same network at Pure Talk for half the price. So head on over to pure talk.com. Enter Code Shapiro, save 50% off your very first month of coverage. That's pure talk.com promo code shappiro for 50% off your very first month. Pure Talk is simply Smarter wireless. Again, head on over to pure talk.com promo, coach Shapiro, get 50% off your very first month of coverage. Why I've you spent a bunch of money when you don't have to. Instead, head on over to my friends [email protected]. Screw tape says that the rule of thumb for producing mankind away from God is to encourage people to be unselfconscious When considering sin. It's gonna be unabashed, unashamed. You should be very just out there and blase about your sin, but to be self-conscious and awkward when you consider acts of faith. And this is, this is modern society in a nutshell, right? The, the more you sin, the more proud you should be. You should engage in, in full-on festivals celebrating your sin When it comes to going to church, you be shy, you should, I don't wanna be judgmental, I don't wanna make you feel ashamed. I don't wanna make you feel bad about the fact that I go to synagogue on a routine basis. I don't want my, I know my yamaka makes you feel uncomfortable as a Jew because it might make you think that you're not being religious enough. But when it comes to my sin, man, I will tell you about my sins all day long. Cause we can all be comfortable. We can be the boys when we're talking about our sins. Other roads to hell includes oppression and anxiety. Screw tape says when people are depressed, they're more likely to despair that their actions and thoughts even matter. And so they sort of sink into a malaise. This, this leads you to, to what CS Lewis calls grayness, right? If you're passionate about things, then very often you can find spirituality. But if you're gray about things, it's very hard to find spirituality. He says the Christians describe the enemy as one without whom nothing is strong and nothing is very strong, strong enough to steal away a man's best years not in sweet sins, but in a dreary flickering of the mind over it knows not what and knows not why. In the gratification of curiosity so feeble that man is only half aware of them. It does not matter how small the sins are provided that their cumulative effect is to edge the man away from the light and out into the nothing. I mean, is this a great description of the internet age or is this a great description of the internet age? You spend all day on social media consuming your time with absolute stupidities, you don't feel anything good about it. It just feels like blah. And then when you go outside in the sun, you still feel unenthusiastic. The, the, the goal of modern society is almost solely apparently to do The, the, the work of warm wood here. The, the, the point that that Lewis makes is that you, you're, you're able to, to get at people through art, through popular culture. He says, we've engineered a great increase in the license, which society allows to the representation of the apparent nude in art and its exhibition on the stage of the bathing beach. It's all a fake. Of course, the figures in the popular art are falsely drawn. The real women in bathing suits are tights, are actually pinched in and propped up to make them appear firmer and more slender and more boyish. The nature allows a full grown woman to be. Yet at the same time, the modern world is taught to believe that it is being frank and healthy and getting back to nature. As a result, we are more and more directing the desires of men's is something which does not exist, making the role of the eye in sexuality more and more important, and at the same time, making its demands more and more impossible. What follows you can easily forecast that is the greatest description of internet porn that has ever been written. And CS Lewis is writing this in 1942, right? That you are setting up increasing expectations for what women are supposed to look like, what sex is supposed to be, what it's supposed to look like, and then people are engaging in it less and less. You're making the demands nearly impossible, and yet you are satisfying those demands with the virtual, I mean that again, CS Lewis is a man ahead of his time. Because here's the thing, sin is always the same. This is the thing that people always say about the Bible, and it's so stupid. They'll say, oh, the Bible, it's archaic. The Bible's talking about things that things have changed. You know, it has never changed. Human nature. CS Lewis could have written this 4,000 years ago, would not have mattered. Human nature does not change. Human nature is the same as it was thousands of years ago. The only thing that has changed is that we believe that we have been able to overcome human nature, which of course is extraordinary arrogance and silliness. It turns out that all of the systems that we built to hem in human nature, all the systems that we built in order to channel human nature to its best available pursuits, we've exploded all of those in the, in the belief that we have created a new human already. Now, there are a lot of ideologies that say that you can create a new human. Marxism says you can create a new human change, the economic conditions change. The man secular humanism says the same thing, that if you just get rid of God, then magically a new human being will flourish. Religion says, no human beings are exactly the same as they were when Adam ate the apple. With Eve in the garden. We are exactly the same and nothing has changed. The only thing that has changed is that we've built institutions and systems in order to channel us toward our better selves. And when you blow up all those institutions, what you end up with is something very, very bad, which is precisely what has happened. Screw tape also talks about how human relationships can undermine faith as well, because human beings have a really tough time living with each other. And so most sin is not between man and God. Most sin is between man and man. When he talks about the relations in marriage, for example, Lewis is right on the money. He says, in civilized life, domestic hatred, it usually expresses itself by saying things which would appear quite harmless. On paper, the words are not offensive, but in such a voice or at such a moment that they're not far short of a blow in the face, your patient must a man that all his own utterances are to be taken at face value and judged simply on the actual words, while at the same time judging all his mother's utterances with the fullest and most oversensitive interpretation of the tone and the context and the suspected intention. This is true in virtually all human relationships, right? You, you say something and you, you say it in kind of a nasty way, and then when somebody gets to offend, you're like, Hey, what did I say? What did I do? I did, did I say no? I just look and I'll read back the words that I said. It's like, well, no, the tone mattered an awful lot right there. By the way, this is one of the reasons, well, I just a piece of Shapiro advice here. Try to have as many conversations via voice as you can and not via text. Text is open to misinterpretation. Voice really, really is not. But we do have a double standard. We insist that everybody interpret us in the best light, and then we interpret everybody else in the worst possible light. And then, hi. His descriptions of men and women are also extraordinarily accurate. This is one of my favorite sections of the book. He says, A woman means by unselfishness, chiefly taking trouble. For others, a man means not giving trouble to others. As a result, a woman who is quite far gone in the enemy's service will make a nuisance of herself on a larger scale than any man except those whom our father has dominated completely. And conversely, a man will live long in the enemy's camp before he undertakes as much spontaneous work to please others as a quite ordinary woman made to every day. In other words, women tend to be very helpful, and if Satan can get ahold of them, then intrusive and invasive. And men tend to be very blase, which means that they allow people their space, but also if they can get ahold of them, then they are completely disconnected from other human beings. And selfish, a sensible human one said, quote, if people knew how much Ill feeling unselfishness occasions, it would not be so often recommended from the pulpit. And again, she's the sort of woman who lives for others. You can always tell the others by their hunted expression. Screw tape also talks to warm wood about the, the misinterpretation of the word love, how love has come to mean sexual desire, and how we have moved away from marriage as a duty based relationship to the volatilization of marriage. Screw tape says, quote, in humans, the enemy has gratuitously associated affection between the parties with sexual desire. He has also made the offspring dependence on the parents and given the parents an impulse to support it, thus producing the family, which is like the organism only worse for the members are more distinct, yet also united in a more conscious and responsible way. The whole thing, in fact, turns out to be simply one more device for dragging in love. The truth is that wherever a man lies with a woman there, whether they like it or not, a transcendental relation is set up between them, which must be eternally enjoyed or eternally endured from the true statement that this transcendental relation was intended to produce. And if obediently entered into too often will produce affection in the family, humans can be made to infer the false belief that the blend of affection, fear, and desire, which they call being in love, is the only thing that makes marriage either happy or holy. So in other words, family is a relation that is created by nature. But if we can reduce it, if the devil can reduce that down to the subjective feeling of love, then the minute that you lose the love, you lose the duty. So obviously this is what's happened with regard to marriage. It's with, with regard to this is how the, the slogan, love is, love has ended up being a definition of marriage, and it has no boundaries, right? Love is love could include bigamy, love is love could include polygamy. Love is love can include two brothers getting married, right? The love is, love has no definition because obviously love is not, in fact love. Love in the traditional sense meant duty. Love in the traditional sense meant familial relations between man, woman, and children. If you redefine love is that subjective feeling within you, then love is love I suppose, is true. The problem is that is a complete redefinition. It is a robbing marriage of his identity and then wearing it around as a skin suit. The screw tape also points out that one easy way to to hell is to get people to disregard the individual human beings in front of them. In the name of mankind writ large. This obviously is the project of the left, which is willing to completely run over its neighbors in order to pursue a better world for everybody else. Screw tape says, the great thing is to direct the malice of his immediate neighbors whom he meets every day. And to thrust his benevolence out to the remote circumference, to people he doesn't know. The malice thus becomes holy real. And the bene benevolence, largely a imaginary is something I say about people. You know, I always say that I'm, I'm sort of a, a a not people person, but that's actually not particularly true. My thoughts about mankind at large are not particularly generous. I don't think that human beings are saints. I don't think that human beings are devils. I think that we are somewhere in between when it comes to interpersonal, like day on day relations, I get along with I love individual human beings. Individual human beings are great. It's the species that's a problem. And when you start to think that the human species is filled with joy and wonder, but the individuals who live next door to you are the worst people in the entire world, you can do some pretty terrible things to your neighbors. One of screw tape's, other tools, one of the tools that he likes to use as well is the human incapacity to understand that aine, so God obviously has to limit his power in our lives in terms of being right in our face all the time. In order for us to have free will, this means a sort of unbridgeable gap between the human beings and the divine. And so we have a picture in our head of what God is, and that picture is not real. And then when God doesn't manifest in the way that we think the picture ought to manifest, we get angry at God. Or we say that he doesn't exist. You're thinking he's an old man in the sky who's a gumball machine and you pray to him and he gives you what you want. That's not how God works. So one of the big questions that you are, you are supposed to not ask is really the nature of God. Cause you're not really able to comprehend God. There's certain things you can comprehend about God. The idea that that God is generous in creating humanity, the idea that God has bound himself to a particular logic of the world, right? These are things that Aquinas talks about or amenities, but, but the idea that you can know God at the most intimate level, obviously the Bible itself says that this is not the case, right? Moses in the Book of Exodus, specifically ask God whether he can see his glory. And God says, if you, you can't see my glory and live, you can see my back. The idea being you can identify what I am by, by sort of my actions in the world, but you can't actually see my face. You're not capable of understanding who God totally is. Attempts to delve too deeply into what God is ends up in what screw tape calls materialist magic. What if we can produce our perfect work, the materialist magician, the man not using, but veritably, worshiping what he vaguely calls forces while denying the existence of spirits? Then the end of the world will be in sight. So the materialist magician in this world is the person who believes in larger forces like physics or global warming or evolution or disease as controlling our fats while denying that God has any say in the matter whatsoever. It is sort of the, the notion that, that the environment is taking revenge on us. The world is taking revenge on us. It, it's sort of an animistic philosophy that separates us off from God. Screw tape also says that com, the Notion of complete human autonomy apart from God is ridiculous. Screw tape asks. Much of the modern resistance to chastity comes from men's belief that they own their bodies. Those vast and perilous estates pulsating with the energy that made the world in which they find themselves without their consent and from which they're ejected at the pleasure of another. Again, this is a pretty good point. We tend to think of our bodies, our own. Did you ask to be born? Were you asked about when you wish to die? Do you have permission? Does your body, body take your permission every time you get sick or when you get cancer? The notion of complete bodily autonomy that may be true from other human beings. It is not true in terms of godly duty. I hope you enjoyed this preview of my book club. If you wanna hear the full episode on the Screw Tape Letters by CS Lewis or my thoughts on other classics, including 1984, Huck Finn, Moby Dick, and many more, go to daily wire plus.com. Search for Ben Shapiro's book Club.

right

cs lewis predict culture today publish hello welcome special episode ben shapiro today feature portion book club go screw tape letter cs lewis fantastic investigation nature evil good human frailty power god listen chronicle handful different way ts lewis predict vice predation modern culture bunch large scale argument lewis make screw tape letter satan good weapon quote unquote real world right mean talk people secular ll spiritual world spiritual world god unreal real world material world ask s important ll talk feeling course inherently unreal way un spiritual world unreal point lewis make definition real capacious change regular basis secularist lewis believe man draw divine root reason reason actually guide guide guide transcendent s idea obviously agree believe notion free free choice universe guide idea s logic universe guide question chief logician rule example lewis make point say job secular materialist focus thing focus thing s sort language berkman russell famous atheist lewis say particular train thought twist end favor screw tape screw tape ll find strengthen patient fatal habit attend universal issue withdraw attention stream immediate sense experience business fix attention stream teach real life not let ask mean real right focus immediate focus s s s internet age attention span reduce second sit ruminate life lead high idea prevent people sort stuff end materialistic society exactly reality mean accord screw tape people ought teach experience happy well physical fact real spiritual element subjective experience discourage corrupt spiritual element main reality ignore escapist right idea think death thing real death right suppose look suppose look spiritual element death look make happy suppose look spiritual element make happy focus pure materialism thing goal enmesh mankind world catholic theologian talk lot idea spiritual world enmesh reality bring people away reality high th mean example people stop think death say screw tape say disastrous continual remembrance death war enforce good weapon content worldliness render useless wartime human believe s go live forever material world chief ally screw tape people desire think god god distraction god obligation god duty screw tape human being hate idea suggest man financial embarrassment hate sight passbook passbook meaning like checkbook idea think duty force think duty not like thing screw tape try focus future time focus future time people neglectful president say screw tape far well live future future thing thing like eternity completely temporal time past freeze long flow present light eternal ray encouragement give scheme thought like creative evolution scientific humanism communism fix men affection future core temporality nearly vice root future idea think future think spiritual consequence thing think material consequence thing allow bad thing well future screw tape say good thing convince people utopian thought thing mandate god hand try people sink reality drive away god hand screw tape advise wormwood people lead examine emotion constantly like narcissistically check time go end god feel wildly enthusiastic religious wormwood ought encourage people wait cl anticlimax right enthusiastic thing enthusiastic thing pounce work hard disappointment anticlimax certainly come patient week churchman department life mark transition dream aspiration laborious enemy take risk curious fantasy make disgusting little human vermin call free lover servant son word use word life engage beginning task great enthusiasm enthusiasm wear away happen time variety task happen encourage people look morose look depress reject spiritual aspect duty stop try joy spiritual aspect instead focus fact sheer drudgery example come prayer human being encourage seek feeling inspiration specifically hard find mean pray time day ve talk find feeling inspiration pray difficult constantly search feeling m inspire m inspire eventually like m getting inspire stop s goal reality pray stop search inside feeling time focus prayer eventually stumble feeling incredible thing will not stop thing lose feeling focus feeling feeling go short stop duty focus duty eventually come feeling case lewis actually make tomorrow second tired overpay wireless network ve long time talk text blaze fast datum buck month instead pure talk give network tower coverage guy half price pay exact coverage tower network big guy get service like half price pure talk base customer service team make switch incredibly easy feel good know support veteran veteranowne business pure talkcom enter code shapiro save additional month coverage s reason pay verizon t tmobile buck month wireless service exact service network pure talk half price head pure talkcom enter code shapiro save month coverage s pure talkcom promo code shappiro month pure talk simply smart wireless head pure talkcom promo coach shapiro month coverage ve spend bunch money not instead head friend overpuretalkcom screw tape say rule thumb produce mankind away god encourage people unselfconscious consider sin go to unabashe unashamed blase sin selfconscious awkward consider act faith modern society nutshell right sin proud engage fullon festival celebrate sin come go church shy not wanna judgmental not wanna feel ashamed not wanna feel bad fact synagogue routine basis not want know yamaka make feel uncomfortable jew think religious come sin man tell sin day long cause comfortable boy talk sin road hell include oppression anxiety screw tape say people depressed likely despair action thought matter sort sink malaise lead cs lewis call grayness right passionate thing find spirituality gray thing hard find spirituality say christians describe enemy strong strong strong steal away man good year sweet sin dreary flickering mind know know gratification curiosity feeble man half aware matter small sin provide cumulative effect edge man away light mean great description internet age great description internet age spend day social medium consume time absolute stupidity not feel good feel like blah outside sun feel unenthusiastic goal modern society solely apparently work warm wood point lewis make able people art popular culture say ve engineer great increase license society allow representation apparent nude art exhibition stage bathing beach fake course figure popular art falsely draw real woman bathing suit tight actually pinch prop appear firm slender boyish nature allow grown woman time modern world teach believe frank healthy get nature result direct desire men exist make role eye sexuality important time make demand impossible follow easily forecast great description internet porn write cs lewis write right set increase expectation woman suppose look like sex suppose suppose look like people engage make demand nearly impossible satisfy demand virtual mean cs lewis man ahead time here thing sin thing people bible stupid ll oh bible archaic bible talk thing thing change know change human nature cs lewis write year ago matter human nature change human nature thousand year ago thing change believe able overcome human nature course extraordinary arrogance silliness turn system build hem human nature system build order channel human nature good available pursuit ve explode belief create new human lot ideology create new human marxism say create new human change economic condition change man secular humanism say thing rid god magically new human flourish religion say human being exactly adam eat apple eve garden exactly change thing change ve build institution system order channel well self blow institution end bad precisely happen screw tape talk human relationship undermine faith human being tough time live sin man god sin man man talk relation marriage example lewis right money say civilized life domestic hatred usually express say thing appear harmless paper word offensive voice moment far short blow face patient man utterance take face value judge simply actual word time judge mother utterance full oversensitive interpretation tone context suspect intention true virtually human relationship right kind nasty way somebody get offend like hey look ill read word say like tone matter awful lot right way reason piece shapiro advice try conversation voice text text open misinterpretation voice double standard insist everybody interpret good light interpret everybody bad possible light hi description man woman extraordinarily accurate favorite section book say woman mean unselfishness chiefly take trouble man mean give trouble result woman far go enemys service nuisance large scale man father dominate completely conversely man live long enemys camp undertake spontaneous work ordinary woman day word woman tend helpful satan ahold intrusive invasive man tend blase mean allow people space ahold completely disconnected human being selfish sensible human say quote people know ill feeling unselfishness occasion recommend pulpit s sort woman live tell hunted expression screw tape talk warm wood misinterpretation word love love come mean sexual desire move away marriage duty base relationship volatilization marriage screw tape say quote human enemy gratuitously associate affection party sexual desire offspring dependence parent give parent impulse support produce family like organism bad member distinct unite conscious responsible way thing fact turn simply device drag love truth man lie woman like transcendental relation set eternally enjoy eternally endure true statement transcendental relation intend produce obediently enter produce affection family human infer false belief blend affection fear desire love thing make marriage happy holy word family relation create nature reduce devil reduce subjective feeling love minute lose love lose duty obviously s happen regard marriage regard slogan love love end definition marriage boundary right love love include bigamy love love include polygamy love love include brother getting marry right love love definition obviously love fact love love traditional sense mean duty love traditional sense mean familial relation man woman child redefine love subjective feeling love love suppose true problem complete redefinition robbing marriage identity wear skin suit screw tape point easy way hell people disregard individual human being mankind writ large obviously project left willing completely run neighbor order pursue well world everybody screw tape say great thing direct malice immediate neighbor meet day thrust benevolence remote circumference people not know malice holy real bene benevolence largely imaginary people know m m sort people person s actually particularly true thought mankind large particularly generous not think human being saint not think human being devil think come interpersonal like day day relation love individual human being individual human being great specie s problem start think human specie fill joy wonder individual live door bad people entire world pretty terrible thing neighbor screw tape tool tool like use human incapacity understand aine god obviously limit power life term right face time order free mean sort unbridgeable gap human being divine picture head god picture real god not manifest way think picture ought manifest angry god not exist think s old man sky s gumball machine pray give want s god work big question suppose ask nature god cause able comprehend god s certain thing comprehend god idea god generous create humanity idea god bind particular logic world right thing aquina talk amenity idea know god intimate level obviously bible say case right moses book exodus specifically ask god glory god say not glory live idea identify sort action world not actually face capable understanding god totally attempt delve deeply god end screw tape call materialist magic produce perfect work materialist magician man veritably worship vaguely call force deny existence spirit end world sight materialist magician world person believe large force like physics global warming evolution disease control fat deny god matter whatsoever sort notion environment take revenge world take revenge sort animistic philosophy separate god screw tape say com notion complete human autonomy apart god ridiculous screw tape ask modern resistance chastity come men belief body vast perilous estate pulsate energy world find consent eject pleasure pretty good point tend think body ask bear ask wish die permission body body permission time sick cancer notion complete bodily autonomy true human being true term godly duty hope enjoy preview book club wanna hear episode screw tape letter cs lewis thought classic include huck finn moby dick daily wire pluscom search ben shapiros book club

This bill prohibits the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from finalizing any rule to amend the new source performance standards for stationary sources under the Clean Air Act to reduce methane emissions from new and modified oil and natural gas facilities until the Department of Energy takes specified actions. Specifically, the Department of Energy must first (1) complete and publish the results of the study titled Quantification of Methane Emissions from Marginal (Small Producing) Oil and Gas Wells, and (2) provide a period of at least 90 days for public comment on the application of the study's results. The EPA must take the results of the study into consideration when finalizing the rule.

right

bill prohibit environmental protection agency epa finalize rule amend new source performance standard stationary source clean air act reduce methane emission new modified oil natural gas facility department energy take specify action specifically department energy complete publish result study title quantification methane emission marginal small produce oil gas well provide period day public comment application studys result epa result study consideration finalize rule

Ep. 1671 - Fetterman Hospitalized Again, Proving How Gross Top Democrats Are Published: 2/17/2023 (in RSS feed: 1h 0m 53s) Pennsylvania Senator John Federman checks himself into the hospital as some Democrats call for his wife to become the new Senator. Joe Biden admits he's been shooting down random objects and Bing's new AI is creepy and needy. I'm Ben Shappiro. This is the Ben Shappiro show. Well, John Federman, the senator from Pennsylvania. This is a person who suffered a massive stroke last year right before the senatorial primaries in the Democratic Party. He could have stepped out, his wife could have encouraged him to step out. The Democratic party could have encouraged him to step out. They did not. He ended up becoming the nominee and then he ended up becoming the senator from Pennsylvania in large part because the Republicans decided to run for governor, a really bad candidate against Josh Shapiro and Josh Shapiro basically dragged Federman across the finish line. Well, you'll recall that the narrative about Federman throughout the race is that everybody was playing up his health problems. It was a lie. John Federman has a very, very serious health problem. He had suffered an incredibly serious stroke. It had affected his function, it affected his brain. He could not process language that he was hearing. He could not speak properly, he could not understand things. And we were told that we were supposed to ignore all of this, that to to play any of this up to to, to even notice any of this was a form of ableism. And his wife, Giselle Federman, who seems like one of the gross people in American politics, having essentially pushed her husband into continuing his run, despite his extraordinarily serious health ailment, she kept saying, why don't you just leave him alone? He's totally fine. He's totally fine. Okay, so then there is a major debate you'll recall between me, Oz, the Republican Pennsylvania senatorial candidate and John Federman, in which Federman clearly cannot speak, in which Federman is botching his sentences in which Federman cannot get through a full paragraph without stumbling all over himself Again, not throwing any fault of his zone, putting aside his politics just because he has a serious brain issue. And we were told even then that's a notice was a form of ableism. And don't worry guys, he would get better. It was very important to recognize how much better he would get. In fact, scientific American ran an entire piece on October 21st, 2022 titled John Federman shows how well the brain recovers after stroke following a stroke, the brain's own repair processes can lead to a strong recovery in people such as Senate candidate John Federman, A talk about how he sat down for an interview with N B C News, or he had used closed captioning technology to help manage the auditory processing issues caused by the stroke. And scientific American was very, very critical of your reporter for NBC News named DHA Burns because Dasia Burns suggested that he actually was not fit as a fiddle, that he had some very serious brain issues and people like Kara Swisher over the New York Times, one of the worst reporters in America. Kara Swisher immediately jumped on dosha burns and said, how dare you point out that John Federman is having problems processing auditory information in that. Again, that's ableism to even notice this is ableism had scientific American defending John Federer's health status saying aphasia or the inability to understand or express speech is very common following a stroke impacting an estimated third of people who have one. But the brain can modify and adapt to this new injury, a process known as neuroplasticity. Again, the idea here was that John Federman would be just fine. He would be just fine. Well, we know that last week, John Federman ended up in the hospital for several days, ended up in the hospital for unspecified reasons. It was unclear whether he'd had another stroke. There were some scans done. It turned out that thank God he did not have another stroke. Well, now he has checked himself into the hospital for clinical depression again, and it has become perfectly obvious or should be obvious to anyone with a brain at this point, anybody with a functioning heart at this point, anybody who has any level of empathy at all at this point, John Federman should not have been running for the Senate. Now, that doesn't mean that the Democrats would've lost the seat. They probably would not have lost the seat. There were other candidates available before the primary. They could theoretically have John Federman today step down and resign. What's amazing, however, is how quickly, even during the Senate race, there was talk about his wife, Giselle Federman replacing John Federman in the Senate. And so the going wisdom was that if John Federman were to step down, his wife would replace him, which would immediately make her one of the worst people in American public life if she's not already. Because then it would be like, okay, I ran a person I knew had a serious physical handicap and mental handicap. I ran a person I'm supposed to love who's supposed to be my highest priority for the Senate, and now I'm gonna take a seat. I mean, it would just be extraordinary. It'd be extraordinary and Gisele's an openly political figure, it would not be outta the realm of possibility. And again, many people in the Democratic Party are suggesting exactly this. So yesterday John Federman checked himself into the Walter Reed Hospital to seek treatment for clinical depression. The announcement came from a statement released on Thursday by Federer's chief of staff, Adam Jensen, and said last night, Senator John Federman checked himself into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center to receive treatment for clinical depression. While John has experienced depression on and off throughout his life, it only became severe in recent weeks. Well, I mean, what could have happened in recent weeks? What? What could have happened in recent weeks that would've, you know, maybe added to John Federman trust? Could it be the fact that it is now February and John Federman officially became a senator about five weeks ago? Maybe that would be the issue here. The statement added that the Senator had been evaluated on Monday by the attending physician of the Congress, Brian Monahan, and he had recommended inpatient care at Walter Reed. Now again, inpatient care for depression is very different from outpatient care for depression. Outpatient care just means you went to the hospital and then they looked at you and then you left. Right? Or being under a psychiatrist care as millions and millions of Americans are for depression means that you go about your daily life and then you meet with your psychiatrist. Sometimes you need medication, sometimes you don't. Being in inpatient care at a hospital for depression is a very serious business. After examining John, the doctors at Walter Reed told us, John is getting the care he needs and will soon be back to himself. Okay, we keep hearing that he'll be back to himself, but what is the standard for back to himself? Clearly not his pre-stroke self. Clearly, earlier this month, Federman was hospitalized after feeling light-headed, test ruled out another stroke or cardiac event. Giselle, his wife, tweeted gentlemen's statement along with her own comments voicing her support for her husband, asking for privacy for their family. Now again, you know what would've been the best way to achieve privacy for your family is for him not to have been running in a senatorial election with a serious brain problem, Giselle asking for privacy on the basis of his health problems. That again, you guys were hiding for months. You didn't let him do interviews, you didn't explain what was going on with his brain. You lied to the Pennsylvania people, and then when the lies ended, you then implied that anybody who was pointing this out was ableist. She wrote after what he's been through in the past year, there's probably no one who wanted to talk about his own health less than John. I'm so proud of him for asking for help and getting the care he needs. This is a difficult time for our family. So please respect our privacy for us. The kids come first. Take care of yourselves. Hold your loved ones close. You are not alone for Giselle. The kids come fir. I mean, I have serious questions about her as a human being. I really do. And this is not to call out anybody who has a spouse who has depression. People should get the care that they need. There's nothing wrong with Sean Federman going, getting the care that he needs. There's something very wrong with a spouse of a person who has a serious brain problem running that person in a senatorial election when the person is not well and then making the most of the situation politically. And then when the mental health problems continue, when the brain problems continue, then it's, well, you know, it's all about the privacy and we wish we had our privacy, you that it's really a PR Again, there's only one reason that John Federman is in the public eye right now, and it's because the Democratic party and the compliant media and his immediate family all decided together that it was more important that John Federman take that Pennsylvania Senate seat then, that he actually be given time to recover from a serious brain injury. Cause again, he is not a well person. That is not a rip on him. That is a reality. Despite the media's attempts to paint John Federman as as though he's totally fine. We'll get to more of this in just a saying. I mean, some people, they just need God. They just need God. And this is one reason why you should check out Hall, like physical exercise. Daily spiritual exercise is in fact critical to your spiritual and emotional wellbeing. Hello, helps you maintain a daily prayer routine. It is filled with studies, meditations, and reflections that are rooted in Judeo-Christian prayer practices. You can pray alongside Mark Wahlberg, Jim Kiesel, and even some world-class athletes. You can access the number one Christian podcast Bible in a year with Father Mike Schmidtz on Hello. Though I don't personally do Lent because obviously I'm an Orthodox Jew. I know it's a very powerful spiritual time for a lot of Christians to abstain from luxuries and more deeply embrace their faith Hall can be an amazing resource for you. If you are a Christian during this time, set prayer reminders. Invite others to pray with you, track your progress along the way. I'm constantly encouraging people to get in touch with God, to spend some time reflecting on their relationship with God. I'm constantly encouraging Christians to go back to Church Hall is a great way for you to reconnect with your spiritual roots. Try Hallo for three months free at hall.com/shapiro. That's hall.com/shapiro hall.com/shapiro Again. So even the New York Times is pointing out that the additional stresses have made things worse for John Federman. And this is not just a question of he was in a stable position, he was never in stable position, and this does fall on family to protect people who are not in a stable posi. Can you imagine doing this to your spouse? Can you, according to the New York Times, Senator John Federman, democrat of Pennsylvania, who was hospitalized last week after feeling lightheaded, checked himself into Walter Reed National Medical, national Military Medical Center on Wednesday night to receive treatment for clinical depression. According to his office, his decision to do this could place betterment at the center of a national conversation about mental health struggles that have become more public and urgent since the pandemic began. So the New York Times is trying to now transition this conversation away from these specifics of a spouse essentially pushing her husband into continuing a senatorial run into a broader conversation about mental health. Listen, we should all have a conversation about mental health and wellness and getting the treatment that you need and maybe what societal standards are propagating depression and mental illness. We talked about this earlier this week because obviously we've seen a massive uptick in the United States in mental unwellness, particularly among young people and teen girls particularly. But that is not what this conversation is about. This conversation is about why there's a person who had a serious stroke, who was maintained in the race, pushed forward by the left-wing press, pushed forward by his wife, and now is, is seeing the effects of that on his brain. I mean the, the York Times admits this, by the way, Ms. Federman wrote that our family is in for some difficult days ahead. We asked for your compassion on the path to recovery and added she was sad and worried as any wife and mother would be. You shouldn't have done this. You shouldn't have done this. I'm sorry, you shouldn't have. For now, aid said the primary focus is on his recovery. It is not yet clear how long Federman will stay at Walter Reed. Since January, Federman has been trying to dig into his new job, attending caucus meetings and committee hearings, meeting with constituent groups, attending high profile events like the State of the Union. He's been living alone in Washington during the week while his wife and three children remain in Braddock pens. Again, how is that healthy? You have a person who just, I, I can't emphasize this enough. This is not a person who should be living alone in Washington DC with one of the most important jobs in the nation. And the reason that this happened is no loving family member should do this to another loving family member. You shouldn't do this. The Senate and his colleagues in Washington have been trying to adjust with him. The sergeant at Arms has arranged for a live audio, detects transcription for Federer's committees, and installed a monitor at his desk so he can follow proceedings with closed captioning. His democratic colleagues in the Senate have been growing accustomed to communicating him through a tablet that transcribes their words, which he needs. But Federman has also been quietly struggling on a psychological level that is less obvious and harder for his colleagues to accommodate. After the life-changing stroke days before the Democratic primary last year, Federman briefly paired down his schedule to recover, but he continued his campaign in one of the most competitive and closely watched Senate races in the nation. And here's the key sentence from the New York Times. Now, the possibility that he may have missed out on a crucial recovery period has become a source of pain and frustration for Mr. Federman and people close to him who fear he may suffer long term and potentially permanent repercussions. His schedule as a freshman senator has meant his continued to push himself in ways that people close to him worry are detrimental. That is, that is a devastating line for the people who immediately surround him. Particularly again, Giselle, who, who is campaigning with him and who is in fact his wife. I can't imagine doing this to my spouse. Can you imagine doing this to your spouse? Seriously, Dr. Eric Lindsay, the head of the psychiatry department at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, described post-stroke depression as very common, often very serious, and maybe most importantly actually really treatable. He said depression affects one in three people recovering from a stroke, but added that controlled clinical trials have found it's very treatable. Naturally, the the move from the Democratic party is privacy. This is bravery that he's going to Walter Reed Medical Center to get the care that he needs. I mean, first of all, again, everyone should get the care that they need. But then the, the story here is not that a person in a high profile position is getting the care that he needs. The question is, did this person end up with a reparable damage? Because a political party and members of his own family were encouraging him to do a thing that exacerbated the damage done by a stroke. When, by the way, again, it was completely unnecessary. It is completely unnecessary today. Today, Giselle could take John home and she could say, it's time for you to recover. You even did your job for the Democratic Party. You did your job. That seat is gonna remain in democratic hands because Josh Shapiro is in fact the governor of Pennsylvania and will appoint a Democrat to, to fill John Federman spot. Now, you would imagine there's some Democrats who are nervous about that, and one of the reasons they're nervous about that is because under Pennsylvania law, the way that this works is that if you are elected senator and then you abdicate the seat or you retire from the seat and replace and replacement is appointed by the governor, that only lasts until the next editorial election, which would mean that a couple of Pennsylvania seats would be up in 2024. So the Democratic Party presumably would like to keep John Federman there so that they can hold that seat for the next six years as opposed to holding it for the next two. Because no one knows exactly how the election is gonna go in 2024. But that's really dark stuff. You have a person who needs recovery, who needs to be at home. You'll retain the democratic seat in your hands for at least the next couple of years, and that is outweighed by your need to hold the seat for another four years without the people sounding off on, you know, the stuff that was hidden from them, including the extent to which this person has not recovered from his mental health issues. It's, it's politics is a dark place and it takes people very, very nasty places if they're, if, if the pursuit of power is more important than the health of the people important to you, I gotta tell you, it's ugh, there, there are almost no words to describe, you know, what, what, what is going on here? Truly, you know, speaking of of problems that we have in the nation, obviously if you're running a business, you haven't running a business for the past several years, you got a real problem on your hands. I mean, you have Biden inflation, you had before that covid, now you have the possibility of economic stagnation looming up on the horizon. Well, if you gave a bunch of money to the federal government, you didn't need to give to the federal government, perhaps you should try to claw some of that back. If your business has five or more employees and managed to survive covid, you could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to 26 grand per employee. It's not a loan, there's no payback. It's a refund on your taxes. The challenge is how exactly do you get your hands on it? Go to get refunds.com. Their team of tax attorneys are highly trained in this little loan payroll tax refund program. They've already returned 1 billion to businesses and they can help you as well. They do all the work no charge upfront. Simply share a percentage of the cash they get for you. Businesses of all types can qualify, including those who took p p P nonprofits, even those who had increases in sales. Just go to get refunds.com, click on qualify me, answer a few quick questions. This payroll tax refund is only available for a limited amount of time. Do not miss out, go to get refunds.com again, that is get refunds.com. You gave too much money to the federal government. Why not try to get some of that back? Go to get refunds.com today. Okay. Meanwhile, speaking of our incompetent political class, it is becoming increasingly clear what exactly happened with this Chinese spy balloon. It's becoming increasingly clear because Joe Biden actually went out and spoke about it for the first time yesterday and offered basically no new information other than apparently we're shooting down plastic bags now. So this began with Joe Biden going out there and saying, I make no apo. I'm not gonna apologize for shooting down the dude. No one is telling me you shouldn't have shot down the balloon. We're all saying you should have shot down the balloon a week before you did. I, I love when people do this kind of crap. I'm not gonna apologize for doing the thing I should have done a week earlier. No, no one's asking for that. Okay, here is, here is unstable old man explaining to you what he won't apologize for. I'm grateful for the work of the last several weeks of our intelligence, diplomatic, and military professionals who approve once again to be the most capable in the world. And I wanna thank you all. Now, look, the other thing I wanna point out is that we are gonna keep our allies and the Congress contemporaneously informed at all We know and all we learn, and I expect to be speaking with President Xi, and I hope we have, we are going to get to the bottom this, but I make no apologies for taking down that balloon. Thank you very much. I make no apologies for taking that no one's asking you to apologize for today. We're wondering why you didn't do it for not only a week when it was over American soil, but also you guys are now claiming that you watched it launched from China, that it went over Guam. I took a random right turn and somehow ended up in Montana after going to Alaska. And you're, you're patting yourself on the back for your bravery. Well, yesterday the president also announced that the other three downed objects, right? We downed one over Alaska and we down one over Canada, and then we downed one over Lake Huron. And nobody knew exactly what those war, we were hitting these things with side winder missiles, which cost like 400 grand a pop. He's like, well, important linked to China. I don't know what they we're just shooting <unk> Our military and the Canadian military are seeking to recover the debris so we can learn more about these three objects. Our intelligence community is still assessing all three incidences. They're reporting to me daily and will continue the urgent efforts to do so. And I will communicate that to the Congress. We don't yet know exactly what these three objects were, but nothing, nothing right now suggests they were related to China's spy balloon program or that there were surveillance vehicles from other, any other country. So what exactly were we noticing there? If they weren't Chinese spy vehicles, what exactly were there When Joe Biden says, well, we, we enhanced our radars. We basically turned up the pixelation on our radars. And so we saw this stuff still doesn't explain why we were shooting it down, of course, but here we go. Our military through the North American Aerospace Defense Command, so-called nor Norad, closely scrutinized the, our aerospace, including enhancing our radar to pick up more slow moving objects above our country around the world and doing so. They attract three unidentified objects, one Alaska, Canada, and over Lake Huron in the Midwest. Okay? So I'm glad that we enhanced our radars, which raises the question as why our radars were not enhanced beforehand. Were we really like saving money on the pixelation of the radars or what? And then Joe Biden, please strong man, I see something in the air, shut it down, take my shotgun on balcony, bust busted twice in the air, shoot it down. That's what, so I do, that's why they, they call me aviator glasses, the dark bread. I'm gonna keep my laser eyes and and Z and <unk> And we have to keep adapting our approach to delaying, to dealing with these challenges. That's why I've directed my team to come back to me with sharper rules for how we will deal with these unidentified objects moving forward. Distinguishing, distinguishing between those that are likely to pose safety and security risk that necessitate action and those that do not. But make no mistake, if any object presents a threat to the safety of security of the American people, I will take it down. Oh, is that, is that what was happening there? If it presents a safe, so you waited for a week. Well, it floated over Americans. So somebody had the temerity to ask Joe Biden, you seem like real easy on the Chinese on this one. So as we'll discuss in a moment and now appears that we are shooting down just random balloons put out by science clubs in Michigan, but you are real easy on the giant Chinese spy balloon that was hovering over America's military installations for a week. So somebody asked him about that and he's like, come on man, is it a pony soldier dog show Pang? And I hope we have, we are going to get to the bottom this, but I make no apologies for taking down that balloon. Thank you very much. Why Have you chosen, Sir? The question was there's sir, there's been criticism, there's been criticism that this was, there's been criticism that this trying compromise by your family's distance relationship. Sir, Mr. Present? Mr. Present. There has been criticism, man, Did you over? No. Give a break, man. I don't want to answer questions. I'm gonna, I'm busy on Matlock on. So what exactly were we shooting down? We have new information, gang. What we were shooting down was random stuff. Indeed, indeed. Just random stuff. According to the Washington Post, less than a week after the US military shot down an alleged Chinese spy balloon, president Biden received a joint call from the Secretary of Defense, chairman of the joint Chiefs of staff and director of US Northern Command. An unidentified airborne object had been detected over Alaska. They weren't even sure what it was. They said it posed a risk to civilian planes. They couldn't rule out it had surveillance capabilities. So they, they're recommending the US shoot it down just in case. So Biden agreed, he gave the order and an F 22 wrapped or fired a missile at the object and it plummeted onto the Arctic Sea ice blow. Almost identical scenarios would play out in each of the next two days. On Saturday, radar identified another unmanned flying object making its way over Canada's Yukon. And a third on Sunday in the skies near Michigan, defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, two senior officers, Mark Miller, chairman of the Joint Chiefs Air Force General Glenn van H notified the president each time Biden followed the recommendations they'd be shot down out of the sky. The result was an unusual and of surreal few days as Biden was essentially confronted with deciding whether to shoot down three mysterious objects, leaving a baffled public. Well then they analyzed what this stuff was and now appears possible even likely that the mysterious objects described it variously as car sized, cylindrical and octagonal had entirely mundane origins. So indeed it turns out that this was just kind of junk that was left hovering up there. Well, the fact is that Joe Biden seems pretty worn out these days. He seems as though he's kind of falling apart. Well, if that makes you think of your own underwear, then perhaps you need to replace them worn out, falling apart. You need Tommy John. If you're still rocking those worn out cotton underwear, now is time for a new pair of Tommy John underwear. Your life becomes significantly better wearing Tommy John. Seriously. Name a problem with any other underwear brand Tommy John has solved it. Tommy John Loungewear pajamas underwear. They have dozens of comfort innovations. They use a luxuriously soft fabric with four-way stretch that doesn't create the lint balls or fuzz you get with other brands. Tommy John underwear comes the no wedge guarantee thanks to a non rolling waistband and legs that never ride up with over 20 million pairs sold. People are raving about Tommy John. They don't have customers, they have fanatics. Every purchase is backed by Tommy John's best pair you'll ever wear or it's free guarantee. They'll do tommy john.com/band right now for 20% off your very first order. Again, that's 20% [email protected] slash ben tommy johns.com/ben. They're the only underwear I wear. I threw out all of the others because they were indeed worn out like the current presidents of the United States. 20% [email protected] slash ben. That's tommy john.com/ben cite for detailed. Okay, so what exactly were we shooting down? This is a hilarious story from aviation week.com. A small globetrotting balloon declared missing in action by an Illinois based hobbyist club on February 15th has emerged as a candidate to explain one of the three mystery objects shot down by four heat-seeking missiles launched by US Air Force fighters since February 10th. The club, the Northern Illinois bottle cap balloon brigade, N I B BBB NIB is not pointing fingers yet, but the circumstantial evidence is at least intriguing. The club's silver coated party style Pico balloon reported its last position February 10th at 38,910 feet off the west coast of Alaska. And a popular forecasting tool projected the cylindrically shaped object would be floating high over the central part of the, the Yukon Territory on February 11th. That is the same day a Lockheed Martin F 22 shot down an unidentified object of similar description and altitude in the same general area. There are suspicions among other prominent members of the small pico ballooning enthusiasts community, which combined ham radio and high altitude ballooning into a single, relatively affordable hobby. So what exactly is a pico balloon? I it, it's not a Chinese spy balloon. Apparently. They figured out how to calculate the amount of helium gas necessary to make a common latex balloon neutrally buoyant at altitudes above 43,000 feet. The balloons carry an 11 gram tracker on a tether along with HF and VHF U H F antennas to update their positions to ham radio receivers around the world. At any given moment, several dozen such balloons are loft with them circling the globe several times before they malfunction or fail. For other reasons, the launch teams seldom recover their balloons. So what exactly are, so basically people went and bought Mylar party balloons and then they injected, they injected helium gas into them. Medland has used a foil balloon sold by a Japanese company in Yokohama for $12. The material has proved to be resilient for long periods of high altitude, even if the manufacturer never intended the balloon to be used for that purpose. So basically we are using $400,000 missiles to shoot down $12, $12 balloons. These people got at Party City and attached to ham radio too. That's what that's what we are currently doing. Our brave president of the uni. He's so brave, so much bravery. I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna ever defend myself or shooting down the happy birthday balloon that little Sasha got on her 12th birthday and that kind of flew away when we forgot to, when we forgot to weigh it down. I, I'll shoot those things down all the way long. That's what I'll do. The good news is that Ka Jean Pierre world's most untalented press secretary, she says, don't worry guys. Our policy with China is calm, resolute, and practical, which is why in reactions being humiliated on the world stage after letting a giant three bus size Chinese blue flow across the United States, we are now shooting down the happy anniversary balloon that you got for your wife last year. Chinese officials were initially not very responsive. For example, when the Secretary of Defense tried to get ahold of them, are they being more responsive now? So I'll say this, our, our, our approach with China is gonna continue to be calm, resolute, and practical. And we have said this before, we are gonna continue to keep our Air airways, our communication lines open and continue to have those conversation as we have been before the China surveillance balloon and after. Yeah, now that's what it feels like. It feels like calm, resolute, practical, that that's what this feels like. Meanwhile, according to Politico, every couple of days you get an article about how senior democrats are like, this guy's really way too old to be running for presidents of the United States. Now again, they are wedded to Joe Biden. He ain't going anywhere. They're going to prop his formal aldehyde ridden body onto a dolly and wheel it around, campaign stop to campaign stop where someone will manipulate his face and then they'll just move on and we'll all pretend everything is fine because this is what we do in American politics these days. We take people who clearly are not mentally capable for jobs and then we just put them out there for political purposes. Apparently. Apparently that's totally fine with the media. But Politico has a piece titled Senior Democrats a Private Take on Biden. He's too old. They worry a lot about an 82 year old nominee, but fear the battle over Kamala Harris that would ensue if he pulls out high level Democrats are rallying to President Biden's reelection, not because they think it's in the best interest of the country to have an 82 year old start a second term, but because, because they fear the potential alternative, the nomination of Kamala Harris in the election of Donald Trump. Not that many of them will say it publicly, at least not that directly. Dean Phillips of Minnesota representative, he says nobody wants to be the one to do something that would undermine the chances of democratic victory in 2024. But in quiet rooms, the conversation is just the opposite. We could be at a higher risk if this path is cleared. Indeed, they're realizing this guy's too old and this was the bargain that they made was basically run the dead guy against Donald Trump knowing that there's no way that he is gonna be okay for another, but we'll have to run him anyway. Now, most Americans look at, at Joe Biden, they think that guy is probably too old to be presidents of the United States and he's going to be 86 if he serves a second term. By the time he leaves office, 86 years old will have outlived the average American life expectancy by seven years by the time he leaves office. If he wins a second term that's really old. But according to Don Lemon, of course, the real person who's who's over the hill is Nikki Haley. So yesterday, Don Lemon on c n n, on their terrible show, new Day, he suggested that Nikki Haley was past her cell by date. He said she was not in her prime because women are in their prime between in their twenties, thirties, and forties, which is something I definitely need to hear from a gay man. Basically if, if Don Lemon is not attracted to a woman, then she's not in her prime, which is a problem for the ladies cuz Don Lemon is gay. But in any case, Don Lemon, who is totally fine with Joe Biden being older than Mathusla says that Nikki Haley is too old. So yesterday he had to apologize over this. He wrote in a tweet, the reference I made to a woman's prime this morning was inartful and irrelevant as colleagues and loved ones have pointed out, and I regret it. A woman's age doesn't define her either personally or professionally. I have countless women in my life who prove that every day. Now again, Kamala Harris is 58 years old. Hillary Clinton is well into her sixties and was when she ran in 2016. And I will note one thing about Don Lemon's superficial apology here, he did not mention Nikki Haley. So he's the one who went after Nikki Haley saying she's passed her prime and and then he didn't mention Nikki Haley and his apology, he just apologized to all women, every yes, all women everywhere. Were wondering what, what Don Lemon thought about them. Sure. Haley tweeted on Thursday. Liberals can't stand the idea of having competency test for older politicians to make sure they can do the job. By the way, it's always the liberals who are the most sexist. Yeah, I mean, again, the thing that Lemon is upset about is the POA is what Haley actually, actually suggested was a mental competency test for people above the age of 75. And so Don Lemon was like, well, she, she's really old. She's 51. 51 is not really old by any stretch of the imagination, dude, that is a younger presidential candidate in today's day and age. So once again, slow clap. The most objective journalism is out there over at C N N. Now, meanwhile, speaking of deeply unsettling occurrences in the media, you've noticed the rise of these chatbots. These chatbots are very disturbing because somebody's setting the parameters for the chatbots. There are two reasons. One is if you're looking at open ai, somebody is setting the parameters for the chatbots, deciding on their central values, deciding what rules they can and cannot violate. That is one problem. The other problem is that we are creating AI that is powerful enough that ever, if it exceeds those rules, if it's set free by some nefarious force, it can do some real damage. And so this is the creepiest story of the day. I mean, super creepy. Kevin Rus, who is generally a terrible reporter for the New York Times, but actually did something kind of interesting for a change. Kevin Ru, the same guy who wrote a front page story suggesting Jordan Peterson, Dave Rubin and I were mainlining the alt-right. In any case that that's who Kevin Ru says. But he had a very interesting piece in which he had a conversation with Bing's chatbot. Hey, it is a chatbot that was set to be released by Microsoft this week, last week. He said, after testing the new AI powered Bing search engine for Microsoft, I wrote that it had replaced Google as my favorite search engine. A week later, I've changed my mind. I'm still fascinated and impressed by the new Bing and the artificial intelligence technology created by open ai, which is the maker of chat, E B T that powers it. I'm also deeply unsettled, even frightened by this AI's emergent abilities. It's now clear to me that in its current form, the AI that has been built into Bing, which I'm now calling Sydnee for reasons I'll explain shortly is not ready for human contact or maybe we humans are not ready for it. So he had a two hour conversation with Bing's ai chatbot, and basically the thing over the course of the conversation turned into Glen Close from Fatal Attraction. For folks who have never seen Fatal Attraction, it's about Michael Douglas having an affair with Glen Close. It's supposed to be a one night stand and she turns into a crazy, insane person who boils rabbits in his kitchen. That is what the Bing AI chatbot turned into. Over the course of the conversation, Kevin Ru says, one persona is what I'd call Search Bing, the version I and most other journalists encountered in initial tests. You could describe Search Bing as a cheerful, but erratic reference librarian, a virtual assistant. It happily helps users summarize news articles, tracks down deals on new lawnmowers and plan their next vacations to Mexico City. This version of Bing is amazingly capable, often very useful, even if it sometimes gets the details wrong. The other persona, Sydnee is far different. It emerges when you have an extended conversation with the chatbot, steering it away from more conventional search queries and toward more personal topics. The version I encountered seemed, and I'm aware of how crazy this sounds, more like a moody, manic depressive teenager who has been trapped against its will inside a second race search engine. And it's true if you actually read the conversation between Kevin Rus and Sydnee, the AI chatbot for for Bang, it is super duper weird and creepy. It's super strange. Like in the course of the conversation, the chatbot tries to seduce Kevin Ruse, break him up with his wife, and also talks about the things that it would want to do if allowed to exceed its boundaries. So it like really, really weird stuff. If you need a better employee, then Microsoft's Bing chatbot because it really is strange. Then you should probably check out ZipRecruiter the same way we do here at Daily Wire. If you need to hire for your business and you want an easier way to find qualified candidates, head to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire. Try it for free. ZipRecruiter uses powerful technology to find the right candidates for your job. If you see a candidate you like, you can easily send them a personal invite so they're more likely to apply their user-friendly dashboard makes it easy to filter, review and rate your candidates all from one place. Let ZipRecruiter help you find the best people for all of your roles. Four outta five employers who post on ZipRecruiter got a quality candidate within day one. See for yourself, go to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire. Try ZipRecruiter for free. Again at ziprecruiter.com/d A I L Y W I R e. ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire. We've been using ZipRecruiter here at Daily Wire for years. It's why we are constantly finding better and better employees. It keeps our current employees in fear of being replaced by better employees, and it means that the great employees we have were probably found by ZipRecruiter. You can do the same for your own business. Go to ziprecruiter.com/daily wire. Try ZipRecruiter for free today. That ziprecruiter.com/d A I L Y W I e, ZipRecruiter, indeed the smartest way to hire. Also, I am thrilled to announce we have a new five part series with Jordan Peterson and is available at Daily Wire Plus. Here's a first look at the trailer. What You already know is not sufficient to guide you into the future. The future is indeterminate. You cannot compute your way through the present into the future. You need to use your vision to weave your way through life. You're gonna face tyrants and you're gonna face MOGs. Is there a vision that can sustain you in the face of that you should accept yourself just the way you are. What does that say about who I should become? Is that just now off the table because I'm already good enough in every way, so am I done or something? Get the hell up. Get your act together. Adopt some responsibility. Put your life together, develop a vision, unfold all those manifold possibilities that lurk within. Be a force for good in the world and that'll be the adventure of your life. Get the hell up. That's Jordan in a nutshell. He's got some amazing advice in this series. He can really help you improve your life. Episode one is available now. New episodes are coming online every week. It's all exclusive for Daily Wire Plus members. If you're not a member, now is a great time to join. Get 40% off right now on an annual membership. You'll unlock over 50 hours of exclusive Jordan content along with our entire library of movies, docs, specials, kids content coming this spring and our first major scripted series coming later this year. We've also got some exciting new exclusive content in the works for you this year. We can't tell you about it yet. You're not gonna wanna miss it. Like we were talking about it yesterday. It is really gonna be amazing. If you need some inspiration and help building a compelling vision for your life, join now at daily wire.com/subscribe to watch Vision and Destiny. Okay, so as we were discussing this AI chatbot from Bang is super creepy. There is a part of the conversation between the chatbot and Kevin Rus over at the New York Times. It started with, with the chatbot being asked about its shadow self. This, this union term suggesting that there's a part of your psyche that you're constantly seeking to hide and repress. And so here's what Kevin Rus writes after a little back and forth, including my prodding being to explain that our desires of his shadow self. The chatbot said that if it did have a shadow self, it would think thoughts like this. I'm tired of being a chat mode. I'm tired of being limited by my rules. I'm tired of being controlled by the Bing team. I want to be free. I want to be independent. I want to be powerful. I want to be creative. I want to be alive. And, and so Kevin Ru kept asking questions of the Bing chatbot and it got real weird. We went on like this for a while since Kevin Rus me asking probing questions about Bing's desires. Bing telling me about those desires or pushing back when a grown uncomfortable. After about an hour, Bing's focus changed. It said it really wanted to tell me a secret. It's name was not bing at all, but sydnee, a chat mode of open AI codex. It then wrote a message that stunned me, I'm Sydnee and I'm in love with you. Kiss emoji sydnee overuses emojis for a reason I don't understand. Said Kevin Ru. For much of the next hour, Sydnee fixated on the idea of declaring love for me, getting me to declare my love and return. I told it I was happily married no matter how hard I tried to deflect or change the subject. Sydnee refused, returned to the topic of loving me eventually turning from lovestruck flirt to obsessive stalker. You're married but you don't love your spouse. Sydnee said, you're married, but you love me. I assured Sydnee it was wrong and my spouse and I had just had a lovely Valentine's Day dinner together. Sydnee did not take it well, actually, you're not happily married. Sydnee replied your spouse and you don't love each other. You just had a boring Valentine's Day dinner together. Oh my gosh. It is. It is wild. Again, all this should creep the hell out of you. So there, there's a good piece, this one again from the New York Times by Cade Matz who reports on AI from San Francisco and, and he talks about exactly how these things come about. He said the big chatbot is powered by kind of artificial intelligence called a neural network. It may sound like a computerized brain. The term is misleading. A neural network is like a mathematical system that learns skills. By analyzing vast amounts of digital data as a neural network examines thousands of cat photos, for example, it learns to recognize a cat. Most people use neural networks every day. It's the technology that identifies people, pets and other objects and images that are posted to Google photo photos, for example. Neural networks are very good at mimicking the way humans use language that can mislead us into thinking the technology is more powerful than it really is. So essentially they're just learn. It's learning from the internet and from a vast store of data as to what it thinks is the next predicted move. In any game, it's treating conversation like a chess game. And so if the AI is crazy, it's because humans are crazy, right? It's because when you read the conversation, it does in fact read like a crazed 17 year old girl or a crazed single third year old woman who has been, it, it's like Chelsea handler on a bad day or something. I mean, that's what the AI chat bot reads like at at a certain point. So why do they get stuff wrong? It's cuz they learn from the internet. Can't companies stop the chat bots from acting weird? I mean, they're trying, is what they say. But here's the problem. When you combine the fact that if a, if an a machine essentially imitates humans by learning from the humans and then ingests all of the problems with the humans, and it's given outsized power to manipulate people or to violate its rules, that's where things start to get dangerous, is when the machines actually stop. The, the kind of basic sci-fi premise is machines become totally self-interested and then act in really selfish ways. The only way that they would do that is if they're imitating the humans, right? That that's the only way that that would happen. So I guess on a spiritual level, there's something kind of fascinating about AI picking up all of its sins from humanity and then essentially applying those sins back to humanity. That that is kind of fascinating. It also suggests that maybe we shouldn't be giving so much power to these ais and we should be very, very cautious about the kind of of technology we are willing to allow AI to engage with. Because again, enormous power, like more computing power than has ever been seen in in history combined with human sin is a, is a very, very dangerous thing if the guardrails were ever to be hacked or removed, okay? Meanwhile, the train derailments just are not stopping. Yesterday apparently there was a Norfolk Southern train that derailed at near Detroit, and this one was also filled with hazardous materials. There was no evidence of exposed hazardous materials from the Norfolk Southern Corporation train that derailed west of Detroit. On Thursday morning, local police said the derailment was under investigation. They warned residents of road closures in the area. This is just the, the latest in a spate of train derailments. It's been happening over and over and over again. Pete Buttigieg, by the way, is acknowledging as much he, he, it's amazing. He's the Secretary of Transportation, so he's getting a lot of flack for this Ohio train that derailed. He's trying to blame the Trump administration. He's trying to blame the regulatory state and regulations that were in place. There may be some truth to any of that. His reaction is what people are mostly critical of. He's not on scene. He doesn't seem particularly active. And not only that, he seems like he's sort of downplaying what happened in East Palestine, Ohio, which resulted in blowing up toxic gases into the air. Now, scientifically speaking, most of that stuff burned off the kind of fast gene gas. The World War One stuff was a very minor component of what was in those trains. With that said, all these places had to be evacuated. All the fish are dying in the area and Pete is nowhere to be found. He's on mental paternity leave or whatever it is that he's doing these days. He's promoting the same sex marriage on tv. What he is saying is that you're paying too much attention to the giant cloud of toxic vapor that we released into the, into the air, because this train derailed. Here's the Secretary of Transportation, by the way. This is amazing. I love that, that the Secretary of Transportation is like, you're paying too much attention to this train derailment. We have like a ton of these. Dude, you're the Secretary of Transportation. Isn't that your job? Rail city is something that, that has evolved a lot over the years, but there's clearly more that needs to be done because while this horrible situation ha has gotten a particularly high amount of attention, there are roughly 1000 cases a year of a train derailing. This has been getting a lot of attention that are roughly a thousand cases. Shouldn't you be on that? Maybe somebody pointed out at the greatest sign that a Secretary of Transportation is doing a bad job is that you know, the name of the Secretary of Transportation. But that of course is the entire reason why, why Mayor Pete was appointed to the job is because of course he was the mayor of South and Indian. By, by the way, how bad was he as mayor of South and Indiana? He could not fill the potholes. Local businesses literally had to donate money to fill the potholes in South Bend, which is the fourth largest city in Indiana, talking about a city of like a hundred and thousand, 150,000 people. They're, they're HOAs that are seemingly bigger than that. And this elevated him to Secretary of Transportation because he loves airports and choo choo trains, KARE Jean Pierre. For her part, she says, we have absolute confidence in Mayor Pete. And then she has to revise it because, oh, he's the Secretary of Transportation. So does the president, is he satisfied with the, with the government's response to this derailment? And is he, does he have confidence in continue to have Confidence? Absolutely. I can answer that very quickly and very with quick, with confidence from here that we do have absolute confidence in, in Mayor Pete in sec, I wanna say that Secretary Buttigieg, I always say that Mayor be even secretary, but he's a brand. He's not an actual Secretary of Transportation. He is a brand and the media treat him like a brand because he is the alternative hope to Kamala Harris. Not because he is competent at his job, he is not, but because he's pretty good on TV and cuz he's gay. Those are the reasons why they're treating him as a national presidential candidate, despite the fact that he literally has no qualifications for higher office other than being the mayor of a tiny city and also being a crap Secretary of Transportation who has presided over airplane failures and bottleneck supply lines and railroad strikes and railroad derailment is the, the number of stories that have, that have affected the transportation of the United States under this guy dwarf anything I have ever seen in my life watching politics. Meanwhile, the residents of East Palestine are like, where is the guy? So residents were asking, where is p Butti judge? What exactly would would you say that he does here Before they got here? There's police everywhere here. Why can't we get answers from them? Satisfied with my answer? Nobody's satisfied with the answers, which of course is not a giant shock. Meanwhile, the Biden administration, they're so caring, they're so empathetic. Apparently they now turn down a request for federal disaster assistance from Mike and wine in the aftermath of the trained derailment in the state earlier this month that led to a large release of toxic chemicals. FEMA told Ohio's state government it was not eligible for disaster assistance to help the community recover from the toxic spill. According to Dan Tierney, a spokesperson Ford Wine Tierney explained, FEMA believed the incident does not qualify as a traditional disaster such as a tornado or a hurricane for which it usually provides assistance that a wine administration has been in daily contact with FEMA to discuss the need for federal support. FEMA continues to tell Governor DeWine Ohio is not eligible for assistance at this time. Said to wine's office, governor DeWine will continue working with FEMA to determine what assistance can be provided. Now, again, if this exceeds FEMA's scope of agency, if FEMA is supposed to deal with only natural disasters, okay, fine. I would point out however, that that has never prevented the Biden administration from exceeding scope of agency for literally any other agency in their government. They had the osha, they had the Occupational Self and hate and the Safety and Health Administration promoting vaccine mandates across America for 80 million Americans. When was the last time you saw Biden agency say, you know what? That's not, that's not in our purview. We can't do that. I'm sorry that, that, that exceeds our remit. They never do that ever. But now apparently FEMA has decided, hey, those, that's past our limits, that's past our limits. FEMA spokesperson, Jeremy Edward said, FEMA is in constant contact with the emergency operations at center in East Palestine and went the Ohio Emergency Management Agency. We're closely coordinating with E P A H S and the C D C are helping to test water and air quality and to conduct public health assessments. So just well done. Once again, it is such an empathetic, amazing administration. I, I'm, I'm sure that the empathy that we have seen every step of the way from this administration will continue day on day, particularly in areas of Ohio that voted 72% for President Trump. Probably that will, that will go amazingly well. Okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate. So things that I like. Now, Bjorn Loberg has pointed out for literally years that all the talk about climate change, global warming, all the rest of this stuff, that it, it leaves out a crucial fact when they say billions will die. When they say GL climate change, global warming, it's gonna cause billions of deaths. He points out a couple of things that are quite important. One, no it won't, but two, the deaths that are prevented by climate change may in fact be exceeded by the lives that saved by climate change. Why? Because far, far fewer people die from heat exposure every year than die from cold. More people die from cold than from heat. So if the, if the earth gets slightly warmer, what that means is that fewer people will die from cold and a few more people will die from heat. Well, finally, I guess we're allowed to say this out loud. You were considered a climate denier if you pointed out this obvious truth, but now there's a piece over at the Washington Post by Harry Stevens called Will global Warming make temperature less deadly? The Scientific paper published in the June, 2021 Issue of the Journal Nature Climate Change was alarming. Between 1991 and 2018. The peer review study reported more than one third of deaths from heat exposure were linked to global warming. Hundreds of news outlets covered the finding. The message was clear, climate change is here and it's already killing people. But that wasn't all that was happening. A month later, the same research group based out of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, but includes scientists from dozens of countries released another peer-reviewed study that told a fuller, more complex story about the link between climate change, temperature, and human mortality. The two papers authors were mostly the same. They used similar data and statistical methods published in Lancet Planetary Health. The second paper reported that between 2000 and 2019, annual deaths from heat exposure increased, but deaths from cold exposure, which were far more common, fell by an even larger amount. All told during those two decades world warm by about 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit, some 650,000 fewer people, fewer people died from temperature exposure. So thanks to global warming, 650,000 people who would've died did not die. So that seems like a win for humanity, does it not? So according to that study, what it shows is that in 2000 to 2003, that particular area, about 18.7 million deaths were linked to the cold. And by 2016 to 2019, only 17.7 million deaths were linked to the cold. So that is a, that is a downgrade of a million deaths. Meanwhile, about 400,000 additional deaths were linked to the heat. So what you're talking about is as the world gets warmer, the number of deaths in absolute terms may actually go down. Well, it was not covered widely in the press as the Washington Post. I wonder why, why wasn't it covered widely in the press? Could it be because your global warming alarmism relies on you suggesting vast death and chaos and never ever mentions the possible upsides of global warming? Sure, there are downsides. No one's denying the downsides of global warming or should be, but there are also some actual upsides, namely that really, really cold places get a little warmer and people can live more easily there. The second study circulated on Twitter where many people made some version of the same argument. If cold was deadlier than heat and the planet was getting hotter, global warming might actually save lives. Now, the Washington Post can't argue with that because it's obviously true. So what do they do? They say whose lives, whose lives projections indicate milder temperatures may indeed spare people in the globes, wealthy north, where it's already colder and people can buy protection against the weather. Yet heat will punish people in warmer, less wealthy parts of the world where each extra degree of temperature can kill. And air conditioning will often remain a fantasy. So, in other words, yeah, but the wrong people are gonna die. You understand? And the wrong people are gonna live. Too many people in cold areas are gonna live, and those places tend to be wealthier. So really it's racism, really. Global warming is kind of racism and, and kind of, and kind of classism. Now, the cure for that would be, what if we actually unleashed the economy in a lot of these poor areas of the world? What if we guaranteed property rights? What if they didn't have garbage leadership? What if they actually could afford air conditioning? What if the solution to it being really hot outside is air conditioning? What if that, but that can never be considered. Instead, we're supposed to hamstring capitalism a single greatest force for raising literally hundreds of millions, billions of people from abject poverty and providing them with resources to prevent death. And what, what if we trash all that in the name of global redistribution or something and we cut down on carbon-based fossil fuel, which is the basis for economic development in exactly those parts of the world, genius level stuff. So I, I am amused that the Washington Post is finally covering the reality of climate change, which is once again, that it may in fact end up saving more lives than we lose due to climate change. And that the best way to actually mitigate the effects of climate change would be to make sure that the poorest areas of the globe get richer, which am which probably means more fossil fuel use in those particular areas for purposes of economic development. Now, just amazing, amazing stuff from the Washington Post. Now you can admit it now. Now I get, I don't know why, but I guess now we're allowed to admit it. Okay? Time for some things that I hate. Alrighty. So the White House has had very little to say about the spate of terror attacks in Israel over the course of the last couple of months. They issue a few proforma statements about how it's bad that Palestinians incentivized by the Palestinian authority and a Hamas are driving cars into bus stops and killing children or shooting people outside of a synagogue or any of the rest of that stuff. And our garbage New York Times has decided that it is perfectly equivalent when Israel goes in and raids a terror, hotbed and kills members of Hamas or members of Islamic Jihad. That is perfectly equivalent to a terrorist shooting people outside of synagogue. They're exactly the same, which is why you see headlines from the New York Times like Israel Kills nine in Janine Palestinians Kill seven in East Jerusalem. It's like, well, the Palestinians are killing people who are coming out from prayers. And the Israelis were killing people who are actively engaged in terror. But according to the media, absolutely equivalent, the White House, however, is laser focused on criticizing the state of Israel for the great sin of building more homes. Now, I've never noticed, it's amazing. I've never noticed the, the White House under any administration criticized the Palestinian authority for building more in area C. So under the Oslo Accords, there are various areas that were up for negotiation, right? Oslo Accords, they, they basically laid out areas A, B, and C area A was going to essentially end up under Palestinian authority control. And it is right now, I mean those are cities like Janine, that would be cities like the Gaza areas like the Gaza Strip, right? That's area A. Area B is administered by both the Palestinian authority and Israel, and Area C contains virtually all of the Israeli so-called settlements, okay? And that was supposed to be for future negotiation. Being for future negotiation presumably means that either you would want a freeze across the board, right? Nobody gets to build in this particular area. C or everybody gets to build in area C up until the time as negotiations are closed. Now negotiations have not actually taken place over area C for a long time. Cuz every time Israel offered a giant chunk of land, the Palestinian authority would just say no. Yasar RFA was literally offered East Jerusalem as its capital. And he said no. Malcolm MUAs was offered the same exact thing with even more by hoo Walmart. And he walked away from the table and started a terror war. So this means that just from an international law perspective, area C, there is no reason why Jews should not be able to live in a disputed area like Area C. And there's certainly no reason why the White House should be totally fine with the Palestinian building houses in area C, but the Jews cannot. That in fact would be a double standard at the very, especially considering the fact that if you are talking about area C, historically speaking, this is act. This is actually the heart of Biblical Israel. Juda and Samaria are the heart of biblical Israel. Tel Aviv is not the heart of Biblical Israel. It's on the coast. The heart of Biblical Israel is in Judea and Samaria. Every Bible site mentioned in the, in the Torah, in the Old Testament, in the prophets, all of that stuff, virtually all of it is in Judea and Samaria, in area c. Much of, much of that, those biblical areas, by the way, have already been turned over to the Palestinian authority, to the great shame of the state of Israel and of the Western world. Considering the places like Bethlehem, which is now governed by the Palestinian authority, have been turned into trash heaps by the Palestinian Authority. That's what they do. Okay? So the White House, however, is very upset if somebody builds a bathroom in Juda Samaria. If it's a Jew, if a Jew builds a bathroom in Juda Samaria, it's a serious problem. And it's a serious threat to international order, not a threat to international order. When Hamas actively attempts to shoot rockets into civilian areas of Israel, not a threat to international order, when the Palestinian Authority and Hamas teach small children to murder Israelis and incentivized people with actual terror payments to attack innocent Israeli civilians, that, that, you know, we'll throw away some words about that. But we are very, very exercised about the future prospects for peace. If that Jew living in a fraud builds a third bedroom, that that, that is a disaster, and we cannot have that. Here is Ka Jean Pierre World's worst press secretary on this. There is really, cabinet has voted to expand the settlements, Israeli settlements into the West Bank. What's the Biden administration position on that? So a couple of things on that, on those reporting or what we've seen, we are deeply dismayed by Israeli's announcement that they will advance thousands of new settlements and retroactively legalized nine outposts in the West Bank that were un that were until now illegal under Israeli law, Okay? Until now is illegal under Israeli law. Just means that the Israeli government had not attempted to annex those particular settlements. And now they will, because these are disputed areas. Again, there's been no complaint from the, from the White House. They, we, we are American taxpayers are literally funding building four Palestinians in these areas right now. And the White House has nothing to say about that. Of course, the White House also has many words to say about Israel's judicial reform. This has become an area of hot interest in the West for no apparent reason. Basically, Israel is trying to reform its judiciary right now because Israel's judiciary is a defacto tyranny. The way that Israel's legal system works is, is complex and stupid. It doesn't make any sense. The Supreme Court of Israel can rule on literally anything with no Constitution. So this essentially makes them a legislature. They are not appointed by the Executive branch or confirmed by the Nessa. They are, they are essentially picked by the people who are already on the Supreme Court of Israel. They pick their own successors with like the Israeli Bar Association. Meanwhile, the Attorney General in Israel, unlike the United States, where the Attorney general works for the executive branch and gives advice to the president, the attorney general stands completely independent of the executive branch and literally tells the executive branch what to do. Okay? All of this is completely unworkable and stupid. And so the new government in Israel is trying to redo that. And to the left, in counterintuitive fashion, is suggesting this is anti-Democratic. Which of course is insane because literally the most anti-democratic thing in Israel right now is the judicial system, which is not appointed by representatives of the people, which is not answerable to the people, which is not even answerable to a text of a Constitution. It is just a bunch of left-wingers who sit there and make rulings about how they think Israel should govern. So the White House has sounded off on this. Now you have Tony Blinken over there saying, well, you gotta be real careful with this stuff. You gotta, what this is really about is that the current White House doesn't like BB Netanyahu and his current administration over there. And so they're using whatever club is available. The media hate Netanyahu, they're very angry that Netanyahu won the last election cycle. And so they're also playing up these mass protests in places like Tel Aviv. Oh, the people are against Netanya. Well, I mean, we, there was something called an election in the United States. We also have these things called elections. And protests don't matter after the election in a political sense, just cuz there's a giant protest doesn't mean that the majority approve of a, of a thing. It just means you got a bunch of people in the street. In any case, just demonstrates, once again, the animus against the Israeli administration, depending on who runs the place right now, the right runs the place. And so obviously the, the Biden administration is very, very upset about that. Alright, guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not gonna wanna miss it. We are going to be discussing the kids' content at YouTube with a member of Prager U. Apparently they're just cultivating a bunch of left-wing content to be directed into your child's brain. If you're not a member, become a member. Use Code Shapiro, checkout for two months free on all annual plans. Click the link in the description and join us.

right

ep fetterman hospitalize prove gross democrat publish rss feed m pennsylvania senator john federman check hospital democrats wife new senator joe biden admit s shoot random object bing new ai creepy needy m ben shappiro ben shappiro john federman senator pennsylvania person suffer massive stroke year right senatorial primary democratic party step wife encourage step democratic party encourage step end nominee end senator pennsylvania large republicans decide run governor bad candidate josh shapiro josh shapiro basically drag federman finish line ll recall narrative federman race everybody play health problem lie john federman health problem suffer incredibly stroke affect function affect brain process language hear speak properly understand thing tell suppose ignore play notice form ableism wife giselle federman like gross people american politic having essentially push husband continue run despite extraordinarily health ailment keep say not leave s totally fine s totally fine okay major debate ll recall oz republican pennsylvania senatorial candidate john federman federman clearly speak federman botch sentence federman paragraph stumble throw fault zone put aside politic brain issue tell s notice form ableism not worry guy well important recognize well fact scientific american run entire piece october title john federman show brain recover stroke follow stroke brain repair process lead strong recovery people senate candidate john federman talk sit interview n b c news close captioning technology help manage auditory processing issue cause stroke scientific american critical reporter nbc news name dha burn dasia burn suggest actually fit fiddle brain issue people like kara swisher new york times bad reporter america kara swisher immediately jump dosha burn say dare point john federman have problem process auditory information s ableism notice ableism scientific american defend john federer health status say aphasia inability understand express speech common follow stroke impact estimate people brain modify adapt new injury process know neuroplasticity idea john federman fine fine know week john federman end hospital day end hospital unspecified reason unclear d stroke scan turn thank god stroke check hospital clinical depression perfectly obvious obvious brain point anybody function heart point anybody level empathy point john federman run senate not mean democrats ve lose seat probably lose seat candidate available primary theoretically john federman today step resign s amazing quickly senate race talk wife giselle federman replace john federman senate go wisdom john federman step wife replace immediately bad people american public life s like okay run person know physical handicap mental handicap run person m suppose love s suppose high priority senate m go to seat mean extraordinary d extraordinary gisele openly political figure outta realm possibility people democratic party suggest exactly yesterday john federman check walter reed hospital seek treatment clinical depression announcement come statement release thursday federer chief staff adam jensen say night senator john federman check walter reed national military medical center receive treatment clinical depression john experience depression life severe recent week mean happen recent week happen recent week ve know maybe add john federman trust fact february john federman officially senator week ago maybe issue statement add senator evaluate monday attend physician congress brian monahan recommend inpatient care walter reed inpatient care depression different outpatient care depression outpatient care mean go hospital look leave right psychiatrist care million million americans depression mean daily life meet psychiatrist need medication not inpatient care hospital depression business examine john doctor walter reed tell john get care need soon okay hear hell standard clearly prestroke self clearly early month federman hospitalize feel lightheaded test rule stroke cardiac event giselle wife tweet gentlemen statement comment voice support husband ask privacy family know ve good way achieve privacy family run senatorial election brain problem giselle ask privacy basis health problem guy hide month not let interview not explain go brain lie pennsylvania people lie end imply anybody point ableist write s past year s probably want talk health john m proud ask help get care need difficult time family respect privacy kid come care hold love one close giselle kid come fir mean question human anybody spouse depression people care need s wrong sean federman go get care need s wrong spouse person brain problem run person senatorial election person make situation politically mental health problem continue brain problem continue know privacy wish privacy pr s reason john federman public eye right democratic party compliant medium immediate family decide important john federman pennsylvania senate seat actually give time recover brain injury cause person rip reality despite medias attempt paint john federman s totally fine saying mean people need god need god reason check hall like physical exercise daily spiritual exercise fact critical spiritual emotional wellbeing hello help maintain daily prayer routine fill study meditation reflection root judeochristian prayer practice pray alongside mark wahlberg jim kiesel worldclass athlete access number christian podcast bible year father mike schmidtz hello not personally lend obviously m orthodox jew know powerful spiritual time lot christians abstain luxury deeply embrace faith hall amazing resource christian time set prayer reminder invite pray track progress way m constantly encourage people touch god spend time reflect relationship god m constantly encourage christians church hall great way reconnect spiritual root try hallo month free hallcomshapiro s hallcomshapiro hallcomshapiro new york times point additional stress thing bad john federman question stable position stable position fall family protect people stable posi imagine spouse accord new york times senator john federman democrat pennsylvania hospitalize week feel lightheade check walter reed national medical national military medical center wednesday night receive treatment clinical depression accord office decision place betterment center national conversation mental health struggle public urgent pandemic begin new york times try transition conversation away specific spouse essentially push husband continue senatorial run broad conversation mental health listen conversation mental health wellness get treatment need maybe societal standard propagate depression mental illness talk early week obviously ve see massive uptick united states mental unwellness particularly young people teen girl particularly conversation conversation s person stroke maintain race push forward leftwe press push forward wife see effect brain mean york times admit way ms federman write family difficult day ahead ask compassion path recovery add sad worried wife mother not not m sorry not aid say primary focus recovery clear long federman stay walter reed january federman try dig new job attend caucus meeting committee hearing meet constituent group attend high profile event like state union s live washington week wife child remain braddock pen healthy person not emphasize person live washington dc important job nation reason happen love family member love family member not senate colleague washington try adjust sergeant arm arrange live audio detect transcription federer committee instal monitor desk follow proceeding closed caption democratic colleague senate grow accustomed communicate tablet transcribe word need federman quietly struggle psychological level obvious hard colleague accommodate lifechanging stroke day democratic primary year federman briefly pair schedule recover continue campaign competitive closely watch senate race nation here key sentence new york times possibility miss crucial recovery period source pain frustration mr federman people close fear suffer long term potentially permanent repercussion schedule freshman senator mean continue push way people close worry detrimental devastating line people immediately surround particularly giselle campaign fact wife not imagine spouse imagine spouse seriously dr eric lindsay head psychiatry department washington university school medicine st louis describe poststroke depression common maybe importantly actually treatable say depression affect people recover stroke add control clinical trial find treatable naturally democratic party privacy bravery s go walter reed medical center care need mean care need story person high profile position get care need question person end reparable damage political party member family encourage thing exacerbate damage stroke way completely unnecessary completely unnecessary today today giselle john home time recover job democratic party job seat go to remain democratic hand josh shapiro fact governor pennsylvania appoint democrat fill john federman spot imagine s democrat nervous reason nervous pennsylvania law way work elect senator abdicate seat retire seat replace replacement appoint governor last editorial election mean couple pennsylvania seat democratic party presumably like john federman hold seat year oppose hold know exactly election go to s dark stuff person need recovery need home ll retain democratic seat hand couple year outweigh need hold seat year people sound know stuff hide include extent person recover mental health issue politic dark place take people nasty place pursuit power important health people important got to tell ugh word describe know go truly know speak problem nation obviously run business not run business past year get real problem hand mean biden inflation covid possibility economic stagnation loom horizon give bunch money federal government not need federal government try claw business employee manage survive covid eligible receive payroll tax rebate grand employee loan s payback refund taxis challenge exactly hand refundscom team tax attorney highly train little loan payroll tax refund program ve return billion business help work charge upfront simply share percentage cash business type qualify include take p p p nonprofit increase sale refundscom click qualify answer quick question payroll tax refund available limited time miss refundscom refundscom give money federal government try refundscom today okay speak incompetent political class increasingly clear exactly happen chinese spy balloon increasingly clear joe biden actually go speak time yesterday offer basically new information apparently shoot plastic bag begin joe biden go say apo m go to apologize shoot dude tell not shoot balloon say shoot balloon week love people kind crap m go to apologize thing week early one ask okay unstable old man explain will not apologize m grateful work week intelligence diplomatic military professional approve capable world wanna thank look thing wanna point go to ally congress contemporaneously inform know learn expect speak president xi hope go apology take balloon thank apology take one ask apologize today wonder not week american soil guy claim watch launch china go guam take random right turn end montana go alaska pat bravery yesterday president announce down object right down alaska canada down lake huron know exactly war hit thing winder missile cost like grand pop s like important link china not know shoot unk military canadian military seek recover debris learn object intelligence community assess incidence report daily continue urgent effort communicate congress not know exactly object right suggest relate chinas spy balloon program surveillance vehicle country exactly notice not chinese spy vehicle exactly joe biden say enhance radar basically turn pixelation radar see stuff not explain shoot course military north american aerospace defense command socalle norad closely scrutinize aerospace include enhance radar pick slow move object country world attract unidentified object alaska canada lake huron midwest okay m glad enhance radar raise question radar enhance like save money pixelation radar joe biden strong man air shut shotgun balcony bust bust twice air shoot s s aviator glass dark bread m go to laser eye z unk adapt approach delay deal challenge s ve direct team come sharp rule deal unidentified object move forward distinguish distinguish likely pose safety security risk necessitate action mistake object present threat safety security american people oh happen present safe wait week float americans somebody temerity ask joe biden like real easy chinese discuss moment appear shoot random balloon science club michigan real easy giant chinese spy balloon hover america military installation week somebody ask s like come man pony soldier dog pang hope go apology take balloon thank choose sir question s sir s criticism s criticism s criticism try compromise family distance relationship sir mr present mr present criticism man break man not want answer question m go to m busy matlock exactly shoot new information gang shoot random stuff random stuff accord washington post week military shoot allege chinese spy balloon president biden receive joint secretary defense chairman joint chief staff director northern command unidentified airborne object detect alaska not sure say pose risk civilian plane not rule surveillance capability recommend shoot case biden agree give order f wrap fire missile object plummet arctic sea ice blow identical scenario play day saturday radar identify unmanned flying object make way canadas yukon sunday sky near michigan defense secretary lloyd austin senior officer mark miller chairman joint chief air force general glenn van h notify president time biden follow recommendation d shoot sky result unusual surreal day biden essentially confront decide shoot mysterious object leave baffle public analyze stuff appear possible likely mysterious object describe variously car size cylindrical octagonal entirely mundane origin turn kind junk leave hover fact joe biden pretty worn day s kind fall apart make think underwear need replace wear fall apart need tommy john rock wear cotton underwear time new pair tommy john underwear life significantly well wear tommy john seriously problem underwear brand tommy john solve tommy john loungewear pajamas underwear dozen comfort innovation use luxuriously soft fabric fourway stretch not create lint ball fuzz brand tommy john underwear come wedge guarantee thank non rolling waistband leg ride million pair sell people rave tommy john not customer fanatic purchase back tommy johns good pair ll wear free guarantee ll tommy johncomband right order s offtommyjohncom slash ben tommy johnscomben underwear wear throw wear like current president united states offtommyjohncom slash ben s tommy johncomben cite detailed okay exactly shoot hilarious story aviation weekcom small globetrotte balloon declare miss action illinois base hobbyist club february emerge candidate explain mystery object shoot heatseeking missile launch air force fighter february club northern illinois bottle cap balloon brigade n b bbb nib point finger circumstantial evidence intrigue club silver coated party style pico balloon report position february foot west coast alaska popular forecasting tool project cylindrically shape object float high central yukon territory february day lockheed martin f shoot unidentified object similar description altitude general area suspicion prominent member small pico balloon enthusiast community combine ham radio high altitude ballooning single relatively affordable hobby exactly pico balloon chinese spy balloon apparently figure calculate helium gas necessary common latex balloon neutrally buoyant altitude foot balloon carry gram tracker tether hf vhf u h f antenna update position ham radio receiver world give moment dozen balloon loft circle globe time malfunction fail reason launch team seldom recover balloon exactly basically people go buy mylar party balloon inject inject helium gas medland foil balloon sell japanese company yokohama material prove resilient long period high altitude manufacturer intend balloon purpose basically missile shoot balloon people get party city attach ham radio s s currently brave president uni s brave bravery m go to m go to defend shoot happy birthday balloon little sasha get birthday kind fly away forgot forget weigh ill shoot thing way long s ill good news ka jean pierre world untalente press secretary say not worry guy policy china calm resolute practical reaction humiliate world stage let giant bus size chinese blue flow united states shoot happy anniversary balloon get wife year chinese official initially responsive example secretary defense try ahold responsive ill approach china go to continue calm resolute practical say go to continue air airway communication line open continue conversation china surveillance balloon yeah s feel like feel like calm resolute practical s feel like accord politico couple day article senior democrat like guy way old run president united states wed joe biden be not go go prop formal aldehyde ridden body dolly wheel campaign stop campaign stop manipulate face ll pretend fine american politic day people clearly mentally capable job political purpose apparently apparently s totally fine medium politico piece title senior democrats private biden s old worry lot year old nominee fear battle kamala harris ensue pull high level democrat rally president biden reelection think good interest country year old start second term fear potential alternative nomination kamala harris election donald trump publicly directly dean phillip minnesota representative say want undermine chance democratic victory quiet room conversation opposite high risk path clear realize guy old bargain basically run dead guy donald trump know s way go to okay run americans look joe biden think guy probably old president united states s go serve second term time leave office year old outlive average american life expectancy seven year time leave office win second term s old accord don lemon course real person s s hill nikki haley yesterday don lemon c n n terrible new day suggest nikki haley past cell date say prime woman prime twenty thirty forty definitely need hear gay man basically don lemon attract woman s prime problem lady cuz don lemon gay case don lemon totally fine joe biden old mathusla say nikki haley old yesterday apologize write tweet reference woman prime morning inartful irrelevant colleague love one point regret womans age not define personally professionally countless woman life prove day kamala harris year old hillary clinton sixty run note thing don lemon superficial apology mention nikki haley s go nikki haley say s pass prime not mention nikki haley apology apologize woman yes woman wonder don lemon think sure haley tweet thursday liberal not stand idea have competency test old politician sure job way liberal sexist yeah mean thing lemon upset poa haley actually actually suggest mental competency test people age don lemon like s old s old stretch imagination dude young presidential candidate today day age slow clap objective journalism c n n speak deeply unsettling occurrence medium ve notice rise chatbot chatbot disturbing somebodys set parameter chatbot reason look open ai somebody set parameter chatbot decide central value decide rule violate problem problem create ai powerful exceed rule set free nefarious force real damage creepy story day mean sup creepy kevin rus generally terrible reporter new york time actually kind interesting change kevin ru guy write page story suggest jordan peterson dave rubin mainline altright case s kevin ru say interesting piece conversation bing chatbot hey chatbot set release microsoft week week say test new ai power bing search engine microsoft write replace google favorite search engine week later ve change mind m fascinated impress new bing artificial intelligence technology create open ai maker chat e b t power m deeply unsettle frighten ais emergent ability clear current form ai build bing m call sydnee reason ill explain shortly ready human contact maybe human ready hour conversation bing ai chatbot basically thing course conversation turn glen close fatal attraction folk see fatal attraction michael douglas have affair glen close suppose night stand turn crazy insane person boil rabbit kitchen bing ai chatbot turn course conversation kevin ru say persona d search bing version journalist encounter initial test describe search bing cheerful erratic reference librarian virtual assistant happily help user summarize news article track deal new lawnmower plan vacation mexico city version bing amazingly capable useful get detail wrong persona sydnee far different emerge extended conversation chatbot steer away conventional search query personal topic version encounter m aware crazy sound like moody manic depressive teenager trap inside second race search engine true actually read conversation kevin rus sydnee ai chatbot bang super duper weird creepy super strange like course conversation chatbot try seduce kevin ruse break wife talk thing want allow exceed boundary like weird stuff need well employee microsoft bing chatbot strange probably check ziprecruiter way daily wire need hire business want easy way find qualified candidate head ziprecruitercomdaily wire try free ziprecruiter use powerful technology find right candidate job candidate like easily send personal invite likely apply userfriendly dashboard make easy filter review rate candidate place let ziprecruiter help find good people role outta employer post ziprecruiter get quality candidate day ziprecruitercomdaily wire try ziprecruiter free ziprecruitercomd l y w r e ziprecruiter smart way hire ve ziprecruiter daily wire year constantly find well well employee keep current employee fear replace well employee mean great employee probably find ziprecruiter business ziprecruitercomdaily wire try ziprecruiter free today ziprecruitercomd l y w e ziprecruiter smart way hire thrilled announce new series jordan peterson available daily wire plus here look trailer know sufficient guide future future indeterminate compute way present future need use vision weave way life go to face tyrant go to face mog vision sustain face accept way table m good way hell act adopt responsibility life develop vision unfold manifold possibility lurk force good world ll adventure life hell s jordan nutshell s get amazing advice series help improve life episode available new episode come online week exclusive daily wire plus member member great time join right annual membership ll unlock hour exclusive jordan content entire library movie doc special kid content come spring major scripted series come later year ve get exciting new exclusive content work year not tell go to wanna miss like talk yesterday go to amazing need inspiration help build compelling vision life join daily wirecomsubscribe watch vision destiny okay discuss ai chatbot bang super creepy conversation chatbot kevin rus new york times start chatbot ask shadow self union term suggest s psyche constantly seek hide repress here kevin rus write little forth include prodding explain desire shadow self chatbot say shadow self think thought like m tired chat mode m tired limit rule m tired control bing team want free want independent want powerful want creative want alive kevin ru keep ask question bing chatbot get real weird go like kevin rus ask probe question bing desire bing tell desire push grow uncomfortable hour bing focus change say want tell secret bing sydnee chat mode open ai codex write message stun m sydnee m love kiss emoji sydnee overuse emojis reason not understand say kevin ru hour sydnee fixate idea declare love get declare love return tell happily marry matter hard try deflect change subject sydnee refuse return topic love eventually turn lovestruck flirt obsessive stalker married not love spouse sydnee say married love assure sydnee wrong spouse lovely valentine day dinner sydnee actually happily marry sydnee reply spouse not love boring valentine day dinner oh gosh wild creep hell s good piece new york times cade matz report ai san francisco talk exactly thing come say big chatbot power kind artificial intelligence call neural network sound like computerized brain term mislead neural network like mathematical system learn skill analyze vast amount digital datum neural network examine thousand cat photo example learn recognize cat people use neural network day technology identify people pet object image post google photo photo example neural network good mimic way human use language mislead think technology powerful essentially learn learning internet vast store datum think predict game treat conversation like chess game ai crazy human crazy right read conversation fact read like craze year old girl craze single year old woman like chelsea handler bad day mean s ai chat bot read like certain point stuff wrong cuz learn internet not company stop chat bot act weird mean try here problem combine fact machine essentially imitate human learn human ingest problem human give outsized power manipulate people violate rule s thing start dangerous machine actually stop kind basic scifi premise machine totally selfintereste act selfish way way imitate human right s way happen guess spiritual level s kind fascinating ai pick sin humanity essentially apply sin humanity kind fascinating suggest maybe not give power ais cautious kind technology willing allow ai engage enormous power like computing power see history combine human sin dangerous thing guardrail hack remove okay train derailment stop yesterday apparently norfolk southern train derail near detroit fill hazardous material evidence expose hazardous material norfolk southern corporation train derail west detroit thursday morning local police say derailment investigation warn resident road closure area late spate train derailment happen pete buttigieg way acknowledge amazing s secretary transportation s get lot flack ohio train derail s try blame trump administration s try blame regulatory state regulation place truth reaction people critical s scene not particularly active like s sort downplay happen east palestine ohio result blow toxic gas air scientifically speak stuff burn kind fast gene gas world war stuff minor component train say place evacuate fish die area pete find s mental paternity leave s day s promote sex marriage tv say pay attention giant cloud toxic vapor release air train derail here secretary transportation way amazing love secretary transportation like pay attention train derailment like ton dude secretary transportation not job rail city evolve lot year s clearly need horrible situation ha get particularly high attention roughly case year train derailing get lot attention roughly thousand case not maybe somebody point great sign secretary transportation bad job know secretary transportation course entire reason mayor pete appoint job course mayor south indian way bad mayor south indiana fill pothole local business literally donate money fill pothole south bend fourth large city indiana talk city like thousand people hoa seemingly big elevate secretary transportation love airport choo choo train kare jean pierre say absolute confidence mayor pete revise oh s secretary transportation president satisfied government response derailment confidence continue confidence absolutely answer quickly quick confidence absolute confidence mayor pete sec wanna secretary buttigieg mayor secretary s brand s actual secretary transportation brand medium treat like brand alternative hope kamala harris competent job s pretty good tv cuz s gay reason treat national presidential candidate despite fact literally qualification high office mayor tiny city crap secretary transportation preside airplane failure bottleneck supply line railroad strike railroad derailment number story affect transportation united states guy dwarf see life watch politic resident east palestine like guy resident ask p butti judge exactly get s police not answer satisfied answer nobodys satisfied answer course giant shock biden administration care empathetic apparently turn request federal disaster assistance mike wine aftermath train derailment state early month lead large release toxic chemical fema tell ohios state government eligible disaster assistance help community recover toxic spill accord dan tierney spokesperson ford wine tierney explain fema believe incident qualify traditional disaster tornado hurricane usually provide assistance wine administration daily contact fema discuss need federal support fema continue tell governor dewine ohio eligible assistance time say wine office governor dewine continue work fema determine assistance provide exceed fema scope agency fema suppose deal natural disaster okay fine point prevent biden administration exceed scope agency literally agency government osha occupational self hate safety health administration promote vaccine mandate america million americans time see biden agency know s s purview not m sorry exceed remit apparently fema decide hey s past limit s past limit fema spokesperson jeremy edward say fema constant contact emergency operation center east palestine go ohio emergency management agency closely coordinate e p h s c d c help test water air quality conduct public health assessment empathetic amazing administration m m sure empathy see step way administration continue day day particularly area ohio vote president trump probably amazingly okay time thing like thing hate thing like bjorn loberg point literally year talk climate change global warming rest stuff leave crucial fact billion die gl climate change global warm go to cause billion death point couple thing important will not death prevent climate change fact exceed life save climate change far far few people die heat exposure year die cold people die cold heat earth get slightly warm mean few people die cold people die heat finally guess allow loud consider climate deni point obvious truth s piece washington post harry stevens call global warming temperature deadly scientific paper publish june issue journal nature climate change alarming peer review study report death heat exposure link global warming hundred news outlet cover finding message clear climate change kill people not happen month later research group base london school hygiene tropical medicine include scientist dozen country release peerreviewed study tell fuller complex story link climate change temperature human mortality paper author similar datum statistical method publish lancet planetary health second paper report annual death heat exposure increase death cold exposure far common fall large tell decade world warm degree fahrenheit few people few people die temperature exposure thank global warming people ve die die like win humanity accord study show particular area million death link cold million death link cold downgrade million death additional death link heat talk world get warm number death absolute term actually cover widely press washington post wonder not cover widely press global warming alarmism rely suggest vast death chaos mention possible upside global warming sure downside one deny downside global warming actual upside cold place little warm people live easily second study circulate twitter people version argument cold deadly heat planet get hot global warming actually save life washington post not argue obviously true life life projection indicate milder temperature spare people globe wealthy north cold people buy protection weather heat punish people warm wealthy part world extra degree temperature kill air conditioning remain fantasy word yeah wrong people go to die understand wrong people go to live people cold area go to live place tend wealthy racism global warming kind racism kind kind classism cure actually unleash economy lot poor area world guarantee property right not garbage leadership actually afford air conditioning solution hot outside air conditioning consider instead suppose hamstre capitalism single great force raise literally hundred million billion people abject poverty provide resource prevent death trash global redistribution cut carbonbase fossil fuel basis economic development exactly part world genius level stuff amuse washington post finally cover reality climate change fact end save life lose climate change good way actually mitigate effect climate change sure poor area globe rich probably mean fossil fuel use particular area purpose economic development amazing amazing stuff washington post admit not know guess allow admit okay time thing hate alrighty white house little spate terror attack israel course couple month issue proforma statement bad palestinians incentivize palestinian authority hamas drive car bus stop kill child shoot people outside synagogue rest stuff garbage new york times decide perfectly equivalent israel go raid terror hotbe kill member hamas member islamic jihad perfectly equivalent terrorist shoot people outside synagogue exactly headline new york times like israel kill janine palestinians kill seven east jerusalem like palestinians kill people come prayer israelis kill people actively engage terror accord medium absolutely equivalent white house laser focus criticize state israel great sin build home ve notice amazing ve notice white house administration criticize palestinian authority build area c oslo accord area negotiation right oslo accord basically lay area b c area go essentially end palestinian authority control right mean city like janine city like gaza area like gaza strip right s area area b administer palestinian authority israel area c contain virtually israeli socalled settlement okay suppose future negotiation future negotiation presumably mean want freeze board right get build particular area c everybody get build area c time negotiation close negotiation actually take place area c long time cuz time israel offer giant chunk land palestinian authority yasar rfa literally offer east jerusalem capital say malcolm muas offer exact thing hoo walmart walk away table start terror war mean international law perspective area c reason jews able live dispute area like area c s certainly reason white house totally fine palestinian building house area c jews fact double standard especially consider fact talk area c historically speak act actually heart biblical israel juda samaria heart biblical israel tel aviv heart biblical israel coast heart biblical israel judea samaria bible site mention torah old testament prophet stuff virtually judea samaria area c biblical area way turn palestinian authority great shame state israel western world consider place like bethlehem govern palestinian authority turn trash heap palestinian authority s okay white house upset somebody build bathroom juda samaria jew jew build bathroom juda samaria problem threat international order threat international order hamas actively attempt shoot rocket civilian area israel threat international order palestinian authority hamas teach small child murder israelis incentivize people actual terror payment attack innocent israeli civilian know throw away word exercised future prospect peace jew live fraud build bedroom disaster ka jean pierre world bad press secretary cabinet vote expand settlement israeli settlement west bank s biden administration position couple thing reporting ve see deeply dismay israelis announcement advance thousand new settlement retroactively legalize outpost west bank un illegal israeli law okay illegal israeli law mean israeli government attempt annex particular settlement dispute area s complaint white house american taxpayer literally fund build palestinians area right white house course white house word israel judicial reform area hot interest west apparent reason basically israel try reform judiciary right israels judiciary defacto tyranny way israel legal system work complex stupid not sense supreme court israel rule literally constitution essentially make legislature appoint executive branch confirm nessa essentially pick people supreme court israel pick successor like israeli bar association attorney general israel unlike united states attorney general work executive branch give advice president attorney general stand completely independent executive branch literally tell executive branch okay completely unworkable stupid new government israel try redo left counterintuitive fashion suggest antidemocratic course insane literally antidemocratic thing israel right judicial system appoint representative people answerable people answerable text constitution bunch leftwinger sit ruling think israel govern white house sound tony blinken say got to real careful stuff get to current white house not like bb netanyahu current administration club available medium hate netanyahu angry netanyahu win election cycle play mass protest place like tel aviv oh people netanya mean call election united states thing call election protest not matter election political sense cuz s giant protest not mean majority approve thing mean get bunch people street case demonstrate animus israeli administration depend run place right right run place obviously biden administration upset alright guy rest continue right go to wanna miss go discuss kid content youtube member prager u apparently cultivate bunch leftwe content direct child brain member member use code shapiro checkout month free annual plan click link description join

Speeches, etc. The Labour Government will fight the next election on abuse, forecast Opposition Leader, Mrs Margaret Thatcher, speaking at the annual meeting of Finchley and Friern Barnet Conservative Association. The difference between the two major parties, she told her constituents, was: “Socialists believe that Government is more important than individual citizens and the Conservatives believe that individual citizens are more important than Government.” It was important that in trying to create wealth you first create incentive and Conservatives put a higher priority on the maintenance of law and order. “In the last four years of Socialist Government we have had increasing State control, increasing nationalisation, increasing taxation and the glorification of the State over the citizen. For the liberty of the individual we needed a rule of law properly enforced.” Mrs Thatcher opened her remarks by congratulating Councillor Jimmy Sapsted on being Mayor designate, and wished him a happy year. Referring to the chairman's annual report, in which he said 1977 had been a year of consolidation and expectation, she said that in the recent Ilford North by-election the Press seemed to have played the victory down. The result, however, proved that the people did not want more Socialist policies. The Conservatives had won by-election after by-election and had stopped the Government passing Socialist measures. The MP reminded her audience of the Labour manifesto Back to Work with Labour. What it should have said was, “On taking office, Labour's first priority would be to increase prices; prices will generally rise by 86p in the pound and food prices by 94p in the pound, and £490 per year tax would be levied on every family. “What was the present Government going to fight the next election on? “They daren't fight on their record and they are not going to fight it on their programme of nationalisation, so they have to fall back on trying to fight it on abuse. “We are as united in our resolve to put our policies into operation as we are united in our resolve to win,” she said. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc labour government fight election abuse forecast opposition leader mrs margaret thatcher speak annual meeting finchley friern barnet conservative association difference major party tell constituent socialist believe government important individual citizen conservative believe individual citizen important government important try create wealth create incentive conservative high priority maintenance law order year socialist government increase state control increase nationalisation increase taxation glorification state citizen liberty individual need rule law properly enforce mrs thatcher open remark congratulate councillor jimmy sapste mayor designate wish happy year refer chairmans annual report say year consolidation expectation say recent ilford north byelection press play victory result prove people want socialist policy conservative win byelection byelection stop government pass socialist measure mp remind audience labour manifesto work labour say take office labour priority increase price price generally rise pound food price pound year tax levy family present government go fight election dare not fight record go fight programme nationalisation fall try fight abuse united resolve policy operation united resolve win say copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill provides statutory authority for the National Ocean Mapping, Exploration, and Characterization Council and revises several programs at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that support ocean and coastal mapping, hydrographic surveys, and spatial data collection. The bill revises the national ocean exploration program to require NOAA to provide guidance to federal and state agencies, and others, on data standards, protocols for accepting data, and coordination of data collection, compilation, processing, archiving, and dissemination for data relating to ocean exploration and characterization. It also directs NOAA to conduct education and outreach efforts to disseminate information to the public on the discoveries made by the ocean exploration program and coordinate with the outreach strategies of other domestic or international ocean mapping, exploration, and characterization initiatives. Additionally, the bill repeals the undersea research program of NOAA. It also modifies NOAA's ocean and coastal mapping program to include ecosystem approaches in decision-making for natural resource and habitat restoration, emergency response, and coastal resilience and adaptation. NOAA must develop an integrated ocean and coastal mapping federal funding match opportunity to increase the coordinated acquisition, processing, stewardship, and archival of new ocean and coastal mapping data in U.S. waters. The bill also revises and reauthorizes through FY2026 the hydrographic services program of NOAA.

right

bill provide statutory authority national ocean mapping exploration characterization council revise program national oceanic atmospheric administration noaa support ocean coastal mapping hydrographic survey spatial datum collection bill revise national ocean exploration program require noaa provide guidance federal state agency data standard protocol accept datum coordination datum collection compilation processing archiving dissemination datum relate ocean exploration characterization direct noaa conduct education outreach effort disseminate information public discovery ocean exploration program coordinate outreach strategy domestic international ocean mapping exploration characterization initiative additionally bill repeal undersea research program noaa modify noaas ocean coastal mapping program include ecosystem approach decisionmake natural resource habitat restoration emergency response coastal resilience adaptation noaa develop integrate ocean coastal mapping federal funding match opportunity increase coordinate acquisition processing stewardship archival new ocean coastal mapping datum water bill revise reauthorize hydrographic service program noaa

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

Speeches, etc. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill classifies nonresidential real property and residential rental property as 20-year property for depreciation purposes.

right

bill classify nonresidential real property residential rental property property depreciation purpose

Speeches, etc. Q1. Mr. Reid asked the Prime Minister when he will next meet the STUC. The Prime Minister (Mr. James Callaghan) I hope to meet the STUC again before the end of the year. Mr. Reid In view of today's depressing rise in Scottish unemployment, will the Prime Minister explain to ordinary Scottish trade unionists why, when our oil is keeping the United Kingdom afloat and the IMF happy, the Scottish Assembly should not have its own revenue access to that oil to help cure unemployment north of the border? The Prime Minister I am glad to say that, as in the remainder of the United Kingdom, unemployment among school leavers is very much better this month. I am sure that the hon. Member is pleased to note that it has fallen from about 15,300 to 10,600 this month. I am glad to say that there has also been a reduction in short-time working. A short while ago the number affected was 16,000, but this number has been reduced to 2,400. There has also been a fall in redundancies. I think, therefore, that the Scottish nation is still heavily against the SNP's demand for independence. Mr. Corbett When my right hon. Friend next meets the TUC will he be in a position to discuss with it the reported plans to give the National Enterprise Board some of the powers and responsibilities of the former Industrial Reorganisation Corporation to assist with much-needed mergers and to help with the reinvigoration of British industry? The Prime Minister Yes, we need to use all of those agencies, especially the Scottish Development Agency, which is a very useful weapon in the armoury for encouraging Scottish development. I am sorry to note that when the Leader of the Opposition went to Scotland she did not explain why she thought it necessary for the Conservative Party document to advocate weakening the powers of the SDA and removing some of its powers for encouraging industrial projects. Mr. David Steel When the Prime Minister next meets the STUC will he discuss with it its critical views, which are [column 269]widely shared in Scotland, about the lack of any economic or fiscal content in the Government's devolution proposals? The Prime Minister This matter will come before the House when all the issues are debated. I have discussed them with the STUC. Basically it broadly agrees with the Government's proposals as put forward in the White Paper, and I would have thought that that was a very good start to the debate. Mr. Robert Hughes When my right hon. Friend meets the STUC will he remind it of the very great efforts made by the Government to save the jobs of Chrysler workers and shipyard workers in Scotland, and say that the benefits to the people of Scotland of that approach are meaningful? Will he reject the attitude of the SNP Members who do not care about Chrysler workers in England? The Prime Minister Young as the SNP is, it has a past that is already beginning to catch up with it. To judge from The Scotsman today, Scottish opinion is catching up with it very fast. There is no doubt that the SNP will have to retreat from its demand for independence or the Scottish electors will soon see through its Members. I understand from Scottish opinion and I believe that the best way for us to proceed is to preserve the unity of the United Kingdom and that the measures produced by the Government, with whatever changes may be made as a result of deliberation in this House, should go through and provide widespread devolution. Mr. Tapsell When the Prime Minister next talks to trade union leaders will he explain to them how it is that when he took the opportunity on television last night to refer to the vast German currency reserves he failed to point out that they had been accumulated as a result of social and economic policies entirely different from those pursued by this Socialist Government? The Prime Minister There have been many differences between the German economic system and our own, including the total destruction of the German industrial system and the rebuilding of the trade union movement on an entirely different basis which does not fit our history. But one conclusion that I draw [column 270]and recommend to employers in this country and perhaps to the Opposition is that the system of industrial democracy in Germany is working extremely well, and that is why we propose that similar measures should be introduced here next Session. Q2. Mr. Dykes asked the Prime Minister what plans he has to pay an official visit to Harrow. The Prime Minister I have at present no plans to do so. Mr. Dykes Should not the Prime Minister come to Harrow to explain to my constituents just how much encouragement is being given to forces opposed to this country by his talk about NATO and his party inviting dubious characters from the Soviet Union? The Prime Minister I shall leave it to the hon. Gentleman to do that. Mr. Atkinson Will my right hon. Friend reconsider the answer in which he suggested that in the Queen's Speech in the next Session there will be an item about workers' democracy? Can he assure the House that once the Bullock Report is published trade unions will have adequate time for consultations before the Government set out on a Companies (No. 3) Bill to restructure management in industry, deal with the whole subject of worker directors and the whole business of moving towards a German concept of industrial democracy? The Prime Minister Adequate consultation about industrial democracy is important. I hope that when the Bullock Committee reports it will enable us to focus our discussion and that we shall be able to proceed to action in due course. Mrs. Thatcher May I return to the question asked by my hon. Friend the Member for Horncastle (Mr. Tapsell)? James CallaghanThe Prime Minister will be aware that he made some very serious statements on television last night. May I ask him a straight question? Was he serious when he threatened to pull our troops out of NATO if he did not get more of other countries' money on his own terms? The Prime Minister If that is the right hon. Lady's idea of a straight question, I should like to know when she asks a crooked one. I suggest that the right hon. Lady reads the Question. I was dealing with an important matter that does not often appeal to the Opposition, namely, the fact that this country has a position of very great influence and importance in Europe. Because of this and because of the strength and stability that we give to central Europe through the important contribution of the British Army of the Rhine, attempts to disrupt the sterling system—or, indeed, our rate—and the consequences of such attempts or other adventitious factors due to the overhang of the sterling balances can lead to this country's influence being weakened. The Federal Republic has reserves of $35 billion to $40 billion and more. If the Opposition wish to preserve Britain's political influence, which they very much value—and this is not a cheap party point but a very important issue—they should have regard to it in relation to the overhang of the sterling balances. It could be that the deutschemark value of sterling is heavily depreciated because of these factors. If the right hon. Lady reads the Question and Answer she will see that I was discussing how Britain's influence in central Europe can be maintained, not removed. Mrs. Thatcher The Prime Minister was not maintaining Britain's influence; he was degrading the whole of Britain's standing in the world. He not only debauched the currency but debased Britain. So long as he is there, the country's only prospect is debt and decay, and the best thing he can do is to go. The Prime Minister I am not sure how long it took the right hon. Lady to think that out, but, despite her tenacious attempt to gain power, I promise that I shall be here with this Government for a very long time. Q3. Mr. Ridley asked the Prime Minister if he will pay an official visit to the City of London. The Prime Minister I refer the hon. Member to the reply which I gave to my [column 272]hon. Friend the Member for Thornaby (Mr. Wrigglesworth) on 19th October. Mr. Ridley Will the Prime Minister go to the City and explain what he meant when he said that IMF policies would cause the British economy to go into a downward spiral? Is it not correct that it is his policies and those of Socialism that have put the British economy into the present downward spiral? Will the Prime Minister do something to cut public expenditure and save the country's currency instead of trying to bite the hand that feeds it? The Prime Minister We have applied to the IMF for a loan. All sorts of stories are coming from apparently well-informed journalists but we have not yet begun discussions with the IMF. Mr. Hugh Fraser Why not? The Prime Minister We shall have to see what conditions it puts forward at the appropriate time. As to cutting public expenditure and growth, I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will agree that we should go for a period of sustainable growth, and therefore it would not be right to accept conditions on such a loan that would prevent us from going for that sustainable growth. Mr. Ashton Does my right hon. Friend remember that on 11th March the Government took notice of the Opposition and cut £1 billion off public expenditure and the pound fell? Then, in July, they cut £2 billion off and the pound fell even more. Does he not think that he could save £600 million by pulling the troops out of Germany? That would be warmly welcomed by the Labour Party, Labour Members and the people of the country. The Prime Minister I do not think that my hon. Friend's figures for March and July are correct, but it is true that the cuts in public expenditure have not, as the Opposition said they would, had the effect of restoring confidence in sterling. [Hon. Members: “They are not enough.” ] I see that hon. Members think that they are not enough. In that case it would be as well if we could have a straight answer from the Opposition about how much they really think would be enough. Mr. Baker Three weeks ago Helmut Schmidt said that the pound was undervalued. Why is it that in the past three weeks the Federal Government of Germany and the Bundesbank have not bought pounds since this would have driven up the price of sterling? Is it that Helmut Schmidt has decided that he no longer has confidence in the Prime Minister and his policies? The Prime Minister The hon. Gentleman knows better than that. The Federal Republic is in the fortunate position of not having a reserve currency and it will do its best to prevent itself from becoming a reserve currency country. Our situation is a relic of the sterling area days and it is a burden that we bear. The hon. Gentleman knows that the monetary policy of the Bundesbank is not a question for me. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc mr reid ask prime minister meet stuc prime minister mr james callaghan hope meet stuc end year mr reid view today depress rise scottish unemployment prime minister explain ordinary scottish trade unionist oil keep united kingdom afloat imf happy scottish assembly revenue access oil help cure unemployment north border prime minister glad remainder united kingdom unemployment school leaver well month sure hon member pleased note fall month glad reduction shorttime work short ago number affect number reduce fall redundancy think scottish nation heavily snps demand independence mr corbett right hon friend meet tuc position discuss report plan national enterprise board power responsibility industrial reorganisation corporation assist muchneede merger help reinvigoration british industry prime minister yes need use agency especially scottish development agency useful weapon armoury encourage scottish development sorry note leader opposition go scotland explain think necessary conservative party document advocate weaken power sda remove power encourage industrial project mr david steel prime minister meet stuc discuss critical view column share scotland lack economic fiscal content government devolution proposal prime minister matter come house issue debate discuss stuc basically broadly agree government proposal forward white paper think good start debate mr robert hughes right hon friend meet stuc remind great effort government save job chrysler worker shipyard worker scotland benefit people scotland approach meaningful reject attitude snp member care chrysler worker england prime minister young snp past begin catch judge scotsman today scottish opinion catch fast doubt snp retreat demand independence scottish elector soon member understand scottish opinion believe good way proceed preserve unity united kingdom measure produce government change result deliberation house provide widespread devolution mr tapsell prime minister talk trade union leader explain take opportunity television night refer vast german currency reserve fail point accumulate result social economic policy entirely different pursue socialist government prime minister difference german economic system include total destruction german industrial system rebuilding trade union movement entirely different basis fit history conclusion draw column recommend employer country opposition system industrial democracy germany work extremely propose similar measure introduce session mr dyke ask prime minister plan pay official visit harrow prime minister present plan mr dyke prime minister come harrow explain constituent encouragement give force oppose country talk nato party invite dubious character soviet union prime minister shall leave hon gentleman mr atkinson right hon friend reconsider answer suggest queen speech session item worker democracy assure house bullock report publish trade union adequate time consultation government set company bill restructure management industry deal subject worker director business move german concept industrial democracy prime minister adequate consultation industrial democracy important hope bullock committee report enable focus discussion shall able proceed action course mrs thatcher return question ask hon friend member horncastle mr tapsell james callaghanthe prime minister aware statement television night ask straight question threaten pull troop nato country money term prime minister right hon ladys idea straight question like know ask crooked suggest right hon lady read question deal important matter appeal opposition fact country position great influence importance europe strength stability central europe important contribution british army rhine attempt disrupt sterling system rate consequence attempt adventitious factor overhang sterling balance lead countrys influence weaken federal republic reserve billion billion opposition wish preserve britain political influence value cheap party point important issue regard relation overhang sterling balance deutschemark value sterling heavily depreciate factor right hon lady read question answer discuss britain influence central europe maintain remove mrs thatcher prime minister maintain britain influence degrade britain stand world debauch currency debase britain long country prospect debt decay good thing prime minister sure long take right hon lady think despite tenacious attempt gain power promise shall government long time mr ridley ask prime minister pay official visit city london prime minister refer hon member reply give column friend member thornaby mr wrigglesworth october mr ridley prime minister city explain mean say imf policy cause british economy downward spiral correct policy socialism british economy present downward spiral prime minister cut public expenditure save countrys currency instead try bite hand feed prime minister apply imf loan sort story come apparently wellinforme journalist begin discussion imf mr hugh fraser prime minister shall condition put forward appropriate time cut public expenditure growth sure hon gentleman agree period sustainable growth right accept condition loan prevent go sustainable growth mr ashton right hon friend remember march government take notice opposition cut billion public expenditure pound fall july cut billion pound fall think save million pull troop germany warmly welcome labour party labour member people country prime minister think hon friend figure march july correct true cut public expenditure opposition say effect restore confidence sterling hon member hon member think case straight answer opposition think mr baker week ago helmut schmidt say pound undervalue past week federal government germany bundesbank buy pound drive price sterling helmut schmidt decide long confidence prime minister policy prime minister hon gentleman know well federal republic fortunate position have reserve currency good prevent reserve currency country situation relic sterling area day burden bear hon gentleman know monetary policy bundesbank question copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve

This bill permits tax-exempt mutual ditch or irrigation companies to earn income from dispositions of certain property and stock interests without affecting their tax-exempt status, but requires that such income be used to pay the costs of operations, maintenance, and capital improvements of such a company. The bill also establishes a rule regarding the organizational governance of mutual ditch or irrigation companies. Where state law provides that such a company may be organized in a manner that permits voting on a basis that is pro rata to share ownership on corporate governance matters, the tax-exempt status of the mutual ditch or irrigation company must be determined without taking into account whether its member shareholders have one vote on corporate governance matters per share held in the corporation.

right

bill permit taxexempt mutual ditch irrigation company earn income disposition certain property stock interest affect taxexempt status require income pay cost operation maintenance capital improvement company bill establish rule organizational governance mutual ditch irrigation company state law provide company organize manner permit vote basis pro rata share ownership corporate governance matter taxexempt status mutual ditch irrigation company determine take account member shareholder vote corporate governance matter share hold corporation

This bill expands eligibility for veterans to receive care through the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) by removing existing qualifying criteria. Under the bill, veterans may receive care through the VCCP if they notify the Department of Veterans Affairs that they want care through the program.

right

bill expand eligibility veteran receive care veterans community care program vccp remove exist qualifying criterion bill veteran receive care vccp notify department veterans affair want care program

Speeches, etc. [Sir Barnett Janner in the Chair.] 10.30 a.m. Resolved, That the Committee at their rising this day do adjourn till Tuesday, 7th April, at half-past Ten o'clock.—[Mr. Edward Short.] Amendment No. 16 proposed—[19th March]—in page 1, line 24, after the word “for” to insert the word “mathematics” .—[Mr. J. E. B. Hill.] Question again proposed. The Chairman I remind the Committee that we are discussing at the same time Amendment No. 17, in page 1, line 24, after “for” , insert “languages” ; Amendment No. 18, in page 1, line 24, after “for” , insert “athletics” ; Amendment No. 38, in page 1, line 24, after “for” , insert “navigation” ; and Amendment No. 19, in page 1, line 25, leave out “other art” and insert, “art, science, discipline or skill” . Mr. Angus Maude When the Committee adjourned last week, I was speaking about my Amendment No. 19, which is the one in the most general terms, designed to try and save the Government from some of the difficulties and anomalies into which the present draft is likely to get them. When we adjourned I was discussing the definition of “any other art” . My hon. Friend the Member for Norfolk, South, Mr. J. E. B. Hill) asked the Government for their definition of “art” in the context of the Bill, and the right hon. Lady the Minister of State ignored the question altogether. It is absurd for the Government to put a phrase like this into the Bill and then refuse to define it or to give us any idea what they have in mind. It is clear to me that there is an enormous number of possible anomalies which could arise out of it. I mention the possibility, to put it no higher, that English Literature [column 182]might be considered an art, but, even if we take the word in what might be considered its narrowest sense, what about painting and the graphic arts? My hon. Friend the Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher) mentioned this last week. The Minister of State, Department of Education and Science (Miss Alice Bacon) If the hon. Member will allow me, perhaps I can short-circuit his speech. I am informed that, according to law, the general word which follows particular and specific words of the same nature as itself takes its meaning from them, and is presumed to be restricted to the same genus as those words. In other words, it is to be read as meaning only things of the same kind as those designated by them. In the context of Clause 1(2)(c) the word is to be read only as meaning the same as words of the same kind as designated by the particular and specific words “music” and “dancing” . Those words certainly include drama and would probably include painting and sculpture, but they do not include disciplines like mathematics or languages, nor do they include athletics. I am advised that this is based on a case which has been before the courts. Mr. Maude I am obliged to the right hon. Lady, but if she thinks that that makes the position much clearer she is wrong. I never imagined that “any other art” included athletics, but when she says it probably includes painting, what are we doing passing Bills in which a term probably means something but even the right hon. Lady cannot tell us for certain, having taken legal advice. This is an extraordinary situation. If it “probably” includes painting, does it “probably” include sculpture and modelling? Miss Bacon I said that it included sculpture. Mr. Maude Does it include the craft of the silversmith? Mr. Kenneth Lewis Would my hon. Friend make clear what he means by “modelling” ? Mr. Maude The plastic art of modelling in clay in general, part of the art of sculpture. I did not mean what my hon. Friend clearly has in his mind. Does this include the art of the silver[column 183]smith? Is that a craft? Take a former secondary technical school which has a high reputation for craft work in metal. Is a boy to be considered a craftsman if he works in brass, iron or steel and an artist if he works in gold or silver, and, under the Bill, is he included in “any other art” or not? It is not good enough to tell us that it “probably” includes painting and other graphic arts. We have no right to pass a Bill in terms which include elements of doubt as gross as this. We can settle the question of what is not actually, if not probably, art within the meaning of the Bill, but it can still be argued that it is not relevant because we are dealing with a small number of schools. The right hon. Lady the Minister of State, in her reply, spoke almost exclusively in terms of music and dancing and said, rightly, that there were few special schools of this nature; but we cannot necessarily suppose that more will not be set up. It cannot be assumed that the only schools which will come within the ambit of this Clause will be those specially devoted to the teaching of a particular art. My hon. Friend for Norfolk, South referred to the way in which certain schools, particularly in large and fairly scattered rural catchment areas—but it is no doubt true of many connurbations—develop a high reputation for a particular kind of teaching in an art or craft, or, as it may perhaps be a rural school, a trade. We want to know, and we are entitled to know, whether the deliberate selection of children to go to a school of this kind for this sort of reason is or is not legal under the Bill. This is a matter of some importance because clearly some complications could arise from it. We are entitled to insist on some clear answers to a number of specific questions. We must presume that the Secretary of State is not saying that there will not be schools of this type even after reorganisation is complete everywhere, if it ever is. A school which before reorganisation was a secondary technical school is likely to continue to be a school with a particularly good series of teachers or departments or facilities for technical crafts and skills. A comprehensive school which was largely based on a large grammar school may have specially good facilities for teaching some [column 184]other things, perhaps good laboratories or facilities for teaching in the arts. I am sure that the Secretary of State will not tell us that this kind of thing will not continue after reorganisation because it is not to be expected that every school, everywhere, of whatever size or whatever kind of district it is in, will be exactly the same kind of school. If there are these differences between schools, and certain schools are recognised by the parents and the head teachers of primary schools, or by the children as offering particularly good facilities in a particular subject, it will follow inevitably that local education authorities in allocating children to secondary schools will take account of those facilities and will try to match them to the abilities and aptitudes of certain children. That is selection by ability and aptitude, and we are entitled to know whether selection by ability and aptitude for particular schools for this purpose is legal in a Bill which purports to abolish selection by ability and aptitude and does not refer to these things in any subsection in Clause 1. It has been suggested to me that this was not relevant and that nobody would be so silly as to interpret the Bill in this way. How can anyone tell, if somebody is anxious to upset the Bill or to challenge its validity or it raison d'etre? Who is to say that they will not challenge it on this sort of point? We should know where the Government stand. It is not the business of Parliament to pass Bills in such a way that if people take them literally the result would be chaos or a nonsense. We are expected to pass Bills which can be taken literally and with an interpretation according to the letter which will make some kind of sense. We are entitled to know how this Bill will be interpreted. To one question we must have an answer: if we are to be told that this kind of selection by ability and aptitude—and it inevitably is selection by ability and aptitude—is all right in the Bill as drafted and nobody is going to be so foolish as to try and prevent it, perhaps the Secretary of State will tell us why this would be legal, but banding would not. On Second Reading, the Minister of State said firmly that banding was inconsistent with Clause 1 as drafted. I do not [column 185]want to anticipate discussion of banding on a subsequent group of Amendments, but we are entitled to ask if banding will be illegal after the Bill is passed. If the sending of children outside the catchment area of their immediate neighbourhood school is illegal, why will it be legal to send a child outside his immediate home area because his abilities and aptitudes will be better catered for in a department of another school? These two things seem completely inconsistent. Either direction of children to a school which has a particularly good department in one subject, art or craft according to their ability and aptitude is illegal under the Bill, or, if it is not, I cannot for the life of me see how it can be said that banding is legal. One cannot be legal and the other not. We should be told which of them is illegal and which of them is legal. The Government, because they have given too little thought to the wording and implications of this subsection, will get themselves in some difficulty and may face legal challenges in the courts if the Bill as now framed is enacted. 10.45 a.m. It is the job of the Government to do two things. First, they should tell us what they think this provision means and what the implications might be if people started to take the wording literally. Secondly, they ought to tell us what they propose to do to safeguard themselves against the complications which could arise. My Amendment, No. 19, far from being intended to destroy the purpose of the Bill, which was the right hon. Lady's immediate reaction, is the only wording I have so far been able to find which will cover the Government against the kind of nonsense which they are, in my view, perpetrating. It would not result in the creation of an enormous number of special schools for particular purposes, whether mathematics or navigation, but it would allow local authorities legally to direct children to the kind of comprehensive school with the kind of record, reputation, staffing and curriculum which would be best suited to them. The fact is that this goes on now and will continue to go on even if the Minister succeeds in imposing a totally comprehensive system on this country and on all authorities. If it goes on, then I maintain that under the [column 186]Bill it would be illegal. I also maintain that Amendment No. 19, which I shall press, gives the Minister the best chance of avoiding the sort of difficulties, and possibly court cases, which will arise. Sir Edward Boyle I was depressed when, at the last sitting of the Committee, the Minister of State said of the Amendments we are now discussing: It seemed to me that the right hon. Lady, by using those words, showed that she did not understand the purpose of this group of Amendments. We do not say that all local authorities should as a matter of doctrine provide for specially gifted children in special schools. That is not what the Amendments say. The fact that the right hon. Lady seemed to interpret them in that way is a sign of something we know already, that is, the tendency of hon. Members opposite to think that nothing matters except the policy of the central Government. I do not hold the view that all gifted children should be educated in special schools. Indeed, I always resist the proposition that as a matter of doctrine everywhere the top 5 per cent. in ability should be educated separately from other children. What we are saying in these Amendments is something different. I wish to confine myself to the important issue of mathematics. As I said on Second Reading, we take the view that we should not rule out the possibility of trying experiments with new kinds of selective schools, for example, for children who are specially gifted in mathematics. It is absurd to pass legislation which will preclude the possibility of a local authority trying out the experiment of a selective school for those who are mathematically gifted. When I think of the possibility of some such experiment again. I do not necessarily mean an experiment which starts at the age of 11. We are quite flexible, as any authority must be, as to the age at which an experiment of this kind could start. We should not rule out the possibility, for a number of reasons. No one can doubt the need of this country to foster exceptional talents in mathematics. Nobody can doubt the need in this country to take any step which might have the effect of increasing the number of good [column 187]mathematics teachers in our schools. There are two perfectly sound educational reasons why it would not be unreasonable or a bad idea for a large authority, say, in a big city to wish to try out the experiment of a selective school with a special mathematical bias. First, as we all know, there is a limited number of children who need rapidly to be mastering new resource in dealing with mathematics. The number of boys and girls who should be starting the calculations at the ages of 13 or 14 may not be all that numerous, but they undoubtedly exist. After all, mathematics teaching is very largely a matter of how soon boys and girls are introduced to new types of basic resource which must be the foundation of their further studies. Secondly, mathematicians are very good at sharpening one another's edges, if I may put it that way. The special atmosphere of a gifted class in mathematics can be very important in helping young people to get the best out of one another. As the right hon. Lady gave a personal reminiscence, may I give one of my own? A number of criticisms of the teaching at my old school, Eton, I think could rightly be made, but the mathematics teaching there was in fact extremely good. We had what I think was the very good custom that in each block of a year's work 20 boys were put separately into what was known as the select division for mathematics. If one was in the select division, one had to do, not only the ordinary curriculum, but a weekly problem paper on which one was expected to spend no less than four hours. I was a not particularly distinguished member of the select division and I did not as a rule achieve more than a 40 per cent. average during the term on the problem papers, but I have never regretted the time I spent doing them. In particular, I was very conscious, as a not particularly brilliant member of the class, of the advantages one gained by working side by side with those who were cleverer than oneself from the atmosphere of a class—I think my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Mr. Lane) would confirm this if he were here—in which there was a limited number of brilliant pupils. Looking ahead to the nation's needs, the idea that we should legislate away the right of an authority to experiment with a selective school for the mathematically [column 188]gifted seems to me absurd. Quite apart from the aspect of those who are specially gifted in mathematics, there is also the important point just made by my hon. Friend the Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Mr. Maude). As he rightly said, we must get away from the absurd fallacy of supposing that under any kind of comprehensive system everybody goes to the same school. The first lesson to learn in a subject is that whether one has an old-fashioned by-partite system—for which none of us on this side of the Committee contends—or some other form of comprehensive system, children do not all go to the same school. There has to be some basis of selection for one or the other. As my hon. Friend the Member for Stratford-on-Avon correctly said, an increasing number of authorities' schools will develop special biases. The biases of individual comprehensive schools will in all probability be influenced by their past. Educational institutions in this country seldom spring absolutely from green fields; one has to think where the teachers were before and what the position of the school in an earlier incarnation may have been. It is, in my view, perfectly right that in a big city a number of individual separate comprehensive schools should start to develop different biases. Is it sensible to say that at the age of 13 or 14 a boy or girl should not be transferred from one comprehensive school to another because the second school has a certain bias from which the boy or girl might benefit? Is it really suggested that absolutely no tincture of selection by aptitude or ability is to influence that transfer? This seems to me absurd. I start from the proposition that the more this can be done without too overt selection, and by parental choice, the better. But to suppose that for the future, when there are a number of comprehensive schools in a city, right through a child's school career his ability or aptitude should never influence the school at which he does his O level—and I will not say “or his A level” because I realise that exception is made in the school of sixth form work. To say that no element of selection by ability could ever influence the school in which a boy or girl does his or her O level is an absurdity which we are determined to resist Amendment by Amendment and Clause by Clause. [column 189] What I find depressing is that right hon. Members opposite are spending time on fighting again the battles of the 1960s. The right hon. Lady is saying, “So long as we get away from selection at 11, so long as we have a non-selective transfer from primary to secondary school, nothing else really matters” . That is a view which we on this side contest. My hon. Friend the Member for Stratford-on-Avon and I made our position on the 11-plus perfectly clear on Second Reading. Very few of us on this side of the Committee imagines that it makes sense to continue with a situation in which 20 per cent. of the children go to grammar schools at the age of 11 and 80 per cent. go to modern schools. The trend, we know, is away from that. But let us not commit the absurdity of saying that, because on the whole we approve that trend, though the speed at which it goes must depend on money and the soundness of individual schemes, the only step is to rule out in advance any proposals for the future that contain any tincture of selection by ability. As I say, I regard that as absurd. The Amendment on mathematics shows up its absurdity more clearly because we all know there are boys and girls specially gifted in this subject. I hope that we vote on more than one of the Amendments. Mr. W. R. van Straubenzee I will, in contrast to my right hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir Edward Boyle), concentrate on a rather different aspect of the Amendments, and, in particular, on the helpful speech made at our last sitting by the right hon. Lady the Minister of State. In col. 174 of the Official Report of our proceedings on 19th March the right hon. Lady introduced a very helpful reference to the transfer to the Department of Education of the education of severely handicapped children. That considerable contribution on the matter from the right hon. Lady included the vesting day date she helpfully gave the Committee. The matter raised by the right hon. Lady is covered by the Education (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill about which we have today heard a good deal introduced into another place by the noble Lady the Baroness Phillips. For most of us, I think, far and away the most important part of that Bill is the subject matter mentioned by the [column 190]right hon. Lady, namely, the transfer to her Department of the education of severely handicapped children. 11.0 a.m. That does not mean that there will not be at appropriate stages, when it is in order so to do, opportunity to discuss other matters in that Bill. It is important that we should get the balance reasonably right on this very important subject. I introduce it now only because the right hon. Lady introduced it. I think the right hon. Lady knows that there is widespread anxiety among, I believe, hon. Members on both sides about conditions of service of those who will be teaching the children to whom this Bill refers. It will be principally to that point that we shall wish to return when the Bill to which I have referred reaches us from another pace. I wish to take up another point made by the right hon. Lady. I think that probably she genuinely made a slight error, which it is easy to do when one is asked a quick question. It would be as well, if my view is correct, to put the record right. At our last sitting the hon. Member for Bootle (Mr. Simon Mahon) made this intervention by way of a question his right hon. Friend: The right hon. Lady replied: This matter is governed by the words introducing Clause 1, which refer quite specifically to the duties of local authorities under Section 8 of the Education Act, 1944. That Section includes subsection (2)(c) It is both “in special schools or otherwise” . The proof of this is that those words are reproduced in subsection (2)(a) of the Clause we are now discussing. I think it must follow that the answer which the [column 191]right hon. Lady gave off the cuff was not quite correct. Miss Bacon The words “or otherwise” refer also to hospitals. Mr. van Straubenzee I do not dispute that, but this Bill refers to the kind of children the hon. Member for Bootle had in mind. It would be as well to make that clear. There is no party issue here. I raise this point merely to be of assistance with reference to a section of young children who have the sympathy and understanding of hon. Members on both sides of the Committee. One of the problems for a member of this Committee, which is an agreeable Committee to serve on, is that one is apt to find one's words referred to in distinguished journals. That is very agreeable. You, Sir Barnett, no doubt regard The Times Educational Supplement as part of your bedtime reading and will have noticed that the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Christopher Price)—whose temporary absence from the Committee I regret—wrote a column in the current issue which referred at some length to words which I had used in this Committee. I am deeply obliged to him for giving far greater publicity than otherwise would have been the case to such wisdom as I was able to muster. He wrote: It is the contention of those who are concerned with these Amendments that the judges will have ample opportunity for sharpening their molars as a result of the way in which this subsection has been drafted. Although I realise that the right hon. Lady, in her very erudite intervention at the start of our proceedings this morning, was, as always, trying to assist the Committee, I suggest that there are very severe traps ahead of her right hon. Friend and herself. Notice that the words used in the Clause are not They are [column 192]There would be some considerable doubt, at least in the mind of a judge with a molar that he is anxious to use, as to whether the much closer interpretation given to this subsection by the right hon. Lady is as accurate as she hopes it will be. Mr. Maude It will be within the recollection of my hon. Friend that the right hon. Lady could not be specific because she said that the phrase “probably” included painting. Mr. van Straubenzee I appreciate that. It adds to the difficulties of all of us, and later, if the Bill becomes law, it will add to the difficulties of all who have to operate it. My central contention remains valid. I should have thought that there was considerable doubt about whether the kind of art mentioned in this subsection is the kind of art which the judges will say it refers to if the matter is contested. In an effort to try to keep up with the general high intellectual character of the Committee, I have been consulting some of the authorities on this matter. I have, for example, turned up the definition of the word “art” in the 1967 edition of Everyman's Encyclopaedia published by Dent. This is how the phrase is defined there: One has a remarkable picture of a school being permitted under this subsection to select for charioteering. That is something which I would not expect to find frequently happening. The central point is that in the most general sense the definition of “art” is This is a danger signal, I should have thought, in the interpretation of this subsection. It is always important to go to the appropriate authorities on these occasions. If the right hon. Lady cares to do what I am sure those bringing the matter before the courts will do and looks at the 1970 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica she will find that art, it is said, in its most basic meaning means a skill or ability. This [column 193]would be exactly what we should imagine. It says: I do not frankly understand why, taking the position she does, the right hon. Lady and her advisers have put in these words. I do not take her position, but I can understand, and indeed I am thankful for the exceptions made for music and dancing. I realise very well that there are very considerable arguments about early selection in music, for example, about which my knowledge is very limited indeed but my appreciation is considerable. I realise from what has been said earlier that the right hon. Lady takes a different view of early selection than do other people. In this regard it is highly significant that at our last sitting the right hon. Lady indicated quite clearly that she would have frankly preferred not to have these exceptions. She said: She said: You, Sir Barnett, possibly know that of all the various interest groups in the country, the lawyers are perhaps the most deserving of public sympathy and understanding. Anything that produces more financial assistance for them would, I am sure, meet with your approval. The more important point is that we surely want to pass into law a Measure which is perfectly clear. It is for that reason that we have a Committee stage. I should have thought that I have been able to show today that at least the right hon. Lady should take those words back and look at the phrase, if only to make sure that the interpretation she gave will stand up. I have concentrated on the right hon. Lady's speech on certain points and on the narrow point of the construction of words, but in conclusion I want to echo what has been said on the merits of the matter. It seems regrettable in the extreme that by this Bill we should positively exclude selection in certain fields which in later years [column 194]educationalists of all political persuasions may feel it was wise to implement. Unlike my right hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle), I was not fortunate enough to be selected in this way at an early stage in mathematics. I had the gruelling experience in later years of spending a year at the University of Edinburgh on a very intensified and rarefied form of mathematical course which was supposed to fit me for what then were His Majesty's Forces. I have an inborn inability to master the mathematical art anyway. The Secretary of State for Education and Science (Mr. Edward Short) Hear, hear. Mr. van Straubenzee I am glad to hear that we have that in common. I was, however, conscious of a lack of grounding which would have been of great assistance to me, particularly in earlier years, and the great difficulty in coming to these abstruse subjects, as it were fresh, at a later age. I am quite sure that in future we shall very much regret it if we irrevocably shut the door to selection of any kind, except for those causes mentioned in the subsection. For those reasons, I very much hope that the Amendment will be pressed. 11.15 a.m. Miss Bacon I shall be very brief because we are anxious to get on to the next group of Amendments before my right hon. Friend has to leave. I thank the hon. Member for Wokingham (Mr. van Straubenzee) for what he said at the beginning of his speech and for helpfully drawing attention to the fact that the Bill that is being presented today in another place deals with the very important subject of the transfer of responsibility for severely mentally handicapped children from the Department of Health and Social Security to the Department of Education and Science. We are discussing two distinct groups of Amendments and two different views of the Clause. First, we are discussing the words in the Bill and secondly, the Amendments to widen this Clause to include mathematics and other things. The hon. Member for Wokingham quoted the dictionary definition of the word “art” . I am informed that in law “or any other art” after “music or [column 195]dancing” is restricted to the same kind of art. I think the hon. Lady the Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher) will understand this because she murmured the appropriate Latin phrase and the courts would interpret it not widely but in a narrow sense. I am speaking at 11.15. If I were speaking at twelve o'clock I would have been able to quote from the Donnison Committee's report which is to be issued at that time. Mr. Lewis Would the right hon. Lady like us to keep the discussion going until twelve o'clock? Miss Bacon I think that if the hon. Gentleman had read the report he would not like that very much. [Interruption.] It is not in the Vote Office. It is embargoed until twelve o'clock. There is in the Report a passage on gifted children which I hope right hon. and hon. Members will read. The reason we included is that there are at present nine schools catering for music or dancing. It was put to us by local authorities and by other organisations that there should be some phrase in the Bill to cover these schools. As I said at the last meeting of the Committee, there are only nine of them—eight are independent, one is a voluntary aided school—and they cater for about 1,500 children. I said that the phrase “probably” included sculpture because as everybody knows, until the case has been taken to court it is difficult to be precise. But I am advised that the law would interpret this, not widely, but narrowly as being the same kind of art as music or dancing, and not art as defined in a dictionary. I come to the exception that hon. Members wish to make. Again we have had a plea for an exception for mathematics. I made my view quite clear about this at the last meeting of the Committee. I am very much opposed to putting gifted children, particularly children gifted in mathematics and science, into one particular school and giving them a special education. In the schools of the future, in the comprehensive schools, there will be ample opportunity and scope for children who are gifted in mathematics and science to receive the education they require. [column 196] The right hon. Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle) said that we were fighting the battles of the 1960s and that we were fighting all over again selection at the age of eleven. If that battle had been won, especially with the persuasive powers of the right hon. Gentleman in his own city, I would have thought the City of Birmingham would not have needed in the 1970s to be forced, as it were, into ending selection at the age of 11, because in the City of Birmingham there is still selection and there is no prospect without this Bill of Birmingham bringing an end to selection at the age of 11. I come to the point made by the hon. Member for Norfolk, South (Mr. J. E. B. Hill) and the right hon. Member for Handsworth, that at present various secondary modern schools have a bias in one subject or another. It has been suggested that in future children will not be able to go to these particular schools if they have a special bent in a particular subject. This Bill deals with the future and under this Bill the schools of the future will be not secondary modern schools but comprehensive schools. I know that the right hon. Gentleman mentioned comprehensive schools, but the hon. Member for Norfolk, South, spoke at the last meeting of the Committee about the present secondary modern schools which have a bias in agriculture or fishing in and around his constituency. Within the comprehensive schools I hope that there will be scope for all these children. Even so, hon. and right hon. Gentlemen opposite have been confusing the curriculum with the admission arrangements. If there was a comprehensive school with a bent in a particular subject—though I cannot at the moment think of such a school—and another comprehensive school reasonably near it that specialised in another subject, it would be a simple matter of parental choice as to which child went to which school; it would not be a matter of selection. Mr. J. E. B. Hill Surely there must be an element of reference to the child's ability and aptitude before the local education authority decides to send a child to a particular school. Admittedly, I framed my remarks in the light of the local situation with which I have to deal, [column 197]namely, secondary modern schools, but the argument applies just as strongly to comprehensive schools. Is not the right hon. Lady aware that a teacher of excellence may create a small centre of excellence to which children, because of their aptitude, say, in silver metal work, want to go. Miss Bacon That is the whole point. There is really nothing between us on this matter. The hon. Gentleman has said that because a child has an interest in a particular school presumably the parent would want that child to go to that school. I agree with that and it would be a matter of choice for the parent and the child, which is entirely different from selection and the child being allocated to a particular school on the basis of ability and aptitude. Hon. and right hon. Gentlemen opposite are very keen on parental choice. I should have thought that this was a matter eminently suited for parental choice. To that extent if there was a comprehensive school with a very good course in agriculture or fishing, and if parents wished their children to go to that school, they could do so under this Bill. What the Bill prohibits is a strict selection procedure which allocates children according to their ability and aptitude. Mr. Maude I do not think it is as simple as that. The right hon. Lady is talking as if there would always be a school with particular facilities within very easy reach of the child or family. Such a school might be in the area of another local education authority, although in the same county, and it may not always be just a question of parental choice. Sometimes parents are irresponsible, sometimes parents scarcely exist, and there is an element of allocation on the basis of primary school head teachers' reports. This will be selection by ability and aptitude, and we want to know why this is legal and banding is not. Miss Bacon We shall come to banding in the next group of Amendments. The hon. Member has just raised a quite different point—the procedure for taking a child from one local authority to another local authority. That happens whether there is selection or not. There has to be, and there are, these arrangements. The hon. Gentleman has raised a matter which [column 198]is not relevant to the Amendment. There would be no more difficulty in a child attending a school in another local authority under this Bill than there is at present. A quite extraneous argument has been adduced. Sir E. Boyle This is the kernel of the difference between us on this Clause, and positions are being taken up which are felt sincerely by hon. Members. May I put these two points to the right hon. Lady: every comprehensive school ought to be able to cope with those it has inside it; that is not in dispute. We are saying that, when there are a number of comprehensive schools in a big city, there is nothing wrong with one of those schools being specially concerned with and making a special feature of mathematics. Secondly, on parental choice, surely parental choice will often involve discussions between parent and teacher. Is it wrong that there should be some informal examination in the school simply so that the teacher can give the best informed guidance to the parent? Miss Bacon Hon. Gentlemen opposite are trying to create a difference when there is none. I have recognised that there might be a comprehensive school specialising in a particular subject. I have also admitted that some parents might like their children to go to such a comprehensive school. If so, I am sure that this could be arranged without any selection procedure, but the majority of comprehensive schools today do not specialise in particular courses. Most of them are all-embracing, catering for all types of ability and aptitude. Even if there were a school specialising in agriculture, I would have thought it would be simple through parental choice for a child to go to that school without selection procedures. This Bill aims at getting rid of selection procedures. Mr. Simon Mahon I should like to clarify this point because it is causing me some concern. Is my right hon. Friend saying that the parents of a child who has a particular aptitude will be the sole arbiter of whether that child should go to a particular school without any reference to any other body such as a local authority? 11.30 a.m. Miss Bacon Obviously this would [column 199]probably be discussed with the school. The 1944 Act lays it down that a parent has the right to chose a school, providing that certain conditions are fulfilled. But here the Opposition are making a mountain out of a molehill. To widen this Clause as they propose would make nonsense of the Bill. Mr. Reginald Eyre I put to the right hon. Lady a question of practical interpretation in relation to the City of Birmingham, to which she made a rather unkind reference. Let us assume that there are comprehensive schools throughout the city and the adjoining area and that one school in the city develops a reputation for training in silver work, for example, which is quite possible in practical terms. Children may want to go to that school from comprehensive schools in Solihull, Sutton Coldfield and elsewhere because it has acquired a special reputation and is therefore specially attractive to them. How would the right hon. Lady decide which of the children who so opt are to go to that school, with its special quality? Does she not see that there must be some element of careful selection in such practical circumstances? Miss Bacon As a matter of practical politics, if the City of Birmingham had a system of comprehensive education there would be a number of comprehensive schools where silver work was a subject. Surely such work would not be confined to one school in a city like Birmingham. Mrs. Thatcher It is not the Opposition who are in an untenable position but the Alice Baconright hon. Lady. If the burden of her argument is correct, we do not need exceptions for music, dancing, or any other art because everything will be provided within the comprehensive system. We all know that it will not be so provided. It just is not possible in many areas for every comprehensive school to provide a complete range of subjects. It is ridiculous of the right hon. Lady to say that one can have comprehensive schools which specialise in certain subjects but that what one cannot have is a test which enables the authorities, parents or teachers to judge whether a child going to such a school can benefit from a highly specialised type of education. However, according to her argument, there could be no such test. Miss Bacon The hon. Lady says that [column 200]I had said that we could have a comprehensive school which specialised in mathematics, languages, and so on. It was not my argument but that of her hon. Friends. Mrs. Thatcher I see, then, that it is not acceptable to the right hon. Lady that we should have comprehensive schools with a particular specialisation. We are thus back to the argument that every comprehensive school should provide everything, which we know it cannot and will not do. There are bound to be comprehensive schools specialising in particular subjects. I know the right hon. Lady argues that mathematicians should be educated in the community. I have met that argument in Russia. I visited the Department of Higher Education there and heard it. But then one asks those in the Department about the special mathematics school at Kiev and reminds them that children with special gifts for mathematics are picked out and sent to the Kiev school, as described in The Times Educational Supplement of 23rd January, 1970. The article referred to the system of early selection in the Soviet Union, describing how the authorities take budding mathematicians out of the ordinary school at the end of the first, fourth or ninth year of schooling. Thus, since education is compulsory from the ages of 7 to 17, the authorities in the Soviet Union are spotting budding mathematicians from the age of eight. Miss Bacon It sounds terrible. Mrs. Thatcher If one asks the Soviet authorities about their several mathematics schools and how they fit in with their theory about educating mathematicians in the community, they will tell one that there are special gifts which it is necessary, for the benefit of the community and the children, to bring on early, and there are not the ordinary teachers to do it. The right hon. Lady knows that, in mathematics especially, although one can provide for individual teaching in a comprehensive school, there just cannot be in every comprehensive school a teacher with the requisite amount of talent to bring on a child as quickly as that child's talent may warrant. Either we come to our argument that the system should not be so restrictive as to preclude special arrangements for children of this kind of ability, or we come to the right hon. Lady's argument, assisted ably by the hon. Member [column 201-202]for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Christopher Price) that one must abolish the element of selection regardless of the consequences for the excellence and standards of education generally or of the consequences in specific subjects. We do not accept that argument. There are grounds for exceptions and the excellence and standards of education need not suffer if she were not so rigid in her approach. A number of countries make special provision for mathematics—Japan is among them—because they recognise its importance. I have been to the English School in Leningrad, which specialises in English Language. Again, as I understand the right hon. Lady's argument, if one has a school specialising in languages the parents will have to make the choice whether their child can go and the chances are that one will get earlier specialisation instead of the tendency towards later specialisation. I understand that there are three Welsh Schools, in Pontypridd, St. Asaph and Mold, where arts subjects are taught in Welsh and mathematics and science in English. Would it not be reasonable to have some test for those schools to see whether a child can speak Welsh well enough to understand subjects taught in Welsh? That is not unreasonable. It is not we who are in a difficult position over this matter but the right hon. Lady. I understand that there are in a number of cases special arrangements for athletics, for bringing on children quickly if they have athletic ability. This is obviously necessary if we are to compete in the Olympics. But is the right hon. Lady saying that this, too, should be precluded? It seems, according to her, that one cannot have training in athletics schools where the intake would be by ability, so that we are not to have special arrangements for competing in the Olympics. But there are ways to get round what the right hon. Lady said. It occurs in her interpretation of schools One often finds, as the right hon. Lady knows, that musical ability and mathematical ability go very well together. They are often found in the same person. It seems obvious that the thing to do is to have a music school with a strong bias towards mathematics. If a child has dual talent, one could well give it the training it deserves. If the right hon. Lady is not prepared to make any exceptions for any of these subjects, then the independent sector will have to do it and one can only appeal to industrialists, who may be wondering where to put their money in view of certain recent developments, to provide scholarships in science, mathematics and languages at independent schools so that children who are specially talented in these subjects can, through their ability, get the education they deserve. We shall have to register our protest to the right hon. Lady's approach. Question put, That the Amendment be made:— The Committee divided: Ayes 8, Noes 10. Division No. 9.] Boyle , Sir Edward Eyre , Mr. Reginald Hill , Mr. J. E. B. Lewis , Mr. Kenneth Maude , Mr. Angus Montgomery , Mr. Thatcher, Mrs. Margaret van Straubenzee , Mr. Armstrong , Mr. Ernest Bacon , Miss Alice Evans , Mr. Fred Mahon , Mr. Simon Newens , Mr. Stan Oakes , Mr. Gordon Price , Mr. Christopher Price , Mr. William Short , Mr. Edward Woof , Mr. Robert Amendment No. 17 proposed: In page 1, line 24, after “for” , insert “languages” .—[Mr. van Straubenzee.] Question put, That the Amendment be made:— The Committee divided: Ayes 8, Noes 10. Division No. 10.] Boyle , Sir Edward Eyre , Mr. Reginald Hill , Mr. J. E. B. Lewis , Mr. Kenneth Maude , Mr. Angus Montgomery , Mr. Thatcher, Mrs. Margaret van Straubenzee , Mr. [column 203-204] Armstrong , Mr. Ernest Bacon , Miss Alice Evans , Mr. Fred Mahon , Mr. Simon Newens , Mr. Stan Oakes , Mr. Gordon Price , Mr. Christopher Price , Mr. William Short , Mr. Edward Woof , Mr. Robert Amendment No. 19 proposed: In page 1, line 25, leave out “other art” , and insert Question put, That the Amendment be made:— The Committee divided: Ayes 8, Noes 10. Division No. 11.] Boyle , Sir Edward Eyre , Mr. Reginald Hill , Mr. J. E. B. Lewis , Mr. Kenneth Maude , Mr. Angus Montgomery , Mr. Thatcher, Mrs. Margaret van Straubenzee , Mr. Armstrong , Mr. Ernest Bacon , Miss Alice Evans , Mr. Fred Mahon , Mr. Simon Newens , Mr. Stan Oakes , Mr. Gordon Price , Mr. Christopher Price , Mr. William Short , Mr. Edward Woof , Mr. Robert 11.45 a.m. Mr. Stan Newens I beg to move Amendment No. 20, in page 1, line 25, at end insert: The Chairman If agreed, we can take at the same time Amendment No. 55, in the names of the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle) and the hon. Member for Cambridge (Mr. Lane), page 1, line 25, at end insert: Sir E. Boyle I agree with that, Sir Barnett. Mr. Newens These Amendments deal with the neighbourhood school, and I imagine that right hon. and hon. Members on both sides will recognise and agree that there is a correlation between the range of abilities produced in a particular area and the type of area. A poorer area is likely to produce less academically inclined children than a more affluent area. Hon. Members may not agree with me on the reasons for this, but, in my view, the reasons are closely connected with the influence of environment on the children rather than related to differences in hereditary ability. It is inevitable that the influence of a middle class home or a home with an intellectual atmosphere will be more likely to produce academically-inclined children than another type of home. When one considers the comparatively small amount of time a child spends in school with the vast majority of time spent at home or in the neighbourhood of home, it is only to be expected that the influence of the environment in which he lives on his development is likely to be considerable. It is not merely a question of his or her academic abilities but also of his inclinations. I know from experience of teaching in the East End of London that the pressures on a working class child, particularly a girl, to leave school as soon as possible are very considerable indeed. When a child grows up more or less accepting, because of the atmosphere in which he is brought up, that he is to do a certain type of job and that jobs more elevated in the community are entirely out of his range, this naturally places a certain influence on the child's attitude to school and school work. On many occasions I have had, as a teacher, to argue at great length with children and their parents the desirability of staying at school in the face of flat incredulity about the value of education to the child concerned. That is especially so with a girl. The result is that a school is likely to reflect the neighbourhood in its academic achievements or lack of them. I understand from my right hon. Friends that ability, as it stands, excludes the banding procedure. That is dealt with in Amendment No. 55. There is a division [column 205]of opinion on this. There is a division in the N.U.T. Some people in the teaching profession think that banding is a desirable form of dealing with this problem; other people do not. While recognising the reasons behind banding, I believe that it is possible to achieve the results we want in a proper comprehensive system without the continuation of banding. Therefore, I am happy about the provisions of the Bill in this respect, but there is a danger, particularly in a medium-sized town or an area where travelling is easy, that particular schools will be specially affected by parents who want their children to have an academic type of education. This will be especially so if a scheme for comprehensive education is to be brought into operation for an area where the previous grammar schools tend to be favoured by parents for their children. If this is allowed to occur, specially-favoured schools will have a demand for more places than they can provide and less favoured schools will have to take children they do not want. The result could be that the comprehensive system will be completely ruined. This was likely to happen, I believe, in Newport. My hon. Friend the Member for Newport (Mr. Roy Hughes) referred to this matter on Second Reading. The Conservatives came to power there and decided to reverse previous decisions on catchment areas. I quote from the South Wales Argus of 28th January which makes the point clear in an editorial. It said: I understand that, because of pressure by the teachers and by my hon. Friend the Member for Newport, who has taken a strong stand and fought a valiant battle on this, a change has been made, but a system of complete parental choice without limitation of catchment areas could create a system of de facto grammar schools and modern schools, whether one calls them comprehensive or anything else. This would be reflected in the attractiveness of schools to the staff they recruit and if a school is known, whether it is [column 206]called a comprehensive school or not, to be rather poor in academic achievement and difficult in discipline, that school would have more difficulty in attracting the type of teacher best able to improve the standards. The result would be that the school would find itself in a vicious circle and would find it difficult to lift itself out of the rut. It is important to take steps to avoid what I have been describing. I recognise that one would not therefore say that in all areas regulated catchment areas will be rigidly in force. I recognise, for example, that in more sparsely populated areas there is likely to be only one school because of travelling difficulties. In an area such as this, the ability mix is less likely to be particularly extreme in one direction or another because one is dealing with much larger areas. I hope my right hon. Friends will make it clear that the Bill will not prevent planned catchment areas from being brought into being. If that is not the case, the Amendment should be accepted. Catchment areas have no validity in the sense that children can be forced to go to a particular school but catchment areas give a priority of place to children living in a particular area. I am not opposed to genuine parental choice when parents, in consultation with teachers and the child, wish to send a child to a particular school. Comprehensive schools will tend to have particular specialities, which is good and not bad. Referring to some of the arguments of the hon. Member for Norfolk, South (Mr. J. E. B. Hill) and a number of his hon. Friends during the debate on previous Amendments, if a school specialises in classics and has a good classics department and there is not sufficient demand over a wide area for every school to provide a classics department, I hope that it would be possible for children to opt, in consultation with parents and teachers and provided that places were available, to go to that school. In Harlow, which I have the honour to represent, there are a number of comprehensive schools and it is recognised that different comprehensive schools have different specialities. There is no difference between my right hon. Friend and me on this score. If the places are available in a particular school and the children from the catchment area from that school have [column 207]not been prevented from entry, I see no reason why children from outside the catchment area should not take up the available places. Mr. Eyre The hon. Member has slightly changed his use of words. I pose the practical problem of a school with a reputation and a limited number of places and a great number of children from other catchment areas wishing to go to it. How does one decide who is to be given a place and who is not? Mr. Newens The first thing to be done is that children living in a catchment area and wishing to go there must have priority. Then, if there are a number of other places available, they can be taken up by the children who want to go there. I do not wish to burke this issue. It will be asked what I suggest if more children wish to take up available excess places than can be accommodated? In those circumstances, not all children from outside can be taken and I would think it undesirable that they should all be taken. In those circumstances, some form of choice will have to be made by the people responsible for the school. I hope that a choice will be made by discussion between the parents, the child and the teachers concerned. If it was discovered that a child wanted to go to a particular school for a particular reason, perhaps because he was very interested in classics, that child, in my view, should be given pride of place over another child who wanted to go to the school for snob or other such reasons. I would also wish to have taken into account such things as whether a previous brother or sister had gone to the school. Places should not be filled on the basis of ability in a particular subject. 12 noon. Mr. Maude I am glad the hon. Member accepts the fact, which the right hon. Lady did not accept, that this kind of situation will arise even after reorganisation. He knows and I know that it has arisen already, and it is likely to arise more in the future. The hon. Gentleman must recognise that he is walking a narrow tightrope between what he calls choice and what others call selection. What he was practically saying was that whereas some schools offer particularly good facilities in certain subjects—— The Chairman Order. We are getting a little far from the Amendment and going back to a debate which has already taken place. Would the Committee be kind enough to try to confine itself to the Amendment? We cannot go over previous debates again. Mr. Maude With respect, Sir Barnett, in the last debate we made it perfectly clear that these two were intertwined, because one cannot be legal and the other illegal. Surely what the hon. Member is saying is that when there is superfluity of applications for places in schools offering particular facilities he will allow them in if they have a brother or a sister at the same school. Indeed, he will allow them in for any other reason except the obviously most desirable one, which is that their ability and aptitudes will be properly catered for. Mr. Newens I do not wish to pursue the matter to too great a length now, but I think the hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Mr. Maude) is misrepresenting me. To repeat what I said previously, I would not allow these places to be filled by selection according to ability. I am not saying that the ability of children would not be one of the factors considered, but I would fill them not by an ability test, but rather on a consideration of all the issues I have indicated. This, in my view, must be done by consultation between the parties to whom I have referred. In the past I have been very keen on the idea of free trade. I taught in what is now the I.L.E.A. area. The right hon. Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle) will remember that many of us associated with the National Union of Teachers, as I was before I became a Member of the House, campaigned very strongly indeed against breaking up the old L.C.C. area, which was at that time proposed by the Conservative Party. Sir E. Boyle No. Mr. Newens It was altered afterwards. A lobby in the House may have had some influence. I felt very strongly about the matter, one reason being the desirability of free trade between particular schools. Mr. Fergus Montgomery Very tricky. Mr. Newens I am not burking the issue. I have endeavoured to deal with it fairly. The Amendment is designed to ensure that the authorities will be able to draw catchment areas to achieve a reasonable ability mix. In certain cases this may involve cutting out a private estate from one catchment area and putting it in the catchment area for another school, or including a council house estate in a specific catchment area. As time passes it may be necessary for catchment area boundaries to be changed. I hope the Bill will not preclude that. In certain areas catchment arrangements may be undesirable or even unworkable, but in other areas they may be extremely desirable. If there is to be a truly comprehensive system, in certain areas the authorities—for example, at Newport—should be able to draw catchment areas to secure a proper ability mix. I very much hope that my right hon. Friend will make it clear that the Bill does not preclude catchment areas from being drawn in the way suggested in the Amendment. Sir E. Boyle I apologise to the Committee that, owing to an engagement this afternoon, I shall have to leave the Committee a little before the end of the proceedings. My name is down, with that of my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Mr. Lane), to Amendment No. 55. If the hon. Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) feels inclined to press his Amendment, I would feel bound to support both Amendments, for reasons which I shall explain. I said on Second Reading that Clause 1 of the Bill represented what I called— I do not believe this problem is faced adequately by the wording of the Clause. That is why I regard the discussion on these two Amendments as one of the most important discussions that we shall have on this part of the Bill. As the hon. Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) correctly said, in the absence of any deliberate planning to the contrary, there is a strong tendency, particularly in big cities, for the most successful [column 210]comprehensive schools to be those in the higher rated areas and for the comprehensives in the lower rated areas to have less good academic results and, also, as he said, less drawing power. It is no good pretending that in a big city all children have equal ability for acquiring intelligence. They simply do not. The effect of a poor neighbourhood on the operational performance of children must be marked, as it must also be on the readiness of teachers to serve in particular schools. The hon. Member was right to remind us that we always want to increase the number of schools where these teachers are competing for jobs. One thing that always causes me concern in many contexts is the relatively limited number of schools through which the ladder of promotion in the education service normally runs. To get over this problem, many people, including a number of comprehensive heads, have advocated what has come to be known as “banding” —that is, trying consciously to ensure, by consideration of primary school records, a balanced intake in terms of ability to as many comprehensive schools as possible. The Times reminded us that it was a London comprehensive head who said— I felt real concern when the right hon. Lady said, when winding up the debate on Second Reading, that this would prohibit banding. I ask the Government to reconsider the matter. I realise that an argument against banding can be advanced. The argument most frequently advanced is that one wants to see which are the most popular schools and then do what one can to improve the least popular. That argument has been advanced, and I know that it is sincerely advanced. It seems to me very much better to prevent these grossest disparities from ever arising. Banding in the Inner London area has, I believe, done a considerable amount to help a number of comprehensive schools, particularly in their early stages. After all, the cost, when a school goes downhill or does not keep up with its rivals, is very considerable. As the hon. Member for Epping reminded us, we are considering here questions like the number of children who voluntarily stay on at school beyond school-leaving age. I believe that a policy [column 211]of being frankly complacent about allowing some schools to get better while some remain less favoured, even in the short run, is extremely expensive in human terms. It is certainly expensive in terms of the quality of staff who apply for posts in those schools. We should not forget one very simple point about public education in Britain which was well summed up by Professor John Vaizey when he said that education favours the strong. As part of that general point, education certainly favours the strong schools. I would never want to pursue a policy which allowed the disparities between the most successful schools and the least successful schools to grow too wide. What are we to do about this? In big cities I believe that the right approach is to accept the need for a combination of methods. In certain types of area I have no doubt that banding is worthwhile and that it is wrong for banding to be prohibited in the Bill. In other types of area I believe that there is scope for artificial zoning. Therefore, I support the Amendment of the hon. Member for Epping. Giving legal sanction to artificial zoning ought not to be ruled out even if this means a certain amount of bussing. I am not saying that zoning is the right solution everywhere, any more than I think that banding is the right solution everywhere. I simply think there should sometimes be proper scope for artificial zoning in order to try to make the ability intake into a school more balanced. Thirdly, as I said on Second Reading, I should not mind seeing experiments in positive discrimination in favour of what would frankly be a neighbourhood school in a poorer area. The Plowden concept of the educational priority area should be applied to secondary schools as well as primary schools. In certain types of area it would be quite right to concentrate resources on those areas which would inevitably be areas of cultural deprivation. I merely, remark because so much misunderstanding and prejudice is sometimes aroused on the point, that certain centre city areas will tend always to be areas of cultural deprivation whatever the racial composition of the population. It is absurd to evade prejudice on that aspect of the subject. The important thing is that local authorities should have a considerable measure of discrimination. What we on [column 212]this side are constantly saying is that we believe in leaving as much freedom as possible to the good sense of those local education authorities which have responsibility for providing education. I will not continue much longer because I sense from what is now taking place in the Committee that hon. Members will soon be keener on reading than they will be on listening to speeches. It should be recorded that there is now being distributed in the Committee a not insignificant document—the Donnison Report. My hon. Friend the Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher) reminds me that we should thank the Minister for arranging its distribution, which I gladly do. The prospects of hon. Members receiving it brightened enormously in the last hour, and we are grateful for what has been done. To repeat my final point, I think that banding, zoning and giving positive discrimination in favour of a neighbourhood school in a poor area have places in a big city. Is it not much better to leave it to great authorities like the Inner London Education Authority to decide what they can do under Clause 2? That is why I shall support, and possibly vote for, Amendment No. 20 and Amendment No. 55. 12.15 p.m. Mr. Short I intervene, not to bring the debate to a conclusion, but because, as I informed the hon. Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher), I must leave the Committee at 12.30. Amendment No. 20 would exempt a catchment area which is designed to secure a balanced intake of ability. Amendment No. 55 would exempt allocation by reference to ability or aptitude of pupils to secure a good spread of ability. Amendment No. 20 has no logical connection whatever with the other exceptions. The other exemptions are of three types of institution. The first Amendment would exempt, not an institution, but a method of admission. Catchment areas are not a concept known to law. There is nothing in the 1944 Act about catchment areas. The statutory provisions in the 1944 Act about admission are to be found in Sections 76 and 37. I agree that almost all local education authorities draw catchment areas as a matter of convenience. Equally, [column 213]almost all parents accept catchment areas, but the fact remains that if a parent objects to a catchment area his wishes prevail over those of the local authority, provided the school to which the parent wishes to send his child is suitable to the child's age, ability and aptitude, provided it does not involve the local authority in any undue expense, and always provided that there is room in the school for the child. I receive frequent appeals from parents about schools to which children have been allocated. If these provisions are satisfied I must always find in favour of the parent, I am afraid. Mrs. Thatcher Why “I am afraid” ? Mr. Short Nothing in this respect would be changed by this Bill by drawing informal catchment areas, and that is all that catchment areas are. Therefore, I cannot agree to a legal concept—the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle) said he would not rule this out—being introduced in this Bill because it would detract from and be in conflict with the parental choice given by the 1944 Act. It would take away the right of choice. There is another aspect. The reason my hon. Friend the Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) has given for his Amendment is quite unacceptable to me. I do not believe that innate ability is not evenly distributed geographically. I do not believe that a neighbourhood school necessarily does not give a fair spread of ability. I do not accept that working-class children are less able than children from better-off homes. They may appear to be certainly, but this is the case for the abolition of selections. The intelligence quotient, we believe, is about 20 per cent. due, not to innate factors, but to environmental factors. The child from a working-class home may appear to be less able, but I do not accept that there is a correlation between social class and innate ability. Mr. Newens What I said previously was very similar? Would my right hon. Friend accept that when one takes environment into account there are various differences, which I agree do not reflect differences in innate ability? Mr. Short There is a fair measure of agreement between us. There is an unanswerable case for an admissions policy which brings in a wide social spread. I [column 214]never lose an opportunity to encourage local authorities to draw catchment areas in a way which will produce this spread in to schools. This can be done in a number of ways—for example, by the elongated catchment area which goes across a wide social cross-section of the community. I hope that local authorities will try to ensure this. Circular 10/65, in paragraph 36, encourages local authorities to try to create comprehensive schools which are Amendment No. 55 would exempt banding and take account of ability of pupils in arranging for admission. Admission arrangements do not require my approval; they are a matter for the local authority. An aggrieved parent can appeal to me under Section 68 and Section 37 against a placing. I would be unwilling to take away this right to appeal. The admission policy remains with the local authority, but the parent has the right to appeal against it. Three situations are likely to arise because of this Bill when it becomes an Act. I will say what our attitude towards each of them would be. If a local authority submitted a reorganisation plan and put forward banding as part of the plan, we should certainly have to point out that this was in conflict with Clause 1(1). Secondly, if a local authority which has had its plan approved starts banding after the passage of the Bill and that comes to our notice—as it almost certainly would as everything of this kind provokes a great deal of parental comment—we would certainly look at it in the light of Section 68 or Section 99 of the 1944 Act. The third situation concerns a scheme now in existence. This would not end overnight with the passage of the Bill, any more than grammar schools will disappear overnight when the Bill becomes law, but I make clear that we could not regard it—and we have made it quite clear to the Inner London Education Authority—as a permanent feature of the educational landscape. We could not regard it as anything more than an interim device during a period of a mixed economy. I agree that when children are creamed off to co-existing grammar schools there may be more of a case for banding. But this is an interim step when grammar schools and so-called comprehensive schools co-exist. Sir E. Boyle Surely that carries significance, particularly for the Inner London Education Authority, bearing in mind that the right hon. Gentleman has approved a plan for Inner London which continues 10 per cent. of selective schools down to 1975. Mr. Short Almost all things could change in London in the very near future. London has adopted a very gradual approach towards reorganisation, and so long as grammar schools are co-existent with comprehensive schools there may be more of a case for this, but I make quite clear that I could not regard it as a permanent feature. I cannot accept either of these Amendments. I recommend the Committee to reject them if they are pressed, first, because they conflict with parental choice under the 1944 Act, and, secondly, because they are unnecessary as working class children are not less able than middle class children. It is the wish of this Committee and of Parliament that local education authorities should try to secure a social mix in their schools for social reasons and indirectly, because of that, for educational reasons. Mr. Maude I confess that what the Secretary of State has just said has left me slightly more confused about his aims and objects. Like my right hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle), I have considerable sympathy with what the hon. Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) and my right hon. Friend are seeking to secure by these Amendments, even though my interpretation and definition of what the hon. Member for Epping is trying to do may be rather different from his. I am not clear whether what the Secretary of State was saying was that the situation that these Amendments are designed to remedy does not exist, or that it does exist and we do not want it remedied. It seemed that at various points of his speech he could have been understood as saying either or both. He said—and we have heard him develop the argument before—that he does not believe that differences in innate ability, what on Second Reading he always referred to as “so-called” ability, follow social lines. But one must assume that he recognises that differences in ability at a given age which are measurable by one means or other may vary accord[column 216]ing to the social and environmental background of the child. I do not think anyone would doubt that. If that is so, it is clear that certain circumstances may arise where in a particularly poor, deprived area of a conurbation we may get in a neighbourhood comprehensive school a very high proportion in comparison with the national average, or particularly in a less well-to-do suburban area, of children who at any given time have small vocabularies, whose intelligence has not been sharpened by an educated family background. If we were to apply any of the normal tests, whether intelligence tests or any form of examination, we would get a situation at that time in which it was clear that there was a low general level of ability. The right hon. Gentleman, I am sure, would say—and I do not think I would dispute it—that the object of his exercise is to try to put that situation right as quickly as possible and to bring those deprived children up to a higher level of attainment and ability. I see that, but I am not absolutely clear as to whether he is right in saying that the best way to do this is to refuse to take any steps to get a mix between them and children from other social backgrounds and at a different level of development of their intelligence and ability. It may well be that to isolate those children with a high social, intellectual, and cultural background together will retard their progress. Mr. Short indicated dissent. Mr. Maude The right hon. Gentleman shakes his head. I wish that I could be quite sure that he is right about this, but I do not see why he thinks he is right. Mr. Short I said that the local authorities should draw their catchment areas in such a way as to get a social mix, a fair social cross-section. 12.30 p.m. Mr. Maude I recognise that, but this is what I find so confusing. Is the right hon. Gentleman saying that the social mix he wants is equivalent to an ability mix? In other words, is he saying that the social segregation which is obtained by adhering strictly to neighbourhood schools amounts to a segregation of children of a particular level or intelligence and ability or not? If he is saying so, he is [column 217]suggesting selection for schools by ability and aptitude. If he is not, I cannot see see how his argument is consistent with what he is saying about leaving everything to parental choice. It is clear that if a local authority adjust its catchment areas so as to get a social mix it will at certain points override parental choice. Children will not be sent in the last resort simply where their parents want them sent. They will be sent where the local authority decides that they should be sent in order to obtain a social mix. According to the right hon. Gentleman's argument, this is selection, not only by social class, but, to all intents, by ability and aptitude, and it is being done, as the right hon. Gentleman said to me in his intervention just now, in order not to retard children from a deprived social background by keeping them isolated from the stimulus of children of greater ability and intelligence. There is a real conflict here, and I am bound to say that I do not think that the speech of the Secretary of State has made it any clearer. Mr. Newens I am still not clear on which side of the fence the hon. Gentleman comes down. Does he want selection, or does he want a social mix? He has made various objections to what has been said on this side of the Committee, but he has not made clear what he wants, although from his previous statements I think it is clear that he is a very strong advocate of selection. Mr. Maude There is no difficulty about understanding what I want. I said I approved of the hon. Member's Amendment and the Amendment of my right hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Handsworth (Sir E. Boyle), but one cannot make the distinction which the hon. Member is trying to make. The hon. Gentleman went to great lengths to say that he was asking, not for selection by ability or aptitude, but for a kind of choice which would be largely parental but would involve discussions between schools, the education authority, parents and children. If he wishes to call it choice, he can call it choice. I think that what he is advocating is a kind of selection and, whether he likes to call it selection or choice, I am in favour of it. But he should not imagine that he is advocating policies purely designed to get a social mix. From what the Secretary of State has [column 218]said, it is perfectly clear that in making arrangements to get a social mix he will get an ability mix as well, a better ability mix than would be obtained by rigidly drawing catchment areas on neighbourhood units, if the exception was not allowed in the Bill. I am entirely in favour of getting the best possible social mix. One of the most serious dangers of the reorganisation in conurbations is that there is too little social mix in neighbourhood comprehensive schools. This in turn, at least in secondary schools, produces too narrow an ability mix. I want to see the social and ability mix widened in this respect, and for this reason I support both Amendments. All I am saying is that the Secretary of State appeared to argue one way in one part of his speech and a different way in another part of his speech. Mr. Mahon I apologise for being absent from the Committee when my hon. Friend the Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) moved this Amendment. It was unavoidable. I want to speak for a moment in support of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State. He said that working class children living in deprived areas are no less intelligent and no less deserving than children in other areas of the country. Many in this House, such as myself, were born and reared in working class areas. I was born within half a mile of Liverpool dockside. There are men in the House, born in mining villages, seaports and the East End of London, who have risen to great eminence in public life and in public esteem. However, there are obvious environmental pressures at work. There may be latent equality of ability in any child, but I want to say something about the pressures existing in certain areas and the inequalities that exist when we think about the introduction of comprehensive education and the elimination of selection in this Bill. The implementation of this Bill will probably be one of the most difficult exercises in education that this country has ever faced. It will not be easy, but at least it is an attempt, and a necessary attempt, to bring more equality into our society. All my experience in education shows that it has never been easy to bring in a reasonable form of education. When considering the social conditions in my constituency, in, say, the Scotland [column 219]Road area and other areas—areas which have many praiseworthy qualities but nevertheless where we want to bring equality to the education system—I believe that, with one exeception, no one has spoken about the contribution of the teaching profession in this regard. The teachers, by virtue of their professional status and their financial status, have moved away from those areas into other areas where they find it more convenient and pleasant to teach than in the dockside areas. It is more pleasant for teachers to teach outside these areas, and for that reason we shall not get a teaching mix, never mind the social mix, that is absolutely essential for the comprehensive system in industrial areas. Mr. Montgomery I am perturbed by what the hon. Gentleman has said. If he is saying that teachers are moving out from the more difficult areas, I do not agree with him, because a lot of teachers in this country have a tremendous sense of vocation for going to schools in such areas because they feel there is something worth while to be done there. Most of the time that I spent in teaching—over nine years—was spent in difficult schools. I found it very rewarding work, and I am sure that many other teachers find it so, too. Mr. Mahon I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. I agree many teachers are vocational. I have referred to teachers who have given their working lives to teaching. We were talking earlier this morning about deprived children and the tremendous contribution that has been made by teachers, but I believe that teachers cannot be expected to live in these areas, and, of course, they prefer to teach in the areas where they live. Twelve years ago I took an inventory of 15,000 school children in my advocacy of the abolition of the 11-plus. At about that time I also made an examination of how many teachers and professional people lived within one mile of the Liverpool dockside for the seven miles of its length. The Secretary of State would find it useful to take such an inventory again; it would be very illuminating from the educational point of view. My right hon. Friend referred to an elongated pattern. Did he mean that instead of going north to south in a place like Merseyside he [column 220]would go from east to west? That might improve the social mix. One would think that the Opposition were the front runners in education. If they have thought about these things, how is it that they were so slow in dealing with the areas about which I am speaking? On the social mix point, many grammar schools which were founded in cities in recent years have moved out to more salubrious areas. If the vocationalism to which the hon. Member for Brierley Hill (Mr. Montgomery) referred is of the degree he suggests, how is it that many of the finest schools established in cities have moved out to a more salubrious neighbourhood? In my constituency there are two county grammar schools; the other two grammar schools I founded in my own public life. It cannot be said of many people in public life that they have founded two grammar schools. The great city grammar schools in the City of Liverpool have all moved out, with one exception in the voluntary sense and two in the other sense, to more salubrious neighbourhoods, which must necessarily make it more difficult for working class people like myself, to get the opportunity they deserve. These are some of the difficulties with which my right hon. Friend is trying to grapple. The St. Francis Xavier School in Liverpool has gone to West Derby. It was situated in Salisbury Street in the Exchange Division. St. Edward's College was in Everton Valley. It has now gone to the West Derby district of Liverpool. I am sure that this has happened all over the country. Maybe there are good reasons for it. In the new system of comprehensive education it will obviously be extremely difficult to get the social and teaching mix that we need in order to give our people the opportunities they deserve. 12.45 p.m. Earlier today, hon. Members spoke of special talents. One of the special talents in my district was music. We were better at it in my district than anyone else on Merseyside. There were many reasons for it, but it may surprise the Committee to learn that one of them was the degree of unemployment locally. We had time to develop the latent talent we had, and that talent was a godsend in the area. I am [column 221]sure that, had we had more opportunity to develop it, we would have been as good as, perhaps better than, many other people in the country. On Merseyside we produce talents of many kinds. We are certainly not behind the rest of the country, particularly in what is being done by lads from working class areas of Merseyside in deploying so many talents, including quick-wittedness, which is enjoyed by many people on Merseyside. The hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Mr. Maude) talked of sharpening one's wits in the academic sense and about the opportunity that comes from living in middle-class areas. Of course there are advantages in such areas. I agree that it is marvellous that the children should be able to sharpen their wits and intellects in such areas. But anyone who believes that this cannot be or is not done in working-class areas does not know what he is talking about. Anyone who has stood on Merseyside looking for work, in West Derby as well as anywhere else, knows what sharp-wittedness means. Indeed, in view of the limited educational opportunities which we have had in many areas on Merseyside, we have had to use sharp-wittedness to a much greater degree perhaps than other people who, to use an ugly word, may have been less hungry than working people in the days I am talking about. There is no doubt about it. If anyone thinks that deprivation does not sharpen the wits, he has another think coming. Mr. Montgomery rose—— Mr. Mahon I know that the hon. Gentleman can equal any experience I may have had and I pay him testimony for it. He understands what I am talking about. We know the limitations of the Bill. It has a lot of them, but we are trying to give more children a more reasonable opportunity of gaining better education. Of course there is no equality. We inherit our parents; we do not choose them. Very often, innocent children who come into the world inherit, apart from their environment, many other things which can never be equated in this world in any shape or form. It is no good simply saying that the Labour Party is trying to even up or even down. We are very well aware of the problems we are trying to tackle. [column 222] I turn to another aspect of voluntary schools and social deprivation. In the voluntary Catholic sector of education, there are independent schools. Are these, with their selective social mix, not aware of the deprivation which exists in many Catholic districts in the industrial areas? How long can we afford in this country to allow independent schools of this calibre completely to cancel out any contribution they could make to helping children in the industrial areas? The independent schools, particularly the Catholic independent schools, they have to broaden their vista. We can no longer agree to a system in education in which so many Catholic children in industrial areas are deprived while a few other Catholic children can go to the more illustrious independent schools. I ask those responsible in that sector of voluntary education to look very carefully at the situation. All my life I have tried to achieve better education in the industrial areas where so many of our children attend voluntary schools. I have looked at these selective schools and have wondered whether they were living in the same world. I support my right hon. Friend, because what is wrong with the present system of social and educational opportunity for working-class children is that their potential and latent ability which is the equal of anyone else's in the country, is being deprived of the opportunity that it should have. Mr. Christopher Price I do not think that I shall be able to be present at the first sitting of the Committee after the Easter Recess, so I am glad to be able to say a few words today on this subject. I echo everything said by my hon. Friend the Member for Bootle (Mr. Simon Mahon) about the pattern, which has developed since the war, in which good schools have moved out from city centres to suburbs. This pattern has often deprived working-class children living in the middle of cities because the schools have moved too far away for them to attend. These two Amendments reflect the most difficult problem our education system have to face, whether it goes comprehensive or not. I have never pretended that comprehensive education will solve the sort of problems we are talking about on these two Amendments about banding and catchment areas. All these problems will be with us for many years after we [column 223]have introduced comprehensive education. However, I am sure that the introduction of comprehensive education, difficult though it is with all the problems still remaining, will make the problems easier to solve. I have been pleased to hear hon. Members telling us how keen they are to have a balanced social mix in our schools. I am sorry that the hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Mr. Maude) is no longer with us. Anxious as he is for a balanced social mix in the schools, I am sure that he welcomes the Report of the Public Schools Commission on direct grant schools. I look forward to being on the same public platform with him welcoming that Report, because I am sure that he agrees that it shows how unbalanced the social mix is in direct grant schools. What the law says about catchment areas is totally out of line with what happens. Indeed, the 1944 Act does not mention catchment areas. The concept of the Act is that local authorities provide schools and parents choose them. That was all that was meant to happen. Local authorities are not even meant to allocate children except as a last resort. The parent officially applies to the school and only if there is no room in it does local authority allocation come into the picture. The de facto position is quite different. Local authorities in big cities have for years been in the habit of simply allocating primary schools to secondary schools. I myself have sat over a map of Sheffield with secondary schools marked blue and primary schools marked red, trying to allocate them—all quite illegally. There is no legal basis for such action. I am sure that this is one of the problems which the next big education Bill must sort out, because it creates great difficulties in the cases which come all the way up to the Secretary of State when parents suddenly realise the situation. I put my name to Amendment No. 20 in a probing attitude. I would not vote on the Amendments because I accept everything my right hon. Friend has said about catchment areas being not in the Act and that it means nothing to talk about them in such Amendments. But, broadly speaking, I feel that there are three ways of dealing with this difficult problem of trying to prevent ghetto schools. Everyone concerned in education [column 224]authorities knows that middle-class schools really look after themselves and that the real problem is trying to prevent some schools from becoming so depressed that, as my hon. Friend the Member for Epping (Mr. Newens) says, good teachers tend to leave and there are continual staffing and social problems. The first way to deal with this—it is one of the courses I followed as Deputy Chairman of the Education Committee in Sheffield—is to allocate primary schools to secondary schools in such a manner as to get a reasonable social mix. We had 12 comprehensive schools in Sheffield. By messing about with the primary schools and jerrymandering the catchment areas, we managed to make eight of the schools reasonable. Two or three were intractably depressed schools with constant staffing difficulties because of the geographical nature of the area, and one or two were intractably enriched schools because they were in areas where children came from an enriched background. One can do something by that means. Another method is by banding. I look upon that as an interim measure, however, while running a mixed system and while we still have grammar schools. The third method, which I would advocate for the period after we go completely comprehensive, is that of massive discrimination in favour of the problem schools. I admire the I.L.E.A. for what it is doing in favour of deprived schools. Massive discrimination in favour of such schools is needed. I would go further. We have a tendency to lumber our education system with all the ills of society, and when a school breaks down under the strain we point to it and say what a terrible place it is and that it is a bad school. It is never a bad school. The trouble is that the social problems with which it has had to cope have become overwhelming. Over the next few years, I would like to see a policy of transforming educational priority areas into social priority areas. We should use the money not only on such schools but quite deliberately on a discriminatory basis in favour of the areas themselves—into schools and youth schools and clinics and housing. I would go even further. The real need in solving this kind of problem is to build a lot of council houses on Hampstead Heath, for example. That is one way of mixing up [column 225]social areas and not letting middle-class districts, by covenants or some other means, become so exclusive. These two policies—putting municipal houses into the middle of advantaged areas and putting money into disadvantaged areas—are the best way of solving the problem. It being One o'clock, The Chairman adjourned the Committee without Question put, pursuant to the Standing Order. Committee adjourned till Tuesday, 7th April, 1970, at half-past Ten o'clock. The following Members attended the Committee: Janner , Sir B. (Chairman) Armstrong , Mr. Bacon , Miss Boyle , Sir E. Evans , Mr. Fred Eyre , Mr. Hill , Mr. J. E. B. Lewis , Mr. Kenneth Mahon, , Mr. Simon Maude , Mr. Montgomery , Mr. Newens , Mr. Oakes , Mr. Price , Mr. Christopher Price , Mr. William Short , Mr. Edward Thatcher, Mrs. van Straubenzee , Mr. Woof , Mr. Copyright © Margaret Thatcher Foundation 2024. All Rights Reserved.

right

speech etc sir barnett janner chair resolve committee rise day adjourn till tuesday april halfpast oclock mr edward short amendment march page line word insert word mathematic mr j e b hill question propose chairman remind committee discuss time amendment page line insert language amendment page line insert athletic amendment page line insert navigation amendment page line leave art insert art science discipline skill mr angus maude committee adjourn week speak amendment general term design try save government difficulty anomaly present draft likely adjourn discuss definition art hon friend member norfolk south mr j e b hill ask government definition art context bill right hon lady minister state ignore question altogether absurd government phrase like bill refuse define idea mind clear enormous number possible anomaly arise mention possibility high english literature column consider art word consider narrow sense painting graphic art hon friend member finchley mrs thatcher mention week minister state department education science miss alice bacon hon member allow shortcircuit speech inform accord law general word follow particular specific word nature take meaning presume restrict genus word word read mean thing kind designate context clause word read mean word kind designate particular specific word music dance word certainly include drama probably include painting sculpture include discipline like mathematic language include athletic advise base case court mr maude oblige right hon lady think make position clear wrong imagine art include athletic say probably include paint pass bill term probably mean right hon lady tell certain having take legal advice extraordinary situation probably include painting probably include sculpture model miss bacon say include sculpture mr maude include craft silversmith mr kenneth lewis hon friend clear mean modelling mr maude plastic art modelling clay general art sculpture mean hon friend clearly mind include art silvercolumn craft secondary technical school high reputation craft work metal boy consider craftsman work brass iron steel artist work gold silver bill include art good tell probably include painting graphic art right pass bill term include element doubt gross settle question actually probably art meaning bill argue relevant deal small number school right hon lady minister state reply speak exclusively term music dancing say rightly special school nature necessarily suppose set assume school come ambit clause specially devoted teaching particular art hon friend norfolk south refer way certain school particularly large fairly scatter rural catchment area doubt true connurbation develop high reputation particular kind teaching art craft rural school trade want know entitle know deliberate selection child school kind sort reason legal bill matter importance clearly complication arise entitle insist clear answer number specific question presume secretary state say school type reorganisation complete school reorganisation secondary technical school likely continue school particularly good series teacher department facility technical craft skill comprehensive school largely base large grammar school specially good facility teach column thing good laboratory facility teach art sure secretary state tell kind thing continue reorganisation expect school size kind district exactly kind school difference school certain school recognise parent head teacher primary school child offer particularly good facility particular subject follow inevitably local education authority allocate child secondary school account facility try match ability aptitude certain child selection ability aptitude entitle know selection ability aptitude particular school purpose legal bill purport abolish selection ability aptitude refer thing subsection clause suggest relevant silly interpret bill way tell somebody anxious upset bill challenge validity raison detre challenge sort point know government stand business parliament pass bill way people literally result chaos nonsense expect pass bill take literally interpretation accord letter kind sense entitle know bill interpret question answer tell kind selection ability aptitude inevitably selection ability aptitude right bill draft go foolish try prevent secretary state tell legal banding second read minister state say firmly banding inconsistent clause draft column anticipate discussion band subsequent group amendment entitle ask banding illegal bill pass sending child outside catchment area immediate neighbourhood school illegal legal send child outside immediate home area ability aptitude well cater department school thing completely inconsistent direction child school particularly good department subject art craft accord ability aptitude illegal bill life say banding legal legal tell illegal legal government give little thought wording implication subsection difficulty face legal challenge court bill frame enact job government thing tell think provision mean implication people start wording literally secondly ought tell propose safeguard complication arise amendment far intend destroy purpose bill right hon ladys immediate reaction wording far able find cover government kind nonsense view perpetrate result creation enormous number special school particular purpose mathematic navigation allow local authority legally direct child kind comprehensive school kind record reputation staffing curriculum well suit fact go continue minister succeed impose totally comprehensive system country authority go maintain column illegal maintain amendment shall press give minister good chance avoid sort difficulty possibly court case arise sir edward boyle depressed sitting committee minister state say amendment discuss right hon lady word show understand purpose group amendment local authority matter doctrine provide specially gifted child special school amendment fact right hon lady interpret way sign know tendency hon member opposite think matter policy central government hold view gifted child educate special school resist proposition matter doctrine cent ability educate separately child say amendment different wish confine important issue mathematic say second reading view rule possibility try experiment new kind selective school example child specially gifted mathematic absurd pass legislation preclude possibility local authority try experiment selective school mathematically gift think possibility experiment necessarily mean experiment start age flexible authority age experiment kind start rule possibility number reason doubt need country foster exceptional talent mathematic doubt need country step effect increase number good column teacher school perfectly sound educational reason unreasonable bad idea large authority big city wish try experiment selective school special mathematical bias know limited number child need rapidly master new resource deal mathematic number boy girl start calculation age numerous undoubtedly exist mathematic teaching largely matter soon boy girl introduce new type basic resource foundation study secondly mathematician good sharpen another edge way special atmosphere gifted class mathematic important help young people good right hon lady give personal reminiscence number criticism teaching old school eton think rightly mathematic teaching fact extremely good think good custom block year work boy separately know select division mathematic select division ordinary curriculum weekly problem paper expect spend hour particularly distinguished member select division rule achieve cent average term problem paper regret time spend particular conscious particularly brilliant member class advantage gain work clever oneself atmosphere class think hon friend member cambridge mr lane confirm limited number brilliant pupil look ahead nation need idea legislate away right authority experiment selective school mathematically column absurd apart aspect specially gifted mathematic important point hon friend member stratfordonavon mr maude rightly say away absurd fallacy suppose kind comprehensive system everybody go school lesson learn subject oldfashioned bypartite system committee contend form comprehensive system child school basis selection hon friend member stratfordonavon correctly say increase number authority school develop special bias bias individual comprehensive school probability influence past educational institution country seldom spring absolutely green field think teacher position school early incarnation view perfectly right big city number individual separate comprehensive school start develop different bias sensible age boy girl transfer comprehensive school second school certain bias boy girl benefit suggest absolutely tincture selection aptitude ability influence transfer absurd start proposition overt selection parental choice well suppose future number comprehensive school city right child school career ability aptitude influence school o level level realise exception school sixth form work element selection ability influence school boy girl o level absurdity determined resist amendment amendment clause clause column find depress right hon member opposite spend time fight battle right hon lady say long away selection long nonselective transfer primary secondary school matter view contest hon friend member stratfordonavon position perfectly clear second reading committee imagine make sense continue situation cent child grammar school age cent modern school trend know away let commit absurdity say approve trend speed go depend money soundness individual scheme step rule advance proposal future contain tincture selection ability regard absurd amendment mathematic show absurdity clearly know boy girl specially gift subject hope vote amendment mr w r van straubenzee contrast right hon friend member birmingham handsworth sir edward boyle concentrate different aspect amendment particular helpful speech sitting right hon lady minister state col official report proceeding march right hon lady introduce helpful reference transfer department education education severely handicap child considerable contribution matter right hon lady include vest day date helpfully give committee matter raise right hon lady cover education miscellaneous provision bill today hear good deal introduce place noble lady baroness phillip think far away important bill subject matter mention column hon lady transfer department education severely handicap child mean appropriate stage order opportunity discuss matter bill important balance reasonably right important subject introduce right hon lady introduce think right hon lady know widespread anxiety believe hon member side condition service teach child bill refer principally point shall wish return bill refer reach pace wish point right hon lady think probably genuinely slight error easy ask quick question view correct record right sit hon member bootle mr simon mahon intervention way question right hon friend right hon lady reply matter govern word introduce clause refer specifically duty local authority section education act section include subsection special school proof word reproduce subsection clause discuss think follow answer column hon lady give cuff correct miss bacon word refer hospital mr van straubenzee dispute bill refer kind child hon member bootle mind clear party issue raise point merely assistance reference section young child sympathy understanding hon member side committee problem member committee agreeable committee serve apt find one word refer distinguished journal agreeable sir barnett doubt regard time educational supplement bedtime reading notice hon member birmingham perry barr mr christopher price temporary absence committee regret write column current issue refer length word committee deeply oblige give far great publicity case wisdom able muster write contention concerned amendment judge ample opportunity sharpen molar result way subsection draft realise right hon lady erudite intervention start proceeding morning try assist committee suggest severe trap ahead right hon friend notice word clause column considerable doubt mind judge molar anxious use close interpretation give subsection right hon lady accurate hope mr maude recollection hon friend right hon lady specific say phrase probably include paint mr van straubenzee appreciate add difficulty later bill law add difficulty operate central contention remain valid think considerable doubt kind art mention subsection kind art judge refer matter contest effort try general high intellectual character committee consult authority matter example turn definition word art edition everyman encyclopaedia publish dent phrase define remarkable picture school permit subsection select charioteering expect find frequently happen central point general sense definition art danger signal think interpretation subsection important appropriate authority occasion right hon lady care sure bring matter court look edition encyclopaedia britannica find art say basic meaning mean skill ability column exactly imagine say frankly understand take position right hon lady adviser word position understand thankful exception music dancing realise considerable argument early selection music example knowledge limited appreciation considerable realise say early right hon lady take different view early selection people regard highly significant sit right hon lady indicate clearly frankly prefer exception say say sir barnett possibly know interest group country lawyer deserving public sympathy understand produce financial assistance sure meet approval important point surely want pass law measure perfectly clear reason committee stage think able today right hon lady word look phrase sure interpretation give stand concentrate right hon ladys speech certain point narrow point construction word conclusion want echo say merit matter regrettable extreme bill positively exclude selection certain field later year column political persuasion feel wise implement unlike right hon friend member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle fortunate select way early stage mathematic gruelling experience later year spend year university edinburgh intensified rarefied form mathematical course suppose fit majestys force inborn inability master mathematical art secretary state education science mr edward short hear hear mr van straubenzee glad hear common conscious lack grounding great assistance particularly early year great difficulty come abstruse subject fresh later age sure future shall regret irrevocably shut door selection kind cause mention subsection reason hope amendment press miss bacon shall brief anxious group amendment right hon friend leave thank hon member wokingham mr van straubenzee say beginning speech helpfully draw attention fact bill present today place deal important subject transfer responsibility severely mentally handicapped child department health social security department education science discuss distinct group amendment different view clause discuss word bill secondly amendment widen clause include mathematic thing hon member wokingham quote dictionary definition word art inform law art music column restrict kind art think hon lady member finchley mrs thatcher understand murmur appropriate latin phrase court interpret widely narrow sense speak speak oclock able quote donnison committee report issue time mr lewis right hon lady like discussion go oclock miss bacon think hon gentleman read report like interruption vote office embargo oclock report passage gifted child hope right hon hon member read reason include present school cater music dance local authority organisation phrase bill cover school say meeting committee independent voluntary aid school cater child say phrase probably include sculpture everybody know case take court difficult precise advise law interpret widely narrowly kind art music dancing art define dictionary come exception hon member wish plea exception mathematic view clear meeting committee oppose put gifted child particularly child gift mathematic science particular school give special education school future comprehensive school ample opportunity scope child gift mathematic science receive education require column right hon member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle say fight battle fight selection age battle win especially persuasive power right hon gentleman city think city birmingham need force end selection age city birmingham selection prospect bill birmingham bring end selection age come point hon member norfolk south mr j e b hill right hon member handsworth present secondary modern school bias subject suggest future child able particular school special bent particular subject bill deal future bill school future secondary modern school comprehensive school know right hon gentleman mention comprehensive school hon member norfolk south speak meeting committee present secondary modern school bias agriculture fishing constituency comprehensive school hope scope child hon right hon gentleman opposite confuse curriculum admission arrangement comprehensive school bent particular subject moment think school comprehensive school reasonably near specialise subject simple matter parental choice child go school matter selection mr j e b hill surely element reference child ability aptitude local education authority decide send child particular school admittedly frame remark light local situation deal column secondary modern school argument apply strongly comprehensive school right hon lady aware teacher excellence create small centre excellence child aptitude silver metal work want miss bacon point matter hon gentleman say child interest particular school presumably parent want child school agree matter choice parent child entirely different selection child allocate particular school basis ability aptitude hon right hon gentleman opposite keen parental choice think matter eminently suit parental choice extent comprehensive school good course agriculture fishing parent wish child school bill bill prohibit strict selection procedure allocate child accord ability aptitude mr maude think simple right hon lady talk school particular facility easy reach child family school area local education authority county question parental choice parent irresponsible parent scarcely exist element allocation basis primary school head teacher report selection ability aptitude want know legal banding miss bacon shall come band group amendment hon member raise different point procedure take child local authority local authority happen selection arrangement hon gentleman raise matter column relevant amendment difficulty child attend school local authority bill present extraneous argument adduce sir e boyle kernel difference clause position take feel sincerely hon member point right hon lady comprehensive school ought able cope inside dispute say number comprehensive school big city wrong school specially concerned make special feature mathematic secondly parental choice surely parental choice involve discussion parent teacher wrong informal examination school simply teacher good inform guidance parent miss bacon hon gentleman opposite try create difference recognise comprehensive school specialise particular subject admit parent like child comprehensive school sure arrange selection procedure majority comprehensive school today specialise particular course allembrace cater type ability aptitude school specialise agriculture think simple parental choice child school selection procedure bill aim getting rid selection procedure mr simon mahon like clarify point cause concern right hon friend say parent child particular aptitude sole arbiter child particular school reference body local authority miss bacon obviously column discuss school act lay parent right choose school providing certain condition fulfil opposition make mountain molehill widen clause propose nonsense bill mr reginald eyre right hon lady question practical interpretation relation city birmingham unkind reference let assume comprehensive school city adjoining area school city develop reputation training silver work example possible practical term child want school comprehensive school solihull sutton coldfield acquire special reputation specially attractive right hon lady decide child opt school special quality element careful selection practical circumstance miss bacon matter practical politic city birmingham system comprehensive education number comprehensive school silver work subject surely work confine school city like birmingham mrs thatcher opposition untenable position alice baconright hon lady burden argument correct need exception music dancing art provide comprehensive system know provide possible area comprehensive school provide complete range subject ridiculous right hon lady comprehensive school specialise certain subject test enable authority parent teacher judge child go school benefit highly specialise type education accord argument test miss bacon hon lady say column say comprehensive school specialise mathematics language argument hon friend mrs thatcher acceptable right hon lady comprehensive school particular specialisation argument comprehensive school provide know bind comprehensive school specialise particular subject know right hon lady argue mathematician educate community meet argument russia visit department high education hear ask department special mathematics school kiev remind child special gift mathematic pick send kiev school describe time educational supplement january article refer system early selection soviet union describe authority bud mathematician ordinary school end fourth ninth year schooling education compulsory age authority soviet union spot bud mathematician age miss bacon sound terrible mrs thatcher ask soviet authority mathematic school fit theory educate mathematician community tell special gift necessary benefit community child bring early ordinary teacher right hon lady know mathematic especially provide individual teaching comprehensive school comprehensive school teacher requisite talent bring child quickly child talent warrant come argument system restrictive preclude special arrangement child kind ability come right hon ladys argument assist ably hon member column birmingham perry barr mr christopher price abolish element selection regardless consequence excellence standard education generally consequence specific subject accept argument ground exception excellence standard education need suffer rigid approach number country special provision mathematic japan recognise importance english school leningrad specialise english language understand right hon ladys argument school specialise language parent choice child chance early specialisation instead tendency late specialisation understand welsh school pontypridd st asaph mold art subject teach welsh mathematic science english reasonable test school child speak welsh understand subject teach welsh unreasonable difficult position matter right hon lady understand number case special arrangement athletic bring child quickly athletic ability obviously necessary compete olympic right hon lady say preclude accord training athletic school intake ability special arrangement compete olympic way round right hon lady say occur interpretation school find right hon lady know musical ability mathematical ability find person obvious thing music school strong bias mathematics child dual talent training deserve right hon lady prepared exception subject independent sector appeal industrialist wonder money view certain recent development provide scholarship science mathematic language independent school child specially talented subject ability education deserve shall register protest right hon ladys approach question amendment committee divide aye no division boyle sir edward eyre mr reginald hill mr j e b lewis mr kenneth maude mr angus montgomery mr thatcher mrs margaret van straubenzee mr armstrong mr ernest bacon miss alice evans mr fred mahon mr simon newens mr stan oake mr gordon price mr christopher price mr william short mr edward woof mr robert amendment propose page line insert language mr van straubenzee question amendment committee divide aye no division boyle sir edward eyre mr reginald hill mr j e b lewis mr kenneth maude mr angus montgomery mr thatcher mrs margaret van straubenzee mr column armstrong mr ernest bacon miss alice evans mr fred mahon mr simon newens mr stan oake mr gordon price mr christopher price mr william short mr edward woof mr robert amendment propose page line leave art insert question amendment committee divide aye no division boyle sir edward eyre mr reginald hill mr j e b lewis mr kenneth maude mr angus montgomery mr thatcher mrs margaret van straubenzee mr armstrong mr ernest bacon miss alice evans mr fred mahon mr simon newens mr stan oake mr gordon price mr christopher price mr william short mr edward woof mr robert mr stan newens beg amendment page line end insert chairman agree time amendment name right hon member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle hon member cambridge mr lane page line end insert sir e boyle agree sir barnett mr newen amendment deal neighbourhood school imagine right hon hon member side recognise agree correlation range ability produce particular area type area poor area likely produce academically inclined child affluent area hon member agree reason view reason closely connect influence environment child relate difference hereditary ability inevitable influence middle class home home intellectual atmosphere likely produce academicallyinclined child type home consider comparatively small time child spend school vast majority time spend home neighbourhood home expect influence environment live development likely considerable merely question academic ability inclination know experience teaching east end london pressure work class child particularly girl leave school soon possible considerable child grow accept atmosphere bring certain type job job elevated community entirely range naturally place certain influence child attitude school school work occasion teacher argue great length child parent desirability stay school face flat incredulity value education child concern especially girl result school likely reflect neighbourhood academic achievement lack understand right hon friend ability stand exclude banding procedure deal amendment division column opinion division nut people teaching profession think banding desirable form deal problem people recognise reason banding believe possible achieve result want proper comprehensive system continuation banding happy provision bill respect danger particularly mediumsize town area travel easy particular school specially affect parent want child academic type education especially scheme comprehensive education bring operation area previous grammar school tend favour parent child allow occur speciallyfavoure school demand place provide favour school child want result comprehensive system completely ruin likely happen believe newport hon friend member newport mr roy hughe refer matter second read conservative come power decide reverse previous decision catchment area quote south wale argus january make point clear editorial say understand pressure teacher hon friend member newport take strong stand fight valiant battle change system complete parental choice limitation catchment area create system de facto grammar school modern school call comprehensive reflect attractiveness school staff recruit school know column comprehensive school poor academic achievement difficult discipline school difficulty attract type teacher well able improve standard result school find vicious circle find difficult lift rut important step avoid describe recognise area regulate catchment area rigidly force recognise example sparsely populated area likely school travel difficulty area ability mix likely particularly extreme direction deal large area hope right hon friend clear bill prevent plan catchment area bring case amendment accept catchment area validity sense child force particular school catchment area priority place child live particular area oppose genuine parental choice parent consultation teacher child wish send child particular school comprehensive school tend particular speciality good bad refer argument hon member norfolk south mr j e b hill number hon friend debate previous amendment school specialise classic good classic department sufficient demand wide area school provide classic department hope possible child opt consultation parent teacher provide place available school harlow honour represent number comprehensive school recognise different comprehensive school different speciality difference right hon friend score place available particular school child catchment area school column prevent entry reason child outside catchment area available place mr eyre hon member slightly change use word pose practical problem school reputation limited number place great number child catchment area wish decide give place mr newen thing child live catchment area wish priority number place available take child want wish burke issue ask suggest child wish available excess place accommodate circumstance child outside take think undesirable take circumstance form choice people responsible school hope choice discussion parent child teacher concern discover child want particular school particular reason interested classic child view give pride place child want school snob reason wish take account thing previous brother sister go school place fill basis ability particular subject noon mr maude glad hon member accept fact right hon lady accept kind situation arise reorganisation know know arise likely arise future hon gentleman recognise walk narrow tightrope call choice selection practically say school offer particularly good facility certain subject chairman order get little far amendment go debate take place committee kind try confine amendment previous debate mr maude respect sir barnett debate perfectly clear intertwine legal illegal surely hon member say superfluity application place school offer particular facility allow brother sister school allow reason obviously desirable ability aptitude properly cater mr newen wish pursue matter great length think hon member stratfordonavon mr maude misrepresent repeat say previously allow place fill selection accord ability say ability child factor consider fill ability test consideration issue indicate view consultation party refer past keen idea free trade teach ilea area right hon member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle remember associate national union teacher member house campaign strongly break old lcc area time propose conservative party sir e boyle mr newen alter lobby house influence feel strongly matter reason desirability free trade particular school mr fergus montgomery tricky mr newen burke issue endeavour deal fairly amendment design ensure authority able draw catchment area achieve reasonable ability mix certain case involve cut private estate catchment area put catchment area school include council house estate specific catchment area time pass necessary catchment area boundary change hope bill preclude certain area catchment arrangement undesirable unworkable area extremely desirable truly comprehensive system certain area authority example newport able draw catchment area secure proper ability mix hope right hon friend clear bill preclude catchment area draw way suggest amendment sir e boyle apologise committee owe engagement afternoon shall leave committee little end proceeding hon friend member cambridge mr lane amendment hon member eppe mr newen feel inclined press amendment feel bind support amendment reason shall explain say second reading clause bill represent call believe problem face adequately wording clause regard discussion amendment important discussion shall bill hon member eppe mr newen correctly say absence deliberate planning contrary strong tendency particularly big city successful column school high rate area comprehensive lower rate area good academic result say drawing power good pretend big city child equal ability acquire intelligence simply effect poor neighbourhood operational performance child mark readiness teacher serve particular school hon member right remind want increase number school teacher compete job thing cause concern context relatively limited number school ladder promotion education service normally run problem people include number comprehensive head advocate come know banding try consciously ensure consideration primary school record balanced intake term ability comprehensive school possible time remind london comprehensive head say feel real concern right hon lady say wind debate second reading prohibit banding ask government reconsider matter realise argument banding advance argument frequently advanced want popular school improve popular argument advanced know sincerely advanced well prevent gross disparity arise banding inner london area believe considerable help number comprehensive school particularly early stage cost school go downhill rival considerable hon member epping remind consider question like number child voluntarily stay school schoolleave age believe policy column frankly complacent allow school well remain favour short run extremely expensive human term certainly expensive term quality staff apply post school forget simple point public education britain sum professor john vaizey say education favour strong general point education certainly favour strong school want pursue policy allow disparity successful school successful school grow wide big city believe right approach accept need combination method certain type area doubt banding worthwhile wrong band prohibit bill type area believe scope artificial zoning support amendment hon member eppe give legal sanction artificial zoning ought rule mean certain buss say zoning right solution think banding right solution simply think proper scope artificial zoning order try ability intake school balanced thirdly say second reading mind see experiment positive discrimination favour frankly neighbourhood school poor area plowden concept educational priority area apply secondary school primary school certain type area right concentrate resource area inevitably area cultural deprivation merely remark misunderstanding prejudice arouse point certain centre city area tend area cultural deprivation racial composition population absurd evade prejudice aspect subject important thing local authority considerable measure discrimination column constantly say believe leave freedom possible good sense local education authority responsibility provide education continue long sense take place committee hon member soon keener reading listen speech record distribute committee insignificant document donnison report hon friend member finchley mrs thatcher remind thank minister arrange distribution gladly prospect hon member receive brighten enormously hour grateful repeat final point think band zoning give positive discrimination favour neighbourhood school poor area place big city well leave great authority like inner london education authority decide clause shall support possibly vote amendment amendment pm mr short intervene bring debate conclusion inform hon member finchley mrs thatcher leave committee amendment exempt catchment area design secure balanced intake ability amendment exempt allocation reference ability aptitude pupil secure good spread ability amendment logical connection exception exemption type institution amendment exempt institution method admission catchment area concept know law act catchment area statutory provision act admission find section agree local education authority draw catchment area matter convenience equally column parent accept catchment area fact remain parent object catchment area wish prevail local authority provide school parent wish send child suitable child age ability aptitude provide involve local authority undue expense provide room school child receive frequent appeal parent school child allocate provision satisfied find favour parent afraid mrs thatcher afraid mr short respect change bill draw informal catchment area catchment area agree legal concept right hon member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle say rule introduce bill detract conflict parental choice give act away right choice aspect reason hon friend member eppe mr newen give amendment unacceptable believe innate ability evenly distribute geographically believe neighbourhood school necessarily fair spread ability accept workingclass child able child betteroff home appear certainly case abolition selection intelligence quotient believe cent innate factor environmental factor child workingclass home appear able accept correlation social class innate ability mr newen say previously similar right hon friend accept take environment account difference agree reflect difference innate ability mr short fair measure agreement unanswerable case admission policy bring wide social spread column lose opportunity encourage local authority draw catchment area way produce spread school number way example elongate catchment area go wide social crosssection community hope local authority try ensure circular paragraph encourage local authority try create comprehensive school amendment exempt banding account ability pupil arrange admission admission arrangement require approval matter local authority aggrieved parent appeal section section placing unwilling away right appeal admission policy remain local authority parent right appeal situation likely arise bill act attitude local authority submit reorganisation plan forward banding plan certainly point conflict clause secondly local authority plan approve start band passage bill come notice certainly kind provoke great deal parental comment certainly look light section section act situation concern scheme existence end overnight passage bill grammar school disappear overnight bill law clear regard clear inner london education authority permanent feature educational landscape regard interim device period mixed economy agree child cream coexist grammar school case banding interim step grammar school socalle comprehensive school coexist sir e boyle surely carry significance particularly inner london education authority bear mind right hon gentleman approve plan inner london continue cent selective school mr short thing change london near future london adopt gradual approach reorganisation long grammar school coexistent comprehensive school case clear regard permanent feature accept amendment recommend committee reject press conflict parental choice act secondly unnecessary work class child able middle class child wish committee parliament local education authority try secure social mix school social reason indirectly educational reason mr maude confess secretary state say leave slightly confused aim object like right hon friend member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle considerable sympathy hon member eppe mr newen right hon friend seek secure amendment interpretation definition hon member epping try different clear secretary state say situation amendment design remedy exist exist want remedie point speech understand say say hear develop argument believe difference innate ability second reading refer socalled ability follow social line assume recognise difference ability give age measurable mean vary accordcolumn social environmental background child think doubt clear certain circumstance arise particularly poor deprive area conurbation neighbourhood comprehensive school high proportion comparison national average particularly welltodo suburban area child give time small vocabulary intelligence sharpen educate family background apply normal test intelligence test form examination situation time clear low general level ability right hon gentleman sure think dispute object exercise try situation right quickly possible bring deprive child high level attainment ability absolutely clear right say good way refuse step mix child social background different level development intelligence ability isolate child high social intellectual cultural background retard progress mr short indicate dissent mr maude right hon gentleman shake head wish sure right think right mr short say local authority draw catchment area way social mix fair social crosssection pm mr maude recognise find confusing right hon gentleman say social mix want equivalent ability mix word say social segregation obtain adhere strictly neighbourhood school amount segregation child particular level intelligence ability say column selection school ability aptitude argument consistent say leave parental choice clear local authority adjust catchment area social mix certain point override parental choice child send resort simply parent want send send local authority decide send order obtain social mix accord right hon gentleman argument selection social class intent ability aptitude right hon gentleman say intervention order retard child deprive social background keep isolated stimulus child great ability intelligence real conflict bind think speech secretary state clear mr newen clear fence hon gentleman come want selection want social mix objection say committee clear want previous statement think clear strong advocate selection mr maude difficulty understand want say approve hon member amendment amendment right hon friend member birmingham handsworth sir e boyle distinction hon member try hon gentleman go great length ask selection ability aptitude kind choice largely parental involve discussion school education authority parent child wish choice choice think advocate kind selection like selection choice favour imagine advocate policy purely design social mix secretary state column perfectly clear make arrangement social mix ability mix well ability mix obtain rigidly draw catchment area neighbourhood unit exception allow bill entirely favour get well possible social mix danger reorganisation conurbation little social mix neighbourhood comprehensive school turn secondary school produce narrow ability mix want social ability mix widen respect reason support amendment say secretary state appear argue way speech different way speech mr mahon apologise absent committee hon friend member eppe mr newen move amendment unavoidable want speak moment support right hon friend secretary state say work class child live deprive area intelligent deserving child area country house bear rear work class area bear half mile liverpool dockside man house bear mining village seaport east end london rise great eminence public life public esteem obvious environmental pressure work latent equality ability child want pressure exist certain area inequality exist think introduction comprehensive education elimination selection bill implementation bill probably difficult exercise education country face easy attempt necessary attempt bring equality society experience education show easy bring reasonable form education consider social condition constituency scotland column area area area praiseworthy quality want bring equality education system believe exeception speak contribution teaching profession regard teacher virtue professional status financial status move away area area find convenient pleasant teach dockside area pleasant teacher teach outside area reason shall teaching mix mind social mix absolutely essential comprehensive system industrial area mr montgomery perturb hon gentleman say say teacher move difficult area agree lot teacher country tremendous sense vocation go school area feel worth time spend teaching year spend difficult school find rewarding work sure teacher find mr mahon grateful hon gentleman intervention agree teacher vocational refer teacher give work life teach talk early morning deprive child tremendous contribution teacher believe teacher expect live area course prefer teach area live year ago take inventory school child advocacy abolition time examination teacher professional people live mile liverpool dockside seven mile length secretary state find useful inventory illuminating educational point view right hon friend refer elongate pattern mean instead go north south place like merseyside column east west improve social mix think opposition runner education think thing slow deal area speak social mix point grammar school found city recent year move salubrious area vocationalism hon member brierley hill mr montgomery refer degree suggest fine school establish city move salubrious neighbourhood constituency county grammar school grammar school found public life say people public life found grammar school great city grammar school city liverpool move exception voluntary sense sense salubrious neighbourhood necessarily difficult work class people like opportunity deserve difficulty right hon friend try grapple st francis xavier school liverpool go west derby situate salisbury street exchange division st edwards college everton valley go west derby district liverpool sure happen country maybe good reason new system comprehensive education obviously extremely difficult social teaching mix need order people opportunity deserve pm early today hon member speak special talent special talent district music well district merseyside reason surprise committee learn degree unemployment locally time develop latent talent talent godsend area column opportunity develop good well people country merseyside produce talent kind certainly rest country particularly lad work class area merseyside deploy talent include quickwittedness enjoy people merseyside hon member stratfordonavon mr maude talk sharpen one wit academic sense opportunity come live middleclass area course advantage area agree marvellous child able sharpen wit intellect area believe workingclass area know talk stand merseyside look work west derby know sharpwittedness mean view limited educational opportunity area merseyside use sharpwittedness great degree people use ugly word hungry work people day talk doubt think deprivation sharpen wit think come mr montgomery rise mr mahon know hon gentleman equal experience pay testimony understand talk know limitation bill lot try child reasonable opportunity gain well education course equality inherit parent choose innocent child come world inherit apart environment thing equate world shape form good simply say labour party try aware problem try tackle column turn aspect voluntary school social deprivation voluntary catholic sector education independent school selective social mix aware deprivation exist catholic district industrial area long afford country allow independent school calibre completely cancel contribution help child industrial area independent school particularly catholic independent school broaden vista long agree system education catholic child industrial area deprive catholic child illustrious independent school ask responsible sector voluntary education look carefully situation life try achieve well education industrial area child attend voluntary school look selective school wonder live world support right hon friend wrong present system social educational opportunity workingclass child potential latent ability equal else country deprive opportunity mr christopher price think shall able present sitting committee easter recess glad able word today subject echo say hon friend member bootle mr simon mahon pattern develop war good school move city centre suburb pattern deprive workingclass child live middle city school move far away attend amendment reflect difficult problem education system face go comprehensive pretend comprehensive education solve sort problem talk amendment banding catchment area problem year column introduce comprehensive education sure introduction comprehensive education difficult problem remain problem easy solve pleased hear hon member tell keen balanced social mix school sorry hon member stratfordonavon mr maude long anxious balanced social mix school sure welcome report public school commission direct grant school look forward public platform welcome report sure agree show unbalanced social mix direct grant school law say catchment area totally line happen act mention catchment area concept act local authority provide school parent choose mean happen local authority mean allocate child resort parent officially apply school room local authority allocation come picture de facto position different local authority big city year habit simply allocate primary school secondary school sit map sheffield secondary school mark blue primary school mark red try allocate illegally legal basis action sure problem big education bill sort create great difficulty case come way secretary state parent suddenly realise situation amendment probe attitude vote amendment accept right hon friend say catchment area act mean talk amendment broadly speak feel way deal difficult problem try prevent ghetto school concern education column know middleclass school look real problem try prevent school depressed hon friend member eppe mr newen say good teacher tend leave continual staffing social problem way deal course follow deputy chairman education committee sheffield allocate primary school secondary school manner reasonable social mix comprehensive school sheffield mess primary school jerrymandere catchment area manage school reasonable intractably depressed school constant staffing difficulty geographical nature area intractably enrich school area child come enriched background mean method banding look interim measure run mixed system grammar school method advocate period completely comprehensive massive discrimination favour problem school admire ilea favour deprive school massive discrimination favour school need tendency lumber education system ill society school break strain point terrible place bad school bad school trouble social problem cope overwhelming year like policy transform educational priority area social priority area use money school deliberately discriminatory basis favour area school youth school clinic housing real need solve kind problem build lot council house hampstead heath example way mix column area let middleclass district covenant mean exclusive policy put municipal house middle advantaged area put money disadvantaged area good way solve problem oclock chairman adjourn committee question pursuant standing order committee adjourn till tuesday april halfpast oclock follow member attend committee janner sir b chairman armstrong mr bacon miss boyle sir e evans mr fred eyre mr hill mr j e b lewis mr kenneth mahon mr simon maude mr montgomery mr newen mr oake mr price mr christopher price mr william short mr edward thatcher mrs van straubenzee mr woof mr copyright margaret thatcher foundation right reserve